14th Mar 2012 07:00
14 March 2012
MirLand Development Corporation plc
("MirLand" / "Company")
FULL YEAR RESULTS FOR THE 12 MONTHS TO 31 DECEMBER 2011
MIRLAND DOUBLES REVENUE, DELIVERING ON DEVELOPMENT, INVESTMENT AND SALES STRATEGY
-SUCCESSFUL LAUNCH OF APARTMENT SALES AT FLAGSHIP ST. PETERSBURG PROJECT MARKS AN IMPORTANT MILESTONE FOR THE COMPANY-
MirLand Development Corporation plc, one of the leading international residential and commercial property developers in Russia, announces results for the 12 months ended 31 December 2011.
Financial Highlights:
·; Total Revenues showed a significant increase of approximately 120% to US$47.6 million (31 December 2010: US$21.6 million) due to growth in operational results and occupancy in all yielding properties that reached an average of 98%, inclusion of a full 12 months of income from the Triumph Mall in Saratov, income from Tamiz office building and partial recognition of sales at the Western Residence project in Perkhushkovo;
·; Net Income: US$28.5 million (31 December 2010: net income US$23.2 million), with the increase mainly attributable to an improvement in operational results of yielding properties and net fair value adjustment in investment properties and investment properties under construction of US$33.5 million (31 December 2010: adjustment of US$29.8 million), a result of overall progress in the Company's commercial portfolio and improved market conditions;
·; Total Assets increased to US$739.6 million (31 December 2010: US$704.5 million);
·; Adjusted NAV: US$536.8 million (31 December 2010: US$493.4 million) and NAV per share of US$5.2 (31 December 2010: US$4.8). The growth in NAV (based on C&W valuation) is attributable mainly to fair value increase of St. Petersburg project of approximately US$56 million due to the significant progress achieved during the year in terms of sales, financing and construction and to a net increase in the fair value of commercial properties of approximately US$25.4 million due to the overall improvement in the Company's commercial portfolio helped by improved market conditions. These increases were partially offset by growth in net liabilities;
·; Real Estate assets amounted to US$671.1 million (31 December 2010: US$636.4 million) representing 91% of total assets (31 December 2010: 90%). The increase is attributed to positive net fair value adjustment and investment of approximately US$39 million in real estate during the year;
·; Shareholders' equity increased to US$347.1 million, equating to 47% of total assets (31 December 2010: US$341.0 million);
·; Further progress in management and optimization of debt raising approximately US$54 million through conversion of warrants to Bonds Series C&D and the sale of Bonds Series D (listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange) and repaying higher interest Shareholders' loans of approximately US$40.6 million (including interest);
·; Further diversification of funding sources, refinancing four loan facilities totalling approximately US$60.1 million (Company's share) with three leading Russian banks and obtaining a construction credit line for the first sub phase of Triumph Park project in St. Petersburg of approximately US$41 million;
·; Modest net leverage maintained at 44% of total assets (31 December 2010: 43.5%) despite raising of debt on the Tel Aviv Stock exchange and obtaining of project financing which were partially offset by repayment of Shareholders' loans, scheduled repayments of previously issued bonds and scheduled principal repayments of loans on the project level. In January 2012, the Company repaid the remaining balance of Shareholders' loans in the amount of approximately US$6.4 million (including interest).
Operational Highlights:
·; Sales campaign for Sub Phase One of Triumph Park Project in St. Petersburg, comprising 510 apartments launched in November 2011 and contracts for the sale of 179 apartments have been executed and 31 apartments reserved; Launch of sales and construction of Sub Phase Two comprising of 710 apartments is planned for Q3 2012.
·; Triumph Mall in Saratov enjoyed a successful first year of operation in terms of footfall and is now 100% leased;
·; Occupancy rate increased to 100% at the Vernissage Mall in Yaroslavl, with the asset experiencing high footfall;
·; Construction of the first phase of 77 houses in Western Residence project, Perkhushkovo, was completed in mid October and the process of handing over the sold houses to buyers has begun;
·; Occupancy rates in Hydro, MAG and Century office buildings are now 97% on average (of available space);
·; The Tamiz office building has been completed during the third quarter of 2011, and is currently 92% leased, with negotiations with tenants underway for the remaining space;
·; The Company completed the acquisition of leasehold rights to a 40.6 hectares site designated for the development of up to 180,000sqm logistics centre in Novosibirsk for a total consideration of US$2.2 million;
·; Insurance settlement amounting to approximately US$6.2 million has been reached compensating MAG for the fire damage caused to one of its buildings in March 2010. Renovation works are now in progress and are expected to be completed in Q2 2012 and negotiations for lease out of the renovated space are in progress.
Nigel Wright, Chairman, commented:
"2011 proved to be a year of solid progress for the Company despite considerable and continuing challenges. I am delighted to report improvements across the board in our business. Growth in Net Revenues, Profit and Net Asset Value are encouraging and we have made significant progress over the past twelve months in a number of other key areas. These are all signs that the strategic decisions taken in the immediate aftermath of the 2008/2009 financial crisis are bearing fruit.
"The completion of key additional financings with domestic banks, the successful commencement of sales at our major St. Petersburg residential project, the growth in revenues and negligible vacancy rate at our principal retail and commercial investment properties all give cause for encouragement. Furthermore, there were positive signs of improvement in key Russian economic indicators during the year and a welcome improvement in bank liquidity. In light of the above, I remain cautiously optimistic in the medium term, barring unforeseen aftershocks."
For further information, please contact:
MirLand Development Corporation plc Roman Rozental
|
+7 499 130 31 09 |
FTI Consulting Dido Laurimore / Will Henderson | +44 20 7831 3113 |
Chairman's Statement
I am pleased to report on MirLand's progress and results during the 2011 financial year. The Russian economy continued to stabilise and show improvement during 2011 and the performance of the Company's real estate portfolio continued to improve. In November, the Company secured construction finance for sub phase one of its flagship residential project, Triumph Park, in St. Petersburg and commenced its sales campaign. Initial response has been highly encouraging with approximately 40% of the 510 apartments in the first phase already sold or reserved.
As the liquidity in the lending market in Russia improved MirLand was also able to obtain bank financing and refinancing for existing assets during the year. However, what is clear is that the measures that the Company took during the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009, and the support received at that time from our principal shareholder, the Fishman Group, have left us well positioned to capitalise on opportunities to take advantage of growth and improving sentiment in the Russian macro economy and real estate arena.
The Company's strategy for 2012 proposes that we:
·; Continue to maximize returns from our existing assets;
·; Successfully complete projects currently under construction; and
·; Activate pipeline projects and selectively seek new projects subject to availability of appropriate funding and market demand.
Russian Business Environment
Russia performed well during 2011 with all macroeconomic indicators presenting positive results. 2011 was a year for record low inflation in Russia which, at 6.1%, was driven mainly by low food inflation. Unemployment continued to decrease and positive GDP growth and industrial production were supported by high energy prices, on which the Russian economy is highly dependent.
The performance of the Russian economy during 2011 can be divided into two halves. In H1 domestic demand was maintained, and consumption and the construction sector started growing faster as the economy was largely influenced by positive news from the world's top-performing economies. However, by the end of the summer, uncertainty about the leading countries' economies grew, bringing volatility to the commodity markets which in turn saw the lending market became more conservative, while the MosPrime interbank interest rate almost doubled.
The price of oil was supported by tensions around Iran, stable growth of BRIC economies and a moderate upturn in the US economy. However, EU financial uncertainty continues to create volatility in the Russian economy.
In addition, as result of the uncertainty about the country post the presidential election (Prime Minister Putin was elected to president in March 2012), consumer confidence decreased during the year, and the escalated political instability reduced the value of the Rouble towards end of the year.
2011 was an exceptionally good year for the real estate sector, which saw a record year of US$7.66 billion of investment in the sector. The market experienced significant quality improvements in 2011 and foreign investors' interest returned. However, demand in the last quarter softened somewhat due to the world economic uncertainty. Transactions were seen across all sectors, but the most significant increase in the volume of investment deals was observed in the retail segment. The increase in interest from investors led to yield compression with prime yields for good quality Moscow premises hardening from circa 13% in Q4 2009 to approximately 9.5% and lower for some assets, by the end of 2011.
2011 Operational Highlights
As a result of MirLand's business model implemented during the year and our high quality portfolio, the Company is well positioned to grow in this improving environment and this has already been reflected in the better performance for 2011.
·; The Company has a diversified portfolio of assets comprising both residential and commercial projects.
·; In November 2011, the sales campaign for the first phase of the Triumph Park residential project in St. Petersburg was launched. The pace of sales has exceeded management's expectations with sale contracts executed for 179 apartments and a further 31 apartments reserved, out of a total of 510, which comprise the first sub phase of the development. Launch of sales and construction of sub phase Two, comprising 710 apartments, is planned to for Q3 2012.
·; Our investment portfolio now comprises six high quality, completed, income producing investment properties, Hydromashservice, MAG, Century and Tamiz office properties in Moscow, and in the retail sector, Vernissage Mall in Yaroslavl and the Triumph Mall in Saratov. Most of the leasing agreements in the yielding assets are for long tenures and denominated in US dollars. During the year, occupancy rates increased in all of our income producing investment properties and we reached full occupancy at both of the Company's retail properties and overall average occupancy rate of approximately 98% (of available space) for all yielding properties.
·; During the year, the Company raised approximately US$54 million through extensions of its Series C bonds, the conversion of previously issued warrants (Series 2 and Series 3) to bonds Series C and D and the sale of Bonds Series D, which are traded on the Tel Aviv stock exchange.
·; During 2011, special emphasis was given to progressing project refinancing and construction financing, resulting in four refinancing loans totalling approximately US$60.1 million and the receipt of a construction credit line of circa US$41 million for the first sub phase of Triumph Park Project in St. Petersburg.
·; In October 2011 the construction of the first phase of the Western Residence project in Perkhushkovo was completed and the delivery of the purchased houses to their new owners has begun. As of 14 March 2012, 19 out of a total of 77 houses have been sold.
·; As previously announced, an insurance settlement amounting to approximately US$6.2 million has been reached compensating MAG for the fire damage caused to one of its buildings in March 2010. Renovation works of the building are now in progress and are expected to be completed in Q2 2012.
·; The Company continues to maintain modest net leverage at just 44% of its total assets at the year end.
Financing
In common with other real estate businesses, MirLand relies on both short and long term financing sources. In recent months we have witnessed an encouraging improvement in the domestic bank finance market in Russia and some improvement in the public debt markets.
To date, MirLand's activities have been financed through a combination of equity capital, proceeds of corporate bond issues, project financing for the Vernissage and Triumph malls, financing for MAG, Hydro, Century and Western Residence properties, shareholders' loans and guarantees and general corporate loans. During 2011, the Company was able to further diversify its funding sources, obtaining four refinancing loans from three of Russia's leading banks at the project level totalling approximately US$60.1 million as well as a construction credit line for the first phase of the Triumph Park Project in St. Petersburg of approximately US$41 million. In addition, during 2011 the Company successfully raised circa US$54 million through extensions of Series C bonds, conversion of previously issued warrants (Series 2 and Series 3) to bonds Series C and D and the sale to third parties of Bonds Series D by the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, which are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. During the year, the Company also repaid US$36.8 million of Shareholders' loans (US$40.6million including interest), US$10.8 million of bonds and US$5.4 million of bank loans.
MirLand is managing its development pipeline according to market conditions and the availability of cash resources. We have re-phased our residential projects in Moscow and St. Petersburg to increase our flexibility and to match it to the adjusted market demand. This will enable us to fund construction through a mix of pre-sales, advance payments and internally generated cash. Where we have ongoing commercial projects under construction, the Company's strategy is to enter into pre-lease agreements with high quality tenants to ensure cash flow upon completion, as demonstrated by our success at the Triumph Mall Project in Saratov, which was delivered under difficult market conditions.
Results
Total assets as at 31 December 2011 were US$739.6 million as compared to US$704.5 million as of 31 December 2010. Equity as of 31 December 2011 was US$347.1 million compared to US$341 million the preceding year. The main reason for the increase was recorded net income for 2011 which was partially offset by an increase in the negative translation reserve due to devaluation of the Rouble against the US Dollar.
Net income was US$28.5 million (31 December 2010:US$23.2 million), following the improvement in the Company's operational results as well as an increase in the value of its investment properties, as a result of improved market conditions and capital investment during the year. The increase was partially offset by increased Finance costs and Net Foreign exchange differences due to a higher balance of financial liabilities, lower capitalized interest and devaluation of the Rouble against US dollar during the year, respectively.
Over the period, revenues recorded a significant increase of approximately 120% to US$47.5 million (31 December 2010: US$21.6 million), due to increased occupancy rates in all MirLand's yielding assets, income from Triumph Mall for its first full year of operation and income recognition from the sale of houses in the Western Residence project in Perkhushkovo.
MirLand's assets are externally valued semi-annually on 30 June and 31 December. The valuation is conducted by Cushman & Wakefield. As a result of market improvement and further investment by the Company during this period, the value of MirLand's portfolio (Company's share) increased by approximately 10% to US$853.6 million at 31 December 2011 (31 December 2010: US$775.4 million). Adjusted NAV, based on Cushman & Wakefield's valuation, was US$536.8 million (31 December 2010: US$493.4 million), an increase of 8.8 %. The growth can be attributed mainly to increase in the valuation of St. Petersburg project due to the significant progress made during the year in terms of sales, construction and financing as well as net increase in the value of the Company's commercial portfolio as a result of overall improvement in all yielding assets that was helped by improved market conditions. The increase in value was offset by decrease in the valuation of our Skyscraper project.
We strongly believe in the quality of the assets in which the Company has invested and that this portfolio will deliver an attractive yield to our investors over the long term.
Portfolio Development
In an improving business environment, MirLand's focus for 2011 was on delivery of projects already under construction, careful management of its income producing investment properties in order to increase the occupancy rates, and the development of good quality pipeline projects with strong demand, in the shortest time to market.
Residential
In November 2011, the Company launched a sales campaign for sub phase One of Triumph Park which offers high quality, competitively priced housing in St. Petersburg's desirable residential market. The project, which is situated on a well located, 40 hectare site, represents one of the few large scale developments in the city to offer close proximity to major transport links. Furthermore, the development will be the first eco-residential complex in St. Petersburg built according to Western standards and will offer attractive features such as ecologically friendly construction materials, an energy efficient design, reduced CO2 emissions, water purification filters and high speed eco-home lifts certified according to ISO 14001. 179 sale contracts have been signed and a further 31 reservations have been secured out of a total of 510 apartments which comprise the first phase. Construction of the first phase is expected to be completed in Q2 2013. On completion of the entire development, expected by 2019, Triumph Park will comprise 9,000 apartments, approximately 58,000 sqm of retail space, 60,000 sqmof offices, surface and underground parking and a variety of public amenities such as kindergartens, schools and parks.
In Q4 2011 the construction of phase one of the Western Residence project in Perkhushkovo (77 houses out of 163) was completed and the houses are now being handed over to the buyers. To date, a total of 19 houses have been sold.
Retail
The Triumph Mall in Saratov enjoyed a successful first year of operations characterized by high footfall figures with circa 450,000 visitors per month on average and 100% occupancy. The project has been nominated for the Russian based Commercial Real Estate Awards 2011 in the category of "Best Medium-sized Regional Shopping Centre".
The occupancy rate in Verrnissage mall in Yaroslavl is 100% and the shopping centre has also enjoyed high footfall figures with more than 300,000 visitors per month in 2011.
Office
The average occupancy in Hydro, MAG and Century Office Buildings increased to 97% of the net available leasable space.
Construction of the Tamiz office building was completed during the period and occupiers started to move in during Q3 2011. The building is currently 92% occupied.
As previously announced, on 20 March 2010 a fire broke out in one office building which constitutes part of the office building complex (MAG, building 26) located in Moscow. In August 2011 an insurance settlement amounting to approximately US$6 million has been reached, compensating MAG for the fire damage. Renovation works on the building are now in progress and expected to be completed during Q2 2012. Based on independent engineering report received by MAG, the renovation cost was estimated at approximately US$7.8 million.
Other
In Q1 2011, MirLand completed the acquisition of leasehold rights to a 40.6 hectares site designated for the development of up to 180,000sqm logistics centre in Novosibirsk for a total consideration of US$2.2 million.
Dividend Policy
MirLand has adopted a dividend policy that is intended to reflect long-term earnings and cash flow potential while, at the same time, maintaining both prudent dividend cover and adequate capital resources within the business.
Despite the improvements in the Russian economy, and the Company's results, the Board believes that it is appropriate to retain maximum flexibility to invest in the opportunities available to it and therefore the Board has determined that it is inappropriate to declare a dividend for the financial year ended 31 December 2011.
Our People
The Board of Directors and Senior Management team consist of dedicated individuals whose expertise has proved invaluable throughout this year. They have recommended and implemented positive and necessary changes to the business plan in light of rapidly changing economic circumstances and been involved in key decisions throughout. As Chairman, I place considerable emphasis on rigorous Board management and, in addition to formal meetings, I meet and communicate with my colleagues on a regular basis.
Once again I would like to pay tribute to both my executive and non-executive Board colleagues and all our operating staff. Together they form the backbone of our business and I thank them for their continuing dedication, energy and achievement. Their efforts have ensured that the Company is well positioned to face the challenges of the future.
The Board of Directors and the management are fully committed to sound corporate governance. As in previous years, detailed information regarding our approach to governance issues, our internal controls and key team members will be provided in our Annual Report & Accounts.
Outlook
In view of the improvements in the Russian macroeconomic environment and its real estate sub-sector, MirLand will continue to execute its clearly defined business plan to maximize long term shareholder returns.
The Company's efforts and resources are focused on completing projects already under construction and commencing those where funding is already in place. We continue to intensify our efforts to improve our pre-sale and letting activities and these strategies are already being reflected in the Company's improved results. As in the past, we will move forward with the planning and design stages of our strategic projects, whilst nurturing and growing the already strong income stream from our investment portfolio. In addition, we anticipate that continuing positive market momentum will create opportunities for us to purchase new assets and so increase our portfolio. Any activity will be undertaken with caution and subject to the availability of funds on appropriate terms.
Accordingly, barring any unforeseen market aftershocks, given growing market demand and availability of funding, MirLand appears well placed to benefit from improving market conditions.
Nigel Wright
Chairman
14 March 2012
Chief Executive's statement
MirLand was established in 2004 as part of the Fishman Group to focus on value-enhancing acquisitions, construction, lease and sale of residential and commercial real estate in Russia. In December 2006 the Company executed an IPO on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange. The Company's projects vary in their locations (major and regional cities), sectors (residential, office, retail and logistics), and status of development (from income producing investment properties to those in the pre-planning stage). For most of MirLand's projects, a local management team is engaged and is responsible for the development and/or the ongoing management of the asset.
The Market
Russian Economy
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | Key economic indicators |
142.4 | 142.9 | 143.0 | 142.0 | 142.2 | Population (millions) |
16,687 | 15,612 | 14,830 | 16,040 | 14,899 | GDP per capita (PPP, $) |
4.2 | 4.0 | -7.9 | 5.6 | 7.6 | GDP growth rate (%) |
6.1 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 13.3 | 11.9 | Inflation (%) |
6.1 | 7.6 | 8.2 | 7.7 | 6.1 | Unemployment rate |
29.4 | 30.4 | 31.7 | 24.9 | 25.7 | average RUR/USD exchange rate |
BBB | BBB | BBB | BBB | BBB+ | Sovereign Credit rating |
In general, all macro indexes were positive in 2011. The real growth in GDP totalled 4.2%, Rosstat's industrial production index totalled 4.7%, fixed investments showed a 4.8% growth in Q1-Q3, unemployment continued to decrease, and CPI at 6.1%, was the lowest rate in Russia's history with low food inflation (3.9%) and non-food inflation (6.7%) and services (8.7%) somewhat higher.
In H1 2011 the economy was largely influenced by positive news from the world's top-performing economies and from commodity markets. The Russian market managed to maintain domestic demand on the part of both consumers and investors. The recovering lending market had a positive impact on consumption and, as a result, the market showed a significant increase in retail turnover (by 5.4% compared to the similar period of 2010). In addition, from May 2011, the construction sector started growing faster, which also contributed to GDP growth. All of this was supported by high prices for energy resources.
However, as early as the end of summer 2011, uncertainty about the leading countries' economies grew stronger. Volatility in commodity markets, caused by the expectation of changes in global economic growth trends, had an even greater impact on the Russian market. The lending market became more conservative and the MosPrime interbank interest rate, a money market indicator, almost doubled in 2011.
Despite an increase in retail sales during the year and low inflation, the consumer confidence index was down 7%, as a result of uncertainty about the post-election future causing changes in consumer spending patterns in favour of savings. In addition, the escalated political instability pushed the Rouble down to RUB 36.46 against the USD/EUR currency basket at the end of year.
Capital outflows in 2011 were US$84.2 billion (Central Bank), which was higher than the US$34 billion of 2010, but still lower compared to the US$134 billion of 2008. Still, the risks are quite moderate, which has allowed Russia to keep its sovereign credit rating stable (Source: C&W).
The oil price remains supported by tensions around Iran, stable growth of BRIC economies and a moderate upturn in the US economy. However, EU financial uncertainty will continue to create volatility within the Russian economy.
Russian Real Estate Market
As the market developed and new opportunities appeared, investment interest responded accordingly taking activity in 2011 to record levels, with more than US$7.66 billion of total investments across the real estate sector. This figure is about twice as high as the quantum achieved in 2010 and 30% higher than 2008, which had previously been the most active year with US$5.8 billion invested in the real estate investment market.
Moscow enjoyed an impressive 88% of total investment volume in 2011. This market share is close to pre-crisis levels for Moscow compared to the regions and reflects Moscow's hierarchy as one of the core drivers of the Russian investment business.
Transaction activity took place across all sectors, with office and retail leading (at 41% and 27% of transactions by value, respectively), followed by hospitality (17%) and warehousing (15%). Although the largest inflow of investment by value was in the office sector, its level was similar to the level of 2010, but its share declined from 80% to 41% of total volume. Compared to the previous year, the most significant increase in the volume of investment deals was observed in the retail segment.
Although more investors entered the market this year, buyers are now looking for opportunities which can provide higher returns and, despite a general lack of appetite for development risk, there have been occasions when they have entered into riskier projects in return for higher yields.
The Russian Office Sector
Over the course of 2011, Moscow's office market showed a mixed performance. On the one hand, there was falling vacancy and an increase in rental rates for good quality office space and on the other, the level of new supply and take-up fell compared with 2010. The steep increase in prime office rents in 2011 positioned Moscow as the fastest-growing location in terms of rent in Europe.
New construction was at its lowest level since 2003 as total stock of office space in Moscow reached 12.6 million sqm in 2011, up from 11.9 million sqm in 2010. But this tightening of supply was good for the market as it contributed to an overall reduction in vacant space. Due to a combination of stable demand and falling supply, the overall vacancy decreased from 20% at the end of 2010 to 13% in 2011 (Source: C&W). Deliveries of completed class A and B office buildings were almost equal, which is another sign of market maturity. Restrictions placed by the Moscow Administration have influenced this process to some extent; however, the construction slowdown has been driven largely by the market.
In 2011, a major shift was observed in office space demand. For the last few years most of transactions were for new space. By 2011 most tenants already resided in high quality buildings, so large portion of deals resulted in freeing up older space. The majority of take-up was accounted for by Russian companies, which accounted for 65% of the total. Average rental rates in 2011 increased by 11%, with 13% attributed to Class A office and 10% Class B.
During the year, investment activity was similar to that of 2010 and accounted for 41% of all real estate investment transactions in Russia by volume. The yield rate of prime office buildings in Moscow compressed sharply from 10% in 2010 to 8.5% at the calendar year end.
The Russian Retail Sector
Russia's retail market continued to show strong performance during the year. In 2011 base rental rates were subject to moderate growth of 3-5% per quarter in Moscow. According to Rosstat (Russia's statistical agency), real income of Russian consumers is stable. At the same time, consumer activity remains high and retail turnover increased during the year. In Q4 2011, footfall grew in accordance with the usual seasonal trend, but was at virtually the same level as in Q4 2010.
2011 became a year of further slowdown in new retail construction in Moscow. This is a result of two influencing factors: the first is that during the recession a limited number of new projects were started and developers largely focused on completing projects already under construction, and the second is that Moscow's local authorities restricted construction of commercial real estate in the city. At the same time, the activity of developers in the Moscow Region and other cities was growing due to increased demand by retailers. By the end of the year, construction of 32 retail assets with a total GLA of nearly 1.2 million sqm was completed, with the majority of new shopping centres having GLAs of between 20,000 and 45,000 sqm. In 2011 there was also a continued growth of retail development activity in cities with a population of less than 1 million people.
Due to the strong demand for retail space in shopping centres with a good catchment area, vacancy rates for high quality shopping centres in Moscow decreased from 0.9% to 0.4%. Recovery in consumer demand has prompted retailers to return to their development plans, and the revival of the Russian economy is also attracting international retailers.
During the year, investment activity in the retail segment increased significantly to US$2.0 billion in comparison to US$0.5 billion in 2010, accounting for 27% of all real estate investment transactions in Russia. Yields in prime shopping centres in Moscow compressed to 9.3% at the end of 2011 from 10.8% in 2010.
The Russian Residential Sector
Together with the positive trend of the Russian economy in 2011, the Russian residential real estate market also benefitted from sharply increased volumes of transaction activity during the year, supported by pent up demand as people had delayed purchases from previous years. In 2011, housing demand was up 49% and 72% in the Moscow Metropolitan Area and St. Petersburg Metropolitan Area, respectively, with both markets witnessing a volume of transactions at pre-crisis levels.
Prices in 2011 increased 12% YoY in the Moscow Metropolitan Area, largely supported by the limited supply due to revisions to the city development plan. In the St. Petersburg Metropolitan Area, prices increased during the year by 8% YoY. In both markets the increase in prices was above the 6.1% CPI. The pricing situation in the primary Moscow residential countryside real estate market in 2011 remained stable as minor fluctuations of the supply prices were recorded.
In 2011 mortgage terms were eased through lower interest rates, lower initial down payment requirements and extended average loan periods. This led to growth in the share of mortgaged deals while 18% of the deals in Moscow and 9% in St. Petersburg involved mortgages.
The Russian Logistics Sector
The distinctive features of the logistics market in 2011 were stable demand and a low pace of construction. About 700,000 sqm of space was leased in the Moscow Region and 400,000 sqm in other regions. The build-to-suit concept became more popular among developers in 2011, but the lack of development finance has led to a shortage of warehouse space. The increase of rental rates to the pre-crisis levels and its further stabilization helped to stimulate limited growth of development activity in the second part of the year. About 900,000 sqm of warehouse space is expected to be completed in 2012 and the majority of these projects have been pre-sold or pre-leased already.
In 2011, Moscow region rental rates increased 25% and reached US$135 per sqm per annum. The practice of entering into preliminary/pre-lease agreements returned to the market for the first time since 2008. Vacancy rates decreased from 3.9% at the end of 2010 to a level of 1% by the end of 2011.
The situation in the regional market differs from that of the Moscow Region. Over 2011, vacancy rates have been decreasing while rental rates kept escalating. However, developers were not agitating to start new projects and lack of warehouse space caused a small volume of deals to be executed and warehouse and industrial real estate demand remained stable.
During the year, investment activity in the logistic segment increased significantly to US$1.2 billion in comparison to US$0.1 billion in 2010. Yields of logistic assets compressed to 10.5% at the end of 2011 from 11.5% in 2010.
Strategy
MirLand's principal activities are focused on the acquisition, development, construction, reconstruction, lease and sale of residential and commercial real estate in Russia. Its particular geographic focus is Moscow, St. Petersburg and major regional cities with a population of over 500,000 people. MirLand invests primarily in projects where it identifies potential for a high return on equity and the generation of strong yields and income, stemming from demand for good quality commercial and residential real estate assets.
The key elements of MirLand's strategy are as follows:
§ Focus on the completion of existing projects: The Company aims for the timely delivery of projects while ensuring they are completed to a high standard. Marketing of all of the Company's commercial projects is commenced during their development phase.
§ Portfolio Diversification: To mitigate risk, the Company's portfolio is balanced between various sectors, locations and development stages.
- Geographic location: investments are spread across Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other major regional cities. Investment decisions are made following a detailed feasibility study and the close examination of local and national economic and demographic data, as well as the balance between supply and anticipated demand for international standard properties.
- Sector: the Company invests in a balanced mix of residential, retail, office and logistics, as well as mixed-use projects.
- The Company's portfolio includes projects which are of varying duration, phasing and anticipated completion. The Company owns both yielding and development properties in order to obtain a relatively balanced spread in the use of working capital and demand for management's attention, that can, at the same time, generate an income flow from sales and yielding properties.
§ Realisation of assets: The Company will continuously assess whether to retain yielding properties or realise their market value through disposal, depending on the opportunity and on prevailing market conditions. The Company uses revenues from yielding assets to diversify its income sources.
§ Use of diverse financing sources to accelerate business activity and growth: Equity, shareholders' loans, corporate loans (some of which have been guaranteed by our main shareholders), project financing and bond issuances are used to finance the Company's activities and projects.
§ The extension of relationships with local partners, especially in the regions: Having a local partner provides daily monitoring of the projects and thus a greater level of control over quality, costs and delivery for the Company. In addition, these relationships are expected to lead to future investment opportunities.
The global financial turmoil, which had a significant impact on the Russian real estate market, has led the Company to adjust its operational focus to be more directed on managing its core activities and available financial resources.
This has been achieved through:
·; a focus on the progression of the development projects which have the greatest potential to deliver the best returns despite changing market conditions;
·; the further phasing of larger projects;
·; the development of the remaining projects according to changes in the market demand and to the availability of financial sources;
·; a strong emphasis on keeping high occupancy rates in yielding commercial projects;
·; a high prioritization of financing.
MirLand believes that adjusting its operational focus in the aforementioned ways will help to strengthen its position as one of the leading international real estate companies in Russia. The backing of the Company's main shareholders, together with the diversification of financial sources, will enable MirLand to continue to develop and maintain its portfolio and help fulfil its mission of creating value for its shareholders.
In addition, in light of the improving market conditions and the increase in availability of financing sources in Russia, when good opportunities arise the Company might consider increasing its portfolio through acquisitions of new real estate assets - either yielding or development projects that can be delivered in a short time to the market.
Portfolio
MirLand currently has fifteen projects, of which six are yielding assets, one project is under construction, one is a completed residential project (Phase One in Western Residence in Perkushkovo) and six projects are at various stages of planning and in the process of obtaining permits (in addition to the second phase in Western Residence project in Perkhushkovo and phases two-five in the Triumph Park project in St. Petersburg).
The Company's portfolio has been valued by Cushman & Wakefield at US$853.6 million (MirLand's share) as of 31 December 2011, based on the Company's freehold/leasehold rights. This value represents an increase of approximately 10% since 31 December 2010 and is mainly attributed to significant progress in St. Petersburg project in terms of sales, construction and financing, continuing development of existing projects, completion of projects and improvement in operational results of yielding properties.
Yielding Projects:
Hydromashservice (Hydro), Moscow - office and retail complex
Class B+ office complex located in the northern part of Moscow's Novoslobodsky business district. The site enjoys good transport links and excellent access.
·; Land area: 1.2 ha
·; Leasable area: 16,700 sqm
·; Completed: Q4 2008
·; Leasehold rights of land: 100%
·; Occupancy rate: 98%
·; Financing: US$14 million financed by Uniastrum in November 2011 (principal balance as of 31 December 2011: US$14 million).
MAG, Moscow - office and retail complex
A renovated class B+ office complex adjacent to the Hydro project.
·; Land area: 2.3 ha
·; Leasable area: 18,400 sqm (including 7,150 sqm under renovation due to fire)
·; Completed: Q4 2007
·; Leasehold rights of land: 100%
·; Occupancy rate: 95% (not including 7,150 sqm under renovation due to fire)
·; Financing: US$15 million financed by Uniastrum (principal balance as of 31 December 2011: US$12 million)
Century Building, Moscow - offices
Two Class B+ office buildings at the Hydro & MAG site.
·; Leasable area: 20,900 sqm
·; Completed: Q1 2009
·; Leasehold rights of land: 50%
·; Occupancy rate: 98%
·; Financing: US$14 million financed by Sberbank in February 2011 (principal balance as of 31 December 2011: US$13.3 million)
Vernissage Mall, Yaroslavl - shopping centre
A Western standard single floor shopping centre in Yaroslavl, located at the entrance road to Yaroslavl from Moscow.
·; Land area: 12 ha
·; Leasable area: 34,092 sqm
·; Completed: Q2 2007
·; Freehold rights: 50.5%
·; Occupancy rate: 100%
·; Financing: US$43 million financed by Gazprom Bank (principal balance as of 31December 2010: US$29.3 million). During February 2011, the remaining principal balance was refinanced by the bank with lower annual repayment and interest rate (principal balance as of 31 December 2011: US$26.7 million).
Triumph Mall, Saratov - shopping centre
The first multi-storey retail and entertainment centre in Saratov. The complex is strategically located near the historical city centre on an important retail avenue in the city.
·; Land area: 2.2 ha
·; Leasable area: 27,305 sqm
·; Completed: Q4 2010
·; Freehold rights: 100%
·; Occupancy rate: 100%
·; Financing: US$48.5 million financed by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (principal balance as of 31 December 2011: US$41.8 million)
Tamiz, Moscow - offices
·; New class B+ office building at the Hydro & MAG site.
·; Leasable area: 11,740 sqm
·; Completed: Q3, 2011
·; Leasehold rights of land: 100%
·; Occupancy rate: 92%
Completed Residential:
Western Residence Perkhushkovo, Moscow region - residential complex - Phase One
Development of 77 townhouses and cottages in the prestigious western outskirts of Moscow. This project is targeting the growing segment of middle class Russian society who are seeking an improved standard of living.
·; Land area (phase I): 11 ha
·; Saleable area (Phase I): 22,579 sqm (excluding sold houses)
·; Freehold rights: 100%
·; Sales: 19 houses have been sold
·; Completion: first phase (77 townhouses and cottages) was completed in Q4, 2011.
·; Financing: US$25 million was financed by Sberbank in December 2011 (principal balance as of 31 December, 2011: US$25million).
Project under construction:
Triumph Park, St. Petersburg - residential complex and trade centre
Flagship phased development of a residential neighbourhood which, upon completion, will comprise approximately 9,000 apartments, commercial and public areas and will provide good access to both St. Petersburg city and its airport. The commercial areas will include offices and a commercial centre with underground parking. The public facilities will include kindergartens, a school and parks.
·; Land area: 41 ha
·; Saleable area: 630, 900 sqm
·; Leasable area: 117,775 sqm
·; Planned completion of total project: Q2 2019
·; Freehold rights: 100%
·; Marketing: sales campaign for the first sub phase which consists of approximately 26,300 sqm sellable space (510 apartments) was launched in November 2011.
·; Launch of sales and construction of sub phase Two is planned for Q3, 2012.
·; Sales: to date, 179 sale contracts were executed in addition to 31 reservations.
·; Financing: construction credit line of $41 million for the first sub phase was obtained from Sberbank in November 2011 (principal balance as of 31 December 2011: US$2.2 million).
Projects in Planning:
Skyscraper, Moscow - offices and retail
A 47-storey Class A office and retail building with underground parking will be constructed on Dmitrovskoye Shosse, adjacent to Moscow's third ring. This prime location offers excellent accessibility.
·; Land area: 0.9 ha
·; Leasable area: 92,000 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q3 2013
·; Planned completion: Q4 2016
·; Leasehold rights: 100%
Big Box Complex, Yaroslavl - retail development
Development of a retail park adjacent to the Vernissage mall.
·; Land area: 18 ha
·; Leasable area: 55,250 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q1 2013
·; Planned completion: Q1 2015
·; Freehold rights: 50.5%
Shopping Centre, Kazan
Development of a three-storey shopping centre in Kazan's city centre aimed at home improvement and design stores.
·; Land area: 2.2 ha
·; Leasable area: 26,300 sqm
·; Sellable area: 5,200 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q1 2013
·; Planned completion: Q4 2014
·; Freehold rights: 100%
Penza - shopping centre
Development of a two-storey shopping centre in Penza in close proximity to a growing residential district.
·; Land area: 5.3 ha
·; Leasable area: 18,000 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q4 2013
·; Planned completion: Q3 2015
·; Freehold rights: 100%
Saratov - logistics
Phased development of a logistics centre in Saratov, located close to the federal highways and adjacent to the city ring road.
·; Land area: 26 ha
·; Leasable area: 104,000 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q2 2013
·; Planned completion: Q1 2016
·; Freehold rights: 100%
Novosibirsk - logistics
Phased development of a logistics centre in Novosibirsk, closely located to the federal highways and railways.
·; Land area: 40.6 ha
·; Leasable area: 180,000 sqm
·; Leasehold rights: 100%
·; Planned construction commencement: Q2 2013
·; Planned completion: Q2 2018
Western Residence Perkhushkovo, Moscow region - residential complex - Phase II
Development of 86 townhouses and cottages in the prestigious western outskirts of Moscow.
·; Land area: 11.5 ha (Phase II)
·; Saleable area: 36,477 sqm
·; Freehold rights: 100%
·; Planned construction commencement: Q2 2013
·; Planned completion: Q1 2015
Outlook
We strongly believe in the quality of our portfolio projects and believe that our prudent and selective approach to the management and development of our projects, together with our committed shareholders, directors and managers, will lead to an increased value to our shareholders.
I would like to thank our shareholders for their ongoing support of the Company, MirLand's management team for its dedication, and the Company's employees, who are responsible for the day-to-day activities. I am confident that this strong team will continue working through the challenging, fast-paced market to realize MirLand's long term vision.
Roman Rozental
Chief Executive Officer
14 March 2012
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Revenues for 2011 were US$47.5 million and Net Income was US$28.5 million. Total Assets at 31 December 2011 amounted to US$739.6 million and Equity amounted to US$347.1 million. The Company's adjusted net asset value was US$536.8 million. The Company's real estate assets were valued on 31 December 2011 at US$953.3 million (for 100% rights from freehold/leasehold) by Cushman and Wakefield, the external appraiser, of which MirLand's share is US$853.6 million.
Accounting Policy
The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as adopted by the European Union ("EU") and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap 113.
Income Statement
The Net Income for 2011 amounted to US$28.5 million in comparison to net income of US$23.2 million in 2010. The increase is mainly attributed to significant improvement in income and gross profit from yielding assets as a result of increased occupancy rates and addition of income from Triumph Mall in Saratov and Tamiz office building. This increase was partially offset by higher finance costs due to greater balances of outstanding Bonds and Bank Loans and the impact of net foreign exchange differences, due to the devaluation of the Rouble versus the US Dollar during the year.
The Company's revenues consist of rental income from investment properties, income from sales of houses and fees from managing investment properties. Rental income and fees from investment properties increased to US$43.6 million from US$20.5 million, which is a 113% increase. This increase is attributed to increased occupancy in all yielding assets that reached an average figure of approximately 98% , inclusion of a full year of income from the Triumph Mall in Saratov and occupancy of the Tamiz Building from Q3, helped by the improved market conditions that influenced the real estate sector in Russia. The Company recognised income of US$3.9 million from sale of inventory due to the handover of houses in the Western Residence project in Perkhushkovo, to buyers.
In accordance with IAS 40, the Company has revalued its investment properties and investment properties under construction for the financial period ending 31 December 2011 and has recognized the resulting movement in valuation through its income statement as fair value adjustments of investment properties and investment properties under construction. The income of US$33.5 million was based on net effect of the valuations of the Company's investment properties and investment properties under constructions prepared by an independent appraiser, Cushman & Wakefield, in accordance with International Valuation Standards.
The cost of maintenance and management of the Company rose from US$10.4 million in 2010 to US$21 million in 2011, which was largely attributed to the inclusion of operating expenses of Triumph Mall in Saratov and to a lesser extent, to the general increase in occupancy rates.
The Company's general administrative expenses for the period were US$16.6 million in comparison to US$14.9 million in 2010. The increase is attributed to inclusion of general, administrative expenses of the Triumph Mall in Saratov and growth in Company's volume of general business activity.
Marketing expenses for the period were US$2.6 million in comparison to $US1.2 million in 2010, with the increase explained mainly by greater marketing efforts of the Company's residential projects.
Net financing costs for the period amounted to US$22.2 million compared to US$0.8 million in 2010. The increase is explained by significantly lower capitalization of interest due to progress in the Company's residential projects due to the construction progress of sub phase I in St. Petersburg and completion of the first phase of the Western Residence project. Other factors contributing to the increase include devaluation of the Rouble versus the US Dollar during the year and to a lesser extent, the higher interest costs due to increased balances of Bonds and Bank loans.
Tax income in 2011 amounted to US$12.3 million compared to a tax expense of US$2.5 million in 2010. The tax income recorded during the period is mainly attributed to the creation of a deferred tax asset in the Company's balance sheet, due to increased feasibility of future profits attributed mainly to the Triumph park project in St. Petersburg.
MirLand is a resident of Cyprus for tax purposes and is subject to a 10% tax rate. MirLand's subsidiaries in Russia are subject to a 20% tax rate. Additional details are covered in note 19 to the financial statements.
The Net Income for 2011 amounted to US$28.5 million in comparison to net income of US$23.2 million in 2010.
The increase is mainly attributed to a significant improvement in income and gross profit from yielding assets as a result of increased occupancy rates and inclusion of income from Triumph Mall in Saratov and to tax income recorded during the period. The increase was partially offset by growth in net finance costs.
Balance Sheet
Total assets as at 31 December 2011 amounted to US$739.6 million in comparison to US$704.5 million in 2010, an increase of 5%. The main reasons for the overall increase were the fair value adjustment of investment properties, and continuing development of the Company's residential projects which were financed through corporate loans, bond issuance and bank financing on the project level.
The Company's real estate portfolio amounted to US$671.1 million at the year end, and comprised 91% of the total assets, in comparison to US$636.4 million as at 31 December 2010 which comprised 90% of the total balance sheet, the increase coming from positive revaluation and investments made during the year.
Equity and Liabilities
Equity as at 31 December 2011 increased to US$347.1 million from US$341 million as at 31 December 2010. The increase in equity from 2011 net income was offset largely by the devaluation of the Rouble versus the US Dollar which led to increased foreign currency translation reserve. MirLand's equity comprises 47% of its total assets.
Net financial liabilities as at 31 December 2011 amounted to approximately 324.7 million compared to US$306.7 million as at 31 December 2010. The increase is mainly due to the Company raising approximately US$54 million through extensions of Series C bonds, conversion of warrants issued previously (Series 2 and Series 3) to bonds Series C and D, sale of bonds Series D by a subsidiary to third parties and obtaining of new bank loans on the project level. However, as an offsetting factor, the Company repaid Shareholder loans of US$40.6 million (principal and interest) leaving a balance at the year end of only US$6.4 million compared to US$44.9 million as at 31 December 2010. The remaining balance was repaid shortly after the balance sheet date. In addition, the Company made scheduled payments of Bonds of $US10.8million and scheduled principal repayments of project loan in total amount of $US5.4million.
In addition, short term loans in the amount of approximately US$70 million from banks are guaranteed by the Company's main shareholders; therefore, the Company assumes that these loans will revolve if necessary. For further details regarding loans from banks and shareholders please review notes 12, 13 15 and 16 of the financial statements.
The Company's rating and the series A to D bonds are rated ilBBB stable by Ma'alot Standard & Poor's. The Company's rating and the series A to B bonds are rated ilBaa2 by Midrug (Moody's Israel affiliate rating agency). In February 2012, Midrug changed the rating outlook from stable to positive.
During 2011, a special emphasis was made on diversifying the company's funding sources by obtaining bank financing on the project level. In 2011, the following new bank loans were obtained:
Project | Bank | Loan type | Original amount (US$m) | Original amount (US$m) Company's share | Balance as of 31.12.11 (US$m) | Balance as of 31.12.11 (US$m) Company's share |
Vernissage Mall, Yaroslavl * | Gazprom Bank | Refinance | 29.1 | 14.0 | 26.7 | 13.5 |
Century (Inomotor) | SberBank | Refinance | 14.0 | 7.1 | 13.3 | 6.8 |
Hydromashservice | Uniastrum | Refinance | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 |
Western Residence | SberBank | Refinance | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Triumph Park | SberBank | Construction | **41 | 41.0 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
123.1 | 101.1 | 81.2 | 61.5 |
*Refinance of remaining balance of existing loan with lower interest and debt service.
** Maximal availability.
Net Asset Value ("NAV")
The Company's real estate assets were valued by an external independent appraiser, Cushman & Wakefield, in accordance with International Valuation Standards on 31 December 2011 at US$953.3 million (for 100% rights from freehold/leasehold), of which MirLand's share is US$853.6 million. The increase in value mainly attributed to the improvement in operational results of MirLand's yielding assets, significant progress made in sales, construction and financing of the Triumph Park residential project in St. Petersburg and investments made during 2011.
Overview of Portfolio Market Values as at 31 December 2011
City | Property Name and Address | Portfolio Market Value as at 31st of December 2011 (Rounded) | Percentage Owned by MirLand | MirLand Market Value as at 31st of December 2011 (Rounded) |
Moscow | Hydromashservice, 2-Khutorskaya str., 38A | $69,100,000 | 100% | $69,100,000 |
Moscow | MAG, 2-Khutorskaya str., 38A | $63,700,000 | 100% | $63,700,000 |
Moscow Region | Western Residence, Perkhushkovo, Odintsovsky district | $87,600,000 | 100% | $87,600,000 |
Saratov | Triumph Mall, 167 Zarubina street | $110,600,000 | 100% | $110,600,000 |
Moscow | Skyscraper, Dmitrovskoe schosse, 1 | $45,200,000 | 100% | $45,200,000 |
St. Petersburg | Triumph Park, Residential | $285,200,000 | 100% | $285,200,000 |
St. Petersburg | Triumph Park, Trade Centre | $21,000,000 | 100% | $21,000,000 |
Yaroslavl | Vernissage Mall, Kalinina str. | $97,200,000 | 50.5% | $49,100,000 |
Yaroslavl | Phase II | $8,300,000 | 50.5% | 4,200,000 |
Moscow | Tamiz Building | $40,700,000 | 100% | $40,700,000 |
Moscow | Century Buildings | $96,900,000 | 51% | $49,400,000 |
Kazan | Triumph House | $8,800,000 | 100% | $8,800,000 |
Penza | Retail Centre | $3,000,000 | 100% | $3,000,000 |
Saratov | Logistics Complex | $7,400,000 | 100% | $7,400,000 |
Novosibirsk | Logistics Complex | $8,600,000 | 100% | $8,600,000 |
Total | $953,300,000 | $853,600,000 |
The full Cushman & Wakefield valuation is available on the Company's website, www.mirland-development.com.
Based on the Cushman & Wakefield valuation as at December 2011, the Company's Adjusted NAV increased to US$536.8 million (31 December 2010: US$493.4 million), an increase of 8.8%. As a result, the NAV per share as at 31 December 2011 was US$5.2 in comparison to US$4.8 as at 31 December 2010.
Cash Flow
During 2010, the Company used US$39 million for investment in real estate properties (including change in buildings for sale) in comparison to US$65.5 million in 2010. Cash flow received from operating activities amounted to US$5.7 million (excluding change in buildings for sale). Cash flow provided by financing activities amounted to US$48 million.
Financial Strategy
In 2011, MirLand's activities were primarily financed by issuance of bonds, project bank loans and by revenues. The Company's policy is to limit its leverage to 66% of the gross value of its assets, including all development, trading and investment properties. The Company continues to have modest net leverage at 44% of its assets.
Typically, residential projects are constructed in phases, allowing the use of capital from pre-sales to finance ongoing development phases. However, during the year, the Company obtained a construction loan facility from Sberbank for the first phase of its flagship project, the Triumph Park in St. Petersburg.
Wherever possible, the Company seeks to acquire finance on a non-recourse basis to minimise risk. The Company is negotiating with several banks for financing some of its other pipeline projects.
Market Risks
MirLand is exposed to market risks from changes in both foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
Foreign Currency Risks: The Company's functional currency across its operating subsidiaries is the Rouble, whereas the Company's reporting currency is the USD. The majority of the Company's revenues, costs and capital expenditures are either priced, incurred, payable or measured in USD. Although most transactions are settled in Roubles, the price for real estate property is tightly linked to the USD. However, the current trend in Russia is to move toward Rouble linked transactions and therefore, the Company will consider in the future hedging its transactions for currency risks.
Interest Rate Risks: whilst the Company does not currently have any significant interest bearing assets, changes in interest rates could affect the cost of current and future financing.
Credit Risks: The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its tenants, purchasers and contractors and its financial statements include specific allowances for doubtful accounts. The Company also seeks to mitigate the risk of non-payment in structuring its contractual arrangements with such parties.
Emil Budilovsky
Chief Financial Officer
14 March 2012
Certain information contained in this Announcement constitutes "forward-looking statements" which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "anticipate", "target", "project", "estimate", "intend", "continue" or "believe", or the negatives therefore or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results or the actual performance of the Company may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.
Independent auditor's report
To the Members of Mirland Development Corporation Plc
Report on the consolidated financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Mirland Development Corporation Plc (the "Company") and its subsidiaries (together with the Company, the "Group"), which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2011, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Board of Directors' responsibility for the consolidated financial statements
The Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113, and for such internal control as the Board of Directors determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the Board of Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2011, and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113. Report on other legal requirements Pursuant to the requirements of the Auditors and Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts Law of 2009, we report the following:·; We have obtained all the information and explanations we considered necessary for the purposes of our audit.·; In our opinion, proper books of account have been kept by the Company.·; The consolidated financial statements are in agreement with the books of account.·; In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the consolidated financial statements give the information required by the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113, in the manner so required.·; In our opinion, the information given in the report of the Board of Directors is consistent with the consolidated financial statements. Other matter This report, including the opinion, has been prepared for and only for the Company's members as a body in accordance with Section 34 of the Auditors and Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts Law of 2009 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving this opinion, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whose knowledge this report may come to.
Charis StylianouCertified Public Accountant and Registered Auditorfor and on behalf ofErnst & Young Cyprus LimitedCertified Public Accountants and Registered Auditors Limassol
14, March 2012
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Note | U.S. dollars in thousands | |||||
ASSETS | ||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 4 | 32,333 | 10,974 | |||
Short-term loans receivable | - | 796 | ||||
Restricted bank deposits | 13f | 1,739 | - | |||
Trade receivables | 4,568 | 905 | ||||
Other receivables | 5 | 2,780 | 2,116 | |||
VAT receivable | 11 | 7,393 | 31,014 | |||
Inventories of buildings for sale | 6 | 157,772 | 178,338 | |||
206,585 | 224,143 | |||||
NON-CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||
Investment properties | 7 | 363,569 | *) 306,257 | |||
Investment properties under construction | 8 | 82,703 | *) 121,364 | |||
Inventories of buildings for sale | 6 | 67,062 | 30,483 | |||
Loans to related parties | 9 | 10,611 | 17,393 | |||
Fixed assets, net | 10 | 1,190 | 1,422 | |||
VAT receivable from related parties | 317 | - | ||||
Other long term receivables | 28b | 2,851 | 2,219 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 1,802 | 1,207 | ||||
Deferred taxes | 19d | 2,915 | *) - | |||
533,020 | 480,345 | |||||
TOTAL ASSETS | 739,605 | 704,488 |
*) Reclassified, see Note 2bb.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||
Note | U.S. dollars in thousands | |||||
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | ||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||
Credit from banks | 12 | 66,992 | 69,845 | |||
Current maturities of long-term loans from banks and debentures | 13, 16 | 40,962 | 18,280 | |||
Credit from banks for financing of inventory of buildings for sale | 13 | 24,218 | - | |||
Loans from shareholders | 15 | 6,402 | 39,298 | |||
Government authorities | 3,981 | 2,221 | ||||
Trade payables | 9,135 | 14,768 | ||||
Deposits from tenants | 3,831 | 4,534 | ||||
Advances from buyers | 6d | 7,099 | 7,587 | |||
Other accounts payable | 14 | 1,871 | 1,128 | |||
164,491 | 157,661 | |||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||
Loans from banks | 13 | 79,960 | 67,589 | |||
Loans from shareholders | 15 | - | 5,567 | |||
Debentures | 16 | 138,488 | 117,044 | |||
Other non-current liabilities | 17 | 9,528 | 5,489 | |||
Deferred taxes | 19d | - | *) 10,115 | |||
227,976 | 205,804 | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 392,467 | 363,465 | ||||
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE PARENT: | ||||||
Issued capital | 20 | 1,036 | 1,036 | |||
Share premium | 359,803 | 359,803 | ||||
Capital reserve for share-based payment transactions | 22 | 11,341 | 10,579 | |||
Capital reserve for transactions with controlling shareholders | 15 | 6,565 | 3,207 | |||
Foreign currency translation reserve | (52,126) | (25,596) | ||||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | 20,519 | (8,006) | ||||
TOTAL EQUITY | 347,138 | 341,023 | ||||
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | 739,605 | 704,488 |
*) Reclassified, see Note 2bb.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
Year ended 31 December | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Note | U.S. dollars in thousands (except per share data) | |||||||
Rental income from investment properties | 39,679 | 17,239 | 14,754 | |||||
Income from sale of inventories | 3,932 | 1,078 | - | |||||
Revenues from managing fees | 3,922 | 3,267 | 2,459 | |||||
Total revenues | 47,533 | 21,584 | 17,213 | |||||
Cost of sales | (6,279) | (1,370) | - | |||||
Cost of maintenance and management | 23 | (20,915) | (10,356) | (7,438) | ||||
Gross profit | 20,339 | 9,858 | 9,775 | |||||
General and administrative expenses | 24 | (16,583) | (14,944) | (15,546) | ||||
Marketing expenses | (2,593) | (1,231) | (768) | |||||
Fair value adjustments of investment properties and investment properties under construction | 7,8 | 33,485 | *) 29,822 | *) (15,013) | ||||
Other income, net | 25 | 3,849 | 2,973 | 2,104 | ||||
Operating income (loss) | 38,497 | 26,478 | (19,448) | |||||
Finance income | 26 | 2,141 | 5,234 | 7,090 | ||||
Finance costs | 26 | (18,031) | (5,047) | (4,089) | ||||
Net foreign exchange differences | (6,349) | (1,025) | 21 | |||||
Profit (loss) before taxes on income | 16,258 | 25,640 | (16,426) | |||||
Taxes on income (tax benefit) | 19b | (12,267) | *) 2,485 | *) 6,558 | ||||
Net income (loss) | 28,525 | 23,155 | (22,984) | |||||
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share (US Dollars) | 21 | 0.28 | 0.22 | (0.22) |
*) Reclassified, see Note 2bb.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Net income (loss) | 28,525 | 23,155 | (22,984) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax effect) | ||||||
Transfer of translation reserve to income statement as a result of sale of jointly controlled entity | - | 815 | - | |||
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | (26,530) | (3,258) | (4,068) | |||
Total other comprehensive loss | (26,530) | (2,443) | (4,068) | |||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | 1,995 | 20,712 | (27,052) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Attributable to equity holders of the Parent | ||||||||||||||||
Capital | Capital reserve | |||||||||||||||
reserve for | for transactions | Retained | ||||||||||||||
share-based | with | Currency | earnings | |||||||||||||
Share | Share | payment | controlling | translation | (accumulated | |||||||||||
capital | premium | transactions | shareholders | reserve | deficit) | Total | ||||||||||
Note | U.S. dollars in thousands | |||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2011 | 1,036 | 359,803 | 10,579 | 3,207 | (25,596) | (8,006) | 341,023 | |||||||||
Net income for the year | - | - | - | - | - | 28,525 | 28,525 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | - | - | - | - | (26,530) | - | (26,530) | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss), net | - | - | - | - | (26,530) | 28,525 | 1,995 | |||||||||
Share-based payment transactions | 22 | - | - | 762 | - | - | - | 762 | ||||||||
Equity component of transaction with controlling shareholders | 20 | - | - | - | 3,358 | - | - | 3,358 | ||||||||
At 31 December 2011 | 1,036 | 359,803 | 11,341 | 6,565 | (52,126) | 20,519 | 347,138 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Attributable to equity holders of the Parent | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital reserve | Capital reserve | |||||||||||||||||||
for | for transactions | Retained | ||||||||||||||||||
share-based | with | Currency | earnings | Non-controlling | ||||||||||||||||
Share | Share | payment | controlling | translation | (accumulated | Total | ||||||||||||||
capital | premium | transactions | shareholders | reserve | deficit) | Total | interests | equity | ||||||||||||
Note | U.S. dollars in thousands | |||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2010 | 1,036 | 359,803 | 9,974 | 2,702 | (23,153) | (31,186) | 319,176 | 25 | 319,201 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) for the year | - | - | - | - | - | 23,180 | 23,180 | (25) | 23,155 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | - | - | - | - | (2,443) | - | (2,443) | - | (2,443) | |||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss), net | - | - | - | - | (2,443) | 23,180 | 20,737 | (25) | 20,712 | |||||||||||
Share-based payment transactions | 22 | - | - | 605 | - | - | - | 605 | - | 605 | ||||||||||
Equity component of transaction with controlling shareholders | 20 | - | - | - | 505 | - | - | 505 | - | 505 | ||||||||||
At 31 December 2010 | 1,036 | 359,803 | 10,579 | 3,207 | (25,596) | (8,006) | 341,023 | - | 341,023 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Attributable to equity holders of the Parent | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital reserve | Capital reserve | |||||||||||||||||||
for | for transactions | Retained | ||||||||||||||||||
share-based | with | Currency | earnings | Non-controlling | ||||||||||||||||
Share | Share | payment | controlling | translation | (accumulated | Total | ||||||||||||||
capital | premium | transactions | shareholders | reserve | deficit) | Total | interests | equity | ||||||||||||
Note | U.S. dollars in thousands | |||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2009 | 1,036 | 359,803 | 8,080 | 579 | (19,085) | (8,202) | 342,211 | 25 | 342,236 | |||||||||||
Loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | (22,984) | (22,984) | - | (22,984) | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | - | - | - | - | (4,068) | - | (4,068) | - | (4,068) | |||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | - | - | - | - | (4,068) | (22,984) | (27,052) | - | (27,052) | |||||||||||
Share-based payment transactions | 22 | - | - | 1,894 | - | - | - | 1,894 | - | 1,894 | ||||||||||
Equity component of transaction with controlling shareholders | 20 | - | - | - | 2,123 | - | - | 2,123 | - | 2,123 | ||||||||||
At 31 December 2009 | 1,036 | 359,803 | 9,974 | 2,702 | (23,153) | (31,186) | 319,176 | 25 | 319,201 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||
Net income (loss) | 28,525 | 23,155 | (22,984) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||
Adjustments to the profit or loss items: | ||||||
Deferred taxes, net | (13,482) | *) 1,610 | *) 4,739 | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 467 | 610 | 504 | |||
Finance costs (income), net | 22,239 | 606 | (2,066) | |||
Share-based payment | 762 | 605 | 1,894 | |||
Fair value adjustment of investment properties and investment properties under construction | (33,485) | *) (29,822) | *) 15,013 | |||
Fair value adjustment and loss from sale of financial derivative | - | 232 | (956) | |||
Gain from sale of jointly controlled entity | - | (3,159) | - | |||
(23,499) | (29,318) | 19,128 | ||||
Changes in asset and liability items: | ||||||
Increase in trade receivables | (5,547) | (256) | (317) | |||
Increase in VAT receivable and others | 23,708 | (2,729) | (6,466) | |||
Increase in inventories of buildings for sale | (21,759) | (25,990) | (18,473) | |||
Increase in trade payables | 165 | - | 284 | |||
Increase (decrease) in other accounts payable | 6,612 | 6,726 | (3,038) | |||
3,179 | (22,249) | (28,010) | ||||
Cash paid and received during the year for: | ||||||
Interest paid | (23,370) | (11,647) | (8,030) | |||
Interest received | 20 | 86 | 236 | |||
Taxes paid | (948) | (218) | (1,736) | |||
Taxes received | 22 | - | 537 | |||
(24,276) | (11,779) | (8,993) | ||||
Net cash flows used in operating activities | (16,071) | (40,191) | (40,859) |
*) Reclassified, see Note 2bb.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||
Additions to investment properties | (6,365) | (15,281) | (1,902) | |||
Additions to investment properties under construction | (8,742) | (24,196) | (49,684) | |||
Purchase of fixed assets | (349) | (872) | (193) | |||
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets | - | 33 | 556 | |||
Proceeds from sale of jointly controlled entity (1) | - | 18,069 | - | |||
Proceeds from repayment of loans granted | 8,428 | 3,398 | - | |||
Investment in restricted deposit | (1,739) | - | - | |||
Net cash flows used in investing activities | (8,767) | (18,849) | (51,223) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||
Issuance of debentures, net | 54,104 | 70,024 | - | |||
Repayment of debentures | (10,768) | (10,823) | - | |||
Short-term credit from banks and others, net | - | 2,868 | 8,998 | |||
Receipt of loans from shareholders | - | 5,000 | 32,772 | |||
Repayment of loans from shareholders | (36,843) | (10,000) | - | |||
Receipt of long-term loans | 47,696 | - | 68,332 | |||
Repayment of other loans origination costs | - | (1,837) | - | |||
Repayment of loans from banks | (6,206) | (5,900) | (3,895) | |||
Proceeds from sale of financial derivative | - | 1,443 | - | |||
Deferred expenses on account of loan receipt | - | - | (1,364) | |||
Net cash flows provided by financing activities | 47,983 | 50,775 | 104,843 | |||
Exchange differences on balances of cash and cash equivalents | (1,786) | (1,732) | (1,612) | |||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 21,359 | (9,997) | 11,149 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 10,974 | 20,971 | 9,822 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 32,333 | 10,974 | 20,971 |
(1) | Proceeds from sale of jointly controlled entity: | ||||||
Investment property under construction | - | 15,545 | - | ||||
Trade and other receivables | - | 180 | - | ||||
Foreign currency translation reserve | - | (815) | - | ||||
Gain from sale of jointly controlled entity, net | - | 3,159 | - | ||||
- | 18,069 | - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 1:- GENERAL
a. Mirland Development Corporation Plc ("the Company") was incorporated in Cyprus on 10 November 2004 under the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113 as a private company limited by shares. Its registered office is located at Thessalonikis Street, Nicolaou Pentadromos Centre, 6th floor, Limassol 3025, Cyprus.
The Company's shares are traded on AIM and its bonds are traded on Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange.
b. During 2011, the Company recorded loss from fair value adjustment in project which is presented in the financial statements as part of investment properties under construction. For further details, see also Note 8e.
c. The principal activities of the Company and its investees ("the Group"), which did not change from last year, are investment and development of residential and commercial real estate assets in Russia.
d. The following are the principal shareholders of the Company as of 31 December 2011:
Shareholder | % of holding | |
Jerusalem Economy Ltd. ("JEC") (a company traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange) | ~ | 30.5 |
Industrial Buildings Corporation Ltd. ("IBC") (71.43%-owned subsidiary of JEC and traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange) | ~ | 40.2 |
Darban Investments Ltd. ("Darban") (a company traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange) | ~ | 14.2 |
All of the above shareholders are companies that are controlled, directly and indirectly, by the Fishman family.
e. Definitions:
In these financial statements:
The Company | - | Mirland Development Corporation Plc. |
The Group | - | Mirland Development Corporation Plc and its investees as listed below. |
Subsidiaries | - | Companies over which the company exercises control (as defined in IAS 27R) and whose financial statements are consolidated with those of the company. |
Jointly controlled entities | - | Companies held by a number of entities, among which contractual agreement exists for joint control and whose financial statements are consolidated with the financial statements of the company according to the proportionate consolidation method. |
Investees | - | Subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities.
|
Parent | - | JEC |
Ultimate controlling shareholder | - | Fishman family (Fishman Group). |
Related parties | - | As defined in IAS 24 (revised) |
f. The following is a list of the fully consolidated subsidiaries:
Name of company | Country of incorporation | Activity | % of holding | |||
Hydromashservice LLC ("Hydro") | Russia | Lease of buildings | 100 | |||
Mashinostroenie & Hydravlika OJSC ("MAG") | Russia | Lease of buildings | 100 | |||
CreativeCom LLC ("Creative") | Russia | Constructing residential projects | 100 | |||
Petra 8 LLC ("Petra") | Russia | Constructing residential projects | 100 | |||
RealService LLC ("RealService") | Russia | Constructing commercial projects | 100 | |||
Investisionno Ipotechnaya Kompania Ltd. )"IIK") | Russia | Constructing commercial projects | 100 | |||
Mall Project Co. Ltd. ("Mall Project") | Cyprus | Holding company | 100 | |||
Gasconade Holding Ltd | Cyprus | Holding company | 100 | |||
Laykapark Trading Ltd | Cyprus | Holding company | 100 | |||
Dunchoille Holdings Ltd | Cyprus | Holding and financing company | 100 | |||
Mirland Management Limited | Cyprus | Consulting | 100 | |||
Mirland Management RUS LLC | Russia | Consulting | 100 | |||
Heckbert 22 Group Financing Limited KFT | Hungary | Financing company | 100 | |||
IsraRussia Services Ltd. ("IRS") | Israel | Consulting | 100 | |||
Tamiz LLC | Russia | Constructing commercial projects | 100 | |||
Design Project LLC | Russia | Constructing commercial projects | 100 | |||
TTM LLC | Russia | Constructing commercial projects | 100 | |||
Liga 45 LLC | Russia | Constructing commercial projects | 100 | |||
WINDEAtts limited | Cyprus | Consulting | 100 | |||
ZARECHIE INVEST llc ("ZARECHIE") | Russia | Holding company | 100 | |||
POLUS INVEST LLC | Russia | Constructing commercial projects | 100 | |||
MIRLAND NOVOSIBIRSK LLC | Russia | Lease of buildings | 100 |
g. List of jointly controlled entities:
Name of company | Country of incorporation | Activity | % of holding | |||
Inverton Enterprises LLC | Cyprus | Holding company | 50.5 | |||
Astraestate & Co. Limited Partnership ("Astra") | Cyprus | Partnership for holding a company, erecting commercial projects and lease of buildings | 50 | |||
Winta Holdings Ltd | Cyprus | Limited partner in partnership for holding a company, erecting commercial projects and lease of buildings | 50 | |||
Global 1 LLC )"Global") | Russia | Lease of commercial property | 50.5 | |||
Inomotor LLC | Russia | Lease of buildings | *) 51 | |||
AvtoPrioritet LLC | Russia | Lease of buildings | *) 51 | |||
Mall Mortgage LTD | Cyprus | Financing company | 50.5 |
h. Based on management plans and as reflected in the Group's forecasted cash flows, the Group expects to finance its activities in 2011 among others by obtaining loans from banks in Russia which will be secured by properties which are presently unsecured with a fair value as of 31 December 2011 amounting to approximately $ 88 million, and by generating revenues from sales of building projects that are expected to be completed during 2012.
In addition, the Group's short-term loans from banks amounting to approximately $ 70 million are secured by non-cancellable guarantees of the controlling shareholders until the full repayment of the loans.
Based on the above, management believes the Group will be able to meet all of its financial obligations.
NOTE 2:- SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
a. Basis of presentation of the financial statements:
1. Measurement basis:
The Group's financial statements have been prepared on a cost basis, except for the following:
Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss;
Investment property;
Investment property under construction;
Shareholder's guaranties
Provisions.
The Group has elected to present the statement of income using the function of expense method.
2. Basis of preparation of the financial statements
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as adopted by the European Union ("EU"). International Financial Reporting Standards comprise standards and interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board, and include:
a) International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
b) International Accounting Standards (IAS).
c) Interpretations to IFRS and IAS: IFRIC and SIC.
Furthermore, the consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law Cap.113
3. Consistent accounting policies
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial years, except as described below:
4. Changes in accounting policies in view of the adoption of new standards:
IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements:
According to the amendment to IAS 1 ("the Amendment"), the changes between the opening and the closing balances of each component of other comprehensive income may be presented in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes accompanying the annual financial statements. Accordingly, the Company has elected to present this disclosure in the statement of changes in equity. The Amendment has been applied retrospectively from January 1, 2011.
IAS 24 - Related Party Disclosures:
The amendment to IAS 24 ("the Amendment") clarifies the definition of a related party to simplify the identification of such relationships and to eliminate inconsistencies in its application. The revised Standard introduces a partial exemption of disclosure requirements for government-related entities. The Amendment has been applied retrospectively from January 1, 2011.
The required disclosures have been included in the Group's financial statements.
IFRS 3 (Revised) - Business Combinations:
The amendments to IFRS 3 (Revised) address the following issues:
a) Measurement of non-controlling interests:
The amendment limits the circumstances in which it is possible to choose the measurement of non-controlling interests based on their fair value on the date of acquisition or at their proportionate share in the recognized amounts of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. According to the amendment, this possibility is only available for types of non-controlling interests that are present ownership interests and entitle their holders to a pro rata share of the acquiree's net assets in the event of liquidation (usually shares). In contrast, for other types of non-controlling interests (such as options that represent equity instruments of the acquiree) no such choice is available, and they are measured at fair value on the acquisition date, unless another measurement basis is required by IFRS such as IFRS 2. The amendment has been applied retrospectively from the date of original adoption of IFRS 3 (Revised).
The retrospective application of the amendment did not have a material effect on the Group's financial statements.
b) Transition provisions for accounting for contingent consideration in a business combination that occurred prior to the adoption of IFRS 3 (Revised):
According to the amendment, the amendments to IFRS 7, IAS 32 and IAS 39 which prescribe that contingent consideration in a business combination is within the scope of these Standards, do not apply to contingent consideration in respect of a business combination whose acquisition date preceded the date of adoption of IFRS 3 (Revised). Such contingent consideration will continue to be accounted for under the provisions of IFRS 3 prior to its amendment. The amendment has been applied retrospectively from January 1, 2011.
The retrospective application of the amendment did not have a material effect on the Group's financial statements.
IFRS 7 - Financial Instruments: Disclosure:
The amendment to IFRS 7 ("the Amendment") clarifies the Standard's disclosure requirements. In this context, emphasis is placed on the interaction between the quantitative disclosures and the qualitative disclosures and the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments. The Amendment also reduces the disclosure requirements for collateral held by the Company and revises the disclosure requirements for credit risk. The Amendment has been applied retrospectively commencing from the financial statements for periods beginning on January 1, 2011.
The retrospective application of the Amendment did not have a material effect on the Group's financial statements.
b. Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements:
Judgments:
In the process of applying the Group's accounting policies, management has made the following judgments, which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements:
Acquisitions of subsidiaries that are not business combinations:
On the day of acquisition of subsidiaries and operations, the Group assesses whether business is acquired in accordance with IFRS 3. A business generally consists of inputs, processes applied to those inputs, and resulting outputs that are, or will be, used to generate revenues. If goodwill is present, the transferred set of activities and assets shall be presumed to be a business. When no business is acquired, the consideration is allocated between the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired on the basis of relative fair values, without allocating to goodwill or deferred taxes.
Reliable measurement of fair value of investment property under construction:
In evaluating whether the fair value of investment property under construction can be reliably measured, the Group considers, among others, the following relevant indicators, when relevant:
1. Is the property being constructed in a developed, liquid market;
2. Are there any quotations of recent transactions or former valuations of acquisitions or sales of properties with similar characteristics and location;
3. Are construction costs reliably determinable;
4. Is the value of the completed property reliably determinable.
If after evaluating the above indicators it is determined that the fair value of investment property under construction can be reliably measured, the property is presented at fair value in accordance with the Group's policy for investment property. If fair value cannot be reliably measured, then investment property under construction is measured at cost less, if appropriate, any impairment loss.
Recognizing revenue on a gross or net basis:
In cases where the Group acts as agent or broker without bearing any of the risks and rewards derived from the transaction, revenue is presented on a net basis. In contrast, if the Group acts as the principal and bears the risks and rewards derived from the transaction, revenue is presented on a gross basis.
Estimates and assumptions:
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that have an effect on the application of the accounting policies and on the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed regularly. Changes in accounting estimates are reported in the period of the change in estimate.
The key assumptions made in the financial statements concerning uncertainties at the end of the reporting period and the critical estimates computed by the Group that may result in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.
Investment property and investment property under development:
Investment property and investment property under development that can be reliably measured are presented at fair value at the end of the reporting period. Changes in their fair value are recognized in profit or loss. Fair value is determined generally by independent valuation experts using economic valuations that involve valuation techniques and assumptions as to estimates of projected future cash flows from the property and estimate of the suitable discount rate for these cash flows. Investment property under development also requires an estimate of construction costs. If applicable, fair value is determined based on recent real estate transactions with similar characteristics and location of the valued asset.
The fair value measurement of investment property requires valuation experts and the Company's management to use certain assumptions regarding rates of return on the Group's assets, future rent, occupancy rates, contract renewal terms, the probability of leasing vacant areas, asset operating expenses, the tenants' financial stability and the implications of any investments made for future development purposes in order to assess the future expected cash flows from the assets. Any change in the assumptions used to measure the investment property could affect its fair value.
Inventories of real estate properties under construction:
The net realizable value is assessed based on management's evaluation including forecasts and estimates as to the amounts expected to be realized from the sale of the project inventory and the construction costs necessary to bring the inventory to a saleable condition.
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred tax assets are recognized for carry forward tax losses and temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the losses can be recognized. Significant management judgment is required to determine the amount of deferred tax assets that can be recognized, based upon the likely timing and level of future taxable profits together with future tax planning strategies.
Deferred taxes in respect of asset entities:
In cases where the Group holds single asset entities and the Group's intention is to realize the shares of single asset entities and not the asset itself, the Group does not record deferred taxes in respect of the temporary differences relating to the asset. Nonetheless, the Group measures the fair value of the single asset entities' shares taking into account said tax implications. As to the change in the Cyprus-Russia tax treaty, see Note 19d.
Inventories of buildings for sale:
The net realizable value is determined in accordance with an independent valuation, which includes forecasts and estimations regarding the expected receipts from selling inventory in the project and regarding required construction costs.
Share-based payment transactions:
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determining the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model including the expected life of the share option, volatility and dividend yield and making assumptions about them. The assumptions and models used for estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions are disclosed in Note 22.
Transactions with controlling shareholder:
The Company received a long-term loan with non-market conditions from a controlling shareholder and a guarantee on a bank loan without charging a fee from a controlling shareholder. The Company accounts for these transactions as contribution from shareholders and recognizes them immediately pursuant to IAS 39 and, accordingly, the amount of contribution that is carried to equity reflects the difference between the fair value of the liability and the consideration received. In determining the compensation, the Company is required to evaluate the market conditions that existed when the transaction was made, including the market terms of a similar guarantee had it been given by an unrelated third party. Further details are given in Note 15.
Determining the fair value of share-based payment transactions:
The fair value of share-based payment transactions is determined using an option-pricing model. The model's assumptions consist of the share price, exercise price, expected volatility, expected life, expected dividend and risk-free interest rate.
Legal claims:
In estimating the likelihood of outcome of legal claims filed against the Company and its investees, the companies rely on the opinion of their legal counsel. These estimates are based on the legal counsel's best professional judgment, taking into account the stage of proceedings and historical legal precedents in respect of the different issues. Since the outcome of the claims will be determined in courts, the results could differ from these estimates.
c. Consolidated financial statements:
Effective from January 1, 2010, the date of adoption of IFRS 3 (Revised) and IAS 27 (2008), the Group applies the accounting policy required by these Standards for business combinations and transactions with non-controlling interests.
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of companies that are controlled by the Company (subsidiaries). Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity. The effect of potential voting rights that are exercisable at the end of the reporting period is considered when assessing whether an entity has control. The consolidation of the financial statements commences on the date on which control is obtained and ends when such control ceases.
Significant intragroup balances and transactions and gains or losses resulting from intragroup transactions are eliminated in full in the consolidated financial statements.
Non-controlling interests of subsidiaries represent the non-controlling shareholders' share of the total comprehensive income (loss) of the subsidiaries and fair value of the net assets upon the acquisition of the subsidiaries. The non-controlling interests are presented in equity separately from the equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company.
Commencing from January 1, 2010, the acquisition of non-controlling interests by the Group is recorded as a decrease/ an increase in equity (capital reserve from transactions with non-controlling interests) and calculated as the difference between the consideration paid by the Group and the proportionate amount of non-controlling interests acquired and derecognized at the date of acquisition (when non-controlling interests also include a share of other comprehensive income, the Company reattributes the cumulative amounts recognized in other comprehensive income between the equity holders of the Company and the non-controlling interests).
Transaction costs in respect of transactions with non-controlling interests are also recorded in equity. Cash flows from transactions with non-controlling interests (without change in status) are classified in the statement of cash flows as cash flows from financing activities.
Until December 31, 2009, additional goodwill was recognized in respect of the acquisition of non-controlling interests and the effect of the sale of non-controlling interests was recorded in profit or loss.
Commencing from January 1, 2010, losses are attributed to non-controlling interests even if they result in a negative balance of non-controlling interests in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Until December 31, 2009, such losses were entirely attributed to the equity holders of the Company unless the non-controlling interests were obligated and able to make additional investments. Losses accrued through December 31, 2009, were not reallocated between the equity holders of the Company and the non-controlling interests.
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of a jointly controlled entity where the shareholders have a contractual arrangement that establishes joint control and which is consolidated in the Company's accounts using the proportionate consolidation method. The Company combines in its consolidated financial statements its share of the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the jointly controlled entity with similar items in its financial statements. Significant intragroup balances and transactions and gains or losses resulting from transactions between the Group and the jointly controlled entity are eliminated to the extent of the interest in the jointly controlled entity.
Upon loss of joint control by the Group, any retained investment is recognized and measured at fair value. The difference between the carrying amount of the former company under joint control as of the date on which joint control ceases and the aggregate fair value of any remaining investment and the consideration from disposal is recognized in profit or loss. If the Group has significant influence over the remaining investment, it is as accounted for as an investment in an associate.
Jointly controlled operations are joint ventures where each party uses its own assets for the joint operation. The consolidated financial statements include all the assets of the joint operations that the Company controls, the liabilities of the joint operations to which it is exposed, the expenses that it incurs in connection with the joint operation and its share of the income of the joint operation.
The financial statements of the Company and of the subsidiaries are prepared as of the same dates and periods. The consolidated financial statements are prepared using uniform accounting policies by all companies in the Group.
d. Functional and foreign currencies:
1. Functional currency and presentation currency:
The financial statements are presented in thousands of U.S. dollars, which is the Company's functional currency and best reflects the economic environment in which the Group operates and conducts its transactions.
The functional currency is separately determined for each subsidiary and jointly controlled entity and is used to measure their financial position and operating results. When their functional currency differs from that of the Company, the investees represent foreign operations whose financial statements are translated in order to be included in the Company's consolidated financial statements as follows:
a) Assets and liabilities in all statements of financial position presented are translated at the closing rate as of each statement of financial position presented.
b) Income and expenses in all statements of income (including comparative data) are translated at the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions or at average exchange rates for the periods during which the transactions were made if such exchange rates approximate the actual exchange rates.
c) Share capital, capital reserves and other changes in capital are translated at the exchange rate prevailing as of the date of incurrence.
d) Retained earnings are translated based on the opening balance at the exchange rate as of that date and other relevant transactions during the period are translated as described in b) and c) above.
e) All translation differences are recorded as a separate item in shareholders' equity ("currency translation reserve").
Upon the disposal of a foreign operation, the relevant portion of other comprehensive income (loss) is recognized in profit or loss. Commencing from January 1, 2010, upon the partial disposal of a subsidiary that is a foreign operation which disposal results in the loss of control of the subsidiary, the cumulative gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss whereas upon the partial disposal of a subsidiary that is a foreign operation which disposal results in the retention of control, the relative portion of the cumulative amount recognized in other comprehensive income is reattributed to non-controlling interests.
Intergroup loans for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future are, in substance, a part of the investment in that foreign operation and are accounted for as part of the investment and the exchange differences arising in these loans are recognized in other comprehensive income.
2. Foreign currency transactions, assets and liabilities:
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded at the exchange rate on the date of transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency of the operation at the exchange rates prevailing at the reporting date. Exchange rate differences are carried to the income statement. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into the functional currency of the operation at the exchange rates prevailing on the date of the transaction (or date of later revaluation). Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the date of the initial transaction.
3. Index-linked monetary items:
Monetary assets and liabilities linked to the changes in the Israeli Consumer Price Index ("Israeli CPI") are adjusted at the relevant index at each reporting date according to the terms of the agreement. Linkage differences arising from the adjustment, as above, other than those capitalized to qualifying assets, are recognized in profit or loss.
e. Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash equivalents are considered as highly liquid investments, including unrestricted short-term bank deposits with an original maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition or with a maturity of more than three months, but which are redeemable on demand without penalty and which form part of the Group's cash management.
f. Allowance for doubtful accounts:
The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined in respect of specific debts whose collection, in the opinion of the Group's management, is doubtful. Impaired debts are derecognized when they are assessed as uncollectible.
g. Inventories of buildings for sale:
Cost of inventories of buildings and apartments for sale comprises identifiable direct costs of land such as taxes, fees and duties and construction costs. The Company also capitalizes borrowing costs as part of the cost of inventories of buildings and apartments for sale from the period in which the Company commenced development of the land. The capitalized costs are expensed along with the other costs of the project when revenues are recognized.
Inventories of land include acquisitions by the Group in an exchange transaction in which in consideration for the land, the vendor is provided units in the completed project. Such land is measured at fair value upon delivery of the land and a corresponding liability is recognized.
Inventories of buildings and apartments for sale are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less estimated costs of completion and the estimated selling costs.
h. The operating cycle:
The Group's normal operating cycle exceeds one year and may generally last four years. Accordingly, the current assets include items that are held and are expected to be realized by the end of the Group's normal operating cycle.
i. Financial instruments:
Financial assets:
Financial assets within the scope of IAS 39 are initially recognized at fair value plus directly attributable transaction costs, except for investments at fair value through profit or loss in respect of which transaction costs are recorded in profit or loss.
Loans and receivables:
Loans and receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. After initial measurement, loans and receivables are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any allowance for impairment. Gains and losses are recognized in the income statement when the loans and receivables are recognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process.
Offsetting financial instruments:
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount is presented in the statement of financial position if there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amount and there is an intention either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost:
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings are initially recognized at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs (such as loan raising costs). After initial recognition, loans, including debentures, are measured based on their terms at amortized cost using the effective interest method taking into account directly attributable transaction costs. Short-term borrowings (such as trade and other payables) are measured based on their terms, normally at face value. Gains and losses are recognized in profit or loss when the financial liability is derecognized as well as through the systematic amortization process.
Financial guarantees:
Financial guarantees granted by controlling shareholders of the Group are incurred from a contract obliging the controlling shareholder in the Group to pay compensation to beneficiary for loss resulted from non collection pursuant to the terms of the contract.
Financial guarantees are initially recognized at fair value while taking into account direct transaction costs attributed to the grant of guarantee. After the initial recognition, the guarantee is measured at the higher of the amount initially recognized (net of the appropriate amortization over the guarantee period) and the estimate of the amount required (if required) to be recognized as of the report date regarding the guarantee amount.
Derecognition of financial instruments:
Financial assets:
A financial asset is derecognized when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire or the Group has transferred its contractual rights to receive cash flows from the financial asset or assumes an obligation to pay the cash flows in full without material delay to a third party and has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.
If the Group transfers its rights to receive cash flows from an asset and neither transfer nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset nor transfers control of the asset, a new asset is recognized to the extent of the Group's continuing involvement in the asset. When continuing involvement takes the form of guaranteeing the transferred asset, the extent of the continuing involvement is the lower of the original carrying amount of the asset and the maximum amount of consideration received that the Group could be required to repay.
Financial liabilities:
A financial liability is derecognized when it is extinguished, that is when the obligation is discharged or cancelled or expires. A financial liability is extinguished when the debtor (the Group):
·; discharges the liability by paying in cash, other financial assets, goods or services; or
·; is legally released from the liability.
When an existing financial liability is exchanged with another liability from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference between the carrying amounts of the above liabilities is recognized in profit or loss. If the exchange or modification is not substantial, it is accounted for as a change in the terms of the original liability and no gain or loss is recognized on the exchange. When evaluating whether the change in the terms of an existing liability is substantial, the Group takes into account both quantitative and qualitative considerations.
Impairment of financial assets:
The Group assesses at each reporting date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.
Financial assets carried at amortized cost:
There is objective evidence of impairment of debt instruments, loans and receivables and held-to-maturity investments carried at amortized cost as a result of one or more events that has occurred after the initial recognition of the asset and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows. Evidence of impairment may include indications that the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, including liquidity difficulty and default in interest or principal payments. The amount of the loss recorded in profit or loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not yet been incurred) discounted at the financial asset's original effective interest rate. If the financial asset has a variable interest rate, the discount rate is the current effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account. In a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss is reversed if the recovery of the asset can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized. The amount of the reversal, up to the amount of any previous impairment, is recorded in profit or loss.
j. Leases:
The tests for classifying leases as finance or operating leases depend on the substance of the agreements and are made at the inception of the lease in accordance with the principles below as set out in IAS 17.
The Group as lessee:
Operating leases:
Lease agreements are classified as an operating lease if they do not transfer substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased asset. Lease payments are recognized as an expense in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Group as lessor:
Operating leases:
Lease agreements where the Group does not actually transfer substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased asset are classified as operating leases.
Initial direct costs incurred in respect of the lease agreement, except those relating to investment property which are carried to the Income Statement, are added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and recognized as an expense in parallel with the lease income. Lease income is recognized as revenue in the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
k. Business combinations and goodwill:
Effective from January 1, 2010, following the expansion of the definition of a "business" pursuant to IFRS 3 (Revised), the Company also accounts for activities and assets as a business even when they are not conducted as such as long as the seller is capable of operating them as a business.
Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method. Under this method, the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired business are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date. The cost of the acquisition is the aggregate fair value of the assets transferred, liabilities incurred and equity interests issued by the acquirer on the date of acquisition.
In respect of business combinations that occurred on or after January 1, 2010, non-controlling interests are measured at fair value on the acquisition date or at the proportionate share of the non-controlling interests in the acquiree's net identifiable assets.
In respect of business combinations that occurred through December 31, 2009, the non-controlling interests were measured at their proportionate share of the fair value of the acquiree's net identifiable assets.
The amendment to IFRS 3 (Revised) has been applied retrospectively from the date of the original adoption of IFRS 3 (Revised). The amendment limits the circumstances in which it is possible to choose the measurement of non-controlling interests based on their fair value on the date of acquisition or at their proportionate share in the recognized amounts of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. According to the amendment, this possibility is only available for types of non-controlling interests that are present ownership interests and entitle their holders to a pro rata share of the acquiree's net assets in the event of liquidation (usually shares). In contrast, for other types of non-controlling interests (such as options that represent equity instruments of the acquiree) no such choice is available, and they are measured at fair value on the acquisition date, unless another measurement basis is required by IFRS such as IFRS 2.
For business combinations that occurred on or after January 1, 2010, direct acquisition costs relating to the business combination are recognized as an expense in profit or loss and are not part of the acquisition cost.
As for business combinations that occurred through December 31, 2009, these costs are recognized as part of the acquisition cost.
On the acquisition date, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are classified and designated in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and other pertinent conditions that exist at the acquisition date, except for lease contracts that have not been modified on the acquisition date and whose classification as a finance or operating lease is therefore not reconsidered.
Starting from January 1, 2010, in a business combination achieved in stages, equity interests in the acquiree that had been held by the acquirer prior to obtaining control are measured at the acquisition date fair value and included in the acquisition consideration while recognizing gain or loss resulting from the fair value measurement, including realization of amounts recorded in other comprehensive income.
In business combinations achieved in stages that occurred through December 31, 2009, the Group measured the goodwill for every acquisition individually.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost which represents the excess of the acquisition consideration and the amount of non-controlling interests over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as measured on the acquisition date. If the resulting amount is negative, the acquisition is considered a bargain purchase and the acquirer recognizes the resulting gain in profit or loss on the acquisition date.
After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less, if relevant, any accumulated impairment losses.
For business combinations that occurred on or after January 1, 2010, contingent consideration is recognized at fair value on the acquisition date. If the contingent consideration is classified as a financial liability in accordance with IAS 39, subsequent changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration are recognized in profit or loss. If the contingent consideration is classified as an equity instrument, it is measured at fair value on the acquisition date without subsequent remeasurement. In any event, if the changes arise from adjustments resulting from the provisional purchase price allocation during the measurement period, they are recognized as adjustments to goodwill.
For business combinations that occurred through December 31, 2009, contingent consideration was recognized on the acquisition date if the outcome of the contingency was probable (in this context, "more likely than not") and the amount could be measured reliably. Subsequent changes in the likelihood of the contingent consideration are accounted for prospectively as a change in estimate with a resulting adjustment to the acquisition cost and goodwill (also applicable to changes that occur on or after January 1, 2010).
Effective from January 1, 2010, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset balance in respect of acquired temporary differences which did not meet the recognition criteria at acquisition date is recorded in profit or loss and not as an adjustment to goodwill.
Acquisitions of subsidiaries that are not business combinations:
Upon the acquisition of subsidiaries and activities that do not constitute a business, the consideration paid is allocated among the subsidiary's identifiable assets and liabilities.
Based on their relative fair values on the acquisition date without attributing any amount to goodwill or to deferred taxes, and the non-controlling interests, if any, participate at their relative share of the fair value of the net identifiable assets on the acquisition date.
Upon the acquisition of non-controlling interests of subsidiaries, as above, that occurred until December 31, 2009, the difference between the consideration paid and the relative portion of non-controlling interests acquired on the date of acquisition is attributed to assets and liabilities as described above. Upon the acquisition of non-controlling interests of subsidiaries, as above, that occurred starting from January 1, 2010, the accounting treatment is in accordance with section c above ("consolidated financial statements").
l. Investment property and investment properties under construction:
An investment property is property (land or a building or both) held by the owner (lessor under an operating lease) or by the lessee under a finance lease to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both rather than for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for administrative purposes or for sale in the ordinary course of business.
Investment property is measured initially at cost, including costs directly attributable to the acquisition. After initial recognition, investment property is measured at fair value which reflects market conditions at the end of the reporting period. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair values of investment property are included in profit or loss when they arise. Investment property is not systematically depreciated.
The fair value model is also applied to property under construction for future use as investment property when fair value can be reliably measured. However, when the fair value of the investment property is not reliably determinable due to the nature and scope of the project risks, the property is measured at cost less, if appropriate, any impairment losses, until the earlier of the date when fair value becomes reliably determinable or construction is completed.
Investment property is derecognized on disposal or when the investment property ceases to be used and no future economic benefits are expected from its disposal. The difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset is recognized in profit or loss in the period of the disposal.
The Group determines the fair value of investment property on the basis of valuations by independent valuers who hold recognized and relevant professional qualifications and have the necessary knowledge and experience.
m. Fixed assets:
Office furniture and equipment are stated at cost, including direct acquisition costs, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, and excluding day-to-day servicing expenses.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset at annual rates of 10%-20%.
The useful life, depreciation method and residual value of an asset are reviewed at least each year-end and any changes are accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate.
Depreciation of an asset ceases at the earlier of the date that the asset is classified as held for sale and the date that the asset is derecognized. An asset is derecognized on disposal or when no further economic benefits are expected from its use. The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of the asset (determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount in the financial statements) is included in profit or loss when the asset is derecognized.
n. Borrowing costs in respect of qualifying assets:
The Group capitalizes borrowing costs that are attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets.
A qualifying asset is an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale, comprising of tangible and intangible non-financial assets, and inventories that require a substantial period of time to bring them to a saleable condition.
The capitalization of borrowing costs commences when expenditures for the asset are being incurred, borrowing costs are being incurred and the activities to prepare the asset are in progress and ceases when substantially all the activities to prepare the qualifying asset for its intended use or sale are complete.
The amount of borrowing costs capitalized in the reported period includes specific borrowing costs and general borrowing costs based on a weighted capitalization rate.
o. Impairment of non-financial assets:
The Company evaluates the need to record an impairment of the carrying amount of non-financial assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount is not recoverable. If the carrying amount of non-financial assets exceeds their recoverable amount, the assets are reduced to their recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of sale and value in use. In measuring value in use, the expected future cash flows are discounted using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the risks specific to the asset. The recoverable amount of an asset that does not generate independent cash flows is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss.
An impairment loss of an asset, is reversed only if there have been changes in the estimates used to determine the asset's recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. Reversal of an impairment loss, as above, shall not be increased above the lower of the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of depreciation or amortization) had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years and its recoverable amount. The reversal of impairment loss of an asset presented at cost is recognized in profit or loss.
p. Taxes on income:
Taxes on income in the Income Statement include current and deferred taxes. The tax charges/credit in respect of current or deferred taxes are carried to the Income Statement other than if they relate to items that are directly carried to equity or to other comprehensive income. In such cases, the tax effect is also carried to the relevant item in equity or to other comprehensive income.
1. Current income taxes:
The current tax liability is measured using the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of reporting period as well as adjustments required in connection with the tax liability in respect of previous years.
2. Deferred income taxes:
Deferred taxes are computed in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts in the financial statements and the amounts attributed for tax purposes.
Deferred taxes are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the taxes are reversed in profit or loss, other comprehensive income or equity, based on tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period. Deferred taxes in profit or loss represent the changes in the carrying amount of deferred tax balances during the reporting period, excluding changes attributable to items recognized in other comprehensive income or in equity.
Deferred tax assets are reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to the extent that it is not probable that they will be utilized. Also, temporary differences (such as carryforward losses) for which deferred tax assets have not been recognized are reassessed and deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that their recoverability has become probable. Any resulting reduction or reversal is recognized in the line item, "taxes on income".
Taxes that would apply in the event of the disposal of investments in investees have not been taken into account in computing deferred taxes, as long as the disposal of the investments in investees is not probable in the foreseeable future. Also, deferred taxes that would apply in the event of distribution of earnings by investees as dividends have not been taken into account in computing deferred taxes, since the distribution of dividends does not involve an additional tax liability or since it is the Company's policy not to initiate distribution of dividends that triggers an additional tax liability.
All deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented in the statement of financial position as non-current assets and non-current liabilities, respectively.
Deferred taxes are offset in the statement of financial position if there is a legally enforceable right to offset a current tax asset against a current tax liability and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxpayer and the same taxation authority.
The Group did not record deferred taxes in respect of temporary differences arising from changes in the fair value of investment properties in view of management's intention to sell the companies holding these assets rather than the assets themselves (see also Note 19).
q. Share-based payment transactions:
The company's employees are entitled to receive remuneration in the form of equity-settled, share-based payment transactions.
Equity-settled transactions:
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured at the fair value of the equity instruments granted at grant date. The fair value is determined using a standard option pricing model, additional details are given in Note 22. In estimating fair value, the vesting conditions (consisting of service conditions and performance conditions other than market conditions) are not taken into account. The only conditions taken into account in estimating fair value are market conditions and non-vesting conditions.
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognized in profit or loss, together with a corresponding increase in equity, during the period which the performance and/or service conditions are to be satisfied, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award ("the vesting period"). The cumulative expense recognized for equity-settled transactions at the end of each reporting period until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and the Group's best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The expense or income recognized in profit or loss represents the change between the cumulative expense recognized at the end of the reporting period and the cumulative expense recognized at the end of the previous reporting period.
No expense is recognized for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other vesting conditions (service and/or performance) are satisfied.
If the Company modifies the conditions on which equity-instruments were granted, an additional expense is recognized for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement or is otherwise beneficial to the employee/other service provider at the modification date.
If a grant of an equity instrument is cancelled, it is accounted for as if it had vested on the cancellation date, and any expense not yet recognized for the grant is recognized immediately. However, if a new grant replaces the cancelled grant and is identified as a replacement grant on the grant date, the cancelled and new grants are accounted for as a modification of the original grant, as described above.
r. Revenue recognition:
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group, the revenue can be reliably measured and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognized:
Rental income from operating lease:
Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Fixed increases in rent over the term of the contract are recognized as income on a straight-line basis over the lease period. The aggregate cost of lease incentives granted is recognized as a reduction of rental income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Rendering of services, including management fees:
Revenue from the rendering of services is recognized by reference to the stage of completion as of the reporting date. Stage of completion is measured according to the reporting periods during which the services were rendered. Where the contract outcome cannot be measured reliably, revenue is recognized only to the extent of the expenses recognized that are recoverable.
Interest income:
Interest income is recognized on a cumulative basis using the effective interest rate method.
Revenues from sale of residential apartments:
Revenues from the sale of residential apartments are recognized when the principal risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the buyer. Revenues are recognized when significant uncertainties regarding the collection of the consideration no longer exist, the related costs are known and there is no continuing managerial involvement with the residential apartment delivered. These criteria are usually met when construction has effectively been completed, the residential apartment has been delivered to the buyer and the buyer has paid the entire consideration for the apartment.
s. Finance income and expenses:
Interest income is recognized as it accrues using the effective interest method. Revenues from dividend are recognized when the Group's right to receive the payment is established.
Finance costs comprise interest expenses on borrowings. Borrowing costs that are not capitalized to qualifying assets are recognized in the Income Statement using the effective interest method.
Gains and losses on exchange differences are reported on a net basis.
t. Advertising expenses:
Expenditures incurred on advertising, marketing or promotional activities, such as production of catalogues and promotional pamphlets, are recognized as an expense when the Group has the right of access to the advertising goods or when the Group receives those services.
u. Operating segments:
An operating segment is a component of the Group that meets the following three criteria:
1. is engaged in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses relating to intragroup transactions;
2. whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Group's chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance; and
3. for which separate financial information is available.
v. Earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net income attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted number of Ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Basic earnings per share only include shares that were actually outstanding during the period. Potential Ordinary shares are only included in the computation of diluted earnings per share from continuing operations. Further, potential Ordinary shares that are converted during the period are included in diluted earnings per share only until the conversion date and from that date in basic earnings per share.
w. Provisions:
A provision in accordance with IAS 37 is recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are measured according to the estimated future cash flows discounted using a pre-tax interest rate that reflects the market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, those risks specific to the liability.
x. Presentation of statement of comprehensive income:
The Group has elected to present comprehensive income using two statements: a statement of income and a statement of comprehensive income in which all the items recognized in other comprehensive income are presented, excluding net income which is brought forward from the statement of income.
y. Presentation of the changes in other comprehensive income items:
The Group presents the changes between the opening and closing balance of each component of other comprehensive income in the statements of changes in equity.
aa. Disclosure of new IFRSs in the period prior to their adoption:
IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements:
In June 2011, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1 ("the Amendment") which provides guidance for the presentation of other comprehensive income. According to the Amendment, items which may be carried to profit or loss at a later stage (such as upon derecognition or recovery) should be presented separately from items that can never be carried to profit or loss.
The Amendment is to be applied retrospectively commencing from the financial statements for annual periods beginning on January 1, 2013, or thereafter. Earlier application is permitted.
The Group believes that the Amendment is not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
IAS 12 - Income Taxes:
The amendment to IAS 12 ("the Amendment") applies to investment property measured at fair value. According to the Amendment, the deferred tax asset/liability in respect of such property should be measured based on the presumption that the carrying amount of the property will be recovered in full through sale (and not through use). However, if the investment property is depreciable and is held within a business model whose objective is to consume substantially all of the economic benefits embedded in the investment property over time rather than through sale, the sale presumption is rebutted and the Group should apply the regular guidelines of IAS 12 (namely, deferred taxes are measured based on the expected recovery of the property as determined by management - through sale or use).
The Amendment supersedes the provisions of SIC 21 that require separation of the land component and the building component of investment property measured at fair value in order to calculate the deferred tax.
The Amendment is to be applied retrospectively commencing from the financial statements for annual periods beginning on January 1, 2012. Earlier application is permitted.
The Group believes that the Amendment is not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
IFRS 7 - Financial Instruments: Disclosure:
The amendment to IFRS 7 ("the Amendment") provides new and expansive disclosure requirements regarding the derecognition of financial assets and regarding unusual transfer activity close to the end of a reporting period. The objective of the Amendment is to assist users of financial statements to assess the risks to which the Company may remain exposed from transfers of financial assets and the effect of these risks on the Group's financial position. The Amendment is designed to enhance the reporting transparency of transactions involving asset transfers, specifically securitization of financial assets. The Amendment is to be applied prospectively commencing from the financial statements for periods beginning on January 1, 2012. Earlier application is permitted.
The appropriate disclosures will be included in the Group's financial statements.
IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments:
1. In November 2009, the IASB issued IFRS 9, "Financial Instruments", the first part of Phase 1 of a project to replace IAS 39, "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement". IFRS 9 ("the Standard") focuses mainly on the classification and measurement of financial assets and it applies to all financial assets within the scope of IAS 39.
According to the Standard, all financial assets (including hybrid contracts with financial asset hosts) should be measured at fair value upon initial recognition. In subsequent periods, debt instruments should be measured at amortized cost only if both of the following conditions are met:
- the asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets in order to collect the contractual cash flows.
- the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
Notwithstanding the aforesaid, upon initial recognition, the Company may designate a debt instrument that meets both of the abovementioned conditions as measured at fair value through profit or loss if this designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency ("accounting mismatch") that would have otherwise arisen.
Subsequent measurement of all other debt instruments and financial assets should be at fair value.
Financial assets that are equity instruments should be measured in subsequent periods at fair value and the changes recognized in profit or loss or in other comprehensive income; in accordance with the election by the Group on an instrument-by-instrument basis (amounts recognized in other comprehensive income cannot be subsequently transferred to profit or loss). Nevertheless, if equity instruments are held for trading, they should be measured at fair value through profit or loss. This election is final and irrevocable. When an entity changes its business model for managing financial assets it shall reclassify all affected financial assets. In all other circumstances, reclassification of financial instruments is not permitted.
The Standard is effective commencing from January 1, 2015. Earlier application is permitted. Upon initial application, the Standard should be applied retrospectively by providing the required disclosure or restating comparative figures, except as specified in the Standard.
2. In October 2010, the IASB issued certain amendments to the Standard regarding derecognition and financial liabilities. According to those amendments, the provisions of IAS 39 will continue to apply to derecognition and to financial liabilities for which the fair value option has not been elected (designated as measured at fair value through profit or loss); that is, the classification and measurement provisions of IAS 39 will continue to apply to financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities measured at amortized cost.
The changes arising from these amendments affect the measurement of a liability for which the fair value option has been chosen. Pursuant to the amendments, the amount of the adjustment to the liability's fair value that is attributable to changes in credit risk should be presented in other comprehensive income. All other fair value adjustments should be presented in profit or loss. If presenting the fair value adjustment of the liability arising from changes in credit risk in other comprehensive income creates an accounting mismatch in profit or loss, then that adjustment should also be presented in profit or loss rather than in other comprehensive income.
Furthermore, according to the amendments, derivative liabilities in respect of certain unquoted equity instruments can no longer be measured at cost but rather only at fair value.
The amendments are effective commencing from January 1, 2015. Earlier application is permitted provided that the Group also adopts the provisions of the Standard regarding the classification and measurement of financial assets (the first part of Phase 1). Upon initial application, the amendments are to be applied retrospectively by providing the required disclosure or restating comparative figures, except as specified in the amendments.
The Group believes that the Standard is not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
IFRS 10, IFRS 11, IFRS 12, IFRS 13 - Consolidated Financial Statements, Joint Arrangements, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, Fair Value Measurement:
In May 2011, the IASB issued four new Standards: IFRS 10, "Consolidated Financial Statements", IFRS 11, "Joint Arrangements", IFRS 12, "Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities" ("the new Standards") and IFRS 13, "Fair Value Measurement", and amended two existing Standards, IAS 27R (Revised 2011), "Separate Financial Statements", and IAS 28R (Revised 2011), "Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures".
The new Standards are to be applied retrospectively in financial statements for annual periods commencing on January 1, 2013 or thereafter. Earlier application is permitted. However, if the Group chooses earlier application, it must adopt all the new Standards as a package (excluding the disclosure requirements of IFRS 12 which may be adopted separately). The Standards prescribe transition provisions with certain modifications upon initial adoption.
The main provisions of the Standards and their expected effects on the Company are as follows:
IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial Statements:
IFRS 10 supersedes IAS 27 regarding the accounting treatment of consolidated financial statements and includes the accounting treatment for the consolidation of structured entities previously accounted for under SIC 12, "Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities".
IFRS 10 does not prescribe changes to the consolidation procedures but rather modifies the definition of control for the purpose of consolidation and introduces a single consolidation model. According to IFRS 10, in order for an investor to control an investee, the investor must have power over the investee and exposure, or rights, to variable returns from the investee. Power is defined as the ability to influence and direct the investee's activities that significantly affect the investor's return.
According to IFRS 10, when assessing the existence of control, potential voting rights should be considered only if they are substantive, as opposed to the provisions of IAS 27 prior to its amendment which required consideration of potential voting rights only if they could be exercised immediately while disregarding management's intentions and financial ability to exercise such rights.
IFRS 10 also prescribes that an investor may have control even if it holds less than a majority of the investee's voting rights (de facto control), as opposed to the provisions of the existing IAS 27 which permits a choice between two consolidation models - the de facto control model and the legal control model.
IFRS 10 is to be applied retrospectively in financial statements for annual periods commencing on January 1, 2013, or thereafter.
The Group is evaluating the possible impact of the adoption of IFRS 10 but is presently unable to assess the effects, if any, on its financial statements.
IFRS 11 - Joint Arrangements:
IFRS 11 supersedes IAS 31 regarding the accounting treatment of interests in joint ventures and SIC 13 regarding the interpretation of the accounting treatment of non-monetary contributions by venturers.
IFRS 11 defines joint arrangements as contractual arrangements over which two or more parties have joint control.
IFRS 11 distinguishes between two types of joint arrangements:
- Joint ventures in which the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. IFRS 11 requires joint ventures to be accounted for solely by using the equity method, as opposed to the provisions of IAS 31 which allowed the Group to make an accounting policy choice whether to apply proportionate consolidation or the equity method for entities under joint control.
- Joint operations in which the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement. IFRS 11 requires the joint operator to recognize a joint operation's assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in proportion to its relative share of the joint operation as determined in the joint arrangement, similar to the current accounting treatment for proportionate consolidation.
IFRS 11 is to be applied retrospectively in financial statements for annual periods commencing on January 1, 2013, or thereafter.
The Group is evaluating the possible impact of the adoption of IFRS 11 but is presently unable to assess the effects, if any, on its financial statements.
IAS 28R - Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures:
IAS 28R supersedes IAS 28. The principal changes in IAS 28R compared to IAS 28 relate to the application of the equity method of accounting for investments in joint ventures, as a result of the issuance of IFRS 11, and the guidance for transition from proportionate consolidation to the equity method of accounting for these investments. IAS 28R also prescribes that in the event of disposal of an investment in an associate or joint venture, including a portion thereof, the portion that meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 5. Any remaining portion is accounted for using the equity method until the time of actual disposal. In addition, an investment in an associate that becomes an investment in a joint venture, or vice versa, will continue to be accounted for at equity and the remaining investment will not be remeasured.
IAS 28R is to be applied retrospectively in financial statements for annual periods commencing on January 1, 2013, or thereafter. Earlier application is permitted; however, if the Group elects earlier application of IAS 28R, it must also apply IFRS 10, IFRS 11, IFRS 12 and IFRS 27R (Revised 2011) collectively.
The Group is evaluating the possible impact of the adoption of IAS 28R but is presently unable to assess the effects, if any, on its financial statements.
IFRS 12 - Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities:
IFRS 12 prescribes disclosure requirements for the Company's investees, including subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structured entities. IFRS 12 expands the disclosure requirements to include the judgments and assumptions used by management in determining the existence of control, joint control or significant influence over investees, and in determining the type of joint arrangement. IFRS 12 also provides disclosure requirements for material investees.
The required disclosures will be included in the Group's financial statements upon initial adoption of IFRS 12.
IFRS 13 - Fair Value Measurement:
IFRS 13 establishes guidance for the measurement of fair value, to the extent that such measurement is required according to IFRS. IFRS 13 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. IFRS 13 also specifies the characteristics of market participants and determines that fair value is based on the assumptions that would have been used by market participants. According to IFRS 13, fair value measurement is based on the assumption that the transaction will take place in the asset's or the liability's principal market, or in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market.
IFRS 13 requires an entity to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. IFRS 13 also includes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:
Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 - unobservable inputs (valuation techniques that do not make use of observable inputs).
IFRS 13 also prescribes certain specific disclosure requirements.
The new disclosures, and the measurement of assets and liabilities pursuant to IFRS 13, are to be applied prospectively for periods commencing after the Standard's effective date, in financial statements for annual periods commencing on January 1, 2013 or thereafter. Earlier application is permitted. The new disclosures will not be required for comparative data.
The appropriate disclosures will be included in the Group's financial statements upon initial adoption of IFRS 13.
The Group is evaluating the possible impact of the adoption of IFRS 13 but is presently unable to assess the effects, if any, on its financial statements.
bb. Reclassification:
During 2011, the Group reclassified deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities relating to Company's Subsidiaries, which own investment properties and investment properties under construction, in order to reflect the fair value of the Company's share in those subsidiaries.
As a result of the reclassification, deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were decreased in the amount of $ 4 million as of 31 December 2010. The reclassification did not have an effect on the Group's net income.
NOTE 3:- INTEREST IN JOINTLY CONTROLLED ENTITIES
The list of jointly controlled entities is provided in Note 1f.
a. The Group's share of the assets and liabilities as of 31 December 2011 and 2010 and income and expenses of the jointly controlled entities for the years ended 31 December 2011, 2010 and 2009, which are proportionally consolidated in the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Share of the joint ventures' statement of financial position: | ||||
Current assets | 8,002 | 2,418 | ||
Non-current assets | 91,498 | 89,835 | ||
Current liabilities | (6,061) | (5,603) | ||
Non-current liabilities | (36,823) | (43,329) | ||
Net assets | 56,616 | 43,321 |
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Share of the joint ventures' revenue and profit: | ||||||
Revenue | 14,379 | 9,357 | 5,354 | |||
Cost of maintenance and management | (3,817) | (2,886) | (1,439) | |||
Administrative expenses | (186) | (486) | (1,154) | |||
Fair value adjustments of investment properties and investment properties under construction | 11,221 | 10,542 | 5,078 | |||
Finance costs | (5,494) | (4,437) | (2,983) | |||
Other income | - | 2,796 | - | |||
Income before taxes on income | 16,103 | 14,886 | 4,856 | |||
Taxes on income | - | - | (53) | |||
Net income | 16,103 | 14,886 | 4,803 |
b. During 2011, the Company purchased 1.5% of the shares of a jointly controlled entity which holds Yaroslavl Vernissage Shopping Center ("The Shopping Center") for the total amount of approximately $ 1,055 thousand.
The deal was executed by offsetting the amount aforesaid from a loan previously granted to the seller in an amount of approximately $ 1,205 thousand (principal and interest).
Pursuant to the deal, the Company through its subsidiaries now holds 50.5% of The Shopping Center.
NOTE 4:- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Cash at banks | 32,333 | 10,423 | ||
Short-term deposits (1) | - | 551 | ||
32,333 | 10,974 |
(1) The short- term deposits are deposited in bank account for a term under three months and earn interest at floating rates, based on daily bank deposit rates.
NOTE 5:- OTHER RECEIVABLES
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Prepayments to suppliers | 1,500 | 686 | ||
Government authorities | 473 | 514 | ||
Trade and other receivables | 807 | 916 | ||
2,780 | 2,116 |
NOTE 6:- INVENTORIES OF BUILDINGS FOR SALE
a. Composition:
Current assets:
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Land | 38,428 | 49,462 | ||
Construction costs | 119,344 | 128,876 | ||
157,772 | 178,338 |
Non-current assets:
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Land | 18,005 | 10,435 | ||
Construction costs | 49,057 | 20,048 | ||
67,062 | 30,483 |
b. Inventories of buildings are intended for the construction of residential apartments and town houses. The inventory is measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value in accordance with IAS 2, which was determined by an independent appraiser.
c. This includes capitalized borrowing costs of approximately $ 5,101 thousand for the year ended 31 December, 2011 and approximately $ 19,262 thousand for the year ended 31 December, 2010.
d. During the period, a Company's subsidiary entered into agreements regarding the sale of 5 units in a residential project located near Moscow, for a total consideration of approximately $ 3.9 million. The Group received advances from buyers for these sales in a total amount of $ 2.7 million.
The total town houses sold since the beginning of the marketing is 19 units.
The total consideration received for sold units amounted to $ 12.2 million.
e. Due to the progress in the development stages of the residential project in St. Petersburg, and due to the commencement of marketing for the project, the Group determined that the operating cycle for this project will be four years. As a result, inventories of buildings for sale of St. Petersburg project in the amount of approximately $ 39 million were reclassified to non-current assets.
NOTE 7:- INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
a. Composition:
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Balance at 1 January | 306,257 | *) 187,340 | ||
Additions for the year | 3,181 | 12,278 | ||
Transfer from investment properties under construction (d) | 42,982 | 98,840 | ||
Fair value adjustments | 30,409 | *) 8,147 | ||
Exchange rate differences | (19,260) | (348) | ||
Balance at 31 December | 363,569 | 306,257 |
*) Reclassified.
b. Investment property is stated at fair value which has been determined based on valuations performed by independent external valuation experts who hold recognized and relevant professional qualifications and who have experience in the location and category of the property being valued. The valuation was prepared pursuant to international valuation standards. The fair value represents the amounts on the valuation date at which the properties will be exchanged between a buyer and a seller in an arm's length transaction after the parties have acted rationally and with caution and without coercion. The fair value was measured with reference to recent real estate transactions for similar properties in the same location as the property owned by the Group, if any, and based on the expected future cash flows from the property. In assessing cash flows, their inherent risk is taken into account. In computing the fair value, the valuators used a discount rate of 12%-14%.
c. Since it is the intention of management to sell the shares in companies holding these properties rather than the properties themselves, deferred taxes have not been recorded, but were taken into consideration while determining the fair value of the investment property. However, the fair values of the properties were reduced in 2011 and 2010 by $ 23,228 thousand and $ 16,236 thousand, respectively, to reflect the fair values of the deferred tax liabilities and assets that the Group would transfer to a buyer upon the sale of the companies owning the properties. The reduction was calculated based on the 20% income tax rate in Russia. The management is of the opinion that the actual amount of the reduction may be significantly lower due to the economic benefits to which the buyer is entitled upon the sale of shares. See also Note 19e.
d. During 2011, the Group completed construction of the Tamiz Building in Moscow and began its operation. As a result, the asset was reclassified from investment property under construction to investment property.
NOTE 8:- INVESTMENT PROPERTIES UNDER CONSTRUCTION
a. Composition:
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
At 1 January | 121,364 | *) 184,782 | ||
Additions for the year | 8,487 | 30,708 | ||
Transfer to investment properties (d) | (42,982) | (98,840) | ||
Disposal | - | (15,545) | ||
Fair value adjustments | 3,076 | *) 21,675 | ||
Exchange rate differences | (7,242) | (1,416) | ||
At 31 December | 82,703 | 121,364 |
*) Reclassified.
b. The fair value of investment property under construction is either determined on the basis of the residual or the discounted cash flow (DCF) methods, as deemed appropriate by the valuation expert. The estimated fair value is based on the expected future income from the completed project using yields adjusted for the significant risks which are relevant to the construction process, including construction costs and rent that are higher than the current yields of similar completed property. The remaining expected costs of completion are deducted from the estimated future income. In computing the fair value, the valuators used a discount rate of 14%- 22%.
c. Since it is the intention of management to sell the shares in companies holding these properties rather than the properties themselves, deferred taxes have not been recorded, but were taken into consideration while determining the fair value of the investment property. However, the fair values of the properties were reduced in 2011 and 2010 by $ 12,615 thousand and $ 13,886 thousand, respectively, to reflect the fair values of the deferred tax liabilities and assets that the Group would transfer to a buyer upon the sale of the companies owning the properties. The reduction was calculated based on the 20% income tax rate in Russia. The management is of the opinion that the actual amount of the reduction may be significantly lower due to the economic benefits to which the buyer is entitled upon the sale of shares. See also Note 19e.
d. See Note 7(d).
e. On 12 December 2011 the Federal Law No. 427-FZ was signed, amending the Federal Law "On the Enactment of the Russian Federation Land Code" and certain other legislative acts (the "New Law"). The New Law will be effective from 1 April, 2012.
In particular, the New Law amends the Federal Laws "On Direct Investment Activities in the Russian Federation", "On the Enactment of the Russian Federation Forestry Code", "On State Registration of Title to Immovable Property and Transactions Therewith".
The amendments stipulate that the state or municipal authorities may unilaterally terminate lease contracts made for the purpose of construction of an immovable property before 1 January 2011, if the contractual obligations on construction of a property are not performed when due or construction of a property has been completed by less than 40% at the last day of the term of the lease.
These provisions apply to lease contracts for land plots in state or municipal ownership and located in Moscow and St. Petersburg. One of the company's projects in Moscow, called 'Skyscraper' (the "Project") may be subject and affected by the New Law, due to the Group's failure to complete construction by the date set forth in the lease agreement (completion of construction prior to 2010). According to the New Law, this gives the state or local authority the right to cancel a lease agreement early. The Project is presented in the financial statements at its fair value in the aggregate amount of $ 38.3 million. As of the balance sheet date the Group invested in the project approximately $ 55.9 million.
There is significant uncertainty of the consequences of the New Law on lessees, generally, and the Group in particular, with regard to the project. This includes the degree and manner of implementation of the New Law by the authorities (if at all), the protections available in the event of its implementation and the method of calculating the compensation if its appeal against the decision to cancel the lease agreement of the land relating to the Project is denied.
As a result, the Company recorded loss from fair value adjustments in the amount of approximately $ 10 million. According to the Company's assessment and based on the valuation of the project, the value of the Project in the Group's financial statements reflects the potential risks deriving from possible implementation of the New Law.
NOTE 9:- LOANS TO RELATED PARTIES
On 31 December 2007, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding with two private companies, which are affiliated with the owners of a management company, that provides the Company with certain services ("the Sellers"), for the purchase of 51% of the Sellers' shares in the companies, Inomotor LLC and Avtoprioritet LLC ("Century project Companies"), both incorporated under the laws of the Russian Federation.
The Group granted during 2007 and 2008 loans of approximately $ 55 million to Century Companies for the purpose of investing in the project buildings and the repayment of former debts to third parties. The loans bear 11% annual interest.
In consideration of purchase of rights in Century project Companies, the Group paid to the Sellers an amount of $ 1 million. In addition, $ 19 million out of loans provided by the Group to Century project Companies during the years 2007, 2008 and 2009, were capitalized in 2010 to the equity of Century project Companies as part of irrecoverable obligations of the Group in accordance with the above mentioned purchase agreement. The total amount of remaining loans and the accrued interest are to be repaid from future income of Century project Companies. See also Note 17(2).
There will be no dividend distribution in the Century project Companies until the loans will be repaid to the Company.
During 2011, the Company utilized an amount of $ 8.5 million from the loan balance.
NOTE 10:- FIXED ASSETS, NET
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Cost: | ||||
At 1 January | 2,725 | 2,294 | ||
Additions | 349 | 872 | ||
Disposals | (331) | (393) | ||
Exchange rate differences | (146) | (48) | ||
At 31 December | 2,597 | 2,725 | ||
Depreciation: | ||||
At 1 January | 1,303 | 1,062 | ||
Additions | 467 | 610 | ||
Disposals | (284) | (360) | ||
Exchange rate differences | (79) | (9) | ||
At 31 December | 1,407 | 1,303 | ||
Net carrying value | 1,190 | 1,422 |
NOTE 11:- VAT RECEIVABLE
a. Comprises of VAT which was paid upon the purchase of land and the construction of the projects, and which the Group expects to recover from VAT to be collected from customers over a period of four years from the reporting date. The VAT receivable over a long-term period is stated at its estimated present value using a discount rate of 8%.
b. Future expected VAT receivable as of 31 December 2011, are as follows:
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||
First year | 7,393 | |
Second year | 317 | |
Total | 7,710 |
NOTE 12:- CREDIT FROM BANKS
The bank loans bear annual interest rates of LIBOR plus 1.5% to 4.05%. During September 2008, the Company's main shareholders (companies that are part of the Fishman Group) reinstated guarantees in favor of certain bank institutions that granted the Group lines of credit. See also Note 15a.
These loans were classified as short-term loans due to the fact that according to the loan agreement, the bank may demand repayment of the loans at any time.
NOTE 13:- LOANS FROM BANKS
a. On 29 May 2007, a subsidiary of the Company (IIK) entered into an agreement with European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) regarding the financing of Triumph Mall project.
Following the above mentioned agreement, in 2009, IIK received funds from the abovementioned loan from EBRD for approximately $ 48 million. The loan is repayable in annual installments, commencing from 2010. The loan bears interest of Libor + 2.5%-5%.
The Company guaranteed IIK's liabilities towards the bank until the conditions undertaken by IIK toward the bank have been met as detailed below:
1. The project will be completed by 31 December 2011.
2. IIK's debt coverage ratio will not fall below 1.3.
3. The ratio of equity to total liabilities will not fall below 0.5 before the project is completed and 0.4 after the project is completed.
4. No dividends will be distributed until the project is completed.
5. No investments will be made of an aggregate amount exceeding $ 250 thousand that are not in compliance with the bank approved project budget.
As of 31 December, 2011, IIK complies with all the covenants regarding this loan.
To secure the loan, IIK has pledged its rights to the project area and rights to the project's expected cash flows, in addition to the shares of IIK held by the Company in favor of the bank.
b. During December 2009, a subsidiary of the Company (MAG) signed an agreement with CB Uniastrum Bank LLC (the Bank). In accordance with the agreement, the bank has approved a credit line of approximately $ 30 million. On 17 December, 2009 MAG received a loan of approximately $ 15 million as part of the approved credit line. The loan bears an annual interest of 9.8% and was repayable on December 3, 2010. However the loan can be extended for a 1 year period by a written application of MAG. The maturity date of the loan extensions cannot exceed 10 years. In December 2011, the loan repayment date was extended for another one year (until December 3, 2012). The rest of the approved credit line will be granted to MAG in accordance with future rental revenues. The covenants of the loan are as follows:
1. Rental income to the loan payments ratio should be at least 1.3 to 1;
2. The ratio between the loan balance and the fair value of the pledged properties will not exceed 50%.
As collateral for this credit, MAG had pledged its rights in investment properties presented at fair value of $ 104.4 million as of 31 December, 2011 and another subsidiary of the Company (Hydro) had provided a guarantee for this credit. As for guarantees provided by the Company, see also Note 28g.
As of 31 December, 2011, MAG complies with all the covenants regarding this loan.
c. The Group has refinanced two loan facilities totaling approximately $ 43.1 million. This refinancing, undertaken by two Russian leading banks, in February 2011, as detailed below.
1. The extension and revision to an existing loan facility with GazpromBank on the Vernissage Mall in Yaroslavl. This property is owned by a jointly controlled entity, in which Mirland holds a 50.5% ownership interest, this being the largest shareholder.
The renewed loan amount is $ 29.1 million, representing the remaining balance of the previous loan following scheduled amortization. The revised interest rate is 9.25% p.a. (previously 12% p.a.) and the loan has been renewed for a five year term, with the option of a two year extension. The principal will be repaid through equal quarterly payments and repayment of approximately 53% at the end of the term.
2. The refinancing by Sberbank of an office building in Moscow, forming part of the "Century Project". The "Century Project" is owned by one of Mirland's 51% held investees.
The loan amount relating to this asset is $14.0 million, bears an annual interest rate of 7.7% above 3 Month LIBOR, and is repayable over a period of seven years. The principal will be repaid through quarterly payments and a payment of approximately 37% at the end of the term.
d. In November 2011, subsidiary of the Company Hydro signed facility agreement with Uniastrum Bank. According to agreement, the loan amounts to $ 14 million and is being repaid over 10 years by monthly repayments that are being updated every year. The loan bears fixed annual interest rate of 9.8%. The covenants of the loan are as follows:
1. The debt cover ratio should not be lower than 1.
2. The ratio between the loan balance and the fair value of the pledged properties will not exceed 50%.
To secure the loan, Hydro has pledged land plots and lease rights of the project.
e. In November 2011, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary Petra 8 LLC has entered into a credit line agreement with SberBank for the provision of a line of credit of $ 41 million. The purpose of the credit line is to finance the construction of the first phase of "Triumph Park" in St. Petersburg. The credit line bears 10.25% interest rate per annum and is being repaid over 3 years by part of the receivables from sales of apartments. The outstanding credit line balance in April, 2013, will be repaid by variable monthly repayments.
As of the report date, Petra 8 LLC utilized an amount of $ 2.2 million from the credit line.
To secure the credit line, Petra 8 LLC has pledged its rights in 300 acres out of 400 acres of the project's land plot, completed apartments to be completed and part of the receivables from sales.
f. In December 2011, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary Creative has entered into a credit line agreement with SberBank of Russia for the provision of credit line of $ 25 million. The credit line bears an annual interest rate of 3months LIBOR + 7.1% and will be repaid within 3 years by part of the receivables from sales of town houses.
The outstanding credit line balance as of six months from the credit line grant date will be repaid by variable quarterly repayments.
To ensure loan repayment, the Company pledged the holdings on Creative, 163 acres out of 163 acres from project's land and completed town houses, and made a deposit of $ 1.8 million.
g. The maturity dates of long-term loans:
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
First year - current liabilities | 11,608 | 5,344 | ||
Second year | 16,085 | 4,100 | ||
Third year | 23,578 | 4,219 | ||
Fourth year and after | 64,517 | 59,270 | ||
115,788 | 72,933 |
NOTE 14:- OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Accrued expenses | 747 | 378 | ||
Other payables | 1,124 | 750 | ||
1,871 | 1,128 |
NOTE 15:- LOANS AND GUARANTEES FROM SHAREHOLDERS
a. During September 2008, the main shareholders of the Company (companies that are part of Fishman Group) have granted guarantees in favor of certain banks that secured lines of credit to the Company in the aggregate amount of approximately $ 70 million that were granted to the Company from banks. The aforementioned guarantees are renewed annually.
As of December 31, 2011, the Group measures the fair value of those benefits received from shareholders and recorded as expense in the total amount of $ 505 thousand for the year ended 31 December, 2011 (2010 - $ 687 thousand). On December 31, 2011 the Group measured the guarantees value based on the yield of the Group's bonds with the required amendments. As a result, the Group recorded capital reserve in a total amount of $ 3,358 thousand.
b. During 2011, the Company repaid shareholder's loans in a total amount of approximately $ 40.6 million (including interest).
c. During 2010, the Company has signed a loan framework agreement for the total amount of $ 5 million, with its major shareholders, according to which, loans were granted in the amount of $ 5 million, which mature on 14 April 2012, bearing interest at a rate 15% per annum.
After the balance sheet date, the Company repaid shareholder's loans in total amount of approximately $ 6.4 million (including interest paid).
NOTE 16:- DEBENTURES
a. On 6 December 2007, the Company raised approximately $ 63 million of debt by the issuance of 2 series (A and B) of debentures on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange. Both series are repayable in 6 annual equal and consecutive payments on 31 December for each of the years 2010-2015 (inclusive). Issuance expenses of approximately $ 1 million were deducted from the amount of the debentures and will be recognised according to the effective interest method.
Series A - is in NIS linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index. The debenture pays an annual interest rate of 6.5%.
Series B - is in NIS linked to the NIS/U.S. dollar exchange rate. The debenture pays an interest of Libor (for dollar deposits for a period of six months) plus a margin of 2.75%.
b. On 8 August 2010, the Company published a Shelf Offering Report in Israel according to which it raised approximately $ 52 million by the issuance of New Israeli Shekel ("NIS") 200,000,000 Series C bonds (the "Series C Bonds") to institutional investors and the public in Israel.
The Series C Bonds are to be redeemed in five annual, equal and consecutive payments on 31 August 2012 to 2016 (inclusive). Interest is payable on the Series C Bonds, in semi-annual payments, at the annual rate of 8.5% linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). In the event of any downgrading of the rating of the Series C Bonds, the interest rate will be increased by 0.5%. The effective interest rate is 8.8%.
c. On 10 November 2010, the Company published a Shelf Offering Report in Israel, according to which it raised approximately $ 18 million (NIS 65.4 million) by the issue of NIS 66,080,000 Series D bonds ("Series D Bonds") to the public in Israel.
The Series D Bonds are to be redeemed in four annual equal and consecutive payments on 30 November from 2014 through 2017 (inclusive). Interest is payable on the Series D Bonds, in semi-annual payments, at the annual rate of 6%. In the event of any downgrading of the current rating of the Series D Bonds (ilBBB), the interest rate will be increased by 0.5%.
The Series D Bonds (principal and interest) are linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index ("CPI").
d. On February 23, 2011, the Company published a Shelf Offering Report in Israel based on a Shelf prospectus that was published on May 31, 2010 and updated on July 27, 2010.
According to the Shelf Offering, the Company raised approximately $ 17 million by the issuance of New Israeli Shekel ("NIS") 56,126 Series C bonds to the public in Israel.
The Series C Bonds are to be redeemed in five annual, equal and consecutive payments on 31 August, 2012 to 2016 (inclusive). Interest is payable on the Series C Bonds, in semi-annual payments, at the annual rate of 8.5% linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). In the event of any downgrade of the Series rating, the interest rate will be increased by 0.5%.
In addition, the Company issued 425,000 Warrants (Series 2) convertible into NIS 42,500,00 Series C Bonds and 1,000,000 Warrants (Series 3) convertible into 100,000,00 Series D bonds, exercisable until March 2011.
During 2011, 419,331 warrants (Series 2) and 186,218 warrants (Series 3) were exercised into 41,933,100 Series C bonds and 18,621,800 Series D bonds, respectively, for a total consideration of approximately $ 19 million, which was raised by the Company in addition to the above amounts.
On March 31, 2011, the warrants that were not exercisable have expired.
e. During 2011, a Company's subsidiary placed and sold 63,950,481 Series D bonds to third parties, which were previously acquired by a Company's subsidiary during December 2010, for a total consideration of approximately $ 18 million. The effective interest rate is 5.4%.
f. During the reporting period, the Company's subsidiary sold 2,800,000 Series C bonds to third parties, which were acquired by the Company's subsidiary during May 2011, for a total consideration of approximately $ 1 million. The effective interest rate is 4.3%.
Quantity of | Effective | 31 December 2011 | ||||
the debentures in thousands | annual interest rate | U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Series A | 26,173 | 6.19% | 7,897 | |||
Series B | 136,583 | 5.15% | 35,308 | |||
Series C | 298,059 | 7.49% | 85,098 | |||
Series D | 146,701 | 6.22% | 39,538 | |||
167,841 |
Quantity of | Effective | 31 December 2010 | ||||
the debentures in thousands | annual interest rate | U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Series A | 32,717 | 6.82% | 9,779 | |||
Series B | 170,728 | 5.68% | 43,383 | |||
Series C | 200,000 | 8.84% | 58,137 | |||
Series D | 66,080 | 6.24% | 18,682 | |||
129,981 |
g. The expected maturities after the reporting date for the year ended December 31, 2011:
Less than one year | 1 to 2 years | 2 to 3 years | 3 to 4 years | 4 to 5 years | > 5 years | Total | ||||||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||||||||
Series A | 1,957 | 1,957 | 1,957 | 1,957 | - | - | 7,828 | |||||||
Series B | 8,771 | 8,771 | 8,771 | 8,771 | - | - | 35,084 | |||||||
Series C | 16,141 | 16,141 | 16,141 | 16,141 | 16,141 | - | 80,705 | |||||||
Series D | - | - | 9,886 | 9,886 | 9,886 | 9,886 | 39,544 | |||||||
*) 26,869 | 26,869 | 36,755 | 36,755 | 26,027 | 9,886 | 163,161 | ||||||||
Premium | 2,196 | |||||||||||||
Total | 165,357 |
*) Not including interest accrued, in the amount of $ 2,484 as of 31 December 2011.
h. Regarding acquisitions of debentures by related parties see Note 27 b.
NOTE 17:- OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Deposits from tenants (1) | 7,011 | 5,319 | ||
Less short-term deposits from tenants | (3,831) | (4,534) | ||
Provision regarding an agreement with government authorities (see Note 28g) | 5,379 | 4,172 | ||
Other (2) | 969 | 532 | ||
9,528 | 5,489 |
(1) The deposits do not bear interest and usually represent up to three months of rent to be repaid at the end of the rent period.
(2) On 31 December, 2007, a wholly owned subsidiary signed a memorandum of understandings with two private companies ("the Sellers") to purchase 51% of the shares held by the Sellers in the companies Inomotor LLC and Avtoprioritet ("the Century Companies"), both incorporated according to the Russian law.
The Company granted the Sellers the right to purchase from it 1% of the share capital of Century Companies, in return for an immaterial amount (such that upon the exercise of the option, the Company and the sellers will have an equal share in the project companies). The option can be exercised starting from the earlier of the date of filing the financial statements of the project companies for 2010 to the tax authorities or starting from August 1, 2011, all by December 31, 2011. Accordingly, the Company had recorded the option's fair value as part of its liabilities.
During December 2011, the Sellers announced their intention to exercise the option.
The Company recorded in its financial statements provisions in the amount of $ 969 thousand and $ 532 thousand as of 31 December 2011 and 2010, respectively, which reflect the option values at those dates.
NOTE 18:- FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
a. Classification of financial assets and liabilities:
The table below presents the classification of the financial assets and liabilities in the financial statements, according to IAS 39:
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Financial assets | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 32,333 | 10,974 | ||
Restricted deposits | 1,739 | - | ||
Loans and receivables | 18,448 | 21,309 | ||
Financial liabilities | ||||
Financial liabilities at amortised cost | (371,538) | (336,564) |
b. Financial risk factors:
The Group's activities in the Russian market expose it to various financial risks such as market risk (foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and CPI risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group's comprehensive risk management plan focuses on activities that reduce to a minimum any possible adverse effects on the Group's financial performance.
1. Exchange rate risk:
The Group has balances of financial instruments held in Ruble, New Israeli Shekels ("NIS") and Hungarian Forint ("HUF"). The Group is exposed to changes in the value of these foreign currencies due to changes in exchange rates against the U.S. dollar. The Group's policy is not to enter into any hedging transactions in order to hedge against exchange rate risks.
a) The following table represents the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in the U.S. dollar/Ruble exchange rates in the year 2011:
2011 | 2010 | |||
Effect on profit before tax | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Increase of 5% in U.S. dollar/Ruble | (131) | (3,821) | ||
Decrease of 5% in U.S. dollar/Ruble | 119 | 3,821 |
b) The following table represents the sensitivity to a reasonable possible change in U.S. dollars/NIS exchange rates in the year 2011:
2011 | 2010 | |||
Effect on profit before tax | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Increase 5% in U.S. dollar/NIS | 6,454 | 4,301 | ||
Decrease 5% in U.S. dollar/NIS | (7,133) | (4,301) |
2. Credit risk:
The Group performs ongoing evaluations of the prospects of collecting debts of customers and buyers and, if necessary, it records a provision in the books reflecting the losses anticipated by management. The financial statements do not include an allowance for doubtful accounts since management believes, from past experience, that the chances of collecting all the debts of customers and buyers are good. The maximum credit risk is the carrying amount of the financial assets at the end of the reporting period. The Group is also exposed to credit risk in respect of receivables, cash equivalents, deposits and other financial assets (including loans provided).
3. Interest rate risk:
In December 2007 and in August and November 2010, the Group issued debentures (see Note 16). These balances bear variable interest and therefore expose the Group to cash flow risk in respect of increase in interest rates.
49% of the Company's loans bear floating interest rates.
The following table represents the sensitivity to a reasonable possible change in interest in the year 2010:
2011 | 2010 | |||
Effect on profit before tax | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Increase 1% in interest | (1,752) | (1,568) | ||
Decrease 1% in interest | 1,752 | 1,568 |
4. Liquidity risk exposure:
b. The main liquidity risk of the Group arises from the issue of debentures. See also Note 16.
c. The table below summarises the maturity profile of the Group's financial liabilities as of 31 December 2011 and 2010, based on contractual undiscounted payments.
31 December 2011 | ||||||||||||
Less than one year | 1 to 2 Years | 2 to 3 Years | 3 to 4 years | > 5 years | Total | |||||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||||||
Loans from banks and others | 18,608 | 22,777 | 29,128 | 11,805 | 32,416 | 114,734 | ||||||
Loans from shareholders | 6,402 | - | - | - | - | 6,402 | ||||||
Debentures | 40,868 | 38,768 | 47,225 | 44,491 | 40,654 | 212,006 | ||||||
Credits from banks | 71,486 | - | - | - | - | 71,486 | ||||||
Accounts payable | 14,987 | - | - | - | - | 14,987 | ||||||
152,351 | 61,545 | 76,353 | 56,296 | 73,070 | 419,615 |
31 December 2010 | ||||||||||||
Less than one year | 1 to 2 Years | 2 to 3 Years | 3 to 4 years | > 5 years | Total | |||||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||||||
Loans from banks | 8,727 | 9,378 | 9,064 | 8,749 | 58,387 | 94,305 | ||||||
Loans from shareholders | 40,772 | 6,682 | - | - | - | 47,454 | ||||||
Debentures | 20,059 | 30,782 | 29,103 | 32,099 | 52,607 | 164,650 | ||||||
Credits from banks | 71,512 | - | - | - | - | 71,512 | ||||||
Accounts payable | 18,117 | - | - | - | - | 18,117 | ||||||
159,187 | 46,842 | 38,167 | 40,848 | 110,994 | 396,038 |
d. Israeli Consumer Price Index risk:
1. The Series A, C and D Bonds issued by the Company are linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). The total amount of financial instruments which are linked to CPI is $ 132,533 thousand and $ 86,598 thousand as of 31 December 2011 and 31 December 2010, respectively.
2. The table below represents sensitivity to a reasonable possible change in CPI in the year 2011:
2011 | 2010 | |||
Effect on profit before tax | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Increase 0.2% in CPI | (271) | (173) | ||
Decrease 0. 2% in CPI | 271 | 173 |
e. Fair value of financial instruments:
Set out below is a comparison by category of carrying amounts and fair values of all the financial instruments of the Group as of 31 December, 2011 and 31 December, 2010:
31 December 2011 | 31 December 2010 | |||||||
Carrying amount | Fair value | Carrying amount | Fair value | |||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||
Long and short-term loans (1) | 45,093 | 43,824 | 27,336 | 25,532 | ||||
Debentures (series A) (2) | 7,897 | 7,396 | 9,779 | 10,701 | ||||
Debentures (series B) (2) | 35,308 | 30,441 | 43,383 | 43,012 | ||||
Debentures (series C) (2) | 85,098 | 79,768 | 58,137 | 64,148 | ||||
Debentures (series D) (2) | 39,538 | 33,394 | 18,682 | 18,595 |
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade receivables, other accounts receivable, short-term loans granted, credit from banks and others, trade payables and other accounts payable approximate their fair value.
(1) The fair value is based on the calculation of the present value of cash flows at standard interest rates acceptable for similar loans with similar characteristics in accordance with the repayment dates of the payments of the loans.
(2) The fair value represents the market value of the debentures on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange.
f. The Group's capital management objectives are to maintain healthy capital ratios in order to support its business activity and maximise shareholder's value.
The Group acts to achieve a capital return at a level that is customary in the industry and markets in which the Group operates. This return is subject to changes depending on market conditions in the Group's industry and business environment.
The Group monitors its capital level using the ratio of net debt to adjusted capital. Net debt is calculated as the total debt less cash and cash equivalents. Adjusted capital includes the equity components: share capital, share premium, retained earnings, capital reserves and shareholders' loans and excludes currency translation adjustment reserves and treasury shares.
g. Linkage terms of financial assets by groups of financial instruments pursuant to IAS 39:
December 31, 2011:
U.S. dollar | RUB | Other linkage basis | Total | |||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 22,098 | 10,164 | 71 | 32,333 | ||||
Restricted deposits | 1,739 | - | - | 1,739 | ||||
Loans and receivables | 17,988 | 460 | - | 18,448 | ||||
41,825 | 10,624 | 71 | 52,520 |
December 31, 2010:
U.S. dollar | RUB | Other linkage basis | Total | |||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 8,562 | 1,861 | 551 | 10,974 | ||||
Loans and receivables | 20,404 | 905 | - | 21,309 | ||||
28,966 | 2,766 | 551 | 32,283 |
h. Linkage terms of financial liabilities by groups of financial instruments pursuant to IAS 39:
December 31, 2011:
U.S. dollar | RUB | Other linkage basis | Total | |||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||
Trade and other payables | 9,135 | 5,379 | - | 14,514 | ||||
Loans from banks and related parties and debentures | 222,320 | 2,171 | 132,533 | 357,024 | ||||
231,455 | 7,550 | 132,533 | 371,538 |
December 31, 2010:
U.S. dollar | RUB | Other linkage basis | Total | |||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||
Trade and other payables | 8,164 | 10,731 | 45 | 18,940 | ||||
Loans from banks and related parties and debentures | 231,026 | - | 86,598 | 317,624 | ||||
239,190 | 10,731 | 86,643 | 336,564 |
NOTE 19:- INCOME TAX
a. Tax rates applicable to the Company and its investees:
Cyprus - corporate tax rate - 10%.
Russia - corporate tax rate - 20%.
Israel - corporate tax rate 25%.
Hungary - corporate tax rate - 19% .
b. Tax expense (income):
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Current income tax | 1,215 | 875 | 1,819 | |||
Deferred taxes | (13,482) | *) 1,610 | *) 4,739 | |||
Tax expense in income statement | (12,267) | 2,485 | 6,558 |
*) Reclassified.
c. A reconciliation between the tax expense in the Income Statement and the product of profit before tax multiplied by the current tax rate can be explained as follows:
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Income (loss) before tax expense | 16,258 | 25,640 | (16,426) | |||
Tax at the statutory tax rate in Russia (20%) | 3,252 | 5,128 **) | (3,286) **) | |||
Increase (decrease) in respect of: | ||||||
Effect of different tax rate in Cyprus (10%) and Hungary (16%) | (1,448) | (528) | 8 | |||
Losses for which deferred tax assets were not recorded | 2,804 | 782 | 3,440 | |||
Previous years losses for which deferred tax assets were recorded during the year | (9,623) | - | - | |||
Inter-company expenses for which deferred tax liabilities were recorded | 3,312 | 3,473 | 3,832 | |||
Exempt income | (10,517) | (5,855) | 2,761 | |||
Others | (47) | (515) | (197) | |||
Income tax expense (tax benefit) | (12,267) | 2,485 | 6,558 |
**) As of 2011, the Company calculates its theoretical tax according to the tax rate in its main operating location- 20%.
d. Deferred taxes:
Consolidated statement of financial position | Consolidated income statement | |||||||||
31 December | 31 December | |||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||||
Inventory of buildings | (21,574) | (13,088) | (4,265) | *) (3,778) | *) (4,960) | |||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||||
Carry forward tax losses | 2,973 | 24,489 | 17,747 | *) 2,168 | *) 221 | |||||
Deferred tax (expenses) income | 13,482 | (1,610) | (4,739) | |||||||
Deferred tax, net | 2,915 | *) (10,115) |
*) Reclassified, see Note 2bb.
e. The fair value adjustments of the investment properties and investment properties under construction result in a temporary difference between the carrying value of the properties and their tax basis.
The Russian Parliament approved in February 2012 the new protocol of the Cyprus-Russian tax treaty, which updated the taxation of capital gain in order that a Cypriot holding company that will receive a capital gain on the sale of a Russian real estate company will be subject to a 20% tax rate in Russia, and not be exempt from tax as it has been. This order will be in force for four years from the date on which the protocol comes into effect.
The Group is evaluating the possible impact of the change, but is presently unable to assess the effects, if any, on its financial statements. However, the Group's management believes that the change will not have any material effect on the Company's results of operations, because the Company has deducted a full discount for the amount of the tax provision from the fair value of the properties.
f. The tax losses carried forward by the Group companies amount to approximately $ 110 million. Deferred tax asset amounting to $ 24 million has been recognised. Deferred tax assets in the total amount of $ 3.2 million, on tax losses carried forward in the amount approximately $ 16 million, were not recorded.
NOTE 20:- EQUITY
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars | ||||
Authorized shares of $ 0.01 par value each | 1,200,000 | 1,200,000 | ||
Issued and fully paid shares of $ 0.01 par value each | 1,035,580 | 1,035,580 |
Dividend policy
The Group adopted a dividend policy which reflects the long-term earnings and cash flow potential of the Group, taking into account the Group's capital requirements, while at the same time maintaining an appropriate level of dividend cover.
Capital reserve for transactions with controlling shareholders:
The capital reserve is comprised of the following:
(1) The fair value surplus from the provision of shareholders' loans at below market interest rate.
(2) The fair value surplus from the financial guarantees provided by the shareholders with respect to the bank loans.
NOTE 21:- EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Weighted average number of Ordinary shares used for computing basic earnings per share (in thousands) | 103,558 | 103,558 | 103,558 | |||
Weighted average number of Ordinary shares used for computing diluted earnings per share (in thousands) (see Note 20) | 105,953 | 105,523 | 103,558 | |||
Income (loss) used for computing basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands of U.S. dollars) | 28,525 | 23,155 | (22,984) |
NOTE 22:- SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
a. The Company adopted the share option plan on 19 November 2006, according to which a certain portion of the options was granted immediately, with options remaining for future grant.
Half of the Options to Officers will vest over three years from the grant date, in equal tranches from the anniversary of the grant date. Termination of employment renders the options that have not vested yet, to expire. The options to Officers are to be exercised within five years from the grant date, otherwise they expire.
The other half of the Options to Officers vest on the grant date. The exercise of the Options to Officers will be a cashless exercise according to a mechanism determined by the Company's Board (so that in practice, the number of shares allocated to the option holder will only be in respect of the benefit component upon the exercise, where the exercise price is not paid by the option holder).
b. On 16 October 2009, 1,122,995 share options have been granted to Mr. Morag, at an exercise price of 2.5 GBP per share and exercisable until 19 December 2012. The Group recognized $ 663 thousand as expenses with respect to this grant.
At the same time, Mr. Morag's existing share options, granted at the time of the Company's IPO, were cancelled. The new share options have been granted at an exercise price of 2.5 BGP per share until 19 December, 2012. According to the binomial model, the value of the share options is 948,722GBP.
On 16 October 2009, 449,198 share options have been granted to Mr. Rozental, the Company's CEO (and at the time the Company's CFO) at an exercise price of 2.5 GBP per share and exercisable until 19 December 2012. The Group recognized $ 266 thousand as expenses with respect to these share options granted.
On 16 October 2009, 374,331 share options were granted to service provider at an exercise price of 2.5 GBP per share and exercisable until 19 December, 2012. The Group recognized $ 221 thousand as expenses with respect to these share options granted.
c. On 2 December 2010, the Company granted to Mr. Rozental, who was appointed as CEO of the Company in December 2010, options for 673,797 Ordinary shares of the Company. The exercise price is 2.30 GBP per share and the options are exercisable until 1 December 2015, and vest in three equal annual installments, with the first installment vesting on the date of grant and the first and second installments vesting on the second and third anniversary of the date of grant, respectively.
The fair value of granted options is $ 1,615 thousands.
The Group recognized $ 762 thousand as expenses with respect to this grant during 2011.
d. The following table lists the binomial model assumption used for calculating the plans, adopted in 2006 and amended in 2009, fair value:
Over three years | ||
Expected volatility (%) | 82.59 | |
Risk-free interest rate (%) | 1.28 | |
Expected life of option (months) | 24 | |
Weighted average share price (GBP) | 1.8 | |
Exercise price | 2.5 |
e. The following table lists the binomial assumption model used for calculating the plan, adopted in 2010, fair value:
Vested over three years | ||
Expected volatility (%) | 82.31 | |
Risk-free interest rate (%) | 1.86 | |
Expected life of option (months) | 60 | |
Weighted average share price (GBP) | 2.25 | |
Exercise price | 2.3 |
The expected life of the options is based on historical data and Group's expectations and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome. The volatility was calculated according to comparative data of companies with similar activity.
f. Details on equity-settled share-based payment transaction:
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Fair value of the options | 1,615 | 1,615 | ||
Less - recognized as expense in the income statement | (1,367) | (605) | ||
Expense to be recognised in the future | 248 | 1,010 |
In the years 2011 and 2010, there was no exercise of any of the options granted to Employees or Officers.
NOTE 23:- COST OF MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Maintenance of property | 14,524 | 7,253 | 4,678 | |||
Land lease payments | 304 | 341 | 264 | |||
Fee to management company | 1,276 | 328 | 371 | |||
Property tax on investment property | 4,811 | 2,434 | 2,125 | |||
20,915 | 10,356 | 7,438 |
NOTE 24:- GENERAL, ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Salaries (1) | 7,737 | 6,847 | 7,339 | |||
Office maintenance | 1,190 | 1,263 | 1,317 | |||
Professional fees | 4,380 | 3,891 | 3,339 | |||
Traveling expenses | 767 | 553 | 453 | |||
Depreciation | 467 | 610 | 504 | |||
Other costs | 2,042 | 1,780 | 2,594 | |||
16,583 | 14,944 | 15,546 | ||||
(1) Includes cost of share-based payment (see Note 22) | 762 | 605 | 1,894 |
NOTE 25:- OTHER INCOME
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Compensation from insurance company in respect of fire damage (1) | 6,246 | - | - | |||
Change in provision regarding an agreement with government authorities and service providers | (2,397) | (186) | 2,802 | |||
Gain from sale of jointly controlled entity | - | 3,159 | - | |||
Loss from acquisition of jointly controlled entities | - | - | (698) | |||
3,849 | 2,973 | 2,104 |
(1) In September 2011, the Company has settled its outstanding insurance claim in respect of the fire damaged property owned by its subsidiary, MAG. (For additional information regarding the fire in MAG please refer to Note 7d in the Company's annual financial statements for 2010).
The total settlement received amounted to approximately $ 6.2 million. Based on an independent engineering report received by MAG, the total cost of the required remedial works will be approximately $ 7.8 million.
NOTE 26:- FINANCE COSTS AND INCOME
a. Finance income:
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Interest income from cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits | 22 | 86 | - | |||
Interest income from loans provided | 1,445 | 1,940 | 6,134 | |||
Fair value adjustment of financial derivative | - | - | 956 | |||
Effect of discounting of long-term receivables | 674 | 3,208 | - | |||
2,141 | 5,234 | 7,090 |
b. Finance costs:
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Interest costs - financial liabilities from banks | (8,999) | (9,168) | (7,433) | |||
Interest costs - loans from shareholders | (2,108) | (6,466) | (3,816) | |||
Interest costs - debentures | (15,998) | (5,703) | (3,294) | |||
Net capitalized interest costs | 9,990 | 16,989 | 10,454 | |||
Loss from disposal of financial derivative | - | (232) | - | |||
Effect of discounting of long-term receivables | - | (467) | - | |||
Bank charges and others | (916) | - | - | |||
(18,031) | (5,047) | (4,089) |
NOTE 27:- RELATED PARTIES
a. Transactions with related parties:
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Interest income from related parties | 1,445 | 1,940 | 1,321 | |||
Interest paid to shareholders | 5,785 | 6,466 | 3,815 | |||
Private jet expenses | 249 | 117 | 17 |
b. Balances with related parties:
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
Debentures held by shareholders | 40,824 | 20,466 | ||
Guarantees provided and benefits received regarding loans received from majority shareholders | 3,358 | 3,207 | ||
Loans from majority shareholders | 6,402 | 44,865 |
c. The transactions with related parties are in accordance with the market terms except for the loans and guarantees from shareholders, see Note 15.
d. Compensation of key management personnel of the Group and employees of the Company:
Year ended 31 December | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Salaries | 1,104 | 1,399 | 1,371 | |||
Share-based payments | 762 | 605 | 1,602 | |||
1,866 | 2,004 | 2,973 |
e. Global, which owns a commercial centre in Yaroslavl has entered into a lease agreement with Home Centres LLC ("Home Center"), a company controlled by the Fishman family, the controlling shareholders of the Company. The area leased to Home center covers 6,712 sq.m., the minimal lease fees are $ 120 per sq.m. and the lease period, assuming the exercise of all of the option periods contained therein, is 25 years. The terms of the agreements are in accordance with market conditions.
f. Hydro leases offices to Home Centre with an overall area of approximately 652 sq.m. used for office purposes. The monthly lease fee is approximately $ 30 thousand. The lease period terminates on 31 December 2012. The engagement is in accordance with market conditions.
NOTE 28:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
a. Group as lessee:
The Group entered into commercial lease agreements for certain land plots. These leases are irrevocable and have a term of 19-45 years with a renewal option.
Future minimum lease payments as of 31 December 2011 are as follows:
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||
First year | 304 | |
After one year but no more than five years | 1,215 | |
More than five years | 7,712 | |
Total | 9,231 |
b. On 1 July 2005, Hydro and FIN (subsidiaries of the Company), entered into a management service agreement for an indefinite period. FIN is a Russian company whose controlling shareholder also serves as the CEO of Hydro. Either party may terminate this agreement without cause at any time upon providing the other party with advance written notice of a minimum of three months.
In return for the management services provided by FIN pursuant to the above agreement, FIN will be entitled to receive: a) 10% of the net profits from the project, including those from sale of the project after completion; b) 2% of the lease fees actually received by Hydro from its tenants. It was further agreed that the direct expenses of FIN's hiring additional employees for providing the said management services will be paid by Hydro. According to the oral agreement with Fin, the Company will provide to Fin advances on account of the abovementioned future profit, in a total amount of $ 35 million, and which will bear interest at the rate of 11%. As of the reporting date, the agreement has not been signed.
c. In December 2006, RealService (subsidiary of the Company) entered into an oral agreement with FIN for the provision of certain services that include sourcing of the investment and project management services. According to the agreement and in consideration for these services FIN will be entitled to receive 10% of the net profits from the project, including those from sale of the project after completion and to 2% of the lease fees actually received by RealService from its tenants. As of the reporting date, the agreement has not been signed.
d. In February 2006, MAG and FIN entered into a management service agreement. The terms of the agreement are identical to Hydro's engagement with FIN, see b above.
e. Expected rental income:
The lease agreements of the Company's investees are for periods of up to 10 years.
The minimum rental income is as follows:
31 December | ||||
2011 | 2010 | |||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||
First year | 46,485 | 31,497 | ||
Second year until five years | 137,457 | 108,031 | ||
More than five years | 84,907 | 27,239 | ||
268,849 | 166,767 |
f. A subsidiary of the Company, which owns a plot of land in Yaroslavl, has entered into an agreement with the municipality of Yaroslavl whereby the municipality of Yaroslavl will be entitled to 8% of the built area on said land. The Group has recorded a provision regarding this agreement. See also Note 17.
g. The Company provided a guarantee for its subsidiary, in order to secure the loan from the bank, in the amount of $ 36.4 million. See also Note 13b.
h. The Company's subsidiary Petra 8 LLC ("Peta") entered into an agreement with Gabel Development LLC ("Gabel") according to which Gable provides services which include preparation for tenders, assistance in projects planning, assistance in selection of providers, technical supervision, budget control and etc.
As of the balance sheet date Petra pays Gabel monthly management fees in an amount of approximately $ 100 thousand.
i. In October 2008, a jointly controlled entity ("Avtoprioritet") entered into a lease agreement with Reiffeisen Bank ("the lessee") according to which the lessee undertook to lease approximately 5,600 sq. m. for a period of 10 years, in a project whose lease rights are held by Avtoprioritet. In December 2008, the lessee announced that it had no intention of fulfilling the lease agreement. Within the framework of mutual legal claims filed in connection with the validity of the lease agreement, the court made a final ruling, in a number of instances, according to which the lease agreement is binding to both parties and the leased space was indeed transferred to the lessee according to the agreement and the law. In view of the court's ruling, Avtoprioritet filed a claim for enforcing the payment of lease fees for 2009 and for the first quarter of 2010, which were fully settled by the lessee during 2010 as a result of the court's ruling in 2010. Avtoprioritet's claim for enforcing the payment of lease fees for the last nine months of 2010 was approved by the court in the first half of 2011 in the amount of approximately $ 3,831 thousand including VAT. As of the date of the financial statements, Avtoprioritet has received the amount aforementioned and filed a claim for enforcing the payment of lease fees for the first nine months of 2011. The court claim for nine months was won in first instance. In view of the above, the Group recognized in its financial statements rental income for the last nine months of 2010 totaling approximately $ 1,656 thousand (the Group's share) which was collected during October 2011 based on the results of the court proceedings. The Group also recognized rental income for the first nine months of 2011 totaling approximately $ 1,820 thousand (the Group's share). The Group recognized rent revenues and accounts receivable due for last three months of 2011 (about $ 710 thousand). No bad debt allowance was recorded taking into consideration the lessee rental deposit held by the Company.
NOTE 29:- SEGMENT INFORMATION
The operations segments are identified on the basis of information that is reviewed by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM") to make decisions about resources to be allocated and assess its performance. Accordingly, for the management purposes, the Group is organized according to operating segments based on products and services.
The commercial segment leases real estate for commercial purposes, the residential segment develops real estate assets for sale for residential purposes.
The following tables present revenue and profit and certain assets and liability information regarding the Group's operating segments.
Year ended 31 December 2011 | ||||||
Commercial | Residential | Total | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Segment revenues | 43,601 | 3,932 | 47,533 | |||
Segment results | 50,840 | (4,661) | 46,179 | |||
Unallocated expenses | (7,682) | |||||
Finance cost, net | (22,239) | |||||
Profit before taxes on income | 16,258 |
Year ended 31 December 2010 | ||||||
Commercial | Residential | Total | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Segment revenues | 20,506 | 1,078 | 21,584 | |||
Segment results | 37,018 | (1,435) | 35,583 | |||
Unallocated expenses | (9,105) | |||||
Finance cost, net | (838) | |||||
Profit before taxes on income | 25,640 |
Year ended 31 December 2009 | ||||||
Commercial | Residential | Total | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Segment revenues | 17,213 | - | 17,213 | |||
Segment results | (5,934) | (1,521) | (7,455) | |||
Unallocated expenses | (11,993) | |||||
Finance Income, net | 3,022 | |||||
Loss before taxes on income | (16,426) |
Year ended 31 December 2011 | ||||||
Commercial | Residential | Total | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Assets: | ||||||
Segments assets | 479,316 | 232,058 | 711,374 | |||
Unallocated assets | 28,231 | |||||
Total assets | 739,605 | |||||
Liabilities: | ||||||
Segments liabilities | 114,379 | 36,853 | 151,232 | |||
Unallocated liabilities | 241,235 | |||||
Total liabilities | 392,467 |
Year ended 31 December 2010 | ||||||
Commercial | Residential | Total | ||||
U.S. dollars in thousands | ||||||
Assets: | ||||||
Segments assets | 466,898 | 221,956 | 688,854 | |||
Unallocated assets | 15,634 | |||||
Total assets | 704,488 | |||||
Liabilities: | ||||||
Segments liabilities | 92,726 | 12,000 | 104,726 | |||
Unallocated liabilities | 258,739 | |||||
Total liabilities | 363,465 |
NOTE 30:- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
After the balance sheet date the Company's board of directors approved by a way of reallocation the prolongation of the expiration date of 1,122,994 options, previously granted by the Company, to 19 March 2014, and updated the exercise price of those options from 4.8 GBP per share to exercise price of 3.5 GBP per share.
NOTE 31:- DATE OF APPROVAL OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements for issue on 14 March 2012.
Related Shares:
MLD.L