7th Feb 2012 07:00
Date: 7 February 2012 | Ref: STM0896 |
ST. MODWEN PROPERTIES PLC
("St. Modwen" or the "Company")
ST. MODWEN DELIVERS STRONG RESULTS WITH 34% INCREASE IN PROFIT BEFORE TAX AND NAV RISE OF 9%
Financial highlights
·; Profit before tax up 34% to £50.4m (2010: £37.5m).
·; Shareholders' NAV up 9% to 232p per share (2010: 213p per share), and EPRA NAV up 9% to 250p per share (2010: 229p per share).
·; Realised property profits up 9% to £23.8m (2010: £21.9m)
·; Net rents up 5% to £35.5m. (2010: £33.7m).
·; Valuation gains of £34m (2010: £23m) in a flat market, of which £33m (2010: £18m) of these gains were driven by active management and planning gain.
·; Gearing at year end of 73% (2010: 72%). All corporate on-balance sheet facilities extended until at least 2014.
·; Terms agreed for new five year debt facilities on KPI joint venture.
·; Dividends for the year increased 10% to 3.3p per share.
Operational highlights
·; Secure development programme for 2012 with commercial developments already on site to deliver in excess of £15m profit in 2012.
·; Positive outlook for residential land with good levels of housing sales already achieved and strong on-going demand.
·; Excellent relationship with principal partners Persimmon, Vinci and Salhia: well placed to deliver growing returns in 2012 and beyond.
·; Substantial future pipeline in place, with significant opportunities emerging at:
o Elephant & Castle
o Swansea University
o Longbridge
o Project MoDEL
Bill Oliver, Chief Executive of St.Modwen, commented:
"We have had a very successful year despite the challenges posed by the market conditions, significantly growing profits and completing transactions across the portfolio, and we have the foundations in place to deliver very good results in 2012. Our commercial developments in progress together with our active housebuilding sites will deliver property profits to underpin our results for 2012 and beyond. We can also see clear opportunities to add value to our assets through the planning process and our active management of our income producing portfolio is producing a resilient income stream.
"Although the wider economic environment remains unpredictable and there may still be further challenges for the sector we are confident that our asset portfolio and development pipeline will provide us with many opportunities to add significant value for our shareholders."
Enquiries:
St. Modwen Properties PLC Tel: 0121 222 9400
Bill Oliver, Chief Executive
Michael Dunn, Group Finance Director
Menna Rees-Steer, PR Manager
www.stmodwen.co.uk
FTI Consulting Tel: 020 7831 3113
Stephanie Highett
Richard Sunderland
Will Henderson
A presentation for analysts and investors will be held at 9.30am today at the offices of FTI Consulting, Holborn Gate, 26 Southampton Buildings, London, WC2A 1PB. If you would like to attend, please contact Will Henderson at FTI +44 (0)20 7269 7238 direct / +44 (0)7930 371 924 mobile or [email protected]
Chairman's Statement
Dear Shareholders,
I am very pleased that, in my first statement to you as Chairman, I am able to report a strong set of results for the year, with the Company delivering increased profit at both an operating and Group level in a difficult economic environment.
Profit before tax increased by 34% to £50.4m (2010: £37.5m) with shareholders' equity net asset value per share growing 9% to 232p per share (2010: 213p) after paying dividends of 3.1p per share during the year (2010: 1.0p).
The basis of these results is the continuing and resilient rental income stream from our assets, consistent development profits and an excellent record of adding value to our portfolio through asset management and planning initiatives, a particularly valuable attribute in a flat market.
We have also continued to improve our funding position with all the Group corporate debt maturities extended until at least 2014 and agreement reached for all our required extensions for our joint venture debt facilities. With our gearing levels held at 73% (2010: 72%), we have a solid foundation for the future.
Dividends
Given the strong set of results for the year, your Board is recommending a 10% increase in the final dividend for the year to 2.2p per share (2010: 2.0p per share), making a total distribution for the year of 3.3p (2010: 3.0p). This final dividend will be paid on 4th April 2012 to shareholders on the register at 9th March 2012.
Strategy
Our strategy remains unchanged: we aim to add significant long-term value to the properties that we control. Through our market leading expertise, we add value through remediation, management of the planning process, asset management, development and delivery. In particular, our regional teams focus on opportunities where our regeneration expertise enables us to generate profits in commercial and residential development.
Our timescales for investment are long- term, often up to 10 years, so we ensure that our business is underpinned by the reliable long-term revenue stream generated by our portfolio of income producing properties. These assets are typically held both for income and their prospects for future development. Our asset management in this area is an area of core expertise for the business and is proving very successful with net rental income having increased again this year to £35.5m (2010: £33.7m). The cash from this income stream pays for substantially all of the cash costs of our overheads and interest charges.
Our commercial development activities are underpinned by our substantial land bank with land acquired at low values providing the opportunities for commercial development. It is pleasing that we have been able to continue to deliver good results through this strategy even in a difficult marketplace, with a large proportion of our current development opportunities for 2012 being executed on land acquired more than five years ago.
We continue to create and extract value from residential land. The value of our residential land assets is increasing as we manage land through the remediation and planning processes and we have been able to crystallise significant value during the year. Through our joint venture with Persimmon and our St. Modwen Homes residential arm we have also benefitted from development profits from house building, and our success to date gives us increasing confidence that this will be a growing source of income in years to come. We continue to believe that residential land in England and Wales will prove increasingly valuable in the medium to long-term, further improving the attractiveness of this section of our portfolio.
People
When I took over as Chairman in March 2011, I succeeded Anthony Glossop. Anthony had been key in establishing a positive legacy visible in the intellectual capital and the potential residing in our land assets.
In my visits to our sites and offices I have been impressed that the business has a key differentiator in the market place due to the expertise and commitment of our people. Their effort and dedication has produced strong results for your Company and will no doubt be an important asset as we address the opportunities and challenges of the year to come.
I would like to take this opportunity on behalf of the Board to thank our people for their hard work that has enabled us to produce these good results.
Prospects
Although the wider economic environment remains unpredictable and there may still be further challenges for the property sector, your Company remains well positioned for sustainable growth. Our results for 2011 have demonstrated our ongoing track record of delivering predictable and growing income streams while managing our costs and keeping our balance sheet in good shape.
At the same time, looking forward, we can see attractive opportunities to generate further value from our assets and pipeline. Our balance sheet is well structured, our regional teams continue to be successful in improving asset and land values and we are generating profitable commercial and residential developments from our substantial land bank.
The strong results for 2011 give us further confidence that the Company has the resources and expertise to meet whatever challenges and opportunities result from the current economic uncertainty and has a robust strategy to deliver value and future growth for its shareholders.
Bill Shannon
Non-executive Chairman
Chief Executive's Review
We have had a very successful year in which the application of the experience, skills and expertise in our business has resulted in almost all areas of the business performing well, despite the challenges posed by the market conditions.
Through our intensive and active asset management we have improved rental income streams, added value to existing assets by undertaking enhancement works and, through management of the planning process, we have continued to be active in development. This has included creating a strong pipeline of opportunities for future years, and successfully continuing to recycle our assets.
As a result of these efforts, profits before tax are up 34%, we have strong visibility on a pipeline of healthy opportunities for future years and we are strongly placed to take advantage of those prospects.
Strategy Overview
As a business we have always sought to add significant value to the assets that we hold. We have a long and successful track record which demonstrates our ability to achieve this and we are very pleased that 2011 has been another year in which we have generated significant value for our shareholders.
We acquire assets where we can see future development opportunities. Consequently, we are constantly working to add value to these assets through remediation, development, asset management or through our careful management of the planning process. Our regionally based teams assess each asset and evolve the strategy to suit local market conditions; so, even in difficult markets, we are able to drive good performance from our assets. Our portfolio of income producing assets (each of which also has development potential) substantially covers our business funding and running costs, while we additionally invest in commercial and residential assets that can deliver significant long-term returns.
As a result of this strategy, we hold a portfolio from which we are confident we can create future value and, while we are not able to accurately predict the effects of the current Eurozone crisis on future property values, our track record has shown that we can continue to do this even in difficult markets.
Market Overview
The wider economic environment remains challenging. The Eurozone macroeconomic issues in the second half of 2011 have restricted confidence in the UK economy and reduced the funding appetite of UK banks. Consequently the transaction levels for most property asset types remain limited.
Despite these negatives, good opportunities do exist. The strength of our business, our regional organisation, our land bank and our funding structure means that we are very much open for business with both the capacity and the will to develop. Many of our previous competitors have dropped away over recent years and so we are able to secure an increased share of a reduced market. Furthermore, the challenging market conditions also affect our suppliers and contractors, meaning that we can pass on cost savings to our customers while maintaining our own profitability.
The UK planning environment continues to evolve with the localism agenda counteracting the need for simplification of the planning system. While some unnecessary complexities look set to be removed, it remains likely that new complications will emerge. One of the Company's key strengths is its ability to guide schemes effectively through the planning process, managing the many stakeholders and their interests as well as overcoming any legal complications.
These skills, and the resources necessary to deploy them, remain scarce, particularly away from London and we are confident that this ensures we have a sustainable market advantage in progressing development across the UK.
The UK house building market is much reduced from its peak levels, but remains active. Well located and ready-to-use land remains in demand and realises sensible values. While mortgage availability is reduced, the combined factors of the long-term housing shortage in the UK, the more vibrant South East of England economy and Government initiatives to support the housing market mean that there remains a good market for new homes.
Through our agreements with Persimmon and our own St. Modwen Homes developments we are able to capitalise on this demand, with all of our sites generating house sales at rates and prices exceeding our previous expectations.
Operating Review
Portfolio
There are three main areas for our business, each supported by a proven business strategy:
Residential
37% by value of our portfolio.
Commercial Land and Development
13% by value of our portfolio.
Income Producing Property
50% by value of our portfolio.
Portfolio Shape
Over the last year we have focused our investment into active developments or into income producing assets. Where we have acquired residential or commercial land we have used capital efficient development agreements or acquired the land at very low value with long-term plans in mind. The value of our residential asset portfolio has generally been increased through our own asset management initiatives, particularly in the South East of England where almost 50% by value of our residential assets are located.
Once we can no longer see opportunities to add significant value to an asset, we aim to realise the asset and recycle the money into our portfolio. During 2011 we have realised £95m from asset disposals and spent £96m on acquisitions and capital expenditure.
Developable acres analysis
Total acres | November 2011 | November 2010 |
Developable | ||
- Retail | 357 | 368 |
- Industrial & Commercial | 2,869 | 2,927 |
- Residential | 1,646 | 1,550 |
- Not yet specified | 890 | 891 |
5,762 | 5,736 |
Residential
Strategy
We acquire sites with the potential for residential development, and our asset management skills enable us to add value to the land throughout the development process, realising value through land sales or by development in joint venture or in-house. Our skills in remediating and developing land, managing our landholdings through the planning process, and balancing commercial and local needs make us an attractive partner to landowners and public bodies.
During this financial year we have been able to add significant value by managing our assets through the planning process, have sold assets effectively, and have commenced active development on two sites for St. Modwen Homes and three held through our joint venture with Persimmon.
We have also been able to progress future opportunities; we are progressing with the development of a further four sites by our Persimmon joint venture, have identified opportunities to create significant further value through our VSM joint venture with Vinci UK plc and have targeted public sector opportunities where our strengths can lead to major value creation for both ourselves and the public sector.
Driving Value Through Active Management
During the course of the 2011 financial year our independent valuers, Jones Lang LaSalle, have assessed that our work has added £26m of value to our residential portfolio. The properties where these gains have principally been made include:
·; Llanwern/Glan Llyn, Newport, South Wales where construction commenced on 311 homes. The site has outline consent for 4,000 homes, the first phase of which has been commenced by Persimmon.
·; Coed Darcy, Neath, South Wales, having resolved Compulsory Purchase Order issues, detailed planning applications were submitted for further development with an increased outline consent for up to 4,000 homes.
·; Long Marston, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire with outline planning consent secured for the development of up to 500 homes.
·; Longbridge, Birmingham with detailed planning applications submitted for further development of 229 homes in addition to the 113 homes already under construction by St. Modwen Homes and strong levels of initial sales.
Future Opportunities
·; Branston, Burton on Trent - planning application submitted for 660 homes and employment space on 280 acres of land for mixed use development.
·; Pye Green, Hednesford, Cannock - planning application submitted for up to 700 high quality homes on a 142 acre development to the north of Cannock Town Centre.
·; Melton Park, Hull - proposals being worked up to adapt part of the 100 acre Melton Park for residential development in response to the current need for new family homes.
·; South Ockendon, Essex - outline planning permission obtained for 650 homes on a 31 acre former car factory site acquired from Ford in 2006. The scheme will form a key part of the delivery of new housing in the Thames Gateway.
Within our VSM joint venture two key sites remain: Uxbridge and Mill Hill. Our strategy for both of these sites is well developed.
At Mill Hill we have entered into a joint venture with the adjoining landowners Annington Holdings plc and the London Borough of Barnet. The site obtained planning consent in 2011 for 2,174 residential units of which VSM's share is 57.55%. We have released the first two phases for sale and have been encouraged by the level of interest and land values which clearly demonstrates the appetite for well located, de-risked residential land.
At Uxbridge we have obtained planning permission for 1,340 units plus approximately 200,000 sqft of B1/retail space. As with Mill Hill the site is well located within the M25 and we expect demand to be strong when we release the first phase for sale in 2012.
Residential Development
We continue to see an active market for residential land. Over 80% (more than 20,000 plots) of our portfolio has either planning permissions or allocations within local plans with significant further value anticipated to be extracted from this land bank over future years.
During the course of 2011 we sold residential land to the value of £45m with an additional £27m of land being contracted within the Persimmon joint venture. All of these transactions were conducted at or above book value.
November 2011 | November 2010 | |||
Acres | Units | Acres | Units | |
With planning recognition | ||||
- Allocated in local plan or similar | 227 | 4,410 | 309 | 6,550 |
- Resolution to grant | 14 | 246 | 39 | 806 |
- Outline permission | 870 | 14,349 | 794 | 12,239 |
- Detailed permission | 82 | 1,366 | 68 | 1,129 |
1,193 | 20,371 | 1,210 | 20,724 | |
No planning recognition | 453 | 4,351 | 340 | 4,081 |
Total residential land | 1,646 | 24,722 | 1,550 | 24,805 |
Persimmon Joint Venture
Our view that the residential land market remains active is reinforced by the continued appetite for our land by Persimmon and by the positive customer response to the two joint venture sites that we have initially started marketing, at Goodyear in Wolverhampton and Glan Llyn in Newport, South Wales.
We are currently progressing for the inclusion of a further four sites into the joint venture, making a total of about 2,000 plots. The combination of these new sites plus the three existing sites should provide us with a recurring consistent stream of cash-backed income and profit for the next four to six years.
St. Modwen Homes
Our initial St. Modwen Homes sites at Park View in Birmingham and Locking Parklands in Weston-super-Mare have also seen very good initial success, with both volumes and prices being ahead of our expectations. While this part of our business is unlikely ever to generate sales of more than 500 units per year, it helps to prove the value of our projects and provides a useful additional skill set and a route to market that can be undertaken using St. Modwen's own capabilities and resources.
Residential Development Sales
Across all of our active residential development sites (both in the Persimmon joint venture and through St. Modwen Homes) both the sales rates and prices have been above our expectations with, excluding 54 pre-sold social housing units, an average of over 1.5 units confirmed reservations per site per week to date.
Residential Outlook
Our current activities should provide profitability in future years because our land is well located and represents the type of land that is currently in demand. In addition, our valuations do not factor in any future increase in values and assume standard house builder margin. Our ability to add value through the planning process is clearly visible and our current development activities are proving successful. Consequently, we believe that we will generate significant value in this area in future years.
Commercial Land and Development
Strategy
Our long-term view allows us to acquire land for reduced capital outlay and manage its development through the remediation and planning processes, taking advantage of local market conditions to release the land for development at the most appropriate time. This strategy means that we hold a lot of land at relatively low values, giving us access to a wide variety of development opportunities without taking on unnecessary obligations.
In the current market the extent of our land bank, again coupled with our local expertise, means that that we are able to identify and meet occupiers' demands quickly and efficiently. This gives us a distinct advantage over many of our competitors, meaning that we are able to consistently generate good cash-backed profits from commercial development even in a subdued marketplace.
Market Commentary
The UK commercial development market is subdued, particularly outside of London and the South East. Few potential tenants have the confidence to make substantial investment, and those that do often expect an attractive commercial deal. We are, however, seeing increasingly limited competition in this area. There is a general unwillingness to invest in short-term commercial land and there is restricted availability of bank funding for developers.
Despite the lack of growth in the wider economy and individual retailer issues there continues to be occupier demand from retailers, particularly for foodstores. We have two major foodstores currently in development and have active negotiations or discussions in place for more in future years. Wider retailer demand for space in attractive developments is also present.
Where industrial and commercial occupiers have pressing needs for new premises through business growth, lease expiry or new location requirements, we are well placed to service this demand. Our existing land bank continues to provide us with opportunities and we are able to replenish our land bank for minimal initial capital outlay. Our funding structure does not rely on development finance and our local presence means that we can be alive to opportunity.
Consequently, we continue to find good commercial development opportunities that are not reliant on speculative development. Furthermore, our activity level means that we are able to secure excellent terms from financially stable main contractors, providing attractive terms for occupiers while preserving our profit levels.
Active Developments
·; Hednesford Town Centre & Tesco Foodstore, Staffordshire
·; Longbridge Town Centre & Sainsbury's Foodstore, Birmingham
·; myplace, Youth Centre, Longbridge, Birmingham
·; Viridor Office Facility, Firepool, Taunton
·; Skypark, Exeter
·; Phoenix Retail Park, Longton, Stoke-on-Trent
·; Siemens PLC Office & Production Facility, Teal Park, Lincoln
·; The Vine, St. Matthew's Quarter, Walsall
·; North Square, Edmonton, London
Developments Completed During the Year
·; Etrop Court, Wythenshawe, Manchester - 48,000 sq. ft. office complex let to Manchester City Council. Investment sale completed.
·; Bournville College, Longbridge, Birmingham - 250,000 sq. ft., six storey educational facility for over 15,000 students occupying 4.2 acres of the new Longbridge Town Centre; including a learning resource centre, business school, construction workshop and leisure and sport facilities.
·; The Hive Leisure Park (Venture Fields), Widnes - 100,000 sq. ft. leisure complex with attractions including a five-screen Reel Cinema, 16 lane Widnes Superbowl plus Nando's restaurant and 60 bedroom Premier Inn with adjoining Brewers Fayre family pub and restaurant. Investment sold.
·; Connah's Quay, Flintshire - 72,000 sq. ft. retail scheme including a 52,000 sq. ft. Morrisons foodstore, creating over 300 new jobs with lettings to a wide range of national retailers including Greggs, Bargain Booze, Just Go Travel and Home Bargains. Investment sold.
·; Travelodge Hotel - 73 room hotel at Edmonton, London.
Future Opportunities
Significant current commercial development opportunities with planning recognition on land owned or controlled by St. Modwen include:
·; Swansea University - creation of a new campus.
·; Elephant & Castle, Southwark, London - Regeneration of the existing shopping centre with the opportunity for up to 1,000 residential units above.
·; Great Homer Street, Liverpool - 80,000 sq. ft. foodstore plus 50,000 sq. ft. of further retail.
Land Bank Comments
During the course of the year we have increased our developable land bank from 5,736 to 5,762 acres. The main movements during the year have been:
·; 65 acres of developable land have been used or sold for development during the course of the year.
·; We have acquired at agricultural prices 62 acres of former Coal Board land in the Midlands that we believe has the potential for long-term development.
·; We have successfully concluded a development agreement with Dyson Group plc for 105 acres of ex-industrial land that we believe will offer commercial and residential opportunities over the medium term.
Commercial Land and Development Outlook
While this market is currently difficult we have sufficient developments underway and sufficient opportunities identified to give us confidence in our ability to generate a stream of development profits in the years to come. While demand may fluctuate we typically hold our land at low values or through development agreements and so do not expect our balance sheet to be materially affected by any reductions in commercial land values. The land bank that we hold, our local expertise and our ability to manage planning processes and local stakeholders means that we remain confident of future returns in this area.
Income Producing Properties
Strategy
While all our assets are ultimately held because of the prospect of generating significant future value, we ensure that a major proportion of these assets also generate income while we hold them prior to development. We aim for the cash received from this income to pay for all of the cash expenses and financing costs of running the overall business.
Efficiency in managing this portfolio of income carries a high priority for the business. We invest in a locally based asset management capability that enables us to effectively manage tenancies, receipts and outgoings, identify opportunities to improve values and to find new tenants.
Despite the problematic economic environment we continue to be very successful in this area, and we have consistently been able to improve our gross and net rental income. Our gross and net rental income has increased again in 2011 and the income from this portfolio of properties continues to substantially cover all of our cash outgoings for running the business (see Note 2 to the accounts).
Income Producing Portfolio Analysis
The development opportunity oriented nature of our portfolio means that we typically hold properties that have high yields and low affordable rents on relatively short tenancies. At the year end we held over 100 income producing properties with a book value of £550m (2010: £525m). The average lease length at the year end was 4.6 years (2010: 5.1 years) while our active asset management means that occupancy levels have been increased to 87.9% (2010: 87.6%). Administrations have been kept to a low level and we have attracted more new tenants than have left our assets. Generally like-for-like valuations have been flat, with changes in values as a result of our asset management.
Portfolio Yield Analysis
Equivalent | Net Initial | |||
Nov 2011 | Nov 2010 | Nov 2011 | Nov 2010 | |
Retail | 8.4% | 8.6% | 7.4% | 7.3% |
Offices | 8.7% | 8.9% | 6.4% | 6.7% |
Industrial | 9.1% | 9.2% | 7.7% | 7.7% |
Portfolio | 8.8% | 8.9% | 7.4% | 7.4% |
Industrial
Industrial assets make up 49% of the income producing assets (25% of the Group's overall property portfolio). These are often older assets with a variety of future opportunities, including potential conversion through the planning process to other uses. Our active asset management and the often flexible nature of the properties has meant that we have continued to be successful in this section of the market.
While the UK industrial environment is far from buoyant, industrial initial yields have been consistent from year to year. We have had some notable letting successes such as at Parkside in Doncaster and Long Marston in Warwickshire. Since the year end we are also pleased that our largest individual lease, for Shanghai Automotive at Longbridge in Birmingham, which is currently producing rent at £1.5m per year, will now extend until at least 2024 following the expiry of a break notice period.
Retail
Retail assets make up 38% of the income producing portfolio (19% of the Group's overall property portfolio). We invest in well located retail assets where we believe we can create significant future value through a combination of development and effective asset management. This strategy means that we have tended to invest in retail assets where there is a high footfall of shoppers spending on essential purchases, rather than in destination shopping centres.
This strategy has meant that our retail assets have continued to perform well in the current economic environment, with retailers attracted to our centres, shoppers continuing to spend on their essential purchases and ongoing developments to improve the retail centres being successful. Credit control in this area remains a high priority.
Nevertheless we continue to see opportunity. In the last year we have taken advantage of development opportunities at Wythenshawe in Manchester and at Edmonton in North London. We have invested in a new asset at Farnworth in Bolton, which we believe has asset management and development potential. We have also made significant progress in the development plans for Elephant & Castle in Central London where we have signed a development agreement with the London Borough of Southwark and we are pursuing a residential and retail development opportunity.
Office
Office assets make up only 13% of the income producing portfolio (6% of the Group's overall property portfolio). We have in past years invested in office assets where we could see development opportunities or where the creation of a business technology centre assisted with a wider development. We have had some success in letting existing assets during the course of the year but due to the current economic climate we do not see this as an area for substantial future investment.
Income Producing Properties Outlook
Our ability to successfully manage our portfolio in difficult economic environments has been clearly demonstrated in recent years, and the 5% increase in net rental income in 2011 is very pleasing. It seems likely that the economic environment will continue to prove difficult in 2012, but our asset management ability and flexible portfolio give us every opportunity to maintain and improve our current position.
Where opportunities arise for investment in well located properties with the chance to add significant future value, then we will continue to use our local knowledge and flexible financial position to take advantage of the investment. Over the course of the next 12 months we anticipate that this is more likely to be in the area of industrial properties than retail, and unlikely to be in offices, but we will judge each opportunity on its own merits.
People
The St. Modwen business model is based on a hands-on and proactive approach. The core skills of our people in asset management, remediation, development and the management of the planning process are locally based and fundamental to our success. Their contribution in 2011 has driven our successful results. We continue to invest in and incentivise our people in order to grow their abilities, build their success and hence build the future success of the business.
Summary and Business Outlook
2011 has been a successful year for the business and we have the foundations in place to deliver successful results in 2012. Our developments in progress at Hednesford, Longbridge, Lincoln and a variety of others, plus our active house building sites give us a pipeline of property development profits that is potentially set to exceed the results achieved in 2011, with additional opportunities still being identified.
While we are unable to predict the impact of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis on asset values we know that our asset portfolio will provide us with many opportunities to add significant value in the years to come.
We are in the process of delivering significant residential and development projects that underpin our property profits for 2012 and beyond. We can see clear opportunities to add value to our assets through the planning process.
Our asset management ability gives us confidence in our ability to make our property assets continue to perform well.
Financial review
Income Statement
Our business model is based on cash from core rental and other income covering the cash costs of running the business (property outgoings, overheads and interest). This provides a solid base from which the Group can drive profits from its development activities and add value to its existing assets through planning and asset management activities.
As we utilise a number of joint venture arrangements, the statutory financial statement disclosures do not always provide a straightforward way of understanding our business. To enable a better understanding we also provide information including the Group's share of joint ventures. A full reconciliation is provided in Note 2 to the accounts.
Trading Profit
Net Rental Income
Our focus on this core area of our business has continued over the last year and we are pleased to have increased the Group's share of net rental income to £35.5m, an increase of 5% year-on-year. This has been driven both by increasing gross annualised rental income from £45.7m to £46.4m, and by successfully managing our property outgoings.
As a development business we will always hold a relatively high level of void as we prepare assets for development. Despite the difficult business environment we have been able to maintain our position with overall occupancy levels maintained at 88%. Our weighted average lease length also remains broadly constant at 4.6 years (2010: 5.1 years), before taking into account the impact of the extension of the Shanghai Automotive lease at Longbridge.
Property Profits
We have maintained our track record of recurring realised property profit delivery. Property profits, including our share of joint ventures, were £23.8m (2010: £21.9m). This included significant contributions from our portfolio of BP remediation sites and a broad portfolio of pre-let and pre-sold developments (including Bournville College, Manchester City Council and Travelodge). As well as realising profits from the disposal of residential land we are also pleased to realise the initial profits from our first St. Modwen Homes development at Park View in Birmingham.
Overheads
As a regional business with a spread of properties across England and Wales, our cost base is largely driven by the employment of skilled teams of professionals to manage the existing and potential assets. While we have gradually moved our skills towards the greater future opportunities in residential land and in the South East of England, we have been able to do this without altering our cost base. The Group's share, including joint ventures and associates of administrative expenses for 2011 is £16.7m (2010: £17.1m).
Finance Costs and Income
During the course of the year we have been able to replace or restructure a substantial proportion of our hedges and LIBOR swap arrangements without incurring any change costs. This has meant that the effect of a slightly higher net debt balance has been more than outweighed by the saving in overall interest costs. Consequently, net bank interest costs have been reduced by 5% to £23.0m (2010: £24.2m). The average cost of our debt for the year was 5.6% (2010: 5.8%).
Trading Profit for the Year
We are therefore pleased to report that our trading profit has increased by 31% to £22.8m, a result that is particularly pleasing given the current UK economic conditions.
Looking forward we can see predictable and consistent trading profit income streams and controllable costs. Our rental income and recurring other income covers substantially all of our overheads and interest and we retain the ability in the business to cope with an increased future development workload.
Property Valuation Movements in the Year
There are two principal components to property valuation movements: those movements resulting from activities that we undertake specifically to add value to our assets, and those resulting from changes in the overall property market. Jones Lang LaSalle provides this valuation split for us.
Valuation Improvements as a Result of St. Modwen Actions
An important part of our business model is to actively manage our asset base in order to add value to the existing portfolio. This year has delivered some successful results, particularly in managing residential land through the planning process.
Our success in attracting new tenants and in improving lease terms has also resulted in added value valuation gains for both our retail and industrial portfolios.
Based on the independent valuations from Jones Lang LaSalle we have been able to generate revaluation gains of £32.9m from our activities, an increase of 79% from 2010 (£18.4m). While 2011 has been a particularly good year we expect to continue to be able to consistently generate valuation improvements through our own activities in future years.
Property Valuation Movements in the Year
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Property Valuation Movements £m | As a result of St. Modwen actions | Market value movements | Total | As a result of St. Modwen actions | Market value movements | Total |
Residential | 26 | 2 | 28 | 8 | 8 | 16 |
Commercial land | 1 | (2) | (1) | (1) | (9) | (10) |
Income Producing: | ||||||
- Retail | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 14 |
- Office | - | - | - | 1 | (1) | - |
- Industrial | 4 | - | 4 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
Total | 33 | 1 | 34 | 18 | 11 | 29 |
Market driven valuation movements
During the course of the year we have not materially benefited from any market driven improvement in the value of our portfolio, with a market driven gain of £1.0m (2010: £4.6m). Given the current UK economic environment we are not expecting any market driven valuation gains in 2012.
Profit Before Tax
Our profit before tax is also stated after movements in the market value of our interest rate derivatives (hedges and swaps). The valuations are based on the financial markets forward prediction curves for interest rates and over the second half of the year these have implied reduced expectation of future interest rate increases. Other finance cost and income items are broadly consistent with 2010. We therefore have a charge to theincome statement of £5.0m in 2011 (2010: £2.2m).
The combination of all the above factors means that profit before tax has increased by 34% to £50.4m (2010: £37.5m), a very pleasing result given the difficult economic environment.
Taxation and Profits After Tax
Our Group tax charge for the year of £4.9m reflects an effective rate of tax of 10%, which includes the utilisation of losses brought forward. Losses brought forward in 2010 resulted in a tax credit of £0.8m. Looking forward we expect tax rates to increase slightly given that the bulk of the losses brought forward have now been utilised.
Despite the increase in tax charge, profits after tax of £45.5m are 19% ahead of the equivalent period last year (2010: £38.3m). Similarly Earnings per Share have increased 17% to 21.7p (2010: 18.6p).
Funding
As a development business it is important for us to retain flexibility in our funding structures. We therefore maintain a series of bilateral revolving credit facilities with clearing banks that have a large UK presence. Where we have joint ventures we have funding arrangements in place as appropriate for each vehicle.
We have been active in development during the year and consequently have invested in developments in progress. This has meant that our net debt has increased in the year from £315m to £347m although gearing levels remain similar to the end of 2010 (2011: 73%, 2010: 72%).
Corporate Facilities
During the course of this year we have replaced or extended all of our corporate bilateral facilities. Facilities with Lloyds, Barclays and HSBC were renewed or extended during the 2011 financial year and a new facility was put in place with Santander. All Group bilateral facilities now extend until at least November 2014, giving us an average debt maturity of 3.5 years (2010: 3.3 years).
Headroom in Corporate Facilities
In total we have corporate debt facilities excluding VSM Estates of £434m against drawn debt of £303m at the year end, giving us substantial potential headroom to meet future development and funding needs.
Our VSM joint venture and its associated debt is treated as on balance sheet for the purposes of the financial accounts. We have reduced this facility in order to reduce the costs of unnecessary undrawn facilities, but still provide sufficient funding to meet future obligations. The facility extends until March 2014 and has £44m debt drawn against a remaining facility of £48m. Since the balance sheet date, VSM has received a further £10m of deferred land sale receipts with a further tranche of £14m due in January 2013.
Substantial headroom remains in our debt facilities to enable us to continue to pursue active development of our business.
Hedging & Cost of Debt
We aim to have predictable costs attached to our borrowing and so we hedge the majority of our interest rate risk. At the year end we were 86% hedged against our corporate debt (2010: 98%). Our hedging maturities are spread between 2012 and 2018 so that we are not overly exposed to re-hedging risks in any one year.
Corporate Funding Covenants
We are operating well within the covenants that apply to our corporate banking facilities. The covenants are:
·; Net assets must be greater than £250m (actual £476m);
·; Gearing must not exceed 175% (actual 73%); and
·; Interest cover ratio (that excludes non-cash items such as revaluation movements) must be greater than 1.25x (actual 2.0x).
Although the current economic conditions still have an element of uncertainty, we have considered available market information, consulted with our advisers and applied our own knowledge and experience. Consequently, we believe that covenant levels are adequate for our possible negative scenarios.
Joint Venture Facilities
In addition to VSM we have two further joint venture facilities:
1 Key Property Investments ('KPI')
KPI, our 50:50 joint venture with Salhia Real Estate Company K.S.C., holds significant retail and commercial assets with the potential for future development. Asset profitability and sales have meant that our financing requirements have reduced over the last year. 'KPI' debt at November 2011 was £146m (2010: £165m) and this is expected to reduce further in the near-term. The existing £200m facility has very advantageous terms but expires in September 2012. Consequently, we are in the process of putting in place a new facility for 'KPI'. The new club has been identified, we have agreed terms and received credit approval and are currently in legal process to finalise a new five year facility.
2 Sowcrest & Holaw
These joint ventures are with Rotch Property Group Ltd and relate principally to our Wembley development. Over the course of the last year asset sales have significantly reduced the debt associated with this project to £22m at November 2011 (2010: £33m). We aim for the pace of asset sales to continue to accelerate over the coming months leaving a minimal level of debt requirement by May 2012.
We are in advanced negotiations with Rotch to acquire its share of the joint ventures. If we successfully conclude this transaction we expect the assets and remaining debt in both Sowcrest and Holaw to be wholly consolidated into St. Modwen's results.
Balance Sheet
Net Assets
At the year end the shareholders' equity value of net assets was £464m or 232p per share. This represents a 9% increase over the year (2010: £427m or 213p per share). In addition to this increase dividends of £6.2m or 3.1p per share were paid during 2011 (2010: £2.0m or 1p per share).
EPRA Net Asset Value
In line with industry best practice we also report net assets per share using the EPRA (European Public Real Estate Association) methodology. Our diluted EPRA net asset value also rose 9% from 229p per share to 250p per share.
A full reconciliation of our net assets is provided in Note 2 to the Group Financial statements.
Property Portfolio
We now have a property portfolio worth £1,103m (2010: £1,055m). Over the course of the year we have been actively managing our property portfolio with £96m having been spent on acquisitions and capital expenditure and £95m realised from asset disposals. In addition to these disposals we have committed £27m of land to our Persimmon arrangements. The sale of this land is only recognised in line with house completions and therefore remains part of our property portfolio.
The land committed to Persimmon is held as part of inventories. Assets held in inventories principally comprise of development properties where development has commenced and assets held for resale. Inventories also include RAF Northolt that has been pre-sold to the Ministry of Defence under Project MoDEL. As it is matched by an equal and opposite obligation within trade payables, we exclude this asset from our property portfolio. A full reconciliation of the property portfolio is provided in Note 2 to the Group Financial statements.
Movements in our property portfolio during the year:
Property Portfolio - Value Movements 2011
At Nov 2010 £m | Market value movements £m | Value added by St. Modwen £m | Net additions and movements £m | At Nov 2011 £m | |
Residential | 400 | 2 | 26 | (24) | 404 |
Commercial land | 130 | (2) | 1 | 20 | 149 |
Income producing: | |||||
Retail | 194 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 209 |
Offices | 60 | - | - | 10 | 70 |
Industrial | 271 | - | 4 | (4) | 271 |
Total | 1,055 | 1 | 33 | 14 | 1,103 |
Property Valuation Bases
All our investment properties are independently valued every six months by Jones Lang LaSalle LLP, a global real estate professional services business, one of whose specialisations is property valuation. Jones Lang LaSalle based its valuations upon an open market transaction between a willing buyer and a willing seller at the balance sheet date. Therefore no value is taken for any future expectations of value increases but discounts are applied to reflect future uncertainties. Where appropriate we will also independently assess our work in progress for any impairment issues. In accordance with accounting standards valuation movements are put through the income statement as gains or losses.
Valuations in all our asset classes have been substantiated by open market transactions during the course of the year. Yields on our income producing properties have remained largely stable in the flat market during the year, with any movements reflecting our success in attracting tenants.
Weighted Average Yields on Income Producing Property
Equivalent | Net Initial | |||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
Retail | 8.4% | 8.6% | 7.4% | 7.3% |
Office | 8.7% | 8.9% | 6.4% | 6.7% |
Industrial | 9.1% | 9.2% | 7.7% | 7.7% |
Total | 8.8% | 8.9% | 7.4% | 7.4% |
Trade Payables
Around two thirds of our trade payables balance relates to the deferred payment arrangements related to land owned by our VSM joint venture, including RAF Northolt as referred to above. As this joint venture progresses and land is sold off for development these payables amounts will naturally reduce. Other trade payables relate to development activities in the normal course of our business.
Pension Scheme
Our defined benefit pension scheme continues to be fully funded on an IAS19 basis. The results of the triennial valuation from April 2011 are well advanced and show a fully funded scheme. With the scheme being closed to new entrants and closed to future accrual we do not expect any significant material future increase in scheme contributions.
Financial Outlook
Our very good financial results for the year and strong pipeline of opportunities are backed by our solid financing structure and committed funding arrangements. While the times ahead will undoubtedly be challenging we believe that we are well equipped to meet those challenges and prosper.
Directors' Responsibility Statement
We confirm to the best of our knowledge:
- The financial information contained within this announcement has been prepared on the basis of the accounting policies applied in the year ended 30th November 2011 which are set out below. Whilst the information included in this announcement has been computed in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), this announcement does not itself contain sufficient information to comply with IFRS as adopted by the European Union. The financial information contained in this announcement does not constitute the company's statutory accounts for the years ended 30th November 2011 or 2010, but is derived from those accounts. Those accounts give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit and loss of the company and the undertakings in the consolidation taken as a whole.
- Statutory accounts for 2010 have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and those for 2011 will be delivered following the company's annual general meeting. The auditors have reported on these accounts; their reports were unqualified, did not draw attention to any matters by way of emphasis without qualifying their report, and did not contain a statement under section 498 (2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006.
- The Chairman's Statement, Chief Executive's Review, Financial Review and the principal risks and uncertainties faced by the company within this announcement are extracted from the company's annual report which gives a fair review of the business and the position of the company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole.
- The Company expects to post full financial statements that comply with IFRS to shareholders, and on its website at www.stmodwen.co.uk, on or before 28th February 2012. The full financial statements will be available to view on National Storage Mechanism on the same date.
Signed on behalf of the Board on 6th February 2012
BILL OLIVER | MICHAEL DUNN |
Chief Executive | Group Finance Director |
Risks and uncertainties
Risk & Impact
Economic & Market Risk
Uncertainty in the economic and market environment increases the risk attached to property valuation and development returns
Risk & Impact | Mitigation | Commentary |
Market/economic changes such as higher interest rates, reduced availability of credit and declining investment yields restrict business development and cause valuation falls.
| ·; Regional spread and portfolio diversity mitigates sector or location-specific risks ·; Active portfolio management achieves a better than market utilisation of assets ·; Hedging policy reduces interest rate risk | We choose to operate only in the UK, which is subject to relatively low risk and low returns from a stable and mature, albeit cyclical economy and property market. By involvement with all sectors of that economy and property market, we are as diversified as possible, without venturing overseas. Over the course of the last year, the worsening sovereign debt position within the Eurozone means that the overall market position has become less positive. |
Poor market intelligence (i.e. failure to anticipate market changes) leads to selection of inappropriate and, ultimately, unprofitable schemes.
| ·; Regional offices in touch with their local market ·; Dedicated central resource supporting regional teams ·; Flexible and innovative approach to acquisitions and schemes in order to adapt to market changes ·; Projects, acquisitions and disposals are reviewed (and financially appraised) within clearly defined authority limits | The excellent reputation and financial capacity of the Company have enabled us to continue to win schemes and grow the land bank to record levels, even in the current financially-constrained climate. In this environment, with a reduced number of active competitors, we expect to be able to continue attractive acquisitions.
|
Declining rental yields and/or loss of key tenants results in reduced profitability and cash flow. | ·; Diverse and extensive rent roll (over 4,000 tenants) ·; Financial checks carried out on new tenants ·; Rents at affordable end of scale | Our diverse tenant base mitigates this risk but reduced UK economic growth prospects and declining business confidence mean that there is increased risk in this area. |
Financial collapse of, or dispute with, a key Joint Venture partner leads to financial loss. | ·; Monthly review of performance to identify if senior management intervention is required ·; Flexible but legally secure contracts with partners | Our key partners are Persimmon, Vinci plc and Salhia plc of Kuwait. These are financially strong partners with good prospects, even in the current economic environment. Where we have financially weaker partners, we are exiting from these arrangements, meaning that the overall risk has reduced year-on-year. |
Financial Risk
Our geared financial structure means that there are inevitable risks attached to the availability of funding and the management of fluctuations in our cash flows
Availability of funding reduces, causing a lack of liquidity that impacts borrowing capacity and reduces the saleability of assets.
| ·; Recurring income from rents provides funding for ongoing overhead and interest costs ·; Strong relationships with key banks ·; Financial headroom maintained to provide flexibility | Our prudent approach to forward commitments, speculative development and asset disposals has enabled us to optimise operational cash flows and to offset the impact of fluctuating market conditions. Furthermore, we have once again recorded a trading profit in the year, demonstrating our ability to succeed in varying markets. However, the sovereign debt issues are increasing the constraints over general bank funding. |
Unforeseen significant changes to cash flow requirements limit the ability of the business tomeet its ongoing commitments.
| ·; Regular and detailed cash flow forecasting enables monitoring of performance and management of future cash flows
| Our year end cash position is in line with the guidelines that we set at the start of the year.
|
Failure to value properties fairly, leading to lower than anticipated profits/yields.
| ·; Independent valuation by external experts and validation by external auditors ·; Professionally conducted and conservative property valuation process | The valuation of our properties is externally undertaken every six months. Our methodologies are consistent and cautious, always allowing for future uncertainties and for housebuilder profit on our residential land. |
Failure to refinance bank facilities as they fall due or failure to comply with banking covenants leads to insufficient funds to run and grow the business.
| ·; Small number of high quality banking relationships ·; Weighted average expiry of covenants 3.5 years for 2011 ·; Acquisitions structured in self financing manner | Our banking facilities have been extended, our gearing is stable and interest rate risk is hedged.
|
Construction Risk
The management of developments is a complex process
Inadequate due diligence on major new schemes leads to unforeseen exposures, costs and liabilities, which prevent effective delivery and result in financial loss.
| ·; Use and close supervision of a preferred supply chain of highquality trusted suppliers and professionals ·; Projects, acquisitions and disposals are reviewed and financially appraised in detail, with clearly defined authority limits ·; Contractual liability clearly defined
| Our programme for the year has been delivered succesfully and we have conducted robust processesin selecting contractors for future projects.
|
Inadequate construction delivery and procurement leads to quality issues and cost overruns causing reputational and/or financial damage.
| ·; Strong internal construction management team ·; Clearly defined formal tender process that evaluates qualitative and quantitative factors in bid assessment ·; Use and close supervision of a preferred supply chain of highquality trusted suppliers and professionals | During the year, all our developments have been completed on time and within budget. Our contractor selection processes are rigorous. However, given the economic environment and the consequentially increased risk of contractor insolvency, we have this year increasingly biased our contractor selection in favour of financially stable and robust contractors.
|
Regulatory & Compliance Risk
Our work is undertaken in a complex environment with consequent compliance risks
National planning policy framework changes adversely impact on our business strategy by limiting our ability to secure viable permissions and/or by removing our competitive advantage.
| ·; Use of high quality professional advisors ·; Active involvement in public consultation ·; Constant monitoring of all aspects of the planning process by experienced in-house experts ·; Contacts in place with central and local government | Our daily exposure to all aspects of the planning process, and internal procedures for spreading best practice ensure we remain abreast of most developments. Furthermore, we continue our efforts toinfluence public policy debate. Although the current fluctuations in proposed planning legislation mean that future rules are uncertain, our expertise should enable us to prosper relative to our competitors, whatever the planning environment.
|
Failure to manage long-term environmental issues relating to brownfield and contaminated sites leads to a major environmental incident, resulting in financial/reputational damage.
| ·; Use of high quality external advisors ·; Highly qualified internal staff ·; Risk assessments conducted as part of due diligence process ·; Full warranties from professional consultants and remediation contractors ·; Defined business processes to proactively manage issues | We are willing to accept a degree of environmental risk, enabling higher returns to be made. Theinherent risks are passed on or minimised where possible but cannot be eliminated, although theresidual risks have been acceptably low in recent years.
|
HS&E culture leads to a major incident (e.g. serious injury to, or death of an employee, client, contractor or member of the public) or non-compliance with legislation, resulting in financial penalties and/or reputational damage.
| ·; Performance indicators are reviewed monthly at Board level ·; Use of high quality external HS&E advisors ·; Defined business processes to proactively manage issues
| Health and Safety continues to be a high priority. The assessment of environmental costs (and the subsequent optimising of remediation solutions) is an integral part of our acquisition and post-acquisition process. We seek to minimise or pass on any such environmental risks, and believe that the residual risk remains acceptably low. In other social and ethical areas, our operations are underpinned by a simple but rigorous set of operating commitments.
|
Organisational Risk
Our activities require highly skilled and motivated people in order to deliver consistently and effectively
Lack of succession planning and/or over reliance on key people causes loss of/failure to attract good people and/or significant disruption/loss of IP.
| ·; Succession planning monitored at Board level and below ·; Targeted recruitment with competitive, performance-driven remuneration packages | We continue to offer attractive and competive remuneration packages as is evidenced by the lack of vacancies. We continue to adapt our recruitment strategy to source the skills that will support the Company's long-term business objectives.
|
Group Income Statement
for the year ended 30th November 2011
Notes | 2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Revenue | 1 | 109.6 | 121.4 |
Net rental income | 1 | 27.5 | 26.4 |
Development profit | 1 | 20.4 | 12.5 |
Gains on disposal of investments/investment properties | 0.5 | 2.5 | |
Investment property revaluation gains | 7 | 36.2 | 23.2 |
Other net income | 1 | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Profits of joint ventures and associates (post tax) | 9 | 2.9 | 7.4 |
Administrative expenses | (16.6) | (16.8) | |
Profit before interest and tax | 74.1 | 58.3 | |
Finance cost | 3 | (26.2) | (24.0) |
Finance income | 3 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Profit before tax | 50.4 | 37.5 | |
Tax (charge)/credit | 4 | (4.9) | 0.8 |
Profit for the year | 45.5 | 38.3 | |
Attributable to: | |||
Equity attributable to owners of the Company | 43.5 | 37.2 | |
Non-controlling interests | 2.0 | 1.1 | |
45.5 | 38.3 | ||
Notes | 2011 pence | 2010 pence | |
Basic and diluted earnings per share | 5 | 21.7 | 18.6 |
A reconciliation of non-statutory measures used in the Overview together with the Business and Financial Review is included in Note 2 to the Group financial statements.
Group Balance Sheet
as at 30th November 2011
Notes | 2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Non-current assets | |||
Investment property | 7 | 848.7 | 828.0 |
Operating property, plant and equipment | 8 | 7.1 | 7.4 |
Investments in joint ventures and associates | 9 | 50.3 | 49.4 |
Trade and other receivables | 10 | 8.4 | 8.2 |
914.5 | 893.0 | ||
Current assets | |||
Inventories | 11 | 191.1 | 171.6 |
Trade and other receivables | 10 | 51.2 | 45.3 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 5.2 | 11.3 | |
247.5 | 228.2 | ||
Current liabilities | |||
Trade and other payables | 12 | (132.2) | (133.1) |
Tax payables | 4 | (0.2) | (9.3) |
(132.4) | (142.4) | ||
Non-current liabilities | |||
Trade and other payables | 12 | (192.6) | (215.1) |
Borrowings | 13 | (352.3) | (326.2) |
Deferred tax | 4 | (8.7) | (0.7) |
(553.6) | (542.0) | ||
Net assets | 476.0 | 436.8 | |
Capital and reserves | |||
Share capital | 20.0 | 20.0 | |
Share premium account | 102.8 | 102.8 | |
Capital redemption reserve | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
Retained earnings | 341.8 | 304.7 | |
Own shares | (0.5) | (0.6) | |
Equity attributable to owners of the Company | 464.4 | 427.2 | |
Non-controlling interests | 11.6 | 9.6 | |
Total equity | 476.0 | 436.8 |
Group Cash Flow Statement
for the year ended 30th November 2011
Notes | 2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Operating activities | |||
Profit before interest and tax | 74.1 | 58.3 | |
Gains on investment property disposals | (0.5) | (2.5) | |
Share of profits of joint ventures and associates (post-tax) | 9 | (2.9) | (7.4) |
Investment property revaluation gains | 7 | (36.2) | (23.2) |
Depreciation | 8 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
Impairment losses on inventories | 2.6 | 6.1 | |
Increase in inventories | (2.7) | (1.6) | |
Increase in trade and other receivables | (6.3) | (12.5) | |
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables | (3.3) | 29.0 | |
Share options and share awards | 0.1 | (0.2) | |
Tax (paid)/received | 4(c) | (6.0) | 1.7 |
Net cash inflow from operating activities | 19.4 | 48.4 | |
Investing activities | |||
Investment property disposals | 19.2 | 27.5 | |
Investment property additions | (42.7) | (49.0) | |
Acquisition of subsidiary undertaking | (4.4) | - | |
Property, plant and equipment additions | (0.3) | (0.3) | |
Cash and cash equivalents acquired with subsidiary | 1.1 | - | |
Interest received | 0.8 | 0.6 | |
Dividends received | 2.0 | - | |
Net cash outflow from investing activities | (24.3) | (21.2) | |
Financing activities | |||
Dividends paid | (6.2) | (2.0) | |
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | - | (0.2) | |
Interest paid | (21.1) | (21.1) | |
New borrowings drawn | 131.3 | 33.1 | |
Repayment of borrowings | (105.2) | (30.5) | |
Net cash outflow from financing activities | (1.2) | (20.7) | |
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | (6.1) | 6.5 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year | 11.3 | 4.8 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 5.2 | 11.3 |
Group Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 30th November 2011
Notes | 2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Profit for the year | 45.5 | 38.3 | |
Pension fund: | |||
- Actuarial losses | (0.2) | (0.1) | |
- Deferred tax thereon | - | - | |
Total comprehensive income for the year | 45.3 | 38.2 | |
Attributable to: | |||
- Owners of the Company | 43.3 | 37.1 | |
- Non-controlling interests | 2.0 | 1.1 | |
Total comprehensive income for the year | 45.3 | 38.2 |
Group Statement of Changes in Equity
for the two years ended 30th November 2011
Share capital £m | Share premium account £m | Capital redemption reserve £m | Retained earnings £m | Own shares £m | Equity attributable to owners of the Company £m | Non- controlling interests £m | Total Equity £m | |
At 30th November 2009 | 20.0 | 102.8 | 0.3 | 269.6 | (0.4) | 392.3 | 8.7 | 401.0 |
Profit for the year | - | - | - | 37.2 | - | 37.2 | 1.1 | 38.3 |
Pension fund actuarial losses | - | - | - | (0.1) | - | (0.1) | - | (0.1) |
Total comprehensive income | - | - | - | 37.1 | - | 37.1 | 1.1 | 38.2 |
Net own shares acquired | - | - | - | - | (0.2) | (0.2) | - | (0.2) |
Dividends paid | - | - | - | (2.0) | - | (2.0) | (0.2) | (2.2) |
At 30th November 2010 | 20.0 | 102.8 | 0.3 | 304.7 | (0.6) | 427.2 | 9.6 | 436.8 |
Profit for the year | - | - | - | 43.5 | - | 43.5 | 2.0 | 45.5 |
Pension fund actuarial losses | - | - | - | (0.2) | - | (0.2) | - | (0.2) |
Total comprehensive income | - | - | - | 43.3 | - | 43.3 | 2.0 | 45.3 |
Net own shares disposed of | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
Dividends paid | - | - | - | (6.2) | - | (6.2) | - | (6.2) |
At 30th November 2011 | 20.0 | 102.8 | 0.3 | 341.8 | (0.5) | 464.4 | 11.6 | 476.0 |
Own shares represent the cost of 215,754 (2010: 259,414) shares held by the Employee Benefit Trust. The open market value of the shares held at 30th November 2011 was £225,463 (2010: £351,246).
Accounting Policies
for the year ended 30th November 2011
Basis of consolidation
The Group's financial statements consolidate the financial statements of St. Modwen Properties PLC and the entities it controls. Control comprises the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the investee and is achieved through direct or indirect ownership of voting rights or by contractual agreement.
VSM Estates (Holdings) Limited is 50% owned by St. Modwen Properties PLC. However, under the funding agreement, the Group obtains the majority of the benefits of the entity and also retains the majority of the residual risks. This entity is therefore consolidated in accordance with SIC 12 "Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities".
All entities are consolidated from the date on which the Group obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases. All intra-Group transactions, balances, income and expense are eliminated on consolidation.
Non-controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets that are not held by the Group and are presented separately within equity in the Group Balance Sheet.
Interests in joint ventures
The Group recognises its interests in joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the interest in the joint venture is carried in the balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Group's share of its net assets, less distributions received, less any impairment in value of individual investments. The income statement reflects the Group's share of the jointly controlled entities' results after interest and tax.
Financial statements of jointly controlled entities are prepared for the same reporting period as the Group. Where necessary, adjustments are made to bring the accounting policies used into line with those of the Group.
The Group statement of comprehensive income reflects the Group's share of any income and expense recognised by the jointly controlled entities outside the income statement.
Interests in associates
The Group's interests in its associates, being those entities over which it has significant influence and which are neither subsidiaries nor joint ventures, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, as described above.
Properties
Investment properties
Investment properties, being freehold and leasehold properties held to earn rental income, for capital appreciation and/or for undetermined future use, are carried at fair value following initial recognition at the present value of the consideration payable. To establish fair value, investment properties are independently valued on the basis of market value. Any surplus or deficit arising is recognised in the income statement for the period.
Once classified as an investment property, a property remains in this category until development with a view to sale commences, at which point the asset is transferred to inventories at current valuation.
Where an investment property is being redeveloped for continued use as an investment property, the property remains within investment property and any movement in valuation is recognised in the income statement.
Investment property disposals are recognised on completion. Profits and losses arising are recognised through the income statement and the profit or loss on disposal is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset.
Investment properties are not depreciated.
Inventories
Inventories principally comprise properties held for sale, properties under construction and land under option. All inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Cost comprises land, direct materials and, where applicable, direct labour costs that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. When inventory includes a transfer from investment properties, cost is recorded as the book value at the date of transfer. Net realisable value represents the estimated selling price less any further costs expected to be incurred to completion and disposal.
Operating property, plant and equipment
Operating property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Such cost includes costs directly attributable to making the asset capable of operating as intended.
Depreciation is provided on all operating property, plant and equipment at rates calculated to write off the cost less estimated residual value of each asset evenly over its expected useful life as follows:
Leasehold operating properties - over the shorter of the lease term and 25 years
Plant, machinery and equipment - over 2 to 5 years
Leases
The Group as lessee
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Non-property assets held under finance leases are capitalised at the inception of the lease with a corresponding liability being recognised for the fair value of the leased asset or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between the reduction of the lease liability and finance charges in the income statement so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Non-property assets held under finance leases are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term.
Freehold interests in leasehold investment properties are accounted for as finance leases with the present value of guaranteed minimum ground rents included within the carrying value of the property and within long-term liabilities. On payment of a guaranteed ground rent, virtually all of the cost is charged to the income statement, as interest payable, and the balance reduces the liability.
Rentals payable under operating leases are charged in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Group as lessor
Rental income from operating leases is recognised in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Income taxes
Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from, or paid to, the taxation authorities, based on tax rates and laws that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
The tax currently payable is based on the taxable result for the year. The taxable result differs from the result as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible.
Deferred income tax is recognised on all temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, using the rates of tax expected to apply based on legislation enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date, with the following exceptions:
- in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates, where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future; and
- deferred income tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, carried forward tax credits or tax losses can be utilised.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured on an undiscounted basis at the tax rates that are expected to apply when the related asset is realised or liability is settled, based on tax rates and laws substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
Income tax is charged or credited directly to equity if it relates to items that are credited or charged to equity. Otherwise, income tax is recognised in the income statement.
Pensions
The Group operates a pension scheme with defined benefit and defined contribution sections. The defined benefit section is closed to new members and to future accrual.
The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit section is determined using the projected unit credit method, which attributes entitlement to benefits to the current period (to determine current service cost) and to the current and prior periods (to determine the present value of defined benefit obligation) and is based on actuarial advice. Past service costs are recognised in the income statement immediately if the benefits have vested.
The interest element of the defined benefit cost represents the change in present value of scheme obligations resulting from the passage of time and is determined by applying the discount rate to the opening present value of the benefit obligation, taking into account material changes in the obligation during the year. The expected return on plan assets is based on an assessment made at the beginning of the year of long-term market returns on scheme assets, adjusted for the effect on the fair value of plan assets of contributions received and benefits paid during the year. The difference between the expected return on plan assets and the interest cost is recognised in the income statement as other finance income or expense.
Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in full in the statement of comprehensive income in the year in which they occur. The defined benefit pension asset or liability in the balance sheet comprises the present value of the defined benefit obligation, less any past service cost not yet recognised and less the fair value of plan assets out of which the obligations are to be settled directly.
When a pension asset (net surplus) arises and the directors consider it is controlled by the Company such that future economic benefits will be available to the Company, it is carried forward in accordance with the requirements of IFRIC14.
Contributions to defined contribution schemes are recognised in the income statement in the year in which they become payable.
Own shares
St. Modwen Properties PLC shares held by the Group are classified in equity attributable to owners of the Company and are recognised at cost.
Dividends
Dividends declared after the balance sheet date are not recognised as liabilities at the balance sheet date.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the Group and the revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received, excluding discounts, rebates, VAT and other sales taxes or duty. The following criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:
Sale of property
Revenue arising from the sale of property is recognised on legal completion of the sale. Where revenue is earned for development of property assets not owned, this is recognised when the Group has substantially fulfilled its obligations in respect of the transaction.
Construction contracts
Revenue arising from construction contracts is recognised in accordance with the Group's accounting policy on construction contracts (see below).
Rental income
Rental income arising from investment properties is accounted for on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Interest income
Interest income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts over the expected life of the financial asset to that asset's net carrying amount.
Dividend income
Dividend income from joint ventures is recognised when the shareholders' rights to receive payment have been established.
Construction contracts
Where the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably, revenue and costs are recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the contract activity at the balance sheet date. The extent to which the contract is complete is determined by the total costs incurred to date as a percentage of the total anticipated costs of the entire contract. Variations in contract work, claims and incentive payments are included only to the extent they have been agreed with the purchaser.
Where the outcome of a construction contract cannot be estimated reliably, contract revenue is recognised only to the extent of contract costs incurred where it is probable they will be recoverable. Contract costs are recognised as expenses in the period in which they are incurred.
When it is probable that total contract costs will exceed total contract revenue, the expected loss is recognised as an expense immediately.
Government grants
Government grants relating to property are treated as deferred income and released to profit or loss over the expected useful life of the assets concerned.
Share-based payments
When employee share options are exercised, the employee has the choice whether to have the liability settled by way of cash or the retention of shares. As it has been the Company's experience to satisfy the majority of share options in cash, and new shares are not issued to satisfy employee share option plans, the Group accounts for its share option schemes as cash-settled. The cost of cash-settled transactions is measured at fair value using an appropriate option pricing model and amortised through the income statement over the vesting period. The liability is remeasured at each balance sheet date. Revisions to the fair value of the accrued liability after the end of the vesting period are recorded in the income statement of the year in which they occur. If the Company's experience or expectations change, the Group may in future be required to amend its accounting to the equity-settled method.
Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the Group's balance sheet when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. The Group derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another entity. If the Group neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Group recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for any amounts it may have to pay. If the Group retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Group continues to recognise the financial asset and also recognises a collateralised borrowing for the proceeds received. The Group derecognises financial liabilities when, and only when, the Group's obligations are discharged, cancelled, or expire.
Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are recognised and carried at the lower of their original invoiced value or recoverable amount. Provision is made when there is evidence that the Group will not be able to recover balances in full. Balances are written off when the probability of recovery is assessed as being remote.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprises cash balances and short-term deposits with banks.
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables on deferred payment terms are initially recorded by discounting the nominal amount payable to net present value. The discount to nominal value is amortised over the period of the deferred arrangement and charged to finance costs.
Interest bearing loans and borrowings
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, loans and borrowings are measured at amortised cost.
Gains and losses arising on the repurchase, settlement or otherwise cancellation of liabilities are recognised in finance income or finance expense as appropriate.
The effective interest rate method is used to charge interest to the income statement.
Derivative financial instruments and hedging
The Group uses derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps to hedge its risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. Such instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date on which a contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at fair value. The Group has determined that the derivative financial instruments in use do not qualify for hedge accounting and, consequently, any gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivatives are taken to the income statement.
Equity instruments
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Group after deducting all its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Group are recorded at the proceeds received less direct issue costs.
Use of estimates and judgements
To be able to prepare accounts according to generally accepted accounting principles, management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the asset and liability items and revenue and expense amounts recorded in the financial accounts. These estimates are based on the Group's systems of internal control, historical experience and the advice of external experts (including qualified professional valuers and actuaries) together with various other assumptions that management and the Board of directors believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these considerations form the basis for making judgements about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources.
The areas requiring the use of estimates and critical judgements that may significantly impact the Group's earnings and financial position are:
Going concern The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis as discussed in the Business and Financial Review.
Valuation of investment properties Management has used the valuation performed by its independent valuers as the fair value of its investment properties. The valuation is performed according to RICS rules, using appropriate levels of professional judgement for the prevailing market conditions.
Net realisable value of inventories The Group has ongoing procedures for assessing the carrying value of inventories and identifying where this is in excess of net realisable value. Management's assessment of any resulting provision requirement is, where applicable, supported by independent information supplied by the external valuers. The estimates and judgements used were based on information available at, and pertaining to, 30th November 2011. Any subsequent adverse changes in market conditions may result in additional provisions being required.
Estimation of remediation and other costs to complete for both development and investment properties. In making an assessment of these costs there is inherent uncertainty and the Group has developed systems of internal control to assess and review carrying values and the appropriateness of estimates made. Any changes to these estimates may impact the carrying values of investment properties and/or inventories.
Calculation of the net present value of pension scheme liabilities In calculating this liability it is necessary for actuarial assumptions to be made, including discount and mortality rates and the long-term rate of return upon scheme assets. The Group engages a qualified actuary to assist with determining the assumptions to be made and evaluating these liabilities.
1. Revenue and gross profit
2011 | ||||
Rental £m | Development £m | Other £m | Total £m | |
Revenue | 36.6 | 67.0 | 6.0 | 109.6 |
Cost of sales | (9.1) | (46.6) | (2.8) | (58.5) |
Gross profit | 27.5 | 20.4 | 3.2 | 51.1 |
2010 | ||||
Rental £m | Development £m | Other £m | Total £m | |
Revenue | 35.1 | 79.9 | 6.4 | 121.4 |
Cost of sales | (8.7) | (67.4) | (3.3) | (79.4) |
Gross profit | 26.4 | 12.5 | 3.1 | 42.0 |
The Group operates exclusively in the UK and all of its revenues derive from its portfolio of properties which the Group manages as one business. Therefore, the financial statements and related notes represent the results and financial position of the Group's sole business segment.
The Group's total revenue for 2011 was £116.9m (2010: £129.1m) and in addition to the amounts above included service charge income of £6.3m (2010: £6.9m), for which there was an equivalent expense and interest income of £1.0m (2010: £0.8m).
Cost of sales in respect of rental income, as disclosed above, comprises direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance) related to the investment property portfolio and includes £0.3m (2010: £0.2m) in respect of properties that did not generate any rental income.
During the year the following amounts were recognised (as part of development revenue and cost of sales) in respect of construction contracts:
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Revenue | 52.7 | 63.8 |
Cost of sales | (39.0) | (50.8) |
Gross profit | 13.7 | 13.0 |
Amounts recoverable on contracts as disclosed in Note 9 comprise £7.4m (2010: £11.6m) of contract revenue recognised and £1.5m (2010: £1.2m) of retentions.
There were no amounts due to customers (2010: £nil) included in trade and other payables in respect of contracts in progress at the balance sheet date.
2. Non-statutory information
(a) Trading profit
The non-statutory measure of trading profit, which includes the Group's share of joint ventures and associates, has been calculated as set out below:
2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Group £m | Joint Ventures and Associates £m | Total £m | Group £m | Joint Ventures and Associates £m | Total £m | ||
Net rental income | 27.5 | 8.0 | 35.5 | 26.4 | 7.3 | 33.7 | |
Development profit | (1) | 23.0 | 0.3 | 23.3 | 18.6 | 0.3 | 18.9 |
Gains on disposal of investments/investment properties | 0.5 | - | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | |
Other income | 3.2 | - | 3.2 | 3.1 | - | 3.1 | |
Administrative expenses | (16.6) | (0.1) | (16.7) | (16.8) | (0.3) | (17.1) | |
Finance costs | (2) | (19.5) | (4.2) | (23.7) | (20.0) | (4.8) | (24.8) |
Finance income | (3) | 0.7 | - | 0.7 | 0.6 | - | 0.6 |
Trading profit | 18.8 | 4.0 | 22.8 | 14.4 | 3.0 | 17.4 |
(1) Stated before the deduction of net realisable value provisions to inventories of: Group £2.6m (2010: £6.1m); Joint ventures and associates £0.1m (2010: £0.3m).
(2) Stated before mark-to-market of derivative financial instruments and other non-cash items of: Group £6.7m (2010: £4.0m); Joint ventures and associates £0.1m (2010: £0.8m).
(3) Stated before mark-to-market of derivative financial instruments and other non-cash items of: Group £1.8m (2010: £2.6m); Joint ventures and associates £nil (2010: £nil).
(b) Property valuations
Property valuations, including the Group's share of joint ventures and associates, have been calculated as set out below:
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Group £m | Joint Ventures and Associates £m | Total £m | Group £m | Joint Ventures and Associates £m | Total £m | |
Investment property revaluation gains | 36.2 | 0.4 | 36.6 | 23.2 | 6.2 | 29.4 |
Net realisable value provisions | (2.6) | (0.1) | (2.7) | (6.1) | (0.3) | (6.4) |
Property valuation gains | 33.6 | 0.3 | 33.9 | 17.1 | 5.9 | 23.0 |
Added value | 33.4 | (0.5) | 32.9 | 15.4 | 3.0 | 18.4 |
Market movements | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 4.6 |
Property valuation gains | 33.6 | 0.3 | 33.9 | 17.1 | 5.9 | 23.0 |
The split of property valuation gains between added value and market movements is based on an analysis of total property valuation movements provided by our external valuers: Jones Lang Lasalle LLP, Chartered Surveyors for the year ended30th November 2011; and (prior to the merger of the two firms) by King Sturge LLP, Chartered Surveyors for the year ended 30th November 2010.
(c) Property portfolio
The property portfolio, including the Group's share of joint ventures and associates, is derived from the balance sheet as detailed below:
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Group £m | Joint Ventures and Associates £m | Total £m | Group £m | Joint Ventures and Associates £m | Total £m | |
Investment properties | 848.7 | 140.3 | 989.0 | 828.0 | 136.6 | 964.6 |
Adjust for non-property elements of investment properties (1) | (0.8) | 0.8 | - | (3.9) | (0.4) | (4.3) |
Inventories | 191.1 | 9.1 | 200.2 | 171.6 | 16.4 | 188.0 |
Less pre-sold properties in the course of construction (2) | (86.3) | (0.4) | (86.7) | (93.3) | - | (93.3) |
Property portfolio | 952.7 | 149.8 | 1,102.5 | 902.4 | 152.6 | 1,055.0 |
(1) Represents the deduction of assets held under finance leases and the add back of lease incentive payments recognised in receivables.
(2) Represents deductions for pre-sold properties under construction, principally RAF Northolt as part of the Project MoDELarrangements between VSM Estates Limited and the Ministry of Defence.
The Group property portfolio, including its share of joint ventures and associates can be split by category as detailed below:
2011 Total £m | 2010 Total £m | |
Retail | 209.3 | 194.0 |
Offices | 70.2 | 60.0 |
Industrial | 269.3 | 271.0 |
Income producing | 548.8 | 525.0 |
Residential land | 404.4 | 400.0 |
Commercial land | 149.3 | 130.0 |
Property portfolio | 1,102.5 | 1,055.0 |
(d) Movement in net debt
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Movement in cash and cash equivalents | (6.1) | 6.5 |
Borrowings drawn | (131.3) | (33.1) |
Repayment of borrowings | 105.2 | 30.5 |
Movement in net debt | (32.2) | 3.9 |
(e) Trading cash flow
Trading cash flows are derived from the Group cash flow statement as set out below:
2011 | ||||
Operating activities £m | Investing activities £m | Financing activities £m | Total £m | |
Net rent and other income | 30.7 | - | - | 30.7 |
Property disposals | 75.5 | 19.2 | - | 94.7 |
Property acquisitions | (0.2) | (6.5) | - | (6.7) |
Capital expenditure | (48.8) | (40.9) | - | (89.7) |
Working capital and other movements | (15.8) | 1.1 | - | (14.7) |
Overheads and interest | (16.0) | 0.8 | (21.1) | (36.3) |
Taxation | (6.0) | - | - | (6.0) |
Trading cash flow | 19.4 | (26.3) | (21.1) | (28.0) |
Net borrowings | - | - | 26.1 | 26.1 |
Net dividends | - | 2.0 | (6.2) | (4.2) |
Movement in cash and cash equivalents | 19.4 | (24.3) | (1.2) | (6.1) |
2010 | ||||
Operating activities £m | Investing activities £m | Financing activities £m | Total £m | |
Net rent and other income | 29.5 | - | - | 29.5 |
Property disposals | 65.4 | 27.5 | - | 92.9 |
Property acquisitions | (6.4) | (24.1) | - | (30.5) |
Capital expenditure | (54.9) | (25.2) | - | (80.1) |
Working capital and other movements | 30.8 | - | - | 30.8 |
Overheads and interest | (17.7) | 0.6 | (21.1) | (38.2) |
Taxation | 1.7 | - | - | 1.7 |
Trading cash flow | 48.4 | (21.2) | (21.1) | 6.1 |
Net borrowings | - | - | 2.6 | 2.6 |
Net dividends | - | - | (2.2) | (2.2) |
Movement in cash and cash equivalents | 48.4 | (21.2) | (20.7) | 6.5 |
(f) Group balance sheet
VSM Estates (Holdings) Limited and its subsidiary undertakings ("VSM") are party to a series of contracts with the Ministry of Defence known as Project MoDEL. The property assets of VSM are subject to purchase on deferred terms and, to increase disclosure of the impact of these arrangements, the following additional split of the Group balance sheet, showing the proportion attributable to VSM has been provided:
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Group £m | VSM £m | Total £m | Group £m | VSM £m | Total £m | |
Investment property | 687.4 | 161.3 | 848.7 | 645.3 | 182.7 | 828.0 |
Other non-current assets | 65.8 | - | 65.8 | 65.0 | - | 65.0 |
Inventories | 108.7 | 82.4 | 191.1 | 83.4 | 88.2 | 171.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 5.2 | - | 5.2 | 8.9 | 2.4 | 11.3 |
Other current assets | 23.9 | 27.3 | 51.2 | 19.4 | 25.9 | 45.3 |
Total assets | 891.0 | 271.0 | 1,162.0 | 822.0 | 299.2 | 1,121.2 |
Current liabilities | (121.6) | (10.8) | (132.4) | (125.4) | (17.0) | (142.4) |
Borrowings | (307.7) | (44.6) | (352.3) | (273.8) | (52.4) | (326.2) |
Other non-current liabilities | (11.0) | (190.3) | (201.3) | (6.2) | (209.6) | (215.8) |
Total liabilities | (440.3) | (245.7) | (686.0) | (405.4) | (279.0) | (684.4) |
Net assets | 450.7 | 25.3 | 476.0 | 416.6 | 20.2 | 436.8 |
Equity attributable to owners of the Company | 445.4 | 19.0 | 464.4 | 412.0 | 15.2 | 427.2 |
Non-controlling interests | 5.3 | 6.3 | 11.6 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 9.6 |
Total equity | 450.7 | 25.3 | 476.0 | 416.6 | 20.2 | 436.8 |
(g) Net assets per share
Net assets per share are calculated as set out below:
2011 | 2010 | |
Total equity (£m) | 476.0 | 436.8 |
Less: Non-controlling interest | (11.6) | (9.6) |
Equity attributable to owners of the Company | 464.4 | 427.2 |
Deferred tax on capital allowances and property revaluations | 13.0 | 9.4 |
Mark-to-market of interest rate swaps | 18.6 | 16.7 |
Fair value of inventories | 4.1 | 5.3 |
Diluted EPRA net asset value | 500.1 | 458.6 |
Shares in issue (number) | 200,360,931 | 200,360,931 |
Total equity net assets per share (pence) | 237.6 | 218.0 |
Percentage increase | 9.0% | |
Total equity attributable to owners of the Company net assets per share (pence) | 231.8 | 213.2 |
Percentage increase | 8.7% | |
Diluted EPRA net asset value per share (pence) | 249.6 | 228.9 |
Percentage increase | 9.0% |
(h) Gearing and LTV
The following table shows the calculation of:
- Gearing, being the ratio of net debt to total equity; and
- Loan to Value, being the ratio of net debt to the property portfolio (representing amounts that could be used as security for that debt).
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Group £m | JV £m | Total £m | Group £m | JV £m | Total £m | |
Property portfolio (Note 2c) | 952.7 | 149.8 | 1,102.5 | 902.4 | 152.6 | 1,055.0 |
Total equity | 476.0 | N/A | 476.0 | 436.8 | N/A | 436.8 |
Net debt | 347.1 | 84.5 | 431.6 | 314.9 | 94.3 | 409.2 |
Gearing | 73% | 91% | 72% | 94% | ||
LTV | 36% | 39% | 35% | 39% |
3. Finance cost and finance income
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Interest payable on borrowings | (19.3) | (19.8) |
Amortisation of loan arrangement fees | (1.3) | (1.0) |
Amortisation of discount on deferred payment arrangements | (2.3) | (1.6) |
Head rents treated as finance leases | (0.2) | (0.2) |
Movement in fair value of interest rate derivative financial instruments | (1.8) | - |
Interest on pension scheme liabilities | (1.3) | (1.4) |
Total finance cost | (26.2) | (24.0) |
The finance cost on interest rate derivative financial instruments derives from financial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss. All other finance costs derive from financial liabilities measured at amortised cost.
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Interest receivable on cash deposits | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Unwinding of discount on deferred receivables | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Movement in fair value of interest rate derivative financial instruments | - | 0.9 |
Expected return on pension scheme assets | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Total finance income | 2.5 | 3.2 |
4. Taxation
(a) Tax on profit on ordinary activities
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Tax charge/(credit) in the income statement | ||
Corporation tax | ||
Current year tax | 0.2 | - |
Adjustments in respect of previous years | (3.3) | (0.1) |
(3.1) | (0.1) | |
Deferred tax | ||
Reversal of temporary differences | (0.2) | (1.0) |
Impact of current year revaluations and indexation | 2.9 | (1.9) |
Utilisation of tax losses | 5.1 | - |
Carry forward of tax losses | - | 1.7 |
Adjustments in respect of previous years | 0.2 | 0.5 |
8.0 | (0.7) | |
Total tax charge/(credit) in the income statement | 4.9 | (0.8) |
Tax relating to items in the statement of comprehensive income | ||
Deferred tax | ||
Actuarial losses on pension schemes | - | - |
Tax credit in the statement of comprehensive income | - | - |
Corporation tax adjustments in respect of previous years include a £3.2m release of tax provisions, following the settlement of a number of open items with HMRC for periods ending on or before 30th November 2009. In aggregate £6.0m was paid against items for which £9.2m was provided at 30th November 2010.
(b) Reconciliation of effective tax rate
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Profit before tax | 50.4 | 37.5 |
Less: profits of joint ventures and associates | (2.9) | (7.4) |
Profit before tax attributable to the Group | 47.5 | 30.1 |
Corporation tax at 26.7% (2010: 28.0%) | 12.7 | 8.4 |
Permanent differences | (0.8) | (0.6) |
Short-term timing differences | - | (0.9) |
Impact of current year revaluations and indexation | (6.6) | (9.1) |
Difference between chargeable gains and accounting profit | 3.4 | 6.9 |
Utilisation of tax losses not previously recognised | (0.7) | (5.9) |
Current year charge / (credit) | 8.0 | (1.2) |
Adjustments in respect of previous years | (3.1) | 0.4 |
4.9 | (0.8) | |
Effective rate of tax | 10% | (3%) |
The post tax results of joint ventures and associates are stated after a tax charge of £1.3m (2010: £0.7m). The effective tax rate for the Group including joint ventures and associates is a charge of 12.0% (2010: 0.3%).
The Finance Act 2011 was enacted on 5th July 2011 and included provisions which reduced the main rate of corporation tax to 26% from 1st April 2011 and 25% from 1st April 2012. Current tax has therefore been provided at 26.7% and deferred tax at 25%. Further reductions to the main rate are proposed to reduce the rate by 1% per annum to 23% by 1st April 2014. This has not been enacted at the balance sheet date and, therefore, is not included in these financial statements.
The proposed reductions of the main rate of corporation tax by 1% per year to 23% by 1st April 2014 are expected to be enacted separately each year. If the deferred tax assets and liabilities of the Group were all to reverse after 1st April 2014, the effect of the changes from 25% to 23% would be to reduce the net deferred tax liability by £0.7m.
(c) Balance sheet
2011 | 2010 | |||
Corporation tax £m | Deferred tax £m | Corporation tax £m | Deferred tax £m | |
Balance at start of the year | 9.3 | 0.7 | 7.7 | 1.4 |
(Credit) / charge to the income statement | (3.1) | 8.0 | (0.1) | (0.7) |
Net (payment) / refund | (6.0) | - | 1.7 | - |
Balance at end of the year | 0.2 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 0.7 |
An analysis of the deferred tax provided by the Group is given below:
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Asset £m | Liability £m | Net £m | Asset £m | Liability £m | Net £m | |
Property revaluations | - | 7.3 | 7.3 | - | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Capital allowances | - | 5.1 | 5.1 | - | 4.7 | 4.7 |
Appropriations to trading stock | - | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Unutilised tax losses | - | - | - | (5.3) | - | (5.3) |
Other temporary differences | (4.2) | - | (4.2) | (3.4) | - | (3.4) |
(4.2) | 12.9 | 8.7 | (8.7) | 9.4 | 0.7 |
At the balance sheet date, the Group has unused tax losses in relation to 2011 and prior years of £1.6m (2010: £6.6m), of which £nil (2010: £5.3m) has been recognised as a deferred tax asset. A deferred tax asset of £1.6m (2010: £1.3m) has not been recognised in respect of current and prior year tax losses as it is not considered certain that there will be taxable profits available in the short-term against which these can be offset.
(d) Factors that may affect future tax charges
Based on current capital investment plans, the Group expects to continue to be able to claim capital allowances in excess of depreciation in future years.
The benefits of any tax planning are not recognised by the Group until the outcome is reasonably certain.
5. Earnings per share
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is set out below:
2011 Number of shares | 2010 Number of shares | |
Weighted number of shares in issue | 200,110,380 | 200,098,045 |
Weighted number of dilutive shares | 520,113 | 346,115 |
200,630,493 | 200,444,160 |
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Profit attributable to equity shareholders (basic and diluted) | 43.5 | 37.2 |
2011 pence | 2010 pence | |
Basic and diluted earnings per share | 21.7 | 18.6 |
Shares held by the Employee Benefit Trust are excluded from the above calculations.
The Group's share options are accounted for as cash-settled share-based payments. In calculating diluted earnings per share, earnings have been adjusted for changes which would have resulted from share options being classified as equity-settled. Where applicable, the number of shares included in the calculation has also been adjusted accordingly.
6. DIVIDENDS
Dividends paid during the year were in respect of the final dividend for 2010 and interim dividend for 2011. The proposed final dividend is subject to approval at the Annual General Meeting and has not been included as a liability in these financial statements.
2011 | 2010 | |||
p per share | £m |
p per share | £m | |
Paid | ||||
Final dividend in respect of previous year | 2.0 | 4.0 | - | - |
Interim dividend in respect of current year | 1.1 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Total | 3.1 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Proposed | ||||
Current year final dividend | 2.2 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 4.0 |
The Employee Benefit Trust waives its entitlement to dividends.
7. Investment property
Freehold investment properties £m | Leasehold investment properties £m | Total £m | |
Fair value | |||
At 30th November 2009 | 455.9 | 307.0 | 762.9 |
Additions - new properties | 23.8 | - | 23.8 |
Other additions | 9.8 | 15.4 | 25.2 |
Net transfers from inventories | 13.0 | 0.8 | 13.8 |
Transfer on acquisition of residual freehold | 3.3 | (3.3) | - |
Disposals | (8.9) | (12.0) | (20.9) |
Gain on revaluation | 10.4 | 12.8 | 23.2 |
At 30th November 2010 | 507.3 | 320.7 | 828.0 |
Additions - new properties | 8.1 | - | 8.1 |
Other additions | 29.1 | 6.2 | 35.3 |
Net transfers to inventories | (7.4) | (12.0) | (19.4) |
Reclassification of assets on transfer | 2.7 | (2.7) | - |
Disposals | (2.8) | (36.7) | (39.5) |
Gain on revaluation | 23.7 | 12.5 | 36.2 |
At 30th November 2011 | 560.7 | 288.0 | 848.7 |
Investment properties were valued at 30th November 2011 by Jones Lang LaSalle LLP, Chartered Surveyors; and at 30th November 2010 (prior to the merger of the firms) by King Sturge LLP, Chartered Surveyors, in accordance with the Appraisal and Valuation Manual of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, on the basis of market value. Jones Lang LaSalle LLP are professionally qualified independent external valuers and have recent experience in the relevant location and category of the properties being valued.
The historical cost of investment properties at 30th November 2011 was £744.1m (2010: £754.9m).
As at 30th November 2011, £756.9m (2010: £709.4m) of investment property was pledged as security for the Group's loan facilities.
Included within leasehold investment properties are £3.9m (2010: £3.9m) of assets held under finance leases.
8. Operating property, plant and equipment
Operating properties £m | Operating plant and equipment £m | Total £m | |
Cost | |||
At 30th November 2009 | 6.9 | 4.8 | 11.7 |
Additions | - | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Disposals | - | (0.3) | (0.3) |
At 30th November 2010 | 6.9 | 4.8 | 11.7 |
Additions | - | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Disposals | - | (0.2) | (0.2) |
At 30th November 2011 | 6.9 | 4.9 | 11.8 |
Depreciation | |||
At 30th November 2009 | 0.5 | 3.3 | 3.8 |
Charge for the year | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
Disposals | - | (0.2) | (0.2) |
At 30th November 2010 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 4.3 |
Charge for the year | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Disposals | - | (0.1) | (0.1) |
At 30th November 2011 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 4.7 |
Net book value | |||
At 30th November 2009 | 6.4 | 1.5 | 7.9 |
At 30th November 2010 | 6.3 | 1.1 | 7.4 |
At 30th November 2011 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 7.1 |
Tenure of operating properties:
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Freehold | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Leasehold | 2.7 | 2.7 |
6.2 | 6.3 |
9. Joint ventures and associates
The Group's share of the results for the year of its joint ventures and associates is:
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Key Property Investments Limited £m | Other joint ventures and associates £m | Total £m | Key Property Investments Limited £m | Other joint ventures and associates £m | Total £m | |
Income statements | ||||||
Revenue | 12.1 | 7.3 | 19.4 | 14.4 | 4.4 | 18.8 |
Net rental income | 7.3 | 0.7 | 8.0 | 6.6 | 0.7 | 7.3 |
Development profit | 0.2 | - | 0.2 | - | - | - |
Gains on disposal of investment properties | - | - | - | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
Investment property revaluation gains | 0.4 | - | 0.4 | 6.2 | - | 6.2 |
Administrative expenses | (0.1) | - | (0.1) | (0.2) | (0.1) | (0.3) |
Profit before interest and tax | 7.8 | 0.7 | 8.5 | 13.0 | 0.7 | 13.7 |
Finance cost | (3.4) | (0.9) | (4.3) | (4.4) | (1.2) | (5.6) |
Profit/(loss) before tax | 4.4 | (0.2) | 4.2 | 8.6 | (0.5) | 8.1 |
Taxation | (1.2) | (0.1) | (1.3) | (0.3) | (0.4) | (0.7) |
Profit/(loss) for the year | 3.2 | (0.3) | 2.9 | 8.3 | (0.9) | 7.4 |
Included in other joint ventures and associates above are the Group's share of profits from associated companies of £0.3m (2010: £0.3m).
The Group's share of the balance sheet of its joint ventures and associates is:
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Key Property Investments Limited £m | Other joint ventures and associates £m | Total £m | Key Property Investments Limited £m | Other joint ventures and associates £m | Total £m | |
Balance sheets | ||||||
Non-current assets | 120.4 | 23.7 | 144.1 | 119.5 | 20.8 | 140.3 |
Current assets | 10.7 | 6.1 | 16.8 | 11.7 | 14.5 | 26.2 |
Current liabilities | (11.1) | (21.6) | (32.7) | (11.9) | (10.1) | (22.0) |
Non-current liabilities | (74.4) | (3.5) | (77.9) | (74.9) | (20.2) | (95.1) |
Net assets | 45.6 | 4.7 | 50.3 | 44.4 | 5.0 | 49.4 |
Equity at start of year | 44.4 | 5.0 | 49.4 | 36.1 | 5.2 | 41.3 |
Transfer from joint venture to subsidiary undertaking | - | - | - | - | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Profit/(loss) for the year | 3.2 | (0.3) | 2.9 | 8.3 | (0.9) | 7.4 |
Dividends paid | (2.0) | - | (2.0) | - | - | - |
Equity at end of year | 45.6 | 4.7 | 50.3 | 44.4 | 5.0 | 49.4 |
Included in other joint ventures and associates above are the Group's share of net assets of £3.0m (2010: £2.7m) in relation to associated companies. These net assets comprise total assets of £4.0m (2010: £3.9m) and total liabilities of £1.0m (2010: £1.2m).
Significant joint venture companies and associates comprise:
Name | Status | Interest | Activity |
Key Property Investments Limited | Joint venture | 50% | Property investment and development |
Barton Business Park Limited | Joint venture | 50% | Property development |
Sowcrest Limited | Joint venture | 50% | Property development |
Holaw (462) Limited | Joint venture | 50% | Property investment |
Sky Park Development Partnership LLP | Joint venture | 50% | Property development |
Coed Darcy Limited | Associate | 49% | Property investment and development |
Baglan Bay Company Limited | Associate | 25% | Property management |
In the Business and Financial Review a series of commerical contracts with Persimmon is referred to as the "Persimmon JV". This is not a statutory entity and the results from these commercial contracts are not included in the figures disclosed above. Revenue and profit from the Persimmon JV are recognised in Group development profit on legal completion of housing unit sales to third party purchasers.
Many of the joint ventures and associates contain change of control provisions, as is common for such arrangements.
On 1st July 2011 the Group increased its shareholding in St Modwen Hungerford Limited to 100%. No goodwill arose on increasing the Group's stake in the entity, which is now accounted for as a subsidiary.
10. Trade and other receivables
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Non-current | ||
Other debtors | 8.4 | 8.2 |
Current | ||
Trade receivables | 8.1 | 2.3 |
Prepayments and accrued income | 5.2 | 7.3 |
Other debtors | 14.1 | 10.2 |
Amounts recoverable on contracts | 8.9 | 12.8 |
Amounts due from joint ventures | 14.9 | 12.7 |
51.2 | 45.3 |
11. Inventories
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Properties held for sale | 16.0 | 37.6 |
Properties under construction | 152.8 | 112.6 |
Land under option | 22.3 | 21.4 |
191.1 | 171.6 |
The movement in inventories during the two years ended 30th November 2011 is as follows:
£m | |
At 30th November 2009 | 192.7 |
Additions | 60.1 |
Net transfers to investment property | (13.8) |
Disposals (transferred to development cost of sales) | (67.4) |
At 30th November 2010 | 171.6 |
Additions | 46.7 |
Net transfers from investment property | 19.4 |
Disposals (transferred to development cost of sales) | (46.6) |
At 30th November 2011 | 191.1 |
The directors consider all inventories to be current in nature. The operational cycle is such that a proportion of inventories will not be realised within 12 months. It is not possible to determine with accuracy when specific inventory will be realised as this will be subject to a number of issues including the strength of the property market.
Included within disposals of inventories are net realisable value provisions made during the year of £2.6m (2010: £6.1m).
As at 30th November 2011 £41.0m (2010: £48.3m) of inventory was pledged as security for the Group's loan facilities.
12. Trade and other payables
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Current | ||
Trade payables | 19.3 | 15.7 |
Amounts due to joint ventures | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Other payables and accrued expenses | 79.7 | 76.4 |
Provision for share options | 0.8 | 0.2 |
Other payables on deferred terms | 7.8 | 18.4 |
Derivative financial instruments | 20.1 | 18.3 |
132.2 | 133.1 | |
Non-current | ||
Other payables and accrued expenses | 47.7 | 46.4 |
Provision for share options | 1.0 | 1.6 |
Other payables on deferred terms | 140.0 | 163.2 |
Finance lease liabilities (head rents) | 3.9 | 3.9 |
192.6 | 215.1 |
The payment terms of other payables on deferred terms are subject to contractual commitments. In the normal course of events the payments will be made in line with either the disposal of investment properties held on the balance sheet, or the commencement of development. Net cash outflows on the settlement of the deferred consideration will therefore be limited.
13. Borrowings
2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Non-current | ||
Bank loans repayable between one and two years | - | 107.9 |
Bank loans repayable between two and five years | 352.3 | 218.3 |
352.3 | 326.2 |
Each bank has its borrowings secured by a fixed charge over a discrete portfolio of certain of the Group's property assets.
Maturity profile of committed bank facilities
The majority of the Group's bank debt is provided by bilateral revolving credit facilities, providing the flexibility to draw and repay loans as required. The maturity profile of the Group's committed facilities is set out below:
2011 | |||||||
Floating rate borrowings | Interest rate swaps | ||||||
Drawn £m | Undrawn £m | Total £m | Earliest termination | Latest termination | |||
£m | % | £m | % | ||||
Less than one year† | - | - | - | 30.0 | 4.97% | 10.0 | 5.42% |
One to two years | - | - | - | 30.0 | 4.66% | 20.0 | 4.65% |
Two to three years | 165.1 | 33.3 | 198.4 | 70.0 | 3.63% | 60.0 | 3.45% |
Three to four years | 105.9 | 73.1 | 179.0 | 50.0 | 2.91% | 50.0 | 2.91% |
Four to five years | 81.3 | 23.7 | 105.0 | 60.0 | 2.99% | 60.0 | 2.99% |
More than five years | - | - | - | 20.0 | 2.01% | 60.0 | 3.81% |
Total | 352.3 | 130.1 | 482.4 | 260.0 | 3.29% | 260.0 | 3.29% |
2010 | |||||||
Floating rate borrowings | Interest rate swaps | ||||||
Drawn £m | Undrawn £m | Total £m | Earliest termination | Latest termination | |||
£m | % | £m | % | ||||
Less than one year | - | 5.0 | 5.0 | 80.0 | 4.79% | 60.0 | 4.83% |
One to two years | 107.9 | 56.1 | 164.0 | 90.0 | 5.43% | 80.0 | 5.54% |
Two to three years | 30.0 | 40.0 | 70.0 | 10.0 | 4.81% | 20.0 | 4.65% |
Three to four years | 89.7 | 35.3 | 125.0 | 10.0 | 4.80% | - | - |
Four to five years | 98.6 | 56.4 | 155.0 | 40.0 | 2.69% | 40.0 | 2.69% |
More than five years | - | - | - | 30.0 | 4.32% | 60.0 | 4.51% |
Total | 326.2 | 192.8 | 519.0 | 260.0 | 4.63% | 260.0 | 4.63% |
14. Related party transactions
Transactions between the Group and its non wholly owned subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are all undertaken on an arms length basis and are detailed as follows:
Key Property Investments Limited ('KPI')
During the year the Group provided management and construction services to KPI for which it received fees totalling £0.2m (2010: £10.9m). The balance due to the Group at year end was £0.3m (2010: £0.6m). No interest is charged on this balance.
Holaw (462) Limited ('Holaw')
The balance due to the Group from Holaw at the year end was £0.3m (2010: £0.3m). No interest is charged on this balance.
Barton Business Park Limited ('Barton')
During the year the Group repaid £0.1m to Barton (2010: borrowed £0.5m). The balance due to Barton at the year end was £3.8m (2010: £3.9m). No interest is charged on this balance.
Sowcrest Limited ('Sowcrest')
During the year £1.2m was paid to Sowcrest (2010: £7.3m) leaving an amount due from Sowcrest at the year end of £12.4m (2010: £11.3m). Interest is chargeable on £10.0m (2010: £8.5m) of the amount outstanding at a fixed rate of 10% (2010: 10%).
Skypark Development Partnership LLP ('Skypark')
The balance due to the Group from Skypark at the year end was £0.5m (2010: £0.6m), of which £0.5m (2010: £0.2m) relates to loan notes issued to the Group. Purchase ledger funding provided by the Group has all been repaid (2010: £0.4m). No interest is charged on these balances.
Chertsey Road Properties Limited ('CRP')
During the year, CRP repaid £nil of its loan (2010: repaid £0.2m) and the balance due to the Group at the year end was £0.1m (2010: £0.1m). No interest is charged on this balance.
Coed Darcy Limited ('CDL')
During the year, CDL repaid £nil of its loan (2010: £0.2m). The balance due to the Group at the year end was £nil (2010: £nil).
Branston Properties Limited ('Branston')
In 2010 the Group entered into an option to acquire the entire issued share capital of Branston, a company in which the family of Simon Clarke has a financial interest, at market value. The price paid for the option was £0.1m and exercise of this is contingent on certain planning milestones being achieved.
St. Modwen Pension Scheme
The Group occupies offices owned by the pension scheme with a value of £0.5m (2010: £0.5m) with an annual rental payable of £0.1m (2010: £0.1m). The balance due to the Group at year end was £0.1m (2010: £nil).
Non-wholly owned subsidiaries
The Company provides administrative and management services and provides a central purchase ledger system to subsidiary companies. In addition, the Company also operates a central treasury function which lends to and borrows from subsidiary undertakings as appropriate. Management fees and interest charged/(credited) during the year and net balances due (to)/from subsidiaries in which the Company has a less than 90% interest were as follows:
Management fees | Interest | Balance | ||||
2011 £m | 2010 £m | 2011 £m | 2010 £m | 2011 £m | 2010 £m | |
Stoke-on-Trent Regeneration Limited | - | - | (0.1) | (0.1) | (4.0) | (3.9) |
Stoke-on-Trent Regeneration (Investments) Limited | - | - | - | - | (0.4) | (0.5) |
Uttoxeter Estates Limited | - | - | - | - | (0.5) | (0.6) |
Widnes Regeneration Limited | - | - | - | - | 2.4 | 2.3 |
Trentham Leisure Limited | - | - | 1.7 | 1.9 | 20.4 | 23.8 |
Norton & Proffitt Developments Limited | - | - | - | - | (0.2) | (0.2) |
VSM Estates (Holdings) Limited | 0.3 | 0.2 | - | - | (11.5) | (9.9) |
0.3 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 6.2 | 11.0 |
All amounts due to the Group are unsecured and will be settled in cash. All amounts above are stated before provisions for doubtful debts of £nil (2010: £nil). No guarantees have been given or received from related parties.
Forward Looking Statements
The Chairman's Statement, Chief Executive's Review and the Financial Review have
been prepared solely to provide additional information to shareholders. They contain
statements that are forward looking. These statements are made by the directors
in good faith based on the information available to them up to the time of approval
of this report. Such statements should be treated with caution due to the inherent
uncertainties and risks associated with forward looking information.
Related Shares:
SMP.L