26th Aug 2011 07:00
Central Rand Gold Limited
("CRG" or the "Company" or the "Group")
(Incorporated as a company with limited liability under the laws of Guernsey,
Company Number 45108)
(Incorporated as an external company with limited liability under the laws of
South Africa, registration number 2007/0192231/10)
ISIN: GG00B24HM601
Share code on LSE: CRND
Share code on JSE: CRD
2011 Interim Report
Central Rand Gold, the South African gold mining and exploration holding company, today announces its Interim Results for the six months ended 30 June 2011. The full set of results is available on the Company's website: www.centralrandgold.com
For further information, please contact:
CRG +27 (0) 11 674 2304
Johan du Toit / Patrick Malaza
Evolution Securities Limited +44 (0) 20 7071 4300
Chris Sim / Neil Elliot
Merchantec Capital +27 (0) 11 325 6363
Roger Pitt / Monique Martinez
Buchanan Communications Limited +44 (0) 20 7466 5000
Bobby Morse / Katharine Sutton / James Strong
Jenni Newman Public Relations (Pty) Ltd +27 (0) 11 772 1033
Jenni Newman
24 August 2010
Johannesburg
JSE Sponsor
Merchantec Capital
Chief Executive Officer's Review
Salient features of this report
• Suspension of underground mining development due to continuing Acid Mine Drainage ("AMD") uncertainty and discovery of "composite voids" in the initial shallow areas.
• Surface mining to continue until the end of September 2011.
• Gold production up 133% to 7,189 ounces.
• Trial conventional mining exercise underway.
• Draft water solution awaiting final Government approval.
• The implementation of a retrenchment programme to reduce staff numbers by 160 in line with reduced mining activity.
• Cash and near cash resources at 30 June 2011 of US$4.8 million.
Overview
The first half of 2011, being the period under review, turned out to be a watershed period for Central Rand Gold.
The continuing AMD in the Central Basin has become a major risk factor and an operational impediment for the Company, prompting the decision to indefinitely suspend underground mining operations with effect from 25 May 2011.
As a result of the uncertainty facing the Company, the size of the workforce has had to be substantially reduced, thus prompting the implementation of a retrenchment programme with effect from 15 July 2011. As a result of this programme, which adheres to relevant labour law policies and procedures, about 159 staff members, of the current total head count of 218, will leave the Company's employment between July and September 2011.
Although July 2011 was indeed a sad moment in the Company's history to have to say goodbye to valuable staff members, the retrenchments were necessary in light of the Company's need to preserve capital while assessing its options regarding the future.
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company will continue to review all operations and activities to accurately assess its future strategic options.
Water
On 29 March 2011, the Company reported that some progress and commitment had been made by the South
African Government towards addressing the AMD situation (including the allocation by the National Treasury of R225 million (US$32 million) to the Department of Water Affairs to finance a solution). Nevertheless, with the water table gradually rising towards the 250 metres below surface ("mbs") level, the Board of Directors of CRG ("the Board") deemed it prudent to discontinue underground mine development, at least until action has been taken to resolve the problem. If the water is stopped at 250 mbs, approximately 90% of the Company's resource base will be under water. The water level as at the end of July 2011 was measured at 425 mbs at South West Vertical, rising at approximately 0.3 metres per day.
On 29 March 2011, the Company also announced that the submersible pumps ordered by the Company at a cost of €3.5 million (R34.4 million or US$5.0 million) would be capable of pumping approximately 72 million litres of water per day, more than the expected water ingress of around 55 million litres per day. As part of a quality control plan, the two pumps were individually tested on 20 July and 22 July 2011, respectively, in a special testing bay at the manufacturer's factory in Schwabisch Gmund in Germany, to ensure conformance to specifications. Representatives from Central Rand Gold as well as the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority ("TCTA") (the appointed project managers by the Department of Water Affairs) and BKS (consultant to TCTA) were present. In the event that these pumps are not utilised for the intended purpose, they will be sold.
The Board believes CRG has done as much as it possibly can to contribute towards finding a workable solution to
the AMD problem, and continues to participate in industry lobbying which has included making presentations to a
parliamentary subcommittee in Cape Town. Additional feedback from the Department of Water Affairs is still being awaited.
TCTA has been tasked with project management of the AMD situation and the implementation of a solution that will benefit the mining industry and other stakeholders in the Central Basin area. At the time that this report was being written, TCTA had presented to the Company a draft proposal on the implementation of a workable and sustainable solution. However, this proposal still requires Governmental approval.
Geology
Resources and Reserves
During the period under review, the Company discovered that approximately 30% of its proposed stoping area,
between 120 and 180 mbs, consisted of composite double voids. Composite double voids represent areas where the Main Reef Leader, middling and the Main Reef have been historically extracted as a single unit.
A statistical analysis study on the occurrence and distribution of composite double voids is underway, and it appears that the prediction of both the location and the frequency of these areas of previous mining activity is possible. The existence of the composite double voids do not appear to be a pervasive situation and is thought only to occur where the middling is relatively thin and mineralised, and the gold grade of total composite package is sufficiently high. The impact of the composite double voids on the resource and reserves is expected to be localised and relatively minor.
Once the aforementioned study has been completed, a full analysis thereof will be incorporated into the Company's
Resource model and a comprehensive update of the Main Reef Resource base is envisaged. A future review and rework of the Main Reef Reserves to incorporate potential conventional mining currently being tested, is also anticipated to take this statistical model into account.
Mineral Reserve Summary (End June 2011) | |||
Probable Reserves | |||
Area | Tonnes | Grade | Oz |
Central MR | 1.94 | 4.1 | 253,000 |
West MR | 1.79 | 4.1 | 229,000 |
Total | 3.73 | 4.1 | 482,000 |
Mineral Resource Summary (End June 2011) | ||||||
Indicated Resource | Inferred Resource | |||||
Area | Tonnage (Mt) | Grade (g/t) | Metal (Moz) | Tonnage (Mt) | Grade (g/t) | Metal (Moz) |
CMR | 10.5 | 5.47 | 1.84 | 1.6 | 9.51 | 0.48 |
Crown | 5.8 | 5.93 | 1.10 | 3.1 | 8.05 | 0.81 |
V&R | 1.8 | 6.67 | 0.39 | 0.2 | 16.50 | 0.11 |
CD | 2.9 | 6.81 | 0.63 | 2.5 | 6.76 | 0.54 |
SJ | 1.5 | 8.80 | 0.43 | 0.2 | 8.27 | 0.04 |
CMR Kimberley Reef | 2.6 | 3.70 | 0.31 | 0.6 | 3.78 | 0.07 |
CMR White Reef | 3.6 | 3.81 | 0.44 | 3.4 | 3.89 | 0.42 |
MR and MRL > 900m and other sources | 58.5 | 9.69 | 18.22 | 46.6 | 7.27 | 10.89 |
Total | 87.2 | 8.33 | 23.36 | 58.2 | 7.15 | 13.36 |
Surface Exploration Target Summary (End June 2011) | |||
Mining Area | Reef | Exploration target material | |
Central | MR&MRL | 2.8-3.4 g/t | 6,900 - 8,300 t |
New Unified | MR&MRL | 4.4-5.3 g/t | 6,800 - 8,200 t |
New Unified West | MR&MRL | 3.6-4.4 g/t | 21,800 - 26,200 t |
Spenser New | MR&MRL | 3.6-4.3 g/t | 15,900 - 19,100 t |
Slot 5 A | White | 2.9-3.1 g/t | 27,000 - 48,000 t |
Slot 5 B,C,D | White | 1.5-1.9 g/t | 17,000 - 33,000 t |
Slot 7 | White | 2.1-3.2 g/t | 87,000 - 200,000 t |
Resources are quoted inclusive of Reserves.
Note: Reserves have not yet been depleted as a result of mining operations, as almost all mining to date has taken place above 70 mbs, that being limited to surface mining which was not part of the quoted Reserve. The limited
underground mining that has taken place to date is not significant enough to warrant the restatement of figures. Unplanned composite double voids will be incorporated into future Resource and Reserve estimates once their full extent is understood.
The potential quantity and grade described by the term "Exploration Target" is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the
definition of a Resource. Further exploration work, which includes trial mining and processing of this shallow target to establish grade and orebody continuity, mineability, dilution and throughput characteristics, is ongoing.
Underground mining
As a result of the AMD and the occurrence of composite double voids - and with a view to conserving cash reserves - the Company suspended underground mining development operations with effect from 25 May 2011, at 205 mbs. The Company continued with underground long-hole stoping operations until the end of June 2011.
Mining production -Underground | ||||
Month | Stope reef tonnes | Grade (g/t) | Development reef tonnes | Grade1 (g/t) |
January | 3,360 | 1.9 | 2,952 | 1.6 |
February | 3,432 | 2.8 | 9,072 | 1.6 |
March | 10,080 | 2.0 | 6,120 | 1.6 |
April | 9,287 | 2.5 | 3,337 | 1.6 |
May | 4,125 | 3.6 | 1,725 | 1.6 |
June | 9,402 | 1.9 | 773 | 1.6 |
Total | 39,686 | 2.4 | 23,979 | 1.6 |
1 Development grades are based on block estimates.
Dilution and grade control
Dilution from delaminated hanging wall waste, resulting from the use of long-hole stoping, has continued to be a
problem with up to two metres of barren quartzite diluting the targeted Main Reef ore. This has had the overall effect of reducing the head-grade, and in some instances to below 1.9 g/t, which has a significant negative impact on project economics. To address the problem, a surface waste sorting programme has been implemented involving both hand sorting and the use of the Commodas Optical Sorter, in an attempt to remove dilutive material from the underground ore stockpiles.
Planned Mining Grade | Actual Mining Grade | |
January | 2.8 g/t | 1.9 g/t |
February | 3.4 g/t | 2.8 g/t |
March | 3.3 g/t | 2.0 g/t |
April | 3.5 g/t | 2.5 g/t |
May | 6.1 g/t | 3.6 g/t |
June | 3.5 g/t | 1.9 g/t |
The impact of this dilution has necessitated the suspension of long-hole stoping as the primary mining method and it is believed that conventional mining trials, currently being tested, will allow for better on-face grade control, selectivity and a dramatic reduction in hanging-wall dilution.
Surface mining
Importantly, in comparison to 2010, more surface tonnes have been mined at a slightly higher grade than expected.
There has also been a slight increase in the stripping ratio as a result of deepening pits. At the end of June 2011, three pits were active - New Unified Pit, Spencer Pit and Central Pit - all of which are expected to be exhausted by the end of September 2011 at a planned output rate of 15,000 reef tonnes per month.
Mining production - Surface | ||
Month | Surface Reeftonnes | Strip ratio |
January | 14,193 | 8.4 |
February | 16,773 | 11.0 |
March | 20,446 | 7.0 |
April | 20,305 | 7.0 |
May | 17,098 | 9.0 |
June | 23,514 | 9.0 |
Total | 112,329 | 8.0 |
Mining area | Reef tonnes | g/t |
New Unified Pit | 61,868 | 4.08 |
Central Pit | 40,128 | 3.39 |
Spencer | 10,333 | 3.86 |
Total | 112,329 | 3.81 |
Metallurgy
During the period under review, the Bateman concentrator processed 37,479 tonnes of Main Reef ore at an average feed grade of 2.05 g/t. The feed material was largely made up of friable surface oxides mixed with a smaller proportion of hard siliceous underground sulphide ore. Bateman floatation recovery for the period improved substantially from approximately 63%, to approximately 77%, generating 6,590 tonnes of concentrate running at 8.9 g/t. Bateman plant availability dropped from 70% to 60%, largely due to a significantly higher proportion of harder sulphide feed.
The Carbon-in-Pulp ("CIP") plant performance also improved markedly during the period under review with 61,109 tonnes of surface oxide ore, running at an average grade of 2.74 g/t, being fed directly to the CIP plant. This was supplemented by the addition of the 6,590 tonnes of Bateman concentrate. Gold recovery improved from 86% to approximately 90% and the CIP availability increased from 86% to 90% during the period under review.
In March and April 2011, approximately 12,000 tonnes of oxide ore, at an average grade of 2.6 g/t, was dispatched to Mintails, the neighbouring gold processing company, with a view to testing the economics of toll treatment of surplus ore in excess of current processing capacity. The exercise was profitable and demonstrated the economic merit of pursuing this arrangement when surplus ore production occurs.
In June 2011, a further toll treatment exercise was initiated to investigate the merits of treating high grade residue tailings generated during the initial commissioning phase of the Gekko concentrating plant. By 30 June 2011, approximately 19,159 tonnes, at an average grade of 1.39 g/t, had been dispatched to Mintails for processing.
Gold production for the first half of 2011 was 7,189 ounces, an increase of 133% from the comparable period in 2010.
Keith Matier, Head of Geology, took over responsibility for the Company's metallurgical processing operations from Riccardo Tonini, who resigned from the Company at the end of May 2011.
Trial conventional mining
An important new development for CRG is the trialing of conventional mining until the end of September 2011. The mining contractor, Sekgwa Mining Services (Proprietary) Limited, has been engaged to undertake conventional trial mining in the Company's current mining area to verify whether or not conventional hand-held, in-stope drilling can be undertaken safely, economically and without major dilution. Improvement of grade selectivity will also be a factor in this trial mining exercise.
The expectation is that the minimisation of blasting vibrations under the conventional mining method will reduce blasting-induced falls of ground and therefore minimise dilution. The other expectation is that shorter rounds of drilling will make mining more flexible to introduce resue mining where the middling is of significant enough width to be blasted separately.
Broad-based black economic empowerment
Central Rand Gold remains in dispute with its broad-based black economic empowerment partner, Puno Gold Investments (Proprietary) Ltd. The matter is currently pending the commencement of arbitration and it is hoped that a resolution will be reached in the near future.
DMR review
Based on its resource base, Central Rand Gold made certain Social and Labour Plan ("SLP") commitments in its original New Order Mining Right application. Between 2009 and the end of 2010, the Company invested R18 million (US$2.6 million) in community related projects and initiatives to the benefit of community members.
It is anticipated that if the water table is stopped at 250 mbs, approximately 90% of the resource base included in its mining right will be under water. This resource can therefore only be accessed, once a de-watering programme has commenced. A request has been made to the DMR to review the Company's current and future SLP commitments, so that it reflects the operational reality of a reduced short-term resource base more closely.
Financial review
Operating loss for the period under review decreased by 17% to US$14.4 million (30 June 2010: US$17.4 million). This decrease is mainly attributed to:
• Revenue from the sale of 7,189 ounces of gold (June 2010: 3,085 ounces) processed from shallow surface materials.
• Proceeds from the sale of the Gekko 50 tonne per hour processing plant of US$5 million.
• Provision for retrenchment of 160 support and operational staff (June 2010: 46 head count).
Net attributable loss for the period under review decreased by 14.6% to US$14.8 million (30 June 2010: US$17.3 million) after taking into account the lower interest received, transactional foreign exchange losses on the back of a stronger Rand/US$ exchange rate and lower cash balances.
At the end of June 2011, the net cash position of the Company was reported at approximately US$4.8 million (30 June 2010: US$4 million) and at the end of July 2011 the balance amounted to US$4.0 million.
Major cash flows during the period under review are set out in the abridged cash flow below:
2011 | 2010 | |
US$'(million) | US$'(million) | |
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January | 14.6 | 15.9 |
Cash used in operations | (11.6) | (13.7) |
Interest received | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Mine property, plant and equipment | (2.4) | (7.8) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | 5.0 | - |
Security deposits - Redemption | - | 0.5 |
Proceeds from share issue | - | 6.0 |
Effects of exchange rate movement on cash balances | (1.0) | 2.8 |
Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June | 4.8 | 4.0 |
Conclusion
Without doubt, the second half of 2011 will be a critical period in determining the future of Central Rand Gold. Future prospects are dependent on how the Company resolves the following three major uncertainties:
1. Stopping the rising water table.
2. Getting a better understanding and confirmation of the ability to predict the occurrence of composite double voids.
3. Confirmation of the viability of conventional mining.
Given resolution and progress on the above-listed uncertainties, the Company expects to be able to reassess its prospects by the end of October 2011. As reported in the 2010 Annual Report, part of this reassessment will be the question of further funding and the possibility of other corporate actions taking place. In the meantime, the Company's remaining staff will do their utmost to maximise productivity from nearby surface deposits and opened underground stopes, testing the conventional mining option and keeping operations as efficient, safe and cost effective as possible.
Johan du Toit
Chief Executive Officer
The information in this statement relating to Mineral Resources and geology has been reviewed and approved by
Mr Keith Matier, BSc (Hons), G D E, Pr Sci Nat, who is a Competent Person in terms of the SAMREC and JORC codes. Mr Matier is Geology Manager of CRGSA and has over 17 years' experience in exploration, mineral resource management and mineral evaluation.
Condensed Group Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 June | 31 December | 30 June |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | (Unaudited) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 5 | 9,140 | 10,022 | 31,339 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets | - | - | 1,282 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security deposits and guarantees | 6,332 | 6,498 | 5,641 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable | 7 | 10,073 | 9,830 | 8,065 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,545 | 26,350 | 46,327 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security deposits and guarantees | 3,630 | 4,069 | 185 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prepayments and other receivables | 5,752 | 6,626 | 4,446 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventories | 8 | 1,087 | 207 | 1,205 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 4,803 | 14,624 | 3,945 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets held-for-sale | 6 | 595 | 4,074 | 8,780 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,867 | 29,600 | 18,561 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | 41,412 | 55,950 | 64,888 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EQUITY |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attributable to equity holders of the parent |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share capital | 9 | 25,604 | 25,604 | 5,424 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Share premium | 9 | 213,377 | 213,377 | 197,017 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation reserve | 28,262 | 27,925 | 28,296 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury shares | (6) | (6) | (6) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation reserve | (26,690) | (26,955) | (31,645) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated losses | (225,708) | (210,897) | (156,174) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
14,839 | 29,048 | 42,912 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest | - | - | - |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL EQUITY | 14,839 | 29,048 | 42,912 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Environmental rehabilitation and other provisions | 10 | 6,291 | 6,474 | 1,460 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan payable | 10,073 | 9,830 | 8,065 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease liability | - | 4 | - |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings | - | - | 1 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
16,364 | 16,308 | 9,526 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables | 7,596 | 8,884 | 8,155 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Environmental rehabilitation and other provisions | 10 | 851 | - | 2,805 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxation payable | 1,756 | 1,704 | 1,461 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease liability | 6 | - | 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings | - | 6 | 25 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
10,209 | 10,594 | 12,450 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITES | 26,573 | 26,902 | 21,976 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | 41,412 | 55,950 | 64,888 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Group Income Statement for the six months ended 30 June 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six months | 12 months | Six months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ended | Ended | ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 June | 31 December | 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | (Unaudited) | (Audited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income and gains | 11 | 10,950 | 11,657 | 3,934 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee benefits expense | (6,509) | (10,875) | (5,546) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors' emoluments | 12 | (537) | (1,237) | (534) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortisation | (1,816) | (2,524) | (1,445) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory write-down | (17) | (263) | (420) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reversal of impairment/(impairment) of assets | 489 | (44,455) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease expense | (313) | (1,045) | (310) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surface mining costs | 13 | (12,945) | (17,099) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operational expenses | (955) | (718) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure | - | - | (9,079) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses | (2,743) | (6,554) | (3,971) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating loss | (14,396) | (73,113) | (17,371) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest receivable | 784 | 1,512 | 772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance costs | (527) | (1,015) | (500) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange transaction (losses)/gains | (672) | 1,384 | 367 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss before income tax | (14,811) | (71,232) | (16,732) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 14 | - | (840) | (617) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss for the period | (14,811) | (72,072) | (17,349) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss is attributable to: | -1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity holders of the parent | (14,811) | (72,072) | (17,349) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14,811) | (72,072) | (17,349) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares in issue | 1,599,682,990 | 1,599,682,990 | 271,611,610 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue | 1,599,682,990 | 1,599,682,990 | 268,746,797 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fully diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue | 1,599,682,990 | 1,599,682,990 | 268,746,797 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic loss per share (cents) | (0.93) | (4.51) | (6.46) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Headline loss per share (cents) | (0.99) | (1.83) | (5.46) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted loss per share (cents) | (0.93) | (4.51) | (6.46) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted headline loss per share (cents) | (0.99) | (1.83) | (5.46) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation between loss attributable to the equity holders of the Group and the headline loss attributable to the equity holders of the Group: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss attributable to equity holders of the Group | (14,811) | (72,072) | (17,349) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for restructuring | - | - | 616 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on measurement of non-current assets held for sale to fair value, less costs to sell | - | 5,559 | 2,159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Profit)/loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | (458) | 24 | (98) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Reversal)/loss on measurement of assets to recoverable amount | (489) | 37,214 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Headline loss attributable to equity holders of the Group | (15,758) | (29,275) | (14,672) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Group Statement of Comprehensive Income for the six months ended 30 June 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Six months | 12 months | Six months | |||||||||||||||||||
ended | ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
30 June | 31 December | 30 June | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss for the period | (14,811) | (72,072) | (17,349) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | 265 | 1,445 | (3,245) | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax relating to components of other comprehensive income | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax | 265 | 1,445 | (3,245) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income for the period | (14,546) | (70,627) | (20,594) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income is attributable to: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity holders of the parent | (14,546) | (70,627) | (20,594) | ||||||||||||||||||
(14,546) | (70,627) | (20,594) | |||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Group Statement of Changes in Equity for the period ended 30 June 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attributable to equity holders of the Group |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | Ordinary share capital | Share premium | Share-based compensation reserve | Treasury shares | Foreign currency translation reserve | Accumulated losses | Total | Non- controlling interest | Total equity |
| ||||||||||||||||||
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 31 December 2009 | 5,023 | 191,406 | 27,482 | (2) | (28,400) | (138,825) | 56,684 | - | 56,684 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income for the period ended 30 June 2010 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss for the period | - | - | - | - | - | (17,349) | (17,349) | - | (17,349) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency adjustments | - | - | - | - | (3,245) | - | (3,245) | - | (3,245) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue of Shares: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital raising | 401 | 5,611 | - | - | - | - | 6,012 | - | 6,012 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Employee Share Option Scheme: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments: Employees' and Directors' shares | - | - | 814 | (4) | - | - | 810 | - | 810 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 30 June 2010 | 5,424 | 197,017 | 28,296 | (6) | (31,645) | (156,174) | 42,912 | - | 42,912 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 31 December 2010 | 25,604 | 213,377 | 27,925 | (6) | (26,955) | (210,897) | 29,048 | - | 29,048 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income for the period ended 30 June 2011 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss for the period | - | - | - | - | - | (14,811) | (14,811) | - | (14,811) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency adjustments | - | - | - | - | 265 | - | 265 | - | 265 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Share Option Scheme: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments: Employees' and Directors' shares | 17 | - | - | 337 | - | - | - | 337 | - | 337 |
| |||||||||||||||||
Balance at 30 June 2011 | 25,604 | 213,377 | 28,262 | (6) | (26,690) | (225,708) | 14,839 | - | 14,839 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Group Cash Flow Statement for the six months ended 30 June 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six months | 12 months | Six months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | ended | ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 June | 31 December | 30 June |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | (Unaudited) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | Notes |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss before tax | (14,811) | (71,232) | (16,732) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted for : |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortisation | 1,816 | 2,524 | 1,445 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bad debts written off | - | 11 | - |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employment benefit expenditure (share-based payments) | 336 | 443 | 265 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Profit)/loss on disposal and scrapping of property, plant and equipment | (458) | 24 | (98) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of inventory | 17 | 578 | 420 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Reversal of impairment)/impairment of assets | (489) | 44,455 | 2,202 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss/(gain) on foreign exchange | 672 | (1,384) | (367) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase/(decrease) in operating lease liability | 3 | (47) | (48) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sundry income | (16) | (36) | (6) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest received | (784) | (1,512) | (772) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance costs | 527 | 1,015 | 500 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in working capital |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in prepayments and other receivables | 873 | (1,354) | (826) | 2,328 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Increase)/decrease in inventory | (880) | 1,367 | (2,185) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables | (1,288) | 1,264 | 535 | 5163.9741178797 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in provisions | 668 | 3,461 | 1,963 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows used in operations | (13,814) | (20,423) | (13,704) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest received | 258 | 513 | 283 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance costs | (1) | (16) | (12) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sundry income | - | - | 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (13,557) | (19,926) | (13,427) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | 5 | (2,128) | (20,595) | (8,263) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment | 6 | 5,043 | 471 | 445 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash from/(used) in investing activities | 2,915 | (20,124) | (7,818) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of borrowings | (6) | (33) | (13) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in security deposits | 605 | (4,251) | 490 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from issue of share capital | 9 | - | 42,552 | 5,985 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash from/(used in) financing activities | 599 | 38,268 | 6,462 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (10,043) | (1,782) | (14,783) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January | 14,624 | 15,899 | 15,899 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects of exchange rate movement on cash balances | 222 | 507 | 2,829 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 4,803 | 14,624 | 3,945 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes to the Condensed Interim Group Financial Statements |
1. Basis of preparation |
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the six months ended 30 June 2011 have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies set out in the 2010 Annual Report (except as stated below), which comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as adopted by the European Union (“EU”) in accordance with EU laws (IA’s regulation EC 1606/2002), and also in accordance with IAS 34, ‘Interim Financial Reporting’ as adopted by the EU. The interim results for the six months ended 30 June 2011 are unaudited. They do not include all of the information required for full annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Group as at and for the year ended 31 December 2010, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU. The financial information set out in this document in respect of the year ended 31 December 2010 does not constitute the Group’s statutory accounts for the year ended 31 December 2010. |
Going concern The Directors have prepared the financial statements on the going concern basis having considered the current operations, the current funding position and the projected funding requirements of the business for at least 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements as detailed below. |
Current operations The Company is facing two significant challenges: the rising water table in the Central Rand Basin and unexpected delays with the underground mine development. On 29 March 2011 the Company announced the results of its operational and strategic review which considered these two challenges and led to the announcement of the suspension of underground mining operations. |
Rising water table The water table in the Central Rand Basin is rising. It is imperative that the water table is 250 meters below surface for the mine to retain access to its Reserves and Resources and hence be able to reach full commercial production. The Directors believe that the South African Government will inevitably need to step in to resolve this to prevent AMD reaching the surface. The discussions held by the Company with the Government to date and the public commitment made by the Government to resolving this issue give the Directors confidence that a suitable solution will be found, although no deadline has been set. |
Delays in underground mine development In addition, the Company has encountered difficulties in the underground mine development. A greater than anticipated level of stopes have been found to have “double voids”, ie, not only has the original Main Reef Leader been extracted but also the Main Reef. This was not indicated on the historical mining plans. The effect of these double voids has been to increase significantly the cost of development per tonne of accessible ore and to reduce revenue compared with the Company’s projections. Having encountered these voids, standard mining practice would be to go deeper. However, as a result of the rising water table referred to above, this is not an option available to the Company. |
The Company has also faced lower than anticipated Mine Call Factors due to a considerable proportion of vintage hanging wall (over and above the planned for “middling”) diluting the mined ore. The empty tonnes associated with this dilution severely impact the cost per ounce of gold produced. |
As a result of these challenges, underground mine development was suspended with effect from 25 May 2011. The focus for the remainder of 2011 will be to continue to investigate viable mining methods to avoid the dilution problem while mining out ore from currently available stopes and processing all available underground ore and surface materials. The underground operations will then be temporarily stopped following extraction of ore from the immediately available stopes. The Company has already commenced a process of reducing staff levels to reflect the lower level of activity. |
The Directors reviewed the carrying values of the Company’s assets at 30 June 2011 and believe that there is no further impairment required beyond what was provided for at 31 December 2010. |
Current and projected funding requirements At 30 June 2011, the Company had cash of US$4.8 million. At the 31 July 2011 the Company had a cash balance of US$4.0 million. |
As reported in annual report 2010, the Directors have prepared cash flow projections for the next 18 months (from the date of these financial statements) that reflect the decision of the Directors to place underground operations on to a care and maintenance basis, to continue to process the available ore from developed stopes or on surface and to run the company with a significantly reduced cost base to reflect these lower activity levels. These projections show that the Group has sufficient funding for at least the next 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements and hence the Directors have prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis. However, the available cash is projected to run out in July 2012. |
The risks inherent in any early-stage mining operation will continue to apply to the Group. In particular, the cash flow projections prepared by the Directors are critically dependent on three key assumptions: the gold grade of the ore; the mining production; and the metallurgical recovery and production rate. If any one of these key assumptions is not achieved, then this will result in the need for additional funding at an earlier date. |
Strategic options As outlined by the Company in its operational and strategic review announced on 29 March 2011 and CEO’s report, the focus for the next few months will be to seek further clarification on the Government’s position on the rising water table regarding the engineering plans, costing and timing; to continue to investigate viable mining methods; to continue to mine out the currently available stopes. |
The Directors expect to be able to reassess the prospects of the Company by the end of October 2011.The Directors believe that the Reserves and Resources statement is not undermined by the double voids as these are not believed to exist at lower levels, and so assuming the above uncertainties can be satisfactorily resolved, the Directors expect to seek new capital to restart the operations (which would require further due diligence and quantification). If insufficient progress is made to resolve the material uncertainties facing the Company and without further funding being available by or around the end of October 2011, the Directors are likely to have to cease trading. |
Conclusion The continued uncertainty around the resolution of the rising water table and the continued difficulty in finding a viable mining method, together with the need for additional fund raising if the water table and viable mining method issues are satisfactorily resolved, are material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and they may therefore be unable to realise their assets and discharge their abilities in the normal course of business. |
The financial statements are prepared on the basis of accounting policies applicable to a going concern.This basis presumes that funds will be available to finance future operations and that the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities will occur in the ordinary course of business. |
2. Accounting policies |
Except as described below, the accounting policies applied by the Group in these condensed consolidated interim financial statements are the same as those applied by the Group in its consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2010, as described in those consolidated financial statements. |
Taxes on income in the interim periods are accrued using the tax rate that would be applicable to expected total annual earnings. |
The following new standards and amendments to standards are mandatory for the first time for the financial year beginning 1 January 2011. |
IFRS 3: Business Combinations. From 1 January 2011, the Group has applied IFRS 3 in accounting for business combinations. The amendment lists the transition requirements for contingent consideration from a business combination that occurred before 1 July 2010. The amendment also describes the measurement of non-controlling interests and also discusses un-replaced and voluntarily replaced share-based payment awards. |
IFRS 7: Financial Instruments: Disclosures. From 1 January 2011, the Group has applied IFRS 7 in accounting for financial instrument disclosures. The amendments add an explicit statement that qualitative disclosure should be made in the contact of the quantitative disclosures to better enable users to evaluate an entity’s exposure to risks arising from financial instruments. In addition, existing disclosure requirements were amended and removed. |
IAS 1: Presentation of Financial Statements. From 1 January 2011, the Group has applied IAS 1 in accounting for presentation of financial statements. The amendments clarify that disaggregation of changes in each component of equity arising from transactions recognised in other comprehensive income is also required to be presented, but may be presented either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes. |
IAS 24: Related-party Disclosure. From 1 January 2011, the Group has applied IAS 24 in accounting for related-party disclosures. The revised standard amends the definition of a related-party. |
IAS 34: Interim Financial Reporting. From 1 January 2011, the Group has applied IAS 34 in accounting for interim financial reporting. The amendments add examples to the list of events or transactions that require disclosure under IAS 34 and remove references to materiality in IAS 34 that describe other minimum disclosures. |
The following new standards and amendments to standards and interpretations have been issued, but are not effective for the financial year beginning 1 January 2011 and have not been early adopted: |
IFRS 7: Financial Instruments: Disclosures – Transfers of Financial Assets |
IFRS 9: Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement |
IFRS 10: Consolidated Financial Statements |
IFRS 12: Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities |
IFRS 13: Fair Value Measurement |
IAS 1: Presentation of Financial Statements |
IAS 12: Income TaxesIAS 19: Employee BenefitsIAS 27: Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements |
3. Estimates |
The preparation of interim financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expense. Actual results may differ from these estimates. |
During the six months ended 30 June 2011 management reassessed its estimates in respect of: |
- the carrying value of property, plant and equipment |
- the units of production depreciation |
- the impairment of assets |
- net realisable value of non-current assets held for sale |
- the recoverable amount of inventory (see note 8) |
- provisions (see note 10) |
4. Financial risk management | ||
The Group's financial risk management objectives and policies are consistent with those disclosed in the consolidated annual financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2010. |
Foreign currency rates | ||
The US Dollar rates of exchange applicable to the year are as follows: |
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||
Six months to 30 June | Year ended 31 December | Six months to 30 June | |||
Closing Average | Closing Average | Closing Average | |||
South African Rand | 0.15 0.14 | 0.15 0.14 | 0.13 0.13 | ||
British Pound | 1.60 1.62 | 1.55 1.55 | 1.51 1.53 |
5. Property, plant and equipment | ||
During the six months ended 30 June 2011, the Group spent US$0 (six months ended 30 June 2010: US$215,820) to upgrade processing plants and US$0 (six months ended 30 June 2010: US$7,151,601) was spent on mine development. US$950,909 was spent on the purchase of the optical sorter and US$1,176,958 was spent on other items of property, plant and equipment. |
6. Non-current assets held-for-sale |
At 31 December 2010, the Group classified an item of plant and machinery, a Gekko 50 tonne per hour processing plant with a net realisable value of US$4,494,839, as held-for-sale. During the period under review, the Group disposed of the Gekko 50 tonne per hour for US$4,344,000, resulting in a profit of US$434,400. The remaining proceeds of US$699,206 of a total US$5,043,206 and remaining profit of US$23,482 of a total US$457,882 relates to the sale of other items of property, plant and equipment. The proceeds will be received in instalments over eight months to the end of September 2011. |
During the six months ended 30 June 2011, pieces of mining equipment were classified as held-for-sale. The value of the assets is now expected to be realised from the sale of the assets rather than the continuing use. The value of assets transferred to non-current assets held-for-sale is US$588,831 at 30 June 2011. Based on management’s estimate of the fair value to be obtained from the sale, no impairment was required. |
7. Loans receivable |
Puno Gold Investments (Proprietary) Limited ("Puno") |
Since the last report for the year ended 31 December 2010 there has been no resolution to the dispute relating to alleged procedural breaches of the Central Rand Gold South Africa (Proprietary) Limited (“CRGSA”) Shareholders’ Agreement between CRGSA and its current Black Economic Empowerment (“BEE”) shareholder, Puno. The dispute surrounds the allocation of intercompany loans which fund the budget and work programme and the incurring of, and level of, certain costs. In order to avoid protracted litigation, the parties agreed to refer the matter to arbitration pursuant to the dispute resolution mechanism under the Shareholders’ Agreement and this arbitration process is still in process. The Group still believes that ultimately their position will prevail. The Board is still of the opinion that this will not have any material consequences in respect of the consolidated accounts of the Group. Notwithstanding this position, the Group have, pending the outcome of any dispute, allocated 100% of the additional intercompany loans directly from the Company to CRGSA. The additional 26% of intercompany debt, excluding interest, amounts to ZAR15,495,796 (US$2,243,791) between 1 January and 30 June 2011 and ZAR75,913,440 (US$10,416,083) between 1 January and 31 December 2010. |
The loan payable to Puno contains the same allocations referred to above. |
Group | |||||||||
June | December | June | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 |
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 | |||||||
8. Inventory | |||||||||
Consumables | 271 | 59 | 1,017 | ||||||
Ore stockpiles | 715 | 125 | 158 | ||||||
Stationery and office consumables on hand | 101 | 23 | 23 |
Total inventories | 1,087 | 207 | 1,205 |
The amount of the write-down of ore stockpiles to net realisable value and recognised as an expense is US$16,701 (2010: US$263,451, 30 June 2010: US$419,995). |
9. Share capital and share premium | ||||||||
There has been no change in share capital and share premium during the six months ending 30 June 2011. |
10. Environmental rehabilitation and other provisions |
Group | |||||||||
June | December | June | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 |
Provisions consist of the following: |
Non-current | |||||||||
Environmental rehabilitation | 6,291 | 6,474 | 1,460 |
Current | |||||||||
Restructuring | 851 | - | 605 | ||||||
Environmental rehabilitation | - | - | 2,200 |
7,142 | 6,474 | 4,265 |
Group | |||||||||
June | December | June | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 |
11. Other income and gains |
Sundry income | 16 | 36 | 6 | ||||||
Revenue1 | 10,476 | 11,645 | 3,830 |
Profit/(loss) on sale of property, plant and equipment | 458 | (24) | 98 |
10,950 | 11,657 | 3,934 |
1 The revenue relates to the sale of 7,189 (30 June 2010: 3,085) ounces of gold. Such revenue was previously netted off against the mine development expenses in exploration expenditure. |
12. Directors |
During the current period, the composition of the Board changed. Two Directors of the Group, Mr N Farr-Jones and Mr J Brauns, resigned on 24 June 2011. |
Group | ||||||||
June | December | June | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 |
13. Surface mining costs |
Surface mining costs comprises the following items: |
Consumables | 3,069 | 4,409 | - | |||||
Utilities | 458 | 893 | - | |||||
Plant hire | 4,973 | 7,389 | - | |||||
Labour hire | 2,994 | 356 | - | |||||
Environmental rehabilitation provision | 354 | 3,497 | - | |||||
Other | 1,097 | 555 | - | |||||
12,945 | 17,099 | - |
14. Income taxes |
Income tax expense is recognised based on management’s best estimate of the weighted average annual income tax rate expected for the full financial year. The estimated average annual tax rate used for the period under review is 0% (2010: 1.18%, 30 June 2010: 3.69%). The decrease is mainly due to a decrease in the intercompany loans from the Company to Central Rand Gold (Netherlands Antilles) N.V. (“CRGNV”) and the disallowed interest on these loans. |
15. Commitments | ||
Group | |||||||||
June | December | June | |||||||
2011 | 2009 | 2010 | |||||||
US$ '000 | US$ '000 | US$ '000 |
Water pump | 3,367 | - | - | ||
Fees payable to iProp Limited for prospecting | - | 500 | - |
Acquisition of tangible assets contracted for | - | 6,517 | - | ||
Design of optical ore sorter | - | - | 26 | ||
Mining equipment | - | - | 1,176 |
3,367 | 7,017 | 1,202 |
16. Segment reporting | |
An operating segment is a component of an entity that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance and for which discrete financial information is available. The entity’s chief operating decision maker reviews information in one operating segment, being the acquisition of mineral rights and data gathering in the Central Rand Goldfield of South Africa, therefore management has determined that there is only one reportable segment. Accordingly, no analysis of segment revenue, results or net assets has been presented. No corporate or other assets are excluded from this segment. |
17. Share based payments |
No additional shares and share options in the Company were granted during the six months ending 30 June 2011. |
18. Related parties |
No disclosable related-party transactions occurred during the period. |
19. Events occurring after balance sheet date |
On 16 August 2011 the double-room development drill rig was sold for US$490,419 (R3,497,001). |
As part of scaling down of mine activities, approximately 83 employees were retrenched on 15 July 2011 at a cost of US$586,440. In total, by the end of October 2011 the staff head count will be reduced from 218 to about 59 at an estimated total cost of US$1,105,060. All these costs were recognised and provided for at the end of June 2011 as the retrenchment programme was approved by the Board and communicated to employees before the end of June 2011. |
Related Shares:
Central Rand Gold