Annual Financial Results

13 March 2026

THIS ANNOUNCEMENT RELATES TO THE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION THAT QUALIFIED OR MAY HAVE QUALIFIED AS INSIDE INFORMATION WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 7(1) OF THE MARKET ABUSE REGULATION (EU) 596/2014

CLS HOLDINGS PLC

("CLS", the "Company" or the "Group")

RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2025

MAKING PROGRESS ON ACHIEVING OUR STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

CLS is a leading office space specialist and a supportive, progressive and sustainably focused commercial landlord, with a £1.7 billion portfolio in the UK, Germany and France, offering geographical diversification with local presence and knowledge.

For the year ended 31 December 2025, the Group has delivered the following results:

1 A reconciliation of statutory to alternative performance measures is set out in Note 5 to the Group financial statements

2 Nm = Not meaningful

Fredrik Widlund, Chief Executive Officer of CLS, commented:

"In 2025, CLS has focused on achieving its strategic priorities, concentrating on what is within our control and continuing to navigate a prolonged downturn in the property cycle amid significant domestic and international economic and political uncertainty. We are clear on what we need to do to refocus the business and drive operational efficiency, strengthen our balance sheet and position our assets for long-term growth: we made good progress in 2025 and expect that to continue in 2026."

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

· EPRA EPS fell 17.4% to 7.6 pence (2024: 9.2 pence) per share reflecting loss of rent from disposals and the above-target vacancy rate, partly offset by reduced finance and administration costs. Prior year EPS also benefited from 0.7 pence related to a forfeited deposit.

· Portfolio valuation fell 3.8% in local currency (UK -4.6%, Germany -2.7% and France -4.5%), although the UK was impacted by a change in the valuation basis of Spring Gardens to a residential development site. Excluding this, our UK portfolio fell by 1.6%.

· Statutory loss after tax of £50.3 million (2024: £93.6 million loss) primarily due to a £79.2 million (2024: £127.7 million) net valuation decline on investment properties. This translates to statutory loss per share of 12.6 pence (2024: 23.6 pence loss).

· EPRA NTA per share fell 6.7% to 200.7 pence (2024: 215.0 pence) primarily as a result of the decline in property values, offset partly by net foreign exchange gains from our portfolios in Germany and France. Total accounting return for the year was -4.8% (2024: -11.9%).

· A final dividend of 2.7 pence per share (2024: 2.68 pence) will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting, resulting in a full dividend of 4.0 pence per share (2024: 5.28 pence per share). The full year dividend is 1.9 times covered by EPRA EPS, in line with the Group's dividend policy.

· Conditional upon shareholder approval at the 2026 AGM, we are proposing to offer an optional enhanced scrip dividend scheme for the final dividend under which shareholders are able to opt to take new shares instead of cash at a 5% discount to the reference share price, increasing their investment in the company and enhancing our ability to invest in our portfolio.

OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS

· Net rental income decreased by 11.1% to £101.3 million (2024: £114.0 million) reflecting the combination of a like-for-like decrease of 6.3% due to increased portfolio vacancy and disposals during the year. The prior year also benefited from £2.9 million from a forfeited deposit which did not reoccur in 2025.

· Disposals totalling £144.2 million completed during the year, including Spring Mews Student, Vauxhall. In December 2025, we signed a conditional sale agreement with a residential developer for Spring Gardens, Vauxhall, which is expected to complete in late 2026 or early 2027.

· We secured contracted annual rent of £17.0 million (2024: £16.6 million) across 99 new lettings and renewals in 2025 (2024: 112), including an eight-year, index-linked lease for 14,700 sqm at Gotic Haus, due to commence in November 2026. As a whole, leases were signed at 6.3% above 31 December 2024 estimated rental values. Rent collection rates remain high at 99% of contracted rent due.

· Vacancy increased to 14.5% (2024: 12.7%) largely reflecting anticipated lease expiries at New Printing House Square in London and Inside in Paris, as well as the previously announced two large unforeseen insolvencies in our German portfolio late in the year. We are seeing a good level of enquiries for our vacant space so far this year and are also evaluating strategic refurbishment or redevelopment opportunities to support medium-term value creation.

· Our embedded focus on improving the sustainability credentials of our portfolio continues: we achieved a 5.8% reduction in like-for-like landlord energy usage (2024: 4.9% reduction) and 84% of our UK portfolio has an Energy Performance Certificate rating of A-C (2024: 82%).

FINANCING

· Net debt fell by £86.2 million during the year, mainly reflecting our disposal activity. Our loan-to-value (LTV) ratio was 50.0% at 31 December 2025 (2024: 50.7%) reflecting lower debt levels, offset by the decline in portfolio value.

· We refinanced or repaid an exceptionally high £373.7 million of loans during the year with a minimal impact on the weighted average cost of debt which was 3.8% at 31 December 2025 (2024: 3.8%). This activity both increased the average debt maturity to 3.6 years (2024: 3.2 years) and smoothed the future maturity profile.

· 69% of debt is at fixed rates and 7% is subject to interest rate caps (2024: 80% fixed and 4% caps).

· Our balance sheet remains resilient with cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash) of £49.4 million (2024: £60.5 million) and undrawn credit facilities of £38.0 million (2024: £60.0 million).

OUTLOOK

· We remain confident in both our long-term strategy of owning and actively managing high-quality, well-located, multi-let office assets in Europe's three largest economies, and our near-term strategic priorities of reducing our vacancy, strengthening our balance sheet through active refinancing and disposals, and investing in our properties.

· Economic conditions remain subdued across Europe but the outlook was becoming more supportive before the war in the Middle East. It is early days and therefore difficult to judge the short- and longer-term impact of the war on Europe's economies and, therefore, property markets. Local factors remain important: Germany should be well positioned to benefit from stimulative fiscal policy and, in a number of our markets, office supply constraints are beginning to emerge following a prolonged period of limited new construction.

· We are focusing on executing initiatives within our control to deliver on our strategic priorities. We are encouraged by letting interest so far this year and we continue to work hard to reduce our vacancy rate towards our long-term target of 5%.

· We expect to dispose between £100 million and £150 million of assets during 2026 to help reduce our leverage towards our target LTV range of between 35% and 45%. In addition, we have submitted the planning application for the Spring Gardens residential redevelopment and, subject to achieving permission later this year, we expect to complete the disposal in late 2026 or early 2027.

· While the effects of our disposal programme, refinancing activity and preparation of certain larger assets for redevelopment are likely to impact earnings in 2026, we believe these necessary actions will bear fruit in the medium-term, improving and focusing our portfolio, driving higher occupancy and strengthening our balance sheet, creating a business capable of delivering attractive and sustainable long-term value for shareholders.

Dividend Timetable

- ends -

Results presentation

A presentation for analysts and investors will be held in-person at Panmure Liberum, by webcast on Friday 13 March 2026 at 8:30am followed by Q&A. Questions can be submitted online via the webcast.

· Panmure Liberum: Ropemaker Place, 25 Ropemaker Street, London EC2Y 9LY

· Webcast: The live webcast will be available to access here: https://sparklive.lseg.com/CLSHoldings/events/05fc441f-3fb4-4171-9f61-86215644c490/cls-holdings-plc-full-year-results-2025

Further information

CLS Holdings plc

(LEI: 213800A357TKB2TD9U78)

www.clsholdings.com

Fredrik Widlund, Chief Executive Officer

Harry Stokes, Chief Financial Officer

+44 (0)20 7582 7766

Panmure Liberum

Jamie Richards

David Watkins

+44 (0)20 3100 2000

Berenberg

Carl Gough

Harry Nicholas

+44 (0)20 3207 7800

Edelman Smithfield (Financial PR)

Alex Simmons +44 7970 174 353

Hastings Tarrant +44 7813 407 665

[email protected]

Forward-looking statements

This document may contain certain 'forward-looking statements'. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to future events and circumstances. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of CLS speak only as of the date they are made and no representation or warranty is given in relation to them, including as to their completeness or accuracy or the basis on which they were prepared. Except as required by its legal or statutory obligations, the Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect any changes in its expectations with regard thereto or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Information contained in this document relating to the Company or its share price, or the yield on its shares, should not be relied upon as an indicator of future performance.

Group at a glance

Our office portfolio at a glance (at 31 December 2025)

1 The above tables comprise data for our offices in investment properties and held for sale (see note 12 and 14). They exclude owner-occupied space, student accommodation and hotel.

Chief Executive's review

Introduction

The economic backdrop of our three chosen geographies of the UK, Germany and France during 2025 was stable but with slow economic growth. When combined with varying levels of political uncertainty both domestically and internationally, the environment was not conducive to improved investment and employment levels which are so important for office occupier demand. Post-pandemic hybrid and flexible working practices are stabilising and, in areas, reversing. Businesses and their employees recognise that offices have an important role to play in efficient, productive and collaborative working. Equally, occupiers now expect more from their offices in terms of amenities, collaborative space, higher sustainability standards (not least to reduce occupancy costs) and a greater focus on employee wellbeing.

The office sub-markets in which we operate have varying degrees of strength at the moment. Core city markets tend to be characterised by limited supply and rental growth; suburban and regional markets have more availability with softer lease terms while supply stabilises through a combination of lettings and the removal of older offices through change of use, mainly to residential space. All of our properties are located in or close to major European cities and they are characterised by being in strong local business centres with good transport links. We remain confident in the long-term success of these markets, particularly as companies look for space convenient for their employees, with shorter commutes and lower-cost, high quality space.

Recent structural changes have reshaped the office market and CLS is responding to these changes. We constantly review our portfolio, selling properties no longer core to our strategy and those for which we have maximised value, but also focusing on multi-let offices where we can benefit from tenant diversification. This reduces concentration risk and the impact of structural changes to any one sector of the economy. For example, the revolutionary impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents both challenges and opportunities.

We use AI to make our own business more productive, and we are mindful that our diversified tenant base will be impacted in different ways and at different times. By having in-house asset management, we keep close to our tenants and ensure that we can react quickly to their evolving needs, as well as directing our capital expenditure to ensure that we are well positioned to benefit from new businesses and technologies that will emerge as part of the AI revolution.

Internally, we have undertaken some difficult but necessary measures to reduce our cost base to reflect the size of our portfolio. The actions we are taking to improve our operational performance will result in a leaner CLS and one that is fit for the future.

Delivering on our strategic priorities

We continue to make progress in reshaping the business to ensure long-term success based on our four strategic priorities.

Reduce vacancy and improve earnings growth

As expected, vacancy increased during the first half of the year from 12.7% at the end of 2024 to 15.1% at June 2025 as newly refurbished space was completed. Since the half-year, we have made good progress in letting this new space at Artesian (now 35% full), The Coade (now 41% full) and at Gotic Haus in Dortmund with an eight year, 14,700 sqm lease taking the building to 85% occupied.

As a result of this increased second half letting activity, vacancy fell to 14.5% at the end of 2025 and would have fallen further to 13.7% had it not been for two larger tenants unexpectedly entering into insolvency in Germany. During the year, leases signed were on average 6.3% ahead of valuers' estimated rental values (ERV) and 2026 has started well with a good level of enquiries, and we continue to work hard to reduce the vacancy rate towards our long-term target of 5%.

Reduce debt through targeted asset sales

In 2025, we made further progress with our sales programme but in a consciously disciplined manner. In 2024 we completed £66.1 million of sales and the progress accelerated in 2025 with £144.2 million of properties sold. A particular highlight was the £101.1 million sale of Spring Mews Student, which was well-timed given the more recent downturn in the purpose-built student accommodation market.

In 2026, we are aiming to dispose of between £100-£150 million of assets, excluding Spring Gardens where we have exchanged contracts to sell the property to a residential developer, conditional on achieving satisfactory planning permission. We have initiated sales programmes on more than the targeted level and are under offer on around £140 million, including Spring Gardens.

CLS remains committed to bringing its LTV to within the targeted range of between 35% and 45%. At the end of 2025, our LTV was 50.0% (2024: 50.7%), reflecting a balance of asset disposals and property value declines during the year. Successful completion of £100-£150 million of disposals, absent further property value declines, will reduce LTV to between 45% and 47%. However, we may consider more sales if LTV does not reduce sufficiently quickly, particularly if we receive favourable unsolicited offers.

Successful refinancing or repayment of debt due in 2025

Due to lease expiries and short-term debt extensions, CLS had a disproportionately higher amount of debt maturing in 2025. As a result of refinancings and the restructuring of some portfolio loans, all £373.7 million across 11 loans with nine lenders was successfully refinanced, extended or repaid.

The profile of debt maturities is now more evenly spread in future years such that no more than £200 million is expiring in any year going forward. As at 31 December 2025, we had £199.3 million of debt maturing in 2026. This comprised £145.5 million across seven loans, £42.0 million of committed facilities and £11.8 million of amortisation. We are confident that debt expiring in 2026 will be refinanced or repaid alongside sales.

Investing in our properties to unlock additional value

The pandemic accelerated occupier demands for higher quality buildings in terms of amenities, flexibility, wellbeing, digital infrastructure and sustainability. During the year, we invested £14.3 million in our portfolio, although capital expenditure requirements vary year to year depending on occupier demand and timing of projects. We are also more consciously linking expenditure to pre-lets, as well as regulatory requirements, to ensure faster and more certain returns on this investment.

Financial results

In 2025, EPRA earnings per share (EPS) fell by 17.4% to 7.6 pence (2024: 9.2 pence), reflecting primarily reduced net rental income largely as a result of disposals, particularly of Spring Mews Student, offset in part by lower financing costs as a result of lower levels of net debt and lower operating and administrative costs. 2024 EPS also benefited by 0.7 pence from the receipt of a forfeited deposit which was not repeated in 2025.

IFRS EPS improved to a loss of 12.6 pence (2024: loss of 23.6 pence) reflecting the lower overall decline of our portfolio value and lower net finance costs compared to 2024. These contributed to a 6.7% reduction in EPRA NTA to 200.7 pence per share (2024: 215.0 pence) and a 5.5% reduction in statutory NAV per share to 186.4 pence (2024: 197.3 pence).

Dividends

We are recommending a final dividend of 2.70 pence per share, in line with the 2.68 pence final dividend declared in 2024. The total dividend for the year is therefore 4.0 pence, 24% lower than the 2024 dividend (5.28 pence), reflecting the dividend policy established in 2024 that dividends should be 1.5 to 3.0 times covered by EPRA earnings. The 2025 full dividend is 1.9 times covered by EPRA EPS of 7.6 pence.

Subject to shareholder approval, we are proposing to offer an enhanced scrip dividend scheme for the 2025 final dividend. Under the UK REIT rules, we are obliged to distribute substantially all of our UK earnings, leaving us with limited ability to retain capital in the business for future investment. By offering an enhanced scrip scheme, shareholders are able to opt to take new shares at a 5% discount to the Reference Share Price instead of a cash dividend, increasing their investment in the company and enhancing our ability to invest in our portfolio.

Property portfolio

At 31 December 2025, the value of our investment portfolio, including assets held for sale, was £1.70 billion (2024: £1.85 billion), reflecting disposals during the year as well as a 3.8% decline in value on a constant currency basis (2024: 5.8% decline). Within this, the UK portfolio fell by 4.6%, or by 1.6% excluding Spring Gardens (2024: 8.3% decline), Germany by 2.7% (2024: 3.5% decline) and France by 4.5% (2024: 5.1% decline).

The lower valuation reflected a slight softening of property yields, by 16 basis points to an equivalent yield of 6.1% (2024: 5.9%) and ERVs which fell by 0.1% (2024: 0.8% fall).

The overall decline was lower than last year, reflecting our belief that values are stabilising in a lower interest rate environment. One of the largest individual moves was Spring Gardens where the valuers have adjusted the basis of valuation to reflect the conditional agreement to sell the property for residential development. This comprises a payment on satisfaction of the conditions (primarily planning permission) and potential overage payments which will not be known until the new owner completes the development.

Asset and property management

At 31 December 2025, our lettable portfolio totalled 533,597 sqm and generated £91.1 million of annualised (passing) rent. Most of our buildings are multi-let, housing 669 tenants of which 30.2% are government agencies, 32.2% are large corporations and 13.4% are medium-sized companies. The strength of our occupier base is reflected in a billed rent collection rate of 99% (2024: 99%). In addition to rent currently being paid, a further £15.1 million of rent will be paid once rent-free periods expire.

Over the course of the year, we signed £17.0 million of new annualised rent (2024: £16.6 million) across 99 lettings and renewals at an average 6.3% above ERV.

Our vacancy rate at the end of 2025 was 14.5% (2024: 12.7%), the increase due in part to planned expiries at New Printing House Square and other buildings as we work towards vacant possession in advance of redevelopment, and two tenant insolvencies in Germany towards the end of the year. We also have a number of properties which are subject to planned future development, conversion to alternative use, or actively undergoing significant refurbishment or development. These buildings form our future pipeline of opportunities to add value to our portfolio.

During the year, we invested £14.3 million of capital in our existing portfolio, and delivered 9,532 sqm of newly refurbished or developed space of which 6,194 sqm has been let.

In 2026, there are a number of known and potential upcoming expiries, not least at Spring Gardens where the National Crime Agency lease expires in September, shortly before we expect to sell the site for residential development, and at Harman House and New Printing House Square, both earmarked for medium-term redevelopment. While we are working hard to retain tenants, these may cause short-term volatility in earnings and vacancy while we work to realise the attractive medium-term opportunities they present.

Balance sheet and financing

At 31 December 2025, net debt fell by 9.2% to £852.5 million (2024: £938.7 million), reflecting disposals during the year. The weighted average cost of debt remained stable despite the refinancing activity, while the weighted maturity of the debt book increased to 3.6 years (2024: 3.2 years) as a result of the refinancing activity carried out during the year, lengthening and smoothing the future maturity profile.

Our primary leverage indicator is balance sheet loan to value (LTV) ratio and this improved slightly to 50.0% (2024: 50.7%) reflecting the lower debt levels, offset by the reduction in the value of the property portfolio. An alternative leverage measure, net debt to EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) increased to 12.4 times (2024: 11.9 times) reflecting the interplay between the lower level of earnings during the year and lower net debt at the end of the year. As we make progress on our strategic priorities (reducing net debt and improving earnings), we expect this measure to fall. Interest cover (defined as EBITDA divided by net finance costs), was 1.8 times (2024: 1.9 times) reflecting lower net finance costs, following the debt repayments in 2025, offset by lower EBITDA than in 2024.

During the year, we refinanced or repaid £373.7 million of debt across 11 loans from nine lenders. In 2026, the refinancing requirements are substantially lower, with £199.3 million of maturing secured loans and credit facilities. Discussions are underway with new and existing lenders, with most of the debt maturing in the second half of the year.

At 31 December 2025, the Group had cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash - see note 16) of £49.4 million (2024: £60.5 million), £28.0 million of undrawn committed facilities (2024: £50.0 million) and a £10.0 million overdraft facility (2024: £10.0 million).

Sustainability

CLS is half-way into the delivery of its 2030 Sustainability Strategy and Net Zero Carbon (NZC) Pathway. Since the launch date in 2020, both the Group's near and medium-term business strategy and the sustainability landscape have evolved. To ensure the ongoing and future strategic alignment of the Group's approach to building and value chain decarbonisation and its overall business strategy, CLS is undertaking a review of its current NZC Pathway. The Group remains committed to becoming a net zero carbon business and any amendments to the current Pathway will be validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), ensuring alignment with the latest climate science.

In 2025, as part of the Group's current NZC Pathway, CLS has continued to deliver energy efficiency and carbon reduction projects across the portfolio and the annual, like-for-like, landlord energy consumption decreased by 5.8% whilst our Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions reduced by 9.3%, meaning we remain on track to deliver our current NZC Pathway targets. We also expect to meet near-term regulatory requirements in our geographies including minimum Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) ratings in the UK and Décret Tertiaire in France: 84% of our UK buildings by space have an EPC rated C or better. Our investment in this important area continues in 2026 with a number of projects involving the replacement of gas supply with renewable and cleaner sources of energy.

In 2025, the Group maintained its EPRA sBPR Gold award for sustainability disclosure and its GRESB four-stars rating for the sustainability of its portfolio. In 2026, CLS has chosen not to participate in GRESB to reduce the burden of reporting allowing us to focus our time and resources on direct decarbonisation of our portfolio. We will continue to assess our buildings using certification schemes including BREEAM In-Use which we believe are more meaningful for both occupiers and investors.

As part of our continued commitment to being a responsible company and a long-term investor in our local communities, we maintained our support for local and industry-related charities and community organisations as well as our Living Wage Employer accreditation, covering both UK employees and regular contractors.

Our staff and our culture

It has not escaped the attention of most market observers that the property sector has experienced one of its longer downturns which has naturally impacted not just our financial results but also our employees. We hold regular town halls and all staff meetings to ensure there are plenty of opportunities to provide feedback on how we can maintain and improve our well-established, positive culture throughout the organisation. I am pleased that our excellent teams have delivered, and continue to deliver, a resolute focus on executing our strategic priorities. On behalf of the Board, I want to reiterate our ongoing thanks for their tremendous dedication to, and achievements for, CLS.

Outlook

We remain confident that the core of the CLS strategy, which has delivered resilient performance through multiple market cycles, is the right approach for the Company over the long term. The strategy continues to focus on the ownership and active management of high-quality, well-located, multi-let office assets across Europe's three largest economies.

Economic conditions remain subdued across Europe but the outlook was becoming more supportive before the war in the Middle East. It is early days and therefore difficult to judge the short- and longer-term impact of the war on Europe's economies and its property markets. However, local factors remain important. Germany should be well positioned to benefit from stimulative fiscal policy with investment in defence and infrastructure expected to support economic growth and, in turn, office occupier and investor demand over the medium-term. Additionally, in a number of our markets, supply constraints are beginning to emerge for high-quality office space following a prolonged period of limited new construction.

Notwithstanding the wider geopolitical and economic uncertainties, we are making good progress in delivering operational improvements and executing initiatives within our control to advance our strategic priorities. These actions are concentrated on: letting available space to reduce vacancy and drive earnings growth; executing sales, at appropriate values, to reduce balance sheet gearing; exploiting opportunities to capture value uplifts as well as fund ongoing investment to improve the quality of the portfolio; and refinancing debt maturities and improving Group liquidity.

In the short term, 2026 has started well with a noticeable uptick in enquiries for our space. However, the combined effects of our disposal programme, refinancing activity and the preparation of certain larger assets for redevelopment are likely to impact earnings in 2026.

In the medium-term, we expect these actions to bear fruit, improving occupancy and creating workplaces in structurally resilient locations where businesses want to be, driving improved values for our properties, reducing our gearing and strengthening our balance sheet.

CLS has successfully navigated several market cycles throughout its history, and we are confident that the Company is well positioned to emerge from the current period as a stronger, more focused business, delivering sustainable long-term value for shareholders.

Fredrik Widlund

Chief Executive Officer

United Kingdom

UK market review

The UK economy experienced another volatile year, initially driven by global economic uncertainty following the imposition of US trade tariffs, and subsequently by business and consumer caution ahead of the November Budget.

The commercial property investment market improved, with investment volumes reaching c.£53 billion, up over 20% compared with 2024. The strongest improvement occurred in the fourth quarter of the year.

Office leasing take-up in London totalled c.10.0 million sq. ft, while the wider South East market recorded c.3.5 million sq. ft, both broadly in line with the previous year. Year-end vacancy in London fell from 9.2% to 8.4%, driven by limited availability of prime properties. Vacancy in the South East decreased from 12.3% to 11.6%.

Portfolio movement and valuation summary

In 2025, the value of the UK portfolio decreased by £129.6 million as a result of a revaluation decline of £32.6 million or 4.6%, disposals of £101.7 million, including Spring Mews Student, Vauxhall, and depreciation of £0.1 million, partly offset by capital expenditure of £4.8 million. The overall valuation decline of 4.6% was largely shaped by movement at Spring Gardens, Vauxhall reflecting a change in valuation approach for this asset to reflect its conditional sale as a residential development.

Excluding Spring Gardens, the portfolio experienced a more modest decline of 1.6%, influenced by a 13 basis point expansion in equivalent yields on a like-for-like basis and higher vacancy following lease expiries. Encouragingly, ERVs edged upwards by 0.2% on a like-for-like basis.

Asset management

EPRA vacancy reduced from 18.5% at 31 December 2024 to 18.0% due to leasing progress at Artesian, Aldgate and The Coade, Vauxhall offset by the scheduled expiry of all leases at New Printing House Square, London in June 2025.

In 2025, 52 lease extensions and new leases secured £8.1 million of rent at an average of 7.9% below 31 December 2024 ERVs, reflecting some short-term, flexible leases at properties due for medium-term development.

The most significant new leasing transaction in 2025 was the letting of 1,217 sqm at Artesian to a serviced office operator whilst a further 578 sqm was let to a social media tech company. There was also meaningful progress at The Coade in Vauxhall where further lettings were secured to a mixture of financial, media and professional services companies.

In terms of existing tenants, despite the expiry of all leases at New Printing House Square, renewals were signed with a significant number of existing tenants which secured a total rent of c.£4 million per annum as part of the strategy to reposition the building in 2029.

Developments and refurbishments

Total capital expenditure in 2025 was £4.8 million, which was reduced from the £9.4 million spent in 2024 as our focus switched to smaller fit-outs to meet tenant requirements.

At Spring Gardens, let to the National Crime Agency, we exchanged a contract for sale with London Square Developments Limited conditional on achieving planning consent for a major residential scheme. The planning application was submitted in February 2026. To support this strategy we extended the leases with the National Crime Agency to September 2026, securing additional income of £7.0 million.

The application for Permitted Development Rights at Columbia House, Bracknell was recently approved and we will commence the design process shortly for our repositioning of New Printing House Square.

Disposals

During 2025 we completed the sale of the student accommodation at Spring Mews for £101.1 million, in line with book value.

We continue to look at opportunities to exit some of our smaller assets, or assets which have a higher value as alternative use, as market conditions allow.

Outlook

Economic growth in 2026 is expected to remain muted. Recent reductions in interest rates have been supportive for the property sector but it remains sensitive to the continuing international political and economic uncertainty. The November 2025 budget avoided several business tax measures expected by commentators which helped build optimism for greater occupier and investment activity. The degree to which this will translate into sustainable momentum will depend significantly on how the war in the Middle East develops.

Germany

Germany market review

Germany experienced another year of weak growth, characterised by low business confidence and political uncertainty. Concerns regarding the long-term impact of trade tariffs and energy supply continued to place pressure on the export sector and overall economic growth.

Commercial property investment remained subdued, declining to c.€24 billion, down 4% compared with 2024.

Office leasing activity across the seven largest cities totalled c.2.7 million sqm, representing a slight increase on the previous year. Average vacancy rose to 8.0%, with Berlin recording the largest increase in availability. Vacancy rates vary significantly between cities, with Cologne among the lowest at 5.0%, while Düsseldorf remains elevated at 11.3%.

Portfolio movement and valuation summary

In 2025, the value of the German portfolio decreased by £13.6 million, reflecting a revaluation decline of £21.9 million or 2.7% in local currency, disposals totalling £38.8 million and depreciation of £0.1 million. These impacts were partly offset by a £41.8 million foreign exchange gain and £5.4 million of capital expenditure. In Sterling, the property valuation growth was 2.6% when incorporating foreign exchange effects and disposals.

The 2.7% valuation decline in local currency reflected a 4 basis point expansion in equivalent yields on a like-for-like basis and higher vacancy. ERVs also reduced by 60 basis points on a like-for-like basis.

Asset management

The vacancy rate increased to 11.1% as at 31 December 2025 (2024: 6.7%) as a result of the expected departure of some large tenants. We were also impacted by two tenants unexpectedly filing for insolvency: one has terminated their lease and the other has downsized after being acquired. We are focused on reconfiguring this space to offer a high-quality product to the market.

In 2025, we completed 27 lease extensions and new lettings, securing £7.5 million of rent at an average of 31.5% above ERV. This was primarily due to a large eight year lease with a government department of the Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia for 14,700 sqm at Gotic Haus, Dortmund. The lease resulted in a valuation uplift of more than 40% at the property. Excluding this transaction, the remaining deals were achieved at 17.6% above ERV.

This lease follows earlier successful government lettings at The Brix, Essen and The Yellow, Dortmund in 2023 and 2024 respectively, demonstrating our continued ability to compete effectively in this market.

Rent from leases subject to indexation increased by an average of 2.5%.

Developments and refurbishments

Development projects across our German portfolio are expected to deliver meaningful ERV growth and are already contributing to valuation uplifts. Works associated with our 30-year lease with the City of Essen at The Brix completed on time, and the tenant is in occupation. Construction relating to the 20-year lease with the City of Dortmund at The Yellow and the eight-year lease with the Federal State of North Rhine‑Westphalia at Gotic Haus has commenced and is progressing well.

We invested £5.4 million in smaller refurbishment projects across the portfolio to improve sustainability performance, meet regulatory requirements and address evolving occupier needs. The largest project was at Technisches Rathaus in Bochum, where we are upgrading the façade and modernising the lifts to support our tenant's 30‑year lease. We are also expanding marketing suites in several properties to aid the re‑letting of recently vacated space.

Disposals

In 2025, we disposed of Jarrestrasse, Hamburg, and Grafelfing Munich, for a total of £35.6 million at a combined discount to pre-sale values of 8.9%.

Outlook

The €500 billion infrastructure spending package introduced by the government is expected to support growth, encouraging higher office take up and strengthening investor confidence.

The German commercial real estate market is set for a selective recovery in 2026, underpinned by stabilising, lower interest rates and an ongoing shift towards high quality, sustainable assets. The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive provisions become legally binding in 2026, increasing the impetus for renovation as new efficiency standards for non residential buildings come into force.

We are optimistic that vacancy rates in major cities will peak during the year, reflecting a marked slowdown in new construction. At the same time, demand is likely to remain focused on core, modern and energy efficient space in prime locations, reinforcing the relative resilience of higher quality assets.

France

France market review

Political uncertainty and a softer macroeconomic backdrop dominated the French economy in 2025, with significant debate surrounding rising government debt and its impact on sovereign bond yields.

The commercial property investment market improved, with volumes reaching c.€14 billion, up 10% compared with 2024, and once again dominated by domestic investors.

Office leasing activity remained challenging, although performance varied significantly between submarkets. Conditions softened in the CBD, while several outer arrondissements recorded some improvement. Take-up declined by 9% to c.1.6 million sqm in Paris, while Lyon fell by 20% to c.0.2 million sqm. Year-end vacancy in Paris increased from 10.2% to 10.7%, and in Lyon from 7.0% to 7.8%

Portfolio movement and valuation summary

In 2025, the value of the French portfolio decreased by £2.2 million as a result of a revaluation decline of £10.4 million or 4.5% in local currency and disposals of £7.9 million, partly offset by capital expenditure of £4.1 million and a foreign exchange gain of £12.0 million. The 4.5% valuation decline reflected a 8 basis point expansion in equivalent yields on a like-for-like basis and higher vacancy following the departure of a major tenant at Inside, Paris. ERVs were flat on a like-for-like basis, and all leases remain fully indexed.

Asset management

As at 31 December 2025, the EPRA vacancy rate in our French portfolio rose to 12.1% (2024: 8.3%), largely due to the expected lease expiry at Inside, Paris and the completion of refurbishment works at Bellevue, Paris. We intend to use this opportunity at Inside to refurbish the space and reconfigure it to accommodate a broader range of floor plates.

In 2025, excluding contractual indexation uplifts, 20 lease extensions and new leases secured £1.4 million in rent, averaging 7.1% below ERV. Notably, we experienced an uptick in leasing activity in Q4, with several new leases in Paris completed despite a difficult leasing market, removing some of the vacancy during the year.

Rent from leases subject to indexation increased by an average of 1.5% in 2025.

The most significant transaction in Paris was a lease extension for 675 sqm at Sigma, located east of La Défense. This renewal was with a long-standing tenant that has occupied space at Sigma for over ten years, highlighting the benefits of our customer-focused asset management approach in a competitive leasing market. In Lyon, the largest transaction was at Park Avenue for 855 sqm with an IT services company.

Developments and refurbishments

A major milestone in the first quarter was the completion of the £1.5 million redevelopment of Petits Hôtels, a centrally located 2,081 sqm asset in Paris. The project involved a full refurbishment of one of the buildings, which has since been let at ERV to a specialist tour operator company.

At Bellevue, Paris, we completed our £1.1 million refurbishment programme in the third quarter of 2025. The scheme upgraded five floors totalling 1,301 sqm, delivering best-in-class space with enhanced sustainability features. The improved specification has already generated strong interest, with two new leases signed in December, and we expect this momentum to continue into 2026.

Disposals

In August, we completed the sale of Les Reflets in Lille which we acquired in 2019. This sale marked our exit from Lille. Our French portfolio is now focused on France's two largest property markets, Paris and Lyon.

Outlook

France's economy is expected to grow modestly in 2026 but it is sensitive to the continuing domestic and international political uncertainty.

Investment volumes ended 2025 with a more balanced distribution across offices, retail and logistics. Conditions in 2026 are expected to remain broadly stable, with stronger momentum anticipated from 2027 onwards.

Leasing activity is likely to remain relatively muted, although we expect a gradual improvement in the second half of 2026, led by the Paris Île de France market and followed by regional markets, particularly with small-to-medium size businesses targeted by CLS.

Chief Financial Officer's review

Summary

The hard work undertaken by the whole CLS team to make progress on our strategic priorities is having its desired effect, with lower net debt, a more streamlined cost base and occupancy starting to improve. These actions have had short-term negative impacts on our earnings and NTA, but they are vital to creating the foundations for medium- and long-term growth, delivering a portfolio and business that are fit for the future.

EPRA net tangible assets (NTA) per share fell by 6.7% to 200.7 pence (2024: 215.0 pence) and basic net assets per share by 5.5% to 186.4 pence (2024: 197.3 pence), primarily reflecting the 3.8% like-for-like decline in the valuation of our portfolio.

EPRA earnings per share (EPS) were 7.6 pence (2024: 9.2 pence) whilst the IFRS loss after tax of £50.3 million (2024: £93.6 million loss) generated basic earnings per share of -12.6 pence (2024: -23.6 pence). We are proposing a final dividend of 2.7 pence (2024: 2.68 pence), equating to a full dividend for 2025 of 4.0 pence (2024: 5.28 pence).

The Total Accounting Return per share (the reduction in EPRA NTA plus the dividends paid in the year) was -4.8%(2024: -11.9%).

CLS uses a number of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) alongside statutory figures. We believe that these assist in providing stakeholders with additional useful information on the underlying trends, performance and position of the Group. Note 5 and our Supplementary disclosures gives a full description and reconciliation of our APMs.

Income statement

EPRA profit after tax was lower than last year at £30.2 million (2024: £36.4 million), reflecting the impact of disposals and higher vacancy costs, offset by lower net finance and administration expenses. 2024 EPRA earnings also benefited from a deposit forfeited by a potential buyer of one of our properties which equated to £2.9 million (0.7 pence per share).

Net rental income in 2025 of £101.3 million fell by 11.1% (2024: £114.0 million), mainly reflecting the lost income from disposals early in the year, and higher vacant space. Like-for-like net rental income fell 6.3% to £106.8 million due to lease expiries and movement of properties to development stock, which reduced rental income by £9.2 million and £0.4 million respectively, and lower other income of £1.0 million. New leases, renewals and indexation added £2.6 million and £0.8 million respectively. Income from student operations fell £4.0 million reflecting the disposal of Spring Mews Student in early 2025, and a further £1.9 million of rent was lost from other property disposals.

CLS' tenant relationships remain strong and the quality and diversity of our tenant base has continued to be reflected in our rent collection. As in previous years, we collected over 99% of rent and this trend has continued into the first quarter of 2026.

Overall administration and property expenses, excluding amortisation of intangibles, decreased by £2.0 million to £33.4 million (2024: £35.4 million). Administration costs were £1.2 million lower compared with 2024 reflecting action taken to reduce our cost base during the year. Property expenses were £0.8 million lower as a result of the disposal of the student property early in the year, offset by increased vacancy costs. The proportion of index-linked rent was 58.7% (2024: 54.4%) of total contracted rent.

Although administration and property expenses were lower, CLS' administration cost ratio increased to 16.1% (2024: 15.4%) and the EPRA cost ratio increased to 36.2% (2024: 33.6%) as a result of lower gross rental income and higher costs associated with vacant space.

The valuation of CLS' properties declined by 3.8% (2024: 5.8% decline) on a like-for-like basis, although much of this was concentrated on two properties: Spring Gardens, where the valuers adjusted their valuation approach to reflect the conditional agreement to sell; and the Spring Mews hotel which will be subject to higher business rates than previously assumed. The reduction in the value of investment properties was £79.2 million (2024: £127.7 million reduction) with falls in the UK of 4.6%, Germany 2.7% and France 4.5% in local currencies.

Four properties were sold in 2025 for an aggregate consideration of £144.2 million. This consideration was in-line with thepre-sale book values but, after costs, resulted in a loss on sale of investment properties before tax of £10.9 million (2024: £2.3 million loss). At year-end, we have classified £94.9 million (2024: £133.0 million) of assets as being held for sale, recognising that we expect to dispose of these assets in the first half of the year. This does not include Spring Gardens, the current headquarters of the National Crime Agency in Vauxhall, London as the sale is conditional on planning permission being obtained from the local council to redevelop the property from offices into residential space. We are working in partnership with the acquiror on this deal and submitted planning permission in February 2026. The transaction is expected to release equity in stages over the next two years, following the repayment of associated debt.

Net finance costs, excluding movement in derivatives, fell by 10.3% to £36.7 million (2024: £40.9 million) reflecting primarily lower debt during the year, and the impact of disposals in late 2024 and the sale of Spring Mews Student in early 2025.

Approximately 52% of the Group's sales are conducted in the reporting currency of Sterling and 48% in Euros. The year-end Sterling rate against the Euro weakened by 5.1% and the average Sterling rate weakened by 1.2%, resulting in a foreign exchange gain of £0.2 million in the income statement (2024: £0.6 million loss).

The low tax expense primarily reflects our status as a UK REIT which means that we do not pay corporation tax on our property-related profits in our UK business.

The components of the EPRA earnings are as shown below:

1 Balances include EPRA adjustments; the reconciliation to the IFRS figures can be found in note 5(i).

EPRA net tangible assets and gearing

At 31 December 2025, EPRA net tangible assets (NTA) per share were 200.7 pence (2024: 215.0 pence), a fall of 6.7%. The main reasons for the decrease were property valuation decreases of 3.8% in local currency (20.4 pence per share), dividends paid in the year of 4.0 pence per share, and a loss on disposal of investment properties of 3.5 pence per share. These were partly offset by EPRA earnings per share of 7.6 pence per share and foreign exchange uplifts on our European business of 7.2 pence per share.

The impact of reduced level of debt in the business was partly offset by a decline in the value of our property portfolio, resulting in a slight improvement in balance sheet loan-to-value ratio at 31 December 2025 to 50.0% (2024: 50.7%). We retain our intention to reduce LTV to between 35% and 45% in the medium-term through disposals and value-enhancing investment. We believe that this LTV range is more appropriate for the business.

Cash flow and net debt

As at 31 December 2025, the Group's cash and cash equivalents balance (including restricted cash - see note 16) was £49.4 million (2024: £60.5 million) as set out in note 16 to the Group financial statements. Available undrawn facilities totalled £28.0 million (2024: £50.0 million), with a further £10 million uncommitted facility (2024: £10 million) which was undrawn at year-end. Net cash flow from operating activities, after payment of £38.0 million for financing costs and tax, generated £14.6 million (2024: £29.5 million) mainly reflecting the impact of disposals and higher vacancy, as well as £1.7 million of non-recurring costs related to the staffing review and financial structuring carried out during the year. Excluding the non-recurring costs, operating cash flows cover the £15.9 million cash cost of the interim and final dividend for 2025.

Borrowings decreased by £97.3 million to £901.9 million (2024: £999.2 million) due primarily to the net repayment of loans of £126.8 million, partially offset by the impact of the weakening Sterling exchange rate on the Sterling value of our Euro-denominated debt. During the year, CLS increased the size of its two committed revolving credit facilities from £50 million to £70 million. It also has a £10 million overdraft facility. As at 31 December 2025, CLS had drawn down £42 million on the revolving credit facilities. No overdraft was utilised as at 31 December 2025.

The weighted average cost of debt at 31 December 2025 was stable at 3.8% (2024: 3.8%), translating to group interest cover of 1.8 times (2024: 1.9 times).

Financing strategy and covenants

The Group's financing strategy is based substantially on raising secured debt against its properties, whether individually or in multi-property facilities. At Group level, we have a target balance sheet LTV ratio of between 35% and 45%. At 31 December 2025, LTV was 50.0%, a level which we are working to reduce through disposals and investment to enhance the value of our properties.

Most of our properties have debt secured against them. Properties not subject to secured debt at 31 December 2025 totalled £64.4 million (2024: £41.3 million).

At the start of 2025, the Group had £373.7 million of debt (including £9.6 million of amortisation) across 11 loan facilities expiring in 2025, all of which have been refinanced, extended or repaid. We took the opportunity to spread the maturities over a longer period to smooth out future refinancing peaks: the £222.8 million of new loans taken out during the year had a weighted average all-in rate of 5.5%, within which £51.6 million were fixed at a weighted average all-in rate of 4.1%. Consequently, the Group's debt maturity risk profile is more evenly spread, and the weighted average maturity has increased to 3.6 years (2024: 3.2 years).

In 2026, the Group has £145.5 million of long-term debt maturing and comprising of seven loans; loan amortisation of £11.8 million and a further £42.0 million of expiring short-term credit facilities which we are currently in discussions to extend or refinance with existing and new lenders.

CLS' objective remains to keep a high proportion of fixed rate debt but to retain some floating rate debt to provide flexibility to allow early repayments expected from planned disposals without incurring break costs typically associated with fixed rate loans.

At 31 December 2025, 69% of the Group's borrowings were at fixed rates or subject to interest rate swaps, 7% were subject to caps which had been hit and 24% of loans were unhedged.

At 31 December 2025, the Group had 36 loans (26 through SPVs, eight portfolios and two credit facilities) from 23 different lenders. The loans vary in terms of the number and nature of their covenants, although the three most common relate to LTV ratio, interest cover and debt service cover.

On average, across the 36 loans, CLS has between 23% and 28% headroom against these three most common covenants. In the event of an actual or forecast covenant breach, all of the loans have equity cure mechanisms to repair the breach, which allow CLS to either repay part of the loan, substitute property or deposit cash, for the period the loan is in breach after which the cash can be released.

Distributions to shareholders

The final dividend for 2024 of 2.68 pence per share (£10.7 million) was paid in May 2025. In October 2025, CLS paid an interim dividend for 2025 of 1.30 pence per share (£5.2 million).

We are proposing to maintain the final dividend at 2.7 pence per share (2024: 2.68 pence), in line with the dividend policy established a year ago, equating to a cash amount of £10.7 million (2024: £10.7 million). This equates to a full year distribution of 4.0 pence per share (£15.9 million), covered 1.9 times by EPRA earnings per share, within our policy of the dividend being covered 1.5 to 3.0 times by EPRA earnings.

Under the terms of being a UK REIT, CLS is obliged to distribute a minimum of 90% of its UK property income as a Property Income Distribution (PID). The final dividend will be paid entirely as a PID. As a result of this high distribution requirement, the ability of a UK REIT to retain capital in the business for investment is limited. Therefore, we are proposing to offer shareholders the option of receiving the dividend in new shares rather than cash, in the form of an enhanced scrip dividend, allowing those who take the scrip alternative to increase their investment in CLS and to receive a benefit by doing so in the form of a 5% discount to the reference share price.

Harry Stokes

Chief Financial Officer

Risk management

Our Risk Management Structure

Risk management is a critical component of the operation of our business, allowing us to take advantage of opportunities whilst ensuring that we do not expose the business to excessive risk, thereby generating shareholder value over the long term in a sustainable and compliant manner.

The Board

·  Sets our overarching risk appetite and ensures that we manage risks appropriately across the Group within a robust internal control framework. The Board delegates oversight of risk management activities to the Audit Committee.

·  Annual assessment of principal and emerging risks.

The Audit Committee

·  Key oversight function for risk management, internal controls and viability.

·  Receives updates on risks and the control environment including the results of any internal control review procedures and other assessments undertaken in the period at each Audit Committee meeting.

·  Reports to the Board on the effectiveness of the external auditors, risk management and internal controls.

Management Committees

·  Several management committees have the responsibility for overseeing and mitigating risks associated with safety, sustainability, treasury and energy procurement amongst other things.

·  Responsible for the day-to-day operational oversight of risk management.

·  Major business-wide decisions such as property acquisitions, disposals, significant strategy changes and the wider changing geopolitical landscape are discussed. These decisions are assessed with reference to risk appetite.

The Senior Leadership Team

·  Comprised of the CEO, the CFO, the COO and senior members of the property operations, finance and human resources teams.

·  Reviews and monitors the Group's principal and emerging risks taking into account the appetite for, and impact of, risk in all areas of the business. These are presented to the Audit Committee every six months for further discussion.

Group Finance

·  Responsible for the management of the Group's risk and internal controls.

·  Conducts regular testing and monitoring of material controls.

·  Responsible for following up and tracking any process or control improvements.

·  The Group has policies set by the Board that govern key risks across the business. These are regularly reviewed to ensure they are up to date and comply with laws and regulations

Business units

·  Risk management embedded in day-to-day operations including identifying, evaluating and reviewing within these units.

·  Execute strategic actions in compliance with the Group's objectives and policies.

What we did in 2025

·  Implemented a Failure To Prevent Fraud ('FTPF') Policy and staff training in advance of the FTPF provisions of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 which became enforceable from September 2025.

·  Upgraded the IT firewall at our London head office to ensure our defences against potential cyber attacks remain robust.

·  Addressed internal control recommendations from our external auditor.

·  Progressed towards providing a declaration of effectiveness of material controls by 31 December 2026 by performing testing on a selection of our material controls.

·  Implemented minor process improvements based on observations from control testing.

·  Refinanced, extended or repaid £373.7 million of debt falling due in 2025.

Our priorities for 2026

·  Increasing letting activity to reduce vacancy and improve earnings.

·  Executing sales to reduce LTV to our target range of 35%-45%.

·  Completing refinancings due in 2026.

·  Investing in our properties to unlock the value within the portfolio.

·  Continuing to deliver on our roadmap activities for the UK Government's corporate reforms. This includes:

-  agreeing the cadence for and performing cycles of material controls testing; and

-  preparing a draft of the material controls declaration including any ineffectiveness explanations.

Management of risk throughout the Group

1. Identification

We proactively identify potential risks across all processes and the wider environment that could impact our organisation.

2. Prioritisation

We evaluate and rank risks based on their potential impact and likelihood of occurrence. Using risk matrices and scoring systems, we focus our resources on the most critical risks. This prioritisation process allows us to address the most significant threats first, ensuring that our risk management efforts are both effective and efficient.

3. Controls and responses

We develop and implement strategies to mitigate or manage risks. We design controls to prevent or reduce the impact of risks and plan responses for when risks materialise. Our controls include preventive, detective, and corrective measures.

4. Governance and reporting

We have established a robust governance framework to oversee our risk management. Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, and policies and procedures are set to ensure accountability. Regular reporting to senior management and the Board keeps them informed of the risk landscape and the effectiveness of our risk management activities, ensuring transparency and oversight.

5. Monitoring

Continuous monitoring is a key part of our risk management process. We track identified risks, assess the performance of controls, and detect new risks. Regular reviews and updates to our risk management plan help us adapt to changes in the internal and external environment, ensuring that our risk management practices remain effective and relevant.

6. Audit and assurance

We conduct independent reviews and audits to provide assurance that our risk management process is functioning as intended. Reviews both internally and by our external auditors help evaluate the effectiveness of our controls and compliance with policies. These assurance activities help us identify gaps and areas for improvement, ensuring that we maintain a robust risk management framework.

Based on the size of its balance sheet and market capitalisation, CLS is a large business, but it is relatively small based on the number of people working directly in the business. The small number of employees and our internal control structures allow the Group to safeguard its assets, prevent and detect material fraud and errors and ensure accuracy and completeness of the accounting records used to produce reliable financial information, while still allowing the flexibility to take advantage of opportunities to further the business strategies of the Group.

Risk assessment

As part of annual business planning, the Board undertakes an assessment of the risks that could threaten the Group's strategic objectives, future performance, solvency or liquidity.

We use a risk scoring matrix to consider the likelihood and impact of each risk at regular points throughout the year. We evaluate risks on an inherent (before mitigating actions) and residual (after mitigating actions and controls) basis. To do so, we identify principal risks (current risks with relatively high impact and certainty) and emerging risks (risks where the extent and implications are not yet fully understood).

Throughout the year, the Board monitored the changing economic and market situation and considered its effect on the business, as it will continue to do going forward. The impact of the macro-economic factors is discussed in the CEO review and the country reviews.

Our principal risks are set out on the following pages. In evaluating these risks, any potential impact as a result of market uncertainties has been considered. Changes in the risk profile between 2024 and 2025 are identified on these pages.

Risk appetite

The Board reviews our risk appetite at least annually. The risk appetite of the Group is assessed with reference to changes that have occurred, or trends that are beginning to emerge in the external environment, and changes in the principal risks and their mitigation. These will guide the actions we take in executing our strategy. Whilst our appetite for risk will vary over time, in general we maintain a balanced approach to risk.

Risk appetite vs risk assessment

The Board's risk appetite in relation to the Group's principal risk assessment is broadly aligned. As shown in the detailed description of our principal risks, there is divergence of risk appetite and risk status in relation to the financing and sustainability risks. The Board accepts that there are factors in relation to these risks that are outside the Group's control and are likely to change over time. Mitigating actions have been put in place to ensure financing risk is adequately managed and monitored to reduce the potential impact on the Group. We expect the sustainability risk appetite and assessment to align in the medium-term. The Board recognises that not all risks can be fully mitigated and that they need to be balanced alongside commercial, and political and economic considerations.

The Group uses five risk categories to allocate its risk appetite:

On reviewing our risk appetite, the Board recognised that there are factors outside of the Group's control, for example the property market environment, that influences risk appetite in any one year.

Our principal risks

Our principal risks and risk assessments are discussed over the following pages along with: any change in their risk profile since the last year end; the current direction of travel; and our risk mitigation actions and plans. Whilst we do not consider that there has been any material change to the nature of the Group's principal risks over the last 12 months, several risks remain elevated as a result of the challenging external environment and significant ongoing uncertainty.

The following pages are only focused on our principal risks being those that have the greatest impact on our strategy and/or business model. In addition, there are many lower level operational and financial risks which are managed on a day-to-day basis through the effective operation of a comprehensive system of internal controls.

Key to strategy:

Key to change in risk profile in year/direction of travel:

Emerging risks

We define emerging risks to be those that may either materialise or impact over a longer timeframe. They may be a new risk, a changing risk or a combination of risks for which the broad impacts, likelihoods and costs are not yet well understood, and which could have a material effect on CLS' business strategy.

Emerging risks may also be superseded by other risks or cease to be relevant as the internal and external environment in which we operate evolves. The Senior Leadership Team, which has representatives from each area of the business, is tasked with identifying emerging risks for the business and discussing what impact these risks may have on the business and what steps we should be taking to mitigate these risks. The Board reviews these assessments on an annual basis.

Going concern statement

Background

CLS' strategy and business model include regular secured loan refinancings, and capital deployment and recycling through acquisitions, capital expenditure and disposals. Over the last thirty years, the Group has successfully navigated several periods of economic uncertainty, including the recent macroeconomic stresses resulting from global conflict, the resulting inflationary pressures and transition to a higher interest rate environment.

The Group continues to have very high levels of rent collection and low bad debts, and has a long-term track record in financing and refinancing debt including £373.7 million completed in the twelve months to 31 December 2025 and a further £38.7 million has been completed or well advanced subsequent to year-end, whereby terms sheets have been obtained or they have reached a first stage credit review.

The Directors note that the group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2024 contained disclosure of a Material Uncertainty related to going concern due to the timing and amounts of the planned refinancing of debt and disposals of property being outside of Management's control. In this context the Directors set out their considerations and conclusions in respect of going concern for these financial statements below.

Going concern period and basis

The Group's going concern assessment covers the period to 31 July 2027 ("the going concern period"). The period chosen takes into consideration the maturity date of loans totalling £254.2 million that expire by July 2027. The going concern assessment uses the forecast approved by the Board at its November 2025 meeting as the Base case. The assessment also considers a Severe but plausible case. The Directors have also considered the period between the date of Board approval and the date of signing the accounts. Based on a review of events since Board approval in November 2025, the Directors conclude that there have been no significant changes since the forecast was approved.

Forecast cash flows - Base case

The forecast cash flows prepared for the Base case take account of the Group's principal risks and uncertainties and reflect the challenging economic backdrop. The forecast cashflows have been updated using assumptions regarding forecast forward interest curves, inflation and foreign exchange, and include revenue growth, principally from contractual increases in rent, and increasing cost levels in line with forecast inflation.

The Base case is focused on the cash and working capital position of the Group throughout the going concern period. In this regard, the Base case assumes continued access to lending facilities in the UK, Germany and France, and specifically that debt facilities of £254.2 million with 13 lenders expiring within the going concern period will be refinanced or extended as expected (£164.4 million) or will be repaid (£89.8 million), some of which are linked to forecast property disposals. The Board acknowledges that these refinancings are not fully within its control; however, they remain confident that refinancings or extensions of these loans will be executed within the required timeframe, having taken into account:

·  existing banking relationships and ongoing discussions with the lenders in relation to these refinancings;

·  CLS' track record of prior refinancings, particularly in the 12 months to 31 December 2025 when £373.7 million was successfully repaid, refinanced or extended;

·  recent refinancings subsequent to 31 December 2025 that have reached an initial credit committee review stage by lenders, or where term sheets have been obtained, totalling £38.7 million of the £164.4 million noted above; and

·  other ongoing discussions with lenders.

The Base case includes property disposals in the going concern period in line with the Group's business model and the forecast cash flows approved by the Board in November 2025. The Board acknowledges that property disposals are not fully within its control; however, they are confident these transactions will be completed within the going concern period, based on their history of achieving disposals (with disposals of £144.2 million achieved in the 12 months to 31 December 2025). The value of the properties available for disposal is in excess of the value of the debt maturing during the going concern period.

The Group's financing arrangements, which utilise ring-fenced property loans, contain Loan to Value ('LTV'), Interest Cover Ratio ('ICR') and Debt Service Coverage Ratio ('DSCR') covenants. In the Base case, minimal cure payments have been forecast given that the Group expects to maintain its compliance with the covenant requirements.

The near-term impacts of climate change risks within the going concern period are expected to be immaterial following an assessment of potential significant inflation resulting from climate change, in the context of increased property and administrative costs, as part of the reverse stress testing performed by CLS. Furthermore, the forecast cash flows prepared for the Base case include all necessary capital expenditure to meet the minimum energy efficiency standards required in the countries where CLS operates.

Forecast cash flows - Severe but plausible case

A Severe but plausible case has been assessed which has been produced by flexing key assumptions further including: lower rents, increased service charges, higher property and administration expenses, falling property values and higher interest rates.

These flexed assumptions are more severe than CLS experienced during the 2007-2009 global financial crisis and other downturns such as that experienced in 2020-2022 during the Covid-19 pandemic. A key assumption in this scenario is a further reduction to the Base case in property values of 10% until July 2027, impacting forecast refinancings, sales and cash cures. This is in addition to the reduction experienced of 3.8% in 2025 and cumulative c.25.4% decline from 30 June 2022 to 31 December 2025.

Assumptions around refinancing and investment property disposals are adjusted to incorporate the higher interest rates and lower property values noted above. A reduction in property values of 10% results in additional cure payments of £1.1 million being necessary for the Group to remain in compliance with its covenant requirements. Similarly, the assumptions of lower rents and increased expenses result in additional cure payments of £1.6 million.

Due to the severity of the assumptions used in this scenario, which is Severe but plausible and therefore not remote, the liquidity of the Group is exhausted even after putting in place controllable mitigating actions as set out below.

Mitigating actions

In the Severe but plausible case, CLS is assumed to take mitigating actions including depositing cash to cure covenant shortfalls under the facilities' equity-cure provisions, scaling back uncommitted capital expenditure (specifically where reductions do not affect tenant revenue streams over the going concern period) and reducing the dividend to the Property Income Distribution required under the UK REIT rules as well as drawing the currently available £30.8 million of its existing £80.0 million revolving credit and overdraft facilities. If needed, further disposals could be considered as there are no sale restrictions on CLS' £1.7 billion of properties, albeit the timing and the amount of these potential disposals are not in the Group's control.

Additionally, the Directors note that the loans that require refinancing in the going concern period are all through ring-fenced SPV borrower structures. Accordingly, in extremis, the lender could enforce their security on an individual property with no claim on the rest of the Group's assets apart from certain limited guarantees and limited recourse security granted by the Company and certain Group companies.

Material uncertainty related to going concern

As described above, the Group is reliant in the Base case and Severe but plausible case upon its ability to both refinance the debt maturing and to complete a number of investment property disposals in the going concern period in challenging market conditions.

Whilst the Directors remain confident that a combination of sufficient refinancings and property disposals will be achieved, the timing and value of both the planned refinancing of facilities falling due within the going concern period, and planned property disposals, are outside of Management's control and consequently a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Group's and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Notwithstanding this material uncertainty on the going concern assumption, given our track-record and reputation, the Directors are confident that the debt falling due for repayment in the going concern period will be refinanced or settled in line with their plans for the reasons set out above, rather than requiring repayment on maturity, or will be extinguished as part of property disposals in the period. In extremis, the loans requiring refinancing are all through ring-fenced SPV structures, save for certain limited guarantees and limited recourse security granted by the Company and certain other Group companies. Therefore, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these Group financial statements.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that would be necessary if the Group and the Company were unable to continue as going concerns.

Viability statement

The Group's viability assessment follows a similar methodology to the going concern assessment in terms of analysing the Base case financial forecasts and a Severe but plausible case but makes the assessment of the viability of the Company to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over a longer period.

The viability assessment covers the period to 31 December 2029 ("the viability period"), as it coincides with the forecasts approved by the Board at its November 2025 meeting. These forecasts comprise the Base case, reviewed against the actual results for 2025 and incorporating updated assumptions. The period of four years is a balance between the Group's weighted lease term and weighted average debt maturity, and so aligns with the period over which the Group has good operational visibility.

In performing this assessment, the Board notes that the financial information for the year ended 31 December 2025 contained disclosure of a Material Uncertainty related to going concern because the timing and amounts of the planned refinancing of debt and disposals of property at the time were outside of Management's control. In this context the Directors set out their considerations and conclusions in respect of their viability statement for these financial statements below.

Viability assessment

As with the Going Concern assessment, the financial forecast prepared for the Base case takes account of the Group's principal risks and uncertainties, and reflects the current challenging economic backdrop. The forecast uses forward interest rate curves, inflation and foreign exchange.

The Base case forecast is focused on the cash, liquid resources and working capital position of the Group including covenant compliance. It also assumes continued access to lending facilities. Within the viability period, it is assumed that expiring debt facilities of £508.3 million will be refinanced as expected or repaid from the proceeds of disposals. The Board acknowledges that these refinancings are not fully within management's control but remains confident that refinancings or extensions of these loans will be executed within the required timeframe, having taken into account:

·  existing banking relationships;

· CLS' track record of prior refinancings, particularly in the 12 months to 31 December 2025 when £373.7 million was successfully repaid, refinanced or extended;

·  recent refinancings subsequent to 31 December 2025 that have reached an initial credit committee review stage by lenders, or where term sheets have been obtained, totalling £38.7 million of the £508.3 million noted above; and

·  other ongoing discussions with lenders.

A Severe but plausible case was also produced by flexing key assumptions including: lower rents, increased service charges, higher property and administration expenses, falling property values (mainly a further 10% reduction in 2026 and no recovery during the viability period), higher interest rates and reduced achievements of refinancings and disposals. These flexed assumptions are derived by considering the negative market and economic impacts experienced during the 2007-2009 global financial crisis and other downturns such as the Covid-19 pandemic.

Assumptions around refinancing and property disposals are adjusted to include only those agreed or considered significantly advanced by management. In addition, a reduction in property values of 10% results in additional equity cure payments of £1.1 million to remain in compliance with covenant requirements. Similarly, the assumptions of lower rents and increased expenses result in additional equity cure payments of £1.6 million.

The impacts of climate change risks within the viability period have been considered in the Severe but plausible case and are expected to be immaterial.

Due to the severity of the assumptions used in this scenario, the liquidity of the Group is exhausted even after putting in place mitigating actions wholly within management's control as set out below.

Mitigating actions

In the Severe but plausible case, CLS would need to take mitigating actions in terms of depositing cash to equity cure covenants under the facilities, scaling back uncommitted capital expenditure and reducing the dividend as well as drawing the currently available £30.8 million of its revolving credit and overdraft facilities. If needed, further disposals could be considered as there are no sale restrictions on CLS' £1.7 billion of properties, albeit the timing and the amount of these potential disposals are not wholly within management's control.

Additionally, the Board notes that the properties that require refinancing in the going concern period are on a non-recourse basis to the Group. Accordingly, in extremis, the lender could enforce their security on an individual property with no claim on the rest of the Group's assets.

Material uncertainty

The Directors highlighted in their going concern assessment that whilst they remain confident in the future prospects for the Group and its ability to continue as a going concern, the Group is reliant upon its ability both to refinance the debt maturing and to complete property disposals in the going concern period in what are assumed to be continued challenging market conditions. The same material uncertainty applies to the future viability of the Group.

Directors' responsibility statement

Directors' responsibilities

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors are required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and United Kingdom adopted International Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and have elected to prepare the Parent Company financial statements in accordance with FRS 101 of United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law the Directors must not approve the accounts unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period.

In preparing the Parent Company financial statements, the Directors are required to:

·  select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

·  make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

· state whether applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and

·  prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business.

 In preparing the Group financial statements, International Accounting Standard 1 requires that Directors:

·  properly select and apply accounting policies;

· present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;

· provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRSs are insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity's financial position and financial performance; and

·  make an assessment of the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Responsibility statement

We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

·  the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole;

· the strategic report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face; and

· the annual report and financial statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.

This statement of responsibilities was approved by the Board on 12 March 2026.

Approved and authorised on behalf of the Board

David Fuller BA FCG

Company Secretary

12 March 2026

Group income statement

for the year ended 31 December 2025

The notes are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

1 During the year, we conducted a review of staffing and financial structuring. This resulted in non-recurring costs including redundancy costs being incurred.

Group statement of comprehensive income

for the year ended 31 December 2025

The notes are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

Group balance sheet

at 31 December 2025

The financial statements of CLS Holdings plc (registered number: 02714781) were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 12 March 2026 and were signed on its behalf by:

Mr F Widlund Mr H Stokes

Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer

The notes are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

Group statement of changes in equity

for the year ended 31 December 2025

The notes are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

Group statement of cash flows

for the year ended 31 December 2025

The notes are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

Notes to the Group financial statements

for the year ended 31 December 2025

1. General information

CLS Holdings plc (the 'Company' or 'Ultimate Parent') and its subsidiaries (together 'CLS Holdings' or the 'Group') is an investment property group which is principally involved in the investment, management and development of commercial properties. The Group's principal operations are carried out in the United Kingdom, Germany and France.

The Company is an incorporated public limited company and is registered and incorporated in the United Kingdom. Its registration number is 02714781, with its registered address at 16 Tinworth Street, London SE11 5AL. The Company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and domiciled in the United Kingdom.

2. Annual financial report

The financial information set out in this announcement has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and United Kingdom adopted International Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).

The financial information set out in this announcement does not constitute the Group's financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2025 or 31 December 2024 as defined by Section 434 of the Companies Act 2006. Statutory accounts for 2024 have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and those for 2025 will be delivered following the Company's Annual General Meeting.

The Group's full financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2025 were approved by the Board of Directors and reported on by the auditors, BDO LLP, on 12 March 2026. The independent auditor's report is unqualified, does not contain statements under section 498 (2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006, however does include reference to a material uncertainty related to going concern.

The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the revaluation properties and financial instruments that are measured at fair values at the end of each reporting period, as explained in the accounting policies. The consolidated financial statements, including the results and financial position, are presented in pounds sterling, which is the functional and presentational currency of CLS Holdings plc. The amounts presented in the financial statements are rounded to the nearest £0.1 million.

The annual financial report (produced in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules) can be found on the Company's website www.clsholdings.com. The 2025 Annual Report and Accounts is expected to be posted to shareholders on 23 March 2026 and will also be available on the Company's website.

3. Going concern

The Company's going concern assessment has been performed as part of the Group's going concern assessment.

Background

CLS' strategy and business model include regular secured loan refinancings, and capital deployment and recycling through acquisitions, capital expenditure and disposals. Over the last thirty years, the Group has successfully navigated several periods of economic uncertainty, including the recent macroeconomic stresses resulting from global conflict, the resulting inflationary pressures and transition to a higher interest rate environment.

The Group continues to have very high levels of rent collection and low bad debts, and has a long-term track record in financing and refinancing debt including £373.7 million completed in the twelve months to 31 December 2025 and a further £38.7 million has been completed or well advanced subsequent to year-end, whereby terms sheets have been obtained or they have reached a first stage credit review.

The Directors note that the group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2024 contained disclosure of a Material Uncertainty related to going concern due to the timing and amounts of the planned refinancing of debt and disposals of property being outside of Management's control. In this context the Directors set out their considerations and conclusions in respect of going concern for these financial statements below.

Going concern period and basis

The Group's going concern assessment covers the period to 31 July 2027 ("the going concern period"). The period chosen takes into consideration the maturity date of loans totalling £254.2 million that expire by July 2027. The going concern assessment uses the forecast approved by the Board at its November 2025 meeting as the Base case. The assessment also considers a Severe but plausible case. The Directors have also considered the period between the date of Board approval and the date of signing the accounts. Based on a review of events since Board approval in November 2025, the Directors conclude that there have been no significant changes since the forecast was approved.

Forecast cash flows - Base case

The forecast cash flows prepared for the Base case take account of the Group's principal risks and uncertainties and reflect the challenging economic backdrop. The forecast cashflows have been updated using assumptions regarding forecast forward interest curves, inflation and foreign exchange, and include revenue growth, principally from contractual increases in rent, and increasing cost levels in line with forecast inflation.

The Base case is focused on the cash and working capital position of the Group throughout the going concern period. In this regard, the Base case assumes continued access to lending facilities in the UK, Germany and France, and specifically that debt facilities of £254.2 million with 13 lenders expiring within the going concern period will be refinanced or extended as expected (£164.4 million) or will be repaid (£89.8 million), some of which are linked to forecast property disposals. The Board acknowledges that these refinancings are not fully within its control; however, they remain confident that refinancings or extensions of these loans will be executed within the required timeframe, having taken into account:

·  existing banking relationships and ongoing discussions with the lenders in relation to these refinancings;

· CLS' track record of prior refinancings, particularly in the 12 months to 31 December 2025 when £373.7 million was successfully repaid, refinanced or extended;

·  recent refinancings subsequent to 31 December 2025 that have reached an initial credit committee review stage by lenders, or where term sheets have been obtained, totalling £38.7 million of the £164.4 million noted above; and

·  other ongoing discussions with lenders.

The Base case includes property disposals in the going concern period in line with the Group's business model and the forecast cash flows approved by the Board in November 2025. The Board acknowledges that property disposals are not fully within its control; however, they are confident these transactions will be completed within the going concern period, based on their history of achieving disposals (with disposals of £144.2 million achieved in the 12 months to 31 December 2025). The value of the properties available for disposal is in excess of the value of the debt maturing during the going concern period.

The Group's financing arrangements, which utilise ring-fenced property loans, contain Loan to Value ('LTV'), Interest Cover Ratio ('ICR') and Debt Service Coverage Ratio ('DSCR') covenants. In the Base case, minimal cure payments have been forecast given that the Group expects to maintain its compliance with the covenant requirements.

The near-term impacts of climate change risks within the going concern period are expected to be immaterial following an assessment of potential significant inflation resulting from climate change, in the context of increased property and administrative costs, as part of the reverse stress testing performed by CLS. Furthermore, the forecast cash flows prepared for the Base case include all necessary capital expenditure to meet the minimum energy efficiency standards required in the countries where CLS operates.

Forecast cash flows - Severe but plausible case

A Severe but plausible case has been assessed which has been produced by flexing key assumptions further including: lower rents, increased service charges, higher property and administration expenses, falling property values and higher interest rates.

These flexed assumptions are more severe than CLS experienced during the 2007-2009 global financial crisis and other downturns such as that experienced in 2020-2022 during the Covid-19 pandemic. A key assumption in this scenario is a further reduction to the Base case in property values of 10% until July 2027, impacting forecast refinancings, sales and cash cures. This is in addition to the reduction experienced of 3.8% in 2025 and cumulative c. 25.4% decline from 30 June 2022 to 31 December 2025.

Assumptions around refinancing and investment property disposals are adjusted to incorporate the higher interest rates and lower property values noted above. A reduction in property values of 10% results in additional cure payments of £1.1 million being necessary for the Group to remain in compliance with its covenant requirements. Similarly, the assumptions of lower rents and increased expenses result in additional cure payments of £1.6 million.

Due to the severity of the assumptions used in this scenario, which is Severe but plausible and therefore not remote, the liquidity of the Group is exhausted even after putting in place controllable mitigating actions as set out below.

Mitigating actions

In the Severe but plausible case, CLS is assumed to take mitigating actions including depositing cash to cure covenant shortfalls under the facilities' equity-cure provisions, scaling back uncommitted capital expenditure (specifically where reductions do not affect tenant revenue streams over the going concern period) and reducing the dividend to the Property Income Distribution required under the UK REIT rules as well as drawing the currently available £30.8 million of its existing £80.0 million revolving credit and overdraft facilities. If needed, further disposals could be considered as there are no sale restrictions on CLS' £1.7 billion of properties, albeit the timing and the amount of these potential disposals are not in the Group's control.

Additionally, the Directors note that the loans that require refinancing in the going concern period are all through ring‑fenced SPV borrower structures. Accordingly, in extremis, the lender could enforce their security on an individual property with no claim on the rest of the Group's assets apart from certain limited guarantees and limited recourse security granted by the Company and certain Group companies.

Material uncertainty related to going concern

As described above, the Group is reliant in the Base case and Severe but plausible case upon its ability to both refinance the debt maturing and to complete a number of investment property disposals in the going concern period in challenging market conditions.

Whilst the Directors remain confident that a combination of sufficient refinancings and property disposals will be achieved, the timing and value of both the planned refinancing of facilities falling due within the going concern period, and planned property disposals, are outside of Management's control and consequently a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Group's and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Notwithstanding this material uncertainty on the going concern assumption, given our track-record and reputation, the Directors are confident that the debt falling due for repayment in the going concern period will be refinanced or settled in line with their plans for the reasons set out above, rather than requiring repayment on maturity, or will be extinguished as part of property disposals in the period. In extremis, the loans requiring refinancing are all through ring-fenced SPV structures, save for certain limited guarantees and limited recourse security granted by the Company and certain other Group companies. Therefore, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these Group financial statements.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that would be necessary if the Group and the Company were unable to continue as going concerns.

4. Segment information

Each property represents an operating segment which the Group aggregates into two reporting segments with similar characteristics - investment properties and other investments. Other investments comprise the hotel at Spring Mews and other small corporate investments. Central administration relates to the operating costs of the Group's headquarters and are not allocated to any reporting segment. The Group manages the investment properties division on a geographical basis due to its size and geographical diversity. Consequently, the Group's principal reporting segments are:

Other investments

1 During the year, we conducted a review of staffing and financial structuring. This resulted in non-recurring costs including redundancy costs being incurred.

1 Other property-related income includes an amount of £2.9 million in the United Kingdom segment which is the forfeited deposit, net of costs, from the original purchaser upon their failure to complete on the sale of Westminster Tower.

Other segment information

5. Alternative Performance Measures

Alternative Performance Measures ('APMs') should be considered in addition to, and are not intended to be a substitute for, or superior to, IFRS measurements.

Introduction

The Group has applied the October 2015 European Securities and Markets Authority ('ESMA') guidelines on APMs and the October 2021 Financial Reporting Council ('FRC') thematic review of APMs in these financial statements, whilst noting the International Organization of Securities Commissions ('IOSCO') 2016 guidance and ESMA's December 2019 report on the use of APMs. An APM is a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, position or cash flows of the Group which is not a measure defined or specified in IFRS.

Overview of our use of APMs

The Directors believe that APMs assist in providing additional useful information on the underlying trends, performance and position of the Group. APMs assist our stakeholder users of the financial statements, particularly equity and debt investors, through the comparability of information across the European real estate sector. APMs are used by the Directors and management, both internally and externally, for performance analysis, strategic planning, reporting and incentive-setting purposes.

APMs are not defined by IFRS and therefore may not be directly comparable with other companies' APMs, including peers in the real estate industry. There are two sets of APMs which we utilise (European Public Real Estate Association ('EPRA') APMs and similar CLS APMs) which are reconciled where possible to statutory measures on the following pages.

CLS monitors the Group's financial performance using APMs which are EPRA measures as these are a set of standard disclosures for the property industry and thus aid comparability for our stakeholder users. CLS considers the two measures below to be the most relevant as we believe that these will continue to reflect the long-term nature of our property investments most accurately:

·  EPRA earnings; and

·  EPRA net tangible asset value ('EPRA NTA').

The Group adopted the EPRA Best Practice Recommendations ('BPRs') September 2024 (see https://www.epra.com/finance/financial-reporting/guidelines for more details) in the reporting period ended 31 December 2024. This did not have a material impact on the Group's reported EPRA earnings and there was no change to the Group's APMs, with the same APMs utilised by the business being defined, calculated and used on a consistent basis. All other EPRA measures are shown within the supplementary unaudited disclosures to the financial statements.

1. EPRA APMs

i) Earnings - EPRA earnings

1 During the year, we conducted a review of staffing and financial structuring. This resulted in non-recurring costs including redundancy costs being incurred which are excluded from EPRA earnings as they are unusual in nature and very unlikely to reoccur in the foreseeable future.

ii) Net asset value measures

1 EPRA NTA and EPRA NDV reflect IFRS values which are net of purchasers' costs. Purchasers' costs are added back when calculating EPRA NRV.

6. Loss for the year

Loss for the year has been arrived at after charging/(crediting):


1 The fee in 2024 represents fees paid to the previous auditor for overruns relating to the 2023 audit.

7. Employee benefits expense

The Directors are considered to be the only key management of the Group. Information on Directors' emoluments, share options and interests in the Company's shares is given in the Remuneration Committee Report.

The monthly average number of employees of the Group in continuing operations, including Executive Directors, was as follows:

8. Finance income

9. Finance costs

10. Taxation

A deferred tax credit of £0.7 million (2024: £0.1 million charge) and a current tax charge of £0.5 million (2024: £nil) were recognised directly in Other Comprehensive Income (note 18). The (credit)/charge for the year differs from the theoretical amount which would arise using the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of Group companies as follows:

The weighted average applicable tax rate of 20.2% (2024: 21.8%) was derived by applying to their relevant profits and losses the rates in the jurisdictions in which the Group operated. The standard UK rate of corporation tax applied to profits is 25.0% (2024: 25.0%). The Germany corporate income tax rate will be gradually reduced by one percent per year over five years from 2028 to 2032. The effect of which was a reduction of the tax charge in 2025 of £6.7 million.

11. Property portfolio

1 The total balance excludes fixtures and fittings of £1.5 million (2024: £1.8 million) as shown in note 13.

12. Investment property

Investment properties included leasehold properties with a carrying amount of £61.9 million (2024: £62.4 million).

Interest capitalised within capital expenditure in the year amounted to £0.2 million (2024: £nil).

The property portfolio, which comprises investment properties, properties held for sale (note 14), and hotel and other, detailed in note 13, was revalued at 31 December 2025 to its fair value. Valuations were based on current prices in an active market for all properties. The property valuations were carried out by independent external valuers and directors as follows:

1 The Directors' valuation includes four properties in Germany which have been classified as held for sale. The value has been determined with reference to the third party letters of intent to purchase the properties. Refer to note 14 for further details.

The total fees, including the fees for this assignment, earned by each of the valuers from the Group is less than 5% of their total revenues in each jurisdiction.

Valuation process

The Group's property portfolio, other than four properties categorised as held for sale, was valued by independent external valuers on the basis of fair value using information provided to them by the Group such as current rents, terms and conditions of lease agreements, service charges and capital expenditure. This information is derived from the Group's property management systems and is subject to the Group's overall control environment. The valuation reports are based on assumptions and valuation models used by the external valuers. The assumptions are typically market related, such as yields and discount rates, and are based on professional judgement and market evidence of transactions for similar properties on arm's length terms. The valuations are prepared in accordance with RICS Valuation - Global standards.

Each Country Head, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer, verifies all major inputs to the external valuation reports, assesses the individual property valuation changes from the prior year valuation report and holds discussions with the external valuers. When the process is complete, the valuation report is recommended to the Audit Committee and the Board, which considers it as part of its overall responsibilities.

Valuation techniques

The fair value of the property portfolio (excluding ongoing developments, see below) has been determined using the following approaches, which are consistent with valuation methodologies in their respective countries, and are in accordance with RICS Valuation - Global Standards:

The resulting valuations are cross-checked against the equivalent yields and the fair market values per square foot derived from comparable recent market transactions on arm's length terms. Other factors taken into account in the valuations include the tenure of the property, tenancy details, and ground and structural conditions.

Ongoing developments are valued under the 'residual method' of valuation, which is the same method as the income capitalisation approach to valuation described above, with a deduction for all costs necessary to complete the development, including a notional finance cost, together with a further allowance for remaining risk. As the development approaches completion, the valuer may consider the income capitalisation approach to be more appropriate.

All valuations have considered the environmental, social and governance credentials of the properties and the potential cost of improving them to local regulatory standards along with the broader potential impact of climate change.

These techniques are consistent with the principles in IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement and use significant unobservable inputs such that the fair value measurement of each property within the portfolio has been classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

There were no transfers between any of the Levels in the fair value hierarchy during either 2025 or 2024. The Group determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the fair value hierarchy by reassessing categorisation at the end of each reporting period.

Gains and losses recorded in profit or loss for recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy amount to a loss of £79.2 million (2024: a loss of £127.7 million) and are presented in the income statement in the line item 'Net revaluation movements on investment property'. The revaluation loss for the property, plant and equipment of £1.6 million (2024: gain of £1.3 million) was included within the revaluation reserve via other comprehensive income.

All gains and losses recorded in profit or loss in 2025 and 2024 or recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are attributable to changes in unrealised gains or losses relating to investment property held at 31 December 2025 and 31 December 2024, respectively.

Quantitative information about investment property fair value measurement using unobservable inputs (Level 3)

Sensitivity of measurement to variations in the significant unobservable inputs

All other factors remaining constant, an increase in estimated rental value 'ERV' would increase valuations, whilst an increase in the equivalent yield would result in a fall in value, and vice versa. There are inter-relationships between these inputs as they are partially determined by market conditions. An increase in the reversionary yield may accompany an increase in ERV and would mitigate its impact on the fair value measurement.

A decrease in the equivalent yield by 25 basis points would result in an increase in the fair value of the Group's investment property by £69.0 million (2024: £79.3 million) whilst a 25 basis point increase would reduce the fair value by £68.3 million (2024: £79.2 million). A decrease in the ERV by 5% would result in a decrease in the fair value of the Group's investment property by £64.5 million (2024: £70.7 million) whilst an increase in the ERV by 5% would result in an increase in the fair value of the Group's investment property by £59.4 million (2024: £64.4 million).

Where the Group leases out its investment property under operating leases the duration is typically three years or more. No material variable contingent rents have been recognised in the current or prior year.

13. Property, plant and equipment