25th Jun 2010 12:00
JSE share code: DMC AIM share code: DCP ISIN: GB00B183ZC46 (Incorporated in England and Wales) (Registration number 05400982) (SA company registration number 2007/031444/10)
("DiamondCorp" or "the Company" or "the Group")
FINAL RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2009
DiamondCorp plc, the African diamond mining and exploration company, releases its audited results for year ended 31 December 2009.
HIGHLIGHTS
·; Cessation of surface mining activities at our Lace mine in South Africa due to the fall in diamond prices;
·; Management focus on funding and completing underground mine development at Lace;
·; Completion of feasibility study on the Lace kimberlite in September 2009 which concluded a life of mine in excess of 25 years at Lace, with the potential of producing more than 400,000 carats of diamonds per annum at peak production in 2016;
·; Completion of an upgraded resource statement by VP3 Geoservices (Pty) Limited outlining 33 million tonnes of kimberlite at an average grade of 40 carats per hundred tonnes ("cpht"), containing more than 13 million carats in resources, worth some US$1.5 billion at current prices;
·; The granting by the Department of Mineral Resources of a mining right over the Lace mine, providing all the required permits for a long-life underground mining operation;
·; The discovery in the Pretoria archives of records of workings at the Lace mine between 1900 and 1931 which showed that more than 10,000m of development drives are already in place between the 240m level and the 340m level, thereby confirming the Company's strategy to access the kimberlite at -240m by a new 4.5m x 4.5m decline;
·; Utilisation of cash resources to meet loan obligations, long term debt at year end £2.2m;
·; Signing of a joint venture with a local company in Botswana over three diamond exploration licences;
·; Initial drilling of the J-01 kimberlite in the joint venture area in Botswana intersected a 10ha diamondiferous kimberlite to a depth of 330m. At least two more kimberlites will be drilled in 2010; and
·; In November 2009 we raised £600,000 to complete exploration obligations in Botswana and to meet short-term working capital requirements.
POST PERIOD HIGHLIGHTS
·; Subsequent to the year end the Company raised a further £7.1 million to complete the decline development at Lace to the 240 metre level and continue with further exploration in Botswana, to fund 2010 debt obligations and working capital requirements.
The annual report and accounts will be posted to shareholders on 30 June 2010 and made available on the company's website www.diamondcorp.plc.uk
The Notice of AGM will be posted in July.
AIM Nomad: Cenkos Securities plc
AIM Brokers: Cenkos Securities plc, Fairfax I.S. plc JSE Sponsor: PSG Capital (Pty) Limited DiamondCorp plc, Paul Loudon +44 20 7256 2651 Liz Bowman/Ivonne Cantu, Cenkos Securities plc +44 20 7397 8900 Ewan Leggat, Fairfax I.S. plc +44 207 598 5368 John-Paul Dicks, PSG Capital (Pty) Limited +27 21 887 9602 Charmane Russell/Marion Brower, Russell & Associates +27 11 880 3924
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Dear Shareholders,
Although the 2009 financial year is one which we would all rather forget, dominated as it was by the cessation of surface mining activities at our Lace mine in South Africa, we have emerged from the global financial collapse in better shape than we would have expected only a year ago when we had started underground mine development.
After we stopped producing diamonds from the old mine tailings, due to the collapse in diamond prices, we focused on putting into place a number of steps to ease the transition into a fully functioning underground mining operation. These include the following developments:
·; The granting by the Department of Mineral Resources of a mining right over the Lace mine, providing all the required permits for a long-life underground mining operation;
·; The fortuitous discovery in the Pretoria archives of records of workings at the Lace mine between 1900 and 1931 which indicates the extensive mining that took place above the 240m level, leaving only remnant pillars. However, more importantly they show that more than 10,000m of development drives are already in place between the 240m level and the 340m level, thereby confirming our strategy to access the kimberlite at this level by a new 4.5m x 4.5m decline;
·; Using available cash resources to reduce long term debt - by the end of 2010 we will have paid down US$1.5 million of US$5 million raised with Africa Opportunity Fund LP;
·; Completion of feasibility study on the Lace kimberlite in September 2009 which concluded a life of mine in excess of 25 years at Lace, with the potential of producing more than 400,000 carats of diamonds per annum at peak production in 2016;
·; Completion of an upgraded resource statement by VP3 Geoservices (Pty) Limited outlining 33 million tonnes of kimberlite at an average grade of 40 carats per hundred tonnes ("cpht"), containing more than 13 million carats in resources, worth some US$1.5 billion at current prices;
·; Signing of a joint venture with a local company in Botswana over three diamond exploration licences covering an area of 109.2 km2 near the Jwaneng Mine - with nine identified kimberlite targets, represents significant blue sky opportunity. DiamondCorp will earn a 77.5% interest in this joint venture, by completing a definitive feasibility study on at least one of the kimberlites over a period of five years;
·; Initial drilling of the J-01 kimberlite in the joint venture area intersected a 9.9ha diamondiferous kimberlite to a depth of 330m. At least two more kimberlites will be drilled in 2010; and
·; In November 2009 we raised £600,000 to complete exploration obligations in Botswana and to meet short-term working capital requirements. Subsequent to the year end we raised a further £7.1 million to complete the decline development at Lace to the 240 metre level and continue with further exploration in Botswana to fund 2010 debt obligations and working capital requirements.
The Lace mine
The interruption of the tailings retreatment operations at Lace was something we would have liked to avoid. The tailings operation provided useful information about the quality of the Lace diamonds and about the functionality of the Lace plant. Nonetheless, we remain upbeat about the future sustainability of Lace, and are confident that it will continue to yield real value, especially as we have now seen a recovery in diamond prices and believe in strong market fundamentals going forward. Key to our future success at Lace is the development of a decline in order to take a 30,000 tonne bulk sample from the 240m level. Snowden Mining Industry Consultants ("Snowden"), our independent mining engineering consultants, has designed and is overseeing the development of the decline and the subsequent sub-level caving mine plan. Once the grade has been confirmed, mining activities, planned to go down to 850m below surface, will start. Approximately 33 million tonnes of kimberlite have been outlined in the main Lace pipe between the 240 and 850m levels, at a grade of 40 cpht. We plan to use sub-level caving at Lace, incorporating 10,000m of development drives already in place between the 240 and 330m levels. While the existing vertical shaft is being refurbished, material will initially be hauled to surface up the decline at a rate of about 12,000 tonnes per month.
Activities at Lace during 2010 will concentrate on completing the decline. Then in 2011, the 30,000 tonne bulk sample will be extracted for determination of grade at the initial mining level. We will then need to raise additional capital to establish full-scale production from underground at a rate of 1.2 million tonnes per annum during 2011 and to finance further debt repayments and other working capital requirements.
New opportunities
In last year's annual report, we noted how we were seeking opportunities to grow DiamondCorp from a single asset company. The search for attractive targets continued last year and we were very pleased to be able to sign, in June last year, a joint venture over known kimberlite pipes in Botswana, a country which is the world's leading diamond producer, is politically stable and has an attractive fiscal regime.
We now have both a near term mine at Lace and outstanding, advanced exploration targets near Jwaneng, . We will continue to use our skill base to evaluate opportunities in the diamond sector. However, we can assure you that our sights remain high and any acquisition must be able to bring financial gains to our shareholders.
Botswana Exploration Joint Venture
Our main exploration project in Botswana is PL/71, a prospect immediately southeast of the De Beers Jwaneng mine, the richest diamond mine in the world. The prospect comprises five geophysical targets, three of them being priority targets for geophysical survey and drill testing. In November 2009 we completed two diamond boreholes at one of the targets J-01. Both of these holes intersected kimberlite at some 20m down hole depth to the end of the boreholes, indicating the presence of a 10 hectare kimberlite body. Encouragingly for any future mine development, the sand cover in the Jwaneng area is only 20m. Our analysis of 350kg of samples has indicated that the J-01 kimberlite is diamondiferous. Large diameter drilling will now need to be completed in order to recover a large enough sample of kimberlite for grade estimation.
Ground gravity and magnetic surveys have been completed over the two other priority targets J-05 and J12, indicating one of these kimberlites to be up to 4 hectares (ha) in size, the other, although still not entirely conclusive, could be between 5 and 15ha in size. We are currently re-processing the geophysical data to better define the target ahead of a programme of initial diamond drill holes, the results of which will allow us to plan future large diameter drilling and mini bulk testing priorities.
Funding for the future
In November 2009 the company raised £600,000 by way of a placement of shares. The funds were applied mainly to complete exploration obligations in Botswana, make an interest payment and cover costs at Lace. In 2009 rough diamond prices started recovering and since then investor and market sentiment has changed completely. We were then able to raise a further £7.1 million subsequent to the year end, through a placement and subscription, to fund the continued development of the company ,which we will allocate as follows:
·; £4.0 million to implement the decline development and complete the sub-level caving plan to resume underground mining at Lace - between 240m and 330m levels. We plan to access the Lace kimberlite at the 240m level via the decline in the first half of 2011. At that time it is expected that a kimberlite mining sample of approx 30,000 tonnes will be extracted and processed through the Lace plant in order to determined a definitive diamond grade at the mining level;
·; £0.5 million - to fund further drilling in Botswana. Our right to earn in a 77.5% joint venture interest will rely on funding exploration activities and completing a definitive feasibility study by May 2014; and
·; £2.6 million for financing costs, working capital and for debt payments - the company currently has a US$4.5 million loan facility with the Africa Opportunity Fund LP, secured against the South African assets. Some £0.9 million will be used to meet principal and interest payments on this loan during the remainder of 2010.
In conclusion
After such a difficult year we wish to thank all of our staff and consultants who have persevered during extremely difficult times. We are also delighted to welcome Keith McCulloch who has recently joined our team as general manager at Lace. Keith's vast experience in both underground and surface mining throughout Southern Africa stands us in good stead as we resume development at Lace and start to turn to account the very attractive potential 13 million carats in resource. With this development schedule in place we should be well placed to deliver into a forecast rising diamond price environment in 2011. At the same time, we hope for exciting results from our exploration programme in Botswana.
Euan Worthington, Chairman
Paul Loudon, CEO
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
Year ended 31 December 2009
Consolidated income statement |
Note |
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
68,863 |
916,767 |
Cost of sales |
|
(68,863) |
(1,494,253) |
|
|
|
|
GROSS LOSS |
|
- |
(577,486) |
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses |
|
(2,456,448) |
(3,027,623) |
Other costs |
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible asset |
|
(1,648,467) |
- |
|
|
|
|
OPERATING LOSS |
3 |
(4,104,915) |
(3,605,109) |
Investment revenues |
|
35,736 |
32,043 |
Finance costs |
|
(80,177) |
(682,286) |
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE TAX |
|
(4,149,356) |
(4,255,352) |
Tax |
6 |
(57,723) |
(30,132) |
|
|
|
|
LOSS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR |
18 |
(4,207,079) |
(4,285,484) |
|
|
|
|
ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE PARENT |
|
(4,207,079) |
(4,285,484) |
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE |
7 |
(10.01p) |
(11.65p) |
HEADLINE LOSS PER SHARE |
7 |
(6.15p) |
(11.55p) |
All of the activities of the Group are classed as continuing.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Year ended 31 December 2009
Consolidated balance sheet |
Note |
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
8 |
|
|
4,606,026 |
4,606,026 |
Other intangible assets |
8 |
|
|
2,523,303 |
2,311,232 |
Property, plant and equipment |
9 |
|
|
6,412,997 |
5,644,476 |
Deferred tax asset |
15 |
|
|
- |
57,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,542,326 |
12,619,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
11 |
|
|
303,020 |
463,822 |
Other receivables |
12 |
|
|
190,703 |
566,730 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
288,188 |
3,252,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781,911 |
4,282,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
|
14,324,237 |
16,902,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under finance leases |
|
|
|
(73,345) |
(91,269) |
Other payables |
13 |
|
|
(691,829) |
(667,375) |
Current portion of long term loan |
14 |
|
|
(941,738) |
- |
Provisions |
|
|
|
(11,791) |
(9,241) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,718,703) |
(767,885) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Long term loan |
14 |
|
|
(2,163,009) |
(3,399,709) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
|
|
10,442,525 |
12,734,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
17 |
|
|
1,416,960 |
1,232,610 |
Share premium account |
18 |
|
|
17,872,580 |
17,460,220 |
Warrant reserve |
18 |
|
|
555,036 |
710,514 |
Share option reserve |
18 |
|
|
371,675 |
320,261 |
Translation reserve |
18 |
|
|
1,495,317 |
209,339 |
Retained losses |
18 |
|
|
(11,269,043) |
(7,198,253) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
10,442,525 |
12,734,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Year ended 31 December 2009
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
Statement of changes in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
12,734,691 |
13,264,924 |
Loss for financial year |
|
(4,207,079) |
(4,285,484) |
New equity share capital subscribed |
|
184,350 |
189,498 |
Premium on new equity share capital subscribed |
|
412,,360 |
3,343,914 |
Value attributed to warrants granted |
|
(19,189) |
57,566 |
Value attributed to share options granted |
|
51,414 |
37,471 |
Translation reserve |
|
1,285,978 |
126,802 |
|
|
|
|
Closing balance |
|
10,442,525 |
12,734,691 |
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
Year ended 31 December 2009
Consolidated cash flow statement |
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
(4,104,915) |
(3,605,109) |
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
1,027,643 |
645,860 |
|
Share based payment charge |
51,414 |
37,471 |
|
Other gains and losses |
- |
3,998 |
|
(Gain)/loss on disposal of property plant and equipment |
(26,436) |
39,642 |
|
Impairment of intangible asset |
1,648,467 |
- |
|
Finance costs |
- |
(7,913) |
|
Decrease /(increase) in receivables |
376,027 |
(430,235) |
|
Decrease in inventories |
160,802 |
522,227 |
|
Increase in payables |
27,004 |
569,276 |
|
Effect of foreign exchange translation |
64,547 |
(85,894) |
|
Other non cash movements |
44,121 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
(731,326) |
(2,310,677) |
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets |
(1,631,961) |
(883,365) |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(1,281,117) |
(1,334,611) |
|
Investment revenues |
35,736 |
32,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(2,877,342) |
(2,185,933) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
New long term loan raised |
- |
2,846,246 |
|
Repayment of borrowings |
(393,683) |
- |
|
Proceeds on issue of ordinary shares |
596,710 |
3,533,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
203,027 |
6,379,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) /INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(3,405,641) |
1,883,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
3,252,276 |
1,330,707 |
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes |
441,553 |
38,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR |
288,188 |
3,252,276 |
|
|
|
|
AUDIT OPINION
The auditors, Deloitte LLP, have audited the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2009. A copy of their unqualified audit report will be sent to shareholders with the report and accounts and will be made available for inspection at the Company's registered office.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General information
DiamondCorp plc is a Company incorporated in England and Wales under the Companies Act 2006 and as an external company in South Africa under the Companies Act No 61 of 1973. The address of the registered office is given on page 1. The nature of the Group's operations and its principal activities are set out in the Directors' Report on page 7.
These financial statements are presented in pounds sterling because that is the currency of the parent Company of the Group. Foreign operations are included in accordance with the policies set out in this note.
a) Adoption of new and revised International Financial Reporting Standards
In the current year, the following new and revised Standards and Interpretations have been adopted and have affected the amounts reported in these financial statements.
Standards affecting presentation and disclosure
IAS 1 (revised 2007) Presentation of Financial Statements |
IAS 1 (2007) has introduced a number of changes in the format and content of the financial statements. In addition, the reviewed Standard has required the presentation of a consolidated statement of comprehensive income. |
|
|
IFRS 8 Operating Segments |
IFRS 8 is a disclosure Standard that has not resulted in any changes to the amounts reported (see note 2) |
|
|
Three interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee are effective for the current period. These are IFRIC 11 IFRS2: Group and Treasury Share Transactions; IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements; and IFRIC 14 IAS 19 The Limit of a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction. The adoption of these interpretations has not led to any changes in the Group's accounting policies.
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the following Standards and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were in issue but not yet effective:
Amendments to IFRS 2 Vesting conditions and cancellations
IFRS 3 (revised) Business Combinations
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRIC 17 Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners
IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets from Customers
IFRIC 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments
IAS 23 (revised) Borrowing Costs
Amendments to IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
IAS 32 (amended)/IAS 1 (amended) Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation
Amendments to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement: Eligible Hedged Items
Amendments to IAS 39 Reclassification of Financial Assets: Effective Date and Transition
The Directors anticipate that the adoption of these Standards and Interpretations in future periods will have no material impact on the financial statements of the Group.
b) Basis of preparation
DiamondCorp plc was incorporated on 22 March 2005. On 15 May 2006 the Company acquired the entire issued share capital of Crown Diamond Mining Limited which changed its name to Diamondcorp Holdings Limited in 2007 (DHL). DHL owns 74% of the issued share capital of Lace Diamond Mines (Pty) Limited.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis. The financial statements have also been prepared in accordance with IFRSs issued by the International Accounting Board (IASB). There are no differences for the Group in applying IFRS as adopted by the European Union and therefore the Group financial statements comply with Article 4 of the EU IAS Regulation. The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.
c) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and entities controlled by the Company (its subsidiaries). Control is achieved where the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an investee entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
Minority interests in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries are identified separately from the Group's equity therein. Minority interests consist of the amount of those interests at the date of the original business combination (see below) and the minority's share of changes in equity since the date of the combination. Losses applicable to the minority in excess of the minority's interest in the subsidiary's equity are allocated against the interests of the Group except to the extent that the minority has a binding obligation and is able to make an additional investment to cover the losses.
The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated income statement from the effective date of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal, as appropriate.
Where necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies used into line with those used by the Group.
All intra-Group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.
d) Going Concern
In determining the appropriate basis of presentation of the financial statements, the Directors are required to consider whether the Group can continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, this being a period of not less than 12 months from the date of the approval of the financial statements. The Group's business activities and goals are set out in the Letter from the Chairman and Chief Executive. During the next 12 months the Group will be in a mine-development phase and forecasts indicate that the Group may have insufficient financial resources to accomplish all its development goals and meet all its financial obligations over the next 12 months. The raising of additional finance is deemed to be a material uncertainty which casts significant doubt over the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern.
If its financial resources were insufficient, then the Group would be required to (i) supplement its current cash resources by accessing the equity markets in 2010-2011 or by sale of assets or, alternatively, (ii) to modify its development plan to preserve cash.
After making enquiries, given the recent successful £7.1 million fundraising which was well-supported by the existing shareholder base, assuming that the Group adheres to its development plan, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that additional funds will be available within the next 12 months. Accordingly the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of presentation of the financial statements.
The financial statements therefore do not include the adjustments that would result if the Group were not able to continue as a going concern
e) Business combinations
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the purchase method. The cost of the acquisition is measured at the aggregate of the fair values, at the date of exchange, of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments issued by the Group in exchange for control of the acquiree, plus any costs directly attributable to the business combination. The acquiree's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3 "Business Combination" are recognised at their fair value at the acquisition date, except for non-current assets (or disposal Groups) that are classified as held for resale in accordance with IFRS 5 "Non-Current Assets held for Sale and Discontinued Operations" which are not recognised and measured at fair value less costs to sell.
Goodwill arising on acquisition is recognised as an asset and initially measured at cost, being the excess of the cost of the business combination over the Group's interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognised. If, after reassessment, the Group's interest in the net fair value of the acquiree's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities exceeds the cost of the business combination, the excess is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
The interest of minority shareholders in the acquiree is initially measured at the minority's proportion of the net fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognised.
e) Goodwill
Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group's interest in the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of a subsidiary, at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is initially recognised as an asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill which is recognised as an asset is reviewed for impairment at least annually. Any impairment is recognised immediately in profit or loss and is not subsequently reversed.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to the Group's cash-generating unit expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. The cash-generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently when there is an indication that the unit may be impaired. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount of the unit, the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro-rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit.
On disposal of a subsidiary, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or loss on disposal.
g) Intangible assets
Exploration and evaluation expenditure comprises costs which are directly attributable to the acquisition of exploration licenses and subsequent exploration expenditures.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure is carried forward as an asset provided that one of the following conditions is met:
(i) Such costs are expected to be recouped in full through successful development and exploration of the area of interest or alternatively, by its sale;
(ii) Exploration and evaluation activities in the area of interest have reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of economically recoverable reserves with active and significant operations in relation to the area continuing, or planned for the future.
Identifiable exploration and evaluation assets acquired are recognised as assets at their cost of acquisition. An impairment review is performed when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of the assets may exceed their recoverable amounts. Exploration assets are reassessed on a regular basis and these costs are carried forward provided that at least one of the conditions outlined is met. Exploration rights are amortised over the useful economic life of the mine to which it relates, commencing when the asset is available for use.
g) Intangible assets (continued)
Expenditure on research activities is recognised as an expense in the period in which it is incurred.
Capitalised pre-production expenditure includes costs incurred and capitalised during the plant construction phase which are intangible in nature. In prior years these capitalised expenditures were amortised over the life of the work in progress. However, the Mining Right has been granted and for 2008 and subsequent years these expenditures will be amortised at a rate of 5% based on the life of the Mining Right.
Rights to use the Power Line are capitalised at their cost of acquisition and are being amortised over the useful economic life at a rate of 5% per annum.
Underground exploration and evaluation expenditure will be amortised from the point at which it is available for use over its useful economic life, expected to be 5% per annum.
h) Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less any subsequent accumulated depreciation and subsequent accumulated impairment losses.
Depreciation is charged so as to write off the cost, less estimated residual value on assets other than land, over their estimated useful lives, using the reducing balance method, on the following bases:
Plant 5%
Mining fleet 25%
Buildings 4% Other tangible assets 20 - 33.33%
The gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an asset is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognised in income.
i) Impairment of tangible and intangible assets excluding goodwill
At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to the present value using a pre‑tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash‑generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised as an expense immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at a re-valued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.
Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised as income immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at a re-valued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.
j) Taxation
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.
The tax currently payable is based on taxable losses for the period. Taxable loss differs from net loss as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group's liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary differences arise from the initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the tax profit nor the accounting profit.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, and interests in joint ventures, except where the Group is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
k) Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the Group's balance sheet when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are measured at initial recognition at fair value, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised in the income statement when there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired. The allowance recognised is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate computed at initial recognition.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprises cash in hand and demand deposits, and other short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Financial liabilities and equity
Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Group after deducting all of its liabilities.
Trade payables
Trade payables are initially measured at fair value, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset and of allocating interest income over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts (including all fees on points paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the financial asset, or, where appropriate, a shorter period.
Equity instruments
Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.
Intercompany receivables
Intercompany receivables are initially recognised by the Company at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
l) Foreign currencies
The individual financial statements of each Group Company are presented in the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates (its functional currency). For the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position of each Group Company are expressed in pounds sterling, which is the functional currency of the Company, and the presentation currency for the consolidated financial statements.
In preparing the financial statements of the individual entities, transactions in currencies other than the entity's functional currency (foreign currencies) are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Non-monetary items carried at fair value that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing on the date when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not translated.
Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items, and on the retranslation of monetary items, are included in the income statement for the period. In the case of intercompany loans, any foreign exchange differences arising on elimination of these loans upon consolidation of the Group Companies, are classified as equity and transferred to the Group's translation reserve, as these loans are for investment purposes even though short term in nature. Exchange differences arising on the retranslation of non-monetary items carried at fair value are included in the income statement for the period except for differences arising on the retranslation of non-monetary items in respect of which gains and losses are recognised directly in equity. For such non-monetary items, any exchange component of that gain or loss is also recognised directly in equity.
For the purpose of presenting consolidated financial statements, the assets and liabilities of the Group's foreign operations are translated at exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period, unless exchange rates fluctuated significantly during that period, in which case the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions are used. Exchange differences arising, if any, are classified as other comprehensive income and transferred to the Group's translation reserve. Such translation differences are recognised in the income statement in the period in which the foreign operation is disposed of.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate.
m) Restoration, rehabilitation and environmental costs
An obligation to incur restoration, rehabilitation and environmental costs arises when environmental disturbance is caused by the development or ongoing production of a mining property. Such costs arising from the installation of plant and other site preparation work, discounted to their net present value, are provided for and capitalised at the start of each project, as soon as the obligation to incur such costs arises. These costs are charged against profits over the life of the operation, through the depreciation of the asset and the unwinding of the discount on the provision. Costs for restoration of subsequent site damage which is created on an ongoing basis during production are provided for at their net present values and charged against profits as extraction progresses.
Changes in the measurement of a liability relating to the decommissioning of plant or other site preparation work that result from changes in the estimated timing or amount of the cash flow, or a change in the discount rate, are added to, or deducted from, the cost of the related asset in the current period. If a decrease in the liability exceeds the carrying amount of the asset, the excess is recognised immediately in the income statement. If the asset value is increased and there is an indication that the revised carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment test is performed in accordance with the accounting policy above.
n) Inventories
Inventory and work in progress are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Work in progress was valued at the time of acquisition at £2.84 per carat based on an in situ valuation equivalent to 8% of the market value of US$63 per carat achieved at a sale of Lace project diamonds in May 2005. The number of carats in inventory (370,285 carats) was based on an expert determination provided to the Company by a qualified external valuer. Work in progress is being amortized on the units of production method.
o) Revenue
Revenue from the sale of diamonds is recorded when the diamonds are sold at tender. The Lace plant was commissioned on 1 October 2007. The proceeds from the sale of diamonds recovered prior to that date were recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the pre-production expenses held within intangible assets.
Revenue earned from pre-commissioning sales was recognised against, property, plant and equipment in the period incurred. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.
Interest income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that asset's net carrying value.
p) Finance leases
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases. Rentals payable under operating leases are charged to income on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease. Assets held under finance leases are initially recognised as assets of the Group at their fair value at the inception of the lease or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation.
r) Critical accounting judgements
In the process of applying the Group's accounting policies, which are described above, the Directors have made the following judgements that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial information.
- Valuation of inventory - see accounting policy n) above.
- Valuation of warrants issued and ordinary shares issued as consideration - see notes 18 and 19.
- Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets - see policy f) and g) above.
- Going concern - see page 25.
2. business and geographical segments
For management purposes, the Group has one business and geographical segment - diamond mining and exploration in the Republic of South Africa. The Group is also exploring for diamonds in Botswana but at 31 December 2009 the investment was not material to this footnote.
3. OPERATING LOSS
|
Group |
Group |
Company |
Company |
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
Operating loss is after charging (crediting): |
|
|
|
|
Auditors' remuneration |
67,000 |
85,800 |
34,000 |
44,000 |
Foreign exchange (gains) losses |
(249,604) |
85,894 |
(248,260) |
85,753 |
(Profit) loss on disposal of fixed assets |
(26,436) |
39,642 |
- |
- |
Depreciation of tangible assets |
960,692 |
547,042 |
- |
- |
Amortisation of intangible assets |
79,885 |
98,818 |
19.817 |
19,817 |
Amortisation of work in progress |
- |
67,331 |
- |
- |
Impairment of intangible assets |
1,648,467 |
- |
- |
- |
Impairment of inventories |
98,059 |
377,534 |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
The analysis of auditors' remuneration is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
Fees payable to the Company's auditors for the audit of Company's accounts |
34,000 |
34,000 |
34,000 |
34,000 |
Fees payable to the Company's auditors and their associates for other services to the Group |
- |
- |
- |
- |
The audit of the Company's subsidiaries |
33,000 |
31,800 |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total audit fees |
67,000 |
65,800 |
34,000 |
34,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate finance services |
- |
20,000 |
- |
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-audit fees |
- |
20,000 |
- |
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
67,000 |
85,800 |
34,000 |
44,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The corporate finance services in 2008 were in relation to the group's listing on JSE.
4. STAFF COSTS
Staff costs of the Group and Company were:
Group |
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
Wages and salaries |
|
566,772 |
661,452 |
Social security costs |
|
27,165 |
39,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
593,937 |
700,599 |
|
|
|
|
Average number of administrative staff |
|
7 |
9 |
Average number of operational staff |
|
52 |
90 |
|
|
|
|
Average number of employees |
|
59 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
Wages and salaries |
|
141,000 |
138,583 |
Social security costs |
|
18,273 |
15,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,273 |
154,255 |
|
|
|
|
Average number of employees |
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
5. DIRECTORS' EMOLUMENTS
Directors' emoluments for the year ended 31 December 2009 and 2008 and for the highest paid director were as follows:
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
Directors' remuneration |
|
|
|
Fees paid by the Company and its subsidiaries |
|
231,500 |
213,033 |
|
|
|
|
Emoluments of highest paid director |
|
137,500 |
147,500 |
|
|
|
|
6. Tax
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
Current tax |
|
- |
87,855 |
Deferred tax (see note 15) |
|
57,723 |
(57,723) |
|
|
|
|
Tax expense for the year |
|
57,723 |
30,132 |
|
|
|
|
The charge for the year can be reconciled to the loss per the income statement as follows:
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
Loss for the year |
(4,149,356) |
(4,255,352) |
|
|
|
Tax at the UK corporation tax rate of 28% (2008 - 28%) |
(1,161,820) |
(1,191,498) |
Expenses not deductible |
184,165 |
603,933 |
Short term timing differences |
- |
364 |
Tax losses carried forward |
977,655 |
632,673 |
Prior year adjustment - deferred tax |
57,723 |
(15,340) |
|
|
|
Tax expense for the year |
57,723 |
30,132 |
|
|
|
The tax charge for the year relates to interest earned by Soapstone Investments (Pty) Limited on an intercompany loan to Lace Diamond Mines (Pty) Limited.
7. LOSS PER SHARE
a) Basic loss per share
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year. The weighted average number of shares used is 42,023,831 (2008 - 36,772,136).
b) Diluted loss per share
International Accounting Standard 33 requires presentation of diluted earnings per share when a company could be called upon to issues shares that would decrease the net profit or increase the net loss per share. For a loss making company with outstanding options, net loss per share would only be increased by the exercise of out-of-money options. Since it seems inappropriate to assume that option holders would exercise out-of-money options, no adjustment has been made to diluted loss per share for out-of-money share options.
c) Headline loss per share
The Group presents an alternative measure of loss per share after excluding all capital gains and losses from the loss attributable to ordinary shareholders. The impact of this is as follows:
|
2009
|
2008
|
Basic |
|
|
Loss per share |
(10.01p) |
(11.65p) |
Effect of (gain)/loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
(0.06p) |
0.10p |
Effect of impairment of intangible assets |
3.92p |
- |
|
|
|
Adjusted loss per share |
(6.15) |
(11.55p) |
|
|
|
8. INTANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS
For the year ended 31 December 2009
Group |
Goodwill £ |
Jwaneng £ |
Power line Phase 1 £ |
Power line Phase 2 £ |
Pre-production capitalised expenses £ |
Under-ground capitalised expenses £ |
Mineral rights £ |
Total £ |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2009 |
4,606,026 |
- |
362,151 |
137,788 |
419,810 |
899,786 |
609,778 |
7,035,339 |
Exchange differences |
- |
- |
57,934 |
22,043 |
61,655 |
138,861 |
34,144 |
314,637 |
Additions |
- |
99,120 |
- |
- |
- |
1,532,841 |
- |
1,631,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
4,606,026 |
99,120 |
420,085 |
159,831 |
481,465 |
2,571,488 |
643,922 |
8,981,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2009 |
- |
- |
(22,878) |
(4,431) |
(42,311) |
(17,972) |
(30,489) |
(118,081) |
Charge for the year |
- |
- |
(18,885) |
(2,433) |
(27,619) |
- |
(30,948) |
(79,885) |
Exchange differences |
- |
- |
(5,779) |
(982) |
3,336 |
205 |
(2,955) |
(6,175) |
Impairment charge |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(1,648,467) |
- |
(1,648,467) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
- |
- |
(47,542) |
(7,846) |
(66,594) |
(1,666,234) |
(64,392) |
(1,852,608) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
4,606,026 |
99,120 |
372,543 |
151,985 |
414,871 |
905,254 |
579,530 |
7,129,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
4,606,026 |
- |
339,273 |
133,357 |
377,499 |
881,814 |
579,289 |
6,917,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment charge relates to those costs associated with the section of the underground tunnelling which no longer has any purpose following the decision to cease mining operations in the above 240 metre mining level.
8. INTANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS (continued)
For the year ended 31 December 2008
Group |
|
Goodwill £ |
Power line Phase 1 £ |
Power line Phase 2 £ |
Pre-production capitalised expenses £ |
Under-ground capitalised expenses £ |
Mineral rights £ |
Total £ |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2008 |
|
4,606,026 |
341,221 |
- |
424,792 |
80,388 |
607,299 |
6,059,726 |
Exchange differences |
|
- |
1,732 |
13,401 |
(4,982) |
79,618 |
2,479 |
92,248 |
Additions |
|
- |
19,198 |
124,387 |
- |
739,780 |
- |
883,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
4,606,026 |
362,151 |
137,788 |
419,810 |
899,786 |
609,778 |
7,035,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2008 |
|
- |
(4,265) |
- |
(3,868) |
- |
- |
(8,133) |
Charge for the year |
|
- |
(16,806) |
(4,000) |
(34,734) |
(13,827) |
(29,451) |
(98,818) |
Exchange differences |
|
- |
(1,807) |
(431) |
(3,709) |
(4,145) |
(1,038) |
(11,130) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
- |
(22,878) |
(4,431) |
(42,311) |
(17,972) |
(30,489) |
(118,081) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
4,606,026 |
339,273 |
133,357 |
377,499 |
881,814 |
579,289 |
6,917,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2007 |
|
4,606,026 |
336,956 |
- |
420,924 |
80,388 |
607,299 |
6,051,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. INTANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS (continued)
For the year ended 31 December 2009 Company |
|
|
|
Mineral rights £ |
|
Cost and carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2009 |
|
|
|
376,526 |
|
Charge for the year |
|
|
|
(19,817) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
356,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended 31 December 2008 Company |
|
|
|
Mineral rights £ |
|
Cost and carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2008 |
|
|
|
396,343 |
|
Charge for the year |
|
|
|
(19,817) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
|
|
376,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Group has received its Mining Right for the Lace project. Accordingly, the amortisation policy for pre-production capitalised expenses was changed effective 1 January 2008 to 5% to conform with the life of the plant for amortisation purposes.
The Group has been granted "New Order Prospecting Rights" in respect of two properties in the Free State of the Republic of South Africa:
(i) Ruby 691 Farm, which covers an area of 1,180.6 hectares and in which is situated the historical workings of the Lace diamond mine; and
(ii) Silverbank Farm, which covers an area of 4,407.6 hectares.
In addition, the Group purchased the surface rights to Subdivision 1 of Ruby 691 Farm which is 108.2 hectares in area.
The Group tests annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indications that goodwill might be impaired. The Group has one reportable business segment and all goodwill is associated with that segment. The recoverable amounts of the cash generating unit ("CGU") is determined from value in use calculations. The key assumptions for the value in use calculations are those regarding the discount rates, growth rates and expected changes to selling prices and direct costs during the period. A discount rate of 10% has been used, which is consistent with the rate used for determining the value of purchased intangibles.
The Group's test for impairment is based on a model adopted by management from the model prepared for the Lace Mine by one of its technical advisors This model uses grade assumptions based on the resource statement of the Group's technical advisor and it uses diamond prices achieved at its last diamond tender in 2009. The model assumes that the Lace mine will reach full production of 1,200,000 tonnes of kimberlite in 2012 and run through 2034. The valuations of the Lace Mine generated by the Model under variable sets of assumptions as to grades, revenues and costs indicate that there has been no impairment of goodwill during the year.
9. property, plant and equipment
For the year ended 31 December 2009
Group |
Plant |
Mining fleet |
Land and buildings |
Other tangible assets |
Total |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2009 |
4,402,552 |
1,737,553 |
205,561 |
200,324 |
6,545,990 |
Additions |
352,924 |
833,051 |
8,965 |
86,177 |
1,281,117 |
Exchange differences |
743,893 |
309,593 |
33,890 |
41,715 |
1,129,091 |
Disposals |
- |
(551,143) |
- |
- |
(551,143) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
5,499,369 |
2,329,054 |
248,416 |
328,216 |
8,405,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2009 |
(287,926) |
(517,890) |
(25,368) |
(70,330) |
(901,514) |
Charge for the year |
(373,707) |
(539,448) |
(14,191) |
(33,346) |
(960,692) |
Disposals |
- |
136,949 |
- |
- |
136,949 |
Exchange differences |
(103,069) |
(143,089) |
(5,651) |
(14,992) |
(266,801) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
(764,702) |
(1,063,478) |
(45,210) |
(118,668) |
(1,992,058) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
4,734,667 |
1,265,576 |
203,206 |
209,548 |
6,412,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
4,114,626 |
1,219,663 |
180,193 |
129,994 |
5,644,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. property, plant and equipment (continued)
Group |
Plant |
Mining fleet |
Land and buildings |
Other tangible assets |
Total |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2008 |
3,970,156 |
1,010,603 |
133,933 |
162,836 |
5,277,528 |
Additions |
660,677 |
675,729 |
54,667 |
34,807 |
1,425,880 |
Exchange differences |
48,384 |
51,221 |
16,961 |
2,681 |
119,247 |
Disposals |
(276,665) |
- |
- |
- |
(276,665) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
4,402,552 |
1,737,553 |
205,561 |
200,324 |
6,545,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2008 |
(48,899) |
(233,444) |
(10,598) |
(25,898) |
(318,839) |
Charge for the year |
(236,574) |
(259,870) |
(10,464) |
(40,134) |
(547,042) |
Disposals |
20,750 |
- |
- |
- |
20,750 |
Exchange differences |
(23,203) |
(24,576) |
(4,306) |
(4,298) |
(56,383) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
(287,926) |
(517,890) |
(25,368) |
(70,330) |
(901,514) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
4,114,626 |
1,219,663 |
180,193 |
129,994 |
5,644,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2007 |
3,921,257 |
777,159 |
123,335 |
136,938 |
4,958,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES
For the year ended 31 December 2009
Company |
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
4,217,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended 31 December 2008
Company |
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and carrying amount |
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2008 |
|
|
|
4,217,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
The investment represents 100% of the share capital of Crown Diamond Mining Limited ("CDM") which was acquired on 15 May 2006. CDM changed its name to Diamondcorp Holdings Limited in 2007 ("DHL") and is a Company registered in the British Virgin Islands.
The Africa Opportunity Fund L.P. loan (Note 14) is secured by the assets of the subsidiaries. For a list of subsidiaries, please refer to note 21.
11. INVENTORIES
Group |
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
Work in progress |
|
|
|
|
Cost and carrying amount at beginning of year |
|
|
261,230 |
754,765 |
Impairment of inventories |
|
|
- |
(377,534) |
Amortisation |
|
|
- |
(67,331) |
Foreign exchange gain/(loss) |
|
|
41,790 |
(48,670) |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at end of year |
|
|
303,020 |
261,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond inventories |
|
|
- |
126,335 |
Consumable and other inventories |
|
|
- |
76,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,020 |
463,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 diamond inventories amounted to nil (2008 - 17,713) carats.
Work in progress was valued on acquisition at £2.84 per carat based on an in situ valuation equivalent to 8% of the market value of US$63 per carat achieved at a sale of Lace project diamonds in May 2005. The number of carats in work in progress (370,285 carats) was based on an expert determination provided to the Company by a qualified external valuer. Commissioning of the tailings plant occurred on 1 October 2007. In 2008, the carrying value of work in progress was written down by £377,534 to reflect depreciation in diamond prices and reduction in grades.
No amortisation was recorded in 2009 (2008 - £67,331).
12. Other RECEIVABLES
|
Group 2009 £ |
Group 2008 £ |
Company 2009 £ |
Company 2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables due from Group undertakings |
- |
- |
14,777,171 |
13,081,817 |
Prepayments and other receivables |
190,703 |
566,730 |
- |
5,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,703 |
566,730 |
14,777,171 |
13,087,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Directors consider that the carrying amount of these assets approximates their fair value. All receivables balances are non-interest bearing.
Included in prepayments and other receivables, is a rehabilitation bond held by the Department of Minerals and Energy in the amount of £62,170 (2008 - £62,170) providing for the cost of rehabilitation on termination of the Lace project.
Credit risk management
The Group and Company's principal financial assets are bank balances and cash. The credit risk on liquid funds is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit-ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies. The Group currently holds no trade receivables. Included within loans and receivables is an amount of £nil (2008 - £100,000) which is a contracted other receivable. This is the amount after an impairment loss recognised in the year of £nil (2008 - £170,000). Management reviews the credit worthiness of all customers before entering into a transaction.
The Company also holds amounts receivable from related parties as disclosed in note 16. Management reviews the credit worthiness of all balances due from related parties with reference to future profitability.
13. OTHER PAYABLES
|
Group 2009 £ |
Group 2008 £ |
Company 2009 £ |
Company 2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax |
- |
87,855 |
- |
- |
Interest on long term loan |
79,781 |
67,342 |
79,781 |
67,342 |
Accruals and deferred income |
612,048 |
512,178 |
156,852 |
90,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
691,829 |
667,375 |
236,633 |
158,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Directors consider that the carrying amount of these liabilities approximates their fair value. All payables balances are non-interest bearing.
14. Long term loan
On 17 October 2008, the Company completed a long term loan with Africa Opportunity Fund L.P. ("AOF") in the amount of US$5,000,000. The loan is secured by the Company's equity interest in Lace Diamond Mines (Pty) Ltd and by the assets of the Company's subsidiaries.
The loan is repayable over 36 months as detailed in the schedule below.
AOF Repayment Schedule
Repayment date |
Capital repayment Schedule (US$) |
Interest payment schedule (US$) |
Total (US$) |
|
|
|
|
16 April 2009 |
- |
299,178 |
299,178 |
16 October 2009 |
- |
300,822 |
300,822 |
16 April 2010 |
500,000 |
299,178 |
799,178 |
16 October 2010 |
1,000,000 |
270,740 |
1,270,740 |
16 April 2011 |
1,500,000 |
209,425 |
1,709,425 |
16 October 2011 |
2,000,000 |
120,329 |
2,120,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
1,499,672 |
6,499,672 |
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of payments made on long term loan: |
|
|
|
Amounts paid as at 31 December 2009 |
- |
600,000 |
600,000 |
Amounts due within 1 year |
1,500,000 |
569,918 |
2,069,918 |
Amounts due after 1 year |
3,500,000 |
329,754 |
3,829,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
1,499,672 |
6,499,672 |
|
|
|
|
Interest accrues daily and is payable half-yearly at a rate of 12% with the portion of the interest relating to the year ended 31 December 2009, US$124,932, being accrued for in these accounts (£78,435).
The cost of the warrants granted to AOF, £57,566, (refer note 18) has been offset against the loan in accordance with IAS 39. The cost of these warrants is to be expensed over the life of the loan and does not constitute payment towards the loan. The warrant cost expensed during the period was £19,189 (2008 - £3,998).
All payments of interest and principal due through 16 April 2010 have been made and the AOF loan is in good standing. The principal balance due at the date of approval of these financial statements is US$4,500,000.
15. deferred tax
|
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January |
|
|
(57,723) |
- |
Debit/(Credit) to the income statement |
|
|
57,723 |
(57,723) |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December |
|
|
- |
(57,723) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
Current year credit |
|
|
- |
(42,383) |
Prior year adjustment |
|
|
57,723 |
(15,340) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,723 |
(57,723) |
|
|
|
|
|
The deferred tax asset relates to capital allowances in excess of depreciation.
Until it is probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or partial recovery of deferred tax assets of £3,325,273 (2008 - £2,163,453), the accounting benefit of tax losses will not be reflected in the accounts.
16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Directors consider that there is no ultimate controlling party of the Company. Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company have been disclosed in the Company section of this note.
The Directors are considered to be the key personnel of the Group and therefore all transactions with such individuals have been disclosed below and in the audited section of the remuneration report.
Details of transactions between the Group and other related parties are disclosed below.
During the year ended 31 December 2009:
(i) £94,000 (2008 - £82,000) were paid to the following companies as Directors' remuneration:
- £60,000 to Glendree Capital Management Limited (2008 - £60,000), a Company owned by P R Loudon;
- £10,000 to Mining Finance Solutions (2008 - £10,000), a Company owned by E A Worthington;
- £12,000 to Loeb Aron & Company Limited (2008 - £12,000), a Company where J Willis-Richards is a director;
- £12,000 to European Islamic Investment Bank plc (2008 - £1,533), represented on the Company's Board of Directors by R L Henshall;
In addition, during the year ended 31 December 2009:
(i) DiamondCorp plc incurred rent of £25,000 from Loeb Aron & Company Limited (2008 - £25,000).
(ii) Lace incurred consulting fees of £1,142 (2008 - £4,110) from The Mineral Corporation, a Company in which G Robbertze, previously a director of Lace, is a principal.
Company
The Company held a loan to Diamondcorp Holdings Limited of £14,659,140 (2008 - £13,064,690), to Lace Diamond Mining (Pty) Limited of £17,127 (2008 - £17,274) and to Botswana DiamondCorp Limited of £100,904 (2008 - £nil).
17. SHARE CAPITAL
|
|
|
2009 £ |
|
2008 £ |
Authorised share capital |
|
|
|
|
|
166,666,666 ordinary shares of 3 pence each |
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
£ |
No. |
£ |
Called up, allotted and fully paid |
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares of 3 pence each |
|
47,231,995 |
1,416,960 |
41,086,995 |
1,232,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 1 February 2007 the Company was admitted to the AIM market and simultaneously issued 2,750,000 ordinary shares at 90 pence each. In accordance with the terms of the Convertible Loan Notes, on the date of admission the notes converted to 6,500,000 ordinary shares.
During the year ended 31 December 2007, 783,330 warrants were exercised for proceeds of £235,000 and the same number of ordinary shares were issued.
On 26 May 2008 the Company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) and simultaneously issued 2,249,923 ordinary shares at the ZAR equivalent of 77.7 pence each.
On 7 November 2008 the Company issued 4,000,000 ordinary shares of 3 pence each in respect of a private placement completed at 45 pence per ordinary share.
During the year ended 31 December 2008, 66,664 warrants were exercised for proceeds of £19,999 and the same number of ordinary shares were issued.
On 6 November 2009 the Company issued 6,000,000 ordinary shares at 10 pence each and on 20 November 2009 a further 145,000 ordinary shares were issued at 13.8 pence each.
On 11 January 2010 the trading of DiamondCorp's shares on the JSE was transferred to Alt-X.
18. RESERVES
For the year ended 31 December 2009
Group
|
Warrant reserve £ |
Share option reserve £ |
Share premium account £ |
Retained losses £ |
Translation reserve £ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2009 |
710,514 |
320,261 |
17,460,220 |
(7,198,253) |
209,339 |
Loss for the year |
- |
- |
- |
(4,207,079) |
- |
Warrants expired |
(136,289) |
- |
- |
136,289 |
- |
Premium arising on issue of equity shares |
- |
- |
435,660 |
- |
- |
Share option expense in year |
- |
51,414 |
- |
- |
- |
Movement during the year |
(19,189) |
- |
- |
- |
1,285,978 |
Issue costs |
- |
- |
(23,300) |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
555,036 |
371,675 |
17,872,580 |
(11,269,043) |
1,495,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
Warrant reserve £ |
Share option reserve £ |
Share premium account £ |
Retained losses £ |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
At 1 January 2009 |
710,514 |
320,261 |
17,460,220 |
(3,304,476) |
|
||||
Loss for the year |
- |
- |
- |
(876,466) |
|
||||
Warrants expired |
|
(136,289) |
- |
- |
136,289 |
||||
Premium arising on issue of equity shares |
- |
- |
435,660 |
- |
|
||||
Share option expense in year |
- |
51,414 |
- |
- |
|
||||
Movement during the year |
(19,189) |
- |
- |
- |
|
||||
Issue costs |
- |
- |
(23,300) |
- |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
At 31 December 2009 |
555,036 |
371,675 |
17,872,580 |
(4,044,653) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
18. RESERVES (continued)
For the year ended 31 December 2008
Group
|
Warrant reserve £ |
Share option reserve £ |
Share premium account £ |
Retained losses £ |
Translation reserve £ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2008 |
740,949 |
282,790 |
14,116,306 |
(3,000,770) |
82,537 |
Loss for the year |
- |
- |
- |
(4,285,484) |
- |
(Exercise of warrants)/Share premium on exercise |
(7,333) |
- |
- |
7,333 |
- |
Warrants expired |
(80,668) |
- |
- |
80,668 |
- |
Premium arising on issue of equity shares |
- |
- |
3,378,692 |
- |
- |
Value of warrants over ordinary shares |
57,566 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Share option expense in year |
- |
37,471 |
- |
- |
- |
Movement during the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
126,802 |
Issue costs |
- |
- |
(34,778) |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
710,514 |
320,261 |
17,460,220 |
(7,198,253) |
209,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
Warrant reserve £ |
Share option reserve £ |
Share premium account £ |
Retained losses £ |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
At 1 January 2008 |
740,949 |
282,790 |
14,116,306 |
(1,608,313) |
|
||||
Loss for the year |
- |
- |
|
(1,784,164) |
|
||||
(Exercise of warrants)/Share premium on exercise |
(7,333) |
- |
- |
7,333 |
|
||||
Warrants expired |
|
(80,668) |
- |
|
80,668 |
||||
Premium arising on issue of equity shares |
- |
- |
3,378,692 |
- |
|
||||
Issue of warrants over ordinary shares |
57,566 |
- |
|
- |
|
||||
Share option expense in year |
- |
37,471 |
|
- |
|
||||
Issue costs |
- |
- |
(34,778) |
- |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
At 31 December 2008 |
710,514 |
320,261 |
17,460,220 |
(3,304,476) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
18. RESERVES (continued)
WARRANTS
|
|
|
Warrants in issue |
Warrant reserve £ |
Group and Company |
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
6,066,666 |
555,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Group and Company |
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
|
7,316,666 |
710,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Vendor Warrants
The vendors of Crown Diamond Mining Limited (which changed its name to Diamondcorp Holdings Limited in 2007) were entitled to be issued on completion of the sale of its ordinary share capital to the Company with a total of 4,166,666 warrants to subscribe for ordinary shares of 3 pence each at a price of the lower of 180 pence or price at which the Company raises equity finance on admission to the Alternative Investment Market (90 pence). These warrants expire on 1 February 2012, being five years from the date of admission to the Alternative Investment Market. Certificates in relation to these warrants were issued on 30 June 2006 following and taking into account, the consolidation of the Company's share capital on that date.
These warrants were valued by the Directors using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based on the assumptions as detailed below.
(ii) AOF Warrants
In 2008 a warrant was issued to Africa Opportunity Fund to subscribe for 1,650,000 ordinary shares of 3 pence each, exercisable at 65.3 pence for a period of 36 months from the date of grant, 17 October 2008.
These warrants were valued by the Directors using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based on the assumptions as detailed below.
(iii) BBK Warrants
In 2007 a warrant was issued to BBK Consultancy plc to subscribe for 250,000 ordinary shares of 3 pence each for a period of 3 years at an exercise price of 121.5 pence. The warrants vest when the Company's share price is above 135 pence per share for 28 consecutive trading days and are exercisable at any time up to and including 30 April 2011.
These warrants were valued by the Directors using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based on the assumptions as detailed below.
(iv) Loeb Aron Warrants
In reference to work performed on fundraisings by Loeb Aron & Company Limited, Loeb Aron were issued warrants over 250,000 ordinary shares of 3 pence each for a period of two years from the date of admission to the Alternative Investment Market, exercisable at 105 pence per share. These warrants expired on 1 February 2009.
These warrants were valued by the Directors using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based on the assumptions as detailed below.
18. RESERVES (continued)
(v) Cenkos Warrants
In January 2007, Cenkos Securities plc, the Company's nominated advisor and broker, received warrants to subscribe for up to 1,000,000 ordinary shares of 3 pence each exercisable at 121.5 pence for a period of 24 months from date of admission to the AIM market. These warrants expired on 1 February 2009
These warrants were valued by the Directors using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based on the assumptions as detailed below.
(vi) Loan Note Warrants
The holders of convertible loan notes which were converted into 4,750,000 ordinary shares of 1 penny each on 21 December 2005, were entitled to be issued, on conversion, with a total of 1,583,333 warrants to subscribe for ordinary shares of 3 pence each at the lower of 180 pence per share or price at which the Company issued ordinary shares of 3 pence each on admission to the Alternative Investment Market. The exercise price was reduced to 30 pence per ordinary share when admission did not take place prior to 30 April 2006. These warrants expired on 30 April 2008 with 66,664 warrants being exercised before the expiry date. Certificates in relation to these warrants were issued on 30 June 2006 following and taking into account, the consolidation of the Company's share capital on that date.
These warrants were valued by the Directors using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based on the assumptions as detailed below.
Black-Scholes Assumptions |
Loan Note Warrants* |
Vendor Warrants* |
Loeb Aron Warrants |
Cenkos Warrants |
BBK Warrants |
AOF Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term range |
2 years |
5.6 years |
2 years |
2 years |
3 years |
0.5 years |
Expected dividend yield |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Risk free interest rate |
5 % |
5 % |
5 % |
5 % |
5 % |
2 % |
Share price volatility |
55 % |
55 % |
55 % |
55 % |
40 % |
40 % |
Share price at time of grant |
45 pence |
45 pence |
90 pence |
90 pence |
90 pence |
56.5 pence |
* These warrants were subject to the share consolidation on 30 June 2006.
18. RESERVES (continued)
SHARE OPTIONS (refer note 19)
|
|
|
Stock options in issue |
Stock option reserve £ |
|
|
|
|
|
Group and Company |
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
2,685,000 |
371,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
Group and Company |
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
|
2,945,000 |
320,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) 2007 UK Options
During 2007, options over 2,940,000 ordinary shares of 3 pence each were granted to employees and management of the Company, exercisable at 135 pence for a period of 10 years from the date of issue. 270,000 of these options vested on grant and the balance vest over 3 years at one-third at each anniversary of the issue date. 690,000 of these options were forfeited during 2008 by reason of retirement.
Share options granted during the year ended 31 December 2007 were valued by the Directors using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based upon the assumptions as detailed below:
(ii) The DiamondCorp Share Option Plan
During 2008, a share option plan was approved and registered in the Republic of South Africa to provide eligible employees of the Group with the opportunity to acquire as incentive an interest in the equity of the Company. Eligible employees were granted options over 695,000 ordinary shares of 3 pence each, exercisable at 50 pence for a period of 10 years from the date of issue, 16 December 2008. These options vest over 3 years at one-third at each anniversary of the issue date.
These options were valued by the Directors using the Black-Scholes valuation model, based upon the assumptions as detailed below.
Black-Scholes Assumptions |
|
2007 UK Option Plan |
The DiamondCorp Share Option Plan |
|
|
|
|
Term range |
|
3 years |
3 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
Nil |
Nil |
Risk free interest rate |
|
5 % |
2 % |
Share price volatility |
|
40 % |
40 % |
Share price at time of grant |
|
90 pence |
34.5 pence |
19. Share based payments
Equity-settled share option scheme
The Company has a share option scheme for all employees of the Group. Options are exercisable at a price equal to the average quoted market price of the Company's shares on the date of grant. The vesting period is three years. If the options remain unexercised after a period of ten years from the date of grant the options expire. Options are generally forfeited if the employee leaves the Group before the options vest.
Details of the share options outstanding during the year are as follows.
|
Number of share options |
2009 Weighted average exercise price (£) |
Number of share options |
2008 Weighted average exercise price (£) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
2,945,000 |
115p |
2,940,000 |
135p |
Granted during the year |
200,000 |
50p |
695,000 |
50p |
Forfeited during the year |
(460,000) |
|
(690,000) |
|
Exercised during the year |
- |
|
- |
|
Expired during the year |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
2,685,000 |
124p |
2,945,000 |
115p |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
1,588,333 |
129p |
930,000 |
135p |
|
|
|
|
|
The options outstanding at 31 December 2009 had a weighted average exercise price of 124p, and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 8.3 years. The aggregate of the estimated fair values of the options granted on those dates is £414,942. At 31 December 2008, 2,945,000 options were outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of 115p.
The inputs into the Black-Scholes model are as follows:
|
|
2009 |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average share price |
|
30.5p |
34.5p |
Weighted average exercise price |
|
50p |
50p |
Expected volatility |
|
40% |
40% |
Expected life |
|
3 years |
3 years |
Risk-free rate |
|
2% |
2% |
Expected dividend yields |
|
0% |
0% |
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility was determined based on management's best estimate. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.
During 2009, the Group recognised total expenses of £51,414 (2008 - £37,471) relating to equity-settled share-based payment transactions.
20. Financial Instruments
Group and Company
Capital risk management
The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to continue as going concerns while maximising the return to stakeholders through the optimisation of the debt and equity balance. The capital structure of the Group consists of debt, which includes the borrowings disclosed in note 15, cash and cash equivalents and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising issued capital, reserves and retained earnings as disclosed in note 18.
Significant accounting policies
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in note 1 to the financial statements.
Categories of financial instruments
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
Carrying value |
Carrying value |
||
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
Loans and receivables (including cash and cash equivalents) |
288,188 |
3,352,276 |
14,938,769 |
15,376,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Amortised cost |
3,635,129 |
3,822,819 |
3,206,945 |
55,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial risk management objectives
The Group's financial function provides services to the business, monitors and manages the financial risks relating to the operations of the Group. These risks include market risk (including currency risk, fair value interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow interest rate risk.
The Group does not enter into or trade financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for any purpose.
Market risk
The Group's activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. There has been an increase in the Group's exposure to market risks due to the long term loan obtained during the year. The manner in which the Group measures and manages the risk has not changed.
20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
Foreign currency risk management
The Group undertakes certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Hence, exposures to exchange rate fluctuations arise.
The carrying amounts of the Group's and Company's foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at the reporting date are as follows:
|
Assets (Liabilities) |
|
|
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash denominated in South African Rand |
128,830 |
1,188,930 |
|
|
Cash denominated in United States Dollar |
3,540 |
414,393 |
|
|
Long term loan denominated in United States Dollar |
(3,139,126) |
(3,453,277) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency sensitivity analysis
The Group is exposed to the currency of South Africa (Rand) and the United States Dollar.
The following table details the Group's sensitivity to a 20% increase and decrease in the Sterling against South African Rand and United States Dollar. 20% is the sensitivity rate used when reporting foreign currency risk internally to key management personnel and represents management's assessment of the reasonably possible change in foreign exchange rates. The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign currency denominated monetary items and adjusts their translation at the period end for a 20% change in foreign currency rates. A negative number below indicates a decrease in profit where the Sterling strengthens 20% against the relevant currency. For a 20% weakening of the Sterling against the relevant currency, there would be an equal and opposite impact on the profit and the balances below would be positive.
|
Rand currency impact |
|
|
|
|
2009 £ |
2008 £ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss due to a 20% change against ZAR |
21,472 |
198,155 |
|
|
Loss due to a 20% change against USD |
(522,598) |
(506,481) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Group's sensitivity to foreign currency has increased during the current period, because the Company held higher balances of foreign currency.
In management's opinion, the impact of the sensitivity analysis is representative.
Liquidity risk management
Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board of Directors, which has built an appropriate liquidity risk management framework for the management of the Group's short term funding and liquidity management requirements. The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves, by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities.
20. Financial Instruments (continued)
Liquidity and interest risk tables
The following table details the Group's remaining contractual maturity for its non-derivative financial liabilities. The tables have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities based on the earliest date on which the Group can be required to pay. The table includes the principal cash flows.
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Weighted average effective interest rate % |
Less than 1 year £ |
1 - 2 years £ |
2 + years £ |
Total £ |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-interest bearing |
|
530,382 |
- |
- |
530,382 |
|
||||
Finance lease liability |
14.20 % |
46,323 |
27,022 |
- |
73,345 |
|
||||
Fixed interest rate instruments |
12.00 % |
1,299,547 |
2,404,416 |
- |
3,703,963 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
1,876,252 |
2,431,438 |
- |
4,307,690 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-interest bearing |
|
278,273 |
- |
- |
278,273 |
|
||||
Finance lease liability |
14.20 % |
35,330 |
35,330 |
20,609 |
91,269 |
|
||||
Fixed interest rate instruments |
12.00 % |
414,600 |
1,281,279 |
2,370,618 |
4,066,497 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
728,203 |
1,316,609 |
2,391,227 |
4,436,039 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Weighted average effective interest rate % |
Less than 1 year £ |
1 - 2 years £ |
2 + years £ |
Total £ |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-interest bearing |
|
102,198 |
- |
- |
102,198 |
|
||||
Fixed interest rate instruments |
12.00 % |
1,299,547 |
2,404,416 |
- |
3,703,963 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
1,401,745 |
2,404,416 |
- |
3,806,161 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-interest bearing |
|
55,679 |
- |
- |
55,679 |
|
||||
Fixed interest rate instruments |
12.00 % |
414,600 |
1,281,279 |
2,370,618 |
4,066,497 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
470,279 |
1,281,279 |
2,370,618 |
4,122,176 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
20. Financial Instruments (continued)
The following table details the Group's and Company's expected maturity for its non-derivative financial assets. The tables below have been drawn up based on the undiscounted contractual maturities of the financial assets including interest that will be earned on those assets.
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
Weighted average effective interest rate % |
Less than 1 month £ |
Weighted average effective interest rate % |
Less than 1 month £ |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
288,188 |
|
161,598 |
Fixed interest rate instruments |
10.09 % |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288,188 |
|
161,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
2,600,971 |
|
2,295,131 |
Fixed interest rate instruments |
10.09 % |
777,305 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,378,276 |
|
2,295,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
21. SUBSIDIARIES
Details of the Company's subsidiaries at 31 December 2009 were as follows:
Name of subsidiary |
Place of incorporation (or registration) and operation |
Proportion of ownership interest % |
Proportion of voting power held % |
Principal activity |
|
|
|
|
|
DiamondCorp Holdings Limited (1) |
British Virgin Islands |
100 |
100 |
Holding Company of a Trading Group |
Botswana DiamondCorp Limited |
British Virgin Islands |
100 |
100 |
Holding Company |
Lace Diamond Mines (Pty) Limited |
Republic of South Africa |
74 |
74 |
Diamond exploration and exploitation |
Soapstone Investments (Pty) Limited |
Republic of South Africa |
100 |
100 |
Investment Company |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Formerly named Crown Diamond Mining Limited
22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In April 2010 the Company placed 101,062,538 ordinary shares at 7 pence each for gross proceeds of £7.1 million.
Related Shares:
DCP.L