13th Mar 2013 07:00
13 March 2013
Capital & Regional plc
2012 Annual Results
Capital & Regional plc today announces its audited annual results for the year to 30 December 2012.
Progress in execution of strategy
·; Sale of Group's stakes in The Junction Fund and Xscape Braehead and, in early 2013, its interest in the X-Leisure Fund and FIX
·; Purchase of Mall Fund units increased Group share from 18.16% to 20.33%
·; Acquisition of 20% interest in Kingfisher Centre Redditch, in joint venture with Oaktree Capital Partners
Financial
·; Robust recurring pre-tax profit up 3.7% to £17.0 million (2011 - £16.4 million).
·; Proforma see-through net debt1 to property value fell to 55% compared to 65% at 2011 year end
·; Fall in net assets and EPRA net assets per share to 51p and 55p, respectively (2011 - 56p and 63p) primarily as a result of value adjustments and impairment of the German portfolio 4 joint venture
Operational
·; Occupancy on a like for like basis in our UK Shopping Centres up to 96.7% from 96.1% notwithstanding significant administrations during the first half of the year
·; Attractive and affordable space supported by 88 new lettings for £5.1 million, 25 renewals for £1.7 million, both at above ERV
·; Significant step forward for asset management and development with key terms agreed to enable the reconfiguration of Waterside Lincoln; Hemel Hempstead redevelopment gaining planning permission and a number of pre-lets finalised; The Hub leisure concept at Redditch gaining momentum
Future priorities
·; Recycle cash from disposals of non-core assets to create shareholder value by strengthening our core UK Shopping Centre business as well as the buyback of shares
·; Resume dividend payments to shareholders to be covered by cash earnings once Mall is in a position to recommence distributions to unit holders
2012 | 2011 | |
Recurring pre-tax profit2 | £17.0m | £16.4m |
(Loss)/profit for year | £(16.0)m | £21.1m |
NAV per share | 51p | 56p |
EPRA NAV per share | 55p | 63p |
Proforma Group net debt1 | 13% | 30% |
Proforma see through net debt1 | 55% | 65% |
1 Adjusted for £30.6 million X-Leisure proceeds received in January 2013.
2 As defined in Note 1 to the financial statements.
Commenting on the results, John Clare, Chairman, said "I am pleased to report that the Group has this year both successfully responded to the challenges created by a tough operating environment and made significant progress in the execution of its strategy."
Hugh Scott-Barrett, Chief Executive, added "We have a unique management platform that supports our aim to be a leading investor and property and asset manager of dominant community schemes. Our focus is in shopping centres which have a dominant market share in the communities they serve and which provide attractive and affordable space for retailers."
Chairman's Statement
Strategy
The Group's strategy is to focus its financial resources and management skills on dominant community shopping centres in the UK. The Group intends to recycle capital from non-core assets to strengthen its position as a leading retail property investment company.
Performance Overview
I am pleased to report that the Group has this year not only successfully responded to the challenges created by a tough operating environment but has also made significant progress in the execution of its strategy.
The UK shopping centres have performed well during a difficult time for UK retailing. The Mall Fund, at the property level, continues to outperform its IPD benchmark and occupancy levels at the year-end are higher than 12 months ago, as the very high levels of retail failures in recent months have provided opportunities to reconfigure space. Success in re-letting this space reinforces earlier decisions to retain and acquire those assets, such as Redditch, with dominant market shares in the communities in which they operate, and to dispose of those which do not.
During the course of this year, the Group has either disposed of or taken significant steps to dispose of non-core assets. The Group has sold its interest in The Junction Fund, the X-Leisure Fund and X-Leisure Limited, our 50% interest in Xscape Braehead as well as the sale of our interest in FIX, completed shortly after the end of the year.
Relevance of our property assets
Our shopping centres demonstrate the key characteristics to remain relevant in the current environment. They are specifically founded on a strong community involvement, affordable rents and continued investment to enhance the shopping experience.
We continually adapt to meet changing retailer and consumer needs. Free Cloud Wi-Fi has been rolled out across the shopping centres; the Mall smart phone app has been launched and we are reconfiguring space to support the multi-channel strategies of our retailers.
Dividend
The dividend policy continues to link future payments to the Group's cash generating ability. Following the renegotiation of the Group's banking arrangements, the restrictions limiting the payments to 50% of operating cash flow less interest and tax have been removed. Following further de-gearing, the Mall is likely to be in a position to recommence distributions in the second half of the year. Distributions from The Mall should enable the Group to resume the payment of a dividend, to be covered by cash earnings, at the end of 2013. Until this happens the board is not recommending the payment of a dividend meaning that no dividend will be payable for the full year 2012.
Responsible business
The Group attaches great importance to maintaining its commitment to responsible business in the still challenging operating environment.
At the beginning of the year a number of key objectives across The Market Place, The Environment and The Workplace were identified, each with target key performance indicators. Good progress has been made in each of these areas. The Group was awarded ROSPA Gold Award status for a sixth consecutive year and has exceeded stretching targets for reduction in energy, water use and water recycling.
Further details are set out in the Responsible Business review in the financial statements.
Our people
The management platform is key to the future and the creation of value for our shareholders. I would like to thank all staff who have once again delivered a robust set of operating results in the face of challenging market conditions. The prompt re-letting of space vacated by retailers in administration earlier in the year reflects the unique asset management skills of our teams.
With the sale of The Junction and X-Leisure we have also said goodbye to a number of colleagues who have been, directly and indirectly, part of the C&R family for some years. We wish them every success in their future careers.
The success of the restructuring programme in recent years gives me confidence the management team can execute the next phase of the Group's strategy.
The Board
I would like to thank Manjit Wolstenholme for her contribution to the board's deliberations over the last six years. Tony Hales has succeeded Manjit as Chairman of the Audit Committee and Philip Newton will take on the role of Chairman of the Remuneration Committee. I believe the current non-executive directors bring a depth of experience of internet retailing and consumer markets to the board in addition to their significant contribution to property, financial and strategic matters.
John Clare
Chairman
Chief Executive's Statement
Operations
Occupancy levels across the UK shopping centres have further improved this year from 96.1% to 96.7%, having fallen to 94.9% at 30 June. This reflects the benefits of a pro-active approach on re-letting vacant space arising from retailers in administration even if, in the short-term, it results in a reduction of income. During the course of the year, 69 units representing £5.8 million or 7% of the year end passing rent (fell into administration. At December 2012 only 12% of the affected space was not income producing or part of an asset management initiative. This highlights the effectiveness of the asset management focus during the year which has supported valuations across the portfolio. We believe that in the medium and longer term, a vibrant well let scheme offers the best potential to boost income. Whilst passing rent has therefore fallen by 3% to £82.3 million it is some 1% higher than at the half-year. Against this background, it is pleasing that the Mall, which is at the core of the Group's shopping centre activities, has again out-performed its benchmark at the property level. An increase in pre-tax recurring profit from £16.4 million to £17.0 million (including results from discontinued operations) is also particularly encouraging in these circumstances.
In our core German portfolio valuations have been stable and occupancy has remained high at 97.9% at December 2012. Contracted rent has remained stable but, importantly, a number of lease re-gears and renewals have enabled us to maintain the weighted average lease length of the core portfolios at 7.8 years.
Asset Management
In spite of the challenging environment for our retailers, we have continued to see demand for good quality affordable space across our shopping centres and other assets.
Key themes include:-
·; Increasing demand from leisure operators (in particular value restaurants) within our shopping centres. The progress we are making in establishing The Hub leisure concept at Redditch highlights the increased importance of such operators to increased dwell time by the shoppers in our schemes
·; Demand for space from fashion and department stores such as H&M in Luton and Debenhams at Blackburn
·; Reconfiguration of space and introduction of new technologies to accommodate multi-channel strategies
·; Significant progress in asset management initiatives at Hemel Hempstead and Great Northern Warehouse where All Star Lanes has now opened
·; Negotiations with anchor retailers on the key expansion and development opportunities within our schemes notably at Lincoln, Walthamstow and Camberley
Encouragingly, many of the new lettings have agreed at or above ERV. Indeed, for the full-year, 88 new lettings representing £5.1 million of passing rent were agreed at 0.2% above ERV.
Financial Position
Significant steps have been taken not only to reduce gearing but also to de-risk the Group balance sheet during the course of the year.
Adjusted for the disposal proceeds from the sale of X-Leisure, gearing at the Group level has fallen from 24% to 13% at December 2012 whilst see through net debt to property value again adjusted for the sale of X-Leisure, has fallen from 65% to 55%.
The impact of disposals on debt levels has therefore more than offset the impact of the acquisition of Redditch. The reduction in statutory NAV from £196 million to £180 million or 56p to 51p has been primarily caused by the impairment and devaluation of the German portfolio 4 and the related Euro B-note of £15.1 million.
At the same time, the Group has repaid the Hemel bank facility and has extended its two remaining facilities at the Group level being:
·; A £25 million Revolving Credit Facility which now matures in July 2016
·; A £57.6 million facility for the Great Northern Warehouse which now matures in October 2014
Following the disposal of The Junction, X-Leisure and FIX, the Mall is the only Fund in which C&R is invested. Following the disposal of the Castle Shopping Centre in Norwich and utilising the cash generated from operations, the Fund's debt has fallen by £91.4 million to £570.9 million. This represents a reduction in gross LTV from 69% to 67%. This is expected to fall further in 2013 following bondholder approval to repay £13.4 million in April 2013 from blocked cash. Adjusted for the unrestricted cash in the Mall, net debt to property value stood at 55% as at December 2012.
The decrease in total German debt of €170.1 million primarily reflects the impact of the full impairment of the investment in Holding 4. Following amortisation of €10 million and with values of the rest of the portfolio broadly stable, gearing levels have fallen slightly from 76% to 74%.
Strategy
The Group has delivered on its commitment to make significant progress in 2012 in focusing Capital & Regional on its core UK Shopping Centre activities. We have achieved this through disposals of The Junction, X-Leisure and Braehead, whilst the acquisition of Kingfisher Centre, Redditch adds critical mass and reinforces our core shopping centre activities.
Our objective remains to grow our portfolio of UK shopping centres which are held both through our investment in the Mall and in joint ventures with our key partners. We have a unique management platform that supports our aim to be a leading investor and property and asset manager of dominant community schemes. Our focus is on shopping centres which have a dominant market share in the communities they serve and which provide attractive and affordable space for retailers.
The Mall remains at the centre of C&R's strategy and will continue to be a priority for the allocation of capital. Each of the underlying core properties offers attractive opportunities for asset management initiatives and development opportunities. Our aim is to help position the Mall to access the necessary capital to exploit these opportunities. We will seek to take advantage of opportunities to increase further our stake in order to support the execution of our strategy for the Mall. To date, these purchases have been very accretive for our shareholders.
Capital & Regional will continue to leverage its management platform by investing with our key partners in shopping centres which share similar characteristics to the Mall. Our acquisition in partnership with Oaktree of the Kingfisher Centre, Redditch, confirms the belief that we are able to generate superior returns from investing in and managing such assets.
Outlook
The operating environment for our retailers remains challenging as the twin pressures of changing consumer behaviour and weak economic growth continue to impact sentiment. I am encouraged that our proven track record in prompt re-letting of space on retailer administrations is already having a positive impact in the early part of this year as asset management initiatives to re-let space from recent retailer failures are well advanced.
Disposals of non-core assets will continue to be a major focus. We expect to recycle capital from the remaining on-balance sheet assets of Hemel and Great Northern Warehouse as well as from the portfolio of German retail investments. Improved investment market sentiment gives us confidence that further progress will be possible this year.
We expect further deleveraging of the Mall. The objective is to reduce the quantum of debt below £400 million and the leverage to a level where we can both recommence distributions and look forward with confidence to the refinancing of the CMBS which matures in April 2015.
Our focus on shopping centres which are dominant in the communities they serve gives us confidence that we will continue to be able to respond to changing consumer behaviours. As in prior years the priority will be to ensure that occupancy levels remain high to maintain the vibrancy of the schemes in the belief that we will be able to rebuild and grow income levels over time. Plans will be progressed for each of our schemes ranging from refurbishment to extensions and major redevelopments which will enhance their relevance to the consumers and retailers they serve.
Hugh Scott-Barrett
Chief Executive
Financial information
The financial information set out in this preliminary statement does not constitute the Group and Company's statutory financial statements for the years to 30 December 2011 or 2012, but is derived from those financial statements. Statutory financial statements for 2011 have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and those for 2012 will be delivered following the Company's annual general meeting.
The auditors have reported on the 2011 and 2012 financial statements and in both cases their report was unqualified, did not draw attention to any matters by way of emphasis and did not contain a statement under section 498(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006.
Forward looking statements
This document contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These statements are forward-looking in nature and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual future results may differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these statements. Many of these risks and uncertainties relate to factors that are beyond the Group's ability to control or estimate precisely, such as future market conditions, currency fluctuations, the behaviour of other market participants, the actions of government regulators and other risk factors such as the Group's ability to continue to obtain financing to meet its liquidity needs, changes in the political, social and regulatory framework in which the Group operates or in economic or technological trends or conditions, including inflation and consumer confidence, on a global, regional or national basis. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this document. The Group does not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document. Information contained in this document relating to the Group should not be relied upon as a guide to future performance.
Our business
UK Shopping Centres
The Group's Shopping Centre business comprises its investment in The Mall Fund, a specialist UK community shopping centre brand, owning eight properties with a total lettable space of over four million square feet which accommodates over 950 retail units. In addition the Group has interests in The Waterside Centre, Lincoln and The Kingfisher Centre, Redditch.
Our approach
The core strength of Capital & Regional is managing dominant UK community shopping centres. Embedded in our culture is a passion to deliver outstanding operational performance. This ethos has been built up over many years of shopping centre ownership during which we have created a unique in-house platform with demanding operating standards. The platform comprises specialists covering all the relevant disciplines of property and asset management.
Our teams think like retailers so they create and maintain environments that deliver sustained profits for our occupiers and an outstanding shopping experience for the communities we serve. Branding to us is not a name change or new sign, it's a culture that runs through every element of our shopping centre business and is why the Mall brand is recognised as being synonymous with best practice in managing shopping centres.
The elements which help to differentiate us include:
·; Our people - our teams hold strong common values and a clear vision as to what makes our business special.
·; Operational standards - we regularly measure each Mall against well defined and detailed brand standards, always striving for improvement. Amongst other aspects this ensures we provide clean and safe places to shop.
·; Retail relationships -we have built up excellent relationships with our retailers and they trust us to deliver on our promises and recognise the value in our operating culture. We understand their needs for space which allows us to plan to optimise the configuration of space as well as helping us to mitigate the exposure from tenant administrations.
·; Technology - shopping habits are changing with a continuing trend towards online shopping, 'click and collect', social media and mobile marketing. Successful retailers now operate through genuine multi-channel formats which enhance the physical shopping experience with the use of mobile technologies. We are absolutely committed to meeting both the challenges and the opportunities which can be derived from technological change.
Specific aspects include:
o The Mall website (www.themall.co.uk) which was launched in 2007 and was the first UK branded website covering a portfolio of shopping centres. We have received 25 million page views since then, 55% of which now arrive through our mobile enabled site.
o Enhancing our marketing and social media feedback through the development of mobile enabled websites, social networking and The Mall smart phone apps and loyalty based marketing and promotions.
o Introducing free cloud Wi-Fi across the shopping centre portfolio.
o We recently signed up fulfilment company "Bybox" to drive our click and collect service.
o We are working with our retail partners to help them fulfil their evolving omni channel requirements utilising our existing Mall digital media platforms.
o Retailer affiliate marketing hosted on: themall.co.uk.
·; Ancillary revenues - using the portfolio scale and leverage from the Mall brand, we have driven income from many sources - including advertising, promotional space, Retail Merchandising Units (RMU's), digital commerce, gift cards, and telecoms, amongst others. Our ancillary income was up 4.5% like for like in 2012.
·; Marketing - by regularly talking to our community of shoppers, we engage and encourage repeat visits and more spend.
·; Operational costs - leveraging the scale of our portfolio we drive down costs in all areas of expenditure. Service charges sit at an average £4.30 psf, 15.7% below the industry benchmark (source: Jones Lang LaSalle 2011 survey).
·; Environment - we are passionate about operating responsibly, and through our Enviromall operating system, now established for 10 years, we have an industry leading track record of year on year improvements with specific excellence in energy reduction and waste management.
Our Assets
Our operational excellence is complimented by the assets that we own and manage. We ensure that our property assets are aligned with the constantly evolving demands of our tenants and shoppers, developments in technology, and consumer behaviour.
The key features we look for in our assets are:
·; Town centre locations which are dominant in the local community with significant catchment
·; Affordable and sustainable rents
·; Attractive opportunities to generate future growth in value from asset management or development opportunities
·; Ownership of car parking and good local transport facilities
Our shoppers have demanding expectations of the level of service, convenience, range and quality of facilities, together with a real appreciation of value and local community. These community hubs provide our retailers with a cost effective location from which to serve their customers and sit as an essential element of the multichannel operation. We believe only those shopping centres which can consistently deliver these different elements will continue to be successful.
Our non-executive directors also bring a depth of experience of the internet, retailer and consumer markets to the board. This ensures our strategy is responsive to the changing retailer and consumer demands that impact on our property assets.
Germany
The commercial retail property portfolio in Germany is a joint venture with AREA Property Partners. The joint venture owns 26 properties with a total lettable space of over 3.3 million square feet.
Garigal Asset Management GmbH, a German asset and property manager, is responsible for the asset and property management of the German property portfolio and the Group holds a 30% stake in Garigal.
The key characteristics of the German portfolio are:
·; Established out-of-town retail locations, typically anchored by food retailers
·; Standalone hypermarkets and retail parks with sales areas of more than 3,500 square metres with car parking
·; Strong cash generation with generally shorter leases
Further details on all of the Group's Property interests including Great Northern Warehouse and Hemel Hempstead can be found in the Property Management and Property Information sections below.
Operating review
The principal focus of management during 2012 has been to implement its strategy of disposing of non-core assets in order to concentrate resources on its core UK Shopping Centre business.
During the year the Group realised £15.0 million in cash from the disposal of its interest in The Junction and its 50% share of Xscape Braehead. In addition £2.6 million of Performance Fee income was received in respect of The Junction. The Group also exchanged contracts for the sale of its interest in the X-Leisure Fund and X-Leisure Limited which completed after the year end raising a further £30.6 million after related transaction costs. During the last three years the Group has disposed of its interest in £1.9 billion of property at a discount to prevailing valuation of around 0.7%. As a result of these actions the Group's see through net debt has fallen to 55% from 75% since December 2009.
Since the year end the Group has completed the disposal of its interest in FIX and a parcel of land raising up to £1 million.
UK Shopping Centres
Occupancy levels
31 December 20121 | 30 June 2012 | 31 December 20111 | |
Occupancy (like for like) | % | % | % |
UK Shopping Centres | 96.7 | 94.6 | 96.1 |
1 Occupancy at December 2012 and December 2011 includes a seasonal increase in temporary lettings.
The increase in occupancy has been achieved in difficult market conditions for our tenants and despite a significant number of administrations during the year. We continue to focus on maintaining high levels of occupancy which create shopping destinations which are appealing to shoppers and tenants and which acts as a springboard for growth in rental values.
New lettings, renewals and rent reviews
There has been good letting activity across the portfolio. Retailers are prepared to invest in new stores and in refurbishing their existing space as demonstrated by Debenhams, who have extended and refitted their store in Blackburn showing a willingness to invest in strong schemes.
UK Shopping Centres | |
Number of new lettings1 | 88 |
Rent from new lettings (£m) | 5.1 |
Comparison to ERV (%)2 | 0.2 |
Renewals settled | 25 |
Revised rent (£m) | 1.7 |
Comparison to ERV (%) | 2.9 |
Rent reviews settled | 140 |
Revised passing rent (£m) | 8.3 |
Uplift to previous rent (%) | 0.1 |
Comparison to ERV (%) | 10.8 |
1 Excluding the temporary letting of the TJ Hughes space in the Mall Maidstone to Beales on a flexible basis
2 For lettings which did not include a turnover rent
Lettings to new occupiers continued at an encouraging level during the year and it is particularly pleasing to see new fascias such as Apple and Pandora taking space in our schemes. Significant highlights during the year are set out below:
Lettings | |
Luton | New letting to H&M for a newly created 22,500 sq ft unit. Further lettings totalling 7,000 sq ft to Vodafone, Pandora and Stormfront who operate an Apple franchise. |
Wood Green | We have taken advantage of the administration of Peacocks to re-let their space as an extension for TK Maxx at a premium to previous passing rent. Further lettings include 10 year leases to Schuh on 3,750 sq ft and Tiger Retail who have taken a 2,700 sq ft unit. |
Blackburn | Debenhams have now taken access to their extended space which has involved combining three additional units with their existing store to 95,000 sq ft on a supplemental lease expiring in 2080. Amongst other notable events there has been an 11,000 sq ft letting to Poundworld until 2020. |
Maidstone | We are continuing to work to optimise the returns from the former TJ Hughes space to catalyse growth in the scheme in conjunction with a significant refurbishment of the scheme. In the meantime we have completed 10 year leases with Sports Direct, who took 25,000 sq ft and with The Entertainer for a 5,000 sq ft unit. |
Sutton Coldfield | We have made excellent letting progress with a 15 year lease with Barclays Bank and nine lettings in the second half including deals with Stormfront (Apple), Card Factory, Sharps Bedrooms and Paperchase for a total of 8,800 sq ft. |
Camberley | We capitalised on the Clinton's administration and used their unit in conjunction with two others to create a 20,000 sq ft unit over two floors which has been let to TK Maxx with occupation targeted for in the second half of 2013. We also secured the lease of the nightclub following Luminar's administration and made further lettings to Trespass and Barratts totalling 6,300 sq ft. |
Walthamstow | New 10 year leases were completed with JD Sports and Carphone Warehouse. Deichmann Shoes and Warren James have taken space. The combine space of these lettings is 15,500 sq ft. |
Uxbridge | New lettings have been completed with Trespass, Lui Menswear and TFS for 7,000 sq ft |
Lincoln | New letting of the former Barratts unit at the entrance to the scheme to Office has improved the appearance of the scheme. Vision Express were relocated from the rear of the centre to maintain momentum on the intended reconfiguration and occupational flexibility was achieved in respect of the Optical Express and Julian Graves units following their administration. |
Redditch | The Entertainer was the first new occupier to take space since the acquisition in May taking a ten year lease. This was followed by Select and Pandora with a total of 5,200 sq ft. |
As part of our continued support of mobile commerce we concluded agreements with Cloud Networks, a Wi-Fi operator, across our portfolio on a six year deal. This importantly provides free Wi-Fi across our portfolio improving accessibility to our mobile apps whilst creating an additional income stream.
Since the year end new lettings in the UK Shopping Centres have been made for contracted rent of £0.9 million.
Administrations
Whilst the number of administrations in 2012 increased compared to the prior year we have re-let most of those units that ceased trading, which has supported the strong occupancy levels reported above.
UK Shopping Centres | Year ended 30 December 2012 | 6 months ended 30 December 2012 | 6 months ended 30 June 2012 | |
Administrations (units) | 69 | 20 | 49 | |
Passing rent (£m) | 5.8 | 1.0 | 4.8 |
During the year, the UK shopping centre business was adversely affected by a number of significant administrations. The most notable of these were Peacocks, Bon Marche, Julian Graves, Game Group, Clinton Cards and Birthdays. Throughout our primary objective was to maintain occupancy unless there was a preferable asset management opportunity such as the TK Maxx extension at Wood Green. This strategy has sustained income and mitigated void costs thus preserving the vibrancy of the centres.
Of the 69 units affected by administrations during the year 46 have been re-let while nine either continue to trade and are expected to be re-let or will be re-let as part of on-going asset management plans. There were 14 units affected by administration which closed and have not yet been re-let with pre-administration passing rent of £0.7 million.
By the end of February 2013 there had been 13 units that had entered administration with passing rent of £1.3 million representing 1.6% of the year end passing rent. 11 of these insolvencies relate to the widely reported HMV, Jessops and Republic administrations. At the end of February 2013 of the 13 units six remained trading, two had been re-let (including one to Morrisons Local with the lease being extended at an increased rent) and one forms part of the new TK Maxx store being created in Camberley, four units had been closed.
Income security
Credit risk is managed through the assessment of the covenant strength of all incoming tenants and by monitoring credit ratings of key existing tenants. Where possible we look to pre-empt the consequences of administrations through contingency planning and actively seeking to reduce exposure to known risks. For example, in Walthamstow we had previously taken a surrender of the HMV lease and re-let the space at ERV. The 10 largest occupiers by rental income at 30 December 2012 are given below.
UK Shopping Centres | |
% | |
Alliance Boots Limited | 4.8 |
Debenhams Properties Limited | 3.3 |
BHS Limited | 2.9 |
Primark Stores Limited | 2.8 |
Superdrug Stores Plc | 2.4 |
New Look Retailers Limited | 2.3 |
Arcadia (excluding BHS) | 2.3 |
Wilkinsons Hardware Stores | 2.2 |
Argos | 1.9 |
WH Smith | 1.8 |
Rent collection rates in the UK shopping centres (adjusted for tenants in administration) have continued to be strong throughout the year, with 97.4% of rent being paid within 14 days of the due date for December 2012.
Footfall
The UK Shopping Centres' footfall has outperformed the national footfall index by 2.5% although there has been a fall in shopper numbers over the year of 1.8% compared of to a decline of 4.3% in the benchmark index, demonstrating the strength of the portfolio. In 2013 UK Shopping Centre footfall has continued to outperform the benchmark, in the 10 weeks to 4 March 2013 The Mall decline of 2.5% on the prior year was 1.1% better than the benchmark index.
Temporary lettings
At 30 December 2012 on a like for like basis there were 128 temporary lettings (2011: 113) for a net rent of £3.1 million (2011: £3.2 million) compared to an ERV of £6.4 million (2011: £5.8 million).
Passing rent
Passing rent across our UK shopping centres increased in the second half of the year following the fall in passing rent which occurred in the first half of the year.
December 2012 | June 2012 | December 2011 | |
Passing rent (like for like) | £m | £m | £m |
UK Shopping Centres | 82.3 | 81.6 | 84.6 |
The UK Shopping Centre passing rent decreased by £2.3m during the year principally due to income lost as a result of tenant failures in the first half of the year. This was offset by the income generated from new lettings as set out above. There was a further £3.6 million of contracted rent at 30 December 2012 which is not included in the passing rent figures above.
Investment portfolio performance
The property level total returns are set out below:
Property valuation | Capital return | Total return | Initial yield | Equivalent yield | |
30 December 2012 | £m | % | % | % | % |
UK Shopping Centres1 | 1,009 | (4.1) | 1.5 | 7.1 | 7.6 |
1 Weighted average by year end property valuation
Within UK shopping centres there has been a differential return performance with those schemes located in the south east and, particularly, in London being capitalised on tighter investment yields than those in the rest of the country.
The Mall Fund has outperformed its quarterly IPD index by 50 basis points during 2012.
Asset management and development
Capital for new asset management initiatives will be recycled from within existing businesses into projects which will deliver value using our in-depth knowledge of retailer requirements for each location. Across the portfolio there is an attractive and exciting pipeline with near term plans for a number of properties as set out below.
Shopping Centres | |
Maidstone | Securing a long-term anchor tenant for the former TJ Hughes store is the key initiative. We are in discussions with a number of major space users in conjunction with a significant investment in the appearance of the scheme. |
Camberley | The key letting activity over the year has been securing TK Maxx, who take occupation of a 20,000 sq ft unit in July 2013.
Our ambition is for a 291,000 sq ft extension to the centre. We are in discussions with the local authority and an anchor tenant to secure the requisite agreements during 2013. |
Luton | Following the successful opening of the 22,500 sq ft store for H&M who were not previously represented in Luton we are in advanced negotiations with River Island for a store upsize and with Deichmann for a new store.
Longer term development opportunities remain around the current market site and the Silver Street land between the centre and railway station. |
Walthamstow | We have continued discussions with the local authority from both a planning and head lease perspective for a 60,000 sq ft extension. Our aim is to submit a planning application during the latter part of 2013.
We are progressing options in the existing scheme to create bigger format retail space to accommodate both existing tenant upsizes and create space suitable for new MSU retailers. |
Lincoln | Our reconfiguration proposals are at an advanced stage. Terms have been agreed with two fashion anchors with a third agreement imminent. Together, these lettings account for 52,000 sq ft of lettable space. We also have agreed terms to relocate the food court operator to a newly created Riverside unit.
Development flexibility around existing occupiers has been largely secured and a full planning application covering the reconfiguration works will be submitted before the end of Q1 2013 to enable a start on site by the end of June 2013 and a completed opening by October 2014. |
Redditch | We have submitted a planning application to reconfigure the former TJ Hughes to create 19,000 sq ft of restaurant space at ground floor and a 15,000 sq ft gym on the lower level, the letting of which is in solicitor's hands. Offers have been received from nationally recognised operators for the restaurants and we are continuing to negotiate these.
We are creating a fashion zone on Evesham Walk and terms have been agreed to relocate Poundland from this unlocking the space to introduce better fashion offers targeting Top Shop, H&M and River Island.
We are exploring opportunities to create a food store offer in the centre. Architects have created developed plans that are under discussion with mainstream supermarket operators. |
Other properties | |
Hemel Hempstead | We are well progressed with our repositioning proposals for the leisure scheme. We are in legals with operators for five catering units which we are working to document by the end of Q1/2013, with good interest in the final two units under active consideration.
Negotiations continue with operators for the leisure space, covering bowling, fitness and bingo uses and we are targeting legal agreements by the end of Q1 2013 / early Q2 2013. |
Great Northern | A new letting of the ground floor to the ten pin bowling operator, All Star Lanes, has completed and they opened in March 2013. This will increase activity at the venue and has helped secure a letting to Almost Famous Burgers on a 10 year term. Further lettings to a bar-nightclub and a further restaurant are in legals. |
Other UK Operations
SNO!zone
The SNO!zone business has had an excellent year increasing its recurring pre-tax profit by 71% to £1.2 million. This has been the result of like for like income growth of 2% which was achieved despite disruption from the weather in January 2012. Significant cost reductions have been achieved following a detailed management review of the business's operations which included the disposal of the loss making site in Braehead, Glasgow last year. We expect further efficiency gains will be achieved in 2013 with the implementation of new online booking systems.
German portfolio
The Group's commercial retail property portfolio in Germany is in a joint venture with AREA Property Partners and is held in six individual and separate joint venture portfolios.
As reported more fully in Note 17c to the Financial Statements the Group impaired its investment in German portfolio 4 to £nil in June 2012 and as a consequence data on this is excluded from the review below. Portfolio 4 differs from the remaining portfolios in that it had the weakest assets in the joint venture with greater exposure to East Germany and non-food retailers. Portfolio 4 had gearing 28% higher at 102% and 30% shorter lease lengths at the date of its impairment.
The key portfolio property data at 30 December 2012 is as follows:
Property sizes | |||||||||
Occupancy | Weighted average lease length | Total | >€50m | €50m - €20m | €10m - €20m | Average Property value | Passing rent | ||
Portfolio | % | Years | # | # | # | # | # | €million | €million |
1 | 96.2 | 6.8 | 6 | - | - | 3 | 3 | 9.2 | 4.4 |
2 | 98.3 | 4.8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 30.9 | 6.8 |
3 | 99.0 | 10.8 | 9 | - | 2 | 4 | 3 | 16.0 | 11.0 |
5 | 99.8 | 8.2 | 4 | - | 1 | 2 | 1 | 14.6 | 4.6 |
6 | 95.3 | 6.2 | 4 | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | 16.8 | 5.7 |
Total | 97.9 | 7.8 | 26 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 16.1 | 32.5 |
The movement in German portfolio properties is as follows:
Valuation | Valuation | Valuation | NIY | NIY | |
30 December 2012 | 30 December 2011 | movement
| 30 December 2012 | 30 December 2011 | |
Portfolio | €million | €million | €million | % | % |
1 | 54.2 | 55.3 | (1.0) | 6.6 | 6.8 |
2 | 92.3 | 92.7 | (0.5) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
3 | 143.5 | 144.3 | (0.7) | 6.5 | 6.4 |
5 | 54.7 | 58.3 | (1.6) | 7.2 | 6.8 |
6 | 70.1 | 67.3 | 3.2 | 6.8 | 7.0 |
Total | 414.8 | 417.9 | (0.6) | 6.6 | 6.6 |
In our German portfolio contracted rent has remained broadly stable at €32.5 million with 20 rent increases through indexation and ten new lettings increasing rent by €0.5 million. These were offset by seven expiries and three lease regears which had a downward impact on rent levels. The focus has been to extend the length of the income stream to increase or maintain valuation, improve marketability and to aid refinancing of the properties. Passing rent decreased marginally from €32.5 million to €31.8 million due to €0.7 million of rent free periods.
Occupancy remains strong at 97.9%, only marginally less than 98.7% at December 2011 due to two lease expiries. The weighted average lease length (WALL) has been maintained at 7.8 years.
The key initiatives undertaken in the year were:
·; An agreement has been signed to renew the lease with Real at Ingelheim which was due to expire in August 2014, with a new 15 year lease at the same rent. We have contributed €0.5 million to the refit of their store.
·; In Bruhl we have negotiated a further 5 year extension to 2024 with Real in consideration of which we have agreed to upgrade the car park and entrance.
·; At Herne we are working on improvements and an extension to the scheme, which on completion will result in Toom taking a new 15 year lease on their existing unit.
·; At Lauchhammer a new 10 year lease with Toom and a 7 year lease extension with Edeka improved the WALL by six years following refurbishment.
·; At Kreuztal a letting has been signed for 1,000 m2 to Rossman and terms agreed with Medimax for a further 1,250m2. Negotiations are advanced for a letting to a major food retailer which would generate combined additional rent of €0.5 million per annum.
·; At Hameln a planning application has been submitted for a proposed 550 m2 extension. A letting to Expert, an electronics retailer, has been agreed to take 2,200m2 with a target lease start date of June 2014 subject to planning. At the same time we are negotiating lease extensions with tenants in conjunction with a refurbishment of the scheme.
·; At Aachen we have agreed a 10 year lease to replace the current tenant, Praktiker, on expiry in July 2013. This is conditional on successful change of use planning application.
·; A sale of Taufkirchen has been agreed at the year end valuation of €6.4 million.
Financial review
Key performance indicators
The key performance indicators we use to measure our performance against our strategy and objectives are:
2012 | 2011 | ||
Investment returns | |||
Net assets per share | 51p | 56p | |
EPRA net assets per share | 55p | 63p | |
Return on equity | (8.5)% | 11.9% | |
Total shareholder return | (9.5)% | (3.8)% | |
Financing | |||
Proforma Group net debt2 | £53.3m | £47.2m | |
Proforma net debt to equity ratio2 | 13% | 24% | |
Proforma see-through net debt to property value1,2 | 55% | 65% | |
Profitability | |||
Recurring pre-tax profit | £17.0 | £16.4m | |
(Loss)/profit for year | £(16.0)m | £21.1m | |
Basic earnings per share - continuing and discontinued operations | (5)p | 6p | |
Property under management | £1.4 billion | £2.5 billion |
1 See-through debt and see-though net debt divided by IFRS property value as disclosed in note 23a
2 Adjusted for £30.6 million X-Leisure proceeds received in January 2013. See Note 23a for figures pre-adjustment.
Investment returns
Net assets per share decreased in the year to 51p, down 5p or 8.9% since 30 December 2011, and EPRA net assets per share decreased to 55p, down 8p, or 12.6% since 30 December 2011. The change in net assets resulted in an -8.5% return on equity for the year.
To provide a greater understanding of the composition of the business, the Group presents its balance sheet in two separate ways, with the "statutory" balance sheet following the accounting and statutory rules, and the "see-through" balance sheet showing the Group's proportionate economic exposure to the different property portfolios. These are shown below as at 30 December 2012:
See through | Statutory | See-through | Statutory |
| |||||||||
Property | Debt | Other | 30 December | Property | Debt | Other | 30 December | ||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | ||||||
The Mall | 180.8 | (115.0) | 2.2 | 68.0 | 184.8 | (120.3) | 0.4 | 64.9 | |||||
Germany | 168.9 | (124.3) | (2.0) | 42.6 | 247.8 | (197.5) | 4.4 | 54.7 | |||||
X-Leisure1 | - | - | 30.6 | 30.6 | 66.5 | (35.4) | (0.6) | 30.5 | |||||
The Junction | - | - | - | - | 36.7 | (21.8) | 2.2 | 17.1 | |||||
Great Northern | 70.0 | (57.6) | 0.4 | 12.8 | 71.5 | (61.9) | (1.7) | 7.9 | |||||
Kingfisher Redditch | 26.3 | (17.2) | 0.3 | 9.4 | - | - | - | - | |||||
Waterside Lincoln | 13.0 | (6.8) | 0.9 | 7.1 | 13.0 | (6.8) | 0.4 | 6.6 | |||||
Hemel Hempstead | 8.4 | - | (0.2) | 8.2 | 8.3 | (5.3) | 0.0 | 3.0 | |||||
Xscape Braehead | - | - | - | - | 24.1 | (22.8) | 2.9 | 4.2 | |||||
FIX | - | - | - | - | 26.1 | (25.2) | 0.1 | 1.0 | |||||
Other net assets | - | (1.0) | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.2 | - | 5.9 | 6.1 | |||||
Net assets | 467.4 | (321.9) | 34.1 | 179.6 | 679.0 | (497.0) | 14.0 | 196.0 | |||||
1 For 2012 X-Leisure shown at net realisable value of £32.2 million less related costs of £1.6 million as per note 30.
Financing
The group net debt to equity ratio increased from 24% to 30% over the course of the year, primarily due to the acquisition of the Kingfisher Centre, Redditch combined with a decrease in shareholders' equity of £12.4 million. Following the receipt in January 2013 of the proceeds for the Group's interest in the X-Leisure Fund the proforma net debt to equity ratio at 30 December 2012 was 13%. A summary of the movements in Group and off balance sheet debt during the year is set out below:
Off balance | See-through | ||
Group debt | sheet debt | debt | |
£m | £m | £m | |
At 30 December 2011 | 67.2 | 429.8 | 497.0 |
Property acquisition | 3.6 | 17.2 | 20.8 |
Other drawdowns | 1.0 | - | (2.6) |
Repayments from disposals | - | (60.2) | (60.2) |
X-Leisure - excluded on reclassification as asset held for sale | - | (35.6) | - |
Other repayments | (13.2) | (9.1) | (17.9) |
Increased investment in The Mall | - | 13.2 | 13.1 |
Impairment of German Portfolio 4 | - | (63.2) | (63.2) |
Impairment of FIX | - | (24.5) | (25.2) |
Foreign exchange | - | (4.3) | (4.3) |
At 30 December 2012 | 58.6 | 263.3 | 321.9 |
Group debt
Group debt fell by £8.6 million to £58.6 million at 30 December 2012 (2011: £67.2 million). This fall was due to a £3.8 million loan repayment of the Great Northern Warehouse loan and the repayment of the £5.3 million loan on the Hemel Hempstead property which matured during the year. Both of these repayments were made using central funds. The breakdown of Group debt and net debt at 30 December 2012 are set out below with the proforma impact of the X-Leisure disposal:
Loan to | Average | Duration to | |||
Debt1 | value3 | interest rate2 | Fixed | loan expiry | |
30 December 2012 | £m | % | % | % | Years |
Core revolving credit facility | 1.0 | n/a | 3.70 | - | 3.6 |
Great Northern | 57.6 | 79 | 7.51 | 102 | 1.8 |
Group debt | 58.6 | 7.45 | 102 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | (5.3) | ||||
Group net debt | 53.3 | ||||
Proforma proceeds from X-Leisure disposal | (30.6) | ||||
Proforma net debt | 22.7 |
1 Excluding unamortised issue costs
2 In the case of variable rate loans, based on LIBOR at 30 December 2012 plus the appropriate margin
3 Debt and net debt divided by investment property at fair value and trading property at the lower of cost and net realisable value
The core revolving credit facility was utilised during the year and the maximum amount drawn down was £14.8 million (2011: £nil). This was mainly as a result of the £5.3 million repayment of the Hemel Hempstead loan at maturity and the repayment of £3.6 million of the Great Northern Warehouse loan. At 30 December 2012 there was £1 million drawn down on the central facility. The forecast covenant tests indicate that there is sufficient headroom for the full £25 million facility available to be drawn down.
In August 2012 the Group signed a new revolving credit facility for £25 million with Bank of Scotland, a reduction from £58 million and with maturity extended to July 2016 from September 2013. This revised facility better reflects the Group's working capital requirements and reduces the cost of the undrawn facility. At the same time the Group extended the maturity of the loan on Great Northern Warehouse by one year to October 2014. The main covenant terms of the revolving facility are reproduced in the section "Covenant Information".
Off balance sheet debt
Off balance sheet debt, which is non-recourse to the Group, fell by £130.9 million to £298.9 million at 30 December 2012 (2011: £429.8 million) as a consequence of asset disposals and the exclusion of the German portfolio 4 and FIX following their impairment.
The proforma breakdown of the Group's share of off balance sheet debt and net debt at 30 December 2012 after adjustment of £35.6 million for the disposal of the X-Leisure Fund was as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Loan to | Net debt | Average | average duration | |||||
Group share | Debt1 | Cash3 | Net debt | Value2 | to value2 | interest rate | Fixed | to loan expiry |
30 December 2012 | £m | £m | £m | % | % | % | % | Years |
The Mall | 115.0 | (21.4) | 93.6 | 67 | 55 | 4.23 | 100 | 2.3 |
Germany | 124.3 | (4.1) | 120.2 | 73 | 71 | 3.93 | 90 | 2.2 |
Waterside Lincoln | 6.8 | (1.0) | 5.8 | 52 | 44 | 4.70 | 100 | 2.1 |
Kingfisher Redditch | 17.2 | (1.6) | 15.6 | 65 | 59 | 6.17 | 100 | 4.3 |
Off balance sheet | 263.3 | (28.1) | 235.2 | 4.23 | 95 | 2.4 |
1 Excluding unamortised issue costs
2 Debt and net debt divided by investment property at fair value
3 Excluding cash beneficially owned by tenants
The Mall Fund's debt was reduced by £91.4 million to £570.9 million at 30 December 2012 (2011: £662.3 million). This decrease was due to debt repayments from the sale proceeds of Norwich and from cash generated from operations. The second amortisation target required by the Mall Fund's CMBS of £600 million by December 2014 has been achieved well in advance of the required date.
The Mall Fund will be permitted to recommence distributions when the LTV of the Fund, which is currently 67%, is less than 60% and we expect this to be achieved later in 2013. Approval has been received from the bond holders to utilise approximately £13.4 million of funds held in Camberley Unit Trust to repay debt which would result in a proforma LTV of 65%.
Total German debt decreased by €170.1 million to €306.7 million at 30 December 2012 (2011: €476.8 million). At the applicable exchange rates this was equivalent to £250.5 million (2011: £398.2 million). The decrease is due to the exclusion of €156.4 million of debt in the German portfolio 4 following the impairment and loss of joint control and amortisation payments of €13.7 million during the year.
Maturity analysis
The table below shows the maturity profile of the see-through debt and undrawn core credit facility at 30 December 2012 excluding debt relating to the X-Leisure Fund:
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Total | |
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Sterling debt drawn | - | 57.6 | 121.8 | 1.0 | 17.2 | 197.6 |
Euro debt drawn | 43.2 | 27.0 | 28.0 | 11.1 | 15.0 | 124.3 |
Undrawn core credit facility | - | - | - | 24.0 | - | 24.0 |
As at 31 December 2012 | 43.2 | 84.6 | 149.8 | 36.1 | 32.2 | 345.9 |
In relation to the Euro debt secured on the German properties discussions have already begun with a number of lenders to refinance these loans and we expect this debt to be refinanced by June 2013 well in advance of maturity.
Covenants
The Group and its associates and joint ventures were compliant with their banking and debt covenants at 30 December 2012, except as disclosed below:
·; The German joint venture has obtained a covenant waiver until maturity on 31 December 2013 for two loans in the same portfolio which had marginally breached their LTV covenants albeit that the overall portfolio covenant was met.
·; The German portfolio 4 formally defaulted on 16 July 2012 and was placed into special servicing.
Further details on the various debt covenants are disclosed in the 'other information' section in covenant information.
Interest rate hedging
The majority of current borrowing, both at Group level and in the funds and joint ventures, continues to be covered by interest rate swaps or caps. At 30 December 2012, the see-through valuation of the Group's swaps and caps was a liability of £14.4 million (2011: £18.8 million) which will not be crystallised unless the underlying contracts are closed out before their expiry date. During the year, The Mall and The Junction terminated swaps at a total cash cost of £13.3 million, of which the Group's share was £1.9 million.
Cash distributions
The Group received total cash distributions of £2.4 million during the year comprising a £0.9 million tax distribution from The Mall Fund; £1.1 million from the X-Leisure Fund; £0.2 million from Garigal Asset Management and £0.2 million from FIX UK.
Profitability
Recurring pre-tax profit
The Group's recurring pre-tax profit increased by £0.6 million to £17.0 million for the year ended 30 December 2012 (2011: £16.4 million). The breakdown of recurring pre-tax profit, as defined in Note 1, is as follows (and as set out further in Note 2a):
Year to | Year to | |
30 December | 30 December | |
2012 | 2011 | |
£m | £m | |
UK Shopping Centres | 5.6 | 4.3 |
German property investment | 7.1 | 7.9 |
Property management | 3.4 | 4.1 |
SNO!zone | 1.2 | 0.7 |
Other including Leisure | 1.6 | 2.5 |
Group items | (4.6) | (4.7) |
Discontinued Operations (The Junction, X-Leisure and Xscape Braehead) | 2.7 | 1.6 |
Recurring pre-tax profit | 17.0 | 16.4 |
The recurring pre-tax profit of £5.6 million from UK Shopping Centres reflects the acquisition of The Kingfisher Centre, Redditch and additional Mall units during the period. The fall in recurring profitability in Germany principally reflects the loss of income from portfolio 4. Recurring profits within Property Management have decreased due to the net impact of the loss of fees in respect of The Junction and Mall disposals partially offset by fees arising from The Kingfisher Centre and the agreement of an asset management and development contract with Scottish Widows Investment Partners for the Broadwalk Centre Edgware. The improvement in SNO!zone recurring profit reflects cost savings delivered from the restructuring of the business during the year.
Loss for the year
The loss for the year ended 30 December 2012 was £16.0 million (2011: profit of £21.1 million) and is analysed below:
Year to | Year to | |
30 December | 30 December | |
2012 | 2011 | |
£m | £m | |
Recurring pre-tax profit | 17.0 | 16.4 |
Property revaluation | (20.8) | 1.7 |
(Loss)/profit on disposal of properties within funds | (1.6) | 0.7 |
Performance fees - net of Group share of cost | 2.0 | - |
Impairments in respect of German portfolio 4 | (6.5) | - |
Other impairments | (3.1) | (0.1) |
Financial instruments revaluation on interest rate swaps | 3.6 | 2.6 |
Investment income | - | 4.0 |
Gain on investment in The Mall | 1.4 | 1.1 |
Loss on disposal of JV and Associates | (4.0) | - |
Other items | (2.9) | (3.0) |
Tax | (1.1) | (2.3) |
(Loss)/profit for the year | (16.0) | 21.1 |
As well as the recurring pre-tax profit discussed above, the other main factors behind the loss in the year were:
·; Property devaluationof £20.8 million was mainly due to a fall in the value of Germany of £10.0 million, of which £8.6 million relates to the impairment of German portfolio 4 and a decline in the value of The Mall of £7.6 million attributable to the loss of income due to the level of administrations, most of which occurred in the first half of the year.
·; Impairments in respect of German portfolio 4 include £3.3 million related to the write down of the carrying value of the equity investment in German portfolio 4 to £nil to reflect the significant fall in property values during 2012 which resulted in the portfolio defaulting on its debt and being put into special servicing in July 2012. Since the year end an administrator has been appointed over the properties in portfolio 4. A further £3.2 million impairment was recognised on the Group's investment in the Euro B-note, reducing the carrying value to £2.3 million, reflecting the risk of recovering the loan due from German portfolio 4 given the continuing uncertainty.
·; Other impairments include £1.8 million of Goodwill previously held in respect of X-Leisure Limited and £1.3 million related to the write down of the carrying value of FIX UK to £nil to reflect the fall in value of the assets such that the net asset value was negative. Since 30 December 2012 the Group's has disposed of its interest in FIX realising up to £0.5 million.
·; Gain on investment in The Mall related to the Group's purchase of 18.7 million units in The Mall Fund as detailed below.
Tax
The tax credit for the year on continuing operations was £0.9 million compared to a charge of £2.0 million in the prior year consisting of £1.4 million credit of current tax and £0.5 million of deferred tax charge (2011: £1.8 million of current tax charge and £0.2 million of deferred tax charge). The reduction in current tax charge arises primarily due to a prior year tax credit to the income statement of £2.1 million.
The current tax liability was £1.3 million at year end (2011: £3.0 million). The final payment of £5.0 million was made in the year for the settlement concluded with the tax authorities during 2009 in relation to the tax structuring of certain property disposals by the Group in 2004 and 2005 and as such no further liabilities exist at 30 December 2012 in respect of this matter.
Property under management
During the year, property under management fell due to property and fund disposals, which was partially offset by the acquisition of Redditch. The overall impact on property under management is set out below and has been adjusted for the disposal of the X-Leisure Fund which completed after the year end.
Valuation | Valuation | ||||
30 December 20111 | Disposals / additions | Other movements2 | Revaluation | 30 December 20121 | |
100% | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
UK Shopping Centres | 997 | 60 | (2) | (46) | 1,009 |
The Junction | 288 | (256) | (4) | (28) | - |
X-Leisure | 565 | (587) | (3) | 25 | - |
German joint venture (excluding portfolio 4) | 496 | - | (140) | (17) | 339 |
Other properties | 135 | (50) | (6) | 2 | 81 |
Property under management | 2,481 | (833) | (155) | (64) | 1,429 |
1 Valuation excludes adjustments to property valuations for tenant incentives and head leases treated as finance leases and trading properties are included at the lower of cost and net realisable value
2 Primarily the exclusion of German portfolio 4 and foreign exchange movements in Germany
The split of property under management by sector has changed as a result of the sale of The Junction during the year and the reclassification of X-Leisure to an asset held for sale. The sector analysis at 30 December 2012 and prior year end is as follows:
2012 | 2011 | |
% | % | |
Shopping centres | 70.7 | 40.2 |
Leisure | 5.6 | 28.2 |
Germany | 23.7 | 20.0 |
Retail parks | - | 11.6 |
100.0 | 100.0 |
Property acquisitions
On 1 May 2012, the Group acquired a 20% interest in The Kingfisher Shopping Centre in Redditch for a total consideration of £10.6 million in partnership with funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management Limited. The Kingfisher Centre was purchased for £130.0 million at an 8% initial yield. The Group acts as property and asset manager for the partnership.
Disposals
On 12 July The Mall sold The Castle Mall Shopping Centre, Norwich for £77.3 million at a net initial yield of 7.8%.
On 19 October the Group disposed of its 13.4% interest in The Junction fund for proceeds of £14.0 million including Performance Fee of £2.6 million.
On 24 December the Group sold its 50% interest in the Braehead Partnership for £4 million.
On 4 December 2012 the Group announced the conditional sale of its interest in the X-Leisure Fund and its 50% interest in X-Leisure Limited for gross proceeds of £32.2 million. This disposal subsequently completed on 16 January 2013.
Mall unit purchases
On 8 February 2012, the Group purchased 18.7 million units in The Mall Fund at £0.30 per unit for a total consideration of £5.6 million and this further increased the holding in The Mall Fund from 18.16% to 20.15%.
On 18 January 2013 the Group purchased 1.6 million units in The Mall Fund at £0.25 per unit for a total consideration of £0.4 million. As a consequence the Group's holding in The Mall Fund is now 20.33%.
Foreign currency exposure management
The Group uses a forward foreign exchange contract as a hedge of its net investment in the German joint ventures. At 30 December 2012, this was achieved through a contract for €47.0 million (2011: €47.0 million) at a fixed exchange rate of 1.1797 (2011: 1.1797) which hedges 97% (2011: 81%) of the Group's German investment. At 30 December 2012 the value of the contract was an asset of £1.4 million (2011: asset of £0.6 million). After the year end the Group closed out the forward contract of €47.0 million which matures on 28 March 2013 and entered into a new forward contract for €37.6 million until 31 December 2013 at a fixed exchange rate of 1.1617.
To the extent the hedge is effective under accounting rules, valuation movements on the forward contract is shown in reserves, where they partially offset the gain or loss in the value of the net investment in the Group's German joint ventures.
Financing strategy
Our financing structure needs to be flexible and cost effective and this was achieved through having cash of £5.3 million and a central revolving credit facility of £25 million at 30 December 2012 of which £1 million was drawn at that date. At end of February 2013 following receipt of the X-Leisure disposal proceeds the Group had cash of approximately £32 million. This gives the Group the scope to fund future property investments as opportunities arise.
At an associate and joint venture level, debt has been raised from a variety of sources, with a spread of maturities to mitigate refinancing risk as set out in the debt maturity analysis chart. Debt held in associates and joint ventures is non-recourse to the Group.
Going concern
As stated in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the directors are satisfied that the Group has sufficient resources to continue in operation for the foreseeable future, a period of not less than 12 months from the date of this report. Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
Charles Staveley
Group Finance Director
Principal risks and uncertainties
There are a number of risks and uncertainties which could have a material impact on the Group's future performance and could cause actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. References to "the Group" include the funds and joint ventures in which Capital & Regional has an interest. The Group carries out a regular review of the major risks it faces and monitors the controls that have been put in place to mitigate them. Property risks are also monitored at various levels within divisional management.
Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
Property risks | ||
Property investment market risks | ||
·; Weak economic conditions and poor sentiment in commercial real estate markets leading to low investor demand and market pricing correction
| ·; Small changes in property market yields have a significant effect on the value of the properties owned by the Group ·; Impact of leverage could magnify the effect on the Group's net assets | ·; Monitoring of indicators of market direction and pursuit of opportunistic asset sales in those schemes and locations most likely to suffer adverse impact ·; Review of debt levels and consideration of strategies to reduce if relevant ·; Geographical diversification of investments |
Impact of the economic environment (tenant risks) | ||
·; Tenant insolvency or distress ·; Prolonged downturn in tenant demand and pressure on rent levels | ·; Tenant failures and reduced tenant demand could adversely affect rental income revenues, lease incentive costs, void costs, available cash and the value of properties owned by the Group | ·; Large, diversified tenant base ·; Review of tenant covenants before new leases signed ·; Long term leases and active credit control process ·; Good relationships with, and active management of, tenants ·; Void management though temporary lettings and other mitigation strategies |
Threat from the internet | ||
·; The trend towards online shopping may adversely impact consumer footfall In shopping centres | ·; A change in consumer shopping habits towards online purchasing and delivery may reduce footfall and therefore potentially reduce tenant demand for space and the levels of rents which can be achieved | ·; Strong location and dominance of shopping centres (predominantly South East England) ·; Strength of the community shopping experience ·; Increasingly retailers within our shopping centres use stores as collection points for purchases made by consumers online ·; Monitoring of footfall for evidence of falling visitors to shopping centres ·; Monitoring of retail trends and shopping behaviour ·; Mobile smart phone marketing initiatives |
Valuation risks | ||
·; In the absence of relevant transactional evidence, valuations can be inherently subjective leading to a degree of uncertainty
| ·; Stated property valuations may not reflect the price received on sale | ·; Use of experienced, external valuers ·; Rotation of valuers ·; Valuations reviewed by internal valuation experts |
Property management income risks | ||
·; Fee income, although largely fixed, may still fall based on value of property under management ·; Contracts allow for termination under certain circumstances, which are largely outside management's control | ·; Changes in property values, sales of properties or other events not wholly under management's control could result in a reduction in or the loss of property management income | ·; Monitoring of compliance with terms of contracts ·; Close dialogue with other investors and stakeholders ·; Contracts have now been largely renegotiated to fix income ·; Reduction of cost base as fee income falls to mitigate loss |
Nature of investments and relationships with key business partners | ||
·; The market for the Group's investments can be relatively illiquid ·; Restrictions on ability to exercise full control over underlying investments in joint ventures or fund structures | ·; Inability to sell investments or fully control exit/asset sale strategies could result in investments in associates and joint ventures not being realisable at reported values | ·; Close dialogue with other investors and stakeholders to align strategies and increase influence over the direction of investments ·; Exercise of significant influence over associates and joint ventures through representation on management boards |
Funding and treasury risks | ||
Liquidity and funding | ||
·; Inability to fund the business or to refinance existing debt on economic terms when needed | ·; Inability to meet financial obligations (interest, loan repayments, expenses, dividends) when due ·; Limitation on financial and operational flexibility ·; Cost of financing could be prohibitive | ·; Capital raising, debt refinancing and asset sales at both Group and fund levels have improved liquidity position, reduced the potential impact of falls in property values and positioned the Group to respond quickly to the turning point in the cycle ·; Ensuring that there are significant undrawn facilities ·; Option of further asset sales if necessary ·; Efficient treasury management and regular proactive reporting of current and projected position to the board to ensure debt maturities are dealt with in good time |
Covenant compliance risks | ||
·; Breach of any of loan covenants causing default on debt and possible accelerated maturity | ·; Unremedied breaches can trigger demand for immediate repayment of loan | ·; Regular monitoring and projections of liquidity, gearing and covenant compliance ·; Review of future cash flows and predicted valuations to ensure sufficient headroom |
Foreign exchange exposure risks | ||
·; Fluctuations in the exchange rate between sterling and the euro in respect of the Group's German joint venture ·; Uncertainty over the Eurozone and the future of the Euro currency | ·; Adverse impact on sterling valuation of investments and income flows, and losses as a result of the Group having not, or not effectively, hedged its risk | ·; Exposure minimised by funding the German investment through euro denominated borrowings and hedging a large proportion of the remaining investment through derivatives ·; Regular monitoring of the effectiveness of hedging and performance of derivative contracts |
Interest rate exposure risks | ||
·; Exposure to rising or falling interest rates | ·; If interest rates rise and are unhedged, the cost of debt facilities can rise and ICR covenants could be broken ·; Hedging transactions used by the Group to minimise interest rate risk may limit gains, result in losses or have other adverse consequences | ·; Regular monitoring of the performance of derivative contracts and corrective action taken where necessary ·; Use of alternative hedges such as caps |
Other risks | ||
Tax risks | ||
·; Exposure to changes in tax legislation or the interpretation of tax legislation and property related regulations ·; Potential exposure to tax liabilities in respect of transactions undertaken where the tax authorities disagree with the tax treatment adopted
| ·; Tax related liabilities and other losses could arise | ·; Expert advice taken on tax positions and other regulations ·; Maintenance of a regular dialogue with the tax authorities
|
Regulation risks ·; Exposure to changes in existing or forthcoming property related or corporate regulation |
·; Failure to comply could result in financial penalties, loss of business or credibility.
|
·; Management undertake training to keep aware of regulatory changes ·; Expert advice taken on complex regulatory matters |
Loss of key management | ||
·; Dependence of the Group's business on the skills of a small number of key individuals | ·; Loss of key individuals or an inability to attract new employees with the appropriate expertise could reduce the effectiveness with which the Group conducts its business | ·; Key management are paid market salaries and offered competitive incentive packages to ensure their retention ·; Succession planning for key positions is undertaken ·; Performance evaluation, training and development programmes are in place to maintain and enhance the quality of staff |
The risks noted above do not comprise all those potentially faced by the Group and are not intended to be presented in any order of priority. Additional risks and uncertainties currently unknown to the Group, or which the Group currently deems immaterial, may also have an adverse effect on the financial condition or business of the Group in the future. These issues are kept under constant review to allow the Group to react in an appropriate and timely manner to help mitigate the impact of such risks.
Significant contracts or arrangements
The Company is required to disclose any contractual or other arrangements which it considers are essential to its business.
·; The asset and property management agreement in relation to The Mall is considered to be essential for the Company, because of the fee income it generates for the Company's subsidiary CRPM and the significant influence it allows the Group to assert over its investment. The asset and property management agreement for the German portfolio is also considered to be essential for the Company because of the fee income it generates for the Garigal associate, and the significant influence it allows the Group to assert over the investment.
·; The Bank of Scotland £25.0 million central credit facility which provides the Group with liquidity.
·; The Company also acts as a guarantor of the Great Northern loan and the Group's central credit facility.
Certain of these agreements can be terminated in the event of a change of control of the Company as disclosed in the Directors' report.
Consolidated income statement
For the year to 30 December 2012
2012 | 20111 | ||||
Note | £m | £m | |||
Continuing operations | |||||
Revenue | 3 | 28.7 | 28.9 | ||
Cost of sales | 4 | (11.1) | (11.7) | ||
Gross profit | 17.6 | 17.2 | |||
Administrative costs | (13.6) | (11.2) | |||
Share of (loss)/profit in associates and joint ventures | 17a | (12.8) | 11.6 | ||
Loss on revaluation of investment properties | 11a | (0.2) | (1.5) | ||
Other gains and losses | - | 0.1 | |||
(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities before financing | (9.0) | 16.2 | |||
Finance income | 5 | 2.9 | 2.3 | ||
Finance costs | 6 | (5.6) | (5.7) | ||
(Loss)/profit before tax | 7 | (11.7) | 12.8 | ||
Tax | 9a | 0.9 | (2.0) | ||
(Loss)/profit for the year from continuing operations | (10.8) | 10.8 | |||
Discontinued operations | |||||
(Loss)/profit for the year from discontinued operations | 30 | (5.2) | 10.3 | ||
(Loss)/profit for the year | (16.0) | 21.1 | |||
Continuing operations | |||||
Basic (loss)/earnings per share | 10a | (3)p | 3p | ||
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share | 10a | (3)p | 3p | ||
Continuing and discontinued operations | |||||
Basic (loss)/earnings per share | 10a | (5)p | 6p | ||
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share | 10a | (5)p | 6p |
1 2011 results have been restated to separate discontinued operations as explained in Note 30.
The loss for the current year and the profit for the preceding year, including amounts from discontinued operations, are fully attributable to equity shareholders.
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
For the year to 30 December 2012
2012 | 2011 | ||||
£m | £m | ||||
(Loss)/profit for the year | (16.0) | 21.1 | |||
Other comprehensive income: | |||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | |||||
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | (1.3) | (1.3) | |||
Gain on a hedge of a net investment taken to equity | 0.7 | 0.9 | |||
Total items that that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | (0.6) | (0.4) | |||
Total comprehensive income for the year | (16.6) | 20.7 |
The total comprehensive income for the current year and preceding year is fully attributable to equity shareholders.
Consolidated balance sheet
At 30 December 2012
2012 | 2011 | ||||
Note | £m | £m | |||
Non-current assets | |||||
Investment properties | 11a | 8.4 | 8.5 | ||
Goodwill | 12 | - | 1.8 | ||
Plant and equipment | 13 | 0.8 | 0.7 | ||
Available for sale investments | 14 | - | 0.3 | ||
Receivables | 15 | 23.6 | 33.3 | ||
Investment in associates | 17b | 80.7 | 120.2 | ||
Investment in joint ventures | 17c | 25.7 | 27.2 | ||
Total non-current assets | 139.2 | 192.0 | |||
Current assets | |||||
Trading properties | 11a | 70.0 | 71.5 | ||
Receivables | 18 | 7.4 | 5.0 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | 5.3 | 20.0 | ||
Assets classified as held for sale | 30 | 32.2 | - | ||
Total current assets | 114.9 | 96.5 | |||
Total assets | 2b | 254.1 | 288.5 | ||
Current liabilities | |||||
Bank loans | 22a | - | (5.0) | ||
Trade and other payables | 20 | (11.7) | (10.0) | ||
Current tax liabilities | (1.3) | (3.0) | |||
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale | 30 | (1.6) | - | ||
(14.6) | (18.0) | ||||
Non-current liabilities | |||||
Bank loans | 22a | (58.3) | (61.6) | ||
Other payables | 21 | (0.7) | (4.0) | ||
Deferred tax liabilities | 9c | (0.9) | (3.9) | ||
Non-current tax liabilities | 9e | - | (5.0) | ||
Total non-current liabilities | (59.9) | (74.5) | |||
Total liabilities | 2b | (74.5) | (92.5) | ||
Net assets | 179.6 | 196.0 | |||
Equity | |||||
Share capital | 24 | 9.9 | 9.9 | ||
Other reserves | 72.0 | 72.8 | |||
Capital redemption reserve | 4.4 | 4.4 | |||
Own shares held | 26 | (0.7) | (6.8) | ||
Retained earnings | 94.0 | 115.7 | |||
Equity shareholders' funds | 179.6 | 196.0 | |||
Basic net assets per share | 28 | £0.51 | £0.56 | ||
EPRA triple net assets per share | 28 | £0.51 | £0.56 | ||
EPRA net assets per share | 28 | £0.55 | £0.63 |
These financial statements were approved by the Board of directors, authorised for issue and signed on their behalf on 12 March 2013 by:
Charles Staveley
Group Finance Director
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
For the year to 30 December 2012
Other reserves | ||||||||||
Net | ||||||||||
Foreign | investment | Capital | Own | |||||||
Share | Special | Merger | Acquisition | currency | hedging | redemption | shares | Retained | Total | |
capital | reserve | reserve | reserve | reserve | reserve | reserve | held | earnings | equity | |
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Balance at 30 December 2010 | 9.9 | 79.5 | 60.3 | 9.5 | 7.4 | (3.5) | 4.4 | (9.7) | 16.7 | 174.5 |
Profit for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 21.1 | 21.1 |
Other comprehensive income for the year | - | - | - | - | (1.3) | 0.9 | - | - | - | (0.4) |
- | ||||||||||
Total comprehensive income for the year | - | - | - | - | (1.3) | 0.9 | - | - | 21.1 | 20.7 |
- | ||||||||||
Credit to equity for equity-settled share-based payments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Transfer between reserves | - | (79.5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 79.5 | - |
Other movements | - | - | - | - | (0.5) | - | - | 2.9 | (2.4) | - |
- | ||||||||||
Balance at 30 December 2011 | 9.9 | - | 60.3 | 9.5 | 5.6 | (2.6) | 4.4 | (6.8) | 115.7 | 196.0 |
Loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (16.0) | (16.0) |
Other comprehensive income for the year | - | - | - | - | (1.3) | 0.7 | - | - | - | (0.6) |
Total comprehensive income for the year | - | - | - | - | (1.3) | 0.7 | - | - | (16.0) | (16.6) |
Credit to equity for equity-settled share-based payments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Transfer between reserves | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Transfer to income statement for German portfolio 4 | - | - | - | - | (0.7) | - | - | - | - | (0.7) |
Other movements | - | - | - | - | - | 0.5 | - | 6.1 | (6.5) | 0.1 |
Balance at 30 December 2012 | 9.9 | - | 60.3 | 9.5 | 3.6 | (1.4) | 4.4 | (0.7) | 94.0 | 179.6 |
The special reserve arose on the cancellation of the Company's share premium account in 2009 when £141.0 million of the share premium account was credited to retained earnings and the balance of £79.5 million remained in the special reserve pending consent from all of the Company's creditors. During 2011 the special reserve of £79.5 million was transferred to retained earnings following the resolution of the outstanding required consent from the Company's creditors.
The merger reserve of £60.3 million arose on the Group's capital raising in 2009 which was structured so as to allow the Company to claim merger relief under section 612 of the Companies Act 2006 on the issue of Ordinary shares. The merger reserve is available for distribution to shareholders.
The acquisition reserve of £9.5 million relates to the purchase of the entire ordinary share capital of Morrison Merlin Limited in 2005, prior to which it had been a joint venture in which the Group had a 50% interest. The balance on the reserve arose from the difference at the date of acquisition between the carrying value of the Group's existing interest and its fair value. The reserve will remain on the balance sheet until Morrison Merlin Limited is sold.
The foreign currency reserve of £3.6 million and the net investment hedging reserve deficit of £2.0 million respectively show foreign exchange translation differences from the Group's investment in its German joint venture and any hedges of that investment. £0.7 million has been reclassified from the foreign currency reserve to the income statement during the year related to the impairment of German portfolio 4 (see Note 17c).
Consolidated cash flow statement
For the year to 30 December 2012
2012 | 2011 | ||||
Note | £m | £m | |||
Operating activities | |||||
Net cash from operations | 27 | 4.3 | 8.2 | ||
Distributions received from associates | 17b | 2.2 | 11.2 | ||
Distributions received from joint ventures | 17c | 0.6 | 4.5 | ||
Distributions received from fixed asset investments | 0.2 | - | |||
Interest paid | (5.1) | (5.3) | |||
Interest received | - | 0.1 | |||
Income taxes paid | (7.2) | (9.9) | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | (5.0) | 8.8 | |||
Investing activities | |||||
Purchase of investment property | 11a | - | (26.1) | ||
Sale of equity interest in Waterside Lincoln | 17c | - | 6.4 | ||
Disposal of interests in Joint Ventures and Associates | 14.9 | - | |||
Other disposals | 0.5 | (0.1) | |||
Purchase of plant and equipment | 13 | (0.4) | (0.3) | ||
Investment in associates | 17b | (16.2) | (4.0) | ||
Investment in joint ventures | 17c | - | (1.2) | ||
Loans to joint ventures | - | (1.3) | |||
Loans repaid by joint ventures | 0.4 | 1.2 | |||
Cash flows from investing activities | (0.8) | (25.4) | |||
Financing activities | |||||
Bank loans drawn down | 4.6 | 13.6 | |||
Bank loans repaid | (13.2) | (3.2) | |||
Loan arrangement costs | (0.3) | (0.3) | |||
Settlement of forward foreign exchange contract | - | 1.5 | |||
Premium cost of interest rate swaption | - | (0.7) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities | (8.9) | 10.9 | |||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (14.7) | (5.7) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 20.0 | 25.7 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 19 | 5.3 | 20.0 |
Notes to the financial statements
For the year to 30 December 2012
1 Significant Accounting Policies
General information
Capital & Regional plc is a company domiciled and incorporated in the United Kingdom under the Companies Act 2006. The address of the registered office is 52 Grosvenor Gardens, London, SW1W 0AU. The nature of the Group's operations and its principal activities are disclosed in note 2a and in the operating and financial reviews.
Basis of accounting
The financial statements comprise the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated balance sheet, the consolidated statement of changes in equity, the consolidated cash flow statement and notes 1 to 35. They are prepared on the historical cost basis except for the revaluation of certain properties and financial instruments. Other than as noted in the 'Accounting developments and changes' section below, the accounting policies have been applied consistently to the results, other gains and losses, assets, liabilities, income and expenses.
The financial statements are presented in pounds sterling because that is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Group operates. Foreign operations are included in accordance with the accounting policies set out below.
Restatement of prior year comparatives
In accordance with the requirements of IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations the income statement and segmental amounts for the year to 30 December 2011 have been restated to show the results relating to the Group's interests in The Junction Fund, X-Leisure Fund, X-Leisure Limited and Xscape Braehead within discontinued operations. The results of discontinued operations are set out in note 30.
Statement of compliance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union (EU) and therefore the Group financial statements comply with Article 4 of the EU IAS Regulation.
Accounting developments and changes
Developments - during 2012
During 2012 the new standards and amendments that have been issued and adopted by EU and the Group have not resulted in a material change to the consolidated financial statements.
Developments - not yet adopted
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the following standards and interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements, were in issue but not yet effective (and in some cases had not yet been adopted by the EU):
·; IFRS 1 (amended) Severe hyperinflation and removal of fixed dates for first time adopters
·; IFRS 7 (amended) Disclosures - Transfers of financial assets
·; IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
·; IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements
·; IFRS 11 Joint arrangements
·; IFRS 12 Disclosure of interests in other entities
·; IFRS 13 Fair value measurement
·; IAS 1 (amended) Presentation of items of other comprehensive income
·; IAS 12 (amended) Deferred tax: Recovery of underlying assets
·; IAS 19 (revised) Employee benefits
·; IAS 27 (revised) Separate financial statements
·; IAS 28 (revised) Investments in associates and joint ventures
·; IAS 32 (amended) Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The directors are in the process of assessing the impact that the adoption of these standards may have on the financial statements of the Group in future periods. The directors do not expect that the adoption of the standards listed above will have a material impact on the financial statements, however it is not practicable to provide a reasonable estimate of the effect of these standards until a detailed review has been completed.
Going concern
The Group prepares cash flow and covenant compliance forecasts to demonstrate that it has adequate resources available to continue in operation for the foreseeable future, being at least 12 months from the date of this report. In these forecasts the directors specifically consider anticipated future market conditions and the Group's principal risks and uncertainties. The directors believe that the Group and the Company have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and accordingly continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the annual report and financial statements.
Further detail is contained within the Financial Review. The Group's borrowing facilities and its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments and hedging activities; and its exposure to credit risk and liquidity risks are provided in Notes 22 and 23 of the financial statements.
Critical accounting judgements
The preparation of financial statements requires the directors to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that may affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses.
The following are the critical judgements, apart from those involving estimation uncertainty which are dealt with separately, that the directors have made in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements. The critical accounting judgements are:
Property valuation
Reliance upon the work undertaken at 30 December 2012 by independent professional qualified valuers, as disclosed in note 11b, in assessing the fair value of certain of the Group's investment and trading properties.
1 Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Associates
An assessment of whether the Group exercises significant influence over its investment in The Mall as discussed in note 17b.
Derivative financial instruments
Reliance upon the work undertaken at 30 December 2012 by independent third party experts in assessing the fair values of the Group's derivative financial instruments, which are disclosed in notes 15, 18, 21 and 23f.
Lease classification
Consideration of the potential transfer of risks and rewards of ownership in accordance with IAS 17 Leases for all properties leased to tenants. The directors have determined that all such leases are operating leases.
Performance fees
Where performance conditions have not already been met he likelihood that CRPM and Garigal will receive performance fee revenue under their respective asset and property management contracts. The directors have concluded that it is not yet probable that any amounts will be received but the performance criteria are disclosed in note 35.
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
The key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the balance sheet date, that have a risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are:
Taxation
An assessment of the likelihood that potential historic tax liabilities will arise as well as the impact of changes in recent legislation, case law and accounting standards, along with future projections for the Group, in determining the current and deferred tax assets, liabilities and charge to the income statement, as disclosed in note 9.
Valuation of loan receivable in Euro B-Note Holding Limited
Determining whether the subordinated loan receivable held indirectly by Euro B-Note Holding Limited is impaired requires an estimation of the credit risk of the relevant German investment portfolio. An independent valuation was obtained as at 30 June 2011 for the loan receivable fair value at the time of the debt refinancing. This fair value was based on the future cash flows expected to arise from the loan receivable and an appropriate discount rate of 15.35% was applied for the calculation of the present value. This discount rate assumed that the loan principal was discounted by 12.0% per annum to reflect credit risk. The discount rate was based on a risk adjusted yield curve. Subsequent to the refinancing the loan receivable is held at amortised cost and tested for impairment at each reporting date.
At 30 December 2012 management performed an impairment review over the relevant German joint venture portfolio which included an assessment of the actual and forecast loan to value, liquidity, net rental income and contribution and the ability of the joint venture entity to repay the debt. This impairment assessment resulted in the Group's share of the loan receivable being carried at £2.3 million compared to a nominal value of £14.7 million (2011 : Group's share of carrying value of £5.6 million compared to nominal value of £15.0 million) as disclosed in 17b.
The directors believe that the estimates and associated assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are reasonable, but actual outcomes may differ from those anticipated and so the judgements, estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.
Principal accounting policies
The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company at 30 December. Control is achieved where the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an investee entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated income statement from the effective date of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal. The reporting period for subsidiaries and affiliates ends on 31 December and their financial statements are consolidated from this date. All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.
Business combinations
Acquisitions of subsidiaries and businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration for each acquisition is measured at the aggregate at the date of exchange of the fair values of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments issued by the Group in exchange for control of the acquiree. Acquisition-related costs are recognised in the income statement as incurred. Where a business combination is achieved in stages, the Group's previously-held interests in the acquired entity are remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date (i.e. the date the Group attains control) and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognised in the income statement.
If the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs, the Group reports provisional amounts for the items for which the accounting is incomplete. Those provisional amounts are adjusted during the remeasurement period or additional assets or liabilities are recognised to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the amounts recognised as of that date. The measurement period is the period from the date of acquisition to the date the Group obtains complete information and is subject to a maximum of one year.
Assets held for sale
Assets held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. Assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year of the date of classification.
1 Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Investments in associates and joint ventures
A joint venture is an entity over which the Group has joint control, which is the contractually agreed sharing of control over an economic activity which exists when the strategic financial and operating decisions relating to the activity require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. An associate is an entity over which the Group has significant influence and that is neither a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies.
In accordance with IAS 28 Investments in Associates and IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures, associates and joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method, whereby the consolidated balance sheet and income statement incorporate the Group's share of net assets and profits or losses after tax. The profits or losses include revaluation movements on investment properties. Losses of an associate or joint venture in excess of the Group's interest in that associate or joint venture (which includes any long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the Group's net investment in the associate or joint venture) are recognised only to the extent that the Group has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate or joint venture.
Any excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group's share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of an associate recognised at the date of acquisition is recognised as goodwill. The goodwill is included within the carrying amount of the associate and is assessed for impairment as part of that investment. Any excess of the Group's share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the associate over the cost of acquisition, after reassessment, is recognised immediately in the income statement.
The reporting period for associates and joint ventures ends on 31 December and their financial statements are equity accounted to this date. In accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, associates and joint ventures are reviewed at the end of the reporting period to determine whether any impairment loss should be recognised.
Goodwill
Goodwill arising in a business combination is recognised as an asset at the date that control is acquired and is measured as the excess of the sum of consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the fair value of any equity interest in the entity already held by the acquirer over the net of the acquisition date amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Goodwill is not amortised but is reviewed for impairment at least annually. The impairment is calculated on the value in use of the goodwill and is recognised immediately in the income statement and not subsequently reversed. Where the Group's interest in the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable net assets exceeds the sum of consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the fair value of any equity interest in the entity already held by the acquirer, the excess is recognised immediately in the income statement as a bargain purchase gain.
Foreign currency
Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at exchange rates approximating to the exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated to sterling at the exchange rate ruling at that date and, unless they relate to the hedging of the net investment in foreign operations, differences arising on translation are recognised in the income statement.
Financial statements of foreign operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on consolidation, are translated into sterling at the exchange rates ruling at the balance sheet date. The operating income and expenses of foreign operations are translated into sterling at the average exchange rates for the period. Significant transactions, such as property sales, are translated at the foreign exchange rate ruling at the date of each transaction. The principal exchange rate used to translate foreign currency denominated amounts in the balance sheet is the rate at the end of the year: £1 = €1.2241 (2011: £1 = €1.1972). The principal exchange rate used for the income statement is the average rate for the year: £1 = €1.2333 (2011: £1 = €1.1522).
Net investment in foreign operations
Exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign operations are taken to the foreign currency reserve and the effective portions of related foreign currency hedges are taken to the net investment hedging reserve. The net investment in foreign operations includes the equity of the underlying entities and the portion of shareholder loans to those entities that is treated as equity where there is no intention of repayment in the foreseeable future. All exchange differences previously accumulated in equity are transferred to the income statement upon disposal or, where control is lost, part-disposal of the foreign operation.
Plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at the lower of cost or valuation, net of depreciation and any provision for impairment. Depreciation is provided on all tangible fixed assets, other than investment properties and land, on a straight line basis over their expected useful lives:
·; Leasehold improvements - over the term of the lease
·; Fixtures and fittings - over three to five years
·; Motor vehicles - over four years
Property portfolio
Investment properties
Investment properties are properties owned or leased under finance leases which are held either for long-term rental income or for capital appreciation or both. Investment property is initially recognised at cost (including directly related transaction costs) and is revalued at the balance sheet date to fair value, being the market value determined by professionally qualified external or director valuers, with changes in fair value being included in the income statement. Valuations are generally carried out twice a year. In accordance with IAS 40 Investment Property, no depreciation is provided in respect of investment properties.
Leasehold properties
Leasehold properties that are leased to tenants under operating leases are classified as investment properties or development properties, as appropriate, and included in the balance sheet at fair value.
1 Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Refurbishment expenditure
Refurbishment expenditure in respect of major works is capitalised. Renovation and refurbishment expenditure of a revenue nature is expensed as incurred.
Property transactions
Acquisitions and disposals are accounted for at the date of legal completion. Investment properties are reclassified as held for sale once contracts have been exchanged and are transferred between categories at the estimated market value on the transfer date. Properties held for sale are shown at fair value less costs of disposal.
Trading properties
Properties held with the intention of disposal are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Any impairment in the value of trading properties is shown within the cost of sales line in the income statement.
Head leases
Where an investment property is held under a head lease, the head lease is initially recognised as an asset at the present value of the minimum ground rent payable under the lease. The corresponding rent liability to the leaseholder is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation.
Tenant leases and incentives
Incentives and costs associated with entering into tenant leases are amortised over a straight line basis over the term of the lease.
Operating leases
Annual rentals under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight line basis over the term of the lease.
Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the Group's balance sheet when the Group becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Financial assets
Financial assets are classified into the following specified categories: financial assets 'at fair value through profit or loss' (FVTPL), 'held to maturity' investments, 'available for sale' financial assets and 'loans and receivables'. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition.
Effective interest rate method
The effective interest rate method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a debt instrument and of allocating the interest income over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts (including all fees and points paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the debt instrument, or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount in initial recognition.
Available for sale financial assets
The Group has investments in unlisted shares and unit trusts that are not traded in an active market but whose fair value the directors consider can be reliably measured. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognised in other comprehensive income, with the exception of impairment losses which are recognised in the income statement. Dividends are recognised in the income statement when the Group's right to receive the dividends is established.
Loans and receivables
Loans and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as 'loans and receivables'. Loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate, except for short term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial.
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are carried at the original invoice amount less allowances made for doubtful accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the recoverable amount where there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due. Discounts and similar allowances are recorded on an accrual basis consistent with the recognition of the related sales, using estimates based on existing contractual obligations, historical trends and the Group's experience. Long-term accounts receivable are discounted to take into account the time value of money, where material.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and demand deposits and other short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified as either financial liabilities 'at FVTPL' or 'other financial liabilities'.
Borrowings
Borrowings are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognised on an effective yield basis. In accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, a substantial modification of the terms of an existing borrowing is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. Where the terms of the modification are not substantially different, any costs paid in connection with the modification are treated as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the liability and are amortised over the remaining life of the modified liability.
1 Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Financial liabilities (continued)
Derivative financial instruments
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to their fair value at each balance sheet date. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is calculated by reference to spot and forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date. The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated by reference to appropriate forecasts of yield curves between the balance sheet date and the maturity of the instrument. Changes in fair value are included as finance income or finance costs in the income statement, except for gains or losses on the portion of an instrument that is an effective hedge of the net investment in a foreign operation, which are recognised in the net investment hedging reserve. Derivative financial instruments are classified as non-current when they have a maturity of more than twelve months and are not intended to be settled within one year.
Trade payables
Trade payables are carried at fair value, with any gains or losses arising on remeasurement recognised in the income statement.
Taxation
Tax is included in the income statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case the related tax is recognised in equity.
Current tax is based on the taxable profit for the year and is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are never taxable or tax deductible (permanent differences) or will be taxable at a later date (temporary differences). Temporary differences principally arise when using balance sheet values for assets and liabilities that are different to their respective tax base values.
Deferred tax is provided using the balance sheet liability method on these temporary differences with the exception of goodwill not deductible for tax purposes; the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit; and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future. The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates applicable at the balance sheet date. A deferred tax asset is regarded as recoverable and therefore recognised only when, on the basis of all available evidence, it can be regarded as more likely than not that there will be suitable taxable profits from which the future reversal of the underlying temporary differences can be deducted. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where the Group has a legally enforceable right to do so.
Employee benefits
Pension costs
Pension liabilities, all of which relate to defined contribution schemes, are charged to the income statement as incurred.
Share-based payments
The Group has applied the arrangements of IFRS 2 Share-based Payment. Equity settled share-based payments are measured at fair value at the date of grant. The fair values of the 2008 LTIP, the COIP, the Matching Share Agreement and the SAYE scheme are calculated using Monte Carlo simulations or the Black-Scholes model as appropriate. The fair values are dependent on factors including the exercise price, expected volatility, period to exercise and risk free interest rate. Market related performance conditions are reflected in the fair values at the date of grant and are expensed on a straight line basis over the vesting period. Non-market related performance conditions are not reflected in the fair values at the date of grant. At each reporting date, the Group estimates the number of shares likely to vest under non-market related performance conditions so that the cumulative expense will ultimately reflect the number of shares that do vest. Where awards are cancelled, including when an employee ceases to pay contributions into the SAYE scheme, the remaining fair value is expensed immediately.
Own shares
Own shares held by the Group are shown as a deduction from shareholders' funds and included in other reserves. The cost of own shares is transferred to retained earnings when shares in the underlying incentive schemes vest. The shares are held in an Employee Share Ownership Trust.
Revenue
Management fees
Management fees are recognised, in line with the property management contracts, in the period to which they relate. They include income in relation to services provided by CRPM to associates and joint ventures for asset and property management, project co-ordination, procurement, and management of service charges and directly recoverable expenses. Income earned by X-Leisure Limited (up to date of reclassification as held for sale) and Garigal for similar services is recognised in the share of profit/(loss) in associates and joint ventures.
Net rental income
Net rental income is gross rental income adjusted for tenant incentives, recognised on a straight line basis over the term of the underlying lease, less expenses directly related to letting and holding the properties.
Dividend and interest income
Dividend income from investments is recognised when the shareholders' right to receive payment has been established. Interest income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that asset's net carrying amount.
1 Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Revenue (continued)
Performance fees
Performance fees are recognised as revenue by the Group or the relevant associate or joint venture when both the amount of performance fee and the stage of completion of the relevant performance conditions can be measured reliably, and when it is probable that the performance fee will be received. Performance fees may be earned as follows:
·; The Mall: by CRPM on property level outperformance relative to the IPD Shopping Centre Index (taking the 30 June 2010 valuation as the start point) of more than 50 basis points provided that the fund level return is greater than zero, payable at the end of the life of the fund or on an exit event, which is defined as a listing, sale of all the interests in the fund or the making of a cash offer which is accepted by a majority of the investors in the fund. For i) between 50 basis points and 150 basis points, CRPM receives 10% of the outperformance proceeds; ii) for between 150 basis points and 300 basis points of outperformance, CRPM receives 15% of the outperformance proceeds; and iii) for over 300 basis points of outperformance, CRPM receives no additional fee to ensure excessive risks are not taken. The provisions in the management agreements relating to removal for underperformance, which currently apply with effect from 31 December 2012, have been amended such that the GP board will only have the right to remove CRPM as the asset and property manager in the event of underperformance of at least 100 basis points below the IPD Shopping Centre Index over the period ending 31 December 2014.
·; German portfolio: by Garigal on any realised geared returns in excess of an internal rate of return of 12% over the period from June 2010 to the disposal of the entire portfolio or its conversion into a listed structure, subject to a maximum of €15 million.
Provisions for performance fees payable by the underlying associate or joint venture are made when there is a present obligation to settle the performance fee, its amount can be measured reliably and it is probable that it will be paid. Further disclosure on performance fees is included in note 35.
Finance costs
All borrowing costs are recognised under Finance costs in the income statement in the period in which they are incurred. Finance costs also include the amortisation of loan issue costs, any loss in the value of the Group's wholly owned interest rate swaps and any loss in the ineffective portion of the Group's hedge of its net investment in a foreign operation.
Operating segments
The Group's share of results for the year from The Junction Fund, Xscape Braehead, X-Leisure Fund and X-Leisure Limited has been classified as Discontinued Operations with the prior year comparatives restated. The Junction Fund and X-Leisure Fund were previously presented as separate segments, X-Leisure Limited was included within Property Management and Xscape Braehead was previously aggregated within 'Other'.
Following these changes and reflecting the smaller and simplified Group structure Management have re-evaluated the reportable segments under IFRS 8. This has resulted in a further partial breakdown of what was previously included within the 'Other' segment into new segments of Leisure, consisting of Great Northern Warehouse and Hemel Hempstead, and 'Other UK Shopping Centres' consisting of The Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership and Kingfisher Limited Partnership (Redditch). The prior year comparatives have also been restated on this basis.
The Group's other reportable segments remain The Mall, Germany, Property Management (consisting of CRPM and Garigal Asset Management GmbH) and SNO!zone. Other segments not individually reportable and therefore aggregated as 'Other' are the Group's remaining associates and joint ventures, comprising FIX UK, until the loss of significant influence, and The Auchinlea Partnership. Group items include Group overheads incurred by Capital & Regional plc and other subsidiaries, and the interest expense on the Group's central borrowing facility.
The Mall, Other UK Shopping Centres, Germany and Leisure derive their revenue from the rental of investment and trading properties. The Property Management and SNO!zone segments derive their revenue from the management of property funds or schemes and the operation of indoor ski slopes respectively. The split of revenue between these classifications satisfies the requirement of IFRS 8 to report revenues from different products and services. Depreciation and the variable overhead represent the only significant non-cash expenses.
The Group's interests in the assets, liabilities and profit or loss of its associates and joint ventures are proportionately consolidated and also shown on a see-through basis as this is how they are reported to the Board of directors. There are no differences between the measurements of the segments' assets, liabilities and profit or loss as they are reported to the Board of directors and their presentation under the Group's accounting policies.
Inter-segment revenue and expenses represent items eliminated on consolidation and are accounted for on an arm's length basis. Management fees and other revenue items in the property management segment are earned from the asset business segments, where they are included under property and void costs. Since these asset business segments are proportionately consolidated, the costs would not eliminate against the income and have therefore not been split out separately as inter-segment expenses.
Recurring pre-tax profit
Recurring pre-tax profit is the total of Contribution, the Group's share of management fees less fixed management expenses earned by CRPM, X-Leisure Limited (until reclassification as held for sale) and Garigal, the profit from SNO!zone and any central costs and interest adjusted for any significant one off items such as Performance Fees. Recurring pre-tax profit includes results from Discontinued Operations up until the point of disposal or reclassification as held for sale.
2a Operating segments
UK Shopping Centres |
| ||||||||||||||||
Other UK | Total |
| |||||||||||||||
Shopping | Property | Group | Continuing | Discontinued |
| ||||||||||||
The Mall | Centres | Germany | Leisure | Other | management | SNO!zone | items | Operations | Operations | Total |
| ||||||
Year to 30 December 2012 | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| ||||
Rental income from external sources | 2b | 15.4 | 3.0 | 15.9 | 6.7 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 42.1 | 8.9 | 51.0 | |||||
Property and void costs | (4.3) | (0.8) | (3.0) | (0.6) | (0.1) | - | - | - | (8.8) | (3.7) | (12.5) | ||||||
Net rental income | 11.1 | 2.2 | 12.9 | 6.1 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 5.2 | 38.5 | ||||||
Interest income | - | - | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.7 | - | 0.7 | ||||||
Interest expense | (6.6) | (1.1) | (6.5) | (5.0) | (0.4) | - | - | - | (19.6) | (3.1) | (22.7) | ||||||
Contribution | 4.5 | 1.1 | 7.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 14.4 | 2.1 | 16.5 | ||||||
Management fees | 2b | - | - | - | - | - | 10.4 | - | - | 10.4 | 2.3 | 12.7 | |||||
Management expenses | - | - | - | - | - | (7.0) | - | (3.9) | (10.9) | (1.7) | (12.6) | ||||||
SNO!zone income | 2b | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10.1 | - | 10.1 | - | 10.1 | |||||
SNO!zone expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | (8.7) | - | (8.7) | - | (8.7) | ||||||
Depreciation | - | - | - | - | - | (0.1) | (0.2) | - | (0.3) | - | (0.3) | ||||||
Inter-segment eliminations | 2b | - | - | - | (0.1) | - | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Interest expense on central facility | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (0.7) | (0.7) | - | (0.7) | ||||||
Recurring pre-tax profit/(loss) | 4.5 | 1.1 | 7.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 1.2 | (4.6) | 14.3 | 2.7 | 17.0 | ||||||
Performance fees | 2b | - | - | - | - | - | 2.6 | - | - | 2.6 | (0.6) | 2.0 | |||||
Variable overhead | - | - | - | - | - | (0.9) | (0.1) | (1.7) | (2.7) | - | (2.7) | ||||||
Revaluation of properties | (7.6) | (1.3) | (10.0) | (1.7) | (0.1) | - | - | - | (20.7) | (0.1) | (20.8) | ||||||
(Loss)/profit on disposal of properties | (1.6) | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | - | - | - | (1.4) | (0.2) | (1.6) | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (1.8) | (1.8) | |||||
Impairment of FIX UK | - | - | - | - | (1.3) | - | - | - | (1.3) | - | (1.3) | ||||||
Impairment of German Portfolio 4 | - | - | (3.3) | - | - | - | - | - | (3.3) | - | (3.3) | ||||||
Transfer from foreign currency reserve for German Portfolio 4 | - | - | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.7 | - | 0.7 | ||||||
Impairment of Euro B-Note | - | - | (3.2) | - | - | - | - | - | (3.2) | - | (3.2) | ||||||
Gain/(loss) on financial instruments | 1.6 | (0.6) | (0.1) | 1.7 | (0.1) | - | - | - | 2.5 | 1.1 | 3.6 | ||||||
Other items | 1.4 | - | 0.2 | - | - | (0.2) | (0.2) | (0.4) | 0.8 | (0.3) | 0.5 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of JV's and Associates | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (4.0) | (4.0) | ||||||
Profit/(loss) before tax | (1.7) | (0.8) | (8.5) | 1.0 | (0.8) | 4.9 | 0.9 | (6.7) | (11.7) | (3.2) | (14.9) | ||||||
Tax credit/(charge) | 9a | 0.9 | (2.0) | (1.1) | |||||||||||||
Profit after tax | (10.8) | (5.2) | (16.0) | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | 2b | 210.5 | 49.2 | 191.9 | 84.2 | 0.2 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 4 | 4.0 | 547.3 | 32.2 | 579.5 |
| |||
Total liabilities | 2b | (142.5) | (32.9) | (149.8) | (62.3) | - | (4.2) | (2.0) | (4.6) | (398.3) | (1.6) | (399.9) |
| ||||
Net assets | 68.0 | 16.3 | 42.1 | 21.9 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | (0.6) | 149.0 | 30.6 | 179.6 |
| |||||
2a Operating segments (continued)
UK Shopping Centres |
| ||||||||||||||
Other UK | Total |
| |||||||||||||
Shopping | Property | Group | Continuing | Discontinued |
| ||||||||||
The Mall | Centres | Germany | Leisure | Other | management | SNO!zone | items | Operations | Operations | Total |
| ||||
Year to 30 December 2011 | Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| ||
Rental income from external sources | 2b | 16.0 | 1.0 | 19.3 | 7.4 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 45.9 | 9.9 | 55.8 |
| ||
Property and void costs | (4.0) | (0.3) | (2.6) | (0.8) | (0.2) | - | - | - | (7.9) | (2.1) | (10.0) |
| |||
Net rental income | 12.0 | 0.7 | 16.7 | 6.6 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 38.0 | 7.8 | 45.8 |
| |||
Interest income | - | - | 0.8 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | - | 0.8 |
| |||
Interest expense | (8.1) | (0.3) | (9.6) | (4.7) | (1.3) | - | - | - | (24.0) | (6.6) | (30.6) |
| |||
Contribution | 3.9 | 0.4 | 7.9 | 1.9 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 14.8 | 1.2 | 16.0 |
| |||
Management fees | 2b | - | - | - | - | - | 10.4 | - | - | 10.4 | 2.3 | 12.7 |
| ||
Management expenses | - | - | - | - | - | (6.2) | - | (3.9) | (10.1) | (1.9) | (12.0) |
| |||
SNO!zone income | 2b | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12.4 | - | 12.4 | - | 12.4 |
| ||
SNO!zone expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | (11.5) | - | (11.5) | - | (11.5) |
| |||
Depreciation | - | - | - | - | - | (0.2) | (0.2) | - | (0.4) | - | (0.4) |
| |||
Inter-segment eliminations | 2b | - | - | - | (0.1) | - | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| ||
Net interest expense on central facility | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (0.8) | (0.8) | - | (0.8) |
| |||
Recurring pre-tax profit/(loss) | 3.9 | 0.4 | 7.9 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 4.1 | 0.7 | (4.7) | 14.8 | 1.6 | 16.4 |
| |||
Variable overhead | - | - | - | - | - | (0.6) | - | (1.1) | (1.7) | - | (1.7) |
| |||
Revaluation of properties | (1.1) | - | (2.4) | (0.7) | (1.0) | - | - | - | (5.2) | 6.9 | 1.7 |
| |||
Profit/(loss) on disposals | (0.7) | - | (0.1) | - | - | - | - | - | (0.8) | 1.5 | 0.7 |
| |||
Impairment of goodwill | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| ||
Gain on financial instruments | 0.1 | (0.2) | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 1.8 | 0.8 | 2.6 |
| |||
Investment income | - | - | 4.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 4.0 | - | 4.0 |
| |||
Other items | 1.1 | - | (1.1) | - | - | - | 0.1 | (0.2) | (0.1) | (0.1) | (0.2) |
| |||
Profit/(loss) before tax | 3.3 | 0.2 | 9.0 | 2.1 | (0.1) | 3.5 | 0.8 | (6.0) | 12.8 | 10.6 | 23.4 |
| |||
Tax charge | 9a | (2.0) | (0.3) | (2.3) |
| ||||||||||
Profit after tax | 10.8 | 10.3 | 21.1 |
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Total assets | 2b | 212.9 | 20.4 | 277.3 | 84.3 | 27.3 | 6.6 | 2.1 | 17.0 | 647.9 | 152.7 | 800.6 | |||
Total liabilities | 2b | (148.0) | (13.9) | (222.6) | (73.2) | (26.3) | (3.8) | (2.1) | (14.0) | (503.9) | (100.7) | (604.6) | |||
Net assets | 64.9 | 6.5 | 54.7 | 11.1 | 1.0 | 2.8 | - | 3.0 | 144.0 | 52.0 | 196.0 |
2b Reconciliations of reportable revenue, assets and liabilities
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Revenue | Note | £m | £m |
Rental income from external sources | 2a | 42.1 | 45.9 |
Inter-segment revenue | 2a | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Management fees | 2a | 10.4 | 10.4 |
Performance fees | 2a | 2.6 | - |
SNO!zone income | 2a | 10.1 | 12.4 |
Revenue for reportable segments - continuing operations | 65.3 | 68.8 | |
Elimination of inter-segment revenue | 2a | (0.1) | (0.1) |
Rental income earned by associates and joint ventures | 17d, 17e | (35.3) | (38.5) |
Management fees earned by associates and joint ventures | 17d, 17e | (1.2) | (1.3) |
Revenue per consolidated income statement - continuing operations | 3 | 28.7 | 28.9 |
Revenue for reportable segments by country - continuing operations | |||
UK | 48.2 | 48.2 | |
Germany | 17.1 | 20.6 | |
Revenue for reportable segments - continuing operations | 65.3 | 68.8 |
Revenue is attributed to countries on the basis of the location of the underlying properties. Revenue from the Group's major customer is management fee income from The Mall LP, included in the property management segment, which represented £6.7 million (2011: £7.1 million) of the Group's total revenue of £28.7 million (2011: £28.9 million). Further information on related party transactions is disclosed in note 35 to the financial statements.
2012 | 2011 | ||
Assets | Note | £m | £m |
Total assets of reportable segments | 2a | 575.5 | 783.6 |
Adjustment for associates and joint ventures | (325.4) | (512.1) | |
Non-segment assets | 2a | 4.0 | 17.0 |
Group assets | 254.1 | 288.5 | |
Liabilities | |||
Total liabilities of reportable segments | 2a | (395.3) | (590.6) |
Adjustment for associates and joint ventures | 325.4 | 512.1 | |
Non-segment liabilities | 2a | (4.6) | (14.0) |
Group liabilities | (74.5) | (92.5) | |
Net assets by country | |||
UK | 136.5 | 140.1 | |
Germany | 43.1 | 55.9 | |
Group net assets | 179.6 | 196.0 |
3 Revenue
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Total | Total | ||
Statutory | Note | £m | £m |
Gross rent from wholly owned properties | 6.6 | 7.4 | |
Management fees | 12.0 | 9.1 | |
SNO!zone income | 2a | 10.1 | 12.4 |
Revenue per consolidated income statement - continuing operations | 2b | 28.7 | 28.9 |
Finance income | 5 | 2.9 | 2.3 |
Total revenue from continuing operations | 31.6 | 31.2 |
Management fees represent revenue earned by the Group's wholly-owned CRPM subsidiary.
With effect from 21 July 2010, the fee basis earned by CRPM for asset and property management on The Mall changed from a percentage of property under management to a fixed fee of £4.5 million per annum. 25% of this fee is subject to reduction on a sliding scale from 100% to 75% if the valuation of the properties in the fund falls to between £850 million and £600 million.
4 Cost of sales
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Property costs of wholly owned properties | 0.5 | 0.3 | |
Void costs of wholly owned properties | 0.2 | 0.4 | |
SNO!zone expenses | 8.9 | 11.7 | |
Impairment/(Impairment reversal) of trading properties | 11a | 1.5 | (0.7) |
Total cost of sales | 11.1 | 11.7 |
5 Finance income
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Interest receivable | 1.0 | 1.3 | |
Dividend income from investments | 0.2 | - | |
Gain in fair value of financial instruments: | |||
- Interest rate swaps | 1.5 | 0.5 | |
- Ineffective portion of forward foreign exchange contracts | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
- Unhedged element of forward foreign exchange contracts | - | 0.3 | |
Total finance income | 2.9 | 2.3 |
6 Finance costs
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Interest payable on bank loans and overdrafts | 5.1 | 4.8 | |
Interest receivable on swaps | (0.5) | (0.5) | |
Interest payable | 4.6 | 4.3 | |
Amortisation of loan issue costs | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
Other interest payable | 0.6 | 1.0 | |
Total finance costs | 5.6 | 5.7 |
7 Profit before tax
The profit before tax has been arrived at after charging the following items:
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Depreciation of plant and equipment | 13 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
Property revaluation | 11a | 0.2 | 1.5 |
Staff costs | 8 | 13.8 | 13.5 |
Auditor's remuneration for audit services (see below) | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Auditor's remuneration
The analysis of the auditor's remuneration is as follows:
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Fees payable to the Company's auditor and its associates for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
Fees payable to the Company's auditor and their associates for other services to the Group - the audit of the Company's subsidiaries | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
Total audit fees for the Company and its subsidiaries | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
Fees payable to the Company's auditor and its associates for other services to the Group - the audit of the Company's affiliates | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
Total audit fees | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
Tax compliance services | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
Other non-audit services | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
Total non-audit fees | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
Total fees paid to auditor and their associates | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Included in other non-audit services is an amount for audit related assurance services of £44,200 (2011: £41,500) for the review of the Group's interim report.
The fees in relation to the audit of the Company's affiliates have been disclosed gross and have not been pro-rated to reflect the Company's equity investment percentage.
Of the tax compliance services payable to the Company's auditor, £nil (2011: £nil) was payable by the Company, with the balance of the fee relating to amounts incurred by affiliates. No fees were charged in the current or prior period pursuant to contingent fee arrangements.
8 Staff costs
All remuneration, including directors, is paid by either CRPM or the SNO!zone companies.
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Salaries | 9.5 | 10.5 | |
Discretionary bonuses | 2.1 | 1.0 | |
Share-based payments | 25 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
12.4 | 12.3 | ||
Social security | 1.2 | 1.1 | |
Other pension costs | 0.2 | 0.1 | |
13.8 | 13.5 |
Except for the directors, the Company has no employees. The costs of the directors shown in the directors' remuneration report are borne by CRPM and appropriate amounts recharged to the Company.
Staff numbers
The monthly average number of persons, including directors, employed by the Group during the year was as follows:
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Number | Number | ||
CRPM | 79 | 84 | |
SNO!zone | 203 | 251 | |
Total staff numbers | 282 | 335 |
9 Tax
9a Tax charge
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Current tax charge | |||
UK corporation tax - continuing operations | 1.0 | 1.9 | |
UK corporation tax - discontinued operations | 2.0 | 0.3 | |
Adjustments in respect of prior years - continuing operations | (2.6) | (0.2) | |
Foreign tax - continuing operations | 0.2 | 0.1 | |
Total current tax charge | 0.6 | 2.1 | |
Deferred tax charge | |||
Origination and reversal of temporary timing differences | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
Deferred tax credit - discontinued operations | 9c | (3.5) | - |
Total deferred tax (credit)/charge | 9c | (3.0) | 0.2 |
Total tax (credit)/charge | (2.4) | 2.3 | |
Total tax (credit)/charge - continuing operations | 9b | (0.9) | 2.0 |
Total tax (credit)/charge - discontinued operations | 30 | (1.5) | 0.3 |
£nil (2011: £nil) of the tax charge relates to items included in other comprehensive income.
9b Tax charge reconciliation
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
(Loss)/profit before tax on continuing operations | (11.7) | 12.8 | |
Profit multiplied by the UK corporation tax rate of 24.5% (2011: 26.5%) | (2.9) | 3.4 | |
Non-allowable expenses and non-taxable items | (1.0) | (2.7) | |
Utilisation of tax losses | (1.3) | (1.1) | |
Tax on realised gains/(losses) | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
Unrealised losses on investment properties not taxable | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
Temporary timing and controlled foreign companies income | 1.7 | 0.9 | |
Adjustments in respect of prior years | (2.6) | (0.3) | |
Total tax (credit)/charge | 9a | (0.9) | 2.0 |
9c Deferred tax
The following are the major deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised by the Group and movements during the current and preceding year.
Total | ||||
Capital | Other timing | deferred tax | ||
allowances | differences | liability | ||
Note | £m | £m | £m | |
At 30 December 2010 | (4.9) | 1.2 | (3.7) | |
Deferred tax charge | (0.3) | 0.1 | (0.2) | |
At 30 December 2011 | (5.2) | 1.3 | (3.9) | |
Deferred tax credit/(charge) - continuing operations | 9a | 0.1 | (0.6) | (0.5) |
Deferred tax credit - discontinued operations | 9a | 3.3 | 0.2 | 3.5 |
At 30 December 2012 | (1.8) | 0.9 | (0.9) |
The reduction in the UK corporation tax rate at 1 April 2013 from 25% to 23% was substantively enacted on 3 July 2012. Consequently, the UK corporation tax rate at which deferred tax is booked in the financial statements is 23% (2011: 25%).
There are no temporary differences relating to the unremitted earnings of subsidiaries as the Group's overseas subsidiaries are controlled foreign companies under UK tax legislation and their profits are treated as taxable in the UK in the year they arise. No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of temporary differences arising from investments in associates and interests in joint ventures of £0.9 million (2011: £2.2 million) as it is not certain that a deduction will be available when the asset crystallises.
9d Unused tax losses
The Group has £46.0 million (2011: £55.8 million) of unused revenue tax losses, all of which are in the UK. During the period several historic tax matters were successfully concluded with the tax authority which has resulted in the closure of all open tax years up to and including 2009 and a prior year tax credit to the income statement of £2.1 million. A deferred tax asset of £0.5 million (2011: £0.5 million) has been recognised in respect of £2.0 million (2011: £2.1 million) of these losses, based on future profit forecasts. No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of the remainder owing to the unpredictability of future profit streams and other reasons which may restrict the utilisation of the losses. The Group has unused capital losses of £20.6 million (2011: £21.4 million) that are available for offset against future gains but similarly no deferred tax has been recognised in respect of these losses owing to the unpredictability of future capital gains and other reasons which may restrict the utilisation of the losses. The losses do not have an expiry date.
9e Factors affecting tax
The Budget on 21 March 2012 revised the previously announced phased reduction in the UK statutory corporation tax rate. The rate is now proposed to reduce to 22% (previously 23%) by 1 April 2014. The reduction in the UK corporation tax rate at 1 April 2012 to 24% was substantively enacted on 26 March 2012. The reduction to 23% from 1 April 2013 was substantively enacted on 3 July 2012. This change will not have a significant impact on the Group.
In 2009 agreement was reached with the tax authorities related to tax structuring of previous property disposals by the Group in 2004 and 2005 which resulted in a liability of £19.5 million including interest. During the period the final instalment of £5.0 million was paid and as at 30 December 2012 no further liability exists.
10 Earnings per share
The European Public Real Estate Association ("EPRA") has issued recommendations for the calculation of earnings per share information as shown in the following tables:
10a Earnings per share calculation
Year to 30 December 2012 | Year to 30 December 2012 | Year to 30 December 2011 | |||||
Note | Basic | Diluted | EPRA diluted | Basic | Diluted | EPRA diluted | |
(Loss)/profit (£m) | |||||||
(Loss)/profit for the year from continuing operations | (10.8) | (10.8) | (10.8) | 10.8 | 10.8 | 10.8 | |
Revaluation of investment properties | 10b | - | - | 19.2 | - | - | 5.9 |
Profit on disposal of investment properties (net of tax) | 10b | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | 0.6 |
Movement in fair value of financial instruments (net of tax) | 10b | - | - | (1.9) | - | - | (1.2) |
Deferred tax charge on capital allowances | 9c | - | - | (0.1) | - | - | - |
(Loss)/profit from continuing operations | (10.8) | (10.8) | 7.5 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 16.1 | |
Discontinued operations | (5.2) | (5.2) | (4.6) | 10.3 | 10.3 | 1.9 | |
(Loss)/profit | (16.0) | (16.0) | 2.9 | 21.1 | 21.1 | 18.0 | |
Weighted average number of shares (m) | |||||||
Ordinary shares in issue | 24 | 350.6 | 350.6 | 350.6 | 350.6 | 350.6 | 350.6 |
Own shares held | (1.3) | (1.3) | (1.3) | (1.8) | (1.8) | (1.8) | |
Dilutive contingently issuable shares and share options | - | - | - | - | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
349.3 | 349.3 | 349.3 | 348.8 | 349.0 | 349.0 | ||
(Loss)/Earnings per share (pence) | (5)p | (5)p | 1p | 6p | 6p | 5p | |
(Loss)/Earnings per share (pence) -continuing operations | (3)p | (3)p | 2p | 3p | 3p | 5p | |
At the end of the year, the Group had 13,987,306 (2011: 15,569,672) share options and contingently issuable shares granted under share-based payment schemes that could potentially have diluted basic earnings per share in the future but which have not been included in the calculation because they are not dilutive or the conditions for vesting have not been met.
10b Reconciliation of earnings figures included in earnings per share calculations
Year to 30 December 2012 | Year to 30 December 2011 | ||||||
Profit / (loss) | Movement | Profit / (loss) | Movement | ||||
on disposal of | in fair value | on disposal of | in fair value | ||||
Revaluation | investment | of financial | Revaluation | investment | of financial | ||
movements | properties | instruments | movements | properties | instruments | ||
Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Associates | 17d | (8.9) | (1.6) | 1.0 | (1.9) | 0.7 | 0.3 |
Joint ventures | 17e | (10.2) | 0.1 | (0.4) | (2.5) | 0.1 | 0.5 |
Wholly owned | (0.1) | 0.1 | 1.9 | (1.5) | - | 1.0 | |
Tax effect | - | 0.3 | (0.6) | - | (0.2) | (0.6) | |
Total | 10a | (19.2) | (1.1) | 1.9 | (5.9) | (0.6) | 1.2 |
11 Property assets
11a Wholly-owned properties
Freehold | Leasehold | Sub-total | Freehold | Total | ||
investment | investment | investment | trading | property | ||
properties | properties | properties | properties | assets | ||
Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Cost or valuation | ||||||
At 30 December 2010 | 0.2 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 70.8 | 80.8 | |
Acquisition | 17c | 26.1 | - | 26.1 | - | 26.1 |
Disposal into a joint venture | 17c | (26.1) | - | (26.1) | - | (26.1) |
Impairment reversal of trading properties | - | - | - | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
Revaluation movement | - | (1.5) | (1.5) | - | (1.5) | |
At 30 December 2011 | 0.2 | 8.3 | 8.5 | 71.5 | 80.0 | |
Capital expenditure | - | 0.3 | 0.3 | - | 0.3 | |
Disposal of freehold investment properties | (0.2) | - | (0.2) | - | (0.2) | |
Impairment of trading properties | - | - | - | (1.5) | (1.5) | |
Revaluation movement | - | (0.2) | (0.2) | - | (0.2) | |
At 30 December 2012 | - | 8.4 | 8.4 | 70.0 | 78.4 |
The Group did not have any wholly owned development property in either the current year or the preceding year. The Group has pledged land and buildings with a carrying amount of £70.0 million (2011: £79.8 million) to secure banking facilities granted to the Group, including amounts relating to trading properties of £70.0 million (2011: £71.5 million). Those banking facilities restrict the remittance of income from the properties to elsewhere in the Group. The historical cost of wholly owned property at 30 December 2012 was £92.2 (2011: £90.0 million).
11b Property assets summary
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Valuation | Valuation | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Wholly owned | |||
Investment properties at fair value | 8.4 | 8.5 | |
Trading properties at the lower of cost and net realisable value | 72.5 | 72.0 | |
Unamortised tenant incentives on trading properties | (2.5) | (0.5) | |
78.4 | 80.0 | ||
Joint ventures (100%) | |||
Investment properties at fair value | 364.1 | 575.9 | |
Unamortised tenant incentives on investment properties | (0.2) | (6.0) | |
17e | 363.9 | 569.9 | |
Associates (100%) | |||
Investment properties at fair value | 982.6 | 1,871.7 | |
Head leases treated as finance leases on investment properties | 65.5 | 70.2 | |
Unamortised tenant incentives on investment properties | (19.1) | (44.8) | |
Held for sale properties at fair value | - | 84.2 | |
17d | 1,029.0 | 1,981.3 |
Valuations
In addition to the wholly-owned properties shown above, the Group's property assets include its share in the investment properties held by its associates and joint ventures. External valuations at 30 December 2012 were carried out on £1,428.7 million (2011: £2,479.7 million) of the property assets held by the Group and its associates and joint ventures, of which the Group's share was £461.3 million (2011: £650.2 million).
The valuations were carried out by independent qualified professional valuers from CB Richard Ellis Limited, Cushman & Wakefield LLP, DTZ Debenham Tie Leung Limited and Jones Lang LaSalle Limited. These valuers are not connected with the Group and their fees are charged on a fixed basis that is not dependent on the outcome of the valuations. The valuations, which conform to International Valuation Standards, were arrived at by reference to market evidence of transaction prices for similar properties.
No Directors' valuations were performed at 30 December 2012. At 30 December 2011 Directors' valuations were carried out on £132.6 million of the property assets of the Group's associates and joint ventures, of which the Group's share was £26.7 million. The valuations were carried out by Kenneth Ford BSc FRICS and were arrived at by reference to market evidence of transaction prices for similar properties.
12 Goodwill
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
At the start of the year | 1.8 | 1.9 | |
Impairment losses for the year | (1.8) | (0.1) | |
At the end of the year | - | 1.8 |
The goodwill carried in the Group balance sheet relating to the management contracts for the X-Leisure fund held by the Group's X-Leisure Limited joint venture was fully impaired during the year through discontinued operations on assessment that the likely future cash benefit arising to the Group from the X-Leisure Limited joint venture would not support the carrying value either through sale or continuing use.
13 Plant and equipment
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Cost or valuation | |||
At the start of the year | 2.3 | 2.7 | |
Additions | 0.4 | 0.3 | |
Disposals | - | (0.7) | |
At the end of the year | 2.7 | 2.3 | |
Accumulated depreciation | |||
At the start of the year | (1.6) | (1.8) | |
Charge for the year | (0.3) | (0.4) | |
Eliminated on disposal | - | 0.6 | |
At the end of the year | (1.9) | (1.6) | |
Carrying amount | |||
At the end of the year | 0.8 | 0.7 |
14 Available for sale investments
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Fair value | |||
At the start of the year | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
Disposals | (0.3) | - | |
At the end of the year | - | 0.3 |
On 12 January 2012 the Group disposed of its 0.3% interest in the units of the Paddington Central III Unit Trust for £0.3 million.
15 Non-current receivables
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Financial assets | |||
Loans to joint ventures | 21.2 | 32.1 | |
Non-derivative financial assets | 21.2 | 32.1 | |
Financial assets carried at fair value through the profit or loss: | |||
- Foreign exchange forward contracts | - | 0.6 | |
- Interest rate swaption | - | 0.2 | |
21.2 | 32.9 | ||
Non-financial assets | |||
Prepayments - tenant incentives | 2.4 | 0.4 | |
23.6 | 33.3 |
Interest is payable on the majority of loans to joint ventures at normal commercial rates. The Group has pledged loans to joint ventures with a carrying amount of £15.0 million (2011: £15.0 million) to secure banking facilities granted to the Group.
16 Subsidiaries
A list of the significant investments in subsidiaries, including the name, country of incorporation, and proportion of ownership interest is given in note G to the Company financial statements.
The terms of the Group's central borrowing facility may restrict the ability of Capital & Regional Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries to make cash distributions or repay loans and advances to the Company or elsewhere in the Group if they would thereby cause a default on the facility.
The terms of the borrowing facilities for the Great Northern property includes a cash sweep that restricts the ability of Morrison Merlin Limited to make cash distributions or repay loans and advances to the Company or elsewhere in the Group as disclosed in note 19.
17 Investment in associates and joint ventures
17a Share of results
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Share of results of associates | 17d | (5.6) | 7.7 |
Impairment of FIX UK | (1.3) | - | |
Share of results of joint ventures | 17e | (3.3) | 3.9 |
Impairment of German portfolio 4 | (3.3) | - | |
Transfer from foreign currency reserve for German portfolio 4 | 0.7 | - | |
(12.8) | 11.6 |
17b Investment in associates
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
At the start of the year | 120.2 | 110.8 | |
Investment in associates | 16.2 | 4.0 | |
Share of results of associates | 17d | (5.6) | 7.7 |
Share of results of associates within discontinued operations | 17d | 0.5 | 9.0 |
Dividends and capital distributions received | 35 | (2.2) | (11.2) |
Reclassified as held for sale (X-Leisure Fund) | (33.9) | - | |
Foreign exchange differences | - | (0.1) | |
Impairment of FIX UK | (1.3) | - | |
Disposal of The Junction Fund | (13.2) | - | |
At the end of the year | 17d | 80.7 | 120.2 |
The Group's associates are:
Group interest | |||
At the start of the year | Average during the year/until disposal | At the end of the year | |
% | % | % | |
The Mall Limited Partnership | 18.16 | 19.98 | 20.15 |
Kingfisher Limited Partnership | - | 20.00 | 20.00 |
The Junction Limited Partnership | 13.29 | 13.29 | - |
X-Leisure Limited Partnership1 | 11.93 | 11.93 | 11.93 |
The FIX UK Limited Partnership | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
Garigal Asset Management GmbH ("Garigal") | 30.06 | 30.06 | 30.06 |
Euro B-Note Holding Limited | 49.90 | 49.90 | 49.90 |
1 Reclassified as asset held for sale.
Whilst the Group held less than 20% in The Mall Limited Partnership at the start of the year it has been accounted for as an associate throughout the year and in the preceding year as the Group have maintained significant influence arising from its representation on the General Partner boards. For the same reason the Group's investments in The Junction Limited Partnership and X-Leisure Limited Partnership were also accounted for as associates prior to their disposal and reclassification to held for sale respectively. The share of results of these investments shown in Note 17d therefore relates to the period up to disposal and being transferred to held for sale respectively (see Note 30 for further details). The Group holds 20% or more of Garigal Asset Management GmbH and Kingfisher Limited Partnership and exercises significant influence through its representation on the General Partner or advisory boards. The Group holds an effective 49.90% of Euro B-Note Holding Limited and exercises significant influence through its ownership interest.
17b Investment in associates (continued)
The Mall Limited Partnership
On 8 February 2012 the Group purchased 18.7 million units in The Mall Fund at £0.30 per unit for a total consideration of £5.6 million. This purchase was at a discount to the net asset value of The Mall and resulted in a gain on investment of £1.4 million. This purchase increased the holding in The Mall Fund from 18.16% to 20.15%.
On 12 July 2012, The Mall completed the sale of The Castle Mall Shopping Centre in Norwich for £77.3 million at a 7.8% net initial yield.
After the year end on 4 January 2013, the Group purchased 1.6 million units in The Mall Fund at £0.25 per unit for a total consideration of £0.4 million. This increased the holding in The Mall Fund from 20.15% to 20.33%.
Kingfisher Limited Partnership
On 1 May 2012, the Group completed its acquisition of a 20% interest in The Kingfisher Shopping Centre in Redditch for a total consideration of £10.6 million in partnership with funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management LP. The Kingfisher Centre was purchased for £130.0 million at an 8% net initial yield.
The FIX UK Limited Partnership
At 30 June 2012, the Group made a provision for impairment of £1.3 million to write down the carrying value of its investment in FIX UK Limited Partnership to £nil. This was to take account of the significant refinancing risk associated with the FIX debt (non-recourse to the Group) amounting to £125.0 million at 30 June 2012 that was due to mature in February 2013. At that date the Group also concluded it had lost significant influence given the debt of the fund exceeded the value of the property and the impending refinancing. As such the following share of results of FIX UK that has been included within note 17d relates purely to the period to 30 June 2012.
£m | |
Net rent | 1.0 |
Contribution | 0.3 |
Profit after tax | 0.3 |
The impairment resulted in the following share of assets and liabilities of FIX UK being removed from the see-through analysis in note 18d:
£m | |
Investment properties | 26.1 |
Other assets | 1.1 |
Current liabilities | (25.0) |
Non-current liabilities | (0.9) |
Net assets | 1.3 |
Euro B-Note Holding Limited
At 30 December 2012, the loan receivable due from German Portfolio 4 is being carried at an amortised cost less impairment of €5.7 million (Group share of £2.3 million) compared to the principal value of €18.0 million of the junior debt. The carrying value at 30 December 2011 was €13.5 million (Group share of £5.6 million). The additional impairment of €7.8 million (Group share of £3.2 million recognised in the period reflects an assessment of the risk of recovering the loan value due to the continuing uncertainty impacting the portfolio as detailed in Note 17c.
Cash distributions
Distributions received from Joint Ventures and Associates are disclosed in Note 35.
17c Investment in joint ventures
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
At the start of the year | 27.2 | 25.7 | |
Investment in joint ventures | - | 1.2 | |
Share of results of joint ventures | 17e | (3.3) | 3.9 |
Share of results of joint ventures within discontinued operations | 17e | 2.0 | 1.7 |
Dividends and capital distributions received | 35 | (0.6) | (4.5) |
Reclassified as held for sale (X-Leisure Limited) | (0.8) | - | |
Impairment of German portfolio 4 | (3.3) | - | |
Disposal of interest in Xscape Braehead | 5.4 | - | |
Foreign exchange differences | (0.9) | (0.8) | |
At the end of the year | 17e | 25.7 | 27.2 |
17c Investment in joint ventures (continued)
The Group's significant joint ventures are:
At the start of the year | Group interest Average during the year/ until disposal/ since acquisition | At the end of the year | |
% | % | % | |
German portfolio | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
X-Leisure Limited | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
Xscape Braehead Partnership | 50.00 | 50.00 | - |
The Auchinlea Partnership | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
The Group's investments in joint ventures include its share of the German portfolio (49.6%), and its investments in The Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership (50%) and The Auchinlea Partnership (50%). The Group's interest in X-Leisure Limited (50%) was reclassified as held for sale during the year while the interest in Xscape Braehead Partnership (50%) was disposed of on 24 December 2012 (See Note 30 for further details). The Group's share in the German portfolio is accounted for at 50% as the minority interests are included as a liability on the joint venture balance sheet.
German portfolio
At 30 June 2012, the Group made a provision for impairment of £3.3 million to write down the carrying value of its investment in the German portfolio 4 joint venture to £nil. This was to take account of the fall in property values during the first half of 2012 which resulted in portfolio 4 defaulting on its €157.9 million debt as it did not meet the required 93% loan to value covenant test that was required to extend the loan into the second year of its extension period. As a result the loan maturity date was 16 July 2012 and the loan was placed into special servicing by the loan servicer. The Group concluded that it had lost joint control of its investment in German Portfolio 4 at 30 June 2012 given the known inability to repay the debt on maturity and as such the following share of results of German Portfolio 4 that has been included within note 17d relates purely to the period to 30 June 2012:
£m | |
Net rent | 1.6 |
Net interest payable | (0.7) |
Contribution | 0.9 |
Revaluation of investment properties | (8.6) |
Profit on sale of investment properties | 0.1 |
Loss before tax | (7.6) |
Tax | 1.0 |
Loss after tax | (6.6) |
The impairment recorded at 30 June 2012 resulted in the following share of assets and liabilities of German portfolio 4 being removed from the see-through analysis in note 17e:
£m | |
Investment properties | 63.6 |
Other assets | 4.2 |
Current liabilities | (63.2) |
Non-current liabilities | (1.3) |
Net assets | 3.3 |
At 30 June 2012, £0.7 million was reclassified from the foreign currency reserve to the income statement related to portfolio 4.
Following receipt of a demand for repayment in December 2012 the portfolio was placed into administration in January 2013. The securitised loan is non-recourse to the Group or any properties in the other German joint venture portfolios.
Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership
On 22 February 2011, the Group completed the purchase of The Waterside Shopping Centre ("Waterside") in Lincoln for total cash consideration of £26.1 million, being a property cost of £24.8 million and directly related transaction costs of £1.3 million. The acquisition was completed utilising a new four year £13.6 million facility from Deutsche PostBank, together with existing cash resources.
On 8 March 2011, the Group conditionally exchanged contracts with Karoo Investment Fund II S.C.A SICAV-SIF ("Karoo") to form a joint venture by selling 50% of the Group's interest in Waterside ("the Disposal"). As the Group and Karoo have common significant shareholders the formation of the joint venture was conditional upon shareholder approval which was granted on 1 April 2011.
On 8 April 2011 the Group completed the Disposal. The Group initially acquired the Waterside through an English Limited Partnership consisting of a General Partner and two equal Limited Partners. In order to form the joint venture, the Group sold the entire share capital of one of the Limited Partners and 50% of the share capital of the General Partner to Karoo. Under the terms of the Disposal it was agreed that Karoo would fund half of the total costs and related expenses incurred by the Group in acquiring Waterside. Accordingly, the total amount paid by Karoo was £6.4 million comprising a purchase price for the shares being sold of £58k and £6.37 million of financing that had been provided by the Group to complete the purchase of Waterside. Following the Disposal the Group's remaining 50% interest in Waterside is classified as a loan to joint venture amounting to £6.4 million at 30 December 2012 (2011: £6.4 million).
17d Analysis of investment in associates
Discontinued Operations | Year to 30 December | Year to 30 December | ||||||
Other UK | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
The Mall | Shopping Centres | Other | The Junction | X-Leisure | Total | Total | ||
Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Income statement (100%) | ||||||||
Revenue - gross rent | 77.5 | 9.0 | 5.5 | 14.4 | 42.6 | 149.0 | 170.1 | |
Property and management expenses | (17.0) | (2.1) | (0.6) | (4.3) | (7.1) | (31.1) | (29.9) | |
Void costs | (4.3) | - | (0.1) | (0.8) | (1.3) | (6.5) | (7.7) | |
Net rent | 56.2 | 6.9 | 4.8 | 9.3 | 34.2 | 111.4 | 132.5 | |
Net interest payable | (33.2) | (3.7) | (3.6) | (6.6) | (21.2) | (68.3) | (95.1) | |
Contribution | 23.0 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 13.0 | 43.1 | 37.4 | |
Revenue - management fees | - | - | 4.1 | - | - | 4.1 | 4.3 | |
Management expenses | - | - | (2.7) | (2.6) | (7.5) | (12.8) | (2.9) | |
Revaluation of investment properties | (38.7) | (5.8) | (0.5) | (29.8) | 25.4 | (49.4) | 33.9 | |
(Loss)/profit on sale of investment properties | (8.1) | - | (0.1) | (1.1) | - | (9.3) | 6.8 | |
Fair value of interest rate swaps | 8.1 | (3.3) | 0.6 | 1.5 | 6.9 | 13.8 | 7.1 | |
Investment income | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8.1 | |
Impairment of Euro B-Note | - | - | (6.3) | - | - | (6.3) | - | |
(Loss)/profit before tax | (15.7) | (5.9) | (3.7) | (29.3) | 37.8 | (16.8) | 94.7 | |
Tax | - | 0.1 | (0.4) | - | - | (0.3) | (0.4) | |
(Loss)/profit after tax | (15.7) | (5.8) | (4.1) | (29.3) | 37.8 | (17.1) | 94.3 | |
Balance sheet (100%) | ||||||||
Investment properties | 897.5 | 131.5 | - | - | - | 1,029.0 | 1,897.1 | |
Investment properties held for sale | - | - | - | - | - | - | 84.2 | |
Other assets | 147.4 | 11.0 | 9.3 | - | - | 167.7 | 250.0 | |
Current liabilities | (36.4) | (7.5) | (1.3) | - | - | (45.2) | (86.2) | |
Non-current liabilities | (671.2) | (87.9) | - | - | - | (759.1) | (1,383.6) | |
Net assets (100%) | 337.3 | 47.1 | 8.0 | - | - | 392.4 | 761.5 | |
Income statement (Group share) | ||||||||
Revenue - gross rent | 15.4 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 5.1 | 25.3 | 26.3 | |
Property and management expenses | (3.4) | (0.4) | (0.2) | (0.6) | (0.9) | (5.5) | (4.5) | |
Void costs | (0.9) | - | - | (0.1) | (0.1) | (1.1) | (1.3) | |
Net rent | 11.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 18.7 | 20.5 | |
Net interest payable | (6.6) | (0.7) | (0.7) | (0.9) | (2.5) | (11.4) | (14.7) | |
Contribution | 4.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
Revenue - management fees | - | - | 1.2 | - | - | 1.2 | 1.3 | |
Management expenses | - | - | (0.8) | (0.3) | (1.0) | (2.1) | (0.9) | |
Revaluation of investment properties | (7.6) | (1.2) | (0.1) | (4.0) | 3.1 | (9.8) | 3.5 | |
(Loss)/profit on sale of investment properties | (1.6) | - | - | (0.2) | - | (1.8) | 0.8 | |
Fair value of interest rate swaps | 1.6 | (0.7) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.2 | |
Investment income | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4.0 | |
Impairment of Euro B-Note | - | - | (3.2) | - | - | (3.2) | - | |
Gain recognised on investment in Mall | 17b | 1.4 | - | - | - | - | 1.4 | 1.1 |
(Loss)/profit before tax | (1.7) | (1.2) | (2.6) | (4.0) | 4.5 | (5.0) | 16.8 | |
Tax | - | - | (0.1) | - | - | (0.1) | (0.1) | |
(Loss)/profit after tax | (1.7) | (1.2) | (2.7) | (4.0) | 4.5 | (5.1) | 16.7 | |
Balance sheet (Group share) | ||||||||
Investment properties | 180.8 | 26.3 | - | - | - | 207.1 | 298.8 | |
Investment properties held for sale | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15.3 | |
Other assets | 29.7 | 2.2 | 3.7 | - | - | 35.6 | 45.6 | |
Current liabilities | (7.3) | (1.5) | (0.4) | - | - | (9.2) | (14.2) | |
Non-current liabilities | (135.2) | (17.6) | - | - | - | (152.8) | (225.3) | |
Net assets (Group share) | 68.0 | 9.4 | 3.3 | - | - | 80.7 | 120.2 |
17e Analysis of investment in joint ventures
Year to | Year to | ||||||
Other UK | 30 December | 30 December | |||||
German | Shopping | Discontinued | 2012 | 2011 | |||
portfolio | Centres | Others | Operations | Total | Total | ||
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | ||
Income statement (100%) | |||||||
Revenue - gross rent | 31.8 | 2.5 | - | 3.8 | 38.1 | 44.2 | |
Property and management expenses | (5.8) | (0.6) | - | (4.2) | (10.6) | (6.0) | |
Void costs | (0.3) | (0.2) | - | (0.2) | (0.7) | (0.8) | |
Net rent | 25.7 | 1.7 | - | (0.6) | 26.8 | 37.4 | |
Net interest payable | (12.9) | (0.7) | - | 0.6 | (13.0) | (23.4) | |
Contribution | 12.8 | 1.0 | - | - | 13.8 | 14.0 | |
Revenue - management fees | - | - | - | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | |
Management expenses | - | - | - | (2.3) | (2.3) | (3.9) | |
Revaluation of investment properties | (20.1) | (0.3) | - | 1.6 | (18.8) | (1.9) | |
Profit/(loss) on sale of investment properties | 0.1 | - | - | - | 0.1 | (0.1) | |
Fair value of interest rate swaps | (0.7) | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | (0.5) | 0.7 | |
(Loss)/profit before tax | (7.9) | 0.8 | - | 4.1 | (3.0) | 13.5 | |
Tax | 0.4 | - | - | (0.6) | (0.2) | (2.3) | |
(Loss)/profit after tax | (7.5) | 0.8 | - | 3.5 | (3.2) | 11.2 | |
Balance sheet (100%) | |||||||
Investment properties | 337.8 | 26.1 | - | - | 363.9 | 569.9 | |
Other assets | 11.7 | 2.6 | 0.4 | - | 14.7 | 29.7 | |
Current liabilities | (31.0) | (0.9) | (0.1) | - | (32.0) | (45.2) | |
Non-current liabilities | (268.6) | (26.7) | - | - | (295.3) | (500.0) | |
Net assets (100%) | 49.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | - | 51.3 | 54.4 | |
Income statement (Group share) | |||||||
Revenue - gross rent | 15.9 | 1.2 | - | 1.9 | 19.0 | 22.1 | |
Property and management expenses | (2.8) | (0.1) | - | (1.9) | (4.8) | (3.0) | |
Void costs | (0.2) | (0.1) | - | (0.1) | (0.4) | (0.4) | |
Net rent | 12.9 | 1.0 | - | (0.1) | 13.8 | 18.7 | |
Net interest payable | (6.5) | (0.4) | - | 0.3 | (6.6) | (11.6) | |
Contribution | 6.4 | 0.6 | - | 0.2 | 7.2 | 7.1 | |
Revenue - management fees | - | - | - | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | |
Management expenses | - | - | - | (1.1) | (1.1) | (1.9) | |
Revaluation of investment properties | (10.0) | (0.2) | - | 0.8 | (9.4) | (1.0) | |
Profit/(loss) on sale of investment properties | 0.1 | - | - | - | 0.1 | (0.1) | |
Fair value of interest rate swaps | (0.4) | - | - | 0.1 | (0.3) | 0.4 | |
(Loss)/profit before tax | (3.9) | 0.4 | - | 2.3 | (1.2) | 6.8 | |
Tax | 0.2 | - | - | (0.3) | (0.1) | (1.2) | |
(Loss)/profit after tax | (3.7) | 0.4 | - | 2.0 | (1.3) | 5.6 | |
Balance sheet (Group share) | |||||||
Investment properties | 168.9 | 13.0 | - | - | 181.9 | 284.9 | |
Other assets | 5.9 | 1.3 | 0.2 | - | 7.4 | 14.9 | |
Current liabilities | (15.5) | (0.5) | - | - | (16.0) | (22.6) | |
Non-current liabilities | (134.3) | (13.3) | - | - | (147.6) | (250.0) | |
Net assets (Group share) | 25.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | - | 25.7 | 27.2 |
18 Current receivables
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Financial assets | |||
Trade receivables | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
Amounts owed by associates | 2.0 | 1.4 | |
Amounts owed by joint ventures | - | 0.2 | |
Other receivables | 1.7 | 0.9 | |
Accrued income | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
Non-derivative financial assets | 4.7 | 3.7 | |
Financial assets carried at fair value through the profit or loss: | |||
- Foreign exchange forward contract | 1.4 | - | |
6.1 | 3.7 | ||
Non-financial assets | |||
Prepayments | 1.3 | 1.3 | |
7.4 | 5.0 |
Trade receivables largely comprise amounts owed by tenants of the Group's wholly owned properties. Before accepting a new tenant, a review of its creditworthiness is carried out using an external credit scoring system and other publicly available financial information. Included in the non-derivative financial assets balance are receivables with a carrying amount of £0.5 million (2011: £1.1 million) which are past due at the reporting date for which the Group has not provided, as there has not been a significant change in credit quality and the amounts are still considered recoverable. The Group holds collateral of £0.1 million (2011: £0.1 million) over trade receivables as security deposits held in rent accounts. The average age of trade receivables is 35 days (2011: 35 days).
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Analysis of non-derivative current financial assets | |||
Not past due | 4.2 | 2.6 | |
Past due but not individually impaired: | |||
Less than 1 month | - | 0.4 | |
1 to 3 months | 0.4 | 0.1 | |
3 to 6 months | - | - | |
Over 6 months | 0.1 | 0.6 | |
4.7 | 3.7 |
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Allowances for doubtful receivables | |||
At the start of the year | 0.2 | 0.8 | |
Additional allowances created | 0.2 | - | |
Utilised during the year | (0.2) | (0.6) | |
At the end of the year | 0.2 | 0.2 |
19 Cash and cash equivalents
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Cash at bank | 2.9 | 16.2 | |
Security deposits held in rent accounts | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
Other restricted balances | 2.3 | 3.7 | |
5.3 | 20.0 |
Other restricted balances include amounts subject to a charge against various borrowings and may therefore not be available for general use by the Group.
The analysis of cash and cash equivalents by currency is as follows:
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Sterling | 4.7 | 19.7 | |
Euro | 0.6 | 0.3 | |
5.3 | 20.0 |
20 Current payables
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Financial liabilities | |||
Trade payables | 0.6 | 0.4 | |
Accruals | 4.6 | 4.1 | |
Payable to associates | 0.8 | 0.7 | |
Other payables | 0.8 | 1.7 | |
Non-derivative financial liabilities | 6.8 | 6.9 | |
Financial liabilities carried at fair value through the profit or loss | |||
Interest rate swaps | 1.8 | - | |
8.6 | 6.9 | ||
Non-financial liabilities | |||
Deferred income | 1.9 | 1.9 | |
Other taxation and social security | 1.2 | 1.2 | |
11.7 | 10.0 |
The average age of trade payables is 20 days (2011: 20 days) and no amounts incur interest (2011: £nil).
21 Non-current payables
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Financial liabilities | |||
Accruals | 0.7 | 0.2 | |
Other payables | - | 0.3 | |
Non-derivative financial liabilities | 0.7 | 0.5 | |
Financial liabilities carried at fair value through profit or loss: | |||
- Interest rate swaps | - | 3.5 | |
0.7 | 4.0 |
22 Borrowings
22a Summary of borrowings
The Group generally borrows on a secured basis and borrowings are arranged to ensure an appropriate maturity profile and to maintain short term liquidity. Short, medium and long term funding is raised principally through revolving credit facilities from a range of banks and financial institutions. There were no defaults or other breaches of financial covenants that were not waived under any of the Group borrowings during the current year or the preceding year.
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Borrowings at amortised cost | Note | £m | £m |
Secured | |||
Fixed and swapped bank loans | 23e | 57.6 | 59.6 |
Variable rate bank loans | 23e | 1.0 | 7.6 |
Total borrowings before costs | 58.6 | 67.2 | |
Unamortised issue costs | (0.6) | (0.6) | |
Total borrowings after costs | 58.0 | 66.6 | |
Analysis of total borrowings after costs | |||
Unamortised issue costs (within prepayments) | (0.3) | - | |
Current | - | 5.0 | |
Non-current | 58.3 | 61.6 | |
Total borrowings after costs | 58.0 | 66.6 |
On 31 August 2012 the Group signed a new revolving credit facility for £25 million, a reduction from £58 million and with the maturity extended to July 2016 from September 2013. These changes better reflect the Group's working capital requirements and reduce the cost of the undrawn facility. At the same time the Group extended the maturity of the loan on the Great Northern Warehouse by one year to October 2014. The loan on Great Northern Warehouse is secured by charges on that property. The Group's central credit facility is secured by charges over the units the Group holds in The Mall carried at £68.0 million at 30 December 2012 (2011: £64.9 million), X-Leisure carried as an asset held for sale at £32.2 million less associated liabilities of £1.6 million (2011: interest in associate of £30.5 million), the units the Group held in The Junction until its disposal (2011: £17.1 million), charges over certain holdings in and loans to the German joint venture carried at £35.5 million (2011: £34.9 million) and guarantees by the Company.
The core revolving credit facility was drawn by £1.0 million at 30 December 2012 (30 December 2011: £nil).
22b Maturity of borrowings
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
From two to five years | 1.0 | - | |
From one to two years | 57.6 | 61.9 | |
Due after more than one year | 58.6 | 61.9 | |
Current | - | 5.3 | |
23a | 58.6 | 67.2 |
22c Undrawn committed facilities
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Expiring between one and two years | - | 58.0 | |
Expiring between two and five years | 24.0 | - |
Under the terms of the loan covenants, as disclosed in note 24e, a total of £25.0 million (2011: £58.0 million under the previous facility) was available for drawdown at year end on this facility. The Articles of the Company also restrict borrowing but this did not limit the amount available for drawdown on the facility during the current year or the preceding year.
22d Interest rate and currency profile of borrowings
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Fixed and swapped rate borrowings | |||
6% to 7% | 57.6 | 59.6 | |
23a | 57.6 | 59.6 | |
Floating rate borrowings | 23a | 1.0 | 7.6 |
58.6 | 67.2 |
All loans are sterling denominated with the weighted average length of fix being 1.8 years (2011: 1.8 years). Floating rate borrowings bear interest based on three month LIBOR.
23 Financial instruments and risk management
23a Overview
Capital risk management
The Group manages its capital to ensure that all entities in the Group will be able to continue as going concerns while maximising the returns to shareholders through the optimisation of the debt and equity balance. The overall strategy of reducing the Group's levels of balance sheet and see-through debt remained unchanged from 2011.
The capital structure of the Group consists of debt, which includes the borrowings disclosed in note 22a; cash and cash equivalents as disclosed in note 19; and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising issued share capital, reserves and retained earnings as disclosed in the Statement of changes in equity. For the purpose of calculating gearing ratios, debt is defined as long and short term borrowings (excluding derivatives) excluding unamortised issue costs. Equity includes all capital and reserves of the Group attributable to equity holders of the Company.
The Group is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements. The Board reviews the capital structure and cost of capital on an annual basis but does not set specific targets for gearing ratios. The risks associated with each class of capital are also considered as part of the risk reviews presented to the Audit Committee and the Board. The Group has met its objectives for managing capital during 2012, with a reduction in its net debt to equity ratios largely as a result of property disposals.
23a Financial instruments and risk management - Overview (continued)
Gearing ratios
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Statutory | Note | £m | £m |
Debt before unamortised issue costs | 22a | 58.6 | 67.2 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | (5.3) | (20.0) |
Group net debt | 53.3 | 47.2 | |
Equity | 179.6 | 196.0 | |
Debt to equity ratio | 33% | 34% | |
Net debt to equity ratio | 30% | 24% | |
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
See-through | Note | £m | £m |
Debt before unamortised issue costs | 23f | 321.9 | 497.0 |
Cash and cash equivalents | (33.4) | (56.8) | |
See-through net debt1 | 288.5 | 440.2 | |
Equity | 179.6 | 196.0 | |
Debt to equity ratio | 179% | 254% | |
Net debt to equity ratio | 161% | 225% | |
Property assets - wholly owned | 11a | 78.4 | 80.0 |
Investment properties - associates1 | 17d | 207.1 | 314.1 |
Investment properties - joint ventures1 | 17e | 181.9 | 284.9 |
Property value | 467.4 | 679.0 | |
Debt to property value ratio | 69% | 73% | |
Net debt to property value ratio | 62% | 65% |
1 See-through values for 2012 do not include the Group's share of German Portfolio 4 and FIX UK following the impairment of the investments and loss of joint control/significant influence during the year (see Notes 17b and 17c). The X-Leisure Fund has also been excluded following its reclassification as an asset held for sale (See Note 30).
23a Financial instruments and risk management - Overview (continued)
Categories of financial assets / (liabilities)
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Carrying value | Gain/(loss) to income | (Loss)/gain to equity | Carrying value | Gain/(loss) to income | (Loss)/gain to equity | ||
Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Financial assets | |||||||
Investments | 14 | - | - | - | 0.3 | - | - |
Available for sale | - | - | - | 0.3 | - | - | |
Loans to joint ventures | 15 | 21.2 | 0.9 | (0.4) | 32.1 | 1.2 | (0.4) |
Current receivables | 18 | 4.7 | - | - | 3.7 | - | - |
Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | 5.3 | - | - | 20.0 | 0.1 | - |
Loans and receivables | 31.2 | 0.9 | (0.4) | 55.8 | 1.3 | (0.4) | |
Foreign exchange forward contracts | 15,18 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
Derivatives in effective hedges | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 | |
Interest rate swaption | 15 | - | (0.2) | - | 0.2 | (0.5) | - |
Assets at fair value held for trading | - | (0.2) | - | 0.2 | (0.5) | - | |
Financial liabilities | |||||||
Current payables | 20 | (6.8) | - | - | (6.9) | 0.5 | - |
Non-current payables | 21 | (0.7) | - | - | (0.5) | - | - |
Current borrowings | 22a | - | - | - | (5.0) | - | - |
Non-current borrowings | 22a | (58.3) | (5.0) | - | (61.6) | (4.7) | - |
Liabilities at amortised cost | (65.8) | (5.0) | - | (74.0) | (4.2) | - | |
Interest rate swaps | 20 | (1.8) | 1.7 | - | (3.5) | 1.0 | - |
Liabilities at fair value held for trading | (1.8) | 1.7 | - | (3.5) | 1.0 | - | |
Total financial (liabilities)/assets | (35.0) | (1.7) | 0.2 | (20.6) | (1.9) | 0.5 |
Significant accounting policies
Details of the significant accounting policies adopted in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, are disclosed in the accounting policies in note 1.
Financial risk management objectives
Exposure to credit, interest rate and currency risks arise in the normal course of the Group's business. The Group seeks to minimise the effect of these risks by using derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Such instruments are not employed for speculative purposes. The use of any derivatives is approved by the Board, which provides guidelines on the acceptable levels of interest rate risk, credit risk, foreign exchange risk and liquidity risk, and the ranges of hedging required against these risks.
23b Interest rate risk
The Group normally raises bank debt on a floating rate basis and fixes a substantial portion of the interest payments by entering into interest rate swaps. The Group's objective in managing its interest rate risk is to ensure that it always maintains sufficient headroom to cover interest payments from anticipated cash flows and the directors regularly review the ratio of fixed to floating rate debt to assist this process. The Group is exposed to fair value risk from its fixed rate debt and interest rate risk from its floating rate debt, loans to joint ventures and cash. The Group does not hedge account its interest rate swaps and states them at fair value with changes in fair value included in the income statement.
The following table shows a summary of the Group's interest rate swap contracts and their maturity dates:
Fair value | Fair value | |||||
Notional | Contract | 30 December | Gain / (loss) | 30 December | ||
principal | Fixed rate | 2012 | To income | 2011 | ||
Maturity date | £m | % | £m | £m | £m | |
Interest rate swap | 10 October 2013 | 58.91 | 4.42 | (1.8) | 1.7 | (3.5) |
Interest rate swaption2 | 2 September 2017 | 50.0 | 2.75 | 0.0 | (0.2) | 0.2 |
1 The notional principal at 30 December 2011 was £59.6 million
2 The exercise date of the interest rate swaption is 2 September 2013
23b Interest rate risk (continued)
Sensitivity analysis
The following table shows the Group's sensitivity to a 1% increase or decrease in Sterling and Euro interest rates. To calculate the impact on the income statement for the year the interest rates on all external floating rate interest bearing loans and borrowings and interest earning cash, including loans and cash within associates and joint ventures, have been increased or decreased by 1%. The income statement impact includes the effect of a 1% decrease or increase in interest rates on the market values of interest rate derivatives.
1% increase in interest rates | 1% decrease in interest rates | |||
Year to | Year to | Year to | Year to | |
30 December | 30 December | 30 December | 30 December | |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |
£m | £m | £m | £m | |
Floating rate loans and cash - gain / (loss) | 0.2 | (0.4) | (0.2) | 0.4 |
Interest rate derivatives - gain / (loss) | 5.4 | 8.0 | (5.4) | (8.0) |
Impact on the income statement - gain / (loss) | 5.6 | 7.6 | (5.6) | (7.6) |
Impact on equity - gain / (loss) | 5.6 | 7.6 | (5.6) | (7.6) |
23c Credit risk
The Group's principal financial assets are loans to joint ventures, bank and cash balances, short term deposits, trade and other receivables and investments. Credit risk, being the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group, is primarily attributable to loans to joint ventures, and trade and other receivables, which are principally amounts due from associates and joint ventures and from tenants. As a result there is a concentration of credit risk arising from the Group's exposure to these associates and joint ventures but the Group does not consider this risk to be material as it is mitigated by the significant influence that it is able to exercise through its holdings and management responsibilities in relation to those associates and joint ventures. Credit risk arising from tenants is mitigated as the Group monitors credit ratings for significant tenants and there is an allowance for doubtful receivables that represents the estimate of potential losses in respect of trade receivables.
The credit risk on short term deposits and derivative financial instruments is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies. The Group is not exposed to significant credit risk on its other financial assets.
23d Currency risk
The Group publishes its consolidated financial statements in Sterling but has investments and loans to its German joint venture portfolio which have the Euro as their functional currency. Therefore the Group is subject to currency risk due to exchange rate movements which affect the translation of results and underlying net assets of the German joint venture portfolio.
Net investment hedge
The Group uses a forward foreign exchange contract as a hedge of its net investment in the German joint ventures. At 30 December 2012, this was achieved through a contract for €47.0 million (2011: €47.0 million) at a fixed exchange rate of 1.1797 (2011: 1.1797) which hedges 97% (2011: 81%) of the Group's German investment. After the year end the Group closed out the forward contract of €47.0 million which will mature on 28 March 2013 and entered into a new forward contract for €37.6 million until 31 December 2013 at a fixed exchange rate of 1.1617.
Only the spot element of the forward foreign exchange contracts is designated as the hedging instrument, determined as the undiscounted difference between the spot rate on the trade date and the spot rate on the revaluation date applied to the notional. The unhedged forward element of the fair value is determined as the total fair value less the spot element. Changes in the forward element of the fair value are reported through the income statement as finance income or finance costs as appropriate. During the year, this change in the unhedged element of the fair value was £0.0 million (2011: gain of £0.3 million) as disclosed in note 6. During the year, the ineffective portion of the hedge resulted in a charge of £0.2 million (2011: charge of £0.2 million) to the income statement as disclosed in note 5.
Sensitivity analysis
The following table shows the Group's sensitivity to a 10% strengthening or weakening in Sterling against the Euro. To calculate the impact on the income statement for the year the average exchange rate has been decreased or increased by 10%. The translational effect on equity is limited due to the Euro hedging in place. The effect on equity is calculated by decreasing or increasing the closing exchange rate with an adjustment for the movement in the currency hedge. It is assumed that the net investment hedge will be 100% effective.
10% strengthening in sterling | 10% weakening in sterling | |||
Year to | Year to | Year to | Year to | |
30 December | 30 December | 30 December | 30 December | |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |
£m | £m | £m | £m | |
Impact on the income statement - gain / (loss) | 0.2 | (0.8) | (0.4) | 0.9 |
Impact on equity - gain / (loss) | (0.4) | (1.2) | 1.2 | 2.1 |
23e Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk reflects the risk that the Group will have insufficient resources to meet its financial liabilities as they fall due. The day-to-day operations of the Group are largely funded through the items included in the breakdown of recurring profit included in note 2a. The majority of income within recurring profit is received quarterly, since the inflows and outflows from net rental income and net interest payable generally coincide with English quarter days, and property management fees are billed to the funds quarterly. As a result, the Group normally has sufficient funds to cover recurring administrative expenses which occur throughout the year. Liquidity risk therefore arises principally from the need to make payments for non-recurring items, such as tax payments and the close out of derivative financial instruments. Payments may also be necessary against bank debt facilities to prevent covenant breaches on loans related to the Group's wholly owned properties or to cover losses in the Group's joint ventures, or to repay loans when they fall due.
The Group's objective in managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it has sufficient funds to meet all its potential liabilities as they fall due, both in normal market conditions and when considering negative projections against expected outcomes, so as to avoid the risk of incurring contractual penalties or damaging the Group's reputation. The Group's treasury department maintains a rolling eighteen month forecast of anticipated recurring and non-recurring cash flows under different scenarios. This is compared to expected cash balances and amounts available for drawdown on the Group's core revolving credit facility to ensure that any potential shortfalls in funding are identified and managed. The Group's primary means of managing liquidity risk is the £25.0 million core revolving credit facility, expiring in July 2016, of which £1.0 million was drawn down at 30 December 2012 with the remainder fully available for draw down at the end of the year as disclosed in note 22c.
The following table shows the maturity analysis of non-derivative financial assets / (liabilities) at the balance sheet date and, where applicable, their effective interest rates.
Effective | Less than | More than | |||||
interest rate | 1 year | 1-2 years | 2-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||
2012 | Note | % | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
Financial assets | |||||||
Available for sale investments | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | |
Non-current receivables | 15 | 3.5 | - | - | 21.2 | - | 21.2 |
Current receivables | 18 | 4.7 | - | - | - | 4.7 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | 0.5 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 5.3 |
10.0 | - | 21.2 | - | 31.2 | |||
Financial liabilities | |||||||
Borrowings - fixed and swapped bank loans1 | 22a | 7.51 | - | (57.6) | - | - | (57.6) |
Borrowings - variable rate bank loans | 22a | 3.70 | - | - | (1.0) | - | (1.0) |
Current payables | 20 | (6.8) | - | - | - | (6.8) | |
Non-current payables | 21 | - | (0.7) | - | - | (0.7) | |
(6.8) | (58.3) | (1.0) | - | (66.1) | |||
Effective | Less than | More than | |||||
interest rate | 1 year | 1-2 years | 2-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||
2011 | Note | % | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
Financial assets | |||||||
Available for sale investments | 14 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.3 | |
Non-current receivables | 15 | 4.2 | - | 10.6 | 21.5 | - | 32.1 |
Current receivables | 18 | 3.7 | - | - | - | 3.7 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | 0.5 | 20.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 |
24.0 | 10.6 | 21.5 | - | 56.1 | |||
Financial liabilities | |||||||
Borrowings - fixed and swapped bank loans1 | 22a | 6.30 | - | (59.6) | - | - | (59.6) |
Borrowings - variable rate bank loans | 22a | 3.49 | (5.3) | (2.3) | - | - | (7.6) |
Current payables | 20 | (6.9) | - | - | - | (6.9) | |
Non-current payables | 21 | - | (0.5) | - | - | (0.5) | |
(12.2) | (62.4) | - | - | (74.6) | |||
1 The maturity is the same as the contractual repricing of the Group's fixed and swapped bank loans
23e Liquidity risk (continued)
The following tables detail the Group's remaining contractual maturity for its non-derivative financial liabilities. The tables have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash inflows / (outflows) of financial liabilities based on the earliest date on which the Group can be required to pay, including both interest and principal cash flows.
Less than | More than | ||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | |
2012 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
Non-interest bearing | (6.8) | (0.7) | - | - | - | - | (7.5) |
Fixed and swapped bank loans | - | (57.6) | - | - | - | - | (57.6) |
Variable interest rate instruments | - | - | (1.0) | - | - | - | (1.0) |
(6.8) | (58.3) | (1.0) | - | - | - | (66.1) | |
Less than | More than | ||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | |
2011 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
Non-interest bearing | (6.9) | (0.5) | - | - | - | - | (7.4) |
Fixed and swapped bank loans | - | (59.6) | - | - | - | - | (59.6) |
Variable interest rate instruments | (7.5) | (3.8) | - | - | - | - | (11.3) |
(14.4) | (63.9) | - | - | - | - | (78.3) |
The following tables detail the Group's remaining contractual maturity for its derivative financial assets / (liabilities), all of which are net settled, based on the undiscounted net cash inflows / (outflows). When the amount payable or receivable is not fixed, it has been determined by reference to the projected interest and foreign currency rates as illustrated by the yield curves existing at the reporting date.
Less than | More than | |||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||
2012 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |||||
Net settled | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | (1.8) | - | - | - | - | - | (1.8) | |||||
Foreign exchange forward contract | 1.4 | - | - | - | - | - | 1.4 | |||||
(0.4) | - | - | - | - | - | (0.4) | ||||||
Less than | More than | |||||||||||
1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||
2011 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |||||
Net settled | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | (2.0) | (1.5) | - | - | - | - | (3.5) | |||||
Interest rate swaption | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - | 0.2 | |||||
Foreign exchange forward contract | - | 0.6 | - | - | - | - | 0.6 | |||||
(2.0) | (0.9) | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - | (2.7) | ||||||
23f Fair values of financial instruments
The fair values of financial instruments together with their carrying amounts in the balance sheet are as follows:
Notional | 2012 | 2012 | 2011 | 2011 | ||
principal | Book value | Fair value | Book value | Fair value | ||
Note | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Financial liabilities not at fair value through income statement | ||||||
Sterling denominated loans | 22a | (58.6) | (58.6) | (67.2) | (67.2) | |
Total on balance sheet borrowings | (58.6) | (58.6) | (67.2) | (67.2) | ||
Group share of associate borrowings | (115.0) | (115.0) | (202.7) | (202.7) | ||
Group share of joint venture borrowings | (148.3) | (149.0) | (227.1) | (228.2) | ||
Total see-through borrowings | 23a | (321.9) | (322.6) | (497.0) | (498.1) | |
Derivative assets/(liabilities) at fair value through income statement | ||||||
Sterling interest rate swaps | 21 | 58.9 | (1.8) | (1.8) | (3.5) | (3.5) |
Sterling interest rate swaption | 15 | 50.0 | - | - | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Foreign exchange forward contracts | 15,18 | 39.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Total on balance sheet derivatives | (0.4) | (0.4) | (2.7) | (2.7) | ||
Group share of Sterling interest rate swaps in associates and joint ventures | 139.0 | (8.4) | (8.4) | (13.1) | (13.1) | |
Group share of Euro interest rate swaps in joint ventures | 143.3 | (2.7) | (2.7) | (2.4) | (2.4) | |
Total see through derivatives | (11.5) | (11.5) | (18.2) | (18.2) | ||
Less foreign exchange forward contracts | (1.4) | (1.4) | (0.6) | (0.6) | ||
Total see through interest rate derivatives | 28 | (12.9) | (12.9) | (18.8) | (18.8) |
23f Fair values of financial instruments (continued)
The fair value of borrowings has been estimated on the basis of quoted market prices. The fair value of the interest rate swaps and interest rate swaption have been estimated by calculating the present value of future cash flows, using market discount rates. The fair value of the forward foreign exchange contract has been estimated by applying the quoted forward foreign exchange rate to the undiscounted cash flows at maturity.
Details of the Group's cash and deposits are disclosed in note 19 and their fair values and those of all other financial assets and liabilities are equal to their book values.
Fair value measurements recognised in the consolidated balance sheet
The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:
·; Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
·; Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).
·; Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
2012 | ||||
Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||
Note | £m | £m | £m | |
Financial assets | ||||
Interest rate swaption | 15 | - | - | - |
Foreign exchange forward contracts | 15,18 | 1.4 | - | 1.4 |
1.4 | - | 1.4 | ||
Financial liabilities | ||||
Interest rate swaps | 20 | (1.8) | (1.8) | |
(1.8) | - | (1.8) |
2011 | ||||
Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||
Note | £m | £m | £m | |
Financial assets | ||||
Available for sale investments | 14 | - | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Interest rate swaption | 15 | 0.2 | - | 0.2 |
Foreign exchange forward contracts | 15,18 | 0.6 | - | 0.6 |
0.8 | 0.3 | 1.1 | ||
Financial liabilities | ||||
Interest rate swaps | 21 | (3.5) | - | (3.5) |
(3.5) | - | (3.5) |
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 in the year. Since the only Level 3 fair value measurements in the year related to available for sale investments, the reconciliation of the movement in these measurements is disclosed in note 14.
24 Share capital
Number of authorised | Number of shares | Nominal value of shares | ||||
shares | issued and fully paid | issued and fully paid | ||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |
Number | Number | Number | Number | £m | £m | |
Ordinary shares of 1p each | ||||||
At the start and end of the year | 857,589,603 | 857,589,603 | 350,612,754 | 350,612,754 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Deferred shares of 9p each | ||||||
At the start and end of the year | 71,348,933 | 71,348,933 | 71,348,933 | 71,348,933 | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Total called-up share capital | 421,961,687 | 421,961,687 | 9.9 | 9.9 |
The Company has one class of Ordinary shares which carry voting rights but no right to fixed income. Deferred shares carry neither voting nor dividend rights.
25 Share-based payments
The Group's share-based payments comprise the SAYE scheme, the 2008 LTIP, the Matching Share Agreement and the COIP. Full details of each of the schemes are disclosed in the Directors' remuneration report. In accordance with IFRS 2, the fair value of equity-settled share-based payments to employees is determined at the date of grant, calculated using either a Black-Scholes option pricing model or a Monte Carlo simulation.
Analysis of income statement charge
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
2008 LTIP | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
Equity-settled share-based payments | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
Movements during the year
SAYE scheme | Matching share | ||||
Invitation I | Invitation II | 2008 LTIP | agreement | COIP | |
Outstanding at 30 December 2010 | 691,326 | - | 13,000,000 | 302,055 | 1,202,080 |
Granted during the year | - | 499,567 | 500,000 | - | - |
Exercised during the year | (22,984) | - | - | (302,055) | - |
Forfeited / lapsed / expired during the year | (66,437) | (12,261) | - | - | - |
Outstanding at 30 December 2011 | 601,905 | 487,306 | 13,500,000 | - | 1,202,080 |
Granted during the year | - | - | - | - | - |
Exercised during the year | (521,901) | - | - | - | - |
Forfeited / lapsed / expired during the year | (80,004) | (90,929) | - | - | (1,202,080) |
Outstanding at 30 December 2012 | - | 396,377 | 13,500,000 | - | - |
Exercisable at the end of the year | - | - | - | - | - |
Fair value of award at grant date | £0.15 | £0.05 | £0.20 | £4.76 | £0.14 |
Weighted average exercise price | 22.8p | 36.7p | 0.0p | 0.0p | 0.0p |
Weighted average remaining contractual life | n/a | 2.33 years | n/a | n/a | n/a |
On 1 November 2011 a new invitation ('invitation II') to participate in the SAYE scheme was made to employees.
The 2008 LTIP awards are subject to a performance condition based on growth of total shareholder return (TSR) as disclosed in the Directors' remuneration report.
On 31 December 2011 all of the COIP lapsed as the performance criteria were not met.
On 1 February 2012, the first SAYE scheme invitation ('invitation I') matured and participants were eligible to exercise their options for up to six months from this date.
Assumptions
The key assumptions and inputs used in the fair value models were:
SAYE scheme | Matching share | ||||
Invitation I | Invitation II | 2008 LTIP | agreement | COIP | |
Share price at grant date | 45.5p | 34.0p | 31.9p | 553.0p | 44.75p |
Exercise price | 46.0p | 36.7p | 0.0p | 0.0p | 0.0p |
Expected volatility | 84% | 56% | 83% | 37% | 84% |
Expected life (years) | 3.12 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.99 | 3.04 |
Risk free rate | 2.28% | 3.51% | 1.58% | 3.78% | 2.58% |
Expected dividend yield | 11.0% | 14.7% | 0% | 4.9% | 11.2% |
Lapse rate | 40% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Correlation | n/a | n/a | n/a | 30% | 29% |
Expected volatility is based on the historic volatility of the Group's share price over the three years to the date of grant. The risk free rate is the yield at the date of grant on a gilt-edged stock with a redemption date equivalent to the expected life of the option or the performance period of the relevant scheme. Options are assumed to be exercised at the earliest possible date.
26 Own shares
Own shares | ||
£m | ||
At the start of the year | 6.8 | |
Disposed of on exercise of options | (6.1) | |
At the end of the year | 0.7 |
The own shares reserve represents the cost of shares in the Company purchased in the market. At 30 December 2012, the Capital & Regional plc 2002 Employee Share Trust (the "ESOT") held 1,319,201 (2011: 1,841,102) shares to assist the Group in meeting the outstanding share awards under the schemes described above. The right to receive dividends on these shares has been waived. The market value of these shares at 30 December 2012 was £0.4 million (2011: £0.6million).
27 Reconciliation of net cash from operations
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities before financing | (9.0) | 16.2 | |
(Loss)/profit from discontinued operations | (5.2) | 10.6 | |
(14.2) | 26.8 | ||
Adjusted for: | |||
Income tax expense - discontinued operations | 30 | 2.0 | - |
Loss on disposal of JV & Associates - discontinued operations | 30 | 4.0 | - |
Impairment of goodwill - discontinued operations | 12 | 1.8 | 0.1 |
Share of loss/(profit) in associates and joint ventures - continuing operations | 17a | 10.3 | (22.3) |
Loss on revaluation of wholly owned properties | 11a | 1.7 | 0.8 |
Loss on disposal of other assets | 0.1 | - | |
Depreciation of other fixed assets | 13 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
(Increase)/decrease in receivables | (2.4) | 2.3 | |
Decrease in payables | (0.1) | (0.7) | |
Non-cash movement relating to share-based payments | 25 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Net cash from operations | 4.3 | 8.2 |
28 Net assets per share
EPRA has issued recommended bases for the calculation of certain net assets per share information as shown in the following table:
30 December | 30 December | ||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||
Net assets | Number of | Net assets | Net assets | ||
Note | £m | shares (m) | per share (£) | per share (£) | |
Basic net assets | 179.6 | 350.6 | 0.51 | 0.56 | |
Own shares held | 26 | - | (1.3) | ||
Dilutive contingently issuable shares and share options | - | - | |||
Fair value of fixed rate loans (net of tax) | (0.5) | ||||
EPRA triple net assets | 179.1 | 349.3 | 0.51 | 0.56 | |
Exclude fair value of fixed rate loans (net of tax) | 0.5 | ||||
Exclude fair value of see-through interest rate derivatives | 23f | 12.9 | |||
Exclude deferred tax on unrealised gains and capital allowances | 0.9 | ||||
EPRA net assets | 193.4 | 349.3 | 0.55 | 0.63 |
29 Return on equity
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Total comprehensive (loss)/income attributable to equity shareholders | (16.6) | 20.7 | |
Opening equity shareholders' funds | 196.0 | 174.5 | |
Return on equity | (8.5)% | 11.9% |
30 Discontinued Operations
On 19 October 2012 subsidiaries of Hammerson plc acquired The Junction Fund, a specialist retail park fund, for a total of £259.5 million of which Capital & Regional plc had a 13.43% interest resulting in net cash consideration attributable to the Group of £11.4 million, excluding performance fee income of £2.6 million. A loss on disposal after tax of £1.2 million was recognised.
On 24 December 2012 the Group sold Capital & Regional (Braehead) Limited to its joint venture partner Capital Shopping Centres for cash consideration of £4 million. Capital & Regional (Braehead) Limited held a 50% stake in Xscape Braehead Partnership the entity that owns the Xscape Braehead, Glasgow property. A profit on disposal after tax of £1.2 million was recognised. At the date of disposal the net assets of Capital & Regional (Braehead) Limited were £4.8 million consisting of a receivable due from the Xscape Braehead Partnership of that amount.
On 4 December 2012 the Group entered into a conditional binding agreement for the sale of its 11.9% stake in the X-Leisure Fund and its 50% interest in X-Leisure Limited to a subsidiary of Land Securities Group plc . The X-Leisure Fund is the largest specialist fund investing in UK leisure property, X-Leisure Limited is the property and asset manager for the Fund. The approval of X-Leisure Fund unit holders not involved in the transaction was obtained on 21 December 2012 and on that date Management, considering the disposal to be highly probable, reclassified the investments to assets held for sale at the consideration expected to be received of £32.2 million, with associated liabilities of £1.4 million in respect of outstanding transaction costs recognised as a separate liability on the balance sheet. A loss on disposal after tax of £4.0 million was recognised.
At 30 December 2012 the principal conditions that needed to be met for the sale to complete were the approval of Capital & Regional plc shareholders and the consent of the X-Leisure Fund's banks. These conditions were satisfied after the year end and as disclosed in note 34 the sale completed on 16 January 2013.
The disposals formed part of the strategy to exit non-core operations to generate cash to further de-leverage and to concentrate on the Group's core UK shopping centre activities.
The results of these discontinued operations, which have been included in the consolidated income statement, were as follows:
Year ended | Year ended | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures before attributable tax | 0.8 | 10.6 | |
Attributable current tax charge | (2.0) | (0.3) | |
Share of loss in associates and joint ventures after attributable tax | (1.2) | 10.3 | |
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations | (4.0) | - | |
(Loss)/profit from discontinued operations | 2a, 17d, 17e | (5.2) | 10.3 |
The loss on disposal of discontinued operations of £4.0 million is stated after Deferred Tax credits of £3.5 million relating to Deferred Tax liabilities extinguished on disposal.
During the year, discontinued operations contributed £1.5 million (2011: £11.9 million) to the Group's net operating cash flows, contributed £15.0 million (2011: £nil million) in respect of investing activities (disposal proceeds) and paid £nil million (2012: £nil million) in respect of financing activities.
Assets held for sale comprise:
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Note | £m | £m | |
Investment in associate - X-Leisure Limited Partnership | 31.7 | - | |
Investment in joint venture - X-Leisure Limited | 0.5 | - | |
32.2 | - |
£1.6 million of balance sheet liabilities associated with these assets have been recognised at 30 December 2012 representing transaction costs outstanding at that date.
31 Lease arrangements
The Group as lessee - operating leases
At the balance sheet date, the Group's future minimum lease payments and sublease receipts under non-cancellable operating leases related to land and buildings were as follows:
2012 | 2011 |
| ||
£m | £m |
| ||
Lease payments |
| |||
Within one year | (2.0) | (2.2) |
| |
Between one and five years | (8.2) | (7.4) |
| |
After five years | (19.9) | (21.7) |
| |
(30.1) | (31.3) |
Operating lease payments are denominated in sterling and have an average remaining lease length of 14 years (2011: 15 years) and rentals are fixed for an average of 2 years (2011: 3 years). During the year there were no contingent rents (2011: £nil) and the Group incurred lease payments recognised as an expense of £2.0 million (2011: £2.2 million).
The Group as lessor
The Group leases out all of its investment properties under operating leases for average lease terms of 8 years (2011: 10 years) to expiry. The most significant leasing arrangements are summarised in the fund portfolio information. The future aggregate minimum rentals receivable under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
Unexpired | 30 | 30 | |||||||
average | Less | More | December | December | |||||
lease | than 1 | 2 - 5 | 6 - 10 | 11 - 15 | 16 - 20 | than 20 | 2012 | 2011 | |
term | year | years | years | years | years | years | Total | Total | |
100% figures | Years | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
The Mall | 8.2 | 62.9 | 189.4 | 124.7 | 48.5 | 29.5 | 130.9 | 585.9 | 701.4 |
Redditch | 7.8 | 8.5 | 27.0 | 16.4 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 17.9 | 79.4 | - |
The Junction | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 225.9 |
X-Leisure1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 530.7 |
FIX UK1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 73.3 |
Total associates | 71.4 | 216.4 | 141.1 | 55.3 | 32.3 | 148.8 | 665.3 | 1,531.3 | |
German portfolio1 | 7.8 | 24.7 | 81.1 | 55.0 | 19.3 | 3.1 | - | 183.2 | 243.8 |
Other joint ventures | 5.4 | 1.7 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 0.6 | - | - | 11.1 | 71.5 |
Total joint ventures | 26.4 | 86.3 | 58.6 | 19.9 | 3.1 | - | 194.3 | 315.3 | |
Wholly owned | 10.6 | 6.9 | 26.8 | 27.4 | 7.6 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 73.6 | 76.7 |
Total | 104.7 | 329.5 | 227.1 | 82.8 | 39.0 | 150.1 | 933.2 | 1,923.3 |
1 Values for 2012 do not include German Portfolio 4 and FIX UK following the loss of joint control/significant influence during the year (see Notes 17b and 17c). The X-Leisure Fund has also been excluded following its reclassification as an asset held for sale and subsequent disposal post year end (See Note 30).
There was no contingent rent (2011: £nil) recognised in income from wholly owned properties during the year.
32 Capital commitments
At 30 December 2012 the Group's share of the capital commitments of its associates, joint ventures and wholly owned properties was £2.5 million (2011: £0.5 million). This comprised £2.5 million (2011: £0.4 million) relating to The Mall and £nil million (2011: £0.1 million) relating to other assets.
33 Contingent liabilities
Under the terms of the Group's disposal of its interest in The Junction Fund, Capital & Regional Units LLP and Capital & Regional (Junction GP) Limited gave certain customary warranties as to their title to the relevant units and shares and certain warranties in relation to the Junction Fund generally and the GP sellers gave warranties in relation to the Junction GP. The relevant warranties were given on a several basis and the maximum liability of Capital & Regional Units LLP in respect of the title and capacity warranties is £34,843,065 and the maximum liability of Capital & Regional (Junction GP) Limited in respect of the title and capacity warranties is £35,356,875. The maximum liability of Capital & Regional Units LLP in respect of the other warranties is £3,484,306.50 and the maximum liability of Capital & Regional (Junction GP) Limited in respect of the other warranties is £3,535,688. Any claims in respect of the warranties must be bought within 12 months of the date of the agreement, being 19 October 2012, other than in respect of certain claims relating to taxation, where the claims must be bought within either 24 months or six years from the date of agreement.
The obligations of Capital & Regional Units LLP under the agreement were guaranteed by Capital & Regional Holdings Limited.
34 Events after the balance sheet date
X-Leisure disposal
The Group's proposed disposal of its 11.9% stake in the X-Leisure Fund and its 50% interest in X-Leisure Limited as detailed in Note 32 completed on 16 January 2013 with gross cash consideration of £32.2 million being received.
Mall unit purchase
On 4 January 2013, the Group purchased 1.6 million units in The Mall Fund at £0.25 per unit for a total consideration of £0.4 million. This increased the holding in The Mall Fund from 20.15% to 20.33%.
34 Events after the balance sheet date (continued)
FIX UK disposal
On 8 February 2013 Legal & General Property acquired the FIX UK Portfolio. The Group will receive up to £0.5 million of consideration in respect of their 20% interest held, since 30 June 2012, as a fixed asset investment at an impaired value of £nil. The level of consideration is contingent on the final total consideration on the transaction.
Share buy-back
Subsequent to 30 December 2012 and up to and including 11 March 2013 (the last practical date prior to the publication of this report) the Group had purchased for cancellation a total of 698,958 of its own shares at a price of 28 pence per share.
Covenant wavier
The German joint venture obtained a one year bank wavier for two loans in one portfolio which had marginally breached their individual LTV covenant. In January 2013 this wavier was extended to the maturity of the loan in December 2013.
35 Related party transactions
Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Transactions between the Group and its associates and joint ventures, all of which occurred at normal market rates, are disclosed below.
Interest received | Distributions received | |||||
Year to | Year to | Year to | Year to | |||
30 December | 30 December | 30 December | 30 December | |||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||
£m | £m | £m | £m | |||
Associates | ||||||
The Junction Limited Partnership | - | - | - | 9.9 | ||
Garigal | - | - | 0.2 | - | ||
The Mall Limited Partnership | - | - | 0.9 | - | ||
X-Leisure Limited Partnership | - | - | 1.1 | 1.3 | ||
- | - | 2.2 | 11.2 | |||
Joint ventures | ||||||
Xscape Braehead Partnership | 0.5 | 0.6 | - | - | ||
The Auchinlea Partnership | - | - | - | 0.3 | ||
X-Leisure Limited | - | - | 0.3 | 0.5 | ||
German joint venture companies | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 3.7 | ||
1.0 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 4.5 |
The borrowing arrangements of The Mall restrict the ability to make cash distributions of profit to the Group as long as its LTV is above 60% and its debt above £600 million. The £0.9 million received during the year relates to a distribution to cover tax to be paid on share of profits for the period, such distributions are excluded from the restriction. It is anticipated that normal distributions from the Mall will resume by the end of 2013 as the relevant debt tests are met.
Fee income and rent | Net amounts | |||||
income / (expense) | Receivable from | |||||
Year to | Year to | As at | As at | |||
30 December | 30 December | 30 December | 30 December | |||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||
£m | £m | £m | £m | |||
Associates | ||||||
The Mall Limited Partnership | 6.7 | 7.1 | 1.9 | 0.7 | ||
The Junction Limited Partnership | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
X-Leisure Limited Partnership | (1.6) | (1.6) | (0.1) | - | ||
Redditch Limited Partnership | 0.4 | - | 0.1 | - | ||
The FIX UK Limited Partnership | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - | ||
9.0 | 6.7 | 2.0 | 0.8 | |||
Joint ventures | ||||||
Xscape Braehead Partnership | - | 0.1 | - | 10.7 | ||
X-Leisure Limited | 0.3 | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | ||
German joint venture companies | - | - | 14.8 | 15.0 | ||
Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership | 0.2 | 0.1 | 6.4 | 6.4 | ||
0.5 | 0.3 | 21.2 | 32.2 |
Amounts receivable from associates are unsecured and do not incur interest and they are payable on demand and settled in cash.
Amounts receivable from the German joint venture incur interest at commercial rates which is payable on demand. The balances are unsecured and settled in cash. Amounts receivable from the Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership are interest free and repayable on demand.
35 Related party transactions (continued)
Management fees are received by Capital & Regional Property Management Limited and are payable on demand, unsecured, do not incur interest and are settled in cash.
All rents payable by SNO!zone companies are due to the relevant Xscape Partnerships. SNO!zone Limited (operator of the ski slopes at Milton Keynes and Castleford) paid rent of £1.6 million (2011: £1.6 million) to the X-Leisure Limited Partnership. SNO!zone (Braehead) Limited was sold on 16 December 2011, it paid rent of £0.1 million in 2011 to the Xscape Braehead Partnership.
Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership
During 2011 the Group formed a joint venture with Karoo Investment Fund II S.C.A SICAV-SIF ("Karoo") by selling 50% of the Group's interest in The Waterside Shopping Centre in Lincoln. As the Group and Karoo have common significant shareholders the formation of the joint venture was conditional upon shareholder approval which was granted on 1 April 2011. Included within loans to joint ventures is an amount of £6.4 million related to the Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership. The details of this transaction are disclosed in note 17c.
Performance fees
Certain entities in the Group may receive performance fees when investors realise their interests in the underlying funds or joint ventures, either at the end of the life of the fund, on the sale of some or all of the underlying properties, or through another realisation mechanism such as a listing. Except where stated below no performance fees were received from or paid in either the current or preceding year.
The Mall Fund
CRPM will earn a performance fee if the property level return is positive and is more than 50 basis points above the index when measured from July 2010 to the realisation of the fund, which is due to expire in April 2017. Part of any performance fee earned may be payable to certain key CRPM management and staff as part of their incentive plans. The Group will also bear 20.33% (our unit holding as of 4 January 2013) of the cost of this performance fee and that payable to the fund manager as an investor in The Mall fund.
Kingfisher Limited Partnership
CRPM will earn an additional equity return if distributions result in a geared return in excess of a 15% IRR. Part of any receipt may be payable to certain key CRPM management and staff as part of their incentive plans. The Group will bear 20.00% of the cost by virtue of their investment in the Partnership.
Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership
CRPM will earn a performance fee on sale of the Property or sale of all of the Partners interests in the Partnership if distributions have resulted in a geared return in excess of a 15% IRR. Part of any performance fee earned may be payable to certain key CRPM management and staff as part of their incentive plans. The Group will bear 50.00% of the cost of any performance fee by virtue of their investment in the Partnership.
The Junction Fund
A performance fee of £2.6 million was recognised within CRPM during the year following the acquisition of the fund by Hammerson plc. A further amount of up to £0.2 million may potentially be received subject to the successful resolution of various outstanding matters. The Group also bore 13.29% of the cost of the performance fee paid in the year through its share of The Junction Fund prior to disposal.
X-Leisure Fund
As part of the transaction in which the Group and other investors agreed the sale of their investments in The X-Leisure Fund and X-Leisure Limited to a subsidiary of Land Securities Group plc it was agreed that a performance fee of £7.5 million would be paid by The X-Leisure Fund to X-Leisure Limited post sale. 50% of this amount received in X-Leisure Limited was paid to certain key X-Leisure Limited management and staff as part of their incentive plans. The agreement effectively provided that the Group would neither bear any of the cost of the performance fee as investor in the fund, nor receive any of the fees as shareholder of X-Leisure Limited. Based on amounts accrued in the accounts of the X-Leisure entities the Group have recognised their 50% share of the remainder within their share of X-Leisure Limited's results for the period up to reclassification as an asset held for sale. Similarly the Group have borne 11.93% of the cost within their share of results of X-Leisure Fund up to the date of reclassification as an asset held for sale. This has then been effectively reversed out of the carrying value of the asset at year end.
German joint venture
Garigal will earn a performance fee if the internal rate of return is over 12% when measured from August 2010 to the realisation of the joint venture, whose current business plan runs to June 2013. Up to 80% of any performance fee earned may be payable to certain key Garigal management and staff as part of their incentive plans. The Group will also bear 49.60% of the cost of this performance fee as an investor in the German joint venture.
Transactions with key personnel
In accordance with IAS 24, key personnel are considered to be the executive and non-executive directors as they have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group. Their remuneration in the income statement is as follows:
Year to | Year to | ||
30 December | 30 December | ||
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Short term employment benefits | 2.4 | 2.0 | |
Post-employment benefits | 0.2 | 0.1 | |
Share-based payments* | 0.5 | 0.6 | |
3.1 | 2.7 |
* Share-based payments relate to amounts awarded under the 2008 LTIP, the COIP and the Matching Share Agreement.
Independent auditor's report to the members of Capital & Regional plc
We have audited the financial statements of Capital & Regional plc for the year ended 30 December 2012 which comprise the Group Income Statement, the Group Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Group Balance Sheet, the Group Statement of Changes in Equity, the Group Cash Flow Statement, the related notes 1 to 35, the Parent Company Balance Sheetand the related notes A to G. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
This report is made solely to the Company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's Ethical Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the Group's and the Parent Company's circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the annual report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion:
·; the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group's and of the Parent Company's affairs as at 30 December 2012 and of the Group's loss for the year then ended;
·; the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union;
·; the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
·; the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.
Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion:
·; the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006; and
·; the information given in the Directors' Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
·; adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
·; the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
·; certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or
·; we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Under the Listing Rules we are required to review:
·; the directors' statement, contained within the Corporate Governance Report, in relation to going concern;
·; the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company's compliance with the nine provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review; and
·; certain elements of the report to shareholders by the Board on directors' remuneration.
Andrew Clark, FCA (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of Deloitte LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
London, United Kingdom
12 March 2013
Company balance sheet
At 30 December 2012
Registered number: 1399411
Prepared in accordance with UK GAAP
2012 | 2011 | |||
Note | £m | £m | ||
Fixed assets | ||||
Investments | C | 79.8 | 145.1 | |
Current assets | ||||
Debtors - amounts falling due within one year | D | 145.8 | 142.4 | |
Debtors - amounts falling due after more than one year | D | 14.2 | 18.5 | |
Cash and deposits | 0.3 | 1.4 | ||
160.3 | 162.3 | |||
Creditors - amounts falling due within one year | ||||
Trade and other creditors | E | (61.3) | (97.5) | |
(61.3) | (97.5) | |||
Net current assets | 99.0 | 64.8 | ||
Creditors - amounts falling due after more than one year | ||||
Loan guarantees | (0.2) | (0.3) | ||
Corporation tax payable | E | - | (5.0) | |
(0.2) | (5.3) | |||
Net assets | 178.6 | 204.6 | ||
Capital and reserves | ||||
Called-up share capital | F | 9.9 | 9.9 | |
Merger reserve | F | 60.3 | 60.3 | |
Capital redemption reserve | F | 4.4 | 4.4 | |
Retained earnings | F | 104.0 | 130.0 | |
Shareholders' funds | 178.6 | 204.6 |
These financial statements were approved by the Board of directors, authorised for issue and signed on their behalf on 12 March 2013 by:
Charles Staveley
Group Finance Director
Notes to the Company financial statements
For the year ended 30 December 2012
A Accounting policies
Although the Group consolidated financial statements are prepared under IFRS, the Company financial statements for Capital & Regional plc presented in this section are prepared under UK GAAP. The main accounting policies have been applied consistently in the current year and the preceding year.
Investments, amounts owed by subsidiaries and amounts owed by associates and joint ventures are stated at cost less provision for impairment. Where there is an indication that an investment is impaired, an impairment review is carried out by comparing the carrying value of the investment against its recoverable amount, which is the higher of its estimated value in use and fair value. This review involves accounting judgements about the future cash flows from the underlying associates and joint ventures and, in the case of CRPM, estimated asset management fee income less estimated fixed and variable expenses.
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at exchange rates approximating to the exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated to sterling at the exchange rate ruling at that date and differences arising on translation are recognised in the income statement.
The Company's related party transactions are described in note 35 to the Group financial statements. The Company had no direct employees during the year (2011: none). Information on the directors' emoluments, share options, long-term incentive schemes and pension contributions is shown in the directors' remuneration report.
B Profit / (Loss) for the year
As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the profit and loss account of the Company is not presented as part of these financial statements. The loss for the year attributable to equity shareholders was £26.0 million (2011: profit of £34.9 million).
C Fixed asset investments
Other | ||||
Subsidiaries | Joint ventures | investments | Total | |
£m | £m | £m | £m | |
At the start of the year | 130.9 | 13.9 | 0.3 | 145.1 |
Investment | 4.8 | - | - | 4.8 |
Disposals | - | - | (0.3) | (0.3) |
Impairment of investments | (56.9) | (12.9) | - | (69.8) |
At the end of the year | 78.8 | 1.0 | - | 79.8 |
During the year several of the Company's subsidiaries converted intercompany balances payable to the Company to equity resulting in a £4.8 million increase in the Company's investment in subsidiaries balance.
Note G shows the principal subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures held by the Group and the Company.
D Debtors
2012 | 2011 | ||
Amounts falling due within one year | £m | £m | |
Amounts owed by subsidiaries | 145.8 | 142.3 | |
Other receivables | - | 0.1 | |
145.8 | 142.4 |
2012 | 2011 | ||
Amounts falling due after more than one year | £m | £m | |
Amounts owed by joint ventures | 14.2 | 18.5 | |
14.2 | 18.5 |
E Creditors
2012 | 2011 | ||
Amounts falling due within one year | £m | £m | |
Amounts owed to subsidiaries | 58.8 | 95.6 | |
Current tax payable | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
Accruals and deferred income | 1.8 | 1.2 | |
61.3 | 97.5 |
2012 | 2011 | ||||
Amounts falling due after more than one year | £m | £m | |||
Corporation tax payable | |||||
From one to two years | - | 5.0 | |||
- | 5.0 |
F Share capital and reserves
Non-distributable | Distributable | |||||||
Capital | ||||||||
Share | redemption | Retained | Retained | Merger | ||||
capital | reserve | earnings | earnings | reserve | Total | |||
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |||
At the start of the year | 9.9 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 126.5 | 60.3 | 204.6 | ||
Retained profit for the year | - | - | (0.5) | ( | (25.5) | - | (26.0) | |
Transfer between reserves | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
At the end of the year | 9.9 | 4.4 | 3.0 | 101.0 | 60.3 | 178.6 |
The Company's authorised, issued and fully paid-up share capital is described in note 24 to the Group financial statements. The other reserves are described in the consolidated statement of changes in equity in the Group financial statements.
G Principal subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures
Share of | ||
Nature of | voting | |
business | rights | |
Incorporated/registered and operating in Great Britain | ||
Capital & Regional Earnings Limited | Property management | 100% |
Capital & Regional Income Limited | Property investment | 100% |
Capital & Regional Holdings Limited | Property investment and management | 100% * |
Capital & Regional Property Management Limited | Property management | 100% |
Capital & Regional Units LLP | Property investment | 100% |
Morrison Merlin Limited | Property trading | 100% * |
Snozone Limited | Operator of indoor ski slopes | 100% |
The Auchinlea Partnership | Property investment | 50% |
X-Leisure Limited | Property management | 50% |
The FIX UK Limited Partnership | Property investment | 20% |
Waterside Lincoln Limited Partnership | Property investment | 50% |
Kingfisher Limited Partnership | Property investment | 20% |
Incorporated/registered and operating in Germany | ||
Garigal Asset Management GmbH | Property management | 30.06% |
Incorporated/registered and operating in Jersey | ||
Capital & Regional Capital Partner Limited | Property investment | 100% |
Capital & Regional (Europe Holding 5) Limited | Property investment | 100% |
Capital & Regional (Europe LP) Limited | Property investment | 50% * |
Capital & Regional (Europe LP 2) Limited | Property investment | 50% * |
Capital & Regional (Europe LP 3) Limited | Property investment | 50% * |
Capital & Regional (Europe LP 4) Limited | Property investment | 50% * |
Capital & Regional (Europe LP 5) Limited | Property investment | 50% * |
Capital & Regional (Europe LP 6) Limited | Property investment | 50% * |
Euro B-Note Holding Limited | Finance | 49.90% * |
The Mall Unit Trust | Property investment | 20.15% |
The X-Leisure Unit Trust | Property investment | 11.93% |
Incorporated/registered in Jersey and operating in Great Britain | ||
Capital & Regional (Jersey) Limited | Property investment | 100% |
Capital & Regional Hemel Hempstead (Jersey) Limited | Property investment | 100% * |
Capital & Regional Overseas Holdings Limited | Property investment | 100% |
* Held directly by the Company or, in the case of the Europe LPs, part-held directly by the Company and part-held through a subsidiary and in the case of Euro B-Note Holding Limited, part held through a subsidiary and part held through the ESOT.
The shares of voting rights are equivalent to the percentages of ordinary shares or units held by the Group.
To avoid a statement of excessive length, details of investments which are not significant have been omitted. All of the above principal subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures have been consolidated in the Group financial statements. Investments in associates and joint ventures are analysed in notes 17d and 17e to the Group financial statements.
Glossary of terms
CRPM is Capital & Regional Property Management Limited, a subsidiary of Capital & Regional plc, which earns management and performance fees from The Mall and certain other associates and joint ventures of the Group. It also earned management and performance fees from The Junction until the Group disposed of its interest on 19 October 2012. It also owned the Group's 50% share in X-Leisure Limited prior its disposal on 16 January 2013.
Contracted rent is passing rent and the first rent reserved under a lease or unconditional agreement for lease but which is not yet payable by a tenant.
Contribution is net rent less net interest, including unhedged foreign exchange movements.
Capital return is the change in value during the period for properties held at the balance sheet date, after taking account of capital expenditure and exchange translation movements, calculated on a time weighted basis
Debt is borrowings, excluding unamortised issue costs.
EPRA earnings per share (EPS) is the profit / (loss) after tax excluding gains on asset disposals and revaluations, movements in the fair value of financial instruments, intangible asset movements and the capital allowance effects of IAS 12 "Income Taxes" where applicable, less tax arising on these items, divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year excluding own shares held.
EPRA net assets per share include the dilutive effect of share-based payments but ignore the fair value of derivatives, any deferred tax provisions on unrealised gains and capital allowances, any adjustment to the fair value of borrowings net of tax and any surplus on the fair value of trading properties.
EPRA triple net assets per share include the dilutive effect of share-based payments and adjust all items to market value, including trading properties and fixed rate debt.
Estimated rental value (ERV) is the Group's external valuers' opinion as to the open market rent which, on the date of valuation, could reasonably be expected to be obtained on a new letting or rent review of a unit or property.
ERV growth is the total growth in ERV on properties owned throughout the year including growth due to development.
Garigal is Garigal Asset Management GmbH, an associate of the Group, which earns management and performance fees from the German joint venture.
Gearing is the Group's debt as a percentage of net assets. See through gearing includes the Group's share of non-recourse debt in associates and joint ventures.
Interest rate cover (ICR) is the ratio of either (i) recurring profit (before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation); or (ii) net rental income to the interest charge.
IPD is Independent Property Databank Limited, a company that produces an independent benchmark of property returns.
Like for like figures exclude the impact of property purchases and sales on year to year comparatives.
Loan to value (LTV) is the ratio of debt excluding fair value adjustments for debt and derivatives, to the fair value of properties.(excluding adjustments for tenant incentives and head leases)
Market value is an opinion of the best price at which the sale of an interest in a property would complete unconditionally for cash consideration on the date of valuation as determined by the Group's external or internal valuers. In accordance with usual practice, the valuers report valuations net, after the deduction of the prospective purchaser's costs, including stamp duty, agent and legal fees.
Net assets per share (NAV) are shareholders' funds divided by the number of shares held by shareholders at the period end, excluding own shares held.
Net initial yield (NIY) is the annualised net rent generated by the portfolio expressed as a percentage of the portfolio valuation, excluding development properties, which is in line with EPRA's best practice recommendations.
Net debt to property value is debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by the property value (including adjustments tenant incentives and head leases)
Net interest is the Group's share, on a see through basis, of the interest payable less interest receivable of the Group and its associates and joint ventures.
Net rent is the Group's share, on a see through basis, of the rental income, less property and management costs (excluding performance fees) of the Group and its associates and joint ventures.
Nominal equivalent yield is a weighted average of the net initial yield and reversionary yield and represents the return a property will produce based upon the timing of the income received, assuming rent is received annually in arrears on gross values including the prospective purchaser's costs.
Passing rent is gross rent currently payable by tenants including car park profit but excluding income from non-trading administrations and any assumed uplift from outstanding rent reviews.
Property under management (PUM) is the valuation of properties for which CRPM, X-Leisure Limited or Garigal is the asset manager.
Recurring pre-tax profitis the total of Contribution, the Group's share of management fees less fixed management expenses earned by CRPM, X-Leisure Limited and Garigal, the profit from SNO!zone and any central costs and interest.
Return on equity is the total return, including revaluation gains and losses, divided by opening equity plus time weighted additions to and reductions in share capital, excluding share options exercised.
Reversionary percentage is the percentage by which the ERV exceeds the passing rent.
Reversionary yield is the anticipated yield to which the net initial yield will rise once the rent reaches the ERV.
See-through balance sheet is the pro forma proportionately consolidated balance sheet of the Group and its associates and joint ventures.
See-through income statement is the pro forma proportionately consolidated income statement of the Group and its associates and joint ventures.
Temporary lettings are those lettings for one year or less.
Topped-up net initial yield is the net initial yield adjusted for the expiration of rent-free periods or other unexpired lease incentives.
Total return is the Group's total recognised income or expense for the year as set out in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income expressed as a percentage of opening equity shareholders' funds.
Total shareholder return (TSR) is a performance measure of the Group's share price over time. It is calculated as the share price movement from the beginning of the period to the end of the period plus dividends paid, divided by share price at the beginning of the period
Vacancy rate is the ERV of vacant properties expressed as a percentage of the total ERV of the portfolio, excluding development properties, in line with EPRA's best practice recommendations.
Variable overhead includes discretionary bonuses and the costs of awards to directors and employees made under the 2008 LTIP, Matching Share Agreement, COIP and SAYE Scheme, which are spread over the performance period.
Five year review
for the year 30 December 2011 to 30 December 2012
2012 | 20111 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Balance sheet | |||||
Property assets | 78.4 | 80.0 | 80.8 | 94.4 | 98.9 |
Other non-current assets | 24.4 | 34.3 | 27.1 | 26.3 | 31.7 |
Intangible assets | - | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 4.2 |
Investment in joint ventures | 25.7 | 27.2 | 25.7 | 30.3 | 34.4 |
Investment in associates | 80.7 | 120.2 | 110.8 | 76.4 | 182.3 |
Cash at bank | 5.3 | 20.0 | 25.7 | 17.5 | 4.1 |
Assets classified as held for sale | 32.2 | - | - | - | - |
Other net current liabilities | (7.2) | (13.0) | (10.2) | (25.7) | (72.9) |
Bank loans greater than one year | (58.3) | (61.6) | (68.8) | (78.6) | (93.8) |
Other non-current liabilities | (1.6) | (12.9) | (18.5) | (13.4) | (2.8) |
Net assets | 179.6 | 196.0 | 174.5 | 129.8 | 186.1 |
Financed by | |||||
Called up share capital | 9.9 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 7.1 |
Share premium account | - | - | - | - | 220.5 |
Revaluation reserve | - | - | - | - | - |
Other reserves | 75.2 | 70.4 | 147.9 | 148.3 | 8.5 |
Retained earnings / (loss) | 94.5 | 115.7 | 16.7 | (28.4) | (50.0) |
Capital employed | 179.6 | 196.0 | 174.5 | 129.8 | 186.1 |
Return on equity | |||||
Return on equity (%) | (8.5)% | 11.9% | 33.9% | (64.3)% | (71.5)% |
Increase / (decrease) in net assets per share + dividend (%) | (8.4)% | 11.8% | 35.1% | (72.3)% | (62.2)% |
Total shareholder return | (9.5)% | (3.8)% | (2.2)% | (24.7)% | (77.4)% |
Period end share price (pence) | 29p | 32p | 33p | 34p | 45p |
Total return | |||||
Total comprehensive income / (expense) | (16.6) | 20.7 | 44.0 | (119.7) | (502.7) |
Net assets per share (pence) | |||||
Basic net assets per share | 51p | 56p | 50p | 37p | 130p |
EPRA triple net assets per share | 51p | 56p | 50p | 37p | 133p |
EPRA net assets per share | 55p | 63p | 57p | 47p | 174p |
EPRA triple net assets per share growth (%) | (8.3)% | 11.9% | 35.1% | (72.3)% | (73.4)% |
Gearing (%) | 32.6% | 34.3% | 40.4% | 61.9% | 60.5% |
Gearing (%) on a see through basis | 179.2% | 253.6% | 305.0% | 508.7% | 449.2% |
Income statement1 | |||||
Group revenue | 28.7 | 28.9 | 30.7 | 37.8 | 65.4 |
Gross profit | 17.6 | 17.2 | 20.3 | 21.8 | 23.7 |
Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities before financing | (9.0) | 16.2 | 52.6 | (105.1) | (478.5) |
Net interest payable | (2.7) | (3.4) | (6.2) | (8.3) | (37.8) |
Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities before tax | (11.7) | 12.8 | 46.4 | (113.4) | (516.3) |
Tax (charge)/credit | 0.9 | (2.0) | (2.0) | (6.3) | 14.1 |
Profit/(loss) after tax | (10.8) | 10.8 | 44.4 | (119.7) | (502.2) |
Recurring pre-tax profit | 17.0 | 16.4 | 14.9 | 17.5 | 27.6 |
Fully taxed recurring dividend cover (x) | - | - | - | - | 5.6 |
Interest cover (x) | 3.7 | 5.5 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 1.2 |
Earnings per share (pence) | |||||
Basic | (5)p | 6p | 13p | (59)p | (355)p |
Diluted | (5)p | 6p | 13p | (59)p | (355)p |
EPRA | 1p | 5p | 4p | 1p | (39)p |
Dividends per share | - | - | - | - | 5p |
1 2011 results have been restated to separate discontinued operations as explained in Note 30.
Property under management information
At 30 December 2012
30 December | 30 December | 30 December | 30 December | 30 December | |
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |
Property under management | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
Wholly owned | 81 | 81 | 82 | 84 | 88 |
Associates | 983 | 1,824 | 2,132 | 2,408 | 3,147 |
Joint ventures | 365 | 576 | 547 | 648 | 750 |
Other property | - | - | 71 | - | - |
Total | 1,429 | 2,481 | 2,832 | 3,140 | 3,985 |
Figures exclude adjustments to property valuations for tenant incentives and head leases treated as finance leases. Trading properties are included at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
UK Shopping Centres
The Mall Fund
At 30 December | At 30 December | |
2012 | 2011 | |
Number of properties | 8 | 9 |
Property value at independent valuation | £851m | £971m |
Passing rent (like for like) | £68m | £70m |
Initial yield (like for like) | 7.00% | 6.92% |
Property level return | 1.0% | 6.2% |
Occupancy (like for like) | 97.0% | 95.8% |
Loan to value ratio | 67% | 69% |
Net debt to value ratio | 55% | 56% |
C&R share | 20.15%1 | 18.16% |
1 Increased to 20.33% after year end
The Waterside Shopping Centre, Lincoln
The Waterside Shopping Centre was purchased in February 2011 and the Group owns a 50% interest in a joint venture with Karoo. The shopping centre is located on a prime retail pitch in the centre of the cathedral city of Lincoln and has a total lettable space of 118,000 square feet and 46 retail units.
The Kingfisher Centre, Redditch
The Kingfisher Centre was acquired in May 2012 through a joint venture with funds managed by Oaktree Capital Partners with the Group taking a 20% interest. The centre forms the majority of the town centre of Redditch comprising 920,000 square feet and 166 retail units.
All of the assets of the UK Shopping Centre business are managed by Capital & Regional Property Management ('CRPM') as asset and property manager. For The Mall, Aviva Investors fulfils the regulated fund management role and investors hold units in a Jersey Property Unit Trust (JPUT) which provides exposure to a diversified portfolio of properties without direct investment and the ability to transfer units without incurring Stamp Duty Land Tax.
Germany
The commercial retail property portfolio in Germany is a joint venture with AREA Property Partners. The joint venture owns 26 properties with a total lettable space of over 3.3 million square feet. Its key statistics excluding portfolio 4 are:
At 30 December | At 30 December | |
2012 | 2011 | |
Number of properties | 26 | 26 |
Property value at independent valuation | €414.8m | €417.9m |
Contracted rent | €32.5m | €32.5m |
Initial yield | 6.6% | 6.6% |
Property level return | 6.6% | 7.8% |
Occupancy (like for like) | 97.9% | 99.0% |
Loan to value ratio | 74% | 76% |
Net debt to value ratio | 71% | 72% |
C&R share | 49.60% | 49.60% |
Garigal Asset Management GmbH, a German asset and property manager, is responsible for the asset and property management of the German property portfolio and the Group holds a 30% stake in Garigal.
EPRA performance measures
At 30 December 2012
2012 | 2011 | ||
EPRA earnings (£m) | 7.5 | 18.0 | |
EPRA earnings per share | 2p | 5p | |
EPRA net assets (£m) | 193.4 | 218.3 | |
EPRA net assets per share | 55p | 63p | |
EPRA triple net assets (£m) | 179.1 | 195.2 | |
EPRA triple net assets per share | 51p | 56p | |
EPRA net initial yield | 6.5% | 6.7% | |
EPRA topped-up net initial yield | 6.7% | 6.9% | |
EPRA vacancy rate (UK portfolio only) | 4.0% | 4.3% |
Reconciliation of EPRA net initial yield and EPRA topped-up net initial yield
2012 | 2011 | ||
£m | £m | ||
Investment property - wholly owned | 8.4 | 8.3 | |
Investment property - share of joint ventures and associates | 380.3 | 596.4 | |
Trading property | 72.5 | 72.0 | |
Less developments | (8.4) | (14.8) | |
Completed property portfolio | 452.8 | 661.9 | |
Allowance for capital costs | 8.4 | 6.2 | |
Allowance for estimated purchasers' costs | 35.0 | 40.0 | |
Grossed up completed property portfolio valuation | 496.2 | 708.1 | |
Annualised cash passing rental income | 36.8 | 51.4 | |
Property outgoings | (4.4) | (4.0) | |
Annualised net rents | 32.4 | 47.4 | |
Add: notional rent expiration of rent free periods or other lease incentives | 1.1 | 1.5 | |
Topped up annualised rent | 33.5 | 48.9 | |
EPRA net initial yield | 6.5% | 6.7% | |
EPRA topped-up net initial yield | 6.7% | 6.9% |
Covenant information
At 30 December 2012
See through borrowings | Covenant | 30 December | Future changes | |
£m | 2012 | |||
Core revolving credit facility | ||||
Asset cover | 1.0 | Greater than 200% | 6,547% | |
Gearing | - | Less than 100% | 2% | |
ICR | - | Greater than 150% | 2,291% | |
The Great Northern facility | ||||
LTV |
57.6 | 80% | 79% | |
ICR | - | Greater than 145% | 173% | |
The Mall | ||||
LTV | 115.0 | 83% | 67% | Reducing in stages to 65% by December 2014 |
ICR | - | Greater than 130% | 171% | |
Germany | ||||
LTV | ||||
Portfolio 1 | 15.8 | 75% | 72% | |
Portfolio 2 | 26.8 | 87%/93% | 69%/74% | |
Portfolio 3 | 40.9 | n/a | n/a | |
Portfolio 5 | 18.7 | 81% | 77% | |
Portfolio 6 | 22.1 | n/a | n/a | |
ICR | ||||
Portfolio 1 | - | Greater than 150% | 267% | |
Portfolio 2 | - | Greater than 150% | 222% | |
Portfolio 3 | - | Greater than 160% | 256% | |
Portfolio 5 | - | Greater than 120% | 186% | |
Portfolio 6 | - | Greater than 140% | 148% | |
Waterside Lincoln | ||||
LTV | 6.8 | 60% | 52% | |
ICR | - | Greater than 175% | 205% | |
Redditch | ||||
LTV | 17.2 | 76% | 65% | |
ICR | - | Greater than 125% | 205% | |
321.9 | ||||
Fund portfolio information (100% figures)
At 30 December 2012
The Mall | German Portfolio | |||
Physical data | ||||
Number of properties | 8 | 26 | ||
Number of lettable units | 967 | 198 | ||
Lettable space (sq feet - '000s) | 4,271 | 3,350 | ||
Valuation data | ||||
Properties at independent valuation (£m) | 850.8 | 338.9 | ||
Adjustments for head leases and tenant incentives (£m) | 46.7 | - | ||
Properties as shown in the financial statements (£m) | 897.5 | 338.9 | ||
Revaluation in the year (£m) | (38.7) | (3.1) | ||
Initial yield | 7.00% | 6.59% | ||
Equivalent yield | 7.49% | 6.12% | ||
Property level return | 0.96% | n/a | ||
Reversionary | 15.7% | n/a | ||
Loan to value ratio | 67% | 74% | ||
Net debt to value ratio | 55% | 71% | ||
Lease length (years) | ||||
Weighted average lease length to break | 8.2 | 7.8 | ||
Weighted average lease length to expiry | 9.0 | 7.8 | ||
Passing rent (£m) of leases expiring in: | ||||
2013 | 8.6 | 2.2 | ||
2014 | 3.9 | 3.2 | ||
2015-2017 | 19.3 | 5.9 | ||
ERV (£m) of leases expiring in: | ||||
2013 | 9.7 | n/a | ||
2014 | 5.0 | n/a | ||
2015-2017 | 20.0 | n/a | ||
Passing rent (£m) subject to review in: | ||||
2013 | 3.7 | n/a | ||
2014 | 6.7 | n/a | ||
2015-2017 | 15.5 | n/a | ||
ERV (£m) of passing rent subject to review in: | ||||
2013 | 3.5 | n/a | ||
2014 | 6.9 | n/a | ||
2015-2017 | 18.3 | n/a | ||
Rental Data | ||||
Contracted rent at year end (£m) | 71.8 | n/a | ||
Passing rent at year end (£m) | 68.4 | 26.0 | ||
ERV at year end (£m per annum) | 79.1 | n/a | ||
ERV movement (%) | (3.2)% | n/a | ||
Vacancy rate (%) | 3.0% | 2.1% | ||
Like for like net rental income under UK GAAP (100%) | ||||
Current year net rental income (£m) | ||||
Properties owned throughout 2011/2012 | 60.5 | 25.3 | ||
Disposals | 3.5 | 1.6 | ||
Net rental income | 64.0 | 26.9 | ||
Prior year net rental income (£m) | ||||
Properties owned throughout 2011/2012 | 64.0 | 23.9 | ||
Disposals | 13.7 | - | ||
Net rental income | 77.7 | 23.9 | ||
Other Data | ||||
Unit Price (£1.00 at inception) | £0.39 | n/a | ||
Group share | 20.15% | 49.60% |
Property information
At 30 December 2012
The Mall properties | |||||||||
Property | Description | Lettable space (sq feet) | Car park spaces | Principal occupiers | Number of lettable units | ||||
Valued at £125m plus | |||||||||
The Mall, Luton | Leasehold covered shopping centre on two floors, offices extending to over 65,000 sq ft | 994,000 | 2,300 | Debenhams, Boots, Primark, Next, Top Shop and Top Man, Marks & Spencer, Wilkinsons, River Island, Argos, TK Maxx | 167 | ||||
The Mall, Wood Green | Freehold, partially open shopping centre, on two floors with nearly 40,000 sq ft of offices | 558,000 | 1,500 | Primark, Cineworld, TK Maxx, Wilkinson, H&M, Boots, Argos, WH Smith, New Look | 104 | ||||
Valued at £75m to £125m | |||||||||
The Mall, Blackburn | Leasehold partially covered shopping centre on three floors | 575,000 | 1,304 | Primark, Debenhams, BHS, Next, H&M, New Look, JD Sports, Bank, Tesco, Boots, Argos | 126 | ||||
The Mall, Sutton Coldfield | Freehold partially open shopping centre on a single level with offices extending to approximately 30,000 sq ft | 559,000 | 960 | House of Fraser, BHS, Marks & Spencer, H&M, Boots, Argos, WH Smith | 112 | ||||
The Mall, Maidstone | Freehold covered shopping centre on three floors with offices extending to 40,000 sq ft | 538,000 | 1,050 | Boots, BHS, Wilkinson, New Look, Sportsworld | 103 | ||||
The Mall, Uxbridge | Leasehold single level covered shopping centre with 40,000 sq ft of offices | 428,000 | 1,150 | Marks & Spencer, Tesco, TK Maxx, Wilkinsons, Argos, Iceland | 121 | ||||
The Mall, Camberley | Part leasehold covered shopping centre on one floor | 401,000 | 1,040 | Argos, Boots, Sainsbury's, River Island, House of Fraser, Primark | 180 | ||||
The Mall, Walthamstow | Freehold covered shopping centre on two floors | 250,000 | 870 | Asda, BHS, Boots, Dixons, Top Shop, Top Man, River Island | 61 | ||||
Other properties | |||||||||
Property | Description | Lettable space (sq feet) | Principal occupiers | Number of lettable units | |||||
Valued at above £50m | |||||||||
Kingfisher Shopping Centre, Redditch | Freehold covered shopping centre on two principal trading levels | 914,000 | Marks & Spencer, Primark, Debenhams, BHS, Apollo, Next, H&M, New Look, Boots, Wilkinsons, TK Maxx | 160 | |||||
Great Northern Warehouse, Manchester | Freehold leisure property with multiplex cinema, casino and bars, health and fitness, restaurants and shops | 399,000 | All Star Lanes, AMC Cinema, Virgin Active, London Clubs International | 46 | |||||
Valued at below £50m | |||||||||
Waterside Shopping Centre, Lincoln (50%) | Freehold covered shopping centre on three floors | 118,000 | Primark, New Look, Top Shop, Superdrug | 46 | |||||
Leisure World, Hemel Hempstead | Redevelopment site | 160,000 | - | - | |||||
German properties1 | |||||||||
Property | Description | Lettable space (sq m) | Principal occupier | JV share | |||||
Valued at €50 million to €100 million | |||||||||
Dortmund | Retail park | 33,800 | Real | 100% | |||||
Valued at €20 million to €50 million | |||||||||
Lübeck | Retail park | 29,100 | Coop/Plaza | 100% | |||||
Hameln | Retail park | 16,800 | Kaufland | 95% | |||||
Moerfelden | Retail park | 12,200 | Rewe | 100% | |||||
Schwäbisch Hall | Retail park | 19,845 | Hela | 95% | |||||
Trier - Kenn | Hypermarket | 11,600 | Real | 100% | |||||
Ingelheim | Hypermarket | 10,200 | Real | 100% | |||||
Valued at €10 million to €20 million | |||||||||
Lauchhammer | Retail park | 17,700 | Marktkauf | 95% | |||||
Oschersleben | Retail park | 10,500 | Marktkauf & Toom | 95% | |||||
Marl | Retail park | 8,800 | Kaufland | 100% | |||||
Brühl | Hypermarket | 17,500 | Real | 100% | |||||
Sinzheim | Hypermarket | 16,500 | Real | 100% | |||||
Koln Gremberg | Hypermarket | 8,300 | Real | 100% | |||||
Herne | Hypermarket | 7,400 | Rewe & Toom | 100% | |||||
Bochum Langendreer | Hypermarket | 6,400 | Kaufland | 91.5% | |||||
Stadthagen | DIY | 10,900 | Hagebau | 100% | |||||
Balingen | DIY | 7,500 | Toom | 100% | |||||
Valued at less than €10 million | |||||||||
Bochum - Wattenscheid | Retail | 10,000 | Gota Tapeten | 100% | |||||
Sobernheim | Supermarket | 7,400 | Real | 95% | |||||
Leverkusen | Supermarket | 6,600 | Edeka & Total | 100% | |||||
Kreuztal | Supermarket | 6,400 | - | 94% | |||||
Heide | Supermarket | 4,600 | Aldi | 100% | |||||
Kirchheimbolanden | Supermarket | 2,500 | HIT Handelsgruppe | 100% | |||||
Taufkirchen2 | Supermarket & Retail | 5,000 | Rewe & AWG | 95% | |||||
Hosbach | DIY | 14,700 | Globus Fachmarkte | 100% | |||||
Aachen | DIY | 2,800 | Praktiker | 100% | |||||
Kirchheim | Petrol station | 2,400 | Real | 100% | |||||
1 Excluding German Portfolio 4 (see Note 17c of Group Financial statements).
2 Sold post year end.
Advisers and corporate information
Auditor | Principal valuers |
Deloitte LLP | CB Richard Ellis Limited |
2 New Street Square | Kingsley House |
London EC4A 3BZ | 1a Wimpole Street |
London W1G 0RE | |
Investment bankers/brokers | |
JP Morgan Cazenove | Cushman & Wakefield LLP |
25 Bank Street Canary Wharf | 43/45 Portman Square |
London E14 5JP | London W1A 3BG |
Numis Securities Limited | DTZ |
The London Stock Exchange Building | 48 Warwick Street |
10 Paternoster Square | London W1B 5NL |
London EC4M 7LT | |
Jones Lang LaSalle Limited | |
Principal legal advisors | 22 Hanover Square |
Olswang LLP | London W1S 1JA |
90 High Holborn | |
London WC1V 6XX | |
Principal lending bankers | |
Bank of Scotland Plc part of Lloyds Banking Group | |
25 Gresham Street | |
London EC2V 7HN | |
Registered office | Registered number |
52 Grosvenor Gardens | 1399411 |
London SW1W 0AU | |
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7932 8000 | |
Facsimile: +44 (0)20 7802 5600 | |
www.capreg.com | |
Shareholder information
Registrars | |
Equiniti Limited | |
Aspect House | |
Spencer Road | |
Lancing | |
West Sussex | |
BN99 6DA | |
Telephone: 0845 607 6838 | |
2013 financial calendar | |
Annual General Meeting | June 2013 |
2013 interim results | August 2013 |
2013 annual results | March 2014 |
For further information:
Capital & Regional: | |
Hugh Scott-Barrett, Chief Executive | Tel: 020 7932 8000 |
Charles Staveley, Group Finance Director | |
Maitland: | |
Martin Leeburn | Tel: 020 7379 5151 |
Emma Burdett | |
Daniel Yea |
Notes to editors:
About Capital & Regional plc
Capital & Regional is a specialist property company with a track record of developing asset management opportunities in town centre shopping centres and out of town retail parks.
Capital & Regional founded The Mall Fund in conjunction with Aviva Investors. Capital & Regional acts as Property and Asset Manager for the Mall and holds 20.3% of the Fund.
Capital & Regional & AREA Property Partners each hold a 50% interest in a German retail property portfolio which is managed by Garigal Asset Management GmbH, in which Capital & Regional holds a 30% interest.
Capital & Regional has a number of other joint ventures and wholly-owned properties.
For further information see www.capreg.com
Related Shares:
Capital & Regional