16th Nov 2015 07:00
Not for Distribution to U.S. Newswire Services or for Dissemination in the United States
Ithaca Energy Inc.
Third Quarter 2015 Financial Results
16 November 2015
Ithaca Energy Inc. (TSX: IAE, LSE AIM: IAE) ("Ithaca" or the "Company") announces its quarterly financial results for the three months ended 30 September 2015 ("Q3-2015" or the "Quarter") and for the nine months ended 30 September 2015 ("YTD-2015").
Financial Highlights
Solid cashflow generation in the first nine months of the year
· Average production of 12,355 barrels of oil equivalent per day ("boepd"), in line with guidance (YTD-2014: 10,640 boepd)
· $217 million cashflow from on-going operations1 ($57 million in Q3-2015), including oil price hedging gains (YTD-2014: $128 million)
· Adjusted earnings of $98 million, excluding a non-cash accounting tax charge of $41 million resulting from a reduction in UK tax rates (YTD-2014: $25 million)
· Cashflow per share $0.66 (YTD-2014: $0.39) and adjusted earnings per share $0.30 (YTD-2014: $0.08)
Business resilient to lower oil price environment
· Full year 2015 production guidance remains unchanged at 12,000 boepd (95% oil)
· Significant commodity price hedging in place - average of 5,900 barrels of oil per day ("bopd") at $64/bbl until June 2017 and approximately 5,000 boepd of gas at 63 pence per therm (~$9.70/MMbtu) until June 2017
· YTD-2015 unit operating expenditure of approximately $33/boe, a reduction of over 40% compared to 2014, and forecast to fall further to around $25/boe following Stella start-up
· Forecast 2015 capital expenditure reduced to $120 million - reflecting $30 million of savings associated with lower Greater Stella Area ("GSA") subsea infrastructure installation costs and removal of Norwegian expenditure
· Solid cash netbacks - underpinned by tax allowances pool of over $1.5 billion at 30 September 2015
Deleveraging process commenced
· Net debt reduced from peak of over $800 million in the first half of 2015 to under $690 million at 31 October 2015 - position expected to be broadly unchanged at year-end 2015
· Deleveraging reflects the benefit of strong operating cashflow generation, lower capital expenditures, the cash received from the sale of the non-core Norwegian business and the recent $66 million premium equity placing
· Semi-annual redetermination of reserves based lending facilities successfully completed - maintaining over $125 million of funding headroom ahead of Stella start-up
Les Thomas, Chief Executive Officer, commented:
"We are very pleased to report a strong set of results thanks to consistent production levels, strong hedging gains and rigorous cost control, all of which has contributed to commencing deleveraging of the business ahead of the step-change that comes with Stella start-up. In parallel, solid progress continues to be made on the Stella development, with commissioning operations advancing on the critical path FPF-1 modifications programme."
Production & Operations
Average production in the nine months to 30 September 2015 was 12,355 boepd (94% oil), a 16% increase on the same period in 2014.
The Company's producing assets have been performing well over the course of the year, with solid operational uptime achieved across the main fields. The planned shutdown maintenance activities scheduled for Q3-2015 were efficiently executed, resulting in slightly higher than anticipated production during the Quarter.
Full year 2015 production guidance remains unchanged at 12,000 boepd (95% oil).
As part of the Company's previously announced activities to high grade the producing portfolio and remove high cost, marginal assets, the planned cessation of production from the Anglia gas field occurred during the Quarter. Production operations continue on the Athena oil field, where a number of initiatives have had a significant impact on reducing the breakeven oil price, although it is still anticipated that production from the field is likely to cease prior to the end of this year. The net daily production capacity of the two fields is approximately 1,000 boepd.
Greater Stella Area Development Update
The primary focus of the on-going GSA development activities remains on completion of the FPF-1 modifications programme that is being undertaken by Petrofac, in the Remotowa shipyard in Poland. Sail-away of the FPF-1 from Poland is planned for the end of the first quarter of 2016, with first production from the Stella field anticipated at the end of the second quarter.
At this stage in the modifications programme the critical path to achieving sail-away of the FPF-1 is the completion of commissioning operations, which commenced during the Quarter. Full completion of these operations while the vessel is located in the yard is key to avoiding an extended period of more complicated offshore commissioning activities and delay to the start-up of production.
Continued progress is being made on close out of pre-commissioning activities on the vessel, enabling the various topsides processing, utilities and accommodation sub-systems to be fed into the main commissioning programme. Commissioning of the electrical switchboards that distribute power around the vessel is nearing completion and electrical loop testing on the process control and safety systems is progressing well. Internal vessel inspection activities are advancing, along with commissioning of the various utilities systems. Preparation is also underway for the start-up and commissioning of the power generators in the coming weeks, which represents a key milestone in the on-going work programme.
Following the completion of various offshore campaigns during the Quarter, all the subsea infrastructure that is required to be installed prior to the arrival of the FPF-1 on location is now in place. This represents completion of a further key development milestone, building upon the successful conclusion of the five well Stella development drilling campaign in April 2015.
Net Debt
As anticipated the Company commenced deleveraging the business in the second half of 2015, reflecting the benefit of strong operating cashflow generation, lower capital expenditures and the cash received from sale of the non-core Norwegian business. Net debt was reduced from a peak of over $800 million in the first half of 2015 to $751 million at the end of Q3-2015, further reducing to under $690 million at 31 October 2015 following the recently completed equity investment in the Company. It is anticipated that net debt at the end of this year will remain broadly unchanged from the current level.
Q3-2015 Financial Results Conference Call
A conference call and webcast for investors and analysts will be held today at 12.00 BST (07.00 EST). Listen to the call live via the Company's website (www.ithacaenergy.com) or alternatively dial-in on one of the following telephone numbers and request access to the Ithaca Energy conference call: UK +44 203 059 8125; Canada +1 855 287 9927; US +1 866 796 1569. A short presentation to accompany the results will be available on the Company's website prior to the call.
Notes
1. Cashflow from on-going operations of $217 million less $21 million of non-recurring net outflows from discontinuing fields (Beatrice, Athena & Anglia), provided for as onerous contracts in 2014, equates to overall cashflow from operations of $196 million
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three and nine month periods ended 30 September 2015 and the related Management Discussion and Analysis are available on the Company's website (www.ithacaenergy.com) and on SEDAR (www.sedar.com). All values in this release and the Company's financial disclosures are in US dollars, unless otherwise stated.
- ENDS -
Enquiries:
Ithaca Energy
Les Thomas [email protected] +44 (0)1224 650 261
Graham Forbes [email protected] +44 (0)1224 652 151
Richard Smith [email protected] +44 (0)1224 652 172
FTI Consulting
Edward Westropp [email protected] +44 (0)207 269 7230
Tom Hufton [email protected] +44 (0)203 727 1625
Cenkos Securities
Neil McDonald [email protected] +44 (0)207 397 8900
Nick Tulloch [email protected] +44 (0)131 220 6939
RBC Capital Markets
Daniel Conti [email protected] +44 (0)207 653 4000
Matthew Coakes [email protected] +44 (0)207 653 4000
In accordance with AIM Guidelines, John Horsburgh, BSc (Hons) Geophysics (Edinburgh), MSc Petroleum Geology (Aberdeen) and Subsurface Manager at Ithaca is the qualified person that has reviewed the technical information contained in this press release. Mr Horsburgh has over 15 years operating experience in the upstream oil and gas industry.
References herein to barrels of oil equivalent ("boe") are derived by converting gas to oil in the ratio of six thousand cubic feet ("Mcf") of gas to one barrel ("bbl") of oil. Boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl is based on an energy conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl, utilising a conversion ratio at 6 Mcf: 1 bbl may be misleading as an indication of value.
About Ithaca Energy
Ithaca Energy Inc. (TSX: IAE, LSE AIM: IAE) is a North Sea oil and gas operator focused on the delivery of lower risk growth through the appraisal and development of UK undeveloped discoveries and the exploitation of its existing UK producing asset portfolio. Ithaca's strategy is centred on generating sustainable long term shareholder value by building a highly profitable 25kboe/d North Sea oil and gas company. For further information please consult the Company's website www.ithacaenergy.com.
Forward-looking statements
Some of the statements and information in this press release are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively, "forward-looking statements") are based on the Company's internal expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and beliefs as at the date of such statements or information, including, among other things, assumptions with respect to production, drilling, construction times, well completion times, risks associated with operations, future capital expenditures, continued availability of financing for future capital expenditures, future acquisitions and dispositions and cash flow. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of such information may prove to be incorrect. When used in this press release, the words and phrases like "forecasts", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "may", "will", "project", "plan", "should", "believe", "could", "target", "in the process of" and similar expressions, and the negatives thereof, whether used in connection with operational activities, the sail-away of the FPF-1 vessel, Stella first hydrocarbons, operating costs, drilling plans, production forecasts, maintenance schedules, budgetary figures, capital expenditures, anticipated future net debt, potential developments including the timing and anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions or otherwise, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are not promises or guarantees, and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. The Company believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable but no assurance can be given that these expectations, or the assumptions underlying these expectations, will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements included in this press release should not be unduly relied upon. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release. Ithaca Energy Inc. expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any change in its expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based except as required by applicable securities laws.
This press release contains non-International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") industry benchmarks and terms, such as "cashflow from operations", "cashflow per share" and "net debt". These terms do not have any standardised meanings within IFRS and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The Company uses cashflow from operations to help evaluate its performance. As an indicator of the Company's performance, cashflow from operations should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net cash from operating activities as determined in accordance with IFRS. The Company considers cashflow from operations to be a key measure as it demonstrates the Company's underlying ability to generate the cash necessary to fund operations and support activities related to its major assets. Cashflow from operations is determined by adding back changes in non-cash operating working capital to cash from operating activities. The Company uses net debt as a measure to assess its financial position. Net debt includes amounts outstanding under the Company's debt facilities and senior notes, less cash and cash equivalents. Net drawn debt noted above excludes any amounts outstanding under the Norwegian tax rebate facility.
Additional information on these and other factors that could affect Ithaca's operations and financial results are included in the Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis for the quarter ended 30 September 2015 and the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended 31 December 2014 and in reports which are on file with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and may be accessed through the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com).
|
| 2015 THIRD QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS |
Strong cashflow generation - underpinned by reduced unit operating expenditure and significant hedging protection |
| · Average production for nine months to 30 September 2015 ("YTD 2015") of 12,355 barrels of oil equivalent per day ("boepd"), in line with guidance (YTD 2014: 10,640 boepd) · YTD 2015 $217 million cashflow from on-going operations1 (YTD 2014: $128 million), including oil price hedging gains, with $57 million of this cashflow generated in Q3 2015 · Adjusted YTD 2015 earnings of $98 million, excluding a non-cash accounting tax charge of $41 million resulting from a reduction in UK tax rates in the first quarter of 2015 (YTD 2014: $25 million) · YTD 2015 cashflow per share $0.66 (YTD 2014: $0.39) and adjusted YTD 2015 earnings per share $0.30 (YTD 2014: $0.08)
|
Business resilient to lower oil price environment |
| · Full year 2015 production guidance remains unchanged at 12,000 boepd (95% oil) · Significant commodity price hedging in place - average of 5,900 barrels of oil per day ("bopd") at $64/bbl until June 2017 and approximately 5,000 boepd of gas at 63 pence per therm (~$9.70/MMbtu) until June 2017 · YTD 2015 unit operating expenditure of approximately $33/boe, a reduction of over 40% compared to 2014, and forecast to fall further to around $25/boe following Stella start-up · Forecast 2015 capital expenditure reduced to $120 million - reflecting $30 million of savings associated with lower Greater Stella Area ("GSA") subsea infrastructure installation costs and removal of Norwegian expenditure · Solid cash netbacks - underpinned by tax allowances pool of over $1.5 billion at 30 September 2015
|
Deleveraging process commenced - robust funding headroom ahead of Stella start-up |
| · Net debt reduced from peak of over $800 million in the first half of 2015 to under $690 million at 31 October 2015 - position expected to be broadly unchanged at year-end 2015 · Deleveraging reflects the benefit of strong operating cashflow generation, lower capital expenditures, the cash received from the sale of the non-core Norwegian business and the recent $66 million equity placing · Semi-annual redetermination of reserves based lending ("RBL") facilities successfully completed - maintaining over $125 million of funding headroom ahead of Stella start-up
|
Primary focus of GSA activities is on advancing the FPF-1 modifications programme to enable vessel sail-away in late Q1-2016 |
| · Installation of the GSA central infrastructure and development of the Stella field are at an advanced stage of completion - critical path to first hydrocarbons is completion of the "FPF-1" floating production facility modifications programme · FPF-1 modifications programme continues to advance towards the planned sail-away of the vessel from the yard in late Q1-2016 - commissioning operations underway · Agreement entered into with Petrofac providing enhanced incentivisation for the timely delivery of the FPF-1 - further underpinning this key step for the Company · All the subsea infrastructure that is required to be installed prior to arrival of the FPF-1 on location is now in place following the various offshore campaigns completed during the quarter · Stella development drilling programme completed in April 2015. Overall well results have materially de-risked forecast initial annualised production of 30,000 boepd (100%) from the Stella field, 16,000 boepd net to Ithaca |
1. Cashflow from on-going operations of $216.8 million less $20.9 million of non recurring net outflows from discontinuing fields (Beatrice, Athena and Anglia), provided for as onerous contracts in 2014, equates to overall cashflow from operations of $196.0 million
|
| SUMMARY STATEMENT OF INCOME | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(1) Average realised price before hedging (2) Revenue including stock movements (3) Q3 2015 Cashflow from On-going Operations of $56.6M less $0.9M onerous contract provision release = total cashflow from operations of $55.7M. Q3 2015 YTD $216.8M less $20.9M to give total cashflow from operations of $196.0M (4) Based on total cashflow from operations (5) Earnings per share adjusted to exclude impact of reduced tax rates
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: This table shows debt repayable as opposed to the reported balance sheet debt which nets off capitalised RBL and senior note costs. The Norwegian Tax Rebate Facility was repaid and retired upon sale of the Norwegian business on 8 July 2015.
|
|
| CORPORATE STRATEGY |
|
| Ithaca Energy Inc. ("Ithaca" or the "Company") is a North Sea oil and gas operator focused on the delivery of lower risk growth through the appraisal and development of UK undeveloped discoveries and the exploitation of its existing UK producing asset portfolio.
Ithaca's goal is to generate sustainable long term shareholder value by building a highly profitable 25kboepd North Sea oil and gas company.
Execution of the Company's strategy is focused on the following core activities: · Maximising cashflow and production from the existing asset base · Delivering first hydrocarbons from the Ithaca operated Greater Stella Area development · Delivery of lower risk, long term development led growth through the appraisal of undeveloped discoveries · Continuing to grow and diversify the cashflow base by securing new producing, development and appraisal assets through targeted acquisitions and licence round participation · Maintaining capital discipline, financial strength and a clean balance sheet, supported by lower cost debt leverage
|
|
| CORPORATE ACTIVITIES |
Equity investment completed at 51% premium to 30 day VWAP - providing additional flexibility to execute the financial and strategic priorities of the business
|
| premium equity placing In October 2015 Ithaca completed a $66 million equity investment in the Company by DKL Investments Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Delek Group Ltd. ("Delek"). Delek is an Israeli listed conglomerate with significant natural gas exploration and production activities in the Levant Basin in the Eastern Mediterranean. Following completion of the placing on 20 October 2015, Delek owns 19.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company.
The investment was executed via a non-brokered private placement of 81,865,425 Common Shares in the capital of the Company at CAD$1.05 per share, equivalent to £0.53 per share, representing a 19% premium to the CAD$0.88 per share closing price on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") on 8 October 2015 (the day prior to announcement of the placing), a 39% premium to the 5 day volume weighted average price ("VWAP") and a 51% premium to the 30 day VWAP.
The investment proceeds have been used to strengthen the balance sheet, reduce bank debt and provide the Company with additional flexibility to pursue value-accretive satellite opportunities in the GSA.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS As a result of the private placement the Board of Directors has been increased from seven to nine Directors following the appointment of two Non-Executive Director representatives nominated by Delek, Mr Joseph Asaf Bartfeld and Mr Yosef Abu. Mr Bartfeld is the President & Chief Executive Officer of Delek and has held a number of senior positions in the Delek Group including that of Chief Financial Officer over the last 20 years. Mr Bartfeld also serves as Chairman and Director on the Board of Directors of a number of Delek Group subsidiaries and affiliates. Mr Abu is the Chief Executive Officer of Delek Drilling Ltd, a subsidiary of Delek, prior to which he held senior consulting positions in the Israeli Ministries of Finance and Interior.
|
Planned RBL redetermination review completed - funding headroom of over $125 million maintained
|
| debt facility redetermination In October 2015 the Company successfully completed its planned semi-annual RBL facilities redetermination review. The Company continues to maintain a solid liquidity position, with over $125 million of funding headroom ahead of planned first hydrocarbons from the GSA at the end of the second quarter of 2016.
Following the RBL redetermination the Company's available bank debt capacity is $515 million prior to Stella start-up, which reflects the lower future oil price assumptions adopted by the banking syndicate during the review. The Company has maintained a robust financial position during this period of lower and more volatile oil prices as a result of the proactive measures taken over the year, ensuring it has the financial flexibility to manage downside risks and pursue potential opportunities within the GSA.
|
Sale of the Norwegian exploration business completed - Norwegian financing facility repaid and net initial cash payment of ~$30M received
|
| SALE oF NORWEGIAN BUSINESS On 8 July the Company completed its agreement to sell the wholly owned subsidiary, Ithaca Petroleum Norge AS ("Ithaca Norge"), to the Hungarian listed company MOL Plc for an initial consideration of US$60 million plus the ability to earn additional bonus payments of up to US$30 million dependent on exploration success from the existing licence portfolio. Following repayment and retirement of the Company's Norwegian exploration financing facility and conventional working capital adjustments, a net cash payment of approximately $30 million was received. These funds have been used to offset drawings under the Company's existing RBL facilities.
This transaction concludes the highly successful restructuring and monetisation of the Norwegian operations acquired as part of the acquisition of Valiant Petroleum plc in April 2013. The Norwegian portfolio had no production or reserves associated with the licence interests.
The sale of the Norwegian business was reflected in the financial statements as of 30 June 2015 with the cash proceeds received in July 2015.
|
|
| PRODUCTION & OPERATIONS |
Solid uptime achieved across main fields - full year guidance remains unchanged at 12kboe/d
|
| Average production for the first nine months of the year was 12,355 boepd, 94% oil. This represents a 16% increase on the same period in 2014 (YTD 2014: 10,640 boepd), driven largely by the inclusion of additional production from the assets acquired from Sumitomo Corporation (the "Summit Assets") in July 2014 more than out-weighing the reduction associated with the removal of Beatrice Area production following the planned re-transfer of the Beatrice facilities to Talisman in the first quarter of 2015.
Production in Q3 2015 averaged 11,915 boepd, 96% oil, a 10% increase on the same quarter in 2014 (Q3 2014: 10,861 boepd). This increase is predominantly due to the inclusion of volumes from the Pierce and Ythan fields, from which production was re-started / started in December 2014 and May 2015 respectively, offsetting the removal of Beatrice Area volumes and natural decline on a number of fields. The planned maintenance shutdown activities scheduled for the quarter were all efficiently completed, resulting in slightly higher than anticipated production during the quarter.
The producing asset portfolio has continued to perform well over the course of the year, with solid operational uptime achieved across the main fields. Full year 2015 production guidance remains unchanged at 12,000 boepd (95% oil).
As part of the Company's previously announced activities to high grade the producing asset portfolio and remove high cost, marginal assets, production has ceased from the Anglia gas field in the Southern North Sea during the quarter. The planned cessation of production from the Athena field is still anticipated prior to the end of 2015. The total net daily production capacity of the two fields is approximately 1,000 boepd.
|
|
| GREATER STELLA AREA DEVELOPMENT | |
Overall GSA development activities are at an advanced stage of completion - production start-up scheduled for late Q2 2016
|
| Ithaca's focus on the GSA is driven by the monetisation of over 30MMboe of net 2P reserves within the existing portfolio and the generation of additional value via the wider opportunities provided by the range of undeveloped discoveries surrounding the Ithaca operated production hub.
The development involves the creation of a production hub based on deployment of the FPF-1 floating production facility located over the Stella field, with onward export of oil and gas. To maximise initial oil and condensate production and fill the gas processing facilities on the FPF-1, the hub will start-up with five Stella wells. Further wells will then be drilled in the GSA post first hydrocarbons to maintain the gas processing facilities on plateau.
Installation of the GSA central infrastructure and development of the Stella field are at an advanced stage of completion. The key element for delivering first hydrocarbons from the GSA hub is completion of the FPF-1 modifications programme, which is being performed by Petrofac in the Remontowa shipyard in Poland. Completion of the works and sail-away of the vessel from the yard is planned for the end of the first quarter of 2016, with first production from the Stella field anticipated at the end of the second quarter. | |
FPF-1 commissioning operations in progress
|
| FPF-1 Modification Works At this stage in the modifications programme the critical path to achieving sail-away of the FPF-1 is the completion of commissioning operations, which commenced during the quarter. Full completion of these operations while the vessel is located in the yard is key to avoiding an extended period of more complicated offshore commissioning activities and delay to the start-up of production.
Continued progress is being made on close out of pre-commissioning activities on the vessel, enabling the various topsides processing, utilities and accommodation sub-systems to be fed into the main commissioning programme. Commissioning of the electrical switchboards that distribute power around the vessel is nearing completion and electrical loop testing on the process control and safety systems is progressing well. Internal vessel inspection activities are advancing, along with commissioning of the various utilities systems. Preparation is also underway for the start-up and commissioning of the power generators in the coming weeks, which represents a key milestone in the on-going work programme.
|
|
All subsea infrastructure required to be in place ahead of arrival of the FPF-1 on location is now installed |
| Subsea Infrastructure WORKS Following the completion of various offshore campaigns during the quarter, all the subsea infrastructure that is required to be installed prior to the arrival of the FPF-1 on location is now in place. Once the FPF-1 is on location over the Stella field, the only remaining subsea workscope to be performed will be the installation and hook-up of the dynamic risers and umbilicals connecting the infrastructure on the seabed to the FPF-1.
|
|
Stella development drilling programme successfully completed in April 2015 |
| Drilling Programme The five well Stella development drilling programme was successfully completed in April 2015. In total the wells have achieved a combined maximum flow test rate during clean-up operations of over 53,000 boepd (100%). This well capacity significantly de-risks the initial annualised production forecast for the GSA hub of approximately 30,000 boepd (100%), 16,000 boepd net to Ithaca.
|
|
Agreement entered into with Petrofac to provide enhanced incentivisation for the timely delivery of FPF-1 and additional contract cost clarity
|
| FPF-1 modifications contract incentivistion In September 2015 the Company entered into an agreement with Petrofac in respect of the FPF-1 floating production facility. The agreement provides enhanced incentivisation for the timely delivery of the vessel and also provides important contract cost clarity, thereby ensuring efficient execution of the remaining FPF-1 modification works. The key terms of the agreement are: · All costs of modifying the FPF-1 above the contract cost cap will continue to be fully paid by Petrofac as incurred; · Ithaca will pay Petrofac $13.7 million in respect of final payment on variations to the contract, with payment deferred until three and a half years after first production from the Stella field; · A further payment to Petrofac of up to $34 million will be made by Ithaca dependent on the timing of sail-away of the FPF-1. The maximum payment can be achieved for delivering sail-away of the vessel from the shipyard prior to the end of March 2016, with this incentive payment eroding on a daily basis to zero by 31 July 2016. This payment will also be deferred until three and a half years after first production from the Stella field.
| |
Sales agreement executed with BP for Stella gas production |
| GAS SALES AGREEMENT In September 2015 the Company entered into a life of field gas sales agreement with BP Gas Marketing Limited ("BP") for the sale of gas produced from the Stella and Harrier fields. The contract reference price is the UK "NBP" spot price. The agreement includes the ability for Ithaca, at its option, to receive up to £10 million of pre-payments for future gas sales to BP, similar to the arrangements available with Shell Trading International Limited for oil sales. |
|
| COMMODITY HEDGING |
Significant downside commodity price protection from hedging in place |
| As part of its overall risk management strategy, the Company's commodity hedging policy is centred on underpinning revenues from existing producing assets at the time of major capital expenditure programmes and locking in asset acquisition paybacks. Any hedging is executed at the discretion of the Company as there are no minimum requirements stipulated in any of the Company's debt finance facilities.
The Company's oil price hedging position is summarised as follows: · 8,500 bopd hedged at $62/bbl from October 2015 to June 2016 · 4,000 bopd hedged at $69/bbl from July 2016 to June 2017
Additionally, for gas years 2015-16 the Company has hedges establishing a gas price floor of £0.63/therm (~$9.70/MMbtu) for approximately 200 million therms (~20 billion cubic feet) of production. Given the majority of gas hedging is in the form of put options, the financial benefit of the hedges will be realised regardless of production in the relevant period.
|
|
| OPERATING EXPENDITURE |
Unit operating costs ~$33/boe in Q3 YTD 2015, over 40% lower than in 2014 |
| As part of managing and minimising the impact of the abrupt decline in oil prices since the second half of 2014, the Company has taken a number of important steps to protect the business from a prolonged period of weak oil prices. While a significant degree of cashflow protection is provided by the oil and gas price hedges already in place, the Company and its partners continue to actively work on delivering supply chain cost reductions, operating efficiency improvements and reductions in overheads in order to reset the cost base to reflect the requirements of the current environment.
When combined with the cessation of operations on the high cost Beatrice and Jacky fields and the retransfer of the Beatrice facilities to Talisman in Q1 2015, the 2015 financial results show a step change in unit operating costs compared to the previous year. Specifically, unit operating costs have reduced by over 40% to $33/boe compared to the same period in 2014 (Q3 YTD 2014: $57/boe). This unit operating expenditure reflects inclusion of the costs associated with the Athena and Anglia fields, which were provided for in Q4 2014 as an onerous contract provision. The provision was made and the book value of the fields fully written down in 2014 due to the expectation that 2015 would be the last year of production given costs may well exceed revenues in the current price environment.
Full year unit operating expenditure is anticipated to be in line with the YTD 2015 average of approximately $33/boe, down from the anticipated level at the start of the year of $40/boe and previous forecast guidance of $35/boe.
|
|
| CAPITAL EXPENDITURE |
2015 capital expenditure programme reduced to ~$120M and substantially complete by end Q3 2015 |
| With the majority of the planned 2015 investment programme now completed, it is anticipated that total expenditure for the full year will be around $120 million, being $30 million lower than previously guided. This saving is primarily driven by reduced GSA subsea infrastructure installation costs, resulting from efficient execution of the various offshore campaigns, as well as the removal of expenditure following the sale of the Norwegian business.
Expenditure on the 2016 capital investment programme is currently anticipated to total around $50 million, the majority of which relates to completion of Stella start-up works once the FPF-1 leaves the Remontowa yard in Poland. There are a number of production enhancement opportunities within the existing producing asset portfolio that could be added to the expected capital investment programme should the prevailing economics justify inclusion, with the sanction of any such expenditures within the control of the Company. |
|
| NET DEBT |
Net debt reduced from a peak of over $800 million to under $690 million as at 31 October 2015 |
| Net debt at 30 September 2015 was $751 million, down from $788 million at the end of the second quarter of 2015, as a result of strong operating cashflow generation, lower capital expenditures and the cash received from sale of the non-core Norwegian business. This net debt position has been further reduced by the $66 million equity investment in the Company that was completed in early October 2015. As a consequence net debt at 31 October 2015 was under $690 million. It is anticipated that net debt at the end of this year will remain broadly unchanged from this level.
|
|
| LICENCE PORTFOLIO ACTIVITIES |
High grading of asset portfolio |
| As part of routine portfolio review activities, the Company has elected to divest of its 10% working interest in the Scolty / Crathes discoveries to EnQuest plc for a nominal sum and transfer its 20% working interest in licence P1792 that contains the Beverley prospect and Evelyn discovery to Shell UK Limited. Divestment of these licence interests is attributable to the financial and strategic metrics of the potential development opportunities being insufficient to meet Ithaca's investment criteria in a lower Brent price environment. In the end-2014 independent reserves evaluation performed by Sproule International Limited ("Sproule") these licences accounted for approximately four million barrels of net proven and probable reserves.
|
|
| 2015 RESERVES EVALUATION |
|
|
Preparation for the year-end independent reserves evaluation that will be completed by Sproule International Limited ("Sproule") will commence in the final quarter of the year, with the results expected to be published as usual with the full year 2015 financial results in March 2016. The assessment will reflect Sproule's future oil and gas price assumptions as of 31 December 2015.
|
|
| Q3 2015 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| COMMODITY PRICES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The financial results for the three and nine months to 30 September 2015 compared to the corresponding periods in 2014 reflect the impact of the significant fall in Brent prices since the middle of last year. The table above presents the average Brent price for the various periods. The negative impact on revenues of this fall has clearly been mitigated to a significant degree by the oil price hedges the Company had put in place.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| REVENUE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| THREE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Revenue decreased by $48.0 million in Q3 2015 to $42.1 million (Q3 2014: $90.1 million) primarily as a consequence of the $51/bbl or 50% decrease in the pre-hedging realised oil price.
In addition, although produced volumes increased by 10% in Q3 2015 compared to the same quarter in the previous year (refer to the Production & Operations section above), sales volumes recorded in revenues during the period decreased by approximately 7%. The decrease was as a result of Athena and Anglia liftings being accounted for against the onerous contracts provision recorded in Q4 2014 and the build in oil inventory being greater in Q3 2015 as there were no liftings from the Pierce field (refer to the Movement in Inventory section below for more details).
The realised price decrease was however offset to a significant extent by a realised hedging gain of $43 per sales barrel in the quarter, resulting in a $35.0 million gain being reported through Foreign Exchange and Financial Instruments (see below).
If revenues were adjusted to include Athena and Anglia sales volumes, there would be an increase in Q3 2015 sales volumes of 4%.
While the realised oil prices for each of the fields in the Company's portfolio do not strictly follow the Brent price pattern, with some fields sold at a discount or premium to Brent and under contracts with differing timescales for pricing, the average realised price for all the fields trades broadly in line with Brent.
NINE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Revenue decreased by $118.1 million in YTD 2015 to $171.6 million (YTD 2014: $289.7 million). This 41% reduction was mainly attributable to the decrease of $49/bbl in the pre-hedging realised oil price, partly mitigated by an 11% increase in sales volumes. The increased sales volumes were largely driven by the inclusion of liftings associated with production from the Summit Assets and start-up of the Ythan field at the end of May 2015, partially offset by the exclusion of Anglia and Athena volumes as noted above. Significantly the decrease in realised oil price was partially offset by an average realised hedging gain of $29 per sales barrel in the period (excluding the benefit of the accelerated hedging reset of $59.7 million in Q1 2015).
|
|
| COST OF SALES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Cost of sales decreased in Q3 2015 to $52.0 million (Q3 2014: $103.6 million) as a result of significant reductions in operating costs, depletion, depreciation and amortisation ("DD&A") and movement in oil and gas inventory.
OPERATING EXPENDITURE Reported operating costs decreased by 63% in the quarter to $25.8 million (Q3 2014: $68.8 million). The main reasons are: i) significant savings realised across the portfolio as a result of supply chain contract cost renegotiations and contractor rate reductions; ii) replacement of high cost Beatrice and Jacky field production with lower cost volumes from the Summit Assets; iii) the absence of the 2013 Sullom Voe Terminal catch-up cost that was charged in 2014; and iv) exclusion of $4.5 million of Athena and Anglia operating costs provided for under an onerous contract provision in Q4 2014.
DD&A The unit DD&A rate for the quarter decreased significantly to $28/boe (Q3 2014: $38/boe), resulting in the total DD&A expense for the quarter reducing to $30.9 million (Q3 2014: $37.8 million). This reduction was mainly attributable to a different contributing field mix, notably the inclusion of the Summit Assets and the exclusion of the Beatrice and Jacky fields. The blended unit cost has been further reduced by the impairment write downs booked in 2014 as a consequence of the change in oil price environment.
MOVEMENT IN INVENTORY Oil and gas inventory increased $4.7 million in Q3 2015 (Q3 2014 credit of $3.3 million) mainly due to the timing of liftings on the Pierce field. Movements in oil inventory arise due to differences between barrels produced and sold, with production being recorded as a credit to movement in oil inventory through cost of sales until the oil has been sold.
NINE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Cost of sales decreased in YTD 2015 to $185.0 million (YTD 2014: $277.6 million) due to decreases in operating costs and DD&A, partially offset by the movement in oil and gas inventory.
OPERATING EXPENDITURE Operating costs decreased in the period to $83.4 million (YTD 2014: $162.0 million) as a result of the previously noted high grading of the producing asset portfolio, with increased production from lower operating cost fields, together with the effect of the wider supply chain cost savings achieved across the portfolio and the absence of Athena and Anglia costs provided for under the onerous contract provision.
The unit operating costs for YTD 2015 (inclusive of Athena and Anglia) were $33/boe. This represents a reduction of over 40% compared to the equivalent underlying rate of $57/boe for YTD 2014. It is expected that full year unit operating costs will continue at this reduced level.
DD&A DD&A for the period decreased to $93.2 million (YTD 2014: $121.6 million). As noted above, this decrease was primarily due to the different contributing field mix along with the impact of the impairment write downs booked in 2014 as a consequence of the change in oil price environment.
MOVEMENT IN INVENTORY An oil and gas inventory movement of $8.4 million was charged to cost of sales in YTD 2015 (YTD 2014: credit of $7.0 million). As noted in the table below, sales and production volumes over the full YTD 2015 were not significantly different. The charge arises from a reduction in the per barrel valuation of the oil inventory over the nine month period mainly resulting from volumes from the Cook field (which had yet to be lifted at 2014 year end but related to sales priced earlier in 2014 when oil prices were high) having been replaced with volumes from the Pierce field (which are valued at current Brent prices).
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| IMPAIRMENT CHARGES AND EXPLORATION & EVALUATION EXPENSES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Exploration and evaluation expenses of $0.6 million were recorded in the quarter (Q3 2014: $0.6 million) primarily associated with costs relating to licences deemed non-commercial. There were no impairments in the period, whereas in Q3 2014 the remaining Anglia field value was fully written down.
The YTD 2015 E&E expense primarily relates to the drilling of the unsuccessful Snømus exploration well in Norway in Q2 2015. Given the 1 January 2015 effective date for the divestment of the Norwegian business to MOL, the costs associated with this well were paid for by MOL as part of the transaction completion price adjustments.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lower administration expenditure in 2015 driven by on-going cost reduction measures and divestment of Norwegian business |
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Total administrative expenses decreased in the quarter to $2.7 million (Q3 2014: $3.7 million) due to a number of initiatives to reduce the cost base of the business combined with the removal of overhead costs associated with the Norwegian operations that were sold earlier in the year. Share based payment expenses have remained relatively flat with small fluctuations based on the timing of option grants and therefore the amortisation profile.
NINE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Total administrative expenses decreased in the period to $8.2 million (YTD 2014: $11.3 million) due to the reduced cost base of the business and the exclusion of around $2 million (pre-tax) of G&A costs following divestment of the Norwegian business. Given the 1 January 2015 effective date for the divestment of the Norwegian business to MOL, these costs were paid for by MOL as part of the transaction completion price adjustments and as such have been fully reimbursed and will be absent going forward.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| FOREIGN EXCHANGE & FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 A foreign exchange gain of $2.4 million was recorded in Q3 2015 (Q3 2014: $4.1 million gain). The majority of the Company's revenue is US dollar denominated, while expenditures are predominantly incurred in British pounds (although some US dollar and Euro denominated costs are also incurred). General volatility in the GBP:USD exchange rate is the primary driver behind the foreign exchange gains and losses, with the rate moving from 1.57 at 1 July 2015 to 1.52 at 30 September 2015.
The Company recorded an overall $74.9 million gain on financial instruments for the quarter ended 30 September 2015 (Q3 2014: $39.2 million gain).
$35.8 million of the gain was realised in Q3 2015, comprising a $35.0 million gain on oil hedges maturing during the quarter at an average exercise price of $92/bbl compared to an average Brent price of $50/bbl, combined with a $0.6 million gain on foreign exchange instruments and $0.1 million gain on gas hedges.
Combined with the realised hedging gain was a $39.1 million revaluation of financial instruments as at 30 September 2015, which relates to hedges held at quarter end. This revaluation was primarily due to a positive revaluation of commodity hedges of $41.8 million and a $0.6 million positive revaluation on interest rate swaps, partly offset by a negative revaluation of foreign exchange instruments of $3.3 million. The value of oil hedges at the end of Q3 2015 has increased based on the decrease in the Brent oil forward curve ($53/bbl average to the end of Q2 2017 as at Q3 2015 vs $68/bbl average as at Q2 2015) at the end of the reporting periods. This has been partially offset by the realisation of hedged barrels during the quarter i.e. the transfer of previously unrealised gains to realised gains.
Going forward the Company holds a derivative fair value of $46 million for oil hedges at 30 September 2015 and a $50 million valuation for future gas derivatives.
This fair value accounting for financial instruments by its nature leads to volatility in the results due to the impact of revaluing the financial instruments at the end of each reporting period.
NINE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 A foreign exchange loss of $1.7 million was recorded in YTD 2015 (YTD 2014: $6.0 million gain) primarily due to volatility in the GBP:USD exchange rate with fluctuation between 1.46 and 1.59 during the period, closing at 1.52 on 30 September 2015.
The Company recorded an overall $94.2 million gain on financial instruments for the nine month period ended 30 September 2015 (Q3 2014: $32.0 million gain).
$145.2 million of the gain was realised in respect of commodity hedges, comprising $59.7 million relating to the accelerated oil hedging gain and $85.5 million relating to oil and gas hedges maturing during the period, with $1.2 million relating to foreign exchange instruments, partly offset by a $0.2 million loss on interest rate swaps.
Offsetting the realised gain was the revaluation of instruments as at 30 September 2015, which relates to instruments still held at quarter end. This $52.1 million revaluation primarily related to a negative revaluation of commodity hedges of $54.5 million, partially offset by a $1.8 million positive revaluation of foreign exchange instruments coupled with a $0.6 million positive revaluation of other instruments. The negative revaluation on commodity instruments was primarily due to the realisation of the amounts noted above (i.e. where they are no longer still held at the period end as they had been realised), partly offset by an increase in value of the remaining hedging instruments based on the movement in the forward curve and the implied volatility at the end of the reporting period.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| FINANCE COSTS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Finance costs decreased to $9.5 million in Q3 2015 (Q3 2014: $9.8 million). This decrease is primarily driven by a fall in bank interest and fees, as a result of the decrease in drawn debt (including the senior notes) from $845 million at the end of Q3 2014 to $762 million at the end of Q3 2015.
Accretion costs increased by $0.7 million compared to Q3 2014 due to the recognition of higher decommissioning liabilities as at 30 September 2015 as a result of inclusion of the decommissioning liabilities associated with the Summit Assets.
NINE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 Finance costs increased to $30.4 million in YTD 2015 (YTD 2014: $21.9 million). This rise primarily reflects increased interest costs and fees incurred in relation to the senior unsecured notes, issued in July 2014, partially offset by the decrease in bank interest and fees noted above.
|
|
| TAXATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No UK corporation tax anticipated to be payable prior to 2020 |
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 A non-cash tax charge of $12.7 million was recognized in the quarter ended 30 September 2015 (Q3 2014: $0.2 million credit). This charge is lower than the expected tax rate due to credit adjustments primarily relating to the UK Ring Fence Expenditure Supplement and additional capital allowances recognised in relation to Stella for expenditure incurred by Ithaca but paid by Petrofac (refer to note 25 in the Q3 2015 Consolidated Financial Statements).
As a result of the above factors, the profit before tax of $55.5 million becomes a profit after tax of $42.8 million (Q3 2014: $8.0 million profit).
NINE MONTHS ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 A tax credit of $19.5 million was recognised in the nine months ended 30 September 2015 (YTD 2014: $19.8 million credit). This amount includes $63.4 million credit relating to UK and Norway taxation which is a product of the taxable loss generated and adjustments to deferred tax charge primarily relating to the UK Ring Fence Expenditure Supplement, the non-taxable gain on disposal of Norway and additional capital allowances recognised in relation to Stella for expenditure incurred by Ithaca but paid by Petrofac (refer to note 25 in the Q3 2015 Consolidated Financial Statements).
This credit is offset by a charge of $41.5 million relating to changes in the Supplementary Charge and Petroleum Revenue Tax ("PRT") rates enacted in the period.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| The UK government announced in its March 2015 budget that the effective rate of corporate income tax on oil and gas companies will be reduced from 62% to 50% with effect from 1 January 2015. The reduction was enacted on 30 March 2015. This resulted in a charge of $52.1 million relating to deferred Corporation Tax. This was partially offset by a credit of $10.6 million relating to the impact in the change of the rate of PRT from 50% to 35% on the deferred PRT liability in the balance sheet.
As a result of the above factors, the profit before tax of $37.1 million becomes a profit after tax of $56.6 million (YTD 2014: $25.0 million profit). Adjusting for the impact of the change in tax rates would give a profit after tax of $98.1 million.
|
|
| CAPITAL INVESTMENTS | ||||||||||
Savings in the year reducing 2015 full year Capital expenditure from $150m to $120m in 2015 |
|
Capital additions to development and production ("D&P") assets totalled $130.1 million in YTD 2015. These relate primarily to the execution of the GSA development and the development of the Ythan field.
Capital additions to E&E assets in YTD 2015 were $29.4 million predominantly relating to drilling of the Snømus prospect, the costs of which have been reimbursed upon completion of the sale of the Norwegian operations.
Total capital expenditure in YTD 2015 excluding Norway and capitalised interest was approximately $115 million.
|
|
| WORKING CAPITAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
*Working capital being total current assets less trade and other payables
As at 30 September 2015, the Company had a net working capital balance of $56.1 million, including an unrestricted cash balance of $10.5 million, invested in money market deposit accounts with BNP Paribas. Substantially all of the accounts receivable are current, being defined as less than 90 days. The Company regularly monitors all receivable balances outstanding in excess of 90 days. No credit loss has historically been experienced in the collection of accounts receivable.
Working capital movements are driven by the timing of receipts and payments of balances and fluctuate in any given quarter. A significant proportion of Ithaca's accounts receivable balance is with customers and co-venturers in the oil and gas industry and is subject to normal joint venture/industry credit risks.
Net working capital has decreased over the nine month period to 30 September 2015 mainly as a result of crystallisation of the cash receipt of a proportion of the oil price hedges held at period end offset by increased settlement of payables primarily associated with the on-going GSA development programme. Receivables includes the Company's joint venture partner's share of payables where the Company is the operator hence the reduction as the GSA payables reduce.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| As noted in the Q1 2015 Management Discussion and Analysis, in April 2015 Trap Oil plc ("Trap"), a 15% working interest partner in the Ithaca operated Athena field, announced that it thought highly likely insolvency proceedings, such as administration or liquidation, would commence. Subsequently, the Athena co-venturers and other principal creditors of Trap entered into a settlement agreement with the company in order to implement an optimal solution for protecting the financial interests of the creditors. In return for the payment of £1.6 million to the Athena co-venturers, all of Trap's future field liabilities will be met by the remaining co-venturers, with repayment of these liabilities being met through the receipt of 60% of any sale proceeds arising from Trap's existing licence interests, up to 125% of the outstanding liabilities. As at 30 September 2015, Ithaca has booked no additional liabilities in relation to this and does not expect any material liabilities to arise.
|
|
| CAPITAL RESOURCES |
Strong liquidity - RBL redetermination completed and funding headroom in excess of $125 million |
| DEBT FACILITIES The Company has in place two bank debt facilities, maturing September 2018; a senior RBL facility of up to $575 million and a junior RBL facility of up to $75 million. The availability to draw upon the facilities is reviewed by the bank syndicate on a semi-annual basis, with the results of the October 2015 redetermination resulting in debt availability of $515 million. Both facilities are based on conventional oil and gas industry borrowing base financing terms, neither of which have historic financial covenant tests. The Company also has $300 million senior unsecured notes, due July 2019.
The Company was in compliance with all its relevant financial and operating covenants during the quarter. The key covenants in the senior and junior RBL facilities are: · A corporate cashflow projection showing total sources of funds must exceed total forecast uses of funds for the later of the following 12 months or until forecast first oil from the Stella field. · The ratio of the net present value of cashflows secured under the RBL for the economic life of the fields to the amount drawn under the facility must not fall below 1.15:1. · The ratio of the net present value of cashflows secured under the RBL for the life of the debt facility to the amount drawn under the facility must not fall below 1.05:1.
There are no financial maintenance covenant tests associated with the senior notes.
Following completion of RBL redetermination review in October 2015, the Company continues to maintain funding headroom in excess of $125 million ahead of planned first hydrocarbons from the GSA at the end of the second quarter of 2016.
|
|
| YTD 2015 CASHFLOW MOVEMENTS During the nine months ended 30 September 2015 there was a cash outflow from operating, investing and financing activities of approximately $9 million (Q3 YTD 2014 outflow of $4 million).
|
|
| Cashflow from operations Cash generated from operating activities was $196 million primarily attributable to cash generated from the Dons, Causeway Area, Cook and Wytch Farm fields, as well as the acceleration of a portion of the accumulated oil hedging gain received during Q1 2015.
Cashflow from financing activities Cash used in financing activities was $23 million primarily due to interest and bank charges ($27 million YTD 2015).
Cashflow from investing activities Cash used in investing activities was $126 million, primarily related to further capital expenditure on the GSA development, together with Ythan well costs, partially offset by funds received on the completion of the divestment of the Norwegian business to MOL.
|
|
| COMMITMENTS | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The Company's commitments relate primarily to completion of the capital investment programme on the GSA development, in addition to more limited commitments associated with the Wytch Farm field well workover programme. These commitments will be funded through the Company's existing cash balance, forecast cashflow from operations and available debt facilities.
In addition to the above, the Company will pay Petrofac $13.7 million in respect of final payment on variations to the contract, with payment deferred until three and a half years after first production from the Stella field. A further payment to Petrofac of up to $34 million will be made by Ithaca dependent on the timing of sail-away of the FPF-1. The maximum payment can be achieved for delivering sail-away of the vessel from the shipyard prior to the end of March 2016, with this incentive payment eroding on a daily basis to zero by 31 July 2016. This payment will also be deferred until three and a half years after first production from the Stella field.
|
|
| FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | |||||||||||||
|
| All financial instruments are initially measured in the balance sheet at fair value. Subsequent measurement of the financial instruments is based on their classification. The Company has classified each financial instrument into one of these categories:
The classification of all financial instruments is the same at inception and at 30 September 2015.
|
|
| The table below presents the total gain / (loss) on financial instruments that has been disclosed through the statement of comprehensive income.
COMMODITIES The following table summarises the commodity hedges in place at the end of the quarter.
* Exposure to increase in oil price capped at $102 / bbl
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| FOREIGN EXCHANGE The table below summarises the foreign exchange financial instruments in place at the end of the quarter.
INTEREST RATES The Company also enters into interest rate swaps as a measure of hedging its exposure to interest rate risks on the loan facilities. As at the end of the quarter, the Company has hedged interest payments on the following:
|
|
| QUARTERLY RESULTS SUMMARY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 1 Based on weighted average number of shares
The most significant factors to have affected the Company's results during the above quarters, other than transactions such as the Valiant and Summit Asset acquisitions, are fluctuations in underlying commodity prices and movement in production volumes. The Company has utilized forward sales contracts and foreign exchange contracts to take advantage of higher commodity prices while reducing the exposure to price volatility. These contracts can cause volatility in profit after tax as a result of unrealized gains and losses due to movements in the oil price and USD: GBP exchange rate. In addition, the significant reduction in underlying commodity prices resulted in impairment write downs in Q4 2014.
|
|
| OUTSTANDING SHARE INFORMATION | ||||||||
|
| The Company's common shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") in Canada under the symbol "IAE" and on the Alternative Investment Market ("AIM") in the United Kingdom under the symbol "IAE". As at 30 September 2015 Ithaca had 329,518,620 common shares outstanding along with 21,453,220 options outstanding to employees and directors to acquire common shares.
1. Represents the TSX close price (CAD$0.62) on 30 September 2015. US$:CAD$ 0.75 on 30 September 2015
Following completion of the equity placing on 20 October 2015, the Company has 411,384,045 Common Shares issued and outstanding, with one voting right per Common Share. |
|
| CONSOLIDATION |
|
| The consolidated financial statements of the Company and the financial data contained in this management's discussion and analysis ("MD&A") are prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ithaca and its wholly‐owned subsidiaries, listed below, and its associates FPU Services Limited ("FPU") and FPF‐1 Limited ("FPF‐1").
Wholly owned subsidiaries: · Ithaca Energy (Holdings) Limited · Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited · Ithaca Minerals North Sea Limited · Ithaca Energy Holdings (UK) Limited · Ithaca Petroleum Limited · Ithaca Causeway Limited · Ithaca Exploration Limited · Ithaca Alpha (NI) Limited · Ithaca Gamma Limited · Ithaca Epsilon Limited · Ithaca Delta Limited · Ithaca North Sea Limited · Ithaca Petroleum Norge AS * · Ithaca Petroleum Holdings AS · Ithaca Technology AS · Ithaca AS · Ithaca Petroleum EHF · Ithaca SPL Limited (formerly Summit Petroleum Limited) · Ithaca SP UK Limited (formerly Summit Petroleum UK Limited) · Ithaca Dorset Limited (formerly Summit Dorset Limited) · Ithaca Pipeline Limited (formerly Summit Pipeline Limited)
The consolidated financial statements include, from 31 July 2014 only (being the acquisition date), the consolidated financial statements of the Summit group of companies. All inter‐company transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation. A significant portion of the Company's North Sea oil and gas activities are carried out jointly with others. The consolidated financial statements reflect only the Company's proportionate interest in such activities.
* Following the sale of the Company's Norwegian operations in Q2 2015, Ithaca Petroleum Norge AS has been divested and as of Q3 2015, no longer features in the financial results of the Company.
|
|
| CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES |
|
| Certain accounting policies require that management make appropriate decisions with respect to the formulation of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These accounting policies are discussed below and are included to aid the reader in assessing the critical accounting policies and practices of the Company and the likelihood of materially different results being reported. Ithaca's management reviews these estimates regularly. The emergence of new information and changed circumstances may result in actual results or changes to estimated amounts that differ materially from current estimates.
The following assessment of significant accounting policies and associated estimates is not meant to be exhaustive. The Company might realize different results from the application of new accounting standards promulgated, from time to time, by various rule-making bodies.
Capitalised costs relating to the exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, along with estimated future capital expenditures required in order to develop proved and probable reserves are depreciated on a unit-of-production basis, by asset, using estimated proved and probable reserves as adjusted for production. A review is carried out each reporting date for any indication that the carrying value of the Company's D&P assets may be impaired. For D&P assets where there are such indications, an impairment test is carried out on the Cash Generating Unit ("CGU"). Each CGU is identified in accordance with IAS 36. The Company's CGUs are those assets which generate largely independent cash flows and are normally, but not always, single developments or production areas. The impairment test involves comparing the carrying value with the recoverable value of an asset. The recoverable amount of an asset is determined as the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and value in use, where the value in use is determined from estimated future net cash flows. Any additional depreciation resulting from the impairment testing is charged to the Statement of Income.
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and also when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be at risk of being impaired. Impairment is determined for goodwill by assessing the recoverable amount of each CGU to which the goodwill relates. Where the recoverable amount of the CGU is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized in the Statement of Income. Impairment losses relating to goodwill cannot be reversed in future periods.
Recognition of decommissioning liabilities associated with oil and gas wells are determined using estimated costs discounted based on the estimated life of the asset. In periods following recognition, the liability and associated asset are adjusted for any changes in the estimated amount or timing of the settlement of the obligations. The liability is accreted up to the actual expected cash outlay to perform the abandonment and reclamation. The carrying amounts of the associated assets are depleted using the unit of production method, in accordance with the depreciation policy for development and production assets. Actual costs to retire tangible assets are deducted from the liability as incurred.
All financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value on the balance sheet. The Company's financial instruments consist of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, deposits, derivatives, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and the long term liability on the Beatrice acquisition. Measurement in subsequent periods is dependent on the classification of the respective financial instrument.
In order to recognize share based payment expense, the Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted using assumptions related to interest rates, expected life of the option, volatility of the underlying security and expected dividend yields. These assumptions may vary over time.
The determination of the Company's income and other tax liabilities / assets requires interpretation of complex laws and regulations. Tax filings are subject to audit and potential reassessment after the lapse of considerable time. Accordingly, the actual income tax liability may differ significantly from that estimated and recorded on the financial statements. The accrual method of accounting will require management to incorporate certain estimates of revenues, production costs and other costs as at a specific reporting date. In addition, the Company must estimate capital expenditures on capital projects that are in progress or recently completed where actual costs have not been received as of the reporting date.
|
|
| CONTROL ENVIRONMENT |
|
| The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as at 30 September 2015, and concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its annual filings, interim filings and other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the securities legislation and such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its certifying officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have designed, or have caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under their supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of the Company's financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS including those policies and procedures that:
(a) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company's assets;
(b) are designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
(c) are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the annual financial statements or interim financial statements.
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer performed an assessment of internal control over financial reporting as at 30 September 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"), and concluded that internal control over financial reporting is effective with no material weaknesses identified.
Based on their inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even those options determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. As of 30 September 2015, there were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended 30 September 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
| CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
| New and amended standards and interpretations need to be adopted in the first interim financial statements issued after their effective date (or date of early adoption). There are no new IFRSs of IFRICs that are effective for the first time for this interim period that would be expected to have a material impact on the Company.
|
|
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
Non-IFRS Measures |
| "Cashflow from operations" and "cashflow per share" referred to in this MD&A are not prescribed by IFRS. These non-IFRS financial measures do not have any standardized meanings and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The Company uses these measures to help evaluate its performance. As an indicator of the Company's performance, cashflow from operations should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net cash from operating activities as determined in accordance with IFRS. The Company considers cashflow from operations to be a key measure as it demonstrates the Company's underlying ability to generate the cash necessary to fund operations and support activities related to its major assets. Cashflow from operations is determined by adding back changes in non-cash operating working capital to cash from operating activities.
"Net working capital" referred to in this MD&A is not prescribed by IFRS. Net working capital includes total current assets less trade & other payables. Net working capital may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies, and accordingly Net working capital may not be comparable to measures used by other companies.
"Net debt" referred to in this MD&A is not prescribed by IFRS. The Company uses net drawn debt as a measure to assess its financial position. Net drawn debt includes amounts outstanding under the Company's debt facilities and senior notes, less cash and cash equivalents. Net drawn debt noted above excludes any amounts outstanding under the Norwegian tax rebate facility. |
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements |
| The Company has certain lease agreements and rig commitments which were entered into in the normal course of operations, all of which are disclosed under the heading "Commitments", above. Leases are treated as either operating leases or finance leases based on the extent to which risks and rewards incidental to ownership lie with the lessor or the lessee under IAS 17. Where appropriate, finance leases are recorded on the balance sheet. As at 30 September 2015, finance lease assets of $30.5 million and related liabilities of $30.9 million are included on the balance sheet. |
Related Party Transactions |
| A director of the Company is a partner of Burstall Winger Zammit LLP who acts as counsel for the Company. The amount of fees paid to Burstall Winger Zammit LLP in Q3 2015 was $0.0 million (Q3 2014: $0.0 million). These transactions are in the normal course of business and are conducted on normal commercial terms with consideration comparable to those charged by third parties.
As at 30 September 2015 the Company had a loan receivable from FPF-1 Ltd, an associate of the Company, for $58.6 million (31 December 2014: $58.3 million) as a result of the completion of the GSA transactions. |
BOE Presentation |
| The calculation of boe is based on a conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas ("mcf") to one barrel of crude oil ("bbl"). The term boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 mcf: 1 bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6 mcf: 1 bbl, utilizing a conversion ratio at 6 mcf: 1 bbl may be misleading as an indication of value. |
Well Test Results |
| Certain well test results disclosed in this MD&A represent short-term results, which may not necessarily be indicative of long-term well performance or ultimate hydrocarbon recovery therefrom. Full pressure transient and well test interpretation analyses have not been completed and as such the flow test results contained in this MD&A should be considered preliminary until such analyses have been completed.
|
| RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES |
| The business of exploring for, developing and producing oil and natural gas reserves is inherently risky. There is substantial risk that the manpower and capital employed will not result in the finding of new reserves in economic quantities. There is a risk that the sale of reserves may be delayed due to processing constraints, lack of pipeline capacity or lack of markets. The Company is dependent upon the production rates and oil price to fund the current development program.
For additional detail regarding the Company's risks and uncertainties, refer to the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended 31 December 2014, (the "AIF") filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. |
Commodity Price Volatility | RISK: The Company's performance is significantly impacted by prevailing oil and natural gas prices, which are primarily driven by supply and demand as well as economic and political factors. MITIGATIONS: To mitigate the risk of fluctuations in oil and gas prices, the Company routinely executes commodity price derivatives, predominantly in relation to oil production, as a means of establishing a floor in realised prices. |
Foreign Exchange Risk | RISK: The Company is exposed to financial risks including financial market volatility and fluctuation in various foreign exchange rates. MITIGATIONS: Given the proportion of development capital expenditure and operating costs incurred in currencies other than the US Dollar, the Company routinely executes hedges to mitigate foreign exchange rate risk on committed expenditure and/or draws debt in pounds sterling to settle sterling costs which will be repaid from surplus sterling generated revenues derived from Stella gas sales. |
Interest Rate Risk | RISK: The Company is exposed to fluctuation in interest rates, particularly in relation to the debt facilities entered into. MITIGATIONS: To mitigate the fluctuations in interest rates, the Company routinely reviews the associated cost exposure and periodically executes hedges to lock in interest rates. |
Debt Facility Risk | RISK: The Company is exposed to borrowing risks relating to drawdown of its debt facilities (the "Facilities"). The ability to drawdown the Facilities is based on the Company meeting certain covenants including coverage ratio tests, liquidity tests and development funding tests, which are determined by a detailed economic model of the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will satisfy such tests in the future in order to have access to the full amount of the Facilities. The Facilities include covenants which restrict, among other things, the Company's ability to incur additional debt or dispose of assets. As is standard to a credit facility, the Company's and Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited's assets have been pledged as collateral and are subject to foreclosure in the event the Company or Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited's defaults on the Facilities. MITIGATIONS: The Company routinely produces detailed cashflow forecasts to monitor its compliance with the financial tests and liquidity requirements of the Facilities. |
Financing Risk | RISK: To the extent cashflow from operations and the Facilities' resources are ever deemed not adequate to fund Ithaca's cash requirements, external financing may be required. Lack of timely access to such additional financing, or access on unfavourable terms, could limit Ithaca's ability to make the necessary capital investments to maintain or expand its current business and to make necessary principal payments under the Facilities may be impaired. A failure to access adequate capital to continue its expenditure program may require that the Company meet any liquidity shortfalls through the selected divestment of all or a portion of its portfolio or result in delays to existing development programs. MITIGATIONS: The Company has established a business plan and routinely monitors its detailed cashflow forecasts and liquidity requirements to ensure it will continue to be fully funded. The Company believes that there are no circumstances that exist at present which require forced divestments, significant value destroying delays to existing programs or will likely lead to critical defaults relating to the Facilities. |
Third Party Credit Risk | RISK: The Company is and may in the future be exposed to third party credit risk through its contractual arrangements with its current and future joint venture partners, marketers of its petroleum production and other parties. The Company extends unsecured credit to these and certain other parties, and therefore, the collection of any receivables may be affected by changes in the economic environment or other conditions affecting such parties. MITIGATIONS: The Company believes this risk is mitigated by the financial position of the parties. The joint venture partners in those assets operated by the Company are largely well financed international companies. Where appropriate, a cash call process has been implemented with partners to cover high levels of anticipated capital expenditure thereby reducing any third party credit risk. The majority of the Company's oil production is sold, depending on the field, to either BP Oil International Limited or Shell Trading International Ltd. Gas production is sold through contracts with RWE NPower PLC, Hess Energy Gas Power (UK) Ltd, Shell UK Ltd. and Esso Exploration & Production UK Ltd. Each of these parties has historically demonstrated their ability to pay amounts owing to Ithaca. The Company has not experienced any material credit loss in the collection of accounts receivable to date. |
Property Risk | RISK: The Company's properties will be generally held in the form of licenses, concessions, permits and regulatory consents ("Authorisations"). The Company's activities are dependent upon the grant and maintenance of appropriate Authorisations, which may not be granted; may be made subject to limitations which, if not met, will result in the termination or withdrawal of the Authorisation; or may be otherwise withdrawn. Also, in the majority of its licenses, the Company is a joint interest-holder with other third parties over which it has no control. An Authorisation may be revoked by the relevant regulatory authority if the other interest-holder is no longer deemed to be financially credible. There can be no assurance that any of the obligations required to maintain each Authorisation will be met. Although the Company believes that the Authorisations will be renewed following expiry or granted (as the case may be), there can be no assurance that such authorisations will be renewed or granted or as to the terms of such renewals or grants. The termination or expiration of the Company's Authorisations may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and business. MITIGATIONS: The Company has routine ongoing communications with the UK oil and gas regulatory body, the Department of Energy and Climate Change ("DECC") as well as Norwegian authorities. Regular communication allows all parties to an Authorisation to be fully informed as to the status of any Authorisation and ensures the Company remains updated regarding fulfilment of any applicable requirements. |
Operational Risk | RISK: The Company is subject to the risks associated with owning oil and natural gas properties, including environmental risks associated with air, land and water. All of the Company's operations are conducted offshore on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf and as such, Ithaca is exposed to operational risk associated with weather delays that can result in a material delay in project execution. Third parties operate some of the assets in which the Company has interests. As a result, the Company may have limited ability to exercise influence over the operations of these assets and their associated costs. The success and timing of these activities may be outside the Company's control. There are numerous uncertainties in estimating the Company's reserve base due to the complexities in estimating the magnitude and timing of future production, revenue, expenses and capital. MITIGATIONS: The Company acts at all times as a reasonable and prudent operator and has non-operated interests in assets where the designated operator is required to act in the same manner. The Company takes out market insurance to mitigate many of these operational, construction and environmental risks. The Company uses experienced service providers for the completion of work programmes. The Company uses the services of Sproule International Limited ("Sproule") to independently assess the Company's reserves on an annual basis. |
Development Risk | RISK: The Company is executing development projects to produce reserves in off shore locations. These projects are long term, capital intensive developments. Development of these hydrocarbon reserves involves an array of complex and lengthy activities. As a consequence, these projects, among other things, are exposed to the volatility of oil and gas prices and costs. In addition, projects executed with partners and co-venturers reduce the ability of the Company to fully mitigate all risks associated with these development activities. Delays in the achievement of production start-up may adversely affect timing of cash flow and the achievement of short-term targets of production growth. MITIGATIONS: The Company places emphasis on ensuring it attracts and engages with high quality suppliers, subcontractors and partners to enable it to achieve successful project execution. The Company seeks to obtain optimal contractual agreements, including using turnkey and lump sum incentivised contracts where appropriate, when undertaking major project developments so as to limit its financial exposure to the risks associated with project execution. |
Competition Risk | RISK: In all areas of the Company's business, there is competition with entities that may have greater technical and financial resources. MITIGATIONS: The Company places appropriate emphasis on ensuring it attracts and retains high quality resources and sufficient financial resources to enable it to maintain its competitive position. |
Weather Risk | RISK: In connection with the Company's offshore operations being conducted in the North Sea, the Company is especially vulnerable to extreme weather conditions. Delays and additional costs which result from extreme weather can result in cost overruns, delays and, ultimately, in certain operations becoming uneconomic. MITIGATIONS: The Company takes potential delays as a result of adverse weather conditions into consideration in preparing budgets and forecasts and seeks to include an appropriate buffer in its all estimates of costs, which could be adversely affected by weather. |
Reputation Risk | RISK: In the event a major offshore incident were to occur in respect of a property in which the Company has an interest, the Company's reputation could be severely harmed MITIGATIONS: The Company's operational activities are conducted in accordance with approved policies, standards and procedures, which are then passed on to the Company's subcontractors. In addition, Ithaca regularly audits its operations to ensure compliance with established policies, standards and procedures. |
|
| FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION |
|
| This MD&A and any documents incorporated by reference herein contain certain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information which are based on the Company's internal expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and beliefs as at the date of such statements or information, including, among other things, assumptions with respect to production, future capital expenditures, future acquisitions and dispositions and cash flow. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of such information may prove to be incorrect. The use of any of the words "forecasts", "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "may", "will", "project", "plan", "should", "believe", "could", "scheduled", "targeted", "approximately" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements or information. The Company believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements and information are reasonable but no assurance can be given that these expectations, or the assumptions underlying these expectations, will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements and information included in this MD&A and any documents incorporated by reference herein should not be unduly relied upon. Such forward-looking statements and information speak only as of the date of this MD&A and any documents incorporated by reference herein and the Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or information, except as required by applicable laws.
|
|
| In particular, this MD&A and any documents incorporated by reference herein, contains specific forward-looking statements and information pertaining to the following: · The quality of and future net revenues from the Company's reserves; · Oil, natural gas liquids ("NGLs") and natural gas production levels; · Commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates; · Capital expenditure programs and other expenditures; · Anticipated future operating costs; · The sale, farming in, farming out or development of certain exploration properties using third party resources; · Supply and demand for oil, NGLs and natural gas; · The Company's ability to raise capital and to use currently available capital to manage downside risks and pursue potential opportunities within the core GSA; · The continued availability of the Facilities; · The peak net drawn debt requirement prior to Stella start up and expected net debt at year end 2015; · The timing of the FPF-1 vessel sail-away and Stella first hydrocarbons; · Expected future amounts and timing of payments associated with the FPF-1 vessel; · The Company's acquisition and disposition strategy, the criteria to be considered in connection therewith and the benefits to be derived therefrom; · The realisation of anticipated benefits from acquisitions and dispositions; · The planned cessation of production from certain fields; · The anticipated liabilities associated with third parties' default with respect to joint venture obligations; · The Company's ability to continually add to reserves; · Schedules, timing, remaining work requirements and anticipated operational plans for certain projects and the Company's strategy for growth; · The Company's future operating and financial results; · The ability of the Company to optimize operations and reduce operational expenditures; · Treatment under governmental and other regulatory regimes and tax, environmental and other laws; · Expected future renewal of Authorisations; · Production rates; · The ability of the company to continue operating in the face of inclement weather; · Targeted production levels; · Expected timing for the completion of the year end reserves evaluation; and · Timing and cost of the development of the Company's reserves.
|
|
| With respect to forward-looking statements contained in this MD&A and any documents incorporated by reference herein, the Company has made assumptions regarding, among other things: · Ithaca's ability to obtain additional drilling rigs and other equipment in a timely manner, as required; · Access to third party hosts and associated pipelines can be negotiated and accessed within the expected timeframe; · FDP approval and operational construction and development is obtained within expected timeframes; · The receipt of necessary regulatory approvals from time to time; · The Company's development plan for its properties will be implemented as planned; · The Company's ability to keep operating during periods of harsh weather; · Reserves volumes assigned to Ithaca's properties; · Ability to recover reserves volumes assigned to Ithaca's properties; · Revenues do not decrease below anticipated levels and operating costs do not increase significantly above anticipated levels; · Future oil, NGLs and natural gas production levels from Ithaca's properties and the prices obtained from the sales of such production; · The level of future capital expenditure required to exploit and develop reserves; · Ithaca's ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms, in particular, the Company's ability to access the Facilities; · The continued ability of the Company to collect amounts receivable from third parties who Ithaca has provided credit to; · Ithaca's reliance on partners and their ability to meet commitments under relevant agreements; and, · The state of the debt and equity markets in the current economic environment.
|
|
| The Company's actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements and information as a result of assumptions proving inaccurate and of both known and unknown risks, including the risk factors set forth in this MD&A and under the heading "Risk Factors" in the AIF and the documents incorporated by reference herein, and those set forth below: · Risks associated with the exploration for and development of oil and natural gas reserves in the North Sea; · Risks associated with offshore development and production including risks of inclement weather and the unavailability of transport facilities; · Operational risks and liabilities that are not covered by insurance; · Volatility in market prices for oil, NGLs and natural gas; · The ability of the Company to fund its substantial capital requirements and operations; · Risks associated with ensuring title to the Company's properties; · Changes in environmental, health and safety or other legislation applicable to the Company's operations, and the Company's ability to comply with current and future environmental, health and safety and other laws; · The accuracy of oil and gas reserve estimates and estimated production levels as they are affected by the Company's exploration and development drilling and estimated decline rates; · The Company's success at acquisition, exploration, exploitation and development of reserves; · Risks associated with realisation of anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions; · Risks related to changes to government policy with regard to offshore drilling; · The Company's reliance on key operational and management personnel; · The ability of the Company to obtain and maintain all of its required permits and licenses; · Competition for, among other things, capital, drilling equipment, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; · Changes in general economic, market and business conditions in Canada, North America, the United Kingdom, Europe and worldwide; · Actions by governmental or regulatory authorities including changes in income tax laws or changes in tax laws, royalty rates and incentive programs relating to the oil and gas industry including any increase in UK or Norwegian taxes; · Adverse regulatory rulings, orders and decisions; and, · Risks associated with the nature of the common shares.
|
Additional Reader Advisories |
| The information in this MD&A is provided as of 13 November 2015. The Q3 2015 results have been compared to the results of the comparative period in 2014. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Company's unaudited consolidated financial statements as at 30 September 2015 and 2014 and with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements as at 31 December 2014 together with the accompanying notes and AIF for the year ended 31 December 2014. These documents, and additional information regarding Ithaca, are available electronically from the Company's website (www.ithacaenergy.com) or SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com. |
Consolidated Statement of Income |
For the three and nine months ended 30 September 2015 and 2014 |
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | ||
| Note | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 |
Revenue |
| 42,108 | 90,094 | 171,635 | 289,665 |
5 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
| (25,760) | (68,819) | (83,383) | (161,979) |
Oil purchases |
| - | (270) | - | (1,061) |
Movement in oil and gas inventory |
| 4,676 | 3,312 | (8,447) | 7,047 |
Depletion, depreciation and amortisation |
| (30,946) | (37,809) | (93,205) | (121,580) |
Cost of sales |
| (52,030) | (103,586) | (185,035) | (277,573) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross (Loss)/ Profit |
| (9,922) | (13,492) | (13,400) | 12,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation expenses | 10 | (620) | (612) | (29,720) | (3,067) |
Gain on disposal | 32 | 1,034 | - | 26,271 | 2,190 |
Gain on financial instruments | 27 | 74,894 | 39,229 | 94,185 | 31,989 |
Impairment of assets |
| - | (7,971) | - | (10,866) |
Administrative expenses | 6 | (2,747) | (3,734) | (8,238) | (11,278) |
Foreign exchange |
| 2,354 | 4,147 | (1,656) | 5,978 |
Finance costs | 7 | (9,464) | (9,844) | (30,360) | (21,865) |
Interest income |
| 11 | 4 | 62 | 46 |
Profit Before Tax |
| 55,540 | 7,727 | 37,144 | 5,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation | 25 | (12,728) | 227 | 19,475 | 19,763 |
Profit After Tax |
| 42,812 | 7,954 | 56,619 | 24,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic | 24 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
Diluted | 24 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No separate statement of comprehensive income has been prepared as all such gains and losses have been incorporated in the consolidated statement of income above.
The accompanying notes on pages 6 to 23 are an integral part of the financial statements.
| Consolidated Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
| |||||||||
| (unaudited) |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| 30 September | 31 December |
| ||||||||
|
|
Note | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 |
| ||||||||
| US$'000 |
| |||||||||||
| ASSETS |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Current assets |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
| 10,454 | 19,381 |
| ||||||||
| Accounts receivable | 8 | 218,175 | 266,747 |
| ||||||||
| Deposits, prepaid expenses and other |
| 3,593 | 1,140 |
| ||||||||
| Inventory | 9 | 18,356 | 27,481 |
| ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 28 | 97,634 | 150,760 |
| ||||||||
|
|
| 348,212 | 465,509 |
| ||||||||
| Non-current assets |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Long-term receivable | 30 | 58,617 | 58,338 |
| ||||||||
| Long-term Norwegian tax receivable | 8 | - | 7,032 |
| ||||||||
| Long-term inventory | 9 | 8,126 | 8,126 |
| ||||||||
| Investment in associate | 13 | 18,337 | 18,337 |
| ||||||||
| Exploration and evaluation assets | 10 | 44,235 | 89,844 |
| ||||||||
| Property, plant & equipment | 11 | 1,471,615 | 1,435,209 |
| ||||||||
| Deferred tax assets |
| 181,146 | 139,266 |
| ||||||||
| Goodwill | 12 | 137,114 | 137,114 |
| ||||||||
|
|
| 1,919,190 | 1,893,266 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Total assets |
| 2,267,402 | 2,358,775 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Current liabilities |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Trade and other payables | 15 | (292,094) | (392,131) |
| ||||||||
| Exploration obligations | 16 | (4,164) | (5,431) |
| ||||||||
| Onerous contracts | 17 | (342) | (21,635) |
| ||||||||
|
|
| (296,600) | (419,197) |
| ||||||||
| Non current liabilities |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Borrowings | 14 | (749,839) | (784,859) |
| ||||||||
| Decommissioning liabilities | 18 | (219,889) | (213,105) |
| ||||||||
| Other long term liabilities | 19 | (92,014) | (92,020) |
| ||||||||
| Contingent consideration | 21 | (4,000) | (4,000) |
| ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 28 | (345) | (587) |
| ||||||||
|
|
| (1,066,087) | (1,094,571) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Net Assets |
| 904,715 | 845,007 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Shareholders' equity |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Share capital | 22 | 551,632 | 551,632 |
| ||||||||
| Share based payment reserve | 23 | 22,323 | 19,234 |
| ||||||||
| Retained earnings |
| 330,760 | 274,141 |
| ||||||||
| Total equity |
| 904,715 | 845,007 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 13 November 2015 and signed on its behalf by:
|
| |||||||||||
| "Les Thomas" |
|
|
| |||||||||
| Director |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| "Alec Carstairs" |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Director |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| The accompanying notes on pages 6 to 23 are an integral part of the financial statements.
|
|
| ||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity |
|
|
|
| |||||||||
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Share Capital | Share Based Payment Reserve | Retained Earnings
| Total
|
| ||||||||
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
| ||||||||
Balance, 1 Jan 2014 | 535,716 | 19,254 | 298,676 | 853,646 |
| ||||||||
Share based payment | - | 4,810 | - | 4,810 |
| ||||||||
Options exercised | 15,916 | (6,244) | - | 9,672 |
| ||||||||
Profit for the period | - | - | 24,982 | 24,982 |
| ||||||||
Balance, 30 September 2014 | 551,632 | 17,820 | 323,658 | 893,110 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Balance, 1 Jan 2015 | 551,632 | 19,234 | 274,141 | 845,007 |
| ||||||||
Share based payment | - | 3,089 | - | 3,089 |
| ||||||||
Profit for the period | - | - | 56,619 | 56,619 |
| ||||||||
Balance, 30 September 2015 | 551,632 | 22,323 | 330,760 | 904,715 |
| ||||||||
The accompanying notes on pages 6 to 23 are an integral part of the financial statements.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow |
|
|
| |||||
For the three and nine months ended 30 September 2015 and 2014 |
|
|
| |||||
(unaudited) |
|
|
| |||||
|
| Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | |||||
|
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | |||
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN): |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Profit Before Tax |
| 55,540 | 7,727 | 37,144 | 5,219 | |||
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Depletion, depreciation and amortisation | 11 | 30,946 | 37,809 | 93,206 | 121,580 | |||
Exploration and evaluation expenses | 10 | 620 | 612 | 29,721 | 3,067 | |||
Impairment |
| - | 7,971 | - | 10,866 | |||
Onerous contracts |
| (914) | - | (20,916) | - | |||
Share based payment |
| 238 | 550 | 627 | 1,316 | |||
Loan fee amortisation |
| 1,267 | 1,203 | 4,324 | 3,052 | |||
Revaluation of financial instruments | 27 | (39,129) | (38,189) | 52,087 | (33,495) | |||
Gain on disposal | 32 | (1,034) | - | (26,271) | (2,190) | |||
Accretion |
| 2,285 | 1,543 | 6,784 | 4,162 | |||
Bank interest & charges |
| 5,913 | 7,099 | 19,252 | 14,582 | |||
Cashflow from operations |
| 55,732 | 26,325 | 195,958 | 128,159 | |||
Changes in inventory, receivables and payables relating to operating activities | (10,353) | 11,242 | (35,437) | 33,390 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Petroleum Revenue Tax refunded/(paid) |
| 1,140 | - | (3,303) | - | |||
Net cash from operating activities |
| 46,519 | 37,567 | 157,218 | 161,549 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Acquisition of Summit |
| - | (163,541) | - | (163,541) | |||
Capital expenditure |
| (40,283) | (75,157) | (158,229) | (305,638) | |||
Loan to associate |
| 183 | (5,077) | (279) | (25,931) | |||
Proceeds on disposal |
| 32,521 | - | 32,521 | 2,190 | |||
Changes in receivables and payables relating to investing activities | 13,450 | (16,787) | (15,843) | (76,758) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| 5,871 | (260,562) | (141,830) | (569,678) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Proceeds from issuance of shares |
| - | 2,106 | - | 9,673 | |||
Decrease in restricted cash |
| - | 12,608 | - | 12,608 | |||
Derivatives |
| - | (1,050) | - | (2,365) | |||
Loan (repayment)/draw down |
| (51,500) | (73,139) | 3,688 | 98,726 | |||
Senior notes |
| - | 300,000 | - | 300,000 | |||
Bank interest & charges |
| (15,682) | (8,370) | (26,993) | (18,555) | |||
Net cash from financing activities |
| (67,182) | 232,155 | (23,305) | 400,087 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Currency translation differences relating to cash | (177) | (865) | (1,010) | 3,655 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equiv. | (14,969) | 8,295 | (8,927) | (4,387) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 25,423 | 50,753 | 19,381 | 63,435 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | 10,454 | 59,048 | 10,454 | 59,048 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
The accompanying notes on pages 6 to 23 are an integral part of the financial statements.
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Ithaca Energy Inc. (the "Corporation" or "Ithaca"), incorporated and domiciled in Alberta, Canada on 27 April 2004, is a publicly traded company involved in the exploration, development and production of oil and gas in the North Sea. The Corporation's registered office is 1600, 333 - 7th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 2Z1. The Corporation's shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange in Canada and the London Stock Exchange's Alternative Investment Market in the United Kingdom under the symbol "IAE".
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION
These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) applicable to the preparation of interim financial statements, including IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting. These interim consolidated financial statements do not include all the necessary annual disclosures in accordance with IFRS.
The policies applied in these condensed interim consolidated financial statements are based on IFRS issued and outstanding as of 13 November 2015, the date the Board of Directors approved the statements. Any subsequent changes to IFRS that are given effect in the Corporation's annual consolidated financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2015 could result in restatement of these interim consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis using the historical cost convention, except for financial instruments which are measured at fair value.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in US dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand (US$ 000), except when otherwise indicated.
The condensed interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Corporation's annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2014.
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGEMENTS AND ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY
Basis of measurement
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for the revaluation of certain financial assets and financial liabilities (under IFRS) to fair value, including derivative instruments.
Basis of consolidation
The interim consolidated financial statements of the Corporation include the financial statements of Ithaca Energy Inc. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries as listed per note 30. Ithaca has twenty wholly-owned subsidiaries, four of which were acquired on 31 July 2014 as part of the acquisition of Summit Petroleum Limited ("Summit"). The consolidated financial statements include the Summit group of companies from 31 July 2014 only (being the acquisition date). All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation.
Subsidiaries are all entities, including structured entities, over which the group has control. The group controls an entity when the group is exposed to or has rights to variable returns from its investments with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the group. They are deconsolidated on the date that control ceases.
Business Combinations
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets acquired, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of completion of the acquisition. Acquisition costs incurred are expensed and included in administrative expenses. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Corporation's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of the acquisition is less than the Corporation's share of the net assets required, the difference is recognised directly in the statement of income as negative goodwill.
Goodwill
Capitalisation
Goodwill acquired through business combinations is initially measured at cost, being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognised as the fair value of the Corporation's share of the identifiable net assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If this consideration is lower than the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired, the difference is recognised in the statement of income.
Impairment
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and also when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be at risk of being impaired. Impairment is determined for goodwill by assessing the recoverable amount of each cash generating unit ("CGU") to which the goodwill relates. Where the recoverable amount of the CGU is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognised in the statement of income. Impairment losses relating to goodwill cannot be reversed in future periods.
Interest in joint arrangements and associates
Under IFRS 11, joint arrangements are those that convey joint control which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. Investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and obligations of each investor. Associates are investments over which the Corporation has significant influence but not control or joint control, and generally holds between 20% and 50% of the voting rights.
Under the equity method, investments are carried at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Corporation's share of net assets, less any impairment in value in individual investments. The consolidated statement of income reflects the Corporation's share of the results and operations after tax and interest.
The Corporation's interest in joint operations (eg exploration and production arrangements) are accounted for by recognising its assets (including its share of assets held jointly), its liabilities (including its share of liabilities incurred jointly), its revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from the joint operation, its share of revenue from the sale of output by the joint operation and its expenses (including its share of any expenses incurred jointly).
Revenue
Oil, gas and condensate revenues associated with the sale of the Corporation's crude oil and natural gas are recognised when title passes to the customer. This generally occurs when the product is physically transferred into a vessel, pipe or other delivery mechanism. Revenues from the production of oil and natural gas properties in which the Corporation has an interest with joint venture partners are recognised on the basis of the Corporation's working interest in those properties (the entitlement method). Differences between the production sold and the Corporation's share of production are recognised within cost of sales at market value.
Interest income is recognised on an accruals basis and is separately recorded on the face of the statement of income.
Foreign currency translation
Items included in the financial statements are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Corporation and its subsidiary operate (the 'functional currency'). The consolidated financial statements are presented in United States Dollars, which is the Corporation's functional and presentation currency.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the statement of income.
Share based payments
The Corporation has a share based payment plan as described in note 22 (c). The expense is recorded in the statement of income or capitalised for all options granted in the year, with the gross increase recorded in the share based payment reserve. Compensation costs are based on the estimated fair values at the time of the grant and the expense or capitalised amount is recognised over the vesting period of the options. Upon the exercise of the stock options, consideration paid together with the amount previously recognised in share based payment reserve is recorded as an increase in share capital. In the event that vested options expire unexercised, previously recognised compensation expense associated with such stock options is not reversed. In the event that unvested options are forfeited or expired, previously recognised compensation expense associated with the unvested portion of such stock options is reversed.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For the purpose of the statement of cash flow, cash and cash equivalents include investments with an original maturity of three months or less.
Financial Instruments
All financial instruments, other than those designated as effective hedging instruments, are initially recognised at fair value in the statement of financial position. The Corporation's financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, deposits, derivatives, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, contingent consideration and borrowings. The Corporation classifies its financial instruments into one of the following categories: held-for-trading financial assets and financial liabilities; held-to-maturity investments; loans and receivables; and other financial liabilities. All financial instruments are required to be measured at fair value on initial recognition. Measurement in subsequent periods is dependent on the classification of the respective financial instrument.
Held-for-trading financial instruments are subsequently measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in net earnings. All other categories of financial instruments are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Cash and cash equivalents are classified as held-for-trading and are measured at fair value. Accounts receivable are classified as loans and receivables. Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, certain other long-term liabilities, and long-term debt are classified as other financial liabilities. Although the Corporation does not intend to trade its derivative financial instruments, they are classified as held-for-trading for accounting purposes.
Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of a financial asset or liability and original issue discounts on long-term debt have been included in the carrying value of the related financial asset or liability and are amortised to consolidated net earnings over the life of the financial instrument using the effective interest method.
Analysis of the fair values of financial instruments and further details as to how they are measured are provided in notes 27 to 29.
Inventory
Inventories of materials and product inventory supplies are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method. Current oil and gas inventories are stated at fair value less cost to sell. Non-current oil and gas inventories are stated at historic cost.
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised and carried at the original invoiced amount, less any provision for estimated irrecoverable amounts.
Trade payables
Trade payables are measured at cost.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Oil and gas expenditure - exploration and evaluation assets
Capitalisation
Pre-acquisition costs on oil and gas assets are recognised in the statement of income when incurred. Costs incurred after rights to explore have been obtained, such as geological and geophysical surveys, drilling and commercial appraisal costs and other directly attributable costs of exploration and evaluation including technical, administrative and share based payment expenses are capitalised as intangible exploration and evaluation ("E&E") assets.
E&E costs are not amortised prior to the conclusion of evaluation activities. At completion of evaluation activities, if technical feasibility is demonstrated and commercial reserves are discovered then, following development sanction, the carrying value of the E&E asset is reclassified as a development and production ("D&P") asset, but only after the carrying value is assessed for impairment and where appropriate its carrying value adjusted. If after completion of evaluation activities in an area, it is not possible to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability or if the legal right to explore expires or if the Corporation decides not to continue exploration and evaluation activity, then the costs of such unsuccessful exploration and evaluation is written off to the statement of income in the period the relevant events occur.
Impairment
The Corporation's oil and gas assets are analysed into CGUs for impairment review purposes, with E&E asset impairment testing being performed at a grouped CGU level. The current E&E CGU consists of the Corporation's whole E&E portfolio. E&E assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances arise which indicate that the carrying value of an E&E asset exceeds the recoverable amount. When reviewing E&E assets for impairment, the combined carrying value of the grouped CGU is compared with the grouped CGU's recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of a grouped CGU is determined as the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Impairment losses resulting from an impairment review are written off to the statement of income.
Oil and gas expenditure - development and production assets
Capitalisation
Costs of bringing a field into production, including the cost of facilities, wells and sub-sea equipment, direct costs including staff costs and share based payment expense together with E&E assets reclassified in accordance with the above policy, are capitalised as a D&P asset. Normally each individual field development will form an individual D&P asset but there may be cases, such as phased developments, or multiple fields around a single production facility when fields are grouped together to form a single D&P asset.
Depreciation
All costs relating to a development are accumulated and not depreciated until the commencement of production. Depreciation is calculated on a unit of production basis based on the proved and probable reserves of the asset. Any re-assessment of reserves affects the depreciation rate prospectively. Significant items of plant and equipment will normally be fully depreciated over the life of the field. However, these items are assessed to consider if their useful lives differ from the expected life of the D&P asset and should this occur a different depreciation rate would be charged
Impairment
A review is carried out each reporting date for any indication that the carrying value of the Corporation's D&P assets may be impaired. For D&P assets where there are such indications, an impairment test is carried out on the CGU. Each CGU is identified in accordance with IAS 36. The Corporation's CGUs are those assets which generate largely independent cash flows and are normally, but not always, single developments or production areas. The impairment test involves comparing the carrying value with the recoverable value of an asset. The recoverable amount of an asset is determined as the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and value in use, where the value in use is determined from estimated future net cash flows. Any additional depreciation resulting from the impairment testing is charged to the statement of income.
Non oil and natural gas operations
Computer and office equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over its estimated useful life on a straight-line basis over three years. Furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis over five years.
Borrowings
All interest-bearing loans and other borrowings with banks are initially recognised at fair value net of directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and other borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any issue costs, discount or premium.
Loan origination fees are capitalised and amortised over the term of the loan. Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale, are added to the cost of those assets until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use of sale. All other borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.
Senior notes are measured at amortised cost.
Decommissioning liabilities
The Corporation records the present value of legal obligations associated with the retirement of long term tangible assets, such as producing well sites and processing plants, in the period in which they are incurred with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long term asset. The obligation generally arises when the asset is installed or the ground/environment is disturbed at the field location. In subsequent periods, the asset is adjusted for any changes in the estimated amount or timing of the settlement of the obligations. The carrying amounts of the associated assets are depleted using the unit of production method, in accordance with the depreciation policy for development and production assets. Actual costs to retire tangible assets are deducted from the liability as incurred.
Onerous contracts
Onerous contract provisions are recognised where the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under a contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it.
Contingent consideration
Contingent consideration is accounted for as a financial liability and measured at fair value at the date of acquisition with any subsequent remeasurements recognised either in the statement of income or in other comprehensive income in accordance with IAS 39.
Taxation
Current income tax
Current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amounts are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.
Deferred income tax
Deferred tax is recognised for all deductible temporary differences and the carry-forward of unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantively enacted income tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in rates is included in earnings in the period of the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are recorded in the consolidated financial statements if realisation is considered more likely than not.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only when a legally enforceable right of offset exists and the deferred tax assets and liabilities arose in the same tax jurisdiction.
Petroleum Revenue Tax
In addition to corporate income taxes, the Corporation's financial statements also include and disclose Petroleum Revenue Tax (PRT) on net income determined from oil and gas production.
PRT is accounted for under IAS 12 since it has the characteristics of an income tax as it is imposed under Government authority and the amount payable is based on taxable profits of the relevant field. Deferred PRT is accounted for on a temporary difference basis.
Operating leases
Rentals under operating leases are charged to the statement of income on a straight line basis over the period of the lease.
Finance leases
Finance leases that transfer substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item to the Corporation, are capitalised at the commencement of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are recognised in finance costs in the income statement. A leased asset is depreciated over the useful life of the asset. However, if there is no reasonable certainty that the Corporation will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the asset is depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term.
Maintenance expenditure
Expenditure on major maintenance refits or repairs is capitalised where it enhances the life or performance of an asset above its originally assessed standard of performance; replaces an asset or part of an asset which was separately depreciated and which is then written off, or restores the economic benefits of an asset which has been fully depreciated. All other maintenance expenditure is charged to the statement of income as incurred.
Recent accounting pronouncements
New and amended standards and interpretations need to be adopted in the first interim financial statements issued after their effective date (or date of early adoption). There are no new IFRSs or IFRICs that are effective for the first time for this interim period that would be expected to have a material impact on the Corporation.
Significant accounting judgements and estimation uncertainties
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions regarding certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Such estimates must often be made based on unsettled transactions and other events and a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events. Actual results may differ from estimated amounts.
The amounts recorded for depletion, depreciation of property and equipment, long-term liability, stock-based compensation, contingent consideration, decommissioning liabilities, derivatives and deferred taxes are based on estimates. The depreciation charge and any impairment tests are based on estimates of proved and probable reserves, production rates, prices, future costs and other relevant assumptions. By their nature, these estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty and the effect on the financial statements of changes in such estimates in future periods could be material. Further information on each of these estimates is included within the notes to the financial statements.
4. SEGMENTAL REPORTING
The Corporation operates a single class of business being oil and gas exploration, development and production and related activities in a single geographical area presently being the North Sea.
5. REVENUE
| Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | ||
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 |
Oil sales | 41,380 | 88,347 | 167,054 | 282,179 |
Gas sales | 542 | 1,060 | 3,782 | 4,579 |
Condensate sales | 85 | 238 | 375 | 374 |
Other income | 101 | 449 | 424 | 2,533 |
| 42,108 | 90,094 | 171,635 | 289,665 |
6. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | |||
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 |
General & administrative | (2,509) | (3,184) | (7,611) | (9,962) |
Share based payment | (238) | (550) | (627) | (1,316) |
| (2,747) | (3,734) | (8,238) | (11,278) |
|
|
|
|
|
7. FINANCE COSTS
| Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | ||
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 |
Bank charges | (1,630) | (2,743) | (6,258) | (9,883) |
Senior notes interest | (3,830) | (3,862) | (11,179) | (3,862) |
Finance lease interest | (260) | (174) | (791) | (174) |
Non-operated asset finance fees | (11) | (22) | (61) | (124) |
Prepayment interest | (181) | (297) | (963) | (608) |
Loan fee amortisation | (1,267) | (1,203) | (4,324) | (3,052) |
Accretion | (2,285) | (1,543) | (6,784) | (4,162) |
| (9,464) | (9,844) | (30,360) | (21,865) |
8. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Norwegian tax receivable - non-current | - | 7,032 |
Norwegian tax receivable - current | - | 25,362 |
Trade debtors | 211,655 | 229,248 |
Accrued income | 6,521 | 12,137 |
| 218,175 | 273,779 |
|
|
|
9. INVENTORY
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Crude oil inventory - current | 16,116 | 25,333 |
Crude oil inventory - non current | 8,126 | 8,126 |
Materials inventory | 2,240 | 2,148 |
| 26,482 | 35,607 |
The non-current portion of inventory relates to long term stocks at the Sullom Voe Terminal.
10. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS
| US$'000 |
|
|
At 1 January 2014 | 57,628 |
|
|
Additions | 48,114 |
Transfer from E&E to D&P (note 11) | (1,365) |
Release of exploration obligations | (7,428) |
Write offs/relinquishments | (7,105) |
At 31 December 2014 | 89,844 |
|
|
Additions | 29,383 |
Disposals | (44,005) |
Release of exploration obligations | (1,267) |
Write offs/relinquishments | (29,720) |
At 30 September 2015 | 44,235 |
|
|
Write offs in the period of $29.7 million primarily relate to the Norwegian Snomus project. An exploration well was drilled and found to be dry, resulting in the carrying value of the asset being fully written off to nil.
The above also includes the release of the exploration obligation provision against expenditure incurred. (Note 16)
The disposal in the quarter relates to the sale of the wholly owned subsidiary, Ithaca Petroleum Norge AS. (Note 32)
11. PROPERY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| Development & Production Oil and Gas Assets US$'000 |
Other fixed assets US$'000 | Total US$'000 |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2014 | 1,743,349 | 3,163 | 1,746,512 |
Acquisitions | 246,169 | - | 246,169 |
Additions | 350,186 | 977 | 351,163 |
Transfers from E&E to D&P (note 10) | 1,365 | - | 1,365 |
At 31 December 2014 | 2,341,069 | 4,140 | 2,345,209 |
|
|
|
|
Additions | 130,111 | 708 | 130,819 |
Disposals | - | (1,451) | (1,451) |
Release of onerous contract provision | (377) | - | (377) |
At 30 September 2015 | 2,470,803 | 3,397 | 2,474,200 |
|
|
|
|
DD&A and Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2014 | (320,501) | (2,299) | (322,800) |
DD&A charge for the period | (166,982) | (396) | (167,378) |
Impairment charge for the period | (419,822) | - | (419,822) |
At 31 December 2014 | (907,305) | (2,695) | (910,000) |
|
|
|
|
DD&A charge for the period | (92,819) | (379) | (93,198) |
Disposals | - | 613 | 613 |
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2015 | (1,000,124) | (2,461) | (1,002,585) |
|
|
|
|
NBV at 1 January 2014 | 1,422,848 | 864 | 1,423,712 |
NBV at 1 January 2015 | 1,433,764 | 1,445 | 1,435,209 |
|
|
|
|
NBV at 30 September 2015 | 1,470,679 | 936 | 1,471,615 |
|
|
|
|
The net book amount of property, plant and equipment includes $30.5 million (31 December 2014: $32.2 million) in respect of the Pierce FPSO lease held under finance lease.
The disposal in the period relates to the sale of the wholly owned subsidiary, Ithaca Petroleum Norge AS. (Note 32)
12. GOODWILL
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Opening balance | 137,114 | 985 |
Addition in the period | - | 136,129 |
Closing balance | 137,114 | 137,114 |
$136.1 million represents a goodwill asset recognised on the acquisition of Summit Petroleum Limited as a result of recognising a $136.9 million deferred tax liability as required under IFRS 3 fair value accounting for business combinations. Absent the deferred tax liability the price paid for the Summit assets equated to the fair value of the assets. $0.9 million represents goodwill recognised on the acquisition of gas assets from GDF in December 2010.
13. INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Investments in FPF-1 and FPU services | 18,337 | 18,337 |
|
|
|
Investment in associates comprises shares, acquired by Ithaca Energy (Holdings) Limited, in FPF-1 Limited and FPU Services Limited as part of the completion of the Greater Stella Area transactions in 2012. There has been no change in value during the period with the above investment reflecting the Corporation's share of the associates' results.
14. BORROWINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 Sept | 31 Dec |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2015 | 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
RBL facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (461,793) | (480,588) | |
Senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (300,000) | (300,000) | |
Norwegian facility |
|
|
|
|
|
| - | (17,444) | ||
Long term bank fees |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7,782 | 7,635 | ||
Long term senior notes fees |
|
| 4,172 | 5,538 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (749,839) | (784,859) |
Extension and amendment to bank debt facilities
In April 2015, the Corporation executed extended and simplified bank debt financing facilities totalling $650 million. The $650 million is comprised of a senior RBL facility of $575 million and junior RBL facility of $75 million. This junior RBL facility replaced the former Corporate Facility and removed the use of historic financial covenant tests from the debt facilities. Both RBL facilities are based on conventional oil and gas industry borrowing base financing terms, with loan maturities in September 2018, and are available to fund on-going development activities and general corporate purposes. The combined interest rate of the two bank debt facilities, fully drawn, is LIBOR plus 3.4% prior to Stella coming on-stream, stepping down to LIBOR plus 2.9% after Stella production has been established.
The availability to draw upon the facilities is reviewed by the bank syndicate on a semi-annual basis, with the results of the October 2015 redetermination resulting in debt availability of $515 million.
Senior Reserves Based Lending Facility
As at 30 September 2015, the Corporation has a Senior Reserved Based Lending ("Senior RBL") Facility of $575 million. As at 30 September 2015, $462 million (31 December 2014: $481 million) was drawn down under the Senior RBL. $7.8 million (31 December 2014: $7.6 million) of loan fees relating to the RBL have been capitalised and remain to be amortised.
Junior Reserves Based Lending Facility
As at 30 September 2015, the Corporation had a Junior Reserved Based Lending ("Junior RBL") Facility of $75 million. The facility remains undrawn at the quarter end.
Norwegian Tax Rebate Facility
The Norwegian Tax Rebate Facility ("Norwegian Facility") of NOK 600 million was closed out as part of the completion of the Norway sale to MOL in the second quarter and fully repaid and retired. (Note 32).
Senior Notes
As at 30 September 2015, the Corporation had $300 million 8.125% senior unsecured notes due July 2019, with interest payable semi-annually. $4.2 million of loan fees (31 December 2014: $5.5 million) have been capitalised and remain to be amortised.
The Corporation is subject to financial and operating covenants related to the facilities. Failure to meet the terms of one or more of these covenants may constitute an event of default as defined in the facility agreements, potentially resulting in accelerated repayment of the debt obligations.
Covenants
The Corporation was in compliance with all its relevant financial and operating covenants during the period.
The key covenants in both the Senior and Junior RBLs are:
- A corporate cashflow projection showing total sources of funds must exceed total forecast uses of funds for the later of the following 12 months or until forecast first oil from the Stella field.
- The ratio of the net present value of cashflows secured under the RBL for the economic life of the fields to the amount drawn under the facility must not fall below 1.15:1
- The ratio of the net present value of cashflows secured under the RBL for the life of the debt facility to the amount drawn under the facility must not fall below 1.05:1.
There are no financial maintenance covenants tests under the senior notes.
Security provided against the facilities
The RBL facilities are secured by the assets of the guarantor member of the Ithaca Group, such security including share pledges, floating charges and/or debentures.
The Senior notes are unsecured senior debt of Ithaca Energy Inc, guaranteed by certain members of the Ithaca Group and subordinated to existing and future secured obligations.
15. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Trade payables | (127,408) | (308,704) |
Accruals and deferred income | (164,686) | (83,427) |
| (292,094) | (392,131) |
16. EXPLORATION OBLIGATIONS
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Exploration obligations | (4,164) | (5,431) |
The above reflects the fair value of E&E commitments assumed as part of the Valiant transaction. During the nine months to 30 September 2015, $1.3 million was released reflecting expenditure incurred in the period.
17. ONEROUS CONTRACTS
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Onerous contracts | (342) | (21,635) |
The above reflects the onerous contracts provided for as a result of the 2014 impairments relating to Beatrice and Jacky, Athena and Anglia. During the period to 30 September 2015, $21.3 million was utilised reflecting net expenditure incurred in the period.
18. DECOMMISSIONING LIABILITIES
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Balance, beginning of period | (213,105) | (172,047) |
Additions | - | (45,715) |
Accretion | (6,784) | (5,724) |
Revision to estimates | - | 10,381 |
Balance, end of period | (219,889) | (213,105) |
The total future decommissioning liability was calculated by management based on its net ownership interest in all wells and facilities, estimated costs to reclaim and abandon wells and facilities and the estimated timing of the costs to be incurred in future periods. The Corporation uses a risk free rate of 4.2 percent (31 December 2014: 4.2 percent) and an inflation rate of 2.0 percent (31 December 2014: 2.0 percent) over the varying lives of the assets to calculate the present value of the decommissioning liabilities. These costs are expected to be incurred at various intervals over the next 21 years.
The economic life and the timing of the obligations are dependent on Government legislation, commodity price and the future production profiles of the respective production and development facilities.
19. OTHER LONG TERM LIABILITIES
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Shell prepayment | (61,131) | (60,168) |
Finance lease acquired | (30,883) | (31,852) |
Balance, end of period | (92,014) | (92,020) |
The balance relates to cash advances of $61 million under the Shell oil sales agreements which have been transferred to long-term liabilities as short-term repayment is not due in the current oil price environment and the finance lease related to the Pierce FPSO acquired as part of the Summit acquisition.
20. FINANCE LEASE LIABILITY
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2013 US$'000 |
Total minimum lease payments |
|
|
|
Less than 1 year | (2,602) | (2,595) | - |
Between 1 and 5 years | (12,605) | (12,714) | - |
5 years and later | (24,121) | (25,959) | - |
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Less than 1 year | (1,008) | (1,048) | - |
Between 1 and 5 years | (4,195) | (4,408) | - |
5 years and later | (3,741) | (4,279) | - |
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments |
|
|
|
Less than 1 year | (1,594) | (1,547) | - |
Between 1 and 5 years | (8,410) | (8,306) | - |
5 years and later | (20,380) | (21,680) | - |
The finance lease relates to the Pierce FPSO acquired as part of the Summit acquisition in July 2014.
21. CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Balance outstanding | (4,000) | (4,000) |
The contingent consideration at the end of the period relates to the acquisition of the Stella field and is payable upon first oil.
22. SHARE CAPITAL
Authorised share capital | No. of common shares | Amount US$'000 |
At 30 September 2015 and 31 December 2014 | Unlimited | - |
|
|
|
(a) Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
The issued share capital is as follows: |
|
|
Issued | Number of common shares | Amount US$'000 |
Balance 1 January 2014 | 323,633,620 | 535,716 |
Issued for cash - options exercised | 5,885,000 | 9,673 |
Transfer from Share based payment reserve on options exercised | - | 6,243 |
Balance 1 January 2015 and 30 September 2015 | 329,518,620 | 551,632 |
(b) Stock options
In the quarter ended 30 September 2015, the Corporation's Board of Directors did not grant any options.
The Corporation's stock options and exercise prices are denominated in Canadian Dollars when granted. As at 30 September 2015, 21,453,220 stock options to purchase common shares were outstanding, having an exercise price range of $0.84 to $2.51 (C$1.04 to C$2.71) per share and a vesting period of up to 3 years in the future.
Changes to the Corporation's stock options are summarised as follows:
| 30 September 2015 | 31 December 2014 | ||
|
No. of Options | Wt. Avg Exercise Price* | No. of Options | Wt. Avg Exercise Price* |
Balance, beginning of period | 24,232,428 | $1.81 | 14,593,567 | $2.01 |
Granted | 950,000 | $0.84 | 15,905,000 | $1.63 |
Forfeited / expired | (3,729,208) | $2.25 | (381,139) | $2.39 |
Exercised | - | - | (5,885,000) | $1.79 |
Options | 21,453,220 | $1.70 | 24,232,428 | $1.81 |
* The weighted average exercise price has been converted into U.S. dollars based on the foreign exchange rate in effect at the date of issuance.
The following is a summary of stock options as at 30 September 2015
Options Outstanding |
| Options Exercisable | |||||||
Range of Exercise Price | No. of Options | Wt. Avg Life (Years) | Wt. Avg Exercise Price* |
| Range of Exercise Price |
No. of Options | Wt. Avg Life (Years) | Wt. Avg Exercise Price* | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
$2.28-$2.51 (C$2.31-C$2.71) | 8,166,552 | 2.1 | $2.46 |
| $2.28-$2.51 (C$2.31-C$2.71) | 2,778,332 | 2.0 | $2.44 | |
$0.84-$2.03 (C$1.04-C$1.99) | 13,286,668 | 2.6 | $1.23 |
| $0.84-$2.03 (C$1.04-C$1.99) | 2,366,670 | 1.0 | $2.03 | |
| 21,453,220 | 2.4 | $1.70 |
|
| 5,145,002 | 1.5 | $2.25 | |
The following is a summary of stock options as at 31 December 2014.
Options Outstanding |
| Options Exercisable | |||||||
Range of Exercise Price | No. of Options | Wt. Avg Life (Years) | Wt. Avg Exercise Price* |
| Range of Exercise Price |
No. of Options | Wt. Avg Life (Years) | Wt. Avg Exercise Price* | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
$2.22-$2.51 (C$2.25-C$2.71) | 11,465,760 | 2.3 | $2.41 |
| $2.22-$2.51 (C$2.25-C$2.71) | 3,680,760 | 0.9 | $2.29 | |
$0.93-$2.03 (C$1.06-C$1.99) | 12,766,668 | 3.2 | $1.28 |
| $0.93-$2.03 (C$1.06-C$1.99) | 2,603,337 | 1.8 | $2.03 | |
| 24,232,428 | 2.8 | $1.81 |
|
| 6,284,097 | 1.1 | $2.18 | |
(c) Share based payments
Options granted are accounted for using the fair value method. The compensation cost during the three months and nine months ended 30 September 2015 for total stock options granted was $1.1 million and $3.1 million respectively (Q3 2014: $1.5 million, Q3 YTD: $4.8 million). $0.2 million and $0.6 million were charged through the income statement for share based payment for the three and nine months ended 30 September 2015 respectively, being the Corporation's share of share based payment chargeable through the income statement. The remainder of the Corporation's share of share based payment has been capitalised. The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated at the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| For the nine months ended 30 September 2015 | For the year ended 31 December 2014 |
Risk free interest rate | 0.65% | 1.27% |
Expected stock volatility | 59% | 56% |
Expected life of options | 3 years | 3 years |
Weighted Average Fair Value | $0.43 | $1.08 |
23. SHARE BASED PAYMENT RESERVE
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Balance, beginning of period | 19,234 | 19,254 |
Share based payment cost | 3,089 | 6,223 |
Transfer to share capital on exercise of options | - | (6,243) |
Balance, end of period | 22,323 | 19,234 |
24. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The calculation of basic earnings per share is based on the profit after tax and the weighted average number of common shares in issue during the period. The calculation of diluted earnings per share is based on the profit after tax and the weighted average number of potential common shares in issue during the period.
| Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | ||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 |
Wtd av. number of common shares (basic) | 329,518,620 | 329,409,055 | 329,518,620 | 327,997,027 |
Wtd av. number of common shares (diluted) | 329,518,620 | 329,954,910 | 329,518,620 | 330,098,302 |
25. TAXATION
| Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | ||
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 |
Taxation (charge)/credit | (12,728) | 227 | 19,475 | 19,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the Stella Sale and Purchase Agreement ("SPA"), Ithaca receives the right to claim a tax benefit for additional capital allowances on certain capital expenditures incurred by Ithaca and paid for by Petrofac on the Stella project.
The tax benefit of these capital allowances is received by Ithaca as the expenditure is incurred. In recognition of the benefit Ithaca receives from the additional capital allowances a payment is expected to be made to Petrofac 5 years after Stella first oil of a sum calculated at the prevailing tax rate applied to the relevant capital allowances, in accordance with the SPA. The taxation charge above includes a deferred tax credit of $17.1million for the three months ended 30 September 2015 resulting in a related deferred tax asset at 30 September 2015 of $77.5 million.
26. COMMITMENTS
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Operating lease commitments |
|
|
Within one year | 352 | 868 |
Two to five years | 360 | 1,739 |
Capital commitments | 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Capital commitments incurred jointly with other ventures (Ithaca's share) | 12,003 | 88,964 |
In addition to the amounts above, during the quarter Ithaca has entered into an agreement with Petrofac in respect of the FPF-1 Floating Production facility.
Ithaca will pay Petrofac $13.7 million in respect of final payment on variations to the contract, with payment deferred until three and a half years after first production from the Stella field. A further payment to Petrofac of up to $34 million will be made by Ithaca dependent on the timing of sail-away of the FPF-1. The maximum payment can be achieved for delivering sail-away of the vessel from the shipyard prior to the end of March 2016, with this incentive payment eroding on a daily basis to zero by 31 July 2016. This payment will also be deferred until three and a half years after first production from the Stella field.
27. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
To estimate fair value of financial instruments, the Corporation uses quoted market prices when available, or industry accepted third-party models and valuation methodologies that utilise observable market data. In addition to market information, the Corporation incorporates transaction specific details that market participants would utilise in a fair value measurement, including the impact of non-performance risk. The Corporation characterises inputs used in determining fair value using a hierarchy that prioritises inputs depending on the degree to which they are observable. However, these fair value estimates may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that could be realised or settled in a current market transaction. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
• Level 1 - inputs represent quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (for example, exchange-traded commodity derivatives). Active markets are those in which transactions occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
• Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, as of the reporting date. Level 2 valuations are based on inputs, including quoted forward prices for commodities, market interest rates, and volatility factors, which can be observed or corroborated in the marketplace. The Corporation obtains information from sources such as the New York Mercantile Exchange and independent price publications.
• Level 3 - inputs that are less observable, unavailable or where the observable data does not support the majority of the instrument's fair value.
In forming estimates, the Corporation utilises the most observable inputs available for valuation purposes. If a fair value measurement reflects inputs of different levels within the hierarchy, the measurement is categorised based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The valuation of over-the-counter financial swaps and collars is based on similar transactions observable in active markets or industry standard models that primarily rely on market observable inputs. Substantially all of the assumptions for industry standard models are observable in active markets throughout the full term of the instrument. These are categorised as Level 2.
The following table presents the Corporation's material financial instruments measured at fair value for each hierarchy level as of 30 September 2015:
| Level 1 US$'000 | Level 2 US$'000 | Level 3 US$'000 | Total Fair Value US$'000 |
Derivative financial instrument asset | - | 97,634 | - | 97,634 |
Contingent consideration | - | (4,000) | - | (4,000) |
Derivative financial instrument liability | - | (345) | - | (345) |
The table below presents the total gain / (loss) on financial instruments that has been disclosed through the statement of comprehensive income:
|
| Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | ||
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | |
Revaluation of forex forward contracts | (3,254) | - | 1,785 | (4,171) | |
Revaluation of other long term liability | - | 716 | 307 | 346 | |
Revaluation of commodity hedges | 41,769 | 37,373 | (54,529) | 37,445 | |
Revaluation of interest rate swaps | 614 | 100 | 349 | (134) | |
| 39,129 | 38,189 | (52,088) | 33,486 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Realised gain on forex contracts | 614 | - | 1,221 | 4,028 | |
Realised gain/(loss) on commodity hedges | 35,132 | 1,122 | 145,238 | (5,219) | |
Realised gain/(loss) on interest rate swaps | 19 | (82) | (186) | (306) | |
| 35,765 | 1,040 | 146,273 | (1,497) | |
Total gain on financial instruments | 74,894 | 39,229 | 94,185 | 31,989 |
The Corporation has identified that it is exposed principally to these areas of market risk.
i) Commodity Risk
The table below presents the total gain/(loss) on commodity hedges that has been disclosed through the statement of comprehensive income:
Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | |||
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 |
Revaluation of commodity hedges | 41,769 | 37,373 | (54,529) | 37,445 |
Realised gain/(loss) on commodity hedges | 35,132 | 1,122 | 145,238 | (5,219) |
Total gain on commodity hedges | 76,901 | 38,495 | 90,709 | 32,226 |
Commodity price risk related to crude oil prices is the Corporation's most significant market risk exposure. Crude oil prices and quality differentials are influenced by worldwide factors such as OPEC actions, political events and supply and demand fundamentals. The Corporation is also exposed to natural gas price movements on uncontracted gas sales. Natural gas prices, in addition to the worldwide factors noted above, can also be influenced by local market conditions. The Corporation's expenditures are subject to the effects of inflation, and prices received for the product sold are not readily adjustable to cover any increase in expenses from inflation. The Corporation may periodically use different types of derivative instruments to manage its exposure to price volatility, thus mitigating fluctuations in commodity-related cash flows.
The below represents commodity hedges in place at the quarter end:
Derivative | Term | Volume |
| Average price |
Oil swaps | Oct 15 - June 17 | 3,216,298 | bbls | $64.2/bbl |
Oil Capped swaps | Oct 15 - June 16 | 575,926 | bbls | $63.3/bbl * |
|
|
|
|
|
Gas swaps | Oct 15 - Mar 17 | 10,247,167 | therms | 47p/therm |
Gas puts | Oct 15 - June 17 | 187,300,000 | therms | 63p/therm |
|
|
|
|
|
* Exposure to increase in oil price capped at $101.7/bbl
ii) Interest Risk
The table below presents the total gain/(loss) on interest financial instruments that has been disclosed statement of income at the quarter end:
Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | |||
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 |
Revaluation of interest contracts | 614 | 100 | 349 | (134) |
Realised gain/(loss) on interest contracts | 19 | (82) | (186) | (306) |
Total gain/(loss) on interest contracts | 633 | 18 | 163 | (441) |
Calculation of interest payments for the RBL Facilities agreement incorporates LIBOR. The Corporation is therefore exposed to interest rate risk to the extent that LIBOR may fluctuate. The below represents interest rate financial instruments in place:
Derivative | Term | Value | Rate |
Interest rate swap | Oct 15 - Dec 15 | $200 million | 0.44% |
Interest rate swap | Jan 16 - Dec 16 | $50 million | 1.24% |
iii) Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
The table below presents the total (loss)/gain on foreign exchange financial instruments that has been disclosed through the statement of income at the quarter end:
Three months ended 30 Sept | Nine months ended 30 Sept | |||
| 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 | 2015 US$'000 | 2014 US$'000 |
Revaluation of foreign exchange forward contracts | (3,254) | - | 1,785 | (4,171) |
Realised gain on foreign exchange forward contracts | 614 | - | 1,221 | 4,028 |
Total (loss)/gain on forex forward contracts | (2,640) | - | 3,006 | (143) |
The Corporation is exposed to foreign exchange risks to the extent it transacts in various currencies, while measuring and reporting its results in US Dollars. Since time passes between the recording of a receivable or payable transaction and its collection or payment, the Corporation is exposed to gains or losses on non USD amounts and on balance sheet translation of monetary accounts denominated in non USD amounts upon spot rate fluctuations from quarter to quarter. The Corporation evaluates its foreign exchange instrument requirements on a rolling monthly basis.
The below represents foreign exchange financial instruments in place at the quarter end:
Derivative | Term | Value | Protection rate | Trigger rate |
Forward Plus | Oct 15 - Dec 15 | £2 million/month | $1.60/£1.00 | $1.39/£1.00 |
Forward Plus | Oct 15 - Dec 15 | £2 million/month | $1.60/£1.00 | $1.42/£1.00 |
Forward | Oct 15 - Dec 15 | £1.6 million/month | $1.48/£1.00 | N/a |
Forward | Oct 15 - Dec 15 | £1.6 million/month | $1.48/£1.00 | N/a |
Forward | Jan 16 - Dec 16 | £1.6 million/month | $1.47/£1.00 | N/a |
Forward | Jan 16 - Dec 16 | £1.6 million/month | $1.48/£1.00 | N/a |
iv) Credit Risk
The Corporation's accounts receivable with customers in the oil and gas industry are subject to normal industry credit risks and are unsecured. Oil production from Cook, Broom, Dons, Pierce, Causeway and Fionn is sold to Shell Trading International Ltd. Wytch Farm oil production is sold on the spot market. Oil production from the Athena field is sold to BP Oil International Limited. Anglia and Topaz gas production is sold through two contracts to RWE NPower PLC and Hess Energy Gas Power (UK) Ltd. Cook gas is sold to Shell UK Ltd and Esso Exploration & Production UK Ltd.
The Corporation assesses partners' credit worthiness before entering into farm-in or joint venture agreements. In the past, the Corporation has not experienced credit loss in the collection of accounts receivable. As the Corporation's exploration, drilling and development activities expand with existing and new joint venture partners, the Corporation will assess and continuously update its management of associated credit risk and related procedures.
The Corporation regularly monitors all customer receivable balances outstanding in excess of 90 days. As at 30 September 2015 substantially all accounts receivables are current, being defined as less than 90 days. The Corporation has no allowance for doubtful accounts as at 30 September 2015 (31 December 2014: $Nil).
The Corporation may be exposed to certain losses in the event that counterparties to derivative financial instruments are unable to meet the terms of the contracts. The Corporation's exposure is limited to those counterparties holding derivative contracts with positive fair values at the reporting date. As at 30 September 2015, the exposure is $97.6 million (31 December 2014: $150.8 million) and is with eight investment grade banks, all members of the company's RBL syndicate.
The Corporation also has credit risk arising from cash and cash equivalents held with banks and financial institutions. The maximum credit exposure associated with financial assets is the carrying values.
v) Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk includes the risk that as a result of its operational liquidity requirements the Corporation will not have sufficient funds to settle a transaction on the due date. The Corporation manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash reserves, banking facilities, and by considering medium and future requirements by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows. The Corporation considers the maturity profiles of its financial assets and liabilities. As at 30 September 2015, substantially all accounts payable are current.
The following table shows the timing of cash outflows relating to trade and other payables.
| Within 1 year US$'000 | 1 to 5 years US$'000 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (292,094) | - |
Other long term liabilities | - | (92,014) |
Borrowings | - | (749,839) |
| (292,094) | (841,853) |
28. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
| 30 Sept 2015 US$'000 | 31 Dec 2014 US$'000 |
Oil swaps | 39,817 | 72,566 |
Oil puts | - | 52,926 |
Oil capped swaps | 6,497 | - |
Gas swaps | 875 | - |
Gas puts | 48,463 | 25,018 |
Interest rate swaps | 334 | (30) |
Foreign exchange forward contract | 1,303 | (307) |
| 97,289 | 150,173 |
29. FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Financial instruments of the Corporation consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, loans and financial derivative contracts, all of which are included in these financial statements. At 30 September 2015, the classification of financial instruments and the carrying amounts reported on the balance sheet and their estimated fair values are as follows:
| 30 September 2015 US$'000 | 31 December 2014 US$'000 | ||
Classification
| Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value |
Cash and cash equivalents (Held for trading) | 10,454 | 10,456 | 19,381 | 19,381 |
Derivative financial instruments (Held for trading) | 97,634 | 97,634 | 150,760 | 150,760 |
Accounts receivable (Loans and Receivables) | 218,175 | 218,175 | 266,747 | 266,747 |
Deposits | 3,593 | 3,593 | 1,140 | 1,140 |
Long-term Norwegian tax receivable | - | - | 7,032 | 7,032 |
Long-term receivable (Loans and Receivables) | 58,617 | 58,617 | 58,338 | 58,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank debt (Loans and Receivables) | (749,839) | (749,839) | (784,859) | (784,859) |
Contingent consideration | (4,000) | (4,000) | (4,000) | (4,000) |
Derivative financial instruments (Held for trading) | (345) | (345) | (587) | (587) |
Other long term liabilities | (92,014) | (92,014) | (92,020) | (92,020) |
Accounts payable (Other financial liabilities) | (292,094) | (292,094) | (392,131) | (392,131) |
30. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Ithaca Energy Inc and the subsidiaries listed in the following table:
| Country of incorporation | % equity interest at 30 Sept | |
|
| 2015 | 2014 |
Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited | Scotland | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Minerals (North Sea) Limited | Scotland | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Energy (Holdings) Limited | Bermuda | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Energy Holdings (UK) Limited | Scotland | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Petroleum Ltd | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca North Sea Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Exploration Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Causeway Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Gamma Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Alpha (N.I.) Limited | Northern Ireland | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Epsilon Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Delta Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Petroleum Norge AS | Norway | 0% | 100% |
Ithaca Petroleum Holdings AS | Norway | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Technology AS | Norway | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca AS | Norway | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Petroleum EHF | Iceland | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca SPL Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Dorset Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca SP UK Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Ithaca Pipeline Limited | England and Wales | 100% | 100% |
Transactions between subsidiaries are eliminated on consolidation.
The following table provides the total amount of transactions that have been entered into with related parties during the quarter ending 30 September 2015 and 30 September 2014, as well as balances with related parties as of 30 September 2015 and 31 December 2014:
|
| Sales | Purchases | Accounts receivable | Accounts payable |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Burstall Winger LLP | 2015 | - | - | - | (100) |
| 2014 | - | 111 | - | (127) |
Loans to related parties |
|
| Amounts owed from related parties | ||
|
|
|
| 30 Sept | 31 Dec |
|
|
|
| 2015 | 2014 |
|
|
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
FPF-1 Limited |
|
|
| 58,617 | 58,338 |
31. SEASONALITY
The effect of seasonality on the Corporation's financial results for any individual quarter is not material.
32. DISPOSAL OF ITHACA PETROLEUM NORGE AS
The Corporation entered into an agreement with a subsidiary of the Hungarian listed company MOL Plc (MOL:BUD) to sell its wholly owned subsidiary, Ithaca Petroleum Norge AS ("Ithaca Norge"), for an initial consideration of US$60 million plus the ability to earn additional bonus payments of up to US$30 million dependent on exploration success from the existing licence portfolio. The disposal was accounted for on 30 June 2015 with cash proceeds received in July 2015.
The disposal resulted in a gain of $25.2 million recorded in 2Q15, being the difference between the net assets disposed of and the proceeds received. An additional $1 million is recognised in 3Q15 after updating of the completion statement.
The disposal has not been presented as a discontinued operation as the assets of Ithaca Norge did not represent a separate major line of business or geographical area of the Corporation.
33. DISPOSAL OF ITHACA PETROLEUM NORGE AS
On 9 October 2015 the Corporation announced the execution of an Investment Agreement with DKL Investments Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Delek Group Ltd. ("Delek"), in respect of a US$66 million equity investment in the Corporation.
The investment was completed on 20 October 2015 via a non-brokered private placement of 81,865,425 Common Shares in the capital of the Corporation (the "Placing") at CAD$1.05 per share (the "Placing Price"), equivalent to £0.53 per share.
Related Shares:
IAE.L