30th Apr 2012 18:36
30th April 2012
Flying Brands Limited (the "Company" or the "Group")
Annual Results Announcement - Replacement
For The Year Ended 30th December 2011
Please find enclosed financial information from the the Annual Report and Accounts.
We announced on 27th April 2012 that we had obtained shareholder approval for the disposal of our Gifts Division and the disposal of our Garden Bird Supplies, Garden Centre Online and Listen2 businesses. We expect to complete these disposals shortly and will announce their completion in due course. After completion of these disposals, the remaining business of the Group will comprise the freehold property at Retreat Farm, the Growing and Live Dispatch business ("GLD") based at Retreat Farm and the Gardening Direct retail business. Currently, the Board is in discussions with a number of prospective purchasers of the Gardening Direct retail business. It is not our current intention to sell either Retreat Farm or the GLD business. We will update shareholders on the progress of discussions for the sale of Gardening Direct at the latest by the date of release of our Interim Announcement and it is our intention at that time to update shareholders on the future of the Group as a whole.
Today we are releasing our annual results for the year ended 30thDecember 2011. A copy of the full text of our Annual Report and financial statements, including the Chairman's Statement and Business Review is attached to this announcement.
In our Annual Report we announce that we have embarked on a restructuring programme to cut central overheads to a level more appropriate to our reduced operational size and that we expect to have reduced costs significantly by the end of the first half of 2012. As a first step we have entered into a contract with Promotional Logistics Limited (trading as Prolog) for the outsourcing of our remaining call centre activities with effect from early June 2012. The proposed closure of our call centre will also enable us to close our Chelmsford Head Office and we have exercised the break clause in our lease and will be vacating these premises in late June 2012.
Finally, we have agreed an overdraft facility of £0.25m with Barclays Bank which will provide the Group with additional short-term working capital should this be required to enable us to continue to operate Gardening Direct in the usual course.
For further information, please contact:
Flying Brands Limited | 01245 228 300 |
Stephen Cook, Chief Executive | |
Stuart Dootson, Finance Director | |
Singer Capital Markets Limited | 020 3205 7500 |
Claes Spang | |
Nick Donovan | |
Smithfield Consultants | 020 7360 4900 |
John Kiely |
Chairman's statement
In our half yearly report we announced that the first half of 2011 had been a very difficult one for Flying Brands as a result of poor trading performance across all our brands and the consequent need to renegotiate our banking arrangements. These difficulties continued into the second half of the year and it became apparent that the downturn in trading meant that the Company could no longer service its then level of borrowings and that this meant in turn that it could not finance its ambitions for the gifts and gardening businesses. In addition, we recognised that the working capital position of the Company had become uncomfortably stretched and that we needed to cut significantly the cash outflows from the business. Our working capital difficulties were further exacerbated as a number of significant trade creditors reduced substantially the amount of credit they were prepared to allow the Company.
We therefore embarked on a strategy to cut our bank borrowing, reduce our level of trade creditors and exit those businesses that we felt we could no longer adequately support. This resulted in a number of actions.
First, we renegotiated the terms of our investment in Dealtastic so that we had no future funding commitments.
Second, we sold our glasshouse premises at Meadow Springs for £1.225m and part of our premises at Retreat Farm for £2.1m. The proceeds of these sales were used mainly to repay bank borrowing of £2.85m and £0.25m of the £1.25m still owed to the vendors of Flowers Direct.
Third, we reviewed our plans for the Gifts division and concluded that the Company no longer had the financial resources to implement its strategy of investing in new areas of corporate and third party business to compensate for declining sales in its traditional "boxed flowers" business. Accordingly we agreed to sell our Gifts division to Interflora® British Unit for a gross consideration of £2.4m.
Fourth, we agreed to sell our Garden Bird Supplies, Garden Centre Online and Listen2 businesses for a gross consideration of £0.8m. Garden Bird Supplies has suffered from a significant increase in competition in its sector coupled with steep rises in the price of the commodities making up its products and will in future require a considerable investment in marketing to restore it to its previous levels of profits. We took the view that this business should therefore be sold along with Garden Centre Online and Listen2.
After completion of these disposals, the business of the Company will comprise the freehold property at Retreat Farm, the Growing and Live Dispatch business ("GLD") based at Retreat Farm and the Gardening Direct retail business. The Board is currently in discussions with a number of prospective purchasers of the retail business. It is not our current intention to sell either Retreat Farm or GLD.
We have also embarked on a restructuring programme to reduce central overheads to a level more appropriate to our slimmed down business and we expect to have reduced overheads very significantly by the end of the first half of 2012.
We expect to be in a position to update shareholders on the progress of the discussions for the sale of Gardening Direct before the end of June 2012 and it is our intention at that time to update shareholders on the future of the Company as a whole.
Tim TrotterChairman27th April 2012
Business review
To the members of Flying Brands Limited
Cautionary statement This business review has been prepared solely to provide additional information to shareholders to assess the Company's strategies and the potential for those strategies to succeed. The business review contains certain forward looking statements. These statements are made by the Directors in good faith based on the information available to them up to the time of their approval of this report and such statements should be treated with caution due to the inherent uncertainties, including both economic and business risk factors, underlying any such forward looking information. |
This business review has been prepared for the Group as a whole and therefore gives greater emphasis to those matters which are significant to Flying Brands Limited and its subsidiary undertakings when viewed as a whole.
The Group's restructuring
During the course of this financial year the Directors have reviewed the Group's operations. They established that after heavy trading losses were incurred in its Gifts division, the Group was not in a position to make the investment necessary to bring this division back into profitability. In light of this, the decision was made to sell this division. As outlined in note 33 to financial statements, this was concluded on 21st February 2012 with a disposal to Interflora®.
Following the Interflora® transaction, the Directors determined that the retail business of the Group was of insufficient size to make it financially viable. In view of this the Directors concluded that the most appropriate way to enhance shareholder value was to embark upon a disposal strategy for all the Group's retail brands.
As outlined in note 33, the Group agreed to sell GBS, GCO and L2 to a subsidiary of the MBL Group PLC on 30th March 2012. This disposal leaves only the GD brand remaining. The Directors are negotiating with a number of interested parties and believe that a disposal of GD can be achieved by 28th December 2012.
The Group's future business model
Following the completion of all of the disposals outlined in the section above, the Group will retain the GLD business based at the freehold Retreat Farm site in Jersey, and will focus on supplying live product to retailers engaged in the sale of bedding out plant and shrubs. The financial impact of the disposal on the performance in 2011 is detailed in note 32.
Review of the Group's progress
During the year, the Group saw a material downturn in the level of its sales activity across all brands. This coupled with the failed investment in Dealtastic lead to its divestment of surplus land assets to repay its bank borrowings. The lack of available cash to invest in marketing of the Group's brands compounded the problem in sales leading to the Group incurring substantial operating losses. At this point, the Directors concluded that the Group must embark on a disposal strategy to realise shareholder value from its brands and reduce the operating model to a point where it could eventually breakeven. To this end the Directors have negotiated two disposals - that of the Gifts division and that of GBS/GCO/L2 and are negotiating a third disposal - that of GD. Following the completion of this final disposal the Group will be left with the GLD business and the freehold property at Retreat Farm, from which it trades.
Objectives:
·; The Directors aim to stabilise the remaining business.
·; The Group aims to return to profitability and positive cash flow.
·; The Directors aim to seek alternative opportunities in which to invest the Group's capital.
The primary elements of the Board's strategy to achieving the objectives are as follows:
·; Complete the agreed disposals as speedily and cost effectively as possible;
·; review the activities of the GLD operation to optimise production/ trading performance;
·; locate alternative investments sympathetic to the historical focus of the Group.
Results for the 2011 financial year
A summary of the key financial results is set out in the table below and discussed in the summary across the page. For explanation of abbreviations see definitions on the inside front cover.
Reportable segment (loss)/profit is (loss)/profit before interest, tax and impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and other one-off charges. This is reconciled to the consolidated income statement in note 4.1 (a).
Revenue | Gross profit | Reportable segment (loss)/profit | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||||
Garden:
| ||||||||||
Continuing: | ||||||||||
GLD | 5,052 | 6,043 | 1,041 | 1,612 | ||||||
Discontinued: | ||||||||||
GD | 4,244 | 5,335 | 713 | 1,069 | ||||||
GBS | 2,805 | 3,871 | 612 | 1,156 | ||||||
GCO | 1,510 | 419 | 44 | 57 | ||||||
Total Garden division | 13,611 | 15,668 | 2,410 | 3,894 | (723) | 1,342 | ||||
Gifts:
| ||||||||||
Discontinued: | ||||||||||
FF | 6,038 | 7,747 | 1,109 | 1,062 | ||||||
FD | 3,467 | 2,179 | 663 | 401 | ||||||
DA and concessions | 527 | 234 | 184 | 140 | ||||||
Total Gifts division | 10,032 | 10,160 | 1,956 | 1,603 | (1,438) | (808) | ||||
Entertainment:
| ||||||||||
Discontinued: | ||||||||||
L2 | 1,333 | 1,731 | 270 | 428 | (35) | 100 | ||||
Other:
| ||||||||||
Discontinued: | ||||||||||
Greetings Direct | 190 | 478 | 150 | 351 | 147 | 371 | ||||
Dealtastic | 859 | - | (262) | - | (745) | - | ||||
Benham | - | 1,665 | - | 551 | - | 84 | ||||
Group total | 26,025 | 29,702 | 4,524 | 6,827 | (2,794) | 1,089 | ||||
Summary by division
Gardening | ||
GD - | Suffered from a loss in turnover during 2011 due to a shrinking database of customers and a shortage of available cash to invest in marketing. | |
GLD - | The reduction in GD turnover had a consequent negative impact on the revenue of the GLD business thus reducing its production efficiency and gross profit. | |
GBS - | Similar to GD, the underlying customer base has declined owing to the lack of available cash to invest in marketing. Added to this, the year of 2011 did not experience any especially cold periods. These periods of cold weather have historically had a positive impact on sales. Typically cold weather reduces the ability of birds to locate food in their natural environment and increases their dependency on food provided by humans. In turn, this increases demand for GBS product. | |
GCO - | This brand saw an increase in sales activity (though the 2010 comparative only covered 4 months) but this was at the expense of overall gross profit.
| |
Gifts - | ||
DAFFFD
|
}-
| The performance of this division at a gross profit level has improved when compared to 2010 although the 2010 performance was subdued due to the delivery problems caused by the snow pre-Christmas 2010. However, the increase in the operating cost base resulted in an overall deterioration in contribution to the Group. |
Entertainment L2 - |
The falloff in turnover and commensurate reduction in gross profit is attributable primarily to the reduction in the customer database. | |
OtherGreetings -Direct | During the year the Group realised the remainder of its inventory relating to this business. The decision to discontinue the operations was taken during 2009. | |
Dealtastic - | This revenue relates to sales made by Dealtastic during the period prior to its ultimate disposal and whilst it was a subsidiary of the Group. The gross loss from trading was a contributory factor to the decision of the Board to dispose of the trade and assets of this investment during 2011. | |
Interest
The net interest cost for the Group for the year was £0.1m (2010: £0.1m).
Loss before tax
Group loss before tax (excluding losses arising from discontinued activities) for the year was £3.2m (2010: £3.7m), this loss includes a profit on disposal of property (net of costs) of £0.7m.
Taxation
Taxation was £0.1m for the year, £0.1m higher than the year before. This higher charge reflects adjustments to previous years' tax estimates.
Earnings per share
Basic and diluted loss per share for the year was 32.6p (2010: 1.4p).
Dividend and dividend policy
The Directors will not be proposing a final dividend with respect to the financial year ended 30th December 2011 (2010: £0.2m). During the course of this financial year no interim dividend was paid (2010: £0.4m) but a final dividend with respect to the financial year ended 31st December 2010 was paid of £0.2m (2010: £nil).
Financial position
The Group's balance sheet as at 30th December 2011 can be summarised as set out in the table below:
Assets
£'m | Liabilities £'m | Net assets £'m | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Property, plant and equipment | 3,551 | - | 3,551 |
Goodwill and intangible assets | - | - | - |
Other non-current assets and liabilities | - | - | - |
Current assets and liabilities (including held for sale) | 4,449 | (5,247) | (798) |
Deferred tax | 155 | - | 155 |
Total before net debt | 8,155 | (5,247) | 2,908 |
Net debt | - | - | - |
Total as at 30th December 2011 | 8,155 | (5,247) | 2,908 |
Total as at 31st December 2010 | 19,085 | (9,172) | 9,913 |
Financial position…(continued)
The main movements in net assets during the year were as follows:
(i) Losses incurred in the Gifts division and the other divisions (reduction in net assets of £2.8m);
(ii) the disposal of the freehold properties in Jersey (reduction in property, plant and equipment of £2.4m);
(iii) the impairments against goodwill and intangible assets (reduction in net assets of £5.5m);
(iv) repayment of bank debt (reduction in liabilities of £2.9m); and
(v) revaluation of Retreat Farm (increase in net assets of £1.5m).
Capital structure
The Group has no net bank debt (2010: £0.6m). During the year, the Group's facilities with the Bank were repaid in full. At the present time, the Group retains clearing facilities with its bank along with an overdraft facility of £0.25m.
Research and development and capital expenditure
During the year, the Group invested £0.2m in capital expenditure (2010: £0.4m). All items of capital expenditure were incidental to the operations of the Group and none of the expenditure was of a strategic nature. The Group made no investment in research and development during the year (2010: £nil).
Cash flow
Net cash outflow for 2011 was £1.7m (2010: £2.0m). This outflow reflects the heavy trading losses incurred in the Gifts division, the disappointing returns from Dealtastic (see notes 30 and 31 for further information on this investment) along with the repayment of bank borrowings. An agreement was signed on 27th April 2012 with the bank for an overdraft facility of £0.25m.
Interest paid resulted in a net outflow of £0.1m which was unchanged from 2010. Net proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment were £3.3m (2010: £0.8m).
Principal risks and uncertainties
The principal risks are those risks that the Board believes the Group faces at the date of this report. They include certain risks relating to the GD business that is the subject of on-going sales discussions.
Risks to the continuing Group post disposal of GD - Operational
| ||
Issue | Risk | Mitigation |
Dependence upon suppliers
| The Group purchases products from third parties, generally on a non-exclusive basis. The Group is reliant on a small number of these third party suppliers that provide materials and services which are key to the Group's activities. Although none of these suppliers provide a unique product or service, the termination of any of these supplies, or the failure of the suppliers to supply or deliver their products or services, could delay or restrict the Group's ability to ship its products while the Group seeks to identify and implement suitable alternatives offered by other sources. This may require significant unplanned investments on the part of the Group. In addition, suitable alternatives are limited in number and therefore similar products and services may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or may be unobtainable.
| The GLD business sources its raw materials from a comparatively small number of suppliers. However, it retains strong relationships with these suppliers and monitors their financial strength on a regular basis to ensure any change in their status is identified as early as possible. The business retains relationships with other suppliers although it may not have placed business with those suppliers. This ensures alternatives exist for supply and best terms possible are obtained.
|
System failures and breaches of security
| The successful operation of the Group's business depends upon maintaining the integrity of its computer; communication and information technology systems in order to promote its services take orders and fulfil dispatches. However, these systems and operations are vulnerable to damage, breakdown or interruption from events which are beyond the Group's control, such as fire, flood and other natural disasters; power loss or telecommunications or data network failures; improper or negligent operation of the Group's system by employees, or unauthorised physical or electronic access; and interruptions to internet system integrity generally as a result of attacks by computer hackers or viruses or other types of security breaches. Any such damage or interruption could cause significant disruption to the operations of the Group. This could be harmful to the Group's business, financial condition and reputation and could deter current or potential customers from using its services. There can be no guarantee that the Group's security measures in relation to its computer, communication and information systems will protect it from all potential breaches of security, and any such breach of security could have an adverse effect on the Group's business, results of operations and/or financial condition.
| The Group maintains adequate IT security and disaster recovery procedures commensurate with its size and complexity. These are maintained and tested at regular intervals.
|
Seasonality
| The Group's business is seasonal in nature, being largely determined by the seasons in the gardening market. This may result in peaks and troughs in the Group's trading and cash performance throughout the year.
| The Group has a very flexible cost base that can increase during seasonal peaks in activity and reduce when sales and activity are low. |
Adverse weather conditions
| The Group is dependent on its facility at Retreat Farm in Jersey to grow the majority of its garden stock. If the facility were destroyed or severely damaged as a result of adverse weather then replacement products could not be easily or inexpensively sourced. Adverse weather conditions may also detrimentally affect the Group's trading performance by impeding its ability to successfully deliver products to customers.
During times of drought, customers for the Group's products may decide not to purchase due to the increased water demand the nurturing of young plants requires. This could result in depressed sales levels or unsold stock.
| The Group maintains insurance to cover damage to production facilities or crop loss. However, the nature of production on an island creates an inherent risk that logistic connections to the UK mainland may be lost temporarily. As and when this occurs, the management changes its product despatch profile so that despatch occurs once connections have been restored.
The Group monitors demand carefully and assesses whether it is in line with that forecast and the proposed "grow plan". In the event that demand is below levels anticipated, operating costs are reduced along with the quantity of plants to be grown. |
Crop failure
| The Group grows the majority of its plants at its property at Retreat Farm. An outbreak of plant disease at the Retreat Farm property, or a failure in the watering or heating systems, could damage or destroy the Group's crop. Any such damage or destruction would have a negative effect on the Group's business, results of operations and financial condition.
| The Group maintains insurance cover to mitigate crop loss or disease in crops. |
Concentration risk | Immediately following the disposal of the GD business, this will become the principal customer of GLD. This creates a concentration risk.
| The Board has set in motion a plan for the GLD business to become a non-exclusive supplier to many customers engaged in activities similar to those of GD.
|
Liquidity and investments
The Group's net debt position has changed over the year with asset disposals being used to clear secured debt, redeem a small proportion of the loan notes arising from the acquisition of FD and fund operating working capital requirements. These requirements arose primarily due to the Group incurring trading losses that caused several loan covenants to be breached all of which were subsequently waived by the Bank.
Post balance sheet events
After the year end the following events occurred:
(i) The Group entered into a contract to sell its Gifts division to Interflora®. The details of this transaction were contained in a circular sent to the shareholders on 11th April 2012. The disposal generated gross proceeds of £2.4m.
(ii) The Group entered into a contract to sell GBS, GCO and L2 on 30th March 2012. The details of this transaction were contained in a circular sent to the shareholders on 11th April 2012. The transaction generated gross disposal proceeds of £0.8m.
(iii) The Group entered into a revised loan agreement with Palatine on 5th April 2012 to defer payment of the £1.0m owing to it (see note 17) until 31st December 2012, at the latest. Details of this transaction were contained in an announcement to shareholders on 5th April 2012.
(iv) The Group entered into an overdraft facility with the Bank for a total sum of £0.25m. This facility, like all overdraft facilities, is repayable on demand by the Bank.
Principal risks and uncertainties…(continued)
The Group is subject to the following material uncertainties:
(i) Currently the Group has modest banking facilities upon which it can call. In the event of a significant issue arising for which the Group is required to access substantial liquid funds in excess of its overdraft facility, it may not be possible to obtain additional funds as and when required.
(ii) As previously communicated in a circular sent to shareholders on 11th April 2012, the Board stated that without further asset disposals or access to additional banking facilities, the Group may not be able to operate beyond October 2012. To be able to continue operating beyond that date, the Group must either complete the disposal of the GD business or locate alternate sources of finance.
(iii) The Group entered into an agreement with Palatine to defer repayment of its £1m loan until the earlier of the disposal of GD or 31st December 2012. In the event that a disposal of GD is not achieved, it may not be possible for the Group to repay this loan.
(iv) The Board is negotiating with various interested parties who may purchase the business and assets of GD. In the absence of alterative finance, a successful completion of this disposal is required to continue trading and repay the loan to Palatine. In the event this does not happen, then the Board will be forced to seek alternative sources of finance.
Key performance indicators
The Board monitors the performance of the Group and implementation of strategy by reviewing monthly management accounts, managers' reports and KPIs. Throughout the year in question the Board monitored the following KPIs:
Number of active customers | 2011 | 2010 |
Count | Count | |
Continuing activities: | ||
GLD | 2 | 2 |
Discontinued activities: | ||
Garden (excluding GLD) | 248,000 | 343,000 |
Gifts | 244,000 | 286,000 |
Entertainment | 1 | 25,000 |
Revenue - online and post & telephone | 2011 | 2010 |
£'m | £'m | |
Continuing activities | ||
GLD | ||
-online | 1.4 | 1.6 |
-post/telephone | 3.7 | 4.4 |
Discontinued activities: | ||
Garden (excluding GLD) | ||
-online | 3.6 | 3.0 |
-post/telephone | 5.0 | 6.7 |
Gifts | ||
-online | 6.1 | 4.9 |
-post/telephone | 3.9 | 5.3 |
Entertainment | ||
-online | 0.1 | 0.2 |
-post/telephone | 1.2 | 1.5 |
Future development
The external economic climate has forced a number of changes on the Group during the year. It has seen a downturn in activity levels in all its brands but particularly in its Gifts division. The Group's borrowings were at such a level that a divestment policy had to be adopted by the Board to fund on-going trading losses and repay loans. This has created a scenario where the remainder of the retail brands within the Group are of insufficient scale to make their continued operation viable.
In view of this, the Board has adopted a divestment plan that ultimately will see the Group consist of a growing and live-despatch business based in Jersey. At the point at which the disposal of GD completes, the Directors will reassess the strategic direction of the Group and communicate this to shareholders in the appropriate manner.
Significant relationships
The Group has a share option scheme in place to reward and to incentivise the most senior employees. During the year no share options have been exercised and it is doubtful that any of these options will be exercised in the foreseeable future.
Going concern basis
The Group's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in this review. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows and liquidity position are described in this business review. In addition, notes 2 and 27 to the financial statements include the Group's objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital; its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments; and its exposure to credit risk and liquidity risk.
As highlighted in note 27 to the financial statements, the Group meets its day to day working capital requirements though its on-going cash flows along with an overdraft facility. The current economic conditions have resulted in declining revenue and profits, and the Directors have subsequently sought to realise value through a series of disposals.
The Directors have prepared detailed working capital projections for the Group to support the decision to prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis. The working capital projections include assumptions such as sales demand, the disposal of further assets and the identification and securing of alternative sources of finance where required. However, by their nature, the assumptions are not confirmed and the Group may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As such there is a material uncertainty in relation to going concern, particularly as to the following:
i) Over the level of demand for the Group's products;
ii) The ability of the Group to complete the disposal of the GD business for an adequate consideration before October 2012; and
iii) The ability of the Directors to secure alternative sources of finance in the event that a disposal of GD and the repayment of the Palatine loan cannot be achieved.
Notwithstanding the above, the Board remains confident that a sale of the GD business can be completed in the time available.
The Group's forecasts and projections, taking account of the uncertainties described above and reasonably possible changes in trading performance, show that the Group has a reasonable expectation of maintaining sufficient working capital to enable the Group to meet its liabilities as they fall due for the foreseeable future, being a period of not less than 12 months from the date of approval of this report.
Thus the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the annual financial statements.
Consolidated income statement
52 weeks ended 30th December 2011
52 weeks | 52 weeks | ||
ended | ended | ||
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
Revenue | 1.17 | 5,052 | 6,043 |
Cost of sales | (4,011) | (4,431) | |
Gross profit | 1,041 | 1,612 | |
Profit on sale of properties | 673 | - | |
Operating expenses | 5 | (4,817) | (4,999) |
Operating loss | 7 | (3,103) | (3,387) |
Net finance expense | 6 | (143) | (130) |
Loss from associate | 14 | - | (149) |
Loss before tax | (3,246) | (3,666) | |
Taxation | 9 | (139) | (52) |
Loss from continuing operations | (3,385) | (3,718) | |
(Loss)/profit from discontinued operations | 32 | (5,679) | 3,324 |
Loss for the period | (9,064) | (394) | |
Loss attributable to non - controlling interest | (39) | - | |
Loss attributable to the Group | (9,025) | (394) |
Loss per share expressed in pence per share | |||
From continuing operations: | |||
Basic | 11 | (12.23) | (13.50) |
Diluted | 11 | (12.23) | (13.24) |
From continuing and discontinued operations: | |||
Basic | 11 | (32.61) | (1.43) |
Diluted | 11 | (32.61) | (1.40) |
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
52 weeks ended 30th December 2011
52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| ||||||
| ended | ended | ||||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||||||
| ` | |||||||
£'000 | £'000 |
| ||||||
Loss for the period | (9,064) | (394) |
| |||||
Other comprehensive income: |
| |||||||
| Revaluation of Jersey property | 2,344 | - | |||||
| Foreign currency translation differences on foreign operations | - | 44 | |||||
Total comprehensive loss for the period | (6,720) | (350) |
| |||||
Total comprehensive loss attributed to non-controlling interest | (39) | - |
| |||||
| Total comprehensive loss attributable to the Group | (6,681) | (350) | |||||
Consolidated balance sheet
As at 30th December 2011
Notes | Assets held for resale30.12.11 £'000 | Group
30.12.11
£'000 | Total 30.12.11 £'000 | Group
31.12.10
£'000 | |
Assets | |||||
Non - current assets | |||||
Goodwill | 12 | - | - | - | 5,410 |
Intangible assets | 12 | - | - | - | 3,307 |
Property, plant and equipment | 13 | - | 3,551 | 3,551 | 4,467 |
Investment in associate | 14 | - | - | - | 1 |
Deferred tax | 20 | - | 155 | 155 | 261 |
Total non - current assets | - | 3,706 | 3,706 | 13,446 | |
Current assets | |||||
Goodwill | 12 | 1,242 | - | 1,242 | - |
Intangible assets | 12 | 1,339 | - | 1,339 | - |
Property, plant and equipment | 13 | 193 | - | 193 | - |
Inventory | 15 | 366 | 250 | 616 | 704 |
Current income tax receivable | - | - | - | 233 | |
Trade and other receivables | 16 | - | 489 | 489 | 1,561 |
Receivable from associate | - | - | - | 850 | |
Cash | - | 570 | 570 | 2,291 | |
Total current assets | 3,140 | 1,309 | 4,449 | 5,639 | |
Current liabilities | |||||
Bank loan and overdrafts | 18 | - | - | - | (2,850) |
Current income tax payable | - | (30) | (30) | - | |
Trade and other payables | 17 | - | (4,775) | (4,775) | (5,739) |
Deferred revenue | 26 | - | (442) | (442) | (583) |
Total current liabilities | - | (5,247) | (5,247) | (9,172) | |
Net current (liabilities)/assets | 3,140 | (3,938) | (798) | (3,533) | |
Net assets/(liabilities) | 3,140 | (232) | 2,908 | 9,913 | |
Share capital | 21 | 282 | 282 | ||
Share premium | 18,059 | 18,059 | |||
Capital reserve | 22 | (17) | (17) | ||
Capital redemption reserve | 22 | 22 | |||
Treasury shares | 22 | (840) | (840) | ||
Non - controlling interest | (39) | - | |||
Revaluation reserve | 22 | 1,484 | - | ||
Retained earnings | (16,043) | (7,593) | |||
Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent | 2,908 | 9,913 |
The financial statements on pages 32 to 63 were approved by the Board of Directors on 27th April 2012 and signed on its
behalf by:
S S Cook S J Dootson
Director Director
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
52 weeks ended 30th December 2011
Share | Share | Revaluation | Capital | Capital | Foreign | Treasury | Retained | Non- | Total |
| ||||||||||||||
capital | premium | reserve | reserve | redemption | exchange | shares | earnings | controlling | equity |
| ||||||||||||||
| reserve | reserve | interest | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| |||||||||||||
Balance at 1st January 2010 | 280 | 17,916 | - | (17) | 22 | (44) | (840) | (6,756) | - | 10,561 |
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss for the period | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (394) | - | (394) |
| |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences on foreign operations | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | - | - | - | 44 |
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income/(loss) | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | - | (394) | - | (350) |
| |||||||||||||
- |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee share incentives | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (8) | - | (8) |
| ||||||||||||
Deferred tax on employee |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| share incentives | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | ||||||||||||
| Dividends | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (443) | - | (443) | ||||||||||||
| Shares issued | 2 | 143 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 145 | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total transactions with owners | 2 | 143 | - | - | - | - | - | (443) | - | (298) |
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 31st December 2010 | 282 | 18,059 | - | (17) | 22 | - | (840) | (7,593) | - | 9,913 |
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss for the period | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (9,025) | (39) | (9,064) | |||||||||||||
| Revaluation of Jersey property | - | - | 2,344 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,344 | |||||||||||||
| Disposal of Jersey property | - | - | (860) | - | - | - | - | 860 | - | - | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income/(loss) | - | - | 1,484 | - | - | - | - | (8,165) | (39) | (6,720) |
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee share incentives | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (41) | - | (41) |
| ||||||||||||
Deferred tax on employee |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| share incentives | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (22) | - | (22) | ||||||||||||
| Dividends | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (222) | - | (222) | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total transactions with owners | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (285) | - | (285) |
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 30th December 2011 | 282 | 18,059 | 1,484 | (17) | 22 | - | (840) | (16,043) | (39) | 2,908 |
| |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated cash flow statement
52 weeks ended 30th December 2011
| ||||||||||
| 52 weeks | 52 weeks | ||||||||
| ended | ended | ||||||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 |
| |||||||
Loss for the period | (9,064) | (394) |
| |||||||
Adjustment for: |
| |||||||||
Profit on sale of trade and assets of subsidiary | (13) | (230) |
| |||||||
| Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment | (947) | (2) | |||||||
| Taxation | 139 | (104) | |||||||
| Loan forgiveness
| 31 | (532) | - | ||||||
| Loss from associate | - | 149 | |||||||
| Impairment of goodwill | 7 | 5,574 | 92 | ||||||
| Impairment of intangible assets | 7 | 1,391 | - | ||||||
| Depreciation | 7 | 830 | 741 | ||||||
| Amortisation | 7 | 635 | 387 | ||||||
| Decrease in inventories | 144 | 1,081 | |||||||
| Decrease in receivables | 330 | 442 | |||||||
| Decrease in payables | (810) | (897) | |||||||
| Net finance expenditure | 6 | 143 | 130 | ||||||
| Share based payments | (41) | (8) | |||||||
| ||||||||||
Cash (used in)/generated from operations | (2,221) | 1,387 |
| |||||||
Interest received | 22 | 9 |
| |||||||
| Interest paid | (150) | (123) | |||||||
| Tax refunded/(paid) | 213 | (120) | |||||||
| ||||||||||
Net cash (absorbed in)/ generated from operating activities | (2,136) | 1,153 |
| |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
| |||||||||
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | 13 | (166) | (352) | ||||||
| Purchases of intangible asset - software | 12 | (58) | (741) | ||||||
| Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment | 3,312 | 752 | |||||||
| Disposal of trade and assets of a subsidiary | 50 | - | |||||||
| Acquisition of investment in associate | - | (150) | |||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries (net of cash) | 30 | 99 | (2,066) | ||||||
| Loans to associates | - | (850) | |||||||
| Deferred consideration received on disposal of subsidiary | 750 | - | |||||||
| Deferred consideration paid on acquisition of subsidiary | (500) | - | |||||||
| ||||||||||
Net cash from/(used in) investing activities | 3,487 | (3,407) |
| |||||||
Share capital | - | 145 |
| |||||||
| New loans raised | - | 1,618 | |||||||
| Repayment of borrowings | (2,850) | (1,100) | |||||||
Dividend | 10 | (222) | (443) |
| ||||||
| ||||||||||
Net cash (used in)/from financing activities | (3,072) | 220 |
| |||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (1,721) | (2,034) |
| |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at 1st January 2011/ 2nd January 2010 | 2,291 | 4,325 |
| |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at 30th December 2011/31st December 2010 | 570 | 2,291 |
| |||||||
1 Summary of significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all financial periods presented, unless otherwise stated.
1.1 Basis of preparation and going concern basis
Flying Brands Limited (the Company) is a limited liability company incorporated and domiciled in Jersey. The Consolidated financial statements of the Company comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the Group). The accounting policies of the Company are the same as for the Group except where separately disclosed.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared and approved by the Directors in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (adopted IFRS).
The financial statements have been prepared on a historic cost basis other that for the revaluation of certain properties.
The Group's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in this review. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows and liquidity position are described in this business review. In addition, notes 2 and 27 to the financial statements include the Group's objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital; its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments; and its exposure to credit risk and liquidity risk.
As highlighted in note 27 to the financial statements, the Group meets its day to day working capital requirements though its on-going cash flows along with an overdraft facility. The current economic conditions have resulted in declining revenue and profits, and the Directors have subsequently sought to realise value through a series of disposals.
The Directors have prepared detailed working capital projections for the Group to support the decision to prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis. The working capital projections include assumptions such as sales demand, the disposal of further assets and the identification and securing of alternative sources of finance where required. However, by their nature, the assumptions are not confirmed and the Group may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As such there is a material uncertainty in relation to going concern, particularly as to the following:
i) Over the level of demand for the Group's products;
ii) The ability of the Group to complete the disposal of the GD business for an adequate consideration before October 2012; and
iii) The ability of the Directors to secure alternative sources of finance in the event that a disposal of GD and the repayment of the Palatine loan cannot be achieved.
Notwithstanding the above, the Board remains confident that a sale of the GD business can be completed in the time available.
The Group's forecasts and projections, taking account of the uncertainties described above and reasonably possible changes in trading performance, show that the Group has a reasonable expectation of maintaining sufficient working capital to enable the Group to meet its liabilities as they fall due for the foreseeable future, being a period of not less than 12 months from the date of approval of this report.
Thus the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the annual financial statements.
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention as modified by the revaluation of certain financial assets and liabilities. A summary of the more important Group accounting policies follow, together with an explanation of where changes have been made to previous policies on the adoption of new accounting standards in the period.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with adopted IFRSs requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of the amount, event or action, actual results ultimately may differ from those estimates.
1.2 Basis of consolidation
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies so as to obtain benefits from its activities generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of the voting rights.
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair value at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired is recorded as goodwill. The results of the subsidiary undertakings acquired or disposed of during the period are included in the Consolidated Income Statement from the date that control commences until the date control ceases.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
1.3 Segment reporting
An operating segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activity from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with and of the Group's other components. All operating segments' operating results, for which discrete financial information is available, are reviewed regularly by the Group's Board to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance.
1.4 Foreign currency transactions
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at the period end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the consolidated income statement.
1.5 Business combinations
Acquisitions of subsidiaries and businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration for each acquisition is measured at the aggregate of the fair values (at the date of exchange) of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments issued by the Group in exchange for control of the acquirer. Acquisition-related costs are recognised in profit or loss as incurred.
Where applicable, the consideration for the acquisition includes any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement, measured at its acquisition-date fair value. Subsequent changes in such fair values are adjusted against the cost of acquisition where they qualify as measurement period adjustments (see below). All other subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability are accounted for in accordance with relevant IFRSs. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration classified as equity are not recognised.
Where a business combination is achieved in stages, the Group's previously-held interests in the acquired entity are remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date (i.e. the date the Group attains control) and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognised in profit or loss. Amounts arising from interests in the acquiree prior to the acquisition date that have previously been recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss, where such treatment would be appropriate if that interest were disposed of.
The acquirer's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3(2008) are recognised at their fair value at the acquisition date, except that:
• deferred tax assets or liabilities and liabilities or assets related to employee benefit arrangements are recognised and measured in accordance with IAS 12 Income Taxes and IAS 19 Employee Benefits respectively;
• liabilities or equity instruments related to the replacement by the Group of an acquiree's share-based payment awards are measured in accordance with IFRS 2 Share-based Payment; and
• assets (or disposal groups) that are classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations are measured in accordance with that Standard.
If the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs, the Group reports provisional amounts for the items for which the accounting is incomplete. Those provisional amounts are adjusted during the measurement period (see below), or additional assets or liabilities are recognised, to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the amounts recognised as of that date.
The measurement period is the period from the date of acquisition to the date the Group obtains complete information about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date, and is subject to a maximum of one year.
1.6 Investments in associates
An associate is an entity over which the Group has significant influence and that is neither a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies.
The results and assets and liabilities of associates are incorporated in these financial statements using the equity method of accounting, except when the investment is classified as held for sale, in which case it is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
Under the equity method, investments in associates are carried in the consolidated balance sheet at cost as adjusted for post-acquisition changes in the Group's share of the net assets of the associate, less any impairment in the value of individual investments. Losses of an associate in excess of the Group's interest in that associate (which includes any long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the Group's net investment in the associate) are recognised only to the extent that the Group has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.
Any excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group's share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the associate recognised at the date of acquisition is recognised as goodwill. The goodwill is included within the carrying amount of the investment and is assessed for impairment as part of that investment. Any excess of the Group's share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities over the cost of acquisition, after reassessment, is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Where a Group entity transacts with an associate, profits and losses are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest in the relevant associate.
1.7 Property, plant and equipment
All property, plant and equipment is shown at cost less subsequent depreciation and impairment other than properties which are stated at their revalued amounts being fair value at the date of revaluation, less subsequent depreciation. Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Depreciation on assets is calculated using a straight-line method to allocate the cost to each asset less its residual value over its estimated useful life, as follows:
% |
| |||
| ||||
Land and buildings | 0-4 |
| ||
Plant and equipment | 10-21 |
| ||
| Computer hardware, included in plant and equipment | 20-33.33 | ||
Motor vehicles, including tractors | 15-25 |
| ||
| ||||
Freehold land is not depreciated.
From 2nd July 2011 the Group changed its accounting policy for property, plant and equipment, adopting the revaluation model for land and buildings. Management takes the view that this policy provides reliable and more relevant information because it deals more accurately with the components of property, and is based on up-to-date values. In addition management has revised the useful economic lives of the buildings to 25 years from the date of revaluation, as this is the best estimate for the remaining lives. The policy has been applied prospectively from 2nd July 2011 because it was not practicable to estimate the effects of applying the policy either retrospectively or prospectively from any earlier date. Accordingly, the adoption of the new policy has no effect on prior years. The effect on the current year is to increase the carrying amount of property on 2nd July 2011 by £2,344,000; create a revaluation surplus on 2nd July 2011 of £2,344,000; decrease depreciation expense by £38,000: and reduce profit on disposal of property by £874,000. Since the revalued properties are is located in Jersey, there was no effect on either deferred tax provision or tax expense. The assets' residual values and useful lives are reviewed and adjusted if appropriate, at each Balance sheet date. Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with the carrying amount and are included in the consolidated income statement.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other costs including repairs and maintenance are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
1.8 Goodwill and intangible assets
(a) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets. Goodwill is not amortised, but is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. Goodwill is allocated to cash generating units for the purposes of impairment testing.
(b) Intangibles - trademarks
Trademarks obtained on the acquisition of subsidiaries are shown at fair value. They have a definite useful life and are carried at fair value at the date of acquisition less accumulated amortisation. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of the trademarks over their estimated useful lives.
(c) Intangibles - customer lists
Customer lists obtained on the acquisition of subsidiaries are shown at fair value. They have a definite useful life and are carried at fair value at the date of acquisition less accumulated amortisation. Amortisation is calculated using the reducing balance method based on the estimated annual attrition rate percentages.
(d) Software
Computer software and associated development costs that generate economic benefits beyond one year are capitalised as an intangible asset and amortised on a straight line basis between three and five years depending on the estimated useful economic life.
(e) Flowers Direct relay network
The Group acquired the rights to manage a substantial linked (relay) network of florist shops when it acquired Flowers Direct. This network enables the Group to deliver florist and same day delivered bouquets and represents a substantial amount of the turnover of the Flowers Direct business. This has therefore been recognised as an intangible asset. The value of this asset will be amortised based on the anticipated decline in the number of florists annually on a reducing balance method.
1.9 Impairment
(a) Financial assets
A financial asset is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any evidence that it is impaired. A financial asset is considered impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset. Individual significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial assets are assessed collectively in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics. All impairment losses are recognised in the consolidated income statement.
(b) Non-financial assets
The carrying amounts of the Group's non-financial assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. For goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives or that are not yet available for use, the recoverable amount is estimated at each reporting date. The recoverable amount of an asset is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risk specific to the asset. The goodwill acquired in a business combination, for the purpose of impairment testing, is allocated to cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in the consolidated income statement. An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed irrespective of whether that loss is recovered subsequently. In respect of other assets, impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined if no impairment loss had been recognised.
1.10 Financial assets
All financial assets are recognised and derecognised on a trade date where the purchase or sale of a financial asset is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the financial asset within the timeframe established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at fair value, plus transaction costs, except for those financial assets classified as at fair value through profit or loss, which are initially measured at fair value. Financial assets are classified into the following specified categories: financial assets 'at fair value through profit or loss' (FVTPL), 'held-to-maturity' investments, 'available-for-sale' (AFS) financial assets and 'loans and receivables'. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition.
1.11 Non-current assets held for sale
Non-current assets (and disposal groups) classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification.
When the Group is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control of a subsidiary, all of the assets and liabilities of that subsidiary are classified as held for sale when the criteria described above are met, regardless of whether the Group will retain a non-controlling interest in its former subsidiary after the sale.
1.12 Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is determined on a first in first out basis and includes transport and handling costs. Net realisable value is the price at which inventory can be sold in the normal course of business after allowing for the costs of realisation. Provision is made where necessary for obsolete, slow moving or defective inventories.
1.13 Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised initially at amortised cost, which is the fair value of consideration receivable and is adjusted for provision or impairment. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all the monies due. The amount of the provision is recognised in the consolidated income statement immediately.
1.14 Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Group's cash management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the consolidated cash flow statement.
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
1 Summary of significant accounting policies…(continued)
1.15 Bank borrowings
Interest-bearing loans and overdrafts are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accruals basis using the effective interest rate method and are added to the carrying amount of the instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise.
1.16 Share capital
Ordinary shares
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of Ordinary shares and share options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.
Repurchase of share capital (treasury shares)
When share capital recognised as equity is repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, including directly attributable costs, net of any tax effects, is recognised as a deduction from equity. Repurchased shares are classified as treasury shares and are presented as a deduction from total equity. When treasury shares are sold or reissued subsequently, the amount received is recognised as an increase in equity, and the resulting surplus or deficit on the transaction is transferred to/from retained earnings.
Share-based payments
The Group provides share-based payment arrangements to certain employees. These are equity-settled arrangements and are measured at fair value (excluding the effect of non-market based vesting conditions) at the date of grant. The fair value is expensed on a straight line basis over the vesting period. The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares or options that will vest.
The fair values of the share-based payment arrangements are measured as follows:
·; Long Term Incentive Plan (EPS based) - using the Monte Carlo model;
·; Long Term Incentive Plan (Total Shareholder Return basis) - using a pricing model adjusted to reflect Total Shareholder Return market-based performance conditions;
See note 25 for a further description of the share-based payment plans.
1.17 Revenue recognition
Revenue represents the invoiced value of goods supplied and is stated net of VAT and any trade discounts. Revenue is recognised at the date of despatch of goods to customers. Provision is made for refunds in the period the goods are despatched. Provision is made for expected returns or bad debts of continuity products. Credit card commission and the cost of overseas bouquets are treated as cost of sales. Commission income is recognised on completion of transmission of orders between network florists. Interest income is recognised using an accrual based method.
1.18 Leases
Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. Rentals payable under operating leases are taken to the consolidated income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Leases in which the lessee assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Upon initial recognition the leased asset is measured at an equal amount to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset.
Minimum lease payments made under finance leases are apportioned between the finance expense and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance expense is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
1.19 Dividend distribution
Dividend distribution to the Company's shareholders is recognised as a liability in the Group's financial statements in the period in which the dividends are approved.
1.20 Taxation
Income tax payable is provided on taxable profits using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred taxation is provided in full, using the liability method on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related balance sheet tax asset is realised or the deferred liability is settled. Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is possible that future taxable profit will be available against which temporary differences can be utilised. Income tax is recognised in the consolidated income statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in equity.
1 Summary of significant accounting policies…(continued)
1.21 Pensions
The Group makes contributions to some employees' and Directors' personal pension defined contribution schemes. These payments are accounted for on an accruals basis.
1.22 Financial instruments
(a) Financial guarantee contracts
Where Group companies enter into financial guarantee contracts to guarantee the indebtedness of other companies within the Group, the Group considers these to be insurance arrangements, and accounts for them as such. In this respect, the Group treats the guarantee contract as a formal contingent liability until such time as it becomes probable that the Company will be required to make a payment under the guarantee.
(b) Non-derivative financial instruments
Non-derivative financial instruments comprise investments in equity and debt securities, trade and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, loans and borrowings and trade and other payables.
Non-derivative financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value plus, for instruments not at fair value through profit or loss, any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition non-derivative financial instruments are measured as described below.
1.23 Termination benefits
Termination benefits are recognised as an expense when the Group is demonstrably committed, without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan to terminate employment before the normal retirement date, or to provide termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy, and the Group has created a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out that plan.
1.24 Adoption of new and revised IFRS
The following new and revised Standards and Interpretations have been adopted in the current period. Their adoption has not had any significant impact on the amounts reported in these financial statements but may impact the accounting for future transactions and arrangements.
IFRS 1 (amended) | First time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards | |
IAS 24 (amended) | Related Party Disclosures | |
IAS 32 (amended) | Classification of Rights Issues | |
IFRIC 14 (amended) | Prepayments of a minimum funding requirement | |
IFRIC 19 | Extinguishing financial liabilities with equity instruments | |
Improvements to IFRSs (May 2010) |
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the following Standards and Interpretations which have not yet been applied in these financial statements were in issue but not yet effective (and in some cases, had not yet been adopted by the EU):
IFRS 1 (amended) | Severe Hyperinflation and Removal of Fixed Dates for First-time Adopters | |
IFRS 7 (amended) | Disclosures - Transfers of Financial Assets | |
IFRS 9 | Financial Instruments | |
IFRS 10 | Consolidated Financial Statements | |
IFRS 11 | Joint Arrangements | |
IFRS 12 | Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities | |
IFRS 13 | Fair Value Measurement | |
IAS 1 (amended) | Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income | |
IAS 12 (amended) | Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets | |
IAS 19 (revised) | Employee Benefits | |
IAS 27 (revised) | Separate Financial Statements | |
IAS 28 (revised) | Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures |
The Directors anticipate that the adoption of the Standards and Interpretations listed above in future periods will have no material impact on the financial statements of the Group.
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
2 Financial risk and credit management
The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:
(a) Credit risk
(b) Liquidity risk
(c) Market risk
This note presents information about the Group's exposure to each of the above risks, the Group's objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risks and the Group's management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout these consolidated financial statements.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Group's risk management framework.
The Group's risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group's activities.
The Group Audit Committee oversees how management monitors compliance with the Group's risk management policies and procedures and reviews the adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group.
(a) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Group's receivables from customers.
Trade and other receivables
The Group's exposure to credit risk is influenced by the type of customer the Group contracts with. The Group is exposed to a high number of low value receivables from retail customers. The Group assesses the risk of these customers by applying historical trends to the likely event of these customers defaulting. Impairment to the value of this receivable is applied in line with the historical trends identified and any changes in risk to the portfolio of the debt.
(b) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group's approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group's reputation. During the latter part of 2011, the Group repaid all its bank borrowings leaving it without committed banking facilities. The strategy of the Directors (outlined earlier) is designed to address the risk that the Group has insufficient liquid resources to satisfy its requirements.
(c) Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the Group's income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return.
Currency risk
The Group is exposed to currency risk on sales and purchases that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional currencies of the Group entities, primarily the Euro and US Dollar. The risks in the period to 30th December 2011 were minimal. The Group currently does not hedge any of its currency exposure due to the minimal impact of these currencies and will not need to do so in the foreseeable future following the decision to close all its overseas operations.
Interest rate risk
The Group has no floating rate loans. Thus the Group has no exposure to interest rate risk.
Capital management
The Board's policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business. The Directors monitor the return on capital, which the Group defines as net operating income divided by total shareholders' equity. The Board also monitors the level of dividends to ordinary shareholders.
From time to time the Group purchases its own shares on the market; the timing of these purchases depends on market prices. Primarily the shares are intended to be used for issuing shares under the Group's share option programme. Buy and sell decisions are made on a specific transaction basis by the Board of Directors; the Group does not have a defined share buy-back plan.
There were no changes in the Group's approach to capital management during the year.
Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
3 Critical accounting estimates and judgements
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The Group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial period are discussed below.
(a) Estimated impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
The Group tests annually, whether goodwill and intangible assets have suffered any impairment this is in accordance with the accounting policy stated in note 1.9. The valuation of cash generating units has been based on recoverable amounts. It is possible that the recoverable amounts estimated for the intangible software assets may be inaccurate as the period over which the Group will benefit from these assets may be shorter than estimated. In this event an impairment will be required.
(b) Discontinued operations
The Directors have assumed for the purposes of presenting the financial information contained in this report, that the business and assets relating to the Gardening Direct brand will be sold in the 12 months ending 28th December 2012. In the event that the Directors conclude that such a disposal cannot be completed by that date, they will revisit this conclusion. Until completion of a sale, the business will continue to be operated as a going concern.
(c) Deferred tax assets
The Directors have included within the consolidated balance sheet a deferred asset of £155,000. Given the Group's strategy of divestment of assets to enhance shareholder value, it is probable that a number of capital gains will be crystallised on disposal during the foreseeable future. The Group is carrying a significant value of capital losses forward which will be used to relieve any capital gains on disposal. As such the Directors have concluded that the likely value of the deferred tax asset is fairly stated at £155,000.
(d) Going concern basis of preparation
The Directors decision to prepare these accounts on a going concern basis is based on assumptions which are discussed innote 1.1 and in the business review on page 13.
(e) Change in accounting policy re valuation of properties
The Directors have assessed that the adoption of a policy of revaluation of the Group's property assets better reflects the financial position of the Group. The valuation was made on the basis of market value and details of the valuation are disclosed in note 13. Such a valuation necessarily involves estimation and the carrying value of the assets under this policy may change significantly based on market conditions in the next financial period.
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
4 Segmental analysis
The Directors have taken the decision to market for sale all the brands owned by the Group. This includes the reportable divisions of Garden, Gifts and Entertainment. Once this disposal programme is complete, the one remaining trading asset in the Group will be a growing and live despatch business based in Jersey.
The three reportable segments, as described below, are the Group's strategic business units. Subject to the disposal programme these business units offer different products and services and are managed separately because they require different business strategies.
For each strategic business unit the Group's Board continues to review high level internal management reports on a monthly basis. The following summary describes the operations in each of the Group's reportable segments:
Garden | - | home shopping retailer selling gardening products including bedding plants, garden hardware and wild bird food. |
Gifts | - | home shopping retailer selling floral bouquets and pot plants delivered as gifts. |
Entertainment | - | home shopping retailer selling audio books, memorabilia, music and DVDs. |
The Group reported on Greetings Direct and Dealtastic separately as these had been abandoned or discontinued during the period.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as described in note 1. Information regarding the results of each reportable segment is included below. Performance is measured based on segment profit before interest and tax, as included in the internal management reports that are reviewed by the Group's Board.
Segment profit is used to measure performance as management believes that such information is the most relevant in evaluating the results of certain segments relative to other entities that operate within these sectors. Inter-segment pricing is determined on an arm's length basis.
4.1 Segmentation by primary divisions
(a) Segment results
52 weeks ending 30th December 2011
Garden | Gifts | Entertainment | GreetingsDirect | Dealtastic | Total | |||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||
Revenue | 13,611 | 10,032 | 1,333 | 190 | 859 | 26,025 | ||
Reportable segment profit/(loss) before interest and tax | (723) | (1,438) | (35) | 147 | (745) | (2,794) | ||
Redundancy and reorganisation |
| (61) | ||||||
One-off acquisition costs |
| (46) | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| (5,574) | ||||||
Impairment of intangible assets | (1,391) | |||||||
Profit on sale of trade and assets |
| 13 | ||||||
Profit on sale of property |
| 673 | ||||||
Banking arrangement fee |
| (134) | ||||||
Third party loan write back | 532 | |||||||
Interest payable | (165) | |||||||
Interest receivable | 22 | |||||||
(8,925) | ||||||||
Taxation | (139) | |||||||
Loss for the period | (9,064) | |||||||
Loss from continuing operations | (3,385) | |||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | (5,679) | |||||||
Depreciation | (487) | (292) | (51) | - | - | (830) | ||
Amortisation of intangible assets | (195) | (426) | (14) | - | - | (635) | ||
4 Segmental analysis…(continued)
Included within discontinued activity of the Garden division is the plant growing business in Jersey. This activity is being retained by the Group but no income is shown as it sells all its production intra-group and then this is on-sold to third party customers. As such, the revenue from the growing operation has been removed by way of consolidation adjustment historically.
52 weeks ended 31st December 2010
| Garden | Gifts | Entertainment | Greetings Direct | Benham | Total |
| ||||||||||
Direct |
| ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| |||||||||||
Revenue | 15,668 | 10,160 | 1,731 | 478 | 1,665 | 29,702 |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Reportable segment profit/(loss) |
| ||||||||||||||||
before interest and tax | 1,342 | (808) | 100 | 371 | 84 | 1,089 |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Redundancy and reorganisation | (168) |
| |||||||||||||||
One-off acquisition costs | (247) |
| |||||||||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill | (92) |
| ||||||||||||||
Loss from associate | (149) |
| |||||||||||||||
Profit from sale of trade and assets | 107 |
| |||||||||||||||
Fair value stock write down |
| (903) |
| ||||||||||||||
| Interest payable |
| (144) |
| |||||||||||||
| Interest receivable |
| 9 |
| |||||||||||||
(498) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Taxation | 104 |
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Loss for the period | (394) |
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations | (3,718) |
| |||||||||||||||
Profit from discontinued operations | 3,324 |
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | (458) | (187) | (73) | - | (23) | (741) |
| ||||||||||
Amortisation of intangible assets | (134) | (247) | (5) | - | (1) | (387) |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| 52 weeks ended 30th December 2011
| Garden | Gifts | Entertainment | GreetingsDirect
| Dealtastic | Total | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||||||||||
| Reportable segment assets | 4,099 | 2,506 | 500 | - | - | 7,105 | ||||||||||
| Other assets | 1,050 | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated total assets | 8,155 | |||||||||||||||
| Reportable segment liabilities | (304) | (1,086) | (7) | (45) | - | (1,442) | ||||||||||
| Other liabilities | (3,805) | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated total liabilities | (5,247) | |||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditure on property, plant | ||||||||||||||||
| and equipment | 127 | 38 | 1 | - | - | 166 | ||||||||||
| Expenditure on software (intangibles) | 26 | 29 | 3 | - | - | 58 | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| 52 weeks ended 31st December 2010
| Garden | Gifts | Entertainment | GreetingsDirect
| Benham | Total |
| |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| ||||||||||
| Reportable segment assets | 7,676 | 5,516 | 989 | 18 | - | 14,199 |
| |||||||||
| Other assets | 4,886 |
| ||||||||||||||
| Consolidated total assets | 19,085 |
| ||||||||||||||
| Reportable segment liabilities | (363) | (4,448) | (10) | (83) | - | (4,904) |
| |||||||||
| Other liabilities | (4,268) |
| ||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated total liabilities | (9,172) |
| ||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditure on property, plant |
| |||||||||||||||
| and equipment | 203 | 131 | 18 | - | - | 352 |
| |||||||||
| Expenditure on software (intangibles) | 319 | 370 | 52 | - | - | 741 |
| |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
4 Segmental analysis…(continued)
4.2 Segmentation by geographical area
52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| ||||
| ended | ended | ||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||||
Revenue by customer geographical area |
| |||||
£'000 | £'000 |
| ||||
Jersey, Channel Islands | 65 | 69 |
| |||
United Kingdom | 25,756 | 29,107 |
| |||
| Australasia | 110 | 110 | |||
| Europe | 44 | 169 | |||
Rest of World | 50 | 247 |
| |||
| ||||||
26,025 | 29,702 |
| ||||
|
| |||||
Non - current assets* by geographical area |
| |||||
| ||||||
Jersey, Channel Islands | 3,405 | 11,411 |
| |||
United Kingdom | 146 | 1,774 |
| |||
| ||||||
3,551 | 13,185 |
| ||||
| ||||||
* Not including deferred tax asset of £155,000 (31st December 2010: £261,000). |
| |||||
There is no external customer who accounts for more than 10% of revenue for the Group inclusive of revenue from discontinued operations. For continuing operations all revenue is derived from intercompany transactions.
5 Operating expenses |
| |||||
52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| ||||
ended | ended |
| ||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||||
| ||||||
£'000 | £'000 |
| ||||
Administrative expenses | 4,817 | 4,999 |
| |||
| ||||||
Selling and distribution costs have been reclassified to discontinued operations as they relate solely to brands where a sale has been concluded or the directors believe that a sale will be concluded by the 28th December 2012.
6 Net finance expense |
| |||||
52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| ||||
ended | ended |
| ||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||||
| ||||||
£'000 | £'000 |
| ||||
Interest receivable | 22 | 9 |
| |||
Interest payable on bank and other loans | (165) | (139) |
| |||
| ||||||
Net finance expense | (143) | (130) |
| |||
| ||||||
7 Operating loss
Continuing | Discontinued | 52 weeks | Continuing | Discontinued | 52 weeks |
| |||||
| ended | ended | |||||||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | |||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 |
| ||||||||
The following items have been included in arriving at operating loss |
| ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Depreciation charge: Property, plant and equipment | 712 | 118 | 830 | 723 | 18 | 741 |
| ||||
Amortisation of intangible assets | - | 635 | 635 | - | 387 | 387 |
| ||||
| Impairment of intangible assets | - | 1,391 | 1,391 | - | - | - | ||||
| Profit on sale of plant and equipment | (10) | - | (10) | (2) | - | (2) | ||||
| Hire of land and buildings under operating lease | 164 | 94 | 258 | 177 | 96 | 273 | ||||
| Cost of inventories recognised as an expense | 1,740 | 8,051 | 9,791 | 1,844 | 7,863 | 9,707 | ||||
| Redundancy and restructuring costs | 61 | - | 61 | 168 | - | 168 | ||||
| Legal costs associated with acquisitions | 46 | - | 46 | 183 | - | 183 | ||||
Professional costs associated with disposal of property | 274 | - | 274 | - | - | - |
| ||||
Profit on disposal of property (note 13) | (947) | - | (947) | - | - | - |
| ||||
| Staff costs (see note 8) | 2,661 | 2,878 | 5,539 | 2,828 | 2,715 | 5,543 | ||||
| Impairment of goodwill (see note 12) | - | 5,574 | 5,574 | - | 92 | 92 | ||||
Reorganisation cost associated with acquisitions | - | - | - | 64 | - | 64 |
| ||||
| |||||||||||
Auditors remuneration has been included in arriving at operating loss as follows: |
| ||||||||||
Fees payable to the Company's current auditor and their associates for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements |
60 | - | 60 | - | - | - |
| ||||
| Fees payable to the Company's current auditor and their associates for the audit of the Company's subsidiaries | 80 | - | 80 | - | - | - | ||||
| Fees payable to the Company's previous auditor and their associates for the audit of the Company's subsidiaries. | - | - | - | 86 | - | 86 | ||||
| |||||||||||
Total audit fees payable to the Group's auditors | 140 | - | 140 | 86 | - | 86 |
| ||||
Fees payable to the Company's previous auditor and their associates for other services to the Group |
| ||||||||||
Taxation compliance service | 16 | - | 16 | 16 | - | 16 |
| ||||
Audit related assurance services | 10 | - | 10 | 10 | - | 10 |
| ||||
Corporate finance services | 75 | - | 75 | - | - | - |
| ||||
Other taxation advisory services | 22 | - | 22 | - | - | - |
| ||||
| |||||||||||
Total | 123 | - | 123 | 26 | - | 26 |
| ||||
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
8 Employee information
The average monthly number of employees (including Executive Directors) was:
52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| ||||||
| ended | ended | ||||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||||||
| ||||||||
count | count |
| ||||||
| ||||||||
| Sales | 87 | 82 | |||||
| Production | 49 | 44 | |||||
Administration | 71 | 77 |
| |||||
207 | 203 |
| ||||||
| ||||||||
£'000 | £'000 |
| ||||||
Staff costs (for the above employees) |
| |||||||
Wages and salaries | 5,094 | 5,052 |
| |||||
Share based payments (credit) | (41) | (8) |
| |||||
| Social security costs | 412 | 394 | |||||
Pension contributions to employees' defined contribution schemes | 74 | 105 |
| |||||
| ||||||||
5,539 | 5,543 |
| ||||||
9 Taxation
52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| ||||||
ended | ended |
| ||||||
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 |
| ||||||
£'000 | £'000 |
| ||||||
Current tax |
| |||||||
Jersey income tax | 12 | 15 |
| |||||
| UK corporation tax | - | 66 | |||||
| Under provision in previous periods | 43 | 87 | |||||
| ||||||||
Total current tax | 55 | 168 |
| |||||
| ||||||||
| Deferred tax | |||||||
Charge/ (credit) to the income statement (see note 20) | 84 | (116) |
| |||||
| ||||||||
Total tax on profit | 139 | 52 |
| |||||
| ||||||||
9 Taxation…(continued)
In March 2011, the UK Government announced a reduction in the standard rate of UK corporation tax to 26% effective 1st April 2011. This rate reduction was substantively enacted in March 2011. The rate applied to UK current tax provisions is an effective rate of 26.5%.
In March 2012, the UK Government announced the main rate of UK corporation tax would reduce to 24% with effect from 1st April 2012, with subsequent 1% reductions annually to 22% by April 2014. These changes were substantively enacted on 26th March 2012.
The effect of these tax rate reductions on the deferred tax balance will be accounted for in the period in which the tax rate reductions are substantively enacted.
| ||||||||
| The tax assessed for the period is different from the standard rate of income tax, as explained below: | |||||||
52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| ||||||
| ended | ended | ||||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||||||
| £'000 | £'000 | ||||||
| ||||||||
Loss before tax | (3,246) | (3,666) |
| |||||
Loss before tax multiplied by the standard rate of Jersey income tax of 0% | - | - |
| |||||
Adjustments to tax in respect of prior periods | 43 | (98) |
| |||||
| Adjustments in respect of foreign tax rates | 84 | 135 | |||||
| Other | 12 | 15 | |||||
| ||||||||
Tax charge for period | 139 | 52 |
| |||||
| ||||||||
10 Dividends
52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| ||||
| ended | ended | ||||
| 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||||
| ||||||
| £'000 | £'000 | ||||
| ||||||
Dividends on equity shares |
| |||||
Interim dividend of nil (2010: 1.6p) per Ordinary share | - | 443 |
| |||
Final dividend for 2010 proposed in March 2011 agreed at AGM in April 2011 at 0.8p (2010: nil) | 222 | - |
| |||
| ||||||
222 | 443 |
| ||||
| ||||||
The Directors are not proposing a final dividend in respect of the financial period ended 30th December 2011.
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
11 Earnings per share
Basic
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the (loss)/profit attributable to the equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue during the period, excluding Ordinary shares purchased by the Company and held as treasury shares (note 22).
Basic | 52 weeks ended 30.12.11 | 52 weeks ended 31.12.10 | ||||||
Continuing operations | Discontinued operations | Continuing and discontinued operations | Continuing operations | Discontinued operations | Continuing and discontinued operations | |||
(Loss)/profit attributable to equity holders of the Company (£'000) | (3,385) | (5,640) | (9,025) | (3,718) | 3,324 | (394) | ||
Weighted average number of shares in issue, less | ||||||||
weighted average number of treasury shares ('000) | 27,671 | 27,671 | 27,671 | 27,546 | 27,546 | 27,546 | ||
Basic (loss)/earnings per share (pence) | (12.23) | (20.38) | (32.61) | (13.50) | 12.07 | (1.43) | ||
Diluted
Diluted earnings per share are calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of Ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential Ordinary shares. The Company has one category of dilutive potential Ordinary shares: LTIP awards.
The calculation is performed for the LTIP awards to determine the number of Ordinary shares that could have been acquired at fair value (determined as the average market share price of the Company's shares) based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to outstanding share awards. The number of shares calculated as above is compared with the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the share awards.
For the purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share the LTIP share awards have been assumed to be non-dilutive as the terms of the LTIP are not likely to be satisfied in the foreseeable future.
52 weeks ended 30.12.11 | 52 weeks ended 31.12.10 | |||||||
Diluted | Continuing operations | Discontinued operations | Continuing and discontinued operations | Continuing operations | Discontinued operations | Continuing and discontinued operations | ||
(Loss)/profit attributable to equity holders of the Company (£'000) | (3,385) | (5,640) | (9,025) | (3,718) | 3,324 | (394) | ||
Weighted average number of shares in issue ('000) | 27,671 | 27,671 | 27,671 | 27,546 | 27,546 | 27,546 | ||
Adjustment for options ('000) | - | - | - | 544 | 544 | 544 | ||
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for diluted earnings per share ('000) | 27,671 | 27,671 | 27,671 | 28,090 | 28,090 | 28,090 | ||
Basic earnings per share (pence) | (12.23) | (20.38) | (32.61) | (13.24) | 11.84 | (1.40) | ||
12 Goodwill and intangible assets
Florist network | Software | Trade marks | Customer lists | Total intangibles | Goodwill | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
The Group | ||||||
Cost | ||||||
At 1st January 2010 | - | 368 | 431 | 1,472 | 2,271 | 15,463 |
Additions | - | 741 | - | - | 741 | - |
Acquisitions | 1,618 | 439 | - | 100 | 2,157 | 1,620 |
Disposals | - | - | - | (45) | (45) | - |
At 31st December 2010 | 1,618 | 1,548 | 431 | 1,527 | 5,124 | 17,083 |
Additions | - | 58 | - | - | 58 | - |
Acquisitions | - | - | - | - | - | 1,406 |
At 30th December 2011 | 1,618 | 1,606 | 431 | 1,527 | 5,182 | 18,489 |
Amortisation and impairment | ||||||
At 1st January 2010 | - | - | 238 | 1,237 | 1,475 | 11,581 |
Amortisation charge for the period | 94 | 132 | 56 | 105 | 387 | - |
Impairment charge for the period | - | - | - | - | - | 92 |
Disposals | - | - | - | (45) | (45) | - |
At 31st December 2010 | 94 | 132 | 294 | 1,297 | 1,817 | 11,673 |
Amortisation charge for the period | 152 | 345 | 56 | 82 | 635 | - |
Impairment charge for the period | 987 | 255 | 31 | 118 | 1,391 | 5,574 |
At 30th December 2011 | 1,233 | 732 | 381 | 1,497 | 3,843 | 17,247 |
Carrying amount | ||||||
At 30th December 2011 | 385 | 874 | 50 | 30 | 1,339 | 1,242 |
At 31st December 2010 | 1,524 | 1,416 | 137 | 230 | 3,307 | 5,410 |
At 1st January 2010 | - | 368 | 193 | 235 | 796 | 3,882 |
Carrying amount at 30th December 2011 comprises: | ||||||
Non-current assets | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Assets held for resale | 385 | 874 | 50 | 30 | 1,339 | 1,242 |
Software
Operational software is the asset used in the Group to operate, inter alia, the Gardening Direct brand and forms £1,166,000 of the cost and the whole of the carrying amount of the software category. It has been reclassified as an asset held for disposal as the Directors expect it to form part of the disposal of that brand owing to its key operational functionality in the continuing trading of that business.
With the exception of the operational software, all intangible assets formed part of the disposals to Interflora® and MBL Group as outlined in note 33. As such they have been written down to their recoverable amounts.
Goodwill
As outlined in note 33, since the balance sheet date, the Group has entered into two disposal arrangements to sell the business and asset of the Gifts Division to Interflora® and GBS, GCO and L2 to a subsidiary of MBL Group. In view of these disposals, the Directors have written down the value of goodwill associated with these cash generating units, which relate to the different divisions of the business, to their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amounts are calculated as fair value less costs of disposal and are based on the sale agreements. This is summarised as follows:
GBS
£'000 | Gifts
£'000 | GCO
£'000 | Dealtastic
£'000 | Entertainment
£'000 | Group
£'000 | |
Carrying value at 31st December 2010 | 3,382 | 1,417 | 203 | - | 408 | 5,410 |
Additions | - | - | - | 1,406 | - | 1,406 |
Impairment | (3,082) | (625) | (143) | (1,406) | (318) | (5,574) |
Carrying value at 30th December 2011 | 300 | 792 | 60 | - | 90 | 1,242 |
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
13 Property, plant and equipment
Land and buildings | Plant and equipment | Motor vehicles | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
The Group | ||||
Cost or valuation | ||||
At 1st January 2010 | 6,736 | 9,557 | 167 | 16,460 |
Additions | - | 352 | - | 352 |
Acquisition of subsidiary | - | 73 | - | 73 |
Disposal of business | - | (450) | (3) | (453) |
Disposals | - | - | (13) | (13) |
At 31st December 2010 | 6,736 | 9,532 | 151 | 16,419 |
Additions | - | 166 | - | 166 |
Disposals | (2,413) | (1,920) | (48) | (4,381) |
Elimination on revaluation | (3,367) | - | - | (3,367) |
Revaluation | 2,344 | - | - | 2,344 |
At 30th December 2011 | 3,300 | 7,778 | 103 | 11,181 |
Comprising: | ||||
At cost | 3,679 | 7,778 | 103 | 11,560 |
At valuation 2011 | (379) | - | - | (379) |
3,300 | 7,778 | 103 | 11,181 | |
Accumulated depreciation and impairment | ||||
At 1st January 2010 | 2,953 | 8,556 | 113 | 11,622 |
Charge for the period | 283 | 437 | 21 | 741 |
Disposal of business | - | (395) | (3) | (398) |
Disposals | - | - | (13) | (13) |
At 31st December 2010 | 3,236 | 8,598 | 118 | 11,952 |
Charge for the period | 232 | 588 | 10 | 830 |
Disposals | (46) | (1,901) | (31) | (1,978) |
Elimination on revaluation | (3,367) | - | - | (3,367) |
At 30th December 2011 | 55 | 7,285 | 97 | 7,437 |
Carrying amount | ||||
At 30th December 2011 | 3,245 | 493 | 6 | 3,744 |
At 31st December 2010 | 3,500 | 934 | 33 | 4,467 |
At 1st January 2010 | 3,783 | 1,001 | 54 | 4,838 |
Carrying amount at 30th December 2011 comprises: | ||||
Non - current assets | 3,245 | 300 | 6 | 3,551 |
Assets held for resale | - | 193 | - | 193 |
At 30th December 2011 | 3,245 | 493 | 6 | 3,744 |
Land and buildings were revalued at 28th June 2011 by CB Richard Ellis Limited, independent valuers not connected with the Group, on the basis of market value. The valuation conforms to International Valuation Standards and was based on recent market transactions on arm's length terms for similar properties.
At 30th December 2011, had the land and buildings other than investment property of the Group been carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, their carrying amount would have been approximately £1,737,000 (31st December 2010: £3,500,000).
The revaluation surplus is disclosed in note 22. The revaluation surplus arises in a subsidiary and cannot be distributed to the parent due to legal restrictions in the country of incorporation.
On 6th December 2011 the Group sold a glasshouse, office and staff accommodation for £3,325,000. The property had a net book value of £2,378,000 and a profit on disposal of £947,000 was generated (see note 7). Had the property been carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, the net book value would have been £1,503,000 and a profit on disposal of £1,822,000 would have been generated.
At 30th December 2011, the Group has entered into contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment amounting to £28,000 (31st December 2010: £43,000).
14 Associate
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | ||
£000 | £000 | ||
Amounts relating to associate | |||
Total assets | - | 211 | |
Total liabilities | - | (2,198) | |
Net assets | - | (1,987) | |
Group's share of net assets of associate | - | (497) | |
Total revenue | - | 559 | |
Loss | - | (595) | |
Group's share of loss of associate | - | (149) |
The associate at 31st December 2010 was the Dealtastic Group as described in note 31.
15 Inventories
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 |
| ||||
| £'000 | £'000 | ||||
| ||||||
Raw materials | 151 | 573 |
| |||
Goods for resale | 349 | 57 |
| |||
| Growing stock | 116 | 74 | |||
| ||||||
616 | 704 |
| ||||
16 Trade and other receivables
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 |
| ||||
| £'000 | £'000 | ||||
Amounts falling due within one year: |
| |||||
Other receivables | 4 | 243 |
| |||
| Trade receivables | 164 | 312 | |||
| Deferred consideration receivable on disposal of Benham | - | 750 | |||
| Prepayments | 321 | 256 | |||
| ||||||
489 | 1,561 |
| ||||
| ||||||
Trade receivables
The majority of the trade receivables' balance relates to balances held with florist and corporate customers of the Gifts division. None of the balances are large on an individual basis and where possible collection is made by direct debit. The Group monitors on a monthly basis the receivable balance and makes impairment provisions when debt reaches a certain age. There are no significant known risks at 30th December 2011.
The ageing of trade receivables at the reporting date was:
Gross | Impairment | Gross | Impairment |
| ||||||
| 30.12.11 | 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | 31.12.10 | ||||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| ||||||
| ||||||||||
Not past due | 114 | - | 292 | - |
| |||||
Past due 0-30 days | 33 | 4 | - |
| ||||||
More than 30 days past due | 112 | (95) | 46 | (30) |
| |||||
Total | 259 | (95) | 342 | (30) |
| |||||
| ||||||||||
The movement in the allowance for impairment in respect of trade receivables during the period was as follows:
£'000 | £'000 | ||
Balance at 31st December 2010/1st January 2010 | 30 | 25 | |
Impairment loss charged | 65 | 5 | |
Balance at 30th December 2011/ 31st December 2010 | 95 | 30 | |
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
17 Trade and other payables
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Trade payables and accruals | 3,775 | 4,268 |
Loan note payable on acquisition of Flowers Direct | 1,000 | 1,471 |
4,775 | 5,739 | |
The loan note is payable to Palatine LLP and relates to deferred consideration due following the acquisition of Flowers Direct in 2010. The original agreement was for this debt to be repaid by 30th August 2011. Since then a number of interim deferrals in repayment have been agreed resulting in a final agreement being reached with Palatine and this is covered in note 33.
18 Bank loans and overdraft
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Bank loans | - | 2,850 |
All loans and overdrafts were UK £-Sterling denominated.
On 7th July 2010 the Group rearranged its loan finance facilities with Barclays Wealth, a subsidiary of Barclays Bank PLC, arranging a £3,000,000 facility repayable over 3 years in 12 quarterly instalments, two instalments of £150,000 followed by ten of £270,000. The facility (secured against the Group's assets and in particular the freehold properties in Jersey) was used to repay the outstanding balances of the existing loans, of £1,381,000 and provide additional funds of £1,618,000 to fund the acquisition of the trade and assets of Flowers Direct. This loan carried a floating interest rate of 2.25% above LIBOR.
As a result of the poor trading performance of the Group in the period to 31st December 2010 the Group breached the net debt covenant test associated with the new loan facility. The Group approached Barclays Wealth with a proposal to repay £600,000 of the loan in March 2011 reducing the repayment on the 10 remaining payments to £210,000. As a result Barclays Wealth waived the breach of covenant.
Due to the trading performance of the Group, it breached its banking covenants when tested in April and July 2011. The Group obtained a waiver from Barclays Wealth for the breach of covenant on 28th July 2011. The Group also had its debt service covenant for the second half of 2011 and financial year 2012 reset with the net debt service covenant and net interest covenant being replaced with an absolute EBITDA and cash test.
The new covenant tests had been breached in the quarter ended 30th September 2011 when tested in October 2011. On 2nd November 2011 Barclays Wealth agreed to waive the breach of covenant.
On 8th July 2011, the Group arranged with Barclays Wealth an overdraft facility of £800,000. This remained in place until 31st December 2011. The interest rate on the overdraft was set at 4% above LIBOR and was secured against the Group's freehold property in Jersey. An arrangement fee of £104,000 was paid.
On 28th October 2011 Barclays Wealth agreed to increase the overdraft facility to £1,475,000 until the proceeds of the sale of the properties (see note 13) had been received. A further arrangement fee of £30,000 was paid.
On 6th December 2011 the Group repaid in full the amounts outstanding on the loan agreement with Barclays Wealth totalling £1,470,000.
At the balance sheet date, the Group had no committed overdraft facilities.
19 Subsidiaries
Name of Company | Proportion owned | Operating Status | Place of incorporation | ||
Benham Collectors Club | 100% | Ceased Trading Sep10 | Jersey | ||
Flying Flowers International | 100% | Non-trading | Jersey | ||
Flying Brands Holdings (UK) PLC | 100% | Non-trading | UK | ||
FF UK Ltd | 100% | Non-trading | UK | ||
Flying Flowers Properties | 100% | Non-trading | Jersey | ||
Garden Bird Supplies | 100% | Trading | UK | ||
Flying Flowers (Jersey) Ltd | 100% | Trading | Jersey | ||
Garden Centre Online Ltd | 100% | Trading | UK | ||
Arrossisca Ltd | 100% | Trading | UK | ||
Dealtastic Holdings Ltd | 80% | Non-trading | Jersey | ||
The Bellbourne Group | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Fresh Flower Supplies | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Bellbourne Properties | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Flying Flowers (UK) | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Collect Direct | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Benham Covers Ltd | 100% | Ceased Trading Sep10 | UK | ||
Victory Cards | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Benham (A Buckingham) | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
DPA Direct Ltd | 100% | Trading | UK | ||
Gardening Direct | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Flying Brands Ltd | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
New Growth | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Greetings Direct Pty Ltd | 100% | Dormant | Australia | ||
Greetings Direct Ltd | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Greetings Direct International Ltd | 100% | Dormant | Malta | ||
Greetings Direct LLC | 100% | Liquidated Feb10 | USA | ||
Greetings Direct (NZ) Ltd | 100% | Liquidated Jul10 | New Zealand | ||
Greetings Made Easy Ltd | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Cards4Free Ltd | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Cards for all Occasions Ltd | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Easy Greetings Ltd | 100% | Dormant | UK | ||
Dealtastic Ltd | 80% | Ceased Trading Jul11 | Jersey | ||
Promomachine Ltd | 80% | Ceased Trading Jul11 | Jersey | ||
Promomachine UK Ltd | 80% | Ceased Trading Jul11 | UK | ||
Vitabits Ltd | 40% | Ceased Trading Jul11 | Jersey | ||
20 Deferred tax
Deferred tax is calculated in full on temporary differences under the liability method using a tax rate of between 0% and 26% (31st December 2010: 0-28%) depended on the locality of the future charges/credits.
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 |
| ||||
£'000 | £'000 |
| ||||
| ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
| |||||
At 31st December 2011 / 1st January 2010 | 261 | 153 |
| |||
| (Charged)/ credited to the Income Statement (see note 9) | (84) | 116 | |||
| Charged to discontinued operations | - | (16) | |||
(Charged)/ credited to reserves in respect of LTIP awards | (22) | 8 |
| |||
| ||||||
At 30th December 2011/31st December2010 | 155 | 261 |
| |||
| ||||||
The deferred tax asset is in respect of timing differences relating to capital allowances. There are no deferred tax liabilities.
The Directors have not recognised any deferred tax asset in respect of further unutilised UK tax losses of £2,160,000 (31st December 2010: £590,000), capital losses of £1,134,000 (31st December 2010: £1,134,000) and connected party capital losses of £8,226,000 (31st December 2010: £8,226,000). At this stage insufficient certainty exists as to the generation of future profits to utilise these losses within the foreseeable future.
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
21 Called-up share capital
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 |
| |||
£'000 | £'000 |
| |||
| |||||
Authorised |
| ||||
35,000,000 Ordinary shares of 1p each | 350 | 350 |
| ||
| |||||
Allotted, called up and fully paid |
| ||||
28,073,735 (31st December 2010: 28,073,735) Ordinary shares of 1p each | 281 | 281 |
| ||
| "A" Shares in Flying Brands Holdings (UK) PLC | ||||
28,073,735 (31st December 2010: 28,073,735) Ordinary shares of 0.005p each | 1 | 1 |
| ||
282 | 282 |
| |||
22 Reserves
Capital reserve
The capital reserve of the Group comprises a premium of £104,000 which was written off in 1988 on the purchase of the minority interest in the subsidiary company, Retreat Farm (1988) Limited, (now Retreat Farm Limited and formerly Flying Flowers (Jersey) Limited), and the assignment of a loan in 1982 of £87,000.
Revaluation reserve
On the 30th June 2011 the property at Retreat Farm was revalued and a revaluation reserve was created.
£'000 |
| ||||
| |||||
| |||||
Balance at 31st December 2010 | - |
| |||
| Revaluation increase on land and buildings | 2,344 | |||
| Disposal of Jersey property | (860) | |||
| |||||
Balance at 30th December 2011 | 1,484 |
| |||
| |||||
This property is situated in Jersey and owned by a Jersey company. As such, on an ultimate disposal no capital gains will be payable as this tax does not exist in Jersey.
Treasury shares
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Investment at cost - own shares | ||
452,323 Ordinary shares (31st December 2010: 452,323) | ||
of 1p each in Flying Brands Limited | 840 | 840 |
These shares are held in an ESOP trust and are all under option to employees and form part of the options/awards described in the Remuneration Committee report and note 25 to the financial statements. All dividends are waived whilst the shares are held in the ESOP trust. The shares are netted off against shareholders' equity. These shares continue to have voting rights whilst held in trust.
23 Operating lease commitments
Financial commitments
At 30th December 2011 the Group had total commitments under non-cancellable operating leases as follows:
As at 30.12.11 | As at 31.12.10 | ||||||
Land and buildings | Motor Vehicles | Total
| Land and buildings | Motor Vehicles | Total | ||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
Within 1 year | 165 | 51 | 216 | 232 | - | 232 | |
More than 1 year and not later than 5 years | - | 56 | 56 | 109 | - | 109 | |
165 | 107 | 272 | 341 | - | 341 | ||
24 Contingent liabilities
All Jersey and UK based Group companies have given unlimited guarantees to Barclays Bank PLC or its subsidiaries where appropriate (the "Bank") in respect of facilities provided to the Group. However as discussed in note 18, the Group has no direct obligation to the Bank though there are a number of contingent liabilities (for example BACS facilities) in existence. The Directors have taken the view that the probability of crystallisation in the foreseeable future is remote.
The Company provided a guarantee in respect of a property leased by Benham Covers Limited. The use of this property has passed to the purchasers of the trade and assets of that business. However, the landlord of the property refused to consent to a change of guarantor. The guarantee expired in September 2011 and therefore the Directors consider the probability of economic outflow to be remote.
A subsidiary of the Company (DPA Direct Limited) has provided a guarantee, supported by a bank bond from Barclays Bank PLC, to The National Newspapers' Safe Home Ordering Protection Scheme Limited. During the course of this financial year the guarantee extended to £0.5m. Since the year end the guarantee has been reduced to £0.1m.
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
25 Share based payments
Total shareholder return basis
During the period ended 30th December 2011 the Group made no awards under the Group's Long Term Incentive Plan. The awards previously issued are shown in the table below. The performance criteria associated with the exercise of these awards are based on a total shareholder return methodology. The awards will only vest if the performance criteria are met. To date 211,166 of the April 2009 awards, all the awards issued in November 2009 and 153,333 of the awards issued in September 2010 have lapsed. The vesting conditions are disclosed in the Remuneration Committee report.
The principal assumptions used in arriving at the valuation are summarised below:
Award | Award | Award |
| |||||
April 2009 | August 2009 | September 2010 |
| |||||
| ||||||||
Grant date | 24/04/09 | 26/08/09 | 30/09/10 |
| ||||
Share price at grant | £0.49 | £0.77 | £0.59 |
| ||||
| Exercise price | Nil | Nil | Nil | ||||
| Number of employees | 5 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Shares under option | 704,510 | 175,000 | 273,333 | ||||
| Vesting period (years) | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Expected volatility | 49.56% | 54.01% | 55.55% | ||||
| Option life (years) | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Expected life | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Risk free rate | 2.29% | 2.09% | 1.06% | ||||
| Expected dividends expressed as a dividend yield | 8% | nil | 6.77% | ||||
| Fair value per option | £0.26 | £0.64 | £0.36 | ||||
| Valuation model | Monte Carlo | Monte Carlo | Monte Carlo | ||||
Simulation | Simulation | Simulation |
| |||||
| ||||||||
The expected volatility is based on historical volatility over a term commensurate with the expected life of each option, calculated separately for each grant. The expected life is the average expected period to exercise. The risk-free rate of return is the implied yield of zero-coupon government bonds with a remaining term equal to the expected life. A credit of £41,000 (31st December 2010: credit of £8,000) relating to employee share-based payment plans has been taken in the Consolidated Income Statement in the period.
26 Deferred revenue
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Arising from customer prepayments | 442 | 583 |
The deferred revenue arises as a result of payments received from customers for goods before the associated order is despatched. The revenue will be recognised when the goods are despatched.
27 Financial instruments
Note 2 to the financial statements details the Group's policy for the holding and issuing of financial instruments. IFRS requires numerical disclosures in respect of financial assets and liabilities and these are set out below.
Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
Valuation, | Book value | Fair value | Book value | Fair value |
| |||||||
methodology | 30.12.11 | 30.12.11 | 31.12.10 | 31.12.10 |
| |||||||
and hierarchy | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| |||||||
| ||||||||||||
Financial assets |
| |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | (a) | 570 | 570 | 2,291 | 2,291 |
| ||||||
Loans and receivables, net of impairment | (a) | 168 | 168 | 1,305 | 1,305 |
| ||||||
| ||||||||||||
738 | 738 | 3,596 | 3,596 |
| ||||||||
Financial liabilities |
| |||||||||||
Floating rate bank loan | (b) | - | - | (2,850) | (2,850) |
| ||||||
| Trade and other payables | (a) | (4,775) | (4,775) | (5,739) | (5,739) | ||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total at amortised cost | (4,775) | (4,775) | (8,589) | (8,589) |
| |||||||
Valuation, methodology and hierarchy
(a) The carrying amounts of trade and other receivables, trade and other payables which are stated at book value, all have the same fair value due to their short-term nature.
(b) As at 31st December 2010 the same calculation was performed on the floating rate bank loan and there was no material difference between the book and the fair value of this liability.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that counterparties to financial instruments do not perform their obligations according to the terms of the contract or instrument. The Group is exposed to counterparty credit risk when dealing with its customers and certain financing activities.
The immediate credit exposure of financial instruments is represented by those financial instruments that have a net positive fair value by counterparty at 30 December 2011. The Group considers its maximum exposure to be:
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 |
| ||||
| £'000 | £'000 | ||||
| ||||||
Financial assets |
| |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 570 | 2,291 |
| |||
| Loans and receivables, net of impairment | 168 | 1,305 | |||
| ||||||
738 | 3,596 |
| ||||
| ||||||
All cash balances and short-term deposits are held with an investment grade bank who is our principal banker (Barclays Bank PLC). Although the Group has seen no direct evidence of changes to the credit risk of its counterparties, the current focus on financial liquidity in all markets has introduced increased financial volatility. The Group continues to monitor the changes to its counterparties' credit risk.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting its obligations associated with financial liabilities as they fall due. The Finance Director is responsible for monitoring and managing liquidity and ensures that the Group has sufficient liquid resources to meet unforeseen and abnormal requirements. The current forecast suggests that the Group has sufficient liquid resources.
Available liquid resources and cash requirements are monitored by the use of detailed cash flow and profit forecasts these are reviewed at least quarterly, or more often as required.
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
27 Financial instruments…(continued)
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities:
Carrying | Contractual | 6 months | 6 to 12 | 1 to 2 | 2 to 5 |
| ||||||||
30th December 2011 | amount | cash flows | or less | months | years | years |
| |||||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Non - derivative financial liabilities |
| |||||||||||||
Trade and other payables | 4,775 | 4,775 | 4,775 | - | - | - |
| |||||||
| ||||||||||||||
4,775 | 4,775 | 4,775 | - | - | - |
| ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Carrying | Contractual | 6 months | 6 to 12 | 1 to 2 | 2 to 5 |
| ||||||||
31st December 2010 | amount | cash flows | or less | months | years | years |
| |||||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Non - derivative financial liabilities |
| |||||||||||||
Secured bank loans | 2,850 | 2,850 | 2,850 | - | - | - |
| |||||||
| Trade and other payables | 5,739 | 5,739 | 4,268 | 1,471 | - | - | |||||||
| ||||||||||||||
8,589 | 8,589 | 7,118 | 1,471 | - | - |
| ||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Included within trade and other payables is £1,000,000 due to Palatine and to be paid on 3rd January and 31st January 2012. An agreement was reached with Palatine to delay this payment which is detailed in note 33.
Cash flow management
The Group produces an annual budget which it updates quarterly with actual results and forecasts for future periods for profit and loss, balance sheet and cash flows. The Group uses these forecasts to report against and monitor its cash position. If the Group becomes aware of a situation in which it would exceed its current available liquid resources it would apply mitigating actions involving reduction of its cost base. The Group would also employ working capital management techniques to manage the cash flow in periods of peak usage. During the 12 months under review where this situation has occurred, the Group has negotiated extended payment terms with its suppliers and utilised other working capital management techniques.
The Group has a seasonal cash flow and has less excess cash in the second half of the year. The Group is expecting to complete the disposal of the Gardening Direct brand before 28th December 2012. On this basis, it will have sufficient liquid resources to meet its forecasted needs including the repayment to Palatine.
Currency risk
The Group currently has minimal exposure to foreign currency and thus does not engage in any hedging activity. The Group liquidated its overseas subsidiaries during 2010 and therefore has no exposure to foreign exchange gains or losses.
Interest rate risk
30.12.11 | 31.12.10 |
| ||||
| ||||||
£'000 | £'000 |
| ||||
Variable rate instruments |
| |||||
Financial liabilities | - | (2,850) |
| |||
Cash | 570 | 2,291 |
| |||
| ||||||
The impact on profit and equity of a 100 basis points increase in the interest rates would be nil as the Group has no variable rate instruments (31st December 2010: decrease both by £5,000).
28 Pension arrangements
For many employees the Group makes contributions to personal defined contribution schemes based on a fixed percentage of those employees' basic remuneration (see note 8). There are no defined benefit pension arrangements in place for any employees employed by the Group during the 12 months under review.
29 Related party
Mr T H S Trotter is Chairman of Smithfield Consultants Limited, who was paid £20,432 (52 weeks ended 31st December 2010: £21,334) during the period for financial public relations consultancy services of which £5,100 was outstanding at the balance sheet date (31st December 2010: £nil)
Key management is defined as the Board. For further information see the Remuneration Committee report.
The Group started using in 2008 a new Web platform for its internet transactions from eCommera, a venture in which West Coast Capital has a material financial interest. The cost of this service in the 52 weeks ended 30th December 2011 was £194,000 (52 weeks ended 31st December 2010: £349,000) of which £9,900 was outstanding at the balance sheet date (31st December 2010: £nil).
30 Acquisition of the majority shareholding in Dealtastic Holdings Limited
On 26th October 2010, the Group acquired a 50% holding in Dealtastic Holdings Limited. Dealtastic Holdings Limited owns 50% of the shares in a group of trading companies Dealtastic, Promomachine and Promomachine UK Limited (the Dealtastic Group). These companies were internet start - up businesses retailing discounted goods and were purchased in order to improve the Group's internet presence. The Group's 50% shareholding in the Dealtastic Group was acquired for £150,000.
The Group also invested £850,000 in the form of a loan to fund start - up costs and initial promotional activity. The Group's share of the loss in the period ended 31st December 2010 was £149,000.
On 20th January 2011 (with an effective date of 1st January 2011) the Group acquired a further 30% of the share capital of Dealtastic Holdings Limited, taking its ownership share to 80%. At the same time Dealtastic Holdings Limited acquired a further 50% of Dealtastic and Promomachine that it did not own. The Group therefore acquired a controlling interest in the Dealtastic Group of 80%, with the remaining 20% owned by Mr Jonathan Ruff.
The consideration payable for the additional 30% was contingent on the Dealtastic Group's performance in the 12 months to 31st December 2011. The maximum consideration was £1,100,000 if profits of £760,000 were achieved. The consideration was to be paid in Flying Brands Limited Ordinary shares at a price of £0.75 per share. The contingent consideration payable to the vendor of Dealtastic was fair valued and agreed to be £nil. Subsequent to this, the Group agreed to dispose of the trade and assets of Dealtastic on 26th July 2011 (see note 31).
The consideration paid and goodwill arising on this transaction is shown below.
Consideration and goodwill | £'000 |
Cash paid | - |
Fair value of contingent consideration | - |
Fair value of share in associate | - |
Total consideration | - |
Fair value of net liabilities acquired | (1,406) |
Goodwill | 1,406 |
This goodwill represented the anticipated future profits of the acquisition and was later impaired, see note 12.
Notes to the financial statements…(continued)
30 Acquisition of the majority shareholding in Dealtastic Holdings Limited…(continued)
The net liabilities acquired are shown below:
Balance sheet | Fair value adjustments | Adjustedbalance sheet | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Stock | 91 | (34) | 57 |
Prepayments | 21 | (13) | 8 |
Cash | 99 | - | 99 |
Trade payables | (145) | - | (145) |
Other payables | (45) | - | (45) |
Loans to minority interests | (1,168) | 636 | (532) |
Loans to other subsidiary undertakings | (848) | - | (848) |
Fair value of net liabilities acquired | (1,995) | 589 | (1,406) |
The stepped acquisition method has been used and therefore as a result a loss on the write off of the investment in associate of £1,000 has been recognised in the consolidated income statement.
On acquiring the additional 30% of Dealtastic Holdings Limited, Mr Ruff waived £636,000 of loans outstanding to him. No minority interest was recognised in the Group's balance sheet due to the fair value balance sheet at acquisition having net liabilities of £1,406,000.
31 Disposal of the trade and assets of Dealtastic
The Directors decided that Dealtastic could no longer be funded from the Group's available cash flow. On 26th July 2011 the Group sold the trade and assets (including the remaining inventory and website) of the Dealtastic business to Click Marketing Specialists Limited for a cash consideration of £50,000 along with a 25% stake holding in the successor venture. As part of a deferred consideration agreement, the Group will be paid 100% of the first £200,000 and 50% of the next £300,000 of profit before tax generated by the successor venture.
As Dealtastic was not consolidated into the Group's financial statements in 2010 there is no impact on comparatives. The discontinued operation in 2010 related to the Benham operation.
Results of operations from the discontinued operations of Dealtastic
52 weeks ended 30.12.11 | |
£'000 | |
Revenue | 859 |
Expenses | (1,604) |
Impairment of goodwill | (1,406) |
Loan forgiveness | 532 |
Results from operating activities | (1,619) |
Income tax | - |
Results from operating activities, net of tax | (1,619) |
Gain on sale of discontinued operation | 13 |
Net loss attributable to discontinued operations of Dealtastic | (1,606) |
52 weeks ended 30.12.11 | |
£'000 | |
Net cash flow used in operating activities | (777) |
Net cash from disposal proceeds | 50 |
Net cash flow for the year | (727) |
31 Disposal of the trade and assets of Dealtastic…(continued)
Cash flow from discontinued operations of Dealtastic
Effect of disposal on the financial position of the Group was as follows:
£'000 | ||
Goodwill | (532) | |
Stock | (37) | |
Accruals and other payables | 532 | |
Net assets | (37) | |
Consideration | 50 | |
Profit on disposal of discontinued operations | 13 | |
32 Results of all discontinued operations
During the course of the financial year under review, it became apparent to the Directors that the size and scale of the Group was such that it was unable to compete effectively in the markets in which it had chosen to specialise. This issue, coupled with a down turn in activity levels across all the Group's brands, has led the Board to adopt a divestment strategy that has resulted in the disposal of some of its retail activities. The remaining retail activities will be sold within the next 12 months. Further information relating to agreements entered into after the year end can be found in note 33.
The results of operations in these discontinued brands, including the operations of Dealtastic are as follows:
52 weeks ended30.12.11 | 52 weeks ended 31.12.10 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Revenue | 20,973 | 23,659 |
Expenses | (21,623) | (20,506) |
Impairment of goodwill | (5,574) | (92) |
Loan forgiveness | 532 | - |
Results from operating activities | (5,692) | 3,061 |
Income tax | - | 156 |
Results from operating activities, net of tax | (5,692) | 3,217 |
Gain on sale of discontinued operation | 13 | 230 |
Disposal costs | - | (123) |
Net (loss)/profit attributable to discontinued operations | (5,679) | 3,324 |
33 Post balance sheet events
After the year end the following events occurred:
The Group entered into a contract to sell its Gifts division to Interflora®. The details of this transaction were contained in a circular sent to the shareholders on 11th April 2012. The disposal generated gross proceeds of £2.4m.
The Group entered into a contract to sell GBS, GCO and L2 on 30th March 2012. The details of this transaction were contained in a circular sent to the shareholders on 11th April 2012. The transaction generated gross disposal proceeds of £0.8m.
The Group entered into a revised loan agreement with Palatine on 5th April 2012 to defer payment of the £1.0m owing to it (see note 17) until 31st December 2012, at the latest. Details of this transaction were contained in an announcement to shareholders on 5th April 2012.
The Group entered into an overdraft facility with the Bank for a total sum of £250,000. This facility, like all overdraft facilities, is repayable on demand by the Bank.
Related Shares:
IQ-AI