Final Results

AIM: CHL

CHURCHILL MINING PLC

("Churchill" or "the Company")

Full Year Results for the 12 Months ended 30 June 2012

Churchill Mining (AIM: CHL) reports its full year results for the 12 months ended 30 June 2012.

Chairman's Statement

Dear Shareholder,

I present Churchill Mining Plc's Full Year Report for the 12 months ended 30 June 2012.

Over the course of the last 12 months, the Company has continued to actively protect its interest in the East Kutai Coal Project ("EKCP") following the negative ruling from the Samarinda Administrative Tribunal wherein Churchill sought to overturn the East Kutai Regent's ("Bupati's") decision to revoke the EKCP licenses. Churchill's appeal of this decision to both the Administrative High Court in Jakarta and the Supreme Court of Indonesia was unsuccessful.

The Company believes that the actions of the Bupati and the subsequent Indonesian Court decisions have brought into serious question the ability of foreign companies to invest in long-term, high value projects in Indonesia.

During the year, the Company made several attempts to resolve the matter directly with the Government of Indonesia. In November 2011 and again in April 2012, the Company wrote formally to the President of the Republic of Indonesia requesting support in reaching an amicable solution. The Company did not receive any response from the President and has experienced a lack of support at all levels of the Government of Indonesia with regard to Churchill's contentions on the treatment of its investment in the EKCP.

International Arbitration against the Republic of Indonesia

Churchill filed for international arbitration against the Republic of Indonesia for breaches of Indonesia's obligations under the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Indonesia (the "UK-Indonesia BIT").

The claim was filed on 22 May 2012 at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID") in Washington D.C. In the ICSID arbitration, Churchill is seeking the full relief owed to it under the provisions of the UK-Indonesia BIT and under international law. The Company looks forward to now addressing and rectifying these issues on the independent platform that international arbitration at ICSID provides.

In light of the on-going EKCP dispute and the international arbitration, further additions to the Board have been made. In May 2012, Mr John Nagulendran joined the Board as a Non-Executive Director and in September 2012 the Board also appointed Mr Nicholas Smith as Managing Director.

Both Mr Nagulendran and Mr Smith bring with them extensive experience in advising companies in the complexities of international law. Mr Nagulendran was previously a practicing lawyer at international law firm Herbet Smith LLP where he specialised in the natural resources sector. Similarly, Mr Smith has more than 30 years' experience in the international resource and resource development industry, including significant experience in project management of major international litigation and arbitration disputes.

We are very pleased to have both of them as part of the Board and their skillsets will be invaluable as the Company progresses its claims in ICSID arbitration against the Republic of Indonesia.

The ICSID arbitration has in effect become Churchill's principal activity and focus for the Company going forward, and the Board remains committed to pursuing an appropriate remedy and restoring value for its shareholders.

On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank shareholders for their continued support and we will continue to update shareholders on the progress during the course of the year.

David Quinlivan

Executive Chairman

24 October 2012

The full report and accounts for the period ended 30 June 2012 are available on the Company's website www.churchillmining.com and will be sent to shareholders.

For further information, please contact:

REVIEW OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCE

COMPANY BACKGROUND AND STRATEGY

Churchill Mining Plc ("Churchill" or "the Company") was listed on AIM in April 2005. Churchill's growth path accelerated following the discovery of a world-class thermal coal deposit at the East Kutai Coal Project ("EKCP") in the East Kutai Regency of Kalimantan, Indonesia, through an intensive and targeted exploration program. 

Churchill had taken the EKCP through to feasibility in readiness for funding and the commencement of construction. The Company and its Indonesian partners, the Ridlatama Group ("Ridlatama"), were then subject to a negative ruling from the Samarinda Administrative Tribunal that confirmed the East Kutai Regent's ("Bupati's") previous decision to revoke the EKCP licenses. Churchill and Ridlatama appealed the Samarinda Administrative Tribunal's decision to the Administrative High Court in Jakarta and the Supreme Court of Indonesia but were unsuccessful in both avenues of appeal. Churchill has subsequently filed international arbitration proceedings against the Republic of Indonesia at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID") for breaches of Indonesia's obligations under the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Indonesia (the "UK-Indonesia BIT").

EAST KUTAI COAL PROJECT

Churchill continues to believe the EKCP is a highly strategic asset, ideally located both in relation to core energy consuming markets, and in the context of rising demand for energy resources such as high quality thermal coal. The completion of the EKCP Feasibility Study in September 2010 confirmed the technical and economic feasibility of the project. The investment evaluation, modelled over an initial 25-year period, indicated that the project has a pre-tax net present value of US$1.8 billion, an internal rate of return of 21% and a payback period of seven years. The September 2010 Feasability Study demonstrates that the EKCP is a world-class thermal coal deposit which is ideally positioned to supply the growing energy needs from China and India, as well as Indonesia.

In January 2011, Churchill completed the purchase of the land to be used as the site of the future port facility for the shipment of coal from the EKCP. In conjunction with this purchase, Churchill received sign-off on the port site from the Indonesian Department of Transportation, thus initiating the land acquisition process in cooperation with the local community and relevant Indonesian Government departments. The location of the port facility is a key component for the direct access of exporting thermal coal to the international markets.

EKCP Licenses

On 3 March 2011, the local Samarinda Administrative Tribunal issued a decision against Churchill and its Indonesian partner Ridlatama, finding that the Bupati's attempted cancellation of the EKCP licenses did not contravene administrative regulations. The Company and Ridlatama rejected the decision of the Samarinda Administrative Tribunal and lodged an appeal to the Administrative High Court in Jakarta. On 19 August 2011, the Company was advised that this appeal had been dismissed and that the Administrative High Court had upheld the decision of the Samarinda Administrative Tribunal.

The Company and Ridlatama immediately moved to file notice of appeal to the Supreme Court of Indonesia, with a subsequent filing of Memoranda of appeal on the 26 September 2011. In April 2012, Churchill was advised that notations on the Indonesian Supreme Court's register of cases showed the Supreme Court had rejected the appeal by Churchill and Ridlatama. In June 2012, the written decisions confirming the rejections of the appeal were delivered to the Samarinda Administrative Tribunal and notified to Churchill and Ridlatama.

As noted in the Chairman's Statement, the Company has made several approaches to the Indonesian Government seeking an amicable solution. The Company has not received any support from the Indonesian Government and was left with no alternative than to commence international arbitration proceedings at ICSID against the Republic of Indonesia pursuant to the UK-Indonesia BIT.

Due to the actions of the Bupati, and the negative decisions by the Indonesian Courts, the activities at the EKCP site were suspended. This has resulted in a loss of local employment and community development projects. While the East Kutai population has continued to strongly support Churchill's endeavors to maintain and develop the EKCP, the actions of the Indonesian Government have had a negative economic impact on the economy of East Kutai and East Kalimantan. Churchill has had to reduce its corporate and administration overheads within Indonesia, which is in line with turning its focus to the international arbitration proceedings at ICSID.

FILING OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CLAIM

On 22 May 2012, Churchill filed its Request for Arbitration at ICSID against the Republic of Indonesia for breaches of Indonesia's obligations under the UK-Indonesia BIT. In the ICSID arbitration, Churchill is seeking the full relief owed to it under the provisions of the UK-Indonesia BIT and under international law.

On 22 June 2012, ICSID notified the parties that Churchill's Request for Arbitration had been registered at ICSID. The Company is now focused on the ICSID arbitration and will be pursuing an appropriate remedy and restoring value for its shareholders.

The Company has also moved to strengthen its management team to assist with the ICSID arbitration, with Mr John Nagulendran and Mr Nicholas Smith joining the Board of the Company. Both appointees bring extensive experience in international law, international arbitration and litigation project management to the Company.

During October 2012 the constitution of the arbitral panel was finalised at ICSID that will hear Churchill's international arbitration claim against the Republic of Indonesia. Now that the ICSID arbitral panel is formally constituted, the next phase of the international arbitration, namely the investigation and determination of the merits of Churchill's claim will proceed.

Churchill's 100% owned Australian subsidiary Planet Mining Pty Ltd "Planet" (which via its 5% shareholding in PT Indonesia Coal Development held an interest in the East Kutai Coal Project), has through its attorneys recently written to His Excellency the President of Indonesia stating that the expropriation of its interest in the East Kutai Coal Project breached Planet's rights under the Australia-Indonesia Bilateral Investment Treaty. In the absence of there being an amicable resolution to this Planet/Republic of Indonesia dispute, Planet will file its own Request for Arbitration before ICSID pursuant to the Australia-Indonesia Bilateral Investment Treaty.

RIDLATAMA GROUP

In July 2011, the Company's Indonesian subsidiary PT Indonesia Coal Development ("ICD") delivered a notice of dispute to its Indonesian minority partner, Ridlatama, as well as several individuals related to Ridlatama, with regards to the EKCP. ICD subsequently commenced arbitration proceedings in Singapore under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce, against other members of Ridlatama who are parties to the investor's agreements, for their alleged breaches of the said agreements. A hearing has been held on jurisdictional objections with the tribunal issuing its interim award finding in favour of ICD and dismissing Ridlatama's preliminary jurisdiction challenge.

ICD has also filed an unlawful act claim against Mr Andreas Rinaldi, one of the controllers of Ridlatama in the Tangerang District Court in Jakarta. Both ICD (the Claimant) and Mr Rinaldi (the Defendant) were in agreement that the parties before the Court were incomplete. ICD asked the Court to dismiss the claim on that basis. The District Court decided to dismiss ICD's claim against Rinaldi in its entirety on the grounds that ICD did not submit any evidence to support its claim, and not that the parties were incomplete. ICD unsuccessfully appealed the District Court's decision to the High Court in Jakarta and has submitted a further appeal to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the decision of which is pending.

During September 2011, the Company filed an application seeking a court order for a shareholders meeting to be called for PT Ridlatama Tambang Mineral (75% indirect subsidiary) to replace the existing Director/Commissioners with members of the Churchill Board. The Company was advised on 13 March 2012 that the application was unsuccessful. Churchill has appealed that decision to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the decision of which is pending. The Company is also currently considering its alternatives in relation to this matter.

In November 2011, ICD received notices that members of Ridlatama had filed two unlawful act claims in the South Jakarta District Court seeking orders that ICD's 75% interest in PT Ridlatama Tambang Mineral and PT Trade Powerindo be declared null and void. These court proceedings remain on foot. ICD considers the Ridlatama claim to have no commercial or legal merit and will continue to take whatever action it deems necessary to fully protect its legal rights in this matter.

OTHER ASSETS

In addition to the EKCP, Churchill continued to maintain its 20% direct interest in the original South Woodie Woodie Manganese Project in Western Australia, with the balance held by ASX listed Spitfire Resources Limited (ASX: SPI). During the year the Group's direct shareholding in Spitfire Resources Limited was diluted from 18.44% to 15.99% by additional equity issues by Spitfire in which the Group did not participate.

OUTLOOK

The cash position at 30 June 2012 of $12.0 million is healthy and allows a solid base to continue Churchill's international arbitration claim over the coming year.

CORPORATE

FINANCIAL SUMMARY

Results of Operations

The Group incurred a loss for the year of US$10,443,956 compared to a loss of US$38,278,947 for the previous year. The 2011 result included an impairment of the value of the EKCP of US$27,897,416. The basic loss per ordinary share for the year was 8.61c compared with the loss per share of 38.57c for the previous year.

Significant expenditure items during the period include:

·; Legal and professional fees of US$2.64 million (2011: US$3.32 million) which includes significant costs incurred to protect the EKCP licenses and then the subsequent filing of its claim in international arbitration against the Republic of Indonesia;

·; Consulting, directors and professional fees of US$2.18 million (2011: US$2.55 million);

·; Exploration and evaluation expenditure of US$1.46 million (2011: US$27.89 million); and

·; Public relations and media outreach programs US$1.26 million (2011: US$0.030 million);

The balance of operating expenditure is in line with the Company's current status including consulting and management resources allocated to the EKCP legal proceedings and filing of international arbitration.

During May/June 2012 a number of staff within the EKCP and Jakarta office were made redundant due to the negative result of the Supreme Court decision in relation to the appeal against the revocation of the EKCP licenses.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the year ended 30 June 2012

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

As at 30 June 2012

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

The financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 24 October 2012 and were signed on its behalf by:

David Quinlivan

Director

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

For the year ended 30 June 2012

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the year ended 30 June 2012

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended 30 June 2012

NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

IAS 8 requires that management shall use its judgement in developing and applying accounting policies that result in information which is relevant to the economic decision-making needs of users; that are reliable, free from bias, prudent, complete and represent faithfully the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the entity.

BASIS OF PREPARATION

The Group financial statements have been prepared and approved by the Directors in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS's and IFRIC interpretations, issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (ISAB) as endorsed for use in the EU ("Endorsed IFRSs") and those parts of the Companies Act 2006 that are applicable to companies that prepare their financial statements under IFRS.

The financial information for the years ended 30 June 2012 does not constitute statutory accounts as defined by section 435 of the Companies Act 2006 but is extracted from the audited accounts for those years. The 30 June 2012 accounts will be delivered to Companies House within the statutory filing deadline. The auditors have reported on those accounts; their report was unqualified and did not contain statements under Section 498 (2) of (3) of the Companies Act 2006.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

New standards and interpretations applied

The IASB has issued the following new standards, amendments to published standards and interpretations to existing standards with effective dates prior to 1 July 2011 which have been adopted by the Group for the first time this year and which have not had a material effect:

New standards and interpretations not yet effective

Certain new standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards have been published that are mandatory for the Group's accounting periods beginning after 1 July 2012 or later periods and which the Group has decided not to adopt early. These are:

[* Not yet adopted by the European Union.]

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Finance income

Interest income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that asset's net carrying amount.

Basis of consolidation

Where the Company has the power, either directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of another entity or business so as to obtain benefits from its activities, it is classified as a subsidiary. The consolidated financial statements present the results of the Company and its subsidiaries ("the Group") as if they formed a single entity. Intercompany transactions and balances between Group companies are therefore eliminated in full.

The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the Group's financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.

Non-controlling interests are presented in the statement of financial position within equity, separately from equity attributable to the equity shareholders of the Company and in respect of the statement of comprehensive income are presented on the face as an allocation of the total profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year between non-controlling interests and the equity shareholders of the Company.

Business combinations

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the results of the business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting.

In the consolidated statement of financial position, the acquiree's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are initially recognised at their fair values at the acquisition date. The results of acquired operations are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income from the date on which control is obtained.

Associates

Where the Group has the power to participate in (but not control) the financial and operating policy decisions of another entity, it is classified as an associate. Associates are initially recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position at cost. The Group's share of post-acquisition profits and losses is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, except that losses in excess of the Group's investment in the associate are not recognised unless there is an obligation to make good those losses.

Profits and losses arising on transactions between the Group and its associates are recognised only to the extent of unrelated investors' interests in the associate. The investor's share in the associate's profits and losses resulting from these transactions is eliminated against the carrying value of the associate.

Any premium paid for an associate above the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired is capitalised and included in the carrying amount of the associate. The carrying amount of investment in an associate is subject to impairment.Where there is objective evidence that the investment in an associate has been impaired the carrying amount of the investment is tested for impairment in the same way as other non-financial assets.

Jointly controlled assets

Jointly controlled assets are arrangements in which the Group holds an interest on a long term basis which are jointly controlled by the Group and one or more ventures' under a contractual arrangement. The Group's exploration, development and production activities are sometimes conducted jointly with other companies in this way. Since these arrangements do not constitute entities in their own right, the consolidated financial statements reflect the relevant proportion of costs, revenues, assets and liabilities applicable to the Group's interests.

Foreign currency

Transactions entered into by Group entities in a currency other than the currency of the primary economic environment in which they operate (the "functional currency") are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the rates ruling at the reporting date. Exchange differences arising on the retranslation of unsettled monetary assets and liabilities are recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive income.

The consolidated financial information is presented in US dollars ($), which is the functional and presentation currency of the Company. On consolidation, the results of overseas operations are translated into US$ at rates approximating to those when the transactions took place. All assets and liabilities of overseas operations are translated at the rate ruling at the reporting date. Exchange differences arising on translating the opening net assets at opening rate and the results of overseas operations at actual rate are recognised directly in the statement of changes in equity (the "foreign exchange reserve"). Exchange differences recognised in the statement of comprehensive income of group entities' separate financial statements on the translation of long-term monetary items forming part of the Group's net investment in the overseas operation concerned are reclassified to the foreign exchange reserve if the item is denominated in the functional currency of the Company or the overseas operation concerned. On disposal of a foreign operation, the cumulative exchange differences recognised in the foreign exchange reserve relating to that operation up to the date of disposal are transferred to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as part of the profit or loss on disposal.

Financial instruments

Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised when the Group and Company become party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are de-recognised when the contractual right to the cash flow expires or when substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred. Financial liabilities are de-recognised when the obligations specified in the contract are either discharged or cancelled.

Financial assets

The Group and Company classify their financial assets into one of the following categories, depending on the purpose for which the asset was acquired. The Group's and Company's accounting policy for each category is as follows:

(i) Available-for-sale

Financial assets designated as available for sale are initially recognised at fair value, being the consideration given including, where appropriate, acquisition costs associated with the investment. The Group's investments in quoted shares are designated as 'available-for-sale' financial assets and are included in non-current assets. Such investments are subsequently carried at fair value, with any gains or losses arising from changes in fair value being recognised in equity. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cashflows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Fair value is based on market value at the balance sheet date.

The Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. In the case of a financial asset classified as available-for-sale, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the financial asset below its cost is considered as an indicator that the financial asset is impaired. If any such evidence exists for available-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss - measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in the income statement - is removed from equity and recognised in the income statement. Impairment losses recognised in the income statement on financial assets which are equity instruments are not reversed through the income statement.

(ii) Loans and receivables

These assets are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They incorporate various types of contractual monetary assets, such as advances made to affiliated entities which give rise to other receivables and cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand and deposits held at call with banks. Other receivables are carried at cost less any provision for impairment. Impairment provisions are recognised when there is objective evidence (such as significant financial difficulties on the part of the counterparty) that the Group will be unable to collect all of the amounts due under the terms of the receivable, the amount of such a provision being the difference between the net carrying amount and the present value of the future expected cash flows associated with the impaired receivable.

Financial liabilities

The Group's financial liabilities consist of trade payables, other short-term monetary liabilities, and long term liabilities which are initially stated at fair value and subsequently at their amortised cost.

Provisions

Provisions are recognised for liabilities of uncertain timing or amount that have arisen as a result of past transactions and are discounted at a pre-tax rate reflecting current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability.

Fair value measurement hierarchy

IFRS 7 requires certain disclosures which require the classification of financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:

(a) quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1);

(b) inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices) (Level 2); and

(c) inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (Level 3).

The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the financial asset or financial liability is categorised is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety into only one of the three levels.

Share-based payments

Where share options are awarded to Directors and employees, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is charged to the statement of comprehensive income immediately or over the vesting period if applicable. Non-market vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each reporting date so that, ultimately, the cumulative amount recognised over the vesting period is based on the number of options that eventually vest. Market vesting conditions are factored into the fair value of the options granted. As long as all other vesting conditions are satisfied, a charge is made irrespective of whether the market vesting conditions are satisfied. The cumulative expense is not adjusted for failure to achieve a market vesting condition.

Where equity instruments are granted to persons other than employees, the statement of comprehensive income is charged with the fair value of goods and services received or where this is not possible at the fair value of the equity instruments granted. Fair value is measured by use of an option pricing model. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.

When the Company grants options over its shares to employees of subsidiaries, the fair value at grant date is recognised as an increase in the investment in subsidiaries, with a corresponding increase in equity over the vesting period of the grant.

Exploration, evaluation and development expenditure

In line with IFRS 6 'Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources', exploration and evaluation expenditure can be capitalised as an intangible asset in respect of each area of interest. This expenditure includes:

·; Acquisition of rights to explore;

·; Topographical, geological, geochemical and geophysical studies;

·; Exploratory drilling;

·; Trenching;

·; Sampling; and

·; Activities in relation to evaluating the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource.

Capitalisation of exploration and evaluation expenditure commences on the acquisition of a right to explore a specific area or evaluate a mineral resource, either by means of the acquisition of an exploration licence or an option to a mineral right and ceases either on the acquisition of a mining lease or mineral production right in respect of that specific area or mineral resource or the making of a decision by management of the Group as to the technical feasibility or economic viability of conducting mining operations in that specific area or extracting the mineral resource being evaluated.

Where management of the Group decide that it is not technically feasible or economically viable to conduct mining operations in a specific area or to extract the mineral resource being evaluated, then capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure attributable to the exploration and evaluation of that specific area or mineral resource, as the case may be, capitalised up to the date of making such a decision, is written off and any further exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred in respect thereof is charged to profit or loss as and when incurred. Management reviews the levels of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure for each area of interest on a regular basis and where deemed appropriate either continues to carry forward costs or impair expenditure based on management estimates of recoverable values for each area of interest.

Assets used exclusively in activities in respect of the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources are classified as property, plant and equipment. Depreciation charges reflecting the consumption of these assets in carrying out such activities are included in exploration and evaluation expenditure.

On 3 March 2011 the Company announced that it had received a negative ruling from the Samarinda Administrative Tribunal in relation to the licenses that make up the East Kutai Coal Project ("the EKCP").

The Company and Ridlatama rejected the conclusions of the Tribunal and lodged appeals to the Administrative High Court in Jakarta and Supreme Court of Indonesia which were both unsuccessful.

In accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards the Directors have impaired the full carrying amount of EKCP within intangible assets at 30 June 2011 and have subsequently impaired any further exploration and evaluation expenditure.

Property, plant and equipment

Items of property, plant and equipment are initially recognised at cost. As well as the purchase price, cost includes directly attributable costs and the estimated present value of any future costs of dismantling and removing items if applicable. The corresponding liability is recognised within provisions. Depreciation is provided on all items of property and equipment to write off the carrying value of items over their expected useful economic lives as follows:

Taxation

Tax on the profit or loss from ordinary activities includes current and deferred tax.

Current tax is based on the profit or loss adjusted for items that are non-assessable or disallowed and is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

Tax is charged or credited to statement of comprehensive income, except when the tax relates to items credited or charged directly to equity, in which case the tax is also dealt with in equity.

Deferred taxation

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised where the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the statement of financial position differs to its tax base, except for differences arising on:

·; The initial recognition of goodwill;

·; The initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which is not a business combination and at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting or taxable profit; and

·; Investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities where the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the difference and it is probable that the difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Recognition of deferred tax assets is restricted to those instances where it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the difference can be utilised.

The amount of the asset or liability is determined using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date and are expected to apply when the deferred tax liabilities/ (assets) are settled/ (recovered).

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when the Group has a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority on either:

·; The same taxable Group Company; or

·; Different Group entities which intend either to settle current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis or to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously, in each future period in which significant amounts of deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or recovered.

Tax consolidation

The Company and its 100% Australian controlled entities have formed a tax consolidation Group. Members of the tax consolidated Group intend to enter into a tax sharing arrangement which will allow for the allocation of income tax expense to the wholly controlled entities on a pro rata basis. The arrangement will provide for the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities should the head entity default on its tax payment obligations. The head entity of the tax consolidated Group is Churchill Mining Plc.

Leased assets

Where substantially all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of a leased asset have been transferred to the Group (a "finance lease"), the asset is treated as if it had been purchased outright. The amount initially recognised as an asset is the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments payable over the term of the lease. The corresponding lease commitment is shown as a liability.

Lease payments are analysed between capital and interest. The interest element is charged to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income over the period of the lease and is calculated so that it represents a constant proportion of the lease liability. The capital element reduces the balance owed to the lessor.

Where substantially all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership are not transferred to the Group (an "operating lease"), the total rentals payable under the lease are charged to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The aggregate benefit of lease incentives is recognised as a reduction of the rental expense over the lease term on a straight-line basis. The land and buildings elements of property leases are considered separately for the purposes of lease classification.

Impairment of non-financial assets

Impairment tests on intangible assets and tangible assets with indefinite useful economic lives are undertaken annually on 30 June. Where the carrying value of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount (i.e. the higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell), the asset is written down accordingly.

Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the impairment test is carried out on the asset's cash-generating unit (i.e. the lowest level group of assets in which the asset belongs for which there are separately identifiable cash flows).

Impairment charges are included within total administration expenses in the statement of comprehensive income, except to the extent that they reverse gains previously recognised in the statement of changes in equity.

Segment reporting

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker, who is the Managing Director, under his delegated board authority, is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments.

Investments

In its separate financial statements, the Company recognises its investments in subsidiaries at cost inclusive of share based payments less any provision for impairment.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash comprises bank and cash deposits at variable interest rates. Any interest earned is accrued monthly and classified as interest income. Cash equivalents comprise short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.

Employee benefits

Provision is made for the Company's liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees. Employee benefits that are expected to be settled within one year have been measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liability is settled. Employee benefits payable later than one year have been measured at the present value of the estimated future cash flows to be made for those benefits.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty

The Group makes estimates and assumptions regarding the future. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated based on historical experiences and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. In the future, actual experience may deviate from these estimates and assumptions. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are as follows:

·; Exploration and evaluation costs are capitalised as intangible assets and are assessed for impairment when circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may exceed the recoverable value thereof. This assessment involves judgement as to the likely future commerciality of the asset and when such commerciality should be determined as well as future revenues and costs pertaining to the utilisation of the mining lease or mineral production rights to which such capitalised costs relate and the discount rate to be applied to such future revenues and costs in order to determine a recoverable value. Refer to the policy for Exploration, evaluation and development expenditure;

·; While conducting an impairment review of its assets, the Group exercises judgement in making assumptions about future commodity prices, mineral reserves/resources and future development and production costs. By their nature, impairment reviews include significant estimates regarding future financial resources and commercial and technical feasibility to enable the successful realisation of the exploration expenditure. Changes in the estimates used can result in significant charges to the statement of comprehensive income; and

·; Employee, corporate advisory and consulting services received, and the corresponding increase in equity, are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date of grant, excluding the impact of any non market vesting conditions. The fair value of share options is estimated by using an option pricing model, on the date of grant based on certain assumptions. Those assumptions are described in the Notes to the accounts and include, among others, the dividend growth rate, expected volatility, expected life of the options and number of options expected to vest. More details including carrying values are disclosed in the Notes to the accounts.

NOTE 2: FINANCE INCOME

NOTE 3: LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

NOTE 4: SALARIES

Key management consists of the Board of Directors, the Company Secretary, the Chief Financial Officer and the Community Development Manager.

The Company provides Directors' & Officers' liability insurance at a cost of $40,278 (2011: $26,820). This cost is not included in the above table.

NOTE 5: TAXATION ON LOSS FOR THE YEAR

No amounts of deferred tax assets or liabilities have been charged/(credited) to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income or reserves. The deductible temporary differences and domestic tax losses being $18,897,000 (2011: $14,440,000) do not expire under current tax legislation. Indonesian tax losses expire after five years. Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of these items because at this point in the Group's development it is not probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the Group can utilise the benefits of tax losses. The Group has not offset deferred tax assets across different jurisdictions.

Foreign tax losses in relation to the Indonesian subsidiary PT Indonesia Coal Development expire as follows:

*Estimate based on the actual loss for 2011/2012

NOTE 6: LOSS PER SHARE

NOTE 7: LOSS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR

The Company has taken advantage of the exemption as allowed by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 and has not presented its own statement of comprehensive income in these financial statements. The Company loss for the year was $11,424,707 (2011: Loss $51,085,087).

NOTE 8: OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS

Prior to 2 December 2010, the investment in ASX listed Spitfire Resources Limited was held as an associate and equity accounted. Post 2 December 2010, the Spitfire holding was accounted for as an available-for-sale financial asset. This was because the group's holding reduced from 21.74% to 18.44% which resulted in the loss of significant influence. Further equity issues in which the group did not participate reduced the group's holding in Spitfire to 15.99%.

Spitfire Resources Limited ("Spitfire") shares are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange ("ASX") and are classified as a listed investment. The fair value of the investment using the closing prices at 30 June 2012 was $2,006,403 (2011: $4,370,480) based on a closing price of A$0.079 (US$0.080) (2011: A$0.165 (US$0.175).

NOTE 9: SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Group's reportable segments are set out below and include the Indonesian based exploration operation and the Australian corporate office which is an administrative cost centre and includes costs relating to the AIM listing in the United Kingdom.

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the board. The operating results of the segments are regularly reviewed by the board in order to make decisions about the allocation of resources and to assess their performance.

NOTE 10: OTHER RECEIVABLES

The Group's exposure to credit and currency risk related to other receivables is disclosed in Note 21.

NOTE 11: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

NOTE 12: INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Group retains a 20% interest in the original South Woodie Woodie Manganese Project in which Spitfire Resources Limited continues to hold an interest. The Group is "free-carried" on its share of exploration costs in respect of its 20% interest until a decision to mine is made in relation to the project. An amount of US$250,777 (2011: US$261,543) is included within the exploration and evaluation asset above.

NOTE 13: INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES

The principal subsidiaries of Churchill Mining Plc, all of which have been included in these consolidated financial statements, are as follows:

*Undertaking held indirectly by the Company.

Churchill Mining Plc owns 95% of the shares in PT Indonesia Coal Development with the balance (5%) held by Planet Mining Proprietary Ltd. Post the year end the Company commenced the process of de-registering the subsidiary companies in Singapore and Luxemburg.

Movements of investments in subsidiaries during the period are:

The intercompany loans are unsecured, non-interest bearing and repayable on demand.

NOTE 14: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES