Half-year Report

RNS Announcement

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon PLC (BGS)

Legal Entity Identifier: X5XCIPCJQCSUF8H1FU83

Regulated Information Classification: Half Yearly Financial Report

Over the six months to 31 July 2025, the Company's net asset value per share† rose by 3.4% compared to a 7.9% increase in the MSCI Japan Small Cap index*. The share price rose by 8.2%. All figures in total return terms.

¾  During the period, Brian Lum was promoted from deputy to the Company's lead portfolio manager, taking over from Praveen Kumar. Jared Anderson was appointed as deputy portfolio manager. The changes were implemented by Baillie Gifford following an internal review.

¾  The top three positive stock contributors to performance were GA Technologies, Yonex and Cybozu following strong operational progress. The key detractors to performance included Harmonic Drive Systems, following a cooling of investor excitement to humanoid robots, and Inforich and JEOL following poor results.

¾  During the period, two new positions have been initiated in companies with market capitalisations or turnover of more than ¥150 billion, DMG Mori and Money Forward, consistent with the revised investment policy. In total, five new positions were initiated, and seven holdings were sold outright.

¾  Over the six months, the Company has bought back approximately 23.1 million shares into treasury, equivalent to approximately 8.3% of the Company's issued share capital as at 31 January 2025. The Company has obtained the necessary approvals to cancel the amount standing to the credit of the Company's share premium account and the creation of an equivalent distributable reserve.

¾  With US-Japan trade negotiations now seemingly concluded and agreed, inflation re-establishing itself and expectations of further monetary policy normalising, macro-economic conditions in Japan appear to be improving. This should provide a tailwind for Japanese growth equities. In addition, reduced uncertainty and a return of risk tolerance should prove beneficial to well-managed Japanese smaller companies

† After deducting borrowings at fair value.

* The Company's comparative index is the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index (total return and in sterling terms). See disclaimer at the end of this announcement.

Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer at end of this announcement.

Shin Nippon aims to achieve long term capital growth through investment principally in small Japanese companies which are believed to have above average prospects for growth. At 31 July 2025 the Company had total assets of £442.3 million (before deduction of bank loans of £74.5 million).

The Company is managed by Baillie Gifford, an Edinburgh based fund management group with approximately £206.8 billion under management and advice as at 4 September 2025.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it is not guaranteed and may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount invested. The Company has borrowed money to make further investments. This is commonly referred to as gearing. The risk is that, when this money is repaid by the Company, the value of these investments may not be enough to cover the borrowing and interest costs, and the Company makes a loss. If the Company's investments fall in value, gearing will increase the amount of this loss. The more highly geared the Company, the greater this effect will be.

Investment in investment trusts should be regarded as long term. You can find up to date performance information about Shin Nippon at shinnippon.co.uk.

For further information please contact:

Anzelm Cydzik, Baillie Gifford & Co

Tel: 0131 275 2000

Jonathan Atkins, Four Communications

Tel: 0203 920 0555 or 07872 495396

The following is the unaudited Interim Financial Report for the six months to 31 July 2025 which was approved by the Board on 4 September 2025.

Shin Nippon's objective is to pursue long term capital growth through investment principally in small Japanese companies which are believed to have above average prospects for growth.

Comparative index

The index against which performance is compared is the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index (total return and in sterling terms).

Principal risks and uncertainties

The principal risks facing the Company are financial risk, private company (unlisted) investment risk, performance and investment strategy risk, climate and governance risk, discount risk, regulatory risk, custody and depositary risk, small company risk, operational risk, cyber security risk, leverage risk, political and associated financial risk and emerging risks. An explanation of these risks and how they are managed is set out on pages 49 to 55 of the Company's Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year to 31 January 2025 which is available on the Company's website: shinnippon.co.uk.

The principal risks and uncertainties have not changed since the date of that report.

Responsibility statement

We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

a. the condensed set of Financial Statements has been prepared in accordance with FRS 104 'Interim Financial Reporting';

b. the Interim Management Report includes a fair review of the information required by Disclosure and Transparency Rule 4.2.7R (indication of important events during the first six months, their impact on the Financial Statements and a description of the principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six months of the year); and

c. the Interim Financial Report includes a fair review of the information required by Disclosure and Transparency Rule 4.2.8R (disclosure of related party transactions and changes therein).

On behalf of the Board

J Skinner

Chair

4 September 2025

Summary of unaudited results*

Longer term total return performance at 31 July 2025*

Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer below.

Notes

* Alternative Performance Measure - see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures below.

† The comparative index is the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index (total return and in sterling terms). See disclaimer below.

‡ Net asset value per share ('NAV') with borrowings at fair value. At 31 July 2025 the NAV with borrowings at fair value was the same as the NAV with borrowings at book value. For a definition of terms see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures below.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

Chairman's Interim Statement

Performance

Over the six months to 31 July 2025, the Company's net asset value per share* rose by 3.4% and the share price rose by 8.2%, with a commensurate narrowing in the discount to 10.8%, although the Company underperformed its comparative index, the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index (total return in sterling terms), which increased by 7.9%. While it is pleasing to see an absolute return in this period, this is nevertheless a continuation of the significant underperformance against the index that shareholders have experienced since 2021.

The Board has worked over recent years with Baillie Gifford to understand the market dynamics impacting on the returns being generated from Japanese small cap growth equities. Whilst appreciating the market backdrop and the reality that small cap companies are often particularly vulnerable to investor risk appetite and sentiment, it is frustrating that Baillie Gifford's investment approach has not resulted in better outcomes. As highlighted in my statement in the annual report, a number of measures have been implemented to strengthen the investment process, such as small cap specific discussions with a wider set of colleagues and closer engagement with the investment risk team at Baillie Gifford. The investable opportunity set at the point of initial investment has also been broadened recently so as to permit initial investment in any company in the comparative index. The previous restriction on having to invest in companies with either a market capitalisation or turnover of not more than ¥150 billion at time of initial purchase, which would have captured most smaller companies ten years ago but now limits investment in only the bottom 20% of the comparative index, was removed. It is hoped that, together, these measures will support improved returns once they have had a chance to take effect. In that vein, during the period, two new positions have been initiated in companies with market capitalisations or turnover of more than ¥150 billion. In total, five new positions were initiated and seven holdings were sold outright. Further details on the transactions and prospects for the portfolio are contained within the managers' interim report.

Prompted by market volatility in April, drawn borrowings from the revolving credit facility were reduced by ¥1.3 billion. Net gearing stood at 15.8% as at period end, having been 16.1% as at 31 January 2025.

Tender and Buybacks

As announced previously, the Company has in place a performance-triggered conditional tender offer for up to 15% of issued share capital. The tender offer will be triggered if the Company's NAV total return per share* underperforms the total return of the comparative index over the three years to 31 January 2027. The tender offer would be at a price equal to a 2% discount to the cum income NAV per share* less costs.

As at 31 July 2025, the Company's performance is trailing the comparative index by 19.4%. Whilst only halfway through the measurement period, clearly the level of underperformance needing to be recouped is notable. I have been in regular communication with a number of 'professional' shareholders and have had correspondence with a number of 'retail' shareholders and, although there remains a loyal supportive base both of Baillie Gifford and Japanese small cap growth equities, I am in no doubt that patience in some quarters is being tested. If poor performance continues into the medium term, then I do not believe that a 15% tender offer will be sufficient and the Board will not hesitate to assess all available options.

In the meantime, the Company remains active in undertaking buybacks. As at 31 July 2025, the Company's share price stood at a 10.8% discount to NAV, having narrowed from 14.6% as at 31 January 2025. Over the six months, the Company has bought back approximately 23.1 million shares into treasury, equivalent to approximately 8.3% of the Company's issued share capital as at 31 January 2025. This has resulted in an increase in NAV of 1%. The Company has also obtained the necessary approval from shareholders to cancel the amount standing to the credit of the Company's share premium account. An application was made to the Scottish Court of Session to obtain its approval to the cancellation and the creation of an equivalent distributable reserve. This was granted in August and, once the Company's interim accounts are lodged with Companies House, will provide a significant pool of reserves which can be used in future to fund distributions, including dividends, and any returns of capital, including any future tender offer and share buybacks.

Portfolio managers

During the period, Brian Lum was promoted from deputy to the Company's lead portfolio manager, taking over from Praveen Kumar. Jared Anderson was appointed as deputy portfolio manager. The changes were implemented by Baillie Gifford following an internal review. Baillie Gifford as a house is a 'growth' manager and therefore the investment style underpinning the portfolio will not be changing. A number of larger shareholders have flagged in my discussions with them that the last thing they wish to happen is style drift.

Outlook

As noted in my most recent annual statement, I am grateful to shareholders for their continued patience. With US-Japan trade negotiations now seemingly concluded and agreed, inflation re-establishing itself and expectations of further monetary policy normalising, macro-economic conditions in Japan appear to be improving. This should provide a tailwind for Japanese growth equities. In addition, reduced uncertainty and a return of risk tolerance should prove beneficial to well-managed Japanese smaller companies. As the only growth-focused Japan small cap investment trust, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon should be increasingly well-placed to capture the opportunities presenting themselves. It is incumbent on the new team at the helm to do so without delay.

J Skinner

Chair

4 September 2025

* With borrowings at fair value. For a definition of terms see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures below.

Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer below.

Interim management report

Performance

Portfolio performance over the past few years has been challenging and this trend continued in the six months to 31 July 2025. This period was characterised by a difficult start to the year in relative terms as capital flowed into larger companies and more defensive sectors, and, since May, a stabilisation of performance as some of the stylistic headwinds began to abate. The volatility triggered by 'Liberation Day' led to renewed interest in the more domestically orientated Japanese small cap segment of the market and the strengthening yen has been helpful. Over the period, the Company's net asset value rose by 3.4%* in sterling terms compared to the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index's total return (in sterling terms) of 7.9%. Encouragingly, the Company's share price rose 8.2% over the same period.

The top three positive stock contributors to performance included GA Technologies, Yonex and Cybozu. All reported strong operational progress. GA Technologies' tech-focused real estate platform is rapidly gaining share, Yonex's badminton and tennis rackets are in demand in China/India, and SaaS company Cybozu's growth has accelerated (aided by a price increase) and operating leverage coming through. Outside of the top three, Technopro - the IT staffing company - was also a significant contributor as an M&A target (at the time of writing, it looks set to be acquired by Blackstone).

On the other hand, the key detractors include Harmonic Drive Systems, Inforich and JEOL. Harmonic Drive, a maker of robotic components, suffered as short-term excitement around humanoid robots cooled. Inforich - which operates the leading smartphone battery rental service in Japan - delivered poor results as it experiments with its pricing model. JEOL - a semiconductor equipment company - reported a poor set of results as it navigates a weaker part of the cycle. We believe the fundamental attractions of these businesses remain valid and they continue to warrant a place in the portfolio.

Why we are excited

Jared Anderson (deputy portfolio manager) and I are under no illusions that the Company's performance needs to improve without delay. We are both energised by the challenge and committed to strengthening processes and work alongside the Board to turn the performance of the Company around. What will not change is our core investment philosophy - we are long term orientated investors with a strong commitment to growth investing.

Several factors underpin our optimism and excitement. Firstly, Japan is a special market for small cap investing. Outside of the US and, arguably, China (to those with access), Japan is the deepest small cap market with thousands of potentially investible companies; more companies means more opportunities to find winners.

Secondly, Japanese small cap is deeply underappreciated. The MSCI Japan Small Cap index offers the lowest valuation in terms of Price-to-Earnings and Price-to-Book, often by a very significant margin, when compared to other major small cap markets such as the US, Europe, the Rest of Asia and the Emerging Markets. In addition, small caps as an asset class is itself deeply out of favour relative to large caps internationally. While we are fundamentally stock pickers, we do not believe that the perfect storm of headwinds will persist forever. Indeed, the strengthening yen represents a small reversal of a headwind that has hurt the asset class over the past five years. Also, structurally, we have noted that the governance reforms pushed by regulators in Japan are beginning to filter through to smaller companies - another catalyst for the asset class. For us, Japan small cap growth's laggard status is a real opportunity.

Changes in market conditions aside, we have worked hard to implement various improvements to our investment processes to better capture the opportunities that come our way. We will detail these in the next Annual Report. Fundamentally, we believe that we have strengthened our approach to position sizing and improved our discipline in risk management; and our capabilities to carry out investment research has deepened meaningfully as we incorporate new tools (AI) to our workflow.

Observations from Japan

During July, we visited 49 companies over a period of three weeks, including 28 holdings (c.40% of the portfolio by number and weighting). This trip completed our initial evaluation of the portfolio, strengthened our relationship with company management teams, and importantly expanded our pipeline of ideas.

There are two key observations to highlight here. The first is the sheer ambition and strategic nimbleness of the companies that we met, particularly those led by founder CEOs. Examples include Gift - a leading ramen chain in Japan; Litalico - a provider of vocational training to those with disabilities; and Soracom - an Internet of Things connectivity platform. All of them are actively planning for expansion in terms of multiples rather than percentages. Several non-holdings also fall into this category and are being actively considered as new holdings.

The other is AI. This is of course a topic that we have all been grappling with in recent years, but the real-world impact is becoming increasingly apparent for companies across all sectors. The implications are profound. Business models across industries will need to adapt, and there are clear opportunities and threats for us all to contemplate. For example, various companies have highlighted how AI is dramatically compressing their product development timelines, and the scope to deliver their existing services using a fraction of the headcount; on the other hand, some businesses will need to adapt to serve AI agents and face new sources of competition. For Japan, this takes on additional significance given the country's chronic labour shortages and productivity challenges.

Portfolio Changes

Over the six-month period, we have made five new investments: Shinnihon (a regional family-owned construction and real estate company), Cover (a fast-growing agency for 'vTubers'), Mani (leading maker of medical tools such as surgical needles), DMG Mori (CNC machine company) and Money Forward (back-office SaaS company). The theme is the diversity of growth drivers behind each of these companies, from emergence of a new form of entertainment, to Japan's strength in precision tools, to industrial automation. Three of the five were enabled by the upward revision to our market cap limit for new purchases.

There were seven complete sales. Several are investment cases that have not worked out: Shima Seiki, Torex Semiconductor, InterAction, SIIX and Iriso fall under this category. Matsukiyo Cocokara and MonotaRO are highly successful investments that we are exiting on valuation grounds.

Looking ahead

The turnover of the portfolio will likely be elevated relative to our historic norms in the short term, as we continue to reshape the portfolio in the next few months. In the meantime, there are two points that we would like to emphasise.

Firstly, we are committed to long term growth investing. There will be no style drift. Secondly, while we acknowledge the pain that shareholders have suffered in recent years, we are optimistic on the prospects from here. Our portfolio companies continue to deliver significantly higher growth than that of the benchmark, while the valuation premium to the benchmark (using forward price-to-earnings) is at near the lowest level in a decade. We are excited by many of our holdings and our investment universe, and we believe our strengthened processes can help us deliver the returns that our shareholders expect.

Lastly, we would like to thank shareholders for their ongoing support and patience, and we look forward to sharing more about our progress with you all soon.

Brian Lum

* With borrowings at fair value. For a definition of terms see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures below.

Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer below.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

The principal risks and uncertainties facing the Company are set out above.

Valuing private companies

We aim to hold our private company investments at 'fair value', i.e. the price that would be paid in an open-market transaction. Valuations are adjusted both during regular valuation cycles and on an ad hoc basis in response to 'trigger events'. Our valuation process ensures that private companies are valued in both a fair and timely manner.

The valuation process is overseen by a valuations group at Baillie Gifford, which takes advice from an independent third party (S&P Global). The valuations group is independent from the investment team with all voting members being from different operational areas of the firm, and the investment managers only receive final valuation notifications once they have been applied.

We revalue the private holdings on a three‑month rolling cycle, with one-third of the holdings reassessed each month. During stable market conditions, and assuming all else is equal, each investment would be valued four times in a twelve‑month period. For investment trusts, the prices are also reviewed twice per year by the respective boards and are subject to the scrutiny of external auditors in the annual audit process.

Beyond the regular cycle, the valuations team also monitors the portfolio for certain 'trigger events'. These may include changes in fundamentals, a takeover approach, an intention to carry out an Initial Public Offering ('IPO'), company news which is identified by the valuation team or by the portfolio managers, or meaningful changes to the valuation of comparable public companies. Any ad hoc change to the fair valuation of any holding is implemented swiftly and reflected in the next published net asset value ('NAV'). There is no delay.

The valuations team also monitors relevant market benchmarks on a weekly basis and updates valuations in a manner consistent with our external valuer's (S&P Global) most recent valuation report where appropriate.

List of investments as at 31 July 2025

* Absolute performance is in sterling terms and has been calculated on a total return basis over the period 1 February 2025 to 31 July 2025.

U Private company (unlisted) investment.

† Figures relate to part period returns where the investment has been purchased in the period.

# See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures below.

‡ Total assets less current liabilities, before deduction of borrowings. See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures below.

Source: Baillie Gifford/Revolution and relevant underlying data providers. See disclaimer below.

Income statement (unaudited)

The accompanying notes below are an integral part of the Financial Statements.

The total column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. The supplementary revenue and capital columns are prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies.

All revenue and capital items in this statement derive from continuing operations.

A Statement of Comprehensive Income is not required as all gains and losses of the Company have been reflected in the above statement.

Balance sheet (unaudited)

Statement of changes in equity (unaudited)

For the six months ended 31 July 2025

For the six months ended 31 July 2024

* The capital reserve includes investment holding losses of £12,240,000 (31 July - losses of £30,383,000).

Condensed cash flow statement (unaudited)

* Cash and cash equivalents represent cash at bank and deposits repayable on demand.

Notes to the financial statements (unaudited)

1. Basis of accounting

The condensed Financial Statements for the six months to 31 July 2025 comprise the statements set out above together with the related notes below. They have been prepared in accordance with FRS 104 'Interim Financial Reporting' and the principles of the AIC's Statement of Recommended Practice issued in November 2014 and updated in July 2022 with consequential amendments and have not been audited or reviewed by the Auditor pursuant to the Auditing Practices Board Guidance on 'Review of Interim Financial Information'. The Financial Statements for the six months to 31 July 2025 have been prepared on the basis of the same accounting policies as set out in the Company's Annual Report and Financial Statements at 31 January 2025.

Going concern

The Directors have considered the nature of the Company's principal risks and uncertainties, as set out on the inside front cover, together with its current position, investment objective and policy, its assets and liabilities and projected income and expenditure. The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility owing to macroeconomic and geopolitical concerns and reviewed the results of specific leverage and liquidity stress testing, but does not believe the Company's going concern status is affected. The Company's assets, which are primarily investments in quoted securities which are readily realisable (Level 1), exceed its liabilities significantly and could be sold to repay borrowings if required. All borrowings require the prior approval of the Board. Gearing levels and compliance with loan covenants are reviewed by the Board on a regular basis. As at 31 July 2025 the Company had a net liability of £57.3 million primarily as a result of a revolving credit facility which is repayable on a three monthly basis until 2027. The Company has continued to comply with the investment trust status requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) Regulations 2011. Accordingly, the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing these Financial Statements and confirm that they are not aware of any material uncertainties which may affect the Company's ability to continue in operational existence for a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of these Financial Statements.

2. Financial information

The financial information contained within this Interim Financial Report does not constitute statutory accounts as defined in sections 434 to 436 of the Companies Act 2006. The financial information for the year ended 31 January 2025 has been extracted from the statutory accounts which have been filed with the Registrar of Companies. The Auditor's Report on these accounts was not qualified, did not include a reference to any matters to which the Auditor drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying their report, and did not contain a statement under sections 498 (2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006.

3. Net gains/(losses) on investments

4. Investment manager

Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford & Co, has been appointed by the Company as its Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) and Company Secretary. The investment management function has been delegated to Baillie Gifford & Co. The management agreement can be terminated on six months' notice.

The annual management fee is 0.75% on the first £50m of net assets, 0.65% on the next £200m of net assets and 0.55% on the remainder, calculated and payable quarterly.

5. Tax

The Company suffers overseas withholding tax on its equity income, currently at the rate of 10%.

6. Net return per ordinary share

Net return per ordinary share is based on the above totals of revenue and capital and the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period. There are no dilutive or potentially dilutive shares in issue.

7. Dividends

No interim dividend has been declared in respect of the current period.

8. Fair value financial assets

The fair value hierarchy used to analyse the basis on which the fair values of financial instruments held at fair value through the profit or loss account are measured is described below. Fair value measurements are categorised on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Level 1 - using unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in an active market;

Level 2 - using inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are directly or indirectly observable (based on market data); and

Level 3 - using inputs that are unobservable (for which market data is unavailable).

The Company's investments are financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss. In accordance with FRS 102, an analysis of the Company's financial asset investments based on the fair value hierarchy described above is shown below.

There have been no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the period. The fair value of listed security investments is bid value, or in the case of certain recognised overseas exchanges, last traded prices. Listed investments are categorised as Level 1 if they are valued using unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in an active market and as Level 2 if they do not meet all these criteria but are, nonetheless, valued using market data. Private company (unlisted) investments are valued at fair value by the Directors following a detailed review and appropriate challenge of the valuations proposed by the Managers. The Managers' private company valuation policy applies methodologies consistent with the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation guidelines 2022 ('IPEV'). The techniques applied are predominantly market-based approaches. The market-based approaches available under IPEV are set out below:

• Multiples;

• Industry Valuation Benchmarks; and

• Available Market Prices.

Further information on the private company (unlisted) valuation process is provided above.

The Company's holdings in private company (unlisted) investments are categorised as Level 3 as unobservable data is a significant input to their fair value measurements.

9. Financial liabilities

The amounts falling due within one year include bank loans of £74,514,000 (¥14.84 billion) outstanding under yen loan facilities repayable on 7 November 2027.

10. Fair value financial liabilities

The fair value of the bank loans at 31 July 2025 was £74,514,000 (31 January 2025 - £83,676,000).

11. Share capital

The Company has the authority to issue shares/sell treasury shares at a premium to net asset value as well as to buy back shares at a discount to net asset value. During the period under review, no shares were issued (31 July 2024 - nil) and 23,054,023 shares were bought back and held in treasury at a cost of £27,314,000 (31 July 2024 - 12,166,184 shares bought back at a cost of £14,385,000).

12. Transaction costs

Transaction costs incurred on the purchase and sale of the investments are added to the purchase cost or deducted from the sale proceeds, as appropriate. During the period, transaction costs on purchases amounted to £24,000 (six months to 31 July 2024 - £26,000; year to 31 January 2025 - £48,000) and transaction costs on sales amounted to £30,000 (six months to 31 July 2024 - £24,000; year to 31 January 2025 - £49,000).

13. Related party transactions

There have been no transactions with related parties during the first six months of the current financial year that have materially affected the financial position or the performance of the Company during that period and there have been no changes in the related party transactions described in the last Annual Report and Financial Statements that could have had such an effect on the Company during that period.

None of the views expressed in this document should be construed as advice to buy or sell a particular investment.

Further shareholder information

How to invest

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange. They can be bought through a stockbroker or by asking a professional adviser to do so. If you are interested in investing directly in Shin Nippon you can do so online. There are a number of companies offering real time online dealing services - find out more by visiting shinnippon.co.uk.

Client relations team contact details

You can contact the Baillie Gifford Client Relations Team by telephone (your call may be recorded for training or monitoring purposes), email or post.

Share register enquiries

Computershare Investor Services PLC maintains the share register on behalf of the Company. In the event of queries regarding shares registered in your own name, please contact the Registrars on 0370 889 3223.

Automatic Exchange of Information

In order to fulfil its obligations under UK tax legislation relating to the automatic exchange of information, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon PLC is required to collect and report certain information about certain shareholders.

The legislation requires investment trust companies to provide personal information to HMRC on certain investors who purchase shares in investment trusts. Accordingly, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon PLC will have to provide information annually to the local tax authority on the tax residencies of a number of non-UK based certificated shareholders and corporate entities.

New shareholders, excluding those whose shares are held in CREST, who come on to the share register will be sent a certification form for the purposes of collecting this information.

For further information, please see HMRC's Quick Guide: Automatic Exchange of Information - information for account holders gov.uk/guidance/automatic-exchange-of-information-account-holders.

Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures ('APM')

An alternative performance measure is a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows, other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable financial reporting framework. The APMs noted below are commonly used measures within the investment trust industry and serve to improve comparability between investment trusts.

Total assets

This is the Company's definition of Adjusted Total Assets, being the total value of all assets held less all liabilities (other than liabilities in the form of borrowings).

Shareholders' funds and Net Asset Value

Also described as shareholders' funds, Net Asset Value ('NAV') is the value of total assets less liabilities (including borrowings). The NAV per share is calculated by dividing this amount by the number of ordinary shares in issue.

Net Asset Value (borrowings at book value)

Borrowings are valued at adjusted net issue proceeds. The Company's yen denominated loans are valued at their sterling equivalent and adjusted for their arrangement fees.The value of the borrowings on this basis is set out in note 9 above.

Net Asset Value (borrowings at fair value) (APM)

This is a widely reported measure across the investment trust industry. Borrowings are valued at an estimate of their market worth. The Company's yen denominated loans are fair valued using methodologies consistent with International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation ('IPEV') guidelines. The value of the borrowings on this basis is set out in note 10 above.

Net liquid assets

Net liquid assets comprise current assets less current liabilities, excluding borrowings.

Discount/premium (APM)

As stockmarkets and share prices vary, an investment trust's share price is rarely the same as its NAV. When the share price is lower than the NAV per share it is said to be trading at a discount. The size of the discount is calculated by subtracting the share price from the NAV per share and is usually expressed as a percentage of the NAV per share. If the share price is higher than the NAV per share, this situation is called a premium.

Total return (APM)

The total return is the return to shareholders after reinvesting the net dividend on the date that the share price goes ex-dividend. In periods where no dividend is paid the total return equates to the capital return.

* The dividend adjustment factor is calculated on the assumption that the final dividend of 0.60p paid by the Company during the period in respect of the year to 31 January 2025 was reinvested into shares of the Company at the cum income NAV per share/share price, as appropriate, at the ex-dividend date.

Ongoing charges (APM)

The total expenses (excluding borrowing costs) incurred by the Company as a percentage of the average net asset value (with debt at fair value).

Gearing (APM)

At its simplest, gearing is borrowing. Just like any other public company, an investment trust can borrow money to invest in additional investments for its portfolio. The effect of the borrowing on the shareholders' assets is called 'gearing'. If the Company's assets grow, the shareholders' assets grow proportionately more because the debt remains the same. But if the value of the Company's assets falls, the situation is reversed. Gearing can therefore enhance performance in rising markets but can adversely impact performance in falling markets.

Gearing represents borrowings at book less cash and cash equivalents expressed as a percentage of shareholders' funds.

Gross gearing is the Company's borrowings expressed as a percentage of shareholders' funds.

* Gearing: ((a) - (b)) ÷ (c), expressed as a percentage.

† Gross gearing: (a) ÷ (c), expressed as a percentage.

Leverage (APM)

For the purposes of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers ('AIFM') Directive, leverage is any method which increases the Company's exposure, including the borrowing of cash and the use of derivatives. It is expressed as a ratio between the Company's exposure and its net asset value and can be calculated on a gross and a commitment method. Under the gross method, exposure represents the sum of the Company's positions after the deduction of sterling cash balances, without taking into account any hedging and netting arrangements. Under the commitment method, exposure is calculated without the deduction of sterling cash balances and after certain hedging and netting positions are offset against each other.

Active share (APM)

Active share, a measure of how actively a portfolio is managed, is the percentage of the portfolio that differs from its comparative index. It is calculated by deducting from 100 the percentage of the portfolio that overlaps with the comparative index. An active share of 100 indicates no overlap with the index and an active share of zero indicates a portfolio that tracks the index.

Private (unlisted) company

A private (unlisted) company means a company whose shares are not available to the general public for trading and not listed on a stock exchange.

Third party data providers disclaimer

No third party data provider ('Provider') makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data contained herewith nor as to the results to be obtained by recipients of the data. No Provider shall in any way be liable to any recipient of the data for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions in the index data included in this document, regardless of cause, or for any damages (whether direct or indirect) resulting therefrom.

No Provider has any obligation to update, modify or amend the data or to otherwise notify a recipient thereof in the event that any matter stated herein changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate.

Without limiting the foregoing, no Provider shall have any liability whatsoever to you, whether in contract (including under an indemnity), in tort (including negligence), under a warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by you as a result of or in connection with any opinions, recommendations, forecasts, judgements, or any other conclusions, or any course of action determined, by you or any third party, whether or not based on the content, information or materials contained herein.

MSCI index data

Source: MSCI. The MSCI information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used as a basis for or a component of any financial instruments or products or indices. None of the MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Historical data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction.

The MSCI information is provided on an 'as is' basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating any MSCI information collectively, the 'MSCI Parties' expressly disclaims all warranties (including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability or any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including, without limitation, lost profits) or any other damages (msci.com).