26th Sep 2012 07:00
Jupiter Energy Limited ("Jupiter" or the "Company")
FINAL RESULTS
KEY POINTS:
·; Sales of 27,806 boe into domestic market
·; Revenue: A$1.1m (2011: Nil)
·; Loss before tax: A$4.3m (2011: A$4.9m)
·; Pro forma net cash of A$12m following completion of rights issue
·; A$5m committed to drilling J-55, which spudded on 5 August 2012
·; Admission to trading on AIM achieved in November 2011
The Board of Jupiter Energy Limited is pleased to announce its results for the twelve month period ending 30 June 2012. Jupiter's Annual Report will be posted to shareholders and will be available today on the Company's website at www.jupiterenergy.com
The past 12 months have seen JPR continue to progress with its transformation from an explorer to an oil producer. The key operational events for the 2011/12 financial year were the drilling, completion and production testing of JPR's third and fourth wells (J-51 and J-53) on its Block 31 permit as well as gaining Trial Production Licences for the J-50 and J-52 wells.
The prospectivity of the 100% owned Block 31 continues to improve and the drilling of two exploration wells during the 2nd half of the 2012 calendar year should continue to provide a good indication of the potential of the 59 km2 southern extension area that was granted to the Company in 2011.
The Company listed on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange in November 2011 and the dual listing has given the Company increased exposure into the UK and European investment community where there is a developed understanding of the opportunities and investment upside available in Kazakhstan.
The Company's two major shareholders, the Waterford Group and Soyuzneftegas Capital Limited (SNG) continue to show great support for the Company and the 1 for 4 Rights Issue announced in late June 2012 was jointly underwritten by them.
The Rights Issue was completed subsequent to the financial period end in August 2012 and raised $A11.25m (after deducting costs). Following completion of the Rights Issue Waterford Group now hold 29.5% of the issued capital of the Company and SNG, after also converting their $US3.45m Convertible Notes in August 2012, hold 19.8%. The number of shares on issue totals 153,377,693.
Commenting in the 2012 Annual Report, Geoff Gander, Chairman/CEO said:
"I am delighted that this year has seen Jupiter successfully transition from explorer to producer. I believe that the Company has a very exciting 12 months ahead of it and continued drilling success will lay the foundation for Jupiter to grow into a significant oil producer in what is one of the most prospective oil producing countries in the world today."
ENDS
Corporate Enquiries:
Jupiter Energy (+61 89 322 8222)
Geoff Gander ([email protected])
finnCap Ltd: +44 (0) 20 7220 0500
Matt Goode/Christopher Raggett (Corporate Finance)
Simon Johnson (Corporate Broking)
GMP Securities (Europe) LLP +44 (0) 20 7647 2800
James Pope (Corporate Finance)
Chris Beltgens (Corporate Finance)
Media Enquiries:
Allerton Communications: +44 (0) 20 3137 2500
Peter Curtain: ([email protected])
About the Company:
Jupiter Energy Limited is an oil exploration and production company, quoted on both the AIM and ASX markets. The Company is focused on developing its onshore assets in western Kazakhstan. In 2008 the Company acquired 100 per cent of the Block 31 permit, located in the oil-rich Mangistau Basin, close to the port city of Aktau.
Jupiter has a proven in-country management team, led by an experienced, international Board, together possessing the skills, knowledge, network and attention to detail needed to operate successfully in Kazakhstan. The forward plan will see Jupiter develop a group production facility on Block 31 to process, store and export oil. This surface infrastructure is a key element in moving to long-term production and the achievement of self-funding for further development of Block 31.
OPERATING REVIEW
This section provides details on the operations of the past 12 months. The key operational events for the year were the drilling, completion and production testing of JPR's third and fourth operated wells (J-51 and J-53) on Block 31 as well as bringing the J-50 and J-52 wells onto Trial Production. Details on all these wells are also outlined below as are details on other work carried out over the course of the year.
Well Operations
J-50 and J-52 Trial Production
The Company announced on 24 April 2012 that Trial Production had commenced on the J-50 and J-52 wells. The Trial Production Licences are issued for maximum three year duration to allow the Company to concurrently produce oil from the J-50 and J-52 wells while completing the planning and implementation of the necessary surface infrastructure required to develop the discoveries for long term production.
J-51 Drilling and Production Testing
The J-51 well was the Company's 2011 Commitment Well and the 3rd well drilled since 2009. The surface location for J-51 was 2 km southwest from J-50 and 1.7 km northwest from J-52 and this location was selected to evaluate the prospectivity of the primary Triassic and secondary Jurassic targets within the structure now known as Akkar East.
On 1 August 2011 the Company announced the spudding of the J-51 exploration well and on 22 September 2011 confirmed that target depth had been reached and open hole logging completed. Analysis of these open hole logs, carried out by independent consulting firm Reservoir Evaluation Services LLC (RES), confirmed that the thickness of the mid Triassic primary objective was 123m of gross and 83m of net oil pay. The net/gross analysis was based on cut-offs of 3.8% for porosity and 50% for oil saturation. These results were consistent with the Company's well prognosis.
After completion, the J-51 well produced on a 9mm choke at a stabilised rate of over 600 bopd from the Mid Triassic (B) horizon. In June 2012 an application to carry out a completion and testing of the Mid Triassic (A) horizon was approved by the Kazakh authorities. The production testing period ended on 12 September 2012 and ~25,700 barrels of oil was produced from the well during this time.
An application is being prepared for submission to the relevant regulatory authorities for the well to be granted a Trial Production Licence. This application will be lodged at the same time as the Trial Production application for the J-53 exploration well and it is expected that J-51 will be on Trial Production before the end of calendar 2012.
J-53 Drilling and Production Testing
The J-53 well was the Company's fourth exploration well and the first of its two 2012 commitment wells on Block 31. The well is located 2.8 km southeast of the J-52 well and increases the known areal extent of the Akkar East field.
The J-53 well took a total of 58 days to drill and reached a total depth of 3,113 m on 21 January 2012. Open hole logs were run and production casing and cement completed. Operational progress and geological results were consistent with the Company's expectations.
Analysis by independent consulting firm RES confirmed approximately 87m of gross and 56m of net pay at the Middle Triassic carbonate reservoir unit, the primary reservoir objective in the well.
During the well's 3 month testing period, J-53 was fracture stimulated and exhibited a flow regime with only periods of intermittent production, recovering oil and water. Analysis of the chemical composition of the recovered water and pressure transient data indicated that during the frac and acid stimulation work carried out on the well during its completion, the zone from 2,996m - 2,999m propagated a fracture down to penetrate the oil water contact.
The resultant water influx from this 3m zone has impacted the overall performance of the well and the composition and quantity of the liquids produced. Selective water shutoff using a permeability modifier was then determined as the most effective way to isolate the water within this zone such that the flow of hydrocarbons is able to take place uninhibited and not reduce the overall productivity of the mid Triassic formation.
The workover of J-53 will be carried out during the 4th quarter 2012 and an extension to the initial 3 month production testing period will be required as part of the workover process. Assuming success with the workover, an application to bring the J-53 well onto Trial Production will be lodged at the same time as the Trial Production application for the J-51 exploration well. It is expected that J-53 will be on Trial Production before the end of calendar 2012.
Reserve Upgrade
As part of the Trial Production application process for the J-51 and J-53 wells, an estimation of reserves associated with the two wells was prepared under the accepted Kazakh standards and submitted to the Kazakh authorities for approval. In June 2012, the Company announced that the State Reserves Committee had approved reserves for the areas associated with the J-50, 51, 52 and 53 wells.
The State Reserves Committee approved C1+C2 reserves equivalent to ~37 million barrels (mmbbl) of oil recoverable under the Russian GOST classification system; while similar, the Board cautioned against extrapolation of this figure directly into the 1P (proved) or 2P (proved plus probable) classification of the Petroleum Resource Management System ("PRMS") used by international oil and gas companies.
The most recent estimation of reserves under PRMS is 24 mmbbl 2P recoverable reserves, the details are in the May 2011 Competent Persons Report prepared by Synergy Limited. This report was based on reserves only within the Triassic horizon after the drilling of J-50 and J-52.
The Company expects to appoint an independent reserves engineer to undertake a comprehensive reserves study using the standards set out within the PRMS document in early 2013, following the drilling of the next two exploration wells to be drilled on the new southern extension scheduled for 2nd half of calendar 2012 (J-55 and J-58). The 2013 reserves study will be based on the results from the J-50, J-51, J-52, J-53, J-55 and J-58 wells.
Forward Plan for Drilling Activity
Following the 2011 southern extension of Block 31, the permit size increased from ~63km2 to ~123km2 and this new acreage has provided the Company with a range of potential new exploration leads. The Company acquired 3D seismic over this new acreage before the end of 2011 and the new data was processed and interpreted and several new prospects were identified.
The 1st well to be drilled on this new area (J-55) will be the final commitment well under the current 6 year exploration licence and this well spudded in early August 2012. A 2nd exploration well is planned with the spud date expected during 4th quarter 2012.
Both these wells are fully funded after the closing of the August 2012 Rights Issue.
Prolongation of Exploration Licence
In March 2012 the Company applied for a 2 year extension to the Block 31 Exploration Licence. The Exploration Licence has an initial 6 year term (ending December 2012) with two 2 year extensions. The first of these extensions has now been approved by the Kazakh authorities, thus enabling the Company to continue exploring on Block 31 until at least December 2014. It is expected that the second 2 year extension will be applied for during 2014.
The Block 31 contract also has the right to a 27 year Production Licence and it is the Company's intention to continue exploring on the southern section of Block 31 whilst also applying, during 2013, for a Production Licence for the already discovered Akkar East field in the northern section of Block 31. The initial 25 year Production Licence was increased by two years to 27 years as a result of the two year increase to the Exploration Licence.
Prospectivity
The Company believes the prospectivity of Jupiter's Block 31 continues to improve and the Board are confident that further additions to the reserves are achievable. As outline in the Forward Plan for Drilling Activity section of this report, the drilling of J-55 and J-58 during the 2nd half of calendar 2012 has the potential, assuming success, for an independent upgrade of Block 31 reserves as well as increased production.
Further exploration wells are planned for 2013.
Production
The J-50 and J-52 wells are already in Trial Production and it is expected that J-51 and J-53 will be in Trial Production by the end of calendar 2012.
Oil produced during the Trial Production period is sold into the domestic market and the initial oil sales contract for J-50 and J-52 oil was concluded in April 2012 and was for 6,000 tonnes (~42,000 barrels). Oil was transported from the field to a nearby processing and storage facility and achieved a price of $US400/tonne FOB the facility. Oil was purchased on a pre-paid basis.
Total barrels sold during the 2011/12 financial year totalled 27,806 for revenues of $1,063,086.
Future oil sales contracts will be negotiated for the 2nd half of calendar 2012 and it is also the intention to negotiate these to be on a pre-paid basis.
Board and Staffing
The Board of Directors continues to be hands on with the relocation of Chairman/CEO Geoff Gander to the United Kingdom ensuring that he is regularly in Kazakhstan working with the Aktau based workforce.
An integrated operating team that has proven in country experience as well as the capacity to operate major assets is a critical component to success in Kazakhstan. The continued building of such a team has been a major priority over the course of several years and the past 12 months has been no exception.
The Board is confident that Jupiter is well prepared for continued growth over the coming years.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE DATE
·; On 16 July 2012 the Company advised that the J-51 well had received approval to be tested at the Mid Triassic (A) horizon and after the workover was completed the co-mingled flow rate from the Mid Triassic (A) and (B) was between 600 and 650 bopd. This rate was confirmed on 30 July 2012 as having stabilized at 600 bopd on a 9mm choke. The well was shut in on 12 September 2012 after production of ~25,700 barrels of oil.
·; On 25 July 2012 the Company announced the closure of its 1 for 4 Rights Issue, raising $11,613,016 (before costs). There was a shortfall of 35% meaning that the joint underwriters took up additional shares.
·; On 01 August 2012, SNG elected to convert its $US3.45m Convertible Notes into equity. Under the terms of the Convertible Notes, the conversion price was the same price as the Rights Issue ($0.40). A total of 8,215,000 shares were issued to SNG in full satisfaction of all outstanding Convertible Notes.
·; On 03 August 2012, change in substantial holding notices were lodged reflecting the impact of the shortfall of the Rights Issue and the conversion of the Convertible Notes. At this date, Waterford held 29.5% of the issued shares of the Company and SNG held 19.8%.
·; On 06 August 2012 the Company announced that the J-55 well had spud.
·; On 21 August 2012 the Company announced details of further oil sales for the August/September period based on a volumes of 2000 tonnes at a price of $US365/tonne ($US52/barrel)
Competent Persons Statements
General
Keith Martens, BSc Geology and Geophysics, with over 35 years' oil & gas industry experience, is the qualified person who has reviewed and approved the technical information contained in this report. Keith Martens has no material interest in the Company.
Independent Reserves (PRMS)
Certain information in this report which relates to independent Triassic oil reserves (1P, 2P, 3P) and prospective resource (P90, P50, P10) is based on information compiled by Senergy Limited, an international oil & gas consulting company that specialises in oil & gas reserve estimations. Senergy Limited has sufficient experience which is relevant to reserve estimations and to the specific exploration permit in Kazakhstan to qualify as competent to verify information pertaining to the Triassic oil reserves (1P, 2P, 3P) and prospective resource (P90, P50, P10). Senergy Limited has given and not withdrawn its written consent to the inclusion of its name and the Triassic 1P, 2P, 3P reserves and prospective resource (P90, P50, P10) figures in the form and context in which they appear in this report. Senergy Limited has no interest in the Company.
Certain information in this report which relates to Triassic prospective resources (P50) and open hole logging interpretation is based on information compiled by Reservoir Evaluation Services LLP (RES), a Kazakh based oil & gas consulting company that specialises in oil & gas reserve estimations. RES has sufficient experience which is relevant to oil & gas reserve estimation and open hole logging analysis and to the specific permit in Kazakhstan to qualify as competent to verify the information pertaining to the Triassic prospective resource (P50) and open hole logging analysis. RES has given and not withdrawn its written consent to the inclusion of the Triassic prospective resource (P50) figure or open hole logging analysis in the form and context in which they appear in this report. RES has no interest in the Company.Kazakh State Approved ReservesThe information in this report which relates to the Kazakh state approved oil reserves (C1, C2) is based on Jurassic and Triassic oil reserves approved by the Kazakh State Reserves Committee. Information presented to the State Reserves Committee was compiled by Reservoir Evaluation Services LLP (RES), a Kazakh based oil & gas consulting company that is an approved body by the Kazakh authorities to prepare such reserve estimations. RES has sufficient experience which is relevant to oil & gas reserve estimation under the Russian GOST classification system. RES has no interest in the Company.
Financial StatementsFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Note | Consolidated | ||||
2012 $ | 2011 $ | ||||
Revenue | 1,063,086 | - | |||
Cost of sales | (898,654) | - | |||
Gross profit | 164,432 | - | |||
Other income | 131,418 | - | |||
Gain / (loss) on derivative financial instrument | 761,813 | (59,455) | |||
General and administrative costs | 4 | (4,659,544) | (4,894,945) | ||
Operating loss | (3,601,881) | (4,954,400) | |||
Finance income | 24,475 | 64,729 | |||
Finance costs | (717,696) | - | |||
Loss before tax | (4,295,102) | (4,889,671) | |||
Income tax expense | 5 | - | - | ||
Loss after income tax | (4,295,102) | (4,889,671) | |||
Other comprehensive income net of tax | |||||
Foreign currency translation | 1,337,981 | (4,943,666) | |||
Total comprehensive loss for the period | (2,957,121) | (9,833,337) | |||
Earnings per share for loss attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company: | |||||
Basic loss per share (cents) | 24 | (3.70) | (5.25) | ||
Diluted loss per share (cents) | 24 | (3.70) | (5.25) | ||
The consolidated statement of comprehensive income is to be read in conjunction with the notes of the financial statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2012
Note | Consolidated | ||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||
$ | $ | ||||
ASSETS | |||||
Current Assets | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 6 | 395,445 | 13,968,248 | ||
Trade and other receivables | 7 | 527,566 | 1,410,979 | ||
Other current assets | 8 | 460,496 | 521,174 | ||
Inventories | 9 | 53,320 | - | ||
Total Current Assets | 1,436,827 | 15,900,401 | |||
Non Current Assets | |||||
Trade and other receivables | 7 | 2,401,889 | - | ||
Oil and gas properties | 10 | 14,225,282 | - | ||
Plant and equipment | 11 | 926,336 | 398,851 | ||
Exploration and evaluation expenditure | 12 | 25,014,521 | 25,319,806 | ||
Other financial assets | 13 | 292,752 | 128,404 | ||
Total Non Current Assets | 42,860,780 | 25,847,061 | |||
Total Assets | 44,297,607 | 41,747,462 | |||
Current Liabilities | |||||
Payables | 14 | 1,124,623 | 534,616 | ||
Deferred revenue | 15 | 1,192,039 | - | ||
Provisions | 16 | 90,957 | 61,918 | ||
Total Current Liabilities | 2,407,619 | 596,534 | |||
Non-current Liabilities | |||||
Provisions | 16 | 356,594 | 230,552 | ||
Other financial liabilities | 17 | 2,789,897 | - | ||
Derivative liability | 17 | 274,880 | - | ||
Total Non-Current Liabilities | 3,421,371 | 230,552 | |||
Total Liabilities | 5,828,990 | 827,086 | |||
Net Assets | 38,468,617 | 40,920,376 | |||
Equity | |||||
Contributed equity | 18 | 71,236,136 | 71,280,610 | ||
Share based payment reserve | 19 | 4,472,289 | 3,922,453 | ||
Foreign currency translation reserve | 19 | (4,746,987) | (6,084,968) | ||
Accumulated losses | (32,492,821) | (28,197,719) | |||
Total Equity | 38,468,617 | 40,920,376 | |||
The consolidated statement of financial position is to be read in conjunction with the notes of the financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Note | Consolidated | ||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||
$ | $ | ||||
Cash flow from operating activities | |||||
Receipts from customers | 3,244,141 | 1,578,406 | |||
Payments to suppliers and employees | (5,996,508) | (6,092,821) | |||
Interest received | 24,476 | 64,729 | |||
Net cash flows (used in) operating activities | 26 | (2,727,891) | (4,449,686) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
Payment for oil field extension | - | (766,964) | |||
Payments for exploration and development expenditure | (13,255,794) | (8,298,650) | |||
Payments for plant and equipment | (752,218) | (348,876) | |||
Net Cash flows (used in) investing activities | (14,008,012) | (9,414,490) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||
Proceeds from issues of shares | - | 27,770,973 | |||
Proceeds from convertible notes | 3,487,987 | ||||
Transactions cost from issue of shares | (44,473) | (1,181,608) | |||
Interest paid | (379,093) | ||||
Proceeds from option issue | - | 10,000 | |||
Net cash flows from financing activities | 3,064,421 | 26,599,365 | |||
Net increase / (decrease) in cash held | (13,671,482) | 12,735,189 | |||
Effects of exchange rate changes | 98,679 | (94,747) | |||
Cash at beginning of the year | 13,968,248 | 1,327,806 | |||
Cash at end of the year | 6 | 395,445 | 13,968,248 |
The statement of cash flows is to be read in conjunction with the notes of the financial statements.
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITYFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Issued capital |
Share Based Payment Reserve |
Foreign Currency Translation Reserve | Accumulated Losses | Total | |
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
CONSOLIDATED | |||||
At 1 July 2010 | 44,681,247 | 3,164,908 | (1,141,302) | (23,308,048) | 23,396,805 |
Loss for the period | - | - | - | (4,889,671) | (4,889,671) |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | (4,943,666) | - | (4,943,666) |
Total comprehensive income | - | - | (4,943,666) | (4,889,671) | (9,833,337) |
Transactions by owners recorded directly in equity: | |||||
Share based payments | - | 757,545 | - | - | 757,545 |
Shares issued | |||||
- Ordinary shares | 27,780,971 | - | - | - | 27,780,971 |
- Costs of issue | (1,181,608) | - | - | - | (1,181,608) |
At 30 June 2011 | 71,280,610 | 3,922,453 | (6,084,968) | (28,197,719) | 40,920,376 |
| |||||
As at 1 July 2011 | 71,280,610 | 3,922,453 | (6,084,968) | (28,197,719) | 40,920,376 |
Loss for the period | - | - | - | (4,295,102) | (4,295,102) |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | 1,337,981 | - | 1,337,981 |
Total comprehensive income | - | - | 1,337,981 | (4,295,102) | (2,957,121) |
Transactions by owners recorded directly in equity: | |||||
Share based payments | - | 549,836 | - | - | 549,836 |
Shares issued | |||||
- Costs of issue | (44,474) | - | - | - | (44,474) |
At 30 June 2012 | 71,236,136 | 4,472,289 | (4,746,987) | (32,492,821) | 38,468,617 |
The statements of changes in equity are to be read in conjunction with the notes of the financial statements.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |||||
1 | CORPORATE INFORMATION | ||||
The financial report of Jupiter Energy Limited for the year ended 30 June 2012 was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the directors on 25 September 2012. | |||||
Jupiter Energy Limited is a company limited by shares incorporated in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian Stock Exchange and on London's Alternative Investment Market (as CDI's). Jupiter Energy Limited is a for profit entity. | |||||
The nature of the operations and principal activities of the Group are described in the Directors Report on pages 5 to 10 of this report. | |||||
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ||||
(a) | Basis of Preparation | ||||
The financial report is a general-purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. The financial report has also been prepared on a historical cost basis except for certain financial instruments measured at fair value. The financial report is presented in Australian dollars.
Going Concern
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis with the Directors of the opinion that the Group can meet its obligations as and when they fall due.
Subsequent to 30 June 2012, the Company raised $11,613,016 (before costs) from an entitlement offer to fund ongoing development of Block 31 and working capital. The Directors recognise that the Company will need to secure Trial Production Licenses for the J-51 and J-53 wells to allow for oil production from these wells. The Company is also reliant on planned production forecasts to fund ongoing exploration, drilling and development activities for Block 31. The Directors are confident that these matters will be achieved. | |||||
(b) | Statement of compliance | ||||
The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards as issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. |
From 1 July 2011, the Group has adopted the following Standards and Interpretations, mandatory for annual periods beginning on 1 July 2011. Adoption of these standards and interpretations did not have any significant effect on the financial position or performance of the Group
|
·; AASB 2009-5 Further Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Annual Improvements Project [AASB 5, 8, 101, 107, 117, 118, 136 & 139] ·; |
·; AASB 2009-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Group Cash-settled Share-based Payment Transactions [AASB 2] |
·; AASB 2009-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Classification of Rights Issues [AASB 132] ·; |
·; AASB 2010-3 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Annual Improvements Project [AASB 3, AASB 7, AASB 121, AASB 128, AASB 131, AASB 132 & AASB 139] |
·; ·; Interpretation 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet effective have not been adopted by the Group for the annual reporting period ending 30 June 2012. These are outlined in the following table.
Reference | Title | Summary | Application date of standard | Impact on Group financial report | Application date for Group |
2010-8 | Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets [AASB 112]
| These amendments address the determination of deferred tax on investment property measured at fair value and introduce a rebuttable presumption that deferred tax on investment property measured at fair value should be determined on the basis that the carrying amount will be recoverable through sale. The amendments also incorporate SIC-21 Income Taxes - Recovery of Revalued Non-Depreciable Assets into AASB 112.
| 1 Jan 2012 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2012 |
AASB 2011-9 | Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Presentation of Other Comprehensive Income [AASB 1, 5, 7, 101, 112, 120, 121, 132, 133, 134, 1039 & 1049] | This Standard requires entities to group items presented in other comprehensive income on the basis of whether they might be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss and those that will not. | 1 July 2012 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2012 |
AASB 10 | Consolidated Financial Statements | AASB 10 establishes a new control model that applies to all entities. It replaces parts of AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements dealing with the accounting for consolidated financial statements and UIG-112 Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities.
The new control model broadens the situations when an entity is considered to be controlled by another entity and includes new guidance for applying the model to specific situations, including when acting as a manager may give control, the impact of potential voting rights and when holding less than a majority voting rights may give control.
Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-7. | 1 January 2013 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 11 | Joint Arrangements | AASB 11 replaces AASB 131 Interests in Joint Ventures and UIG-113 Jointly- controlled Entities - Non-monetary Contributions by Ventures. AASB 11 uses the principle of control in AASB 10 to define joint control, and therefore the determination of whether joint control exists may change. In addition it removes the option to account for jointly controlled entities (JCEs) using proportionate consolidation. Instead, accounting for a joint arrangement is dependent on the nature of the rights and obligations arising from the arrangement. Joint operations that give the venturers a right to the underlying assets and obligations themselves is accounted for by recognising the share of those assets and obligations. Joint ventures that give the venturers a right to the net assets is accounted for using the equity method.
Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-7 and amendments to AASB 128. | 1 January 2013 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 12 | Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities | AASB 12 includes all disclosures relating to an entity's interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structures entities. New disclosures have been introduced about the judgments made by management to determine whether control exists, and to require summarised information about joint arrangements, associates and structured entities and subsidiaries with non-controlling interests. | 1 January 2013
| The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 13 | Fair Value Measurement | AASB 13 establishes a single source of guidance for determining the fair value of assets and liabilities. AASB 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather, provides guidance on how to determine fair value when fair value is required or permitted. Application of this definition may result in different fair values being determined for the relevant assets.
AASB 13 also expands the disclosure requirements for all assets or liabilities carried at fair value. This includes information about the assumptions made and the qualitative impact of those assumptions on the fair value determined.
Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-8. | 1 January 2013 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 119 | Employee Benefits | The main change introduced by this standard is to revise the accounting for defined benefit plans. The amendment removes the options for accounting for the liability, and requires that the liabilities arising from such plans is recognized in full with actuarial gains and losses being recognized in other comprehensive income. It also revised the method of calculating the return on plan assets.
The revised standard changes the definition of short-term employee benefits. The distinction between short-term and other long-term employee benefits is now based on whether the benefits are expected to be settled wholly within 12 months after the reporting date.
Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-10. | 1 January 2013 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 2012-5 | Annual Improvements to 2009-2011 Cycle | This standard sets out amendments to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and the related bases for conclusions and guidance made during the International Accounting Standards Board's Annual Improvements process. These amendments have not yet been adopted by the AASB.
The following items are addressed by this standard:
AASB 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards • Repeated application of IFRS 1 • Borrowing costs
AASB 1 Presentation of Financial Statements • Clarification of the requirements for comparative information
AASB 16 Property, Plant and Equipment • Classification of servicing equipment
AASB 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation • Tax effect of distribution to holders of equity instruments
AASB 34 Interim Financial Reporting • Interim financial reporting and segment information for total assets and liabilities | 1 January 2013
| The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013
|
AASB 2011-4 | Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirements[AASB 124] | This Amendment deletes from AASB 124 individual key management personnel disclosure requirements for disclosing entities that are not companies.
| 1 July 2013 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 1053 | Application of Tiers of Australian Accounting Standards | This Standard establishes a differential financial reporting framework consisting of two Tiers of reporting requirements for preparing general purpose financial statements: (a) Tier 1: Australian Accounting Standards (b) Tier 2: Australian Accounting Standards - Reduced Disclosure Requirements Tier 2 comprises the recognition, measurement and presentation requirements of Tier 1 and substantially reduced disclosures corresponding to those requirements. The following entities apply Tier 1 requirements in preparing general purpose financial statements: (a) For-profit entities in the private sector that have public accountability (as defined in this Standard) (b) The Australian Government and State, Territory and Local Governments The following entities apply either Tier 2 or Tier 1 requirements in preparing general purpose financial statements: (a) For-profit private sector entities that do not have public accountability (b) All not-for-profit private sector entities (c) Public sector entities other than the Australian Government and State, Territory and Local Governments. Consequential amendments to other standards to implement the regime were introduced by AASB 2010-2, 2011-2, 2011-6, 2011-11 and 2012-1. | 1 July 2013 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 2012-2 | Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
| AASB 2012-2 principally amends AASB 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures to require disclosure of information that will enable users of an entity's financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements, including rights of set-off associated with the entity's recognised financial assets and recognised financial liabilities, on the entity's financial position.
| 1 January 2013 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 2012-5 | Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Annual Improvements 2009-2011 Cycle; and
| AASB 2012-5 makes amendments resulting from the 2009-2011 Annual Improvements Cycle. The Standard addresses a range of improvements, including the following:• repeat application of AASB 1 is permitted (AASB 1); and• clarification of the comparative information requirements when an entity provides a third balance sheet (AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements).
| 1 January 2013 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2013 |
AASB 2012-3 | Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities;
| AASB 2012-3 adds application guidance to AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Presentation to address inconsistencies identified in applying some of the offsetting criteria of AASB 132, including clarifying the meaning of "currently has a legally enforceable right of set-off" and that some gross settlement systems may be considered equivalent to net settlement.
| 1 January 2014 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2015 |
AASB 9 | Financial Instruments | AASB 9 includes requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets. It was further amended by AASB 2010-7 to reflect amendments to the accounting for financial liabilities. These requirements improve and simplify the approach for classification and measurement of financial assets compared with the requirements of AASB 139. The main changes are described below. (a) Financial assets that are debt instruments will be classified based on (1) the objective of the entity's business model for managing the financial assets; (2) the characteristics of the contractual cash flows. (b) Allows an irrevocable election on initial recognition to present gains and losses on investments in equity instruments that are not held for trading in other comprehensive income. Dividends in respect of these investments that are a return on investment can be recognised in profit or loss and there is no impairment or recycling on disposal of the instrument. (c) Financial assets can be designated and measured at fair value through profit or loss at initial recognition if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would arise from measuring assets or liabilities, or recognising the gains and losses on them, on different bases. (d) Where the fair value option is used for financial liabilities the change in fair value is to be accounted for as follows: ► The change attributable to changes in credit risk are presented in other comprehensive income (OCI) ► The remaining change is presented in profit or loss If this approach creates or enlarges an accounting mismatch in the profit or loss, the effect of the changes in credit risk are also presented in profit or loss. Consequential amendments were also made to other standards as a result of AASB 9, introduced by AASB 2009-11 and superseded by AASB 2010-7 and 2010-10. | 1 January 2015 | The group has not yet determined the financial impact of the change. | 1 July 2015 |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
(c) | Basis of consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Jupiter Energy Limited and its subsidiaries as at 30 June each year ('the Group'). | |
Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies so as to obtain benefits from their activities. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether a group controls another entity. | |
The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. | |
Subsidiaries and special purpose entities are fully consolidated from the date on which control is obtained by the Group and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Group. | |
Adjustments are made to bring into line any dissimilar accounting policies that may exist. All intercompany balances and transactions, including unrealised profits arising from intra-group transactions, have been eliminated in full. Unrealised losses are eliminated unless costs cannot be recovered. | |
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Group. Where there is loss of control of a subsidiary, the consolidated financial statements include the results for the part of the reporting period during which Jupiter Energy Limited has control. | |
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting involves recognising at acquisition date, separately from goodwill, the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquisition. The identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are measured at their acquisition date fair values. | |
(d) | Significant accounting estimates and assumptions |
The carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities are often determined based on estimates and assumptions of future events. The key estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities within the next annual reporting period are: | |
Share-based payment transactions | |
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined using a Black and Scholes model, trinomial and Monte Carlo using the assumptions detailed in note 21. | |
Exploration and evaluation | |
The Group's accounting policy for exploration and evaluation is set out in note 2(f). The application of this policy necessarily requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions as to future events and circumstances, in particular the assessment of whether economic quantities of reserves may be found. Any such, estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after having capitalised expenditure under the Group's policy, management concludes that the Group is unlikely to recover the expenditure by future exploitation or sale, then the relevant capitalised amount will be written off to the income statement. | |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Provision for restoration | |
Costs of site restoration are provided over the life of the facility from when exploration commences and are included in the costs of that stage. Site restoration costs include the dismantling and removal of plant, equipment and building structures, waste removal, and rehabilitation of the site in accordance with clauses of the permits. Such costs have been determined using estimates of future costs, current legal requirements and technology on an undiscounted basis. | |
Any changes in the estimates for the costs are accounted on a prospective basis. In determining the costs of site restoration, there is uncertainty regarding the nature and extent of the restoration due to community expectations and future legislation. Accordingly the costs have been determined on the basis that the restoration will be completed within one year of abandoning the site. | |
Units of production depreciation of oil and gas properties | |
Oil and gas properties are depreciated using the units of production (UOP) method over total proved developed hydrocarbon reserves. This results in a depreciation/amortisation charge proportional to the depletion of the anticipated remaining production from the field.
Each items' life, which is assessed annually, has regard to both its physical life limitations and to present assessments of economically recoverable reserves of the field at which the asset is located. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions, including the amount of recoverable reserves. The calculation of the UOP rate of depreciation could be impacted to the extent that actual production in the future is different from current forecast production based on total proved reserves. Changes to proved reserves could arise due to changes in the factors or assumptions used in estimating reserves, including:
·; The effect on proved reserves of differences between actual commodity prices and commodity price assumptions Or ·; Unforeseen operational issues
Changes are accounted for prospectively. | |
Recoverability of oil and gas properties | |
The Group assesses each asset or cash generating unit (CGU) (excluding goodwill, which is assessed annually regardless of indicators) every reporting period to determine whether any indication of impairment exists. Where an indicator of impairment exists, a formal estimate of the recoverable amount is made, which is considered to be the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use. These assessments require the use of estimates and assumptions such as long-term oil prices (considering current and historical prices, price trends and related factors), discount rates, operating costs, future capital requirements, decommissioning costs, exploration potential, reserves operating performance (which includes production and sales volumes). These estimates and assumptions are subject to risk and uncertainty. Therefore, there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will impact these projections, which may impact the recoverable amount of assets and/or CGUs.
|
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Fair value is determined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an arm's length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. Fair value for oil and gas assets is generally determined as the present value of estimated future cash flows arising from the continued use of the assets, which includes estimates such as the cost of future expansion plans and eventual disposal, using assumptions that an independent market participant may take into account. Cash flows are discounted to their present value using a discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Management has assessed its CGUs as being an individual field, which is the lowest level for which cash inflows are largely independent of those of other assets. |
(e) | Plant and equipment |
Plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Such cost includes the cost of replacing parts that are eligible for capitalisation when the cost of replacing the part is incurred. Similarly, when each major inspection is performed, its cost is recognised in the carrying amount of the plant and equipment as a replacement only if it is eligible for capitalisation. All other repairs and maintenance are recognised in profit or loss as incurred. | |
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets as follows: | |
Plant and equipment - over 3 to 10 years | |
The assets' residual values, useful lives and amortisation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial year end. | |
Disposal An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits are expected to be derived from its use or disposal. | |
Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in the income statement in the year the asset is derecognised. |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
(f) | Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure |
Exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest. These costs are only carried forward to the extent that they are expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area or where activities in the area have not yet reached a stage that permits reasonable assessment of the existence of economically recoverable reserves. A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest. | |
Costs of evaluation, seismic and unsuccessful exploration in the area of interest are expensed as incurred even if activities in this area of interest are continuing. Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area are written off in full against profit in the year in which the decision to abandon the area is made. | |
When a discovered oil or gas field enters the development phase the accumulated exploration and evaluation expenditure is transferred to oil and gas assets - assets in development. | |
(g) | Oil and Gas Properties |
Oil and gas properties are usually single oil or gas fields being developed for future production or which are in the production phase. Where several individual oil fields are to be produced through common facilities, the individual oil field and the associated production facilities are managed and reported as a single oil and gas asset. | |
Assets in development When the technical and commercial feasibility of an undeveloped oil or gas field has been demonstrated, the field enters its development phase. The costs of oil and gas assets in the development phase are separately accounted for as tangible assets and include past exploration and evaluation costs, development drilling and plant and equipment and any associated land and buildings. When commercial operation commences the accumulated costs are transferred to oil and gas assets - producing assets.
| |
Producing assets The costs of oil and gas assets in production are separately accounted for as tangible assets and include past exploration and evaluation costs, pre-production development costs and the ongoing costs of continuing to develop reserves for production and to expand or replace plant and equipment and any associated land and buildings. Producing assets are depreciated over proved reserves on a unit of production basis.
|
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
(h) | Impairment of assets |
At each reporting date, the company reviews the carrying values of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have been impaired. If such an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset, being the higher of the asset's fair value less costs to sell and value in use, is compared to the asset's carrying value. Any excess of the asset's carrying value over its recoverable amount is expensed to the income statement. | |
(i) | Trade and other receivables |
Trade receivables, which generally have 30-90 day terms, are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less an allowance for any uncollectible amounts. | |
An estimate for doubtful debts is made when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Bad debts are written off when identified. | |
(j) | Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and short-term deposits in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less. | |
For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts. | |
(k) | Inventories |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less any estimated selling costs. | |
Cost includes those costs incurred in bringing each component of inventory to its present location and condition. |
(l) | Trade and other payables |
Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised costs and due to their short-term nature are not discounted. They represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition. | |
(m) | Financial liabilities
|
Financial liabilities within the scope of AASB 139 are classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, loans and borrowings, or as derivatives designated, as appropriate. The Group determines the classification of its financial liabilities at initial recognition. | |
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and in the case of loans and borrowings, plus directly attributable transaction costs. The Group's financial liabilities include trade and other payables, loans and borrowings and derivative financial instruments. | |
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivatives are fair valued using appropriate valuation techniques. Such techniques may include using recent arm's length market transactions; reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same; a discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation techniques. | |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
(n) | Share-based payment transactions | |
Share-based compensation benefits are provided to directors and executives.
| ||
Options | ||
The fair value of options granted to directors and executives is recognised as an employee benefit expense with a corresponding increase in contributed equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and recognised over the vesting period during which the directors and/or executives becomes entitled to the options. | ||
The fair value at grant date is determined using an option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the vesting and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, the non-tradeable nature of the option, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected divided yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option. | ||
Performance Rights | ||
The cost of performance rights are measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined using a Monte Carlo methodology, which considers the incorporation of market based hurdles. Non market conditions are not factored into the fair value of the performance rights at grant. Probability factors are assigned to the vesting expense as to whether non market conditions will be met. | ||
(o) | Revenue recognition | |
Sales revenue | ||
Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer and can be measured reliably. Incidental revenue generated during the development stage of an asset, is offset against the carrying value of the asset, rather than recognised in the statement of comprehensive income. | ||
Interest | ||
Revenue is recognised as the interest accrues (using the effective interest method, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument) to the net carrying amount of the financial asset. | ||
(p) | Convertible Note
| |
The Convertible Note is split into two components: a debt component and a component representing the embedded derivatives in the Convertible Note. The debt component represents the Group's liability for future interest coupon payments and the redemption amount. The embedded derivatives represent the value of the option that note holders have to convert into ordinary shares in the Company. | ||
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
(q) | Income tax | ||
The consolidated entity adopts the liability method of tax-effect accounting whereby the income tax expense is based on the profit adjusted for any non-assessable or disallowed items. | |||
Deferred tax is accounted for using the liability method in respect of temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements. No deferred income tax will be recognised from the initial recognition of an asset or liability, excluding a business combination, where there is no effect on accounting or taxable profit or loss. | |||
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realised or liability is settled. Deferred tax is credited in the income statement except where it relates to items that may be credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is adjusted directly against equity. | |||
Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future tax profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. | |||
The amount of benefits brought to account or which may be realised in the future is based on the assumption that no adverse change will occur in income taxation legislation and the anticipation that the consolidated entity will derive sufficient future assessable income to enable the benefit to be realised and comply with the conditions of deductibility imposed by the law. | |||
| |||
(r) | Other taxes |
| |
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except: |
| ||
| |||
• where the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and |
| ||
| |||
• receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included. |
| ||
| |||
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the balance sheet. |
| ||
| |||
Cash flows are included in the Cash Flow Statement on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as operating cash flows. |
| ||
| |||
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority. |
| ||
| |||
(s) | Contributed equity |
| |
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. |
| ||
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |||||
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ||||
(t) | Earnings per share |
| |||
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent, adjusted to exclude any costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element. |
| ||||
| |||||
Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent, adjusted for: |
| ||||
• costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends; |
| ||||
• the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have beenrecognised as expenses; and |
| ||||
• other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of potential ordinary shares; |
| ||||
divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element. |
| ||||
| |||||
(u) | Provisions |
| |||
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. |
| ||||
| |||||
Where the Group expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognised as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the income statement net of any reimbursement. |
| ||||
| |||||
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. |
| ||||
| |||||
Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost. |
| ||||
| |||||
Employee leave benefits |
| ||||
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, annual leave and accumulating sick leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in provisions in respect of employees' services up to the reporting date. They are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for non accumulating sick leave are recognised when the leave is taken and are measured at the rates paid or payable. |
| ||||
| |||||
Restoration |
| ||||
Costs of site restoration are provided over the life of the facility from when exploration commences and are included in the costs of that stage. Site restoration costs include the dismantling and removal of plant, equipment and building structures, waste removal, and rehabilitation of the site in accordance with clauses of the permits. Such costs have been determined using estimates of future costs, current legal requirements and technology on an undiscounted basis. |
| ||||
| |||||
Any changes in the estimates for the costs are accounted on a prospective basis. In determining the costs of site restoration, there is uncertainty regarding the nature and extent of the restoration due to community expectations and future legislation. Accordingly the costs have been determined on the basis that the restoration will be completed within one year of abandoning the site. |
| ||||
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |||||
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ||||
(v) | Foreign Currency Transactions and Balances |
| |||
| |||||
(i) Functional and presentation currency Both the functional and presentation currency of Jupiter Energy Limited and its Australian subsidiaries are Australian dollars ($). The Singapore subsidiaries' functional currency is United States Dollars which is translated to the presentation currency. The functional currency of the Branch of the Singapore subsidiary is Tenge. (see below for consolidated reporting). |
| ||||
| |||||
(ii) Transactions and balances Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency by applying the exchange rates ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate of exchange ruling at the reporting date. |
| ||||
| |||||
Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate as at the date of the initial transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined. |
| ||||
| |||||
(iii) Translation of Group Companies' functional currency to presentation currency The results of the Singapore subsidiaries are translated into Australian Dollars (presentation currency) as at the date of each transaction. Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates prevailing at reporting date.
Exchange variations resulting from the translation are recognised in the foreign currency translation reserve in equity |
| ||||
| |||||
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in the Singapore subsidiaries and it's Branch are taken to the foreign currency translation reserve. If a Singapore subsidiary was sold, the proportionate share of exchange differences would be transferred out of equity and recognised in the statement of comprehensive income. |
| ||||
| |||||
(w) | Segments |
| |||
An operating segment is a component of an entity that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenue and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same entity), whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Board of Directors (the chief operating decision makers) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance and for which discrete financial information is available. Management will also consider other factors in determining operating segments such as the existence of a line manager and the level of segment information presented to the executive management team. |
| ||||
| |||||
Operating segments are identified based on the information provided to the chief operating decision makers, being the Board of Directors. Currently the Group has only one operating segment, being the Group.
|
| ||||
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
| |
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
(x) | Borrowing costs |
Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds.
Where funds are borrowed specifically to finance a project, the amount capitalised represents the actual borrowing costs incurred. Where surplus funds are available for a short term out of money borrowed specifically to finance a project, the income generated from the temporary investment of amounts is also capitalised and deducted from the total capitalised borrowing cost. Where the funds used to finance a project form part of general borrowings, the amount capitalised is calculated using a weighted average of rates applicable to relevant general borrowings of the Group during the period.
All other borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they are incurred.
Even though exploration and evaluation assets can be qualifying assets, they generally do not meet the ―probable economic benefits test and also are rarely debt funded. Any related borrowing costs are therefore generally recognised in profit or loss in the period they are incurred. |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
3. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The Group's principal financial instruments comprise receivables, borrowings, payables, cash and short-term deposits.
Risk Exposures and Responses
The main purpose of these financial instruments is to provide finance for the Group's operations. The Group has various other financial assets and liabilities such as trade receivables and trade payables, which arise directly from its operations. The main risks arising from the Group's financial instruments are cash flow interest rate risk, liquidity risk, foreign currency risk and credit risk.
Primary responsibility for identification and control of financial risks rests with the Board. The Board reviews the risks identified below, including the setting of limits for trading in derivatives, hedging cover of foreign currency and interest rate risk, credit allowances, and future cash flow forecast projections.
Interest rate risk
The Group's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates is only on short term deposits and cash and cash equivalents.
At balance date, the Group had the following mix of financial assets and liabilities exposed to interest rate risk:
Consolidated | ||
2012 | 2011 | |
$ | $ | |
Financial Assets | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | 395,445 | 13,968,248 |
Net exposure | 395,445 | 13,968,248 |
The following table summarises the sensitivity of the fair value of the financial instruments held at balance date, if interest rates had moved, with all other variables held constant, post tax profit would have been affected as follows:
Consolidated | ||
Post - tax gain / (loss) | 2012 | 2011 |
$ | $ | |
+ 1% | 3,954 | 139,682 |
-1% | (3,954) | (139,682) |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
3. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES (cont.)
Foreign currency risk
The Group has transactional currency exposures. Such exposure arises from sales or purchases by an operating entity in currencies other than the functional currency.
At balance date, the Group had the following exposure to United States Dollars (USD), Kazakhstan Tenge (KZT), Great Britain Pound (GBP) and Singapore Dollars (SGD) foreign currency that is not designated in cash flow hedges:
Consolidated | ||
2012 | 2011 | |
$ | $ | |
Financial Assets | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | ||
- USD | 341,630 | 11,948,540 |
- KZT | - | - |
- SGD | - | - |
- GBP | 4,200 | 8,511 |
Liquidation Fund | 244,151 | 128,404 |
Trade and other receivables | - | 7,426 |
Other debtors | - | - |
589,981 | 12,092,881 | |
Financial Liabilities | ||
Trade and other payables | - | - |
Other financial liabilities | (2,789,897) | - |
Derivative | (274,880) | - |
(3,064,777) | - | |
Net exposure | (2,474,796) | 12,092,881 |
The following table summarises the sensitivity of financial instruments held at balance date to movement in the exchange rate of the Australian dollar to the United States dollar and Kazakhstan Tenge, with all other variables held constant. The 5% sensitivity is based on reasonably possible changes, over a financial year, using the observed range of actual historical rates for the preceding 5 periods.
Consolidated |
| |||||
Post - tax gain / (loss) | 2012 | 2011 |
| |||
$ | $ |
| ||||
| ||||||
+5% | (123,740) | 604,644 |
| |||
-5% | 123,740 | (604,644) |
| |||
| ||||||
Credit risk | ||||||
Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognised if counterparties fail to perform as contracted. | ||||||
Part of the Group's receivables balances are represented by GST input tax credits, which are received on a quarterly basis, and deposits held in trust in respect of leases for office premises. | ||||||
With respect to credit risk arising from the financial assets of the Group, which comprise cash and cash equivalents and trade receivables, the Group's exposure to credit risk arises from default of the counter party, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments. | ||||||
There are no significant concentrations of credit risk within the Group. | ||||||
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
3. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES (cont.)
Liquidity Risk |
| ||||
The Group's objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through use of bank overdrafts, bank loans, finance leases and hire purchase contracts. |
| ||||
| |||||
The contractual maturities of the Group's financial liabilities are shown in the table below. Undiscounted cash flows for the respective years are presented. |
| ||||
Consolidated | |||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||
$ | $ | ||||
Financial Assets | |||||
Within one year | 527,566 | - | |||
After one year but not more than five years | 2,401,889 | - | |||
More than five years | 292,752 | 128,404 | |||
3,222,207 | 128,404 | ||||
Financial Liabilities | |||||
Within one year | (2,316,661) | (534,616) | |||
After one year to two years | (3,064,777) | - | |||
More than two years | - | - | |||
(5,381,438) | (534,616) | ||||
Net Exposure | (2,159,231) | (406,212) | |||
Management and the Board monitor the Group's liquidity on the basis of expected cash flow. The information that is prepared by senior management and reviewed by the Board includes monthly and annual cash flow budgets. |
Fair value
The Group uses various methods in estimating the fair value of a financial instrument. The methods comprise:
Level 1 - the fair value is calculated using quoted prices in active markets.
Level 2 - the fair value is estimated using inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices).
Level 3 - the fair value is estimated using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data.
All of the Group's other financial liabilities are carried at amortised cost, where the carrying value approximates the fair value.
The fair value of the derivative was determined using the level 2 method.
NOTE 4. EXPENSES
Consolidated | ||||
2012 | 2011 | |||
$ | $ | |||
Administration and compliance expenses | 2,846,275 | 2,183,445 | ||
Consulting fees | 252,673 | 481,258 | ||
Depreciation and amortisation expenses | 241,723 | 43,156 | ||
Directors fees | 321,147 | 564,911 | ||
Legal fees | 112,022 | 133,512 | ||
Occupancy expenses | 335,868 | 262,092 | ||
Share based payments | 549,836 | 343,266 | ||
Foreign currency loss | - | 883,305 | ||
Total expenses | 4,659,544 | 4,894,945 | ||
During the year, employee benefits were $1,052,621. This is included in administration and compliance expenses. |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 5. TAXATION
Prima facie income tax on operating (loss) is reconciled to the income tax benefit provided in the financial statements as follows:
Consolidated |
| |||||||||
2012 | 2011 |
| ||||||||
$ | $ |
| ||||||||
Prima facie income tax benefit on operating (loss) at the Australian tax rate of 30% (2011: 30%) | (1,288,531) | (1,466,901) |
| |||||||
Non deductible expenditure: |
| |||||||||
- Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions | 523,042 | 165,642 |
| |||||||
- Share Based payments | 164,951 | 94,880 |
| |||||||
- Administration expenses | 6,619 | 57,812 |
| |||||||
Temporary differences and tax losses not bought to account as a deferred tax asset | 593,919 | 1,148,567 |
| |||||||
Income tax expense | - | - |
| |||||||
| ||||||||||
Deferred Income Tax |
| |||||||||
Deferred income tax at 30 June relates to the following: |
| |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Consolidated |
| |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | - | - |
| |||||||
| ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
| |||||||||
Unrealised FX (gain) / loss | 32,989 | 264,991 |
| |||||||
Unrealised derivative gain | 228,544 | - |
| |||||||
Share issue costs | 52,136 | 27,164 |
| |||||||
Revenue tax losses - Australia | 6,572,464 | 5,438,370 |
| |||||||
Deferred tax assets not recognised | (6,886,133) | (5,730,525) |
| |||||||
Deferred tax (income)/expense | - | - |
| |||||||
Net deferred tax recognised in Balance Sheet | - | - |
| |||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
The Consolidated Group has tax losses of $6,886,133 (2011: $5,730,525) that are available indefinitely for offset against future taxable profits of the companies in which the losses arose.
The potential deferred tax asset will only be realised if:
(a) The relevant Company derives future assessable income of a nature and an amount sufficient to enable the asset to be realised, or the asset can be utilised by another Company in the consolidated entity in accordance with Division 170 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997;
(b) The relevant Company and/or consolidated entity continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by the Law; and
(c) No changes in tax legislation adversely affect the relevant Company and/or consolidated entity in realising the asset.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated |
| |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||
$ | $ | |||||||||||
NOTE 6. CASH ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Cash at bank and in hand | 395,445 | 13,968,248 | ||||||||||
395,445 | 13,968,248 | |||||||||||
The bank accounts are at call and pay interest at a weighted average interest rate of 0.30% at 30 June 2012 (2011: 0.84%) |
| |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
NOTE 7. RECEIVABLES |
| |||||||||||
Current |
| |||||||||||
Trade receivables | 23,911 | 7,426 |
| |||||||||
Other debtors | 503,655 | 1,403,553 |
| |||||||||
527,566 | 1,410,979 |
| ||||||||||
Non current |
| |||||||||||
Other debtors | 2,401,889 | - |
| |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
The Group's exposure to credit and currency risks is disclosed in Note 3. The majority of the non-current other debtor balance is VAT receivable which will be offset against future taxes payable on oil revenue.
|
| |||||||||||
At 30 June, the aging analysis of receivables is as follows:
|
| |||||||||||
Total | 0 - 30 Days | 31 - 60 days | 61 - 90 days | 90+ days |
| |||||||
2012 | 2,929,455 | 23,911 | 150,926 | 11,336 | 2,743,282 |
| ||||||
2011 | 1,410,979 | 55,425 | 16,919 | 34,702 | 1,303,933 |
| ||||||
There are no receivables as at 30 June 2012 that are impaired. |
| |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
NOTE 8. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS |
| |||||||||||
Prepayment | 336,995 | 460,969 |
| |||||||||
Other | 123,501 | 60,205 |
| |||||||||
460,496 | 521,174 |
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
NOTE 9. INVENTORIES |
| |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Raw Material | 58,113 | - |
| |||||||||
Crude oil | 11,265 | - |
| |||||||||
Provision of obsolete items | (16,058) | - |
| |||||||||
53,320 | - |
| ||||||||||
Consolidated | ||
$ | ||
NOTE 10. OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES | ||
Cost as at 1 July 2011 | ||
Additions | - | |
Transferred from exploration and evaluation assets | 14,241,140 | |
Disposals | - | |
Net exchange differences | 82,137 | |
Cost as at 30 June 2012 | 14,323,277 | |
Depletion and impairment as at 1 July 2011 | ||
Charge for the year | (97,995) | |
Provision for impairment | - | |
Disposals | - | |
Depletion and impairment as at 30 June 2012 | (97,995) | |
Net book value as at 30 June 2012 | 14,225,282 | |
During the year, costs associated with J50 and J52 were transferred to oil and gas properties as during the year these wells were granted a trial production licence and are producing. | ||
NOTE 11. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | ||
| ||
$ | ||
Year ended 30 June 2012 | ||
At 1 July 2011 net of accumulated depreciation | 398,851 | |
Additions | 752,218 | |
Depreciation charge for the year | (241,723) | |
Disposals | - | |
Reclassifications | - | |
Net exchange differences | 16,990 | |
At 30 June 2012 net of accumulated depreciation | 926,336 | |
At 30 June 2012 | ||
Cost | 1,254,140 | |
Accumulated depreciation | (327,804) | |
Net carrying amount | 926,336 | |
Year ended 30 June 2011 | ||
At 1 July 2010 net of accumulated depreciation | 144,140 | |
Additions | 349,102 | |
Depreciation charge for the year | (43,156) | |
Disposals | - | |
Reclassifications | - | |
Net exchange differences | (51,235) | |
At 30 June 2011 net of accumulated depreciation | 398,851 | |
At 30 June 2011 | ||
Cost | 564,301 | |
Accumulated depreciation | (165,450) | |
Net carrying amount | 398,851 |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
$ | $ | |||||||||
NOTE 12. EXPLORATION & EVALUATION EXPENDITURE | ||||||||||
Exploration expenditure carried forward in respect of areas of interest in: |
| |||||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenditure at cost | 25,014,521 | 25,319,806 | ||||||||
Movements during the year | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | 25,319,806 | 22,282,954 | ||||||||
Expenditure incurred during the year | 12,856,785 | 7,189,909 | ||||||||
Reclassification to oil and gas properties | (14,241,140) | - | ||||||||
Foreign exchange translation | 1,079,070 | (4,153,057) | ||||||||
Balance at end of year | 25,014,521 | 25,319,806 | ||||||||
NOTE 13. OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS | ||||
| ||||
Liquidation fund | 244,151 | 128,404 |
| |
Other | 48,601 | - |
| |
292,752 | 128,404 |
| ||
| ||||
The Group has a deposit for the purpose of a Liquidation fund in the amount of $244,151. The deposit is to be used for land restoration when required. Under the laws of Kazakhstan, the deposit must be replenished in the amount of 1% of the annual investments. |
|
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
$ | $ | ||||||
NOTE 14. PAYABLES | |||||||
Trade creditors | 675,335 | 298,307 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 36,889 | 47,401 | |||||
Other payables | 412,399 | 188,908 | |||||
1,124,623 | 534,616 | ||||||
NOTE 15. DEFERRED REVENUE | |||||||
As at July | - | - | |||||
Deferred during the year | 2,358,621 | - | |||||
Released during the year | (1,166,582) | - | |||||
At 30 June | 1,192,039 | - | |||||
The deferred revenue refers to an amount received in advance for oil sales. As at 30 June 2012, there is 2,904 tonnes of oil to be delivered under the contract.
NOTE 16. PROVISIONS | |||||||
Current | |||||||
Annual leave | 90,957 | 61,918 | |||||
90,957 | 61,918 | ||||||
Non - current | |||||||
Provision for rehabilitation | 356,594 | 230,552 | |||||
356,594 | 230,552 | ||||||
The Group accrues provisions for the forthcoming costs of rehabilitation of the territory. On the basis of forecasts the cost of rehabilitation of the oilfield would be $258,836 | |||||||
Movements in rehabilitation provision | |||||||
Carrying amount at beginning of the year | 230,552 | 85,713 | |||||
Unwinding of discount rate | 13,362 | 10,553 | |||||
Foreign exchange translation | 8,641 | (684) | |||||
Provision for the year | 104,039 | 134,970 | |||||
Carrying amount at the end of year | 356,594 | 230,552 |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Consolidated | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
$ | $ | ||||||
NOTE 17. OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES | |||||||
Convertible note | 2,789,897 | ||||||
Derivative liability | 274,880 | - | |||||
3,064,777 | - | ||||||
On 29 September 2011, the Company agreed terms on its US$3.45m Convertible Notes with major shareholder Soyuzneftegas Capital Limited (SNG). On 2 August 2012, the convertible notes were converted into 8,125,000 Jupiter shares, being the share price of the Rights Issue that occurred in July 2012.
The key terms of the Convertible Notes are:
·; Effective date: 29 September 2011
·; Coupon Rate: 15% per annum
·; Term: 24 months with interest payable quarterly in arrears
·; Conversion price: US$0.75, SNG has right to convert earlier if there is a capital raising prior to conversion and the price of that capital raising is less than $0.75. In this instance, the conversion price will be reduced to be in line with the capital raising price.
·; Number of shares to be issued if note converted at US$0.75: 4.6 million, representing approximately 4% of the issued share capital
·; Arrangement Fee: 1%
Valuation of Convertible Notes
The Notes have an embedded derivative in the form of a call option for the holder to convert the Notes at US$0.75 into Jupiter ordinary shares.
The convertible equity feature of the Notes has been separated from the liability component of the Notes for financial reporting purposes. The call option to convert the notes into shares does not meet the definition of an equity instrument, as the exercise price is denominated in foreign currency to the company's functional currency and the conversion price is not fixed. The convertible call option is classified as a Derivative liability and measured at fair value through the income statement.
The Derivative component of the Notes was valued using the Black Scholes option valuation methodology. The Black Scholes option valuation methodology calculates the expected benefit from acquiring the shares outright less the present value of paying the exercise price for the options at expected exercise date.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 18. CONTRIBUTED EQUITY | Consolidated |
| |||||||||
2012 | 2011 |
| |||||||||
$ | $ |
| |||||||||
Shares issued and fully paid |
| ||||||||||
Ordinary shares (a) | 70,941,938 | 70,986,412 |
| ||||||||
Share options (b) | 294,198 | 294,198 |
| ||||||||
71,236,136 | 71,280,610 |
| |||||||||
| |||||||||||
Number of | $ |
| |||||||||
Shares |
| ||||||||||
(a) Movements in ordinary share capital: |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2010 | 886,220,391 | 44,397,049 |
| ||||||||
Issue of shares - Placement | 277,777,778 | 7,500,000 |
| ||||||||
Issue of shares - Rights issue 1 for 3 | 339,717,817 | 9,172,380 |
| ||||||||
Issue to Pursuit Capital | 7,718,695 | - |
| ||||||||
Cost of issue | - | (875,075) |
| ||||||||
Issue of shares - Placement | 226,500,061 | 11,098,591 |
| ||||||||
Cost of issue | - | (306,533) |
| ||||||||
Balance 30 June 2011 | 1,737,934,742 | 70,986,412 |
| ||||||||
1 for 15 reconstruction | (1,622,071,255) | - |
| ||||||||
Cost of issue - Rights Issue | - | (44,474) |
| ||||||||
Issue of shares - share based payment * | 266,667 | - |
| ||||||||
Balance 30 June 2012 | 116,130,154 | 70,941,938 |
| ||||||||
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
* In respect of share based payments, refer to Note 20 and 21. |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
(b) Movements in options | |||||||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2011 | 13,000,000 | 294,198 | |||||||||
1 for 15 reconstruction | (12,133,331) | ||||||||||
Balance 30 June 2012 | 866,669 | 294,198 | |||||||||
Terms and conditions Ordinary shares have no par value and the Company does not have a limited amount of authorised capital.
Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time and are entitled to one vote per share at shareholders' meetings.
| |||||||||||
(c) Movement in performance rights | |||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2011 | 10,000,000 | - | |||||
Cancelled during year | (10,000,000) | - | |||||
Granted during the year | 2,133,335 | - | |||||
Balance as at 30 June 2012 | 2,133,335 | - |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 18. CONTRIBUTED EQUITY (continued)
Capital risk management |
When managing capital, management's objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to maintain optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management also aims to maintain a capital structure that ensures the lowest cost of capital available to the entity.
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the entity may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares, enter into joint ventures or sell assets.
The entity does not have a defined share buy-back plan.
No dividends were paid in 2011 and nil are expected to be paid in 2012.
The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.
|
NOTE 19. RESERVES
CONSOLIDATED |
| ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation reserve | Share based payments reserve | Total |
| ||||||||||
$ | $ | $ |
| ||||||||||
At 30 June 2011 | (6,084, 968) | 3,922,453 | (2,162, 515) |
| |||||||||
Share based payment | - | 549,836 | 549,836 |
| |||||||||
Foreign currency translation | 1,337,981 | - | 1,337,981 |
| |||||||||
At 30 June 2012 | (4,746,987) | 4,472,289 | (274,698) |
| |||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Nature and purpose of reserves |
| ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation reserve |
| ||||||||||||
The foreign currency translation reserve is used to record exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries. |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Share based payments reserve |
| ||||||||||||
The share based payments plan reserve is used to record the value of equity benefits provided to eligible employees as part of their remuneration. Refer to note 21 for further details of this plan.
During the period, Erkin Svanbayev (after shareholder approval) received 266,667 Jupiter Shares. This was included in the share based payment reserve at 30 June 2011. | |||||||||||||
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 20. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
This note is to be read in conjunction with the Remuneration Report, which is included in the Directors Report on pages 12 to 20.
(a) Key management personnel compensation
Consolidated |
| |||
2012 | 2011 | |||
$ | $ | |||
Short-term employee benefits | 947,463 | 1,299,175 | ||
Post-employment benefits | 48,000 | 23,445 | ||
Other | 119,203 | - | ||
Termination benefits | - | 96,000 | ||
Share-based payments | 549,836 | 472,958 | ||
1,664,502 | 1,891,578 |
Shareholdings
The number of shares in the Company held during the financial year by each Key Management Personnel of Jupiter Energy Limited, including their personally-related entities, are set out below.
2012 | Balance01-Jul-11 | Granted as Remuneration | On Exercise of Options | Net Change Other* | Balance30-June-12 |
Directors | |||||
G A Gander | 38,266,668 | - | - | (35,715,555) | 2,551,113 |
A Beardsall | 10,000,000 | - | - | (9,000,000) | 1,000,000 |
B Kuandykov | - | - | - | - | - |
S Mison | 4,694,812 | - | - | (4,381,825) | 312,987 |
Executives | |||||
K Martens | 4,138,420 | - | - | (4,138,420) | - |
H Wolski | - | - | - | - | - |
*Change relates to the consolidation of shares and options which occurred during the year.
2011 | Balance01-Jul-10 | Granted as Remuneration | On Exercise of Options | Net Change Other | Balance30-June-11 |
Directors | |||||
G A Gander | 28,700,000 | - | - | 9,566,668 | 38,266,668 |
A Beardsall | - | - | - | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 |
B Kuandykov | - | - | - | - | - |
S Mison | 3,692,220 | - | - | 1,002,592 | 4,694,812 |
A R Childs 1 | 13,000,000 | - | - | 3,500,000 | 16,500,000 |
E Svanbayev 1 | 11,000,000 | - | - | - | 11,000,000 |
D Thorpe 1 | 5,300,000 | - | - | 1,767,667 | 7,067,667 |
Executives | |||||
K Martens | 4,138,420 | - | - | - | 4,138,420 |
H Wolski | - | - | - | - | - |
1The director resigned during the year. This was the holding at time of resigning.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 20. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL (continued)
Option Holdings
The number of options in the Company held during the financial year by each Key Management Personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally-related entities, is set out below.
2012 | Balance at beg of period01-Jul-11 | Granted as Remune-ration | Options Exercised | Net Change Other * | Balance at end of period30-Jun-12 | Not Vested & Not Exercisable | Vested & Exercisable |
(i) Unlisted Options | |||||||
Directors | |||||||
G A Gander | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
A Beardsall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
B Kuandykov | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
S Mison | 1,000,000 | - | - | (933,333) | 66,667 | - | 66,667 |
Executives | |||||||
K Martens | 2,000,000 | - | - | (1,866,667) | 133,333 | - | 133,333 |
H Wolski | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
*Change relates to the consolidation of shares and options which occurred during the year.
2011 | Balance at beg of period01-Jul-10 | Granted as Remune-ration | Options Exercised | Net Change Other | Balance at end of period30-Jun-11 | Not Vested & Not Exercisable | Vested & Exercisable |
(ii) Unlisted Options | |||||||
Directors | |||||||
G A Gander | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
A Beardsall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
B Kuandykov | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
S Mison | 1,000,000 | - | - | - | 1,000,000 | - | 1,000,000 |
A R Childs | 5,000,000 | - | - | - | 5,000,000 | - | 5,000,000 |
E Svanbayev | 5,000,000 | - | - | - | 5,000,000 | - | 5,000,000 |
D Thorpe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Executives | |||||||
K Martens | 12,000,000 | - | - | (10,000,000)1 | 2,000,000 | - | 2,000,000 |
S Sinistin | 10,000,000 | - | - | (10,000,000)2 | - | - | - |
H Wolski | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
1Relates to options cancelled unexercised
2Relates to options expired unexercised.
3 Options held by Messer's Childs and Svanbayev were not cancelled upon them resigning.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 20. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL (continued)
Performance Rights Holdings
The number of Performance Rights in the Company held during the financial year by each Director of Jupiter Energy Limited and each of the specified Executives of the consolidated entity, including their personally-related entities, are set out below.
2012 | Balance at beg of period01-Jul-11 | Granted as Remune-ration | Rights Exercised | Net Change Other * | Balance at end of period30-Jun-12 | Not Vested & Not Exercisable | Vested & Exercisable |
Directors | |||||||
G A Gander | 10,000,000 | 666,667 | - | (10,000,000) | 666,667 | 666,667 | - |
A Beardsall | - | 666,667 | - | - | 666,667 | 666,667 | - |
B Kuandykov | - | 666,667 | - | - | 666,667 | 666,667 | - |
S Mison | - | 133,334 | - | - | 133,334 | 133,334 | - |
Executives | |||||||
K Martens | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
H Wolski | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
* Relates to rights cancelled.
2011 | Balance at beg of period01-Jul-10 | Granted as Remune-ration | Rights Exercised | Net Change Other * | Balance at end of period30-Jun-11 | Not Vested & Not Exercisable | Vested & Exercisable |
Directors | |||||||
G A Gander | 15,000,000 | - | - | (5,000,000) | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | - |
A Beardsall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
B Kuandykov | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
S Mison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
A R Childs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
E Svanbayev | 15,000,000 | - | - | (15,000,000) | - | - | |
D Thorpe | 15,000,000 | - | - | (15,000,000) | - | - | |
Executives | |||||||
K Martens | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
S Sinistin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
H Wolski | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
* Relates to rights lapsed or forfeited.
Transactions between the Group and other related parties (b) Other Transactions with Key Management Personnel and Related Parties |
i. Consultancy fees
During the year, consulting fees of $136,649 (2011: Nil) were accrued and paid under normal terms and conditions to Meridian Petroleum LLP of which Mr Kuandykov is a director, for the provision of geological services at normal commercial rates.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 21. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
Types of share based payment plans |
| |||
Employee share option plan and Performance Rights Plan |
| |||
Included under expenses in the income statement is $549,836 (2011: $343,266), and relates, in full, to equity-settled share-based payment transactions for employees.
Employee Share Option Plan The Jupiter Energy Employee Share Option Plan was established whereby Jupiter Energy Limited may, at the discretion of the Jupiter Energy Limited Board, grant options over unissued shares of Jupiter Energy Limited to directors, executives, employees and consultants of the consolidated entity. The options are issued for nil consideration, will not be quoted on the ASX, cannot be transferred and are granted at the discretion of the Jupiter Energy Board. The options are issued for a term of five years. The options have a service period of 12 months attached to them before they vest.
The Employee Share Option Plan was approved by shareholders at the November 2007 Annual General Meeting.
|
Options
The fair value of the options is estimated at the date of grant using the Black -Scholes option pricing model.
No options were granted during the year ended 30 June 2012 (2011: Nil)
During the year ended 30 June 2012, no options were exercised over ordinary shares (2011: Nil).
The following table illustrates the number (No.) and weighted average exercise prices (WAEP) of share options issued under the ESOP. | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Weighted | Weighted | ||||||
Number of | Average | Number of | Average | ||||
Options | Exercise | Options | Exercise | ||||
$ | $ | ||||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the year | 13,000,000 |
0.14 | 33,000,000 |
0.102 | |||
Reconstruction of options (1:15) | (12,133,331) | ||||||
Granted | - | - | |||||
Cancelled / forfeited | - | (10,000,000) | 0.08 | ||||
Exercised | - | - | |||||
Expired | - | (10,000,000) | 0.08 | ||||
Outstanding at year end | 866,669 | 2.08 | 13,000,000 | 0.14 | |||
Exercisable at year end | 866,669 | 2.08 | 13,000,000 | 0.14 |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 21. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS (CONT.)
Performance Rights
The Jupiter Energy Performance Rights Plan was established whereby Jupiter Energy Limited may, at the discretion of the Jupiter Energy Limited Board, grant performance rights over unissued shares of Jupiter Energy Limited to directors, executives, employees and consultants of the consolidated entity. The rights are issued for nil consideration, will not be quoted on the ASX, cannot be transferred and are granted at the discretion of the Jupiter Energy Board.
The Performance Rights Plan was approved by shareholders at the November 2009 Annual General Meeting.
On 12 August 2011, 2,133,335 performance rights were approved by shareholders to directors. The number of performance rights vest in proportion to the percentage increase in share price at vesting date $0.919 (minimum vesting price). For 100% of the performance rights to vest, the share price of the Company needs to reach $1.47. In respect of the Vesting Condition, the % increase in the Share price of the Company will be calculated by reference to the volume weighted average price of Shares in the 20 consecutive trading days immediately prior to the Vesting Date (25th August 2012). No performance rights vest if the calculated share price is less than the minimum vesting price at vesting date. The minimum vesting price was set based on 25% premium to the Company's share price at the original grant date.
On 14 May 2012, shareholders approved the extension of the expiry date on the same terms and conditions to the 31 December 2013.
The fair value of performance rights granted to directors is estimated as at the grant date using a hybrid model incorporates a trinomial option valuation and a Monte Carlo simulation option pricing model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the instruments were granted. Two valuations were performed during the year: 1. As at 26 August 2011 with an expiry date of 25th August 2012 2 Modification as at 14 May 2012 with an expiry date of 31 December 2013. | |||
The following table lists the inputs to the models for the period ended 30 June 2012: | |||
Performance Rights | Performance Rights | ||
Grant / Modification date | 26 August 2011 | 14 May 2012 | |
Number of performance rights | 2,133,335 | 2,133,335 | |
Share price | 60 cents | 50 cents | |
Exercise price | 0 cents | 0 cents | |
Dividend Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Expected volatility | 80.0% | 80.0% | |
Risk-free interest rate | 4.80% | 2.67% | |
Expected life | 1 year | 1.63 year | |
Weighted average fair value | 27.0 cents | 19.5 cents | |
Total amount | $576,000 | $601,600 | |
Expensed to 30 June 2012 | $480,000 | $46,277 | |
During the year, no performance rights vested. | |||
During the year 10,000,000 (pre consolidation) performance rights were cancelled. $23,559 has been expensed in relation to these rights. | |||
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 22. COMMITMENTS FOR EXPENDITURE |
Exploration Work Program Commitments | ||||||||||
The Group has entered into a subsoil utilisation rights for petroleum exploration and extraction in Areas 1 and 2 in Mangistauskaya Oblast in accordance with Contract No. 2272 dated 29th of December 2006 with the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan. | ||||||||||
Exploration work program commitments contracted for (but not capitalised in the accounts) that are payable:
| ||||||||||
- not later than one year | 4,783,196 | 5,661,900 | ||||||||
- later than one year but not later than five years | - | 10,380,150 | ||||||||
4,783,196 | 16,042,050 | |||||||||
NOTE 23. AUDITORS REMUNERATION | |||||||
The auditor of Jupiter Energy Limited is Ernst & Young. | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
$ | $ | ||||||
Amounts received or due and receivable by Ernst & Young (Australia) for: | |||||||
- auditing or reviewing the financial report | 73,511 | 79,655 | |||||
- reporting accountant services - AIM listing | 121,025 | - | |||||
194,536 | 79,655 | ||||||
Amounts received or due and receivable by Ernst & Young (Kazakhstan) for: | |||||||
- auditing or reviewing the financial report | 51,569 | 26,872 | |||||
- tax compliance | 14,725 | - | |||||
66,294 | 26,872 | ||||||
Amounts received or due and receivable by Ernst & Young (Singapore) for: | |||||||
- auditing or reviewing the financial report | 6,966 | 7,156 | |||||
- other services | - | - | |||||
6,966 | 7,156 | ||||||
Total paid to Ernst & Young | 267,796 | 113,683 |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 24. EARNINGS PER SHARE | |||||||
Basic earnings per share | |||||||
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the profit / (loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. | |||||||
The following reflects the income and data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations: | |||||||
Consolidated | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Net loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Parent from continuing operations |
(4,295,102) |
(4,889,671) | |||||
Number of shares | Number of shares | ||||||
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic and diluted earnings per share | 115,973,076 |
91,870,460* | |||||
\* The weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic earnings per share has been adjusted to reflect the rights issue during the year ended 30 June 2011.
A share consolidation was completed on 30 August 2011. The weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic and diluted earnings per share has been adjusted retrospectively for both the 2012 and 2011 earnings per share.
NOTE 25. SEGMENT REPORTING
Identification of reportable segments
The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are used by the chief operating decision makers in assessing performance and determining the allocation of resources.
The Group has identified that it has one operating segments being related to the activities in Kazakhstan, on the basis that the operations in Australia relate to running the Corporate Head Office only.
Accounting policies and inter-segment transactions
The accounting policies used by the Group in reporting segments internally are the same as those contained in Note 1 to the accounts.
Interest revenue is derived in Australia. Non-current assets relate to capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure located in Kazakhstan.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 26. STATEMENT OF CASHFLOWS RECONCILIATION
(a) Reconciliation of operating (loss) after income tax to net cash (used in) operating activities
Consolidated | ||||
2012 | 2011 | |||
$ | $ | |||
Operating (loss) after income tax: | (4,295,102) | (4,889,671) | ||
Add/(less) non cash items: | ||||
Depreciation | 339,178 | 43,156 | ||
Share based payments | 549,836 | 343,266 | ||
(Gain) / Loss on derivative | (761,813) | 59,455 | ||
Finance costs | 717,696 | - | ||
Effect of foreign exchange translation | (114,781) | 883,305 | ||
Other | 989,016 | - | ||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||
(Increase)/decrease in receivables | (1,518,476) | (437,437) | ||
(Increase)/decrease in inventories | (53,320) | 87,499 | ||
(Increase)/decrease in other current assets | (103,671) | (372,268)
| ||
Increase/ (decrease) in deferred revenue | 1,192,039 | |||
Increase/ (decrease) in payables | 174,265 | (333,786) | ||
Increase/(decrease) in provisions | 155,081 | 166,795 | ||
(2,727,892) | (4,449,686) |
For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash includes cash on hand, at banks, and money market investments readily convertible to cash on hand, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
(b) Non- cash financing and investing activities
Consolidated | |||
2012 | 2011 | ||
$ | $ | ||
Issue of shares to Pursuit Capital Pty Ltd (note 15) | - | 239,279 |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
NOTE 27. EVENTS OCCURING AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
·; On 16 July 2012 the Company advised that the J-51 well had received approval to be tested at the Mid Triassic (A) horizon and after the workover was completed the co-mingled flow rate from the Mid Triassic (A) and (B) was between 600 and 650 bopd. This rate was confirmed on 30 July 2012 as having stabilized at 600 bopd on a 9mm choke. The well was shut in on 15 September 2012 after the 90 day production testing period expired.
·; On 25 July 2012 the Company announced the closure of its 1 for 4 Rights Issue, raising $11,613,016 (before costs). There was a shortfall of ~35% meaning that the joint underwriters took up additional shares.
·; On 01 August 2012, SNG elected to convert its $US3.45m Convertible Notes into equity. Under the terms of the Convertible Notes, the conversion price was the same price as the Rights Issue ($0.40). A total of 8,215,000 shares were issued to SNG in full satisfaction of all outstanding Convertible Notes.
·; On 03 August 2012, change in substantial holding notices were lodged reflecting the impact of the shortfall of the Rights Issue and the conversion of the Convertible Notes. At this date, Waterford held 29.5% of the issued shares of the Company and SNG held 19.8%.
·; On 06 August 2012 the Company announced that the J-55 well had spud.
·; On 21 August 2012 the Company announced details of further oil sales for the August/September period based on a volumes of 2000 tonnes at a price of $US365/tonne ($US52/barrel)
NOTE 28. INFORMATION ON PARENT ENTITY
2012 | 2011 | |
(a) Information relating to Jupiter Energy Ltd:
| $ | $ |
Current assets | 570,756 | 13,416,085 |
Total assets | 41,624,671 | 41,094,709 |
Current liabilities | (91,277) | (174,332) |
Total liabilities | (3,156,054) | (174,332) |
Issued capital | 71,236,136 | 71,519,889 |
Retained earnings | (37,239,808) | (34,282,686) |
Share based payment reserve | 4,472,289 | 3,683,174 |
Total shareholders' equity | 38,468,617 | 40,920,377 |
Profit or (loss) of the parent entity | (2,957,121) | (9,833,338) |
Total comprehensive income / (loss) of the parent entity | (2,957,121) | (9,833,338) |
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Country of | Equity Holding | ||
incorporation | 2012 | 2011 | |
% | % | ||
Name of Entity | |||
Jupiter Energy (Victoria) Pty Ltd | Australia | 100 | 100 |
Jupiter Biofuels Pty Ltd | Australia | 100 | 100 |
Jupiter Energy (Kazakhstan) Pty Ltd | Australia | 100 | 100 |
Jupiter Energy Pte. Ltd | Singapore | 100 | 100 |
Jupiter Energy (Services) Pte. Ltd | Singapore | 100 | 100 |
(b) Details of any guarantees entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries
There are no guarantees entered into by the parent entity.
(c) Details of any contingent liabilities of the parent entity
There are no contingent liabilities of the parent entity as at reporting date.
(d) Details of any contractual commitments by the parent entity
There are no contractual commitments by the parent entity
NOTE 29. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Group has no contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2012. (30 June 2011: Nil)
Related Shares:
Jupiter Energy