25th Nov 2013 07:00
25 November 2013
BETTER CAPITAL PCC LIMITED
(the "Company")
INTERIM RESULTS UPDATE
Better Capital PCC Limited is pleased to announce its 2013 interim results for both the 2009 Cell and the 2012 Cell.
2009 Cell Interim Results
· £210.0 MILLION total capital raised
· £12.4 MILLION distribution in the period to 30 September 2013
· £26.5 MILLION/12.6 PER CENT. cumulative distributions to date
· 42.65 PER CENT. return from NAV growth and distributions since inception
· 7 platform acquisitions
· 1 bolt-on acquisition in the period to 30 September 2013
· 10 bolt-on acquisitions since inception
· 1 exit in Fund I
Key Financials | |
NAV | £266.0m |
NAV (including distributions) | £292.5m |
NAV per share | 128.62 pence |
NAV per share (including distributions) | 141.42 pence |
NAV total return * | 29.74 per cent. |
NAV total return (including distributions)* | 42.65 per cent. |
Share price at 30 September 2013 | 153.5 pence |
Market capitalisation at 30 September 2013 | £317.4m |
* Based on the weighted average issue price of ordinary shares and net of share issue costs.
2012 Cell Interim Results
· £185.6 MILLION additional capital raised in August 2013
· £355.5 MILLION total capital raised in the 2012 Cell
· £347.4 MILLION net proceeds invested in Fund II
· £110.0 MILLION/31.7 PER CENT. committed to date
· 3 platform acquisitions at 30 September 2013
· 5.8 PER CENT. increase in NAV (net of issue costs) since inception
Key Financials | |
NAV | £368.1m |
NAV per share | 106.2 pence |
NAV total return* | 5.8 per cent. |
Share price at 30 September 2013 | 109.75 pence |
Market capitalisation at 30 September 2013 | £380.4m |
* Based on the weighted average issue price of ordinary shares and net of share issue costs.
Chairman's Statement
The Board is pleased to present the Company's Interim Report for the six months to ended 30 September 2013. From a corporate perspective, this has been a busy period. Notably the Company (through the 2012 Cell) was successful in raising further capital for deployment into Fund II. Gross proceeds of £185.6 million were raised over the summer. The Company, through the 2009 Cell also distributed a further 6.0 pence per share to the 2009 Cell investors in the period.
The Fund I GP and the Fund II GP have provided trading updates to the Board. Broadly, the portfolio companies continue to operate in a weak environment despite some very early signs of growth in the UK. The Board has been informed that the 2009 Cell NAV for the period (adjusted for distributions) is only marginally uplifted, principally reflecting continuing progress in Gardner, Spicers and Santia being offset by weaker performances in Calyx and Fairline. Progress in the Fund II portfolio companies remains encouraging, providing for a modest growth in the 2012 Cell NAV.
2009 Cell
Overview
NAV (including distributions) in the period grew by £1.2 million. At the fund level, the Fund I portfolio carrying value rose by £8.8 million, a combination of further investments into the portfolio companies and value enhancement. Cash reduced by £18.3 million in the period, reflecting a distribution of £12.4 million to the 2009 Cell and the funding of various portfolio company activities. The carry provision in the valuation also rose by £1.4 million in the period to £8.7 million.
In April 2013, the Board approved the 2009 Cell's second distribution of £12.4 million to the 2009 Cell investors. This brought the total distribution in the 2009 Cell to £26.5 million or 12.6 per cent. of total capital raised.
Investment activities
Three portfolio companies received further investment from Fund I. Santia received £2.0 million towards the acquisition of First Order Red Limited, an asbestos consultancy business. Fairline and Calyx Managed Services received funding injections totalling £2.6 million, to fund working capital.
Portfolio
Gardner is a medium to high complexity metallic components manufacturer, serving the aerospace industry. The business completed its 2013 financial period in August with underlying profitability significantly ahead of prior year. Gardner's current year plan shows further improvement albeit this is dependent on the timing of customer demand. The restructuring in the legacy UK sites is substantially completed with considerable work still on-going in Airia, the French business acquired in April 2012.
Reader's Digest has emerged from a Company Voluntary Arrangement in early 2013 and is now trading as a small magazine business. However, in recognition of the scale of the business, the general weakness in the printing sector and the challenges to grow its value, Reader's Digest is now fully written down.
The Calyx Group is made up of m-hance, a provider of business software management solutions operating on the Microsoft Dynamics AX Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution, and Calyx Managed Services, a managed service provider to small medium size enterprises. Both businesses are now expected to report lower year-on-year profitability, predominantly driven by weak revenues.
m-hance, which is re-positioning its proposition from a software re-seller to a bespoke provider of business management software solutions, has struggled to convert its prospect pipeline. The failure to close expected business in the autumn led to a substantial reduction in expected 2013 profitability which was disappointing. Considerable change is underway to drive focus back into growing the order pipeline and to improve conversion. The Microsoft Dynamics AX ERP solution remains an area for growth due to its scalability and the ability to customise to complex requirements.
Calyx Managed Services continues to face highly competitive market conditions. The business has now re-focused in its core competencies such as break-fix and telephony. Calyx Managed Services has also made structural changes to its sales team with further cost reduction measures and management change being implemented.
Santia is a health and safety consultancy, providing services in occupational health, health and safety management, contractor accreditation, training, food safety testing and asbestos management. Santia is on course to deliver strong year-on-year underlying profitable growth. The integration of First Order Red, an asbestos consultancy business acquired in May 2013 is progressing satisfactorily and provides the scale required to make Santia's asbestos management division a significant market participant. Santia is expecting to make a small repayment back to Fund I before the end of 2013.
Omnico is a global omni-channel point of sale software and hardware provider. Considerable progress has been achieved in stabilising the business which recorded a small underlying profit in its 2013 financial year in September, compared with a significant loss in its prior year. Omnico's priority now is to continue to drive growth through its software and mobile point of sale offering, supported by new product launches. The order pipeline is encouraging with some high profile prospects.
Fairline designs and manufactures luxury boats, ranging from 38 to 80 feet in length. Trading conditions remain challenging for the sector with the demise of a number of businesses and widespread reduction in the availability of dealer financing. This resulted in a significant reduction in sales to dealers with a healthy reduction in dealer stocks. Fairline also suffered from short term production issues as a result of migrating its manufacturing to the re-engineered Corby facility and the introduction of the new Targa 48 range. Significant effort is being invested to resolve the production issues, to drive retail sales, and strengthen the dealer network. A new CEO is in place. The new Targa 48 has been well received and has a full order book until Q3 2014, with overall retail sales turning up.
Spicers is a wholesale stationery and office equipment distributor. The business remains profitable despite the industry as a whole contracting at around 8 per cent. per annum, reflecting the shift towards a paperless environment. The challenge for Spicers is to arrest revenue decline with growth initiatives such as contract distribution and targeting the small home office via e-commerce platforms such as Amazon and its own proprietary portal (www.memoetc.co.uk). The business has set itself an ambitious plan in the current year and is working to distribute further cash to Fund I in the near term. Significant surplus assets are in the process of being realised.
2012 Cell
Overview
The 2012 Cell invests solely in Fund II. In the period, Fund II acquired its third platform, City Link. The carrying value of Everest has increased, with Jaeger and City Link retained at the price of recent investment, providing a NAV growth in the 2012 Cell of 5.8 per cent., net of issuance costs, 20.3 per cent. on invested capital.
Fundraising
In line with the intent stated in the Company's prospectus dated 19 December 2011, the Company embarked on the second fundraising of the 2012 Cell over the summer through the issuance of new 2012 Cell shares. The issue closed in under ten weeks and raised gross proceeds of £185.6 million.
The new 2012 Cell shares were issued at 105.0 pence per share, at a 2.1 per cent. premium to NAV. The issue received strong support from both existing and new investors, all attracted by the Better Capital proposition of superior total returns from investing in a pool of distressed businesses.
Proceeds, net of issuance costs, of £181.9 million were deployed into Fund II on 16 August 2013.
Investment activities
On 26 April, Fund II acquired City Link, an express delivery courier business from Rentokil Initial plc for a nominal sum. Fund II has invested £40.0 million into City Link, to fund its restructuring programme and growth initiatives.
Fund II has also invested a total of £6.4 million in the period to fund Jaeger's refurbishment of its flagship store on Regent Street, London and its on-going restructuring.
Portfolio
Everest manufactures and installs premium priced home improvement products such as double glazed windows, doors, rooflines and conservatories. The business continues to make good progress in its turnaround, particularly with the restructuring of the sales organisation and the refining of the installation process. Current year profitability is significantly ahead of the prior year.
Jaeger, a British premium fashion retailer, has strengthened its management team in the period. Like-for-like and current year sales have grown considerably, albeit from a low base. Under the new management team, some sourcing and production are being brought back into Europe to improve quality and lead time. Jaeger is expected to generate a modest profit in the current year which will be a substantial improvement on the prior year loss.
The turnaround programme in City Link is progressing at pace. The IT implementations to improve visibility across the logistics chain and to provide more accurate estimated delivery time to the customers are largely complete and being trialled. City Link generated a small underlying profit in September 2013 despite experiencing some setback due to the threat of a RMT Union strike.
Deal flow
The position in the UK reported in previous periods persists, with struggling businesses still supported by the benign interest rate environment. Deal flow in the UK has been consistent but attractive transactions have been very few in number. The Board remains confident that due to Better Capital's market position as a leading turnaround investor, Better Capital LLP, the Consultant to Fund II GP, has been privy to the vast majority of all UK turnaround opportunities.
The average weekly deal flow volume has risen in the period as the Consultant expands its marketing efforts beyond the UK. Particular focus has been invested in Germany due to the volume of attractive opportunities that would benefit from Better Capital's investment led modus operandi. Germany is also appealing due to the Consultant's extensive knowledge and experience of operating in the country. A German office is in the process of being set up to facilitate further deal origination. Deal flow is also coming from other European jurisdictions.
Better Capital (Dublin) Limited, the Dublin Consultant to Fund II GP, continues to generate a good flow of leads in Ireland. The backing from both Fund II and the National Pensions Reserve Fund of Ireland has given the Dublin Consultant credibility among the local advisory and banking communities. Deal flow from Ireland has improved following the setup of a Dublin office, albeit the opportunities are typically smaller than those in the UK and Continental Europe.
The Consultant continues to be well-resourced. In the period, Richard Favier, formerly from the Pension Protection Fund, joined the Consultant on a consultancy basis. With Richard's input, the Consultant intends to originate opportunities with complex pension issues.
The composition of source and sector has remained broadly consistent with the prior periods. A total of 1,337 leads had been logged by the Consultant from incorporation to 30 September 2013.
Outlook
Better Capital is now moving into its fifth year of operations and has established a strong market position through its proven ability to execute deals and restructure distressed businesses. The additional capital raised over the summer reinforces Better Capital's ability to participate in the niche market of distressed turnaround investing and its long term position as a reputable investor in growth.
The team has grown significantly over the past year, having boosted resources in Ireland and now Germany, and in specialist areas such as pension and legal.
The Board believes that deal flow should remain sufficient to deploy the remainder of the uncommitted funds in Fund II in the remaining investment period, with UK sources enhanced by the expansion into Continental Europe and growing traction in the Irish market.
Richard Crowder
Chairman
22 November 2013
Enquiries:
Better Capital PCC Limited +44 (0)1481 716 000
Richard Crowder (Chairman)
Mark Huntley (Administrator and Company Secretary)
Numis Securities Limited (Corporate Broker & Financial Adviser) +44 (0)20 7260 1000
Nathan Brown
Oliver Hardy
Powerscourt (Public Relations Adviser) +44 (0) 20 7250 1446
Justin Griffith
Statement of Responsibility and Other Information
Responsibility Statement
The Directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
· the condensed set of financial statements has been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 'Interim Financial Reporting' as adopted by the European Union; and
· the Interim Financial Report meets the requirements of an interim management report (as defined below), and includes a fair review of the information required by:
a) DTR 4.2.7R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being an indication of important events that have occurred during the first period of the financial year; and their impact on the condensed set of financial statements; and a description of the principal risks and uncertainties of the remaining six months of the year; and
b) DTR 4.2.8R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being related party transactions that have taken place in the first period of the current financial year and that have materially affected the financial position or performance of the entity during that period; and any changes in the related party transactions described in the audited financial statements that could do so.
Shareholdings of the Directors
The beneficial interests in shares of the Company that were held by Directors as at 30 September 2013 are detailed below:
2009 Cell
Director | 2009 Shares | Per cent. Holding* 30 September 2013 | |
30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | ||
Richard Crowder | 50,000 | 50,000 | 0.02 |
Richard Battey | 30,000 | 30,000 | 0.01 |
Philip Bowman | 250,000 | 250,000 | 0.12 |
Jon Moulton | 19,523,809 | 19,523,809 | 9.44 |
* Per cent. holding is given on one for one share holding basis rather than on voting rights.
2012 Cell
Director | 2012 Shares | Per cent. Holding* 30 September 2013 | |
30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | ||
Richard Crowder | 100,000 | 100,000 | 0.03 |
Richard Battey | 60,000 | 30,000 | 0.02 |
Philip Bowman | 595,238 | 500,000 | 0.17 |
Jon Moulton | 34,761,905 | 30,000,000 | 10.03 |
* Per cent. holding is given on one for one share holding basis rather than on voting rights.
There have been no changes to the Directors' shareholdings since 30 September 2013.
On 28 June 2013, Mr Mark Huntley resigned as a director of the Company. On 28 June 2013, Mr Jon Moulton was appointed as a director of the Company.
Shareholders' voting rights
Other than the 100 Core Shares issued to the Better Capital Purpose Trust as part of the Conversion, the Directors confirm that there are no securities in issue that carry special rights with regards to the control of the Company. The Core Shares have no voting rights for so long as Cell Shares are in issue.
The Company's issued share capital consists of 206,780,952 in the 2009 Cell and 346,600,520 in the 2012 Cell. Under the Company's articles of incorporation, at any general meeting of the Company:
• each holder of 2009 Shares who is present in person shall have one vote and on a poll the vote shall be weighted where a vote cast in relation to each 2009 Share shall count as 1.1096 towards the total number of votes cast; and
• each holder of 2012 Shares who is present in person shall have one vote and on a poll the vote shall be weighted where a vote cast in relation to each 2012 Share shall count as 0.9770 towards the total number of votes cast.
The figure which may be used by the Shareholders as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, Better Capital PCC Limited under the FCA's Disclosure and Transparency Rules, is the aggregate of the number of votes capable of being cast on a poll, namely 568,072,852. This is calculated as the sum of the 2009 Shares (206,780,952) multiplied by 1.1096 plus the 2012 Shares (346,600,520) multiplied by 0.9770.
Similarly, to calculate the numerator, Shareholders should multiply their holding of 2009 Shares by 1.1096 and multiply their holding of 2012 Shares by 0.9770. The sum of those calculations will result in the relevant number of voting rights for the numerator.
Fund I GP's Share and Carried Interest
The Fund I GP's Share is calculated under the terms of the Fund I Limited Partnership Agreement and as described in the Prospectus dated 29 July 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the Fund I Limited Partnership Agreement, where net income and net capital gains are insufficient to extinguish the Fund I GP's Share, Fund I shall advance a non-interest bearing loan to the extent of the Fund I GP's Share not already drawn by the Fund I GP. The loan is not recoverable from the Fund I GP other than by allocation of net income or net capital gains.
In the period under review, Fund I has advanced a non-interest bearing loan to its general partner of £1.2 million (31 March 2013: £2.9 million, 30 September 2012: £1.55 million) in respect of the Fund I GP's Share. This has been accounted for as a reduction in the underlying fair value when calculating the fair value of the investment by 2009 Cell in Fund I.
Pursuant to Clause 14 of the Fund I Limited Partnership Agreement, the Net Asset Value limit has been reached however no amounts are yet liable to be paid or accrued in respect of Carried Interest but is taken into account when calculating the fair value of the 2009 Cell's investment in Fund I.
Fund II GP's Share and Carried Interest
The Fund II GP's Share is calculated under the terms of the Fund II Limited Partnership Agreement and as described in the Prospectus dated 29 July 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the Fund II Limited Partnership Agreement, where net income and net capital gains are insufficient to extinguish the Fund II GP's Share, Fund II shall advance a non-interest bearing loan to the extent of the Fund II GP Share not already drawn by the Fund II GP. The loan is not recoverable from the Fund II GP other than by allocation of net income or net capital gains.
In the period under review, Fund II has advanced a non-interest bearing loan to its general partner of £1.6 million (31 March 2013: £2.5 million, 30 September 2012: £1.3 million) in respect of the Fund II GP's Share. This has been accounted for as a reduction in the underlying fair value when calculating the fair value of the investment by 2012 Cell in Fund II.
Pursuant to Clause 14 of the Fund II Limited Partnership Agreement, the Net Asset Value limit has not yet been reached; therefore no amounts are yet liable to be paid or accrued in respect of Carried Interest.
Going Concern
After making enquiries and given the nature of the Company, Fund I and its investments and Fund II and its investments, the Directors are satisfied that it is appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements, and, after due consideration, the Directors consider that the Company is able to continue for the foreseeable future.
Interim management report
· Important events of the interim period
The important events of the interim period that have occurred during the period and the key factors influencing the financial statements are all set out in this report, comprising: the Chairman's Statement, Fund I General Partner's Report, Investment Report of Fund I and Financial Statement sections and Fund II General Partner's Report, Investment Report of Fund II and Financial Statement sections.
· Principal risk
For the remaining six months of the financial period, the Company's principal risk relates to the financial performance of the Fund I and Fund II portfolios.
The Company's principal risk factors are fully discussed in the Company's prospectuses, available on the Company's website (www.bettercapital.gg).
The Directors of the Company are listed in the General Information section and, with the exception of Mr Jon Moulton, have been directors throughout the period.
By order of the Board
Richard Crowder
Chairman
22 November 2013
Independent Review Report to Better Capital PCC Limited
Introduction
We have been engaged by the Company to review the condensed set of financial statements of the Company in the interim financial report for the period ended 30 September 2013 which comprises the Company Condensed Statement of Financial Position, Company Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income, Company Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity, Company Condensed Statement of Cash Flows and Company related notes.
We have read the other information contained in the interim financial report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the condensed set of financial statements.
Directors' responsibilities
The interim financial report is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the Directors. The Directors are responsible for preparing the interim financial report in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
As disclosed in Note 2, the annual financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union. The Company's condensed set of financial statements included in this interim financial report have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, 'Interim Financial Reporting' as adopted by the European Union.
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express to the Company a conclusion on the Company's condensed set of financial statements in the interim financial report based on our review.
Our report has been prepared in accordance with the terms of our engagement to assist the Company in meeting its responsibilities in respect of interim financial reporting in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority and for no other purpose. No person is entitled to rely on this report unless such a person is entitled to rely upon this report by virtue of and for the purpose of our terms of engagement or has been expressly authorised to do so by our prior written consent. Save as above, we do not accept responsibility for this report to any other person or for any other purpose and we hereby expressly disclaim any and all such liability.
Scope of review
We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, 'Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity' issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Conclusion
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Company's condensed set of financial statements in the interim financial report for the six months ended 30 September 2013 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 as adopted by the European Union and the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
BDO LimitedChartered AccountantsPlace du Pré, Rue du Pré, St Peter Port, Guernsey
Date: 22 November 2013
Condensed Statement of Financial Position
As at 30 September 2013
As at | As at | |||||||
30 September | 30 September | As at | ||||||
2013 | 2012 | 31 March 2013 | ||||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||
Non-current assets | ||||||||
Investment in Limited Partnerships | 4 | 631,893 | 437,295 | 450,090 | ||||
Total non-current assets | 631,893 | 437,295 |
450,090 | |||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Trade and other receivables | 1,605 | 1,618 | 822 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 803 | 2,066 | 1,252 | |||||
Total current assets | 2,408 | 3,684 | 2,074 | |||||
TOTAL ASSETS | 634,301 | 440,979 | 452,164 | |||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Trade and other payables | (246) | (151) | (236) | |||||
Total current liabilities | (246) | (151) | (236) | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | (246) | (151) | (236) | |||||
NET ASSETS | 634,055 | 440,828 | 451,928 | |||||
EQUITY | ||||||||
Share capital | 526,453 | 371,011 | 356,950 | |||||
Retained earnings | 107,602 | 69,817 | 94,978 | |||||
TOTAL EQUITY | 634,055 | 440,828 | 451,928 | |||||
Number of 2009 Shares in issue at period/year end | 6 | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | ||||
Number of 2012 Shares in issue at period/year end | 6 | 346,600,520 | 169,861,895 | 169,861,895 | ||||
Net asset value per 2009 Share (pence) | 8 | 128.62 | 133.13 | 134.06 | ||||
Adjusted net asset value per 2009 Share (pence) | 8 | 141.42 | 133.13 | 140.86 | ||||
Net asset value per 2012 Share (pence) | 8 | 106.20 | 97.45 | 102.86 |
The unaudited condensed financial statements of the Company were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 22 November 2013 and signed on their behalf by:
Richard Crowder Richard Battey
Chairman Director
The notes form an integral part of the Company's condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
Six months to 30 September 2013 | Six months to 30 September 2012 | Year ended 31 March 2013 | ||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||
Income | ||||||
Change in fair value on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 4 | 12,303 | 18,453 | 44,048 | ||
Income distribution | 4 | 800 | 800 | 800 | ||
Interest income | 4 | 4 | 8 | |||
Total income | 13,107 | 19,257 | 44,856 | |||
Expenses | ||||||
Administration fees | 130 | 125 | 250 | |||
Directors' fees and expenses | 7 | 92 | 104 | 208 | ||
Legal and professional fees | 120 | 91 | 185 | |||
Other fees and expenses | 78 | 44 | 83 | |||
Audit fees | 32 | 38 | 70 | |||
Insurance premiums | 6 | 12 | 34 | |||
Registrar fees | 25 | 22 | 44 | |||
Total expenses | 483 | 436 | 874 | |||
Profit for the financial period/year | 12,624 | 18,821 | 43,982 | |||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | |||
Total comprehensive income for the period/year | 12,624 | 18,821 | 43,982 | |||
Basic and diluted earnings per 2009 Share (pence) | 8 | 0.56 | -9.32 | 17.04 | ||
Basic and diluted earnings per 2012 Share (pence) | 8 | 5.28 | (0.26) | 5.14 |
All activities derive from continuing operations.
The notes form an integral part of the Company's condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
Share | Retained | Total | |
capital | earnings | Equity | |
Period | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
As at 1 April 2013 | 356,950 | 94,978 | 451,928 |
Profit for the financial period | - | 12,624 | 12,624 |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - |
Total comprehensive income for the period | - | 12,624 | 12,624 |
Transactions with owners | |||
Capital distribution | (12,407) | - | (12,407) |
Proceeds from issue of shares | 185,576 | - | 185,576 |
Share issue costs | (3,666) | - | (3,666) |
Total transactions with owners | 169,503 | - |
169,503 |
As at 30 September 2013 (unaudited) | 526,453 | 107,602 | 634,055 |
Share | Retained | Total | |
capital | earnings | Equity | |
Period | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
As at 1 April 2012 | 371,011 | 50,996 | 422,007 |
|
|
|
|
Profit for the financial period | - | 18,821 | 18,821 |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - |
Total comprehensive income for the period | - | 18,821 | 18,821 |
As at 30 September 2012 (unaudited) | 371,011 | 69,817 | 440,828 |
|
|
|
|
The notes form an integral part of the Company's condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
For the six months period to 30 September 2013
Six months to | Six months to | Year ended | ||||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 | 31 March 2013 | ||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||
Profit for the financial period/year | 12,624 | 18,821 | 43,982 | |||
Adjustments for: | ||||||
Change in fair value on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | (12,303) | (18,453) | (44,048) | |||
Movement in trade receivables | (783) | (784) | 12 | |||
Movement in trade payables | 10 | (5) | 80 | |||
Net cash (used in)/generated from operating activities | (452) | (421) | 26 | |||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||
Purchase of investment in Limited Partnerships | (181,900) | - | - | |||
Repayment of loan investment in Limited Partnerships | 12,400 | - | 12,800 | |||
Net cash (used in)/generated from investing activities | (169,500) | - | 12,800 | |||
Cash flow from financing activities | ||||||
Proceeds from issue of shares | 185,576 | - | - | |||
Share issue costs | (3,666) | - | - | |||
Capital distribution | (12,407) | - | (14,061) | |||
Net cash generated from/(used in) financing activities | 169,503 | - | (14,061) | |||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the period/year | (449) | (421) | (1,235) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period/year | 1,252 | 2,487 | 2,487 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period/year | 803 | 2,066 | 1,252 |
The notes form an integral part of the Company's condensed interim financial statements.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
1. General information
Better Capital PCC Limited (formerly known as Better Capital Limited) was incorporated on 24 November 2009 in Guernsey with an unlimited life and registered with the Commission as a Registered Closed-ended Collective Investment Scheme pursuant to the POI Law. The registered office of the Company is Heritage Hall, PO Box 225, Le Marchant Street, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 4HY.
Further information regarding the background of the Company is detailed in the Company Background and Further Information section.
2. Accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The unaudited company condensed financial information included in the interim financial report for the six months ended 30 September 2013 have been prepared in accordance with the DTRs and Listing Rules of the UK's FCA and IAS 34, 'Interim Financial Reporting' as adopted by the EU.
The interim financial statements do not include all the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company's annual financial statements for the year to 31 March 2013, which are available on the Company's website (www.bettercapital.gg). The annual financial statements have been prepared in accordance with EU adopted IFRSs.
The Company does not operate in an industry where significant or cyclical variations, as a result of seasonal activity are experienced during the financial period.
Except as listed below, the same accounting policies and methods of computation are followed in the interim financial statements as in the annual financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2013.
Standards, interpretations and amendments to published standards adopted in the period
The following standards, which have only impacted disclosures, are mandatory for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and have been adopted in the financial statements:
- Amendments to IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting
- IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (Note 4 & Note 5)
Going concern
After making appropriate enquiries, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company, and in turn Funds I and II, have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and do not consider there to be any threat to the going concern status of the Company. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these financial statements.
Segmental reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Board of Directors, as a whole. The key measure of performance used by the Board to assess the Company's performance and to allocate resources is the total return on the Company's Net Asset Value, as calculated under IFRS, and therefore no reconciliation is required between the measure of profit or loss used by the Board and that contained in the financial statements.
For management purposes, the Company is organised into two main operating segments, being the 2009 Cell and the 2012 Cell. Full details of the 2009 Cell's and 2012 Cell's results are shown on in the Cell sections.
All of the Company's income is from within Guernsey.
All of the Company's non-current assets are located in Guernsey.
Due to the Company's nature it has no customers.
Critical accounting judgement and estimation uncertainty
Use of estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The areas involving a high degree of judgement or complexity or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are disclosed below. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected.
The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results.
Investments in Fund I and Fund II
The value of the Cells investments in the Funds are based on the value of each cell's limited partner capital and loan accounts within each Fund. This is based on the components within the Funds, principally the value of the underlying investee companies. Any fluctuation in the value of the underlying investee companies will directly impact on the value of the Cells investments in the Funds.
Further information in relation to the valuations of the investments in the Funds is disclosed in Note 4 and Note 5.
3. Taxation
The Company and Cells are exempt from taxation in Guernsey and the Company is charged an annual exemption fee of £600.
4. Investment in Limited Partnerships
Total Investment:
Loans | Capital | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cost | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2013 | 356,463 | 37 | 356,500 |
Purchase of investment in Limited Partnerships | 181,900 | - | 181,900 |
Repayment of loan investment in Limited Partnerships | (12,400) | - | (12,400) |
Carried forward at 30 September 2013 | 525,963 | 37 | 526,000 |
Fair value adjustment through profit or loss | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2013 | 93,590 | - | 93,590 |
Fair value movement during period | 12,303 | - | 12,303 |
Carried forward at 30 September 2013 | 105,893 | - | 105,893 |
Fair value as at 30 September 2013 (unaudited) | 631,856 | 37 | 631,893 |
Loans | Capital | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cost | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2012 | 369,263 | 37 | 369,300 |
Repayment of loan investment in Limited Partnerships | (12,800) | - | (12,800) |
Carried forward at 31 March 2013 | 356,463 | 37 | 356,500 |
Fair value adjustment through profit or loss | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2012 | 49,542 | - | 49,542 |
Fair value movement during year | 44,048 | - | 44,048 |
Carried forward at 31 March 2013 | 93,590 | - | 93,590 |
Fair value as at 31 March 2013 (audited) | 450,053 | 37 | 450,090 |
The movement in fair value is derived from the fair value movements in the underlying investments held by Fund I and Fund II, net of income and expenses of Fund I and Fund II and their related special purpose vehicles.
The outstanding loans do not carry interest. The loans are expected to be repaid by way of distributions from the Funds. The Company is not entitled to demand repayment of the outstanding loans, however, the General Partner may, upon request by the Company, repay to the Company any amount of the outstanding loan. During the period £12.4 million was repaid to the Company by Fund I (31 March 2013: £12.8 million, 30 September 2012: £nil).
During August 2013 a further investment of £181.9 million was paid into Fund II.
Distributions receivable from the Funds in the period amounted to £0.8 million (31 March 2013: £0.8 million, 30 September 2012: £0.8 million) of which £1.6 million (31 March 2013: £0.8 million, 30 September 2012: £1.6 million) remains outstanding at the period end, which have been allocated as income based on discretionary allocation powers of the respective General Partners of the Funds as set out in the respective Limited Partnership Agreements.
In the financial statements of the Company, the fair value of the investments in Limited Partnerships will be increased or reduced to reflect the fair value of the Cell's attributable valuation of net assets within Fund I and Fund II.
5. Fair value
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the financial assets or financial liabilities are categorised is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety into only one of the three levels.
The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
- Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
- Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices)
- Level 3 - inputs for the assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The only financial instruments carried at fair value are the investments which are fair valued at each reporting date.
The Company's investments have been classified within Level 3 as they have unobservable inputs and are not traded. Amounts classified under Level 3 for the period are, £265,663,000 for Fund I (31 March 2013: £276,667,000, 30 September 2012: £273,249,000) and £366,230,000 for Fund II (31 March 2013: £173,423,000, 30 September 2012: £164,047,000).
Transfers during the period
There have been no transfers between levels. Due to the nature of the investments, they are always expected to be classified under Level 3.
Valuation techniques
The value of the Cells investments in the Funds is based on the value of each Cell's limited partner capital and loan accounts within each Fund. This is based on the components within the Funds, principally the value of the underlying investee companies. Any fluctuation in the value of the underlying investee companies will directly impact on the value of the Company's investment in the Funds.
When valuing the underlying investee companies, the GPs of each Fund review information provided by the underlying investee companies and other business partners and applies IPEV methodologies, to estimate a fair value as at the date of the statement of financial position.
Initially acquisitions are valued at price of recent investment. Once maintainable earnings can be identified the preferred method of valuation is the earnings multiple valuation technique, where a multiple that is an appropriate and reasonable indicator of value (given the size, risk profile and earnings growth prospects of the underlying company) is applied to the maintainable earnings of the company. Occasionally other methods, as deemed suitable by the GPs, may be used, such as revenue or gross profit multiples, net assets, break-up value or discounted cash flows.
The Board reviews and considers the fair value arrived at by the GPs before incorporating into the fair value of the investment adopted by the Company. The variety of valuation bases adopted, quality of management information provided by the underlying investee companies and the lack of liquid markets for the investments mean that there are inherent difficulties in determining the fair value of these investments that cannot be eliminated. Therefore the amounts realised on the sale of investments may differ from the fair values reflected in these financial statements and the differences may be significant.
Where the price of recent investment is determined to be the most appropriate methodology the transactional price will be that of the investment by Fund I or Fund II. The Omnico, Jaeger and City Link investments are carried at the price of recent investment. Due to the immaturity of the turnaround position of these investee companies, interest receivable on loans advanced by the Funds will only be recognised when it is deemed more likely than not that the interest will be paid. As at 30 September 2013 such unrecognised interest receivable amounted to £9.0 million (31 March 2013: £2.1 million, 30 September 2012: £0.6 million) (Note 2 - Investments in Fund I and Fund II).
The significant unobservable inputs in the 2009 Cell and in the 2012 Cell are shown in the Cell reports.
6. Share Capital
Core Shares
Period ended 30 September 2013
£ | ||||||||
Core shares as at 1 April 2013 |
100 | |||||||
Issued | - | |||||||
Core Shares as at 30 September 2013 | 100 | |||||||
Year ended 31 March 2013
£ | ||||||||
Core shares as at 1 April 2012 |
100 | |||||||
Issued | - | |||||||
Core Shares as at 31 March 2013 | 100 | |||||||
|
Cell Shares
Period ended 30 September 2013
Authorised:
The Cells are authorised to issue unlimited shares at £1 par value.
2009 Cell | 2012 Cell | Total | |||||
Issued and fully paid: | |||||||
Unlimited shares of £1 par value | No. | No. | No. | ||||
Shares as at 1 April 2013 | 206,780,952 | 169,861,895 | 376,642,847 | ||||
Movement for the period | - | 176,738,625 | 176,738,625 | ||||
Shares as at 30 September 2013 | 206,780,952 | 346,600,520 | 553,381,472 | ||||
Share capital | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||
Share capital as at 1 April 2013 | 190,946 | 166,004 | 356,950 | ||||
Movements for the period: | |||||||
Proceeds from issue of shares | - | 185,576 | 185,576 | ||||
Issue costs paid | (3,666) | (3,666) | |||||
2009 Cell Distribution | (12,407) | - | (12,407) | ||||
Share capital as at 30 September 2013 | 178,539 | 347,914 | 526,453 |
Year ended 31 March 2013
Authorised:
The Cells are authorised to issue unlimited shares at nil par value.
2009 Cell | 2012 Cell | Total | |||||
Issued and fully paid: | |||||||
Unlimited shares of no par value | No. | No. | No. | ||||
Shares as at 1 April 2012 | 206,780,952 | 169,861,895 | 376,642,847 | ||||
Movement for the year | - | - | - | ||||
Shares as at 31 March 2013 | 206,780,952 | 169,861,895 | 376,642,847 | ||||
Share capital | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||
Share capital as at 1 April 2012 | 205,007 | 166,004 | 371,011 | ||||
Movements for the year: | |||||||
Capital distribution | (14,061) | - | (14,061) | ||||
Share capital as at 31 March 2013 | 190,946 | 166,004 | 356,950 |
During the period the 2009 Cellmade a second distribution of capital of 6.0 pence per ordinary share to Shareholders of the 2009 Cell as at the ex-date of 3 April 2013. In line with the first distribution, this distribution of £12.4 million will be treated by the Company as a reduction of share capital. The distribution was paid on 19 April 2013.
The two capital distributions (reductions of share capital) announced to date for the 2009 Cell total £26.5 million, 12.6 per cent. of funds raised.
On 13 August 2013 a total of 176,738,625 shares were issued in 2012 Cell under the Firm Placing and Placing and Open Offer raising gross proceeds of £185.6 million. Following Admission the Better Capital 2012 Cell consisted of 346,600,520 shares.
On 31 July 2013, at the Annual General Meeting, the Shareholders of the 2009 Cell and the 2012 Cell approved by ordinary resolution the re-designation of the 2009 Cell and 2012 Cell shares to par value of £1 (31 March 2013: nil par value).
Principal members of Better Capital LLP, the appointed Consultant to BECAP GP LP and BECAP12 GP LP, which act as General Partners to Fund I and Fund II, respectively, hold investments in the Company in accordance with the terms of the Prospectus. At the period end, those members held the following proportions of shares:
2009 Cell | 2012 Cell | |||
Number of Shares | Per cent. of Share Capital | Number of Shares | Per cent. of Share Capital | |
Mark Aldridge | 157,572 | 0.1 | 926,190 | 0.3 |
Nick Sanders* | 200,000 | 0.1 | 926,190 | 0.3 |
*Shareholding is held through a discretionary trust in favour of Nick Sanders' children
7. Related party transactions
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the party in making financial or operational decisions. The Directors are responsible for overall control, management and supervision of the Company's affairs and are responsible for the overall implementation of the investment objective and policy of the Company.
The Company has four non-executive Directors. On 28 June 2013, Mr Mark Huntley resigned from the Board and Mr Jon Moulton was appointed as a non-executive Director of the Company. Mr Moulton is a Director and the sole shareholder of BECAP GP Limited, the general partner of the Fund I GP and BECAP12 GP Limited, the general partner of the Fund II GP.
Annual remuneration for each Director is as follows: the Chairman receives £60,000, the Chairman of the audit committee receives £52,500, the Chairman of the management engagement, nomination and remuneration committee receives £50,000 and the other non-executive Director receives £45,000. During the period Mr Moulton waived his fee.
Other remuneration paid to each Director of £5,000 (£2,500 for Mr Huntley) during the period was in respect of additional services rendered in relation to the fund raising in the 2012 Cell and totalled £17,500. These have been included within share capital as costs of raising capital within the 2012 Cell. Mr Moulton waived his fee for the fundraising.
Directors' fees for the period to 30 September 2013 amounted to £92,000 (31 March 2013: £208,000, 30 September 2012: £104,000), of which £41,000 (31 March 2013: £52,000, 30 September 2012: £11,000) was outstanding at the period end.
Directors share holdings are shown on page 6.
During the period, the Company incurred administration fees of £130,000 (31 March 2013: £250,000, 30 September 2012: £125,000) apportioned on a NAV basis between the Cells. £68,000 (31 March 2013: £63,000, 30 September 2012: £63,000) remained outstanding at the period end.
8. Earnings per share and net asset value per share
Earnings per share
2009 Cell | Six months to 30 September 2013 | Six months to 30 September 2012 | Year ended 31 March 2013 | |||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||
Profit for the period/year | £1.159m | £19.264m | £35.243m | |||
Weighted average number of 2009 Shares in issue | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | |||
EPS (pence) | 0.56 | 9.32 | 17.04 | |||
2012 Cell | Six months to 30 September 2013 | Six months to 30 September 2012 | Year ended 31 March 2013 | |||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||
Profit/(loss) for the period/year | £11.465m | £(0.443)m | £8.739m | |||
Weighted average number of 2012 Shares in issue | 217,185,352 | 169,861,895 | 169,861,895 | |||
EPS (pence) | 5.28 | (0.26) | 5.14 | |||
The earnings per share is based on the profit or loss of each Cell of the Company for the period/year and on the weighted average number of shares of each Cell of the Company in issue for the period/year.
The Cells of the Company do not have any instruments which could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future.
Net asset value per share
The net asset value per share for the 2009 Cell and 2012 Cell are shown in the Cell reports.
9. Subsequent events
On 11 October 2013, Fund I received £0.7 million of interest income from Spicers.
On 13 November 2013, Omnico received £1.3 million of further investment from Fund I. The new investment was deployed towards working capital requirements.
Other than the above, there have been no significant subsequent events since 30 September 2013.
Better Capital 2009 Cell
Investment policy summary
Better Capital 2009 Cell has invested in a portfolio of businesses which, when purchased, had significant operating issues and associated financial distress, and which have significant activities within the United Kingdom or Ireland.
Uninvested or surplus capital or assets may be invested on a temporary basis in cash or cash equivalents, money market instruments, bonds, commercial paper or other debt obligations with banks or other counterparties having a "single A" or higher credit rating as determined by any reputable rating agency selected by the General Partner and any "government and public securities" as defined for the purposes of the FCA Rules.
The 2009 Cell Investment policy is in the Company's prospectuses, available on the Company's website (www.bettercapital.gg).
Investment activities in Fund I
In the period under review, total follow-on investments of £4.6 million were made.
Santia
· 2 May 2013 - Fund I invested £2.0 million in Santia to fund the bolt-on acquisition of First Order Red Limited. Total commitment and investment in Santia now stands at £15.5 million.
Calyx
· 23 July 2013 - Fund I injected £1.0 million into Calyx Managed Services to fund its working capital requirements. Total commitment and investment by Fund I in Calyx (comprising Calyx Managed Services and m-hance) is £32.0 million.
Fairline
· 15 August 2013 - Fund I provided further funding to Macsco 30 Limited, the acquisition vehicle of Fairline, to fund working capital requirements. Fund I invested £1.6 million whilst the minority shareholder, West Register (Investments) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Scotland plc, invested £1.4 million. To date, Fund I has committed and invested £23.1 million in the business.
The following investment activity took place post 30 September 2013:
Omnico
· 13 November 2013 - Omnico Group received a £1.3 million investment to fund working capital. Total commitment and investment by Fund I in Omnico Group is £34.3 million.
General Partner's Report
The market conditions for most portfolio companies remained subdued during the period.
Activities
A total of £2.6 million was injected into funding the working capital requirements of two portfolio companies in the period. Calyx Managed Services and Fairline received £1.0 million and £1.6 million respectively. The markets in which these businesses operate continue to be challenging as they progress with their respective restructuring.
Santia received £2.0 million in May 2013 to fund the acquisition of First Order Red Limited, an asbestos consultancy business to provide both scale and management expertise to Santia's asbestos management division.
In April 2013, Fund I returned £12.4 million, 6.0 pence per share to the 2009 Cell for onward distribution to the 2009 Cell investors. This was enabled following the sale of debt instruments in ATH Resources in March 2013. Total distributions from the 2009 Cell now stand at £26.5 million, or 12.6 per cent of total capital raised.
The cash balance at 30 September 2013 stood at £3.0 million.
Subsequent events
On 11 October 2013, Fund I received £0.7 million of interest income from Spicers.
On 13 November 2013, Omnico Group received £1.3 million to fund working capital.
Portfolio update
Gardner continues to deliver on service levels with customer confidence remaining high. For the financial year ended 31 August 2013, Gardner delivered a solid underlying profitability, significantly ahead of prior year. The UK businesses performed ahead of plan; however, Airia, the French business acquired in April 2012 has struggled operationally. The key issue has been the level of resources required to manage the integration and turnaround of Airia. In addition Airia, which supplies directly to Airbus, suffered from customer delays on some new programmes. Considerable resources have been invested in Airia and it is now starting to demonstrate tangible improvements. The carrying value in Gardner has been marked up by £14.7 million, reflecting confidence in the business to deliver further improvement in profitability supported by favourable market multiples.
The Reader's Digest business is now trading from a substantially smaller platform and with better systems and processes following its exit from the direct marketing activities earlier in 2013. Modest investment has also been made to drive growth in the subscriber base, including the development of a new web portal which was launched on 1 November 2013. Early signs are encouraging. The carrying value in Reader's Digest has been marked down to a nominal value, reflecting a cautious view of the business's medium term prospects and the generally weak state of the printed media market.
m-hance is one of two businesses making up the Calyx Group. m-hance is expected to record a significantly lower profitability in the current year to 31 December 2013. Although market conditions remain broadly flat, poor sales performance and the integration of the Maxima acquisition has resulted in the underperformance of the enlarged business. Additional resources have been introduced into the business to strengthen the sales functions.
Calyx Managed Services, also part of the Calyx Group, is still experiencing difficult trading conditions in a largely fragmented market. The management team was strengthened in late 2012 and had executed a strategy to re-focus on the business's core competencies. Considerable long term investment has been made to overhaul the sales team and in the short term, further cost rationalisation measures are being deployed.
To reflect both m-hance and Calyx Managed Services' current weaker performance, the carrying value has been written down by £13.8 million.
Santia, the health and safety consultancy business acquired out of the Connaught plc administration is on course to deliver significant underlying improvement in profitability and cash generation. First Order Red Limited, the asbestos consultancy follow-on investment acquired in May 2013, is performing in line with the investment case. The strategy to amalgamate the existing Santia Asbestos Management division with First Order Red is progressing satisfactorily. The business has also completed the acquisition of its head office freehold in the period, funded by a mortgage and loans from the Welsh government. The order pipeline is continuing to grow across most business streams with international sales picking up. Santia's carrying value has been written up by £4.3 million.
Omnico Group, the business formed from the merger of Digipos and Clarity reported a small underlying profit in the financial year ended 30 September 2013. The business has enjoyed good success with winning contracts on the back of its software and mobile capability, boasting customers such as Merlin Entertainments, Universal Studios, Waterstones, Paperchase and YO! Sushi, with good prospects for further growth in software licences. At the operational level, the centralisation of the procurement functions has had the dual impact of improving quality control and working capital. It is anticipated that further investment will be required to fund product development and the implementation of a new Enterprise Resource Planning system. Whilst profitability is in sight, the business is still in the early stages of profitable growth. Omnico's carrying value remains unchanged.
Fairline is a luxury boat business. The demand for luxury boats continued to be weak for most of the period although there are recent signs of improvement. Floor plan finance for dealers has been restricted and as a result, boat stocks in the dealer network have reduced resulting in fewer sales for Fairline. In the current year, Fairline embarked on a major investment which involved the re-engineering of the Corby facility. Teething issues at the Corby mixed model line due to inadequate management of the new Targa 48 furniture design had an adverse impact on productivity. However, the benefits from the mixed model line will allow for a reduced cost base and provide the flexibility to react to changes in market demand. The Targa 48 range boats have been well received with new products set to be unveiled at the London Boat Show in January 2014. The business received a £1.6 million investment from Fund I to fund its short-term needs. It is anticipated that further investment will be required in early 2014 to fund working capital and growth initiatives. In light of its weaker performance, Fairline's carrying value has been marked down by £5.2 million. However there are grounds for believing performance will improve under the new CEO in the near future.
Sales at Spicers continue to reduce as the market for wholesale stationery and office equipment contracts. However, margins have remained on plan and the business remains profitable. New growth initiatives such as contract sales and direct selling to the small home office via e-commerce platforms such as Amazon and its own website (www.memoetc.co.uk) are gaining good traction. The re-development of its central distribution facility in Birmingham is on schedule to complete in December 2013. The marketing of the business's surplus freehold land in Sawston, Cambridge has attracted a number of interested parties with a potential sale in discussion. The carrying value in Spicers has been written up by £9.8 million, reflecting the profitable and cash positive business. The investment in Spicers remains at £5.0 million having already repaid £35.0 million of the original investment.
Valuation
The portfolio carrying value has risen by a net £8.8 million in the period. Total movement of the portfolio during the period was as follows:
£m | |
Portfolio value at 1 April 2013 | 261.0 |
Additions at cost | 4.6 |
265.6 | |
NAV movement | 4.2 |
Portfolio value at 30 September 2013 | 269.8 |
Uninvested cash
The investment period for Fund I expired on 31 December 2012, with the Fund I portfolio moving towards realisation phase. Uninvested cash (£2.0 million at 20 November 2013) in Fund I may be utilised for the acquisition of bolt-on investments, working capital requirements or restructuring costs.
Jon Moulton
Chairman
BECAP GP Limited
22 November 2013
Investment Report of Fund I
Gardner
Business description
· A Tier-1 supplier of medium and high complexity machined metallic components to the aerospace industry (www.gardner-aerospace.com)
Progress
· Performance at the UK and Polish sites continue to be satisfactory
· Airia is now fully resourced and the turnaround is progressing albeit at a slower pace and greater cost than initially anticipated
· Sites in Burnley and Ilkeston are being marketed for disposal
· Emphasis now on cash generation after a period of heavy investment
· Airbus A350 flight tests are reportedly progressing well
Performance
· UK business performing in line with investment plan. Operational issues in Airia are being addressed
· Significant year-on-year growth (56.7 per cent.) in underlying profitability
Fund I Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 |
Original investment (February 2010) | 14.9 | 14.9 | 14.9 |
Acquisition of RD Precision (May 2010) | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Acquisition of Blade (January 2011) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Purchase of new factory (March 2011) | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Working capital facility (May 2011) | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 |
Towards acquisition of Airia (April 2012) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Total invested | 40.6 | 40.6 | 40.6 |
Total committed | 40.6 | 40.6 | 40.6 |
Fund I fair value (earnings based) | 90.7 | 76.0 | 69.6 |
Reader's Digest
Business description
· An iconic magazine brand in the UK (www.readersdigest.co.uk)
Progress
· Rightsizing of business complete
· New web portal launched on 1 November
· Implementation of the new standalone IT system in advance progress
· Printing market remains challenging
Performance
· Reader's Digest is now trading satisfactorily from a substantially smaller platform. The business remains debt-free
· The key challenge for the business is to reduce subscriber attrition
Fund I Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 |
Original investment (April 2010) | 13.0 | 13.0 | 13.0 |
On-going restructuring programme (June 2011) | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Working capital facility (July 2011) | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Working capital facility (May 2012) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Working capital facility (July 2012) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Total invested | 23.0 | 23.0 | 23.0 |
Total committed | 23.0 | 23.0 | 23.0 |
Fund I fair value (fully provided) | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Calyx
Business description
· m-hance - develops, manages and deploys enterprise-wide business management software solutions (www.m-hance.com)
· Calyx Managed Services - supplier of managed IT and cloud services, connectivity, technology infrastructure management, hardware maintenance and support (www.calyxms.com)
Progress
· m-hance - The restructuring of the sales team to facilitate more upsell of Microsoft Dynamics AX products
· Calyx Managed Services - Investment into the sales force to drive volume
- Product offering has been reviewed
Performance
· m-hance is suffering from a shortfall in sales
· Trading remains difficult for Calyx Managed Services. The business remains debt-free
Fund I Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 | ||
Original investment (September 2010) | 16.3 | 16.3 | 16.3 | ||
Working capital facility | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | ||
Acquisition of Touchstone (June 2011) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||
Acquisition of Trinity (June 2011) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | ||
Towards acquisition of Maxima (February 2012) | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||
Additional investment (July 2013) | 1.0 | n/a | n/a | ||
Total invested | 32.0 | 31.0 | 31.0 | ||
Total committed | 32.0 | 31.0 | 31.0 | ||
Fund I fair value (earnings/revenue/gross profit based) | 22.6 | 36.4 | 40.1 |
·
Santia
Business description
· Provider of consultancy and advisory health, safety and environmental services (www.santia.co.uk)
Progress
· Growth in order pipeline continues to be encouraging
· Further investment into sales and marketing
· Integration completed of First Order Red, an asbestos consultancy acquired in May 2013
· Acquisition of the head office freehold near Cardiff completed in September 2013
Performance
· Substantial growth in year-on-year profitability
· Varied performance across Santia's seven divisions with strong growth in its contractor accreditation and occupational health divisions offset by weaker performance in training and asbestos
Fund I Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 | ||
Original investment (February 2011) | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | ||
Return of loan (May 2011) | (3.5) | (3.5) | (3.5) | ||
On-going restructuring programme (October 2011) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | ||
On-going restructuring programme (October 2011) | 0.5 | 0.5 | n/a | ||
Additional investment (May 2013) | 2.0 | n/a | n/a | ||
Total invested | 15.5 | 13.5 | 13.0 | ||
Total committed | 15.5 | 15.0 | 15.0 | ||
Fund I fair value (earnings based) | 32.0 | 27.7 | 27.7 |
Omnico Group
Business description
· Provider of omni-channel hardware, software and services to the retail, entertainment, hospitality and leisure sectors (www.omnicogroup.com)
Progress
· Progress with repositioning the business to be software-led
· Heavy investment into new software products continuing
· Some significant licence software sales to high profile corporates
· Certain country-level management change completed - benefits already showing
· Centralisation of the procurement process has improved quality control and working capital
Performance
· Omnico is profitable and trading to plan
· A further £1.3 million has been injected to fund working capital since the period end
Fund I Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 | ||
DigiPoS original investment (July 2011) | 21.0 | 21.0 | 21.0 | ||
Acquisition of Clarity (September - December 2011 | 10.9 | 10.9 | 10.9 | ||
DigiPoS return of short-term loan (February 2012) | (3.0) | (3.0) | (3.0) | ||
Clarity working capital facility (March 2012) | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | ||
Total invested | 33.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 | ||
Total committed | 33.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 | ||
Fund I fair value (price of recent transaction) | 33.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 |
Fairline
Business description
· A leading global brand specialising in the design, engineering and manufacture of luxury boats in the range of 38 to 80 feet (www.fairline.com)
Progress
· Restrictions on dealer finance have resulted in a reduction in sales. However sales to retail customers have been significantly ahead of sales to dealers resulting in a considerable reduction in dealer stock which should help 2014 sales
· Significant productivity issues in Corby mixed model line linked to the new Targa 48 furniture design and mix of customer orders - issues are now actively managed
· Strengthening of the management team completed
· Targa 48 is well-received and has a full order book until Q3 2014
· New routes to market being developed, with retail rates growing
Performance
· Short term losses expected due to one-off events
Fund I Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 | ||
Original investment (July 2011) | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | ||
On-going restructuring programme (August 2012) | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||
Working capital facility (January/February 2013) | 5.4 | 5.4 | n/a | ||
Repayment of surplus cash (February 2013) | (0.5) | (0.5) | n/a | ||
Additional Investment (August 2013) | 1.6 | n/a | n/a | ||
Total invested | 23.1 | 21.5 | 16.6 | ||
Total committed | 23.1 | 21.5 | 16.6 | ||
Fund I fair value (earnings based) | 16.8 | 22.0 | 22.0 |
Spicers
Business description
· A leading office products and stationery wholesaler, supplying a vast product range - with over 16,000 stock lines across 300 vendors (www.spicers.co.uk, www.memoetc.co.uk)
Progress
· New routes to market and products gaining traction
· Re-development of new distribution facility in Birmingham is on schedule to complete in December 2013
· Disposal of surplus freehold assets also being progressed
Performance
· The business continues to deliver improved underlying profitability and remains cash generative
Fund I Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 | ||
Original investment (December 2011) | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | ||
Repayment of short-term loan (December 2011) | (10.0) | (10.0) | (10.0) | ||
Repayment of short-term loan (March 2012) | (10.0) | (10.0) | (10.0) | ||
Repayment of short-term loan (September 2012) | (5.0) | (5.0) | (5.0) | ||
Repayment of short-term loan (December 2012) | (10.0) | (10.0) | n/a | ||
Total invested | 5.0 | 5.0 | 15.0 | ||
Total committed | 5.0 | 5.0 | 15.0 | ||
Fund I fair value (earnings & asset based) | 74.7 | 64.9
| 52.5
|
Portfolio summary and reconciliation
Sector | Fund Project cost* | Fund fair value investment in SPV's** | Valuation percentage of NAV | Valuation methodology | |||||
£m | £m | ||||||||
Gardner | Aerospace manufacturing | 40.6 | 90.7 | 34.10% | Earnings | ||||
Reader's Digest | Magazine Publisher | 23.0 | - | 0.00% | Fully Provided | ||||
Calyx | Information Systems | 32.0 | 22.6 | 8.50% | Earnings | ||||
Santia | Professional Services | 15.5 | 32.0 | 12.03% | Earnings | ||||
Omnico Group | Information Systems | 33.0 | 33.0 | 12.41% | Price of Recent Investment | ||||
Fairline | Marine Leisure Manufacturing | 23.1 | 16.8 | 6.31% | Earnings | ||||
Spicers | Office Equipment Wholesale | 5.0 | 74.7 | 28.08% | Earnings & Assets | ||||
172.2 | 269.8 | 101.43% | |||||||
Fund cash on deposit | 3.0 | 1.13% | |||||||
Fund & SPV combined other net assets | 1.5 | 0.56% | |||||||
Provision for Better Capital SLP interest in Fund I | (8.6) | (3.23)% | |||||||
2009 Cell fair value of investment in Fund | 265.7 | 99.89% | |||||||
2009 Cell cash on deposit | 0.4 | 0.15% | |||||||
2009 Cell current assets less liabilities | (0.1) | (0.04)% | |||||||
2009 Cell NAV | 266.0 | 100.00% | |||||||
* Fund I holds its investments at cost in accordance with the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement. | |||||||||
** 2009 Cell fair values its investment in Fund I in accordance with the accounting policies as set out in Note 2. | |||||||||
Cash Management
As at 30 September 2013, Fund I had placed a total of £3.0 million (31 March 2013: £21.3 million, 30 September 2012: £25.5 million) of cash on instant access deposit with one banks. Fund I has in place a strict cash management policy that limits counterparty risks whilst simultaneously seeking to maximise returns.
Counterparty | Location | Rating | Term |
30 September 2013 |
31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||
Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited | Guernsey | A | Instant access |
3,002 |
21,245 | 6,300 |
Lloyds TSB Offshore Ltd | Jersey | A | Instant access |
- |
7 | 19,200 |
INDEPENDENT REVIEW REPORT TO BETTER CAPITAL PCC LIMITED IN RESPECT OF THE 2009 CELL
Introduction
We have been engaged by the Company to review the condensed set of financial statements of the 2009 Cell, a cell of Better Capital PCC Limited, for the period ended 30 September 2013 which comprise the 2009 Cell Condensed Statement of Financial Position, the 2009 Cell Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income, the 2009 Cell Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity, the 2009 Cell Condensed Statement of Cash Flows, and the 2009 Cell related notes.
We have read the other information contained in the interim financial report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the condensed set of financial statements.
Directors' responsibilities
The interim financial report is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the Directors. The Directors are responsible for preparing the interim financial report in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
As disclosed in Note 2, the annual financial statements of the 2009 Cell are prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union. The 2009 Cell's condensed set of financial statements included in this interim financial report have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, 'Interim Financial Reporting' as adopted by the European Union.
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express to the Company a conclusion on the 2009 Cell's condensed set of financial statements in the interim financial report based on our review.
Our report, including the conclusion, has been prepared in accordance with the terms of engagement to assist the 2009 Cell in meeting its responsibilities in respect of interim financial reporting in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority and for no other purpose. No person is entitled to rely on this report unless such a person is entitled to rely upon this report by virtue of and for the purpose of our terms of engagement or has been expressly authorised to do so by our prior written consent. Save as above, we do not accept responsibility for this report to any other person or for any other purpose and we hereby expressly disclaim any and all such liability.
Scope of review
We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, 'Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity' issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Conclusion
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the 2009 Cell's condensed set of financial statements in the interim financial report for the six months ended 30 September 2013 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 as adopted by the European Union and the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
BDO LimitedChartered AccountantsPlace du Pré, Rue du Pré, St Peter Port, Guernsey
22 November 2013
Condensed Statement of Financial Position
As at 30 September 2013
As at | As at | As at | ||||||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 | 31 March 2013 | ||||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||
Non-current assets | ||||||||
Investment in Limited Partnership | 4 | 265,663 | 273,249 | 276,667 | ||||
Total non-current assets | 265,663 | 273,249 | 276,667 | |||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Trade and other receivables | 1 | 313 | 6 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 394 | 1,813 | 660 | |||||
Total current assets | 395 | 2,126 | 666 | |||||
TOTAL ASSETS | 266,058 | 275,375 | 277,333 | |||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Trade and other payables | (98) | (85) | (125) | |||||
Total current liabilities | (98) | (85) | (125) | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | (98) | (85) | (125) | |||||
NET ASSETS | 265,960 | 275,290 | 277,208 | |||||
EQUITY | ||||||||
Share capital | 6 | 178,539 | 205,007 | 190,946 | ||||
Retained earnings | 87,421 | 70,283 | 86,262 | |||||
TOTAL EQUITY | 265,960 | 275,290 | 277,208 | |||||
Number of 2009 Shares in issue at period/year end | 6 | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | ||||
Net asset value per 2009 Share (pence) | 8 | 128.62 | 133.13 | 134.06 | ||||
Adjusted net asset value per 2009 Share (pence) | 8 | 141.42 | 133.13 | 140.86 |
The unaudited condensed financial statements of the 2009 Cell were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 22 November 2013 and signed on their behalf by:
Richard Crowder Richard Battey
Chairman Director
The notes form an integral part of the 2009 Cell condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
Six months to | Six months to | |||||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 | Year ended 31 March 2013 | ||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||
Income | ||||||
Change in fair value on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 4 | 1,396 | 19,493 | 35,712 | ||
Interest income | 1 | 3 | 7 | |||
Total income | 1,397 | 19,496 | 35,719 | |||
Expenses | ||||||
Administration fees | 69 | 75 | 153 | |||
Directors' fees and expenses | 7 | 46 | 52 | 104 | ||
Legal and professional fees | 58 | 48 | 99 | |||
Other fees and expenses | 34 | 21 | 39 | |||
Audit fees | 16 | 19 | 35 | |||
Insurance premiums | - | 6 | 22 | |||
Registrar fees | 15 | 11 | 24 | |||
Total expenses | 238 | 232 | 476 | |||
Profit for the financial period/year | 1,159 | 19,264 | 35,243 | |||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | |||
Total comprehensive income for the period/year | 1,159 | 19,264 | 35,243 | |||
Basic and diluted earnings per 2009 Share (pence) | 8 | 0.56 | 9.32 | 17.04 |
All activities derive from continuing operations.
The notes form an integral part of the 2009 Cell condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
Share | Retained | Total |
| |||
capital | earnings | Equity |
| |||
Period | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| ||
| ||||||
As at 1 April 2013 | 190,946 | 86,262 | 277,208 |
| ||
| ||||||
Profit for the financial period | - | 1,159 | 1,159 |
| ||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - |
| ||
Total comprehensive income for the period | - | 1,159 | 1,159 |
| ||
| ||||||
Transactions with owners |
| |||||
Capital distribution | (12,407) | - | (12,407) |
| ||
Total transactions with owners | (12,407) | - |
(12,407) |
| ||
| ||||||
As at 30 September 2013 (unaudited) | 178,539 | 87,421 | 265,960 |
| ||
| ||||||
| ||||||
Share | Retained | Total |
| |||
capital | earnings | Equity |
| |||
Period | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| ||
| ||||||
As at 1 April 2012 | 205,007 | 51,019 | 256,026 |
| ||
| ||||||
Profit for the financial period | - | 19,264 | 19,264 |
| ||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - |
| ||
As at 30 September 2012 (unaudited) | 205,007 | 70,283 | 275,290 |
| ||
The notes form an integral part of the 2009 Cell condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
Six months to | Six months to | ||||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 | Year ended 31 March 2013 | |||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
Profit for the financial period/year | 1,159 | 19,264 | 35,243 | ||
Adjustments for: | |||||
Change in fair value on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | (1,396) | (19,493) | (35,712) | ||
Movement in trade receivables | 5 | 4 | 313 | ||
Movement in trade payables | (27) | - | 39 | ||
Net cash used in operating activities | (259) | (225) | (117) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
Repayment of loan investment in Limited Partnership | 12,400 | - |
12,800 | ||
Net cash generated from investing activities | 12,400 | - |
12,800 | ||
Cash flow used in financing activities | |||||
Capital distribution | (12,407) | - | (14,061) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities | (12,407) | (14,061) | |||
Net movement in cash and cash equivalents during the period/year | (266) | (225) | (1,378) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period/year | 660 | 2,038 | 2,038 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period/year | 394 | 1,813 | 660 |
The notes on form an integral part of the 2009 Cell condensed interim financial statements.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
1. General information
The 2009 Cell has the investment objective of generating attractive total returns from investing (through Fund I) in a portfolio of businesses which have significant operating issues and may have associated financial distress, with a primary focus on businesses which have significant activities within the United Kingdom and Ireland. Such returns being expected to be largely derived from capital growth.
Fund I is managed by its general partner, BECAP GP LP, which is in turn managed by its general partner BECAP GP Limited. Such arrangements are governed under the respective Limited Partnership Agreement, as amended.
The 2009 Cell is listed on the London Stock Exchange Main Market.
Further information regarding the background of the 2009 Cell is detailed in the Company Background and Further Information section.
2. Accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The unaudited Cell 2009 condensed financial information included in the interim financial report for the six months ended 30 September 2013 have been prepared in accordance with the DTRs and Listing Rules of the UK's FCA and IAS 34, 'Interim Financial Reporting' as adopted by the EU.
The interim financial statements do not include all the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements for the year to 31 March 2013, which are available on the Company's website (www.bettercapital.gg). The annual financial statements have been prepared in accordance with EU adopted IFRSs.
The 2009 Cell does not operate in an industry where significant or cyclical variations, as a result of seasonal activity are experienced during the financial period.
Except as listed below, the same accounting policies and methods of computation are followed in the interim financial statements as in the annual financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2013.
Standards, interpretations and amendments to published standards adopted in the period
The following standards, which have only impacted disclosures, are mandatory for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and have been adopted in the financial statements:
- Amendments to IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting
- IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (Note 4 & Note 5)
Going concern
After making appropriate enquiries, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the 2009 Cell, and in turn Fund I, have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and do not consider there to be any threat to the going concern status of the 2009 Cell. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these financial statements.
Segmental reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Board of Directors, as a whole. The key measure of performance used by the Board to assess the 2009 Cell's performance and to allocate resources is the total return on the 2009 Cell's Net Asset Value, as calculated under IFRS, and therefore no reconciliation is required between the measure of profit or loss used by the Board and that contained in the financial statements.
For management purposes, the 2009 Cell is organised into one main operating segment, which invests in one limited partnership.
All of the 2009 Cell's income is from within Guernsey.
All of the 2009 Cell's non-current assets are located in Guernsey.
Due to the 2009 Cell's nature it has no customers.
Critical accounting judgement and estimation uncertainty
Use of estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The areas involving a high degree of judgement or complexity or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are disclosed below. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected.
The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results.
Investment in Fund I
The value of the 2009 Cell's investment in Fund I is based on the value of the 2009 Cell's limited partner capital and loan accounts within Fund I. This is based on the components within the Fund, principally the value of the underlying investee companies. Any fluctuation in the value of the underlying investee companies will directly impact on the value of the 2009 Cell's investment in Fund I.
Further information in relation to the valuation of the investment in Fund I is disclosed in Note 4 and Note 5.
3. Taxation
The 2009 Cell is exempt from taxation in Guernsey as Better Capital PCC Limited has tax exempt status.
4. Investment in Limited Partnership
Loans | Capital | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cost | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2013 | 190,980 | 20 | 191,000 |
Repayment of loan investment in Limited Partnerships | (12,400) | - | (12,400) |
Carried forward at 30 September 2013 | 178,580 | 20 | 178,600 |
Fair value adjustment through profit or loss | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2013 | 85,667 | - | 85,667 |
Fair value movement during period | 1,396 | - | 1,396 |
Carried forward at 30 September 2013 | 87,063 | - | 87,063 |
Fair value as at 30 September 2013 (unaudited) | 265,643 | 20 | 265,663 |
Loans | Capital | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cost | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2012 | 203,780 | 20 | 203,800 |
Repayment of loan investment in Limited Partnership | (12,800) | - | (12,800) |
Carried forward at 31 March 2013 | 190,980 | 20 | 191,000 |
Fair value adjustment through profit or loss | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2012 | 49,955 | - | 49,955 |
Fair value movement during year | 35,712 | - | 35,712 |
Carried forward at 31 March 2013 | 85,667 | - | 85,667 |
Fair value as at 31 March 2013 (audited) | 276,647 | 20 | 276,667 |
The movement in fair value is derived from the fair value uplifts in the Gardner, Santia and Spicers investments and the write down in Reader's Digest, Calyx and Fairline net of income and expenses of Fund I and its related special purpose vehicles.
The outstanding loans do not carry interest. The loans will be repaid by way of distributions from Fund I. The 2009 Cell is not entitled to demand repayment of the outstanding loans, however, the General Partner may, upon request by the Company, repay to the 2009 Cell any amount of the outstanding loan. During the period £12.4 million was repaid to the 2009 Cell by Fund I (31 March 2013: £12.8 million, 30 September 2012: £nil).
Distributions receivable from Fund I in the period amounted to £nil (31 March 2013: £nil, 30 September 2012: £nil), of which £nil (31 March 2013: £nil, 30 September 2012: £300,000) remains outstanding at the period end, which have been allocated as income based on discretionary allocation powers of the General Partner of Fund I as set out in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
In the financial statements of the 2009 Cell the fair value of the loans will be increased or reduced to reflect the fair value of the 2009 Cell's attributable valuation of net assets within Fund I.
5. Fair Value
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the financial assets or financial liabilities is categorised is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety into only one of the three levels.
The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
- Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
- Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices)
- Level 3 - inputs for the assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The only financial instruments carried at fair value are the investments which are fair valued at each reporting date.
The 2009 Cell's investment has been classified within Level 3 as it has unobservable inputs and is not traded. Amounts classified under Level 3 for the period are £265,663,000 for Fund I (31 March 2013: £276,667,000, 30 September 2012: £273,249,000).
Transfers during the period
There have been no transfers between levels. Due to the nature of the investments, they are always expected to be classified under Level 3.
Valuation techniques
The value of the 2009 Cell's investment in Fund I is based on the value of the 2009 Cell's limited partner capital and loan accounts within Fund I. This is based on the components within Fund I, principally the value of the underlying investee companies. Any fluctuation in the value of the underlying investee companies will directly impact on the value of the 2009 Cell's investment in Fund I.
When valuing the underlying investee companies, the General Partner of Fund I reviews information provided by the underlying investee companies and other business partners and applies IPEV methodologies, to estimate a fair value as at the date of the statement of financial position.
Initially acquisitions are valued at price of recent investment. Once maintainable earnings can be identified the preferred method of valuation is the earnings multiple valuation technique, where a multiple that is an appropriate and reasonable indicator of value (given the size, risk profile and earnings growth prospects of the underlying company) is applied to the maintainable earnings of the company. Occasionally other methods, as deemed suitable by the Fund I GP, may be used, such as revenue or gross profit multiples, net assets, break-up value or discounted cash flows. The techniques used in determining the fair value of the 2009 Cell's investments is selected on an investment by investment basis so as to maximise the use of market based observable inputs.
The Board reviews and considers the fair value arrived at by the Fund I GP before incorporating into the fair value of the investment adopted by the 2009 Cell. The variety of valuation bases adopted, quality of management information provided by the underlying investee companies and the lack of liquid markets for the investments mean that there are inherent difficulties in determining the fair value of these investments that cannot be eliminated. Therefore the amounts realised on the sale of investments may differ from the fair values reflected in these financial statements and the differences may be significant.
Where price of recent investment is determined to be the most appropriate methodology the transactional price will be that of the investment by Fund I. The Omnico Group investment is carried at the price of recent investment. Due to the immaturity of the turnaround position of the investee companies, interest receivable on loans advanced by Fund I to investee companies will only be recognised when it is deemed more likely than not that the interest will be paid. As at 30 September 2013 such unrecognised interest receivable amounted to £4.8 million (31 March 2013: £1.0 million, 30 September 2012: £0.6 million).
The following table summarises the valuation methodologies and inputs used for the 2009 Cell's Level 3 investments as at period end:
Valuation Methodology | Description | Input | Adjustments | Discount Rate Applied to Multiples | Discounted Multiples | Value of portfolio valued on this basis (£'m) | |
30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | ||||||
Multiple | Most commonly used Private Equity valuation methodology. Used for investments which are profitable and for which a set of listed companies and precedent transactions with similar characteristics can be determined | Multiples are applied to the earnings of the company to determine the enterprise value | Surplus assets available for imminent sale may be added to the multiple valuation | A discount is applied to earnings multiples, ranging from 10% and 20% | Multiples range between 6 times and 11 times (weighted average 8.3 times) | 230.1 | 227.0 |
EarningsReported earnings adjusted for non-recurring items, such as restructuring expenses, for significant corporate actions and, in exceptional cases, run-rate adjustments to arrive at maintainable earnings. Most common measure is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation ("EBITDA"). Earnings used are usually the forecast for the investee company's current financial year, unless data from the latest audited accounts provides a more reliable picture of maintainable earnings | |||||||
MultiplesThe earnings multiple is derived from comparable listed companies or relevant market transaction multiples. The Fund I GP selects businesses in the same industry and, where possible, with a similar business model and profile in terms of size, products, services and customers, growth rates and geographic focus and adjust for changes in the relative performance in the set of comparables | |||||||
Price of recent investment | Where there has been a recent Investment in the Investee Company, the price of that Investment will provide a basis of the valuation | Book cost | Addition of costs since initial purchase and the subtraction of monies returned to Fund I | n/a | n/a | 33.0 | 33.0 |
Other | Values of separate elements prepared under other methods, as deemed suitable by the Fund I GP, such as such as revenue or gross profit multiples, net assets, break-up value, fully provided for or minimum break-up value | As determined on a case by case basis | n/a | Revenue or gross profit multiples range between 0.5 times and 1.5 times (weighted average 0.53 times) | 6.7 | 1.0 | |
Portfolio valuation | 269.8 | 261.0 | |||||
Other assets | (4.1) | 15.7 | |||||
2009 Cell fair value of investments in Fund I | 265.7 | 276.7 |
This approach requires the use of assumptions about certain unobservable inputs. Significant unobservable inputs as at 30 September 2013 are:
- Multiples used to derive enterprise value
- Discount factors
A reasonably possible change in the multiples used +/- 10.0% would result in:
- An increase in carrying value of £25.8 million or 9.6% (+10.0%)
- A decrease in the carrying value of £24.0 million or 8.9% (-10.0%)
A reasonably possible change in the discount factors used would be to completely remove the discount factor or to double the discount factor. This would result in:
- A decrease in carrying value of £45.2 million or 16.8% (+100.0%)
- An increase in the carrying value of £53.9 million or 20.0% (-100.0%)
The Fund I GP approves the valuations performed with input from the Consultant and monitors the range of reasonably possible changes in significant observable inputs on a regular basis.
6. Share Capital
Period ended 30 September 2013
Authorised:
The 2009 Cell is authorised to issue unlimited shares at £1 par value.
| |||||||
Issued and fully paid: | |||||||
Unlimited shares of £1 par value | No. | ||||||
Shares as at 1 April 2013 | 206,780,952 | ||||||
Movement for the period | - | ||||||
Shares as at 30 September 2013 | 206,780,952 | ||||||
Share capital | £'000 | ||||||
Share capital as at 1 April 2013 | 190,946 | ||||||
Movements for the period: | |||||||
Capital distribution | (12,407) | ||||||
Share capital as at 30 September 2013 | 178,539 |
Year ended 31 March 2013
Authorised:
The 2009 Cell is authorised to issue unlimited shares at nil par value.
Issued and fully paid: | |||||||
Unlimited shares of no par value | No. | ||||||
Shares as at 1 April 2012 | 206,780,952 | ||||||
Movement for the year | - | ||||||
Shares as at 31 March 2013 | 206,780,952 | ||||||
Share capital | £'000 | ||||||
Share capital as at 1 April 2012 | 205,007 | ||||||
Movements for the year: | |||||||
Capital distribution | (14,061) | ||||||
Share capital as at 31 March 2013 | 190,946 |
During the period the 2009 Cellmade a second distribution of capital of 6.0 pence per ordinary share to Shareholders of the 2009 Cell as at the ex-date of 3 April 2013. In line with the first distribution, this distribution of £12.4 million will be treated by the Company as a reduction of share capital. The distribution was paid on 19 April 2013.
The two capital distributions (reductions of share capital) announced to date for the 2009 Cell total £26.5 million, 12.6 per cent. of funds raised.
On 31 July 2013, at the Annual General Meeting, the Shareholders of the 2009 Cell approved by ordinary resolution the re-designation of the 2009 Cell shares to par value of £1 (31 March 2013: nil par value).
Principal members of Better Capital LLP, the appointed Consultant to BECAP GP LP, which acts as General Partner to Fund I, hold investments in the Company in accordance with the terms of the Prospectus. At the period end, those members held the following proportions of shares:
2009 Cell | ||||
Number of Shares | Per cent. of Share Capital | |||
Mark Aldridge | 157,572 | 0.1 | ||
Nick Sanders* | 200,000 | 0.1 | ||
*Shareholding is held through a discretionary trust in favour of Nick Sanders' children
7. Related party transactions
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the party in making financial or operational decisions. The Directors are responsible for overall control, management and supervision of the Company's affairs and are responsible for the overall implementation of the investment objective and policy of the Company.
The Company has four non-executive Directors. On 28 June 2013 Mr Mark Huntley resigned from the board and Mr Jon Moulton was appointed as a non-executive Director of the Company. Mr Moulton is also a Director and the sole shareholder of BECAP GP Limited, the general partner of the Fund I GP.
Annual remuneration for each Director at company level is as follows: the Chairman receives £60,000, the Chairman of the audit committee receives £52,500, the Chairman of the management engagement, nomination and remuneration committee receives £50,000 and the other non-executive Director receives £45,000. During the period Mr Moulton waived his fee.
Directors' fees, incurred by the 2009 Cell, for the period to 30 September 2013 amounted to £46,000 (31 March 2013: £104,000, 30 September 2012: £52,000) apportioned on a 50/50 basis between the cells. £20,500 (31 March 2013: £26,000, 2012: £6,000) remained outstanding at the period end.
Directors share holdings are shown on page 6.
During the period, the Company incurred administration fees of £69,000 (31 March 2013: £153,000, 30 September 2012: £75,000) apportioned on a NAV basis between the Cells. £30,000 (31 March 2013: £39,000, 30 September 2012: £38,000) remained outstanding at the period end.
8. Earnings per share and net asset value per share
Earnings per share
Six months to | Six months to | |||||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 | Year ended 31 March 2013 | ||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||
Profit for the period/year | £1.159m | £19.264m | £35.243m | |||
Weighted average number of 2009 Shares in issue | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | |||
| ||||||
EPS (pence) | 0.56 | 9.32 | 17.04 | |||
The earnings per share is based on the profit for the period/year and on the weighted average number of shares in issue for the period/year.
The 2009 Cell does not have any instruments which could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future.
Net Asset Value per share
| As at 30 September 2013 | As at 30 September2014 | As at 31 March 2013 | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||
Net assets attributable to 2009 Share shareholders | 265,960 | 275,290 | 277,208 | |
Capital distributions | 26,468 | - | 14,061 | |
Adjusted Net Asset Value | 292,428 | 275,290 | 291,269 | |
2009 Shares in issue | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | 206,780,952 | |
NAV per share (IFRS) | 128.62 | 133.13 | 134.06 | |
Adjusted NAV per share | 141.42 | 133.13 | 140.86 |
The Net Asset Value per share for the 2009 Cell is arrived at by dividing the total net assets of the 2009 Cell at the period/year end by the number of shares in issue at the period/year end.
The Adjusted Net Asset Value adds back capital distributions made to the 2009 Share investors to date.
The Adjusted Net Asset Value per sharefor the 2009 Cell is arrived at by dividing the Adjusted Net Asset Value of the 2009 Cell at the period/year end by the number of 2009 Shares in issue at the period/year end.
9. Subsequent events
On 11 October 2013, Fund I received £0.7 million of interest income from Spicers.
On 13 November 2013, Omnico received £1.3 million of further investment from Fund I. The new investment was deployed towards working capital requirements.
Other than the above, there have been no significant subsequent events since 30 September 2013.
Better Capital 2012 Cell
Investment policy summary
Better Capital 2012 Cell seeks to invest in a portfolio of businesses which have significant operating issues and may have associated financial distress.
Uninvested or surplus capital or assets may be invested on a temporary basis in cash or cash equivalents, money market instruments, bonds, commercial paper or other debt obligations with banks or other counterparties having a "single A" or higher credit rating as determined by any reputable rating agency selected by the General Partner and any "government and public securities" as defined for the purposes of the FCA Rules.
The 2012 Cell Investment policy is in the Company's prospectuses, available on the Company's website (www.bettercapital.gg).
Investment activities in Fund II
The following investment activities took place between 1 April 2013 and 30 September 2013:
City Link
· 29 April 2013 - Fund II acquired the entire issued share capital of City Link on a debt free basis for a consideration of £1. City Link is one of the leading express parcel delivery and distribution businesses in the UK. Fund II committed to and invested £40.0 million into the acquisition.
Jaeger
· 22 May 2013 - Fund II invested £1.8 million into Jaeger to fund the refurbishment of its flagship store on Regent Street, London.
· 19 August 2013 - The business drew down a further £4.6 million to fund working capital requirements. Total funds committed and invested in Jaeger is now £40.0 million.
General Partner's Report
Fundraising
The £40.0 million investment in City Link generated the need for the second round of fundraising in the 2012 Cell in early summer of 2013. Gross proceeds of £185.6 million were raised through the issuance of 176,738,625 new 2012 Cell shares with net proceeds of £181.9 million deployed into Fund II on 16 August 2013. This brings the total funds invested into Fund II to £347.4 million, of which £237.4 million remains uncommitted at the time of writing.
The additional capital in Fund II allows Better Capital to retain its competitive advantage. Being able to provide certainty of funding in distressed transactions and the ability to transact at speed are two of our key differentiators. The recent fundraising provides adequate funding for a further 18 to 24 months and the ability to participate in larger transactions, both in the UK and Europe.
Fund II
Fund II has a portfolio of three companies. All three businesses continue to show demonstrable progress. Everest's carrying value has been marked up by £11.4 million with Jaeger's and City Link's carrying value retained at cost.
Activities and portfolio update
Everest is a leading manufacturer and distributor of double-glazed windows, doors and conservatories. In May 2013, the business rolled out a major restructuring of the sales organisation. The plan involved employing the previously self-employed supervisors and streamlining the reporting channel. The initial implementation met with some resistance; however, Everest has overcome the worst period of dislocation and is on plan to deliver a strong profitable finish to its FY13 financial period.
Jaeger, a premium fashion retailer of British womenswear and menswear continues to make steady progress. A new CEO joined the business in July 2013 and has championed considerable change since that period including overhauling the management team and injecting vigour into the Jaeger customer experience. The business is also returning to the sourcing of certain products in the UK and in Europe to drive quality and better manage the supply chain. Jaeger received a £6.4 million investment in the period to fund the refurbishment of its flagship store on Regent Street, London and working capital. This further injection is in line with the investment case of committing up to £40.0 million. Jaeger expects to make a small underlying profit in the current year. This compares favourably to the prior year's significant loss. The management team has confidence in continued growth.
City Link is a leading express delivery business, servicing predominantly the B2B market. Under Fund II's ownership, the business has been able to accelerate its planned transformation programmes. Two of the three major IT projects are largely completed. The 'Seal the Pipeline' project will enable the business to track parcels from start to end with the 'Estimated Time of Arrival' project enabling City Link's customers to track the parcels within a two-hour delivery slot. City Link has also rolled out a programme of pay and conditions harmonisation in the period. The initiative has attracted some media interest due to the role of the RMT (a union representing 12 per cent. of the workforce). The business posted its first monthly profit in September 2013 and is expected to close the current year with substantially lower losses than the prior year.
Joint venture with the National Pensions Reserve Fund of Ireland (NPRF)
Better Capital (Dublin) Limited, the Dublin Consultant to Fund II GP, has continued to market actively since its launch in March. The strong Better Capital brand, supported by the commitment from the NPRF has provided a great platform for the Dublin Consultant to source Irish deals from the local advisory and banking communities. Irish deal flow has improved substantially since the setup of the Dublin Consultant, although a deal has yet to be completed.
New routes to market
Deal volume in Better Capital's core market UK has been consistent with prior periods. Nevertheless, the Consultant has observed an increase in attractive distressed European opportunities, particularly in Germany and has been actively marketing in the region. Since June 2013, the Consultant has logged a total of 78 opportunities in Germany with an average turnover of €200 million. In order to facilitate deal sourcing, the Consultant is progressing with the setup of an office in Frankfurt.
The Consultant has also boosted its expertise in pensions by engaging Richard Favier on a consultancy basis. Richard was formerly the Head of Insolvency and Restructuring at the Pension Protection Fund and will assist the Consultant in originating opportunities with legacy pension issues. This area remains an untapped source of opportunity as there are a large number of corporates whose growth are burdened by the substantial pension deficits, and are unable to unlock the position to pursue a growth strategy.
Valuation
The portfolio carrying value has risen by £57.8 million in the period (a 77.6 per cent. growth in portfolio value), £46.4 million of which was as a result of investment at cost.
Uninvested cash and deal flow in Fund II
Uninvested cash at 20 November 2013 was £231.0 million. There is adequate deal flow to deploy the remaining cash.
Jon Moulton
Chairman
BECAP12 GP Limited
22 November 2013
Investment Report of Fund II
Everest
Business description
· A leading consumer brand in the manufacture, installation and supply of uPVC and aluminium windows and doors, conservatories, roofline products, garage doors, security systems, driveways and other home improvement products (www.everest.co.uk)
Progress
· Significant traction on improving margins
· Reorganisation of the sales force structure and its remuneration policy completed
· Increasing efficiency of marketing spend to drive sales growth
· Introduction of new product range with different price points to capture market share
Performance
· Substantial profit growth on prior periods visible
Fund II Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 |
Original investment (March 2012) | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Additional investment (December 2012) | 5.0 | 5.0 | n/a |
Total invested | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 |
Total committed | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 |
Fund II fair value (earnings based) | 52.3 | 40.9 | 25.0 |
Jaeger
Business description
· Womenswear and menswear retailer, operating in the premium segment of the market (www.jaeger.co.uk)
Progress
· New CEO and senior management team in place
· Steady improvements in the range being recognised by customers
· Margins improving as a result of less discounting
· Sourcing of some products to return to the UK and Europe
Performance
· Satisfactory progress has been achieved to date. Substantial prior period losses have been stemmed
Fund II Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 |
Original investment (April 2012) | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
Return of short-term loan (August and September 2012) | (6.4) | (6.4) | (6.4) |
Additional investment (May and August 2013) | 6.4 | n/a | n/a |
Total invested | 40.0 | 33.6 | 33.6 |
Total committed | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
Fund II fair value (price of recent transaction) | 40.0 | 33.6 | 33.6 |
City Link
Business description
· A leading premium express delivery business (www.city-link.co.uk)
Progress
· Two of the three major IT projects are completed. The Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA) project enables the customer to track the arrival of his parcel within a two hour slot whereas the Seal the Pipeline project tracks the parcel's end to end progress
· Phase I of depot rationalisation has completed with Phase II under planning
· Cost reduction plans progressing to plan
· Price review completed with price increases implemented
Performance
· Satisfactory progress has been achieved to date. Substantial prior period losses have been stemmed and a monthly profit was achieved in September
· At period end, the company held £42.1 million in cash
Fund II Investment details
£'m | 30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | 31 September 2012 |
Original investment (April 2013) | 40.0 | n/a | n/a |
Total invested | 40.0 | n/a | n/a |
Total committed | 40.0 | n/a | n/a |
Fund II fair value (price of recent transaction) | 40.0 | n/a | n/a |
Portfolio summary and reconciliation
Sector | Fund Project cost* | Fund fair value investment in SPV's** | Valuation percentage of NAV | Valuation methodology | ||||
£m | £m | |||||||
Everest | Building Products | 30.0 | 52.3 | 14.21% | Earnings | |||
Jaeger | Retail | 40.0 | 40.0 | 10.87% | Price of Recent Investment | |||
BECAP (Ireland) LP | Investment Vehicle | - | - | 0.00% | Fair Value | |||
City Link | Logistics | 40.0 | 40.0 | 10.87% | Price of Recent Investment | |||
110.0 | 132.3 | 35.95% | ||||||
Fund cash on deposit | 232.5 | 63.16% | ||||||
Fund & SPV combined other net assets | 1.4 | 0.38% | ||||||
2012 Cell fair value of investment in Fund II | 366.2 | 99.49% | ||||||
2012 Cell cash on deposit | 0.4 | 0.11% | ||||||
2012 Cell current assets less liabilities | 1.5 | 0.40% | ||||||
2012 Cell NAV | 368.1 | 100.00% | ||||||
* Fund II holds its investments at cost in accordance with the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement. |
** 2012 Cell fair values its investment in Fund II in accordance with the accounting policies as set out in Note 2. |
Cash Management
As at 30 September 2013, Fund II had placed a total of £232.5 million (31 March 2013: £82.2 million, 30 September 2012: £105.6 million) of cash on deposit with six banks subject to maturity dates ranging from instant access to one month. Fund II has in place a strict cash management policy that limits counterparty risks whilst simultaneously seeking to maximise returns.
Counterparty | Location | S&P Rating | Term | 30 September 2012 | 31 March 2013 | 30 September 2012 |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||
Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited | Guernsey | A | Instant access | 47,493 | 26,538 | 30,300 |
Lloyds TSB Offshore Limited | Jersey | A | Instant access | 49,564 | 15,329 | 35,200 |
Standard Chartered (Jersey) Limited | Jersey | AA- | One month | 39,343 | 30,230 | 30,100 |
HSBC Bank plc | Guernsey | AA- | One month | 44,100 | 10,056 | 10,000 |
Barclays Bank plc | Guernsey | A | One month | 7,003 | - | - |
BNP Paribas | Jersey | A+ | One month | 45,017 | - | - |
INDEPENDENT REVIEW REPORT TO BETTER CAPITAL PCC LIMITED IN RESPECT OF 2012 CELL
Introduction
We have been engaged by the Company to review the condensed set of financial statements of the 2012 Cell, a cell of Better Capital PCC Limited, for the period ended 30 September 2013 which comprise the 2012 Cell Condensed Statement of Financial Position, the 2012 Cell Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income, the 2012 Cell Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity, the 2012 Cell Condensed Statement of Cash Flows and the 2012 Cell related notes.
We have read the other information contained in the interim financial report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the condensed set of financial statements.
Directors' responsibilities
The interim financial report is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the Directors. The Directors are responsible for preparing the interim financial report in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
As disclosed in Note 2, the annual financial statements of the 2012 Cell are prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union. The 2012 Cell's condensed set of financial statements included in this interim financial report have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, 'Interim Financial Reporting' as adopted by the European Union.
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express to the Company a conclusion on the 2012 Cell's condensed set of financial statements in the interim financial report based on our review.
This report, including the conclusion, has been prepared in accordance with the terms of engagement to assist the 2012 Cell in meeting its responsibilities in respect of interim financial reporting in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority and for no other purpose. No person is entitled to rely on this report unless such a person is entitled to rely upon this report by virtue of and for the purpose of our terms of engagement or has been expressly authorised to do so by our prior written consent. Save as above, we do not accept responsibility for this report to any other person or for any other purpose and we hereby expressly disclaim any and all such liability.
Scope of review
We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, 'Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity' issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Conclusion
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the 2012 Cell's condensed set of financial statements in the interim financial report for the six months ended 30 September 2013 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 as adopted by the European Union and the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
BDO LimitedChartered AccountantsPlace du Pré, Rue du Pré, St Peter Port, GuernseyDate: 22 November 2013
Condensed Statement of Financial Position
As at 30 September 2013
As at | As at | As at | ||||||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 | 31 March 2013 | ||||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||
Non-current assets | ||||||||
Investment in Limited Partnership | 4 | 366,230 | 164,047 | 173,423 | ||||
Total non-current assets | 366,230 | 164,047 | 173,423 | |||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Trade and other receivables | 1,604 | 1,318 | 816 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 409 | 242 | 592 | |||||
Total current assets | 2,013 | 1,560 | 1,408 | |||||
TOTAL ASSETS | 368,243 | 165,607 | 174,831 | |||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Trade and other payables | (148) | (69) | (111) | |||||
Total current liabilities | (148) | (69) | (111) | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | (148) | (69) | (111) | |||||
NET ASSETS | 368,095 | 165,538 | 174,720 | |||||
EQUITY | ||||||||
Share capital | 6 | 347,914 | 166,004 | 166,004 | ||||
Retained earnings | 20,181 | (466) | 8,716 | |||||
TOTAL EQUITY | 368,095 | 165,538 | 174,720 | |||||
Number of 2012 Shares in issue at period/year end | 6 | 346,600,520 | 169,861,895 | 169,861,895 | ||||
Net asset value per 2012 Share (pence) | 8 | 106.20 | 97.45 | 102.86 |
The unaudited condensed financial statements of the 2012 Cell were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 22 November 2013 and signed on their behalf by:
Richard Crowder Richard Battey
Chairman Director
The notes form an integral part of the 2012 Cell condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
Six months to | Six months to | |||||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 | Year ended 31 March 2013 | ||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||
Income | ||||||
Change in fair value on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 4 | 10,907 | (1,040) | 8,336 | ||
Income distribution | 4 | 800 | 800 | 800 | ||
Interest income | 3 | - | 1 | |||
Total income | 11,710 | (240) | 9,137 | |||
Expenses | ||||||
Administration fees | 61 | 50 | 97 | |||
Directors' fees and expenses | 7 | 46 | 52 | 104 | ||
Legal and professional fees | 62 | 43 | 86 | |||
Other fees and expenses | 44 | 23 | 44 | |||
Audit fees | 16 | 19 | 35 | |||
Insurance premiums | 6 | 6 | 12 | |||
Registrar fees | 10 | 10 | 20 | |||
Total expenses | 245 | 203 | 398 | |||
Profit/(loss) for the financial period/year | 11,465 | (443) | 8,739 | |||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | |||
Total comprehensive income for the period/year | 11,465 | (443) | 8,739 | |||
Basic and diluted earnings per 2012 Share (pence) | 8 | 5.28 | (0.26) | 5.14 |
All activities derive from continuing operations.
The notes form an integral part of the 2012 Cell condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
Share | Retained | Total | ||
capital | earnings | Equity |
| |
Period | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
|
| ||||
As at 1 April 2013 | 166,004 | 8,716 | 174,720 |
|
| ||||
Profit for the financial period | - | 11,465 | 11,465 |
|
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - |
|
Total comprehensive income for the period | - | 11,465 | 11,465 |
|
| ||||
Transactions with owners |
| |||
Proceeds from issue of shares | 185,576 | - | 185,576 |
|
Share issue costs | (3,666) | - | (3,666) |
|
181,910 | - | 181,910 |
| |
| ||||
As at 30 September 2013 (unaudited) | 347,914 | 20,181 | 368,095 |
|
Share | Retained | Total | |
capital | earnings | Equity | |
Period | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
As at 1 April 2012 | 166,004 | (23) | 165,981 |
Loss for the financial period | - | (443) | (443) |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - |
Total comprehensive income for the period | - | (443) | (443) |
As at 30 September 2012 (audited) | 166,004 | (466) | 165,538 |
The notes form an integral part of the 2012 Cell condensed interim financial statements.
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
Six months to | Six months to |
Year ended | |||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 |
31 March 2013 | |||
£'000 | £'000 |
£'000 | |||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) |
(audited) | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
Profit/(loss) for the financial period/year | 11,465 | (443) | 8,739 | ||
Adjustments for: | |||||
Change in fair value on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | (10,907) | 1,040 | (8,336) | ||
Movement in trade receivables | (788) | (802) | (299) | ||
Movement in trade payables | 37 | (2) | 39 | ||
Net cash (used in)/generated from operating activities | (193) | (207) | 143 | ||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
Purchase of investment in Limited Partnerships | (181,900) | - |
- | ||
Net cash used in investing activities | (181,900) | - |
- | ||
Cash flow used in financing activities | |||||
Proceeds from issue of shares | 185,576 | - | - | ||
Share issue costs | (3,666) | - | - | ||
Net cash generated from financing activities | 181,910 | - | - | ||
Net movement in cash and cash equivalents during the period/year | (183) | (207) | 143 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period/year | 592 | 449 | 449 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period/year | 409 | 242 | 592 |
The notes form an integral part of the 2012 Cell condensed interim financial statements.
Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements
For the six month period to 30 September 2013
1. General information
The 2012 Cell has the investment objective of generating attractive total returns from investing (through Fund II) in a portfolio of businesses which have significant operating issues and may have associated financial distress, with a primary focus on businesses which have significant activities within the United Kingdom and Europe. Such returns being expected to be largely derived from capital growth.
Fund II is managed by its general partner, BECAP12 GP LP, which is in turn managed by its general partner BECAP12 GP Limited. Such arrangements are governed under the respective Limited Partnership Agreement, as amended.
The 2012 Cell is listed on the Main Market.
Further information regarding the background of the 2012 Cell is detailed in the Company Background and Further Information section.
2. Accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The unaudited Cell 2012 condensed financial information included in the interim financial report for the six months ended 30 September 2013 have been prepared in accordance with the DTRs and Listing Rules of the UK's FCA and IAS 34, 'Interim Financial Reporting' as adopted by the EU.
The interim financial statements do not include all the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the 2012 Cell's annual financial statements for the year to 31 March 2013, which are available on the Company's website (www.bettercapital.gg). The annual financial statements have been prepared in accordance with EU adopted IFRSs.
The 2012 Cell does not operate in an industry where significant or cyclical variations as a result of seasonal activity are experienced during the financial period.
Except as listed below, the same accounting policies and methods of computation are followed in the interim financial statements as in the annual financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2013.
Standards, interpretations and amendments to published standards adopted in the period
The following standards, which have only impacted disclosures, are mandatory for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and have been adopted in the financial statements:
- Amendments to IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting
- IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (Note 4 & Note 5)
Going concern
After making appropriate enquiries, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the 2012 Cell, and in turn Fund II, have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and do not consider there to be any threat to the going concern status of the 2012 Cell. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these financial statements.
Segmental reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Board of Directors, as a whole. The key measure of performance used by the Board to assess the 2012 Cell's performance and to allocate resources is the total return on the 2012 Cell's Net Asset Value, as calculated under IFRS, and therefore no reconciliation is required between the measure of profit or loss used by the Board and that contained in the financial statements.
For management purposes, the 2012 Cell is organised into one main operating segment, which invests in one limited partnership.
All of the 2012 Cell's income is from within Guernsey.
All of the 2012 Cell's non-current assets are located in Guernsey.
Due to the 2012 Cell's nature it has no customers.
Critical accounting judgement and estimation uncertainty
Use of estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The areas involving a high degree of judgement or complexity or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are disclosed below. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected.
The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results.
Investment in Fund II
The value of the 2012 Cell's investment in Fund II is based on the value of the 2012 Cell's limited partner capital and loan accounts within Fund II. This is based on the components within Fund II, principally the value of the underlying investee companies. Any fluctuation in the value of the underlying investee companies will directly impact on the value of the 2012 Cell's investment in Fund II.
Further information in relation to the valuation of the investment in Fund II is disclosed in Note 4 and Note 5.
3. Taxation
The 2012 Cell is exempt from taxation in Guernsey as Better Capital PCC Limited has tax exempt status.
4. Investment in Limited Partnership
Loans | Capital | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cost | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2013 | 165,483 | 17 | 165,500 |
Purchase of investment in Limited Partnerships | 181,900 | - | 181,900 |
Carried forward at 30 September 2013 | 347,383 | 17 | 347,400 |
Fair value adjustment through profit or loss | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2013 | 7,923 | - | 7,923 |
Fair value movement during period | 10,907 | - | 10,907 |
Carried forward at 30 September 2013 | 18,830 | - | 18,830 |
Fair value as at September 2013 (unaudited) | 366,213 | 17 | 366,230 |
Loans | Capital | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cost | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2012 | 165,483 | 17 | 165,500 |
Additions During the year | - | - | - |
Carried forward at 31 March 2013 | 165,483 | 17 | 165,500 |
Fair value adjustment through profit or loss | |||
Brought forward at 1 April 2012 | (413) | - | (413) |
Fair value movement during year | 8,336 | - | 8,336 |
Carried forward at 31 March 2013 | 7,923 | - | 7,923 |
Fair value as at 31 March 2013 (audited) | 173,406 | 17 | 173,423 |
The movement in fair value is derived from the fair value uplift in Everest net of income and expenses of Fund II and its related special purpose vehicles.
The outstanding loans do not carry interest. The loans are expected to be repaid by way of distributions from Fund II. The 2012 Cell is not entitled to demand repayment of the outstanding loans, however, the General Partner may, upon request by the Company, repay to the 2012 Cell any amount of the outstanding loan.
During August 2013 a further investment of £181.9 million was paid into Fund II.
Distributions receivable from Fund II in the year amounted to £0.8 million (31 March 2013: £0.8 million, 30, September 2012: £0.8 million), of which £1.6 million (31 March 2013: £0.8 million, 30 September 2012: 1.3 million) remains outstanding at the period end, which have been allocated as income based on discretionary allocation powers of the General Partner of Fund II as set out in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
In the financial statements of the 2012 Cell the fair value of the investment in limited partnership will be increased or reduced to reflect the fair value of the 2012 Cell's attributable valuation of net assets within Fund II.
5. Fair Value
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the financial assets or financial liabilities are categorised is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety into only one of the three levels.
The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
- Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
- Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices)
- Level 3 - inputs for the assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The only financial instruments carried at fair value are the investments which are fair valued at each reporting date.
The 2012 Cell's investment has been classified within Level 3 as it has unobservable inputs and is not traded. Amounts classified under Level 3 for the period are £366,230,000 (31 March 2013: £173,423,000, 30 September 2012: £164,047,000).
Transfers during the period
There have been no transfers between levels. Due to the nature of the investments, they are always expected to be classified under Level 3.
Valuation techniques
The value of the 2012 Cell's investment in Fund II is based on the value of the 2012 Cell's limited partner capital and loan accounts within Fund II. This is based on the components within Fund II, principally the value of the underlying investee companies. Any fluctuation in the value of the underlying investee companies will directly impact on the value of the 2012 Cell's investment in Fund II.
When valuing the underlying investee companies, the General Partner of Fund II reviews information provided by the underlying investee companies and other business partners and applies IPEV methodologies, to estimate a fair value as at the date of the statement of financial position.
Initially acquisitions are valued at price of recent investment. Once maintainable earnings can be identified the preferred method of valuation is the earnings multiple valuation technique, where a multiple that is an appropriate and reasonable indicator of value (given the size, risk profile and earnings growth prospects of the underlying company) is applied to the maintainable earnings of the company. Occasionally other methods, as deemed suitable by the Fund II GP, may be used, such as revenue or gross profit multiples, net assets, break-up value or discounted cash flows.The techniques used in determining the fair value of the 2012 Cell's investments is selected on an investment by investment basis so as to maximise to use of market based observable inputs.
The Board reviews and considers the fair value arrived at by the Fund II GP before incorporating into the fair value of the investment adopted by the 2012 Cell. The variety of valuation bases adopted, quality of management information provided by the underlying investee companies and the lack of liquid markets for the investments mean that there are inherent difficulties in determining the fair value of these investments that cannot be eliminated. Therefore the amounts realised on the sale of investments will differ from the fair values reflected in these financial statements and the differences may be significant.
Initially acquisitions are valued at price of recent investment. Once maintainable earnings can be identified the preferred method of valuation is the earnings multiple valuation technique, where a multiple that is an appropriate and reasonable indicator of value (given the size, risk profile and earnings growth prospects of the underlying company) is applied to the maintainable earnings of the company. Occasionally other methods, as deemed suitable by the Fund II GP, may be used, such as revenue or gross profit multiples, net assets, break-up value or discounted cash flows.The techniques used in determining the fair value of the 2012 Cell's investments is selected on an investment by investment basis so as to maximise to use of market based observable inputs.
Where price of recent investment is determined to be the most appropriate methodology the transactional price will be that of the investment by Fund II. Jaeger and City Link are carried at the price of recent investment. Due to the immaturity of the turnaround position of the investee companies, interest receivable on loans advanced by Fund II to investee companies will only be recognised when it is deemed more likely than not that the interest will be paid. As at 30 September 2013 such unrecognised interest receivable amounted to £4.2 million (31 March 2013: £1.9 million, 30 September 2012: £nil).
The following table summarises the valuation methodologies and inputs used for the 2012 Cell's Level 3 investments as at period end:
Valuation Methodology | Description | Input | Adjustments | Discount Rate Applied to Multiples | Discounted Multiples | Value of portfolio valued on this basis (£'m) | ||
30 September 2013 | 31 March 2013 | |||||||
Multiple | Most commonly used Private Equity valuation methodology. Used for investments which are profitable and for which a set of listed companies and precedent transactions with similar characteristics can be determined | Multiples are applied to the earnings of the company to determine the enterprise value | Surplus assets available for imminent sale may be added to the multiple valuation | A discount is applied to earnings multiples of 20% | Multiple of up to 7 times was used | 52.3 | 40.9 | |
EarningsReported earnings adjusted for non-recurring items, such as restructuring expenses, for significant corporate actions and, in exceptional cases, run-rate adjustments to arrive at maintainable earnings. Most common measure is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation ("EBITDA"). Earnings used are usually the forecast for the investee company's current financial year, unless data from the latest audited accounts provides a more reliable picture of maintainable earnings | ||||||||
MultiplesThe earnings multiple is derived from comparable listed companies or relevant market transaction multiples. The Fund II GP selects businesses in the same industry and, where possible, with a similar business model and profile in terms of size, products, services and customers, growth rates and geographic focus and adjust for changes in the relative performance in the set of comparables | ||||||||
Price of recent investment | Where there has been a recent Investment in the Investee Company, the price of that Investment will provide a basis of the valuation | Book cost | Addition of costs since initial purchase and the subtraction of monies returned to Fund II | n/a | n/a | 80.0 | 33.6 | |
Portfolio valuation | 132.3 | 74.5 | ||||||
Other assets | 233.9 | 98.9 | ||||||
2012 Cell fair value of investments in Fund II | 366.2 | 173.4 |
This approach requires the use of assumptions about certain unobservable inputs. Significant unobservable inputs as at 30 September 2013 are:
- Multiples used to derive enterprise value
- Discount factors
A reasonably possible change in the multiples used +/- 10.0% would result in:
- An increase in carrying value of £4.0 million or 3.0% (+10.0%)
- A decrease in the carrying value of £3.5 million or 2.6% (-10.0%)
A reasonably possible change in the discount factors used would be to completely remove the discount factor or to double the discount factor. This would result in:
- A decrease in carrying value of £14.5 million or 11.0% (+100.0%)
- An increase in the carrying value of £17.1 million or 12.9% (-100.0%)
The Fund II GP approves the valuations performed with input from the Consultant and monitors the range of reasonably possible changes in significant observable inputs on a regular basis.
6. Share Capital
Cell Shares
Period ended 30 September 2013
Authorised:
The 2012 Cell is authorised to issue unlimited shares at £1 par value.
Issued and fully paid: | |||||||||
Unlimited shares of £1 par value | No. | ||||||||
Shares as at 1 April 2013 | 169,861,895 | ||||||||
Movement for the year | 176,738,625 | ||||||||
Shares as at 30 September 2013 | 346,600,520 | ||||||||
Share capital | £'000 | ||||||||
Share capital as at 1 April 2013 | 166,004 | ||||||||
Movements for the year: | |||||||||
Proceeds from issue of shares | 185,576 | ||||||||
Issue costs paid | (3,666) | ||||||||
Share capital as at 30 September 2013 | 347,914 | ||||||||
Year ended 31 March 2013
Authorised:
The 2012 Cell is authorised to issue unlimited shares at nil par value.
Issued and fully paid: | |||||||
Unlimited shares of no par value | No. | ||||||
Shares as at 1 April 2012 | 169,861,895 | ||||||
Movement for the year | - | ||||||
Shares as at 31 March 2013 | 169,861,895 | ||||||
Share capital | £'000 | ||||||
Share capital as at 1 April 2012 | 166,004 | ||||||
Movements for the year | - | ||||||
Share capital as at 31 March 2013 | 166,004 |
On 31 July 2013, at the Annual General Meeting, the Shareholders of the 2012 Cell approved by ordinary resolution the re-designation of the 2009 Cell shares to par value of £1 (31 March 2013: nil par value).
On 13 August 2013 a total of 176,738,625 shares were issued in 2012 Cell under the Firm Placing and Placing and Open Offer raising gross proceeds of £185.6 million. Following Admission the Better Capital 2012 Cell consisted of 346,600,520 shares.
Principal members of Better Capital LLP, the appointed Consultant to BECAP GP LP and BECAP12 GP LP, which act as General Partners to Fund I and Fund II, respectively, hold investments in the Company in accordance with the terms of the Prospectus. At the period end, those members held the following proportions of shares:
2012 Cell | ||||
Number of Shares | Per cent. of Share Capital | |||
Mark Aldridge |
926,190 |
0.3 | ||
Nick Sanders* |
926,190 |
0.3 | ||
*Shareholding is held through a discretionary trust in favour of Nick Sanders' children
7. Related party transactions
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the party in making financial or operational decisions. The Directors are responsible for overall control, management and supervision of the Company's affairs and are responsible for the overall implementation of the investment objective and policy of the Company.
The Company has four non-executive Directors. On 28 June 2013 Mr Mark Huntley resigned from the board and Mr Jon Moulton was appointed as a non-executive Director of the Company. Mr Moulton is also a Director and the sole shareholder of BECAP12 GP Limited, the general partner of the Fund II GP.
Annual remuneration for each Director at company level is as follows: the Chairman receives £60,000, the Chairman of the audit committee receives £52,500, the Chairman of the management engagement, nomination and remuneration committee receives £50,000 and the other non-executive Director receives £45,000. During the period Mr Moulton waived his fee.
Other remuneration paid to each Director of £5,000 (£2,500 for Mr Huntley) during the period was in respect of additional services rendered in relation to the fund raising in the 2012 Cell and totalled £17,500. These have been included within share capital as costs of raising capital within the 2012 Cell. Mr Moulton waived his fee for the fundraising.
Directors' fees, incurred by the 2012 Cell, for the period to 30 September 2013 amounted to £46,000 (31 March 2013: £104,000, 30 September 2012: £52,000) apportioned on a 50/50 basis between the Cells. £20,500 (31 March 2013: £26,000, September 2012: £6,000) remained outstanding at the period end.
Directors share holdings are shown on page 6.
During the period, the Company incurred administration fees of £61,000 (31 March 2013: £97,000, 30 September 2012: £50,000) apportioned on a NAV basis between the Cells. £38,000 (31 March 2013: £24,000, 30 September 2012: £25,000) remained outstanding at the period end.
8. Earnings per share and net asset value per share
Earnings per share
Six months to | Six Months to | Year ended | ||||
30 September 2013 | 30 September 2012 | 31 March 2013 | ||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (audited) | ||||
Profit/(loss) for the period/year | £11.465m | £(0.443)m | £8.739m | |||
Weighted average number of 2012 Shares in issue | 217,185,352 | 169,861,895 | 169,861,895 | |||
EPS (pence) | 5.28 | (0.26) | 5.14 | |||
The earnings per share is based on the profit or loss for the period/year and on the weighted average number of shares in issue for the period/year.
The 2012 Cell does not have any instruments which could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future.
Net Asset Value per share
The Net Asset Value per share for the 2012 Cell is arrived at by dividing the total net assets of the 2012 Cell at the period/year end by the number of shares in issue at the period/year end.
9. Subsequent events
There have been no significant subsequent events since 30 September 2013.
Defined Terms
"2009 Cell" or "Better Capital 2009 Cell" | the Cell in the Company created pursuant to the Resolutions Capital 2009 Cell and holding partnership interests in Fund I, and shall be interpreted as the Company acting in its capacity as a protected cell company transacting its business in the name of the 2009 Cell; |
"2009 Shares" | the ordinary shares of £1 par value in the 2009 Cell being, prior to Conversion, the Shares; |
"2012 Cell" or "Better Capital 2012 Cell" | the Cell in the Company established following the Conversion which holds partnership interests in Fund II, and is interpreted as the Company acting in its capacity as a protected cell company transacting its business in the name of the 2012 Cell; |
"2012 Shares" | the ordinary shares of £1 par value in the 2012 Cell issued by the Company pursuant to the Firm Placing and Placing and Open Offer; |
"Administrator" or "Heritage" or "HIFM" | means Heritage International Fund Managers Limited; |
"AIC" | the Association of Investment Companies; |
"AIC Code" | the AIC Code of Corporate Governance; |
"AIC Guide" | the AIC Corporate Governance Guide for Investment Companies; |
"AIM" | the AIM Market, a market operated by the London Stock Exchange; |
"Annual General Meeting" | the general meeting of the Company; |
"ATH" | Means ATH Resources Plc and its subsidiary Aardvark TMC Limited; |
"Calyx" | means Calyx Holdings Limited; |
"Carried Interest" | the Special Limited Partner's entitlement to participate in the gains and profits of Fund I or Fund II, as set out in the relevant partnership agreement; |
"Cells" | the 2009 Cell and 2012 Cell together; |
"Cell Shares" | the 2009 Shares and 2012 Shares together; |
"City Link" | means City Link Limited; |
"Clarity" | means Clarity Commerce Solutions Plc/Clarity Commerce Solutions Ltd; |
"Companies Law" | the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008; |
"Company" or "Better Capital PCC Limited" | Better Capital Limited, being prior to the Conversion, a non-cellular company limited by shares and being upon and after the Conversion a protected cell company, in each case incorporated in Guernsey with registered number 51194 whose registered office is at Heritage Hall, PO Box 225, Le Marchant Street, St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 4HY; |
"Consultant" | means Better Capital LLP; |
"Conversion" | the conversion of the Company from a non-cellular company into aprotected cell company pursuant to the Resolutions in accordance withsection 46 of the Companies Law; |
"Core" | the Company excluding its Cells; |
"Core Shares" | the shares in the Core; |
"Corporate Broker" | being Numis Securities Limited; |
"DigiPoS" | means the DigiPoS group of companies; |
"Directors" or "Board" | the directors of the Company as at the date of this document and "Director" means any one of them; |
"DTR" | Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the UK's FCA; |
"Dublin Consultant" | means Better Capital (Dublin) Limited; |
"EU" or "European Union" | the European Union first established by the treaty made at Maastricht on 7 February 1992; |
"EU Adopted IFRS" | International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted in the EU; |
"Fairline"
"Follow-on Fundraising" | means the Fairline group of companies;
any additional capital raising by the 2012 Cell; |
"FCA" | the Financial Conduct Authority; |
"FCA Rules" | the rules or regulations issued or promulgated by the FCA from time to time and for the time being in force (as varied by any waiver or modification granted, or guidance given, by the FCA); |
"Funds" | both Fund I and Fund II together; |
"Fund GPs" | being both Fund I GP and Fund II GP; |
"Fund I" | BECAP Fund LP, a Guernsey limited partnership established on 23 November 2009 and registered in Guernsey as a limited partnership on 25 November 2009 (registration number 1242); |
"Fund I GP" | means BECAP GP LP acting as general partner of Fund I and by its general partner, the GP Company; |
"Fund I GP Company" | means BECAP GP Limited (a company registered in Guernsey with registration number 51176) acting as general partner of the General Partner; |
"Fund I Investment Period" | in respect of Fund I, the period from the 21 December 2009 to 31 December 2012, subject to the Fund I GP (with the prior consent of the Company acting in relation to the 2009 Cell), extending this period by up to 12 calendar months, unless terminated earlier following an Executive Departure; |
"Fund I Investment Policy" | the investment policy to be applied by the Company in respect of the 2009 Cell and relating to Fund I; |
"Fund I Total Commitments" | the aggregate commitments of the 2009 Cell and the Fund I Special Limited Partner to Fund I, being prior to Conversion the total commitments of the Company and the Fund I Special Limited Partner to Fund I; |
"Fund II" | BECAP12 Fund LP, a Guernsey limited partnership established and registered in Guernsey as a limited partnership on 17 November 2011 (registration number 1558); |
"Fund II GP" | means BECAP12 GP LP acting as general partner of Fund II and by its general partner, the GP 12 Company; |
"Fund II GP Company" | means BECAP12 GP Limited (a company registered in Guernsey with registration number 54252) acting as general partner of the Fund II GP; |
"Fund II GP's Share" | The priority profit share payable to the Fund II GP pursuant to the Fund II Partnership Agreement; |
"Fund II Investment Period" | in respect of Fund II, the period from 13 January 2012 to 30 June 2016. This was extended from 31 December 2014 due to a Follow-on Fundraising. Subject to the Fund II GP (with the prior consent of the Company acting in relation to the 2012 Cell), this period may be extended up to 12 calendar months, unless terminated earlier following an Executive Departure; |
"Fund II Investment Policy" | the investment policy to be applied by the Company in respect of the 2012 Cell and relating to Fund II; |
"Fund II Total Commitments" | the aggregate commitments of the 2012 Cell and Fund II Special Limited Partner to Fund II; |
"Gardner" | Gardner Group Limited; |
"General Partners" or "GPs" | both Fund I GP and Fund II GP together; |
"General Partner's Share" | the priority profit share payable to the General Partner pursuant to the Partnership Agreement; |
"GFSC" | the Guernsey Financial Services Commission; |
"GFSC Code" | the GFSC Finance Sector Code of Corporate Governance; |
"IAS" | International Accounting Standard; |
"IFRS" | International Financial Reporting Standard; |
"IPEV" | International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines; |
"Jaeger" | means the Jaeger group of companies; |
"Listing Rules" | the listing rules made under section 73A of the FSMA (as set out in the FCA Handbook), as amended; |
"London Stock Exchange" | London Stock Exchange plc; |
"LSE" | London Stock Exchange's main market for listed securities; |
"Main Market" | the main market of the London Stock Exchange; |
"Net Asset Value" or "NAV" | the value of the assets of the Company less its liabilities, calculated in accordance with the valuation guidelines laid down by the Board; |
"NPRF" | means the National Pensions Reserve Fund of Ireland; |
"Numis" | Numis Securities Limited; |
"Official List" | the official list of the UK Listing Authority; |
"Omnico Group" | the business formed from the merger of DigiPoS and Clarity; |
"PCC" | Protected Cell Company; |
"POI Law" | The Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 1987, as amended; |
"Prospectus" | the prospectus of the Company, most recently updated on 29 July 2013 and available on the Company's website (www.bettercapital.gg); |
"Reader's Digest " | Being BECAP Vivat Limited and its subsidiaries, trading as Reader's Digest; |
"Reader's Digest UK" | The Reader's Digest Association Limited (in administration) and its main subsidiary; |
"Registrar" | Capita Registrars (Guernsey) Limited; |
"Santia" | means the Santia group of companies; |
"SLP" | Better Capital SLP LP; |
"SLP12" | Better Capital 12 SLP LP; |
"Spicers" | means the Spicers group of companies; |
"Total Commitments" | the aggregate commitments of the Company and the Special Limited Partner to Better Capital Fund; |
"UK" | United Kingdom; |
"UK Code" | the UK Corporate Governance Code published by the Financial Reporting Council. |
Background and further information
General information
The Company is a limited liability, Closed-ended Investment Company, which was incorporated on 24 November 2009 in Guernsey and which, by special resolution of its members, converted to a protected cell company on 12 January 2012 and on that same day changed its name from Better Capital Limited to Better Capital PCC Limited. It has an unlimited life and is registered with the GFSC as a Registered Closed-ended Collective Investment Scheme. The registered office of the Company is Heritage Hall, PO Box 225, Le Marchant Street, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 4HY.
Background
The Company was launched as a feeder fund which would pursue its investment objective and policy by investing in Fund I, which in turn would invest in a portfolio of distressed businesses. The Company was initially admitted to list on the AIM market on 17 December 2009, raising £142.4 million gross capital proceeds by way of a placing of shares. On 28 June 2010 the Company raised an additional £67.6 million gross capital proceeds from a firm placing and placing and open offer. On 8 July 2010 the Company was admitted to the Official List and the enlarged share capital of the Company was migrated to the Main Market.
Conversion to a PCC
On 12 January 2012 the Company converted to a PCC structure. A PCC is a cellular company governed by Guernsey Law under which the PCC can create additional cells from time to time. The PCC can have a separate portfolio of assets in each cell. A PCC may, in respect of any of its cells, create and issue shares representing economic and voting rights in relation to such cells. Persons investing in cell shares only have recourse to, and except in very limited circumstances their interests are limited to, the cellular assets of that cell and they have no recourse to assets attributed to any other cell (as may be created from time to time) or to the core assets of the company.
The Company maintains a separate cell account for each class of shares, to which the capital proceeds of issue and the income arising from the investment of these proceeds in the respective Fund are credited, and against which the expenses allocated are charged. Under redemptions, Shareholders are only entitled to their proportion of the net assets held in the cell relating to the particular shares.
On Conversion all of the previous share capital of the Company was transferred to Better Capital 2009 Cell and 100 Core Shares were issued to the newly formed Core of the PCC, being Better Capital PCC Limited. The Core Shares have no voting rights for so long as Cell Shares are in issue.
The Company's issued share capital consists of 206,780,952 shares in 2009 Cell and 346,600,520 shares (31 March 2013: 169,861,895 shares) in 2012 Cell. Under the Company's articles of incorporation, at any general meeting of the Company:
• each holder of 2009 Shares who is present in person shall have one vote and on a poll the vote shall be weighted where a vote cast in relation to each 2009 Share shall count as 1.1096 towards the total number of votes cast; and
• each holder of 2012 Shares who is present in person shall have one vote and on a poll the vote shall be weighted where a vote cast in relation to each 2012 Share shall count as 0.9770 towards the total number of votes cast.
The figure which may be used by the Shareholders as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, Better Capital PCC Limited under the FCA's Disclosure and Transparency Rules, is the aggregate of the number of votes capable of being cast on a poll, namely 568,072,852. This is calculated as the sum of the 2009 Shares (206,780,952) multiplied by 1.1096 plus the 2012 Shares (346,600,520) multiplied by 0.9770.
Similarly, to calculate the numerator, Shareholders should multiply their holding of 2009 Shares by 1.1096 and multiply their holding of 2012 Shares by 0.9770. The sum of those calculations will result in the relevant number of voting rights for the numerator.
Core
In addition to the creation of the cells, the Companies Law requires the PCC to also have a "core" which holds the non-cellular assets of the PCC. The Core assets are nominal and the Core Shares are of negligible economic value carrying restricted voting rights. The Core Shares are held by a Guernsey purpose trust which is wholly independent from the Company, Fund I and Fund II.
Better Capital 2009 Cell
All of the original members at 12 January 2012, shares, capital, assets and liabilities of the existing Company were attributed to the 2009 Cell. The 2009 Shares have continued to be admitted to the premium segment of the Official List and to trading on the Main Market. The Company incurred fundraising and listing expenses comprising predominantly of commissions, regulatory fees, professional adviser fees and disbursements totalling £4,993,301 for both fundraisings. These costs were taken to the share capital account of the Company and are now attributed to the 2009 Cell.
The 2009 Shares trade separately from the 2012 Shares, under their existing ISIN (GG00B5885941) and have the TIDM of BCAP since the Conversion.
Fund I is managed by its general partner, BECAP GP LP, which is in turn managed by its general partner BECAP GP Limited. Such arrangements are governed under the respective Limited Partnership Agreement, as amended.
Better Capital 2012 Cell
On 12 January 2012, the Company raised gross proceeds of £169,861,895 by the issuance of 169,861,895 ordinary shares in the 2012 Cell at 100 pence per 2012 Share. The 2012 Cell is a feeder fund legally segregated from the 2009 Cell and which invests in Fund II. The Company incurred fundraising and listing expenses comprising predominately of commissions, regulatory fees, professional adviser fees and disbursements totalling £3,857,660. These costs were taken to the share capital account of the 2012 Cell.
The Admission became effective, and dealings in the 2012 Shares commenced on the Main Market on 13 January 2012. The 2012 Shares trade separately from and are not fungible with the 2009 Shares and have a separate ISIN (GG00B4N1RV71) and a TIDM of BC12.
On 29 July 2013, the Company announced its intention to raise gross proceeds of up to £250 million by way of a Firm Placing and Placing and Open Offer of up to approximately 238 million 2012 Shares at 105 pence per 2012 Share with 115,438,571 2012 Shares through the Firm Placing and up to 122,678,035 2012 Shares through the Placing and Open Offer.
On 13 August 2013, a total of 176,738,625 shares were issued by the 2012 Cell under the Firm Placing and Placing and Open Offer raising gross proceeds of £185.6 million. The net proceeds were transferred to Better Capital Fund II within five days of Admission. Following Admission the Better Capital 2012 Cell consisted of 346,600,520 shares with an estimated Net Asset Value per 2012 Share (unaudited) of 102.9 pence (as at 31 March 2013).
Fund II is managed by its general partner, BECAP12 GP LP, which is in turn managed by its general partner BECAP12 GP Limited. Such arrangements are governed under the respective Limited Partnership Agreement, as amended.
Board
The current Board of the Company is accountable to Shareholders of both the 2009 Cell and the 2012 Cell and the Board will exercise its duties in respect of the 2009 Cell and the 2012 Cell and the PCC as a whole. In the unlikely event that a situation should develop whereby there may be a conflict of interest between the Cells, it is the intention of the Board to allocate an individual Director to each Cell to manage such conflicts.
Material relationships
Conflicts of interest may arise between the Company, the Directors, Fund I, BECAP GP, the Fund I GP Company, the Fund I Special Limited Partner, Fund II, BECAP GP II, the Fund II GP Company, the Fund II Special Limited Partner, the Consultant, the Administrator, the Purpose Trust and certain of the Directors, members and officers of each. These relationships are described further in the Prospectus.
General Information
Board of Directors Richard Crowder (Chairman) Richard Battey Philip Bowman Jon Moulton (appointed 28 June 2013) Mark Huntley (resigned 28 June 2013)
*all of the above are non-executive, including the Chairman, and were appointed on 24 November 2009 unless otherwise stated.
Company secretary Heritage International Fund Managers LimitedHeritage Hall PO Box 225 Le Marchant StreetSt Peter PortGuernseyGY1 4HY
Registered office Heritage Hall PO Box 225 Le Marchant StreetSt Peter PortGuernseyGY1 4HY
Guernsey administrator Heritage International Fund Managers LimitedHeritage Hall PO Box 225 Le Marchant StreetSt Peter PortGuernseyGY1 4HY
Registrar Capita Registrars (Guernsey) Limited Longue Hougue House St Sampson Guernsey GY2 4JN
Principal bankers The Royal Bank of Scotland International Limited Royal Bank Place 1 Glategny Esplanade St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 4BQ
|
Guernsey advocates to the Company Carey Olsen PO Box 98 Carey House Les Banques St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 4BZ
English solicitors to the Company DLA Piper UK LLP 3 Noble Street London EC2V 7EE
Corporate broker and financial adviser Numis Securities Limited 10 Paternoster Square London EC4M 7LT
Independent auditor BDO Limited PO Box 180 Place du Pré Rue du Pré St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 3LL
Public relations adviser Powerscourt 2-5 St John's Square London EC1M 4DE
Website www.bettercapital.gg
Tickers 2009 Cell: BCAP.L 2012 Cell: BC12.L |
Cautionary Statement
The Chairman's Statement and Investment Reports (IRs) have been prepared solely to provide additional information for Shareholders to assess the Company's strategies and the potential for those strategies to succeed. These should not be relied on by any other party or for any other purpose.
The Chairman's Statement and IRs may include statements that are, or may be deemed to be, ''forward-looking statements''. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms ''believes'', ''estimates'', ''anticipates'', ''expects'', ''intends'', ''may'', ''will'' or ''should'' or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology.
These forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this document and include statements regarding the intentions, beliefs or current expectations of the Directors and the General Partners of the Funds, supported by the consultant, concerning, amongst other things, the investment objectives and investment policy, financing strategies, investment performance, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, and distribution policy of the Company and the markets in which it invests.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. The Company's actual investment performance, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, distribution policy and the development of its financing strategies may differ materially from the impression created by the forward-looking statements contained in this document.
Subject to their legal and regulatory obligations, the Directors and the General Partners of the Funds, supported by the consultant, expressly disclaim any obligations to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any change in expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.
Related Shares:
BC12.LBCAP.L