17th Mar 2010 07:00
17 March 2010
MirLand Development Corporation plc
("MirLand" / "Company")
FULL YEAR RESULTS FOR THE YEAR TO 31 DECEMBER 2009
MirLand Development Corporation, one of the leading international residential and commercial property developers in Russia, announces results for the 12 months ended 31 December 2009.
Financial Highlights:
·; Loss before tax US$23.0m (31 December 2008: loss of US$104.8m)
·; Rental income and property management fees of US$17.2m (31 December 2008: US$20.4m) reflecting a decrease in market rental rates at yielding assets and an increase in vacancy rates
·; Total assets US$616.1m (31 December 2008: US$529.9m)
·; Adjusted NAV US$472.3m (31 December 2008: US$487m) and NAV per share US$4.6 (31 December 2008: US$4.7)
·; General and administrative expenses decreased to US$16.3m (2008: US $22.3m), mainly a result of cost reductions implemented
·; The Company continues to have modest leverage at 31% of its assets (not including shareholders' loans) and 38% of its assets (including shareholders' loans).
Operational Highlights:
·; Revised strategic focus in 2009 to concentrate on the delivery of projects already under construction and the careful management of yielding assets
·; Significant progress made on the construction of Perkhushkovo Phase 1 and the first sub phase (c. 510 apartments) of the St Petersburg project
·; Facade of the Tamiz office building completed
·; Triumph Mall, Saratov has either pre-let agreements or letters of intent received for approx 92% of the lettable area in advance of its opening in Q2 2010
·; Good progress at Perkhushkovo with first five houses sold in Q4 2010
·; Succession plans in place with the announcement of replacement of CEO Moshe Morag with current CFO Roman Rozental.
Nigel Wright, Chairman, commented:
"The prudent early actions we took have helped us cope with the changing environment and better position ourselves to take advantage of the upturn, of which we have started to see encouraging signs, including increased levels of activity at both our commercial and residential projects.
"In light of these recent indications of economic recovery, I believe that MirLand is well positioned to capitalise on the improved market situation by resuming its pipeline projects according to demand and availability of finance."
Moshe Morag, MirLand's Chief Executive, added:
"Throughout 2009, we continued to make progress on our diversified portfolio in line with our revised business plan, focussing on projects already under construction and the effective management of our yielding assets. In 2010, with the ongoing backing of our shareholders and by seeking to further diversify our financial sources, MirLand will continue to develop and maintain its portfolio, allowing us to consolidate the Company's position as one of the leading international real estate companies in Russia."
For further information, please contact:
MirLand Development Corporation plc Roman Rozental
|
+972 52 2776640 +7 499 130 31 09 |
Financial Dynamics Dido Laurimore / Rachel Drysdale |
+44 20 7831 3113 |
Chairman's Statement
Once again, I am pleased to report on MirLand's progress during the 2009 financial year. During this year, MirLand has implemented a number of measures that enabled us to endure the financial crisis and I am pleased to report that our prudent actions have helped us cope with the changing economic environment while also better positioning ourselves to take advantage of the upturn of which we have already started to see encouraging signs.
The Russian economy continued to experience challenges across its financial and real estate markets but, nevertheless, began to show the first steps of emergence from the recession at the end of 2009. As I reported last year, MirLand conducted a comprehensive review of its business plan in order to ensure that the Company's future strategy is aligned with both current and forecasted market conditions, particularly given the ongoing uncertainties facing the world economy, availability of funding liquidity, energy prices and pace of recovery.
The Company's business plan aims to:
·; maximize returns from our existing assets;
·; successfully complete those projects currently under construction; and
·; resume our pipeline projects according to the level and cost of available finance and market demand for the final product
By adjusting its operations to strictly focus on managing cash flow, halting the development of its pipeline projects and completing the construction of final staged projects, along with the continuous support from our main shareholders, the Fishman Group Companies, the Company has successfully endured the recent crisis and is now more strongly positioned to capitalise on opportunities as the market continues to gradually recover.
Business Environment
Although the Russian economy did not suffer as severely as originally anticipated, the 2009 fiscal year was nonetheless extremely difficult - resulting in a significant decline in both output and employment levels and an overall decrease in GDP over the previous year.
During 2009, inflation decreased as a result of a contraction in consumer spending and lower food and service prices. In turn, this caused a reduction in refinancing rates but, as the Central Bank rates largely indicated, the impact was limited and, therefore, the cost of credit still remains very high. For the first time in recent years, a budget deficit occurred as a result of the sharp decrease in oil and gas prices (despite Government support provided to stimulate the economy.) The impact of this deficit was primarily offset by the Reserve and Welfare funds which had been accumulated before the financial crisis, when Russia's economy was flourishing.
Over the last two quarters of 2009, the Russian economy showed signs of recovery and reported growth, largely due to an increase in oil prices. However, as the performance of the Russian economy relies heavily on oil prices, which are also highly volatile, it should be anticipated that the pace of the recovery will be slow and gradual.
2009 Highlights
Despite the challenging conditions of the past year, we believe that as a result of MirLand's revised business model and high quality portfolio, the Company is well positioned to weather this rapidly changing environment and capitalise on opportunities in the future.
·; The Company has a diversified portfolio of assets comprising both residential and commercial projects;
·; Our investment portfolio comprises four high quality, completed and income producing investment properties, Hydromashservice, MAG and Century office buildings in Moscow, and Vernissage mall in Yaroslavl. Most of the leasing agreements in these assets are linked to US dollar;
·; The Triumph Mall in Saratov, which is expected to open towards the second quarter of 2010, continues to see strong demand from potential tenants and MirLand has already received either pre-let agreements or letters of intent for approximately 92% of the lettable area;
·; During the fourth quarter of 2009, the first five houses were sold in Perkhushkovo;
·; The Company is very modestly leveraged at just 31% of its assets excluding shareholders' loans and 38% including shareholders' loans; and
·; As was evident throughout this crisis period, MirLand enjoys significant backing and support from its main shareholders.
Financing
Like most other real estate companies, MirLand relies on both short and long term financing sources but, over the last period, the global economic situation dramatically changed companies' abilities to arrange bank debt or raise debt on the public markets or as project financing. Despite recent improvements in the economic environment, the financing markets remain difficult.
To date, MirLand's activities have been financed through a combination of equity capital raised during our earlier IPO on AIM, the proceeds of our previous corporate bond issue in Israel, the line of credit backed by our main shareholders, project financing for the Vernissage and Triumph malls, shareholders' loans, and recently, a new corporate loan. Given the current and ongoing difficult credit situation, the Company is taking measures aimed at diversifying these funding sources, including efforts to build strong relationships with national and international banks.
As mentioned above, MirLand is managing its development pipeline according to market conditions and the availability of cash resources. Consequently, we have re-phased our residential projects in Moscow and St. Petersburg to increase our flexibility and to match the adjusted market demand. This will enable us to fund construction through a mix of pre-sales, advance payments and internally generated cash. Where we have ongoing commercial projects under construction, the Company's strategy is to enter into pre-lease agreements with high quality tenants to ensure cash flow upon completion, as demonstrated by our successes at the Triumph Mall in Saratov, even during these challenging times.
Results
Total assets as at 31 December 2009 were US$616.1 million as compared to US$529.9 million as of 31 December 2008. Equity as of 31 December 2009 was US$319.2 million compared to US$342.2 million the preceding year. The main reasons for the decrease in 2009 were reductions in income due to the financial crisis and the downward revaluation of our investment properties.
Loss after tax in 2009 amounted to US$23.0 million as compared to loss of US$104.8 million in 2008. Again, the main reason for this loss is the decline in the value of the Company's investment properties, as a result of deteriorating market conditions. Most of these losses, however, do not impact the cash flow of the Company.
Over the period, rental income and property management fees decreased to US$17.2 million, from US$20.4 million in 2008. This was due to a decrease in rental rates in our yielding MAG and Hydromashservice projects and an increase in vacancies in these assets.
MirLand's assets are externally valued semi-annually on 30 June and 31 December. The valuation is conducted by Cushman & Wakefield Stiles & Riabokobylko ("Cushman & Wakefield"). As a result of market stabilization and further investment by the Company during this period, the value of MirLand's portfolio increased by 8.9% to US$687.8 million (Company's share) during the year (31 December 2008: US $631.7 million). Adjusted NAV based on Cushman & Wakefield's valuation is US$472.3 million compared to US$487 million in 31 December 2008.
We strongly believe in the quality of the assets in which the Company has invested and that this portfolio will deliver an attractive yield to our investors over the long term as the market begins to recover.
Portfolio Development
Due to the deteriorating business environment and the lack of liquidity, MirLand's focus in 2009 was on the ongoing delivery of projects which were already under construction and on the careful management of its yielding assets.
During 2009, significant progress was made on the construction of Perkhushkovo Phase 1 and the Triumph Mall in Saratov and construction also continued on the St. Petersburg project's first sub-phase (approximately 510 apartments). Moreover, the facade of the Tamiz office building was completed.
By the end of the year, following improved conditions in the Russian economy, activity had slightly increased amongst tenants and buyers. This was evidenced in Perkushkovo, where the first five houses were sold in the final quarter of the year. We also saw some improvement in leasing activity. However, both sale prices and rental rates were below pre-crisis levels.
During the year, the acquisitions of the Century buildings and Saratov logistics project which began in 2008 were completed.
Furthermore, the Company continues to make progress on the pre-construction elements of its Skyscraper, Techagrocom, Kazan, Penza and Yaroslavl Phase 2 projects, although commencement of construction will inevitably be dependent upon market conditions and the availability of financing. However, we will continue to prepare the sites and position the assets so that when the markets stabilise, value will be added to the land.
Dividend Policy
MirLand has adopted a dividend policy that is intended to reflect long-term earnings and cash flow potential while, at the same time, maintaining both prudent dividend cover and adequate capital resources within the business.
Despite modest improvements in the Russian economy, conditions are likely to remain challenging for real estate investment and development. Moreover, considering the net loss reported by the Company in this period, and as a means to provide the Company with maximum financial flexibility in the year ahead, the Board has determined that it is inappropriate to declare a dividend for the current financial year.
Our People
The Board of Directors and Senior Management team consists of dedicated individuals whose expertise has proved invaluable throughout this particularly challenging year. They have recommended and implemented positive and necessary changes to the business plan in light of current economic circumstances and been involved in key decisions throughout. Furthermore, as Chairman, I place considerable emphasis on rigorous Board management and, in addition to formal meetings and I meet and communicate with my colleagues on a regular basis.
In 2009, the Board of Directors announced management changes in two key positions.
The CFO, Roman Rozental, will replace the current CEO, Moshe Morag, as of 1 January 2011 and, until that time, he will continue to act as the CFO of the Company. In order to ensure that the Company will continue to benefit from Mr. Morag's experience, he will serve as a non-executive director for an additional six months. During this time, we will continue our search to replace the CFO, while also recruit new candidate for the NE.D.
Project manager of MirLand's flagship Triumph Park project in Saint Petersburg, Mr. Lev Margolin was appointed at the beginning of 2010 to replace Mr. Yehuda Marom as Chief Engineer. We would like to thank Mr. Marom for his considerable efforts and devotion to leading the developing of our projects during the past three years. I believe that Mr. Margolin's extensive experience, including in development projects in Russia, will allow him to lead the development of our portfolio assets.
Once again I would like to pay tribute to my executive colleagues and all our staff on both Board and operating levels. Together they form the backbone of our business and I thank them for their continuing dedication, energy and achievement that will ensure we are well placed to face the challenges of the future.
Despite market difficulties, our commitment to sound corporate governance remains firm. As in previous years, fully detailed information regarding our approach to governance issues, our internal controls and key team members will be provided in our Annual Report & Accounts.
Outlook
In view of modest improvements in the Russian macroeconomic environment, MirLand will continue to monitor and adjust its business plan to maximize shareholder return in the future.
The Board has decided to focus the Company's efforts and resources on completing projects already under construction and commencing those where funding is already in place. In conjunction with this, we continue to intensify our efforts to improve our pre-sale and pre- letting activities. As in the past, we will move forward with the planning and design stages of our strategic projects, whilst nurturing the strong income stream from our investment portfolio.
I have previously alluded to signs of modest recovery in the Russian economy and the slight improvement that we have witnessed recently in our current portfolio. Barring any unforeseen market aftershocks and dependent upon market demand and availability of funding, I believe that, as we move forward, MirLand is reasonably well placed to benefit from these improving market conditions.
Nigel Wright
Chairman
17 March 2010
Chief Executive's statement
MirLand was established in December 2006 to focus on value-enhancing acquisition, construction, lease and sale of residential and commercial real estate in Russia. The Company's projects vary in their locations (major and regional cities), sectors (residential, office, retail and logistics), and status of development (from income producing investment properties to those in the pre-planning stage). For most of MirLand's projects, a local management team is put in place which is responsible for the development and/or the ongoing management of the asset.
The Market
Russian Economy
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
Key economic indicators
|
141.9
|
142.0
|
142.2
|
142.8
|
143.5
|
144.2
|
Population (millions)
|
15,039
|
15,800
|
14,600
|
12,200
|
11,000
|
9,800
|
GDP per capita (PPP, $)
|
-7.9
|
5.6
|
7.6
|
6.7
|
6.4
|
7.2
|
GDP growth rate (%)
|
8.8
|
13.3
|
11.9
|
9.7
|
12.7
|
10.9
|
Inflation (%)
|
8.2
|
7.7
|
6.1
|
7.6
|
8.2
|
8.6
|
Unemployment rate
|
30.2
|
24.9
|
25.7
|
27.4
|
28.3
|
28.8
|
average RUR/USD exchange rate
|
BBB
|
BBB
|
BBB+
|
BBB+
|
BBB
|
BB+
|
Credit rating
|
2009 was a difficult year for the Russian economy. In the first half of the year, the main macroeconomic indicators decreased sharply as a result of the world economic crisis, as did the drop in oil prices, which remains the major influencing factor on the Russian economy. GDP showed negative growth for the first time since the crisis in 1998, the level of unemployment rose and industrial output decreased. However, the rate of inflation was lower than in 2008 and the Central Bank cut the refinancing interest rate 10 times during the year. The reserve funds that had been accumulated during the previous years were used to offset the budget deficit and the Government implemented additional measures to support the economy. Consequently, in the second half of the year, signs of recovery appeared and the Russian economy reported two consecutive quarters of positive GDP growth demonstrating that the country has started to emerge from the downturn.
The global economic crisis naturally affected Russia's real estate market along with its economy. Across the sector, we faced increasing yields which lead to decreases in our assets' values, increased vacancy rates, coupled with decreasing rental rates, and an overall lack of financial resources. However, at the end of the year, the market started to slowly turn around as a result of the improvement in the macroeconomic situation.
In 2010, Russia's main macroeconomic indicators are expected to continue to improve. GDP is forecast to show modest growth along with a decrease in both unemployment and inflation rates.
The Office Sector
The total stock of office space in Moscow reached 10.6 million sqm in 2009, up from 9 million sqm in 2008. This increase in office space is largely attributed to construction that started prior to the crisis.
During the first half of the year, demand for office space was very depressed and resulted in a fall in rental rates and a significant increase in vacancy rates. However, in the fourth quarter of 2009, signs of stabilization in rent and vacancy rates began to appear as the macroeconomic environment slowly improved.
It is expected that in 2010 both rental and vacancy rates will remain stable, while the market absorbs an additional 1 million sqm of space that is currently under construction.
The Retail Sector
During the crisis, consumers started to reduce their spending and increase their saving, which caused a decline in retailers' turnover and a concurrent decline in demand for quality retail premises. Nevertheless, the prime retail market in Moscow was the least affected by the crisis. In 2009, the total stock of quality retail space reached 3 million sqm, including more than 650,000 sqm of new high quality shopping space.
Overall, rental rates decreased by 8% to $2,200 per sqm and vacancy rates increased from 0.5% to 4.5%. Despite the crisis, new international retailers entered the Russian market to take advantage of low rental rates and expand into the region.
It is expected that in 2010 another 600,000 sqm will be delivered to Moscow's retail market. With consumer demand and retail turnover likely to improve, rental rates are expected to increase and vacancy rates of prime retail to decrease.
The Residential Sector
The market for residential property in Russia was severely affected by the crisis as evidenced by sharp declines during the first half of the year. The number of apartments sold decreased dramatically as did average asking prices. The decrease in sales across Russia was also impacted by a lack of available mortgage financing. However, in the last quarter of 2009, the market started to show signs of increased activity, likely due to increased consumer confidence and reduced interest rates. In St. Petersburg, for example, the volume of deals increased by 35% over the third quarter of 2009 which represents approximately 300,000 sqm of sales.
In 2010, activity in the housing market is expected to improve with modest to average price growth and a slight increase in sales expected. As very few new construction products were started during the crisis, Russia's limited housing supply and the low ratio of apartment area per capita, in relation to Europe, will create a demand for existing stock.
The Logistics Sector
New construction volume in Moscow totalled 600,000 sqm, down from 620,000 sqm in 2008. Several projects were put on hold and land plots, where construction had not yet started, were put on the market for sale. In the fourth quarter of 2009, the vacancy rate for prime assets stabilized at 13% in Moscow, 30% in Saint Petersburg and over 50% in regions. Rental rates for dry storage also stabilized, whereas rates for cold storage slightly increased.
In 2010, it is expected that just 100,000 sqm of warehouses will be delivered to the Moscow region market.
Strategy
MirLand's principal activities are focussed on acquisition, development, construction, reconstruction, rental and sale of residential and commercial real estate in Russia. Its particular geographic focus is in Moscow, St. Petersburg and major regional cities with populations over 500,000 people. MirLand invests primarily in projects where it identifies potential for a high return on equity and generation of strong yields and income, stemming from demand for good quality commercial and residential real estate assets that has not otherwise been met.
Since the second half of 2008, the business arena in Russia has changed dramatically and the Company has adjusted its operational focus accordingly.
The key elements of MirLand's strategy are as follows:
§ Focus on the completion of existing projects: The Company aims for the timely delivery of projects while ensuring they are completed to a high standard. Marketing of all of the Company's commercial projects is commenced during their development phase so that they can generate income immediately upon completion.
§ Portfolio Diversification: To mitigate risk, the Company's portfolio is balanced between various sectors, locations and development stages.
- Geographic location: investments are spread across Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other major regional cities. Investment decisions are made following a detailed feasibility study and the close examination of local and national economic and demographic data, as well as the balance between supply and anticipated demand for international standard properties.
- Sector: the Company invests in a balanced mix of residential, retail, office and logistics, as well as mixed-use projects.
- The Company's portfolio includes projects which are of varying duration, phasing and anticipated completion. The Company holds both yielding and development properties to obtain a relatively balanced spread in the use of working capital and demand for management's attention, that can, at the same time, generate an income flow from sales and yielding properties.
§ Realisation of assets: The Company will continuously assess whether to retain yielding properties or realise their market value through disposals, depending on the opportunity and on prevailing market conditions. The Company uses revenues from yielding assets to diversify its income sources.
§ Use of diverse financing sources to accelerate business activity and growth: Equity, shareholders' loans, bank loans (some of which have been guaranteed by our main shareholders) and bond issuances are used to finance the Company's activities and projects.
§ The extension of relationships with local partners, especially in the regions: Having a local partner provides daily surveillance of the projects and thus a greater level of control over quality, costs and delivery for the Company. In addition, these relationships are expected to lead to future investment opportunities.
The global financial turmoil, which had a significant impact on the Russian real estate market during 2009, has led the Company to adjust its operational focus to be more focused on managing its core activities and available financial resources.
This has been achieved through:
·; a focus on the progression of those development projects which have the greatest potential to deliver the best returns despite current market conditions;
·; the further phasing of larger projects;
·; the development of the remaining projects according to changes in the market demand and to the availability of financial sources;
·; a strong emphasis on keeping high occupancy rates in yielding commercial projects;
·; a high prioritization on financing; and
·; a reduction of costs in OPEX, General and Administrative, professional services and "in-house" expenses.
MirLand believes that by adjusting its operational focus in the aforementioned ways, it can firmly establish its position as one of the leading international real estate companies in Russia.
During 2009, MirLand enjoyed financial support from its key shareholders through loans and guarantees. This crucial ongoing backing, together with the diversification of financial sources, will enable MirLand to continue to develop and maintain its portfolio and help fulfil its mission of creating value for its shareholders.
Portfolio
As at 31 December 2009, MirLand had fifteen projects, of which four are yielding assets, four are under construction, and seven projects are at various stages of the planning phase and in the process of gaining permits. During the year, the acquisitions of the Century buildings and Saratov logistics project (which began in 2008) were completed.
The Company's portfolio has been valued by Cushman & Wakefield at US$688 million (MirLand's share) as of 31 December 2009, based on the Company's freehold/leasehold rights. This value represents an increase of 8.7% since 30 June 2009 and is due to the advancement in development projects and decrease in yields due to market stabilization.
Yielding Projects:
Hydromashservice (Hydro), Moscow - office and retail complex
Class B+ office complex located in the northern part of Moscow's Novoslobodsky business district. The site enjoys good transport links and excellent access.
·; Land area: 1.2 ha
·; Leasable area: 18,200 sqm
·; Completed: Q4 2008
·; Leasehold rights: 100%
MAG, Moscow - office and retail complex
A renovated class B+ office complex adjacent to the Hydro project.
·; Land area: 2.3 ha
·; Leasable area: 19,500 sqm
·; Completed: Q4 2007
·; Leasehold rights: 100%
Century Building, Moscow - offices
Recently completed class B+ office buildings at the Hydro & MAG site.
·; Leasable area: 24,000 sqm
·; Completed: Q1 2009
·; Leasehold rights: 50%
Vernissage Mall, Yaroslavl - shopping centre
A Western standard single floor shopping centre in Yaroslavl, completed in 2007. This project is located at the entrance road to Yaroslavl from Moscow.
·; Land area: 12 ha
·; Leasable area: 33,300 sqm
·; Completed: Q2 2007
·; Freehold rights: 49%
Projects Under Construction:
Triumph Park, St. Petersburg - residential complex and trade centre
Flagship phased development of a residential neighbourhood which, on completion, will comprise approximately 9,000 apartments, commercial and public areas and will provide good access to both St. Petersburg and its airport. The commercial areas will include offices and a commercial centre with underground parking. The public areas will include kindergartens, a school and parks.
·; Land area: 41 ha
·; Saleable area: 630, 900 sqm
·; Leasable area: 96,000 sqm
·; Construction commencement of sub phase 1: Q3 2008
·; Planned completion of total project: Q1 2019
·; Freehold rights: 100%
Western Residence Perkhushkovo, Moscow region - residential complex
Development of 163 townhouses and cottages in the prestigious western outskirts of Moscow, implemented in two phases. This project targets the growing segment of successful professionals who are seeking an improved standard of living.
·; Land area: 22.5 ha
·; Saleable area: 65,500 sqm
·; Construction commencement of phase 1: Q3 2007
·; Planned completion: Q3 2013
·; Freehold rights: 100%
·; Sales: first five houses were sold in the last quarter of 2009
Triumph Mall, Saratov - shopping centre
Development of the first multi-storey retail and entertainment centre in Saratov. The complex is strategically located near the historical city centre on an important retail avenue in the city.
·; Land area: 2.2 ha
·; Leasable area: 27,400 sqm
·; Construction commencement: Q2 2007
·; Planned completion: Q2 2010
·; Freehold rights : 100%
·; Marketing: 92% is pre-let or with signed letters of intent
·; Financing: US$ 48.5 million financed by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)
Tamiz, Moscow - offices
New class B+ office building under construction at the Hydro & MAG site.
·; Leasable area: 12,200 sqm
·; Construction commencement: Q3 2008
·; Planned completion: Q4 2010
·; Leasehold rights: 100%
Projects in Planning:
Skyscraper, Moscow - offices and retail
A 47-storey Class A office and retail building with underground parking will be constructed on Dmitrovskoye Shosse, adjacent to Moscow's third ring. This prime location offers excellent accessibility.
·; Land area: 0.9 ha
·; Leasable area: 92,000 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q3 2011
·; Planned completion: Q4 2014
·; Leasehold rights: 100%
Techagrocom, Moscow region - Business Park
A three phase development of a business park, which will include Class B+ office buildings and a trade centre. The complex is ideally located near the Leninskiy district near Moscow's fourth ring ("MKAD").
·; Land area: 22 ha
·; Leasable area: 163,400 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement of phase 1: Q3 2011
·; Planned completion of project: Q2 2016
·; Freehold rights: 50%
Big Box Complex, Yaroslavl - retail development
Development of a retail park adjacent to the Vernissage mall.
·; Land area: 18 ha
·; Leasable area: 55,200 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q1 2012
·; Planned completion: Q4 2013
·; Freehold rights: 49%
Shopping Centre, Kazan
Development of a three-storey shopping centre in Kazan's city centre aimed at home improvement and design stores.
·; Land area: 2.2 ha
·; Leasable area: 26,300 sqm
·; Sellable area: 5,200 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q1 2011
·; Planned completion: Q1 2013
·; Freehold rights: 100%
Penza - shopping centre
Development of a two-storey shopping centre in Penza in close proximity to a growing residential district.
·; Land area: 5.3 ha
·; Leasable area: 17,900 sqm
·; Planned construction commencement: Q2 2012
·; Planned completion: Q4 2013
·; Freehold rights: 100%
Saratov - logistics
Phased development of a logistics centre in Saratov, closely located to the federal highways and adjacent to the city ring road.
·; Land area: 26 ha
·; Leasable area: 104,000 sqm
·; Construction commencement: Q4 2011
·; Planned completion: Q3 2014
·; Freehold rights: 100%
Outlook
MirLand is adjusting to the new and fast changing environment and, as discussed, has refocused its business plan to enable it to continue to develop its portfolio. These changes include:
·; focusing on gradual and prudent development of key projects according to demand and market conditions;
·; focusing on the maintenance of occupancy and therefore rental rates at its yielding properties;
·; constantly monitoring and analysing the market to resume its pipeline projects. The Company will prioritise the progression of projects according to the availability of financial sources and specific market conditions surrounding each project.
·; looking for additional diversified sources of financing to fill the gap left by the lack of institutional finance for real estate;
I would like to thank our shareholders for their continuous trust in the Company, to MirLand's management team for its dedication, and to the Company's employees, who are responsible for the day-to-day activities. I am confident that this strong team will continue working through the challenging, fast-paced market to realize MirLand's vision.
We strongly believe in the quality of our portfolio projects and believe that our prudent and selective approach to the management and development of our projects, especially in the challenging business environment in which we operate, together with our committed directors and managers, will lead to an increased value for our shareholders' investments.
Moshe Morag
Chief Executive Officer
17 March 2010
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Revenues for 2009 were US$17.2 million and the net loss was US$20.4 million. Total assets at December 2009 amounted to US$616.1 million and equity amounted to US$319.2 million. The Company's adjusted net asset value was US$472.3 million. The Company's real estate assets were valued on 31 December 2009 at US$783.7 million (for 100% rights from freehold/leasehold) by an external appraiser, of which MirLand's share is US$687.8 million.
Accounting Policy
The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as adopted by the European Union ("EU"), the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap 113.
Income Statement
The loss for 2009 amounted to US$23.0 million in comparison to the loss of US$104.8 million in 2008.
The Company's revenues consist of rental income and fees from managing investment properties. Rental income and fees from investment properties decreased to US$17.2 million from US$20.4 million, which is a decrease of 18%. This decline is attributed to the financial crisis that influenced the real estate sector in Russia causing a decrease in rental rates, discounts granted to tenants and an increase in vacancies. These conditions had particular influence on two of the Company's yielding assets, MAG and Hydromashservice.
In accordance with IAS 40, the Company has revalued its investment properties and investment properties under construction for the financial period ending 31 December 2009 and has recognized the resulting movement in valuation through its income statement as fair value adjustments of investment properties and investment properties under construction. The loss of US$16.5 million was based on the valuations of the Company's investment properties and investment properties under constructions prepared by an independent appraiser, Cushman & Wakefield, in accordance with International Valuation Standards.
The cost of maintenance and management of the Company are embodied in property maintenance and management costs, which rose only marginally from US$7.3 million in 2008 to US$7.4 million in 2009.
The Company's general and administrative expenses for the period decreased to $16.3 million in comparison to US$22.3 million in 2008, mainly resulting from cost reductions implemented as part of the strategic review of the business plan.
Total financing costs for the period decreased to US$5.7 million compared to US$44.7 million in 2008, mainly a result of foreign exchange differences caused by the sharp devaluation of the Rouble in 2008. Due to US$ denominated financing sources of the Russian companies, the devaluation of the Rouble caused significant financing costs during 2008 in contrast to a lower devaluation in the currency in 2009. Financing income from deposits, loan interests and financial assets not at fair value that were recognised through the profit and loss statement amounted to US$8.7 million.
Tax expenditure in 2009 amounted to US$5.1 million compared to US$1.0 million in 2008 mainly due to deferred taxes. MirLand is a resident of Cyprus for tax purposes and is subject to a 10% tax rate. MirLand's subsidiaries in Russia are subject to a 20% tax rate (24% in 2008). Additional details are covered in note 19 to the financial statements.
The net loss for 2009 was US$23.0 million, in comparison to net loss of US$104.8 million in 2008. This improvement is largely due to the reduction in the negative fair value adjustment of investment properties and the reduction in investment properties under construction which amounted to US$16.5 million for the period compared to US$58.8 million in 2008, the reduction in financing costs as explained above, and the reduction of general and administrative costs.
Balance Sheet
Total assets as at 31 December 2009 amounted to US$616.1 million in comparison to US$529.9 million in 2008, an increase of 16%. The main reason for the overall increase was the addition of investment properties, investment properties under construction and inventories of buildings for sale to the portfolio, which were financed through corporate loans, loans from shareholders and new loans for the Triumph Mall in Saratov.
Equity and Liabilities
Equity as at 31 December 2009 decreased to US$319.2 million from US$342.2 million in 2008, a decrease of 7%. Equity decreased mainly due to foreign currency translation adjustments and net loss that occurred in 2009. MirLand's equity comprises 52% of its total assets.
Financial liabilities as at 31 December 2009 amounted to US$210.8 million (excluding shareholders' loans) compared to $141.9 million for 31 December 2008. The increase is mainly due to a US$15 million corporate loan received from Uniastrum bank and a US$48.5 million loan received from the EBRD to finance the construction of the Triumph Mall in Saratov. Shareholders' loans also increased during 2009 from US$9.0 million to US$45.0 million. These loans were granted to MirLand from its main shareholder, the Fishman Group, in order to finance the current operations and development of the Company's assets. In addition, the short term loans are guaranteed by the Company's main shareholders; therefore, the Company assumes that these loans will revolve if necessary.
The Company raised approximately US$63 million by issuing two series of debentures on the Tel Aviv stock exchange in December 2008. The debentures are to be redeemed in six equal, annual payments at the end of each year starting in 2010 up until 2015. For further details please review note 16 of the financial statements.
Net Asset Value ("NAV")
The Company's real estate assets were valued by an external independent appraiser, Cushman & Wakefield, in accordance with International Valuation Standards on 31 December 2009 at US$783.7 million (for 100% rights from freehold/leasehold), of which MirLand's share is US$687.8 million.
Overview of Portfolio Market Values as at 31 December 2009
City |
Property Name and Address |
Portfolio Market Value as at 31st of December 2009 (Rounded) |
Percentage Owned by MirLand |
MirLand Market Value as at 31st of December 2009 (Rounded) |
Moscow |
Hydromashservice, 2-Khutorskaya str., 38A |
$59,500,000 |
100% |
$59,500,000 |
Moscow |
MAG, 2-Khutorskaya str., 38A |
$63,200,000 |
100% |
$63,200,000 |
Moscow Region |
Western Residence, Perkhushkovo, Odintsovsky district |
$84,200,000 |
100% |
$84,200,000 |
Saratov |
Triumph Mall, 167 Zarubina street |
$79,800,000 |
100% |
$79,800,000 |
Moscow |
Skyscraper, Dmitrovskoe schosse, 1 |
$51,400,000 |
100% |
$51,400,000 |
St. Petersburg |
Triumph Park, Residential |
$202,600,000 |
100% |
$202,600,000 |
St. Petersburg |
Triumph Park, Trade Centre |
$12,500,000 |
100% |
$12,500,000 |
Moscow Region |
Techagrocom, Kaluzhskoe Highway |
$37,600,000 |
50% |
$18,800,000 |
Yaroslavl |
Vernissage Mall, Kalinina str. |
$64,900,000 |
49% |
$31,801,000 |
Yaroslavl |
Phase II |
$4,300,000 |
49% |
$2,107,000 |
Moscow |
Tamiz Building |
$27,300,000 |
100% |
$27,300,000 |
Moscow |
Century Buildings |
$85,300,000 |
51% |
$43,503,000 |
Kazan |
Triumph House |
$7,600,000 |
100% |
$7,600,000 |
Penza |
Retail Centre |
$2,500,000 |
100% |
$2,500,000 |
Saratov |
Logistics Complex |
$1,000,000 |
100% |
$1,000,000 |
Total |
$783,700,000 |
|
$687,811,000 |
The full Cushman & Wakefield valuation is available on the Company's website, www.mirland-development.com.
Based on the Cushman & Wakefield valuation as at December 2009, the Company's Adjusted NAV decreased to US$472.3 million (31 December 2008: US$487.0 million), a decrease of 3%. As a result, the NAV per share as at 31 December 2009 was reduced to US$4.6 in comparison to US$4.7 as at 31 December 2008.
Cash Flow
During 2009, the Company used US$69.7 million for investment in real estate properties in comparison with US$176.0 million in 2008. Cash flow used for operating activities amounted to US$70.3 million. Cash flow provided by financing activities amounted to US$104.8 million.
Financial Strategy
In 2009, MirLand's activities were primarily financed by shareholders' loans, corporate bank loans guaranteed by the Company's main shareholders, a construction loan to the triumph Mall project in Saratov and by revenues. The Company's policy is to limit its leverage to 66% of the gross value of its assets, including all development, trading and investment properties. However, the Company anticipates that the debt markets in Russia will continue to be difficult, making project financing and other sources of financing limited.
On the other hand, residential projects are principally financed by equity as the financing market for residential projects remains relatively undeveloped in Russia. Accordingly, residential projects are constructed in phases, allowing the use of capital from pre-sales to finance upcoming development phases.
Wherever possible, the Company seeks to acquire finance on a non-recourse basis to minimise risk. In 2009, the Company signed one new corporate loan agreement and it is currently negotiating with several banks for financing some of its portfolio projects.
Market Risks
MirLand is exposed to market risks from changes in both foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
Foreign currency risk: The Company's functional currency across its operating subsidiaries is the Rouble, whereas the Company's reporting currency is the USD. The majority of the Company's revenues, costs and capital expenditures are either priced, incurred, payable or measured in USD. Although most transactions are settled in Roubles, the price for real estate property is tightly linked to the USD. However, the current trend in Russia is to move toward Rouble linked transactions and therefore, the Company will consider in the future hedging its transactions for currency risks.
Interest rate risk: whilst the Company does not currently have any significant interest bearing assets, changes in interest rates could affect the cost of current and future financing.
Credit risk: The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its tenants, purchasers and contractors and its financial statements include specific allowances for doubtful accounts. The Company also seeks to mitigate the risk of non-payment in structuring its contractual arrangements with such parties.
Roman Rozental
Chief Financial Officer
17 March 2010
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Note |
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
4 |
|
20,971 |
|
9,822 |
Short-term loans |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
- |
Trade receivables |
|
|
|
655 |
|
328 |
Other receivables |
|
5 |
|
7,686 |
|
7,238 |
Inventories of buildings for sale |
|
6 |
|
140,310 |
|
137,200 *) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,786 |
|
154,588 *) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables |
|
11 |
|
21,909 |
|
16,172 |
Investment properties |
|
7 |
|
187,419 |
|
163,987 |
Investment properties under construction |
|
8 |
|
185,043 |
|
127,037 *) |
Inventories of buildings for sale |
|
6 |
|
21,939 |
|
- |
Long-term loans |
|
9 |
|
19,311 |
|
58,525 |
Advance on acquisition of subsidiary |
|
|
|
- |
|
584 |
Financial derivative |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
719 |
Fixed assets, net |
|
10 |
|
1,232 |
|
2,154 |
Deferred expenses |
|
|
|
753 |
|
1,936 |
Deferred taxes |
|
19d |
|
6,020 |
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445,301 |
|
375,360 *) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
|
616,087 |
|
529,948 |
*) Reclassified.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Note |
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit from banks |
|
12 |
|
68,964 |
|
60,282 |
Current maturities of long-term loans from banks and debentures |
|
13, 16 |
|
15,455 |
|
1,914 |
Loans from shareholders |
|
15 |
|
20,672 |
|
- |
Government authorities |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
2,476 |
Trade payables |
|
|
|
11,584 |
|
11,615 |
Other accounts payable |
|
14 |
|
7,003 |
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,153 |
|
81,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans from banks |
|
13 |
|
74,077 |
|
17,443 |
Loans from shareholders |
|
15 |
|
24,282 |
|
9,032 |
Debentures |
|
16 |
|
52,345 |
|
62,267 |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
17 |
|
5,082 |
|
8,112 |
Deferred taxes |
|
19d |
|
14,947 |
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,733 |
|
106,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
296,886 |
|
187,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to equity holders of the Parent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued capital |
|
20 |
|
1,036 |
|
1,036 |
Share premium |
|
|
|
359,803 |
|
359,803 |
Capital reserve for share-based payment transactions |
|
22 |
|
9,974 |
|
8,080 |
Capital reserve for transactions with controlling shareholders |
|
15 |
|
2,702 |
|
579 |
Foreign currency translation reserve |
|
|
|
(23,153) |
|
(19,085) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
|
(31,186) |
|
(8,202) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,176 |
|
342,211 |
Non controlling interests |
|
|
|
25 |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
319,201 |
|
342,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
616,087 |
|
529,948 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
16 March, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Date of approval of the financial statements
|
|
Moshe Morag CEO
|
|
Roman Rozental Senior Officer Responsible for Financial Matters |
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
Note |
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except per share data) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income from investment properties |
|
|
|
14,754 |
|
17,949 |
|
10,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from managing fees |
|
|
|
2,459 |
|
2,411 |
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
17,213 |
|
20,360 |
|
12,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and management |
|
23 |
|
(7,438) |
|
(7,291) |
|
(6,384) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
9,775 |
|
13,069 |
|
6,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General, administrative and marketing expenses |
|
24 |
|
(16,314) |
|
(22,259) |
|
(19,063) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of provision to service provider |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
5,160 |
|
(7,643) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value adjustments of investment properties and investment properties under construction |
|
|
|
(16,463) |
|
(58,768) |
|
82,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses, net |
|
25 |
|
(698) |
|
(6,186) |
|
(5,469) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
(20,898) |
|
(68,984) |
|
56,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income |
|
26 |
|
8,675 |
|
9,883 |
|
23,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs |
|
26 |
|
(5,653) |
|
(44,725) |
|
(8,703) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes on income |
|
|
|
(17,876) |
|
(103,826) |
|
70,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on income |
|
19b |
|
(5,108) |
|
(1,005) |
|
(5,423) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
(22,984) |
|
(104,831) |
|
64,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share (in U.S. dollars per share): |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
(0.222) |
|
(1.012) |
|
0.627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except per share data) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
(22,984) |
|
(104,831) |
|
64,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations |
|
|
|
(4,068) |
|
(28,236) |
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
(4,068) |
|
(28,236) |
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
(27,052) |
|
(133,067) |
|
71,629 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
|
Attributable to equity holders of the Parent |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital reserve for |
|
Retained |
|
|
|
Capital reserve for transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share-based |
|
earnings |
|
Currency |
|
with |
|
|
|
Non-controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
Share |
|
payment |
|
(accumulated |
|
Translation |
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Note |
capital |
|
premium |
|
transactions |
|
deficit) |
|
reserve |
|
shareholders |
|
Total |
|
interests |
|
equity |
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2006 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
329,028 |
|
2,348 |
|
31,749 |
|
2,402 |
|
- |
|
366,527 |
|
25 |
|
366,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the year |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
64,880 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
64,880 |
|
- |
|
64,880 |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
- |
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
64,880 |
|
6,749 |
|
- |
|
71,629 |
|
- |
|
71,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of share capital (net of issue expenses) |
|
|
36 |
|
30,775 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
30,811 |
|
- |
|
30,811 |
Share-based payment transactions |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,851 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
3,851 |
|
|
|
3,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2007 |
|
|
1,036 |
|
359,803 |
|
6,199 |
|
96,629 |
|
9,151 |
|
- |
|
472,818 |
|
25 |
|
472,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(104,831) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(104,831) |
|
- |
|
(104,831) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,236) |
|
|
|
(28,236) |
|
- |
|
(28,236) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(104,831) |
|
(28,236) |
|
- |
|
(133,067) |
|
- |
|
(133,067) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment transactions |
|
22 |
- |
|
- |
|
1,881 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,881 |
|
- |
|
1,881 |
Shareholders' contribution (see Note 15) |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
579 |
|
579 |
|
- |
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
|
1,036 |
|
359,803 |
|
8,080 |
|
(8,202) |
|
(19,085) |
|
579 |
|
342,211 |
|
25 |
|
342,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(22,984) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(22,984) |
|
- |
|
(22,984) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(4,068) |
|
- |
|
(4,068) |
|
- |
|
(4,068) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(22,984) |
|
(4,068) |
|
- |
|
(27,052) |
|
- |
|
(27,052) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment transactions |
|
22 |
- |
|
- |
|
1,894 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,894 |
|
- |
|
1,894 |
Shareholders' contribution (see Note 15) |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,123 |
|
2,123 |
|
- |
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
1,036 |
|
359,803 |
|
9,974 |
|
(31,186) |
|
(23,153) |
|
2,702 |
|
319,176 |
|
25 |
|
319,201 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
(22,984) |
|
(104,831) |
|
64,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to the profit or loss items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes, net |
|
2,629 |
|
958 |
|
2,764 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
556 |
|
343 |
|
287 |
Finance costs (income), net |
|
(3,022) |
|
34,842 |
|
(14,301) |
Share-based payment |
|
1,894 |
|
1,881 |
|
3,851 |
Fair value adjustment of investment properties and investment properties under construction |
|
16,463 |
|
58,768 |
|
(82,138) |
Impairment of investment properties under construction |
|
- |
|
4,289 |
|
- |
Fair value adjustment of financial derivative |
|
(956) |
|
(769) |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,564 |
|
100,312 |
|
(89,487) |
Changes in asset and liability items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in trade receivables |
|
(317) |
|
(60) |
|
2,628 |
Increase in other accounts receivable |
|
(6,466) |
|
(2,614) |
|
(5,695) |
Increase in buildings for sale |
|
(18,473) |
|
(62,666) *) |
|
(21,401) *) |
Impairment of advances on account of investment |
|
- |
|
1,256 |
|
406 |
Increase (decrease) in trade payables |
|
284 |
|
5,016 |
|
(600) |
Increase (decrease) in other accounts payable |
|
(1,422) |
|
(2,820) |
|
9,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,394) |
|
(61,888) *) |
|
(15,512) *) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid and received during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
(8,030) |
|
(8,135) |
|
(6,881) |
Interest received |
|
236 |
|
3,156 |
|
10,343 |
Taxes paid |
|
(1,736) |
|
(1,909) |
|
(1,169) |
Taxes received |
|
537 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,993) |
|
(6,888) |
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities |
|
(40,807) |
|
(73,295) *) |
|
(37,826) *) |
*) Reclassified.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to investment properties |
|
(1,902) |
|
(29,206) |
|
(36,056) |
Additions to investment properties under construction |
|
(49,684) |
|
(50,096) *) |
|
(63,260) *) |
Capitalization of financing expenses to investment properties under construction |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2,016) |
Purchase of fixed assets |
|
(193) |
|
(679) |
|
(3,373) |
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets |
|
504 |
|
- |
|
- |
Advances on account of investments |
|
- |
|
(600) |
` |
(1,080) |
Grant of long-term loans |
|
- |
|
(47,408) |
|
(22,238) |
Collection of short-term loans |
|
- |
|
14,829 |
|
- |
Proceeds from restricted bank deposits, net |
|
- |
|
71,406 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
(51,275) |
|
(41,754) *) |
|
(128,023) *) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of shares (net of issue expenses) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
30,811 |
Advances received on account of IPO |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,053 |
Issue of debentures (net of issue expenses) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
61,756 |
Short-term credit from banks and others, net |
|
- |
|
(12,433) |
|
- |
Receipt of long-term loans from shareholders |
|
32,772 |
|
7,991 |
|
- |
Receipt of long-term loans |
|
77,330 |
|
- |
|
- |
Repayment of long-term loans |
|
(3,895) |
|
- |
|
- |
Deferred expenses on account of loan receipt |
|
(1,364) |
|
(1,500) |
|
(767) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities |
|
104,843 |
|
(5,942) |
|
92,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on balances of cash and cash equivalents |
|
(1,612) |
|
13,055 |
|
(5,832) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
11,149 |
|
(107,936) |
|
(78,828) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year |
|
9,822 |
|
117,758 |
|
196,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
|
20,971 |
|
9,822 |
|
117,758 |
*) Reclassified.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 1:- GENERAL
a. Mirland Development Corporation Plc ("the Company") was incorporated in Cyprus on 10 November 2004 under the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113 as a private company limited by shares. Its registered office is located at Thessalonikis Street, Nicolaou Pentadromos Centre, 6th floor, Limassol 3025, Cyprus.
b. The principal activities of the Company and its subsidiaries ("the Group"), which did not change from last year, are investment and development of residential and commercial real estate assets in Russia.
c. The following are the principal shareholders of the Company as of 31 December 2009:
Shareholder |
|
Rate of holding |
|
|
(%) |
|
|
|
Jerusalem Economy Ltd. ("JEC") (a company traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange) |
~ |
28.8 |
|
|
|
Industrial Buildings Corporation Ltd. ("IBC") (71.43%-owned subsidiary of JEC and traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange) |
~ |
34.0 |
|
|
|
Darban Investments Ltd. (a company traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange) |
~ |
13.5 |
All of the above shareholders are companies that are controlled, directly and indirectly, by the Fishman family.
f. Definitions:
In these financial statements:
The Company |
|
- |
|
Mirland Development Corporation Plc. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Group |
|
- |
|
Mirland Development Corporation Plc and its subsidiaries as listed below. |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
- |
|
Companies over which the company exercises control (as defined in IAS 27) and whose financial statements are consolidated with those of the company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jointly controlled entities |
|
- |
|
Companies held by a number of entities, among which contractual agreement exists for joint control and whose financial statements are consolidated with the financial statements of the company according to the proportionate consolidation method. |
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
- |
|
JEC |
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate controlling shareholder |
|
- |
|
Fishman family. |
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
- |
|
As defined in IAS 24. |
g. The following is a list of the fully consolidated subsidiaries:
Name of subsidiary |
|
Country of incorporation |
|
Activity |
|
% of holding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydromashservice LLC ("Hydro") |
|
Russia |
|
Lease of buildings |
|
100 |
Mashinostroenie & Hydravlika OJSC ("MAG") |
|
Russia |
|
Lease of buildings |
|
100 |
CreativeCom LLC ("Creative") |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting residential projects |
|
100 |
Petra 8 LLC ("Petra") |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting residential projects |
|
100 |
RealService LLC ("RealService") |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting commercial projects |
|
100 |
Investisionno Ipotechnaya Kompania Ltd. )"IIK") |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting commercial projects |
|
100 |
Mall Project Co. Ltd. ("Mall Project") |
|
Cyprus |
|
Holding company |
|
100 |
Gasconade Holding Ltd. |
|
Cyprus |
|
Holding company |
|
100 |
Laykapark Trading Ltd. |
|
Cyprus |
|
Holding company |
|
100 |
Dunchoille Holdings Ltd. |
|
Cyprus |
|
Holding and financing company |
|
100 |
Mirland Management Limited |
|
Cyprus |
|
Consulting |
|
100 |
Mirland Management RUS LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Consulting |
|
100 |
Heckbert 22 Group Financing Limited KFT |
|
Hungary |
|
Financing company |
|
100 |
IsraRussia Services Ltd. ("IRS") |
|
Israel |
|
Consulting |
|
100 |
Tamiz LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting commercial projects |
|
100 |
Design Project LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting commercial projects |
|
100 |
TTM LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting commercial projects |
|
100 |
Liga 45 LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting commercial projects |
|
100 |
WINDEAtts limited |
|
Cyprus |
|
Consulting |
|
100 |
ZARECHIE INVEST llc ("ZARECHIE") |
|
Russia |
|
Holding company |
|
100 |
POLUS INVEST LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting commercial projects |
|
100 |
MIRLAND NOVOSIBIRSK LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Lease of buildings |
|
100 |
h. List of jointly controlled entities:
|
Name of company |
|
Country of incorporation |
|
Activity |
|
% of holding |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Inverton Enterprises LLC |
|
Cyprus |
|
Holding company |
|
49 |
|
||||||
|
Astraestate & Co. Limited Partnership ("Astra") |
|
Cyprus
|
|
Partnership for holding a company, erecting commercial projects and lease of buildings |
|
50 |
|
||||||
|
Winta Holdings Ltd |
|
Cyprus |
|
Limited partner in partnership for holding a company, erecting commercial projects and lease of buildings |
|
50 |
|
||||||
|
Global 1 LLC )"Global") |
|
Russia |
|
Lease of commercial property |
|
49 |
|
||||||
|
Techagrocom-2 ("Techagrocom") |
|
Russia |
|
Erecting commercial projects |
|
50 |
|
||||||
Inomotor LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Lease of buildings |
|
*) 51 |
||||||||
AvtoPrioritet LLC |
|
Russia |
|
Lease of buildings |
|
*) 51 |
||||||||
|
Mall Mortgage LTD |
|
Cyprus |
|
Financing company |
|
49 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
*) The Company holds the Century Project in Russia. This investment was acquired on 31 December 2009. For further information see Note 7d.
i. For the year ended 31 December 2009, the Company recorded a net loss of approximately $23 million, and had negative cash flows from operating activities of approximately $23 million (excluding cash outflows for additions to costs of construction of residential projects for sale of approximately $18 million).
Based on management plans and as reflected in the Company's forecasted cash flows, the Company expects to finance its activities in 2010 among others by obtaining loans from banks in Russia which will be secured by properties which are presently unsecured with a fair value as of 31 December 2009 amounting to approximately $119 million, and by generating revenues from sales of building projects that are expected to be completed during 2010, as well as by the Company's operating cash flows.
In addition, the Company's short-term loans from banks amounting to approximately $71 million are secured by non-cancellable bank guarantees of the controlling shareholders until the full repayment of the loans.
Also, according to an amendment of an agreement dated 12 March, 2010 with the controlling shareholders of the Company, the repayment of the principal balance of loans due to the controlling shareholders amounting to $9 million and accrued interest thereon will be deferred to 31 March 2011.
The Company's policy is to continue construction of projects for which the Company is able to obtain the necessary construction financing from external sources.
Based on the above, management believes the Company will be able to meet all of its financial obligations.
NOTE 2:- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
a. Basis of presentation of the financial statements:
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as adopted by the European Union ("EU"). International Financial Reporting Standards comprise standards and interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board, and include:
a) International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
b) International Accounting Standards (IAS).
c) Interpretations to IFRS and IAS: IFRIC and SIC.
Furthermore, the financial statements are prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law Cap.113 and under historical cost convention except for investment properties investment properties under construction and financial derivatives which are measured at fair value.
The Company has been preparing financial statement in accordance with IFRS since its establishment.
The Company has elected to present the income statements using the function of expense method.
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial years, except as follows:
IAS 1 (Revised) - Presentation of Financial Statements:
Pursuant to a revision to IAS 1 (Revised), an additional separate statement, "Statement of Comprehensive Income", may be presented and display net income taken from the Income Statement and all items carried in the reported period to equity that do not result from transactions with the shareholders in their capacity as shareholders (Other Comprehensive Income (loss) and the tax effect of these items carried to equity, allocated between the Company and the minority interests. Alternatively, the items of Other Comprehensive Income may be displayed along with the items of the Income Statement in a single statement entitled "Statement of Comprehensive Income".
The revision was adopted on 1 January, 2009 with a retrospective restatement of comparative figures. The Company presents "Statement of Comprehensive Income" as an additional separate statement.
IAS 23 (Revised) - Borrowing Costs:
Pursuant to a revision to IAS 23, borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset must be capitalized. A qualifying asset is an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale and includes fixed assets and inventories. The possibility of immediately recording these costs as an expense has been removed.
The revision was adopted as a prospective change on 1 January, 2009.
The adoption of the Standard did not have any material effect on the presentation of consolidated financial statements.
IFRIC 15 - Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate:
IFRIC 15 establishes rules for distinguishing between agreements for the construction of real estate within the scope of IAS 11 and similar agreements within the scope of IAS 18. When an agreement is specifically negotiated for the construction of an asset or a combination of assets when the buyer is able to specify the major structural elements and specify any changes therein, the agreement is within the scope of IAS 11. Accordingly, revenue will be recognized by reference to the stage of completion. In contrast, when the buyer has only limited ability to influence the design or to specify only minor variations, the agreement is an agreement for the sale of real estate within the scope of IAS 18.
The Interpretation was applied retrospectively from 1 January, 2009. The initial adoption of the Interpretation did not have any material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
IAS 40 - Investment Property:
Pursuant to an amendment to IAS 40, investment property under construction or development for future use as an investment property will be classified as investment property if the fair value model is applied and it can be measured reliably. Investment property under construction will be measured at cost if fair value cannot be measured reliably until such time as the fair value becomes reliably measurable or construction is completed, whichever comes earlier.
The amendment was adopted as a prospective change from 1 January, 2009.
IFRS 2 - Share-based Payment:
Pursuant to an amendment to IFRS 2, the definition of vesting terms will only include service conditions and performance conditions and the cancellation of a grant that includes non-vesting conditions by the Company or the counterparty will be accounted for by way of acceleration of vesting and not by forfeiture. Conditions that are other than service and performance conditions will be viewed as non-vesting conditions and must therefore be taken into account when estimating the fair value of the instrument granted.
This amendment was adopted on 1 January, 2009 with a retrospective restatement of comparative figures. The initial adoption of the Standard did not have any material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures:
The amendment to IFRS 7 requires additional disclosures about fair value measurement and liquidity risk. According to the amendment, additional disclosures should be made, among others, as to the source of inputs used in making the measurements, using a three level fair value hierarchy for all financial instruments recognized at fair value. In addition, a reconciliation between the beginning and ending balance for Level 3 fair value measurements is required (source of inputs that is not based on market data), as well as disclosure of significant transfers between levels in the fair value hierarchy.
The amendment was adopted as a prospective change from the financial statements for the year beginning 1 January, 2009 (there is no need to provide comparative information).
b. Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements:
Judgments:
In the process of applying the Company's accounting policies, management has made the following judgments which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements:
Acquisitions of subsidiaries that are not business combinations:
On the day of acquisition of subsidiaries and operations, the Company assesses whether business is acquired in accordance with IFRS 3. A business generally consists of inputs, processes applied to those inputs, and resulting outputs that are, or will be, used to generate revenues. If goodwill is present, the transferred set of activities and assets shall be presumed to be a business. When no business is acquired, according to IFRS 3, the consideration is allocated between the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired on the basis of relative fair values, without allocating to goodwill or deferred taxes.
Estimates and assumptions:
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the adoption of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The underlying estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. The changes in accounting estimates are carried to the period in which they are made.
The following are the principal assumptions in the financial statements regarding uncertainties as of the balance sheet date and the critical judgments used by the Group in respect of which any material change might modify the cost of assets and liabilities in the coming reporting year:
Investment property and Investment property under construction:
Investment property is presented at fair value as of balance sheet date. Changes in fair value of investment property are carried to the income statement. Fair value is determined by independent outside appraisers based on economic evaluations that are also performed according to the revenue capitalization method. This method consists of estimating the value of the asset by discounting the expected flow of revenues over the economic useful life of the asset. This calculation involves making assumptions, among other things, as to the capitalization rates, the continued lease of the assets by the existing tenants, and the occupancy rates in the different assets. Fair value is sometimes measured with reference to recent real estate transactions with similar characteristics and location to the estimated asset. Additional information is provided in Note 7.
Investment property under construction is also valued at fair value as determined by independent real estate valuation experts, except if such values cannot be reliably determined. In the exceptional cases when a fair value cannot be reliably determined, such properties are recorded at cost. Additional information is provided in Note 8.
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred tax assets are recognized for carry forward tax losses and temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the losses can be recognized. Significant management judgment is required to determine the amount of deferred tax assets that can be recognized, based upon the likely timing and level of future taxable profits together with future tax planning strategies.
Transactions with controlling shareholder:
The Company received a long-term loan with non-market conditions from a controlling shareholder and a guarantee on a bank loan without charging a fee from a controlling shareholder. The Company accounts for these transactions as contribution from shareholders and recognizes them immediately pursuant to IAS 39 and, accordingly, the amount of contribution that is carried to equity reflects the difference between the fair value liability and the consideration received. In determining the compensation, the Company is required to evaluate the market conditions that existed when the transaction was made, including the market terms of a similar guarantee had it been given by an unrelated third party. Further details are given in Note 15.
c. Basis of consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of companies over which the Company exercises control (subsidiaries). Control is normally evidenced when the Company is able, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an enterprise so as to benefit from its activities. In the examination of the existence of control, the effect of potential voting rights exercisable as of the balance sheet date is taken into consideration. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Group obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases.
All intercompany balances and transactions among the Group companies have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Minority interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets not held by the Group and are presented within equity in the consolidated balance sheet, separately from the Company's shareholders' equity.
The accounts of a jointly controlled entity in which the shareholders share joint control under contractual consent are consolidated with those of the Company using the proportionate consolidation method. The Group consolidates its share in the jointly controlled entity's assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses with the proper financial statement items. All intercompany balances and transactions and gains and losses between the Group companies and the jointly controlled entity are eliminated based on the Company's share in the jointly controlled entity.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities are prepared for the same reporting periods as the company, using consistent accounting policies.
d. Functional and foreign currencies:
1. Functional currency:
The financial statements are presented in thousands of U.S. dollars, which is the Company's functional currency and best reflects the economic environment in which the Company operates and conducts its transactions.
The functional currency is separately determined for each subsidiary and jointly controlled entity and is used to measure their financial position and operating results. When their functional currency differs from that of the Company, the subsidiary and jointly controlled entity represent foreign operations whose financial statements are translated in order to be included in the Company's consolidated financial statements as follows:
a) Assets and liabilities in all balance sheets presented (including comparative data) are translated at the closing rate as of each balance sheet presented.
b) Income and expenses in all statements of income (including comparative data) are translated at the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions or at average exchange rates for the periods during which the transactions were made if such exchange rates approximate the actual exchange rates.
c) Share capital, capital reserves and other changes in capital are translated at the exchange rate prevailing as of the date of incurrence.
d) Retained earnings are translated based on the opening balance at the exchange rate as of that date and other relevant transactions during the period are translated as described in b) and c) above.
e) All translation differences are recorded as a separate item in shareholders' equity ("currency translation reserve").
Intragroup loans for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future are, in substance, a part of the investment in that foreign operation and are accounted for as part of the investment and the exchange differences arising in these loans (net of income taxes) are recognized in the same component of equity as discussed above.
2. Foreign currency transactions, assets and liabilities:
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded at the exchange rate on the date of transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency of the operation at the exchange rates prevailing at balance sheet date. Exchange rate differences are carried to the income statement. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into the functional currency of the operation at the exchange rates prevailing on the date of the transaction (or date of later revaluation). Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the date of the initial transaction.
3. Index-linked monetary items:
Monetary assets and liabilities linked to the changes in the Israeli Consumer Price Index ("Israeli CPI") are adjusted at the relevant index at each balance sheet date according to the terms of the agreement. Linkage differences arising from the adjustment, as above, other than those capitalized to qualifying assets or carried to equity in hedge transactions, are recognized in the statement of income.
e. Allowance for doubtful accounts:
The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined in respect of specific debts whose collection, in the opinion of the Company's management, is doubtful. Impaired debts are derecognized when they are assessed as uncollectible.
f. Inventory of buildings for sale:
The cost of the inventory of buildings for sale includes direct identifiable costs in respect of the cost of the land such as taxes, fees and levies and construction costs. The Company also recognized to cost of inventory of buildings for sale borrowing costs incurred in the period during which the Company began the land's development, pursuant to IAS 23. Capitalised costs are charged to operations, along with other costs related to the project, when revenues are recognized.
Inventories of buildings for sale are measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price during the ordinary course of business less estimated completion and selling costs.
g. The operating cycle:
The Company's normal operating cycle exceeds one year and may generally last between five and six years. Accordingly, the current assets include items that are held and are expected to be realized by the end of the Company's normal operating cycle.
h. Financial instruments:
Financial assets
Financial assets within the scope of IAS 39 are initially recognized at fair value through profit and loss in respect of which transaction costs are carried to the statement of income.
Loans and receivables:
Loans and receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. After initial measurement, loans and receivables are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any allowance for impairment. Gains and losses are recognized in the income statement when the loans and receivables are recognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process.
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings:
Loans and borrowings are initially recognized at the fair value less directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, loans, including debentures, are measured based on their terms at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Short-term borrowing are measured based on their terms normally at nominal value. Gains and losses are recognized in the Income statement when the financial assets are derecognized as well as through asset amortization process.
Offsetting financial instruments:
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount is presented in the balance sheet if there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amount and there is an intention either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Financial assets:
A financial asset is derecognized when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire or the company has transferred its contractual rights to receive cash flows from the financial asset or assumes an obligation to pay the cash flows in full without material delay to a third party and has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.
If the Company transfers its rights to receive cash flows from an asset and neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset nor transfers control of the asset, a new asset is recognized to the extent of the Company's continuing involvement in the asset. When continuing involvement takes the form of guaranteeing the transferred asset, the extent of the continuing involvement is the lower of the original carrying amount of the asset and the maximum amount of consideration received that the Company could be required to repay.
Financial liabilities:
A financial liability is derecognized when it is extinguished, i.e. when the obligation is discharged or cancelled or expires. A financial liability is extinguished when the debtor:
·; discharges the liability by paying in cash, other financial assets, goods or services; or
·; is legally released from the liability.
Where an existing financial liability is exchanged with another liability from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference between the carrying amount of the above liabilities is recognized in the statement of income. If the exchange or modification is immaterial, it is accounted for as a change in the terms of the original liability and no gain or loss is recognized from the exchange.
Impairment of financial assets:
The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.
Assets carried at amortised cost:
If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables carried at amortised cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future expected credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset's original effective interest rate.
Derivative financial instruments held for hedging:
Sometimes the Group enters into contracts with derivative financial instruments such as forward currency contracts (forward) in respect of foreign currency and interest rate swaps (IRS) to hedge its risks associated with foreign exchange rates and interest rate fluctuations. Such derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value. After initial recognition, the derivatives are measured at fair value.
Any gains or losses arising from changes in the fair values of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are carried directly to the Income Statement.
i. Leases:
The tests for classifying leases as finance or operating leases depend on the substance of the agreements and are made at the inception of the lease in accordance with the principles below as set out in IAS 17.
The Group as lessee:
Operating leases:
Lease agreements are classified as an operating lease if they do not transfer substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased asset. Lease payments are recognized as an expense in the statement of income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Group as lessor:
Operating leases:
Lease agreements where the Group does not actually transfer substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased asset are classified as operating leases. Initial direct costs incurred in respect of the lease agreement, except those relating to investment property which are carried to the Income Statement, are added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and recognized as an expense in parallel with the lease income. Lease income is recognized as revenue in the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
j. Business combinations and goodwill:
Business combinations, excluding business combinations involving entities under common control, are accounted for by applying the acquisition method pursuant to IFRS 3. Under this method, the assets and liabilities of the acquired business are identified at fair value on the acquisition date and all minority interest in the acquired entity reflects the minority shareholders' proportionate interest in the net fair value of these items. The acquisition consideration is measured at the fair value of the assets given, the equity instruments issued and the liabilities incurred on the acquisition date plus direct acquisition costs.
Goodwill acquired in a business combination is initially measured as the difference between the cost of the acquisition and the Group's interest in the net fair value of the acquired business identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. If the acquisition consideration is less than the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business, the difference is recognized as a gain in the Income Statement (negative goodwill). After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less, if appropriate, any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is not systematically amortized.
k. Acquisitions of subsidiaries that are not business combinations:
Pursuant to IFRS 3, upon the acquisition of subsidiaries and operations that do not constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3, the acquisition consideration is only allocated between the acquired business identifiable assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values on the acquisition date without attributing any amount to goodwill or to deferred taxes, whereby the minority, if any, participates at its relative share of the fair value of the net identifiable assets on the acquisition date. In the acquisition of minority interests in subsidiaries, as above, the difference between the consideration paid and the relative minority interest acquired on the date of acquisition is attributed to assets and liabilities as described above.
l. Investment properties and investment properties under construction.
An investment property is property (land or a building or both) held by the owner (lessor under an operating lease) or by the lessee under a finance lease to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both rather than for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for administrative purposes or for sale in the ordinary course of business.
Investment property is measured initially at cost, including costs directly attributable to the acquisition. After initial recognition, investment property is measured at fair value which reflects market conditions at the balance sheet date. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair values of investment property are included in the Income Statement when they arise. Investment property is not systematically depreciated.
The fair value model is also applied to investment property that is being constructed for future use as investment property when it can be reliably measured. However, when the fair value of the investment property is not reliably determinable due to the nature and scope of the project risks, the property is at cost less, if appropriate, any impairment losses, until either its fair value becomes reliably determinable or construction is completed, whichever is earlier.
An investment property is derecognized on disposal or when the investment property is withdrawn from use and no future economic benefits are expected from its disposal.
The Group determines the fair value of an investment property on the basis of a valuation by an outside independent valuator who holds a recognized and relevant professional qualification.
m. Fixed assets:
Office furniture and equipment are stated at cost, including direct acquisition costs, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, and excluding day-to-day servicing expenses.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset at annual rates of 10%-20%.
n. Borrowing costs in respect of qualifying assets:
A qualifying asset is an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale.
The capitalization of borrowing costs commences when expenses for the asset are being incurred, borrowing costs are being incurred and the activities to prepare the asset are in progress and ceases when substantially all the activities to prepare the qualifying asset for its intended use or sale are complete.
Exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings are capitalized to the extent that they are considered as an adjustment to interest costs.
The Group present items in the Income Statement as if borrowing costs had been capitalized on Investment properties under construction before measuring them at fair value.
o. Impairment of non-financial assets:
The Company assesses at each reporting date whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized if an asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments specific to the asset. The recoverable amount of an asset that does not generate independent cash flows is determined for the income-generating unit of that asset. Impairment losses are carried to the statement of income.
p. Taxes on income:
Taxes on income in the Income Statement include current and deferred taxes. The tax results in respect of current or deferred taxes are carried to the Income Statement other than if they relate to items that are directly carried to equity. In such cases, the tax effect is also carried to the relevant item in equity.
1. Current income taxes:
Current income tax liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
2. Deferred income taxes:
Deferred taxes are computed in respect of temporary differences between the amounts included in the financial statements and the amounts allowable for tax purposes, other than a limited number of exceptions.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year in which the asset is recognized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Taxes that would apply in the event of the sale of investments in investees have not been taken into account in computing the deferred taxes, as long as it is probable that the sale of the investments is not expected in the foreseeable future.
Similarly, deferred taxes that would apply in the event of distribution of earnings by investees as dividends have not been taken into account in computing the deferred taxes, since the distribution of dividends does not involve an additional tax liability.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented as non-current assets and long-term liabilities, respectively. Deferred taxes are offset if there is a legal enforceable right that allows offsetting a current tax asset against a current tax liability and the deferred taxes refer to the same taxpayer and the same tax authority.
The Company did not create deferred taxes in respect of temporary differences arising from changes in the fair value of investment properties in view of management's intention to sell the companies holding these assets rather than the assets themselves (see also Note 19e).
q. Share-based payment transactions:
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured at the fair value of the equity instruments granted at grant date. The fair value is determined using a standard pricing model.
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognized in the statement of income, together with a corresponding increase in equity, during the period which the performance and/or service conditions are to be satisfied, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award ("the vesting period"). The cumulative expense recognized for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and the Group's best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest.
If a grant of an equity instrument is cancelled, it is accounted for as if it had vested on the cancellation date, and any expense not yet recognized for the grant is recognized immediately. However, if a new grant replaces the cancelled grant and is identified as a replacement grant on the grant date, the cancelled and new grants are accounted for as a modification of the original grant, as described in the previous paragraph.
If the Company modifies the conditions on which equity-instruments were granted, an additional expense is recognized for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement or is otherwise beneficial to the employee/other service provider at the modification date.
r. Revenue recognition:
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group, the revenue can be reliably measured and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognized:
Rental income:
Rental income is accounted for on a straight-line basis over the lease terms.
Rendering of services, including management fees:
Revenue from the rendering of services is recognized by reference to the stage of completion as of the balance sheet date. Stage of completion is measured according to the reporting periods during which the services were rendered. Where the contract outcome cannot be measured reliably, revenue is recognized only to the extent of the expenses recognized that are recoverable.
Interest income:
Interest income is recognized on a cumulative basis using the effective interest rate method.
Revenues from sale of residential apartments:
Revenues from the sale of residential apartments are recognized when the principal risks and rewards relating to the ownership have been transferred to the buyer. Revenues are not recognized if there are significant uncertainties regarding the collection of the consideration and the related costs or if there is continuing managerial involvement of the Group with respect to the real estate sold. These criteria are usually met once the apartment is transferred to the buyer.
s. Finance income and expenses:
Finance income comprise interest income on amounts invested and exchange differences. Interest income is recognized as it accrues using the effective interest method. Revenues from dividend are recognized when the Group's right to receive the payment is established.
Finance costs comprise interest expenses on borrowings and changes in the time value of provisions. Borrowing costs that are not capitalized to qualifying assets are recognized in the Income Statement using the effective interest method.
Gains and losses on exchange differences are reported on a net basis.
t. Advertising expenses:
Advertising expenses are charged to the Income Statement as incurred.
u. Operating segments:
An operating segment is a component of the Group that meets the following three criteria:
1. is engaged in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses relating to intragroup transactions;
2. whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Group's chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance; and
3. for which separate financial information is available.
v. Earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings per share are computed according to the number of Ordinary shares. Basic earnings per share only include shares that were actually outstanding during the period. Convertible securities are only included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. Furthermore, options that have been exercised during the period are included in diluted earnings per share only until the exercise date and starting from that date in basic earnings per share. Options are included in diluted earnings when their exercise results in the issuance of shares for a consideration which is less than the average market price of the shares. The investor's share of earnings of an investee is included based on the earnings per share of the investee multiplied by the number of shares held by the investor.
w. Provisions:
A provision in accordance with IAS 37 is recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are measured according to the estimated future cash flows discounted using a pre-tax interest rate that reflects the market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, those risks specific to the liability.
x. Standards issued but not yet effective:
IFRS 3 (Revised) - Business Combinations and IAS 27 (Amended) - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements:
IFRS 3 (Revised) and the amendments to IAS 27 ("the Standards") will be effective for annual financial statements for periods beginning on January 1, 2010. The combined early application of the two Standards is permitted from the financial statements for periods beginning on January 1, 2008.
The principal changes expected to take place following the adoption of the Standards are:
- The definition of a business was broadened so that it contains also activities and assets that are not managed as a business as long as the seller is capable of operating them as a business.
- IFRS 3 currently prescribes that goodwill, as opposed to the acquiree's other identifiable assets and liabilities, will be measured as the excess of the cost of the acquisition over the acquirer's share in the fair value of the identifiable assets, net on the acquisition date. According to the Standards, non-controlling interests, including goodwill, can be measured either at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree's fair value of net identifiable assets, this in respect of each business combination transaction measured separately.
- Contingent consideration in a business combination is measured at fair value and changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration, which do not represent adjustments to the acquisition cost in the measurement period, are not simultaneously recognized as goodwill adjustments. If the contingent consideration is classified as a liability it will be measured at fair value through profit or loss.
- Direct acquisition costs attributed to a business combination transaction are recognized in the statement of income as incurred as opposed to the previous requirement of carrying them as part of the consideration of the cost of the business combination, which has been removed.
- Subsequent measurement of a deferred tax asset for acquired temporary differences which did not meet the recognition criteria at acquisition date will be against profit or loss and not as adjustment to goodwill.
- A transaction with the minority interests, whether a sale or an acquisition, will be accounted for as an equity transaction and will therefore not be recognized in the statement of income or have any effect on the amount of goodwill, respectively.
- A subsidiary's losses, even if resulting in a capital deficiency in a subsidiary, will be allocated between the parent company and minority interests, even if the minority has not guaranteed or has no contractual obligation for sustaining the subsidiary or of investing further amounts.
- On the loss or achievement of control of a subsidiary, the remaining investment, if any, will be revalued to fair value against gain or loss from the sale and this fair value will represent the cost basis for the purpose of subsequent treatment.
The Company is evaluating the possible effect of the adoption of the new Standard on the consolidated financial statements but is presently unable to assess such effect, if any.
IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments:
In November 2009, the IASB issued IFRS 9, "Financial Instruments", which represents the first phase of a project to replace IAS 39, "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement". IFRS 9 focuses mainly on the classification and measurement of financial assets and it applies to all financial assets within the scope of IAS 39.
According to IFRS 9, upon initial recognition, all the financial assets (including hybrid contracts with financial asset hosts) will be measured at fair value. In subsequent periods, debt instruments can be measured at amortized cost if both of the following conditions are met:
- the asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets in order to collect the contractual cash flows.
- the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
Subsequent measurement of all other debt instruments and financial assets will be at fair value.
Financial assets that are equity instruments will be measured in subsequent periods at fair value and the changes will be recognized in the statement of income or in other comprehensive income (loss), in accordance with the election of the accounting policy on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Nevertheless, if the equity instruments are held for trading, they must be measured at fair value through profit or loss. This election is final and irrevocable. When an entity changes its business model for managing financial assets it shall reclassify all affected financial assets. In all other circumstances, reclassification of financial instruments is not permitted.
The Standard will be effective starting January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. Early adoption will be made with a retrospective restatement of comparative figures, subject to the reliefs set out in the Standard.
The Company is evaluating the possible effect of the adoption of the new Standard on the consolidated financial statements but is presently unable to assess such effect, if any.
IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements:
The amendment to IAS 1 deals with current or non-current classification of the liability component of a convertible instrument. Pursuant to the amendment, terms of a liability that can, at the option of the counterparty, be settled by the issue of the entity's equity instruments do not affect its classification as current or non-current. The amendment will be prospectively adopted starting from the financial statements for periods beginning on 1 January, 2010. Earlier application is permitted.
The Company believes that the effect of the amendment on the financial statements is not expected to be material.
IAS 17 - Leases:
The amendment to IAS 17 ("the amendment") deals with the classification of land and buildings. Pursuant to the amendment, the specific criteria for classification of land were removed. Consequently, the requirement to classify a lease of land as an operating lease when title does not pass at the end of the lease no longer exists but the classification of a lease of land is examined by reference to the general guidance in IAS 17 which addresses the classification of a lease as finance or operating while taking into account that land, normally, has an indefinite economic life.
The amendment will be retrospectively or prospectively adopted starting from the financial statements for periods beginning on January 1, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. For the retrospective adoption, at the date of adoption of the amendment, the classification of the land shall be reassessed on the basis of information existing at the inception of the lease and if there has been a change in the lease classification, the guidance of IAS 17 shall be applied retrospectively at the inception of the lease. However, if the entity does not have the information necessary to apply the amendment retrospectively, it shall apply the amendment prospectively on the basis of the information existing at the date it adopts the amendment and recognize the asset and liability relating to the land lease newly classified as a finance lease at the fair value on that date. Any difference between the fair value of the asset and the fair value of the liability will be recognized in retained earnings.
The Company believes that the effect of the amendment on the financial statements is not expected to be material.
IAS 32 - Financial Instruments: Presentation - Classification of Rights Issues:
The amendment to IAS 32 determines that rights, options or share options to acquire a fixed number of the entity's equity instruments for a fixed amount of any currency are classified as equity instruments if the entity offers the rights, options or share options pro rata to all of its existing owners of the same class of its non-derivative equity instruments.
IAS 36 - Impairment of Assets:
The amendment to IAS 36 defines the required accounting unit to which goodwill will be allocated for impairment testing of goodwill. Pursuant to the amendment, the largest unit permitted for impairment testing of goodwill acquired in a business combination is an operating segment as defined in IFRS 8, "Operating Segments" before the aggregation for reporting purposes. The amendment will be prospectively adopted starting from the financial statements for periods beginning on 1 January, 2010. Earlier application is permitted.
The Company believes that the effect of the amendment on the financial statements is not expected to be material.
IFRS 5 - Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations:
According to the amendment to IFRS 5, when the parent decides to sell part of its interest in a subsidiary so that after the sale the parent retains a non-controlling interest, such as rights conferring to significant influence, all the assets and liabilities attributed to the subsidiary will be classified as held for sale if the relevant criteria of IFRS 5 are met, including the presentation as a discontinued operation. Further, an additional amendment specifies the disclosures required in respect of non-current assets (or disposal groups) that are classified as held for sale or discontinued operations. Pursuant to the amendment, only the disclosures required in IFRS 5 will be provided. Disclosures in other IFRSs apply to such assets only if they require specific disclosures in respect of non-current assets or disposal groups. The amendment will be prospectively adopted starting from the financial statements for periods beginning on 1 January, 2010. Earlier application is permitted.
The Company believes that the effect of the amendment on the financial statements is not expected to be material.
IFRIC 17 - Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners:
IFRIC 17 ("the Interpretation") provides guidance on how to account for a non-cash asset distribution to owners that are not controlling shareholders, including fixed assets, a business as defined in IFRS 3 and ownership interests in another entity. The Interpretation will be prospectively adopted starting from the financial statements for periods beginning on January 1, 2010. Earlier application is permitted.
According to the Interpretation, a liability to distribute is recognized when it is appropriately authorized by the entity. The liability is measured at the fair value of the asset to be distributed and carried directly to retained earnings in equity. At each balance sheet date, until the derecognition of the asset, the liability is measured at the fair value of the assets and the changes in fair value are carried to retained earnings. At the date of derecognition, a gain or loss is recognized in the statement of income in the amount of the difference between the amount of the liability and the carrying amount of the asset until the date of derecognition. Further, the scope of IFRS 5 was amended to include non-cash asset distributions to owners.
The Company believes that the effect of the new Interpretation on the financial statements is not expected to be material.
IFRIC 19 - Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments:
IFRIC 19 ("the Interpretation") which was published in November 2009 addresses the accounting treatment of transactions in which financial liabilities are settled by issuing equity instruments. According to the Interpretation, equity instruments issued as a replacement of a debt instrument are measured at fair value of the equity instruments issued unless the fair value can not be reliably measured. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued can not be reliably measured, then the equity instruments are measured to reflect the fair value of the financial liability extinguished when extinguished. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability extinguished and the fair value of the equity instruments issued is recognized in the statement of income.
The Interpretation will be adopted for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January, 2010.
y. change in classification
During the year, the Company has changed the classification of part of its inventories of buildings for sale to the investment properties under construction in the balance sheet, in order to properly reflect the nature of the reclassified asset. Comperative periods were reclassified for consistency such that an amount of $7,002 thousand and $5,202 thousands were reclassified from inventories of buildings for sale to investment properties under construction as of 31 December 2008 and 2007, respectively.
NOTE 3:- INTEREST IN JOINTLY CONTROLLED ENTITIES:
The list of jointly controlled entities provided in Note 1 h.
The Group's share of the assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2009 and 2008 and income and expenses of the jointly controlled entities for the years ended 31 December 2009, 2008 and 2007, which are proportionally consolidated in the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of the joint venture's statement of financial position: |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
3,095 |
|
2,017 |
Non-current assets |
|
74,662 |
|
46,394 |
Current liabilities |
|
(8,367) |
|
(6,438) |
Non-current liabilities |
|
(16,060) |
|
(18,156) |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
(53,330) |
|
(23,817) |
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of the joint venture's revenue and profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
5,354 |
|
5,562 |
|
3,547 |
Cost of sales |
|
(1,439) |
|
(1,831) |
|
(1,390) |
Administrative expenses |
|
(1,154) |
|
(713) |
|
(428) |
Fair value adjustments of investment properties and investment properties under construction |
|
5,204 |
|
(11,695) |
|
2,499 |
Finance costs |
|
(2,983) |
|
(7,669) |
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes on income |
|
4,982 |
|
(16,347) |
|
4,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on income |
|
(179) |
|
652 |
|
(586) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
4,804 |
|
(15,695) |
|
3,958 |
NOTE 4:- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at banks |
|
20,971 |
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,971 |
|
9,822 |
NOTE 5:- OTHER RECEIVABLES
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayments to suppliers |
|
601 |
|
716 |
Government authorities (mainly VAT) (1) |
|
6,192 |
|
6,318 |
Other |
|
893 |
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,686 |
|
7,238 |
(1) See also Note 11.
NOTE 6:- INVENTORIES OF BUILDINGS FOR SALE
a. Composition:
Current assets:
|
|
31 December |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land (1) |
|
65,062 |
|
72,691 *) |
|
Apartments under construction |
|
75,248 |
|
64,509 *) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,310 |
|
137,200 *) |
|
*) Reclassified
(1) Includes development costs $ 19,380 thousand and $ 16,913 thousand as of 31 December 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Non current assets:
|
|
31 December |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land (1) |
|
12,515 |
|
- |
|
Apartments under construction |
|
9,424 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,939 |
|
- |
|
(1) Includes development costs of approximately $ 5,489 thousand.
b. Inventories of building are intended for construction of residential apartments and vacation houses. The inventory is measured at lower of cost and net realized value in accordance with IAS 2.
c. Includes capitalized borrowing costs of approximately U.S. dollars 10,454 thousand for the year ended 31 December, 2009 and approximately U.S. dollars 2,075 thousand for the year ended 31 December, 2008.
d. During the period, due to a change in original construction plans for inventories of land and buildings under construction, the Company decided to reclassify approximately U.S. dollars 21 million of the inventories as non-current assets.
e. During the period the Company entered into agreements regarding the sale of 5 vacation houses in residential project near Moscow in consideration to approximately U.S Dollars 3.2 million. See also Note 14 regarding the advances from buyers.
NOTE 7:- INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
a. Composition:
|
|
31 December |
|
|||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1 January |
|
163,987 |
|
227,030 |
|
|
Additions for the year |
|
1,902 |
|
29,206 |
|
|
Purchase of new jointly controlled entities (see Note 7d) |
|
40,831 |
|
- |
|
|
Fair value adjustments |
|
(15,881) |
|
(58,768) |
|
|
Exchange rate differences |
|
(3,420) |
|
(33,481) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 31 December |
|
187,419 |
|
163,987 |
|
|
b. Investment property is stated at fair value which has been determined based on valuations performed by independent external valuation experts who hold recognized and relevant professional qualifications and who have experience in the location and category of the property being valued less the adjustments made by the Company. The valuation was prepared pursuant to international valuation standards. The fair value represents the amounts on the valuation date at which the properties will be exchanged between the buyer and seller in an arm's length transaction after the parties have acted rationally and with caution and without coercion. The fair value was measured with reference to recent real estate transactions for similar properties in the same location as the property owned by the Company, if any, and based on the expected future cash flows from the property. In assessing cash flows, their inherent risk is taken into account. In computing the fair value, the valuators used a discount rate of 12.5%-17%.
c. Fair value adjustments of investment property result in temporary differences between the carrying amount of the assets and their tax base. Since management has the intention to sell the shares of the companies holding the assets rather than the assets themselves, no deferred tax liability was recognized in respect of these differences. Nevertheless, the fair value of the assets has been reduced in order to reflect the fair value of the deferred tax liabilities that the Company would have transferred to the buyer upon the sale of the companies holding the assets. This reduction was calculated according to the income tax rate in Russia, which is 20%. Management is of the opinion that the actual amount of the reduction may be significantly lower due to the economic benefits to which the buyer is entitled upon the sale of shares. As for the tax laws applicable to the Company, see Note 19.
d. On 31 December 2007, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding with two private companies which are affiliated with the owners of a management company that provides the Company with certain services ("the Sellers") for the purchase of 51% of the Sellers' shares in the companies Inomotor LLC and Avtoprioritet LLC ("Century Companies"), both incorporated under the laws of the Russian Federation.
On 31 December, 2009, the Company has signed an agreement with the Sellers. The acquisition does not constitute a business combination as defined in IFRS-3. In accordance with the purchase agreements, a contractual agreement exists for joint control in Century Companies.
Century Companies are owners in a real estate project which is adjacent to the projects of subsidiaries of the Company ("Hydro and MAG Projects") and is comprised of two buildings. One building is owned by Inomotor and the other by Avtoprioritet. The buildings are part of the investment properties of the company.
The subsidiary granted during 2007 and 2008 loans of approximately $ 55 million to Century Companies for the purpose of investing in the project buildings and the repayment of former debts to third parties. The loans bear 11% annual interest.
In consideration of purchase of rights in Century Companies, the Company paid to the Sellers an amount of $ 1 million. In addition, $ 19 million out of loans provided by the Company to Century Companies during the years 2007 and 2008, is to be capitalized to the equity of Century Companies as part of irrecoverable obligations of the Company in accordance with the above mentioned purchase agreement. The total amount of remaining loans and the accrued interest are to be repaid from future income of Century Companies.
NOTE 8:- INVESTMENT PROPERTIES UNDER CONSTRUCTION
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|
|
|
|
a. |
At 1 January 2008 |
|
(* 93,165 |
|
Additions for the year |
|
(* 50,096 |
|
Classification from fixed assets |
|
2,981 |
|
Impairment |
|
(4,289) |
|
Effect of discounting of long-term receivables |
|
2,200 |
|
Exchange rate differences |
|
(17,116) |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
(* 127,037 |
|
Additions for the year |
|
49,684 |
|
Classification from loans |
|
6,048 |
|
Fair value adjustments |
|
(582) |
|
Exchange rate differences |
|
2,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
185,043 |
*) Reclassified.
b. The fair value of investment property under construction is either determined on the basis of the residual or the discounted cash flow (DCF) methods, as deemed appropriate by the valuation expert. The estimated fair value is based on the expected future income from the completed project using yields adjusted for the significant risks which are relevant to the construction process, including construction costs and rent that are higher than the current yields of similar completed property. The remaining expected costs of completion plus development profit are deducted from the estimated future income, as above. In computing the fair value, the valuators used a discount rate of 14.5%- 25%.
c. Fair value adjustments of investment property under construction, result in temporary differences between the carrying amount of the assets and their tax base. Since management has the intention to sell the shares of the companies holding the assets rather than the assets themselves, no deferred tax liability was recognized in respect of these differences. Nevertheless, the fair value of the assets has been reduced in order to reflect the fair value of the deferred tax liabilities that the Company would have transferred to the buyer upon the sale of the companies holding the assets. This reduction was calculated according to the income tax rate in Russia, which is 20%. Management is of the opinion that the actual amount of the reduction may be significantly lower due to the economic benefits to which the buyer is entitled upon the sale of shares. As for the tax laws applicable to the Company, see Note 19a.
NOTE 9:- LONG-TERM LOANS
Loans to jointly controlled entities bear annual interest of 11% and are repayable from future income of the entities. There will be no dividend distribution in the jointly controlled entities until the loans will not be repaid to the Company. See also Note 7d.
NOTE 10:- FIXED ASSETS, NET
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2008, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
4,866 |
|
Additions for the year |
|
679 |
|
Classification to investment properties under construction |
|
(2,981) |
|
Depreciation for the year |
|
(343) |
|
Exchange rate differences |
|
(67) |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
2,154 |
|
Additions for the year |
|
193 |
|
Disposal during the year |
|
(504) |
|
Depreciation for the year |
|
(556) |
|
Exchange rate differences |
|
(55) |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2008 |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
2,796 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(642) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2009 |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
2,314 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(1,082) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
1,232 |
|
NOTE 11:- LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES
a. Comprises of VAT which was paid upon the purchase of land and construction, and which the Group expects to recover from VAT to be collected from customers over a period of four years from the balance sheet date. The receivable is shown on its estimate present value using a discount rate of 9%.
b. Future expected VAT receivables as of 31 December 2009 are as follows:
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|
|
|
First year |
|
5,796 |
Second year |
|
10,633 |
Third year |
|
8,520 |
Fourth year |
|
4,939 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
29,888 |
NOTE 12:- CREDIT FROM BANKS
The bank loans bear annual interest at rates of LIBOR plus 0.9% to 3.8%. During September 2008, the Company's main shareholders (companies that are part of the Fishman Group) have reinstated guarantees in favor of certain banking institutions that have granted the Company lines of credit in the aggregate amount of $ 70 million. See also Note 15a.
These loans were classified as short-term loans due to the fact that according to the loan agreement, the bank may demand repayment of the loans at any time.
NOTE 13:- LOANS FROM BANKS
a. In February 2006, a jointly controlled entity received a loan of approximately $ 42 million from bank, bearing annual interest of 12%. As collateral for this loan, the jointly controlled entity pledged 100% of Inverton shares to the bank. Company's relative share in the loan is approximately $ 18 million as of 31 December 2009.
b. During the period, a subsidiary of the Company (IIK) received a loan from EBRD of approximately $ 48 million. The loan is repayable in annual installments, commencing 2011. The loan bears interest of 2.5%-5% (2.9%-5.4% as of 31 December, 2009). The loan is a part of a credit agreement with the bank, as described below:
On 29 May 2007, IIK entered into an agreement with a bank whereby the bank extended to IIK during 2009 a loan of approximately $ 48.5 million to IIK for a period of 15 years to be repaid in quarterly installments.
The loan bears interest of Libor + 2.5% -5%. The Company guaranteed IIK's liabilities towards the bank until the conditions undertaken by IIK toward the bank have been met as detailed below:
1. The project will be completed by 31 December 2011.
2. IIK's debt coverage ratio will not fall below 1.3.
3. The ratio of equity to total liabilities will not fall below 0.5 before the project is completed and 0.4 after the project is completed.
4. No dividends will be distributed until the project is completed.
5. No investments will be made of an aggregate amount exceeding $ 250 thousand that are not in compliance with the bank approved project budget.
To secure the loan, IIK will pledge its rights to the project area and rights to the project in addition to the shares of IIK held by the Company in favor of the bank.
Expenses regarding this loan were recorded as other assets in the balance sheet. Once the loan was received, these deferred expenses were been discounted from the loan and recognised in profit and loss according to the effective interest method.
As of 31 December, 2009 IIK complies all the covenants regarding this loan.
c. During December 2009 a subsidiary of the Company (MAG) signed an agreement with CB Uniastrum Bank LLC (the Bank). In accordance with the agreement, the bank has approved a credit line of approximately $ 30 million. On 17 December, 2009 MAG received a loan of approximately $ 15 million as part of the approved credit line. The loan bears an annual interest of 10.7% and is to be repaid on December 3, 2010. However the loan can be extended for 1 year period by a written application of MAG and MAG intends to prolong the loan on December 2010. The maturity date of the loan extensions cannot exceed 10 years. The rest of the approved credit line will be granted to MAG in accordance to future rental revenues. The covenants of the loan are as following: a) rental income to the loan payments ratio should be at least 1.3 to 1; b) fair value of the pledged assets shall not be lower than twice the carrying amount of the loan.
As collateral for this credit, MAG has pledged its rights in investment properties presented at fair value of $ 88 million as of 31 December, 2009 and other subsidiary of the Company (Hydro) had provided a guarantee for this credit.
As of 31 December, 2009 MAG complies all the covenants regarding this loan.
d. The maturity dates of long-term loans subsequent to balance sheet date are as follows:
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
First year - current maturities |
|
4,830 |
|
1,914 |
Second year |
|
18,190 |
|
2,059 |
Third year |
|
2,925 |
|
15,384 |
Fourth year and after |
|
52,962 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,907 |
|
19,357 |
NOTE 14:- OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Rent received in advance |
|
2,684 |
|
2,047 |
Deposits from tenants (1) |
|
1,569 |
|
2,065 |
Advances from buyers |
|
813 |
|
- |
Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
1,937 |
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,003 |
|
5,417 |
(1) The deposits do not bear interest.
NOTE 15:- LOANS AND GUARANTEES FROM SHAREHOLDERS
a. During September 2008, the main shareholders of the Company (companies that are part of Fishman Group) have reinstated certain guarantees in favor of certain banks that secured lines of credit in the aggregate amount of approximately $ 70 million that were previously granted to the Company.
b. On 11 December 2008, the Company signed a loan facility agreement with its main shareholders. According to the agreement the Company received in December 2008 loans in the amount of $ 8 million. The loans bear interest of 12% and are repayable on 31 March 2010.
During 2009 the Company received additional loans of approximately $ 23 million, bearing the same terms.
According to an amendment of an agreement dated 16 November, 2009 with the controlling shareholders of the Company, the repayment of the principal balance of loans due to the controlling shareholders amounting to $22 million and accrued interest thereon will be deferred to 31 March 2011 and the interest rate on the loans provided by shareholders will be 15% on extension period.
According to an amendment of an agreement dated 15 March, 2010 with the controlling shareholders of the Company, the repayment of the principal balance of loans due to the controlling shareholders amounting to $9 million and accrued interest thereon will be deferred to 31 March 2011 and the interest rate will be 15% on extension period
c. During 2009, the Company received loans from principal shareholders (companies owned by the Fishman Group) of approximately $ 10 million, repayable on 31 December 2010. These loans bear interest at an annual rate of 15%.
NOTE 16:- DEBENTURES
a. On 7 December 2007, the Company raised approximately $ 63 million of debt by the issuance of 2 series (A and B) of debentures on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange. Both series are repayable in 6 annual equal and consecutive payments on 31 December for each of the years 2010-2015 (inclusive). Issuance expenses of approximately $ 1 million were discounted from the amount of the debentures and will be recognised according to the effective interest method.
Series A - is in NIS linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index. The debenture pays an annual interest rate of 6.5%. The Company has entered into a swap agreement regarding this series.
Series B - is in NIS linked to the NIS/U.S. dollar exchange rate. The debenture pays an interest of Libor (for dollar deposits for a period of six months) plus a margin of 2.75%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2009 |
|
|
Quantity of the debentures in thousands |
|
Effective semi-annual interest rate |
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
39,260 |
|
3.41% |
|
11,816 |
Series B |
|
204,874 |
|
1.61% |
|
51,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2008 |
|
|
Quantity of the debentures in thousands |
|
Effective semi-annual interest rate |
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
39,260 |
|
3.41% |
|
10,583 |
Series B |
|
204,874 |
|
2.84% |
|
51,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,267 |
b. The expected maturities after the balance sheet date for the year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
Less than one year |
|
1 to 2 years |
|
2 to 3 years |
|
3 to 4 years |
|
4 to 5 years |
|
> 5 years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
1,911 |
|
1,911 |
|
1,911 |
|
1,911 |
|
1,911 |
|
1,911 |
|
11,466 |
|
Series B |
|
8,714 |
|
8,714 |
|
8,714 |
|
8,714 |
|
8,714 |
|
8,714 |
|
52,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,625 |
|
10,625 |
|
10,625 |
|
10,625 |
|
10,625 |
|
10,625 |
|
63,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected maturities after the balance sheet date for the year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
Less than one year |
|
1 to 2 years |
|
2 to 3 years |
|
3 to 4 years |
|
4 to 5 years |
|
> 5 years |
|
Total |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
- |
|
1,784 |
|
1,784 |
|
1,784 |
|
1,784 |
|
3,570 |
|
10,706 |
Series B |
|
- |
|
8,714 |
|
8,714 |
|
8,714 |
|
8,714 |
|
17,433 |
|
52,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
10,498 |
|
10,498 |
|
10,498 |
|
10,498 |
|
21,003 |
|
62,995 |
Less discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,267 |
c. Regarding acquisitions by related parties, see Note 27 b.
NOTE 17:- OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision to service provider (1) |
|
- |
|
3,374 |
||
Deposits from tenants |
|
1,105 |
|
1,141 |
||
Provision regarding an agreement with government authorities (see Note 28l) |
|
3,417 |
|
3,328 |
||
Other |
|
560 |
|
269 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
5,082 |
|
8,112 |
||
(1) According to the management services agreements signed between MAG and Hydro ("the Companies") and FIN ("the Service Provider"), in return for the service provider's assistance in sourcing the project, the Service Provider shall be entitled to a payment equal to 10% of the net profit (as defined below) of the Companies from their ongoing operation as well as in case of the sale of properties, if they are sold to a third party. See also Notes 28b and 28h.
The net profit in relation to these properties is calculated as: the price of the property paid by a third party, less any expenses that the Companies have incurred as a result of such sale, less repayments of any external debt of the Companies, and only after the balance of any outstanding shareholder loans plus an annual interest of 10% have been repaid in full to the relevant shareholder and/or repayment of any other third party financing relating to said property. The amounts paid for the acquisition of the Companies at the date of acquisition and thereafter will be treated as shareholders loans to the Group for the purposes therein.
The Group has accounted for this payment as an interest in the profits of MAG and Hydro. Accordingly, a liability measured at fair value has been recorded based on the fair value of the properties as recorded in the financial statements at each reporting period date.
NOTE 18:- FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
a. Financial risk factors:
The Group's activities in the Russian market expose it to various financial risks such as market risk (foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and CPI risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group's comprehensive risk management plan focuses on activities that reduce to a minimum any possible adverse effects on the Group's financial performances.
1. Exchange rate risk:
The Group has balances of financial instruments held in Ruble, New Israeli Shekels ("NIS") and Hungarian Forint ("HUF"). The Group is exposed to changes in the value of these foreign currencies due to changes in exchange rates against the U.S. dollar. The Group's policy is not to enter into any hedging transactions in order to hedge against exchange rate risks, except for raising funding from the public.
a) The following table represents the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in the U.S. dollar/Ruble exchange rates in the year 2009:
|
|
Effect on equity |
||||||
|
|
Increase |
|
Decrease |
||||
|
|
5% |
|
5% |
||||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term receivables |
|
(1,147) |
|
1,147 |
||||
Lease agreements |
|
(113) |
|
113 |
||||
b) The following table represents the sensitivity to a reasonable possible change in U.S. dollars/NIS exchange rates in the year 2009:
|
|
Effect on profit before tax |
||||||
|
|
Increase |
|
Decrease |
||||
|
|
5% |
|
5% |
||||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures (series A) and swap agreement |
|
(73) |
|
73 |
||||
2. Credit risk:
The Group performs ongoing evaluations of the prospects of collecting debts of customers and buyers and, if necessary, it records a provision in the books reflecting the losses anticipated by management. The financial statements do not include an allowance for doubtful accounts since management believes, from past experience, that the chances of collecting all the debts of customers and buyers are good. The maximum credit risk is the carrying amount of the financial assets in the reporting period.
Credit risk may arise to the Company from concentration of revenues to a major client. The rental income of the Company from this client amounted in the year 2009 to approximately 15% of total rental income from investment properties.
3. Interest rate risk:
In December 2007, the Group issued debentures (see Note 23). These balances bear variable interest and therefore expose the Group to cash flow risk in respect of increase in interest rates.
a) The following table represents the sensitivity to a reasonable possible change in interest on balances in U.S. dollars in the year 2009:
|
|
Effect on equity |
||||||
|
|
Increase |
|
Decrease |
||||
|
|
5% |
|
5% |
||||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial derivatives |
|
(6) |
|
6 |
||||
Long term receivables |
|
353 |
|
(353) |
||||
Lease agreements |
|
(2,034) |
|
2,126 |
||||
Rent agreements |
|
(91) |
|
99 |
||||
b) The following table represents the sensitivity to a reasonable possible change in interest on balances in U.S. dollars in the year 2009:
|
|
Effect on profit before tax |
||||||
|
|
Increase |
|
Decrease |
||||
|
|
5% |
|
5% |
||||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures (series A) and swap agreement |
|
(237) |
|
237 |
||||
4. Significant risk exposure:
The only item in the balance sheet that is affected significantly by various risks is debentures denominated in shekels. Since there is a hedge on this item, the risk is not material.
b. The table below summarises the maturity profile of the Group's financial liabilities at 31 December 2009 and 2008 based on contractual undiscounted payments.
|
|
31 December 2009 |
||||||||||
|
|
On demand |
|
Less than 3 months |
|
3 to 12 months |
|
1 to 5 years |
|
> 5 years |
|
Total |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans from banks |
|
- |
|
1,006 |
|
3,824 |
|
27,364 |
|
46,713 |
|
78,907 |
Long-term loans from shareholders |
|
- |
|
- |
|
20,672 |
|
24,282 |
|
- |
|
44,954 |
Debentures |
|
- |
|
- |
|
10,495 |
|
41,980 |
|
10,495 |
|
62,970 |
Short-term loans from banks |
|
68,964 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
68,964 |
Accounts payable and accruals |
|
- |
|
3,342 |
|
11,998 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
15,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,964 |
|
4,348 |
|
46,989 |
|
93,626 |
|
57,208 |
|
271,135 |
|
|
31 December 2008 |
||||||||||
|
|
On demand |
|
Less than 3 months |
|
3 to 12 months |
|
1 to 5 years |
|
> 5 years |
|
Total |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||||||
Long-term loans from banks |
|
- |
|
479 |
|
1,436 |
|
17,443 |
|
- |
|
19,358 |
Long-term loans from shareholders |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
9,032 |
|
- |
|
9,032 |
Debentures |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
41,511 |
|
20,756 |
|
62,267 |
Short-term loan from bank |
|
60,282 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
60,282 |
Accounts payable and accruals |
|
- |
|
4,539 |
|
9,551 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
14,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,282 |
|
5,018 |
|
10,987 |
|
67,987 |
|
20,756 |
|
165,029 |
c. Fair value of financial instruments:
Set out below is a comparison by category of carrying amounts and fair values of all the financial instruments of the Group in 2009 and 2008:
|
|
31 December 2009 |
||||
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans |
|
19,311 |
|
19,363 |
|
|
Long-term receivables and prepayments |
|
21,909 |
|
21,909 |
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
8,341 |
|
8,341 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
20,971 |
|
20,971 |
|
|
Loans from shareholders |
|
(44,954) |
|
(44,954) |
|
|
Debentures (series A) and swap agreement (1) |
|
(11,816) |
|
(9,516) |
|
|
Debentures (series B) |
|
(51,154) |
|
(40,161) |
|
|
Long-term loans from banks (including current maturities) |
|
(78,907) |
|
(78,907) |
|
|
Accounts payable and accruals, including income tax |
|
(21,062) |
|
(21,062) |
|
|
|
31 December 2008 |
||||
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
Fair value |
||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans |
|
58,525 |
|
58,525 |
|
|
Long-term receivables and prepayments |
|
16,172 |
|
16,172 |
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
7,566 |
|
7,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
9,822 |
|
9,822 |
|
|
Loans from shareholders |
|
(9,032) |
|
(7,841) |
|
|
Debentures (series A) and swap agreement (1) |
|
(10,583) |
|
8,652 |
|
|
Debentures (series B) |
|
(51,684) |
|
(51,684) |
|
|
Long-term loans from banks (including current maturities) |
|
(19,357) |
|
(21,352) |
|
|
Accounts payable and accruals, including income tax |
|
(19,508) |
|
(19,508) |
|
(1) The fair value represents the market value of the debentures on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.
d. On 31 December 2007, the Company entered into a transaction agreement with Bank Leumi (UK) plc. According to the agreement, payments of the Company on account of Series A debentures (see Note 16) will be linked to the NIS/U.S. dollar rate as of 31 December 2007, and the interest payments will be according to LIBOR (for dollar deposits for a six-month period), plus a margin of 3.72%. The transaction hedging is not recognised for accounting purposes, therefore it is recorded in each period in profit and loss account according to the fair value. The fair value of the swap agreement at 31 December 2008 amounted to $ 719 thousand and the fair value of the swap agreement at 31 December 2009 amounted to $ 1,675 thousand.
e. The Group's capital management objectives are to maintain healthy capital ratios in order to support its business activity and maximise shareholders value.
The Group acts to achieve a capital return at a level that is customary in the industry and markets in which the Group operates. This return is subject to changes depending on market conditions in the Group's industry and business environment.
The Group monitors its capital level using the ratio of net debt to adjusted capital. Net debt is calculated as the total debt less cash and cash equivalents. Adjusted capital includes the equity components: share capital, premium, retained earnings, capital reserves and shareholders' loans and excludes currency translation adjustment reserves and treasury shares.
f. On 11 December 2008, the Company signed a loan facility agreement with its main shareholders (see Note 15). The fair value of this transaction is recorded in the equity of the Company ("shareholders' contributions") and is amortised in the subsequent periods through profit and loss.
g. Linkage terms of financial assets by groups of financial instruments pursuant to IAS 39:
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
||
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
linkage |
|
|
|
|
dollar |
|
RUB |
|
basis |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
19,039 |
|
1,852 |
|
60 |
|
20,971 |
Loans and receivables |
|
20,571 |
|
23,968 |
|
- |
|
50,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,610 |
|
32,006 |
|
60 |
|
71,696 |
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
||
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
linkage |
|
|
|
|
dollar |
|
RUB |
|
basis |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
4,828 |
|
4,963 |
|
31 |
|
9,822 |
Loans and receivables |
|
60,553 |
|
21,711 |
|
2 |
|
82,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,381 |
|
26,674 |
|
33 |
|
92,088 |
h. Linkage terms of financial liabilities by groups of financial instruments pursuant to IAS 39:
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
||
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
linkage |
|
|
|
|
dollar |
|
RUB |
|
basis |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
|
5,698 |
|
7,134 |
|
689 |
|
14,521 |
Loans from banks and related parties |
|
243,979 |
|
- |
|
11,816 |
|
255,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,677 |
|
7,134 |
|
12,505 |
|
269,316 |
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
||
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
linkage |
|
|
|
|
dollar |
|
RUB |
|
basis |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
|
45 |
|
12,848 |
|
22 |
|
12,915 |
Loans from banks and related parties |
|
144,122 |
|
- |
|
10,644 |
|
154,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,167 |
|
12,848 |
|
10,666 |
|
167,681 |
NOTE 19:- INCOME TAX
a. Tax applicable to the Group companies
The Company is considered to be a Cypriot tax resident company, holding directly or through subsidiaries which are considered to be Cyprus tax resident companies ("Cypriot Holding Companies") Russian tax resident Companies which are involved in residential and commercial projects in Russia ("Russian Companies"). The Company is financing its activities through a Hungarian tax resident subsidiary ("Hungarian subsidiary"). The Hungarian subsidiary is operating through a Swiss financing branch. An Israeli tax resident subsidiary of the Company ("Israeli Company"). is providing consulting services to the Russian Companies. Furthermore, a Cypriot tax resident subsidiary ("Cypriot consultant Company") is providing technical services to the Russian Companies.
As far as the Company is aware, control and management of the Company and its subsidiaries (except for the Israeli Company) is not exercised from Israel, and there is no economical substance in Israelfor each one of the subsidiaries in accordance with tax laws in Israel. Therefore, the Company's income is not of Israeli source and the Company's income is not expected to be taxable in Israel (except for the income of the Israeli Company)
Taxation in Cyprus:
- Companies the management and control of which is exercised from Cyprus are subject to Corporate Income Tax in Cyprus at a rate of 10% on their worldwide profit from business operations, taking into account certain exemptions
- Dividends received by the Company and the Cypriot Holding Companies are exempt from Corporate Income Tax in Cyprus.
Dividends received by Cypriot tax resident companies from non taxresident subsidiaries ("foreign companies") are exempt from Defence Tax in Cyprus provided certain requirements are met. Dividend income received from the Russian companies shall be exempt from Defence Tax exempt in Cyprus in accordance with Cyprus tax laws provided these companies either derive at least 50% of their income (either directly or indirectly) from activities not leading to investment income or provided the foreign tax burden on their profits has not been substantially lower than 5%. On this basis dividends to be received by the Company and the Cypriot Holding Companies from the Russian Companies should reasonably be exempt from Defence Tax in Cyprus.
- The distribution of dividends by the Cypriot HoldingCompanies to the Company is not subject to tax in Cyprus. If the Cypriot Holding Companies do not distribute at least 70% of their accounting profits (excluding revaluations and fair value adjustments) within a 2 year period to the Company then a deemed distribution of 70% of such profits shall be constituted which is subject to Defence Tax at a rate of 15%.
- A gain from the sale of shares of the Russian companies or Cypriot Holding Companies by the Company shall be exempt from Corporate Income Tax and shall not be subject to Capital Gains Tax in Cyprus.
Taxation in Russia:
- Income from the sale or lease of real estate in Russia, net of legally deductible expenses, should be subject to corporate tax of 20% in Russia.
- The Russian companies must pay property tax at a maximum rate of 2.2% of the value of the properties in the financial statements of those Russian companies, prepared in accordance with Russian GAAP. In view of the Company's policy to acquire companies rather than properties, this tax liability is immaterial.
- Russian companies that own real estate are liable to pay real estate tax at a maximum rate of 1.5% of the value of the real estate in the Land Registrar's Office.
- The distribution of dividends by the Russian companies to the Company or to the Cypriot holding companies will be subject to withholding tax in Russia at a rate of 5% according to the treaty between Russia and Cyprus.
- Losses for tax purposes are deductible from taxable revenues during 10 years after tax are formed.
- A capital gain from the sale of shares of the Russian companies by the Company or the Cypriot holding companies is tax exempt in Russia subject to certain conditions, in accordance with the treaty for the prevention of double taxation signed between Russia and Cyprus.
In accordance with minutes of the tax agreement between Russia and Cyprus (which has not been ratified yet and therefore is not yet valid), capital gain from sale of shares of Russian Companies, whose assets consists more than 50% real estate assets is to be taxable in Russia at 20%. This change is not expected to occur before 1 January, 2015 (4 years from the date the minutes were ratified).
Taxation in Hungary:
- Net interest income is subject to corporate income tax in Hungary at a rate of 16%.It is also subject to solidarity tax of 4%.
- According to the thin capitlization rules, if the average debt exceeds three times the Company's average equity, the excess interest expense (interest expense on the debt potion exceeding the 3:1 ratio) will not be tax deductible in the fiscal year in which it was created and could not be carried forward for use in subsequent years.
Taxation in Israel:
- In July 2009, the "Knesset" (Israeli Parliament) passed the Law for Economic Efficiency (Amended Legislation for Implementing the Economic Plan for 2009 and 2010), 2009, which prescribes, among others, an additional gradual reduction in the rates of the Israeli corporate tax and real capital gains tax starting 2011 to the following tax rates: 2011 - 24%, 2012 - 23%, 2013 - 22%, 2014 - 21%, 2015 - 20%, 2016 and thereafter - 18%.
- The Company is subject to the Income Tax (Inflationary Adjustments) Law, 1985 according to which, until 2007, the results for tax purposes were adjusted for the changes in the Israeli CPI.
In February 2008, the "Knesset" (Israeli parliament) passed an amendment to the Income Tax (Inflationary Adjustments) Law, 1985, which limits the scope of the law starting 2008 and thereafter. Starting 2008, the results for tax purposes are measured in nominal values, excluding certain adjustments for changes in the Israeli CPI carried out in the period up to December 31, 2007. The amendment to the law includes, inter alia, the elimination of the inflationary additions and deductions and the additional deduction for depreciation starting 2008.
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
b. Tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax |
|
1,819 |
|
1,844 |
|
2,659 |
Prior year taxes |
|
- |
|
(849) |
|
- |
Deferred taxes |
|
3,289 |
|
10 |
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense in Income Statement |
|
5,108 |
|
1,005 |
|
5,423 |
c. A reconciliation between the tax expense in the Income Statement and the product of profit before tax multiplied by the current tax rate can be explained as follows:
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
Profit (loss) before tax expense |
|
(17,876) |
|
(103,826) |
|
70,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax at the statutory tax rate in Cyprus (10%) |
|
(1,788) |
|
(10,383) |
|
7,030 |
Increase (decrease) in respect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary differences in respect of which no deferred tax was recorded |
|
3,293 |
|
6,846 |
|
(17,918) |
Effect of different tax rate in Russia (20%) and Hungary (16%) |
|
2,102 |
|
6,375 |
|
13,224 |
Effect of change in tax law in Russia |
|
- |
|
196 |
|
- |
Prior year taxes |
|
- |
|
(849) |
|
- |
Losses for which deferred tax assets were not recorded |
|
2,544 |
|
416 |
|
2,852 |
Income not subject to tax |
|
(821) |
|
(716) |
|
(641) |
Other |
|
(222) |
|
(880) |
|
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
5,108 |
|
1,005 |
|
5,423 |
d. Deferred taxes:
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance - net credit balance |
|
4,908 |
|
4,904 |
Charged to the Income Statement |
|
3,289 |
|
10 |
Purchase of new jointly controlled entities (see Note 7d) |
|
660 |
|
- |
Exchange rate differences |
|
70 |
|
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance - net credit balance |
|
8,927 |
|
4,908 |
e. The fair value adjustments of the investment properties result in a temporary difference between the carrying value of the properties and their tax basis. Since it is the intention of management to sell the shares in companies holding these properties rather than the properties themselves, deferred taxes on the above differences have not been recorded. However, the fair values of the properties have been reduced in 2009 and 2008 by $ 16,463 thousand and $ 58,768 thousand, respectively, to reflect the fair values of the deferred tax liabilities that the Company would transfer to a buyer upon the sale of the companies owning the properties. The reduction was calculated based on the 20% income tax rate in Russia. The Company's management believes that the actual amount of the reduction might be substantially lower due to economic benefits that the buyer will be entitled to, based upon the differences arising from the method of disposal, (i.e. direct asset sale or share sale).
f. The tax losses carried forward of the Group companies amount to approximately $ 27 million and a deferred tax asset amounting to $ 6 million has been recognised.
NOTE 20:- EQUITY
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized shares of $ 0.01 par value each |
|
1,200,000 |
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and fully paid shares of $ 0.01 par value each |
|
1,035,580 |
|
1,035,580 |
Dividend policy
The Company adopted a dividend policy which reflects the long-term earnings and cash flow potential of the Company, taking into account the Company's capital requirements, while at the same time maintaining an appropriate level of dividend cover. Subject to these factors, and where it is otherwise appropriate to do so, the Company intends to declare a dividend of 2% of the Adjusted NAV on Admission (taking into account the net proceeds of the Placing) for each financial year, and 7% of the Adjusted NAV on Admission (market value of company's property assets, as determined by a third party valuation, adjusted to reflect the percentage interests held by the Group, plus its non-property assets minus its total liabilities minus assumed amounts payable under certain management services agreements with Senior Managers) for each financial year, with a view to increasing the dividend in line with the Company's cash flow growth in the future.
Due to the global financial crisis and the downturn of the Russian real estate market, the Company decided not to declare a dividend for the year 2009. The Company intends to continue to evaluate its ability to declare a dividend during 2010, taking into account, inter alia, the cash flow levels of the Company and the economical conditions of the Russian real estate market.
Share option schemes
The Company adopted a share option plan on 19 November 2006 ("the Adoption Date"), according to which a certain portion of the options was granted immediately with the remaining options to be granted in the future.
The Company granted on 18 December 2006 options to purchase 1,871,658 Ordinary shares under the share option plan to employees ("the Employee Options"). The exercise price of the Employee Options is equivalent to the price of the offering of the Ordinary shares (GBP 4.78 per share). The Employee Options will vest over a period of three years from the grant date, in equal tranches from the anniversary of the grant date. Termination of employment renders the options that are not yet vested, expired. The options will expire within five years from the date of grant or within three months from the date of termination of employment, whichever is sooner.
The Company also granted at the same date, options to purchase 1,497,326 Ordinary shares that were granted under the share, option plan to officers of subsidiaries of the Company ("Options to Officers"). For additional information see Note 22.
Shareholders' contributions:
The shareholders' contributions are comprised of the following:
(1) The fair value surplus from the provision of shareholders' loans at below market interest rate.
(2) The fair value surplus from the financial guarantees provided by the shareholders with respect to the bank loans.
NOTE 21:- EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Ordinary shares used for computing basic earnings per share (in thousands) |
|
103,558 |
|
103,558 |
|
103,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Ordinary shares used for computing diluted earnings per share (in thousands) (see Note 20) (1) |
|
103,558 |
|
103,558 |
|
103,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) used for computing basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
(22,984) |
|
(104,831) |
|
64,880 |
(1) The options have no dilutive impact in 2009, 2008 and 2007.
NOTE 22:- SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
a. The terms of half of the Options to Officers are identical to the terms of options to the employees. The Options to Officers will vest over three years from the grant date, in equal tranches from the anniversary of the grant date. Termination of the engagement renders the options that are not yet vested expired. The options to Officers are to be exercised within five years from the grant date, otherwise they expire.
The other half of the Options to Officers vest on the grant date. The exercise of the Employee Options and the Options to Officers will be a cashless exercise according to a mechanism determined by the Company's Board (so that in practice, the number of shares allocated to the option holder will only be in respect of the bonus component upon the exercise, where the exercise price is not paid by the option holder).
As part of the December 18, 2006 offering terms, the IPO underwriters accompanying the issuance received an option to purchase 3,558,000 shares of the Company for an exercise price of GBP 4.78 per share. The option was exercisable until 6 January 2007. On 4 January 2007, some of the options were exercised. The weighted average share price at that date was GBP 4.78. The above grant had no effect on the financial statements since it was accounted as part of the issuance of the shares carried to equity.
b. The following table lists the binomial model used for the plans for the year ended 31 December 2009:
|
|
Vested on grant date |
|
|
|
Expected volatility (%) |
|
31.89 |
Risk-free interest rate (%) |
|
5 |
Expected life of option (months) |
|
0 |
Weighted average share price (GBP) |
|
4.78 |
|
|
Vested over three years |
|
|
|
Expected volatility (%) |
|
31.89 |
Risk-free interest rate (%) |
|
5 |
Expected life of option (months) |
|
12 |
Weighted average share price (GBP) |
|
4.78 |
The expected life of the options is based on historical data and Company's expectations and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome. The volatility was calculated according to comparative data of companies with similar activity.
No options were exercised as of the balance sheet date.
The options were appraised by an independent appraisal company.
c. On 16 October 2009, the Board announced that Mr. Roman Rozental, who is currently the CFO of the Company will be appointed CEO with effect from 1 January 2011 and will continue to be employed as CFO of the Company until that time.
Mr. Morag's appointment as CEO of the Company has been extended until 31 December 2010. After that, it is intended that he will serve as a non-executive director for a further period of six months in order to ensure the Company will continue to benefit from his experience over that period.
On 16 October 2009, 1,122,995 share options have been granted to Mr. Morag, at an exercise price of 250 pence per share and exercisable until 19 December 2012. The Company acknowledged $ 663 thousands expenses regarding this granting.
At the same time, Mr. Morag's existing share options, granted at the time of the Company's IPO, will be cancelled. Under the rules of the Company's share option scheme, shareholder consent is required to extend the life of the options beyond three months from Mr. Morag ceasing his anticipated non-executive directorship and accordingly it is expected that shareholder consent will be sought for this extension at the Company's next General Meeting which will be held in May 2010.
On 16 October 2009, 449,198 share options have been granted to Mr. Rozental, at an exercise price of 250 pence per share and exercisable until 19 December 2012. The Company acknowledged $ 266 thousands expenses regarding this granting.
At the same time, Mr. Rozental's existing share options, granted at the time of the Company's IPO, will be cancelled. It has also been agreed with Mr. Rozental, that on or before his appointment as CEO of the Company, he will be granted a further 673,797 share options. The exercise price for these options shall be equal to the aggregate of shareholder equity (as shown in the Company's consolidated balance sheet as at 30 June 2010) divided by the Company's fully diluted share capital, subject to such price not being less than the Company's share price as at the date of grant.
On 16 October 2009, 374,331 share options were granted to service provider at an exercise price of 250 pence per share and exercisable until 19 December, 2012. The Company acknowledged $ 221 thousands expenses regarding this granting.
|
|
Vested on grant date |
|
|
|
Expected volatility (%) |
|
82.59 |
Risk-free interest rate (%) |
|
0.6 |
Expected life of option (months) |
|
0 |
Weighted average share price (GBP) |
|
2.50 |
c. Details on equity-settled share-based payment transaction:
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of the options |
|
9,974 |
|
8,823 |
Less - recognized as expense in the income statement |
|
(9,974) |
|
(8,080) |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense to be recognised in the future |
|
- |
|
743 |
In the years 2009 and 2008, there were no exercise of any of the options granted to Employees or Officers.
d. The weighted average remaining contractual life for the share options outstanding as at 31 December, 2009 is:
Shares issued 18 December 2006: 1.97
Shares issued 16 October 2009 (see Note 22c above): 2.97
NOTE 23:- OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance of property |
|
4,678 |
|
4,783 |
|
3,831 |
Land lease payments |
|
264 |
|
241 |
|
195 |
Fee to management company (1) |
|
371 |
|
813 |
|
773 |
Property tax on investment property |
|
2,125 |
|
1,454 |
|
812 |
Land tax on investment property under construction and inventories of buildings under construction |
|
- |
|
- |
|
773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,438 |
|
7,291 |
|
6,384 |
(1) In beginning of 2009, subsidiary ceased it's agreement with a management company, see Note 28f.
NOTE 24:- GENERAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND MARKETING EXPENSES
|
|
Year ended 31 December
|
||||
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
||||
Salaries (1)
|
|
7,339
|
|
7,530
|
|
8,506
|
Office maintenance
|
|
1,317
|
|
1,652
|
|
1,330
|
Professional fees (2)
|
|
3,339
|
|
6,236
|
|
4,968
|
Marketing fees
|
|
768
|
|
2,386
|
|
674
|
Write-down of advances on account of investments
|
|
60
|
|
1,256
|
|
406
|
Traveling expenses
|
|
453
|
|
1,090
|
|
1,440
|
Depreciation
|
|
556
|
|
343
|
|
287
|
Other costs
|
|
2,482
|
|
1,766
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,314
|
|
22,259
|
|
19,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes cost of share-based payment (see Note 22)
|
|
1,894
|
|
1,881
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Includes in consideration of the audit amount of approximately $ 1,719 thousand (2008 - $ 2,080 thousand) and the fee to directors is approximately $ 459 thousand (2008 - $ 617 thousand).
NOTE 25:- OTHER EXPENSES
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from acquisition of jointly controlled entities (see Note 7d) |
|
698 |
|
- |
|
- |
Update of provision regarding an agreement with government authorities |
|
- |
|
1,897 |
|
- |
Registration of land lease |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5,469 |
Impairment of investment properties under construction and inventories of buildings under construction |
|
- |
|
4,289 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
6,186 |
|
5,469 |
NOTE 26:- FINANCE COSTS AND INCOME
a. Finance costs:
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
|||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|||||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Interest costs - financial liabilities not at fair value through profit and loss |
|
(14,543) |
|
(12,913) |
|
(10,669) |
||||
|
Net capitalised interest costs |
|
10,454 |
|
2,075 |
|
2,016 |
||||
|
Effect of discounting of long-term receivables |
|
(602) |
|
(3,933) |
|
(1,400) |
||||
|
Fair value adjustment of financial derivative |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(50) |
||||
|
Effect of discounting of long-term receivables to investment properties under construction and residential projects for sale under construction |
|
602 |
|
3,933 |
|
1,400 |
||||
|
Other (mainly foreign exchange differences) (1) |
|
(1,564) |
|
(33,887) |
|
- |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
(5,653) |
|
(44,725) |
|
(8,703) |
||||
b. Finance income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits |
|
- |
|
3,420 |
|
10,744 |
Interest income from loans provided |
|
6,134 |
|
4,420 |
|
843 |
Fair value adjustment of financial derivative |
|
956 |
|
769 |
|
- |
Other (mainly foreign exchange differences) |
|
1,585 |
|
1,274 |
|
11,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,675 |
|
9,883 |
|
23,004 |
(1) Starting from the last quarter of 2008, the Company has no intention in the foreseeable future to require repayment of intercompany loans provided by the Company to its subsidiaries developing real estate projects under construction in Russia. Therefore, foreign exchange differences for the said loans beginning in the last quarter of 2008 are recognized as a separate item in equity (currency translation reserve).
NOTE 27:- RELATED PARTIES
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. Transactions with related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense to shareholders |
|
3,815 |
|
1,494 |
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private jet expenses |
|
17 |
|
279 |
|
515 |
b. Balances with related parties:
|
|
31 December |
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures held by shareholders |
|
24,909 |
|
22,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees and benefit regarding loans received from majority shareholders |
|
2,702 |
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans received from majority shareholders |
|
44,954 |
|
9,032 |
c. The transactions with related parties are in accordance with the market terms except the loans and guarantees from shareholders, see Note 15.
d. Compensation of key management personnel of the Group:
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
|||||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|||||||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Salaries |
|
1,371 |
|
1,227 |
|
856 |
||||||
|
Share-based payments |
|
1,602 |
|
1,881 |
|
3,851 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
3,108 |
|
4,707 |
||||||
e. Global, which owns a commercial centre in Yaroslavl has entered into a lease agreement with Home Centres LLC ("Home Centre"), a company controlled by the Fishman family, the controlling shareholders in the Company. The area leased to Home center covers 6,712 sq. m., the minimal lease fees are $ 120 per sq. m. and the lease period, assuming the exercise of all of the option periods contained therein, an aggregate of is 25 years. The engagement is in accordance with market conditions.
f. Hydro leases offices to Home Centre with an overall area of approximately 730 sq. m. used for office purposes. The monthly lease fee is approximately $ 22 thousand. The lease period terminates on 30 September 2011. The engagement is in accordance with market conditions.
g. Regarding loans received from main shareholders, see Note 15.
NOTE 28:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
a. Group as lessee:
The Group entered into commercial lease agreements for certain land plots. These leases are irrevocable and have a term of 19-45 years with a renewal option.
Future minimum lease payments as at 31 December 2009 are as follows:
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
|
|
|
First year |
|
277 |
After one year but no more than five years |
|
1,107 |
More than five years |
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
8,928 |
b. On 1 July 2005, Hydro and FIN (subsidiaries of the Company), entered into a management service agreement for an indefinite period. FIN is a Russian company whose controlling shareholder also serves as the CEO of Hydro. Either party may terminate this agreement without cause at any time upon providing the other party with advance written notice of a minimum of three months.
In return for the management services provided by FIN pursuant to the above agreement, FIN will be entitled to receive 2% of the lease fees actually received by Hydro from its tenants. It was further agreed that the direct expenses of FIN's hiring additional employees for providing the said management services will be paid by Hydro. Hydro's books include the proper expenses.
c. On 22 May 2005, the Company and the other shareholders of Inverton (Gazprombank Invest and NAM) signed a shareholders' agreement whereby it was agreed that NAM would be entitled to receive fees from Inverton based on a fixed formula set forth in the shareholders' agreement accounting to a total of approximately $ 1,763 thousand for rendering certain management services stipulated in that agreement (mainly coordination with local authorities).
d. On 27 November 2006 Global 1(subsidiary of the Company) entered into an agreement with a third party for the commercial centre in Yaroslavl, which began its operations in April 2007. The agreement was in effect until March 2009. In exchange for said management services Global 1 paid monthly fees to the third party based on a mechanism established in the agreement. An adequate expense was recorded in Global 1's books in respect of the agreement.
From 11 May 2009, the project has been managed by another third party. During 2009 Global 1 paid such third party approximately $ 678 thousand.
e. On 16 March 2006, IIK (subsidiary of the Company) entered into a consulting agreement with a third party according to which the latter undertook to provide consulting services to IIK in connection with the development and construction of a commercial project in Saratov, in consideration of the equivalent of approximately $ 1.1 million.
In February 2008, IIK entered into an additional management agreement with NAM, according to which IIK will paid NAM an amount of $ 450 thousand during the year 2008.
In May 2009 the agreement expired and, as of the date hereof, IIK is managed by the Group.
f. In December 2006, RealService (subsidiary of the Company) entered into an oral agreement with FIN for the provision of certain services that include sourcing of the investment and project management services. According to the agreement and in consideration for these services FIN will be entitled to receive 10% of the net profits from the project, including from sale of the project after completion and to 2% of the lease fees actually received by RealService from its tenants.
g. In February 2006, MAG and FIN entered into a management service agreement. The terms of the agreement are identical to Hydro's engagement with FIN, see b above . MAG's books include the proper expenses.
h. On 24 May 2007, IIK entered into a contracting agreement with a Russian company controlled by Denya Cebus Ltd. ("Denya") for the construction of the commercial centre in Saratov as a main contractor in consideration for an overall amount of $ 50.8 million to be paid along the project's progress.
On 25 February 2009, IIK signed an additional agreement with Denya in which the overall amount of the agreement, subject to certain terms and conditions, was enlarged by $ 3 million.
i. Expected rental income:
The lease agreements of the Company's subsidiaries are for periods of up to 10 years.
The minimum rental income is as follows:
|
|
31 December |
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
||
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year |
|
20,707 |
|
17,398 |
|
|
Second year until five years |
|
81,616 |
|
50,286 |
|
|
More than five years |
|
52,555 |
|
18,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,878 |
|
85,716 |
|
j. The previous owners of a plot of land in Yaroslavl, which is currently owned by the Group and on which the Group has constructed a shopping centre, have entered into an agreement with the municipality of Yaroslavl whereby the municipality of Yaroslavl will be entitled to 8% of the built area on said land. The Company has recorded a provision regarding this agreement. See also Note 17.
NOTE 29:- SEGMENT INFORMATION
The organizational basis for management purposes is determined according to products and services.
The commercial segment leases real estate for commercial purposes, the residential segment develops real estate assets for sale for residential purposes.
The following tables present revenue and profit and certain assets and liability information regarding the Group's operating segments.
NOTE 30:- SEGMENT INFORMATION (Cont.)
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2009 |
|
Year ended 31 December 2008 |
||||||||
|
|
Commercial |
|
Residential |
|
Total |
|
Commercial |
|
Residential |
|
Total |
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||||||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income from investment properties |
|
14,754 |
|
- |
|
14,754 |
|
17,949 |
|
- |
|
17,949 |
Revenue from management fees |
|
2,459 |
|
- |
|
2,459 |
|
2,411 |
|
- |
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
17,213 |
|
- |
|
17,213 |
|
20,360 |
|
- |
|
20,360 |
Fair value adjustments of investment properties and investment properties under construction |
|
(16,463) |
|
- |
|
(16,463) |
|
(58,768) |
|
- |
|
(58,768) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) |
|
750 |
|
- |
|
750 |
|
(38,408) |
|
- |
|
(38,408) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
- |
|
750 |
|
(38,408) |
|
- |
|
(38,408) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment results |
|
(7,384) |
|
(1,521) |
|
(8,905) |
|
(59,150) |
|
(2,246) |
|
(61,396) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated expenses (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
(11,993) |
|
|
|
|
|
(7,588) |
Net finance income (costs) |
|
|
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
(34,842) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
(17,876) |
|
|
|
|
|
(103,826) |
Tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(5,108) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,005) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
(22,984) |
|
|
|
|
|
(104,831) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
397,732 |
|
181,411 |
|
579,143 |
|
323,546 |
|
147,170 |
|
470,716 |
Unallocated assets |
|
|
|
|
|
36,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
59,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
616,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
529,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment liabilities |
|
106,165 |
|
11,898 |
|
118,063 |
|
34,333 |
|
9,485 |
|
43,818 |
Unallocated liabilities (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
178,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
143,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
296,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
187,712 |
(1) Includes in 2008 an expense for registration of land lease of $ 5,469 thousand.
(2) Includes mainly tax, financing assets and genuine central assets.
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2007 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
Residential |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands |
||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income from investment properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,446 |
|
- |
|
10,446 |
Revenue from management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
- |
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,423 |
|
- |
|
12,423 |
Fair value adjustments of investment properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,138 |
|
- |
|
82,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,561 |
|
- |
|
94,561 |
Inter-segment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,561 |
|
- |
|
94,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,872 |
|
(1,314) |
|
68,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,556) |
Net finance income (costs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,303 |
Tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,423) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352,027 |
|
98,778 |
|
450,805 |
Unallocated assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,370 |
|
1,202 |
|
24,572 |
Unallocated liabilities (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Includes mainly tax, financing assets and genuine central assets.
NOTE 31:- DATE OF APPROVAL OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements for issue on 16 March 2010.
Related Shares:
MLD.L