Half-year Report

ASHMORE GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES LTD - Half-year Report

PR Newswire

London, August 26

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AUSTRALIA OR JAPAN OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE TO DO SO WOULD CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE RELEVANT LAWS OF SUCH JURISDICTION

Ashmore Global Opportunities Limited (“AGOL”, or the “Company”)

a Guernsey incorporated and registered limited liability closed-ended investment company with a Premium Listing of its US Dollar and Sterling share classes on the Official List.

Interim ResultsFor the period ended 30 June 2016

The financial information set out in this announcement does not constitute the Company's statutory accounts for the six months ended 30 June 2016. All figures are based on the unaudited financial statements for the six months ended 30 June 2016.

The financial information for the six months ended 30 June 2016 is derived from the financial statements delivered to the UK Listing Authority.

The announcement is prepared on the same basis as will be set out in the interim accounts.

The Interim Report and Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Statements for the six months ended 30 June 2016 will be available on the Company website: www.agol.com.

Financial Highlights

Chairman’s Statement

The Company’s Net Asset Values (“NAVs”) per share rose to US$5.17 and £5.03 as at 30 June 2016, up from US$5.06 and £4.98 respectively as at 31 December 2015. The share prices stood at US$3.43 and £3.78 as at 30 June 2016, decreases of 11.14% and 1.05% respectively compared with 31 December 2015 levels. The main contributor to performance was a mark-up in the value of AEI. Further details on the underlying exposure of the Company are given in the Investment Manager’s Report.

There were no new realisations during the reporting period, although in April 2016 the Company did receive a payment resulting from the April 2015 sale of Pacnet. The final payment related to this transaction remains outstanding and is scheduled for November 2016. The Investment Manager is working towards the sale of the remaining assets, with a particular focus on the three largest exposures of the Company, namely; Bedfordbury, Microvast and AEI. Your Board receives regular updates on progress with the sales. The recent development at Bedfordbury, as detailed in the Investment Manager’s Report, is likely to delay the realisation of this asset for some time. It now seems unlikely that there will be any more significant realisations in 2016 apart from the final payment for Pacnet. In spite of that, the Board remains confident that other realisations are likely to occur during 2017.

The Company paid distributions of US$16.2 million in January 2016 and US$2.5 million in April 2016. The first was principally proceeds from the sale of one of the two remaining AEI power plants, while the second was a combination of the Pacnet payment and some dividends received. With no further income received in Q2 2016, there was no Q2 distribution. Below is an overview of the distributions made since February 2013 when Shareholders voted to wind up the Company in an orderly fashion.

As at 30 June 2016, the NAV of the Company was US$56.0 million. The Board continues to monitor the operating expenses of the Company. In this light, the Board will carry out another review of the costs and benefits of the Company’s London Stock Exchange listing later this year.

I would like to thank everyone involved with AGOL for their hard work.

Richard Hotchkis25 August 2016

Investment Manager’s Report

Performance

As at 30 June 2016, the Net Asset Values (“NAVs”) per share of the US$ and £ share classes stood at US$5.17 and £5.03 respectively, representing returns of 2.17% and 1.00% over the six months to 30 June 2016.

Portfolio Review

Following the payment of a US$16.2m distribution based on the 31 December 2015 NAV, Ashmore Global Opportunities Limited (“AGOL”) returned a further US$2.5m to investors based on cash flows received during the six months ended 30 June 2016. This distribution resulted from cash received as part of the earlier sale of Pacnet. Although there were no new realisations at the investee company level during the period, performance was positive in the main driven by an uplift in the value of AEI.

The three largest investee company exposures, namely; Bedfordbury, AEI and Microvast, now account for around 70% of AGOL’s NAV.

We have exchanged letters before action with Bedfordbury Development Corporation’s partner in the land bank. Unless a settlement can be reached we expect the process to go to arbitration which will take approximately 18 months to finish but the timing may change. This process is expected to push back the realisation of this asset, until either a settlement is reached allowing the Ashmore funds to exit or the arbitration process is completed. The asset is valued at a discount to its market value to reflect the uncertainties of legal processes. However given the potential value of the asset this litigation strategy is important to preserve value and help in the realisation process.

AEI achieved a significant premium over book value for its sale of the Fenix power plant in Peru in December 2015. This had knock on effects on the revaluation of AEI during the period and contributed to the uplift in valuation. AEI is now working on the sales process for Jaguar, the coal fired power plant in Guatemala.

Microvast continues to perform well, and operating cash flow has been used to fund production capacity increases, with further capacity increases planned. Follow-on battery orders continue to be received for both pure e-bus and plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles. Microvast’s audited revenues were US$174m for FY 2015, a 300% year-on-year increase.

Kulon is the holding company for a warehouse and office complex near the centre of Moscow. The strengthening Ruble means that rental income has grown in US dollar terms but so have operating expenses.

Numero Uno is one of India’s leading jeanswear brands with over 700 retail outlets throughout India. The company offers a comprehensive portfolio of products including jeanswear, casual wear, footwear & accessories for both men and women. Over the past year, online sales of garments in India have grown substantially, driven by discounts funded by venture capital firms aggressively targeting market share for their e-commerce businesses. This has made traditional brick and mortar retail more challenging, but despite this, Numero Uno performed well during the period and continued to grow both revenues and profit. It has also expanded and consolidated its manufacturing unit and moved into a new headquarters. The team continues to explore the most attractive exit options.

ZIM Laboratories is engaged in the research and manufacture of a wide range of off-patent (generic) pharmaceutical products, the value of which is enhanced via new drug delivery mechanisms. ZIM achieved a milestone by becoming EU-GMP (European Union Good Manufacturing Practices) compliant; a certification that allows it to sell its products in Europe and eases its entry into many other markets. The company is registering its products in several new markets to diversity its revenue base and is continuously substituting its lower margin products with more attractive higher margin products. ZIM is focussed on producing more of its own branded drugs where its margins are significantly enhanced.

The backdrop for Largo remains challenging, although the price for vanadium pentoxide rebounded to US$ 3.20-3.50/lb from a historic low of less than US$3/lb earlier in the year. The company continued to ramp up production in Q2 2016.

GZI (the Nigerian aluminium can producer) progressed with its African growth strategy during the period, and the second plant in Nigeria is now operational. The macro backdrop in Nigeria remains challenging following the FX devaluation, but volume sales at GZI have hit record highs: It continued to deliver to customers reliably during the period and clients built up stock prior to the devaluation.

Outlook

The focus remains on realising AGOL's remaining investments in an orderly manner.

Details on the Top 10 Underlying Holdings (on a look through basis)

The table below shows the top 10 underlying investments as at 30 June 2016 excluding the cash balance (cash was 4.05% as at 30 June 2016).

The tables below show the country and industry allocations of underlying investments over 1% at the end of June 2016:

Details on a Selection of the Underlying Holdings

Bedfordbury

Industry: Real estate development companyCountry: PhilippinesWebsite: n/aCompany Status: PrivateInvestment Risk: Equity

Exit strategy and timing

Microvast

Industry: Electric battery and battery systems supplierCountry: ChinaWebsite: www.microvast.comCompany Status: PrivateInvestment Risk: Equity

Operational update

2016 operational strategy/priorities

Key risks

Exit strategy

AEI

Industry: Power generation in Latin AmericaCountry: GuatemalaWebsite: www.aeienergy.comCompany Status: PrivateInvestment Risk: Equity 

Operational update

Key risks

2016 operational strategy/priorities

Exit strategy

Kulon

Industry: Real estate development companyCountry: RussiaWebsite: n/aCompany Status: PrivateInvestment Risk: Equity 

Operational update

Key risks

Exit strategy

Pacnet

Industry: TelecommunicationsCountry: Hong Kong and SingaporeWebsite: www.pacnet.comCompany Status: PrivateInvestment Risk: Equity 

Exit strategy and timing

GZI 

Industry: Aluminium cans manufacturerCountry: NigeriaWebsite: www.gzican.comCompany Status: PrivateInvestment Risk: Equity 

Operational update

2016 operational strategy/priorities

Key risks

Exit strategy and timing

Ashmore Investment Advisors Limited

Investment Manager

25 August 2016

Board Members

As at 30 June 2016, the Board consisted of four non-executive Directors. The Directors are responsible for the determination of the investment policy of Ashmore Global Opportunities Limited (the “Company” or “AGOL”) and have overall responsibility for the Company’s activities. As required by the AIC Code on Corporate Governance (the “Code”), the majority of the Board of Directors are independent of the Investment Manager. In preparing this interim report, the independence of each Director has been considered.

Richard Hotchkis, Independent Chairman, (Guernsey resident) appointed 18 April 2011

Richard Hotchkis has 40 years of investment experience. Until 2006, he was an investment manager at the Co-operative Insurance Society, where he started his career in 1976. He has a breadth of investment experience in both UK and overseas equities, including in emerging markets, and in particular, investment companies and other closed-ended funds, offshore funds, hedge funds and private equity funds. Richard is currently a director of a number of funds, including Aberdeen Frontier Markets Company (formerly Advance Frontier Markets Fund Limited).

Steve Hicks, Non-Independent Director (connected to the Investment Manager), (UK resident) appointed 16 January 2014

Steve Hicks, who is a qualified UK lawyer, has held a number of legal and compliance roles over a period of more than 25 years. From June 2010 until January 2014 he was the Ashmore Group Head of Compliance. Prior thereto he was Director, Group Compliance at the London listed private equity company 3i Group plc.

Nigel de la Rue, Independent Director, (Guernsey resident) appointed 16 October 2007

Nigel de la Rue graduated in 1978 from Pembroke College, Cambridge with a degree in Social and Political Sciences. He is qualified as an Associate of the Chartered Institute of Bankers, as a Member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) and as a Member of the Institute of Directors. He was employed for 23 years by Baring Asset Management’s Financial Services Division, where he was responsible for the group’s Fiduciary Division and sat on the Executive Committee. He left Baring in December 2005, one year after that Division was acquired by Northern Trust. He has served on the Guernsey Committees of the Chartered Institute of Bankers and STEP, and on the Guernsey Association of Trustees, and currently holds a number of directorships in the financial services sector.

Christopher Legge, Independent Director, (Guernsey resident) appointed 27 August 2010

Christopher Legge has over 25 years’ experience in financial services. He qualified as a Chartered Accountant in London in 1980 and spent the majority of his career based in Guernsey with Ernst & Young, including being the Senior Partner of Ernst & Young in the Channel Islands. Christopher retired from Ernst & Young in 2003 and currently holds a number of directorships in the financial sector. Until 24 June 2016, he was Senior Independent Director and chaired the Audit Committee at BH Macro Limited.

Disclosure of Directorships in Public Companies Listed on Recognised Stock Exchanges

The following summarises the Directors’ directorships in other public companies:

Christopher Legge

Directors’ Responsibility Statement

We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors on 25 August 2016

Unaudited Schedule of Investments

As at 30 June 2016

The unaudited condensed interim financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 25 August 2016, and were signed on its behalf by:

Richard Hotchkis Christopher Legge

Chairman Chairman of the Audit Committee

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

Unaudited Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the six months ended 30 June 2016

All items derive from continuing activities.

* The credit to other expenses represents the reversal of accruals as a result of a reduction in expenses as the Company continues to wind down.

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

Unaudited Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity

For the six months ended 30 June 2016

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

Unaudited Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

For the six months ended 30 June 2016

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Statements

a) Statement of Compliance

These unaudited condensed interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting and on a going concern basis, despite the managed wind-down of the Company approved by the shareholders on 13 March 2013. The Directors have examined significant areas of possible financial going concern risk and are satisfied that no material exposures exist. The Directors consider that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and believe that it is appropriate to adopt the going concern basis despite the managed wind-down of the Company over the next few years.

These unaudited condensed interim financial statements do not include as much information as the annual financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2015. Selected explanatory notes are included to explain events and transactions that are relevant to understanding the changes in financial position and performance of the Company since the last annual financial statements. 

These unaudited condensed interim financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 25 August 2016.

b) Judgements and Estimates

Preparing the unaudited condensed interim financial statements requires judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The significant judgements made in applying the Company’s accounting policies, and the key sources of estimation uncertainty, were the same as those that applied to the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2015.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Board has concluded that at present the managed wind-down of the Company has no significant impact on the valuation of the Company’s investments.

The accounting policies applied in these unaudited condensed interim financial statements are the same as those applied in the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2015.

3. Financial Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value through Profit or Loss

There were no significant changes to the Company’s direct equity other than valuation movements.

As at 30 June 2016, derivative financial assets comprised forward foreign currency contracts as follows:

As at 31 December 2015, derivative financial assets comprised forward foreign currency contracts as follows:

As at 30 June 2016, derivative financial liabilities comprised forward foreign currency contracts as follows:

As at 31 December 2015, derivative financial liabilities comprised forward foreign currency contracts as follows:

a) Other financial assets:

Other financial assets relate to accounts receivable and prepaid expenses and comprised the following:

b) Other financial liabilities:

Other financial liabilities relate to accounts payable and accrued expenses, and comprised the following:

a) Financial risk management

The Company’s financial risk management objectives and policies are consistent with those disclosed in the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2015.

b) Carrying amounts versus fair values

As at 30 June 2016, the carrying values of financial assets and liabilities presented in the Unaudited Condensed Statement of Financial Position approximate their fair values.

The table below sets out the classifications of the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities into categories of financial instruments as at 30 June 2016.

The table below sets out the classifications of the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities into categories of financial instruments as at 31 December 2015.

c) Financial instruments carried at fair value - fair value hierarchy

The fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities that are traded in active markets are based on prices obtained directly from an exchange on which the instruments are traded or obtained from a broker that provides an unadjusted quoted price from an active market for identical instruments. For all other financial instruments, the Company determines fair values using other valuation techniques.

For financial instruments that trade infrequently and have little price transparency, fair value is less objective, and requires varying degrees of judgement depending on liquidity, uncertainty of market factors, pricing assumptions and other risks affecting the specific instrument.

The Company measures fair values using the following fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements.

Valuation techniques include net present value and discounted cash flow models, comparison with similar instruments for which observable market prices exist and other valuation models. Assumptions and inputs used in valuation techniques include risk-free and benchmark interest rates, credit spreads and other premia used in estimating discount rates, bond and equity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, equity indices, EBITDA multiples and revenue multiples and expected price volatilities and correlations.

The objective of valuation techniques is to arrive at a fair value measurement that reflects the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. For this purpose, the significance of an input is assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that measurement is a level 3 measurement. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company considers observable market data to be that market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, not proprietary, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market.

The Company recognises transfers between levels 1, 2 and 3 based on the date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. This policy on the timing of recognising transfers is the same for transfers into a level as for transfers out of a level. There were no transfers between the three levels during the period ended 30 June 2016 and the year ended 31 December 2015.

The following table analyses within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss (by class) measured at fair value as at 30 June 2016:

The following table analyses within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss (by class) measured at fair value as at 31 December 2015:

Level 1 assets include the Ashmore SICAV 2 Global Liquidity US$ Fund (31 December 2015: Aginyx Ordinary Shares (MCX) and the Ashmore SICAV 2 Global Liquidity US$ Fund).

Level 2 assets and liabilities include forward foreign currency contracts that are calculated internally using observable market data.

Level 3 assets include all unquoted Funds, limited partnerships and unquoted investments. Investments in unquoted Funds and limited partnerships are valued on the basis of the latest Net Asset Value, which represents the fair value, as provided by the administrator of the unquoted Fund at the close of business on the relevant valuation day. Unquoted Funds have been classified as level 3 assets after consideration of their underlying investments, lock-up periods and liquidity.

The following table presents the movement in level 3 instruments for the period ended 30 June 2016.

* Gains and losses recognised in profit and loss include unrealised results on existing assets as at 30 June 2016 of US$(389,908,073).

Total gains and losses included in the Unaudited Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income are presented in “Other net changes in fair value on financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss”.

Valuation methodology of level 3 assets held directly by the Company and indirectly by the Company through its investments in the underlying Ashmore Funds

The Pricing Methodology and Valuation Committee (PMVC) which has been authorised as an Approved Person to provide valuations to the Administrator, operates and meets to consider the methods for pricing hard-to-value investments where a reliable pricing source is not available, if an asset does not trade regularly, or in the case of a significant event (such as a major economic event or market volatility outside of local market hours). These assets, which are classified within level 3, may include all asset types but are frequently ‘Special Situations’ type investments, typically incorporating distressed, illiquid or private equity assets.

For these hard-to-value investments, the methodology and models used to determine fair value are created in accordance with the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation (IPEV) guidelines. Material investments are valued by experienced personnel at an independent third-party valuation specialist. Such valuations are subject to review, amendment if necessary, then approval, firstly by the PMVC, and then by the Board of Directors of the Company. Smaller investments may be valued directly by the PMVC.

Valuation techniques used include the market approach, the income approach or the cost approach depending on the availability of reliable information. The market approach generally consists of using comparable market transactions or EBITDA/EV multiples for comparable listed companies, while the use of the income approach generally consists of the net present value of estimated future cash flows, adjusted as deemed appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors.

Inputs used in estimating the value of investments may include the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalisations and other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in the equity or debt capital markets and bids received from potential buyers.

The following tables show the valuation techniques and the key unobservable inputs used in the determination of the fair value of level 3 direct investments:

* Management has assessed whether there are any discounts in relation to lock-in periods that are impacting liquidity.

The Company believes that its estimates of fair value are appropriate; however the use of different methodologies or assumptions could lead to different measurements of fair value. For fair value investments in level 3, changing one or more of the assumptions used to alternative assumptions could result in an increase or decrease in net assets attributable to investors. Due to the numerous different factors affecting the assets, the impact cannot be reliably quantified. It is reasonably possible on the basis of existing knowledge, that outcomes within the next financial period that are different from the assumptions used could require a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of affected assets.

Share Conversion

The following share conversions took place during the period ended 30 June 2016:

Compulsory Partial Redemptions

Following the approval by the Company’s shareholders of the wind-down proposal as described in the circular published on 20 February 2013, during the period ended 30 June 2016, the Company announced partial returns of capital to shareholders by way of compulsory partial redemptions of shares with the following redemption dates:

The amounts applied to the partial redemptions of shares comprised monies from dividends received and from the realisation of the Company’s investments up to and including the reference NAV calculation dates pursuant to the wind-down of the Company.

During the period, the following shares were redeemed by way of compulsory partial redemptions of shares (consideration in US$ has been determined using the exchange rates at the date of the official announcement):

Voting rights

The voting rights each share is entitled to in a poll at any general meeting of the Company (applying the Weighted Voting Calculation as described in the Prospectus published by the Company on 6 November 2007) are as follows:

The above figures may be used by shareholders as the denominator for calculations to determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in the Company under the FCA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

The Net Asset Value of each US$ and £ share is determined by dividing the total net assets of the Company attributable to the US$ and £ share classes by the number of US$ and £ shares in issue respectively at the period and year ends as follows:

The allocation of the Company’s Net Asset Value between share classes is further described in the Company’s Prospectus.

The calculation of the earnings per US$ and £ share is based on the gain/loss for the period attributable to US$ and £ shareholders and the respective weighted average number of shares in issue for each share class during the period.

The gain/(loss) attributable to each share class for the period ended 30 June 2016 was as follows:

There were no dilutive instruments in issue during the period.

The loss attributable to each share class for the period ended 30 June 2015 was as follows:

There were no dilutive instruments in issue during the period.

Although the Company has two share classes and invests in various investment themes, it is organised and operates as one business and one geographical segment, as the principal focus is on emerging market strategies, mainly achieved via investments in funds domiciled in Europe but investing globally. Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based upon analysis of the Company as one segment. The financial results from this segment are equivalent to the financial statements of the Company as a whole. Additionally, the Company’s performance is evaluated on an overall basis. The Company’s management receives financial information prepared under IFRS and, as a result, the disclosure of separate segmental information is not required.

In the opinion of the Directors and on the basis of shareholdings advised to them, the Company has no ultimate controlling party.

The table below describes the types of structured entities that the Company does not consolidate but in which it holds an interest.

The table below sets out interests held by the Company in unconsolidated structured entities. The maximum exposure to loss is the carrying amount of the financial assets held.

During the period, the Company did not provide financial support to these unconsolidated structured entities and the Company has no intention of providing financial or other support, except for the outstanding commitments disclosed in note 14 to the financial statements.

Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or to exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial or operational decisions.

The Directors are responsible for the determination of the investment policy of the Company and have overall responsibility for the Company’s activities. The Company’s investment portfolio is managed by Ashmore Investment Advisors Limited.

The Company and the Investment Manager entered into an Investment Management Agreement under which the Investment Manager has been given responsibility for the day-to-day discretionary management of the Company’s assets (including uninvested cash) in accordance with the Company’s investment objectives and policies, subject to the overall supervision of the Directors and in accordance with the investment restrictions in the Investment Management Agreement and the Articles of Incorporation.

During the period ended 30 June 2016, the Company had the following related party transactions:

During the period ended 30 June 2015, the Company engaged in the following related party transactions:

Related Funds are other Funds managed by Ashmore Investment Advisors Limited or its associates.

Purchases and sales of the Ashmore SICAV 2 Global Liquidity US$ Fund (“Global Liquidity Fund”) were solely related to the cash management of US dollars on account. Funds are swept into the S&P AAAm rated Global Liquidity Fund and returned as and when required for asset purchases or distributions. The Global Liquidity Fund is managed under the dual objectives of the preservation of capital and the provision of daily liquidity, investing exclusively in very highly rated short-term liquid money market securities.

During the period ended 30 June 2016, Directors’ remuneration was as follows:

The Directors agreed to reduce their Directors’ fees by 10% with effect from 31 December 2015.

The Directors had the following beneficial interests in the Company:

During the year ended 31 December 2010, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with Everbright Ashmore China Real Estate Fund LP for a total commitment of US$10 million. As at 30 June 2016, the outstanding commitment was US$529,455 (31 December 2015: US$529,455).

During the year ended 31 December 2011, the Company increased its commitment to VTBC Ashmore Real Estate Partners 1 LP to a total of €11.4 million. As at 30 June 2016, the outstanding commitment was €243,474 (31 December 2015: €243,474).

During the year ended 31 December 2011, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with AA Development Capital India Fund LP for an initial commitment of US$4,327,064, which was subsequently increased to US$23,581,027. AA Development Capital India Fund LP was dissolved by its General Partner on 28 June 2013 with all outstanding commitments transferred to AA Development Capital India Fund 1 LLC. As at 30 June 2016, the outstanding commitment was US$6,261,340 (31 December 2015: US$6,261,340).

There were no significant events subsequent to the period-end date that require adjustment to, or disclosure in, the financial statements.

Corporate Information