7th Mar 2007 07:02
Provident Financial PLC07 March 2007 Provident Financial plc Preliminary announcement of the final results for the year ended 31 December 2006 H I G H L I G H T S Provident Financial is a leading international group providing home credit,credit cards and motor insurance with 4.1 million customers in the UK, Republicof Ireland, Central Europe, Mexico and Romania. Key financial results Percentage 2006 2005 change Profit before tax and exceptional costs1,2 £191.3m £181.4m +5.5%Pre-exceptional earnings per share1 52.92p 50.41p +5.0% Profit before tax2 £180.2m £40.4mBasic earnings per share 49.00p nilFull year dividend per share 36.50p 35.43p +3.0% 1 Stated before exceptional demerger costs of £11.1m in 2006 and Yes Car Creditclosure costs of £141.0m in 2005 2 2006 profit before tax includes a one-off £6.6m pension credit in respect ofchanges to members' commutation rights Key points • Group profit before tax and exceptional costs up 5.5% after absorbing £30.4m (2005 £19.0m) of investment in start-up businesses to drive future UK and international growth (Vanquis Bank £18.3m, new international countries £12.1m) • UK home credit customer growth for the first time in three years, up 2.0% to 1.52 million, after a step up in marketing activity • Vanquis Bank customer numbers pass year end target of 250,000, up 57% on prior year • Profits from established Central European home credit businesses up 8.2% to £65.7m (2005 £60.7m) • Motor insurance pre-tax profit up 2.5% to £41.0m (2005 £40.0m) Commenting on the results, John van Kuffeler, Chairman, said: "With growth in customer numbers restored, the medium-term outlook for UK homecredit has improved over the past 12 months and the business is well placed totake advantage of changing market conditions. Future performance will benefit asthe recent investments in marketing and technology gain momentum, although thebusiness will have to absorb the financial impact of the Competition Commissionremedies. Vanquis Bank, which made a substantial start-up loss in 2006, isexpected to trade at around breakeven for 2007 as a whole. Having laid sound foundations in Central Europe during 2006, we expect to seecontinued progress in the coming year. The opportunity within the internationalbusiness for growth in both existing and new markets remains excellent. 2006 has been a year of significant progress for the group. The investment innew businesses will benefit the future growth of both the UK and internationalbusinesses. This leaves the group well placed to effect the demerger of theinternational business following the sale of Provident Insurance which the boardexpects to be completed during the second quarter of 2007." John van KuffelerChairman7 March 2007 Enquiries: Today Thereafter MediaDavid Stevenson, Provident Financial 020 7404 5959 01274 731111Kevin Byram, Brunswick 020 7404 5959 020 7404 5959Nigel Prideaux, Brunswick 020 7404 5959 020 7404 5959 Investor RelationsSteve Jones, Provident Financial 020 7404 5959 01274 731111 Chairman's statement Overview 2006 has been a year of significant progress for the group. The investment innew businesses will benefit the future growth of both the UK and internationalbusinesses, and leaves the group well placed to complete the forthcomingdemerger of the international business. UK operations In 2006, UK home credit has restored customer growth, enhanced creditmanagement, invested in technology to drive future efficiency and effectiveness,seen a conclusion to the long running Competition Commission inquiry and,overall, generated improved medium term prospects. The UK home credit business grew customer numbers for the first time in threeyears, assisted by increased investment in marketing which has opened up newsales channels and stimulated customer growth. 2006 saw continuing pressure onthe disposable incomes of UK home credit customers. Impairment charges rose at afaster rate than revenue, although in comparison with other UK lenders, werekept well in check by enhanced credit management and arrears processes. Efficiency is a key priority for UK home credit and the integration of theGreenwood Personal Credit and Provident Personal Credit field management andadministration was completed early in the year. In addition, the investment inhand-held computers for agents which is expected to be rolled out from 2007,will allow the company to operate more efficiently in future years and alsoincrease the effectiveness of the agency force. Overall, UK home credit profitsfor 2006 of £127.5 million (2005 £130.0 million) were lower than 2005 because ofincreased marketing expenditure and impairment charges. Vanquis Bank's focus on developing more rigorous underwriting criteria togetherwith increasing the resources dedicated to collections proved to be the rightpriorities in 2006, a year of difficult market conditions which saw impairmentcharges rise across the industry. Customer numbers continue to grow andexceeded 250,000 by the end of the year, assisted by internet recruitment whichhas supplemented the primary direct mail sales channel. Vanquis Bank re-pricedits assets towards the end of 2006 and, in line with corporate objectives, thebusiness is expected to trade around breakeven for 2007 as a whole. The motor insurance business once again delivered excellent results, withincreased profits benefiting from releases of prior years' claims reserves.Yesinsurance.co.uk, the internet-based distribution channel launched during2006, is trading well. Discussions with potential acquirers of the motor insurance business areproceeding satisfactorily. A further announcement will be made in due course. The collect-out of the Yes Car Credit receivables book continues to progresswell and the balance stood at £108.6 million at the year end (2005 £235.3million). The board is reviewing whether the group should continue tocollect-out the book itself or realise value through sale to a third party. International During 2006, the international business grew profits from its establishedCentral European operations to £65.7 million (2005 £60.7 million) andsubstantially improved credit quality. It also stepped up investment in its newbusinesses in Mexico and Romania resulting in start-up losses of £12.1 million(2005 £3.1 million). The international business finished the year strongly after restoring thequality of the receivables book in Poland and overcoming the temporarysuspension of new lending in Hungary. Over the past two years, the Polish operation has had to contend with rollingout a new product to comply with the interest rate cap legislation introduced inFebruary 2006 and also respond to the adverse trends in collections andimpairment that emerged during 2005. Management have successfully met bothchallenges. Since the late summer of 2006, the improvement in the quality oflending and the receivables book has generated a significantly reduced level ofimpairment charges. From this foundation, the business is investing in marketingand its field operations to restore profitable growth. In Hungary, the changes to administrative procedures and the status of agentsrequired by the PSZAF, the Hungarian financial supervisory authority, werecompleted and on 6 December 2006 lending recommenced after a suspension periodof seven weeks. The business recovered well and very high levels of credit wereissued through the remainder of December. The Czech Republic and Slovakia performed well and the Romanian pilot continuesto perform in line with plan. In Mexico, customer numbers stood at just over 250,000 at the end of December,nearly double the figure a year earlier. The current priority is building theexperience of the existing local management and field operations before resuminggeographic expansion through further branch openings. Financial results and dividend Profit before tax for the year before exceptional costs increased by £9.9million to £191.3 million (2005 £181.4 million). The profit for the yearbenefited from a one-off £6.6 million pension credit in respect of changes tomembers' commutation rights. The group has incurred £11.1 million of exceptional costs in the period up to 31December 2006 in preparation for the demerger of the international businesses,comprising legal, accounting, advisory and other one-off separation costs. Thesecosts have been reflected in the consolidated income statement. Profit before tax after exceptional costs for the year was £180.2 million (2005£40.4 million). Earnings per share were 49.00 pence for the year (2005 nil), andadjusted earnings per share, before exceptional costs, were up 5.0% to 52.92pence (2005 50.41 pence). The board is recommending a final dividend of 22.02 pence (2005 21.37 pence)making a total dividend for the year of 36.50 pence (2005 35.43 pence), anincrease of 3%. Subject to the approval of shareholders at the company's annualgeneral meeting on 16 May 2007, the final dividend will be paid on 25 May 2007to shareholders on the register at 6 April 2007. Balance sheet and capital Net assets increased by £36.6 million during 2006 to finish the year at £354.0million (2005 £317.4 million). Amounts receivable from customers fell by £41.2 million to £1,232.7 million asthe collect-out of the Yes Car Credit book continued to progress well. ExcludingYes Car Credit, receivables increased by £85.5 million to £1,124.1 million (2005£1,038.6 million), primarily reflecting growth in UK home credit and VanquisBank. Borrowings increased to £1,021.0 million (2005 £982.9 million) following thefunding of the group's pension deficit earlier in the year. At the year end, thegroup had a small pension asset of £8.9 million compared to a £105.6 milliondeficit in 2005. Year end gearing, expressed as the ratio of borrowings toshareholders' equity, was 2.9 times (2005 3.1 times). The group's year end capital adequacy ratio was 23.0% (2005 21.2%), fullycompliant with the requirement set by the Financial Services Authority. Regulatory developments In November 2006, the Competition Commission delivered the final report of itsinquiry into home credit in the UK. This report sets out a number of remediesdesigned to increase competition in the home credit industry. The group isworking constructively with the Competition Commission to implement the remediesto the agreed timetable. The report confirms that customer satisfaction is high and that home credit iswell-suited to its customers' needs and represents an important part of theconsumer credit mix in the UK. After two years of intense investigation, it issatisfying to have won this independent endorsement of the strengths andbenefits of the home credit product. The report also rejected the introductionof an interest rate cap, an option which is widely recognised to be damaging toconsumers. The package of remedies put forward by the Competition Commission centre on thesharing of customer data with credit reference agencies and also includeenhanced rebates to customers who settle their loans early. The cost ofimplementing the required changes is estimated at around £5 million in 2007 asthe remedies are progressively implemented, and up to £10 million per annumthereafter. In the international business, the Polish operation has responded to theinterest rate cap imposed by the Polish government from February 2006 byredesigning its loans to make the home collection service an option whichcustomers can choose to pay for separately. At the request of the financial supervisory authority in Hungary, the businessthere has modified its administrative procedures and IT systems and has changedthe status of its agents from self-employed to employed. Lending was suspendedfor seven weeks up to 6 December 2006 while the changes were made. Trading hasreturned to normal, although annual running costs will be some £6 million higheras a result of the change in status of agents. The proposed demerger (i) Background The group announced on 4 July 2006 that it would work towards implementing aseparate listing of the international business. The rapid expansion of the international business since formation in 1997 hasbeen achieved in part through the financial and operational support of UK homecredit. Ten years on, the international business is a successful,self-sufficient, stand-alone entity. With the regulatory uncertainties in the UK and Poland now resolved, the boardbelieves it is appropriate to separate the UK and international businesses intoindependently listed entities. The two businesses will have distinct strategicagendas calling for different management skills and focus, as well as offeringdifferent investment propositions to shareholders. The management of theinternational business will focus solely on the significant opportunities tocapture the growth in new, existing and emerging markets. The management of theUK business will focus on developing a more broadly based business in the UKnon-prime consumer credit market. (ii) Organisation and board structures Following the demerger, Provident Financial plc will continue to own the UK homecredit business and Vanquis Bank, its UK non-prime credit card businessestablished in 2004. As announced on 17 January, the group is progressing thesale of its non-core motor insurance business, Provident Insurance.Discussions with potential acquirers are proceeding satisfactorily and the boardexpects to complete the sale of the business before the demerger becomeseffective. I will continue to be Chairman of Provident Financial and the other directorswill be as set out below: Peter Crook Chief ExecutiveAndrew Fisher Finance DirectorJohn Maxwell Non-executive directorRobert Hough Non-executive director Peter Crook joined Provident Financial in 2005 as Managing Director of UK homecredit and was appointed to the board in March 2006. He joined from Barclaysplc where he was UK Managing Director of Barclaycard from 2000 and the ManagingDirector of UK Consumer Finance from 2004. Andrew Fisher joined Provident Financial in 2006 as Finance Director, havingserved as Finance Director of Premier Farnell plc from 1994. He qualified as achartered accountant with Price Waterhouse in 1983 and became a partner in 1990. John Maxwell joined the board of Provident Financial in 2000. He is also anon-executive director of Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc and Homeserveplc and Chairman of the Institute of Advanced Motorists. He is a director of theRoyal Automobile Club Limited and a trustee of the RAF Benevolent Fund. Robert Hough was appointed to the board of Provident Financial in February 2007.He was executive Deputy Chairman of Peel Holdings p.l.c. for 15 years until 2002and is currently non-executive Deputy Chairman of Peel Holdings (Management)Limited and Chairman of Peel Airports Limited. He is also non-executiveChairman of Cheshire Building Society and a non-executive director of AlfredMcAlpine plc and of Styles & Wood Group plc. The board is seeking to make one further non-executive appointment for ProvidentFinancial. Following the demerger, International Personal Finance plc, a newly establishedpublic limited company, will own the international businesses of ProvidentFinancial. The board of directors of International Personal Finance will be asset out below: Christopher Rodrigues Executive ChairmanJohn Harnett Chief Operating OfficerDavid Broadbent Finance DirectorRay Miles Deputy Chairman and senior non-executive directorCharles Gregson Non-executive directorTony Hales Non-executive director Christopher Rodrigues joined the board of Provident Financial in January 2007 asjoint Deputy Chairman and Chairman of the international business, havingpreviously been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Internationaland formerly the Group Chief Executive of Bradford & Bingley plc and anon-executive director of the Financial Services Authority. He is also anon-executive director of Ladbrokes plc and Chairman of Visit Britain, a UKgovernment agency. John Harnett previously held positions as Finance Director of Allied ColloidsPLC and Holliday Chemical Holdings plc before joining Provident Financial in1999 as Finance Director and has been Managing Director of the internationalbusiness since May 2006. David Broadbent qualified as a chartered accountant with Coopers & Lybrand in1993. He was appointed Finance Director of the international business in 2003having previously been financial controller for four years. Ray Miles was formerly Chief Executive of CP Ships Limited and was appointed asa non-executive director of Provident Financial in 2004. He is also anon-executive director of Southern Cross Healthcare Group plc, an advisorydirector of Stena AB of Sweden and Chairman of Devon Community Foundation. Charles Gregson joined the board of Provident Financial as a non-executivedirector in 1995 and was appointed Deputy Chairman in 1997. He is also adirector of United Business Media plc and non-executive chairman of ICAP plc. Tony Hales became a non-executive director of Provident Financial in 2006. Heis currently Chairman of British Waterways and Workspace PLC and has previouslyserved as a non-executive director of Reliance Security Group plc, Aston Villaplc and HSBC Bank plc and as Chief Executive of Allied Domecq plc. The board is seeking to make one further non-executive appointment forInternational Personal Finance. (iii) Demerger preparations The demerger plans are at an advanced stage as summarised below: • the boards' and management roles have been confirmed; • the primary UK and European bank syndication processes have been successfully completed. Formal documentation is in the process of being completed; • the legal process and main tax clearances to effect the demerger are in place; • the separation of IT systems and infrastructure is substantially complete; • the corporate support functions and governance structures for the demerged international business have been determined; • the new headquarters for the international business based in Leeds has been established and is now occupied; • the basis of splitting pension scheme assets has been agreed; and • the corporate name, International Personal Finance plc, has been selected. (iv) Timetable, capital structure and dividend Full details of the capital structure will be included in the circular andprospectus to be issued in connection with the demerger which will follow oncethe sale of Provident Insurance has been completed. The board expect the saleto be completed during the second quarter of 2007. A proportion of the expectedgain on the disposal will be retained to assist the capitalisation ofInternational Personal Finance. It is the board's intention that the aggregate dividends per share paid byProvident Financial and International Personal Finance in respect of 2007 willbe at least equivalent to the amount paid by Provident Financial in respect of2006. The completion of the demerger is subject to the approval of Provident Financialshareholders. This will be sought at an extraordinary general meeting, detailsof which, along with other resolutions to be considered, will be set out in thecircular to be posted to shareholders which will follow once the sale ofProvident Insurance has been completed. The board We announced on 14 November 2006 that Robin Ashton would be stepping down asChief Executive at the end of December. We thank him for his dedication andhard work and he goes with our very best wishes for the future. Since Robin's departure, the three executive directors have reported to me andthis will remain in place until the demerger. On 26 January 2007, Christopher Rodrigues joined the board as joint DeputyChairman and Chairman of the international business. He will become the firstChairman of the separately listed international business. On 14 October 2006,Tony Hales joined the board and on 1 February 2007 Robert Hough joined theboard, both as non-executive directors. Graham Pimlott resigned as a non-executive director on 27 February 2007 and heleaves with our thanks and best wishes for the future. Outlook With growth in customer numbers restored, the medium-term outlook for UK homecredit has improved over the past 12 months and the business is well placed totake advantage of changing market conditions. Future performance will benefit asthe recent investments in marketing and technology gain momentum, although thebusiness will have to absorb the financial impact of the Competition Commissionremedies. Vanquis Bank, which made a substantial start-up loss in 2006, isexpected to trade at around breakeven for 2007 as a whole. Having laid sound foundations in Central Europe during 2006, we expect to seecontinued progress in the coming year. The opportunity within the internationalbusiness for profitable growth in both existing and new markets remainsexcellent. John van KuffelerChairman7 March 2007 Trading reviews Group The group's profit before taxation for the year can be analysed as follows: 2006 2005 Change £m £m £m UK home credit* 127.5 130.0 (2.5)Vanquis Bank (18.3) (15.9) (2.4)Motor insurance 41.0 40.0 1.0Yes Car Credit (1.5) (24.6) 23.1 Total UK operations 148.7 129.5 19.2 International - Established countries 58.3 54.2 4.1 - New countries (12.1) (3.1) (9.0) Total international 46.2 51.1 (4.9)Central - Costs (6.0) (8.3) 2.3 - Interest receivable* 2.4 9.1 (6.7) Total central (3.6) 0.8 (4.4) Profit before tax and exceptional costs 191.3 181.4 9.9 Demerger costs (11.1) - (11.1)Yes Car Credit closure costs - (141.0) 141.0 Total group profit before taxation 180.2 40.4 139.8 * The allocation of the group's interest charge to UK home credit has beenchanged during 2006 to reflect revised borrowings based on an average ratio ofborrowings to UK home credit receivables of 80%. The impact of this in 2006 isto reduce profit in UK home credit by £12.0 million and reduce the interest costheld centrally by £12.0 million. 2005 results have been restated onto acomparable basis resulting in a reduction in UK home credit profit in 2005 of£16.3 million and a reduction in the interest cost held centrally of £16.3million. These changes have had no impact on reported group profits in either2006 or 2005. UK operations UK home credit 2006 2005 Change £m £m % Customer numbers ('000) 1,518 1,488 2.0Credit issued 940.8 926.5 1.5Average customer receivables 601.3 559.0 7.6 Revenue 576.7 578.9 (0.4)Impairment (178.8) (171.8) (4.1)Revenue less impairment 397.9 407.1 (2.3) Impairment % revenue 31.0% 29.7% Costs (240.0) (247.6) 3.1Interest (30.4) (29.5) (3.1) Profit before tax 127.5 130.0 (1.9) In the UK, customer numbers increased by 2.0% to 1.52 million; the firstincrease for three years. This was an encouraging result in a competitivemarket, particularly given the tighter credit controls being applied to theacceptance of new customers. It reflects the success of increased marketingexpenditure in new sales channels including direct mail, direct responseadvertising, the internet and affinity relationships with retailers. Credit issued grew a little more slowly, up 1.5% on 2005 to £940.8 million (2005£926.5 million). However, this was achieved against 2005 volumes which benefitedfrom the increased issue of larger loans repayable over 18 months to two years.Reported revenue declined by 0.4%, but after adjusting for the 53rd weekincluded in the 2005 financial year, grew by 1.8% on a like-for-like basis.Revenue growth was lower than the growth in average receivables of 7.6% becauseof the increased issue during 2005 of larger loans which are repayable over alonger period and so carry a lower effective interest rate. As a result of pressure on customers' disposable incomes, impairment rose to31.0% of revenue up from 29.7% in 2005. Statistical credit management techniquesand arrears management processes have been enhanced in order to balance growthand credit quality as the business pursues profitable customer growth in a toughenvironment. It is estimated that since May the enhanced credit managementprocesses have declined over 50,000 customer applications which would otherwisehave been accepted. Despite additional marketing expenditure of approximately £4.0 million,operating costs reduced by 3.1% to £240.0 million (2005 £247.6 million)including the benefit from a one-off £5.5 million pension credit in respect ofchanges to members' commutation rights together with tighter cost controls.Improving cost efficiency remains a priority and the integration of theGreenwood Personal Credit field management and administration into ProvidentPersonal Credit was completed in the first half of the year. In addition, the 'Insight' programme to develop hand-held personal computers for agents and fieldstaff is expected to begin roll-out during 2007. As well as increasingefficiency through the replacement of paper-driven processes, the technologywill also increase agent effectiveness through, for example, more flexible agentworking and on-line credit checks. Overall, profits reduced by 1.9% to £127.5 million (2005 £130.0 million) mainlyas a consequence of investment in new sales channels and higher impairmentcharges. Vanquis Bank 2006 2005 Change £m £m % Customer numbers ('000) 251 160 57Average customer receivables 77.3 42.5 82 Revenue 34.2 17.8 92Impairment (19.4) (12.4) (57)Revenue less impairment 14.8 5.4 174 Impairment % revenue 56.7% 69.7% Costs (30.0) (20.0) (50)Interest (3.1) (1.3) (139) Loss before tax (18.3) (15.9) (15) 2006 was Vanquis Bank's second full year of operation. Customer numbers endedthe year at 251,000, an increase of 57% over the previous year. During the year,the internet has been developed as a sales channel and customer recruitment fromthis source is now a valuable supplement to the primary direct mail channel. Average receivables grew by 82% to £77.3 million (2005 £42.5 million), andrevenue by 92% to £34.2 million (2005 £17.8 million). These growth rates exceedcustomer number growth because of the strategy to increase customers' creditlimits as they develop a satisfactory payment history. Impairment as a percentage of revenue has reduced from 69.7% in 2005 to 56.7%.The improvement has arisen from the focus on the development and application ofmore rigorous underwriting criteria, increased resources dedicated tocollections and increased pricing on new business written during 2006. Costs, which comprise customer acquisition costs and operating costs, increasedby 50% to £30.0 million (2005 £20.0 million). This is significantly less thanthe increase in revenue and as volumes continue to grow, the business willcontinue to benefit from leveraging its established operational cost base. Towards the end of 2006, Vanquis Bank re-priced its assets and all new businessnow reflects a typical APR of 39.9%. At the same time, a number of larger bankshave stepped back from the non-prime market because of concerns over pricing andthe need to focus on their more significant prime portfolios. This providesVanquis Bank with an enhanced opportunity to develop its position in the UKnon-prime credit card segment. The loss before tax in 2006 increased to £18.3 million (2005 £15.9 million).Volume growth and the re-pricing of assets referred to above leaves the businesswell placed to trade at around breakeven for 2007 as a whole. Motor insurance 2006 2005 Change £m £m % Policyholders ('000) 490 473 3.6 Revenue(^) 158.0 154.7 2.1Costs (131.8) (134.4) 1.9 Underwriting profit 26.2 20.3 29.1Combined ratio 83% 87%Investment income 18.1 21.6 (16.2) Profit before tax and yesinsurance.co.uk 44.3 41.9 5.7yesinsurance.co.uk (3.3) (1.9) (73.7) Profit before tax 41.0 40.0 2.5 Average investment fund 370 427 (13.3)Investment yield 4.9% 5.0% (^) Excludes £2.9 million of revenue in respect of yesinsurance.co.uk (2005£nil). The motor insurance business delivered an excellent performance in a highlycompetitive UK motor insurance market. Average premiums on non-comprehensiverates increased by 2.6% during the year, whilst comprehensive rates remainedflat. The business continued its policy of pricing for an adequate return onequity, and increased its base premiums whilst making selective changes toimprove competitiveness on certain, more profitable, parts of the business.During the latter part of 2006 market prices began to improve and this hascontinued into the new year. Policyholders increased during the year, up by 3.6% to 490,000 (2005 473,000)benefiting from new product and pricing initiatives and development of the newinternet-based distribution channel, yesinsurance.co.uk. Revenue increased by2.1% to £158.0 million (2005 £154.7 million). Previous years' claims provisions have continued to develop favourably and havebenefited underwriting profit by £42.7 million (2005 £24.9 million). The average investment fund fell by 13.3% to £370 million (2005 £427 million)and yielded income of £18.1 million (2005 £21.6 million) at an averageinvestment yield of 4.9% (2005 5.0%). Yesinsurance.co.uk is making encouraging progress at this early stage. Thebusiness sold 75,000 policies, 33,000 of which were underwritten by our motorinsurance business. The start-up losses during the year were £3.3 million (2005£1.9 million), in line with our expectations. Overall, profit for the year from the motor insurance business, includingyesinsurance.co.uk, was £41.0 million, a 2.5% increase on last year (2005 £40.0million). Yes Car Credit Collections progressed well at Yes Car Credit with total cash collected of£147.8 million during the year. Receivables now stand at £108.6 million, downfrom £235.3 million at the end of 2005. The business made a small loss for theyear of £1.5 million (2005 loss of £24.6 million). International Percentage and monetary changes for credit issued, average net customerreceivables, revenue, impairment and costs are calculated after restating prioryear figures at the current year average exchange rate in order to present alike-for-like comparison. Percentage changes for profit are based on reportedfigures. 2006 2005 Change £m £m £m Central Europe - Home credit+ 68.8 61.4 7.4 - New products (3.1) (0.7) (2.4) Total Central Europe 65.7 60.7 5.0Central UK divisional overheads+ (7.4) (6.5) (0.9) Total established countries 58.3 54.2 4.1 Investment in new countries: Mexico+ (9.7) (3.1) (6.6) Romania (2.4) - (2.4) Total new countries (12.1) (3.1) (9.0) Total international profit before tax 46.2 51.1 (4.9) + The allocation of central UK divisional overheads has changed during 2006 toreflect more accurately the costs attributable to Central Europe, Mexico andRomania. The impact of this in 2006 is to reduce profit in Central Europe by£3.9 million, increase the loss in Mexico by £0.5 million and reduce central UKdivisional overheads by £4.4 million. The results shown above for 2005 have beenrestated to reflect the results as though a similar basis of cost allocation hadbeen adopted. Accordingly, the 2005 profit in Central Europe has been reduced by£3.5 million, the 2005 loss in Mexico has been increased by £0.2 million and thecentral UK divisional overheads in 2005 have been reduced by £3.7 million. Thesechanges have no impact on reported group or international profits. The key aims for Central Europe in 2006 were to successfully introduce a ratecap compliant product into Poland and to drive down impairment as a percentageof revenue through the deployment of improved credit management and collectionsprocesses. These targets were met and although, as planned, customer numbersand credit issued reduced, sound foundations were laid for future profitability. The core Central European operation increased profit by £5.0 million to £65.7million (2005 £60.7 million). This increase is after absorbing a £3.1 million(2005 £0.7 million) cost of testing new monthly home-collected and remotelycollected loan products in Poland and the Czech Republic, and after a £3.7million reduction in profit from changes to administrative procedures and thestatus of agents required by the Hungarian regulator which resulted in asuspension of lending for a seven-week period. It is very encouraging that the Central European operation finished the yearstrongly after restoring the quality of the Polish receivables book in the latesummer and overcoming the temporary suspension of lending in Hungary. 2006 also saw the international business step up its expansion programme throughdeveloping the Mexican market, launching a pilot operation in Romania in early2006 and researching the potential opportunities for new country openings in2007 and beyond. Investment in start-up losses in new countries cost £12.1million, an increase of £9.0 million on 2005, which comprised losses in Mexicoof £9.7 million (2005 £3.1 million) and Romania of £2.4 million (2005 £nil). Central divisional overheads increased by £0.9 million to £7.4 million duringthe year as the business continues to gear itself up for the demerger andexpansion into new territories. Central Europe 2005 CER* 2006 2005 £m Change £m £m % Customer numbers ('000) 1,523 1,646 1,646 (7.5)Credit issued 474.9 522.3 529.3 (10.3)Average customer receivables 292.9 275.9 280.9 4.3 Revenue 338.6 347.9 353.0 (4.1)Impairment (90.6) (128.8) (131.4) 31.1 Revenue less impairment 248.0 219.1 221.6 11.9 Impairment % revenue 26.8% 37.0% 37.2% Costs (164.1) (140.1) (141.7) (15.8)Interest (18.2) (18.3) (18.4) 1.1 Profit before tax 65.7 60.7 61.5 8.2 * restated at constant exchange rates The key operational metrics by country are as follows: Czech Republic and Poland Slovakia Hungary 2006 2005* 2006 2005* 2006 2005* Customer numbers ('000) 854 968 385 372 284 306Growth (11.8%) 2.9% 3.5% 12.0% (7.2%) 21.9% Credit issued (£m) 235.6 291.8 136.6 132.2 102.7 105.3Growth (19.3%) 4.2% 3.3% 13.6% (2.5%) 27.3% Average receivables (£m) 159.2 165.9 76.7 64.5 57.0 50.5Growth (4.0%) 11.8% 18.9% 20.1% 12.9% 50.7% Revenue (£m) 185.0 211.7 83.0 76.0 70.6 65.3Growth (12.6%) 10.0% 9.2% 18.0% 8.1% 48.4% Impairment (£m) 56.0 90.6 17.4 23.3 17.2 17.5 Impairment % revenue 30.3% 42.8% 21.0% 30.7% 24.4% 26.8% * restated at constant exchange rates Poland The Polish business experienced a deterioration in credit quality following therapid expansion of credit in late 2004 and early 2005. The response during 2006was to restore the balance between credit quality, costs and growth bytightening lending criteria, including the upgrading of the behavioural scoringsystem, and focusing the agent force on collections. Progress in Poland wasaffected by the need to reconfigure the home credit product to comply with thecap on interest rates introduced in February 2006. The impact of these measuresis a better quality business albeit with a reduction in customer numbers, creditissued and revenues in 2006. At the same time, improved lending decisions andthe restoration of the quality of the receivables book by late summer 2006 hasresulted in very significant improvements in impairment as demonstrated by thereduction in the charge from 42.8% of revenue in 2005 to 30.3% in 2006. Overall, the 2006 profit contribution from Poland, after the cost of new productdevelopment, was little changed on 2005. The business now has a strongfoundation and under new leadership is executing a plan to restore customergrowth. During the last quarter of 2006, there was an expansion of fieldoperations, including the introduction of 1,000 more agents and 150 developmentmanagers and an increase in direct marketing. There are now early signs of alift in new customer volumes. Czech Republic and Slovakia The primary focus in the Czech Republic and Slovakia over the last two years hasbeen on extending larger loans to lower risk customers and continuing to improvecredit quality. Accordingly, whilst customer numbers continued to grow, averagereceivables and revenue have grown faster. At the same time, the initiatives toimprove credit quality have proved effective. This is evidenced by the reductionin impairment from 30.7% of revenue in 2005 to 21.0% in 2006. The profit contribution from Czech Republic and Slovakia increased sharply in2006. Hungary The main influence on the Hungarian performance in 2006 was the temporarysuspension of lending imposed by the Hungarian regulator which required thebusiness to make certain changes to administrative procedures and change thestatus of agents from self-employed to employed. The period of suspension lastedseven weeks during which time agents continued to collect on existing loans inthe normal way. Lending resumed on 6 December 2006 and the volume of lending inthe pre-Christmas period was very strong. The reduction in customer numbers and credit issued in 2006 is whollyattributable to this temporary disruption to lending and growth is fullyexpected to resume in 2007. Average receivables still showed year-on-year growthwhich drove an 8.1% increase in revenues. Hungary has consistently displayedgood credit quality and saw impairment reduce from 26.8% of revenue in 2005 to24.4% in 2006. The profit contribution from Hungary declined slightly in 2006. The adverseimpact of the temporary suspension of lending was £3.7 million taking intoaccount lost customer revenue, increased costs arising from the transfer ofagents to employed status and other ancillary costs of implementing the requiredchanges. In 2007, the cost is expected to rise to £6 million, predominantlyrelating to the cost of employing agents. Central European costs Central European costs have increased by 15.8% to £164.1 million. A significantproportion reflects increased marketing activity, increased field resourcelevels and the introduction of a centralised collections function in Poland. Inaddition, all countries have incurred higher depreciation charges following theroll-out of new field IT systems during 2006. Mexico CER* 2006 2005 2005 Change £m £m £m % Customer numbers ('000) 252 131 131 92Credit issued 48.1 22.6 21.4 125Average customer receivables 14.5 5.8 5.4 169 Revenue 26.4 10.7 10.0 164Impairment (12.5) (3.6) (3.4) (268)Revenue less impairment 13.9 7.1 6.6 111 Impairment % revenue 47.3% 33.6% 34.0% Costs (21.2) (9.2) (8.8) (141)Interest (2.4) (1.0) (0.9) (167) Loss before tax (9.7) (3.1) (3.1) (213) * restated at constant exchange rates The Mexican operation has continued to roll-out the agent and branchinfrastructure across the first region of Puebla-Veracruz and augmented this byopening in Guadalajara-Leon, the second of five regions with a population ofabout 20 million. Customer numbers increased by 92% from 131,000 at the end of 2005, served by2,200 agents from 16 branches, to 252,000 at the end of 2006, served by 5,200agents from 34 branches. This pace of growth was the fastest of any new countryand during 2006 evidence of high agent and field staff turnover and higher thanplanned impairment indicated that a period of consolidation was needed.Accordingly, since mid 2006, further branch openings have been deferred, creditcontrols have been tightened and actions taken to strengthen management andreduce agent and field staff turnover. There are early signs that this packageof measures is improving the performance of the business. Romania The Romanian pilot operation recruited 6,000 customers during the year and isprogressing well and in line with expectations. The investment in start-uplosses in the year was £2.4 million. A decision on national roll-out isscheduled for 2007. Further expansion Research into new countries is well advanced. Consolidated income statement for the year ended 31 December 2006 Notes 2006 2005 £m £m Revenue 2 1,180.8 1,337.5Finance income 25.3 27.7 Total income 1,206.1 1,365.2 Finance costs (69.8) (61.9)Operating costs (637.4) (861.0)Administrative expenses (318.7) (401.9) Total costs (1,025.9) (1,324.8) Profit before taxation 2 180.2 40.4Profit before taxation and exceptional costs 2 191.3 181.4Exceptional costs - Demerger costs 2 (11.1) - - Yes Car Credit closure costs 2 - (141.0) Profit before taxation 2 180.2 40.4 Tax expense - UK (37.9) (28.1)Tax expense - Overseas (17.4) (12.3) Total tax expense 3 (55.3) (40.4) Profit after taxation attributable to equity shareholders 124.9 - Notes 2006 2005Earnings per shareBasic 4 49.00p - Diluted 4 48.83p - Dividends per shareProposed final dividend 5 22.02p 21.37p Total dividend in respect of the year 5 36.50p 35.43p Paid in the year* 5 35.85p 34.81p * The total cost of dividends paid in the year was £91.4m (2005 £88.6m) Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense for the year ended 31December 2006 Notes 2006 2005 £m £m Profit after taxation attributable to equity shareholders 124.9 - Exchange (losses)/gains on foreign currency translations (0.2) 2.7Net fair value gains/(losses) - cash flow hedges 0.2 (5.0)Actuarial losses on retirement benefit asset/obligations 10 (0.3) (20.1)Tax (charge)/credit on items taken directly to equity (0.1) 7.5 Net expense recognised directly in equity 11 (0.4) (14.9) Total recognised income/(expense) for the year 11 124.5 (14.9) Consolidated balance sheet as at 31 December 2006 Notes 2006 2005 £m £mASSETSNon-current assetsGoodwill 6 3.1 3.1Other intangible assets 30.0 27.5Property, plant and equipment 58.7 42.8Retirement benefit asset 10 8.9 -Deferred income tax assets 30.8 64.5 131.5 137.9 Current assetsInventories - 7.4Financial assets:- Amounts receivable from customers: - due within one year 7 1,103.2 952.8 - due in more than one year 7 129.5 321.1- Derivative financial instruments 2.7 9.0- Cash and cash equivalents 438.8 451.9Trade and other receivables 30.6 32.9Insurance assets 56.2 65.4Current income tax assets 8.1 0.9 1,769.1 1,841.4 Total assets 1,900.6 1,979.3 LIABILITIESCurrent liabilitiesFinancial liabilities:- Bank and other borrowings (87.4) (35.2)- Derivative financial instruments (44.1) (30.1)Trade and other payables (114.1) (126.0)Insurance accruals and deferred income 8 (328.3) (359.2)Current income tax liabilities (37.3) (33.4)Provisions 9 (1.8) (16.2) (613.0) (600.1) Non-current liabilitiesFinancial liabilities:- Bank and other borrowings (933.6) (947.7)Provisions 9 - (8.5)Retirement benefit obligations 10 - (105.6) (933.6) (1,061.8) Total liabilities (1,546.6) (1,661.9) NET ASSETS 354.0 317.4 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITYCalled-up share capital 11 26.5 26.5Share premium account 11 110.8 107.7Other reserves 11 5.7 5.5Retained earnings 11 211.0 177.7 TOTAL EQUITY 11 354.0 317.4 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year ended 31 December 2006 Notes 2006 2005 £m £mCash flows from operating activitiesCash generated from operations 109.7 68.2Finance costs paid (67.0) (60.8)Finance income received 25.9 27.8Income tax paid (24.9) (53.2) Net cash generated from/(used in) operating activities 43.7 (18.0) Cash flows from investing activitiesPurchases of property, plant and equipment (33.3) (20.9)Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 4.6 3.2Purchases of intangible assets (6.0) (9.8)Acquisition of a subsidiary 6 - (19.1) Net cash used in investing activities (34.7) (46.6) Cash flows from financing activitiesProceeds from borrowings 225.7 161.8Repayment of borrowings (161.7) (60.9)Dividends paid to company shareholders 5 (91.4) (88.6)Proceeds from issue of share capital 3.1 2.3Proceeds from sale of treasury shares 2.3 0.7 Net cash (used in)/generated from financing activities (22.0) 15.3 Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (13.0) (49.3)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 444.4 493.5Exchange gains on cash and cash equivalents 0.2 0.2 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 431.6 444.4 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period comprise:Cash at bank and in hand 61.9 54.6Short-term deposits 376.9 397.3 Cash and cash equivalents 438.8 451.9Overdrafts (held in bank and other borrowings) (7.2) (7.5) 431.6 444.4 The cash and short-term deposits held by those businesses that are regulated arerequired to be strictly segregated from those of the rest of the group and arenot available to repay group borrowings. At 31 December 2006 the cash andshort-term deposits held by the group's regulated businesses amounted to £387.2m(31 December 2005 £404.5m). All short-term deposits have a maturity of threemonths or less on acquisition. Consolidated cash flow statement for the year ended 31 December 2006 (continued) Reconciliation of profit after taxation to cash flows from operations 2006 2005 £m £m Profit after taxation 124.9 -Adjusted for: Tax expense 55.3 40.4 Finance costs 69.8 61.9 Finance income (25.3) (27.7) Share-based payment (credit)/charge (1.9) 3.2 Pension (credit)/charge (note 10) (5.5) 10.1 Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 12.6 12.2 Impairment of property, plant and equipment (note 2) - 4.6 Amortisation of intangible assets 24.4 23.0 Impairment of goodwill (note 6) - 91.0 Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment (0.1) -Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Inventories 7.4 9.2 Amounts receivable from customers 36.5 (67.0) Trade and other receivables 1.1 - Insurance assets (11.7) 3.1 Trade and other payables (14.0) 0.6 Insurance accruals and deferred income (30.9) (65.7) Retirement benefit asset/obligations (109.3) (54.4) Derivative financial instruments (0.7) (1.0) Provisions (22.9) 24.7 Cash generated from operations 109.7 68.2 Notes to the preliminary announcement 1. Basis of preparation The preliminary announcement has been prepared in accordance with the ListingRules of the Financial Services Authority and is based on the 2006 financialstatements which have been prepared under International Financial ReportingStandards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union and those parts of theCompanies Act 1985 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS. The preliminary announcement does not constitute the statutory financialstatements of the group within the meaning of Section 240 of the Companies Act1985. The statutory financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005have been filed with the Registrar of Companies. The auditors have reported onthose financial statements and on the statutory financial statements for theyear ended 31 December 2006, which will be filed with the Registrar of Companiesfollowing the annual general meeting. Both the audit reports were unqualifiedand did not contain any statement under sections 237 (2) or (3) of the CompaniesAct 1985. The preliminary announcement has been agreed with the company's auditors forrelease. 2. Segment information Primary reporting format - business segments Revenue Profit before taxation 2006 2005 2006 2005 £m £m £m £m UK home credit* 576.7 578.9 127.5 130.0Vanquis Bank 34.2 17.8 (18.3) (15.9)Motor insurance 160.9 154.7 41.0 40.0Yes Car Credit 43.7 227.5 (1.5) (24.6) Total UK operations 815.5 978.9 148.7 129.5 International - Established countries 338.6 347.9 58.3 54.2 - New countries+ 26.7 10.7 (12.1) (3.1) Total international 365.3 358.6 46.2 51.1Central - Costs - - (6.0) (8.3) - Interest receivable* - - 2.4 9.1 Total central - - (3.6) 0.8 1,180.8 1,337.5 191.3 181.4 Demerger costs - - (11.1) -Yes Car Credit closure costs - - - (141.0) Total group 1,180.8 1,337.5 180.2 40.4 + new countries comprise Mexico and Romania * The allocation of the group's interest charge to UK home credit has beenchanged during 2006 to reflect revised borrowings based on an average ratio ofborrowings to UK home credit receivables of 80%. The impact of this in 2006 isto reduce profit in UK home credit by £12.0m and reduce the interest cost heldcentrally by £12.0m. 2005 results have been restated onto a comparable basisresulting in a reduction in UK home credit profit in 2005 of £16.3m and areduction in the interest cost held centrally of £16.3m. These changes have noimpact on reported group profits in either 2006 or 2005. All of the above activities relate to continuing operations as defined in IFRS5. Consistent with the treatment in the 2005 financial statements, the Yes CarCredit operation has been classified as part of continuing operations on thebasis that revenue and impairment will continue to be generated from the loanbook until it has been fully collected out. As announced on 17 January 2007, the group is progressing the sale of the motorinsurance business. Discussions with potential acquirers are proceedingsatisfactorily and the board expects to complete the sale of the business beforethe proposed demerger becomes effective. As at the group balance sheet date, themotor insurance business did not meet the IFRS 5 criteria of an asset held forresale and, therefore, the business has been classified as part of continuingoperations. Demerger costs represent costs incurred to date in preparing for the demerger ofthe international business from the remainder of the group. The costs comprise£6.4m of professional fees and £4.7m of other separation costs. All of thedemerger costs have been classified as administrative expenses within theconsolidated income statement. £6.9m of the demerger costs relate to centralwith the remaining £4.2m relating to international. The tax credit in respectof demerger costs was £1.1m. The Yes Car Credit closure costs in 2005 comprise £91.0m of goodwill impairment(note 6), £14.9m of provisions for onerous property obligations (note 9), £14.4madditional impairment charge on customer receivables following closure (note 7),£10.1m provision for redundancy costs (note 9), £4.6m of impairment to property,plant and equipment, £2.0m of inventory write downs and £4.0m of other costs.Of the total closure costs, £40.1m has been classified as operating costs and£100.9m has been classified as administrative expenses within the consolidatedincome statement. The tax credit in respect of Yes Car Credit closure costs was£12.8m. Secondary reporting format - geographical segments Revenue Profit before taxation 2006 2005 2006 2005** £m £m £m £m UK and Republic of Ireland 815.5 978.9 137.7 123.8Central Europe 338.6 347.9 65.7 60.7Mexico 26.4 10.7 (9.7) (3.1)Romania 0.3 - (2.4) - 1,180.8 1,337.5 191.3 181.4 UK and Republic of Ireland:Demerger costs - - (11.1) -Yes Car Credit closure costs - - - (141.0) Total group 1,180.8 1,337.5 180.2 40.4 ** The allocation of international central UK divisional overheads has changedduring 2006 to reflect more accurately the costs attributable to Central Europe,Mexico and Romania. The impact of this in 2006 is to reduce profit in CentralEurope by £3.9m, increase the loss in Mexico by £0.5m and reduce costs in UK andIreland by £4.4m. The results shown above for 2005 have been restated to reflectthe results as though a similar basis of cost allocation had been adopted.Accordingly, the 2005 profit in Central Europe has been reduced by £3.5m, the2005 loss in Mexico has been increased by £0.2m and costs in UK and Ireland in2005 have been reduced by £3.7m. These changes have no impact on reported groupor international profits. 3. Tax expense 2006 2005 £m £m Current tax - UK (2.0) 10.8 - Overseas 23.8 19.3 Total current tax 21.8 30.1 Deferred tax - UK 39.9 17.3 - Overseas (6.4) (7.0) Total deferred tax 33.5 10.3 Total tax expense 55.3 40.4 The tax charge/(credit) on items taken directly to equity is as follows: 2006 2005 £m £m Current tax charge/(credit) on net fair value gains/(losses) - cash flow 0.2 (1.5)hedgesDeferred income tax credit on actuarial losses on retirement benefitobligations (0.1) (6.0) Total tax charge/(credit) on items taken directly to equity 0.1 (7.5) The rate of tax expense on the profit before taxation for the year is higherthan (2005 higher than) the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK (30%).The differences are explained as follows: 2006 2005 £m £m Profit before taxation 180.2 40.4 Profit before taxation multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax inthe UK of 30% (2005 30%) 54.1 12.1Effects of:Adjustment in respect of prior years (3.4) (3.7)Adjustment in respect of foreign tax rates (7.1) (10.0)Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 7.6 8.0Impairment of goodwill not deductible for tax purposes - 27.3Overseas taxable dividends 4.1 6.7 Total tax expense 55.3 40.4 4. Earnings per share Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing the earningsattributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinaryshares outstanding during the year, excluding those shares held by the ProvidentFinancial Qualifying Employee Share Ownership Trust and in respect of thePerformance Share Plan. For diluted EPS, the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue isadjusted to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. Reconciliations of the earnings and weighted average number of shares used inthe calculations are set out below: 2006 2005 Weighted Weighted average average number of Per share number of Per share Earnings shares amount Earnings shares amount £m m pence £m m pence Basic EPS 124.9 254.9 49.00 - 254.3 -Dilutive effect of options - 0.9 (0.17) - 0.6 - Diluted EPS 124.9 255.8 48.83 - 254.9 - The directors have elected to show an adjusted EPS prior to demerger costs in2006 and Yes Car Credit closure costs in 2005. This is presented to show the EPSgenerated by the group's underlying operations. A reconciliation of basic anddiluted EPS to adjusted and adjusted diluted EPS is as follows: 2006 2005 Weighted Weighted average average number of Per share number of Per share Earnings shares amount Earnings shares amount £m m pence £m m pence Basic EPS 124.9 254.9 49.00 - 254.3 -Demerger costs, net of tax credit 10.0 - 3.92 - - -Yes Car Credit closure costs, net oftax - - - 128.2 - 50.41 Adjusted EPS 134.9 254.9 52.92 128.2 254.3 50.41 Diluted EPS 124.9 255.8 48.83 - 254.9 -Demerger costs, net of tax credit 10.0 - 3.91 - - -Yes Car Credit closure costs, net oftax credit - - - 128.2 - 50.29 Adjusted diluted EPS 134.9 255.8 52.74 128.2 254.9 50.29 5. Dividends paid and proposed Pence per share 2006 2005 £m £m 2004 final - 20.75p - 52.72005 interim - 14.06p - 35.92005 final - 21.37p 54.4 -2006 interim - 14.48p 37.0 - Dividends paid 91.4 88.6 The directors are recommending a final dividend in respect of the financial yearended 31 December 2006 of 22.02p per share which will amount to a dividendpayment of £56.4m. If approved by the shareholders at the annual general meetingon 16 May 2007, this dividend will be paid on 25 May 2007 to shareholders whoare on the register of members at 6 April 2007. This dividend is not reflectedin the balance sheet as at 31 December 2006 as it is subject to shareholderapproval. 6. Goodwill 2006 2005 £m £m CostAt 1 January 94.1 87.8Additions - 6.3 At 31 December 94.1 94.1 Accumulated impairment lossesAt 1 January 91.0 -Impairment on closure of Yes Car Credit - 91.0 At 31 December 91.0 91.0 Net book value at 31 December 3.1 3.1 The increase of £6.3m in goodwill during 2005 reflected the final settlement ofthe contingent consideration of £19.1m in respect of the acquisition of Yes CarCredit in 2002. Following the decision of the directors to close the Yes Car Credit operation on14 December 2005, the whole of the goodwill in respect of that acquisition,amounting to £91.0m, was impaired in the year ended 31 December 2005. The remaining balance on goodwill, amounting to £3.1m, relates to theacquisition of N&N Cheque Encashment Limited in 2001. 7. Amounts receivable from customers 2006 2005 £m £m UK home credit 695.6 649.9Vanquis Bank 97.5 60.0Yes Car Credit 108.6 235.3 Total UK operations 901.7 945.2International 331.0 328.7 Total group 1,232.7 1,273.9 Analysed as:- due within one year 1,103.2 952.8- due in more than one year 129.5 321.1 1,232.7 1,273.9 The impairment charge in respect of amounts receivable from customers reflectedwithin operating costs can be analysed as follows: 2006 2005 £m £m UK home credit 178.8 171.8Vanquis Bank 19.4 12.4Yes Car Credit 22.6 36.8 Total UK operations 220.8 221.0International 103.1 132.4 Total group 323.9 353.4 In 2005, the Yes Car Credit impairment charge excludes £14.4m of additionalimpairment which arose as a result of the expected deterioration in collectionsperformance following the closure of the business. 8. Insurance accruals and deferred income 2006 2005 £m £m Provision for unpaid insurance claims 248.6 284.0Unearned insurance premiums 79.5 74.8Other deferred income 0.2 0.4 328.3 359.2 The profit before tax of motor insurance includes £42.7m (2005 £24.9m) inrespect of the release of provisions for prior year claims. 9. Provisions Onerous property Restructuring obligations provision Total £m £m £m At 1 January 2006 14.9 9.8 24.7Utilised in the year (13.1) (9.8) (22.9) At 31 December 2006 1.8 - 1.8 Included in current liabilities 1.8 Included in non-current liabilities -- 1.8 The onerous property obligation provision was created on closure of Yes CarCredit and related to the estimated costs of exiting the Yes Car Credit propertyportfolio. The provision was calculated by taking into account the full leaseterm, any sublet income that was recoverable and the potential for leaseassignment. During the year, 26 properties were disposed of at a total cost of£13.1m. The £1.8m provision as at 31 December 2006 relates to the anticipateddisposal costs of the remaining four properties. The restructuring provision related to redundancy and other people related costsfollowing the announcement of the closure of Yes Car Credit on 14 December 2005. The provision covered the redundancy cost of approximately 820 employees.£0.3m of the provision was utilised in 2005 with the remainder, amounting to£9.8m, being fully utilised during 2006. 10. Retirement benefit asset/obligations The group operates a number of UK based pension schemes. The two major definedbenefit schemes are the Provident Financial Senior Pension Scheme ('the seniorpension scheme') and the Provident Financial Staff Pension Scheme ('the staffpension scheme'). The schemes cover 78% of employees with company providedpension arrangements and are of the funded, defined benefit type providingretirement benefits based on final salary. The assets of the schemes are heldin separate, trustee administered funds. Following a full group review ofpension scheme arrangements during 2005, from 1 April 2006 members were providedwith a choice of paying higher member contributions to continue accruingbenefits based on final salary or paying a lower member contribution andaccruing benefits based on a percentage of salary which would be revalued eachyear. The most recent actuarial valuations of plan assets and the present value of thedefined benefit obligation were carried out at 1 June 2006 by a qualifiedindependent actuary. The valuation used for the purposes of IAS 19 has beenbased on the preliminary results of these valuations which have been updated bythe actuary to take account of the requirements of IAS 19 in order to assess theliabilities of the scheme at 31 December 2006. Scheme assets are stated at fairvalue at 31 December 2006. The major assumptions used by the actuary were: 2006 2005 % % Price inflation 3.10 2.80Rate of increase in pensionable salaries 4.68 4.38Rate of increase to pensions in payment 3.10 2.80Discount rate 5.10 4.80Long term rate of return - Equities 7.85 7.85 - Bonds 5.10 4.10 - Index-linked gilts 4.50 4.10 - Other 5.25 4.50 - Overall (weighted average) 6.62 6.74 The mortality assumptions used in the valuation of the defined benefit pensionschemes are based on the mortality experience of insured pension schemes andallow for future improvements in life expectancy. For members of the staffscheme it is assumed that members who retire in the future at age 65 will liveon average for a further 21 years if they are male and for a further 24 years ifthey are female. For members of the senior scheme it is assumed that memberswho retire in the future at age 60 will live on average for a further 29 yearsif they are male and for a further 32 years if they are female. If assumed lifeexpectancies had been one year greater for both schemes, the charge to the groupincome statement would have increased by approximately £0.4m and the definedbenefit obligation would have increased by approximately £20.0m. The amounts recognised in the balance sheet are determined as follows: 2006 2005 £m £m Equities 254.5 226.9Bonds 22.1 21.9Index-linked gilts 21.8 21.2Other 169.5 61.1 Total fair value of scheme assets 467.9 331.1Present value of funded defined benefit obligations (459.0) (436.7) Net asset/(liability) recognised in the balance sheet 8.9 (105.6) The amounts recognised in the income statement are as follows: 2006 2005 £m £m Current service cost (7.6) (7.2)Interest cost (21.0) (19.6)Expected return on scheme assets 27.5 16.7Past service credit 2.2 -Curtailment credit 4.4 - Net credit/(expense) recognised in the income statement 5.5 (10.1) The net credit/(expense) recognised in the income statement has been includedwithin administrative expenses. From 5 April 2006, changes to the rules of the pension schemes and to the taxapplying to pension scheme benefits has meant that in most cases members of thepension schemes will be able to take a larger proportion of their benefits inthe form of a cash lump sum at retirement. Due to the terms under which members'pensions are converted into cash lump sums, these changes have led to a £2.2mpast service saving relating to deferred members of the pension schemes and a£4.4m curtailment saving relating to active members of the pension schemes. Movements in the fair value of scheme assets were as follows: 2006 2005 £m £m Fair value of scheme assets at 1 January 331.1 231.4Expected return on assets 27.5 16.7Actuarial gains on scheme assets 7.1 30.3Contributions by the group 109.3 54.4Contributions paid by scheme participants 3.5 3.8Net benefits paid out (10.6) (5.5) Fair value of scheme assets at 31 December 467.9 331.1 During 2005, the group made additional special contributions of £13.0m in May2005 and £31.0m in December 2005. The group made a further additional specialcontribution of £102.2m in January 2006 in order to ensure that the definedbenefit pension schemes were fully funded based on the June 2005 deficitposition. The increase in the group's interest payable after funding the deficitis broadly offset by a reduction in the IAS 19 pension charge to the group'sincome statement. Movements in the present value of the defined benefit obligation were asfollows: 2006 2005 £m £m Defined benefit obligation at 1 January (436.7) (361.2)Current service cost (7.6) (7.2)Interest cost (21.0) (19.6)Past service credit 2.2 -Curtailment credit 4.4 -Contributions paid by scheme participants (3.5) (3.8)Actuarial losses on scheme liabilities (7.4) (50.4)Net benefits paid out 10.6 5.5 Defined benefit obligation at 31 December (459.0) (436.7) An analysis of amounts recognised in the SORIE is as follows: 2006 2005 £m £m Actuarial gains on scheme assets 7.1 30.3Actuarial losses on scheme liabilities (7.4) (50.4)Total loss recognised in the SORIE in the year (0.3) (20.1) 11. Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders' equity Attributable to equity shareholders of the company Called-up Share share premium Other Retained capital account reserves earnings Total £m £m £m £m £m Balance at 1 January 2005 26.4 105.5 2.4 280.4 414.7 Exchange gains on foreign currency translations - - 2.7 - 2.7Net fair value losses - cash flow hedges - - (5.0) - (5.0)Actuarial losses on retirement benefitobligations - - - (20.1) (20.1)Tax credit on items taken directly to equity - - 1.5 6.0 7.5 Net expense recognised directly in equity - - (0.8) (14.1) (14.9)Profit for the period - - - - - Total recognised expense for the period - - (0.8) (14.1) (14.9)Increase in share capital 0.1 - - - 0.1Increase in share premium account - 2.2 - - 2.2Movement in treasury shares - - 0.7 - 0.7Share-based payment charge - - 3.2 - 3.2Dividends - - - (88.6) (88.6) Balance at 31 December 2005 26.5 107.7 5.5 177.7 317.4 Balance at 1 January 2006 26.5 107.7 5.5 177.7 317.4 Exchange losses on foreign currency translations - - (0.2) - (0.2)Net fair value gains - cash flow hedges - - 0.2 - 0.2Actuarial losses on retirement benefit asset/obligations - - - (0.3) (0.3)Tax (charge)/credit on items taken directly toequity - - (0.2) 0.1 (0.1) Net expense recognised directly in equity - - (0.2) (0.2) (0.4)Profit for the period - - - 124.9 124.9 Total recognised (expense)/income for the period - - (0.2) 124.7 124.5Increase in share premium account - 3.1 - - 3.1Movement in treasury shares - - 2.3 - 2.3Share-based payment credit - - (1.9) - (1.9)Dividends - - - (91.4) (91.4) Balance at 31 December 2006 26.5 110.8 5.7 211.0 354.0 Information for shareholders 1. The shares will be marked ex-dividend on 4 April 2007. 2. The final dividend will be paid on 25 May 2007 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 6 April 2007. Dividend warrants/ vouchers will be posted on 23 May 2007. 3. The 2006 annual report and financial statements together with the notice of the annual general meeting will be posted to shareholders on or around 29 March 2007. 4. The Provident Financial Company Nominee Scheme ('the scheme') enables shareholders who are eligible, namely individuals, to take advantage of the CREST system for settling transactions in shares in the company by means of a low-cost dealing service. It includes a dividend reinvestment scheme for those who wish to use this facility. Shareholders who wish to take advantage of the scheme should contact the company's registrar, Capita Registrars, The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent, BR3 4TU (telephone: 0870 162 3100) to request an information pack. The registrar's website is www.capitaregistrars.com. 5. The annual general meeting will be held on 16 May 2007 at the Marriott Hollins Hall Hotel and Country Club, Hollins Hill, Baildon, Shipley, West Yorkshire, BD17 7QW. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock ExchangeRelated Shares:
PFG.L