Annual Report for year ended December 31st 2011

1 May 2012

Origo Partners plc

("Origo" or the "Group")

Annual Report for year ended 31st December 2011

Highlights of the year:

- Net asset value: rose by 22 per cent to US$240.6 million (2010: US$196.6 million)

- Net asset value per share: rose by 3 per cent to US$0.68 (2010: US$0.66)

- Assets under management grew by 76 per cent to US$358.1 million (2010: US$203.4 million)

- Gains in the fair value of investments and from disposals of investments of US$26.4 million (2010: US$39.9 million)

- Total comprehensive income after tax of US$2.2million (2010: US$36.1 million)

- Total investments of US$83.6 million (2010: US$35.2 million)

- Cash position of US$56.9 million as at 31st December 2011 (2010: US$33.4 million)

- Establishment of China Cleantech Partners Fund in conjunction with Ecofin

- Establishment of Joint Venture with Trafigura provides a new platform for growth in mining

- Appointment of new Non-Executive Director

Chairman's Statement

Our second full year as Origo Partners was a successful one as we continued to deliver on the objectives set out at the time of the merger of Origo Sino India Plc and Origo Resource Partners Ltd, notably to capitalise on the significant pipeline of identified investments and develop an asset management business including the establishment of RMB funds.

These objectives were achieved against a background which clearly illustrated both the significant opportunities and risks inherent in operating in China.

The Chinese economy continued to post strong growth in 2011 against an otherwise lacklustre global economic backdrop. Sustained Chinese demand for coal, copper, and iron ore propped up commodity prices despite the on-going European debt crises. Meanwhile, theTwelfth5-year plan, enacted in spring of 2011, manifested a shift in the Chinese Government's development strategy towards sustainable growth, including support for the development of a domestic cleantech industry. For the first time in China's history, the proportion of city dwellers surpassed the rural population, prompting a renewed focus in both policy circles as well as the broader popular discourse about the imperative of developing supply of safe and high-quality food sources.

Our portfolio of investments, which is increasingly focussed on metals &mining, cleantech and agriculture, is well placed to benefit from these macro trends.

Balanced against these significant opportunities, a number of high profile cases over the last year also demonstrated the risks of investing in China. I believe that our active approach to investment and portfolio management enables us to mitigate against such risks. We take a rigorous approach to due diligence and maintain a close involvement in our portfolio companies in the post-investment phase. We seek to link disbursements of funds to the delivery of key targets, hold board-seats and often second our own employees and/or recruit and appoint key personnel to portfolio management teams.

A key determinant of our success is, therefore, to ensure we attract and retain those employees who are vital to our continued ability to deliver on our strategy. To this end, we recently granted options and shares to executive directors and a senior employee and last year we began accruing for performance incentives under the framework endorsed by shareholders in conjunction with the merger.

I am also pleased that we have been successful in recruiting Lionel de Saint- Exupery to our Board as a Non-Executive Director. Mr de Saint-Exupery brings a vast amount of experience in both equity and debt capital market transactions as well as in mergers and acquisitions across a broad range of industries to the Board, all of which will be invaluable in our further development.

In sum, Origo is well positioned to continue its progress in 2012 and we are confident that in the year ahead we will be able to deliver value from our portfolio.

Chief Executive's Statement

Last year we set out three clear goals for the business: to build on our strong position in the natural resources and cleantech sectors; to re-launch our asset management business; and to deliver value to shareholders through revaluations and exits. I'm pleased to say that we have delivered good progress against each objective.

In particular, I am very pleased to report on the significant progress being made at a number of our portfolio companies. We saw increases in the carrying value of a number of holdings, in particular in the mining portfolio. The value of Gobi Coal & Energy Ltd rose by 65 per cent to US$87.1 million (2010: US$52.7 million); the value of our investment in Celadon Mining Ltd increased by 78 per cent to US$23.3 million (cost of US$13.1 million); whilst the valuation of Kincora Copper Ltd increased by just below 300 per cent toUS$11.5 million, which included a US$0.5 million following investment this year (2010: US$2.9 million). I believe the value creation in these portfolio companies were - to a large extent - directly related to the on-going assistance of our strong metal and mining team, comprising investment professionals, geologists and technical experts.

The formation of our Joint Venture ("JV") with Trafigura Beheer B.V. ("Trafigura") in November 2011 was a significant endorsement of the underlying quality and increasing scale of our mining portfolio. The JV will invest in coal and iron ore opportunities in Mongolia with the objective of targeting high-grade deposits with the potential to produce significant export volumes. The combination of Origo's technical and deal making skills with Trafigura's global network and sector expertise in logistics and trading has the potential to form a powerful a platform to identify, fund and develop metal and mining assets.

We developed our cleantech strategy by partnering with Ecofin Limited ("Ecofin"), a sector leader in the global utility, infrastructure, alternative energy and environmental sectors. Together, we launched China Cleantech Partners, L.P. ("CCP"), a private equity fund targeting investment opportunities in the Chinese cleantech sector alongside the Chinese Government.CCP benefits from a flexible and unique dual USD/RMB structure and invests either directly, or indirectly as a limited partner through the Origo Xinxiang Renewable Energy Fund, L.P., which was launched by Origo and the Xinxiang Municipal Government in April 2010. Origo and a trust managed by Ecofin have each made an initial commitment of US$15 million to CCP This partnership again provides significant third party endorsement of Origo's ability to identify and complete investments, this time in the cleantech sector.

Following our successful US$60 million convertible issue in February 2011, we raised a further US$32.5 million before commissions and expenses in December 2011 via a placing of new ordinary shares to institutional investors. Increasingly, we thus have the balance sheet and financial flexibility to capture opportunities as they arise.

Investments

In 2011, total investments amounted to US$83.6 million compared to US$35.2 million in the prior year. Investments comprised US$ 22.3 million in funds and investment vehicles advised and co-managed by the Group; US$ 46.1 million in three new portfolio companies; and US$15.2 million of follow-on investments in a number of existing companies.

In February, we made a small loan investment of approximately US$0.5 million to acquire a 49 per cent stake in Shanghai EV-Tech Ltd. ("EV-Tech") in the future, subject to the achievement of certain operational and financial milestones. EV-Tech specialises in the sale and development of battery management systems and vehicle control units for the electrical vehicle market.

In March, we made a US$13 million investment in China Rice Ltd ("China Rice"), one of China's largest privately held rice processing and distribution groups, converting a US$13 million loan into equity. At the same time, we secured an option to invest a further US$10 million in the form of a convertible note which was exercised in August. We are pleased to report that company posted healthy growth in 2011 on the back of our capital injection.

In that same month, we announced a US$9 million follow on investment in Unipower Battery Ltd ("Unipower") in the form of a convertible note. Our investment enabled Unipower to increase production of large capacity lithium-ion batteries. While the electrical vehicle market grew slower than expected in the second half of the year, the company made good progress in building its customer base and expanding its product offering into the power storage segment.

In March, Origo also acquired a 9.7 per cent equity stake in Celadon Mining Ltd ("Celadon"), a China focused coal mining and exploration company. Celadon owns four coal properties with a total estimated resource base of 260 million tonnes of predominantly high grade PCI and meagre coal. The position was acquired in a secondary transaction for US$13.1 million, prompting us to revaluate the holding on the back of several other secondary transactions at significantly higher price level during the second half of the year.

In June, Origo invested US$10 million in Moly World Ltd ("Moly World"), the owner of an advanced stage molybdenum exploration project in Mongolian return for 20 per cent equity stake and an off take covering up to 20 per cent of all future production for the life of mine. Moly World used the proceeds to fund the drilling program resulting in a maiden JORC-compliant resource estimate, which was published in March 2012. The resource statement confirmed the presence of a high grade, near surface resource of 203.4 million tonnes grading 0.1261 per cent molybdenum with total contained molybdenum metal of 256,000 MT. This very significant resource could support a large scale open cut mine and consultants have been retained to produce a scoping study which is expected to lead to the commencement of a detailed pre-feasibility study.

In December, Origo exercised warrants granted in conjunction with the Company's initial equity investment in Niutech Energy Ltd to subscribe for US$1.65 million worth of additional preferred stock in that company.

Divestments

In January, we sold part (0.4 per cent) of our beneficial interest in Beijing Rising Information Technology Ltd. ("Rising"), raising US$2.5 million in cash.

In July 2011,Kincora Copper Ltd ("Kincora") was successfully created following the acquisition of Origo's interests in Kincora Group Ltd by Brazilian Diamonds Ltd. As a result of this transaction, we were able to convert our holding in a private company into a public listed exploration and development company with a strong management team. Kincora, which is listed on the Toronto Venture Exchange, has already made significant progress in advancing the development of its key Bronze Fox copper gold project in Mongolia. In August 2011, Kincora successfully acquired the remaining 25 per cent holding in the Bronze Fox deposit which it did not already own and, after the end of the year, acquired two highly prospective contiguous mining licences. Both of these transactions were funded via equity issuance and whilst this has led to our equity interest in Kincora reducing to 33.2 per cent we believe the company's prospects are much enhanced as a result of the transactions. After the year end, Kincora announced a number of positive exploration results significantly extending the potential zone of copper mineralisation and underlining the potential to discover significant copper-gold porphyry.

Finally, in October 2011 our portfolio company Smarton5 was acquired by 6waves Lolapps, a leading global social and mobile game developer and publisher with significant venture capital backing. The transaction, settled in a combination of cash and 6wavescommon stock, valued Origo's interest in Smartron5 at (US$2.6 million) compared to cost of US$ 0.7 million.

Portfolio

At the end of 2011, the carrying value of our Portfolio was US$260 million compared to US$163 million at the end of 2010. The portfolio comprised 27 companies with the top ten investments representing 90 per cent of the fair value.

The proportion of our portfolio in the metals and mining sector rose, from 50 per cent in 2010 to 57 per cent in 2011, following US$23 million of new investments in the sector and revaluation of a number of holdings. Our exposure to cleantech also rose from 13 per cent to 15 per cent. Despite investments in China Rice during the year, the portion of the portfolio invested in agriculture fell slightly to 24 per cent from 27 per cent. Following our decision to dispose of older investments meant the TMT portion of our portfolio fell to 4 per cent from 9 per cent.

Reflecting the Group's strategy of investing in privately held companies, 92 per cent of the Portfolio (in terms of fair value) at the end of the year was invested in unquoted portfolio companies.

The Company's direct holdings in listed companies included stakes in HaloSource Inc. (LSE: HAL), Kincora Copper Limited (TSXV: KCC), Voyager Resources Ltd (ASX: VOR) and IsCool Entertainment (ALISC:EN Paris). The Group also held indirect interest in quoted stocks through its investments in the Mongolian Stock Exchange Liquidity ("MSE") Fund and China Commodities Absolute Return Ltd ("CCF"), further described below in Assets under management.

The weighted average holding period for portfolio companies is 2.5 years, up from 1.9 years in 2010 reflecting the new investments made during 2011, with 80 per cent of the Portfolio (primarily comprising of our natural resources investments) having been held for less than 3 years. Of the remainder, 16 per cent has been held for 3-4 years, and 4 per cent for 4 years or longer.

Assets under management

The Group defines its assets under management ("AUM") as total assets of the Group plus the net asset value of (and the aggregate commitments to) third party funds and other pools of investments advised by the Group (net of any commitments to or ownership of the Group in such funds).

Assets under management rose from US$203.4 million at the end of 2010 to US$358.1 million at the end of 2011 as we launched new funds and made significant progress in developing our asset management business. Total assets of the Group equalled US$323.1 million (2010: US$203.4 million). Aggregate commitments to funds managed by the Group amounted to US$ 35 million (2010:nil).

Besides CCP, described above, we manage two public equity funds; the Mongolian Stock Exchange Liquidity ("MSE") Fund and the China Commodities Absolute Return Ltd ("CCF").

The MSE Fund provides investors with exposure to the fast growing Mongolian economy through investments in the largest companies listed on the Mongolian Stock Exchange; high interest savings deposit rates on offer at Mongolian commercial banks; and exposure to the Mongolian currency. The MSE Fund is open-ended and has a minimum subscription threshold of $10,000. The fund is off to a promising start, having posted annualized returns of 22 per cent since launch in September 2011 until the end of 2011.

CCF is a global equity, long/short mining fund with a focus on China event driven opportunities. The fund seeks to capitalise on opportunities through taking long and short positions mainly in publicly traded equities. CCF seeks to holds 10-15 positions and principally invests in base metals, precious metals and steel raw materials. Currently, CCF is predominantly invested in companies with Mongolia based assets (c.60 per cent of portfolio). CCF has returned 46 per cent since inception until the end of 2011.

Profit and Loss

Administration costs amounted to US$21.9 million compared to US$6.2 million in 2010. 72 per cent of these costs were non-cash based charges in the form of movements in accruals including a reversal in the accrued interest on loans extended to portfolio companies of US$2.4 million and a provision for US$13.4 million in performance incentives.

Accruals for performance incentives were assessed on the basis of performance fees arising on individual investments under the terms of the Company's investment performance scheme, capped at 20 per cent of the accumulated gain (realised and unrealised) of the Company's portfolio of investments taking into account write-offs, realisations, and movements in the fair value of all investment completed from the time of admission until the reporting date and previous incentive payments made,

Adjusting for the above items, operating expenses equated to US$6.0 million in 2011 compared to US$6.2 million in 2010.

Primarily due to the same accruals, our operating loss widened to US$21.4 million (2010: loss of US$4.7 million). Investment income decreased to US$26.4 million compared to US$39.7 million in 2010. Post net gains from foreign exchange movements and finance income, Origo posted total comprehensive income after tax of US$2.2 million (2010: US$36.1 million).

Balance Sheet

The Directors' valuation of the portfolio at 31 December 2011 was US$260 million compared to US$163 million at 31 December 2010, an increase of US$97 million. A significant part of the 59 per cent increase was due to US$83.6 million of investments completed during the year offset by divestments of US$ 14 million. The remaining balance of US$27.4 resulted from a net positive movement in the fair value of our portfolio.

At the end of 2011, Origo had total cash and cash equivalents of US$56.9 million. (2010: US$33.4 million). The increase is mainly a result of US$57.3 million in net proceeds following the issuance of convertible zero-dividend shares in March 2011 and a placing of US$32.5 million before commission and expenses December 2011. Net asset value rose from US$196.6 million in 2010 to US$240.6 million in 2011 representing a net asset value per share of US$0.68, a 3 per cent increase from US$0.66 per share in 2010.

Outlook

Having been close to overheating in 2010/2011, we expect the Chinese economy to enter into a more modest, but stable growth mode in 2012 and beyond.

Still, China's comparatively low rates of consumption of commodities per capita relative to OECD economies indicates that consumption of natural resources is likely to continue to rise for years to come as the processes of industrialisation and urbanisation continues to unfold. Similarly, we expect China's shift to a more sustainable development strategy, coupled with a growing middle class, will provide a fertile ground for identifying promising investment opportunities in the cleantech and agricultural sectors.

To address these opportunities, we will continue to develop on our competitive strengths - both through further growing our team and developing our in-house competence as our asset base expands - as well as through partnerships with sector leaders.

In fiercely competitive private equity market, we expect our nascent fund management business, in particular that of RMB funds, to become a valuable tool in gaining access to the best deals. We also believe our experience in originating and managing cross-border transactions form a powerful value-proposition to Chinese enterprises, which are increasingly seeking to capitalise on China linked opportunities outside of China's boarders.

Accordingly, executing on our fund-raising strategy, as well as realising value in our existing portfolio and recycling the proceeds into new products and investment targets remain key priorities for this year and beyond.

For further information about the Origo please visit www.origoplc.com or contact:

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

For the year ended 31 December 2011

Consolidated statement of financial position

At 31 December 2011

The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue. They were signed on its behalf by:

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

For the year ended 31 December 2011

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve within parent's equity:

Consolidated statement of cash flows

For the year ended 31 December 2011

* FVTPL refers to fair value through profit or loss

1 Accounting policies

1.1 Corporate information

The consolidated financial statements of Origo Partners Plc ('the Company") and its subsidiaries (together "the Group") for the year ended 31 December 2011 were authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the directors on 1 May 2012. The Company is a limited liability company incorporated and domiciled in the Isle of Man whose shares are publicly traded on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange. The registered office is located at 1 Circular Road Douglas, Isle of Man IM99 3NZ. The principal activities of the Group are described in Note 6.

1.2 Basis of preparation

The Group financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the Accounting Standards Board and also to comply with relevant Isle of Man law.

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial information is set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the periods presented, unless otherwise stated.

(a) The financial information set out below, is based on the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and associates for the year ended 31 December 2011.

(b) The consolidated financial information has been prepared under the historical cost convention except for certain financial instruments, which have been measured at fair value, and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee's interpretations ("IFRIC") (collectively , "IFRSs") issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the "IASB").

(c) Non-controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets that is not held by the Group and are presented separately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and within equity in the consolidated statement of financial position, separately from parent shareholders' equity.

1.3 Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions

The preparation of consolidated financial information in conformity with IFRSs requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial information and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based upon management's best knowledge of current events and actions, actual results may differ from those estimates.

The following is a list of accounting policies which cover areas that the directors consider requiring estimates and judgements which have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year:

(a) Share-based payments, equity-settled transactions and cash-settled transactions

The Group has applied the requirements of IFRS 2 share-based payment in these financial statements.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.3 Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions (continued)

(a) Share-based payments, equity-settled transactions and cash-settled transactions (continued)

The Group has issued equity-settled share-based payments to certain directors and employees, and to its advisors for services provided in respect of the admission of the Company to trading on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange. Equity-settled share-based payments to directors and employees are measured at the fair value of equity instruments awarded at the date of grant. Equity-settled share-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of goods or services rendered at the date when the goods or services are received. Where equity investments are granted subject to vesting conditions, share-based payments are expensed to the profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group's estimate of the number of shares that will eventually vest. Fair value is measured by use of the Black-Scholes model.

The Group has granted cash-settled share-based payments to certain directors, executives and key employees under the Company's joint share ownership scheme ("JSOS"). The cost of cash-settled share-based payments is measured initially at fair value at the grant date using Black-Scholes option pricing model. This fair value is expensed over the period until the vesting date with recognition of a corresponding liability. The liability is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date up to and including the settlement date, with changes in fair value recognised in employee expense.

When estimating the value of the options and the upper share rights ("USR"), significant assumptions such as the expected life of the option and the USR, and expected volatility of the share have been applied based on management's best estimates.

(b) Fair value of unquoted equity instruments

The Group has estimated the value of each of its unquoted equity instruments by using judgement to select the most appropriate valuation methodology for each investment based on the recommendations of the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Guidelines (the "Guidelines"). Valuation methodologies mainly include the price of recent investments, earnings multiples, industry valuation benchmarks, available market prices and so on, which may apply individually or in combination. Key assumptions and judgements of each methodology concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty will have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the fair value of the instruments within the next financial year.

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies

The following principal accounting policies have been applied consistently throughout the year in dealing with items which are considered material in relation to the financial information.

(a) Basis of consolidation

Basis of consolidation from 1 January 2010

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries as at 31 December 2011.

Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Group obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date when such control ceases. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. All intra-group balances, transactions, unrealised gains and losses resulting from intra-group transactions and dividends are eliminated in full.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(a) Basis of consolidation (continued)

Basis of consolidation from 1 January 2010 (continued)

Losses within a subsidiary are attributed to the non-controlling interest even if that results in a deficit balance.

A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction. If the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it:

·; Derecognises the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities of the subsidiary

·; Derecognises the carrying amount of any non-controlling interest

·; Derecognises the cumulative translation differences, recorded in equity

·; Recognises the fair value of the consideration received

·; Recognises the fair value of any investment retained

·; Recognises any surplus or deficit in profit or loss

·; Reclassifies the parent's share of components previously recognised in other comprehensive income to profit or loss or retained earnings, as appropriate.

Business combinations from 1 January 2010

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, measured at acquisition date fair value and the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. For each business combination, the acquirer measures the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. Acquisition costs incurred are expensed and included in administrative expenses.

When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date. This includes the separation of embedded derivatives in host contracts by the acquiree.

If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer's previously held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date through profit or loss.

Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration which is deemed to be an asset or liability, will be recognised in accordance with IAS 39 either in profit or loss or as a change to other comprehensive income. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity, it should not be remeasured until it is finally settled within equity.

Goodwill is initially measured at cost being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognised for non-controlling interest over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If this consideration is lower than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised in profit or loss.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(a) Basis of consolidation (continued)

Business combinations from 1 January 2010 (continued)

After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is, from the acquisition date, allocated to each of the Group's cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the combination, irrespective of whether other assets or liabilities of the acquiree are assigned to those units.

Where goodwill forms part of a cash-generating unit and part of the operation within that unit is disposed of, the goodwill associated with the operation disposed of is included in the carrying amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal of the operation. Goodwill disposed of in this circumstance is measured based on the relative values of the operation disposed of and the portion of the cash-generating unit retained.

(b) Associates

Associates are all entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights except where the entity has been classified as held for trading and measured at fair value through profit or loss according to IAS 39. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are initially recognised at cost. The Group's investments in associates include goodwill (net of any accumulated impairment loss) identified on acquisition.

The Group's share of its associates' post-acquisition profits or losses is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income, and its share of post-acquisition movements in reserves is recognised in reserves. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. When the Group's share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other unsecured receivables, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.

Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its associates are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interests in the associate. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.

(c) Joint ventures

Interests in joint ventures which are held for operating activity are accounted for in accordance with IAS 31 using the equity method of accounting. Interest in joint ventures that are held as part of Group's investment portfolio are carried in the balance sheet at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IAS39, with changes in fair value recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in the period of the change.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(d) Foreign currencies

·; Functional and presentation currency

Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the "functional currency"). The consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollar, which is the Group's presentation currency.

·; Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.

Changes in the fair value of monetary securities denominated in foreign currencies classified as available for sale are analysed between translation differences resulting from changes in the amortised cost of the security, and other changes in the carrying amount of the security. Translation differences are recognised in profit or loss, and other changes in the carrying amount are recognised in other reserve.

Non-monetary financial assets and liabilities that are carried at historic cost are translated using the exchange rate as at the dates of initial transactions and not re-measured. Translation differences on non-monetary financial assets and liabilities such as equities held at fair value through profit or loss are recognised in profit or loss as part of the fair value gain or loss. Translation differences on non-monetary financial assets, such as equities classified as available for sale, are included in the fair value reserve in equity.

·; Group companies

The results and financial position of all Group entities, none of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

(I) assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that statement of financial position;

(II) income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive income are translated at average exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the dates of the transactions); and

(III) all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(e) Financial assets

The Group classifies its financial assets into one of the following categories, depending on the purpose for which the asset was acquired. The Group's accounting policy for each category is as follows:

·; Investments at fair value through profit or loss

These financial assets are designated by the Board of Directors at fair value through profit or loss at inception, which include debt and equity securities, and derivatives.

Recognition / Derecognition:

Regular acquisitions and disposals of investments are recognised on the date on which the Group received acquisitions of investments or delivered disposals of investments. A fair value through profit or loss asset is derecognised when the Group loses control over the contractual rights that comprise that asset. This occurs when rights are realised, expire or are surrendered and the rights to receive cash flows from the investment have expired or the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Realised gains and losses on fair value through profit or loss assets sold are calculated as the difference between the sales proceeds and cost. Fair value through profit or loss assets that are derecognised and corresponding receivables from the buyer for the payment are recognised as of the date the Group commits to sell the assets.

Measurement:

Financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss is initially recognised at fair value. Transaction costs are expensed in the profit or loss. Subsequent to initial recognition, all financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss are presented in the profit or loss in the period in which they arise.

Interest income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss is recognised in the profit or loss within other income using the effective interest method. Dividend income from investments at fair value through profit or loss is recognised in the profit or loss within other income when the Group's right to receive payments is established.

Fair value estimation:

The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded securities) is based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, PLUS listed securities and unlisted private companies) is determined by using valuation techniques in accordance with the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines (the "Guidelines"). Pursuant to the Guidelines, the Group believes the following techniques applied individually, or in combination, are the most suitable ones for the Group's current portfolios:

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(e) Financial assets (continued)

·; Investments at fair value through profit or loss (continued)

Fair value estimation (continued):

(I) Price of recent investments: When valuing investments on the basis of the price of recent investments, the cost of the investment itself or the price at which a significant amount of new investment into the relevant investee company was made to estimate the fair value of the investment, but only for a limited period following the date of the relevant transaction. During the limited period following the date of the relevant transactions, changes or events subsequent to the relevant transaction which would imply a change in the investment's fair value have been assessed.

(II) Earnings multiples: When valuing investments on a multiple basis, the Group has abided by the following principles:

i. apply a multiple that is appropriate and reasonable (giving the risk profile and earnings growth prospects of the underlying company) to the maintainable earnings of the underlying company;

ii. adjust the amount derived in (i) above for surplus assets or excess liabilities and other relevant factors to derive the enterprise value for the underlying company;

iii. deduct from the enterprise value all amounts relating to financial instruments ranking ahead of the highest ranking instrument of the Group in a liquidation and taking into account the effect of any instrument that may dilute the Group's investments in order to derive the gross attributable enterprise value;

iv. apply an appropriate marketability discount to the gross attributable enterprise value derived in (iii) above in order to derive the net attributable enterprise value. The marketability discount relates to an investment rather than to the underlying business. Marketability discounts will vary from situation to situation and is a question of judgement. When a discount is applied, relevant factors in determining the appropriate marketability discount in each particular situation will be considered. A discount in the range of 10% to 30% (in steps of 5%) is generally used in practice, depending upon the particular circumstances; and

v. apportion the net attributable enterprise value appropriately between the relevant financial instruments.

(III) Industry valuation benchmarks: The use of industry benchmarks is only likely to be reliable and therefore appropriate as the main basis of estimating fair value in limited situations, and is more likely to be useful as a sense of check of values produced using other methodologies. The Group has primarily relied on such metrics to validate the outcome produced by other valuation techniques.

(IV) Available market prices: Instruments quoted on an active stock market are valued at their bid prices on the reporting date.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(e) Financial assets (continued)

·; Investments at fair value through profit or loss (continued)

Fair value estimation (continued):

As recommended by the Guidelines, the Group generally does not adopt net asset value or discounted cash-flow methodologies for assessing the fair value of its investments, unless such methodologies result in a more accurate estimate of fair value.

·; Loans and receivables

These assets are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted on an active market. Income from loans and receivables is recognised as it accrues by reference to the principal outstanding and the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash flows through the expected life of the financial asset to the asset's carrying value. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.

·; Available-for-sale investments

Non-derivative financial assets not included in the above categories are classified as available-for-sale investments and comprise the Group's strategic investments in entities not qualifying as subsidiaries or associates. Investments that do not have a quoted market price and whose fair value cannot be reliably measured are held at cost. Where investments are carried at fair value, any changes are recognised directly in equity. Where a decline in the fair value of an available-for-sale financial asset constitutes objective evidence of impairment, the amount of the loss is removed from equity and recognised in the other comprehensive income.

·; Derivative financial instruments

Derivative financial instruments are held at fair value and changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss of the statement of comprehensive income.

(f) Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently carried at amortised cost.

·; Preference shares

Convertible Redeemable Zero-Dividend Preference Shares ("CZDP") are regarded as a compound financial instrument, consisting of a liability component and an equity component. The fair value of the liability component is estimated at the date of issue using the prevailing market interest rate for similar bond without early redemption or equity conversion option. The difference between the proceeds of the CZDP issue and the fair value of the liability component of the CZDP is assigned to the equity component of the CZDP representing the embedded equity conversion option, and the derivative financial assets representing the embedded early redemption option.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(f) Financial liabilities (continued)

·; Preference shares (continued)

Issue costs were allocated among the liability, and equity components of the CZDP and the derivative financial assets based on their relative carrying amounts at the date of issue.

The interest charges on the CZDP liability component is computed using the prevailing market interest rate for similar bond without early redemption or equity conversion option.

(g) Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term borrowings

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash in hand, demand deposits, time deposit and short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash, are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, and have a short maturity, generally less than three months, less bank overdrafts which are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Group's cash management. For the purpose of the statement of financial positions, cash and bank balances comprise cash on hand and at banks, including term deposits, which are not restricted as to use.

Short-term borrowings are made for varying periods of between three months and twelve months, depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Group, and pay interest at the respective short-term borrowing rates.

(h) Share-based payments

Employees (including senior executives) of the Group receive remuneration in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render services as consideration for equity instruments ("equity-settled transactions"). Certain directors, executives and key employees of the Group are granted share appreciation rights, which can only be settled in cash ("cash-settled transactions"). Advisors receive equity-settled options in relation to the Company's admission to trading on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange.

The cost of these options with employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments awarded at the date of grant, whereas those with non-employees are measured at the fair value of goods or services received at the date when the goods or services have been received. The fair value is determined by using Black-Scholes model, further details of which are given in note 26.

Equity-settled transactions

The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award (the "vesting date"). The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and the Group's best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The profit or loss charge of credit for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of that period and is recognised in employee expense (see Note 4).

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(h) Share-based payments (continued)

Equity-settled transactions (continued)

No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market or non-vesting condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other performance and/or service conditions are satisfied.

Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, the minimum expense recognised is the expense as if the terms had not been modified. An additional expense is recognised for any modification, which increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee as measured at the date of modification.

Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award, and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new awards are treated as if they were a modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.

The dilutive effect of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of earnings per share.

Cash-settled transactions

The cost of cash-settled transactions is measured initially at fair value at the grant date using Black-Scholes option pricing model, further details of which are given in Note 26. This fair value is expensed over the period until the vesting date with recognition of a corresponding liability. The liability is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date up to and including the settlement date, with changes in fair value recognised in employee expense (see Note 4).

(i) Leased assets

Where a significant portion of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership is retained by the lessor (an "operating lease"), the total rentals payable under the lease are charged to the profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The land and buildings elements of property leases are considered separately for the purposes of lease classification.

(j) Taxes

Current Income Tax

Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

Current income tax relating to items recognised directly in equity is recognised in equity and not in the statement of comprehensive income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(j) Taxes (continued)

Deferred Tax

Deferred tax is provided using the liability method on temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences, except:

(I) where the deferred tax liability arises from goodwill or the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and

(II) in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and associates where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised, except:

(I) where the deferred tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and

(II) in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and associates, deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Income taxes are recognised in the profit or loss except when a tax exemption has been granted.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(k) Performance incentive payable

Performance incentive payable is only accrued on those investments (classified as investments at fair value through profit or loss and loans) in which the investment's performance conditions, measured at the end of each reporting period , would be achieved if those investments were realised at fair value. Fair value is determined using the Group's valuation methodology and is measured at the end of each reporting period.  A provision is made based on the Group's share of profits, taken into account, the overall performance of the Company's portfolio and return to shareholders, subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Any changes in the performance incentive provision will be reflected in the line item of the statement of comprehensive income in which the expense establishing the provision was originally recorded.

(l) Revenue recognition

Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for the sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of the Group's activities. Revenue is shown, net of sales taxes, rebates and discounts and after eliminating sales within the Group. Revenue is recognised as follows:

·; Sales of goods - wholesale

Sales of goods are recognised when a Group entity has delivered products to the customer; the customer has accepted the products and ability to collect the related receivables is reasonably assured.

·; Sales of goods - retail

Sales of goods are recognised when a Group entity sells a product to the customer. Retail sales are usually in the form of cash or through a credit card transaction. The recorded revenue includes credit card fees payable for the transaction. Such fees are included in distribution costs. It is the Group's policy to sell its products to the end customer with a right of return. Accumulated experience is used to estimate and provide for such returns at the time of sale.

·; Sales of services

Sales of services include fund consulting and consulting services which are recognised in the accounting period in which the services are rendered, by reference to completion of the specific transaction assessed on the basis of the actual service provided as a proportion of the total services to be provided.

·; Income

Interest income is recognised on a time proportion basis using the effective interest method and includes bank interests and interests from debt securities.

Investment income includes changes in the fair value of financial assets and liabilities held for trading or designated upon initial recognition as 'at fair value through profit or loss' and excludes interest and dividend income and expense.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(l) Revenue recognition (continued)

·; Income (continued)

Realised profits over value on the disposal of investments are the difference between the fair value of the consideration received less any directly attributable costs, on the sale of equity and the repayment of loans and receivables, and its initial carrying value, converted into dollar using the exchange rates in force at the date of disposal.

Unrealised profits on the revaluation of investments are the movement in the carrying value of investments between the start and end of the accounting period converted into dollar using the exchange rates in force at the date of the movement.

(m) Provisions and contingent liabilities

Provisions are recognised for liabilities of uncertain timing or amount when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation arising as a result of a past event, which will probably result in an outflow of economic benefits that can be reasonably estimated.

Where it is not probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required, or the amount cannot be estimated reliably, the obligation is disclosed as a contingent liability, unless the probability of an outflow of economic benefits is remote. Possible obligations, the existence of which will only be confirmed by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more future events, are also disclosed as contingent liabilities unless the probability of an outflow of economic benefits is remote.

(n) New and revised international financial reporting standards that are effective or early adopted in 2011 and relevant to the Group

The IASB has issued the following new and revised IFRSs (including International Accounting Standards ("IASs")) and IFRIC interpretations that are effective as of 1 January 2011:

IAS 24 Related Party Transactions (Amendment)

The IASB issued an amendment to IAS 24 that clarifies the definitions of a related party. The new definitions emphasise a symmetrical view of related party relationships and clarifies the circumstances in which persons and key management personnel affect related party relationships of an entity. In addition, the amendment introduces an exemption from the general related party disclosure requirements for transactions with government and entities that are controlled, jointly controlled or significantly influenced by the same government as the reporting entity. The adoption of the amendment did not have material impact on the financial position or performance of the Group.

IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation (Amendment)

The IASB issued an amendment that alters the definition of a financial liability in IAS 32 to enable entities to classify rights issues and certain options or warrants as equity instruments. The amendment is applicable if the rights are given pro rata to all of the existing owners of the same class of an entity's non-derivative equity instruments, to acquire a fixed number of the entity's own equity instruments for a fixed amount in any currency. The amendment has had no material effect on the financial position or performance of the Group.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(n) New and revised international financial reporting standards that are effective or early adopted in 2011 and relevant to the Group (continued)

IFRIC 14 Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement (Amendment)

The amendment removes an unintended consequence when an entity is subject to minimum funding requirements and makes an early payment of contributions to cover such requirements. The amendment permits a prepayment of future service cost by the entity to be recognised as pension asset. The amendment to the interpretation had no material effect on the financial position or performance of the Group.

(o) Impact of improvements to International Financial Reporting Standards (issued 2010)

Improvements to IFRSs (issued May 2010)

In May 2010, the IASB issued its third omnibus of amendments to its standards, primarily with a view to removing inconsistencies and clarifying wording. There are separate transitional provisions for each standard. The adoption of the following amendments resulted in certain changes to accounting policies, but did not have significant impact on the financial position or performance of the Group.

(a) IFRS 3 Business Combinations: The measurement options available for non-controlling interest (NCI) were amended. Only components of NCI that constitute a present ownership interest that entitles their holder to a proportionate share of the entity's net assets in the event of liquidation shall be measured at either fair value or at the present ownership instruments' proportionate share of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. All other components are to be measured at their acquisition date fair value.

The amendments to IFRS 3 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2011. The Group however adopted these as of 1 January 2011 and changed its accounting policy accordingly as the amendment was issued to eliminate unintended consequences that may arise from the adoption of IFRS 3.

(b) IFRS 7 Financial Instruments - Disclosures: The amendment was intended to simplify the disclosures provided, by reducing the volume of disclosures around collateral held and improving disclosures by requiring qualitative information to put the quantitative information in context.

(c) IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements: The amendment clarifies that an entity may present an analysis of each component of other comprehensive income either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes to the financial statements.

Other amendments resulting from improvements to IFRSs to the following standards did not have significant impact on the accounting policies, financial position or performance of the Group.

(a) IFRS 3 Business Combinations (Contingent consideration arising from business combination prior to adoption of IFRS 3 (as revised in 2008))

(b) IFRS 3 Business Combinations (Un-replaced and voluntarily replaced share-based payment awards)

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(o) Impact of improvements to International Financial Reporting Standards (issued 2010) (continued)

Other amendments resulting from improvements to IFRSs to the following standards did not have significant impact on the accounting policies, financial position or performance of the Group (continued).

(c) IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements

(d) IAS 34 Interim Financial Statements

The following interpretation and amendments to interpretations did not have any impact on the accounting policies, financial position or performance of the Group:

IFRIC 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments

(p) Standards issued but not yet effective

Standards issued but not yet effective up to the date of issuance of the Group's financial statements are listed below. This listing is of standards and interpretations issued that the Group reasonably expects to be have an impact on disclosures, financial position or performance when applied at a future date.

IAS 1 Financial Statement Presentation - Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income

The amendments to IAS 1 change the grouping of items presented in OCI. Items that could be reclassified (or 'recycled') to profit or loss at a future point in time (for example, upon derecognition or settlement) would be presented separately from items that will never be reclassified. The amendment affects presentation only and has there no impact on the Group's financial position or performance. The amendment becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012

IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements (as revised in 2011)

As a consequence of the new IFRS 10 and IFRS 12, what remains in IAS 27 is limited to accounting for subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities, and associates in separate financial statements. The Group does not present separate financial statements. The amendment becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (as revised in 2011)

As a consequence of the new IFRS 11 and IFRS 12, IAS 28 has been renamed IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, and describes the application of the equity method to investments in joint ventures in addition to associates. The amendment becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(p) Standards issued but not yet effective (continued)

IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures - Enhanced Derecognition Disclosure Requirements

The amendment requires additional disclosure about financial assets that have been transferred but not derecognised to enable the user of the Group's financial statements to understand the relationship with those assets that have not been derecognised and their associated liabilities. In addition, the amendment requires disclosures about continuing involvement in derecognised assets to enable the user to evaluate the nature of, and risks associated with, the entity's continuing involvement in those derecognised assets. The amendment becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2011. The amendment affects disclosure only and has no impact on the Group's financial position or performance.

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement

IFRS 9 as issued reflects the first phase of the IASBs work on the replacement of IAS 39 and applies to classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities as defined in IAS 39. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. In subsequent phases, the IASB will address hedge accounting and impairment of financial asset. The completion of this project is expected over the course of 2011 or the first half of 2012. The adoption of the first phase of IFRS 9 will have an effect on the classification and measurement of the Group's financial assets but will potentially have no impact on classification and measurements of financial liabilities. The Group will quantify the effect in conjunction with the other phases, when issued, to present a comprehensive picture.

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements

IFRS 10 replaces the portion of IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements that addresses the accounting for consolidated financial statements. It also includes the issues raised in SIC-12 Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities.

IFRS 10 establishes a single control model that applies to all entities including 'special purpose entities'. The changes introduced by IFRS 10 will require management to exercise significant judgement to determine which entities are controlled, and therefore are required to be consolidated by a parent, compared with the requirements that were in IAS 27.

This standard becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements

IFRS 11 replaces IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures and SIC-13 Jointly-controlled Entities - Non-monetary Contributions by Venturers.

IFRS 11 removes the option to account for jointly controlled entities (JCEs) using proportionate consolidation. Instead, JCEs that meet the definition of a joint venture must be accounted for using the equity method.

This standard becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

1 Accounting policies (continued)

1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(p) Standards issued but not yet effective (continued)

IFRS 12 Disclosure of Involvement with Other Entities

IFRS 12 includes all of the disclosures that were previously in IAS 27 related to consolidated financial statements, as well as all of the disclosures that were previously included in IAS 31 and IAS 28. These disclosures relate to an entity's interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structured entities. A number of new disclosures are also required. This standard becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

IFRS 13 - Fair Value measurement

IFRS 13 establishes a single source of guidance under IFRS for all fair value measurements. IFRS 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather provides guidance on how to measure fair value under IFRS when fair value is required or permitted. The Group is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on the financial position and performance. This standard becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

The Group has not early adopted any other standard, interpretation or amendment that was issued but is not yet effective.

2 Revenue and cost of sales

3 Administrative expenses

* In connection with the passing of the subsequent re-admission of the Company on November 10, 2009 and Resolution 5 of the Company's extraordinary general meeting on December 11, 2009, an investment performance incentive arrangement for investment professionals, including Chris Rynning and Niklas Ponnert, involved with OPP's investment portfolio became effective (the "Scheme")

Under the arrangement, Origo Advisors Ltd ("OAL"), a company beneficially owned by Chris Rynning and Niklas Ponnert, will become entitled to a performance fee with respect to any profitable realisation of an investment of the Group on the following basis:

• a performance incentive shall be paid only if the Group has realised a profit on a realisation in excess of the cost of investment plus a rate of 10 per cent. per annum on a compounding basis up to the date of realisation ("Performance Hurdle");

• if the Performance Hurdle is met, the performance incentive will be an amount equal to 20 per cent. of the excess of the sum of the cost of investment and the Performance Hurdle ("Performance Incentive"); and

• Performance Incentives accruing to OAL shall be payable at the discretion of the board of directors of the Company (other than Chris Rynning and Niklas Ponnert), subject to (i) there being no change in control of the Company; and (ii) Chris Rynning and Niklas Ponnert both serving as Directors, save if either voluntarily resigns or is guilty of misconduct or neglect in the performance of his duties on behalf of the Company.

In exercising its discretion, the Board shall take into account, inter alia: the overall performance of the Company's portfolio and return to shareholders; and the requirement to incentivise and retain key members of the Company's wider management team from time to time.

For the year ended 31 December 2011, performance incentive accruals of US$13,357K was approved by the board of directors of the Company (other than Chris Rynning and Niklas Ponnert) at the board meeting held on 27 April 2012.

In determining the amount to be accrued, the board (i) assessed the amount of performance incentives arising on each and every individual investment under the terms of the Scheme; and (ii) capped the total amount to be accrued at 20 per cent of the accumulated gain (realised and unrealised) of the Company's portfolio of investments taking into account write-offs, realisations, and movements in the fair value of all investment completed from the time of admission until the balance sheet date and previous payments made under the Scheme.

4 Information regarding directors and employees

* Management includes Mr. Chris A Rynning, the Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Niklas Ponnert, the Chief Financial Officer.

5 Directors' remuneration

Directors' remuneration for the year 2011 and the number of options held were as follows:

Directors' remuneration for the year 2010 and the number of options held were as follows:

* Short term employee benefits

** Share-based payment refers to expenses arising from the Company's share option scheme (note 26)

*** Resigned from the Board on 16 February 2011.

6 Operating segment information

The Group's primary reporting format for reporting segment information is by operating segment based on the nature of its business which was private equity investments, fund consulting, consulting services and furniture trading in 2011 and 2010.

The Group mainly had five geographical segments based on the location of assets. The segments are defined as Isle of Man, Guernsey, Malaysia, China and others.

6 Operating segment information (continued)

For the year ended 31 December 2011

For the year ended 31 December 2011

6 Operating segment information (continued)

For the year ended 31 December 2010

For the year ended 31 December 2010

7 Investment income

7 Investment income (continued)

* FVTPL refers to fair value through profit or loss

8 Finance income and costs

9 Tax

No provision for current tax was made for the year as the subsidiaries had no assessable profit. As the Company is not in receipt of income from Manx land or property and does not hold a Manx banking licence, it is taxed at the standard rate of 0% on the Isle of Man. As the Company is quoted on AIM market of the London Stock Exchange, it is outside the scope of the Attribution Regime for Individuals.

* The tax charge for the year arises from realised profits of Rising Technology Corporation Ltd based on a tax rate of 25% and realised profits of Smartron 5 Inc. based on a tax rate of 10%.

** The deferred income tax relates to net change in fair value loss of Rising Technology Corporation Ltd, fair value gain of Celadon Mining Ltd and fair value gain of convertible option of China Rice Ltd, estimated in accordance with the relevant tax laws and regulations in the PRC based on a tax rate of 10%.

The tax expense for the year can be reconciled per the statement of comprehensive income as follows:

9 Tax (continued)

Deferred income taxes

10 Earnings per share

11 Property, plant and equipment

12 Investments in subsidiaries

The principal subsidiaries of the Group, all of which have been included in these consolidated financial

statements are as follows: