Results for the full year ended 31 December 2025

THIS ANNOUNCEMENT CONTAINS INSIDE INFORMATION AS STIPULATED UNDER THE UK'S MARKET ABUSE REGULATION. UPON THE PUBLICATION OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT, SUCH INSIDE INFORMATION IS NOW CONSIDERED TO BE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

15 April 2026

DIGITAL 9 INFRASTRUCTURE PLC 

("D9" or the "Company" and, together with its subsidiaries, the "Group")

 Results for the full year ended 31 December 2025

The Board of Digital 9 Infrastructure plc (the "Board") announces the Company's audited results for the year ended 31 December 2025. The Company's Annual Report and Accounts have been published and are available on the Company's website.

Eric Sanderson, Chair of D9, said:

"2025 was another challenging year for the Company and its shareholders but the Board and Investment Manager made tangible progress in delivering the managed wind‑down approved in March 2024. The Company completed three material disposals during the year which enabled D9 to fully repay and cancel the Group's revolving credit facility, and significantly strengthen the Company's liquidity position. Together with the early settlement of the Verne Global earn‑out post-period end, these actions have enabled the first compulsory capital redemption to shareholders, expected in April 2026.

With two remaining assets in the portfolio, our focus is on proactively managing D9's positions in Arqiva and Elio Networks. We now begin the next phase of D9's wind down with our focus remaining on delivering the realisation plan by supporting the management teams of Arqiva and Elio to maximise value and, over time, support the orderly return of capital to D9 shareholders."

Key Highlights

· The Company completed three material disposals, EMIC‑1, SeaEdge UK1 and Aqua Comms, generating aggregate proceeds of £76.7 million. This enabled the full repayment and cancellation of the Group's revolving credit facility ("RCF"), a core priority of the Board.

· Post year-end, the Company agreed to and received an early cash settlement of the Verne Global earn‑out for £10 million (valued at nil as at 30 June 2025), providing increased certainty of a return of capital to shareholders.

· Compulsory Redemption of ordinary shares for an amount equivalent to approximately 3.5 pence per existing share. Payment to shareholders is expected to be made by end of April 2026..

· Net Asset Value at 31 December 2025 was 9.3 pence per share (31 December 2024: 34.4 pence), reflecting the combined impact of completed disposals, portfolio revaluation movements, and the reassessment of valuation assumptions for the remaining investments.

· As part of the year‑end valuation process, the Company undertook a comprehensive reassessment of Arqiva, resulting in a nil equity valuation which reflected the structure of the Company's equity interest and associated leverage held via the Vendor Loan Note at the time of acquisition, observable market transactions, and updated, more conservative business plan assumptions.

· Following the completion of the wholly‑owned asset disposals, the portfolio now comprises two investments: Arqiva and Elio Networks, simplifying the portfolio structure and delivery of the Managed Wind‑Down.

· Elio Networks continued to perform strongly during the year, delivering revenue and EBITDA growth, performing ahead of business plan expectations and benefiting from active operational and strategic engagement by the Investment Manager.

· During the year, Arqiva performed broadly in line with expectations, in terms of financial results and successfully installing smart meters to water customers. The valuation adjustment taken in 2025 reflects updated long‑term assumptions and is not driven by under-delivery in current performance.

· The Group ended the year with a positive net cash position, materially reducing financial risk and providing the Board with increased flexibility to progress remaining realisations and, where appropriate, consider further returns of surplus capital to shareholders through compulsory redemptions.

Publication of documentation

The above information is an extract from D9's 2025 Annual Report. The Annual Report has been submitted to the National Storage Mechanism and will shortly be available for inspection at: https://data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism.

It can also be obtained from the Company Secretary or from the Reports & Publications section of the Company's website, at https://www.d9infrastructure.com/.

ENDS.

Contacts

LEI Code: 213800OQLX64UNS38U92

The person responsible for arranging the release of this announcement on behalf of the Company is Uloma Adighibe, Company Secretary.

About Digital 9 Infrastructure plc

Digital 9 Infrastructure plc (DGI9) is an investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange and a constituent of the FTSE All-Share, with the ticker DGI9. The Company's investment objective is to undertake a Managed Wind-Down of the Company and realise all existing assets in the Company's portfolio in an orderly manner. For more information, please visit www.d9infrastructure.com.

Chair's Statement

Introduction

2025 was another difficult year for D9's shareholders, marked by significant write-downs in net asset value. The Board focused on the execution of the managed wind-down and to do so, we sought to provide shareholders with greater clarity on the Company's path forward. This is from a position of comparative strength following the Company's deleveraging and disciplined asset realisations. The Board is pleased to report the first Compulsory Redemption of ordinary shares for an amount equivalent to approximately 3.5 pence per existing ordinary share. Payment to shareholders is expected to be made by end of April 2026.

In line with the four priorities outlined last year - reducing leverage, balancing value maximisation with timely capital returns, preserving value through active cost and portfolio management, and maintaining transparent shareholder engagement - the Board and Investment Manager delivered substantial progress. We completed several material disposals, strengthened the Group's financial position through the full repayment of the RCF, and oversaw continued positive performance at Elio Networks.

Despite this progress, the recent third-party minority shareholder transactions, and the associated reduction in value of our largest investment, Arqiva, were disappointing. They highlighted the risks inherent in the structure of the Company's investment in Arqiva, where even relatively modest changes in the enterprise value of the business can translate into substantial movements in the equity value attributable to D9, which has fallen below the balance outstanding on D9's Vendor Loan Note ("VLN"). The VLN issued in connection with the acquisition of Arqiva is non-recourse to the Company and the wider Group, with recourse limited to the Company's shares in Arqiva, and any repayment or transfer of the VLN would arise only in connection with the realisation of the Arqiva investment.

Realisation Plan Progress and Liquidity

During the year, the Company completed three major disposals: EMIC-1, SeaEdge UK1 and Aqua Comms. The first two disposals provided the liquidity required to fully repay the RCF, a central priority for the Board, while also leaving the Company in a stronger and more stable position from which to execute the remainder of the Managed Wind-Down.

The repayment and cancellation of the RCF, held by the Company's direct subsidiary D9 Holdco, has materially reduced the Group's financial risk and increased the Company's strategic flexibility. The Compulsory Redemption mechanism approved by shareholders at a General Meeting on 12 March 2026, provides a flexible and orderly framework to return cash to shareholders as asset realisations are completed. Following the retention of an appropriate working capital reserve, the Board expects to return surplus proceeds to shareholders through the compulsory redemption mechanism, as described further below.

Portfolio Valuation

Arqiva

As part of the 31 December 2025 year-end valuation process, the Company undertook a comprehensive reassessment of its valuation of Arqiva. This review was informed by updated business planning and, importantly, by observable third-party transaction evidence, including arms-length third-party minority shareholder transactions.

In November 2025, vehicles managed by Macquarie Asset Management ("Macquarie") announced an agreement to sell their minority interest in Arqiva. This sale completed in March 2026, when IFM also entered into a binding agreement to sell its minority interest on equivalent economic terms to Macquarie. Both stakes were acquired by Polus Capital Management ("Polus"), an investment management firm with approximately $14 billion in assets under management and with extensive experience investing in essential European and UK infrastructure. D9 and Polus are aligned in their commitment to work actively with Arqiva's management in order to enhance the value of Arqiva over time.

These two transactions provided independent and contemporaneous market datapoints for Arqiva's equity value. Consistent with the approach adopted by the Company's auditors and an independent third-party valuation expert, these transactions were treated as the most reliable indicator of fair value at the year-end.

In parallel, Arqiva refreshed its long-term business plan during the second half of 2025. The revised plan adopts a deliberately conservative approach, reflecting prudent assumptions around the evolution of the DTT market, competitive dynamics in capacity pricing, the phasing of smart metering activity and the capital structure required to support the business through its next refinancing cycle. While Arqiva continues to deliver resilient operational performance in terms of revenue and service delivery and remains a critical part of the UK's national broadcast and utilities infrastructure, it has experienced margin pressure during the year from competitive DTT capacity pricing and business-mix effects. The structure of D9's equity interest in Arqiva, together with the associated Vendor Loan Note issued at acquisition and leverage at the operating company level, means that even modest changes in long‑term assumptions can translate into disproportionate movements in the equity value attributable to the Company. More detail is available in the Q2 financial statements released by Arqiva in February 2026.

While this is disappointing for shareholders, we see a credible path to value over time and subject to external policy and financing developments, including broadcasting policy outcomes, capital structure developments, inflation indexation, and further operational efficiencies, which could support future upside recovery should market conditions evolve favourably.

To ensure the Company is well positioned to capture such upside, we have strengthened governance and oversight at Arqiva during the year. This includes the appointment of a new CFO, enhancements to forecasting and financial modelling processes, and more focused engagement on capital structure, operating performance and strategy. At a D9 fund level, the Board and Valuation Committee have implemented additional oversight measures. The realisation plan anticipates an optimal exit of Arqiva following milestones relating to broadcasting policy, the BBC charter, public service broadcasting, contract renewals and refinancing. Nonetheless, we remain prepared to act earlier should it be in D9's shareholder interests.

Elio Networks

Elio Networks continued to make strong operational progress during 2025, delivering growth in customer segments and strengthening its commercial base. The business is performing ahead of expectations and continues to benefit from a high-quality service proposition and targeted commercial strategy.

InfraRed has remained deeply engaged with Elio's management team, supporting improvements across governance, operations, strategic planning and long-term growth positioning. The recently announced M&A debt facility, run in-house by InfraRed, provides flexibility to pursue targeted acquisition opportunities as part of a disciplined buy-and-build strategy, although no value relating to potential acquisitions has been recognised at this stage.

Given its potential, the Board considers that retaining Elio at this stage of the wind-down is in shareholders' best interests. Elio offers both organic and inorganic upside potential, and we intend to continue pursuing value-enhancing initiatives ahead of a future realisation aligned with the broader wind-down timetable.

More details on the strategy for Arqiva and Elio and the valuation movements for both can be found in the Investment Manager's report and Valuation section of this report, respectively.

Verne Earn-Out Settlement

During the period, the Board and the Investment Manager undertook an extensive review of the Verne Global earn-out, including detailed legal, commercial, financial and technical due diligence and engaged in a negotiation process with Ardian regarding the operation of the earn-out mechanism. As part of this process, and in order to support its assessment, the Company negotiated access to additional information relating to the performance of the assets within the defined earn-out perimeter.

Based on this work, led by InfraRed and supported by specialist advisors with deep expertise in Data Centre businesses and by leading external legal advisers reviewing the contractual terms of the earn out, as announced on 2 April 2026, the Board concluded that the earn-out was highly unlikely to result in any payment under the contractual mechanism. This reflected the defined earn-out perimeter agreed at the time of sale and prevailing operating conditions, including constraints on capacity delivery, which materially limited the likelihood of achieving the FY 2026 run-rate EBITDA threshold.

In light of this assessment, and following constructive engagement with Ardian, the Board determined that agreeing a settlement represented the best available outcome for shareholders. Binding terms were agreed and the Company received £10 million in cash prior to the end of April 2026. The settlement provides both parties with a clear and certain crystallisation of value at an agreed level and represents a pragmatic and mutually beneficial resolution, including for Ardian-backed Verne through the release of capital previously reserved in respect of the maximum earn-out amount.

Capital Distribution

Following the repayment and cancellation of the Company's RCF and the retention of an appropriate working capital reserve, the Board intends to return surplus proceeds to shareholders through the compulsory redemption mechanism approved by shareholders on 12 March 2026.

As announced on 2 April 2026, the cash proceeds received from the settlement of the Verne Global earn-out, together with proceeds from the disposal of Aqua Comms, are expected to fund the first distribution under the Managed Wind-Down. The first compulsory redemption is expected to take place by the end of April 2026 and is anticipated to be equivalent to approximately 3.5 pence per share, with the detailed timetable and mechanics set out in the Redemption Announcement released alongside these results.

Prior Year Adjustment ("PYA") Review (for the year ended 31 December 2023)

As previously disclosed in the 2024 Annual Report, the Board undertook an independent review of selected components of the 31 December 2023 valuation, recognising that neither the current Board nor the current Investment Manager were involved in that process. The review identified material errors, in respect of an overstatement of the Aqua Comms valuation and an omission relating to a provision for potential additional VLN associated with the Arqiva acquisition. This exercise was concluded in September 2025 and therefore was not reflected in the 2024 Annual Report and Accounts, but was reported in the June 2025 unaudited half year review. The adjustment has been recognised in the June 2025 financial statements through the statement of changes in equity, resulting in a £111.5 million reduction to the 2024 opening reserves, with no impact on the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2024. On 9 April 2026, the Financial Reporting Council ("FRC") announced the opening of an investigation under its Audit Enforcement Procedure into the audit conducted by PwC of the Company's financial statements for the financial year ended 31 December 2023.

Previous Investment Management Arrangements

As previously reported, the Company is in ongoing discussion with Triple Point Investment Management LLP ("Triple Point"), its previous manager, regarding the level of fees due, if any, in connection with the cessation of their management contract. These discussions are ongoing.

As part of the PYA recognised during the year, the Board reassessed certain historical management fee accruals based on updated information and a revised understanding of the contractual framework. This resulted in the release of £0.8 million of previously accrued fees through the current year income statement. This accounting adjustment does not prejudice, nor does it represent a resolution of, the ongoing discussions with Triple Point.

Maximising Value from Here

The Board is focused on delivering the Managed Wind-Down in a way that protects and maximises value for shareholders. As previously noted, with the RCF fully repaid and as announced today, the first capital distribution expected in late April 2026, the Company has reached an important transition point in the realisation process.

The Board recognises that the deterioration in Arqiva's equity value to a level below the VLN is deeply disappointing for our shareholders. While historical decisions and structural characteristics of the portfolio have contributed meaningfully to this position, the Board and Investment Manager have taken decisive steps to stabilise the Company, through stronger governance, complete balance sheet deleveraging and a disciplined, pragmatic approach to the asset realisation plan.

In 2026, we remain focused on the levers within our control: maintaining strong oversight of Arqiva and Elio, progressing realisation activities responsibly, preserving liquidity, controlling costs and maintaining open, consistent engagement with shareholders. Although the backdrop remains challenging, the Board continues to believe that sustained active management and disciplined execution offer a credible path to outcomes exceeding those implied by the Company's current market valuation.

Eric SandersonChair

14 April 2026

Investment Objective and Investment Policy

The Board is responsible for the Company's Investment Objective and Investment Policy and has overall responsibility for ensuring the Company's activities are in line with such overall strategy.

The Company's current Investment Objective and Investment Policy, as approved by shareholders at the 25 March 2024 General Meeting receiving 99.89% of votes in favour, are published below.

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE

The Company will be managed, either by a third-party investment manager or internally by the Company's Board of Directors, with the intention of realising all the remaining assets in the Portfolio, in an orderly manner with a view to ultimately returning available cash to the Company's shareholders ("Shareholders") following the repayment and cancellation of the Group's RCF from the proceeds of the assets realised pursuant to the Investment Policy.

INVESTMENT POLICY

The assets of the Company will be realised in an orderly manner, returning cash to Shareholders at such times and in such manner (which may be by way of compulsory redemptions, direct buybacks, tender offers, dividends or any other form of return) as the Board may, in its absolute discretion, determine. The Board intends that the proceeds of asset realisations, following the retention of an appropriate working capital reserve, will be available for distribution to Shareholders or used to meet other outstanding indebtedness of the Company, including the non-recourse indebtedness to the vendors of the Company's Arqiva asset issued by way of a vendor loan note ("VLN"), which the Company may repay or transfer to a future buyer of the Arqiva asset.

The Board will endeavour to realise all of the Company's investments in a manner that achieves a balance between maximising the net value received from those investments and making timely returns to Shareholders.

The Company will cease to make any new investments (including any follow-on investments) or to undertake capital expenditure, except with the prior written consent of the Board and where, in the opinion of the Board, in its absolute discretion:

a) failure to make the investment or capital expenditure would result in a breach of contract or applicable law or regulation by the Company, any member of its group or any vehicle through which it holds its investments; or

b) the investment or capital expenditure is considered necessary to protect or enhance the value of any existing investment or to facilitate an orderly divestment, any such investment or capital expenditure being a "Permitted Investment".

Subject to the ability of the Company to make Permitted Investments, any cash received by the Company as part of the realisation process prior to its distribution to Shareholders will be held by the Company as cash in Sterling on deposit and/or as cash equivalents.

BORROWING AND HEDGING

The Company may utilise borrowings for short-term liquidity purposes. The Company may also, from time to time, use borrowing for investment purposes on a short-term basis where it expects to repay those borrowings from realisation of investments. Gearing represented by borrowings (excluding the VLN) will not exceed 20% of Net Asset Value calculated at the time of drawdown. The RCF was fully repaid and cancelled during the year.

The Company may use derivatives for hedging as well as for efficient portfolio management. No such hedging transactions will be undertaken for speculative purposes.

Key Performance Indicators

In order to track the Company and/or Group's progress, the key performance indicators ("KPIs") monitored are set out below.

1 Proceeds are disclosed net of transaction costs in-line with their corresponding RNS'

2 Alternative Performance Measure ("APM").

Investment Manager's Report

Review of the Year

Company and Portfolio Performance

The Company reported a pre-tax loss of £217.0 million for the twelve months to 31 December 2025 (2024 restated: £277.5 million pre-tax loss), equal to a 25.1 pence loss per share (2024: 32.1 pence loss per share). This primarily reflects the fair value decrease in the Arqiva investment valuation. This valuation write down resulted in an overall Net Asset Value ("NAV") decrease from £297.3 million (34.4 pence per share) at 31 December 2024 to £80.2 million (9.3 pence per share) at 31 December 2025.

At a portfolio level, aggregate portfolio company revenues increased 5.2% year-on-year, with EBITDA decreasing 4.9%, reflecting ongoing margin pressure at Arqiva. Further details are set out below.

Following multiple disposals, the portfolio now comprises two investments: Arqiva and Elio Networks. Arqiva remains a critical national provider of UK broadcast and utilities infrastructure, delivering revenue growth in 2025 driven by indexation and contracted metering programmes, albeit with margin pressure from competitive DTT pricing and business-mix effects. The asset operates within an evolving policy and financing environment, with downside outcomes reflected in the current valuation and potential upside linked to future broadcasting policy clarity, refinancing and utilities growth.

Elio continues to perform strongly, delivering resilient revenue and EBITDA growth, supported by high-quality connectivity demand, operational discipline and a scalable platform. Across the remaining portfolio, the Investment Manager remains focused on active stewardship, transparency and disciplined execution in support of the Company's Managed Wind-Down.

The NAV decrease in the year of £217.0 million, or 25.1 pence per share, was primarily driven by a £212.9 million (24.6 pence per share) fair value loss across the portfolio. The most significant driver was the write-down of the Arqiva investment which, net of the associated VLN liability, reduced NAV by 24.8 pence per share. This was partially offset by a 0.8 pence per share contribution from Elio Networks due to its outperformance relative to its business plan, and the 0.7 pence per share uplift on the Verne Global earn-out following the early cash settlement which was received in April 2026. Other movements, including financing costs, contributed a further 1.8 pence per share decrease.

VALUATIONS

Overview of Valuation Approach

The Directors' Valuation, prepared by the Investment Manager and independently reviewed for Arqiva and Elio, reflects detailed bottom-up financial modelling, market evidence and updated investee company business plans. Investee companies were valued using a discounted cash flow methodology alongside relevant transaction evidence. External macro-assumptions (inflation, interest rates, taxation) and updated long-term forecasts were incorporated based on market data.

During the year, the portfolio's fair value decreased £283.8 million, driven by:

· Arqiva write-down: £214.8 million;

· Divestments (SeaEdge, EMIC-1, Aqua Comms, Verne Earn-out): £82.1 million combined reduction, derecognition of investments held at fair value at their opening NAV

· Elio Networks positive movement: £7.1 million;

· Verne Global earn-out: net positive movement of £6.0 million, reflecting a write-down from £4.0 million at 31 December 2024 to £nil at the half-year, followed by the recognition of a £10.0 million settlement uplift at the year-end.

The weighted average discount rate was 14.50% (31 December 2024: 14.00%).

SUMMARY OF PORTFOLIO VALUATION METHODOLOGY

InfraRed Capital Partners Limited ("InfraRed"), in its capacity as Investment Manager, prepares the fair market valuation of the Company's investment portfolio for approval by the Directors each reporting period. This valuation (the "Directors' Valuation") is an Alternative Performance Measure and reflects both the fair value of the investment portfolio and any contracted future divestments as at the reporting date.

The Directors' Valuation is prepared on a six-monthly basis at 30 June and 31 December. As the Group's investments are unquoted, valuations are derived using a blended approach incorporating discounted cash flow ("DCF") analysis of forecast cash flows from each portfolio company alongside relevant market evidence, including transaction benchmarks and long-term sector data.

Key external macroeconomic assumptions, such as inflation, interest rates, and taxation, are informed by market data and external economic forecasts. The Investment Manager exercises judgement in assessing expected future cash flows, using detailed portfolio company financial models and adjusting where necessary to reflect economic assumptions, operating performance, and risk factors.

The Investment Manager exercises its judgement in assessing the expected future cash flows from each investment based on the detailed financial models produced by each Portfolio Company and adjusting where necessary to reflect the Group's economic assumptions as well as any specific operating assumptions.

Fair value is then derived using an appropriate market discount rate and year-end currency exchange rates. Discount rates reflect risks associated with equity cash flows, including liquidity, market appetite, revenue predictability and service delivery considerations. Where appropriate, relevant market transactions by other investors and transactions for comparable companies are also factored into the decision on fair value at this stage.

The Directors' Valuation is a key input to the calculation of NAV, and the Valuation Committee receives an independent review of the valuations for Arqiva and Elio Networks from a third-party professional valuation expert, with the Audit Committee reviewing the outputs and methodologies. Following the completion of the PYA exercise, and the 2025 year-end valuation process, and given the reduced number of investments remaining, the Board resolved to dispense with the separate Valuation Committee and for the activities to be rolled back in to the Audit Committee's remit.

Valuation of unquoted equities is necessarily subjective and relies on assumptions that are sensitive to external macroeconomic, market and political factors. As a result, no assurance can be given that divestment proceeds will equal or exceed the Directors' Valuation.

DISCOUNT RATES

Investments are valued on a DCF basis using forecast free equity cash flows over periods typically ranging from 5 to 25 years, followed by a terminal value where applicable. Discount rates are determined using a bottom-up analysis of the weighted average cost of capital, incorporating observable market inputs and sector-specific metrics, including betas derived from comparable listed companies.

Where appropriate, valuations are cross-checked against market multiples to validate DCF outcomes.

For the year ended 31 December 2025, the weighted average discount rate was 14.50% (31 December 2024: 14.00%). Terminal value assumptions have been reassessed to reflect InfraRed's bottom-up review of updated portfolio company business plans.

LIQUIDITY

As at 31 December 2025, the Group held £39.3 million of cash, including £0.6 million held by the Company. All cash is unrestricted. The increase from the prior year reflects disposal proceeds (EMIC-1, Sea Edge UK1 and Aqua Comms) offset by the full repayment of the RCF in May 2025.

The Company expects to distribute surplus proceeds from Aqua Comms following retention of an appropriate working capital reserve and subject to completion of the capital redemption mechanism. Including the expected future distribution to shareholders initially announced in December 2025, there is sufficient liquidity to meet the expected working capital requirements of the Company until the fund is wound up.

DEBT FINANCING

Excluding Portfolio Companies and the VLN, D9 had no debt as of 31 December 2025, having fully repaid the RCF during the year. As at 31 December 2025, the VLN balance was £197.6 million including accrued interest but excluding the Bilsdale provision (31 December 2024: £185.5 million). The VLN is non-recourse to the rest of the group.

Portfolio Company debt as at 31 December 2025 consisted of £718.1 million at Arqiva (31 December 2024: £746.6 million), presented pro rata based on D9's 51.76% economic interest. This debt is not a contractual obligation of D9.

Subsequent to the year-end, Elio completed a debt financing which provides additional flexibility to support its disciplined buy‑and‑build strategy.

Debt metrics

The below table shows the Group's leverage position as at 31 December 2025.

1 The Company's fair value investment represents the valuation of its wholly owned direct subsidiary D9 Holdco, which in turn holds the investments in the underlying Portfolio Companies, and the shareholder loan between the Company and D9 Holdco. D9 Holdco also held the Group's RCF before it was fully repaid during the year.

2 The impact of the VLN is excluded from this table. This is on the basis that the Arqiva investment value is nil as at 31 December 2025 and the VLN is non-recourse to the rest of the Group.

3 Gross Asset Value

1 Excludes impact of VLN which is non-recourse to the rest of the group

2 This is D9's share of Arqiva gross debt. It is not an Arqiva net debt figure and as a result does not include cash held by Arqiva; it is a more conservative approach and is in line with previously reported figures

During the year ended 31 December 2025, the Company fully repaid the RCF, ending the year in a net cash position of £39.3 million (31 December 2024: net debt position of £29.4 million), excluding the VLN.

Review of Portfolio as of 31 December 2025

Aggregate portfolio revenues totalled £732.3 million, a 5% increase on 2024. The increase is a result of indexation of inflation linked cashflows in Arqiva, along with the continued water meter roll out, partially offset by continued growth at Elio Networks. Portfolio EBITDA declined 5%, consistent with prior guidance that margin pressure would continue in 2025.

Portfolio Financial Performance(based on portfolio as at 31 December 2025)

Portfolio companies' performance for all periods have been retranslated at the 31 December 2025 exchange rates.

Our portfolio

Note: Figures presented are pro-rated based on the Company's 51.76% economic interest in Arqiva. Economic interest is determined by D9's ownership of New Shareholder Loans in Arqiva.

Arqiva is the UK's pre-eminent national provider of television and radio broadcast infrastructure and a key supplier of end-to-end connectivity solutions to both media and utilities customers. The business is a longstanding partner to the UK broadcasting sector and a significant participant in the development of the UK's smart utility infrastructure through its water and energy metering services. Arqiva also operates one of the UK's leading satellite uplink and distribution businesses.

As at 31 December 2025, the Company's investment in Arqiva was held at a nil valuation. This reflects the application of market‑based fair value principles within a highly leveraged capital structure and the Company's VLN, rather than any change in the operational importance or strategic relevance of the business.

Arqiva's broadcast and transmission services underpin the provision of public service and commercial broadcasting on the UK digital terrestrial television ("DTT") network. These activities are supported by long-term contracts with blue-chip customers, including the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Sky and Warner Bros. Discovery. Within utilities, Arqiva's metering infrastructure supports the Government's strategic aims on water and electricity efficiency and customer value. Major customers include the Data Communications Company ("DCC"), Thames Water, Anglian Water, Affinity Water and United Utilities.

Performance in 2025

During 2025, Arqiva delivered revenue growth driven primarily by inflation indexation and the continued delivery of contracted water-metering programmes. EBITDA declined modestly year on year, reflecting ongoing margin pressure in the DTT capacity business and a changing mix towards lower-margin utilities activities.

In broadcast, Arqiva continued to renew a number of significant customer contracts; however, competitive intensity in commercial DTT capacity pricing remained elevated, resulting in lower contribution margins than previously anticipated. The business also continued to manage inflationary cost pressures while maintaining service quality and network resilience across its national infrastructure.

Policy and Market Environment

In May 2024, Ofcom published its report on the future of UK television distribution, setting out a range of potential pathways for broadcasting over the next 10-15 years. Arqiva remains actively engaged with Ofcom, DCMS and other relevant stakeholders as policy development continues.

The range of potential outcomes spans continued service provision broadly in line with current limited arrangements through to scenarios involving a more DTT network over time. The Directors' valuation adopts a balanced and evidence-based position across this range of outcomes, informed by management insight, external perspectives and a prudent assessment of policy risk.

Arqiva also derives a significant proportion of its income from transmission services provided to UK public service broadcasters under contracts expiring from 2030. Renewal discussions are expected over the next two years.

Within utilities, the Independent Water Commission chaired by Sir Jon Cunliffe recommended in June 2025 the acceleration of smart-meter rollout, including through expanded mandatory metering. The subsequent Defra White Paper reaffirmed the Government's intention to remove barriers to wider deployment. Arqiva secured several major contracts for the current regulatory period ("AMP8"), representing a substantial share of available opportunities. Delivery of these contracts is progressing well, with connection rates performing broadly to plan. Most remaining AMP8 tenders were awarded in 2025, and Arqiva will focus on delivering its contracted programmes while developing higher-value secondary services such as data analytics and sensor solutions. Market volumes for smart-meter deployments in AMP9 (from 2030) are expected to be similar to or greater than AMP8.

Valuation

As part of the year-end valuation process, the Company reassessed Arqiva's valuation taking into account both updated business planning and observable third-party transaction evidence, including minority transactions completed at arm's length on equivalent economic terms. During the period, Macquarie-managed vehicles completed the sale of their minority interest in Arqiva, and subsequent to the year-end IFM entered into a binding agreement to sell their stake on equivalent economic terms.

These two transactions represent recent, arm's-length market datapoints and have been treated as the most reliable indicators of equity value at the measurement date. Consistent with the approach adopted by the Company's auditors and the independent valuation expert, greater weight has been placed on these market transactions than on modelled valuation outputs where the two diverge.

While discounted cash flow analysis continues to be prepared and reviewed, the implied equity values from the revised long-term plan sit below the outstanding VLN once leverage is taken into account. Accordingly, the Directors' valuation reflects a nil equity value for accounting purposes at 31 December 2025.

Business Plan and Outlook

During the second half of 2025, Arqiva undertook a comprehensive refresh of its long-term business plan. The revised plan adopts a deliberately conservative and prudent planning framework, designed to ensure resilience through refinancing and policy uncertainty rather than to forecast upside outcomes.

In broadcast, the plan reflects a cautious approach to the evolution of the DTT platform and continued competitive pressure in capacity pricing. In utilities, the plan assumes a more measured growth trajectory following the conclusion of the majority of AMP8 tender activity, with increased focus on delivery, operational performance and the development of higher-value services.

These assumptions do not reflect a deterioration in Arqiva's operational performance or strategic positioning. Rather, they represent a disciplined approach to forecasting in the context of competitive, regulatory and financing uncertainty.

Capital Structure and Sensitivity

Arqiva operates within a highly leveraged capital structure, which materially amplifies the sensitivity of equity value to changes in cashflow, leverage and refinancing assumptions. As a result, relatively modest variations in outcomes can have a disproportionate impact on equity value, both negatively and positively.

The Company continues to engage actively with Arqiva's management team on capital structure, refinancing strategy and operational initiatives, with a focus on positioning the business to navigate upcoming refinancing milestones and policy developments effectively.

Upside Potential

Notwithstanding the valuation outcome at the year-end, and consistent with the Company's application of market-based valuation principles following recent minority shareholder transactions, credible upside scenarios remain. These include favourable policy outcomes for broadcasting, refinancing of the senior and junior debt tranches on improved terms, capital structure optimisation and further operational efficiencies. While such outcomes cannot be assumed for valuation purposes at 31 December 2025, the Investment Manager remains focused on supporting initiatives that could enable the Company to capture value as these uncertainties resolve over time.

Provision in Respect of Potential Additional VLNs

Arqiva's Bilsdale site returned to full operation in January 2024 following the 2021 fire. At acquisition, estimated restoration costs were adjusted for in the purchase price. Current estimates indicate that net restoration costs will be lower than originally forecast. Under the acquisition terms, additional VLNs are issued to the vendor equal to the amount by which actual restoration costs fall below the estimated costs at acquisition.

A provision has been recognised at D9 HoldCo level in respect of this potential adjustment. The quantum of this provision is commercially sensitive and is therefore not disclosed, but the impact is reflected in the fair value of the HoldCo investment. No provision relating to this mechanism was originally recognised as at 1 January 2024. However, this is now reflected in the Prior Year Adjustment, with further details included in Note 25 of the financial statements.

Inflation Linked Swaps Held by Arqiva

Arqiva's inflation-linked swaps led to an accretion payment by the Company of £43.2 million in 2025, reflecting January year-on-year RPI of 3.6%. For 2026, RPI is forecast at 3.25%, implying an accretion liability of £43.6 million, of which approximately £22.5 million relates to D9's pro-rata interest. These accretion payments are funded entirely from Arqiva's internal cash flows. As RPI is expected to remain within the collar range (2.5%-6.0%), no collar cash flows apply for the 2026 accretion year.

Vendor Loan Note Interest

The VLN, which matures on 18 October 2029, is non-recourse to the Company; recourse is limited to the Company's shares in Arqiva Group Limited. A fixed charge is registered at Companies House against D9 Wireless Midco 1 Limited.

The VLN carries stepped interest rates as follows:

· 6% p.a. to 30 June 2025

· 7% p.a. from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026

· 8% p.a. from 1 July 2026 to 30 June 2027

· 9% p.a. from 1 July 2027 to maturity

Interest is payable annually in arrears on 30 June and may be settled in cash or in PIK notes. Interest to date has been settled by PIK notes. As at 31 December 2025, the VLN balance was £197.6 million including accrued interest.

Distributions to the Group require all accrued interest to be paid in full. From 18 October 2026, no distributions may be received unless both VLN principal and rolled-up interest have been fully repaid. No interest on the VLN to date has been settled in cash.

Note: Figures presented relate to Arqiva on a 100% basis. D9's economic interest in Arqiva remains 51.76%.

Arqiva Sustainability update1

Arqiva's purpose is inherently social: enabling people to access the information and entertainment that matter to them. The business embeds social responsibility across four focus areas: communities, people, diversity and inclusion, and suppliers.

In 2024, Arqiva developed a refreshed sustainability strategy and associated goals. Progress during 2025 included significant reductions in Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, enhancements to biodiversity initiatives, and strengthened governance and assurance processes.

Key achievements included:

· Validation of near and long-term Net Zero targets by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).

· A 21% reduction in location-based Scope 1 and 2 emissions and a 13% reduction in Scope 3 emissions.

· Expanded biodiversity enhancement measures across operational sites.

· Increased levels of circular-economy adoption, including refurbishment and reuse of technical equipment and IT assets.

Assurance of emissions reporting in accordance with ISO 14064-3:2019.

More detail is available in Arqiva's latest Sustainability Report.

1 Provided for corporate entities in the portfolio, which are not being consideredfor sale at present time

Elio Networks is a leading provider of high performance, resilient business to business ("B2B") connectivity, operating Ireland's highest-capacity fixed wireless access ("FWA") network. Its dense base station footprint enables dedicated symmetric connectivity of up to 10Gbps for enterprise clients across the Greater Dublin Area.

Performance in 2025

Elio delivered another year of strong performance, achieving revenue of £8.5 million for the year ended 31 December 2025 (GBP equivalent), compared with £8.0 million in the prior year. The business continued to expand its base of high‑quality customer connections, with strong traction across both multi‑site enterprises and technology‑driven SMEs. Network reliability and service quality remain key differentiators, supported by targeted upgrades and proactive optimisation of the network architecture.

Elio serves a diversified customer base, including multinational corporates, Government bodies, global technology firms, professional services, and retail and hospitality operators. Originally established to address the shortfall in affordable high‑speed broadband in the Dublin metropolitan area, Elio continues to gain market share in segments that value resilience, dedicated bandwidth and rapid deployment.

Strategy and Growth Outlook

The Board and InfraRed continue to believe that retaining Elio currently is most likely to maximise shareholder value. The business presents both organic and inorganic growth opportunities, and the realisation of Elio is expected to be phased in line with the wider wind‑down strategy and D9's proposed exit from Arqiva.

Elio's phased inorganic expansion plan progressed well in 2025. The strategy is to apply Elio's efficient operating model and strong integration capabilities to create value through disciplined acquisition of complementary businesses. The Company completed the initial phases of this buy‑and‑build programme, demonstrating the scalability of its platform and identifying further opportunities for consolidation. Subsequent to the year- end, Elio completed a debt financing, comprising€15 million of committed debt and a further €15 million of uncommitted accordion debt, which provides additional flexibility to support its disciplined buy‑and‑build strategy.

InfraRed has taken an active role in the management and governance of Elio, including:

· Refinement of strategic positioning and commercial priorities;

· Running the debt‑raising process in‑house to optimise capital efficiency;

· Implementation of governance enhancements and strengthened business processes;

Development and execution of the initial buy‑and‑build phase.

Sustainability update1

As a smaller but fast‑growing company, Elio integrates sustainability into its strategic development. The CEO's remuneration includes sustainability‑linked objectives where possible, and the business focuses primarily on two pillars: diversity and inclusion, and decarbonisation.

Elio continues to build an inclusive culture through targeted recruitment practices, enhanced family‑friendly policies and diversity training. Increasing workforce diversity is a long‑term ambition and is expected to progress as the company scales.

On decarbonisation, Elio is looking to develop an emissions‑reduction roadmap, which will be progressed during 2026.

1 provided for corporate entities in the portfolio, which are not being considered for sale at present time

DIVESTED ASSETS

EMIC‑1

On 29 May 2025, the Company completed the divestment of 100% of its interest in EMIC‑1. The transaction generated £32 million in proceeds for the Company and released a further £10 million of undrawn construction commitments. Together, these amounts enabled a £40 million reduction in the RCF, decreasing the outstanding balance to £13 million after accounting for working‑capital requirements.

This divestment was executed in line with the Realisation Plan and represented a meaningful early step in strengthening the Company's liquidity and reducing leverage at the Group level.

SeaEdge UK1

On 11 June 2025, the Company completed the divestment of 100% of its interest in SeaEdge UK1 ("SeaEdge") to Stellium Datacenters Limited, following a competitive sale process involving multiple strategic and financial bidders. The transaction generated £10.7 million in proceeds, which-together with additional working‑capital surpluses-enabled the full repayment and cancellation of the remaining c. £13 million RCF balance.

The deleveraging achieved through the EMIC‑1 and SeaEdge disposals was a key milestone in the execution of the Managed Wind‑Down. With the RCF fully repaid, all future surplus proceeds from divestments will be available for distribution to shareholders, subject to appropriate working‑capital and regulatory considerations.

Aqua Comms

On 31 December 2025, the Company completed its divestment of 100% of the Group's holdings in Aqua Comms. This followed the granting of various regulatory approvals including competition clearances over the course of 2025, across Aqua Comms' various operating jurisdictions.

Throughout 2025, the Company continued to act as a proactive shareholder during the regulatory approval period. Actions included:

· implementing cost reduction measures;

· maintaining key staff through targeted retention initiatives; and

· guiding commercial strategy, particularly around the sale of remaining Atlantic capacity.

These initiatives helped preserve value under the completion-accounts framework, maximising final proceeds to shareholders.

Aqua Comms was included in the year-end NAV at £34.0 million, reflecting the cash proceeds received at completion (GBP-equivalent). The Company intends to distribute surplus proceeds following the Aqua Comms divestment, after retaining sufficient working capital. This will be implemented via the recently announced and launched capital-redemption programme designed to ensure proceeds are returned to shareholders in an efficient compulsory pro-rata mechanism.

VERNE GLOBAL EARN-OUT

During the period, the Board and the Investment Manager undertook an extensive review of the Verne Global earn-out, including detailed legal, commercial, financial and technical due diligence and engaged in a negotiation process with Ardian regarding the operation of the earn-out mechanism. As part of this process, and in order to support its assessment, the Company negotiated access to additional information relating to the performance of the assets within the defined earn-out perimeter.

Based on this work, led by InfraRed and supported by specialist advisors with deep expertise in Data Centre businesses and by leading external legal advisers reviewing the contractual terms of the earn out, as announced on 2 April 2026, the Board concluded that the earn-out was highly unlikely to result in any payment under the contractual mechanism. This reflected the defined earn-out perimeter agreed at the time of sale and prevailing operating conditions, including constraints on capacity delivery, which materially limited the likelihood of achieving the FY 2026 run-rate EBITDA threshold.

In light of this assessment, and following constructive engagement with Ardian, the Board determined that agreeing a settlement represented the best available outcome for shareholders. Binding terms were agreed and the Company received £10 million in cash prior to finalising these financial statements. The settlement provides both parties with a clear and certain crystallisation of value at an agreed level and represents a pragmatic and mutually beneficial resolution, including for Ardian-backed Verne through the release of capital previously reserved in respect of the maximum earn-out amount.

Section 172(1) Statement

The Board is committed to promoting the success of the Company whilst conducting business in a fair, ethical, and transparent manner.

The Board makes every effort to understand the views of the Company's key stakeholders and to take into consideration these views as part of its decision-making process.

As an investment company, the Company does not have any employees and conducts its core activities through third-party service providers. The Board seeks to ensure each service provider has an established track record, has in place suitable policies and procedures to ensure they maintain high standards of business conduct, treat shareholders fairly, and employ corporate governance best practice.

As a Jersey incorporated entity, the Company voluntarily discloses how the Directors have had regard to the matters set out in section 172(1)(a) to (f) and fulfils the reporting requirements under section 414CZA of the UK Companies Act 2006 (the "Act").

The following disclosure describes how the Directors have had regard to the matters set out in section 172(1) (a) to (f) when performing their duty under s172 and forms the Directors' statement required under section 414CZA of the Act.

Stakeholder Engagement

Principal Decisions

Principal decisions have been defined as those that have a material impact to the Group and its key stakeholders. In taking these decisions, the Directors considered their duties under section 172 of the Act.

Managed Wind-Down

In January 2024, following careful consideration of the options available to the Company and after consultation with its financial advisers, as well as taking into account feedback received from a large number of shareholders and institutional investors, the Board decided that it would be in the best interests of shareholders to put forward a proposal for a Managed Wind-Down of the Company.

The implementation of the Managed Wind-Down required amendments to the Company's investment objective and investment policy which was proposed to shareholders and overwhelmingly approved with over 99% of shareholders that voted, voting in favour of the resolution at the General Meeting on 25 March 2024. Following entering into the Managed Wind-Down, the Company entered into binding agreements to divest its stake in EMIC-1 and Aqua Comms.

REPAYMENT AND CANCELLATION OF THE RCF

In May 2025, the Group completed its divestment of its entire stake in EMIC-1, allowing the Group to repayc.£40 million of the RCF.

The sale of the Group's interest in SeaEdge UK1 was completed in June 2025, following receipt of the necessary regulatory approvals. After completion, and upon receipt of the sale proceeds and working capital surpluses, the Group's RCF of approximately £13 million was fully repaid and cancelled.

Risk Management

Framework The Board and the Investment Manager recognise that risk is inherent in the operation of the Company and are committed to effective risk management to ensure that shareholder value is protected and maximised.

As an externally managed investment company, the Company outsources key services to the Investment Manager and other service providers and rely on their systems and controls. The Board has ultimate responsibility for risk management and internal controls within the Company and has convened a Risk Committee to assist it in these responsibilities. The Risk Committee undertakes a formal risk review twice a year to assess and challenge the effectiveness of our risk management and to help define risk appetite and controls to manage risks within that appetite, particularly those which would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency, valuation, liquidity or reputation. Further details of the Risk Committee's activities can be found in the Risk Committee Report.

The Investment Manager has responsibility for identifying potential risks at an early stage, escalating risks or changes to risk and relevant considerations and implementing appropriate mitigations which are recorded in the Group's risk register. Where relevant, the financial model is stress tested to assess the potential impact of recorded risks against the likelihood of occurrence and graded suitably. In assessing risks, both internal controls and external factors that could mitigate the risk are considered. A post-mitigation risk score is then determined for each principal risk. The Board regularly reviews the risk register to ensure gradings and mitigating actions remain appropriate.

Risk Appetite Statement

Managing risk is fundamental to the delivery of the Company's strategy, and this is achieved by defining risk appetite and managing risks within that appetite. Risk appetite is the level of risk the Company is willing to take to achieve its strategic objectives.

The Board is responsible for setting the Company's risk appetite and ensuring that the Company operates within these parameters. The Board defines its risk appetite using a category of risks inherent to the environment in which the Company operates. Risk appetite is set for each category of risk enabling the actual risks which are identified by management to be compared to the defined appetite, to identify where any additional mitigation activity is required. Any risks outside of tolerance are subject to additional oversight and action planning. The Board has reviewed the Company's appetite for each of the principal risks set out below.

The Board will review and monitor the Company's risk appetite at least on an annual basis or when there is a material change in the internal or external environment, to ensure that it remains appropriate and consistent with the Investment Policy.

Principal Risks and Uncertainties

The table below sets out what the Board believes to be the principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group. The table does not cover all of the risks that the Group may face. The Board defines the Group's risk appetite, enabling the Group to judge the level of risk it is prepared to take in achieving its overall objectives. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to management or deemed to be less material at the date of this report may also have an adverse effect on the Group.

Emerging Risks

Changes to power supply and prices / Supply chain disruption

As demonstrated by the geopolitical tension and conflict in the Middle East and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, global conflicts can have significant disruption to both power supply and supply chains. The changing political landscape across the world and increased tensions are monitored by the Investment Manager. Scenario planning tools are used to understand the impacts and possible mitigation actions.

Development of disruptive technology

The digital infrastructure sector is constantly evolving. As a result, there is a risk that disruptive technology emerges which results in current digital infrastructure assets becoming obsolete. The Investment Manager constantly monitors the emerging technology trends with digital infrastructure to ensure Portfolio Companies evolve their business models where required and new investment opportunities are accurately assessed in order to protect the value of the business as the wind-down of the Company progresses.

Going Concern and Viability

Going Concern

The Company's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position, including its principal risks and uncertainties are set out in the Strategic Report.. In addition, Notes 2 to 21 of the financial statements include: the Company's objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital; its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments and hedging activities; and its exposures to credit risk and liquidity risk.

Following the shareholder vote at the General Meeting in early 2024, the Company is now in a Managed Wind-Down. This strategy was re-confirmed by a Continuation Resolution that passed at the June 2025 AGM. The Managed Wind-Down is anticipated to take several years to complete due to the expected timing associated with the divestment of Arqiva. The targeted completion of this Managed Wind-Down is circa 36 months. As such, the audited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2025 continue to be prepared on a going concern basis.

In adopting the appropriateness of the going concern basis of preparation, the Directors considered the fact that the Company is in Managed Wind-Down, the successful recent disposal activity (EMIC-1, SeaEdge UK1 and Aqua Comms, plus the Verne Global earn-out that is due to settle by end of April 2026, for combined net proceeds of £86.3 million) during the year, the strong performance of one of the two remaining assets, Elio, and the disposal plans and timelines for Arqiva, which Directors still reasonably expect to be disposed of within a two to three-year timeframe, even considering the ongoing Arqiva related disposal activity by minority shareholders. In addition, the Directors considered the significantly improved liquidity position of the Company compared with 31 December 2024, with the full repayment of the RCF in May 2025 primarily using disposal proceeds, and the receipt of Aqua Comms disposal proceeds in December 2025, ensuring sufficient cash, post any distribution to shareholders, is available to meet the future liquidity requirements of the Company until it is wound up1.

Although the Company is not reliant on distributions from Elio Networks to meet its going concern obligations, it is able to benefit from distributable free cash generated by the business. This position is further supported by the recently announced debt facility, which enables Elio to deliver its buy-and-build M&A strategy without reliance on its current free cash flows.

Post the balance sheet date, the Board and the Investment Manager agreed binding terms for an early £10 million settlement of the Verne Global earn-out with Ardian.

The settlement reflects the Board's assessment of the uncertainty inherent in the contractual earn-out mechanism, including its dependence on future operating performance and run-rate EBITDA targets for the financial year ending 31 December 2026. The year-end valuation of the earn-out reflects the terms of the settlement and provides a clear and certain crystallisation of value for shareholders. No further amounts are expected to be received in respect of the Verne Global earn-out.

The Directors have considered the cashflow assumptions for a period of 12 months following the approval of the financial statements, including the reduced liquidity requirements, following the previously noted full repayment of the RCF, the available distribution options from performing assets, as well as the available cash balance following recent disposals. The Directors have also considered a number of severe, but plausible downside scenarios to these cashflow assumptions and the potential mitigating actions the Company has at its disposal to address these scenarios where required.

Given these considerations, the Directors believe that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue to operate for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements and therefore the Directors believe that it continues to be appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis.

1 No provision has been made for the costs of winding up the Company as these will be charged to the Income Statement on an accruals basis as they are incurred or as the Company becomes obligated to make such payments in the future.

Viability Statement At least once a year the Directors have carried out a robust assessment of the principal and emerging risks and make a statement which explains how they have assessed the prospects of the Company, over what period they have done so and why they consider that period to be appropriate, considering the Company's current position.

The principal and emerging risks faced by the Company are described in the annual report. As detailed above, the Company is preparing the audited Financial Statements on a going concern basis despite fact that the Company is in a Managed Wind-Down, and the recent Arqiva related disposal activity by minority shareholders. The Directors have not assessed the longer-term viability of the Company other than for a period of three years as the future policy on broadcasting, BBC Charter, public service broadcasting contract renewals and refinancing that will facilitate the future disposal of Arqiva.

The Directors have assessed the Managed Wind-Down of the Company to be within 36 months of the date of the approval of these audited Financial Statements (being 14 April 2026), although there is no guarantee that it will be possible to realise maximum value for the assets within that timeframe and therefore the Managed Wind-Down could potentially take longer. The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company can meet its liabilities in order to enable the Managed Wind-Down.

Board Approval of the Strategic Report

The Strategic Report has been approved by the Board of Directorsand signed on its behalf by the Chair.

Eric SandersonChair

14 April 2026

Statement of Directors' responsibilities in respect of the financial statements

The Directors are responsible for preparing the annual report in accordance with applicable law and regulation.

The Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 ("company law") requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRSs") as adopted in the European Union.

The Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period, and that they comply with company law. In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are required to:

· select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

· state whether applicable IFRSs as adopted in the European Union have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;

· make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and

· prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business.

The Directors confirm that they have complied with the above requirements in preparing the financial statements.

The Directors are responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are also responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and to ensure that financial statements prepared by the Company comply with the requirements of company law.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company's website. The Company's financial statements are published on the Company's website, www.d9infrastructure.com.

Directors' confirmations

The Directors consider that the annual report and financial statements, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.

Each of the Directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge:

· the Company financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted in the European Union, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and loss of the Company; and

· the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.

Approval

This Directors' responsibilities statement and the financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 14 April 2026 and signed on its behalf by:

Eric Sanderson

Chair

14 April 2026

Independent Auditors' Report to the Members of Digital 9 Infrastructure plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements

Opinion

In our opinion, Digital 9 Infrastructure plc's financial statements:

· give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 31 December 2025 and of its loss and cash flows for the year then ended;

· have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted in the European Union; and

· have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991.

We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report & Accounts (the "Annual Report"), which comprise:

· the Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2025;

· the Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year then ended;

· the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended;

· the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended; and

· the Notes to the financial statements, comprising material accounting policy information and other explanatory information.

Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) ("ISAs (UK)") and applicable law. Our responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence

We remained independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes the Financial Reporting Council's ("FRC") Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities in accordance with the requirements of the Crown Dependencies' Audit Rules and Guidance for market-traded companies, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

We remained independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes the FRC's Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard were not provided.

We have provided no non-audit services to the company in the period under audit.

Our audit approach

Context

Digital 9 Infrastructure plc is incorporated in Jersey and is a listed company on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. The company invests in a range of digital infrastructure assets, and its investment objective is to focus on a managed wind down of the company.

Overview

Audit scope

· The company invests in digital infrastructure investments through its investment in its wholly-owned subsidiary, Digital 9 Holdco Limited.

· The company is a closed-ended investment company and has appointed InfraRed Capital Partners Limited (the "Investment Manager") to manage its assets.

· We conducted our audit of the financial statements using information from InfraRed Capital Partners Limited, and Ocorian Fund Services (Jersey) Limited (the "Administrator") to whom the directors delegated the provision of certain administrative functions.

· We tailored the scope of our audit taking into account the types of investments within the company, the involvement of the third parties referred to above, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the company operates.

Key audit matters

· Valuation of investments held at fair value through profit or loss

Materiality

· Overall materiality: £802,000 (2024: £2,972,000) based on 1% of net assets.

· Performance materiality: £601,000 (2024: £2,229,000).

The scope of our audit

As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors' professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.

"Material uncertainty related to going concern" and "Basis for qualified opinion - losses on investments held at fair value recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31 December 2024", which were key audit matters last year, are no longer included because the Directors no longer consider there to be a material uncertainty in relation to going concern and our audit opinion is not qualified in the current year in relation to losses on investments held at fair value. Otherwise, the key audit matters below are consistent with last year.

How we tailored the audit scope

We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.

The company's accounting is delegated to the Administrator who maintains the company's accounting records and who has implemented controls over those accounting records.

We obtained our audit evidence from substantive tests. However, as part of our risk assessment, we understood and assessed the internal controls in place at both the Investment Manager and the Administrator to the extent relevant to our audit.

As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular, we looked at where the Directors made subjective judgements, for example in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain.

The impact of climate risk on our audit

As part of our audit, we inquired of management to understand and evaluate the company's risk assessment process in relation to climate change. We used our own knowledge and understanding of the company to evaluate the impact of climate risk on the performance of the company's digital infrastructure investments. We read disclosures in relation to climate change made in other financial information within the Annual Report to ascertain whether the disclosures are materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge from our audit. Our responsibility over other information is further described in the reporting on other information section of our report.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% (2024: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting to £601,000 (2024: £2,229,000) for the company financial statements.

In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range was appropriate.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £40,100 (2024: £158,600) as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.

Conclusions relating to going concern

Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:

· Obtained the going concern assessment prepared by InfraRed and approved by the Board, which covers a period of at least 12 months from the date of signing the 2025 financial statements and supports that the company has adequate resources to continue to operate for at least 12 months from this date. The going concern assessment assumes the managed wind-down will occur within 24 to 36 months of the signing of the 2025 financial statements, with a target wind-down circa 2028;

· Agreed inputs, such as cash balances and known cash movements, into the going concern assessment and challenged the assumptions adopted by management on cash outflows and inflows during the 12 month period.

· Validated to supporting documentation the cash receipts from the disposals of assets in the year and the repayment of the RCF, which are the significant factors in management's assessment that the prior year material uncertainty in relation to going concern is no longer present;

· Obtained supporting evidence for events post the balance sheet date that are relevant to the going concern assessment, such as the settlement of the Verne earn out.

· Evaluated whether the directors' conclusion, that sufficient liquidity and covenant headroom existed to continue trading operationally throughout the going concern period under the base and severe but plausible scenarios, is appropriate;

· Reviewed the disclosures provided relating to the going concern basis of preparation and found that these provided an explanation of the directors' assessment that was consistent with the evidence we obtained.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the company's ability to continue as a going concern.

In relation to the directors' reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Reporting on other information

The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors' report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.

Corporate governance statement

The Listing Rules require us to review the directors' statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the corporate governance statement relating to the company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are described in the Reporting on other information section of this report.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:

· The directors' confirmation that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;

· The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify emerging risks and an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated;

· The directors' statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material uncertainties to the company's ability to continue to do so over a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements;

· The directors' explanation as to their assessment of the company's prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate; and

· The directors' statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.

Our review of the directors' statement regarding the longer-term viability of the company was substantially less in scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors' process supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit.

In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:

· The directors' statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the information necessary for the members to assess the company's position, performance, business model and strategy;

· The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and

· The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit Committee.

We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the directors' statement relating to the company's compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.

Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit

Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements

As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors' responsibilities in respect of the financial statements, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors' report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.

Based on our understanding of the company and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations related to breaches of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the financial statements. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the financial statements such as the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991. We evaluated management's incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journals, and management bias in accounting estimates and judgements applied by management in the valuation of investments held at fair value through profit or loss, as described in our key audit matter. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included:

· Discussions with management, and the Board, including consideration of known or suspected instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud impacting the company;

· Reviewing relevant meeting minutes, including those of the Board of Directors, Risk Committee and the Audit Committee;

· Designing audit procedures to incorporate unpredictability around the nature, timing or extent of our testing;

· Procedures relating to valuation of investments held at fair value through profit or loss described in the related key audit matter;

· Identifying and testing a sample of journal entries posted with unusual account combinations, words or amounts as well as a selection of year end manual journals; and

· Reviewing of financial statement disclosures to underlying supporting documentation.

There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.

Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors' report.

Use of this report

This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the company's members as a body in accordance with Article 113A of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.

Other required reporting

Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 exception reporting

Under the Article 113A of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

· we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or

· proper accounting records have not been kept by the company, or proper returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

· the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.

Other voluntary reporting

Directors' remuneration

The company voluntarily prepares a Directors' Remuneration Report in accordance with the provisions of the UK Companies Act 2006. The directors requested that we audit the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report specified by the UK Companies Act 2006 to be audited as if the company were a UK quoted company.

In our opinion, the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.

Kevin Rollo

for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPChartered Accountants and Recognized AuditorLondon14 April 2026

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Statement of Comprehensive Income  

For the year ended 31 December 2025  

The total column of this statement is the Statement of Comprehensive Income of Digital 9 Infrastructure Plc ("the Company") prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as adopted by the European Union ("EU"). The supplementary revenue return and capital columns have been prepared in accordance with the Association of Investment Companies Statement of Recommended Practice (AIC SORP).

All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. The Company does not have any other income or expenses that are not included in the net loss for the year. The net loss for the year disclosed above represents the Company's total comprehensive expense.

This Statement of Comprehensive Income includes all recognised gains and losses.

The accompanying notes below form part of these Financial Statements.

Statement of Financial Position

As at 31 December 2025

The Financial Statements set out in this report were approved and authorised for issue by the Board on 14 April 2026 and signed on its behalf by:

Eric Sanderson Chair14 April 2026

The accompanying notes below form part of these Financial Statements.

Statement of Changes in Equity

For the year ended 31 December 2025

The accompanying notes below form part of these Financial Statements.

Statement of Cash Flows

For the year ended 31 December 2025

The accompanying notes below form part of these Financial Statements.

Notes to the Financial Statements  

For the year ended 31 December 2025  

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION

Digital 9 Infrastructure plc (the "Company" or "D9") is a Jersey registered alternative investment fund, and it is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission as a "listed fund" under the Collective Investment Funds (Jersey) Law 1988 (the "Funds Law") and the Jersey Listed Fund Guide published by the Jersey Financial Services Commission. The Company is registered with number 133380 under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991.

The Company is domiciled in Jersey and the address of its registered office, which is also its principal place of business, is 26 New Street, St Helier, Jersey, JE2 3RA. The Company is tax domiciled in the United Kingdom.

The Company was incorporated on 8 January 2021 and is a public company and the ultimate controlling party of the Group. The Company's Ordinary Shares were admitted to trading on the Specialist Fund Segment of the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange under the ticker DGI9 on 31 March 2021, following its IPO which raised gross proceeds of £300 million. A further £175 million was injected following the second equity raise on 10 June 2021 and a total of £155.2m injected following two further equity raises in 2022. It was admitted to the premium listing segment of the Official List of the Financial Conduct Authority and migrated to trading on the premium segment of the Main Market on 30 August 2022. The Company is listed on the closed-ended investment funds category of the FCA's Official List and its Ordinary Shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange's Main Market.

Following the Strategic Review and shareholder vote in March 2024 for the Company to enter into a Managed Wind-Down, and which was reconfirmed by a Continuation Resolution in June 2025, the Company's principal activity is to execute the Managed Wind-Down of the Company and realise all existing assets in the Company's portfolio in an ordinary manner.

These financial statements comprise only the results of the Company, as its investment in Digital 9 Holdco Limited ("D9 Holdco") is measured at fair value through profit or loss.

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

These financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2025 have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.

Where presentational guidance set out in the AIC SORP is consistent with the requirements of IFRS as adopted by the EU, the Directors have sought to prepare the financial statements on a basis compliant with the recommendations of the AIC SORP. In particular, supplementary information which analyses the Statement of Comprehensive Income between items of a revenue and capital nature has been presented alongside the total Statement of Comprehensive Income.

The functional and reporting currency is sterling, reflecting the primary economic environment in which the Company operates. Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rates of exchange ruling on the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated into sterling at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date.

The financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for the following:

· Investments at fair value through profit or loss

The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year.

The principal accounting policies to be adopted are set out below and will be consistently applied, subject to changes in accordance with any amendments in IFRS.

IFRS 13 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). When measuring fair value, the Company takes into consideration the characteristics of the asset or liability if market participants would take those characteristics into account when pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk.

The Company accounts for its investment in its wholly-owned direct subsidiary D9 Holdco at fair value. The investment in D9 Holdco which will principally comprise working capital balances and investments in Digital Infrastructure Projects, are required to be included at fair value in the carrying value of investments. Consequently, the Company does not consolidate its subsidiaries or apply IFRS 3 business combinations when it obtains control of another entity as it is considered to be an investment entity under IFRS. Instead, the Company includes its investment in its subsidiary at fair value through profit or loss.

The Company's Investment Manager, and the Company's Board are currently in the process of undertaking a Managed Wind-Down of the Company and realising all existing assets in the portfolio in an orderly manner.

D9 Holdco is itself an investment entity. Consequently, the Company need not have an exit strategy for its investment in D9 Holdco.

(a) Going Concern

The Company's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position, including its principal risks and uncertainties are set out in the Strategic Report.. In addition, Notes 2 to 21 of the financial statements include: the Company's objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital; its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments and hedging activities; and its exposures to credit risk and liquidity risk.

Following the shareholder vote at the General Meeting in early 2024, the Company is now in a Managed Wind-Down. This strategy was re-confirmed by a Continuation Resolution that passed at the June 2025 AGM. The Managed Wind-Down is anticipated to take several years to complete due to the expected timing associated with the divestment of Arqiva. The targeted completion of this Managed Wind-Down is circa 36 months. As such, the audited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2025 continue to be prepared on a going concern basis.

In adopting the appropriateness of the going concern basis of preparation, the Directors considered the fact that the Company is in Managed Wind-Down, the successful recent disposal activity (EMIC-1, SeaEdge UK1 and Aqua Comms, plus the Verne Global earn-out which settled in April 2026, for combined net proceeds of £86.3 million) during the year, the strong performance of one of the two remaining assets, Elio, and the disposal plans and timelines for Arqiva, which Directors still reasonably expect to be disposed of within a two to three-year timeframe, even considering the ongoing Arqiva related disposal activity by minority shareholders. In addition, the Directors considered the significantly improved liquidity position of the Company compared with 31 December 2024, with the previously noted full repayment of the RCF in May 2025 primarily using disposal proceeds, and the receipt of Aqua Comms disposal proceeds in December 2025, ensuring sufficient cash, post any distribution to shareholders, is available to meet the future liquidity requirements of the fund until it is wound up1. 

Although the Company is not reliant on distributions from Elio Networks from a going concern perspective, it is able to benefit from distributable free cash generated by the business. This position is further supported by the recently announced debt facility, which enables Elio to deliver its buy‑and‑build M&A strategy without reliance on its current free cash flows.

Post the balance sheet date, the Board and the Investment Manager agreed binding terms for an early £10 million settlement of the Verne Global earn‑out with Ardian.

The settlement reflects the Board's assessment of the uncertainty inherent in the contractual earn‑out mechanism, including its dependence on future operating performance and run‑rate EBITDA targets for the financial year ending 31 December 2026. The year‑end valuation of the earn‑out reflects the terms of the settlement and provides a clear and certain crystallisation of value for shareholders. No further amounts are expected to be received in respect of the Verne Global earn-out.

The Directors have considered the cashflow assumptions for a period of 12 months following the approval of the financial statements, including the reduced liquidity requirements following the previously noted full repayment of the RCF, the available distribution options from performing assets, as well as the available cash balance following recent disposals. The Directors have also considered a number of severe, but plausible downside scenarios to these cashflow assumptions and the potential mitigating actions the Company has at its disposal to address these scenarios where required. 

Given these considerations, the Directors believe that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue to operate for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements and therefore the Directors believe that it continues to be appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis.

(b) Investment entities

The Directors have concluded that in accordance with IFRS 10, the Company meets the definition of an investment entity, having evaluated against the criteria presented below that needs to be met. Under IFRS 10, investment entities are required to hold financial investments at fair value through profit or loss rather than consolidate them on a line-by-line basis. There are three key conditions to be met by the Company for it to meet the definition of an investment entity.

For each reporting period, the Directors will continue to assess whether the Company continues to meet these conditions:

· It obtains funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing these investors with professional investment management services;

· It commits to its investors that its business purpose is to invest its funds solely for returns (including having an exit strategy for investments) from capital appreciation, investment income or both; and

· It measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all its investments on a fair value basis.

The Company satisfies the first criteria as it has multiple investors and has obtained funds from a diverse group of shareholders for the purpose of providing them with investment opportunities to invest in a large pool of digital infrastructure assets.

1 No provision has been made for the costs of winding up the Company as these will be charged to the Income Statement on an accruals basis as they are incurred or as the Company becomes obligated to make such payments in the future.

In satisfying the second criteria, the notion of an investment timeframe is critical. An investment entity should not hold its investments indefinitely but should have an exit strategy for their realisation. The Company is now in a Managed Wind-Down with the intention to sell all its investments and return capital to investors.

In March 2024 the Company sold 100% of its ownership in the Verne Global group of companies. Following the year-end, the Company also concluded an early settlement of the residual Verne Global earn‑out, completing the Company's economic exit from the investment. During 2025, the Company completed the disposals of EMIC-1, SeaEdge UK1 and Aqua Comms. In addition, the early cash settlement of the Verne Global earn-out was agreed, and which is due to settle by end of April 2026. The Company held just two investments, Elio Networks and Arqiva, at the end of the year. After repaying the RCF, excess disposal proceeds are to be returned to shareholders. This disposal activity demonstrates the exit strategy being realised.

The Company satisfies the third criteria as it measures and evaluates the performance of all of its investments on a fair value basis which is the most relevant for investors in the Company. Management use fair value information as a primary measurement to evaluate the performance of all of the investments and in decision making.

In assessing whether it meets the definition, the Company shall also consider whether it has the following typical characteristics of an investment entity:

a) it has more than one investment;

b) it has more than one investor;

c) it has investors that are not related parties of the entity; and

d) it has ownership interests in the form of equity or similar interests.

The absence of any of these typical characteristics does not necessarily disqualify an entity from being classified as an investment entity. As D9 Holdco divests its investments it is inevitable it will have only one investment at some point. As the aim will be to sell that investment to generate returns for investors, this will not change the analysis as to whether the Company meets the definition of an investment entity.

As per IFRS 10, a parent investment entity is required to consolidate subsidiaries that are not themselves investment entities and whose main purpose is to provide services relating to the entity's investment activities.

The Directors have assessed whether D9 Holdco satisfies those conditions set above by considering the characteristics of the whole Group structure, rather than individual entities. The Directors have concluded that the Company and D9 Holdco are formed in connection with each other for business structure purposes. When considered together, both entities display the typical characteristics of an investment entity.

The Company entering into a Managed Wind-Down, a decision which was made and voted on by shareholders in March 2024, and reconfirmed in June 2025, and the changes in the Group structure following the sale of Verne Global, EMIC-1, SeaEdge and Aqua Comms, have not impacted management's judgement and conclusion over the IFRS 10 investment entity application and the Company has applied the same accounting policies described.

The Directors are therefore of the opinion that the Company meets the criteria and characteristics of an investment entity and therefore, subsidiaries are measured at fair value through profit or loss, in accordance with IFRS 13 "Fair Value Measurement", IFRS 10 "Consolidated Financial Statements" and IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments".

(c) New and amended standards adopted by the Company

A number of amended standards became applicable for the current reporting period. The Group did not have to change its accounting policies or make retrospective adjustments as a result of adopting these amended standards. Management do not expect the new or amended standards will have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. The most significant of these standards are set out below:

New standards and amendments - applicable 1 January 2025

(a) Amendments to IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates titled Lack of Exchangeability (the Company has adopted the amendments to IAS 21 for the first time in the current year. The amendments specify how to assess whether a currency is exchangeable, and how to determine the exchange rate when it is not.) 

FORTHCOMING REQUIREMENTS

The following standards and interpretations had been issued but were not in effect for annual reporting periods ending on 31 December 2025.

(a) Amendments to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Amendments to the Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments (effective date 1 January 2026).

(b) Annual Improvements to IFRS Accounting Standards - Volume 11: Amendments to IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures and its accompanying Guidance on implementing IFRS 7, IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, and IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows (effective date 1 January 2026).

(c) Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7: Contracts Referencing Nature-dependent Electricity (effective date 1 January 2026).

(d) IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements (effective date of 1 January 2027).

(e) IFRS 19 Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures (effective date of 1 January 2027)

The directors do not expect that the adoption of the standards listed above will have a material impact on the financial statements of the group in future periods, except if indicated below:

• IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements (effective date of 1 January 2027). IFRS 18 introduces newrequirement to:

o present specified categories and defined subtotals in the statement of profit or loss

o provide disclosures on management-defined performance measures (MPMs) in the notes to the financial statements

o improve aggregation and disaggregation.

The directors of the entity anticipate that the application of these amendments may have an impact on the group's financial statements in future periods. IFRS 18 does not alter the measurement of financial performance, it significantly impacts how results are presented and structured, aiming to reduce the inconsistency in reported figures.

3. MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Financial Instruments

Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the Company's Statement of Financial Position when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are to be derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the instrument expire or the asset is transferred, and the transfer qualifies for de-recognition in accordance with IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments".

The Company did not use any derivative financial instruments during the period.

(i) Financial assets

The Company's investment in D9 Holdco comprises both equity and debt. The Company classifies its financial assets as either investments at fair value through profit or loss or financial assets at amortised cost (e.g. cash and cash equivalents and trade and other receivables). The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets are acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition.

(ii) Investments at fair value through profit or loss

At initial recognition, the Company measures its investments through its investment in D9 Holdco, at fair value through profit or loss and any transaction costs are expensed to the Statement of Comprehensive Income. The Company will subsequently continue to measure all investments at fair value and any changes in the fair value are to be recognised as unrealised gains or losses through profit or loss within the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

IFRS 13 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). When measuring fair value, the Company takes into consideration the characteristics of the asset or liability if market participants would take those characteristics into account when pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk.

(iii) Financial liabilities and equity

Debt and equity instruments are measured at amortised cost and are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement.

All financial liabilities are classified as at amortised cost. These liabilities are initially measured at fair value less transaction costs and subsequently using the effective interest method.

(iv) Equity instruments

The Company's Ordinary Shares are classified as equity under stated capital and are not redeemable. Costs associated or directly attributable to the issue of new equity shares, including the costs incurred in relation to the Company's IPO on 31 March 2021 and its subsequent equity raises, are recognised as a deduction in equity and are charged against stated capital.

(b) Finance income

Finance income is recognised using the effective interest method. This is calculated by applying the effective interest rate to the gross carrying amount of a financial asset unless the assets subsequently became credit impaired. In the latter case, the effective interest rate is applied to the amortised cost of the financial asset. Finance income is recognised on an accruals basis.

(c) Finance expenses

Borrowing costs are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income in the period to which they relate on an accruals basis.

(d) Fair value estimation for investments at fair value

The fair value of financial investments at fair value through profit or loss is based on the valuation models adjusted in accordance with the IPEV (International Private Equity and Venture Capital) valuation guidelines December 2022 to comply with IFRS 13. Where applicable, investments are also referenced and considered against the external market information.

The Company records the fair value of D9 Holdco by calculating and aggregating the fair value of each of the individual investments in which the Company holds an indirect investment. The total change in the fair value of the investment in D9 Holdco is recorded through profit and loss within the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

(e) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and deposits held on call with banks. Deposits to be held with original maturities of greater than three months are included in other financial assets. Cash and cash equivalents are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method and assessed for expected credit losses at each reporting date.

There are no material expected credit losses as the bank institution has high credit ratings assigned by international credit rating agencies.

(f) Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. They are included in current assets, except where maturities are greater than 12 months after the reporting date, in which case they are to be classified as non-current assets.

The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument to the relevant asset's carrying amount.

Impairment provisions for all receivables are recognised based on a forward-looking expected credit loss model using the simplified approach. The methodology used to determine the amount of the provision is based on whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition of the financial asset. For those where the credit risk has not increased significantly since initial recognition of the financial asset, 12 month expected credit losses along with gross interest income are recognised. For those for which credit risk has increased significantly, lifetime expected credit losses along with the gross interest income are recognised. For those that are determined to be credit impaired, lifetime expected credit losses along with interest income on a net basis are recognised.

(g) Amortised costs

Assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows, where those cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest, are measured at amortised cost. Interest income from these financial assets is included in finance income using the effective interest rate method. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition is recognised directly in profit or loss and presented in other gains/(losses) together with foreign exchange gains and losses. Impairment losses are presented as a separate line item in the statement of profit or loss.

(h) Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less from the end of the current accounting period. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities. Trade and other payables are recognised initially at their fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method until settled.

(i) Segmental reporting

The Chief Operating Decision Maker (the "CODM") being the Board of Directors, is of the opinion that the Company is engaged in a single segment of business, being investment in digital infrastructure projects.

The internal financial information to be used by the CODM on a quarterly basis to allocate resources, assess performance and manage the Company will present the business as a single segment comprising the portfolio of investments in digital infrastructure assets.

(j) Foreign currency transactions and balances

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the foreign exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are translated at the foreign exchange rate ruling at that date. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as a revenue or capital item depending on the income or expense to which they relate.

All exchange differences recognised in income or expenses, except for those arising on financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 9, is on an aggregate net basis. The total amount of exchange differences recognised in income or expenses includes exchange differences recognised on subsequent settlement and re-translation to the closing rate on balances arising from foreign currency transactions.

(k) Revenue recognition

Gains and losses on fair value of investments in the Statement of Comprehensive Income will represent gains or losses that arise from the movement in the fair value of the Company's investment in D9 Holdco.

Investment income comprises dividend income received from the Company's direct subsidiary, D9 Holdco. Interest income is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income using the effective interest method. 

Other income is recognised to the extent that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and the income can be reliably measured. Income is measured as the fair value of consideration received or receivable, excluding discounts, rebates and value added tax. Other Income comprises fees charged to Investee Companies under a Management Services Agreement. Other Income is recognised 100% through revenue.

Dividend income receivable on equity shares is recognised on the ex-dividend date. Dividend income on equity shares where no ex-dividend date is quoted is brought into account when the Company's right to receive payment is established.

(l) Dividends

Dividends payable are recognised as distribution in the financial statements in the period in which they are paid or when the Company's obligation to make payment has been established.

(m) Expenses

Expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Share issue costs of the Company directly attributable to the issue and listing of shares are charged to stated capital. The Company's investment management fee, administration fees and all other expenses are charged through the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

In order to better reflect the activities of an investment trust company and in accordance with guidance issued by the AIC SORP, supplementary information which analyses the Statement of Comprehensive Income between items of a revenue and a capital nature has been presented alongside the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Expenses have been charged wholly to the revenue column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income, except as follows:

· expenses which are incidental to the acquisition or disposal of an investment are treated as capital;

· expenses are treated as capital where a connection with the maintenance or enhancement of the value of the investments can be demonstrated; and

· the investment management fee has been allocated 100% to revenue in 2025 (2024: 75% to revenue and 25% to capital) on the Statement of Comprehensive Income. The Board have decided to stop allocating indirect costs between capital and revenue as it is not a useful metric in a wind down scenario.

(n) Acquisition costs and disposals

In line with SORP, acquisition costs and disposals are expensed to the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income as they are incurred for investments which are held at fair value through profit or loss.

(o) Taxation

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax. The tax currently payable is based on the taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the Statement of Comprehensive Income because it excludes items of income or expenses that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Company's liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that were applicable at the balance sheet date.

Where expenses are allocated between the capital and revenue accounts, any tax relief in respect of expenses is allocated between capital and revenue returns on the marginal basis using the Company's effective rate of corporation tax for the accounting period.

Deferred taxation is recognised in respect of all temporary differences that have originated but not reversed at the financial reporting date, where transactions or events that result in an obligation to pay more taxation in the future or right to pay less taxation in the future have occurred at the financial reporting date. This is subject to deferred tax assets only being recognised if it is considered more likely than not that there will be suitable profits from which the future reversal of the temporary differences can be deducted. Deferred tax is measured on a non-discounted basis, at the average tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which the timing differences are expected to reverse based on tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.

(p) Earnings per share

The Company presents basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS").

(i) Basic earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing:

· the profit attributable to owners of the Company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than Ordinary Shares; by

· the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in Ordinary Shares issued during the year and excluding treasury shares

(ii) Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account:

· the after-income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential Ordinary Shares, and

· the weighted average number of additional Ordinary Shares that would have been outstanding assuming the conversion of all dilutive potential Ordinary Shares.

4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS

In the application of the Company's accounting policies, the Directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. It is possible that actual results may differ from these estimates.

(a) Significant accounting judgements

(i) Investment entity

As discussed above in Note 2(b), the Company meets the definition of an investment entity as defined in IFRS 10 and therefore its subsidiary entities have not been consolidated in these financial statements.

(b) Key sources of estimation uncertainty

The estimates and underlying assumptions underpinning our investments are reviewed on an ongoing basis by both the Board and the Investment Manager. Revisions to any accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.

(i) Fair value measurement of investments at fair value through profit or loss

The Company owns 100% of D9 Holdco, which through its wholly-owned subsidiaries invests in Digital Infrastructure projects. The fair value of investments in digital infrastructure projects is calculated by discounting at an appropriate discount rate future cash flows expected to be generated by the trading subsidiary companies and received by D9 Holdco, through dividend income, equity redemptions and Shareholder loan repayments or restructurings and adjusted in accordance with the IPEV (International Private Equity and Venture Capital) valuation guidelines, where appropriate, to comply with IFRS 13 and IFRS 9. For December 2025 the Board received and challenged an independent report and opinion on the Investment Manager's valuation from a third-party valuation expert on Arqiva and Elio Networks.

Estimates such as the forecasted cash flows from investments form the basis of making judgements about the fair value of assets, which is not readily available from other sources. The discounted cash flows from earnings are forecasted over a period of up to 25 years followed by a terminal value based on a long-term growth rate or exit multiple. Discount rates are arrived at via a bottom-up analysis of the weighted average cost of capital, using both observable and unobservable inputs, and calculation of the appropriate beta based on comparable listed companies where appropriate, a sense-check to the DCF analysis is compared to market multiples.

To do this, implied multiples from the DCF analysis are calculated and considered against the multiples available for reasonably comparable quoted companies and any relevant recent sector transactions. It should be noted that finding directly comparable companies to Arqiva and Elio Networks is challenging and as a result no directly comparable companies have been identified. Similarly, there have been few recent transactions with publicly available information where the target is directly comparable to the businesses. As a result, whilst the market multiples approach is a useful crosscheck to the DCF analysis, less reliance should be placed upon it.

A broad range of assumptions are used in the Company's valuation models, which are arrived at by reviewing and challenging the business plans of the Investee Companies with their management. The Investment Manager exercises its judgement and uses its experience in assessing the expected future cash flows from each investment and long-term growth rates. The impact of changes in the key drivers of the valuation are set out below.

The following significant unobservable inputs were used in the model, cash flows, terminal value and discount rates. The key area where estimates are significant to the financial statements and have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year is in the valuation of the investment portfolio. The key risks to the portfolio are discussed in further detail in the Risk report.

Arqiva and Elio Networks are valued on a discounted cash flow basis which requires assumptions to be made regarding future cash flows, terminal value and the discount rate to be applied to these cash flows. Where appropriate, relevant market transactions by other investors and transactions for comparable companies are also factored in.

The discount rate applied to the cash flows in each investment portfolio company is a key source of estimation uncertainty. The acquisition discount rate is adjusted to reflect changes in company-specific risks to the deliverability of future cash flows and is calibrated against secondary market information and other available data points, including comparable transactions. The weighted average discount rate used in these valuations was 14.5%.

The cash flows on which the discounted cash flow valuations are based are derived from detailed financial models. These incorporate a number of assumptions with respect to individual portfolio companies, including: forecast new business wins or new orders; cost-cutting initiatives; liquidity and timing of debtor payments; timing of non-committed capital expenditure and construction activity; the terms of future debt refinancing; and macroeconomic assumptions such as inflation and energy prices.

The terminal value attributes a residual value to the portfolio company at the end of the projected discrete cash flow period based on market comparables. The valuation of each asset has significant estimation in relation to asset-specific items but there is also consideration given to the impact of wider megatrends such as the transition to a lower-carbon economy and climate change.

We note that the December 2023 valuations has been reviewed by an independent third-party valuation expert as discussed in the Chair's Statement. A prior year adjustment has been accounted for in the financial statements as at 31 December 2023. Please refer to the Prior Year Adjustment Review subsection in the Chair's Statement and see Note 25 of these accounts for more information.

5. INCOME FROM INVESTMENTS HELD AT FAIR VALUE AND OTHER INCOME

Dividends are under income from investments whist other Income comprises Management Services Fees charged to the Company's subsidiaries.

6. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEES

1 The 2025 management fee includes a £0.8 million release of a previously accrued management fee payable to Triple Point. Of the management fee recognised in 2024, £6.1 million related to Triple Point and £0.8 million related to InfraRed for the period from 11 October 2024 to 31 December 2024. In 2024, management fees were allocated between revenue and capital on a 75/25 basis. Following the change in the Company's strategy to a Managed Wind-Down in 2025, the Board determined that this allocation was no longer appropriate and, accordingly, all management fees were allocated to revenue in 2025.

The Company entered into an Investment Management Agreement ("IMA") with Triple Point on 8 March 2021. The Company served notice to terminate this agreement in March 2024. Under the terms of the IMA, Triple Point was entitled to a management fee calculated by reference to adjusted Net Asset Value.

As at 31 December 2025, the amount invoiced by Triple Point and accrued was £2.0 million (2024: £2.8 million), reflecting Triple Point's calculation of fees due for the period from 1 July 2024 to 31 March 2025 following certain adjustments. The Board remains in dispute with Triple Point regarding these fees.

On 11 October 2024, the Company entered into a new Investment Management Agreement with InfraRed (the "New IMA"), which became effective on 11 December 2024, at which point Triple Point's role as AIFM terminated. For the period from 11 October 2024 to 11 December 2024, the Company entered into an interim support services agreement with InfraRed, under which fees were charged at the same annual rate as under the New IMA.

InfraRed is responsible, subject to the overall supervision of the Board, for portfolio management and risk management in accordance with the Company's Investment Objective and Policy and acts as the Company's AIFM. The exercise of discretion by InfraRed under the New IMA is subject to the Board's oversight and to specific approval requirements where conflicts of interest arise.

From 11 December 2024, the Investment Manager was InfraRed, and they were entitled to receive an annual management fee on the following basis:

1. InfraRed will receive a fixed annual management fee of £3.75 million for 36 months from 11 December 2024 and a reduced management fee of £1.75 million per annum thereafter until the Group's last asset is sold.

2. 10% of the annual management fee (net of applicable taxes) will be used to acquire shares in the capital of D9 in the secondary market within a reasonable timeframe following receipt of the management fee and unless it would be unlawful to do so. These shares will be subject to lock-in and orderly market provisions. 

3. Following the sale of the final asset, a fee of £100,000 per month will be payable until the earlier of a) the Company being delisted, and b) 6 months from the date of completion of the sale of the final asset.

4. To appropriately align InfraRed with shareholder outcomes, InfraRed will also be entitled to receive a performance fee based on distributions made to shareholders in excess of £225 million. InfraRed will be entitled to a performance fee of 3.5% of any distributions above £225 million, when aggregate distributions are in excess of £225 million but less than £300 million, and 4.75% of any distributions above £300 million when aggregate distributions are in excess of £300 million.

Any distributions to shareholders will be assessed against any third-party financing and accrued liabilities of the Company. InfraRed will also be entitled to receive certain fees in the event of the termination of its appointment in prescribed circumstances. 

Any performance fee payable to InfraRed will not exceed, in aggregate, £15 million.

The total amount accrued and due to InfraRed at the year-end was £0.9 million (2024: £0.8 million).

InfraRed's appointment is terminable by either party by serving 6 month's notice, with such notice not to expire earlier than 24 months from the 11 December 2024.

InfraRed were paid a pro rata fee of their annual management fee under an interim support services agreement from 11 October 2024 to 10 December 2024.

7. OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES

1 Excludes audit fees of the financial statements of subsidiaries totalling £224,438 (2024 - £467,000). £73,000 of current year fees relates to the prior year adjustment reflected in the 2025 Annual Report.

2 Fees for non-audit services relate to the review of interim financial statements. No such services were performed during 2025. 

3 Strategic review costs relate to the Wind Down strategy of the Company and no such fees were incurred during 2025 after the strategy had been confirmed. Prior year strategic review costs were agreed by the previous Board and Investment Manager.

4 Success advisory fee (as agreed by the previous Board and Investment Manager) directly related to the completion of EMIC-1 and Aqua Comms disposals. All other disposal costs incurred have been accounted for within the subsidiary which held the relevant disposed of investment.

8. TAXATION

The Company is registered in Jersey, Channel Islands but resident in the United Kingdom for taxation. The standard rate of corporate income tax currently applicable to the Company is 25% (2024: 25%).

The financial statements do not directly include the tax charges for the Company's intermediate holding company, as D9 Holdco is held at fair value. D9 Holdco is subject to taxation in the United Kingdom.

The tax charge for the period is less than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 25% (2024: 25%). The differences are explained below.

Investment companies which have been approved by HM Revenue & Customs under section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are exempt from tax on capital gains. The Directors are of the opinion that the Company has complied with the requirements for maintaining investment trust status for the purposes of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. The Company has not provided for deferred tax on any capital gains or losses arising on the revaluation of investments.

The Company has unrelieved excess management expenses of £30 million (2024: £25 million). It is unlikely that the Company will generate sufficient taxable profits in the future to utilise these expenses and therefore no deferred tax asset has been recognised.

The unrecognised deferred tax asset calculated using a tax rate of 25% amounts £7 million (2024: to £6 million). 

9. INVESTMENTS AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS

As set out in Note 2, the Company designates its interest in its wholly-owned direct subsidiary as a investment at fair value through profit or loss.

Summary of the Company's valuation:

The Company views equity and debt instruments as one investment and measures the performance of these investments together. Therefore, the Company's equity and debt investments are presented as investments at fair value through profit or loss in the Statement of Financial Position.

Included in debt investments as at the year-end is a loan of £35.4 million (2024: £27.9 million) due from D9 Holdco upon which interest is charged at a rate of Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) plus a 3.75% margin. Interest of £2.8 million (2024: £2.5 million) was charged during the year on the loan. The debt instrument is measured at fair value as at 31 December 2025.

Breakdown of investments in D9 Holdco between equities and debts:

Valuation process

The valuation process for the valuation at 31 December 2025 was conducted by InfraRed, overseen by the Board, and further supported by an independent review from a leading third-party valuation expert.

InfraRed is responsible for preparing the valuation of the company's investment portfolio for the Directors' approval. These valuations are scrutinised by an independent third-party valuation expert at year-end. The valuation is carried out on a six-monthly basis as at 30 June and 31 December each year and is reported to shareholders in the Annual and Interim Reports.

Valuation methodology

The Company owns 100% of its subsidiary D9 Holdco. The Company meets the definition of an investment entity as described by IFRS 10, as such, the Company's investment in D9 Holdco is valued at fair value. D9 Holdco's cash, working capital balances and fair value of investments are included in calculating fair value of D9 Holdco. The Company acquired underlying investments in special purpose vehicles ("SPV") through its investment in D9 Holdco.

The Board has approved fair market valuations of Arqiva and Elio Networks at 31 December 2025, which were prepared by InfraRed and supported by an independent review by a leading professional firm of valuation experts. The Directors satisfied themselves as to the methodology used, the discount rates and key assumptions applied, and the valuations. All SPV investments are at fair value through profit or loss and are valued using the IFRS 13 framework for fair value measurement. 

The following economic assumptions were used in the valuation of the SPVs.

The main Level 3 inputs used by the Group are derived and evaluated as follows:

· The appropriate discount rate is determined is based on the Investment Manager's knowledge of the market, considering intelligence gained from its bidding activities, discussions with financial advisers in the appropriate market and publicly available information on relevant transactions. The bottom-up analysis of the discount rate and the appropriate beta is based on comparable listed companies. Investments are valued using a discounted cash flow approach, being valued on a Free Cash Flow to Equity ("FCFE") basis. The portfolio weighted average discount rate for investments valued under the FCFE discounted cash flows approach was 14.5%.

· Expected cash inflows are estimated based on terms of the contracts and the Company's knowledge of the business and how the current economic environment is likely to impact it taking into consideration of growth rate factors.

· Future Foreign exchange rates of GBP against EUR.

Fair value measurements

As set out above, the Company accounts for its interest in its wholly owned direct subsidiary as a financial asset at fair value through profit or loss.

IFRS 13 requires disclosure of fair value measurement by level. The level of fair value hierarchy within the financial assets or financial liabilities is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety into only one of the following three levels:

Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly (i.e., as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and

Level 3 - inputs for assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

The following table presents the Company's financial assets and financial liabilities measured and recognised at fair value at31 December 2025 and 31 December 2024:

There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the period, nor have there been any transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 during the year.

The Company's investments are reported as Level 3 in accordance with IFRS 13 where external inputs are "unobservable" and value is the Directors' best estimate, based upon advice from relevant knowledgeable experts.

Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

As set out within the significant accounting estimates and judgements in Note 3(d), the valuation of the Company's financial asset is an estimation uncertainty. The sensitivity analysis was performed based on the current capital structure and expected performance of the Company's investment in D9 Holdco. For each of the sensitivities, it is assumed that potential changes occur independently of each other with no effect on any other base case assumption, and that the number of investments in the SPVs remains static throughout the modelled life. The following table summarises the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurement and the changes to the fair value of the financial asset if these inputs change upwards or downwards by 1.00% for long-term inflation and 1% for discount rate:

The movement in valuation column is the movement in the value of D9 Holdco which is held on the Company's balance sheet.

10. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

The Directors consider that the carrying value of trade and other receivables approximate their fair value.

11. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Directors consider that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value.

12. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

The Directors consider that the carrying value of trade and other payables approximates their fair value. All amounts are unsecured and due for payment within one year from the reporting date. £2.0 million (2024: £2.8 million) of the above accruals figure relates to fees payable to the Triple Point Investment Management in respect of management fees. The Board remains in dispute with Triple Point regarding these fees. £0.9 million relates to management fees for InfraRed (2024: £0.8 million).

13. STATED CAPITAL

Shareholders are entitled to all dividends paid by the Company and, on a winding up, provided the Company has satisfied all its liabilities, the shareholders are entitled to all of the residual assets of the Company.

14. DIVIDENDS PAID

There were £Nil dividends paid in the year to 31 December 2025 (31 December 2024: £Nil).

15. SUBSIDIARIES

At the reporting date, the Company had one wholly-owned subsidiary, being its 100% investment in Digital 9 Holdco Limited. The following table shows subsidiaries of the Company. As the Company is regarded as an Investment Entity as referred to in Note 2, these subsidiaries have not been consolidated in the preparation of the financial statements.

1 Held by Digital 9 Subsea Holdco limited

2 Held by Digital 9 Wireless Limited

3 Held by D9 Wireless Midco 1 Limited

4 Held by Digital 9 Subsea Limited

5 Held by Leeson Telecom Limited

6 Held by D9 Wireless Opco 1 Limited

The Investee Companies above are restricted in transferring cash to the Company due to the need to fulfil their capex and operational cash requirements first.

The Company is committed to fund capex totalling £nil (2024: £7.4 million) for Aqua Comms Ireland 2 Limited in respect of EMIC-1 project, having sold the investment during the year.

16. TRANSACTIONS WITH THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS AND RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURE

Directors

Directors are remunerated for their services at such rate as the Directors shall from time to time determine. The current Directors (Philip Braun, Robert Burrow and Andrew Zychowski) are each paid an annual fee of £50,000, this increased to £52,500 from 1 July 2025. The Chair of the Audit Committee also receives an additional £7,500 fee per annum from 1 July 2025. The Chair of the Company (Eric Sanderson) is entitled to receive an annual fee of £100,000, which increased to £105,000 from 1 July 2025. Directors are entitled to recover all reasonable expenses properly incurred in connection with performing their duties as a Director.

1 Dividends disclosed for the period from the date of appointment and up to the date of resignation.

2 Robert Burrow's persons closely associated hold 1,350,000 shares in the Company.

3 Andrew Zychowski and persons closely associated to him together hold 3,080,000 shares in the Company. In addition, other family members of Andrew Zychowski hold 603,000 shares in the Company.

Transaction with subsidiary undertakings

During the period, the Company received dividend income of £Nil (2024: £Nil) from Digital 9 Holdco Limited.

As per Note 18, the Company, through its subsidiary undertakings has capital expenditure commitments totalling £Nil (2024: £7.4 million).

Loan to subsidiary undertaking

As at the year-end, the Company had provided a total loan of £35.4 million (2024: £27.9 million) to Digital 9 Holdco Limited. The total loan outstanding at the year-end was £35.4 million (2024: £27.9 million). This was used to assist the underlying Investee Companies with their capital expenditure requirements. Interest of £2.8 million (2024: £2.5 million) was charged on the loan during the year.

Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings

Included within Note 10 is an amount due from subsidiary undertakings:

17. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

On 10 April 2026, Elio signed a new debt facility with Allied Irish Banks comprising €15 million of committed debt and a further€15 million of uncommitted accordion debt.

The £10 million Verne Global earn-out early cash settlement was received on 10 April 2026.

On 12 March 2026, shareholders of the Company approved a return of surplus disposal proceeds shareholders through the compulsory redemption mechanism. Final details of the redemption are due to be publicly announced on 15 April 2025, and is expected to take place by the end of April 2026.

18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

The Company has a £1 million future commitment to J.P. Morgan Cazenove for Defence Services, payable upon the Company Wind- Down being substantially complete (being the disposal of Aqua Comms, Verne Global and Arqiva), or, if earlier, upon completion of a transaction that materially affects the Company, including a takeover or sale of the Company.

19. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

The Company is exposed to market risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and liquidity risk in the current and future periods. The Board oversees the management of these risks. The Board's policies for managing each of these risks are summarised below.

Market Risk

The Company's activities are exposed to a potential reduction in demand for internet, data centre or cell network service and competition for assets and services. In addition, Arqiva's cashflows are dependent upon regulatory factors such as the likely scenarios for the future of Digital Terrestrial Television ("DTT") and the renewal of the BBC charter. The Company's exposure to market risks in data centres has been reduced following the sale of Verne in 2024 and the divestments of Aqua Comms and EMIC-1 in the year have also reduced the risk associated with a reduction in demand for internet traffic. Some factors that could impact the volume of demand or the ability to provide competitive pricing includes:

· continued development and expansion of the internet as a secure communications medium and marketplace for the distribution and consumption of data and video

· continued growth in cloud hosted services as a delivery platform

· ongoing growth in demand for access to high-capacity broadband 

· continued focus on technologies, assets and services which can offer competitive pricing and high-quality reliable services

· continued partnership with suppliers to maintain and provide the most cost-effective access

Variations in any of the above factors can affect the valuation of assets held by the Company and as a result impact the financial performance of the Company.

Market risk arising from foreign currency risk

Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument translated into GBP will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company, being Digital 9 Infrastructure PLC does not hold any cash balances in different currencies, however its subsidiaries do as detailed below.

As a result, the Company is exposed to changes in fair value in its investments, as a result of foreign currency changes. The below tables present the Company's exposure to currency risk through its subsidiaries with foreign currency cash balances.

The Group had the following foreign currency and their GBP equivalent balances at the end of the reporting period:

1 Investments at fair value includes cash non-UK cash subsidiary.

The Company is primarily exposed to changes in the EUR/GBP exchange rate on its investment in Leeson Telecom (Elio Networks). Following the completion of the sales of the Aqua Comms and EMIC-1, the exposure to changes in currencies is reduced. The sensitivity of profit or loss to changes in the exchange rates arises mainly on the fair value of investment. To demonstrate the impact of foreign currency risk (in GBP), a 10% increase / decrease in USD/GBP and EUR/GBP rates are measured as this is in line with the relevant change in the rate during the last six months. The sensitivity is performed on the carrying value of investments on the balance sheet at year-end.

The above figures represent impacts of changes in the EUR/GBP exchange rates. The Company's exposure to other foreign exchange movements is not material.

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates.

The Company's interest rate risk on interest bearing financial assets is limited to interest earned on cash deposit. Exposure to interest rate risk on the liquidity funds is immaterial to the Company.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty of the Company will be unable or unwilling to meet a commitment that it has entered into with the Company. It is a key part of the pre-investment due diligence. The credit standing of the companies which we intend to lend or invest is reviewed, and the risk of default estimated for each significant counterparty position. Monitoring is ongoing and period end positions are reported to the Board.

Credit risk arises on the debt investments held at fair value through profit or loss, this includes loan provided to Digital 9 Holdco Limited. The Company's debt investments at fair value through profit or loss is considered to have low credit risk, and management have not recognised any loss allowance during the year.

Credit risk also arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with banks and financial institutions. The Company and its subsidiaries may mitigate their risk on cash investments and derivative transactions by only transacting with major international financial institutions with high credit ratings assigned by international credit rating agencies. The Company's cash and cash equivalents are all deposited with Barclays Bank plc which has a Fitch rating of A+.

The Company had no derivatives during the period.

The carrying value of the investments, trade and other receivables and cash represent the Company's maximum exposure to credit risk.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company may not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities and the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities to meet obligations when due and to close out market positions.

The Investment Manager and the Board continuously monitor forecast and actual cash flows from operating, financing, and investing activities to consider payment of dividends, repayment of trade and other payables or funding further investing activities. The Company ensures it maintains adequate reserves and will put in place banking facilities and it will continuously monitor forecast and actual cash flows to seek to match the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities. Further analysis on the Company's liquidity is included within the Basis of Preparation - Going Concern assessment.

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

21. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

The Company's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company's ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to minimise the cost of capital.

In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares.

22. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share ("EPS") amounts are calculated by dividing the profit or loss for the period attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue during the period. As there are no dilutive instruments outstanding, both basic and diluted earnings per share are the same.

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is based on the following:

Year ended 31 December 2025

There is no difference between basic or diluted Loss per Ordinary Share as there are no convertible securities.

There is no difference between the weighted average Ordinary or diluted number of Shares.

Year ended 31 December 2024

There is no difference between basic or diluted Loss per Ordinary Share as there are no convertible securities.

There is no difference between the weighted average Ordinary or diluted number of Shares.

23. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE

Net Asset Value per share is calculated by dividing net assets in the Statement of Financial Position attributable to Ordinary equity holders of the parent by the number of Ordinary Shares outstanding at the end of the period. Although there are no dilutive instruments outstanding, both basic and diluted NAV per share are disclosed below.

Net asset values have been calculated as follows:

24. ULTIMATE CONTROLLING PARTY

In the opinion of the Board, on the basis of the shareholdings advised to them, the Company has no ultimate controlling party.

25. PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT

Due to material downward revaluations observed in both the June 2024 and December 2024 investment valuations in the D9 portfolio, and following the completion of an independent third-party expert review commissioned by the D9 Board, a prior year adjustment has been recognised relevant for the financial statements as at 31 December 2023. The scope of the review covered underlying assets representing approximately £270 million (40%) of the fair value of investments held at that date. This decision was driven by the fact that neither the current Board nor the Investment Manager were involved in the original valuation process relating to the 31 December 2023 Annual Report. The independent review identified material errors in the 31 December 2023 valuation, specifically an overstatement in the valuation of Aqua Comms and an omission in respect of a provision for additional VLN to potentially be issued under the Arqiva SPA, related to the restoration of the Bilsdale site, resulting in an overstatement of the Investments at fair value through profit and loss of £111.5 million. This has been recognised in the current year financial statements as a reduction in the opening Reserves in the Statement of Changes in Equity. The impact on the 31 December 2023 financial statements would have been as follows:

1 The prior year adjustment is all capital reserves related, being unrealised movement on investments. Refer to Note 2 for accounting treatment.

1. ONGOING CHARGES RATIO

1 Average undiluted net assets is calculated as the average of net assets of 31 December 2024 and 31 December 2025 for 2025 and 31 December 2023 (restated) and 31 December 2024 for 2024.

2. TOTAL RETURN

3. MARKET CAPITALISATION

4. TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN

A measure of the return based upon share price movements over the period and assuming reinvestment of dividends.