11th Dec 2015 16:19
11 December 2015
Asa Resource Group PLC
("Asa Resource", the "Group" or the "Company")
INTERIM UNAUDITED RESULTS
Asa Resource is pleased to announce its unaudited interim financial results for the six months to 30 September 2015.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September (unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | Variance |
|
US$ million |
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Revenue |
| 61.9 | 85.8 | -28% |
|
Cost of sales |
| 45.3 |
46.8 | -3% |
|
Group EBITDA¹ |
| (0.2) | 17.1 | -101% |
|
Group net gain / (loss) |
|
(4.3) | 7.7 | -156% |
|
Group net cash from operating activities |
|
(2.0) | 4.5 | -144% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¹ EBITDA includes US$1.5m one-off retrenchment and restructuring costs
· Group revenue decreased 28% to US$61.9m (H1 FY2015: US$85.8m) despite a 17% increase in gold sales as commodity prices were substantially weaker over the period and nickel sales fell 29% due in part to a major planned shut down at the Trojan Mine. Operating efficiencies are being addressed under a new mine plan which the Company believes will drive improvements in the nickel division in the second half of the financial year
· Cost of sales fell 3% to US$45.3m (H1 FY2015 US$46.8m). This reflects both the higher unit costs on lower production at Bindura as well as the cost cutting initiatives that began post the EGM have and which have begun to take effect
· Group EBITDA decreased by 101% to a loss of US$0.2m (H1 FY2015: US$17.1m profit) which is largely due to a sharp reduction in revenues and one-off retrenchment and restructuring costs
· Group net cash from operating activities decreased 144% to cash utilised of US$2.0m (H1 FY2015: US$4.5m generated) reflecting a drop in revenues which was partly offset by a 3% reduction in cost of sales
· As a result, Group net loss for the period amounted to US$4.3m (H1 FY2015: US$7.7m profit) which included one-off retrenchment and restructuring expenses of US$1.5m and was a lower loss than the guidance figure of US$5m released on 26 November 2015.
· The Company's cash position at the period end was US$9.7m and at the beginning of December 2015 was approximately US$3.8m.
CORPORATE UPDATE· Following the Board and Management changes coinciding with the General Meeting held on 9 June 2015, the Company has implemented a number of initiatives to reduce costs, re-organize the corporate structure and bring about necessary cultural changes.
· The Company has appointed Cantor Fitzgerald Europe as its Financial Adviser and Corporate Broker and Grant Thornton UK LLP as its Nominated Adviser.
· On 28 September 2015, the Company successfully raised US$2.9m via an open offer to fund corporate restructuring and re-organization costs as well as further developmento of the Klipspringer diamond mine.
· Following the Company's Annual General Meeting on 30h September 2015, the Company changed its name to Asa Resource Group PLC.
· The Directors, having initiated an organizational review, continue to seek to take advantage of opportunities to add positive cash-flow to the Group and diversify its operations.
· Progress on the smelter at BNC continues and will be strategically important to the Company, taking into account the change in theGovernment's policy to imposee a 15% export tax on concentrates. Upon, re-commissioning the Company will wholly-own the only nickel smelter in Africa with scope to introduce a PGM circuit, subject to a feasibility assessment.
OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Nickel - Bindura Nickel Corporation (BNC) (Zimbabwe) (74.73% interest)
Trojan Nickel Mine (Trojan) (Zimbabwe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trojan Mine production results (unaudited) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
|
| Six months ended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
|
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Tonnes mined | t | 226,294 | 315,351 | -28% |
|
Tonnes milled | t | 231,224 | 309,989 | -25% |
|
Head grade | % | 1.40 | 1.50 | -7% |
|
Recovery | % | 85.8 | 83.3 | 3% |
|
Nickel sales | t | 2,762 | 3,879 | -29% |
|
Average nickel price realized for nickel in concentrate | US$/t | 7,654 | 11,809 | -35% |
|
Cash cost (C1) | US$/t | 7,864 | 7,423 | 6% |
|
All-in sustaining cost (C3) | US$/t | 8,601 | 8,265 | 4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figures shown are unaudited and may vary upon final audit. BNC released unaudited results for the half year ended September 2015 on 1st December 2015
Gold - Freda Rebecca Gold Mine (Zimbabwe) (85% interest)
|
|
|
|
|
Freda Rebecca Gold Mine production results (unaudited) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
| Six monthsended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
Tonnes mined | T | 687,228 | 661,526 | 4% |
Tonnes milled | T | 602,861 | 583,298 | 3% |
Head grade | g/t | 2.09 | 2.17 | -4% |
Recovery | % | 83.1 | 79.3 | 5% |
Gold sales | Oz | 35,052 | 30,058 | 17% |
Average gold price received | US$/oz | 1,153 | 1,283 | -10% |
Cash cost (C1) | US$/oz | 899 | 969 | -7% |
All-in sustaining cost (C3) | US$/oz | 1,057 | 1,161 | -9% |
|
|
|
|
|
Figures shown are unaudited and may vary upon final audit.
Diamonds - Klipspringer (South Africa) (70% interest)
· Klipspringer's throughput of Marsfontein fine residue tailings increased by 8% to 91,561t (H1 FY2015: 84,563t)
· Diamonds recovered decreased marginally by 4% to 54,557cts (H1 FY2015: 56,617cts)
· Revenue increased by 2% due to a 19% increase in diamonds sold to 51,660cts (H1 FY2015: 43,557cts), despite a 15% decrease in the average diamond price received per carat to $17.11/ct (H1 FY2015: $20.14/ct). This was in line with market conditions.
EXPLORATION HIGHLIGHTS
Gold - Zani-Kodo (Democratic Republic of Congo) (80% interest)
· Exploration activity was focused on field assessment of several target areas
· Two new targets, Kepira and Kodo West, have been identified with two potentially mineralised zones present
· Orientation grab sampling has been carried out in both areas with fieldwork and data compilation ongoing
Copper/Cobalt - SEMHKAT/Hailiang JV (Democratic Republic of Congo) (100% interest, but may decline to 38% in terms of the joint venture agreement with Hailiang)
· Exploration programmes are in progress at Kawesitu, Mwombe, Kibolwe East, Lufira and PR763 by Hailiang in line with the terms of the joint venture arrangement
POST PERIOD EVENTS, CURRENT TRADING AND OUTLOOK
· At Bindura, a new mining plan has been adopted and a number of cost savings initiatives have been implemented to reflect a weaker nickel price environment. The impact of plan is that high grade ore will be mined earlier than envisaged in the original plan and less of the disseminated ore will be extracted. Production is expected to increase in the second half of the year and the Company expects that the nickel division will become profitable in the second half of the year even at current nickel prices.
· As part of Group cost saving initiatives, the Company intends to further reduce its headcount by 350 to around 1,150 people
· As part of its restructuring and re-organization, the Company has commenced farming activities on the land it owns in Bindura to generate income that is not connected to its mining activities
· The Board is seeking to refine an M&A strategy to take advantage of opportunities in the current environment
EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN COMMENTARY
Yat Hoi Ning, the Company's Executive Chairman, commented:
While the past six months have been a period of challenges, they have also been a period in which the Company restructured and stabilised its management, operations and finances in preparation for future progress.
We have not been immune to the stresses that have emanated from the declines in virtually all commodities markets, particularly the global markets for gold and nickel, our principal products. Our response has been to sustain margins by containing unit costs by, where possible, simultaneously increasing production and maintaining tight control of overall costs.
This was clearly shown at Freda Rebecca where, comparing this year's first half with last year's, a 17% increase in the number of ounces sold more than counteracted the 10% drop in gold's price per ounce. Higher mill throughput and tighter control of operating costs resulted in lower cash costs and all-in sustaining costs. This is important in the context of a dollarized economy in which, unlike mining companies in the countries neighbouring Zimbabwe, the Company does not benefit from the positive impact on its operating costs of a weaker exchange rate vs. the US dollar.
The price of gold remains hostage to the US Federal Reserve's decisions on interest rates. However, as I write, gold's dollar prices is gradually weakening, not, I might add, to the point where it has dropped below Freda Rebecca's unit costs but a slippage which has, nonetheless, to be matched by ever-tighter cost controls.
The half year's operations at Bindura Nickel and its Trojan mine contrasted sharply with those at Freda Rebecca, in part because of scheduled operating downtime for maintenance. Trojan is gradually overcoming its legacy of equipment maintenance shortcomings. And as equipment is fully and correctly serviced, I am confident that the recent interferences with operations will be unlikely to be repeated.
Nickel prices have continued and continue to weaken in response to slowing demand growth by Chinese steel mills, and I believe that further price downside will occur during our financial year's second half. Though the past half year's production decline did not allow Trojan to contain unit costs at levels below the nickel price, I believe that, helped by a new mining plan and uninterrupted operations, this situation will be reversed in the current and future half-year periods.
Operations at our Klipspringer joint venture have been carefully watched as diamond prices have come under pressure in their main markets. We and our JV partners continue to evaluate the feasibility of treating additional tailings residues, while we ourselves have refined the parameters for resuming extraction of stones from the Leopard fissure.
It goes without saying that any decisions on restarting underground mining at Klipspringer will be founded on the most-conservative of cost and price estimates. The same, too, continues to be the case as far as our exploration partnerships are concerned in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). We have located sound prospective sites for future copper and gold developments, but we shall not pursue developments unless there is a high degree of certainty that extraction is possible at low costs and will quickly become cash generative. I believe these initiatives place the Company in a strong position despite the ongoing challenges facing the sector today, and we will seek to leverage this strength as opportunities present themselves to revise and optimise the Group's portfolio.
In conclusion I must thank the staff and executives who have guided Asa Resource PLC through a testing period and who, I am certain, will rise to whatever challenges present themselves in the future. I look forward to updating you on further progress shortly.
For further information please visit www.asaukplc.com or contact:
Asa Resource Group Plc:
1 Catherine Place, London, SW1E 6DX, United Kingdom
Scott Morrison, Senior Independent Non-Executive Director: [email protected]
Yim Kwan, Finance Director: [email protected] or
Amilha Young, Group General Counsel and Company Secretary: [email protected]
Tel: +44(0) 20 3696 5470
Email: [email protected]
Nominated Adviser:
Grant Thornton UK LLP
30 Finsbury Square, London EC2P 2YU, United Kingdom
Colin Aaronson / Richard Tonthat / Carolyn Sansom
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100
Financial Adviser and Corporate Broker:
Cantor Fitzgerald Europe
1 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London E14 5RB, United Kingdom
Stewart Dickson / Jeremy Stephenson / Patrick Pittaway
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7894 7000
Public Relations:
Russell and Associates (South Africa)
42 Glenhove Road, Johannesburg, 2196, South Africa
Leigh King: [email protected]
Jim Jones: [email protected]
Tel: +27 (0) 11 880 3924
Interim Operational Review and Outlook
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
Presentation note:
In prior years, all financial figures in the below tables were presented net of consolidation entries. In the current period, actual figures before consolidation entries are shown in order to improve comparability with the underlying financial statements of subsidiaries. Thus, comparative figures may differ to those reported in prior periods. The Company will use a similar presentation in the next annual report and accounts.
Nickel: Bindura Nickel Corporation Limited (BNC) - Trojan Nickel Mine (Zimbabwe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trojan Mine production results (unaudited) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
|
| Six months ended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
|
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Tonnes mined | t | 226,294 | 315,351 | -28% |
|
Tonnes milled | t | 231,224 | 309,989 | -25% |
|
Head grade | % | 1.40 | 1.50 | -7% |
|
Recovery | % | 85.8 | 83.3 | 3% |
|
Nickel sales | t | 2,762 | 3,879 | -29% |
|
Average nickel price realized for nickel in concentrate | US$/t | 7,654 | 11,809 | -35% |
|
Cash cost (C1) | US$/t | 7,864 | 7,423 | 6% |
|
All-in sustaining cost (C3) | US$/t | 8,601 | 8,265 | 4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figures shown are unaudited and may vary upon final audit.
· C1 cash cost per tonne includes costs for mining, processing, administration, offtake costs and penalties, transport costs, accounting movements for stockpiles, and net proceeds from by-product credits. It excludes capital costs for exploration, mine development or processing mill capital works, and, the cost of royalties
· C3 all-in sustaining cost reflects C1 cash cost per tonne plus depreciation and amortisation, thus incorporating the capital cost of production, plus interest, other indirect costs and royalties. All-in-sustaining cost represents all costs attributable to nickel production over the period
· Note: the Company has amended the reporting of the nickel price realized for nickel in concentrate, cash cost and all-in sustaining cost. The average nickel price realized for nickel in concentrate reflects the actual price received rather than the actual average price for the quarter as previously reported. Cash costs and all-in sustaining costs are now reported as actual costs incurred. Previously these costs were adjusted for the opportunity cost forgone as a result of selling a nickel concentrate rather than a nickel cathode
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trojan Mine financial performance indicators (unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
|
| Six months ended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
US$'000 |
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Revenue |
| 20,560 | 46,386 | -56% |
|
Cost of sales |
| (17,230) | (20,936) | -18% |
|
Gross profit |
| 3,330 | 25,450 | -87% |
|
Operating profit |
| (2,769) | 14,160 | -120% |
|
EBITDA ¹ |
| (3,193) | 14,134 | -123% |
|
Profit/(loss) before tax |
| (4,418) | 12,148 | -136% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¹ EBITDA refers to earnings before interest, impairments, tax, depreciation and amortisation
Commentary
Trojan Mine entered its third year of operations in April 2015, after having sold the first concentrate in April 2013. The first half of the financial year had its own challenges. Production was relatively low during the period under review mainly due to limited number of draw points, longer lashing cycles and locomotive and SVR breakdowns. There was also a major planned shutdown during the month of July 2015 to upgrade service winders electrical switches and the Trojan Re-deep Project tie-in.
Tonnes mined and milled decreased by 28% to 226,294t (H1 FY2015: 316,351t) and 25% to 231,224t (H1 FY2015: 309,989t) respectively compared to H1 FY2015. This performance was aided by the deliberate move to push volumes on the massive sulphide grades in order to increase the production of nickel. Recovery was 85.8%, which was better than last year's achievement of 83.3%. In addition to the higher grade of ore achieved, the concentrator plant was stable during the period under review. This was achieved as a result of improved plant uptime following positive maintenance.
The Shaft Re-deepening Project continued, albeit at a slower pace, given the cash flow constraints induced by the unfavourable nickel prices. Commissioning of this project is now planned for the quarter ending 31 March 2016. Two key projects were completed and commissioned during the second quarter, namely (a) the Sub Vertical Service Winder and Main Rock Winder Drives Upgrade and (b) the Concentrator Plant and Sub vertical Medium Voltage Switch Room Equipment Replacement.
The average cash settlement price for nickel leach alloy for the period was US$11,787 per tonne ($5.35/lb.) compared to US$18,516 per tonne ($8.40/lb.) in the first half of the prior year. BNC receives an adjusted price commensurate with selling nickel in concentrate as opposed to nickel leach alloy. Nickel prices remained depressed during the half year. This was in contrast to what analysts had predicted as the prices hit a six year low of $9,100 per tonne in August 2015, close to the $8,850 per tonne recorded in October 2009.
The long awaited supply shortfall caused by the Indonesian ore export ban of January 2014 did not materialize. Analysts estimate that 60%-65% of the producers are producing at a loss though there have not been any curtailments by producers as yet. Nickel supply continued to increase as the Chinese Nickel Pig Iron (NPI) sector managed to continue in production, albeit at a reduced rate, by blending high grade Indonesian ore with that from the Philippines and New Caledonia respectively. Coupled with this, the new generation of plants planned during the boom years (2006-2007) came into production. Nickel stocks continued to emerge from bonded warehouses into more secure London Metal Exchange (LME) warehouses following the Qingdao probe thus pushing LME stocks to all-time highs (+470kt in June 2015). Stainless steel production, which accounts for around two thirds of the global nickel demand has not changed year on year as the Chinese output was staggered by soft domestic and export demand amid anti-dumping in Europe. In the United States, suppliers continue to destock due to high inventories while European distributors are keeping stocks at a minimum as a drop in nickel price is a powerful disincentive to hold stainless steel.
As nickel prices tumbled during the period under review, this necessitated the review of the mining plan for Trojan Mine. Management came up with a new mining plan and adopted a number of cost savings initiatives to regain profitability under these difficult circumstances. The impact of the new plan is that high grade ore (massives) will be mined earlier than envisaged in the original plan and less of disseminated ore will be extracted. Production is expected to increase in the second half of the year.
The anticipated effect of the new plan is that the Company will be able to narrow its loss and become profitable in the second half of the year even at current nickel prices. From cash generation perspective, the Company is now self-sufficient utilizing only existing financing facilities with no need for additional funding in the short term.
The market is expected remain in surplus for the rest of the year though LME stocks have reduced to multi-year lows (currently 426,000 tonnes). Fundamentals are improving and a deficit is most likely to be felt in 2016 as demand increases. The major demand growth is expected to come from China's booming infrastructure industry where there will be increased use of the 300 series steel which uses more nickel as compared to the 200 series steel. In the medium term the demand opened up in 2016 will outpace production and LME stocks will dwindle, providing a sustained price support.
The smelter's refurbishment and modification project is ongoing. While the Smelter Restart Project is progressing well, the Board is conducting studies on the feasibility of converting the Smelter to a plant that will process Platinum Group Metals (PGMs). The capital requirement for this project remains at $26.5 million. As reported before, US$20 million was raised for the project through a secured bond (the Bond). The balance of funding required of approximately US$6.5m is expected to come from cash generated from operations and other external sources.
The Company's other nickel assets i.e. the refinery and Shangani Mine remain under care and maintenance.
Gold: Freda Rebecca Gold Mine (Zimbabwe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freda Rebecca Gold Mine production results (unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
|
| Six months ended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
|
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Tonnes mined | t | 687,228 | 661,526 | 4% |
|
Tonnes milled | t | 602,861 | 583,298 | 3% |
|
Head grade | g/t | 2.09 | 2.17 | -4% |
|
Recovery | % | 83.1 | 79.3 | 5% |
|
Gold sales | oz | 35,052 | 30,058 | 17% |
|
Average gold price received | US$/oz | 1,153 | 1,283 | -10% |
|
Cash cost (C1) | US$/oz | 899 | 969 | -7% |
|
All-in sustaining cost (C3) | US$/oz | 1,057 | 1,161 | -9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figures shown are unaudited and may vary upon final audit.
· C1 cash cost includes costs for mining, processing, administration, accounting movements for stockpiles and gold-in-circuit, and, net proceeds from by-product credits. It excludes capital costs for exploration, mine development or processing mill capital works and royalties
· C3 all-in sustaining cost reflects C1 cash cost plus depreciation and amortisation, thus incorporating the capital cost of production, interest, other indirect costs and royalties. All-in sustaining costs represents all costs attributable to gold production over the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freda Rebecca Gold Mine financial performance indicators (unaudited) |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
|
| Six months ended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
US$'000 |
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Revenue |
| 40,403 | 38,556 | 5% |
|
Cost of sales |
| (27,294) | (25,322) | 8% |
|
Gross profit |
| 13,109 | 13,234 | -1% |
|
Operating profit |
| 6,258 | 6,409 | -2% |
|
EBITDA ¹ |
| 6,300 | 6,419 | -2% |
|
Profit/(loss) before tax |
| 2,874 | 3,293 | -13% |
|
¹ EBITDA refers to earnings before interest, impairments, tax, depreciation and amortisation
Commentary
Gold production increased by 17% to 35,052 ounces in H1 FY2016 compared to 30,058 ounces in H1 FY2015 mainly as a result of a 3% increase in tonnes milled. The upturn in performance was underpinned by improved availability of loading units and improved flexibility in stopes.
Tonnes mined for the six months under review increased by 4% to 687,228t from 661,526t in H1 FY2015. The 3% increase in tonnes milled to 602,861t compared to H1 FY2015 is attributable to a 3% increase in mill running time as a result of improved maintenance planning and a 1% increase in throughput due to size reduction of feed material.
The average feed grade decreased by 4% from 2.17g/t in H1 FY2015 to 2.09g/t in the 6 month period under review as commissioned stopes were posting lower than expected grades.
Gold recovery for H1 FY2016 increased by 5% to 83% from 79% in H1 FY2015. The increase was due to reduction in fine carbon losses to tails as a result of improved carbon quality and commissioning of carbon sizing screen.
C1 cash costs decreased by 7% to US$899/oz from US$969/oz in H1 FY2015 as a result of a 17% increase in gold production. Consequently, all-in sustaining costs realised a net decrease of 9% from $1,161/oz in H1 FY2015 to $1,057/oz.
Diamonds: Klipspringer (South Africa)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Klipspringer Mine production results (unaudited) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
|
| Six months ended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
|
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Tonnes treated | t | 91,561 | 84,563 | 8% |
|
ROM diamonds recovered | ct | 54,557 | 56,617 | -4% |
|
Diamond sales | ct | 51,660 | 43,557 | 19% |
|
Average diamond price received | US$/ct | 17.11 | 20.14 | -15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Klipspringer Mine financial performance indicators (unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
|
| Six months ended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
US$'000 |
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Revenue |
| 891 | 877 | 2% |
|
Cost of sales |
| (737) | (574) | 28% |
|
Gross profit |
| 154 | 303 | -49% |
|
Operating profit |
| (205) | (399) | -49% |
|
EBITDA ¹ |
| (205) | (399) | -49% |
|
Profit/(loss) before tax |
| (204) | (413) | -51% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¹ EBITDA refers to earnings before interest, impairments, tax, depreciation and amortisation
Commentary
· The tonnages mined at Klipspringer improved due to rationalisation of mining and haulage
· The diamonds recovered remained constant
· The diamond price received decreased in line with market conditions
· An ongoing review of the Klipspringer operations including the feasibility of re-opening the underground fissure mine is in progress
EXPLORATIONGold: Zani-Kodo (DRC)
· Exploration activity was focused in field assessment of several target areas.
· Two new targets, Kepira and Kodo West, have been identified with two potentially mineralised zones present.
· Orientation grab sampling has been carried out in both areas with fieldwork and data compilation ongoing.
Copper/Cobalt - SEMHKAT/Hailiang JV (Democratic Republic of Congo)
· Exploration programmes are in progress at Kawesitu, Mwombe, Kibolwe East, Lufira and PR763 by Hailiang in terms of the joint venture arrangement
· Several promising mineralized zones have been identified, including a 98m wide malachite-bearing intersection at Kawesitu.
Kawesitu:
· 13 shallow drill holes were completed for a total of 271m
· Diamond drilling is ongoing with four holes completed for a total of 943m
Mwombe:
Three prospects were identified in Mwombe by Hailiang, so called Small Zone, Mwombe West and Mwombe East:
· Small Zone
o Geological mapping, soil gridding and profiling followed by trenching and IP sounding were conducted to identify the drill targets
o Six diamond holes were drilled for a total of 1,222m
o Two zones of copper mineralization were intersected.
· Mwombe West
o Geological mapping followed by trenching and IP sounding were conducted
· Mwombe East
o Geological mapping, soil gridding and profiling followed by trenching and IP sounding were carried out
Lufira:
· Exploration programmes completed.
· Geological mapping and drilling have confirmed that the existence of Lower Roan Formation.
INTERIM FINANCIAL REVIEW
Statement of Profit and Loss (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 |
| H1 FY2015 |
| FY2015 |
| ||||||||||||
|
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | Total |
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | Total |
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | TOTAL |
|
Revenue |
| 20.6 | 40.4 | 0.9 | - | 61.9 |
| 46.4 | 38.6 | 0.8 | - | 85.8 |
| 78.9 | 72.1 | 1.3 | - | 152.3 |
|
Cost of sales |
| (17.3) | (27.3) | (0.7) | - | (45.3) |
| (20.9) | (25.4) | (0.5) | - | (46.8) |
| (40.4) | (51.8) | (1.3) | - | (93.5) |
|
Gross profit |
| 3.3 | 13.1 | 0.2 | - | 16.6 |
| 25.5 | 13.2 | 0.3 | - | 39.0 |
| 38.5 | 20.3 | - | - | 58.8 |
|
Other income |
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | - | 0.5 |
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.7 | (2.5) | 0.6 |
| 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | - | 1.9 |
|
Freight and insurance expenses |
| (2.9) | (0.3) | - | - | (3.2) |
| (6.5) | (0.2) | - | - | (6.7) |
| (8.9) | (0.3) | - | - | (9.2) |
|
Royalties and selling expenses |
| (0.6) | (1.9) | - | - | (2.5) |
| (0.9) | (2.6) | - | - | (3.5) |
| (4.3) | (4.3) | - | - | (8.6) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
| (1.9) | (3.9) | - | - | (5.8) |
| (2.5) | (3.3) | (0.6) | (0.5) | (6.9) |
| (5.1) | (8.8) | (0.2) | (1.0) | (15.1) |
|
Care and maintenance expenses |
| (0.5) | - | (0.4) | - | (0.9) |
| (0.5) | - | (0.6) | - | (1.1) |
| (1.0) | - | (0.5) | - | (1.5) |
|
Corporate expenses |
| (0.4) | (0.9) | (2.1) | - | (3.4) |
| (1.2) | (0.9) | (3.2) | 2.5 | (2.8) |
| (1.6) | (1.7) | (4.6) | 1.0 | (6.9) |
|
Operating profit |
| (2.8) | 6.3 | (2.2) | - | 1.3 |
| 14.1 | 6.4 | (1.4) | (0.5) | 18.6 |
| 18.7 | 5.5 | (4.8) | - | 19.4 |
|
Dividends received |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| 0.1 | - | - | - | 0.1 |
|
Retrenchment and restructuring expenses |
| (0.3) | - | (1.2) | - | (1.5) |
| - | - | (0.2) | - | (0.2) |
| (0.7) | - | - | - | (0.7) |
|
Profit/(loss) on sale of assets |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| - | (0.1) | - | - | (0.1) |
|
Fair value adjustment |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | 0.7 | (0.7) | - |
|
Foreign exchange gain/(loss) |
| (0.1) | - | 0.4 | (0.3) | - |
| - | - | (1.1) | (0.2) | (1.3) |
| (0.1) | - | 4.6 | (4.4) | 0.1 |
|
EBITDA |
| (3.2) | 6.3 | (3.0) | (0.3) | (0.2) |
| 14.1 | 6.4 | (2.7) | (0.7) | 17.1 |
| 18.0 | 5.4 | 0.5 | (5.1) | 18.8 |
|
Impairment loss |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | (0.3) | (0.2) | (0.5) |
| - | - | (0.7) | - | (0.7) |
|
Impairment reversal |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | 0.2 | - | 0.2 |
| - | - | - | 5.1 | 5.1 |
|
Depreciation |
| (1.1) | (2.9) | - | - | (4.0) |
| (1.7) | (2.9) | - | - | (4.6) |
| (2.3) | (5.7) | (0.2) | - | (8.2) |
|
Finance income |
| - | - | 1.0 | (1.0) | - |
| - | - | 1.3 | (1.3) | - |
| 0.7 | - | 2.2 | (2.1) | 0.8 |
|
Finance expense |
| (0.1) | (0.5) | (0.9) | 1.0 | (0.5) |
| (0.3) | (0.2) | (1.1) | 1.3 | (0.3) |
| (0.6) | (0.7) | (1.9) | 2.3 | (0.9) |
|
Net profit/(loss) before income tax |
| (4.4) | 2.9 | (2.9) | (0.3) | (4.7) |
| 12.1 | 3.3 | (2.6) | (0.9) | 11.9 |
| 15.8 | (1.0) | (0.1) | 0.2 | 14.9 |
|
Income tax credit/(expense) |
| 0.9 | (0.2) | (0.3) | - | 0.4 |
| (3.7) | (0.5) | (0.3) | 0.3 | (4.2) |
| (4.8) | (1.0) | (0.8) | (1.3) | (7.9) |
|
Net profit/(loss) |
| (3.5) | 2.7 | (3.2) | (0.3) | (4.3) |
| 8.4 | 2.8 | (2.9) | (0.6) | 7.7 |
| 11.0 | (2.0) | (0.9) | (1.1) | 7.0 |
|
Net profit attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of the Parent |
| (3.5) | 2.7 | (3.2) | 0.2 | (3.8) |
| 8.4 | 2.8 | (2.9) | (3.2) | 5.1 |
| 11.0 | (2.0) | (0.9) | (4.6) | 3.5 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
| - | - | - | (0.5) | (0.5) |
| - | - | - | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| - | - | - | 3.5 | 3.5 |
|
Net profit/(loss) for the period |
| (3.5) | 2.7 | (3.2) | (0.3) | (4.3) |
| 8.4 | 2.8 | (2.9) | (0.6) | 7.7 |
| 11.0 | (2.0) | (0.9) | (1.1) | 7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 |
| H1 FY2015 |
| FY2015 |
| ||||||||||||
|
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | Total |
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | Total |
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | TOTAL |
|
Cash generated /(utilised) in operating activities |
| (2.7) | 5.6 | (4.9) | - | (2.0) |
| 5.1 | 2.4 | (3.0) | - | 4.5 |
| 6.6 | 9.9 | (4.9) | - | 11.6 |
|
Cash generated /(utilised) in investing activities |
| (8.8) | (2.3) | (2.3) | - | (13.4) |
| (2.2) | (2.3) | (3.8) | - | (8.3) |
| (9.3) | (5.6) | (7.2) | - | (22.1) |
|
Cash generated /(utilised) in financing activities |
| 1.9 | (1.9) | 11.5 | - | 11.5 |
| (4.2) | (0.2) | 6.2 | - | 1.8 |
| 10.4 | (5.8) | 10.9 | - | 15.5 |
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents |
| (9.6) | 1.4 | 4.3 | - | (3.9) |
| (1.3) | (0.1) | (0.6) | - | (2.0) |
| 7.7 | (1.5) | (1.2) | - | 5.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
| 11.9 | 0.7 | 1.4 | - | 14.0 |
| 4.2 | 2.1 | 2.8 | - | 9.1 |
| 4.2 | 2.1 | 2.8 | - | 9.1 |
|
Exchange rate movement on cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| - | - | (0.4) | - | (0.4) |
| - | - | (0.2) | - | (0.2) |
| - | - | (0.1) | - | (0.1) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
| 2.3 | 2.1 | 5.3 | - | 9.7 |
| 2.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | 6.9 |
| 11.9 | 0.6 | 1.5 | - | 14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 |
| H1 FY2015 |
| FY2015 |
| ||||||||||||
|
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | Total |
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | Total |
| BNC | Freda Rebecca | Other Asa Resource | Consol-idation entries | TOTAL |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
| 67.9 | 45.9 | 289.3 | (223.3) | 179.8 |
| 49.4 | 46.7 | 68.7 | - | 164.8 |
| 59.3 | 46.4 | 287.2 | (223.3) | 169.6 |
|
Current assets |
| 24.4 | 18.4 | 327.1 | (319.5) | 50.4 |
| 20.7 | 20.4 | 3.6 | (0.8) | 43.9 |
| 33.8 | 18.3 | 321.8 | (321.7) | 52.2 |
|
Total assets |
| 92.3 | 64.3 | 616.4 | (542.8) | 230.2 |
| 70.1 | 67.1 | 72.3 | (0.8) | 208.7 |
| 93.1 | 64.7 | 609.0 | (545.0) | 221.8 |
|
Equity and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
| 35.4 | 18.2 | 265.4 | (182.2) | 136.8 |
| 24.8 | 18.9 | 93.2 | 0.1 | 137.0 |
| 39.0 | 15.6 | 263.5 | (181.9) | 136.2 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
| 37.6 | 25.7 | 340.6 | (352.1) | 51.8 |
| 24.7 | 31.4 | (19.1) | - | 37.0 |
| 34.5 | 29.4 | 337.3 | (354.5) | 46.7 |
|
Current liabilities |
| 19.3 | 20.4 | 10.4 | (8.5) | 41.6 |
| 20.6 | 16.8 | (1.8) | (0.9) | 34.7 |
| 19.6 | 19.7 | 8.2 | (8.6) | 38.9 |
|
Total equity and liabilities |
| 92.3 | 64.3 | 616.4 | (542.8) | 230.2 |
| 70.1 | 67.1 | 72.3 | (0.8) | 208.7 |
| 93.1 | 64.7 | 609.0 | (545.0) | 221.8 |
|
Presentation note:
In prior periods, all financial figures in the below tables were presented net of consolidation entries. In the current period, actual figures before consolidation entries are shown in order to improve comparability with the underlying financial statements of subsidiaries. Through the addition of a new column entitled "Consolidation entries", these figures may then be tied back to the Group's financial statements. Thus, comparative figures may differ to those reported in prior years. Secondly, a further change made to the presentation of the Group's figures in the Consolidated Statement of Profit and Loss as follows: royalties and selling expenses have been classified separately on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Profit and Loss in the current period, with a corresponding change to the prior period figures as well. Lastly, in the past, finance income was reclassified from cash flows from operating activities to cash flows from investing activities on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows but due to the lack of materiality of this figure, this figure has instead been presented as part of cash flows from operating activities, and comparative figures have been adjusted to reflect this change.
Statement of Profit or Loss
The group reported revenue of $61.9m for the period (H1 FY2015: $85.8m). BNC generated $20.6m of revenue (H1 FY2015: $46.4m) from the sale of 2,762t (H1 FY2015: 3,879t) of nickel in concentrate, and Freda Rebecca generated $40.4m of revenue (H1 FY2015: $38.6m) from the sale of 35,052oz of gold (H1 FY2015: 30,058oz).
The group generated a gross profit of $16.6m (H1 FY2015: $39.0m) for the period; $3.3m at BNC (H1 FY2015: $25.9m), and $13.1m (H1 FY2015: $13.2m) at Freda Rebecca. Operating costs of $60.6m were lower than H1 FY2015 ($67.2m) due to fewer tonnes produced by BNC and the adoption of a number of cost saving initiatives.
No impairment or reversal of impairment of assets was recorded in the period. The group reported a loss before tax of $4.7m (H1 FY2015: $11.9m profit). Fully diluted loss per share for the period were 0.18 US cents per share (cps) (H1 FY2015: 0.37cps earnings).
Statement of Cash Flows
The group utilised $2.0m (H1 FY2015: $4.5m generated) of cash flow from operations during the period. BNC utilised $2.7m (H1 FY2015: $5.1m generated) of operating cash flows, and Freda Rebecca generated $5.6m (H1 FY2015: $2.4m), offset by $4.9m (H1 FY2015: $3.0m) which was utilised for expenses incurred in relation to the interest in the diamond recovery JV, and additional cash flows generated by other Asa Resource entities.
Working capital absorbed $2.1m (H1 FY2015: $13.8m) of cash flow, with $0.6m (H1 FY2015: $9.4m) related to BNC and $0.5m (H1: FY2015: $4.8m) relating to Freda Rebecca. The balance related to other corporate activities including in respect of a prepayment related to the BNC smelter project of $2.8m and foreign exchange movements on intercompany loans.
Capital investment comprised $13.4m (H1 FY2015: $8.3m) of which $11.1m (H1 FY2015: $4.6m) was spent on property, plant and equipment, and a further $2.3m (H1 FY2015: $3.8m) on exploration assets. BNC invested $8.8m (H1 FY2015: $2.2m) into the Re-Deep Project, mobile equipment and work in progress capitalized on the smelter project. Freda Rebecca invested $2.3m (H1 FY2015: $2.3m) into capital expenditure, which included $1.1m (H1 FY2015: $1.7m) in respect of stay-in-business capital and the balance was expended on exploration, and other sundry projects.
The group generated $11.5m (H1 FY2015: $1.8m) in cash from financing activities and mainly comprised $4.4m in proceeds received as at 30 September 2015 following the open offer carried out by Asa Resource. A further $3.6m was generated from proceeds received from the issue of the smelter bond by BNC in addition to the $16.4m banked during the financial year ended 31 March 2015. $1m was received by BNC in respect of asset financing. Freda Rebecca received a bank loan of $2.5m from EcoBank. At 30 September 2015 the group held cash balances of $9.7m (H1 FY2015: $6.9m).
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS (UNAUDITED)
For the six months ended 30 September 2015
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 |
|
| $’000 | $'000 | $'000 |
|
Revenue | 61,854 | 85,819 | 152,316 |
|
Cost of sales | (45,261) | (46,832) | (93,483) |
|
Gross profit/(loss) | 16,593 | 38,987 | 58,833 |
|
Other income | 489 | 534 | 1,923 |
|
Freight and insurance expenses | (3,159) | (6,728) | (9,225) |
|
Royalties and selling expenses | (2,521) | (3,549) | (8,568) |
|
General and administrative expenses | (5,837) | (6,792) | (15,131) |
|
Care and maintenance expenses | (861) | (1,136) | (1,518) |
|
Corporate expenses | (3,388) | (2,705) | (6,952) |
|
Operating profit | 1,316 | 18,611 | 19,362 |
|
Retrenchment and restructuring expenses ¹ | (1,516) | (213) | (677) |
|
Dividends received | - | 24 | 59 |
|
Loss on sale of assets | (1) | (43) | (81) |
|
Fair value adjustment | - | 9 | (24) |
|
Foreign exchange gain/(loss) | 4 | (1,309) | 127 |
|
EBITDA ² | (197) | 17,079 | 18,766 |
|
Impairment loss | - | (471) | (749) |
|
Impairment reversal | - | 188 | 5,075 |
|
Depreciation | (3,964) | (4,571) | (8,146) |
|
Finance income | 27 | 48 | 764 |
|
Finance expense | (608) | (369) | (841) |
|
Net profit/(loss) before income tax | (4,742) | 11,904 | 14,869 |
|
Income tax expense/(credit) | 476 | (4,221) | (7,850) |
|
Net profit/(loss) for the period | (4,266) | 7,683 | 7,019 |
|
Net profit attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
Owners of the Parent | (3,816) | 5,125 | 3,557 |
|
Non-controlling interest | (450) | 2,558 | 3,462 |
|
Net profit/(loss) for the period | (4,266) | 7,683 | 7,019 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
Basic profit/(loss) per share (US cents) | (0.25) | 0.37 | 0.25 |
|
Diluted profit/(loss) per share (US cents) | (0.25) | 0.37 | 0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¹ Following a decision in 2014 to mothball operations at Shangani, certain staff retrenchment and one-off costs in respect of restructuring costs were incurred during the current year in respect of Bindura Nickel Corporation. In the prior year, such costs related to restructuring activities in respect of London, Johannesburg and the DRC (SEMHKAT) |
| |||
² Earnings before interest, impairments, tax, depreciation and amortisation |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 |
|
| $’000 | $'000 | $'000 |
|
Profit for the period | (4,266) | 7,683 | 7,019 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/profit |
|
|
|
|
Items that are or may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation differences | 475 | 785 | (40) |
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/profit for the period, net of income tax | 475 | 785 | (40) |
|
Total comprehensive profit for the period | (3,791) | 8,468 | 6,979 |
|
Total comprehensive profit attributable to |
|
|
|
|
Owners of the Parent | (3,341) | 5,910 | 3,517 |
|
Non-controlling interest | (450) | 2,558 | 3,462 |
|
Total comprehensive profit for the period | (3,791) | 8,468 | 6,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 |
$’000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment | 101,041 | 81,210 | 93,907 |
Intangible assets | 71,532 | 66,556 | 69,275 |
Investments | 576 | 579 | 577 |
Deferred tax assets | 5,737 | 14,138 | 4,837 |
Non-current receivables | 895 | 2,392 | 1,071 |
Total non-current assets | 179,781 | 164,875 | 169,667 |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
Inventories | 16,311 | 15,257 | 17,821 |
Trade and other receivables | 24,304 | 21,616 | 20,382 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 9,670 | 6,922 | 14,023 |
Total current assets | 50,285 | 43,795 | 52,226 |
Total assets | 230,066 | 208,670 | 221,893 |
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
Issued share capital | 104,007 | 99,572 | 99,572 |
Share premium | 69,351 | 69,536 | 69,536 |
Reserves | 97,039 | 97,523 | 96,391 |
Accumulated losses | (145,355) | (140,924) | (141,539) |
Total equity attributable to equity holders of the Parent | 125,042 | 125,707 | 123,960 |
Non-controlling interest | 11,752 | 11,309 | 12,202 |
Total equity | 136,794 | 137,016 | 136,162 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
Loans payable | 24,491 | 2,345 | 18,910 |
Environmental rehabilitation provisions | 17,467 | 17,765 | 17,629 |
Deferred tax liabilities | 9,817 | 16,886 | 10,289 |
Total non-current liabilities | 51,775 | 36,996 | 46,828 |
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
Trade payables | 13,917 | 10,790 | 17,245 |
Accruals and other payables | 21,755 | 16,143 | 16,989 |
Loans payable | 2,369 | 3,584 | 822 |
Provisions | 3,457 | 4,142 | 3,847 |
Total current liabilities | 41,498 | 34,659 | 38,903 |
Total liabilities | 93,273 | 71,655 | 85,731 |
Total equity and liabilities | 230,067 | 208,671 | 221,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Share capital | Share premium | Treasury stock ¹ | Translation reserve | Share based payments | Total reserves | Retained earnings | Total equity attributable to equity holders of the Parent | Non-controlling interest | Total equity |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 |
Balance at 1 April 2014 | 99,572 | 69,536 | - | 94,224 | 2,933 | 97,157 | (146,049) | 120,216 | 8,705 | 128,921 |
Profit for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3,557 | 3,557 | 3,462 | 7,019 |
Foreign currency translation differences | - | - | - | (40) | - | (40) | - | (40) | - | (40) |
Total comprehensive income for the period | - | - | - | (40) | - | (40) | 3,557 | 3,517 | 3,462 | 6,979 |
Contributions by and distributions to owners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares issued | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | 46 |
Change in non-controlling interest - carrying amount | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | 11 | (11) | - |
Share-based payment transactions | - | - | - | - | 216 | 216 | - | 216 | - | 216 |
Share-based payment reversals | - | - | - | - | (942) | (942) | 942 | - | - | - |
Total contributions by and distributions to owners | - | - | - | - | (726) | (726) | 953 | 227 | 35 | 262 |
Balance as at 31 March 2015 | 99,572 | 69,536 | - | 94,184 | 2,207 | 96,391 | (141,539) | 123,960 | 12,202 | 136,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
| - |
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1 April 2015 | 99,572 | 69,536 | - | 94,184 | 2,207 | 96,391 | (141,539) | 123,960 | 12,202 | 136,162 |
Loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | (3,816) | (3,816) | (450) | (4,266) |
Foreign currency translation differences | - | - | - | 475 | - | 475 | - | 475 | - | 475 |
Total comprehensive income for the period | - | - | - | 475 | - | 475 | (3,816) | (3,341) | (450) | (3,791) |
Contributions by and distributions to owners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares issued | 4,435 | (185) | - | - | - | - | - | 4,250 | - | 4,250 |
Share-based payment transactions | - | - | - | - | 173 | 173 | - | 173 | - | 173 |
Share-based payment reversals | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total contributions by and distributions to owners | 4,435 | (185) | - | - | 173 | 173 | - | 4,423 | - | 4,423 |
Balance as at 30 September 2015 | 104,007 | 69,351 | - | 94,659 | 2,380 | 97,039 | (145,355) | 125,042 | 11,752 | 136,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 |
|
$’000 | $'000 | $'000 |
| |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
Profit before income tax | (4,742) | 11,904 | 14,869 |
|
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange movements | (4) | 1,311 | (127) |
|
Depreciation | 3,964 | 4,571 | 8,146 |
|
Fair value adjustments | - | (9) | 24 |
|
Charge in relation to share-based payments | 173 | (419) | 216 |
|
Increase/(Decrease) in rehabilitation provisions | (162) | 82 | (42) |
|
Increase/(Decrease) in other provisions | (390) | 937 | 1,242 |
|
Increase/(Decrease) in environmental assets | 176 | - | (72) |
|
Bad debts provision movement | 141 | - | 1,491 |
|
Impairment loss | - | 471 | 749 |
|
Impairment reversal | - | (188) | (5,075) |
|
Profit/(Loss) on sale of assets | (1) | 43 | 81 |
|
Adjusted profit before tax | (845) | 18,703 | 21,502 |
|
Movements in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/Decrease in inventories | 1,510 | (2,263) | (4,827) |
|
Increase in trade and other receivables | (4,063) | (2,784) | (3,010) |
|
(Decrease)/Increase in trade and other payables | 1,438 | (8,731) | (811) |
|
| (1,960) | 4,925 | 12,854 |
|
Income tax paid | - | (332) | (1,231) |
|
Net cash from operating activities | (1,960) | 4,593 | 11,623 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (11,109) | (4,573) | (15,881) |
|
Investment in intangible exploration assets | (2,257) | (3,796) | (6,416) |
|
Increase in non-current receivables | - | - | - |
|
Decrease in investments | - | - | - |
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 8 | 103 | 176 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (13,358) | (8,266) | (22,121) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issue of share capital | 4,435 | 46 | 46 |
|
Share issue expenses | (186) | - | 0 |
|
Proceeds from issue of smelter bond | 3,600 | - | 16,400 |
|
Proceeds from asset financing facility | 1,000 | - | 0 |
|
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | - | - | 0 |
|
Share issuance to non-controlling interests | - | - | 0 |
|
Loans advanced | 2,528 | 1,660 | 3,332 |
|
Loans repaid |
| - | (4,269) |
|
Net cash from financing activities | 11,377 | 1,706 | 15,509 |
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | (3,941) | (1,967) | 5,011 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | 14,023 | 9,089 | 9,089 |
|
Exchange rate movement on cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | (412) | (200) | (77) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | 9,670 | 6,922 | 14,023 |
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
For the six months ended 30 September 2015
1. Reporting entity
Asa Resource Group PLC (the "Company") is a company domiciled in the United Kingdom. The condensed consolidated interim financial statements ("Interim Financial Statements") of the Company as at and for the six months ended 30 September 2015 comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the "Group") and the Group's interests in associates and jointly controlled entities. The audited consolidated financial statements of the Group as at and for the year ended 31 March 2015 are available upon request from the Company's registered office at 1 Catherine Place, London, SW1E 6DX, United Kingdom or at www.asaukplc.com.
2. Statement of compliance
These Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard ("IAS") 34, Interim Financial Reporting, as adopted by the EU. These Interim Financial Statements have been prepared using the same accounting policies as used in the preparation of the Group's annual financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015, which were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU ("IFRS"). They do not include all of the information required for full annual financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Group for the year ended 31 March 2015. The financial information presented in this document is unaudited.
The comparative figures for the financial year ended 31 March 2015 are the Company's statutory accounts for that financial year. Those accounts have been reported on by the Company's auditor and delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The report of the auditor was unqualified, included emphasis of matter paragraphs in which the auditor drew attention to significant uncertainties that may cast significant doubt regarding going concern and the carrying value of investments, and did not contain a statement under section 498(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006. These sections address whether proper accounting records have been kept, whether the Company's accounts are in agreement with those records and whether the auditor has obtained all the information and explanations necessary for the purposes of its audit.
3. Going concern
The Directors, having considered the Group's and the Company's current trading activities, funding position and projected funding requirements and the Zimbabwean environment for the period at least twelve months from the date of approval of these interim financial statements, consider it appropriate to adopt the Going Concern basis in preparing the Interim Financial Statements for the six months ended 30 September 2015. The Group's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in the Interim Operational Review above. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows and liquidity position are as set out in the Interim Financial Review.
The group reports a loss for the six months ended 30 September 2015 of $4.3m (H1 FY2015: $7.7m profit). As at 30 September 2015, the group held cash of $9.7m (H1 FY2015: $6.9m).
During the six months to 30 September 2015, BNC's cash flow contribution to the Group fell significantly due to a lower nickel price relative to the same period last year and resulted in cash utilised in operating activities of $2.7m. However, Freda Rebecca's gold production augmented the Group's cash flow by contributing $5.7m in cash generated from operating activities. This was however, offset by $4.9m utilised in operating activities by other group companies, resulting in a group net cash outflow from operating activities of $2.0m.
Discussions are on-going with the Zimbabwean Government pertaining to the implementation of the country's Indigenisation Act in relation to Asa Resource's Zimbabwean assets. Asa Resource's implementation of the
Indigenisation Act may reduce the quantum of cash flow Asa Resource receives from its Zimbabwean entities. Furthermore, the lack of clarity around indigenisation makes it harder for Asa Resource to raise funding as required for its Zimbabwean assets.
The Directors have prepared the cash flow forecasts of the Group and are of the opinion that the Group's current cash resources, together with the cash forecast to be generated by Freda Rebecca and BNC, are sufficient to fund all of the Group's planned activities for at least 12 months from the date of these Financial Statements.
Ongoing operations
During the year, operations at both BNC and Freda Rebecca have continued successfully and the operating cash inflows from BNC, together with financing raised in the form of a bond to part-fund the restart of the smelter, have significantly improved the Group's cash position and outlook. Despite this, there still remains a number of challenges to ensure that appropriate funding in the form of bank facilities are obtained across the Group when required and certain known risks are managed as set out in more detail below.
The Directors' cash flow forecasts assume:
· An average nickel price for nickel in concentrate of $7,180 per tonne and average gold price of $1,150 per ounce; and
· All planned capital expenditure to maintain existing operations, with any additional capital expenditure to be funded from a combination of cash generated from operations and bank overdraft facilities, some of which have yet to be secured.
The Directors are aware that various risks outside the Group's control might impact the validity of their forecasts. These risks include future gold and nickel prices; mining and processing performance; resource and reserve risks; and customer risks in addition to the political and indigenisation risks in Zimbabwe (refer to page 30 of the Directors' Report and note 22 of the FY2015 Annual Report) which may constrain the ability of the Company to control the movement of cash between entities or receive dividends.
Nickel prices in particular have been historically volatile, however, absent a structural change in the market, forecasts are considered to be achievable. Reasonably expected variations in nickel price would not cause the going concern assumption to be inappropriate. Although the gold price has too been depressed in recent times, reasonably expected variations in the gold price would also not cause the going concern assumption to be inappropriate.
The Directors are aware that various uncertainties might affect the validity of their forecasts. These uncertainties include metal prices, mining and processing risks and resource and reserve risks, in addition to indigenisation risks in Zimbabwe. The Directors, however, believe they have the ability to manage cash flows and implement indigenisation proposals so as to minimise the cash flow impact to the Group. However, the Directors acknowledge that there is no certainty that mitigation efforts will be successful. The Directors have concluded that the combination of these circumstances represents a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Company's and the Group's ability to continue as a going concern and that the Company and the Group may therefore be unable to realise all their assets and discharge all of their liabilities in the normal course of business.
Nevertheless, after making enquiries and considering the uncertainties described above the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing
these Financial Statements which do not include any adjustments that would result from the going concern basis of preparation being inappropriate.
BNC smelter re-start
The Directors' cash flow forecasts assume that the smelter restart will only take place after the period under consideration for going concern purposes while the Board continues to evaluate technical modifications in order to make the smelter viable at currently low commodity prices. It should be noted that:
· The outstanding balance of $3.6m in respect of the smelter bond proceeds were received during the six months ended 30 September 2015; and
· The cost review mentioned in the FY2015 Annual Report is ongoing and may reduce the smelter project costs by some $2.3m.
· Although at present BNC has had a number of discussions and offers in terms of an offtake agreement for the nickel leach alloy to be produced by the smelter, it does not as yet have a signed offtake agreement. However, BNC and Asa have no reason to believe that a favourable agreement will not be reached within the desired timeframes. Therefore, the cash flow models presented include estimated cash flows to be received from a potential offtake agreement.
If the planned smelter project cost savings cannot be achieved or satisfactory terms obtained for the output then the Board may need to further delay the commissioning of the smelter by a few months. It is not anticipated that a delay of this length would have a material impact on the group cash flows. However, if the delay were to be extended for a much longer period, indications are that whilst the cashflows generated from the mining operations alone would be sufficient to fund all cashflow obligations as they fall due within the 12 month period from the date of this interim report, there could be cash constraints beyond this period.
4. Significant accounting policies
In the preparation of these Interim Financial Statements, the Group has applied the same accounting policies as those presented in the Group's consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015, as set out on pages 51 to 59 of the Annual Report. Management is currently assessing the potential impact of the changes of the amendments, noted in the Annual Report, to published standards and interpretations which are effective for the Group for the half year ended 30 September 2015. They are not anticipated to be material or significant.
5. Operating segments
The Group has four reportable segments, as described below, which are the Group's strategic business units, along with the corporate segment.
The strategic business units offer different products and services, and are managed separately because they require different technology and marketing strategies. The executive chairman reviews internal management reports for each of the strategic business units.
The following summary describes the operations in each of the Group's reportable segments:
· Gold: Gold mining and prospecting activities
· Nickel: Nickel mining, smelting and refining activities partially on care and maintenance
· Diamonds: Diamond mining activities currently on care and maintenance
· Exploration: Gold and base metal exploration activities
Information about reportable segments - Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nickel | Gold | Diamonds | Exploration | Total |
| ||||||||||
|
|
| (Bindura NickelCorporation) | (Freda Rebecca) | (Klipspringerdiamond mine) | (Zani Kodo and SEMHKAT) | For reportable segments (before consolidation entries) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 |
|
|
|
| $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 |
|
External revenue | 20,560 | 46,386 | 78,872 | 40,403 | 38,556 | 72,083 | 891 | 877 | 1,361 | - | - | - | 61,854 | 85,819 | 152,316 |
| ||
EBITDA | (3,193) | 14,134 | 18,089 | 6,300 | 6,419 | 5,410 | (205) | (399) | (691) | 8 | (416) | 95 | 2,910 | 19,738 | 22,903 |
| ||
Impairment reversal/(loss) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| ||
Reportable segment profit/(loss) before income tax | (4,418) | 12,148 | 15,955 | 2,874 | 3,293 | (1,060) | (204) | (413) | (645) | 855 | 559 | 1,788 | (893) | 15,587 | 16,038 |
| ||
Reportable segment assets | 92,324 | 70,118 | 93,084 | 64,245 | 67,114 | 64,737 | 1,527 | 1,186 | 1,416 | 201,011 | 67,294 | 199,479 | 359,107 | 205,712 | 358,716 |
| ||
Reportable additions to property, plant and equipment | 8,804 | 2,267 | 9,469 | 2,283 | 1,753 | 5,625 | - | - | 11 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 11,107 | 4,021 | 15,106 |
| ||
Reportable additions to intangible assets | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,255 | 3,796 | 6,416 | 2,255 | 3,796 | 6,416 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of reportable segments information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TotalFor reportable segments(before consolidation entries) | Corporate(not a reportable segment) | Consolidation entries | Totalas per Financial Statements |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 |
|
|
|
| $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 |
|
External revenue | 61,854 | 85,819 | 152,316 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 61,854 | 85,819 | 152,316 |
| ||
EBITDA | 2,910 | 19,738 | 22,903 | (2,788) | (1,971) | 1,048 | (319) | (688) | (5,185) | (197) | 17,079 | 18,766 |
| ||
Impairment reversal/(loss) | - | - | - | - | (106) | (749) | - | (177) | 5,075 | - | (283) | 4,326 |
| ||
Reportable segment profit/(loss) before income tax | (893) | 15,587 | 16,038 | (3,582) | (2,814) | (1,249) | (267) | (869) | 80 | (4,742) | 11,904 | 14,869 |
| ||
Reportable segment assets | 359,107 | 205,712 | 358,716 | 413,763 | 3,803 | 408,127 | (542,803) | (845) | (544,950) | 230,067 | 208,670 | 221,893 |
| ||
Reportable additions to property, plant and equipment | 11,107 | 4,021 | 15,106 | 2 | 552 | 776 | - | - | - | 11,109 | 4,573 | 15,882 |
| ||
Reportable additions to intangible assets | 2,255 | 3,796 | 6,416 | 2 | - |
| - | - | - | 2,257 | 3,796 | 6,416 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about reportable segments - Geographical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| South Africa and Zimbabwe ¹ | Democratic Republic of the Congo | United Kingdom | Consolidation entries | Total perFinancial Statements |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 | H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 | $’000 | $'000 | $'000 |
|
|
|
|
External revenue | 61,854 | 85,819 | 152,316 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 61,854 | 85,819 | 152,316 |
|
|
|
| ||
EBITDA | 6,281 | 19,699 | 27,570 | 8 | (421) | 83 | (6,167) | (1,511) | (3,702) | (319) | (688) | (5,185) | (197) | 17,079 | 18,766 |
|
|
|
| ||
Impairment reversal/(loss) | - | (236) | - | - | - | - | - | 130 | (749) | - | (177) | 5,075 | - | (283) | 4,326 |
|
|
|
| ||
Reportable segment profit/(loss) before income tax | 1,768 | 14,593 | 19,411 | (9) | (436) | 38 | (6,234) | (1,384) | (4,660) | (267) | (869) | 80 | (4,742) | 11,904 | 14,869 |
|
|
|
| ||
Reportable segment assets | 198,260 | 140,632 | 199,926 | 73,477 | 67,311 | 70,794 | 501,133 | 1,572 | 496,123 | (542,803) | (845) | (544,950) | 230,067 | 208,670 | 221,893 |
|
|
|
| ||
Reportable additions to property, plant and equipment | 11,086 | 4,573 | 15,825 | 20 | - | 1 | 3 | - | 56 | - | - | - | 11,109 | 4,573 | 15,882 |
|
|
|
| ||
Reportable additions to intangible assets | - | - | - | 2,255 | 3,796 | 6,416 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2,257 | 3,796 | 6,416 |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing the profit or loss after taxation for the period attributable to ordinary shareholders by the sum of the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue for dividends during the period.
Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the profit or loss after taxation for the period attributable to ordinary shareholders by the sum of the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue, adjusted for the effect of all dilutive potential ordinary shares that were outstanding during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 | FY2015 |
|
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 |
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders | (3,816) | 5,125 | 3,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Number | Number | Number |
|
Weighted average number of shares |
|
|
|
|
Issued ordinary shares at the beginning of the year | 1,397,780,675 | 1,397,780,675 | 1,397,780,675 |
|
Effect of shares issued | 148,184,882 | - | - |
|
Weighted average shares at the end of the year for basic and diluted EPS | 1,545,965,557 | 1,397,780,675 | 1,397,780,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings/(loss) per share (US cents) | (0.25) | 0.37 | 0.25 |
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share (US cents) | (0.25) | 0.37 | 0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Post balance sheet events
There were no events after balance sheet date that required additional disclosure besides those detailed below:
· Non-Executive Director, Anne-Marie Chidzero resigned from the Board on 1 October 2015 with immediate effect in order to devote more time to family and other professional commitments
8. Commitments and contingent liabilities
Commitments
Capital commitments at the end of the period for BNC and Freda Rebecca, for which no provision has been made, are as follows:
Commitments (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H1 FY2016 | H1 FY2015 |
|
|
|
| Six months ended | Six months ended | Variance |
|
US$'000 |
| 30-Sep-15 | 30-Sep-14 | % |
|
Contracted |
| 7,745 | 7,645 | 1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent liabilities
The Group and Company monitor contingent liabilities, including, inter alia, those relating to taxation in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates environmental, closure and other contingent liabilities, on an ongoing basis. Provision for such liabilities is raised in the financial statements when the necessary recognition criteria have been satisfied. The following contingencies exist at the date of the Interim Financial Statements:
Group
· There are a number of legal claims which have been brought against BNC and Freda Rebecca. These have been provided for when the obligation relating to these liabilities met the criteria for recognition under IAS 37 and are disclosed in note 31 of the Annual Report.
Company
· The Company has issued a guarantee to the extent of the outstanding Bindura Nickel Corporation bond amount, including accrued interest at any time during the tenor of the Bond. The $20m bond carries a coupon rate of 10% per annum for a period of 5 years. The bond capital will be repaid in 8 instalments of $2.5m plus interest every 6 months commencing after the first 18 months have passed. The Company has provided a letter of guarantee to Freda Rebecca of the amount owing to it by its subsidiary, the farm Bindura Estates, of $1.4m (2014: $1.1m), in the event that the farm is unable to meet its obligations.
9. Comparative figures
Where necessary, comparatives have been reclassified and repositioned for consistency with the current year disclosures.
ABOUT ASA RESOURCE GROUP PLC
Asa Resource Group Plc is a pan-African resources company with operations in Zimbabwe and South Africa, and a broad range of exploration projects and interests in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Angola and Botswana.
In September 2015 the Company changed its name from Mwana Africa PLC to Asa Resource Group PLC to better reflect the Company's global strategy. The Group has a diverse asset base, including gold, nickel, copper, cobalt and diamonds and intends to diversify and reorganize its business along commodity lines as well as stimulating growth through global investment.
The Company is listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM market and enjoys the strategic advantage of having supportive and influential shareholders in China. While the Company has been built on mining in Zimbabwe and South Africa, it is intended that its interests will be diversified beyond mining as well as geographically.
In Zimbabwe, Asa's interests are the Trojan and Shangani nickel mines and the Freda Rebecca gold mine. Asa's nickel and gold projects include Hunter's Road and Maligreen, with the Makaha deposit being a gold exploration prospect.
The Freda Rebecca gold mine in Zimbabwe restarted operations in 2009 and in the 12 months ended September 2015, produced 58,714oz of gold.
The Trojan nickel mine is owned by Asa's Zimbabwe subsidiary Bindura Nickel Corporation (BNC). After a four-year period of being under care and maintenance, in 2012 BNC carried out a US$23m restructuring and recapitalisation programme which allowed it to restart the Trojan mine. The first sale of nickel concentrate to Glencore plc took place in April 2013. In the 12 months ended September 2015, BNC produced 7,306t of nickel
In the DRC, Asa has exploration programmes in Zani-Kodo (gold), Katanga (copper) and a 20% stake in Société Minière de Bakwanga (diamonds).
In the Katanga Province, Asa Resource has a Joint Venture with Zhejiang Hailiang Company Limited to jointly explore for copper within the licensed areas. The Katanga concessions are otherwise known as SEMHKAT (Société d'Exploration Minière du Haut Katanga).
The Zani-Kodo joint venture project has a JORC compliant gold mineral resource of 2.97Moz.
Klipspringer diamond mine is Asa's South African interest. Asa holds a 69.77% interest in Klipspringer and although the mining operations are temporarily on care and maintenance, the tailings retreatment plant is in production. The viability of underground mining is being investigated.
Qualified Person
The information presented here that relates to Mineral Resources of the Kodo, Badolite, Zani Central and Lelumodi deposits is based on information compiled by Dr Colin Porter, who is a full time employee of Asa Resource Africa, has a PhD in Geology, is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity they are undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code 2012)'.
The information presented here that relates to Mineral Resources of the Kibolwe deposit is based on information compiled by Gayle Hanssen, who is a Director and Geological Consultant with Digital Mining Services (pvt) Ltd., has a BSc (Hons) in Geology, is a Registered Professional Natural Scientist (Pr. Sci. Nat)with the South African Council for Professional Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP), and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity they are undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code 2012)'.
The Competent Persons consent to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.
Related Shares:
Asa Resources