26th Jul 2011 07:00
26 July 2011
Mwana Africa PLC
("Mwana", the "Group" or the "Company")
Audited results for the year to 31 March 2011
Mwana Africa PLC is pleased to announce its audited financial results for the year to 31 March 2011.
Financial Highlights
·; Group revenues up £8.5m to £27.3m (2010: £18.8m), of which Freda Rebecca contributed £23.4m (2010: £6.0m)
·; Reduced loss for the Group of £7.2m (2010: £14.4m)
·; Reduced loss attributable to Mwana Africa shareholders of £2.1m (2010: £14.5m loss)
·; Impairment reversal of £11.7m at Freda Rebecca due to the successful restart and production ramp up
·; Exploration spend: £7.7m (2010: £4.0m)
·; Share placement of 46.4m shares in November 2010 raised approximately £4.8m net of expenses
·; Drawdown of $4m by Freda Rebecca under its IDC facility in February 2011
Operational highlights
·; Freda Rebecca production:
o 27,240 ounces of gold in the year to March 2011 (2010: 8,550 ounces-six months production)
·; Increased gold resource at Zani-Kodo announced in July 2010:
o the Indicated Mineral Resource increased to 256koz and the Inferred Mineral Resource increased to 998koz, based on a cut-off grade of 1.0g/t gold;
·; Detailed plans for the resumption of operations at the Bindura Nickel Corporation ("BNC") Trojan mine
o Completion of SRK independent Competent Person's Report reviewing these plans
o BNC off-take agreement with Glencore International for the purchase of the concentrate produced by Trojan
Highlights after the reporting period
·; Increased gold resources at Freda Rebecca announced in April 2011
o the Indicated Mineral Resource increased to 1.67m ounces and Inferred Mineral Resource increased to 0.64m ounces, based on a cut-off grade of 1.5g/t gold
·; £9.27 million gross fundraising completed in May 2011
Commenting on the results Kalaa Mpinga, Chief Executive Officer, said:
"During the last twelve months our team has worked hard to increase cash flow from our producing assets, whilst continuing the exploration programme at our promising gold and base metals assets in the DRC. Our strengthened balance sheet, also following two successful fundraisings, exciting drilling results at Zani Kodo and Semhkat and strong ramp-up in production at the Freda Rebecca Mine have created a strong basis on which to grow during the year ahead. With restart plans progressing at BNC, we look forward to delivering further value from our assets over the next twelve months."
For more information, please visit www.mwanaafrica.com or contact:
Enquiries:
Mwana Africa PLC Tel: +44 (0)20 7654 5580
Oliver Baring - Executive Chairman
Nominated Adviser and Broker
Ambrian Partners Limited Tel: +44 (0) 20 7634 4700
Anthony Rowland / Jen Boorer
Joint Broker
XCAP Securities plc
Jon Belliss / John Grant / Parimal Kumar Tel: +44 (0)20 7101 7070
Public Relations
Merlin Tel: +44 (0)20 7726 8400
David Simonson
Anca Spiridon
Chairman's Letter
Dear shareholder
Looking back on the past year, it has been one of contrast. We have seen notable success in the continued ramp up of the Freda Rebecca Mine in Zimbabwe which is now a significant producer of gold and a valuable contributor to cashflow, while uncertainty over the outcome of indigenisation proposals by the Government of Zimbabwe have made it challenging to secure the necessary finance for the restart of Bindura.
Metal prices remain strong, with gold in particular continuing to respond positively to quantitative easing in many of the world's major economies, while the China and India growth story continues to confirm the commodity super cycle.
In April we announced a 60% increase in the gold resource at Freda Rebecca. The indicated resource of 1.7m ounces demonstrates that the mine has a mine life of at least twenty years even at increased production rates. In addition to our on-going drive to increase production and lower costs, the life of mine expansion adds to Freda Rebecca's strong potential for the future.
Another notable success at Freda Rebecca has been the securing of debt finance for the project. In February we announced the drawdown of US$4 million of the loan facility provided by the IDC (Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa). This was a ground breaking transaction, being one of the very first loans by an external lender into Zimbabwe for many years and I would like to express my gratitude to the IDC for their continued support.
We believe that Freda Rebecca is a success at all levels and demonstrates Mwana's ability to finance and restart operations in Zimbabwe. We will now apply that experience to the restart of operations at Bindura.
Bindura remains on care and maintenance pending the raising of restart finance. The core operational team at the site has been kept in place and the assets have been well maintained. Securing financing for Bindura remains a challenge in the current political climate and with uncertainty prevailing over the Zimbabwe government's indigenisation proposals. Nevertheless we are progressing negotiations for loan finance and for the restructuring of creditor and workforce liabilities which I believe will put us in a better position to restart operations.
In the DRC we have made significant progress at our Zani-Kodo gold project in Ituri, where we have identified a JORC compliant combined, indicated and inferred resource of 1.25m ounces and hope to announce a further increase in resources shortly. While pursuing our strategy of attracting joint venture partners such as the agreement we have in place with Anglo American on the North West Block, the exploration programme has been successful in identifying new drill targets for copper and zinc at Semhkat.
With the ongoing cost of care and maintenance at BNC and our commitment to grow our gold resource at Zani-Kodo and base metal exploration in Katanga, it was considered prudent to raise £4.8 million net in October 2010. In March 2011 we embarked on a fund raising to enable the restart of the Trojan Mine. Our presentation to a wide group of international investors was well received and it became clear that more than sufficient demand would be achieved to meet our target. Within a few days of the proposed closing the Zimbabwean Government issued regulations on indigenization which resulted in investors withdrawing their support for the fundraising. It is a sobering thought that as a result of this event we were unable to restart Bindura's Trojan Mine, with the resultant ongoing uncertainties for our 2,170 employees, their dependants and of course our shareholders. As a result, in May 2011 we raised £8.8 m to ensure the company is properly funded through 2011/12. Further initiatives are now under consideration to facilitate the restart.
We are disappointed by the performance of the share price at a time of strong cash flow performance from the Freda Rebecca Mine. As previously mentioned, we believe this stems from the current uncertainties in Zimbabwe.
We have complete confidence that these difficulties can and will be resolved. I would like to take this opportunity to thank our management, operational and exploration teams for their heroic contribution and express our gratitude to our shareholders for their ongoing support and confidence in the company.
Chief Executive's Review
Over the last twelve months, we have continued to focus on increasing cash flow from our producing assets whilst further developing our exciting exploration projects. The year has not been without its challenges, but with production growing at Freda Rebecca, strong drilling results from Zani-Kodo and a strengthened balance sheet, we have built a solid basis for our next phase of growth.
The ramp up in production continued successfully at the Freda Rebecca Mine, in parallel with a 60% increase in indicated gold resources, significantly extending the expected life of the mine. Phase I of the restart was successfully completed, with the annualised production rate of 30,000ozs reached by February 2011. Since then, the mine reached an annualised run rate of 35,000ozs in May and is showing strong progress towards its 50,000ozs pa Phase II production target. Freda Rebecca produced a total of 27,240ozs of gold during the period, contributing £14.4m to Group profits and generating £0.3m of cash inflows.
We are confident that Freda Rebecca will continue to be a strong contributor to our cash flow, as we continue the successful ramp up towards the Phase II production target in parallel with increasing the efficiency of our production process and reducing our cash costs; this involves the refurbishment of the second parallel mill and the expansion of the rock moving fleet. As reported in June, this mill has been successfully commissioned and has contributed as planned to the Phase II tonnage ramp up at Freda Rebecca. The mine is now handling ore at the rate of 2,350tpd up from 1,800tpd, with a targeted Phase II throughput of 2,700tpd, which we expect to reach in September. The nature of the ore body at Freda Rebecca is such that mine economics benefit hugely from increased mined volumes and our aim now is to expand production which will not only increase ounces produced but also lower cash operating costs per ounce.
Further limited exploration drilling is being carried out within the mining permit with the aim of expanding the resource inventory of near-surface material. We believe that there is considerable potential to add near-surface resources which could be blended in to the ore processing stream to increase production and lower costs.
We have detailed plans in place for the restart of operations at BNC. We have also refurbished substantial parts of the mine and processing equipment at Trojan in preparation for the restart. The restart plans involve the production of 7,000 tpa of Nickel in concentrate annually and we have agreed off-take terms with Glencore International to purchase all of this output. The technical and economic viability of the project has been verified by SRK Consulting in a Competent Person's Report. Negotiations to secure financing for the restart are on-going, together with a restructuring designed to streamline creditor and workforce liability at the asset. Whilst this task has been made difficult by uncertainties in the Zimbabwe mining industry regarding government indigenisation legislation, we remain committed to securing the restart of this unique asset in the Southern African region. Meanwhile, our care and maintenance programme and continuing refurbishment of the mine and equipment are maintaining the integrity of the operations and will ensure a quick and efficient restart process.
Whilst there remain a number of challenges for Zimbabwe, not least of which are the concerns regarding indigenization of foreign companies which continues to constrain inward investment flows, there are a number of positives in the Zimbabwe economy which are often overlooked. Annual inflation continues its downward trend, falling to 2.7% in March 2011, compared with the hyper inflationary years in the not too distant past, these low inflation figures have brought with them the stability required for businesses to operate normally. The agricultural sector is poised to grow by 19.3% in 2011 compared to 33.9% in 2010 and 14.9% in 2009. Buoyed by favourable international prices and a stable operating environment, production of most minerals in Zimbabwe continued to show an upward trend, gold, for example, is expected to increase from a total of 9 tonnes produced in 2010 to a forecasted 12.5 tonnes in 2011. These performances in the agricultural and mining sectors not only create employment, but also generate substantial foreign currency inflows into Zimbabwe as well as tax revenues for the country.
The strong potential of our exploration assets was confirmed by successful drilling campaigns at both the Zani-Kodo gold project and the Semhkat base metals concessions in the DRC. JORC compliant Indicated and Inferred resources at Zani-Kodo have reached a total of 1.25moz, with the results of further drilling expected to be known shortly. With a further 7,000m of the Zani-Kodo trend yet to be tested, we continue to believe in the tremendous potential of this asset for Mwana. Exploration is also continuing at the Semhkat concession, focussing on the development of a resource at Kibolwe through diamond drilling and geo-chemical surveys. With an intensive exploration programme planned for the months to come, we hope to be able to update the market on this in due course.
Mwana finishes the financial year with a significantly strengthened balance sheet. The proceeds of our successful share placings in October 2010 and May 2011, £4.8m and £8.8m respectively have been allocated to our exploration, expansion, and care and maintenance programmes. Our plans at Freda Rebecca were further supported by the drawdown of a US$4m loan facility from the Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa. The financing, the first of its kind in Zimbabwe, confirms both the quality of our assets and our ability to finance their development in Zimbabwe and beyond.
In addition to providing the best value for our shareholders, our commitment also remains with the communities in which we operate. Education and employee and community health programmes are a priority at our assets, and our positive impact on the local economy has included infrastructure support and procurement expenditure sourced from local suppliers. During the difficult care and maintenance period at BNC, we have continued to provide accommodation, water, electricity and primary health care for BNC employees.
I would like to extend my thanks to our shareholders, management and operational teams, employees and all those who have supported us over the last year and are continuing to do so as we grow into the next stage of our development.
Review of Operations and Exploration
Precious metals - operations
Freda Rebecca Gold Mine - Zimbabwe
The Freda Rebecca gold mine, situated in the town of Bindura, was acquired by Mwana Africa in April 2005. Production resumed in October 2009 following an extended period of care and maintenance. Mwana has committed to sell a 15% stake in Freda Rebecca to a Zimbabwe investor.
Freda Rebecca produced 27,240 ozs of gold in the year to March 2011, the first full financial year of production since the restart.
Since the recommencement of production, tonnage mined, grade and recovery have made steady progress. Ramp-up to the Phase 1 production target rate of 2,500 ozs per month (30,000 ozs per annum equivalent) has been successfully achieved with an average monthly production of over 2,500 ozs for the 10 month period to March 2011.
A steady increase in mined tonnage from underground operations has been recorded. This is attributable to improved loader availability and the deployment of an increased number of trucking units following the award of a load and haul contract as part of the ramp-up strategy.
Operational effectiveness as measured by equipment availability, running hours and tonnes per hour have demonstrated that the milling circuit is well established and capable of handling the required volume throughputs. As a result of implementing the planned maintenance programme, which involved significant upgrade work on the processing plant, plant availability has improved and has been sustained ahead of targets.
Plant recovery has improved progressively since operations resumed, with an average recovery rate of 84% being achieved in the quarter ended March 2011.
With effect from the 11th of January, Freda Rebecca joined the "uninterrupted power supply" tariff with the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority. Since that date, the site has benefitted from full power with no incidents of load shedding or power disturbance being recorded.
In June 2011, Mwana announced the completion of the Phase 2 refurbishment programme and the commencement of commissioning of the second mill at Freda Rebecca. The Phase 2 programme comprised the overhaul and refurbishment of the second milling circuit and its associated Carbon-In-Pulp/Carbon-In Leach sections. Following completion of the commissioning of the second mill, Freda Rebecca is well positioned to expand its processing capability and reach the targeted Phase 2 annualised gold production rate of 50,000ozs per annum.
In February 2011, following fulfilment of the required conditions, including the provision by the Export Credit Insurance Corporation of South Africa ("ECIC") of political risk insurance for the facility, Freda Rebecca drew down the first $4m tranche of a $10m project finance facility from the Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa. The drawdown of the remaining $6m remains subject to the fulfilment of further conditions precedent.
In April 2011, the Company announced increased mineral resources at Freda Rebecca. Based on a cut-off grade of 1.5g/t gold, the Indicated Mineral Resource increased from just over 1 million ounces to 1.67 million ounces of gold, whilst the Inferred Mineral Resource, as similarly defined, is now 0.64 million ounces. The updated mineral resource was independently verified by SRK Consulting (UK) Limited, and is expected to form the basis of an extended mine life.
Freda Rebecca production results for the periods to March 2010 and March 2011: | |||
2011 | 2010 (6 months) | ||
Tonnes mined - underground | t | 410,653 | 95,668 |
Tonnes mined - low grade surface dump | t | 139,608 | 137,569 |
Tonnes processed | t | 539,864 | 205,194 |
Feed grade | g/t | 2.34 | 1.76 |
Plant recovery | % | 76.9 | 74.2 |
Gold produced | Oz | 27,240 | 8,550 |
Freda Rebecca mine - Resources at a 1.5g/t cut off | |||
Classification | Tonnes ('000t) | Grade (g/t) | Metal ('000oz) |
Indicated | 21,043 | 2.48 | 1,675 |
Inferred | 8,746 | 2.28 | 640 |
The effective date for the Freda Rebecca resource estimate is September 2010.
Precious metals - exploration
Zani-Kodo - Democratic Republic of Congo
Mwana has a joint venture with the state-owned Office des Mines d'Or de Kilomoto (OKIMO) for gold exploration in the Ituri district of the DRC. The joint venture, in which OKIMO has a 20% free carried interest, covers gold mining rights over 1,605 square kilometres in Orientale Province, containing a series of highly prospective greenstone belts of Kibalian age which are considered to have the potential to host world-class gold deposits. Zani-Kodo is situated between the Kibali (formerly Moto Mines) Project (Randgold/Anglogold J.V.) and the Mongbwalu project (Anglogold).
In July 2010, an increased JORC compliant resource at Zani-Kodo was announced. Based on a cut-off grade of 1.0g/t gold, the Indicated Mineral Resource increased to 265koz of gold while the Inferred Mineral Resource, as similarly defined, is now 998koz .
Zani-Kodo - Resources at a 0.5g/t cut off | |||
Classification | Tonnes ('000t) | Grade (g/t) | Metal ('000oz) |
Indicated | 2,489 | 3.20 | 256 |
Inferred | 8,623 | 3.60 | 999 |
The effective date for the Zani-Kodo resource estimate is July 2010.
Zani-Kodo - Resources at a 1.0g/t cut off | |||
Classification | Tonnes ('000t) | Grade (g/t) | Metal ('000oz) |
Indicated | 2,480 | 3.21 | 256 |
Inferred | 8,578 | 3.62 | 998 |
The effective date for the Zani-Kodo resource estimate is July 2010.
Diamond drilling during the year was focused on the Badolite target area which is situated 1.5km to the south of the Kodo deposit. A total of 50 holes for 10,027 metres were drilled during the reporting period. The southerly continuation of the Zani-Kodo mineralized trend, which is marked by the sheared contact between footwall metasandstones and hangingwall Banded Iron Formations, was interpreted to pass through the area based on aeromagnetic data and field mapping. The area is largely covered by talus deposits which explains the lack of artisanal activity. Drilling successfully intersected the targeted contact, and continuous mineralisation was identified over a strike length of 700m. Two high grade shoots with intersections of up to 28m @ 3.00g/t were identified. In addition a significant portion of the near surface mineralisation is within the oxide zone. The ore zone remains completely open at depth. The table below shows intersections above 1.0g/t at Le Badolite released to date.
Le Badolite Intersections above 1.0g/t released to date
Hole | From | To | Width (m) | Au (g/t) | |
BDLDD001 | 23 | 32 | 9 | 2.15 | |
BDLDD004 | 75 | 90 | 15 | 1.52 | Incl. 5m @ 2.13g/t |
BDLDD006 | 54 | 82 | 28 | 3.00 | Incl. 6m @ 4.24g/t and 10m @ 4.14g/t |
BDLDD010 | 112 | 118 | 6 | 3.69 | |
125 | 128 | 3 | 4.27 | ||
BDLDD011 | 151.8 | 154.4 | 2.6 | 1.80 | |
165 | 167 | 2 | 1.55 | ||
BDLDD007 | 92 | 111 | 19 | 2.39 | |
BDLDD012 | 82 | 85.2 | 3.2 | 1.26 | |
BDLDD013 | 151 | 161.2 | 10.2 | 2.11 | |
BDLDD009 | 57.8 | 60 | 2.2 | 1.15 | |
BDLDD008 | 150 | 154 | 4 | 2.30 | |
BDLDD016 | 102 | 103 | 1 | 1.02 | |
BDLDD017 | 166 | 172 | 6 | 1.10 | |
BDLDD021 | 187 | 189 | 2 | 1.78 | |
BDLDD024 | 45 | 48 | 3 | 2.14 | |
56 | 62 | 6 | 3.43 | ||
74 | 79 | 5 | 3.55 | ||
BDLDD025 | 46 | 50 | 4 | 3.88 | |
BDLDD026 | 27 | 29 | 2 | 1.13 | |
48 | 49 | 1 | 1.64 | ||
BDLDD014 | 182 | 200.2 | 18.2 | 2.38 | Includes 3.7m @ 4.65g/t |
BDLDD018 | 202.8 | 213 | 10.2 | 2.95 | |
BDLDD027 | 251 | 270 | 19 | 2.60 | |
BDLDD033 | 299 | 307 | 8 | 3.33 | |
BDLDD032 | 333 | 340.1 | 7.1 | 2.81 | |
BDLDD040 | 393.4 | 395.0 | 1.6 | 2.96 | |
BDLDD039 | 345.2 | 346.4 | 1.2 | 1.87 | |
BDLDD020 | 108 | 117.4 | 9.4 | 1.39 | |
BDLDD022 | 229.5 | 234 | 4.5 | 2.22 | |
BDLDD023 | 272 | 285 | 13 | 1.82 | |
BDLDD031 | 261.6 | 264 | 2.4 | 1.62 |
To date a total of 2,000m of the Zani-Kodo trend has been shown to contain continuous mineralisation. A further 7,000m remains to be tested, along with a number of targets in the hangingwall of the structure.
Base metals - Operations
Bindura Nickel Corporation - Zimbabwe
Situated near the town of Bindura, 90 kilometres north-east of Harare, BNC is the only integrated nickel mine, smelter and refinery operation in Africa. Historically, ore from the Company's Shangani and Trojan mines, with a combined hoisting capacity in excess of two million tonnes of ore per year, was concentrated and fed, along with concentrate from third parties, to BNC's smelter and refinery. BNC is listed on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange. Mwana Africa acquired its 52.9% stake in the company in 2003.
The mines, smelter and refinery remained on care and maintenance during the year. The care and maintenance programme continues to preserve the integrity of the underground operations, surface concentrators and the smelter and refinery complex.
BNC has evaluated various scenarios for the resumption of operations. Given relatively limited availability of debt and equity finance for projects in Zimbabwe at this time, a decision was taken to try to restart BNC's operations sequentially, beginning with the resumption of concentrate production from the Trojan mine and processing facility.
BNC has developed detailed plans for the resumption of operations at Trojan, and SRK has completed an independent Competent Person's Report (CPR) reviewing these plans - the results of which were announced on 10 August 2010. SRK's CPR states that; "SRK has reviewed the Business Plan for the re-start of operations at Trojan and considers the plan to be both realistic and achievable".
BNC announced in February 2011 that it had signed an off-take agreement with Glencore International who will purchase all the concentrate produced by Trojan. After the restart, BNC expects to produce concentrate containing 7,000 tonnes of nickel per year at steady state. BNC continues to seek finance to fund the restart of operations.
In anticipation of the re-start of operations management has carried out a programme of works aimed at overhauling key components of engineering and operational infrastructure. These works, funded from the BNC balance sheet, included overhaul of the main pumping arrangements and ventilation fans and a replacement programme of shaft guides. On surface the waste handling system has been re-engineered together with a major overhaul of the surface secondary and tertiary crushers.
Preparatory work for the restart of operations has included the commencement of limited underground development (approximately 850m development completed), allowing the commissioning of underground Load Haul Dumpers, rigs and associated mining and engineering services together with shaft systems. Ore and waste hoisted to surface has allowed the successful hot commissioning of the surface waste conveyors and ore crushing facilities. The objective of the programme has been to de-risk the planned restart programme in anticipation of project funding. The management team at BNC has been retained during care and maintenance and have been re-mobilised and actively engaged in the pre-start programme.
In anticipation of the phased re-start, plans are underway to restructure the operations so as to reduce cost structures and ensure maximum productivity and profitability going forward. The restart is dependent on obtaining funding which most likely will have to be sourced from foreign investors and/or the international debt markets. Obtaining restart funding will likely be dependent on BNC restructuring and improving its current creditor and workforce structure and resolving issues around the indigenisation and empowerment act.
BNC - Resources at March 2011 | |||
Tonnage(kt) | Grade(%) | Nickel(t) | |
Measured | |||
Trojan | 1,710 | 1.36 | 23,250 |
Shangani | 1,840 | 0.58 | 10,750 |
Hunters Road | - | - | - |
Total | 3,550 | 0.96 | 34,000 |
Indicated | |||
Trojan | 710 | 1.38 | 9,810 |
Shangani | 480 | 0.59 | 2,840 |
Hunters Road | 36,437 | 0.55 | 200,404 |
Total | 37,627 | 0.57 | 213,054 |
Inferred | |||
Trojan | 1,110 | 1.13 | 12,540 |
Shangani | 9,710 | 0.56 | 54,280 |
Hunters Road | - | - | - |
Total | 10,820 | 0.62 | 66,820 |
The effective date for the Trojan resource estimate is March 2010, and the effective date for the Shangani resource estimate is August 2008. The effective date for the Hunters Road resource estimate is May 2006. The JORC compliant resource of 36,437kt is found in the West Ore body of Hunters Road and includes 2,377kt of resource which forms part of a 30m cap of oxide ore mineralisation. In addition, in 1993, an Anglo American MinRED estimate showed 11,000kt grading 0.43% Ni approximately 600m east of the West Ore body of Hunters Road which is excluded from the resource shown above.
Base metals - exploration
SEMHKAT (Societe d'exploration Miniere du Haut Katanga)
Mwana Africa holds a 100% interest in SEMHKAT, which has exploration concessions covering 4,845 square kilometres in the south-east of the DRC. Exploration is focusing on sediment-hosted stratiform copper-cobalt, iron oxide copper gold (IOCGs) occurrences as well as on showings of lead and zinc.
Exploration during the year focused on developing the resource at Kibolwe through a diamond drilling programme on the East, South and West of Kibolwe. Soil geochemical surveys were also conducted at Kibolwe, Mukema West and Lunsano target areas. Mwana has outlined a 10,000 metre drilling programme for 2011/12.
Mwana Africa is also conducting exploration under a joint venture agreement with Ambase Exploration Africa, a subsidiary of Anglo American, over 476 square kilometres in the North West part of the concession. During the course of the year a total of 2,355 samples were collected on regional reconnaissance lines and several new soil geochemical anomalies were identified. Soil geochemical anomalies reach a maximum of 530ppm Cu. A regional 20,000m RAB drilling programme is scheduled for 2011 to follow up the soil anomalies.
Mwana Africa holds an 85% interest in further exploration rights over 6,395 square kilometres of prospective ground in the western Katanga and eastern Kasai Oriental provinces of the DRC (Maniamuna).
Kibolwe ProjectThe Kibolwe prospect is a stratiform copper oxide deposit consisting of mainly malachite mineralisation.
Reverse circulation and core drilling programmes carried out from 2004 to 2010 have outlined a near-surface, flat-lying mineralised zone up to 40 metres thick extending over a strike of 1.88 kilometres. During 2010 a core drilling programme of 5,686m was completed with a view to extending the known mineralized zone to both East and West. The table below shows all intersections above 0.5% at Kibolwe as at March 2011.
Kibolwe Intersections above 0.5% as at 31 March 2011
No | Hole_ID | X | Y | Incl | Azi | From | To | Drill_int | Grade% |
1 | KIBWDD12B | 411772 | 8765310 | -50 | 0 | 22 | 26.8 | 4.8 | 1.28 |
51.2 | 61.6 | 10.4 | 0.64 | ||||||
2 | KIBWDD15B | 411770 | 8765220 | -50 | 0 | 55.7 | 61.25 | 5.55 | 1.38 |
71.2 | 99 | 27.8 | 0.54 | ||||||
3 | KIBWDD19B | 411472 | 8765265 | -50 | 0 | 54 | 94 | 40 | 1.17 |
-50 | 0 | 73 | 91 | 18 | 2.05 | ||||
4 | KIBWDD19 | 411470 | 8765190 | -50 | 0 | 36 | 80 | 44 | 1.12 |
5 | KIBWDD21D | 411370 | 8765192 | -50 | 0 | 76.2 | 111.3 | 35.1 | 0.59 |
123.8 | 128.25 | 4.45 | 1.9 | ||||||
6 | KIBEDD001 | 412800 | 8765290 | -50 | 145 | 12 | 31.5 | 19.5 | 0.5 |
52 | 59 | 7 | 0.6 | ||||||
7 | KIBEDD002 | 412800 | 8765292 | -50 | 145 | 12 | 49.9 | 37.9 | 0.62 |
88.9 | 105.9 | 17 | 0.51 | ||||||
8 | KIBEDD003 | 413035 | 8765255 | -50 | 145 | 62.28 | 73.8 | 11.52 | 0.5 |
9 | KIBWDD21B | 411370 | 8765303 | -50 | 0 | 97 | 101 | 4 | 0.91 |
10 | KIBWDD13 | 411870 | 8765115 | -50 | 0 | 74 | 145.6 | 71.6 | 1 |
11 | KIBWDD14 | 4111870 | 8765165 | -50 | 0 | 0 | 116.4 | 116.4 | 1.3 |
38.1 | 101 | 62.9 | 2.16 | ||||||
12 | KIBWDD15 | 411770 | 8765170 | -50 | 0 | 6.12 | 11 | 4.88 | 1 |
13 | KIBWDD16 | 411570 | 8765170 | -50 | 0 | 50.31 | 78 | 27.69 | 1 |
14 | KIBWDD14B | 411870 | 8765262 | -50 | 0 | 18.0 | 42.5 | 24.5 | 1.12 |
15 | KIBWDD09 | 412070 | 8765100 | -50 | 0 | 110 | 130.0 | 20 | 0.88 |
133.0 | 154.0 | 21.0 | 0.8 | ||||||
215.0 | 223.0 | 8.0 | 0.62 | ||||||
16 | KIBWDD10 | 412070 | 8765190 | -50 | 0 | 40.9 | 84.4 | 38.5 | 0.86 |
17 | KIBWDD11 | 411971 | 8765110 | -50 | 0 | 20.9 | 35.9 | 15.0 | 0.65 |
66.5 | 70.5 | 4.0 | 1.3 | ||||||
98.2 | 107.9 | 9.7 | 0.57 | ||||||
117.0 | 131.6 | 13.6 | 0.92 | ||||||
134.7 | 142.05 | 7.35 | 0.62 | ||||||
170.6 | 181.1 | 10.5 | 0.53 | ||||||
18 | KIBWDD08 | 411996.2 | 8765032 | -50 | 0 | 141.85 | 147 | 5.15 | 1.18 |
208 | 227 | 19 | 0.69 | ||||||
19 | KIBWDD12 | 411898.1 | 8765188 | -50 | 0 | 18 | 70 | 52 | 0.62 |
20 | KIBWDD16C | 411495 | 8765106 | -50 | 0 | 102 | 116 | 14 | 0.75 |
21 | KIBWDD17B | 411791.6 | 8765046 | -50 | 0 | 67 | 75.92 | 8.92 | 0.71 |
22 | KIBWDD18B | 411565 | 8765348 | -50 | 0 | 26 | 31 | 5 | 0.59 |
23 | KIBEDD05 | 413025 | 8765310 | -50 | 145 | 107 | 112 | 5 | 0.63 |
To the west at Kibolwe the mineralisation splits into two zones representing the limbs of an antiformal structure. The main Kibolwe area is situated in the crestal area of the fold, with mineralisation deepening to the east. The 2010 drilling has added significant strike length to the already defined deposit.
MukemaMukema represents a Fe Oxide-Cu-Au target. Malachite, chalcopyrite and chalcocite have been identified along a 700-metre strike length. In places the mineralised breccia is 40m thick and coincides with a four-kilometre long thrust fault highlighted by aeromagnetic and radiometric data. Further follow up work will be carried out in 2011.
LunsanoThe Lunsano Permit overlies brecciated Roan Group sediments with a strike length of over 20km. During 2010 infill soil geochemical surveys were carried out and these confirm the presence of copper mineralisation. A 2km x 2km Cu anomaly (>80ppm) has been identified.
Diamonds - operations
Klipspringer - South Africa
The Klipspringer diamond mine is situated approximately 250 kilometres north of Johannesburg. Mwana Africa acquired its stake of approximately 62% through the purchase of SouthernEra in 2007. The Company's stake has increased to 66.7% following dilution of the JV partner due to non-investment by the partner in the working capital requirements of Klipspringer.
A total of 24,780 carats were produced during the year. The average diamond price for the year was US$125 per carat. Although the diamond prices improved during the year by almost 15%, this was offset in part by the continuing strength of the South African rand against the United States Dollar, in which Klipspringer's revenues are denominated.
In September 2010 a 31.25 carat stone was recovered from the mine. The diamond was sold for US$8,200 per carat and to date this is the largest diamond recovered from the Klipspringer mining operation in just over 10 years.
Following a number of severe weather incidents in December 2010 and January 2011, which flooded the shaft bottom and lower (7) level, a decision to stop production and development at Klipspringer for reasons of health and safety was taken. Operations have ceased and the mine is currently in a recovery phase aimed at re-instating infrastructure that was damaged as a result of the flooding. Management are reviewing restart scenarios and timing.
Klipspringer production results for the periods to March 2010 and March 2011 | |||
2011* | 2010 | ||
Tonnes mined | t | 48,946 | 46,497 |
Tonnes treated | t | 48,946 | 46,786 |
Carats recovered* | Carats | 22,700 | 24,642 |
Grade | cpht | 46.00 | 52.67 |
* effectively represents 9 months production due to the weather incidents in December/January
Diamonds - other interests
Mwana Africa has minority stakes in a number of other diamond projects including a 20% interest in Société Miniére de Bakwanga (MIBA) in the DRC, an 18% interest in the Camafuca project in Angola, and a 12.5% interest in the BK16 project in Botswana.
Financial review
Income Statement
Pro-forma income and expense
£ million | Freda Rebecca | BNC | Other Mwana Africa Group | Total |
Revenue | 23.4 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 27.3 |
Cost of sales | (16.3) | - | (2.1) | (18.4) |
Gross profit | 7.1 | 2.6 | (0.8) | 8.9 |
Other income | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 |
Selling and distribution expenses | (1.1) | - | - | (1.1) |
Care and maintenance expenses | - | (11.1) | - | (11.1) |
Administrative expenses | (3.0) | (2.8) | (1.6) | (7.4) |
Corporate costs | - | - | (4.9) | (4.9) |
Impairment reversal | 11.7 | - | - | 11.7 |
Profit/(loss) from operating activities | 14.8 | (10.1) | (6.6) | (1.9) |
Finance income | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Finance costs | (0.4) | (0.6) | (0.9) | (1.9) |
Profit/(loss) before income tax | 14.4 | (10.7) | (7.4) | (3.7) |
Income tax expense | (3.3) | (0.1) | - | (3.4) |
Non-controlling interest | - | 5.0 | - | 5.0 |
Net profit/(loss) attributable to owners of the parent | 11.1 | (5.8) | (7.4) | (2.1) |
The group reported turnover for the period of £27.3 million (2010: £18.8 million) and a net loss before income tax for the year of £3.7 million (2010: £14.4 million).
Freda Rebecca
During the year, Freda Rebecca sold 27,240 ounces of Gold (2010: 8,550 ounces) at an average price of US$1,325 per ounce (2010: US$1,116 per ounce) as well as by-products, generating revenue of £23.4 million (2010: £6.0 million). Operating costs during the period increased in line with the ramp up of operations, and totalled £20.4 million (2010: £9.7 million) for the year. An operating profit of £3.1 million together with a reversal of impairment on property, plant and equipment of £11.7 million resulted in a net profit before income tax of £14.4 million.
Bindura Nickel Corporation
Revenue of £2.6 million (2010: £11.8 million) was generated through the sale of in-process inventories. Operating costs of £15.1 million (2010: £16.6 million before impairment) were reduced from the previous year as the mine was on care and maintenance for the entire year. BNC reported a net loss before income tax of £10.7 million (2010: £4.8 million).
Other Mwana Africa group
Other revenue of £1.3 million (2010: £1.0 million) was generated by the group, principally the Klipspringer diamond mine. The company, excluding BNC and Freda Rebecca, incurred operating costs of £8.6 million (2010: £8.6 million).
Cash flow statement
Pro-forma cash reconciliation
£ million | Freda Rebecca | BNC | Other Mwana Africa Group | Total |
Opening cash at 1 April 2010 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 9.8 | 15.2 |
Cash financing | 2.4 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 9.0 |
Equity issues | - | - | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Loan finance | 2.4 | - | - | 2.4 |
Sale of equity investments | - | 1.8 | - | 1.8 |
Operations | (1.8) | (5.0) | (12.8) | (19.6) |
Operating cash flow | 4.3 | (7.3) | (7.3) | (10.3) |
Change in working capital | (3.0) | 3.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 |
Capital expenditure | (2.6) | (1.4) | - | (4.0) |
Capitalised exploration | - | - | (7.7) | (7.7) |
Other | (0.5) | - | - | (0.5) |
Closing cash at 31 March 2011 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 4.6 |
Freda Rebecca
Positive cashflow of £4.3 million was generated by operations during the year. £3.0 million was invested in additional working capital of which £2.2 million was used to increase inventory to more adequate levels. Further capital expenditure of £2.6 million (2010: £2.2 million) comprises £1.0 million to maintain operations and £1.6 million to expand operations through the phase 2 project. Funding was made available by the drawdown of £2.4 million (US$4 million) from a loan facility provided by the Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa and positive operating cashflow.
Bindura Nickel Corporation
Sales of inventory and intermediate material and investments and receipt of cash from debtors, was offset by partial repayments to creditors and the costs of the care and maintenance programme. Net working capital movements resulted in the release of £5.5 million (2010: £2.8 million) including the sale of listed equities held by BNC. BNC's net cash position decreased from an opening balance of £4.7 million to £1.5 million at the year end.
Other Mwana Africa group
Mwana Africa (excluding BNC and Freda) saw operating cash outflow of £7.3 million (2010: £7.2 million). During the year, Mwana Africa invested £7.7 million (2010: £4.0 million) on its portfolio of exploration prospects, £2.8 million on Semhkat (2010: £1.9 million) and £4.9 million on Zani (2010: £2.1 million).
During the period, the company issued 46.4 million shares (2010: 88.3 million), raising £4.8 million net of costs (2010: £8.4 million).
Balance sheet
Freda Rebecca | BNC | Other Mwana Africa Group | Total | |||||
£ million | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
Non-current assets | 26.4 | 13.2 | 21.8 | 21.9 | 24.0 | 17.1 | 72.2 | 52.2 |
Current assets (excl. cash) | 6.6 | 2.7 | 6.2 | 11.7 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 14.1 | 18.2 |
Cash | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 9.7 | 4.6 | 15.1 |
Non-current liabilities | (7.8) | (2.0) | (7.9) | (9.4) | (2.8) | (3.3) | (18.5) | (14.7) |
Current liabilities | (4.6) | (3.8) | (20.3) | (15.6) | (3.5) | (2.6) | (28.4) | (22.0) |
Total equity | 21.9 | 10.8 | 1.3 | 13.3 | 20.8 | 24.7 | 44.0 | 48.8 |
Minority interests | - | - | (1.5) | (7.3) | - | - | (1.5) | (7.3) |
Equity attributable to owners of the parent | 21.9 | 10.8 | (0.2) | 6.0 | 20.8 | 24.7 | 42.5 | 41.5 |
At 31 March 2011, the group had cash balances of £4.6 million (2010: £15.1 million), comprising £1.5 million (2010: £4.7 million) held by BNC and £3.1 million (2010: £10.4 million) held by other Mwana Africa group entities. The book value of shareholders' equity at the year end was £42.5 million (2010: £41.5 million).
Freda Rebecca
A combination of continued investment in assets, the ramp up to phase 2 and the impairment reversal of £11.7 million has resulted in an increase in non-current assets to £26.4million (2010: £13.2 million).
Current assets increased by £3.9 million to £6.6 million (2010: £2.7 million). This amount includes an increase in trade debtors of £1.2 million, an increase in spares and inventory of £2.0 million and other debtors of £0.7 million.
Bindura Nickel Corporation
The value of current assets reduced by £5.5 million to £6.2 million (2010: £11.7 million) owing to conclusion of sales of various in-process inventories, certain non-critical stocks and spares, sale of the remaining portion of the equity portfolio, and receipts from an outstanding debtor. Raising additional provisions have resulted in an increase in current liabilities to £20.3million (2010: £15.6 million).
Other Mwana Africa groupThe value of non-current assets increased to £24.0 million (2010: £17.1 million) as a result of additional exploration expenditure which was capitalised during the year in accordance with the groups policy.
Group liquidity
At 31 March 2011 the Group, excluding BNC, held cash of £3.1 million (2010: £10.4 million). As at 30 June 2011 the group, excluding BNC, held cash of £8.8 million following funds raised of £8.8 million in May 2011 and positive operational cashflows from Freda Rebecca.
IDC facility
As announced in February 2011, following the fulfillment of required conditions, including the provision by the Export Credit Insurance Corporation of South Africa ("ECIC") of political risk insurance for the facility, Freda Rebecca drew down the first $4m tranche of the Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Ltd ("IDC") $10m project finance facility. The facility is repayable in 10 equal installments over a five year period and attracts an interest rate of US$LIBOR plus 5%.
Draw down of the second tranche of the facility, totalling US$6 million, is subject to independent verification of JORC/SAMREC compliant measured gold resources, sufficient to support a 10-year mine life. Adequate inferred and indicated resources to support this mine life were defined in the resource update at Freda Rebecca announced in April 2011 and discussions are ongoing with the IDC to confirm whether this is sufficient to meet the draw down condition.
Zimbabwean indigenisation
In 2007, the Zimbabwean Government published the Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Act which made provision for the indigenisation of up to 51% of all foreign owned businesses operating in Zimbabwe. Regulations in support of the Indigenisation Act were published in February 2010 in preparation for the implementation of the Act.
On 25 March 2011 the Minister of Youth Development, Indigenisation and Empowerment published a notice in the government gazette promulgating the Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment (General) Regulations in statutory instrument 21 of 2010. The document sets out the requirements for the implementation of the Indigenisation Act and its supporting regulations as they pertain to the mining sector. These regulations include the requirement to transfer a minimum of 51% or a controlling interest to indigenous Zimbabweans. They also state that the valuation of the shares would be calculated taking into account the State's sovereign ownership of the minerals exploited.
The company has submitted representations relating to the indigenisation regulations to the Zimbabwe Government and discussions are ongoing to determine the impact, if any, on Mwana's shareholding in its Zimbabwean assets.
52.9% of BNC is owned by Mwana with Zimbabwean shareholders owning the remaining 47.1%, which includes the government who own approximately 22% through government controlled entities. The directors of Mwana consider that through the local ownership and the participation by BNC in local community initiatives, BNC substantially complies with Zimbabwean indigenisation regulations existing and proposed. BNC has submitted its Indigenisation Plan and is in discussion with Government concerning the restructuring of BNC's creditors.
Freda Rebecca Gold Mine which is currently 100% owned, has submitted its Indigenisation Plan in 2010 and is in discussion with Government concerning these proposals. The Board of Mwana anticipates that these discussions will result in an ownership structure that will benefit all stakeholders and will not reduce Mwana's ability to control the cash flows of Freda Rebecca although there may be a reduction in its economic interest. Mwana has already committed to sell a 15% interest in Freda Rebecca Gold Mine to a local Zimbabwean investor as detailed in note 31 to the accounts.
Going concern
The Directors, after making enquiries and considering the uncertainties described further in note 2: Basis of preparation to the financial statements 'Going Concern' have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Annual Report and Financial Statements and these Financial Statements do not include any adjustments that would result from the going concern basis of preparation being inappropriate.
Overview of social and environmental responsibility
Mwana Africa's reputation for responsible development has been established by ensuring a safe working environment for its staff, by delivering benefits to the communities in which it operates, and by minimising the environmental impact of its activities. The Company's primary contribution to the remote areas in which it operates is the stimulation of economic activity through the creation of jobs, development and support of local businesses, the use of local contractors, and the purchase of goods and services from nearby suppliers. The focus of Mwana Africa's social initiatives continues to be in education, health, and support of small and medium enterprises (SME's).
The Mwana Group policies for Business Principles, Occupational Health and Safety, Environment, and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were all updated and revised during this reporting period. All Exploration Standards of Practice were similarly reviewed and re-issued. Stakeholder engagement is actively pursued through a variety of formal and informal meetings, briefings, surveys, and feedback sessions on issues raised.
Give the importance of CSR, Mwana was very proud that Freda Rebecca was awarded the best CSR programme in 2010 in the Mashonoland Central region by the Zimbabwe Chamber of Commerce.
As per the South African Department of Mineral Resources requirements, for the calendar year to 31 December 2010, the Klipspringer Mine was 62% compliant with the South African 2002 Mining Charter targets for Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), Employment Equity (EE) and localisation of recruitment and procurement, skills training, and environmental practices.
Workplace health and safety
Mwana Africa recognises that exploration and mining have an inherent level of risk, and is pleased to report that no fatalities occurred this year at any of its operations. Proactive safety management programmes instituted at our active mines resulted in reductions in the lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) at the Klipspringer Mine from 14.78 to 1.06, and from 5.61 to 0.53 at the Freda Rebecca Mine. Both mines and all our exploration operations routinely achieved months in which no lost time injuries were reported. Freda Rebecca Mine began the initial systems and documentation compilation for certification to the OHSAS 18001: 1999 standard for occupational health and safety.
Employment
At the year end, Mwana Africa employed 2,991 people, of which 276 are in management and administrative positions.
Preference during recruitment is given to the local community, especially for unskilled and semi-skilled positions. With the exception of senior expatriate management, all staff in our exploration operations are drawn from the immediate communities. At Freda Rebecca Mine in Zimbabwe 94% of the workforce is from the local town of Bindura. 90% of BNC's staff are from the local communities of Bindura and Shangani.
Between 90% and 100% of our workforce are represented by unions, which contribute to positive labour relations and collaboration with management through joint forums on issues such as wages, conditions of employment, Occupational Health and Safety, and serious diseases such as HIV/AIDS. No employee days were lost to industrial action. At the Klipspringer Mine in South Africa, 52% of the workforce was recruited from the immediate community, and a further 41% from within the province.
Local economic impact
At the Klipspringer and the Freda Rebecca Mines, 31% and 23% respectively of total procurement expenditure was sourced from local/provincial suppliers. Several small business enterprises have been established or assisted by Freda Rebecca to provide services to the Mine and the Mine villages, and to encourage entrepreneurial ventures. The mines and exploration projects assist with infrastructure support such as the refurbishment of schools, upgrade of roads, and the construction of small bridges.
Where operations interact with artisanal gold miners, the Company has undertaken studies to better understand the issues of and challenges faced by these populations. This is as a prelude to formulating a strategy to manage future interactions with the aim to improve these miners working conditions. At Zani, PACT, an American NGO, is assisting Mwana with this process.
Education
Freda Rebecca Mine has developed a partnership with the Italian NGO Terre des Hommes to improve the educational facilities at the local village's crèche. This NGO aims to uplift vulnerable children through the full provision of school fees for a child's educational career. It is hoped that this partnership can be extended to the local primary schools in the Bindura area. Both BNC and Freda Rebecca Mine assist local scholars to complete their tertiary education by providing them with 6 month vocational placements. The Freda Rebecca Mine is also sponsoring 4 students through their degrees at the School of Mines. BNC provides on-site primary school education, funds secondary schooling and grants a number of scholarships to higher education institutions for employees' children.
Employee and community health
The principal health issues faced in the regions where Mwana Africa operates are malaria and HIV/AIDS. The Company provides medicines, education and training for the prevention and treatment of both diseases, as well as associated infections such as tuberculosis. BNC and Freda Rebecca Mine also staff and fund the occupational health as well primary health care clinics for employees and their families. Freda Rebecca recently began offering an Employee Assistance Programme to its employees and dependents, which focused on counselling for work and lifestyle problems. Mwana's mine operations have all implemented community-wide HIV/AIDS management strategies linked to the concept of overall Wellness. This includes awareness and education campaigns, voluntary counselling and testing (VCT), and health care training. UNICEF donates primary health care drugs to Freda Rebecca, which passes on the unused portions to the local provincial hospital.
Both Freda Rebecca and BNC have been accepted into the HIV/AIDS assistance programme co-ordinated by the Swedish Workplace HIV & AIDS Programme (SWHAP). This was possible through the relationship with a Swedish company, one of Mwana's major equipment suppliers. Assistance from this organisation will improve the implementation of Mwana's Zimbabwean HIV/AIDS and Wellness practices, and assist with specialized studies such as zero-prevalence surveys, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) questionnaires, and statistical risk assessments. Both organisations also receive assistance from the Zimbabwean Business Council on Aids (ZBCA). Freda Rebecca, through a company supported medical aid, provides anti-retroviral (ARV's) medication to affected employees and their dependents. BNC has initiated the process of providing this aid through the same medical aid organisation.
Environmental impact
Mwana Africa limits the impact of its operations on the environment through responsible waste disposal and prevention of pollution, and optimising the use of resources such as water, fuel and electricity. Proactive measures are taken to conserve local biodiversity, and to re-establish habitats disrupted by vehicle movement, waste rock dumps and tailings dams.
In all but one of our operations, internal and external environmental audits were completed. No significant non-compliances were found, and Freda Rebecca received a complimentary report from the Zimbabwean Chamber of Mines for overhauled environmental management systems. Monitoring of water discharged by pumping after the flooding incidents at Klipspringer Mine showed no contamination of the groundwater. Geohydrological studies at Freda Rebecca Mine established that the groundwater has not been contaminated with Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) or industrial pollution or effluent. Proactive water quality practices have sufficiently improved on Freda Rebecca Mine to reduce its discharge permits from red to blue.
Freda Rebecca has successfully implemented an Environmental Management Programme, prepared in accordance with the Equator Principles and the performance standards of the IFC/World Bank/World Health Organisation Guidelines. This mine has begun the process of obtaining ISO14001 certification for environmental practices.
Mwana Africa recognises its obligation to rehabilitate the sites where it has operated. Financial provisions are in place for costs associated with the closure of the Company's operations in Zimbabwe and South Africa, as prescribed by local laws.
Results for the year ended 31st March 2011
The financial information set out in this annual results announcement does not constitute the Company's statutory accounts for the years ended 31 March 2011 or 31 March 2010 but is derived from those accounts. Statutory accounts for the year ended 31 March 2010 have been delivered to the registrar of companies, and those for the year ended 31 March 2011 will be delivered in due course. The auditors have reported on those accounts; their report was (i) unqualified, (ii) included an emphasis of matter relating to going concern and an emphasis of matter relating to the carrying value of the Company's investment (iii) did not contain a statement under section 498 (2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006.
Consolidated income statement for the year ended 31 March 2011
2011 | 2010 | ||||
Note | £'000 | £'000 | |||
Revenue | 27,267 | 18,780 | |||
Cost of sales | (18,442) | (9,861) | |||
Gross profit | 8,825 | 8,919 | |||
Other income | 1,988 | 728 | |||
Selling and distribution expenses | (1,131) | (2,316) | |||
Care and maintenance expenses | (11,054) | (9,447) | |||
Administrative expenses | (7,409) | (5,240) | |||
Corporate expenses | (4,916) | (4,542) | |||
Other expenses | (37) | (4,250) | |||
Impairment loss | - | (2,395) | |||
Impairment reversal | 11,743 | 4,073 | |||
Loss from operating activities | (1,991) | (14,470) | |||
Investment income | - | 368 | |||
Dividends received | 16 | 20 | |||
Loss before finance charges and income tax | (1,975) | (14,082) | |||
Finance income | 87 | 134 | |||
Finance costs | (1,913) | (428) | |||
Loss before income tax | (3,801) | (14,376) | |||
Income tax expense | (3,360) | (67) | |||
Loss for the year | (7,161) | (14,443) | |||
Loss attributable to: | |||||
Owners of the Parent | (2,148) | (14,520) | |||
Non-controlling interest | (5,013) | 77 | |||
Loss for the year | (7,161) | (14,443) | |||
Loss per share | |||||
Basic loss per share (pence) | (0.42) | (3.63) | |||
Diluted loss per share (pence) | (0.42) | (3.63) | |||
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2011
2011 | 2010 | ||||
£'000 | £'000 | ||||
Loss for the year | (7,161) | (14,443) | |||
Other comprehensive loss | |||||
Foreign currency translation differences | (1,219) | (1,148) | |||
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale financial assets, net of tax | (1,252) | 1,252 | |||
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of income tax | (2,471) | 104 | |||
Total comprehensive loss for the year | (9,632) | (14,339) | |||
Total comprehensive loss attributable to: | |||||
Owners of the Parent | (3,862) | (14,492) | |||
Non-controlling interests | (5,770) | 153 | |||
Total comprehensive loss for the year | (9,632) | (14,339) |
Consolidated balance sheet as at 31 March 2011
2011 | 2010 | ||||
Note | £'000 | £'000 | |||
ASSETS | |||||
Non-current assets | |||||
Property, plant and equipment | 4 | 46,832 | 35,451 | ||
Intangible assets | 5 | 20,299 | 13,659 | ||
Investments | 2,516 | 2,076 | |||
Deferred tax assets | 1,575 | - | |||
Non-current receivables | 948 | 1,005 | |||
Total non-current assets | 72,170 | 52,191 | |||
Current assets | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 6 | 4,592 | 15,156 | ||
Inventories | 4,597 | 3,674 | |||
Trade and other receivables | 9,582 | 12,197 | |||
Available-for-sale financial assets | - | 2,250 | |||
Assets held for sale | - | 108 | |||
Total current assets | 18,771 | 33,385 | |||
Total assets | 90,941 | 85,576 | |||
EQUITY | |||||
Issued share capital | 7 | 53,514 | 48,877 | ||
Share premium | 19,615 | 19,406 | |||
Reserves | 62,541 | 64,291 | |||
Retained earnings | (93,073) | (91,100) | |||
Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent | 42,597 | 41,474 | |||
Non-controlling interest | 1,551 | 7,321 | |||
Total equity | 44,148 | 48,795 | |||
LIABILITIES | |||||
Non-current liabilities | |||||
Loan payable | 1,919 | - | |||
Rehabilitation provisions | 11,201 | 13,954 | |||
Deferred tax liabilities | 5,338 | 670 | |||
Total non-current liabilities | 18,458 | 14,624 | |||
Current liabilities | |||||
Trade payables | 8,317 | 8,879 | |||
Provisions and other payables | 8 | 20,018 | 13,278 | ||
Total current liabilities | 28,335 | 22,157 | |||
Total liabilities | 46,793 | 36,781 | |||
Total equity and liabilities | 90,941 | 85,576 |
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 March 2011
Share capital | Share premium | Translation reserve | Investment revaluation reserve | Treasury stock | Share based payments | Retained earnings | Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent | Non-con-trolling interest | Total equity | ||||||||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||||||||
Balance as at 31 March 2009 | 40,043 | 19,406 | 62,176 | - | (1,072) | 3,247 | (76,474) | 47,326 | 7,168 | 54,494 | |||||||||
Loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | (14,520) | (14,520) | 77 | (14,443) | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences | - | - | (634) | - | - | - | - | (634) | (514) | (1,148) | |||||||||
Revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets | - | - | - | 697 | - | - | - | 697 | 621 | 1,318 | |||||||||
Deferred tax on available-for-sale financial assets | - | - | - | (35) | - | - | - | (35) | (31) | (66) | |||||||||
Total comprehensive loss for the year | - | - | (634) | 662 | - | - | (14,520) | (14,492) | 153 | (14,339) | |||||||||
Contributions by and distributions to owners | |||||||||||||||||||
Issue of ordinary shares | 8,834 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8,834 | - | 8,834 | |||||||||
Share issue expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | (456) | (456) | - | (456) | |||||||||
Share-based payment transactions | - | - | - | - | - | 262 | - | 262 | - | 262 | |||||||||
Share-based payment reversals | - | - | - | - | - | (350) | 350 | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total contributions by and distributions to owners | 8,834 | - | - | - | - | (88) | (106) | 8,640 | - | 8,640 | |||||||||
Balance as at 31 March 2010 | 48,877 | 19,406 | 61,542 | 662 | (1,072) | 3,159 | (91,100) | 41,474 | 7,321 | 48,795 |
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 March 2011 (continued)
Share capital | Share premium | Translation reserve | Investment revaluation reserve | Treasury stock | Share based payments | Retained earnings | Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent | Non-con-trolling interest | Total equity |
| |||||||||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 |
| |||||||||||
Balance as at 31 March 2010 | 48,877 | 19,406 | 61,542 | 662 | (1,072) | 3,159 | (91,100) | 41,474 | 7,321 | 48,795 | |||||||||||
Loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | (2,148) | (2,148) | (5,013) | (7,161) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences | - | - | (1,052) | - | - | - | - | (1,052) | (167) | (1,219) | |||||||||||
Reversal of fair value adjustments on available-for-sale financial assets | - | - | - | (697) | - | - | - | (697) | (621) | (1,318) | |||||||||||
Deferred tax on available-for-sale financial assets | - | - | - | 35 | - | - | - | 35 | 31 | 66 | |||||||||||
Total comprehensive profit/(loss) for the year | - | - | (1,052) | (662) | - | - | (2,148) | (3,862) | (5,770) | (9,632) | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions by and distributions to owners |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Issue of ordinary shares | 4,637 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4,637 | - | 4,637 |
| ||||||||||
Share issue expenses | - | 209 | - | - | - | - | - | 209 | - | 209 |
| ||||||||||
Share-based payment transactions | - | - | - | - | - | 139 | - | 139 | - | 139 |
| ||||||||||
Share-based payment reversals | - | - | - | - | - | (175) | 175 | - | - | - |
| ||||||||||
Total contributions by and distributions to owners | 4,637 | 209 | - | - | - | (36) | 175 | 4,985 | - | 4,985 |
| ||||||||||
Balance as at 31 March 2011 | 53,514 | 19,615 | 60,490 | - | (1,072) | 3,123 | (93,073) | 42,597 | 1,551 | 44,148 |
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 March 2011
2011 | 2010 | ||||
Note | £'000 | £'000 | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
Loss before income tax | (3,801) | (14,376) | |||
Adjustments for: | |||||
Inventory write-off | 65 | - | |||
Foreign exchange movements | 313 | (280) | |||
Depreciation | 1,265 | 1,192 | |||
Fair value adjustments | (294) | - | |||
Charge in relation to share-based payments | 139 | 262 | |||
(Decrease)/increase in rehabilitation provisions | (1,169) | 8,295 | |||
Increase in other provisions | 5,107 | - | |||
Increase in environmental assets | (48) | (5,402) | |||
Impairment loss | - | 2,395 | |||
Impairment reversal | (11,743) | (4,073) | |||
Profit on sale of non-current assets | (996) | (551) | |||
Profit on sale of equity investments | - | (368) | |||
Loss on sale of assets held for sale | - | 1,036 | |||
Finance income | (87) | (134) | |||
Finance costs | 555 | 428 | |||
(10,694) | (11,576) | ||||
(Increase)/decrease in inventories | (1,142) | 4,113 | |||
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables | 1,905 | (879) | |||
Increase in creditors | 2,555 | 743 | |||
(7,376) | (7,599) | ||||
Finance costs | (523) | (428) | |||
Income tax paid | (10) | (60) | |||
Net cash used in operating activities | (7,909) | (8,087) | |||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (3,995) | (2,028) | |||
Investment in intangible exploration assets | (7,652) | (4,047) | |||
Acquisition of investments | (25) | - | |||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 51 | 439 | |||
Proceeds on sale of investments | - | 1,200 | |||
Proceeds on sale of available-for-sale financial assets | 1,815 | 233 | |||
Finance income | 87 | 134 | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (9,719) | (4,069) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||
Proceeds from issue of share capital | 5,100 | 8,834 | |||
Share issue expenses | (255) | (456) | |||
Loans | 2,440 | (102) | |||
Net cash from financing activities | 7,285 | 8,276 | |||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (10,343) | (3,880) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | 15,156 | 18,886 | |||
Exchange rate movement on cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | (221) | 150 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year | 21 | 4,592 | 15,156 |
Notes to the annual financial statements
for the year ended 31 March 2011
1 Accounting policies
Basis of preparation
With the exception of certain items noted below, which are carried at fair value, the financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention.
The company and consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the EU and, as regards the company financial statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. Under section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the company has elected not to present its own income statement.
Going Concern
The Directors, having considered the Group's and the Company's current trading activities, funding position and projected funding requirements and the Zimbabwean environment for the period at least twelve months from the date of approval of these Financial Statements consider it appropriate to adopt the Going Concern basis in preparing the Financial Statements for the year ended 31st March 2011.
The group reports a loss for the year ended 31 March 2011 of £7.2 million (2010: £14.4 million). As at 30 June 2011, the group held cash of £8.8 million, of which £0.7 million is held by BNC.
During the year to 31st March 2011, operations at Freda Rebecca have continued to ramp up and the Phase I production rate of 30,000 ounces of gold per annum was achieved in March. Production averaged 2,949 ounces per month in the four months to June 2011, the month in which the second mill was commissioned. The second mill will enable production to be increased further. As such, Freda Rebecca is now well positioned to expand its processing capability and reach the targeted Phase 2 annualised gold production rate of 50,000 ounces per annum. The operating cash inflows from Freda Rebecca represent a strengthening of the Group's cash generating ability.
During the year there have been steps towards the planned restart of the Trojan mine at Bindura Nickel Corporation ("BNC"). SRK Consulting completed their competent persons report on the restart of operations at BNC. This study confirmed the economic and technical viability of the planned restart of the Trojan mine and concentrator. During the year BNC has also signed an agreement for the off-take of all of the Nickel concentrate from Trojan and has made progress arranging loan finance which will provide part of the funds required for the restart.
BNC remains on care and maintenance pending the restart of Trojan. BNC's ongoing costs for the year to 31st March 2011 have been funded from its own resources, inter-company loans from Group and by the continued deferral of significant amounts which remain due on demand to creditors. The restart of BNC remains a priority for the Board and the Directors have considered the continued care and maintenance costs of BNC in light of the Group's current cash resources. They recognise that securing funds in the next 15 months will be necessary to continue to maintain all of the BNC assets on care and maintenance. Whilst securing financing for BNC remains a challenge in the current political climate and with the uncertainty prevailing over the Zimbabwe government's indigenisation programme the Directors are nevertheless making progress with negotiations for loan finance and for the restructuring of creditor and workforce liabilities and believe it is reasonable to plan on the basis that arrangements can be made to refinance BNC and to restart operations in the coming year.
The Group's other activities have been funded by its cash resources, including cash generated by Freda Rebecca together with proceeds from equity issues in October 2010 and May 2011 raising £4.8 million and £8.8 million respectively and the drawing of $4 million by Freda Rebecca under the IDC loan facility. The Group has no other borrowings and $6 million of the IDC loan facility remains undrawn.
The Directors have prepared the cash flow forecasts of the Group and are of the opinion that the Group's current cash resources, together with the cash forecast to be generated by Freda Rebecca, are sufficient to fund all of the Group's planned activities for at least twelve months from the date of these Financial Statements, with the exception of the planned restart of operations at BNC which will require additional funds to be raised. The creditor restructuring at BNC and the financing (debt and equity) of the BNC restart is the subject of negotiations with a number of parties and the Directors are confident that financing can be arranged within the twelve month period. The Group cash flow forecast shows sufficient cash flows for the rest of the Group and to keep BNC on care and maintenance until the earlier of the BNC restart and autumn 2012.
The Directors are aware that various uncertainties might affect the validity of their forecasts. These uncertainties include metal prices, mining and processing risks and resource and reserve risks, in addition to the political and indigenisation risks in Zimbabwe as noted above which may constrain the ability of the Company to control the movement of cash between entities. The Directors believe they have the ability to manage cash flows and will continue to do so even taking into account the Indigenisation proposals such that these risks could be mitigated and their impact on the going concern status of the Group and the Company is minimised. This can be by achieved by deferring discretionary exploration spend, drawing down the second tranche of the IDC loan when related conditions are met and restructuring to meet the Indigenisation law in a way that the Company is still able to exercise control over cashflows from both BNC and Freda Rebecca. However, the Directors acknowledge that there is no certainty of successfully carrying out such mitigating steps.
The Directors have concluded that the combination of these circumstances represents a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Company's and the Group's ability to continue as a going concern and that therefore the Company and the Group may be unable to realise all their assets and discharge all of their liabilities in the normal course of business. This uncertainty is linked to the current reliance of BNC on creditor deferral and future availability of funding for BNC, general market conditions and reflects the political and economic situation in Zimbabwe and in particular the recent developments relating to Indigenisation laws which the Directors have considered in the context of making their going concern assumption. Nevertheless, after making enquiries and considering the uncertainties described above the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these Financial Statements which do not include any adjustments that would result from the going concern basis of preparation being inappropriate.
Basis of consolidation
SubsidiariesSubsidiaries are those entities over whose financial and operating policies the Group has the ability to exercise control. The Group financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the company and its subsidiaries. The acquisition method of accounting has been adopted. Under this method, the results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated income statement from the date of acquisition or up to the date of disposal.
Jointly controlled entities - Klipspringer Diamond MineA joint venture is an entity in which the Group holds a long term interest and in which the Group has the ability to exercise joint control in terms of a contractual arrangement. The Group's interest in a jointly controlled entity is accounted for by proportionate consolidation. In terms of this method, the Group includes its share of the income and expenses, assets and liabilities, and cash flows on a line by line basis with similar items in the Group's financial statements.
Transactions eliminated on consolidationIntra-group transactions and balances are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Use of significant estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRSs requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.
Derivation of assumptions used in the estimation of the recoverable values of assets, disclosed in note 11 relating to impairment, requires a significant amount of judgement. The assumptions underlying the estimated recoverable values include, amongst others, the technical performance, revenue, operating costs and discount rate (for discounted cash flow based valuations), and are based on management's best judgements at the date of signing the accounts. The life of mine periods used for the purpose of calculating estimated recoverable values are based on resources and reserves. These judgements used by management correspond to realistic scenarios taking into account the information available. The impairment note discloses a sensitivity analysis with regard to the assumptions which the board deems most susceptible to variances against forecast.
Foreign currencies
The individual financial statements of each Group entity are prepared in its functional currency, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which that entity operates. For the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position of each entity are translated into pounds sterling, which is the presentational currency of the Group.
(a) Reporting foreign currency transactions in functional currencyTransactions in currencies other than the entity's functional currency (foreign currencies) are initially recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each subsequent balance sheet date:
·; foreign currency monetary items are re-translated at the rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences arising on the settlement or re-translation of monetary items are recognised in the income statement;
·; non-monetary items measured at historical cost in a foreign currency are not re-translated; and
·; exchange differences arising on the re-translation of non-monetary items carried at fair value are included in the income statement except for differences arising on the re-translation of non-monetary items in respect of which gains and losses are recognised in the other comprehensive income, in which case any exchange component of that gain or loss is also recognised directly in equity.
The directors have prepared the financial statements on the basis of their judgement that the functional currency under IAS 21 of the Group's Zimbabwean subsidiaries is the US dollar. The directors judge that the functional currency of these subsidiaries is the US dollar, based on revenue, capital expenditure and the majority of costs being denominated in US dollars.
(b) Translation from functional currency to presentational currencyWhen the functional currency of a Group entity is different from the Group's presentational currency (pounds sterling), its results, financial position and cash flows are translated into the presentational currency as follows:
·; assets and liabilities are translated using exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date;
·; income and expense items are translated at average exchange rates for the year, except where the use of such an average rate does not approximate the exchange rate at the date of the transaction, in which case the transaction rate is used; and
·; all resulting exchange differences are recognised in translation reserves as a separate component of equity and are recognised in the income statement in the period in which the foreign operation is disposed of.
·; Cash flows are translated using average exchange rates during the period and the effect of exchange rate changes on the balances of cash and cash equivalents is presented as part of the reconciliation of movements therein.
Property, plant and equipment and depreciation
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost, net of depreciation and any provision for impairment.
Depreciation is provided to write off the cost less the estimated residual value of property, plant and equipment by equal instalments over the estimated useful economic lives as set out below.
·; Mining assets: mining assets are depreciated at varying rates on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives, which range from three to 17 years.
·; Smelter and refinery assets: smelter and refinery assets are depreciated at varying rates on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives, which range from five to 40 years.
·; Plant and equipment and motor vehicles: plant and equipment and motor vehicles are depreciated over their estimated useful lives on a straight line basis at the rate of 10% and 20% respectively.
·; Buildings: buildings are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives, currently 40 years.
Intangible assets - exploration and evaluation expenditure
All expenditure directly related to mineral exploration is capitalised on a project-by-project basis, pending the determination of the feasibility of the project. Exploration costs include certain administration and salary costs. If a project is ultimately deemed commercially and technically viable, the related exploration costs remain capitalised whilst the asset is developed, and are then written off over the life of the estimated ore reserve on a unit-of-production basis. If it is determined that a project is not expected to be successful, whether relinquished, abandoned or uncommercial, the related exploration costs are written off.
Once a decision is made to develop then the related exploration and evaluation costs are transferred from intangible to tangible assets.
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment used in exploration activities is capitalised to intangible exploration and evaluation assets.
For the purpose of impairment assessment, capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditures are allocated to the cash generating units on the basis of the exploration field in which the costs have been incurred.
Impairment
The carrying amounts of the Group's assets are reviewed at each balance sheet date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the asset's recoverable amount is estimated.
Exploration and evaluation assets are also assessed for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of an asset may exceed its recoverable amount.
An impairment loss is recognised to the extent that the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit ("CGU") exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the higher of i) its fair value less costs to sell and ii) its value in use, which is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset or CGU, discounted using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks associated with the asset or CGU. Impairment losses are recognised in the income statement.
Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to cash-generating units and then to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit. A cash generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. It usually corresponds to the exploration field or the production unit.
When a decline in the fair value of an available-for-sale financial asset has been recognised directly in equity and there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired, the cumulative loss that had been recognised directly in equity is recognised in profit or loss even though the financial asset has not been de-recognised. The amount of the cumulative loss that is recognised in the income statement is the difference between the acquisition cost and current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in the income statement.
The Company assesses for impairment the value of its investments in and loans to its subsidiaries.
Reversals of impairment
An impairment loss in respect of an investment in an equity instrument classified as available-for-sale is not reversed through the income statement. If the fair value of a debt instrument classified as available-for-sale increases and the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in the income statement, the impairment loss is reversed through the income statement. An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed.
In respect of other assets, an impairment loss is reversed when there is an indication that the impairment loss may no longer exist and there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised. Reversals of impairment relating to other assets are recognised in the income statement.
Investments
The Group's investments in equity securities are recognised initially at cost. Subsequent to their initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, including impairment losses, are recognised through profit or loss.
The Group holds a 66.7% interest in the Klipspringer Diamond Mine joint venture, the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of which are consolidated on a proportional basis.
The company has investments in its various subsidiaries. These are accounted for at cost less impairment. All inter-group loans are repayable on demand.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and call deposits with an initial period to maturity of no more than three months. Cash reserves held in currencies other than sterling are subject to changes in value resulting from exchange rate fluctuations.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. In determining the cost of raw materials, consumables and goods purchased for resale, the weighted average purchase price is used. For finished goods and work in progress which includes quantities of gold in process, cost is taken as production cost, which includes an appropriate proportion of attributable overheads. Net realisable value is calculated based on market prices prevailing as at the year-end less costs to sell.
Available-for-sale financial assets
The Group's Zimbabwean investments in equity securities, which were disposed of during the year were classified as available-for-sale financial assets. Subsequent to their initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses, are recognised directly in other comprehensive income. When an investment is de-recognised, the cumulative gain or loss in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss.
Loan payable
Loans are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Loans are subsequently carried at amortised cost; any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest rate.
Rehabilitation provision
A provision is recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, and when it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made.
Estimated long-term environmental obligations, comprising pollution control, rehabilitation and mine closure, are based on the Group's environmental management plans in compliance with current technology, environmental and regulatory requirements.
On initial recognition, the net present value of estimated future decommissioning costs are capitalised to property, plant and equipment and the concomitant provisions are raised. These estimates are reviewed annually and discounted using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money. Any increases in such revised estimates are capitalised to property, plant and equipment while decreases in estimates are recognised by impairing the asset in the income statement in the period in which they are incurred.
Revenue recognition
Revenue represents the sale of gold, nickel and diamonds net of discounts and taxes. Revenue also includes toll refining and processing of material on behalf of, or purchased from, non-group companies. Revenue from the sale of gold is based on the spot price on the date of delivery, while revenue from the sale of nickel is based on the international market price of nickel. Diamond revenue is based on negotiated prices. Revenue is only recognised when significant risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the purchaser.
Leases
Leases where the lessor retains the risks and rewards of ownership of the underlying asset are classified as operating leases. Operating lease rentals are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
The Group has not entered into any finance lease arrangements.
Employee benefits
(a) Defined contribution pension schemeCertain companies in the Group operate defined contribution pension schemes. The assets of the schemes are held separately from those of the Group in independently administered funds. The amounts charged to the income statement represent the contributions payable to the schemes in respect of the accounting period.
(b) Share-based paymentsThe share option programmes allow employees to acquire shares of the company. The fair value of options granted is measured at grant date and spread over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options. The fair value of the options granted is measured using an option- pricing model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted. The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options that vest except where variations are due only to share prices not achieving the threshold for vesting.
Taxation
The tax expense represents the sum of the current tax and deferred tax.
Current tax payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit before tax as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group's liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates and laws that have been enacted, or substantively enacted, by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is recognised on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and are accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and interests in joint ventures, except where the Group is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised, based on tax rates and laws that have been enacted, or substantively enacted, by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is charged or credited to the income statement, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the associated deferred tax is also dealt with in equity.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
2 Revised and Amended Standards and Interpretations
The following revised and amended standards and interpretations, which have all been endorsed by the EU, have been adopted by the Group in these consolidated financial statements; their adoption has had no material impact on the Group's net cash flows, financial position, total comprehensive income or earnings per share.
·; IFRS 1 (Revised), First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009, simplifies the structure of IFRS 1 without making any technical changes.
·; Amendments to IFRS 2, Group Cash-settled Share-based Payments Transactions, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2010, provides a clear basis to determine the classification of share-based payment awards in both consolidated and separate financial statements.
·; IFRS 3 (Revised), Business Combinations, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009. The standard continues to apply the acquisition method to business combinations, but with some significant changes. For example, all payments to purchase a business are to be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date, with some contingent payments subsequently remeasured at fair value through profit or loss; goodwill and non-controlling interests may be calculated on a gross or net basis; and all transaction costs are to be expensed.
·; IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009, requires the effects of all transactions with non-controlling interests where there is no change in control to be recorded in equity. Such transactions will no longer result in goodwill or gains and losses in the income statement.
·; Amendment to IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, for Eligible Hedged Items, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009, clarifies how to apply the principles that determine whether a hedged risk or portion of cash flows is eligible for designation.
·; IFRIC 15, Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2010, standardises accounting practice for the recognition of revenue by real estate developers for sales before construction is complete.
·; IFRIC 16, Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009, clarifies which currency exposures qualify for hedge accounting; which entity within a group can hold the hedging instrument; and how to determine the amounts to be reclassified from equity to profit or loss for both the hedging instrument and the hedged item when an investment in a foreign operation is disposed of.
·; IFRIC 17, Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2010, clarifies how an entity should measure distributions of assets, other than cash, when it pays dividends to its owners.
·; IFRIC 18, Transfers of Assets from Customers, which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 November 2009, clarifies the accounting for arrangements where an item of property, plant and equipment provided by the customer is used to provide an ongoing service.
Standards, Amendments and Interpretations That Are Not Yet Effective
The following new, revised and amended standards and interpretations have been issued and endorsed by the EU unless otherwise stipulated, but are not yet effective and have not been adopted by the Group in these consolidated financial statements. None of these revised and amended standards and interpretations is expected to have a material impact on the Group's net cash flows, financial position, total comprehensive income or earnings per share.
·; IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, which has not yet been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, is the first part of a new standard on classification and measurement of financial assets that will replace IAS 39.
·; IAS 24 (Revised), Related Party Disclosures, which has been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011, removes the requirement for government related entities to disclose details of transactions with the government and other government related entities and clarifies and simplifies the definition of a related party.
·; Amendment to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, which has been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 February 2010, addresses the accounting for rights issues that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuer.
·; Amendment to IFRIC 14, IAS 19 - The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and Their Interaction, entitled Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement, which has been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011, applies to companies that are required to make minimum funding contributions to a defined benefit pension plan.
·; IFRIC 19, Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments, which has been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010, clarifies the accounting treatment for equity instruments that are used to extinguish financial liabilities.
·; Amendments to IFRS 1, First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, (a) Limited Exemption from Comparative IFRS 7 Disclosures for First-time Adopters, which has been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010, ensures that first-time adopters of IFRS benefit from the same transition provisions that amendments to IFRS 7 provide to current IFRS preparers; and (b) Severe Hyperinflation and Removal of Fixed Dates for First-time Adopters, which has not yet been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2011, provides relief for first-time adopters of IFRS from having to reconstruct transactions that occurred before their date of transition to IFRS and provides guidance for entities emerging from severe hyperinflation.
·; Amendments to IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures, which has not yet been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2011, enhances the reporting of transfers of financial assets.
·; Amendments to IAS 12, Income Taxes, Deferred tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets, which has not yet been endorsed by the EU and which is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2012, provides a practical approach for measuring deferred tax assets and liabilities when investment properties are measured at fair value.
3 Segmental information
The Group has 4 reportable segments, as described below, which are the Group's strategic business units.
The strategic business units offer different products and services, and are managed separately because they require different technology and marketing strategies. The CEO reviews internal management reports for each of the strategic business units. The following summary describes the operations in each of the Group's reportable segments:
·; Gold: Gold mining and prospecting activities
·; Nickel: Nickel mining, smelting and refining activities currently on care and maintenance
·; Diamonds: Diamond mining activities currently on care and maintenance
·; Exploration: Gold and base metal exploration activities
Information about reportable segments - Operations
Gold | Nickel | Diamonds | Exploration | |||||||
(Freda Rebecca) | (Bindura Nickel Corporation) | (Klipspringer diamond mine) | Total | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
External revenue | 23,279 | 5,979 | 2,648 | 11,796 | 1,340 | 1,005 | - | - | 27,267 | 18,780 |
Reportable segment profit/(loss) before tax | 14,353 | (3,699) | (10,863) | (4,887) | (748) | (761) | (813) | 2,472 | 1,929 | (6,875) |
Reportable segment assets | 34,327 | 16,647 | 29,540 | 38,306 | 1,360 | 1,742 | 21,199 | 15,070 | 86,426 | 71,765 |
Reportable additions to property, plant and equipment | 2,555 | 2,210 | 1,414 | (261) | 16 | - | - | - | 3,985 | 1,949 |
Reportable additions to intangible assets | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7,652 | 4,047 | 7,652 | 4,047 |
Reconciliation of reportable segment profit or loss
2011 | 2010 | ||
£'000 | £'000 | ||
Total profit/(loss) for reportable segments | 1,929 | (6,875) | |
Unallocated amounts: | |||
Other corporate expenses | (5,730) | (7,501) | |
Consolidated loss before income tax | (3,801) | (14,376) |
Information about reportable segments - Geographical
South Africa and Zimbabwe | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Ghana | United Kingdom | Total | ||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
External revenue | 27,267 | 18,780 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 27,267 | 18,780 |
Reportable segment profit/(loss) before tax | 1,613 | (10,097) | (287) | 1,922 | 358 | (1,132) | (5,485) | (5,069) | (3,801) | (14,376) |
Reportable segment assets | 65,988 | 57,618 | 21,110 | 14,854 | 1,139 | 1,025 | 2,704 | 11,022 | 90,941 | 84,519 |
Reportable additions to property, plant and equipment | 3,991 | 1,956 | - | - | - | - | 4 | 72 | 3,995 | 2,028 |
Reportable additions to intangible assets | - | - | 7,652 | 4,047 | - | - | - | - | 7,652 | 4,047 |
Freda Rebecca sells its gold production to the Zimbabwean Chamber of Mines. The main products at BNC during the year related to nickel and the major customers were well-established commodities traders.
4 Property, plant and equipment
Mining assets | Smelter and refinery plant and equipment | Plant and equipment | Exploration assets | Building & leasehold | Motor vehicles | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cost or deemed cost | |||||||
Balance at 1 April 2009 | 68,797 | 23,817 | 2,032 | 2,713 | 22,265 | 9,633 | 129,257 |
Additions | 1,787 | 162 | 61 | - | - | 18 | 2,028 |
Additions of environmental assets | 5,402 | - | - | - | - | - | 5,402 |
Disposals | (14) | - | (12) | - | - | (14) | (40) |
Effect of movements in exchange rates | (3,706) | (1,451) | 41 | (125) | (1,268) | (547) | (7,056) |
Balance at 31 March 2010 | 72,266 | 22,528 | 2,122 | 2,588 | 20,997 | 9,090 | 129,591 |
Additions | 3,969 | - | 26 | - | - | - | 3,995 |
Additions of environmental assets | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | 24 |
Write down of environmental assets recognised previously | (906) | - | - | - | - | - | (906) |
Disposals | (72) | - | - | - | - | - | (72) |
Effect of movements in exchange rates | (4,448) | (1,350) | (68) | (145) | (1,259) | (545) | (7,815) |
Balance at 31 March 2011 | 70,833 | 21,178 | 2,080 | 2,443 | 19,738 | 8,545 | 124,817 |
Depreciation and impairment losses | |||||||
Balance at 1 April 2009 | (51,774) | (14,181) | (1,618) | (2,711) | (19,085) | (9,500) | (98,869) |
Depreciation for the year | (1,006) | - | (162) | - | - | (24) | (1,192) |
Disposals | 3 | - | 7 | - | - | 3 | 13 |
Effect of movements in exchange rates | 3,302 | 810 | 46 | 123 | 1,086 | 541 | 5,908 |
Balance at 31 March 2010 | (49,475) | (13,371) | (1,727) | (2,588) | (17,999) | (8,980) | (94,140) |
Impairment reversal | 11,743 | - | - | - | - | - | 11,743 |
Depreciation for the year | (1,124) | - | (118) | - | - | (23) | (1,265) |
Disposals | 41 | - | - | - | - | - | 41 |
Effect of movements in exchange rates | 2,998 | 802 | 73 | 145 | 1,079 | 539 | 5,636 |
Balance at 31 March 2011 | (35,817) | (12,569) | (1,772) | (2,443) | (16,920) | (8,464) | (77,985) |
Carrying amounts | |||||||
At 31 March 2009 | 17,023 | 9,636 | 414 | 2 | 3,180 | 133 | 30,388 |
At 31 March 2010 | 22,791 | 9,157 | 395 | - | 2,998 | 110 | 35,451 |
At 31 March 2011 | 35,016 | 8,609 | 308 | - | 2,818 | 81 | 46,832 |
Depreciation on exploration assets was capitalised to intangible assets.
The net book value of the company's property, plant and equipment as at 31 March 2011 amounted to £66,811 (2010: £92,187). Depreciation charged to the income statement of the company during the year amounted to £28,772 (2010: £18,749) and capital expenditure for the year to £3,395 (2010: £53,874).
5 Intangible assets
Goodwill | Development assets | Exploration and evaluation assets | Total | ||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||
Cost or deemed cost | |||||||
Balance at 1 April 2009 | 34,782 | 5,783 | 113,836 | 154,401 | |||
Capitalised exploration costs | - | - | 4,047 | 4,047 | |||
Capitalised depreciation | - | - | 141 | 141 | |||
Effect of movements in exchange rates | - | - | 119 | 119 | |||
Balance at 31 March 2010 | 34,782 | 5,783 | 118,143 | 158,708 | |||
Capitalised exploration costs | - | - | 7,652 | 7,652 | |||
Capitalised depreciation | - | - | 33 | 33 | |||
Effect of movements in exchange rates | - | - | (1,887) | (1,887) | |||
Balance at 31 March 2011 | 34,782 | 5,783 | 123,941 | 164,506 | |||
Amortisation and impairment losses | |||||||
Balance at 1 April 2009 | (34,782) | (5,783) | (105,836) | (146,401) | |||
Impairment reversal | - | - | 4,073 | 4,073 | |||
Impairment loss | - | - | (2,395) | (2,395) | |||
Effect of movements in exchange rates | - | - | (326) | (326) | |||
Balance at 31 March 2010 | (34,782) | (5,783) | (104,484) | (145,049) | |||
Effect of movements in exchange rates | - | - | 842 | 842 | |||
Balance at 31 March 2011 | (34,782) | (5,783) | (103,642) | (144,207) | |||
Carrying amounts | |||||||
At 31 March 2009 | - | - | 8,000 | 8,000 | |||
At 31 March 2010 | - | - | 13,659 | 13,659 | |||
At 31 March 2011 | - | - | 20,299 | 20,299 |
The carrying amount of the intangible assets relates to capitalised exploration on the SEMHKAT and Zani-Kodo exploration projects.
6 Cash and cash equivalents
Group | Company | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||||
Cash at bank and on hand | 4,592 | 6,300 | 1,279 | - | ||||
Call deposits | - | 8,856 | - | 8,856 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 4,592 | 15,156 | 1,279 | 8,856 | ||||
Net cash and cash equivalents were represented by the following major currencies:
Group | Company | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |||||
Australian dollar | - | 272 | - | - | ||||
British pound | 352 | 7,330 | 352 | 7,330 | ||||
Euro | 5 | 5 | - | - | ||||
South African rand | 369 | 244 | 34 | - | ||||
United States dollar | 3,866 | 7,305 | 893 | 1,526 | ||||
Net cash and cash equivalents | 4,592 | 15,156 | 1,279 | 8,856 | ||||
A further £69,027 (2010: £67,946) represents restricted cash and is being held by various institutions as guarantees.
The group's exposure to interest rate risks and sensitivity analysis for financial assets and liabilities is disclosed in note 32.
7 Issued share capital
Number of shares | Nominal value of shares | |||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||
£'000 | £'000 | |||||
Authorised | ||||||
Ordinary shares of 10 pence each | Unlimited | 65,000,000 | Unlimited | 65,000 | ||
Allotted, called up and fully paid | ||||||
Opening balance
| 488,774,359 | 400,433,819 | 48,877 | 40,043 | ||
Issued during the year
| 46,367,401 | 88,340,540 | 4,637 | 8,834 | ||
Closing balance
| 535,141,760 | 488,774,359 | 53,514 | 48,877 |
During the year the company issued 46,367,401 ordinary 10 pence shares for 11 pence per share (2010: 88,340,540 ordinary 10 pence shares for 10 pence per share) raising total consideration of £5,100,414 (2010: £8,834,054).
No shares were issued but not fully paid as at 31 March 2011 (2010: nil).
8 Provisions and other payables
2011 | Provisions at beginning of year | Effect of movements in exchange rates | Additional provisions | Provisions at end of year | |||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||
Legal provision | 819 | (49) | 1,232 | 2,002 | |||
Other provisions | 423 | (22) | 3,875 | 4,276 | |||
Provisions | 1,242 | (71) | 5,107 | 6,278 | |||
Other payables and accrued expenses | 13,291 | ||||||
Current portion of non-current loan payable | 449 | ||||||
Total provisions and other payables | 20,018 |
2010 | Provisions at beginning of year | Effect of movements in exchange rates | Additional provisions | Provisions at end of year | |||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||||
Legal provision | 120 | (28) | 727 | 819 | |||
Other provisions | 378 | (22) | 67 | 423 | |||
Provisions | 498 | (50) | 794 | 1,242 | |||
Other payables and accrued expenses | 12,036 | ||||||
Total provisions and other payables | 13,278 |
The company's other payables and accrued expenses as at 31 March 2011 amounted to £1,284,837 (2010: £1,052,928).
Related Shares:
Asa Resources