13th Jun 2005 14:33
BHP Billiton PLC13 June 2005 13 June 2005 To: London Stock Exchange Australian Stock Exchange cc: New York Stock Exchange Swiss Stock Exchange JSE Securities Exchange SA Deutsche Bank UBS Zurich For Announcement to the Market Extraordinary General Meeting of BHP Billiton Plc Please find attached an address to shareholders delivered by the Chairman at the BHP Billiton Plc Extraordinary General Meeting in London on 13 June 2005. Yours sincerely Karen WoodCompany Secretary BHP Billiton Plc EGM 13 June 2005 DON ARGUS, CHAIRMAN, BHP BILLITON Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen and welcome to this Extraordinary GeneralMeeting of BHP Billiton Plc. My name is Don Argus and I will Chair today's meeting. As a quorum is present I declare the meeting open. Before we turn to the business of the meeting let me introduce you to ourCompany Secretary, Karen Wood, who is sitting on my right. Also here this afternoon are David Jenkins and Michael Chaney, two of ournon-executive directors. Chris Jenkins, representing the Group's externalauditors KPMG, is also present. I propose to take the Notice of Meeting as read. If you need a copy of theNotice, please ask one of the attendants. Let me now turn to today's business. As explained in my letter of 11 May this meeting has been convened to address atechnical issue that has arisen in respect of the final dividend for the yearended 30 June 2004 paid to shareholders on 22 September. Let me explain: Under the Companies Act, dividends paid may not exceed the total of thedistributable profits that are reported in the last annual accounts laid beforethe company in general meeting. In our case these were the accounts laid before the 2003 AGM. The company has traditionally paid two dividends each year. The two dividend payments proposed for 2004 totalled 407 million US dollars. The distributable profits in the 2003 accounts were 603 million US dollars - so the two dividend payments were within the amount available for distribution. However, during 2004 we decided to pay three dividends. We did this so that we could align the dividend payment dates to the dates onwhich we announced our half and full year results. The third dividend paid was 234 million US dollars. The total of the three dividends was 641 million US dollars. This was 38 million US dollars more than the distributable profits in the 2003accounts. We have described this as a technical breach because by the time the thirddividend was paid, the 2004 accounts had been prepared and audited and thedistributable profits in those accounts exceeded 641 million US dollars. However, those 2004 accounts had not been laid before the annual generalmeeting. This did not take place until November. Let me make three important points: 1. By the time the third dividend was paid, BHP Billiton Plc had more than enough distributable profits to make all three dividend payments; 2. If BHP Billiton Plc's AGM had been held before the third payment there would have been no breach; and 3. As little comfort as this might be - this sort of technical breach is not unusual in the UK market. We very much regret the inconvenience to shareholders that has arisen as aresult of this issue and - although I don't expect we will encounter this issueagain - we have put in place processes to ensure it does not. So what are we asking you to consider today? The first motion is designed to: •rectify the technical breach by sanctioning the appropriation of profits to the final dividend payment in 2004; •waive any rights the Company may have against shareholders and directors who received the dividend and against past and present directors who approved the payment; and •approve the Company entering into deeds of release in favour of such shareholders and directors. The second motion is the cancellation of the Company's share premium accountwhich will increase the Company's distributable profits and provide "headroom"for the Company to pay future dividends to shareholders. As a result of the complexities associated with the Group's structure, however,the Company is not yet certain whether the cancellation will be achievable andaccordingly passage of the resolution today will not necessarily mean we will goforward with the cancellation. The Notice of Meeting provides information, which the Board believes to bematerial to you in deciding whether or not to approve the motions to be put toyou. Before I ask you to vote let me first outline some procedural matters. A poll will be taken for both items and I now open the polls. If you are entitled to vote, you will have been given a voting paper which is onthe back of the green admission card. Only shareholders and their representatives, proxies and attorneys are entitledto vote. The number of proxies that have been received for each item will then bedisplayed on the screen. I will now explain how the voting papers should be completed. You can exercise all your votes, "for" or .... .... "against" each of the resolutions by placing a mark in the appropriate box. If you wish, you can allocate some of your votes "for" and some "against" bywriting the applicable number in the appropriate boxes. You may also express this as a percentage if you would prefer. Proxy holders who have been instructed to vote in a particular manner shouldvote in that way. By completing and lodging a voting paper, proxy holders aretaken to vote in accordance with those instructions. Let me remind you of my intention that was set out in the Proxy Form - that is -that I will be casting discretionary votes that have been given to me in favourof each of the items of business. At the conclusion of the meeting, completed voting papers should be placed inthe box that is by the exit door. Mr John Miller of Computershare Investor Services has been appointed Scrutineer. If you are in any doubt as to the procedure, please raise your hand and one ofthe attendants will assist you. We will now turn to the items of business. The first item of business, which is on the screen, is the proposal to: • sanction the appropriation of profits to that dividend payment; • waive any rights of the Company against shareholders who received the dividend and against both past and present directors who approved the payment of the dividend; and • approve the Company entering into deeds of release in favour of such shareholders and directors. As I was in office at the time the final dividend for 2004 was declared andpaid, I formally declare my interest in the subject matter of this motion.I have received a letter from Mr Carlos Cordeiro, in his capacity as anindependent non-executive director, appointed after the approval of the finaldividend in 2004 confirming his belief that this proposal is in the bestinterests of the Company and its Shareholders and asking that I move the motiontoday on his behalf. Are there any questions on Motion 1? Since there are no questions, I now propose motion 1. I ask you now to complete your voting paper in respect of item 1. The proxy results for the first item are now displayed on the screen. At the bottom of the slide, you will see the number of 'Open" - ordiscretionary- votes to me as Chairman. As I have explained, these "Open" voteswill be voted by me in favour of the items of business. The second item of business is the cancellation of the Company's share premiumaccount. Are there any questions on Motion 2? If there are no more questions, I now propose motion 2 that the Company's sharepremium account be cancelled. I ask you now to complete your voting paper in respect of item 2. The proxy results for the second item are now displayed on the screen. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for attending. Please don't forget to place your voting papers in the box beside the exit asyou leave. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock ExchangeRelated Shares:
BHP Group