24th Apr 2019 07:14
24 April 2019
Petropavlovsk PLC
Annual Results for the Year Ended 31 December 2018 and Q1 2019 Production Update
Petropavlovsk PLC ("Petropavlovsk" or the "Company" or, together with its subsidiaries, the "Group") today issues its audited annual results for the year ended 31 December 2018 and a Q1 2019 Production Update.
The financial and operational highlights of both trading periods are as follows
FY 2018
§ A management-led turnaround took place in the second half, enabling the Company to meet upwardly revised guidance provided at the H1 2018 trading update; with full-year gold production of 422.3koz (including 51.2k oz of gold contained in refractory concentrates from the new Malomir flotation circuits) (2017: 439.6koz)
§ FY 2018 total cash costs (TCC¨) were contained at $786/oz (2017: $741/oz) due to operational measures taken by the new CEO which brought TCC down to $650/oz in H2 2018 following suboptimal organisation of mine works in H1 2018
§ Group revenue of $499.8m (2017: $587.4m) was affected by the build-up of refractory gold concentrates as at 31 December 2018 leading to EBITDA¨ of $143.0m (2017: $196.8m)
§ All-in Sustaining Costs1 (AISC) were $1,117/oz (2017: $963/oz), reflecting the growth in TCC as well as higher sustaining capital expenditures related to the existing mining operations
§ Profit before tax of $82.4m (2017: $48.9m) reflecting a $101.7m reversal of impairment
§ Net debt¨ of $568m (2017: $585.1m)
§ Commissioning of Autoclaves 1 and 2 completed smoothly and ahead of target at the Pressure Oxidation (POX) Hub
§ The fully ramped-up Malomir flotation circuits have achieved significant improvements on the original design parameters, including up to 50% higher concentrate grades and concentrate yields of up to 50-60% above design
§ Board and Management teams have been strengthened by new appointments. The Board is now fully compliant with the UK Corporate Governance Code
Q1 2019 (unaudited)
§ Total gold sales of 107.7koz slightly above management expectations with a strong contribution from underground mining at Malomir where grades averaged 8.26g/t
§ 28koz gold recovered from 32kt of high-grade refractory concentrates at the POX Hub
§ Recoveries at the POX Hub were consistent at 91% in March and on track to meet the 94% target set for June 2019
§ Autoclaves 3 and 4 tested and fully functioning in advance of processing additional material from Petropavlovsk's mines and third-party concentrates
§ Completion of the refinancing of IRC's project finance facility with Gazprombank enabling full repayment of the ICBC loan and $57m of bridging loans plus $6m guarantee fee to Petropavlovsk
§ Net debt¨ (unaudited) as of 31 March 2019 reduced to $550.1m
Outlook for FY2019 onwards
§ Gold sales[1] are on track to meet the full year target of 450 - 500koz (after processing gold concentrate stockpiles from FY2018)
§ 2019 TCC¨ guidance of $850 - $950/oz (based on a $:RUB exchange rate of 66) reflecting additional costs associated with ramp-up of the POX Hub and optimisation of flotation operations
§ Once the POX Hub is operating at full production from 2020, cash costs are expected to normalise at c.15% below 2019 guidance
§ In 2019, production from the Malomir flotation plant is expected to range between 125kt - 145kt of material grading between 29g/t - 32g/t and the POX Hub is expected to treat 155kt to 175kt of refractory gold concentrates grading 30g/t - 31g/t
§ The above guidance includes processing of gold concentrate produced in 2018 (28.9kt of 26koz contained gold) but excludes potential upside from the processing of third-party refractory gold concentrate. The Company is currently in discussions with several producers to secure supplies of high-grade concentrates
§ CAPEX¨ in 2019 is expected to range from $45m to 55m and is principally comprised of sustaining, exploration and the remaining POX Hub investment capex
§ Net debt¨ should reduce with the ramp up of production and increase in free cash flow
§ Working capital is expected to be positively affected by the processing of stockpiled concentrates from Pioneer and Albyn, plus the positive impact of a deferred stripping write-down at Pioneer
§ Capital Markets Day to take place in Q3 2019 to provide a detailed update on the progress of the POX Hub, capital expenditure and growth plans for POG
Comment from Dr Pavel Maslovskiy, CEO, on the FY 2018 Results and Q1 2019 Production Report:
"Despite re-joining the Company only during the second half of 2018 and after a weak first half performance, I am pleased the team was able to exceed the revised full year guidance given at the time of the half year trading update. Beyond this, the principal highlight of the year was the completion of the POX Hub which has seen throughput and gold recoveries exceed expectations from even the earliest stage of its ramp-up. This progress has continued apace in the first quarter of the current financial year, with approximately one quarter of our total production in Q1 being attributed to the processing of our own refractory material. We remain on target to meet guidance of between 450 - 500koz sales for 2019 with an increasing contribution from processing refractory concentrates. This guidance excludes the processing of third party concentrates and I look forward to updating the market during the year on our progress on this area of potential upside.
The first quarter gold sales included 28koz of gold from the newly commissioned POX Hub of which we are very proud, and I congratulate the team on this achievement. Production rates are expected to increase from Q2 2019 once the Malomir flotation plant begins processing higher grade material to produce higher concentrate grades. Our technical team continues to improve gold recoveries at POX towards its design-rate of 94% and was successful in achieving consistent recoveries of 91% in the month of March.
Significant engineering work has been carried out at the newly-commissioned Malomir flotation plant leading to up to 50% higher gold concentrate grades and up to 50-60% improvement in concentrate yields. The improvement in these parameters has enabled the Company to carry out test work concerning the viability of mining and processing lower grade ores at Malomir. Initial stripping at the central pit at Malomir has resulted in the build-up of significant low-grade stockpiles. This material graded 0.73g/t gold and was trial processed at the flotation plant, yielding economic concentrates grading between 22-24g/t. This is both a remarkable and significant result which means we will be able to economically treat lower grade ores at Malomir. There is significant flexibility embedded in our reserves at Malomir where changes in the cut-off grade can be introduced in response to changes in the gold price. At current gold prices, this implies there is a potential to economically mine lower grade ore reserves.
In preparation for the launch of autoclaves three and four, we are purchasing third-party refractory concentrates at grades of up to 75g/t. These lines were tested by our engineers and are ready for commissioning once we are confident there is enough availability of stockpiled material to ensure stable production can be achieved at full capacity. Your Board is also giving due consideration to the proposal of advancing construction of an additional flotation line at Malomir and a two-line flotation plant at Pioneer and accelerating the rate at which we process our refractory ores. This will allow the Company to optimise utilisation rates at the POX Hub and enable us to leverage the considerable hidden value of 5.31m ounces of refractory ore reserves and, in turn, generate substantially higher cash flows from our asset base.
Corporately, the new $240 million facility for IRC with Gazprombank is on more favourable terms than the previous ICBC facility and provides IRC with an extended period to repay its debt finance through to 2026. This new facility de-risks the Company's liability due to the longer maturity of the facility, alongside a more relaxed amortisation schedule that aligns more closely with the ramp-up of production at the K&S mine. As part of the new facility, the guarantee mechanism is implemented through a series of five guarantees that fluctuate in value through the eight-year life of the loan, with the possibility of Petropavlovsk's initial $160 million liability reducing to $40 million within two to three years, subject to certain conditions being met. For the final two years of the new facility, the guarantee liability will increase to a maximum $120 million to cover the final principal and interest repayments.
Our teams on the ground will continue to work hard to meet the production, development and cost targets we have set for the year and I look forward to updating on our progress against these as the year continues."
Conference Call and Webcast
A live conference call and webcast will take place today at 8:15am BST. Participants will be able to listen to the call by dialling one of the following numbers shortly before 8:15am BST:
UK toll free number: 0800 358 9473
UK local number: +44(0) 3333 000 804
Participant Password: 74397671#
A presentation will be webcasted and can be accessed via this URL, from which a recording of the call will also be made available: http://webcasting.buchanan.uk.com/broadcast/5ca379faeb566331974d517c
Full Year 2018 - Summary
Note: Figures may not add up due to rounding
FY 2018 Financial Highlights
|
| 31-Dec-18 | 31-Dec-17 |
Total gold produced | koz | 422.3 | 439.6 |
Gold sold | koz | 369.6 | 439.8 |
Total Cash Costs¨ | $/oz | 786 | 741 |
All-in Sustaining Costs¨ (AISC) | $/oz | 1,117 | 963 |
Average realised gold price¨ | $/oz | 1,263 | 1,262 |
|
|
|
|
Group revenue | $m | 499.8 | 587.4 |
Underlying EBITDA¨ | $m | 143.0 | 196.8 |
Operating Profit | $m | 126.6 | 100.4 |
Profit before tax | $m | 82.4 | 48.9 |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure¨ | $m | 134.4 | 88.1 |
Net cash from operating activities | $m | 217.2 | 124.0 |
(Net debt¨)/cash | $m | (568.0) | (585.1) |
§ Gold production of 422.3koz (2017: 439.6koz) including 51.2koz of gold contained in refractory concentrate stockpiles for later processing at the newly-commissioned Pressure Oxidation Hub (POX)
§ Gold sales of 369.6koz (2017: 439.8koz) reflecting lower production and the stockpiling of refractory concentrates
§ Group revenue was $499.8m (2017: $587.4m) primarily reflecting a 16% decrease in physical volumes of gold sold
§ Total cash cost (TCC) increases were contained to a 6% rise to $786/oz from 2017 levels despite H1 2018 cash costs reaching $899/oz due to suboptimal mine performance in terms of grade control and stripping rates under previous management
§ Underlying EBITDA¨ of $143.0m (2017: $196.8m) was affected by lower sales volumes contributing $36.6m to the decrease with a further $16.4m resulting from an increase in total cash costs
§ Net cash from operating activities increased by 75% to US$217.2m (2017: US$124.0m) primarily due to US$131.8m of advance payments under the gold sales agreements
§ Reduction in year-end Net Debt¨ by $17.1m to $568.0m (2017: $585.1m) due the above operating cash inflows being partially offset by continued investment in fixed assets of US$131m and the provision of bridging loans to Group's associate IRC of $57.0m.
§ Profit before tax rose to $82.4m in 2018 compared to $48.9m in 2017, reflecting the US$102m impairment recognised
§ Capital expenditure¨ investments increased to $134.4m (2017: $88.1m) due to spending on underground development at Pioneer and Malomir and construction of the POX Hub
2018 Operational Highlights
§ Gold production of 422.3koz in line with increased H1 2018 guidance of 420 - 450Koz, including 52.1koz of gold contained within high-grade gold refractory concentrate (for processing at the POX Hub)
§ JORC Reserve update
§ Ore Reserves increased by 0.56Moz despite depletion to 8.21Moz due to new discoveries at Pioneer and Malomir
2018 Development Highlights
§ POX Hub successfully commissioned in Q4 2018
§ Following Q4 commissioning, the first two autoclave lines reached design capacity in record time and consequently first gold was poured on 21 December 2018
§ Stable gold recovery of 93% was achieved in line with design parameters
§ Malomir flotation (Stage 1 - 3.6Mtpa)
§ The first flotation line (1.8Mtpa capacity) was commissioned in July, with the second line (1.8Mtpa capacity) coming on stream in October
§ Operating at full capacity, both lines enabled the Company to build up a high-grade refractory stockpile, ready for processing at the POX Hub
§ Significant improvements made to flowsheet resulting in up to 50% increase in gold concentrate grades from c.24g/t to c36-40g/t and an improvement in concentrate yield to around c.2.8% vs. design of 5.5%
Corporate Update
§ Refinancing of ICBC project finance facility and renegotiation of Petropavlovsk's guarantee
§ On 12 March 2019, Petropavlovsk shareholders approved the Company's proposal to guarantee the obligations of K&S, a wholly owned subsidiary of IRC Ltd ("IRC"), under two facility agreements with JSC Gazprombank ("Gazprombank") totalling $240m
§ The new facility agreements have an improved loan repayment term along with a reduced guarantee resulting in lower risk for Petropavlovsk
§ This facility allowed IRC to repay in full an outstanding project finance facility K&S had with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd ("ICBC") and has enabled repayment to Petropavlovsk of $57m of bridge loan financings advanced in 2018 and payment of $6m in guarantee fees owing to it
§ Board and Management teams strengthened
§ Following election at the 2018 AGM of Sir Roderic Lyne (Chairman), Mr Robert Jenkins and Dr Pavel Maslovskiy, and the reappointment of Mr Bektas Mukazhanov (Fincraft nominee Director), the Board was strengthened with the appointment of three additional Independent Non-Executive Directors
§ As a result, the Board is fully compliant with the UK Corporate Governance Code and comprises Directors with a wide range of skills and experience, including in the mining industry
§ Mr Harry Kenyon - Slaney was appointed as the Senior Independent Director on 23 April 2019.
§ The return of Dr Maslovskiy as Chief Executive Officer has restored authoritative and expert leadership to the executive team, reflected in much improved performance
IRC Limited (IRC)
Petropavlovsk is a major shareholder (31.1%) of IRC and guarantor of two facility agreements for a loan in aggregate of $240m with Gazprombank. In accordance with IAS 28, IRC is treated as an investment in associate.
IRC is a vertically integrated iron ore producer and developer in the Russian Far East, listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (ticker: 1029.HK).
The following selected summary is extracted from IRC Annual Results for the year ended 31 December 2018:
Highlights
§ Financials
§ 39% increase in total revenue to $151.5m (2017: $ 109.3m) on the back of increased production volumes at K&S
§ 42% increase in EBITDA to $28.5m (2017: $20.0m) due to stronger revenues and stricter cost-control
§ Operations
§ Iron ore concentrate production up 43% to 2,235Kt (2017: 1,563Kt)
§ Iron ore concentrate sales up 44% to 2,224Kt (2017: 1,539Kt)
§ During December 2018, K&S achieved record-breaking monthly production, operating at an average capacity of 84%
§ Russian and Chinese sections of the 2.2km Amur River Bridge have been successfully connected, and the bridge is expected to be operational in September 2019
Q1 2019 Production Update (unaudited)
§ Production
Gold production (000oz) | |||
Asset | Q1 2019 | Q1 2018 | |
Pioneer | 21.9 | 40.9 | |
Albyn | 41.3 | 39.4 | |
Malomir1 | 44.5 | 27.9 | |
Pokrovskiy | - | 4.3 | |
Total | 107.7 | 112.6 |
1Production at Malomir includes 27.7koz produced via the POX Hub
§ Operations
§ First quarter gold production and sales of 107.7koz which is in-line with the budget and includes c.28koz of gold produced from refractory ore at the POX Hub. This level of production puts the Company on course to meet the delivery of its FY2019 targets
§ A successful start to the year at Albyn which produced 41.3koz, 12% above budget
§ A strong quarter for Malomir with 44.5koz produced, 22% above budget
§ Production at Pioneer was below expectations due to a combination of delays in the underground workings caused by the persistence of underground water and lower grade material from the open pit (0.60g/t vs 0.87g/t in Q1 2018). This has been offset by strong performances at Albyn and Malomir
§ A highlight for the quarter was a strong contribution from underground operations at Malomir which produced 17.7koz contained gold from 67kt of ore grading 8.26g/t
§ Flotation
§ Test works successfully produced concentrate from lower grade (0.73g/t) material removed during stripping activities ahead of opening the main orebody
§ These activities resulted in 25kt of refractory concentrate being produced at an average grade of 23g/t with an 87% recovery and with improved concentrate yields (c.2.8% instead of 5.5% design)
§ As of the end of the quarter, around 29kt of concentrate at 28.2g/t containing 26koz of gold was stockpiled for processing at POX facilities
§ Refractory ore processing at the POX Hub
§ Approximately 32kt of high-grade refractory concentrate was processed through the POX Hub during Q1 at an average grade of 32g/t including stockpiled material
§ POX recoveries were consistent in March at 91%, with the expectation that 94% design-rate recovery will be achieved later in the year
§ The third and fourth lines at the POX Hub were tested during Q1 and shown to be fully-functioning. These additional lines are ready to begin operating at full capacity once supplies of third-party concentrate can be secured
§ Purchase of third-party refractory concentrate
§ The Company has successfully trialled third party concentrates from two different sources and is actively seeking to increase supply from across the region
§ As of the date of this release, two batches of third-party material have been secured, including 20kt at a grade of 40-60g/t and 17kt of material at a grade of 65-75g/t
§ Pilot testing carried out at the Group's in-house scientific and research institute RDC Hydrometallurgy, indicates POX recovery of between 92% to 96%, depending on the properties of the concentrate
2019 Outlook
§ 2019 Outlook
§ 125kt -145kt of refractory gold concentrate is planned to be produced at Malomir flotation plant
§ To reach its target, the Company expects to treat a total of 155kt - 175kt of refractory concentrates grading between 29g/t - 32g/t in 2019
§ Production
§ Production is expected to increase from the second quarter due to a combination of higher grades treated at the Malomir flotation plant, POX recoveries improving towards their design rate and two further autoclaves are being commissioned
§ POX autoclaves 3 and 4 are ready for commissioning when a sufficient stockpile of third-party concentrate is secured to ensure stable production at full capacity
§ Capex¨
§ Capex guidance remains between $45m to $55m, although Management and the Board are considering the benefits of accelerating the construction of additional flotation lines at Malomir
§ Working capital
§ Working capital is expected to be positively affected by the processing of stockpiled concentrates from Pioneer and Albyn
Capital Markets Day
Petropavlovsk is planning an institutional capital markets day to be held in London during Q3 2019. The event will focus on technical aspects of the Company's flagship POX Hub development project and medium-term guidance.
Enquiries
For more information, please visit www.petropavlovsk.net and www.ircgroup.com.hk or contact:
Petropavlovsk PLC Patrick Pittaway Max Zaltsman +44 (0) 20 7201 8900
| Buchanan Bobby Morse Ariadna Peretz +44 (0) 207 466 5000 |
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014.
Cautionary note on forward-looking statements
This release may include statements that are, or may be deemed to be, "forward-looking statements". These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms "believes", "estimates", "plans", "projects", "anticipates", "expects", "intends", "may", "will" or "should" or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy, plans, objectives, goals, future events or intentions. These forward- looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this release and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the Group's intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, the future price of gold, the Group's results of operations, financial position, liquidity, prospects, growth, estimation of mineral reserves and resources and strategies, and exchange rates and the expectations of the industry.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to future events and circumstances outside the control of the Group. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and the development of the markets and the industry in which the Group operates may differ materially from those described in, or suggested by, any forward- looking statements contained in this release. In addition, even if the development of the markets and the industry in which the Group operates are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this release, those developments may not be indicative of developments in subsequent periods. A number of factors could cause results and/or developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements including, without limitation, general economic and business conditions, demand, supply and prices for gold and other long-term commodity price assumptions (and their effect on the timing and feasibility of future projects and developments), trends in the gold mining industry and conditions of the international gold markets, competition, actions and activities of governmental authorities (including changes in laws, regulations or taxation), currency fluctuations (including as between the US Dollar and Rouble), the Group's ability to recover its reserves or develop new reserves, changes in its business strategy, any litigation, and political and economic uncertainty. Except as required by applicable law, rule or regulation (including the Listing and Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules), the Group does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Past performance cannot be relied on as a guide to future performance.
The content of websites referred to in this announcement does not form part of this announcement
The financial information set out in this release does not constitute the Company's statutory accounts for the years ended 31 December 2018 or 2017 but is derived from those accounts. Statutory accounts for 2017 have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and those for 2017 will be delivered following the Company's annual general meeting. The auditors have reported on those accounts: their reports were unqualified, did not draw attention to any matters by way of emphasis and did not contain statements under s498(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006.
FY 2018 CFO Statement
Note: Figures may not add up due to rounding
Financial Highlights
|
| 2018
| 2017 (restated)(c) |
Gold produced | '000oz | 422.3 | 439.6 |
Gold sold | '000oz | 369.6 | 439.8 |
Group revenue | US$ million | 499.8 | 587.4 |
Average realised gold price¨ | US$/oz | 1,263 | 1,262 |
Average LBMA gold price afternoon fixing | US$/oz | 1,269 | 1,257 |
Total Cash Costsu (a) | US$/oz | 786 | 741 |
All-in Sustaining Costsu (b) | US$/oz | 1,117 | 963 |
All-in Costsu (b) | US$/oz | 1,332 | 1,065 |
Underlying EBITDAu | US$ million | 143.0 | 196.8 |
Operating profit | US$ million | 126.6 | 100.4 |
Profit before tax | US$ million | 82.4 | 48.9 |
Profit for the period | US$ million | 25.9 | 37.1 |
Profit for the period attributable to equity shareholders of Petropavlovsk PLC | US$ million | 24.5 | 37.0 |
Basic profit per share | US$ | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Net cash from operating activities | US$ million | 217.2 | 124.0 |
(a) Calculation of Total Cash Costsu ("TCC") is set out in the section Hard rock mines below.
(b) All-in Sustaining Costsu ("AISC") and All-in Costsu ("AIC") are calculated in accordance with guidelines for reporting All-in Sustaining Costsu and All-in Costsu published by the World Gold Council. Calculation is set out in the section All-in Sustaining Costsu and All-in Costsu below.
(c) See note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for details regarding the restatement which resulted in the 2017 deferred tax expense decrease by US$7.3 million and the depreciation expense increase by US$11.6 million.
|
| 31 December 2018 US$ million | 31 December 2017 US$ million |
Cash and cash equivalents |
| 26.2 | 11.4 |
Notes(d) |
| (499.0) | (497.7) |
Convertible bonds (e) |
| (95.2) | (91.6) |
Loans(f) |
| - | (7.1) |
Net Debt u |
| (568.0) | (585.1) |
(d) US$500 million Guaranteed Notes due on 14 November 2022 at amortised cost.
(e) US$100 million convertible bonds due on 18 March 2020 at amortised cost.
(f) US$4 million principal under Sberbank facility at amortised cost.
Revenue
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
| US$ million | US$ million |
Revenue from hard rock mines |
| 470.7 | 556.2 |
Revenue from other operations |
| 29.1 | 31.2 |
|
| 499.8 | 587.4 |
Group revenue during the period was US$499.8 million, 15% lower than the US$587.4 million achieved in 2017.
Revenue from hard rock mines during the period was US$470.7 million, 15% lower than the US$556.2 million achieved in 2017. Gold remains the key commodity produced and sold by the Group, comprising 93% of total revenue generated in 2018. The physical volume of gold sold from hard rock mines decreased by 16% from 439,834oz in 2017 to 369,611oz in 2018. The average realised gold priceu slightly increased from US$1,262/oz in 2017 to US$1,263/oz in 2018. The average realised gold priceu includes a US$(9)/oz effect from hedge arrangements (2017: US$2/oz).
The Group recognised a further US$3.2 million revenue from sales of refractory ore concentrate produced at the Malomir flotation plant (2017: nil).
Hard rock mines sold 54,746oz of silver in 2018 at an average price of US$15/oz, compared to 65,503oz in 2017 at an average price of US$17/oz.
Revenue generated as a result of third-party work by the Group's in-house service companies was US$29.1 million in 2018, a US$2.1 million decrease compared to US$31.2 million in 2017. This revenue is substantially attributable to sales generated by the Group's engineering and research institute, Irgiredmet, primarily through engineering services and the procurement of materials, consumables and equipment for third parties, which comprised US$25.1 million in 2018 compared to US$29.0 million in 2017.
Cash flow hedge arrangements
In order to increase certainty in respect of a significant proportion of its cash flows, the Group has entered into a number of gold forward contracts.
Forward contracts to sell an aggregate of 200,000oz of gold matured during the 2018 and resulted in a US$(3.4) million net cash settlement by the Group (2017: US$0.8 million cash contribution to revenue from forward contracts to sell an aggregate of 212,501oz of gold).
The Group constantly monitors the gold price and hedges some portion of production as considered appropriate. Forward contracts to sell an aggregate of 200Koz of gold at an average price of US$1,252/oz were outstanding as at 31 December 2018. Forward contracts to sell an aggregate of 133Koz of gold at an average price of US$1,252/oz are outstanding as at 24 April 2019.
Underlying EBITDA¨ and analysis of operating costs
|
|
| |
| 2018 | 2017 (restated)(b) | |
| US$ million | US$ million | |
Profit for the period | 25.9 | 37.1 | |
Add/(less): |
|
| |
Investment income | (3.8) | (0.8) | |
Interest expense | 29.5 | 25.9 | |
Other finance gains | (13.9) | (2.2) | |
Other finance losses | 32.4 | 28.5 | |
Foreign exchange (gains)/losses | (8.5) | 0.7 | |
Accrual for additional mining tax (a) | - | 19.9 | |
Taxation | 56.5 | 11.8 | |
Depreciation | 102.2 | 104.8 | |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | 12.2 | - | |
Impairment/(reversal of impairment) of ore stockpiles | 18.0 | (4.7) | |
Impairment of gold in circuit | 2.1 | 3.9 | |
Impairment of non-trading loans | - | 0.6 | |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets | (101.7) | - | |
Share of results of associates (c) | (8.1) | (28.7) | |
Underlying EBITDAu | 143.0 | 196.8 | |
(a) Amounts of mining tax for the six-month period to 31 December 2016, interest and penalties paid by the Group in 2017 following unfavorable court decisions.
(b) See note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for details regarding the restatement.
(c) Group's share of interest expense, investment income, other finance gains and losses, foreign exchange gains/losses, taxation, depreciation and impairment/reversal of impairment recognised by an associate (IRC).
Underlying EBITDA¨ as contributed by business segments is set out below.
|
|
| |
| 2018 | 2017 | |
| US$ million | US$ million | |
Pioneer | 63.1 | 75.5 | |
Pokrovskiy | (0.5) | 0.8 | |
Malomir | 37.7 | 22.1 | |
Albyn | 76.6 | 130.7 | |
Total Hard rock mines | 177.0 | 229.1 | |
Corporate and other | (34.0) | (32.3) | |
Underlying EBITDAu | 143.0 | 196.8 | |
Hard rock mines
During this period, the hard rock mines generated Underlying EBITDAu of US$177.0 million compared to US$229.1 million Underlying EBITDAu in 2017.
Total Cash Costsu for hard rock mines increased from US$741/oz in 2017 to US$786/oz in 2018. The increase in TCCu primarily reflects the effect of inflation of certain Rouble denominated costs, higher volumes of stripping and suboptimal organisation of mining works in the first half of 2018. This effect was partially mitigated by higher grades of ore processed at Pioneer and Malomir and higher recoveries achieved at Pioneer, Albyn and Malomir as well as by the effect of Rouble depreciation. The decrease in physical ounces sold from c.439,834oz in 2017 to c.369,611oz in 2018 resulted in US$36.6 million decrease in the Underlying EBITDAu. The increase in TCCu contributed to a further US$16.4 million decrease in the Underlying EBITDAu. This effect was partially mitigated by the increase in the average realised gold priceu from US$1,262/oz in 2017 to US$1,263/oz in 2018 and US$0.6 million profits from the sale of gold concentrate in 2018.
The key components of the operating cash expenses are wages, electricity, diesel, chemical reagents and consumables, as set out in the table below. The key cost drivers affecting the operating cash expenses are stripping ratios, production volumes of ore mined and processed, grades of ore processed, recovery rates, cost inflation and fluctuations in the Rouble to US Dollar exchange rate.
Compared with 2017 there was ongoing inflation of certain Rouble denominated costs, in particular, electricity costs increased by 3% in Rouble terms (decreased by 4% in US Dollar terms) and the cost of diesel increased by 26% in Rouble terms (increased by 17% in US Dollar terms). The Rouble depreciated against the US Dollar by 7% in 2018 compared to 2017, with the average exchange rate for the period of 62.68 Roubles per US Dollar in 2018 compared to 58.32 Roubles per US Dollar in 2017, somewhat mitigating the effect of Rouble denominated costs inflation.
Refinery and transportation costs are variable costs dependent on production volume. Mining tax is also a variable cost dependent on production volume and the gold price realised. The Russian statutory mining tax rate is 6%. Under the Russian Federal Law 144-FZ dated 23 May 2016 that introduced certain amendments to the Russian Tax Code, taxpayers who are participants in Regional Investment Projects ("RIP") have the right to apply the reduced mining tax rate provided certain conditions are met. The Group's mining entities (JSC Pokrovskiy Rudnik, LLC Malomirskiy Rudnik and LLC Albynskiy Rudnik) met eligibility criteria and continued applying 0% mining tax rate in 2018.
The Group initially applied a reduced rate of mining tax from 1 July 2016 in its capacity of a RIP participant. The position of the Russian tax authorities was that the effective date for the aforementioned concession should be 1 January 2017 and, accordingly, the Group should be liable for the mining tax of for the six month period to 31 December 2016. Following unfavorable court decisions, the Group has settled an aggregate equivalent of US$19.9 million of mining tax for the six month period to 31 December 2016, interest and penalties, which amounts were recognised as an expense in 2017.
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 | ||
|
| US$ million | % |
| US$ million | % |
Staff cost |
| 67.3 | 22 |
| 72.1 | 23 |
Materials |
| 93.2 | 31 |
| 107.1 | 34 |
Fuel |
| 45.5 | 15 |
| 43.8 | 14 |
Electricity |
| 26.5 | 9 |
| 30.1 | 10 |
Other external services |
| 46.8 | 15 |
| 36.2 | 12 |
Other operating expenses |
| 23.4 | 8 |
| 24.1 | 7 |
|
| 302.7 | 100 |
| 313.4 | 100 |
Movement in ore stockpiles, gold in circuit, bullion in process, limestone and flotation concentrate attributable to gold production (a) |
| (55.6) |
|
| (19.2) |
|
Total operating cash expenses |
| 247.1 |
|
| 294.2 |
|
(a) Excluding deferred stripping
| Hard rock mines | 2018 | 2017 | ||||
| Pioneer | Pokrovskiy | Malomir | Albyn | Total | Total | |
| US$ million | US$ million | US$ million | US$ million | US$ million | US$ million | |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gold | 171.0 | 8.2 | 98.3 | 189.1 | 466.7 | 555.1 | |
Silver | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.1 1.1 | |
Flotation concentrate | - | - | 3.2 | - | 3.2 | - | |
| 171.6 | 8.2 | 101.6 | 189.3 | 470.7 | 556.2 | |
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating cash expenses | 105.3 | 8.6 | 51.2 | 82.1 | 247.1 | 294.2 | |
Refinery and transportation | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 0.8 | |
Other taxes | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 6.2 | 5.9 5.9 | |
Accrual of additional mining tax(a) | - | - | - | - | - | 19.9 | |
Deferred stripping costs | 0.9 | - | 10.6 | 28.2 | 39.8 | 26.2 | |
Depreciation | 37.0 | 0.7 | 22.7 | 41.4 | 101.8 | 104.6 | |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets | - | - | (83.0) | - | (83.0) | - | |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets
| - | - | 12.2 | - | 12.2 | - | |
Impairment/(reversal of impairment) of ore stockpiles | - | - | 0.3 | 17.7 | 18.0 | (4.7) | |
Impairment of gold in circuit | 1.4 | - | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 3.9 | |
Operating expenses | 146.9 | 9.4 | 16.7 | 172.0 | 344.9 | 450.7 | |
Result of precious metals operations | 24.8 | (1.2) | 84.9 | 17.3 | 125.8 | 105.5 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add/(less): |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Accrual of additional mining tax(a) | - | - | - | - | - | 19.9 | |
Depreciation | 37.0 | 0.7 | 22.7 | 41.4 | 101.8 | 104.6 | |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets | - | - | (83.0) | - | (83.0) | - | |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | - | - | 12.2 | - | 12.2 | - | |
Impairment/(reversal of impairment)/ of ore stockpiles | - | - | 0.3 | 17.7 | 18.0 | (4.7) | |
Impairment of gold in circuit | 1.4 | - | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 3.9 | |
Segment EBITDA¨ | 63.1 | (0.5) | 37.7 | 76.6 | 177.0 | 229.1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Physical volume of gold sold, oz | 135,001 | 6,442 | 77,448 | 150,720 | 369,611 | 439,834 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating cash expenses | 105.3 | 8.6 | 51.2 | 82.1 | 247.1 | 294.2 | |
Refinery and transportation | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | |
Other taxes | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
Deferred stripping costs | 0.9 | - | 10.6 | 28.2 | 39.8 | 26.2 | |
Operating cash costs | 108.5 | 8.7 | 63.9 | 112.7 | 293.7 | 327.1 | |
Deduct: co-product revenue | (0.6) | (0.0) | (0.1) | (0.2) | (0.8) | (1.1) | |
Deduct: cost of flotation concentrate | - | - | (2.6) | - | (2.6) | - | |
Total Cash Costsu | 107.9 | 8.6 | 61.3 | 112.5 | 290.3 | 326.0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TCCu, US$/oz | 799 | 1,341 | 791 | 747 | 786 |
741 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(a) Amounts of mining tax for the six-month period to 31 December 2016, interest and penalties paid by the Group in 2017 following unfavorable court decisions.
All-in Sustaining Costsu and All-in Costsu
AISC¨ increased from US$963/oz in 2017 to US$1,117/oz in 2018. The increase in AISCu reflects the growth in TCC as well as higher sustaining capital expenditures related to the existing mining operations and impairment of non-refractory ore stockpile at Albyn due to suboptimal organization of mining works in the first half of 2018.
AICu increased from US$1,065/oz in 2017 to US$1,332/oz in 2018, primarily reflecting the increase in AISCu explained above and Capital Expenditureu in relation to the POX and Malomir flotation plant projects.
| Hard rock mines | 2018 | 2017 | |||
| Pioneer | Pokrovskiy | Malomir | Albyn | Total | Total |
| US$ million | US$ million | US$ million | US$ million | US$ million | US$ million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical volume of gold sold, oz | 135,001 | 6,442 | 77,448 | 150,720 | 369,611 | 439,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Costsu | 107.9 | 8.6 | 61.3 | 112.5 | 290.3 | 326.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCCu, US$/oz | 799 | 1,341 | 791 | 747 | 786 |
741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment/(reversal of impairment) of ore stockpiles | - | - | 0.3 | 17.7 | 18.0 | (2.5) |
Impairment of gold in circuit | 1.4 | - | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 3.9 |
Adjusted operating costs | 109.3 | 8.7 | 62.1 | 130.4 | 310.5 | 327.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central administration expenses | 14.3 | 0.7 | 8.2 | 16.0 | 39.2 | 39.9 |
Capitalised stripping at end of the period | 22.9 | - | 11.5 | 12.6 | 47.0 | 39.8 |
Capitalised stripping at beginning of the period | (0.9) | - | (10.6) | (28.2) | (39.8) | (26.2) |
Close down and site restoration | 0.2 | - | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
Sustaining exploration expenditures | 8.9 | - | 5.5 | 4.1 | 18.5 | 16.1 |
Sustaining Capital Expenditureu | 20.0 | - | 4.6 | 11.5 | 36.1 | 24.9 |
All-in Sustaining Costsu | 174.7 | 9.3 | 81.9 | 146.8 | 412.7 | 423.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-in Sustaining Costsu, US$/oz | 1,294 | 1,449 | 1,058 | 974 | 1,117 | 963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration expenditureu | 1.1 | - | 1.1 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 5.8 |
Capital Expenditureu | 22.7 | - | 53.9 | - | 76.7 | 41.2 |
Reversal of impairment of ore stockpiles (a) | - | - | - | - | - | (2.2) |
All-in Costsu | 198.5 | 9.3 | 136.9 | 147.8 | 492.5 | 468.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-in Costsu, US$/oz | 1,470 | 1,449 | 1,768 | 980 | 1,332 | 1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Refractory ore stockpiles to be processed at the POX Hub.
Corporate and other
Corporate and other operations contributed US$(34.0) million to Underlying EBITDA¨ in 2018 compared to US$(32.3) million in 2017. Corporate and other operations primarily include central administration function, the results of in-house service companies and related charges, and the Group's share of results of its associate IRC.
The Group has corporate offices in London, Moscow and Blagoveshchensk, which together represent the central administration function. Central administration expenses decreased by US$0.7 million from US$39.9 million in 2017 to US$39.2 million in 2018.
The Group recognised US$15.5 million profit in relation to its associate IRC, including US$28.1 million effect from partial reversal of impairment at K&S mine and US$(5.7) million impairment of investment in IRC (2017: US$35.2 million share of profit generated by IRC, including US$40.3 million effect from partial reversal of impairment at K&S mine). IRC contributed US$7.4 million to the Group's Underlying EBITDAu in 2018.
Impairment review
The Group undertook a review of impairment indicators and impairment reversal indicators of the tangible assets attributable to its gold mining projects and supporting in-house service companies. Detailed calculations of recoverable amounts, which are value-in-use calculations based on discounted cash flows, were prepared which concluded no impairment was required as at 31 December 2018 and 2017.
Having considered the excess of estimated recoverable amounts over the carrying values of the associated assets on the balance sheet as at 31 December 2018 and taking into consideration removed uncertainty connected with the timing of the final construction and performance of the POX Hub, the Directors concluded on the following:
- A reversal of impairment previously recorded against the carrying value of the assets that are part of the Malomir CGU would be appropriate. Accordingly, a post-tax impairment reversal of US$66.4 million (being US$83.0 million gross impairment reversal net of associated deferred tax liabilities) has been recorded against the associated assets within property, plant and equipment. The aforementioned impairment reversal takes into consideration the effect of depreciation attributable to relevant mining assets and intra-group transfers of previously impaired assets to Malomir.
- A further reversal of impairment previously recorded against the carrying value of the assets of the supporting in-house service companies would be appropriate to the extent of the headroom available at Malomir and Albyn CGUs and relevant carrying values allocated to these CGUs. Accordingly, a post-tax impairment reversal of US$15.2 million (being US$18.7 million gross impairment reversal net of associated deferred tax liabilities) has been recorded against the associated assets within property, plant and equipment. The aforementioned impairment reversal takes into consideration the effect of depreciation attributable to relevant assets and intra-group transfers of previously impaired assets.
The key assumptions which formed the basis of forecasting future cash flows and the value in use calculation are set out below:
| 2018 | 2017 |
Long-term real gold price | US$1,300/oz | US$1,300/oz |
Discount rate (a) | 8.5% | 8.0% |
RUB : US$ exchange rate | RUB67 : US$1 | RUB60 : US$1 |
(a) Being the post-tax real weighted average cost of capital, equivalent to a nominal pre-tax discount rate of 12.5% (2017: 11.6%)
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets
The Group performed a review of its exploration and evaluation assets and concluded to suspend exploration at the Flanks of Malomir and surrender relevant licenses. An aggregate impairment charge of US$12.2 million was recorded against associated exploration and evaluation assets.
As at 31 December 2018, all exploration and evaluation assets on the balance sheet related to the areas adjacent to the existing mines with ongoing drilling and technical studies being performed.
Interest income and expense
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
| US$ million | US$ million |
Investment income |
| 3.8 | 0.8 |
The Group recognised US$2.7 million interest income on loans granted to IRC and US$1.1 million interest income on cash deposits with banks.
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
| US$ million | US$ million |
Interest expense |
| 62.8 | 60.2 |
Interest capitalised |
| (33.7) | (34.6) |
Other |
| 0.4 | 0.3 |
|
| 29.5 | 25.9 |
Interest expense for the period comprised US$41.9 million of effective interest on the Notes, US$12.6 million of effective interest on the Convertible Bonds, US$1.1 million of effective interest on bank facilities and US$7.2 million of interest on prepayments on gold sale agreements (2017: US$5.3 million of effective interest on the Notes, US$12.2 million of effective interest on the Convertible Bonds and US$42.7 million of effective interest on bank facilities).
As the Group continued with active construction of the POX Hub and flotation at Malomir, these projects met eligibility criteria for borrowing costs capitalisation under IAS 23 "Borrowing Costs". US$33.7 million of interest expense was capitalised within property, plant and equipment (2017: US$34.6 million interest capitalised in relation to the POX Hub, Malomir flotation and underground projects at Pioneer and Malomir). With the POX Hub having now achieved commercial production, interest captialisation will cease, resulting in an increased interest expense from 2019 onwards
Other finance gains and losses
Net other finance losses for the period totalled US$(18.4) million compared to US$(26.3) million of net other finance losses in 2017. Key elements of other finance losses this period include:
- US$(25.5) million losses recognised in relation to the ICBC guarantee contract to reflect the expected credit losses associated with the ICBC guarantee arrangement;
- US$(3.7) million result of re-measurement of receivable from IRC under ICBC guarantee arrangements to fair value (net of US$4.0 million contractual guarantee fee charges);
- US$(2.4) million lifetime expected credit losses recognised on origination of loans granted to IRC and US$(0.8) million further impairment charges in relation to those loans;
- US$11.7 million gain from re-measurement of the conversion option of the Convertible Bonds to fair value and US$1.9 million gain from re-measurement of the issued the Call Option over the Company's shares to fair value.
Taxation
|
| 2018 | 2017 (restated) |
|
| US$ million | US$ million |
Tax charge |
| 56.5 | 11.8 |
The Group is subject to corporation tax under the UK, Russia and Cyprus tax legislation. The statutory tax rate for 2018 was 19.0% in the UK and 20% in Russia. Under the Russian Federal Law 144-FZ dated 23 May 2016 taxpayers who are participants in Regional Investment Projects ("RIP") have the right to apply the reduced corporation tax rate over the period until 2027, subject to eligibility criteria. In 2018 and 2017, LLC Albynskiy Rudnik has received tax relief as a RIP participant and was entitled to the reduced statutory corporation tax rate of 17%.
The tax charge for the period arises primarily related to the Group's gold mining operations and is represented by a current tax charge of US$19.9 million (2017: US$24.4 million) and a deferred tax charge, which is a non-cash item, of US$36.6 million (2017: deferred tax credit of US$12.6 million). Included in the deferred tax charge in 2018 is a US$30.6 million charge (2017: US$8.6 million credit) foreign exchange effect which primarily arises because the tax base for a significant portion of the future taxable deductions in relation to the Group's property, plant and equipment are denominated in Russian Roubles, whilst the future depreciation charges associated with these assets will be based on their US Dollar carrying value.
During the period, the Group made corporation tax payments which were partially offset by refunds of excessive advance payments made in prior periods and giving a net of US$5.0 million in Russia (2017: corporation tax payments in aggregate of US$31.1 million in Russia).
Earnings per share
| 2018
| 2017 (restated)
|
Profit for the period attributable to equity holders of Petropavlovsk PLC | US$24.5 million | US$37.0 million |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares | 3,305,069,755 | 3,303,768,532
|
Basic profit per ordinary share | US$0.01 | US$0.01 |
Basic profit per share for 2018 was US$0.01 (2017: basic profit per share was US$0.01). The total number of Ordinary Shares in issue as at 31 December 2018 was 3,307,151,712 (31 December 2017: 3,303,768,532).
Financial position and cash flows
| 31 December 2018 | 31 December 2017 |
| US$ million | US$ million |
Cash and cash equivalents | 26.2 | 11.4 |
Notes (a) | (499.0) | (497.7) |
Convertible bonds (b) | (95.2) | (91.6) |
Bank loans (c) | - | (7.1) |
Net Debt¨ | (568.0) | (585.1) |
(a) US$500 million Guaranteed Notes due on 14 November 2022 at amortised cost.
(b) US$100 million convertible bonds due on 18 March 2020 at amortised cost.
(c) US$4 million principal under Sberbank facility at amortised cost.
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$ million | US$ million |
Net cash from operating activities | 217.2 | 124.0 |
Net cash used in investing activities (d) | (186.5) | (87.0) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (13.0) | (38.6) |
(d) Including US$134.4 million Capital Expenditureu (2017: US$88.1 million) and US$56.75 million loans advanced to IRC (2017: US$nil).
Key movements in cash and Net Debtu
| Cash | Debt | Net Debtu | ||||
| US$ million | US$ million | US$ million | ||||
| As at 1 January 2018 | 11.4 | (596.5) | (585.1) |
| ||
| Net cash generated by operating activities before working capital changes | 122.6 | - |
|
| ||
| Increase in working capital (e) | 160.3 | - |
|
| ||
| Income tax paid | (5.0) | - |
|
| ||
| Capital Expenditureu | (134.4) | - |
|
| ||
| Amounts repaid under bank loans | (4.0) | 4.0 |
|
| ||
| Interest accrued | - | (55.5) |
|
| ||
| Interest paid | (60.6)(f) | 53.8 |
|
| ||
| Transaction costs in connection with bank loans | (6.4) | - |
|
| ||
| Transaction costs in connection with notes | (2.6) | - |
|
| ||
| Loans granted (g) | (57.0) | - |
|
| ||
| Interest received | 3.7 | - |
|
| ||
| Other | (1.8) | - |
|
| ||
| As at 31 December 2018 | 26.2 | (594.2) | (568.0) |
| ||
(e) Including an aggregate of US$163.8 million advance payments received from Gazprombank and Sberbank outstanding as at 31 December 2018. Advance payments are to be settled against physical delivery of gold produced by the Group in regular intervals over the period of up to twenty-four months from the reporting date based on the sales price prevailing at delivery that is determined with reference to LBMA fixing.
(f) Including US$6.7 million interest paid in relation to advance payments from Gazprombank and Sberbank.
(g) Including loans to IRC in the equivalent of US$56.75 million.
Capital Expenditure¨
The Group invested an aggregate of US$134.4 million in 2018 compared to US$88.1 million in 2017. The key areas of focus in 2018 were on the POX Hub project, for which active development continued ahead of scheduled commissioning in the end of 2018, exploration and development to support the underground mining at Pioneer and Malomir, expansion of tailings dams at Pioneer and Albyn and ongoing exploration related to the areas adjacent to the ore bodies of the Group's main mining operations. The Group capitalised US$33.7 million of interest expense incurred in relation to the Group's debt into the cost of the POX Hub and Malomir flotation (2017: US$34.6 million into the cost of the POX Hub, Malomir flotation and underground development at Pioneer and Malomir).
| Exploration expenditure | Development expenditure and other CAPEXu | Total CAPEXu
|
| ||||
| US$ million | US$ million | US$ million |
| ||||
| POX (a) | - | 61.5 | 61.5 | ||||
| Pokrovskiy and Pioneer (b) | 10.0 | 19.1 | 29.1 | ||||
| Malomir(c), (d) | 5.5 | 19.3 | 24.8 | ||||
| Albyn | 5.0 | 10.5 | 15.5 | ||||
| Other | 1.1 | - | 1.1 | ||||
| Upgrade of in-house service companies | - | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||
|
| 21.6 | 112.8 | 134.4 | ||||
(a) Including US$61.5 million of development expenditure in relation to the POX Hub which is considered to be non-sustaining Capital Expenditureu for the purposes of calculating AISCu and AICu.
(b) Including US$8.1 million of expenditure in relation to the underground mining project at Pioneer to be sustaining Capital Expenditureu for the purposes of calculating AISCu and AICu.
(c) Including US$6.1 million of expenditure in relation to the underground mining project at Malomir to be sustaining Capital Expenditureu for the purposes of calculating AISCu and AICu.
(d) Including US$15.2 million of expenditure in relation to Malomir flotation (including tailing dams), which is considered to be non-sustaining Capital Expenditureu for the purposes of calculating AISCu and AICu.
Foreign currency exchange differences
The Group's principal subsidiaries have a US Dollar functional currency. Foreign exchange differences arise on the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, which for the principal subsidiaries of the Group are the Russian Rouble and GB Pounds Sterling.
The following exchange rates to the US Dollar have been applied to translate monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
|
| 31 December 2018
| 31 December 2017
|
GB Pounds Sterling (GBP:US$) |
| 0.78 | 0.74 |
Russian Rouble (RUB: US$) |
| 69.47 | 57.60 |
The Rouble depreciated by 21% against the US Dollar during 2018, from RUB57.60: US$1 as at 31 December 2017 to RUB69.47: US$1 as at 31 December 2018. The average year-on-year depreciation of the Rouble against the US Dollar was approximately 7%, with the average exchange rate for 2018 being RUB62.68: US$1 compared to RUB58.32: US$1 for 2017. The Group recognised foreign exchange gains of US$8.5 million in 2018 (2017: losses of US$0.7 million) arising primarily on Rouble denominated net monetary assets.
Going concern
The Group monitors and manages its liquidity risk on an ongoing basis to ensure that it has access to sufficient funds to meet its obligations. Cash forecasts are prepared regularly based on a number of inputs including, but not limited to, forecast commodity prices and the impact of hedging arrangements, the Group's mining plan, forecast expenditure and debt repayment schedules. Sensitivities are run for different scenarios including, but not limited to, changes in commodity prices, cost inflation, different production rates from the Group's producing assets and the timing of expenditure on development projects. This is done to identify risks to liquidity and enable management to develop appropriate and timely mitigation strategies. The Group meets its capital requirements through a combination of sources including cash generated from operations, advances received from customers under prepayment arrangements and external debt.
The Group performed an assessment of the forecast cash flows for the period of 12 months from the date of approval of the 2018 Annual Report and Accounts. As at 31 December 2018, the Group had sufficient liquidity headroom. The Group is also satisfied that it has sufficient headroom under a base case scenario for the period to May 2020. The Group has also performed projections under a layered stressed case that is based on a gold price, which is approximately 10% to 14% lower than the average of the market consensus forecasts, non-refractory gold production approximately 5% lower than projected, and Russian Rouble : US Dollar exchange rate that is approximately 8-9% stronger than the average of the market consensus forecasts. This layered stressed case indicates that mitigating actions will be required to be taken in order to ensure sufficient liquidity for the relevant period to May 2020. This includes sufficient liquidity for the repayment, if necessary, of the Company's US$100 million 9% Convertible Bonds, due in March 2020. The mitigating actions include items within the control of the management, such as cost cutting, reduction of capital and operating expenditure, the deferral of prepayment settlements as well as working capital management.
As at 31 December 2018, the Group has guaranteed the outstanding amounts IRC owed to ICBC. The outstanding loan principal was US$169 million as at 31 December 2018. On 19 March 2019, the ICBC Facility was fully refinanced by the loans from Gazprombank. The Group has provided a guarantee in respect of IRC's new $240 million facility, of which approximately $233 million has been drawn down to date. The Gazprombank Facility is subject to an initial $160 million guaranteed by the Group. The assessment of whether there is any material uncertainty that IRC will be able to repay this facility as it falls due is another key element of the Group's overall going concern assessment. IRC projections demonstrate that IRC expects to have sufficient working capital liquidity over the next 12 months and expects to meet its obligations under the Gazprombank Facility. If a missed repayment under debt or guarantee obligations occurs, this would result in events of default which, through cross-defaults and cross-accelerations, could cause all other Group's debt arrangements to become repayable on demand.
Having taken into account the aforementioned factors, and after making enquiries and considering the uncertainties described above, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, being at least the next 12 months from the date of approval of the 2018 Annual Report and Accounts. Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing consolidated financial statements.
2019 Outlook
The Group is currently aiming to achieve 2018 production guidance in the range of 450 - 500 koz. The Group's operating cash expenses are substantially Rouble denominated. The Group expects its TCC◆ in 2019 to be in the range of c.US$850-950/oz at current exchange rates.
FY 2018 Consolidated Annual Financial Statements
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss
For the year ended 31 December 2018
|
| 2018 | 2017 (restated) (a) |
| note | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Group revenue | 5 | 499,775 | 587,420 |
Operating expenses | 6 | (388,643) | (522,267) |
Share of results of associate | 14 | 15,480 | 35,208 |
Operating profit |
| 126,612 | 100,361 |
Investment income | 9 | 3,775 | 760 |
Interest expense | 9 | (29,520) | (25,905) |
Other finance gains | 9 | 13,905 | 2,199 |
Other finance losses | 9 | (32,354) | (28,470) |
Profit before taxation |
| 82,418 | 48,945 |
Taxation | 10 | (56,489) | (11,804) |
Profit for the period |
| 25,929 | 37,141 |
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
Equity shareholders of Petropavlovsk PLC |
| 24,493 | 37,006 |
Non-controlling interests |
| 1,436 | 135 |
Profit per share |
|
|
|
Basic profit per share | 11 | US$0.01 | US$0.01 |
Diluted profit per share | 11 | US$0.01 | US$0.01 |
(a) See note 2 for details regarding the restatement.
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the year ended 31 December 2018
|
| 2018
US$'000 | 2017 (restated) US$'000 |
Profit for the period |
| 25,929 | 37,141 |
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: |
|
|
|
Revaluation of available-for-sale investments |
| - | (758) |
Exchange differences: |
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations |
| (3,183) | 832 |
Share of other comprehensive loss of associate |
| (329) | (458) |
Cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
Fair value gains/(losses) |
| 20,238 | (39,148) |
Tax thereon |
| (3,743) | 7,343 |
Transfer to revenue |
| 3,419 | (808) |
Tax thereon |
| (633) | 162 |
Other comprehensive profit/(loss) for the period net of tax |
| 15,769 | (32,835) |
Total comprehensive profit for the period |
| 41,698 | 4,306 |
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
Equity shareholders of Petropavlovsk PLC |
| 40,203 | 4,334 |
Non-controlling interests |
| 1,495 | (28) |
|
| 41,698 | 4,306 |
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
At 31 December 2018
| note | 31 December 2018
US$'000 | 31 December 2017 (restated) US$'000 | 1 January 2017 (restated) US$'000 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation assets | 12 | 43,115 | 53,518 | 49,270 |
Property, plant and equipment | 13 | 1,097,075 | 937,547 | 918,811 |
Investments in associates | 14 | 85,140 | 70,890 | 36,140 |
Inventories | 15 | 56,805 | 72,720 | 51,686 |
Trade and other receivables | 16 | 547 | 8,931 | 11,383 |
Other non-current assets |
| 1,177 | 347 | 1,105 |
|
| 1,283,859 | 1,143,953 | 1,068,395 |
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
Inventories | 15 | 205,844 | 172,652 | 183,266 |
Trade and other receivables | 16 | 68,394 | 75,830 | 90,430 |
Loans granted to an associate | 25 | 50,966 | - | - |
Derivative financial instruments |
| - | - | 7,478 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 17 | 26,152 | 11,415 | 12,642 |
|
| 351,356 | 259,897 | 293,816 |
Total assets |
| 1,635,215 | 1,403,850 | 1,362,211 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables | 19 | (219,845) | (88,333) | (55,638) |
Current income tax payable |
| (1,571) | (940) | (2,288) |
Borrowings | 20 | - | (7,137) | (85,306) |
Derivative financial instruments | 18 | (9,955) | - | - |
Provision for close down and restoration costs | 22 | (804) | (200) | - |
|
| (232,175) | (96,610) | (143,232) |
Net current assets |
| 119,181 | 163,287 | 150,584 |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings | 20 | (594,177) | (589,337) | (525,906) |
Derivative financial instruments | 18 | (2,411) | (49,684) | (10,314) |
Deferred tax liabilities | 21 | (113,354) | (72,380) | (92,396) |
Provision for close down and restoration costs | 22 | (20,584) | (20,804) | (19,152) |
Financial guarantee contract | 25 | (37,387) | (8,603) | (9,229) |
Trade and other payables | 19 | (33,779) | - | - |
|
| (801,692) | (740,808) | (656,997) |
Total liabilities |
| (1,033,867) | (837,418) | (800,229) |
Net assets |
| 601,348 | 566,432 | 561,982 |
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Share capital | 23 | 48,963 | 48,920 | 48,920 |
Share premium |
| 518,142 | 518,142 | 518,142 |
Hedging reserve |
| (7,166) | (26,388) | 5,900 |
Share based payments reserve |
| 227 | 144 | - |
Other reserves |
| (17,980) | (17,500) | (17,574) |
Retained earnings/(losses) |
| 47,538 | 32,985 | (10,602) |
Equity attributable to the shareholders of Petropavlovsk PLC |
| 589,724 | 556,303 | 544,786 |
Non-controlling interests |
| 11,624 | 10,129 | 17,196 |
Total equity |
| 601,348 | 566,432 | 561,982 |
These consolidated financial statements for Petropavlovsk PLC, registered number 4343841, were approved by the Directors on 24 April 2019 and signed on their behalf by
Sir Roderic Lyne Pavel Maslovskiy
Director Director
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31 December 2018
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
| Total attributable to equity holders of Petropavlovsk PLC |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| Share capital | Share premium | Share based payments reserve | Hedging reserve | Other reserves(a) | Retained earnings/ (losses) | Total | Non-controlling interests | Total equity |
| |||
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Balance at 1 January 2017 |
|
48,920 |
518,142 |
- |
5,900 |
(17,574) | (1,502) |
553,886 |
16,447 | 570,333 |
| |||
Correction of errors in accounting for property, plant and equipment and deferred tax liabilities (b) |
| - | - | - | - | - | (9,100) | (9,100) | 749 | (8,351) |
| |||
Balance at 1 January 2017 (restated) |
|
48,920 |
518,142 |
- |
5,900 |
(17,574) | (10,602) |
544,786 |
17,196 | 561,982 |
| |||
Total comprehensive (loss)/income (restated) |
| - | - | - | (32,288) | 74 | 36,548 | 4,334 | (28) | 4,306 |
| |||
Profit for the period (restated) |
| - | - | - | - | - | 37,006 | 37,006 | 135 | 37,141 |
| |||
Other comprehensive (loss)/income |
| - | - | - | (32,288) | 74 | (458) | (32,672) | (163) | (32,835) |
| |||
Deferred share awards |
| - | - | 144 | - | - | - | 144 | - | 144 |
| |||
Issue of shares by subsidiary |
| - | - | - | - | - | 7,039 | 7,039 | (7,039) | - |
| |||
Balance at 31 December 2017 (restated) |
| 48,920 | 518,142 | 144 | (26,388) | (17,500) | 32,985 | 556,303 | 10,129 | 566,432 |
| |||
Impact of adopting IFRS 9 (c) |
| - | - | - | - | 2,703 | (9,959) | (7,256) | - | (7,256) |
| |||
Impact of adopting IFRS 15 (c) |
| - | - | - | - | - | 58 | 58 | - | 58 |
| |||
Total comprehensive income/(loss) |
| - | - | - | 19,222 | (3,183) | 24,164 | 40,203 | 1,495 | 41,698 |
| |||
Profit for the period |
| - | - | - | - | - | 24,493 | 24,493 | 1,436 | 25,929 |
| |||
Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
| - | - | - | 19,222 | (3,183) | (329) | 15,710 | 59 | 15,769 |
| |||
Deferred share awards |
| 43 | - | 83 | - | - | 290 | 416 | - | 416 |
| |||
Balance at 31 December 2018 |
| 48,963 | 518,142 | 227 | (7,166) | (17,980) | 47,538 | 589,724 | 11,624 | 601,348 |
| |||
(a) Including translation reserve of US$(18.0) million (31 December 2017: US$(14.8) million).
(b) See note 2 for details regarding the restatement.
(c) See note 2 for details of adoption of IFRS 9 and IFRS 15.
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended 31 December 2018
| note
| 2018 US$'000 | 2017 US$'000 |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
Cash generated from operations | 24 | 282,826 | 204,306 |
Interest paid |
| (60,577) | (49,205) |
Income tax paid |
| (5,024) | (31,098) |
Net cash from operating activities |
| 217,225 | 124,003 |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | 24 | (131,213) | (82,295) |
Expenditure on exploration and evaluation assets | 12 | (3,153) | (5,763) |
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| 1,170 | 334 |
Loans granted | 25 | (56,960) | - |
Interest received |
| 3,667 | 752 |
Net cash used in investing activities |
| (186,489) | (86,972) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
Issue of Notes, net of transaction costs |
| - | 495,035 |
Repayments of borrowings |
| (4,006) | (525,789) |
Notes related costs |
| (2,599) | - |
Debt transaction costs paid in connection with bank loans |
| (6,412) | (9,040) |
Funds advanced to the Group under investment agreement with the Russian Ministry of Far East Development | 29 | - | 31,225 |
Funds transferred under investment agreement with the Russian Ministry of Far East Development | 29 | - | (31,225) |
Guarantee fee in connection with ICBC facility |
| - | 1,158 |
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (13,017) | (38,636) |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents in the period |
| 17,719 | (1,605) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
| (2,982) | 378 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 17 | 11,415 | 12,642 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 17 | 26,152 | 11,415 |
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 31 December 2018
1. General information
Petropavlovsk PLC (the 'Company') is a company incorporated and registered in England and Wales. The address of the registered office is 11 Grosvenor Place, London SW1X 7HH.
2. Significant accounting policies
2.1. Basis of preparation and presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Petropavlovsk PLC and its subsidiaries (the 'Group') have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ('IFRS') as adopted by the European Union, IFRIC Interpretations and the Companies Act 2006. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of certain financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative financial instruments) at fair value through profit or loss. The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all years presented, unless otherwise stated.
Going concern
The Group monitors and manages its liquidity risk on an ongoing basis to ensure that it has access to sufficient funds to meet its obligations. Cash forecasts are prepared regularly based on a number of inputs including, but not limited to, forecast commodity prices and the impact of hedging arrangements, the Group's mining plan, forecast expenditure and debt repayment schedules. Sensitivities are run for different scenarios including, but not limited to, changes in commodity prices, cost inflation, different production rates from the Group's producing assets and the timing of expenditure on development projects. This is done to identify risks to liquidity and enable management to develop appropriate and timely mitigation strategies. The Group meets its capital requirements through a combination of sources including cash generated from operations, advances received from customers under prepayment arrangements and external debt.
The Group performed an assessment of the forecast cash flows for the period of 12 months from the date of approval of the 2018 Annual Report and Accounts. As at 31 December 2018, the Group had sufficient liquidity headroom. The Group is also satisfied that it has sufficient headroom under a base case scenario for the period to May 2020. The Group has also performed projections under a layered stressed case that is based on a gold price, which is approximately 10% to 14% lower than the average of the market consensus forecasts, non-refractory gold production approximately 5% lower than projected, and Russian Rouble : US Dollar exchange rate that is approximately 8-9% stronger than the average of the market consensus forecasts. This layered stressed case indicates that mitigating actions will be required to be taken in order to ensure sufficient liquidity for the relevant period to May 2020. This includes sufficient liquidity for the repayment, if necessary, of the Company's US$100 million 9% Convertible Bonds, due in March 2020. The mitigating actions include items within the control of the management, such as cost cutting, reduction of capital and operating expenditure, the deferral of prepayment settlements as well as working capital management.
As at 31 December 2018, the Group has guaranteed the outstanding amounts IRC owed to ICBC. The outstanding loan principal was US$169 million as at 31 December 2018. On 19 March 2019, the ICBC Facility was fully refinanced by the loans from Gazprombank. The Group has provided a guarantee in respect of IRC's new $240 million facility, of which approximately $233 million has been drawn down to date. The Gazprombank Facility is subject to an initial $160 million guaranteed by the Group (see note 30). The assessment of whether there is any material uncertainty that IRC will be able to repay this facility as it falls due is another key element of the Group's overall going concern assessment. IRC projections demonstrate that IRC expects to have sufficient working capital liquidity over the next 12 months and expects to meet its obligations under the Gazprombank Facility. If a missed repayment under debt or guarantee obligations occurs, this would result in events of default which, through cross-defaults and cross-accelerations, could cause all other Group's debt arrangements to become repayable on demand.
Having taken into account the aforementioned factors, and after making enquiries and considering the uncertainties described above, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, being at least the next 12 months from the date of approval of the 2018 Annual Report and Accounts. Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing these consolidated financial statements.
Guarantee over IRC's external borrowings
The Group historically entered into an arrangement to provide a guarantee over its associate's, IRC, external borrowings, the ICBC Facility. At 31 December 2018 the principal amounts outstanding subject to the guarantee were US$169.6 million (2017: $233.75 million). Under the terms of the arrangement the Group is entitled to receive an annual fee equal to 1.75% of the outstanding amount.
The financial guarantee contract liability and the guarantee fee income receivable are accounted for under IFRS 9 "Financial instruments". This standard was adopted as at 1 January 2018 (note 2.2). The valuation of these instruments is complex, as set out within the key estimation disclosures in note 3.
As at 31 December 2018, the value of the financial guarantee contract liability recognised was US$37.4 million (1 January 2018: US$11.9 million). The additional provision for expected credit losses (ECL) of US$25.5 million, which reflects the declining credit status of IRC during the year prior to the refinancing agreed in March 2019, has been recognised within Other finance losses (note 9).
As at 31 December 2018, the fair value of the receivable under ICBC guarantee arrangements was US$6.8 million (1 January 2018: US$10.5 million) comprising both billed and future fees receivable, less provision for credit losses. The result from re-measurement of the guarantee receivable to fair value of US$3.7 million was recognised within Other finance losses (note 9).
As set out in note 30, IRC has subsequently refinanced the ICBC Facility through entering into a US$240 million new facility with Gazprombank. In March 2019, IRC drew down an aggregate of US$228.9 million on the Gazprombank Facility that were used to repay the amounts outstanding under the ICBC Facility of approximately US$169 million in full, the two loans provided by the Group in the equivalent of approximately US$57 million in full and to finance the K&S Project's working capital of approximately US$3 million. Part of the remaining proceeds from the Gazprombank Facility is to be used to repay part of the guarantee fee of US$6 million owed by IRC to the Group in respect of the guarantee of the ICBC Facility. The remaining outstanding contractual guarantee fee of approximately US$5 million is payable by IRC no later than 31 March 2020. In April 2019, IRC has further drawn down US$4.5 million on the Gazprombank Facility.
As part of the refinancing the Group issued a new guarantee which was approved by the Company's shareholders on 12 March 2019. The initially guaranteed borrowings total US$160 million. Further description of the revised arrangements are set out in note 30. Under the new guarantee arrangements, the guarantee fees receivable is determined at each reporting date on an independently determined fair value basis.
Correction of errors related to property, plant and equipment and deferred tax
In calculating depreciation expense for mining assets calculated using the units of production method (described in note 2.8), the Group uses volumes of ore processed during the period divided by total ore reserve estimates, including both refractory and non-refractory ore reserves. This ratio is then applied to the depreciable asset base. As the planned processing of the refractory ores required further capital investment, future budgeted capital expenditure has been added to the net book value of mining assets to determine the depreciable amounts. In 2018, the Group undertook a detailed review of application of these accounting policies and discovered that capital expenditure incurred to date in relation to POX Hub and carried within capital construction in progress was excluded from adjustments to the depreciable amounts. As a result, matching between expected capital expenditure and the mining activity over the life of mine was not fully achieved and depreciation charges in prior periods were understated. As a consequence, property, plant and equipment was overstated by US$35.0 million as at 1 January 2017 and US$46.6 million as at 31 December 2017 and associated deferred tax liability was overstated by US$7.0 million as at 1 January 2017 and US$9.3 million as at 31 December 2017.
When preparing consolidated financial statements for relevant prior periods, management applied judgement with regards to whether it was probable that future taxable profits would be available against which the unused tax losses can be utilised and whether it would be appropriate to recognize relevant deferred tax assets accordingly. Management concluded that there was insufficient certainty with regards to relevant project development and availability of future taxable profits against which unused tax credits could be utilised by relevant entities. This was the basis for concluding that recognition of deferred tax assets in relation to unused tax losses would be inappropriate. In 2018, the Group re-analysed criteria for recognising deferred tax assets arising from the unused tax losses under IAS 12 "Income Taxes" and concluded that recognition of deferred tax assets to the extent that the relevant entity has sufficient taxable temporary differences would be appropriate. As a consequence, deferred tax liabilities were previously overstated by US$19.6 million as at 1 January 2017 and US$24.6 million as at 31 December 2017.
These errors have been corrected by restating the comparative amounts and the opening balances of assets, liabilities and equity as set out below.
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (extract)
| 31 December 2017 | (Decrease)/ increase | 31 December 2017 | 1 January 2017 | (Decrease)/ increase | 1 January 2017 |
|
|
| Restated |
|
| Restated |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Property, plant and equipment | 984,114 | (46,567) | 937,547 | 953,794 | (34,983) | 918,811 |
Deferred tax liabilities | 106,271 | (33,891) | 72,380 | 119,028 | (26,632) | 92,396 |
Net assets | 579,108 | (12,676) | 566,432 | 570,333 | (8,351) | 561,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings/ (losses) | 47,457 | (14,472) | 32,985 | (1,502) | (9,100) | (10,602) |
Non-controlling interests | 8,333 | 1,796 | 10,129 | 16,447 | 749 | 17,196 |
Total equity | 579,108 | (12,676) | 566,432 | 570,333 | (8,351) | 561,982 |
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss (extract)
| 2017 | (Decrease)/ | 2017 |
|
| increase | Restated |
| US$' 000 | US$' 000 | US$' 000 |
Operating expenses | 510,683 | 11,584 | 522,267 |
Taxation | 19,063 | (7,259) | 11,804 |
Profit for the period | 41,466 | (4,325) | 37,141 |
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
Equity shareholders of Petropavlovsk PLC | 42,378 | (5,372) | 37,006 |
Non-controlling interests | (912) | 1,047 | 135 |
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (extract)
| 2017 | (Decrease)/ | 2017 |
|
| increase | Restated |
| US$' 000 | US$' 000 | US$' 000 |
Profit for the period | 41,466 | (4,325) | 37,141 |
Other comprehensive loss for the period net of tax | (32,835) | - | (32,835) |
Total comprehensive profit for the period | 8,631 | (4,325) | 4,306 |
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
Equity shareholders of Petropavlovsk PLC | 9,706 | (5,372) | 4,334 |
Non-controlling interests | (1,075) | 1,047 | (28) |
2.2. Adoption of new and revised standards and interpretations
New and revised standards and interpretations adopted for the current reporting period.
The following new and revised Standards and Interpretations that were effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 and applicable to the Group have been adopted:
- IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments".
- IFRS 15 "Revenue from contracts with customers".
The Group applied the modified retrospective transition approach and has not restated comparative information on the initial application of IFRS 9 and IFRS 15. The impact of the adoption of these standards is disclosed below.
Impact of adoption - IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments":
The standard addresses the classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and financial liabilities, and introduces new rules for hedge accounting and a new impairment model for financial assets.
Classification and measurement: IFRS 9 establishes a principles-based approach to determining whether a financial asset should be measured at amortised cost or fair value, based on the cash flow characteristics of the asset and the business model in which the asset is held.
Impairment: The new impairment model requires the recognition of impairment provision based on expected credit losses (ECL) rather than only incurred credit losses as under IAS 39. This may result in an earlier recognition of credit losses.
Hedge accounting: The adoption of the new standard did not materially change the amounts recognised in relation to existing hedging arrangements and the Group elected to continue to adopt the hedge accounting provisions of IAS 39.
The classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities under IAS 39 and IFRS 9 on the date of initial application, 1 January 2018, are set out below.
| Measurement category |
| Carrying amount as at 1 January 2018 | |||
| Original under IAS 39 | New under IFRS 9 |
| Original under IAS 39 | New under IFRS 9 | Difference |
|
|
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents | Amortised cost | Amortised cost |
| 11,415 | 11,415 | - |
Trade and other receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables and contract assets (a) | Amortised cost | Amortised cost |
| 9,297 | 9,256 | (41) |
Other receivables - ICBC guarantee arrangements (b), (c) | Amortised cost | FVPL |
| 13,077 | 10,566 | (2,511) |
Other receivables (a) | Amortised cost | Amortised cost |
| 5,401 | 4,926 | (475) |
Other non-current assets (d) | Available for sale | FVPL |
| 347 | 347 | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables | Amortised cost | Amortised cost |
| 53,695 | 53,695 | - |
Borrowings | Amortised cost | Amortised cost |
| 596,474 | 596,474 | - |
Financial guarantee (b), (c) | Financial guarantee contract | Financial guarantee contract |
| 8,603 | 11,928 | (3,325) |
Derivative financial instruments | FVPL | FVPL |
| 17,207 | 17,207 | - |
Derivative financial instruments - cash flow hedge | FV designated as a hedging instrument | FV designated as a hedging instrument | 32,477 | 32,477 | - |
(a) The difference in carrying amounts is the result of applying new ECL model.
(b) Please refer to notes 14 and 25 for the details of the financial guarantee issued to IRC in relation to ICBC Facility.
(c) The following criteria were evaluated when concluding on classification of the financial asset:
- Business model test: Reflects how the financial asset is managed. Business model for the ICBC guarantee asset is concluded to be "hold to collect" and
- SPPI ("Solely payments of Principal and Interest") test: the cash flows the Group is entitled under the guarantee arrangement are not considered to be consistent with a "basic lending arrangement".
In view of the above, the financial asset was classified at FVPL. The difference in carrying amounts is the result of re-measurement of the receivable at fair value.
(d) US$2.7 million associated accumulated revaluation losses previously recognised through other comprehensive losses were re-classified from Other reserves to Retained earnings.
(e) The difference in carrying amounts is the result of re-measurement of the associated liability in accordance with ECL model.
(f) A further US$0.9 million increase in loss allowance was recognised to reflect the impact of adopting the ECL approach by the Group's associate IRC on the Group's share in net assets of IRC (note 14).
Impact of adoption - IFRS 15 "Revenue from contracts with customers":
The main principle under IFRS 15 is that revenues earned from contracts should be apportioned to individual performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis, based on a five-step model that involves identifying the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to each performance obligation and recognising revenue when a performance obligation is satisfied by transferring a promised good or service to a customer. The timing of revenue recognition under IFRS 15 occurs when control is transferred to the customer, while under IAS 18 this took place when risk and rewards were transferred.
Sales of gold and silver: The point of revenue recognition for gold and silver sales is dependent on the contract sales terms. As the transfer of risks and rewards coincides with the transfer of control at a point in time, the Group retains no continuous involvement over the goods sold and consideration is fixed when control is transferred, the timing and amount of revenue recognised for the sale of gold and silver was not affected as a result of adoption of IFRS 15.
Other revenue: The adoption of IFRS 15 has resulted in earlier recognition of revenue from procurement of certain materials and consumables for third parties. This change resulted in a corresponding increase in costs of sales and, therefore, did not have material impact on previously reported operating profit. Revenue from engineering and construction contracts was not materially affected as a result of adoption of IFRS 15.
New standards, amendments and interpretations that are applicable to the Group, issued but not yet effective for the reporting period beginning 1 January 2018 and not early adopted.
At the date of approval of these financial statements, the following Standards and Interpretations which have not been applied in these consolidated financial statements were in issue but not yet effective (and in some cases had not yet been adopted by the EU):
- IFRS 16 'Leases'.
The standard replaces IAS 17 'Accounting for Leases' and related interpretations and is effective for annual periods beginning in or after 1 January 2019.
The standard will affect primarily the change the accounting treatment by lessees of leases currently classified as operating leases. Lease agreements will give rise to the recognition by the lessee of an asset, representing the right to use the leased item, and a related liability for future lease payments. Lease costs will be recognised in profit or loss in the form of depreciation of the right-of-use asset over the lease term, and finance charges representing the unwind of the discount on the lease liability. The only exceptions are short-term and low-value leases. The accounting for lessors will not change significantly.
The Group reviewed the Group's lease and other contractual arrangements over the last year in light of the new lease accounting rules in IFRS 16. The Group expects to recognise right-of-use assets of approximately US$2 million and corresponding lease liabilities.
- Annual improvements to IFRS Standards: 2015-2017 Cycle.
There are no other standards and amendments that are not yet effective and would be expected to have a significant impact on the Group's financial statements.
2.3. Basis of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements consist of the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries as at the reporting date. Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has control.
Control is achieved when the Group is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the subsidiary and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the subsidiary. Specifically, the Group controls a subsidiary if, and only if, it has all of the following:
- Power over the subsidiary (i.e. existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant activities of the subsidiary).
- Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the subsidiary.
- The ability to use its power over the subsidiary to affect its returns.
When the Group has less than a majority of the voting rights of a subsidiary or similar rights of a subsidiary, it considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over the subsidiary including:
- the size of the Group's holding of voting rights relative to the size and dispersion of holdings of the other vote holders;
- potential voting rights held by the Group, other vote holders or other parties;
- rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and
- any additional facts and circumstances that indicate that the Group has, or does not have, the current ability to direct the relevant activities at the time that decisions need to be made, including voting patterns at previous shareholders' meetings.
The Company reassesses whether or not it controls a subsidiary if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control listed above.
Consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the Group obtains control over the subsidiary and ceases when the Group loses control of the subsidiary. Specifically, income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated statement of income and other comprehensive income from the date the Group gains control until the date when the Group ceases to control the subsidiary.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated on consolidation. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Where necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to ensure consistency of accounting policies with the policies adopted by the Group.
Non-controlling interests in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries are identified separately from the Group's equity therein. The interests of non-controlling shareholders may be initially measured at fair value or at the non-controlling interests' proportionate share of the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. The choice of measurement is made on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis. Subsequent to acquisition, the carrying amount of non-controlling interests is the amount of those interests at initial recognition plus the non-controlling interests' share of subsequent changes in equity. The recognised income and expense are attributed to non-controlling interests even if this results in the non-controlling interests having a deficit balance.
2.4. Non-controlling interests
The Group treats transactions with non-controlling interests as transactions with equity owners. For purchases from non-controlling interests, the difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recorded in equity. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recorded in equity.
2.5. Investments in associates
An associate is an entity over which the Group is in a position to exercise significant influence but not control or joint control.
Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the investments are initially recognised at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognise the Group's share of the post-acquisition profits or losses of an associate in profit or loss and the Group's share of movements in other comprehensive income of an associate in other comprehensive income.
Losses of an associate in excess of the Group's interest in that associate (which includes any long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the Group's net investment in the associate) are recognised only to the extent that the Group has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.
When a Group entity transacts with an associate of the Group, unrealised profits and losses are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest in the relevant associate.
The carrying amount of equity-accounted investments is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
2.6. Foreign currency translation
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency). For the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position of each Group company are expressed in US Dollars, which is the Group's presentation currency. The functional currency of the Company is the US Dollar.
The rates of exchange used to translate balances from other currencies into US Dollars were as follows (currency per US Dollar):
| As at 31 December 2018 | Average year ended 31 December 2018 | As at 31 December 2017 | Average year ended 31 December 2017 |
GB Pounds Sterling (GBP : US$) | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
Russian Rouble (RUB : US$) | 69.47 | 62.68 | 57.60 | 58.32 |
In preparing the financial statements of the individual companies, transactions in currencies other than the entity's functional currency (foreign currencies) are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are remeasured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at the year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or loss. Non-monetary items carried at fair value that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not retranslated.
For the purpose of presenting consolidated financial statements, the assets and liabilities of the Group's foreign operations which have a functional currency other than US Dollars are translated at exchange rates prevailing on the reporting date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the year, unless exchange rates fluctuate significantly during that year, in which case the exchange rates at the date of transactions are used. Exchange differences arising, if any, are recognised in other comprehensive income and expenses and accumulated in equity, with share attributed to non-controlling interests as appropriate. On the disposal of a foreign operation, all of the accumulated exchange differences in respect of that operation attributable to the shareholders of the Company are reclassified to profit or loss.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign operation are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign operation.
2.7. Exploration and evaluation assets
Exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred in relation to those projects where such expenditure is considered likely to be recoverable through future extraction activity or sale, or where the exploration activities have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of reserves, are capitalised and recorded on the statement of financial position within exploration and evaluation assets for mining projects at the exploration stage.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure comprise costs directly attributable to:
- researching and analysing existing exploration data;
- conducting geological studies, exploratory drilling and sampling;
- examining and testing extraction and treatment methods;
- compiling pre-feasibility and feasibility studies; and
- costs incurred in acquiring mineral rights, the entry premiums paid to gain access to areas of interest and amounts payable to third parties to acquire interests in existing projects.
Exploration and evaluation assets are subsequently valued at cost less impairment. In circumstances where a project is abandoned, the cumulative capitalised costs related to the project are written off in the period when such decision is made.
Exploration and evaluation assets are not depreciated. These assets are transferred to mine development costs within property, plant and equipment when a decision is taken to proceed with the development of the project.
2.8. Property, plant and equipment
Mine development costs
Development expenditure incurred by or on behalf of the Group is accumulated separately for each area of interest in which economically recoverable resources have been identified. Such expenditure includes costs directly attributable to the construction of a mine and the related infrastructure. Once a development decision has been taken, the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation expenditure in respect of the area of interest is aggregated with the development expenditure and classified under non-current assets as 'mine development costs'. Mine development costs are reclassified as 'mining assets' at the end of the commissioning phase, when the mine is capable of operating in the manner intended by management.
Mine development costs are not depreciated, except for property plant and equipment used in the development of a mine. Such property, plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis based on estimated useful lives and depreciation is capitalised as part of mine development costs.
Mining assets
Mining assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Mining assets include the cost of acquiring and developing mining assets and mineral rights, buildings, vehicles, plant and machinery and other equipment located on mine sites and used in the mining operations.
Mining assets, where economic benefits from the asset are consumed in a pattern which is linked to the production level, are depreciated using a units of production method based on the volume of ore reserves. This results in a depreciation charge proportional to the depletion of reserves. The basis for determining ore reserve estimates is set out in note 3.2. Where the mining plan anticipates future capital expenditure to support the mining activity over the life of the mine, the depreciable amount is adjusted for the related assets under construction and estimated future expenditure.
Certain property, plant and equipment within mining assets are depreciated based on estimated useful lives, if shorter than the remaining life of the mine or if such property, plant and equipment can be moved to another site subsequent to the mine closure.
Non-mining assets
Non-mining assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Non-mining assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis based on estimated useful lives.
Capital construction in progress
Capital construction in progress is stated at cost. On completion, the cost of construction is transferred to the appropriate category of property, plant and equipment. Capital construction in progress is not depreciated.
Depreciation
Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using a units of production method as set out above or on a straight-line basis based on estimated useful lives. Estimated useful lives normally vary as set out below.
| Average life Number of years |
Buildings | 15-50 |
Plant and machinery | 3-20 |
Vehicles | 5-7 |
Office equipment | 5-10 |
Computer equipment | 3-5 |
Residual values and useful lives are reviewed and adjusted if appropriate, at each reporting date. Changes to the estimated residual values or useful lives are accounted for prospectively.
2.9. Impairment of non-financial assets
Property, plant and equipment, exploration and evaluation assets and other non-financial assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. This applies to the assets held by the Group itself as well as the Group's share of the assets held by the associates.
When a review for impairment is conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference to the higher of 'value in use' (being the net present value of expected future cash flows of the relevant cash generating unit) or 'fair value less costs to sell'. Where there is no binding sale agreement or active market, fair value less costs to sell is based on the best information available to reflect the amount the Group could receive for the cash generating unit in an arm's length transaction. Future cash flows are based on:
- estimates of the quantities of the reserves and mineral resources for which there is a high degree of confidence of economic extraction;
- future production levels;
- future commodity prices (assuming the current market prices will revert to the Group's assessment of the long-term average price, generally over a period of up to five years); and
- future cash costs of production, capital expenditure, environment protection, rehabilitation and closure.
IAS 36 'Impairment of assets' includes a number of restrictions on the future cash flows that can be recognised in respect of future restructurings and improvement related capital expenditure. When calculating 'value in use', it also requires that calculations should be based on exchange rates current at the time of the assessment.
For operations with a functional currency other than the US Dollar, the impairment review is undertaken in the relevant functional currency. These estimates are based on detailed mine plans and operating budgets, modified as appropriate to meet the requirements of IAS 36 'Impairment of assets'.
The discount rate applied is based upon a post-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks associated with the relevant cash flows, to the extent that such risks are not reflected in the forecast cash flows.
If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is impaired and an impairment loss is charged to profit or loss so as to reduce the carrying amount in the statement of financial position to its recoverable amount. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed if the recoverable amount increases as a result of a reversal of the conditions that originally resulted in the impairment. This reversal is recognised in profit or loss and is limited to the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised in prior years.
2.10. Deferred stripping costs
In open pit mining operations, removal of overburden and other waste materials, referred to as stripping, is required to obtain access to the ore body.
Stripping costs incurred during the development of the mine are capitalised as part of mine development costs and are subsequently depreciated over the life of a mine on a units of production basis.
Stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are deferred as part of cost of inventory and are written off to profit or loss in the period over which economic benefits related to the stripping activity are realised where this is the most appropriate basis for matching the costs against the related economic benefits.
Where, during the production phase, further development of the mine requires a phase of unusually high overburden removal activity that is similar in nature to pre-production mine development, such stripping costs are considered in a manner consistent with stripping costs incurred during the development of the mine before the commercial production commences.
2.11. Provisions for close down and restoration costs
Close down and restoration costs include the dismantling and demolition of infrastructure and the removal of residual materials and remediation of disturbed areas. Close down and restoration costs are provided for in the accounting period when the legal or constructive obligation arising from the related disturbance occurs, whether this occurs during the mine development or during the production phase, based on the net present value of estimated future costs. Provisions for close down and restoration costs do not include any additional obligations which are expected to arise from future disturbance. The costs are estimated on the basis of a closure plan. The cost estimates are calculated annually during the life of the operation to reflect known developments and are subject to formal review at regular intervals.
The amortisation or unwinding of the discount applied in establishing the net present value of provisions is charged to profit or loss in each accounting period. The amortisation of the discount is shown as a financing cost, rather than as an operating cost. Other movements in the provisions for close down and restoration costs, including those resulting from new disturbance, updated cost estimates, changes to the lives of operations and revisions to discount rates are capitalised within property, plant and equipment. These costs are then depreciated over the lives of the assets to which they relate.
Where rehabilitation is conducted systematically over the life of the operation, rather than at the time of closure, provision is made for the outstanding continuous rehabilitation work at each reporting date. All other costs of continuous rehabilitation are charged to profit or loss as incurred.
Changes in the measurement of a liability relating to the decommissioning of plant or other site preparation work (that result from changes in the estimated timing or amount of the cash flow or a change in the discount rate), are added to or deducted from the cost of the related asset in the current period. If a decrease in the liability exceeds the carrying amount of the asset, the excess is recognised immediately in profit or loss. If the asset value is increased and there is an indication that the revised carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment test is performed in accordance with the accounting policy set out above.
2.12. Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position when the Group entity becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Financial assets and liabilities are initially measured at fair value. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of financial assets and financial liabilities are added to or deducted from the fair value of the financial assets or financial liabilities, as appropriate, on initial recognition. Transaction costs attributable to financial assets and financial liabilities carried at FVPL are expensed in profit or loss.
The subsequent measurement of financial assets and liabilities is set out below.
Effective interest method
The effective interest rate method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or financial liability and of allocating interest over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts and payments through the expected life of the financial asset or financial liability, or where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount on initial recognition.
Financial assets
Classification and subsequent measurement
From 1 January 2018, the Group classified its financial assets in the following measurement categories:
- those to be measured subsequently at fair value (either through profit or loss or through OCI); and
- those to be measured at amortised cost.
The classification depends on the entity's business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset.
Financial assets the meet the following conditions are subsequently measured at amortised cost:
- the financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows; and
- the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
All other financial assets are subsequently measured at fair value either through OCI or profit or loss.
The Group may, at initial recognition, irrevocably designate a financial asset as measured at FVPL if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency (sometimes referred to as an 'accounting mismatch') that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognising the gains and losses on them on different bases.
Impairment
From 1 January 2018, the Group assesses on a forward looking basis the ECL associated with its financial assets carried at amortised cost. The impairment methodology applied depends on whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk.
For trade receivables and contract assets, the group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring ECL which uses a lifetime expected loss allowance for all trade receivables and contract assets. Trade receivables and contract assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery.
Credit-impaired financial assets
A financial asset is credit-impaired when one or more events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of
that financial asset have occurred. Evidence that a financial asset is credit-impaired include observable data about the following
events:
- significant financial difficulty of the issuer or the borrower;
- a breach of contract, such as a default or past due event;
- the lender(s) of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrower's financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession(s) that the lender(s) would not otherwise consider;
- it is becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation;
- the disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties; or
- the purchase or origination of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses.
For credit-impaired financial assets, the credit-adjusted effective interest rate is applied to the amortised cost of the financial asset from initial recognition. When calculating the credit-adjusted effective interest rate, The Group estimates the expected cash flows by considering all contractual terms of the financial asset and ECL.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, demand deposits and short-term, highly liquid investments readily convertible to known amounts of cash and subject to insignificant risk of changes in value and are measured at cost which is deemed to be fair value as they have a short-term maturity.
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less loss allowance.
Financial assets - accounting policies applied until 31 December 2017
Financial assets were classified into the following specified categories: 'financial assets at fair value through profit or loss', 'held-to-maturity investments', 'available-for-sale financial assets' and 'loans and receivables'. The classification depended on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and was determined at the time of initial recognition. Financial assets were recognised at trade-date, the date on which the Group commits to purchase the asset. The Group did not hold any financial assets which met the definition of 'held-to-maturity investments'.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
This category had two sub-categories: financial assets held for trading, and those designated at fair value through profit or loss at inception. A financial asset was classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term or if so designated by management. Assets in this category were classified as current if they are either held for trading or are expected to be realised within 12 months after the reporting date.
Available-for-sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets were non-derivative financial assets that were either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They were included within non-current assets unless the investment matures or management intends to dispose of them within 12 months after the reporting date. Available-for-sale financial assets were initially measured at cost and subsequently carried at fair value. Changes in the carrying amount of available-for-sale financial assets were recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated under the heading of other reserve in equity. When the investment was disposed of or is determined to be impaired, the cumulative gain or loss previously accumulated in equity is reclassified to profit or loss.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables were non-derivative financial assets fixed or determinable payments that were not quoted on an active market. Loans and receivables were recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest income was recognised by applying the effective interest rate, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial.
Impairment
The Group assessed at each reporting date whether there was objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets was impaired. In the case of equity securities classified as available-for-sale, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below its cost was considered in determining whether the securities were impaired. If any such evidence existed for available-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss - measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in profit or loss - was removed from equity and recognised in profit or loss. Impairment losses recognised in profit or loss on equity instruments were not reversed.
Financial liabilities and equity
Equity instruments
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Group after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue cost.
Borrowings
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective interest method. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption amount is recognised in profit or loss over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting date.
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective interest method.
Financial guarantee contracts
Financial guarantee contracts are recognised as a financial liability at the time the guarantee is issued. The liability is initially measured at fair value and subsequently at the higher of:
- the amount determined in accordance with the ECL model under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments; and
- the amount initially recognised less, where appropriate, the cumulative amount of income recognised in accordance with the principles of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Derivatives and hedging activities
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date the derivative contracts are entered into and are subsequently re-measured at fair value. The accounting for subsequent changes in fair value depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged.
The Group designates certain derivative financial instruments as hedging relationships. For the purposes of hedge accounting, hedging relationships may be of three types:
- fair value hedges are hedges of particular risks that may change the fair value of a recognised asset or liability;
- cash flow hedges are hedges of particular risks that may change the amount or timing of future cash flows; and
- hedges of net investment in a foreign entity are hedges of particular risks that may change the carrying value of the net assets of a foreign entity.
Currently the Group has only cash flow hedge relationships.
To qualify for hedge accounting the hedging relationship must meet several strict conditions on documentation, probability of occurrence, hedge effectiveness and reliability of measurement. If these conditions are not met, then the relationship does not qualify for hedge accounting. In this case the hedging instrument and the hedged item are reported independently as if there were no hedging relationship.
The effective portion of changes in fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognised in other comprehensive income. The fair value gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in hedging reserve in equity are reclassified to profit or loss in the periods when the hedged item is recognised in profit or loss, in the same line of the statement of profit or loss as the recognised hedged item.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Group revokes the hedging relationship, the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any gain or loss recognised in other comprehensive income at that time is accumulated in equity and is reclassified to profit or loss when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Changes in fair value of any derivative instrument that does not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised in profit or loss immediately and included in other finance gains or losses.
Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or non-financial host contracts are treated as separate derivatives when their risks and characteristics are not closely related to their host-contract and the host contract is not carried at fair value. Embedded derivatives are recognised at fair value at inception. Any change to the fair value of the embedded derivatives is recognised in other finance gains or losses in profit or loss. Embedded derivatives which are settled net are disclosed in line with the maturity of their host contracts.
2.13. Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation, whether legal or constructive, as a result of a past event for which it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management's best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the reporting date. The discount rate used to determine the present value reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability.
2.14. Inventories
Inventories include the following major categories:
- Stores and spares represent raw materials consumed in the production process as well as spare parts and other maintenance supplies.
- Construction materials represent materials for use in capital construction and mine development.
- Ore in stockpiles represent material that, at the time of extraction, is expected to be processed into a saleable form and sold at a profit. Ore in stockpiles is valued at the average cost per tonne of mining and stockpiling the ore. Quantities of ore in stockpiles ore are assessed through surveys and assays. Ore in stockpiles is classified between current and non-current inventory based on the expected processing schedule in accordance with the Group's mining plan.
- Work in progress inventory primarily represents gold in processing circuit that has not completed the production process. Work in progress inventory is valued at the average production costs.
- Deferred stripping costs are included in inventories where appropriate, as set out in note 2.10.
- Flotation concentrate represents very fine, powder-like product containing the valuable ore mineral from which most of the waste mineral has been eliminated. Flotation concentrate is valued at the average production costs.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value, with cost being determined primarily on a weighted average cost basis.
Provisions are recorded to reduce ore in stockpiles, work in process, flotation concentrate and finished goods inventory to net realisable value where the net realisable value is lower than relevant inventory cost at the reporting date. Net realisable value is determined with reference to relevant market prices less estimated costs to complete production and bring the inventory into its saleable form. Provisions are also recorded to reduce mine operating supplies to net realisable value, which is generally determined with reference to salvage or scrap value, when it is determined that the supplies are obsolete. Provisions are reversed to reflect subsequent recoveries in net realisable value where the inventory is still on hand at the reporting date.
2.15. Leases
Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
2.16. Revenue recognition
To recognise revenue under IFRS 15, the Group applies the following five steps:
- Identify the contract(s) with a customer.
- Identify the separate performance obligations in the contract: Performance obligations are promises in a contract to transfer to a customer goods or services that are distinct.
- Determine the transaction price: The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the Group expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. If the consideration promised in a contract includes a variable amount, the Group estimates the amount of consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised goods or services to a customer.
- Allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation on the basis of the relative stand-alone selling prices of each distinct good or service promised in the contract.
- Recognise revenue when a performance obligation is satisfied by transferring a promised good or service to a customer (which is when the customer obtains control of that good or service). A performance obligation may be satisfied at a point in time or over time. For a performance obligation satisfied over time, the Group selects an appropriate measure of progress to determine how much revenue should be recognised as the performance obligation is satisfied.
Sales of gold and silver
The majority of the Group's revenue is derived from the sale of refined gold. The sale of gold is classified as a single performance obligation and revenue is recognised at a point in time when control has passed to the customer, as specified in individual sales contracts. The sales price is determined with reference to LBMA fixing at the time of sale.
Silver is a co-product of gold production. Revenue from the sales of silver is recognised in revenue. Sales of silver is classified as a single performance obligation and revenue is recognised at a point in time when control has passed to the customer, as specified in individual sales contracts.
Other revenue
Other revenue is recognised as follows:
- engineering contracts: revenue under each engineering contract is classified as a single performance obligation and revenue is recognised over time based on percentage completion applied to the contract price;
- flotation concentrate: the sale of flotation concentrate is classified as a single performance obligation and revenue is recognised at a point in time when control has passed to the customer, as specified in individual sales contracts;
- sales of other goods represent the procurement of materials, consumables and equipment for third parties. Revenue from sales of other goods is classified as a single performance obligation and revenue is recognised at a point in time when control has passed to the customer;
- other services: revenue from other services is classified as a single performance obligation and revenue is recognised over time during the term of the relevant contract; and
- rental income from operating leases is classified as a single performance obligation and revenue is recognised over time during the term of the relevant lease.
2.17. Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are generally expensed as incurred except where they relate to the financing of acquisition, construction or development of qualifying assets, which are mining projects under development that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get prepared for their intended use. Such borrowing costs are capitalised and added to mine development costs of the mining project when the decision is made to proceed with the development of the project and until such time when the project is substantially ready for its intended use (which is when commercial production is ready to commence) or if active development is suspended or ceases.
To the extent that funds are borrowed to finance a specific mining project, borrowing costs capitalised represent the actual borrowing costs incurred. To the extent that funds are borrowed for the general purpose, borrowing costs capitalised are determined by applying the interest rate applicable to appropriate borrowings outstanding during the period to the average amount of capital expenditure incurred to develop the relevant mining project during the period.
2.18. Taxation
Tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in profit or loss, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in the statement of comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognised in the statement of comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively.
Current tax is the tax expected to be payable on the taxable income for the year calculated using rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. It includes adjustments for tax expected to be payable or recoverable in respect of previous periods.
Full provision is made for deferred taxation on all temporary differences existing at the reporting date with certain limited exceptions. Temporary differences are the difference between the carrying value of an asset or liability and its tax base. The main exceptions to this principle are as follows:
- Tax payable on the future remittance of the past earnings of subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled entities is provided for except where the Company is able to control the remittance of profits and it is probable that there will be no remittance in the foreseeable future.
- Deferred tax is not provided on the initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that does not affect accounting profit or taxable profit and is not a business combination, such as on the recognition of a provision for close down and restoration costs and the related asset or on the inception of finance lease.
- Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be recovered.
Deferred tax is provided in respect of fair value adjustments on acquisitions. These adjustments may relate to assets such as mining rights that, in general, are not eligible for income tax allowances. In such cases, the provision for deferred tax is based on the difference between the carrying value of the asset and its nil income tax base.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised using tax rates that have been enacted, or substantively enacted. Deferred tax is charged or credited to profit or loss, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt within equity.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set-off current tax assets against current tax liabilities, when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
3. Areas of judgement in applying accounting policies and key sources of estimation uncertainty
When preparing the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the accounting policies as set out in note 2, management necessarily makes judgements and estimates that can have a significant impact on the financial statements. These judgements and estimates are based on management's best knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances and previous experience. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
3.1. Critical accounting judgements
Significant influence over IRC
As at 31 December 2018, the Group was the single largest shareholder of IRC, holding approximately 31.1% of IRC's issued shares. The Group considers that it exercises significant influence, but does not control, over IRC such that it is equity accounted as an investment in an associate, in accordance with IAS 28 "Investments in associates". Significant influence is defined as the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee. If control were to exist then IRC would be required to be consolidated as a subsidiary into the Group's consolidated financial information.
In making this assessment, the Group also considered the definition of control under IFRS 10 "Consolidated Financial Statements" being where an investor controls an investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.
The factors considered included:
- relative shareholdings
- shareholder voting rights;
- rights to nominate and appoint Directors and executive management of IRC;
- influence over the IRC Board and executive management; and
- operational independence of IRC.
After taking into account the aforementioned control factors in aggregate, it is considered that the Group does not exercise de facto control over IRC and IRC is not a subsidiary to the Group. Accordingly, accounting treatment applied to treat the Group's investment in IRC is as an investment in associate in accordance with IAS 28 "Investments in associates".
Functional currency
IAS 21 "The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates" defines functional currency as the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. The Group therefore performs an analysis of the currencies in which each subsidiary primarily generates and expends cash. This involves an assessment of the currency in which sales are generated and operational and capital expenditures are incurred, and currency in which external borrowing costs are denominated. Management makes judgements in defining the functional currency of the Group's subsidiaries based on economic substance of the transactions relevant to these entities.
For each of the Group's consolidated entities, management performed analysis of relevant factors that are indicators of functional currency and, based on the analysis performed, determined functional currency, accordingly. The Group concluded that the functional currency for each of the subsidiaries in Russia, except for its research institute Irgiredmet, is the US Dollar. Functional currency for Irgiredment was concluded to be the Russian Rouble.
Cash generating unit ("CGU") determination and impairment indicators
The Group exercises judgement in determining the Groups individual CGUs based upon an assessment of the whether the cash inflows generated are capable of being separately identifiable and independent. This assessment considered whether there is an active market for the outputs of each significant element of the production process, including gold concentrate. Management also applies judgement in allocating assets that do not generate independent cash inflows to the Group's CGUs. Any changes to CGU determinations would impact the carrying values of the respective CGUs.
The Group considers both external and internal sources of information in assessing whether there are any indications that its CGUs are impaired. External sources of information include changes in the market, economic and legal environment in which the Group operates that are not within its control. Internal sources of information include the manner in which mining assets and plant and equipment are being used or are expected to be used and indicators of economic performance of such assets. Judgement is therefore required to determine whether these updates represent significant changes in the recoverable amount of an asset or CGU, and are therefore indicators of impairment or impairment reversal.
Advances from customers under gold sales contracts
During the year ended 31 December 2018, the Group has entered into prepaid gold sales arrangements, which are settled solely through physical delivery and are priced based on the spot gold price, prevailing at the date of the respective shipment. The arrangements fall under IFRS 15 'Revenue from Contracts with Customers' and advances received represent contract liabilities included within Trade and other payables as Advances from customers. As of 31 December 2018, the relevant contract liabilities amount to US$163.8 million (31 December 2017: US$nil).
3.2. Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Ore reserve estimates
The Group estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code) and the internally used Russian Classification System, adjusted to conform with the mining activity to be undertaken under the Group mining plan. Both the JORC Code and the Russian Classification System require the use of reasonable investment assumptions when reporting reserves, including future production estimates, expected future commodity prices and production cash costs.
Ore reserve estimates are used in the calculation of depreciation of mining assets using a units of production method (note 13), impairment charges (note 6) and for forecasting the timing of the payment of close down and restoration costs (note 22). Also, for the purposes of impairment reviews and the assessment of life of mine for forecasting the timing of the payment of close down and restoration costs, the Group may take into account mineral resources in addition to ore reserves where there is a high degree of confidence that such resources will be extracted.
Ore reserve estimates may change from period to period as additional geological data becomes available during the course of operations or economic assumptions used to estimate reserves change. Such changes in estimated reserves may affect the Group's financial results and financial position in a number of ways, including the following:
- Asset carrying values due to changes in estimated future cash flows (note 6).
- Depreciation charged to profit or loss where such charges are determined by using a units of production method or where the useful economic lives of assets are determined with reference to the life of the mine.
- Provisions for close down and restoration costs where changes in estimated reserves affect expectations about the timing of the payment of such costs (note 22).
- Carrying value of deferred tax assets and liabilities (note 21) where changes in estimated reserves affect the carrying value of the relevant assets and liabilities.
Impairment and impairment reversals
The Group reviews the carrying values of property, plant and equipment to determine whether there is any indication that those assets are impaired. The recoverable amount of an asset, or cash-generating unit ('CGU'), is measured as the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use.
The Group necessarily applies judgement in the determining the assumptions to be applied within the value in use calculations. The key assumptions which formed the basis of forecasting future cash flows and the value in use calculation are set out in note 6.
Future changes to the key assumptions in the value in use calculation could impact the carrying value of the respective assets. The impairment assessments are sensitive to changes in commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and discount rates. Changes to these assumptions would result in changes to conclusions in relation to impairment, which could have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements. Details of impairment and/or impairment reversals, together with a sensitivity analysis, in relation to the property, plant and equipment are set out in note 6.
Valuation of financial guarantee contracts
The Group has provided a guarantee over IRC's external borrowings from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China ("ICBC"). IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments" requires that financial guarantee contracts are valued at the higher of:
- the amount of the loss allowance; and
- the amount initially recognised less the cumulative amount of income recognised in accordance with the principals of IFRS 15 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers"
In determining the loss allowance, the Group must make significant judgements in the estimating the expected credit losses. This includes using a probability-based approach to determine a range of possible outcomes, assessing the time value of money and thereby determining an estimate of the payments required to reimburse ICBC in the event of a future default by IRC.
Details of the Group's financial guarantee are set out in note 14. The valuation of the financial guarantee contract liability was sensitive to a number of factors including IRC's default risk and the probability of IRC's refinancing completing as at 31 December 2018. Given the successful completion of the refinancing in March 2019 on improved terms, the valuation of the guarantee liability may reduce materially and the fee receivable asset may increase.
Valuation of ore stockpiles
Costs are allocated to ore mined based on the cost per tonne of extraction. At 31 December 2018 the group held ore stockpile inventories of US$93.2 million (2017: US$110.2 million). These are tested for impairment at each reporting date based on the expected costs to complete their processing and the realisable gold price. Changes in these assumptions, particularly for ore stockpiles of a lower grade, can give rise to write downs. In the year ended 31 December 18, the Group recognised a charge of US$18 million and as at 31 December 2018 the Group had US$10.1 million ore stockpiles carried at net realisable value. A 10% reduction in the forecast gold price would give rise to an additional write down of approximately US$1.7 million.
Taxation
The Group is subject to income tax in the UK, Russian Federation and Cyprus.
Deferred tax liabilities are calculated on taxable temporary differences, being the difference between the tax and accounting base.
Deferred tax assets, including those arising from unused tax losses carried forward for the future tax periods and deductible temporary differences, are recognised only when it is either probable that the future taxable profits will be available against which the unused tax losses can be utilised or there are sufficient taxable temporary differences.
Assumptions about the generation of future taxable profits depend on management's estimates of future cash flows. Judgements are also required about the application of income tax legislation. In addition, the functional currency for the subsidiaries in Russia is the US Dollar which gives rise to foreign exchange movements in relation to temporary differences and deferred tax (note 10).
The aforementioned judgements and assumptions are subject to risk and uncertainty and there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will alter expectations, which may impact the amount of deferred tax recognised in the statement of financial position and the amount of other tax losses and temporary differences not yet recognised. In such circumstances, the carrying amount of recognised deferred tax assets may require adjustment, resulting in a corresponding charge or credit to profit or loss. In particular, if the Russian Rouble was 10% weaker as at 31 December 2018, this would give rise to an additional US$13.2 million deferred tax liability and corresponding increase to the tax charge for the year ended 31 December 2018.
Details of deferred tax disclosures are set out in note 21.
Going Concern
Details about the Group's ability to continue as a going concern are set out in note 2.1.
3.3. Other sources of estimation uncertainty
Exploration and evaluation costs
The Group's accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure results in exploration and evaluation expenditure being capitalised for those projects where such expenditure is considered likely to be recoverable through future extraction activity or sale or where the exploration activities have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of reserves. This policy requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions as to future events and circumstances, in particular whether the Group will proceed with development based on existence of reserves or whether an economically viable extraction operation can be established. Such estimates and assumptions may change from period to period as new information becomes available. If, subsequent to the exploration and evaluation expenditure being capitalised, a judgement is made that recovery of the expenditure is unlikely or the project is to be abandoned, the relevant capitalised amount will be written off to profit or loss. Details of exploration and evaluation assets are set out in note 12.
Deferred stripping costs
Stripping costs are deferred and capitalised if they relate to gaining improved access to an identified component of an ore body to be mined in future periods. The capitalised amount is determined based on the volume of waste extracted, compared with expected ore volume in the identified component of the ore body. The identification of the components of a mine's ore body is a critical estimate and is made by reference to the respective life of mine plan. Changes to the life of mine plan, including the life and design of a mine, may result in the capitalisation of production stripping costs or adjustments of the carrying value of stripping costs capitalised in previous periods. As a result, there could be significant adjustments to the amounts of deferred stripping costs capitalised and their classification between current and non-current assets. Details of deferred stripping costs capitalised are set out in note 15.
Close down and restoration costs
Costs associated with restoration and rehabilitation of mining sites are typical for extractive industries and are normally incurred at the end of the life of the mine. Provision is recognised for each mining site for such costs discounted to their net present value, as soon as the obligation to incur such costs arises. The costs are estimated on the basis of the scope of site restoration and rehabilitation activity in accordance with the mine closure plan and represent management's best estimate of the expenditure that will be incurred. Estimates are reviewed annually as new information becomes available.
The actual costs may be different from those estimated due to changes in relevant laws and regulations, changes in prices as well as changes to the restoration techniques. The actual timing of cash outflows may be also different from those estimated due to changes in the life of the mine as a result of changes in ore reserves or processing levels. As a result, there could be significant adjustments to the provision for close down and restoration costs established which would affect future financial results.
Details of provision for close down and restoration costs are set out in note 22.
4. Segment information
The Group's reportable segments under IFRS 8, which are aligned with its operating locations, were determined to be Pokrovskiy, Pioneer, Malomir and Albyn hard rock gold mines which are engaged in gold and silver production as well as field exploration and mine development.
Corporate and Other segment amalgamates corporate administration, in-house geological exploration and construction and engineering expertise, engineering and scientific operations and other supporting in-house functions as well as various gold projects and other activities that do not meet the reportable segment criteria.
Reportable segments are based on the internal reports provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker ('CODM') to evaluate segment performance, decide how to allocate resources and make other operating decisions and reflect the way the Group's businesses are managed and reported.
The financial performance of the segments is principally evaluated with reference to operating profit less foreign exchange impacts.
2018 | Pioneer | Pokrovskiy | Malomir | Albyn | Corporate and other | Consolidated |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold (a) | 171,023 | 8,173 | 98,343 | 189,135 | - | 466,674 |
Silver | 591 | 29 | 61 | 160 | - | 841 |
Flotation concentrate | - | - | 3,202 | - | - | 3,202 |
Other external revenue | - | - | - | - | 29,058 | 29,058 |
Inter segment revenue | 524 | - | 807 | 5 | 170,916 | 172,252 |
Intra group eliminations | (524) | - | (807) | (5) | (170,916) | (172,252) |
Total Group revenue from external customers | 171,614 | 8,202 | 101,606 | 189,295 | 29,058 | 499,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash costs (b) | (108,466) | (8,667) | (63,913) | (112,687) | (31,286) | (325,019) |
Depreciation | (36,982) | (681) | (22,701) | (41,427) | (445) | (102,236) |
Central administration expenses | - | - | - | - | (39,195) | (39,195) |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets | - | - | 82,958 | - | 18,737 | 101,695 |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | - | - | (12,192) | - | - | (12,192) |
Impairment of ore stockpiles | - | - | (309) | (17,712) | - | (18,021) |
Impairment of gold in circuit | (1,415) | (17) | (536) | (157) | - | (2,125) |
Total operating expenses (c) | (146,863) | (9,365) | (16,693) | (171,983) | (52,189) | (397,093) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of results of associates | - | - | - | - | 15,480 | 15,480 |
Segment result | 24,751 | (1,163) | 84,913 | 17,312 | (7,651) | 118,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gains |
|
|
|
|
| 8,450 |
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
| 126,612 |
Investment income |
|
|
|
|
| 3,775 |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
| (29,520) |
Other finance gains |
|
|
|
|
| 13,905 |
Other finance losses |
|
|
|
|
| (32,354) |
Taxation |
|
|
|
|
| (56,489) |
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
| 25,929 |
Segment assets | 437,203 | - | 630,918 | 319,139 | 188,516 | 1,575,776 |
Segment liabilities | (66,689) | - | (75,876) | (100,569) | (83,202) | (326,336) |
Deferred tax - net |
|
|
|
|
| (113,354) |
Unallocated cash |
|
|
|
|
| 8,473 |
Loans granted to associate |
|
|
|
|
| 50,966 |
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
| (594,177) |
Net assets |
|
|
|
|
| 601,348 |
Other segment information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation expenditure | 1,092 | - | 1,090 | 971 | - | 3,153 |
Capital Expenditure | 50,277 | - | 59,879 | 14,539 | 2,558 | 127,253 |
Other items capitalised (d) | 28,789 | - | 5,130 | (115) | - | 33,804 |
Average number of employees | 2,711 | - | 1,138 | 1,485 | 3,347 | 8,681 |
(a) Net of US$(3.4) million net of cash settlement paid by the Group for realised cash flow hedges.
(b) Operating cash costs of Malomir include cost of flotation concentrate sold US$2.6 million.
(c) Operating expenses excluding foreign exchange losses (note 6).
(d) Interest and close down and restoration costs capitalised (note 13).
2017 | Pioneer | Pokrovskiy | Malomir | Albyn | Corporate and other | Consolidated (restated) |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold (e) | 202,392 | 40,687 | 83,098 | 228,915 | - | 555,092 |
Silver | 743 | 121 | 42 | 185 | - | 1,091 |
Other external revenue | - | - | - | - | 31,237 | 31,237 |
Inter segment revenue | 815 | - | 1,001 | 327 | 154,325 | 156,468 |
Intra group eliminations | (815) | - | (1,001) | (327) | (154,325) | (156,468) |
Total Group revenue from external customers | 203,135 | 40,808 | 83,140 | 229,100 | 31,237 | 587,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash costs | (127,657) | (39,988) | (61,079) | (98,354) | (30,030) | (357,108) |
Accrual for additional mining tax (f) | (6,511) | (2,255) | (2,780) | (8,306) | - | (19,852) |
Depreciation | (36,168) | (7,112) | (16,959) | (44,346) | (215) | (104,800) |
Central administration expenses | - | - | - | - | (39,944) | (39,944) |
Reversal of impairment/(impairment) of ore stockpiles | 3,589 | (175) | (304) | 1,592 | - | 4,702 |
Impairment of gold in circuit | (2,594) | (733) | (563) | - | - | (3,890) |
Impairment of non-trading loans | - | - | - | - | (629) | (629) |
Total operating expenses (g) | (169,341) | (50,263) | (81,685) | (149,414) | (70,818) | (521,521) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of results of associates | - | - | - | - | 35,208 | 35,208 |
Segment result | 33,794 | (9,455) | 1,455 | 79,686 | (4,373) | 101,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange losses |
|
|
|
|
| (746) |
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
| 100,361 |
Investment income |
|
|
|
|
| 760 |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
| (25,905) |
Other finance gains |
|
|
|
|
| 2,199 |
Other finance losses |
|
|
|
|
| (28,470) |
Taxation |
|
|
|
|
| (11,804) |
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
| 37,141 |
Segment assets | 383,012 | 11,117 | 474,164 | 379,040 | 154,281 | 1,401,614 |
Segment liabilities | (35,777) | (7,583) | (14,474) | (35,949) | (74,781) | (168,564) |
Deferred tax - net |
|
|
|
|
| (72,380) |
Unallocated cash |
|
|
|
|
| 2,236 |
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
| (596,474) |
Net assets |
|
|
|
|
| 566,432 |
Other segment information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and evaluation expenditure | 5,592 | - | 44 | 127 | - | 5,763 |
Capital Expenditure | 44,349 | 37 | 29,700 | 10,000 | 2,070 | 86,156 |
Other items capitalised (h) | 26,438 | 355 | 8,540 | 1,052 | - | 36,385 |
Average number of employees | 1,670 | 990 | 1,021 | 1,535 | 3,303 | 8,519 |
(e) Including US$0.8 million contribution from realised cash flow hedges.
(f) Amounts of mining tax for the six-month period to 31 December 2016, interest and penalties paid by the Group in 2017 following unfavourable court decisions.
(g) Operating expenses excluding foreign exchange losses (note 6).
(h) Interest and close down and restoration costs capitalised (note 13).
Entity wide disclosures
Revenue by geographical location (a)
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Russia and CIS | 499,716 | 587,361 |
Other | 59 | 59 |
| 499,775 | 587,420 |
(a) Based on the location to which the product is shipped or in which the services are provided.
Non-current assets by location of asset (b)
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 (restated) |
Russia | 1,282,672 | 1,134,630 |
Other | 50 | 45 |
| 1,282,722 | 1,134,675 |
(b) Excluding financial instruments and deferred tax assets.
Information about major customers
During the years ended 31 December 2018 and 2017, the Group generated revenues from the sales of gold to Russian banks for Russian domestic sales of gold. Included in gold sales revenue for the year ended 31 December 2018 are revenues of US$451 million which arose from sales of gold to two banks that individually accounted for more than 10% of the Group's revenue, namely US$368 million to Sberbank of Russia and US$83 million to Gazprombank (2017: US$555 million which arose from sales of gold to two banks that individually accounted for more than 10% of the Group's revenue, namely US$414 million to Sberbank of Russia and US$142 million to VTB). The proportion of Group revenue of each bank may vary from year to year depending on commercial terms agreed with each bank. Management considers there is no major customer concentration risk due to high liquidity inherent to gold as a commodity.
5. Revenue
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Sales of goods: |
|
|
Gold | 466,674 | 555,092 |
Silver | 841 | 1,091 |
Flotation concentrate | 3,202 | - |
Other goods | 14,603 | 15,483 |
Sales of services: |
|
|
Engineering and construction contracts | 11,653 | 13,952 |
Other services | 2,136 | 1,093 |
Rental income | 666 | 709 |
| 499,775 | 587,420 |
Timing of revenue recognition: |
|
|
At a point in time | 485,320 | 571,666 |
Over time | 14,455 | 15,754 |
| 499,775 | 587,420 |
6. Operating expenses and income
| 2018 | 2017 (restated) |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Net operating expenses (a) | 427,255 | 461,908 |
Accrual for additional mining tax (b) | - | 19,852 |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets and in-house service (a) | (101,695) | - |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | 12,192 | - |
Impairment/(reversal of impairment) of ore stockpiles (a) | 18,021 | (4,702) |
Impairment of gold in circuit | 2,125 | 3,890 |
Central administration expenses (a) | 39,195 | 39,944 |
Foreign exchange (gains)/losses | (8,450) | 746 |
Impairment of non-trading loans | - | 629 |
| 388,643 | 522,267 |
(a) As set out below.
(b) Amounts of mining tax for the six-month period to 31 December 2016, interest and penalties paid by the Group in 2017 following unfavourable court decisions.
Net operating expenses
| 2018 |
| 2017 (restated) |
| US$'000 |
| US$'000 |
Depreciation | 102,236 |
| 104,800 |
Staff costs | 76,110 |
| 80,071 |
Materials | 95,282 |
| 108,201 |
Fuel | 45,713 |
| 43,793 |
External services | 48,058 |
| 38,719 |
Mining tax credit | (131) |
| - |
Electricity | 26,563 |
| 30,074 |
Smelting and transportation costs | 607 |
| 794 |
Movement in ore stockpiles, deferred stripping, work in progress, bullion in process, limestone and flotation concentrate attributable to gold production | (15,853) |
| 7,456 |
Taxes other than income | 6,418 |
| 5,886 |
Insurance | 7,168 |
| 8,214 |
Operating lease rentals | 2,034 |
| 3,352 |
Provision for impairment of trade and other receivables | 1,435 |
| 364 |
Bank charges | 414 |
| 258 |
Repair and maintenance | 6,078 |
| 6,643 |
Security services | 3,966 |
| 2,750 |
Travel expenses | 2,955 |
| 3,369 |
Goods for resale | 11,200 |
| 11,802 |
Other operating expenses | 7,002 |
| 5,362 |
| 427,255 |
| 461,908 |
Central administration expenses
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Staff costs | 25,366 | 23,556 |
Professional fees | 5,531 | 6,854 |
Insurance | 616 | 928 |
Operating lease rentals | 1,723 | 1,920 |
Business travel expenses | 1,541 | 1,142 |
Office costs | 589 | 533 |
Other | 3,829 | 5,011 |
| 39,195 | 39,944 |
Impairment charges
Impairment of mining assets
The Group undertook a review of impairment indicators and impairment reversal indicators of the tangible assets attributable to its gold mining projects and supporting in-house service companies. Detailed calculations of recoverable amounts, which are value-in-use calculations based on discounted cash flows, were prepared which concluded no impairment was required as at 31 December 2018 and 2017.
Having considered the excess of estimated recoverable amounts over the carrying values of the associated assets on the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2018 and taking into consideration removed uncertainty connected with the timing of the final construction and performance of the POX hub, the Directors concluded on the following:
- A reversal of impairment previously recorded against the carrying value of the assets that are part of the Malomir CGU would be appropriate. Accordingly, a post-tax impairment reversal of US$66.4 million (being US$83.0 million gross impairment reversal net of associated deferred tax liabilities) has been recorded against the associated assets within property, plant and equipment. The aforementioned impairment reversal takes into consideration the effect of depreciation attributable to relevant mining assets and intra-group transfers of previously impaired assets to Malomir.
- A further reversal of impairment previously recorded against the carrying value of the assets of the supporting in-house service companies would be appropriate to the extent of the headroom available at Malomir and Albyn CGUs and relevant carrying values allocated to these CGUs. Accordingly, a post-tax impairment reversal of US$15.2 million (being US$18.7 million gross impairment reversal net of associated deferred tax liabilities) has been recorded against the associated assets within property, plant and equipment. The aforementioned impairment reversal takes into consideration the effect of depreciation attributable to relevant assets and intra-group transfers of previously impaired assets.
The key assumptions which formed the basis of forecasting future cash flows and the value in use calculation are set out below:
| Year ended 31 December 2018 | Year ended 31 December 2017 |
Long-term real gold price | US$1,300/oz | US$1,300/oz |
Discount rate (a) | 8.5% | 8.0% |
RUB : US$ exchange rate | RUB67.0 : US$1 | RUB60.0 : US$1 |
(a) Being the post-tax real weighted average cost of capital, equivalent to a nominal pre-tax discount rate of 12.5% (2017: 11.6%).
With all other assumptions being constant, changes to the aforementioned key assumptions could potentially result in impairment of certain mining assets as set out below.
|
| Potential impairment (a) |
Long-term real gold price | US$1,150/oz | US$129 million |
Discount rate | 9.5% | US$12 million |
RUB : US$ exchange rate | RUB61.0 : US$1 | US$42 million |
(a) Primarily in relation to Pioneer CGU.
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets
The Group performed a review of its exploration and evaluation assets and concluded to suspend exploration at the Flanks of Malomir and surrender the relevant licences. An aggregate impairment charge of US$12.2 million was recorded against associated exploration and evaluation assets. No impairment was recorded against exploration and evaluation assets in 2017.
As at 31 December 2018, all exploration and evaluation assets in the statement of financial position related to the areas adjacent to the existing mines (note 12).
Impairment of ore stockpiles
The Group assessed the recoverability of the carrying value of ore stockpiles and recorded impairment charges/reversals of impairment as set out below:
| Year ended 31 December 2018 |
| Year ended 31 December 2017 |
| ||||
| Pre-tax impairment charge | Taxation | Post-tax impairment charge | Pre-tax impairment charge/ (reversal of impairment) | Taxation | Post-tax impairment charge/ (reversal of impairment) | ||
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | ||
Pokrovskiy | - | - | - | 175 | (35) | 140 | ||
Pioneer | - | - | - | (3,589) | 717 | (2,872) | ||
Malomir | 309 | (62) | 247 | 304 | (61) | 243 | ||
Albyn | 17,712 | (3,011) | 14,701 | (1,592) | 271 | (1,321) | ||
| 18,021 | (3,073) | 14,948 | (4,702) | 892 | (3,810) | ||
7. Auditor's remuneration
The Group, including its overseas subsidiaries, obtained the following services from the Company's auditor and their associates:
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Audit fees and related fees |
|
|
Fees payable to the Company's auditor for the annual audit of the parent company and consolidated financial statements | 803 | 568 |
Fees payable to the Company's auditor and their associates for other services to the Group: |
|
|
For the audit of the Company's subsidiaries as part of the audit of the consolidated financial statements | 320 | 296 |
For the audit of subsidiary statutory accounts pursuant to legislation (a) | 65 | 57 |
| 1,188 | 921 |
Non-audit fees |
|
|
Other services pursuant to legislation - interim review | 273 | 231 |
Fees for reporting accountants services (b) | 900 | 202 |
Tax services | - | 12 |
| 1,173 | 445 |
(a) Including the statutory audit of subsidiaries in the UK and Cyprus.
(b) Fees payable in relation to the ICBC guarantee restructuring process (notes 25 and 30) (2017: Fees payable in relation to the issuance of the US$500 million 8.125 per cent Guaranteed Notes (note 20).
8. Staff costs
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Wages and salaries |
| 80,090 | 81,619 |
Social security costs |
| 20,855 | 21,696 |
Pension costs |
| 115 | 168 |
Share-based compensation |
| 416 | 144 |
|
| 101,476 | 103,627 |
|
|
|
|
Average number of employees |
| 8,681 | 8,519 |
9. Financial income and expenses
|
| ||
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| US$'000 |
| US$'000 |
Investment income |
|
|
|
Interest income | 3,775 |
| 760 |
| 3,775 |
| 760 |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
Bank loans | (1,083) |
| (42,701) |
Notes | (41,886) |
| (5,308) |
Convertible bonds | (12,579) |
| (12,221) |
Prepayment on gold sale agreements | (7,213) |
| - |
| (62,761) |
| (60,230) |
Interest capitalised | 33,666 |
| 34,592 |
Unwinding of discount on environmental obligation | (425) |
| (267) |
| (29,520) |
| (25,905) |
Other finance gains |
|
|
|
Fair value gain on listed equity investments | 244 |
| - |
Fair value gain on derivative financial instruments (a) | 13,661 |
| - |
Financial guarantee fee (b) | - |
| 2,199 |
| 13,905 |
| 2,199 |
Other finance losses |
|
|
|
Financial guarantee contract (b) | (25,471) |
| - |
Fair value loss on guarantee receivable (c) | (3,720) |
| - |
Impairment of financial assets (d) | (3,163) |
| - |
Loss on bank debt refinancing | - |
| (21,577) |
Fair value loss on derivative financial instruments (a) | - |
| (6,893) |
| (32,354) |
| (28,470) |
(a) Result from re-measurement of the conversion option of the Convertible Bonds to fair value (note 20) and the Call Option over the Company's shares to fair value (note 18).
(b) Provision for ECL under ICBC guarantee (notes 14 and 25).
(c) Result of re-measurement of receivable from IRC under ICBC guarantee arrangements to fair value, net of US$4.0 million guarantee fee charges (note 25).
(d) Including US$2.4 million lifetime ECL recognised on origination of loans granted to IRC and US$0.8 million further impairment charges in relation to loans granted to IRC (note 25).
10. Taxation
|
|
|
| 2018 | 2017 (restated) |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Current tax |
|
|
Russian current tax | 19,861 | 24,357 |
| 19,861 | 24,357 |
Deferred tax |
|
|
Origination/(reversal) of timing differences (a) | 36,628 | (12,553) |
Total tax charge | 56,489 | 11,804 |
(a) Including effect of foreign exchange movements in respect of deductible temporary differences of US$30.6 million (year ended 31 December 2017: US$(8.6) million) which primarily arises as the tax base for a significant portion of the future taxable deductions in relation to the Group's property, plant and equipment are denominated in Russian Rouble whilst the future depreciation charges associated with these assets will be based on their US Dollar carrying value and reflects the movements in the Russian Rouble to the US Dollar exchange rate.
The charge for the year can be reconciled to the profit before tax per the statement of profit or loss as follows:
| 2018 | 2017 (restated) |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Profit before tax | 82,418 | 48,945 |
Less: share of results of associates | (15,480) | (35,208) |
Profit before tax (excluding associates) | 66,938 | 13,737 |
|
|
|
Tax on profit (excluding associates) at the Russian corporation tax rate of 20% (2017: 20%) | 13,387 | 2,747 |
Effect of the reduced corporation tax rate (a) | (354) | (2,034) |
Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries operating in other jurisdictions | 1,161 | 912 |
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes | 1,191 | 3,043 |
Tax effect of tax losses for which no deferred income tax asset was recognised (b) | 17,055 | 21,385 |
Utilisation of previously unrecognised tax losses | (442) | (288) |
Foreign exchange movements in respect of deductible temporary differences (c) | 30,618 | (8,602) |
Effect of the reduced corporation tax rate on previously recognised deferred tax | - | (4,283) |
Income not subject to tax(d) | (2,209) | - |
Other adjustments | (3,918) | (1,076) |
Tax charge for the period | 56,489 | 11,804 |
(a) Under the Russian Federal Law 144-FZ dated 23 May 2016 taxpayers who are participants to the Regional Investment Projects ("RIP") have the right to apply the reduced corporation tax rate over the period until 2027, subject to eligibility criteria. In 2018 and 2017, LLC Albynskiy Rudnik has received tax relief as a RIP participant and was entitled to the reduced statutory corporation tax rate of 17%.
(b) Primarily relate to interest expense and central administration expenses incurred in the UK and loss on fair value change on financial guarantee fee (note 9) (2017: primarily relate to central administration expenses and interest expense incurred in the UK).
(c) Foreign exchange movements primarily arise as the tax base for a significant portion of the future taxable deductions in relation to the Group's property, plant and equipment are denominated in Russian Rouble whilst the future depreciation charges associated with these assets will be based on their US Dollar carrying value and reflects the movements in the Russian Rouble to the US Dollar exchange rate.
(d) Primarily relate to the fair value income on re-measurement of the conversion option of the Convertible Bonds (note 9).
Tax laws, regulations and court practice applicable to the Group are complex and subject to frequent change, varying interpretations and inconsistent and selective enforcement. There are a number of practical uncertainties associated with the application of relevant tax legislation and there is a risk of tax authorities making arbitrary judgements of business activities. If a particular treatment, based on management's judgement of the Group's business activities, was to be challenged by the tax authorities, the Group may be subject to tax claims and exposures. The Directors do not anticipate that these exposures will have a material adverse effect upon the Group's financial position.
11. Earnings per share
|
| |
|
| |
| 2018 US$'000 | 2017 (restated) US$'000 |
Profit for the period attributable to equity holders of Petropavlovsk PLC | 24,493 | 37,006 |
Interest expense on convertible bonds (a) | - | - |
Profit used to determine diluted earnings per share | 24,493 | 37,006 |
|
No of shares |
No of shares |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares | 3,305,069,755 | 3,303,768,532 |
Adjustments for dilutive potential Ordinary Shares (a) | - | - |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares for diluted earnings per share | 3,305,069,755 | 3,303,768,532 |
| US$ | US$ |
Basic profit per share | 0.01 | 0.01 |
|
|
|
Diluted profit per share | 0.01 | 0.01 |
(a) Convertible bonds which could potentially dilute basic profit per ordinary share in the future are not included in the calculation of diluted profit per share because they were anti-dilutive for the years ended 31 December 2018 and 2017.
12. Exploration and evaluation assets
|
| Flanks of Pioneer | Flanks of Albyn | Flanks of Malomir |
Other |
Total |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
At 1 January 2018 |
| 5,827 | 34,076 | 12,192 | 1,423 | 53,518 |
Additions |
| 1,092 | 971 | - | 1,090 | 3,153 |
Impairment (a) |
| - | - | (12,192) | - | (12,192) |
Transfer to mining assets (b) |
| - | - | - | (1,364) | (1,364) |
At 31 December 2018 |
| 6,919 | 35,047 | - | 1,149 | 43,115 |
(a) Note 6
(b) Amounts capitalised in respect of limestone, an essential reagent the pressure oxidation process, and underground water deposits to be used for the POX Hub operations.
|
| Flanks of Pioneer | Flanks of Albyn | Flanks of Malomir |
Other (c) |
Total |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
At 1 January 2017 |
| 1,750 | 33,949 | 12,148 | 1,423 | 49,270 |
Additions |
| 5,592 | 127 | 44 | - | 5,763 |
Transfer to mining assets |
| (1,515) | - | - | - | (1,515) |
At 31 December 2017 |
| 5,827 | 34,076 | 12,192 | 1,423 | 53,518 |
(c) Amounts capitalised in respect of limestone, an essential reagent the pressure oxidation process, and underground water deposits to be used for the POX Hub operations.
(d)
13. Property, plant and equipment
| Mining assets | Non-mining assets | Capital construction in progress (c) | Total |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2017 | 1,821,764 | 174,476 | 330,394 | 2,326,634 |
Additions | 34,725 | 2,048 | 49,383 | 86,156 |
Interest capitalised (a) | - | - | 34,592 | 34,592 |
Close down and restoration cost capitalised (note 22) | 1,793 | - | - | 1,793 |
Transfer from exploration and evaluation assets (note 12) | 1,515 | - | - | 1,515 |
Transfers from capital construction in progress (b) | 22,397 | 4,042 | (26,439) | - |
Disposals | (8,856) | (4,731) | (72) | (13,659) |
Reallocation and other transfers | 1,727 | (1,897) | 170 | - |
Foreign exchange differences | - | 1,245 | 4 | 1,249 |
At 31 December 2017 (d) | 1,875,065 | 175,183 | 388,032 | 2,438,280 |
Additions | 51,709 | 2,730 | 72,814 | 127,253 |
Interest capitalised (a) | - | - | 33,666 | 33,666 |
Close down and restoration cost capitalised (note 22) | 138 | - | - | 138 |
Transfer from exploration and evaluation assets (note 12) | 1,364 | - | - | 1,364 |
Transfers from capital construction in progress (b) | 108,479 | 582 | (109,061) | - |
Disposals (e) | (53,744) | (4,526) | (3) | (58,273) |
Disposals of subsidiaries | (7,400) | - | - | (7,400) |
Reallocation and other transfers | (1,325) | (41) | 988 | (378) |
Foreign exchange differences | - | (4,407) | (21) | (4,428) |
At 31 December 2018 (d) | 1,974,286 | 169,521 | 386,415 | 2,530,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and impairment |
|
|
|
|
At 1 January 2017 (restated) | 1,249,228 | 154,679 | 3,916 | 1,407,823 |
Charge for the year (restated) | 102,446 | 2,708 | - | 105,154 |
Disposals | (8,062) | (5,196) | - | (13,258) |
Reallocation and other transfers | 192 | 2,213 | (2,405) | - |
Foreign exchange differences | - | 1,014 | - | 1,014 |
At 31 December 2017 (restated) | 1,343,804 | 155,418 | 1,511 | 1,500,733 |
Charge for the year | 100,578 | 2,016 | - | 102,594 |
Disposals | (52,818) | (4,410) | - | (57,228) |
Disposals of subsidiaries | (7,400) | - | - | (7,400) |
Reallocation and other transfers | (352) | (23) | (3) | (378) |
Reversal of impairment (note 6) | (82,958) | (18,737) | - | (101,695) |
Foreign exchange differences | - | (3,479) | - | (3,479) |
At 31 December 2018 | 1,300,854 | 130,785 | 1,508 | 1,433,147 |
Net book value |
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2017 (restated) | 531,261 | 19,765 | 386,521 | 937,547 |
At 31 December 2018 | 673,432 | 38,736 | 384,907 | 1,097,075 |
(a) Borrowing costs were capitalised at the weighted average rate of the Group's relevant borrowings being 9.3% (2017: 10%).
(b) Being costs primarily associated with continuous development of Malomir and Pioneer projects.
(c) Including US$345.8 million costs associated with the POX Hub project (31 December 2017: US$277.6 million).
(d) Including US$400.8 million of fully depreciated property, plant and equipment (31 December 2017: US$215.6 million).
(e) Including US$18.1 million of fully depreciated mining fleet that is not suitable for future use due to wear and tear, US$5.8 million of fully depreciated infrastructure that is not intended for future use, US$19.1 million disposals associated with closure of Pokrovskiy mine as the site was transformed into a key component of the POX Hub and US$8.1 million mining fleet parts replaced as part of capital repair and maintenance programme.
14. Investment in associate
|
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
IRC Limited ('IRC') |
|
| 85,140 | 70,890 |
|
|
| 85,140 | 70,890 |
Summarised financial information for those associates that are material to the Group is set out below.
| IRC | IRC |
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Non-current assets |
|
|
Exploration and evaluation assets | 7,607 | 7,259 |
Property, plant and equipment | 533,446 | 458,624 |
Other non-current assets | 15,185 | 5,486 |
| 556,238 | 471,369 |
Current assets |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents | 7,637 | 8,997 |
Other current assets | 34,195 | 54,026 |
| 41,832 | 63,023 |
Current liabilities |
|
|
Borrowings (a), (b) | (111,954) | (61,309) |
Other current liabilities | (55,080) | (37,729) |
| (167,034) | (99,038) |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
Borrowings (a) | (100,915) | (162,078) |
Other non-current liabilities | (22,501) | (33,722) |
| 123,416 | 195,800 |
Net assets | 307,620 | 239,554 |
(a) Including US$158.8 million (2017: US$221.6 million) million under ICBC Facility and loans provided by the Group in the equivalent of US$54.0 million (2017: US$nil) (note 25).
(b) On 13 December 2010, K&S entered into a project finance facility agreement with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited ('ICBC') (the 'ICBC Facility Agreement') pursuant to which ICBC would lend US$340 million to K&S to be used to fund the construction of the IRC's mining operations at K&S. The facility is guaranteed by the Company (note 25) and originally was repayable semi-annually in 16 instalments US$21.25 million each, starting from December 2014 and is fully repayable by June 2022. On 27 February 2017, ICBC agreed to restructure two repayment instalments originally due for payment on 20 June 2017 and 20 December 2017 in an aggregate amount of US$42.5 million evenly into five subsequent semi-annual repayment instalments. As a result, each of the repayment instalments due on 20 June 2018, 20 December 2018, 20 June 2019, 20 December 2019 and 20 June 2020 increased by US$8.5 million to an amount equal to US$29.75 million. The outstanding loan principal was US$169.6 million as at 31 December 2018 (2017: US$233.75 million).
The loan is carried at amortised cost with effective interest rate 6.8% per annum (2017: 6.41%). ICBC Facility Agreement contains certain financial covenants to which ICBC had agreed to grant a waiver until 31 December 2018, inclusive.
As at 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2017, the Group's entire 31.1% ownership in the issued capital of IRC was pledged to ICBC as security for the obligations of the Company as guarantor and in consideration for the waiver of financial covenants under the ICBC facility.
On 20 March 2019, IRC repaid the outstanding loan principal and interest in full as set out below and terminated the ICBC Facility Agreement.
On 18 December 2018, IRC into two facility agreements for a loan in aggregate of US$240 million with Gazprombank (the "Gazprombank Facility"). The Gazprombank Facility will mature in March 2026 and consists of two tranches. The principal under the first tranche amounts to US$160 million with interest being charged at LIBOR+5.7% per annum and is repayable in equal quarterly payments during the term of the Gazprombank Facility, the final payment in December 2026. The principal under the second tranche amounts to US$80 million with interest being charged at LIBOR+7.7% per annum and is repayable in full at the end of the term, in December 2026. Interest charged on the drawn down amounts under the two tranches is payable in equal quarterly payments during the term of the Gazprombank Facility.
In March 2019, IRC drew down an aggregate of US$228.9 million on the Gazprombank Facility that were used to repay the amounts outstanding under ICBC facility of approximately US$169 million in full and the loans provided by the Group in the equivalent of approximately US$57 million in full, the remaining proceeds were to finance the K&S Project's working capital of approximately US$3 million. In April 2019, IRC has further drawn down US$4.5 million on the Gazprombank Facility.
|
IRC |
IRC |
| Year ended 31 December 2018 US$'000 | Year ended 31 December 2017 US$'000 |
Revenue | 151,549 | 109,265 |
Net operating (expenses)/ income | (53,876) | 25,657 |
Including: |
|
|
Depreciation | (21,208) | (14,618) |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets | 90,483 | 129,614 |
Foreign exchange gains/(losses) | 4,554 | (859) |
Impairment of financial assets | (7,741) | - |
Investment income | 82 | 114 |
Interest expense | (21,679) | (22,410) |
Taxation | (130) | 590 |
Profit for the period | 68,205 | 113,216 |
Other comprehensive loss | (1,057) | (1,470) |
Total comprehensive profit | 67,148 | 111,746 |
|
|
|
Group's share % | 31.1% | 31.1% |
Group's share in profit for the period | 21,210 | 35,208 |
Impairment of investment in associate | (5,730) | - |
Share of results of associate | 15,480 | 35,208 |
Impairment of investment in associate
The Group undertook a review of impairment indicators of its investment in IRC. Detailed calculations of recoverable amounts, which are value-in-use calculations based on discounted cash flows, were prepared which concluded a US$5.7 million impairment was required as at 31 December 2018 (2017: US$nil).
15. Inventories
|
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Current |
|
|
|
|
Construction materials |
|
| 6,267 | 6,792 |
Stores and spares |
|
| 69,082 | 57,226 |
Ore in stockpiles (a), (b) |
|
| 36,395 | 37,496 |
Gold in circuit |
|
| 16,751 | 24,088 |
Deferred stripping costs |
|
| 46,988 | 39,767 |
Bullion in process |
|
| 606 | 391 |
Flotation concentrate |
|
| 25,654 | - |
Other |
|
| 4,101 | 6,892 |
|
|
| 205,844 | 172,652 |
Non-current |
|
|
|
|
Ore in stockpiles (a), (b), (c) |
|
| 56,805 | 72,720 |
|
|
| 56,805 | 72,720 |
(a) As at 31 December 2018, ore in stockpiles include balances in the aggregate of US$10.1 million carried at net realisable value (2017: US$28.9 million).
(b) For details of ore stockpile impairments see note 6.
(c) Ore in stockpiles that is not planned to be processed within twelve months after the reporting period.
16. Trade and other receivables
|
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Current |
|
|
|
|
VAT recoverable |
|
| 20,474 | 20,438 |
Advances to suppliers |
|
| 5,919 | 11,343 |
Prepayments for property, plant and equipment |
|
| 7,233 | 5,809 |
Trade receivables (a) |
|
| 13,389 | 9,297 |
Contract assets |
|
| 3,307 | - |
Guarantee fee receivable (b) |
|
| 6,829 | 4,681 |
Other debtors (c) |
|
| 11,243 | 24,262 |
|
|
| 68,394 | 75,830 |
Non-current |
|
|
|
|
Guarantee fee receivable (b) |
|
| - | 8,396 |
Other |
|
| 547 | 535 |
|
|
| 547 | 8,931 |
(a) Net of provision for impairment of US$0.9 million (2017: US$0.2 million). Trade receivables are generally due for settlement between three and twelve months.
(b) Please refer to notes 14 and 25 for the details of ICBC guarantee arrangements. Measured at fair value as at 31 December 2019 (note 2.2) and considered Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy which valuation incorporates the following inputs:
- Assessment of the credit standing of IRC and yield on comparable bonds issued by mining companies of a similar credit standing;
- Share price and share price volatility of IRC as at 31 Dec 2018;
- Prospective terms of the proposed refinancing of IRC debt and the likelihood of this being achieved.
(c) Net of provision for impairment of US$1.7 million (2017: US$1.3 million).
Other than receivables from IRC in the aggregate of US$2.1 million (2017: US$1.0 million), there is no significant concentration of credit risk with respect to trade and other receivables. The Group has implemented policies that require appropriate credit checks on potential customers before granting credit. The Group has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy counterparties. The Group's exposure and credit ratings of its counterparties are monitored by the Board of Directors. The maximum credit risk of financial assets is represented by the carrying value of the asset.
The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other receivables approximates their fair value.
17. Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Cash at bank and in hand |
|
| 10,682 | 8,109 |
Short-term bank deposits |
|
| 15,470 | 3,306 |
|
|
| 26,152 | 11,415 |
18. Derivative financial instruments
| 31 December 2018 |
|
| 31 December 2017 | ||
| Assets | Liabilities |
|
| Assets | Liabilities |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Forward gold contracts - cash flow hedge (a), (b), (c) | - | (8,819) |
|
| - | (32,477) |
Call Option over the Company's shares (d) | - | (1,136) |
|
| - | (3,097) |
Conversion option (e), (f) | - | (2,411) |
|
| - | (14,110) |
| - | (12,366) |
|
| - | (49,684) |
(a) Forward contracts to sell an aggregate of 200,000 ounces of gold at an average price of US$1,252 per ounce are outstanding as at 31 December 2018 (31 December 2017: 400,000 ounces of gold at an average price of US$1,252 per ounce).
(b) Measured at fair value and considered as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy which valuation incorporates the following inputs:
- gold forward curves observable at quoted intervals; and
- observable credit spreads.
(c) The hedged forecast transactions are expected to occur at various dates during the period to December 2019.
Gain and losses recognised in the hedging reserve in equity as at the reporting date will be recognised in profit or loss in the periods during which the hedged gold sale transactions affect profit or loss.
There was no ineffectiveness to be recorded from the cash flow hedge during the years ended 31 December 2018 and 2017.
(d) Cash settled call option issued in relation to 3.6 per cent. of the outstanding aggregate ordinary share capital in the Company exercisable between December 2018 and June 2019 at strike price of £0.068. Measured at fair value and considered as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy which valuation incorporates the following inputs:
- historic share price volatility;
- historic GBP : US$ exchange rate volatility;
- conversion price;
- time to maturity; and
- risk free rate.
(e) Note 20.
(f) Measured at fair value and considered as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy which valuation incorporates the following inputs:
- the Group's credit risk and implied credit spreads;
- historic share price volatility;
- historic GBP : US$ exchange rate volatility;
- dividend yield;
- conversion price;
- time to maturity; and
- risk free rate.
19. Trade and other payables
|
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Current Trade payables |
|
| 50,099 | 39,902 |
Payables for property, plant and equipment |
|
| 5,242 | 10,389 |
Advances from customers (a) |
|
| 131,752 | 826 |
Advances received on resale contracts (b) |
|
| 5,432 | 1,029 |
Accruals and other payables |
|
| 27,320 | 36,187 |
|
|
| 219,845 | 88,333 |
Non-current |
|
|
|
|
Advances from customers (c) |
|
| 33,779 | - |
|
|
| 33,779 | - |
(a) The current advances from customers as at 31 December 2018 include US$86.0 million and US$44.0 million advance payments received from Gazprombank and Sberbank, respectively, under gold sales agreements. Advance payments are to be settled against physical delivery of gold produced by the Group in regular intervals over the period of up to twelve months from the reporting date based on the sales price prevailing at delivery that is determined with reference to LBMA fixing. For details of interest charged in relation to the aforementioned advances please refer to note 9.
(b) Amounts included in advances received on resale contracts at 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2017 relate to services performed by the Group's subsidiary, Irgiredmet, in its activity to procure materials such as reagents, consumables and equipment for third parties.
(c) The non-current advances from customers as at 31 December 2018 include US$33.8 million advance payments received from Gazprombank under gold sales agreements. Advance payments are to be settled against physical delivery of gold produced by the Group in regular intervals over the period after twelve months from the reporting date based on the sales price prevailing at delivery that is determined with reference to LBMA fixing. For details of interest charged in relation to the aforementioned advances please refer to note 9.
The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other payables approximates to their fair value.
20. Borrowings
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Borrowings at amortised cost |
|
|
|
Notes (a) |
| 499,007 | 497,747 |
Convertible bonds (b) |
| 95,170 | 91,590 |
Bank loans (c) |
| - | 7,137 |
|
| 594,177 | 596,474 |
|
|
|
|
Amount due for settlement within 12 months |
| - | 7,137 |
Amount due for settlement after 12 months |
| 594,177 | 589,337 |
|
| 594,177 | 596,474 |
(a) US$500 million Guaranteed Notes due for repayment on 14 November 2022 (the "Notes"), measured at amortised cost. The Notes were issued by the Group's wholly owned subsidiary Petropavlovsk 2016 Limited and are guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries JSC Pokrovskiy Rudnik, LLC Albynskiy Rudnik and LLC Malomirskiy Rudnik. The Notes have been admitted to the official list of the Irish Stock Exchange and to trading on the Global Exchange Market of the Irish Stock Exchange on 14 November 2017. The Notes carry a coupon of 8.125% payable semi-annually in arrears. The interest charged was calculated by applying an effective interest rate of 8.35%.
(b) Debt component of the US$100 million Convertible Bonds due on 18 March 2020, measured at amortised cost. The interest charged was calculated by applying an effective interest rate of 13.89% to the liability component.
The conversion option of the US$100 million Convertible Bonds represents the fair value of the embedded option for the bondholders to convert into the equity of the Company (the "Conversion Right"). As the Company can elect to pay the cash value in lieu of delivering the Ordinary Shares following the exercise of the Conversion Right, the conversion option is a derivative liability. Accordingly, the conversion option is measured at fair value and is presented separately within derivative financial liabilities.
As at 31 December 2018, the fair value of debt component of the convertible bonds, considered as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, amounted to US$86.8 million (31 December 2017: US$102.1 million). Valuation incorporates the following inputs: the Group's credit risk and implied credit spreads, time to maturity and risk free rate.
As at 31 December 2018, the fair value of the convertible bonds, considered as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and calculated by applying the market traded price to the convertible bonds outstanding, amounted to US$89.2 million (31 December 2017: US$116.3 million).
(c) The weighted average interest rate during the year ended 31 December 2018 was 15.0% (2017: 9.3%).
As at 31 December 2018 and 2017, the carrying value of the bank loans approximated their fair value.
As at 31 December 2018 and 2017, there was no security and financial covenants attached to the bank loans.
21. Deferred taxation
|
| 2018 | 2017 (restated) | |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | |
At 1 January |
| 72,380 | 92,396 | |
Deferred tax charged/(credited) to profit or loss (a) |
| 36,628 | (12,553) | |
Deferred tax charged/(credited) to equity |
| 4,376 | (7,505) | |
Exchange differences |
| (30) | 42 | |
At 31 December |
| 113,354 | 72,380 | |
|
|
|
| |
Deferred tax liabilities |
| (113,354) | (72,380) | |
Net deferred tax liability |
| (113,354) | (72,380) | |
(a) Note 10.
| At 1 January2018
| Charged/(credited) to profit or loss | Charged directly to equity |
| Exchange differences | At 31 December2018 |
US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | |
Property, plant and equipment | 79,665 | 37,846 | - |
| (82) | 117,429 |
Inventory | 10,711 | 5,158 | - |
| (234) | 15,635 |
Exploration and evaluation assets | 8,070 | (982) | - |
| - | 7,088 |
Fair value adjustments | 6 | (6) | - |
| - | - |
Other temporary differences | (1,494) | (6,351) | 4,376 |
| 286 | (3,183) |
Tax losses carried forward (a) | (24,578) | 963 | - |
| - | (23,615) |
| 72,380 | 36,628 | 4,376 |
| (30) | 113,354 |
(a) Deferred tax recognised in relation to unused tax losses of LLC Malomirskiy Rudnik and LLC TEMI to the extent that it is either probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses can be utilised or there are sufficient taxable temporary differences.
| At 1 January2017 (restated) | Charged/(credited) to profit or loss (restated) | Credited directly to equity |
| Exchange differences | At 31 December2017 (restated) |
US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | |
Property, plant and equipment | 89,028 | (9,422) | - |
| 59 | 79,665 |
Inventory | 10,056 | 655 | - |
| - | 10,711 |
Exploration and evaluation assets | 5,008 | 3,062 | - |
| - | 8,070 |
Fair value adjustments | 129 | (123) | - |
| - | 6 |
Other temporary differences | 7,811 | (1,783) | (7,505) |
| (17) | (1,494) |
Tax losses carried forward (b) | (19,636) | (4,942) | - |
| - | (24,578) |
| 92,396 | (12,553) | (7,505) |
| 42 | 72,380 |
(b) Deferred tax recognised in relation to unused tax losses of LLC Malomirskiy Rudnik and LLC TEMI to the extent that it is either probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses can be utilised or there are sufficient taxable temporary differences.
As at 31 December 2018, the Group did not recognise deferred tax assets in respect of the accumulated unused tax losses comprising US$595.4 million (2017: US$575.8 million) on the basis that there is no certainty about future taxable profit of relevant entities against which the unused tax losses can be utilised or there are insufficient relevant taxable temporary differences. Tax losses of US$566.6 million (2017: US$531.0 million) arise in the UK and tax losses of US$28.8 million (2017: US$44.7 million) arise in Russia, both can be carried forward indefinitely.
As at 31 December 2018, the Group did not recognise deferred tax assets of US$2.6 million (2017: US$2.7 million) in respect of deductible temporary differences arising on property, plant and equipment and close down and restoration costs.
The Group has not recorded a deferred tax liability in respect of withholding tax and other taxes that would be payable on the unremitted earnings associated with investments in its subsidiaries and associates as the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of those temporary differences and does not intend to reverse them in the foreseeable future. As at 31 December 2018, statutory unremitted earnings comprised in aggregate US$845.3 million (2017: US$943.8 million).
22. Provision for close down and restoration costs
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
At 1 January | 21,004 | 19,152 |
Unwinding of discount | 425 | 267 |
Change in estimates(a) | 138 | 1,793 |
Amounts charged against provision | (179) | (208) |
At 31 December | 21,388 | 21,004 |
(a) Primarily reflects the effect of change in the forecast the Russian Rouble to the US Dollar exchange rate and the inflation rate.
The Group recognised provisions in relation to close down and restoration costs for the following mining operations:
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
POX Hub/ Pokrovskiy (a) | 3,256 | 3,195 |
Pioneer | 2,941 | 2,876 |
Malomir | 6,903 | 6,679 |
Albyn | 8,288 | 8,254 |
| 21,388 | 21,004 |
(a) With the closure of Pokrovskiy mine in 2018, as the site was transformed into a key component of the POX Hub, the associated amounts of close down and restoration costs were attributed to the POX project accordingly.
The provision recognised represents the present value of the estimated expenditure that will be incurred, which has been arrived at using the long-term risk-free pre-tax cost of borrowing. The expenditure arises at different times over the life of mine. The expected timing of significant cash outflows is between years 2019 and 2034, varying from mine site to mine site.
23. Share capital
| 2018 |
| 2017 | ||
| No of shares | US$'000 |
| No of shares | US$'000 |
Allotted, called up and fully paid |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January | 3,303,768,532 | 48,920 |
| 3,303,768,532 | 48,920 |
Issued during the period | 3,383,180 | 43 |
| - | - |
At 31 December | 3,307,151,712 | 48,963 |
| 3,303,768,532 | 48,920 |
The Company has one class of ordinary shares which carry no right to fixed income.
24. Notes to the statement of cash flows
Reconciliation of profit before tax to operating cash flow
|
| 2018 | 2017 (restated) |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Profit before tax |
| 82,418 | 48,945 |
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
Share of results of associate |
| (15,480) | (35,208) |
Investment income |
| (3,775) | (760) |
Interest expense |
| 29,520 | 25,905 |
Other finance gains |
| (13,905) | (2,199) |
Other finance losses |
| 32,354 | 28,470 |
Share based payments |
| 416 | 144 |
Depreciation |
| 102,236 | 104,800 |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets |
| 12,192 | - |
Impairment/(reversal of impairment) of ore stockpiles |
| 18,021 | (4,702) |
Effect of processing previously impaired stockpiles |
| (10,496) | (12,948) |
Provision for impairment of trade and other receivables |
| 1,435 | 364 |
Impairment of gold in circuit |
| 2,124 | 3,890 |
Effect of processing previously impaired gold in circuit |
| (3,384) | (1,315) |
(Gain)/loss on disposals of property, plant and equipment |
| (862) | 67 |
Foreign exchange (gains)/losses |
| (8,450) | 746 |
Impairment of non-trading loans |
| - | 629 |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets |
| (101,695) | - |
Other non-cash items |
| (106) | (75) |
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables |
| (18,510) | 26,515 |
(Increase)/decrease in inventories |
| (26,054) | 4,323 |
Increase in trade and other payables |
| 204,827 | 16,715 |
Net cash generated from operations |
| 282,826 | 204,306 |
Reconciliation of cash flows used to purchase property, plant and equipment
|
| 2018 | 2017 |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
| 127,253 | 86,156 |
Non-cash additions to property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
Transfer from materials |
| (747) | (600) |
Capitalised depreciation |
| (293) | (207) |
Finance lease additions |
| (55) | - |
|
| 126,158 | 85,349 |
Associated cash flows: |
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
| 131,213 | 82,295 |
Increase in prepayments for property, plant and equipment |
| (1,419) | (5,115) |
(Decrease)/increase in payables for property, plant and equipment |
| (5,147) | 9,431 |
Cash movements presented in other cash flow lines: |
|
|
|
Changes in working capital |
| 1,511 | (1,262) |
|
| 126,158 | 85,349 |
Non-cash transactions
An equivalent of US$8.0 million of VAT recoverable was offset against profit tax during the year ended 31 December 2018. An equivalent of US$14.5 million of VAT recoverable was offset against additional mining tax (note 6) during the year ended 31 December 2017. There were no other significant non-cash transactions during the years ended 31 December 2018 and 2017.
25. Related parties
Related parties the Group entered into transactions with during the reporting period
PJSC Asian-Pacific Bank ('Asian-Pacific Bank'), LLC Insurance Company Helios Reserve ('Helios') and Peter Hambro Limited were considered to be related parties as members of key management had an interest in and collectively exercise significant influence over these entities until 22 June 2017 when the Group lost significant influence over these companies.
The Petropavlovsk Foundation for Social Investment (the 'Petropavlovsk Foundation') is considered to be a related party due to the participation of the key management of the Group in the governing board of the Petropavlovsk Foundation and their presence in its board of guardians.
IRC Limited and its subsidiaries (Note 32) are associates to the Group and hence are related parties since 7 August 2015.
Transactions with related parties which the Group entered into during the years ended 31 December 2018 and 2017 are set out below.
Trading Transactions
Related party transactions the Group entered into that relate to the day-to-day operation of the business are set out below.
| Sales to related parties | Purchases from related parties |
| ||
| 2018 US$'000 | 2017 US$'000 | 2018 US$'000 | 2017 US$'000 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Entities in which key management have interest and exercise a significant influence or control | - | 3 | 764 | 1,336 | |
IRC Limited and its subsidiaries | 164 | 85 | 681 | 2,062 | |
| 164 | 88 | 1,445 | 3,398 | |
During the year ended 31 December 2018, the Group made US$0.4 million charitable donations to the Petropavlovsk Foundation (2017: US$0.2 million).
The outstanding balances with related parties at 31 December 2018 and 2017 are set out below.
| Amounts owed by related parties | Amounts owed to related parties |
| |||
| 2018 US$'000 | 2017 US$'000 | 2018 US$'000 | 2017 US$'000 | ||
Entities in which key management have interest and exercise a significant influence or control | 1,556 | 236 | - | - | ||
IRC Limited and its subsidiaries | 2,078 | 2,099 | 976 | 527 | ||
| 3,634 | 2,335 | 976 | 527 | ||
In March 2018, the Group entered into a transaction with the member of key management personnel to purchase the office building and land, currently subject to an operating lease arrangement. The aggregate consideration payable is US$3.5 million, of which US$1.5 million of advance payments were paid by the Group as at 31 December 2018.
Financing transactions
The Group has charged a fee for the provision of the guarantee to IRC under ICBC Facility, equal to 1.75% on the ICBC outstanding loan principal (note 14), which amounted to US$4.0 million during the year ended 31 December 2018 (2017: US$4.1 million). The guarantee fee contractual balance outstanding amounted to US$10.3 million (2017: US$6.4 million) which corresponding fair value was US$6.8 million (2017: US$10.5 million).
In June 2018, the Group provided a Rouble denominated unsecured loan to IRC in the amount of RUB1,878 million (an equivalent of US$29.75 million). The loan carried interest of 12% per annum and was repaid on 21 March 2019. The loan was recognised net of lifetime ECL of US$0.5 million at inception. The Group recognised further US$0.8 million impairment based on ECL model.
In December 2018, the Group provided a dollar denominated unsecured loan to IRC in the amount of US$27.0 million. The loan carried interest of 16% per annum and was repaid on 21 March 2019. The loan was recognised net of lifetime ECL of US$1.9 million at inception.
In March 2018, the Group entered into a loan agreement with Dr Pavel Maslovskiy. At 31 December 2018, the loan principal outstanding amounted to an equivalent of US$0.2 million. Interest charged during the year ended 31 December 2018 comprised an equivalent of US$0.01 million.
Key management compensation
Key management personnel, comprising a group of 16 individuals during the period (2017: 13), including Executive and Non-Executive Directors of the Company and members of senior management, are those having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group.
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Wages and salaries | 7,761 | 6,285 |
Pension costs | 136 | 176 |
Share-based compensation | 404 | 136 |
| 8,301 | 6,597 |
26. Analysis of Net Debt¨
|
At 1 January 2018 | Net cash Movement | Exchange movement | Non-cash changes | At 31 December 2018 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 11,415 | 17,719 | (2,982) | - | 26,152 |
Borrowings | (596,474) | 57,845 (a) | - | (55,548) | (594,177) |
Net Debtu | (585,059) | 75,564 | (2,982) | (55,548) (b) | (568,025) |
(a) Being US$53.8 interest paid on borrowings and US$4.0 million repayment of bank loan.
(b) Being amortisation of borrowings (note 20).
|
At 1 January 2017 | Net cash Movement | Exchange movement | Non-cash changes | At 31 December 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 12,642 | (1,605) | 378 | - | 11,415 |
Borrowings | (611,212) | 87,191 (c) | - | (72,453) | (596,474) |
Net Debtu | (598,570) | 85,586 | 378 | (72,453) (d) | (585,059) |
(c) Including US$49.1 million interest paid on borrowings, US$495.0 million net proceeds from the issue of Notes (note 20), US$525.8 million repayment of bank loans and US7.4 million debt transaction costs.
(d) Being amortisation of borrowings (note 20) and the effect of the bank debt refinancing.
27. Financial instruments and financial risk management
Capital risk management
The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to optimise the weighted average cost of capital and tax efficiency subject to maintaining sufficient financial flexibility to undertake its investment plans.
The capital structure of the Group consists of Net Debtu (as detailed in note 26) and equity (comprising issued capital, reserves and retained earnings). As at 31 December 2018, the capital comprised US$1.2 billion (2017: US$1.2 billion).
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. The Group adopts a modular approach in developing its projects in order to minimise upfront capital expenditure and related funding requirements. The Group manages in detail its funding requirements on a 12 month rolling basis and maintains a five year forecast in order to identify medium-term funding needs.
The Group is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.
Significant accounting policies
Details of significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Categories of financial instruments
| 2018US$'000 | 2017(a) US$'000 |
Financial assets |
|
|
Financial assets at amortised cost |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents | 26,152 | 11,415 |
Trade receivables and contract assets | 13,389 | 9,297 |
Loans granted to an associate | 50,966 | - |
Other financial assets at amortised cost | 5,271 | - |
Other loans and receivables | - | 18,478 |
Financial assets at FVPL |
|
|
Guarantee fee receivable | 6,829 | - |
Listed equity securities | 590 | - |
Available-for-sale investments | - | 347 |
Financial liabilities |
|
|
Financial liabilities at amortised cost |
|
|
Trade and other payables | 58,343 | 53,695 |
Borrowings | 594,177 | 596,474 |
Derivative financial instruments | 12,366 | 49,684 |
Financial guarantee contract | 37,387 | 8,603 |
(a) Please refer to note 2.2 for the impact of adopting IFRS 9.
Financial risk management
The Group's activities expose it to interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, risk of change in the commodity prices, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group's overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the Group's financial performance.
Risk management is carried out by a central finance department and all key risk management decisions are approved by the Board of Directors. The Group identifies and evaluates financial risks in close cooperation with the Group's operating units. The Board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as guidance covering specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, gold price risk, credit risk and investment of excess liquidity.
Interest rate risk
The Group has borrowings with fixed rate, which are carried at amortised cost. They are therefore not subject to interest rate risk as defined in IFRS 7, since neither the carrying amount nor the future cash flows will fluctuate because of a change in market interest rates. The Group does not have borrowings with variable interest rates.
Foreign exchange risk
The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from fluctuations in currencies the Group transacts, primarily US Dollars, GB Pounds Sterling and Russian Roubles.
Exchange rate risks are mitigated to the extent considered necessary by the Board of Directors, through holding the relevant currencies. At present, the Group does not undertake any foreign currency transaction hedging.
The carrying amounts of the Group's foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at period end are set out below.
| Assets |
| Liabilities | ||
| 2018US$'000 | 2017US$'000 |
| 2018US$'000 | 2017US$'000 |
Russian Roubles | 66,285 | 40,101 |
| 54,757 | 55,740 |
US Dollars (a) | 4,652 | 3,101 |
| 5,886 | 3,768 |
GB Pounds Sterling | 1,905 | 2,560 |
| 1,033 | 3,173 |
EUR | 22 | - |
| 2,301 | 763 |
Other currencies | 159 | - |
| 312 | 313 |
(a) US Dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities in Group companies with Rouble functional currency.
The table set out below illustrates the Group's profit sensitivity to changes in exchange rates by 25% (2017: 25%), representing management's assessment of a reasonably possible change in foreign exchange currency rates. The analysis was applied to monetary assets and liabilities at the reporting dates denominated in respective currencies.
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Russian Rouble currency impact | 2,882 | 3,910 |
US Dollar currency impact | 309 | 167 |
GB Pounds Sterling currency impact | 218 | 153 |
EUR currency impact | 570 | 191 |
Other currencies | 38 | 78 |
Credit risk
The Group's principal financial assets are cash and cash equivalents, comprising current accounts, amounts held on deposit with financial institutions and investments in money market and liquidity funds. In the case of deposits and investments in money market and liquidity funds, the Group is exposed to a credit risk, which results from the non-performance of contractual agreements on the part of the contract party. The Group is also exposed to a credit risk in relation to the amounts guaranteed under the ICBC facility (note 14). The Group has loans advanced to its associate, IRC, with a carrying value at 31 December 2018 of US$51.0 million, net of expected credit losses (2017: US$nil).
The credit risk on liquid funds held in current accounts and available on demand is limited because the main counterparties are banks with high credit-ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies.
The Group's maximum exposure to credit risk is limited to the carrying amounts of the financial assets recorded in the consolidated financial statements and the outstanding principal and interest under the ICBC facility (note 14).
The major financial assets at the reporting date are cash and cash equivalents held with the counterparties as set out below.
Counterparty | Credit rating | Carrying amount at 31 December 2018US$'000 | Carrying amount at 31 December 2017US$'000 |
VTB | BB+ | 14,841 | 6,559 |
Citibank | AA- | 8,011 | - |
Raiffeisen Bank | BBB- | 872 | - |
AVANGARD | - | 764 | 1,436 |
Sberbank | BBB- | 598 | 914 |
Barclays | A | 337 | 660 |
Asian-Pacific Bank | CCC | 266 | 78 |
Bank of Cyprus | B- | 145 | 11 |
Alfa-Bank | BB+ | 3 | 7 |
UBS | A+ | - | 1,493 |
Commodity price risk
The Group generates most of its revenue from the sale of gold. The Group's policy is to sell its products at the prevailing market price. In 2018 and 2017, the Group has entered into gold forward contracts to protect cash flows from the volatility in the gold price (note 18).
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that suitable sources of funding for the Group's business activities may not be available. The Group constantly monitors the level of funding required to meet its short, medium and long-term obligations. The Group also monitors compliance with restrictive covenants set out in various loan agreements (note 20) to ensure there is no breach of covenants resulting in associated loans become payable immediately.
Effective management of liquidity risk has the objective of ensuring the availability of adequate funding to meet short-term requirements and due obligations as well as the objective of ensuring a sufficient level of flexibility in order to fund the development plans of the Group's businesses.
The table below details the Group's remaining contractual maturity for its non-derivative financial liabilities with agreed repayment periods. The amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash flows and so these balances will not necessarily agree with the amounts disclosed in the statement of financial position. The contractual maturity is based on the earliest date on which the Group may be required to pay.
|
| 0 - 3 monthsUS$'000 | 3 months - 1 yearUS$'000 |
1 - 2 yearsUS$'000 |
2 - 3 yearsUS$'000 |
3 - 6 years US$'000 |
2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Convertible bonds |
| - | - | 100,000 | - | - |
- Notes |
| - | - | - | - | 500,000 |
Future interest payments (a) |
| 2,250 | 47,375 | 42,875 | 40,625 | 40,625 |
Trade and other payables |
| 31,506 | 26,837 | - | - | - |
|
| 33,756 | 74,212 | 142,875 | 40,625 | 540,625 |
2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Convertible bonds |
| - | - | - | 100,000 | - |
- Notes |
| - | - | - | - | 500,000 |
- Loans |
| - | 4,006 | - | - | - |
Future interest payments (a) |
| 2,395 | 51,229 | 49,625 | 42,875 | 81,250 |
Trade and other payables |
| 30,438 | 23,257 | - | - | - |
|
| 32,833 | 78,492 | 49,625 | 142,875 | 581,250 |
(a) Future interest payments have been estimated using interest rates applicable at 31 December. There are no borrowings that are subject to variable interest rates and, therefore, subject to change in line with the market rates.
28. Operating lease arrangements
The Group as a Lessee
The Group incurred rental expense, primarily associated with rent of office premises and rent of mining fleet, as set out below.
| 2018US$'000 | 2017US$'000 |
Minimum lease payments under operating leases recognised as an expense in the year | 3,757 | 5,256 |
At the reporting date, the Group had outstanding commitments for future minimum lease payments under a non-cancellable operating lease for office premises and vehicles, which fall due as follows:
| 2018 | 2017 |
| US$'000 | US$'000 |
Expiring: |
|
|
Within one year | 929 | 369 |
In two to five years | 468 | 123 |
| 1,397 | 492 |
The Group as a Lessor
The Group earned property rental income during the year of US$0.7 million (2017: US$0.7million) on buildings owned by its subsidiary Irgiredmet.
29. Capital commitments
At 31 December 2018, the Group had entered into contractual commitments in relation to the acquisition of property, plant and equipment amounting to US$9.5 million (31 December 2017: US$19.1 million) including US$6.8 million in relation to POX Hub project (31 December 2017: US$17.6 million).
Investment agreement with the Russian Ministry of Far East Development
On 14 December 2015, the Group entered into an investment agreement with the Russian Ministry of Far East Development (the 'Investment Agreement'). The Investment Agreement involves provision of RUB5.5billion (an equivalent to c.US$79 million as at 31 December 2018) funding towards the construction of the electricity power line in the North-East of the Amur Region of Russia, where the Group's Albyn and Malomir mines and adjacent licence areas are operated, during the period from 2015 to 2019. The funds are passed through the Group to the joint-stock company Far East Grid Distribution Company ('DRSK'), which is required to engage a contractor to build the relevant power supply infrastructure. The Group's responsibility under the Investment Agreement will be to monitor the progress and to report to the Russian Ministry of Far East Development. The Group is taking ultimate responsibility for the construction of the power line. Upon completion, the Group will get access to the enhanced capacity of the power supply infrastructure in the region. Under the terms of the Investment Agreement, the Group has certain capital commitments, including further development of Albyn and Malomir mines.
During 2018, the Group did not receive and made no transfers of funds under the Investment Agreement (2017: the Group received an aggregate RUB1.8 billion (an equivalent to US$31.2 million) in funding and transferred these funds to DRSK).
30. Subsequent events
Refinancing of the ICBC Facility
Following the approval by the Company shareholders at a General Meeting held on 12 March 2019, to guarantee the obligations of K&S under the Gazprombank Facility, the refinancing of the ICBC Facility has been completed.
IRC entered into a new US$240 million facility with Gazprombank. In March 2019, IRC drew down an aggregate of US$228.9 million on the Gazprombank Facility that were used to repay the amounts outstanding under ICBC Facility of approximately US$169 million in full, the two loans provided by the Group in the equivalent of approximately US$57 million in full and to finance the K&S Project's working capital of approximately US$3 million. The remaining proceeds from the Gazprombank Facility are to be used to repay part of the guarantee fee of US$6 million owed by IRC to the Group in respect of the guarantee of the ICBC Facility with the remaining guarantee fee outstanding of approximately US$5 million payable no later than 31 March 2020. In April 2019, IRC has further drawn down US$4.5 million on the Gazprombank Facility.
A new guarantee was issued by the Group over part of the Gazprombank Facility, the guarantee mechanism is implemented through a series of five guarantees that fluctuate in value through the eight-year life of the loan, with the possibility of the initial US$160 million principal amounts guaranteed reducing to US$40 million within two to three years, subject to certain conditions being met. For the final two years of the Gazprombank Facility, the guaranteed amounts will increase to US$120 million to cover the final principal and interest repayments.
31. Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures (unaudited)
|
| 2018 US$'000 | 2017 (restated) US$'000 |
Profit for the period |
| 25,929 | 37,141 |
Add/(less): |
|
|
|
Investment income |
| (3,775) | (760) |
Interest expense |
| 29,520 | 25,905 |
Other finance gains |
| (13,905) | (2,199) |
Other finance losses |
| 32,354 | 28,470 |
Foreign exchange (gains)/losses |
| (8,450) | 746 |
Accrual for additional mining tax (a) |
| - | 19,852 |
Taxation |
| 56,489 | 11,804 |
Depreciation |
| 102,236 | 104,800 |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets and in-house service |
| (101,695) | - |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets |
| 12,192 | - |
Impairment/(reversal of impairment) of ore stockpiles |
| 18,021 | (4,702) |
Impairment of gold in circuit |
| 2,125 | 3,890 |
Impairment of non-trading loans |
| - | 629 |
Share of results of associates (b) |
| (8,065) | (28,744) |
Underlying EBITDA¨ |
| 142,976 | 196,832 |
(a) Amounts of mining tax for the six-month period to 31 December 2016, interest and penalties setlled by the Group in 2017 following unfavourable court decisions.
(b) Group's share of interest expense, investment income, other finance gains and losses, foreign exchange gains/losses, taxation, depreciation and impairment/reversal of impairment recognised by the associate and impairment recognised against investment in the associate (note 14).
32. Principal subsidiaries and other significant investments
The Group has the following principal subsidiaries and other significant investments, which were consolidated in this financial information.
Principal subsidiary, joint venture and associate undertakings | Country of incorporation | Principal activity | Proportion of shares held by Petropavlovsk PLC(a) |
| Proportion of shares held by the Group(a) |
| |||||||
31 December 2018 | 31 December 2017 |
| 31 December 2018 | 31 December 2017 |
| ||||||||
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
JSC Management Company Petropavlovsk | Russia | Management company | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
Petropavlovsk 2010 Limited | Jersey | Finance company | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
Petropavlovsk 2016 Limited | Jersey | Finance company | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
JSC Pokrovskiy mine | Russia | Gold exploration and production | 19.37% | 19.37% |
| 99.38% | 99.38% |
| |||||
LLC Malomirskiy Rudnik | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 99.94% | 99.94% |
| |||||
LLC Albynskiy Rudnik | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
LLC Osipkan | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
LLC Tokurskiy Rudnik | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
LLC Rudoperspektiva | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| - | 100% |
| |||||
LLC TEMI | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 75% | 75% |
| |||||
LLC AGPK | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 99.38% | 99.38% |
| |||||
LLC Perspektiva DV | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 99.94% | - |
| |||||
LLC Vostok Geologiya | Russia | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 99.94% | - |
| |||||
Universal Mining Inc. | Guyana | Gold exploration and production | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
LLC Kapstroi | Russia | Construction services | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
LLC NPGF Regis | Russia | Exploration services | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
CJSC ZRK Dalgeologiya | Russia | Exploration services | - | - |
| 99.38% | 99.38% |
| |||||
JSC PHM Engineering | Russia | Project and engineering services | - | - |
| 94% | 94% |
| |||||
JSC Irgiredmet | Russia | Research services | - | - |
| 99.69% | 99.69% |
| |||||
LLC NIC Gydrometallurgia | Russia | Research services | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
LLC BMRP | Russia | Repair and maintenance | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
LLC AVT-Amur | Russia | Production of explosive materials | - | - |
| 49% | 49% |
| |||||
LLC Transit | Russia | Transportation services | - | - |
| 100% | 100% |
| |||||
Pokrovskiy Mining College | Russia | Educational institute | - | - |
| 99.38% | 99.38% |
| |||||
Associate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
IRC Limited (b) | HK | Management and holding company | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
IRC and its principal subsidiary and joint venture undertakings ('IRC') |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
IRC Limited | HK | Management and holding company | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
Principal subsidiaries of IRC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
LLC Petropavlovsk-Iron Ore | Russia | Management company | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
LLC Olekminsky Rudnik | Russia | Iron ore exploration and production | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
LLC KS GOK | Russia | Iron ore exploration and production | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
LLC Garinsky Mining & Metallurgical Complex | Russia | Iron ore exploration and production | - | - |
| 30.97% | 30.97% |
| |||||
LLC Kostenginskiy GOK | Russia | Iron ore exploration and production | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
LLC Orlovsko-Sokhatinskiy Rudnik | Russia | Iron ore exploration and production | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
JSC Giproruda | Russia | Engineering services | - | - |
| 21.85% | 21.85% |
| |||||
LLC SHMTP | Russia | Infrastructure project | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
LLC Amursnab | Russia | Procurement services | - | - |
| 31.07% | 31.07% |
| |||||
Heilongjiang Jiatal Titanium Co., Limited | China | Titanium sponge project | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
LLC Uralmining | Russia | Iron ore exploration and production | - | - |
| 31.10% | 31.10% |
| |||||
LLC Gorniy Park | Russia | Molybdenym project | - | - |
| 18.75% | 18.75% |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Joint ventures of IRC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Heilongjiang Jianlong Vanadium Industries Co., Limited | China | Vanadium project | - | - |
| 14.31% | 14.31% |
|
(a) In the ordinary class of shares.
(b) IRC Limited and its principal subsidiary and joint venture undertakings.
33. Related undertakings of the Group
The Group consists of the parent company, Petropavlovsk PLC, incorporated in the United Kingdom and its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures. In accordance with Section 409 of the Companies Act 2006 a full list of related undertakings, the country of incorporation and the effective percentage of equity owned as at 31 December 2018 is disclosed below. The Group's principal subsidiaries and other significant investments are set out in note 32.
Name of undertaking |
| Country of incorporation | Proportion of shares held by the Group(a) | Registered address | ||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
| ||||
Eponymousco Limited |
| UK | 100% | 11 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HH |
| |||
Victoria Resources Limited |
| UK | 100% | 11 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HH |
| |||
Petropavlovsk Mining Treasury UK Limited |
| UK | 100% | 11 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HH |
| |||
Petropavlovsk Rouble Treasury Limited |
| UK | 100% | 11 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HH |
| |||
Petropavlovsk Dollar Treasury Limited |
| UK | 100% | 11 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HH |
| |||
Petropavlovsk 2010 Limited |
| Jersey | 100% | 13-14 Esplanade, St. Helier, JE1 1EE |
| |||
Petropavlovsk 2016 Limited |
| Jersey | 100% | 13-14 Esplanade, St. Helier, JE1 1EE |
| |||
Petropavlovsk Group Finance Limited |
| Guernsey | 100% | PO Box 409, Elizabeth House, Ruette Braye, St. Peter Port, GY1 3WA |
| |||
JSC Management Company Petropavlovsk |
| Russia | 100% | 675000, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Lenina Street, 140/1 |
| |||
JSC Pokrovskiy mine |
| Russia | 99.38% | 676150, Amur Region, Magdagachinskiy District, Tygda Village, Sovetskaya Street, 17 |
| |||
LLC Malomirskiy Rudnik |
| Russia | 99.94% | 675000, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Lenina Street, 140/1 |
| |||
LLC Albynskiy Rudnik |
| Russia | 100% | 675000, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Lenina Street, 140/1 |
| |||
LLC Osipkan |
| Russia | 100% | 675000, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Lenina Street, 140/1 |
| |||
LLC Tokurskiy Rudnik |
| Russia | 100% | 676581, Amur Region, Selemdzhinskiy District, Tokur Village, Vorozhejkina Street, 16 |
| |||
LLC TEMI |
| Russia | 75% | 675000, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Lenina Street, 140/1 |
| |||
LLC AGPK |
| Russia | 99.38% | 675000, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Lenina Street, 140/1 |
| |||
LLC Perspektiva DV |
| Russia | 99.94% | 680021, Khabarovskiy Region, Khabarovsk, Vladivostokskaya Street, 22, build.3, office 11 |
| |||
LLC Vostok Geologiya |
| Russia | 99.94% | 680021, Khabarovskiy Region, Khabarovsk, Vladivostokskaya Street, 22, build.3, office 9 |
| |||
LLC Kapstroi |
| Russia | 100% | 675002, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Amurskaya Street, 17 |
| |||
LLC NPGF Regis |
| Russia | 100% | 675027, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Western Industrial Hub |
| |||
CJSC ZRK Dalgeologiya |
| Russia | 99.38% | 680041, Khabarovskiy Region, Khabarovsk, Balashovskaya Street, 15 |
| |||
JSC PHM Engineering |
| Russia | 94% | 105082, Moscow, Rubtsov Pereulok, 13 |
| |||
JSC Irgiredmet |
| Russia | 99.69% | 664025, Irkutsk, Gagarina Boulevard, 38 |
| |||
LLC NIC Gydrometallurgia |
| Russia | 100% | 196247, St. Petersburg, Leninskiy Prospekt, 151 |
| |||
LLC BMRP |
| Russia | 100% | 675016, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Kalinina Street, 137 |
| |||
LLC AVT-Amur |
| Russia | 49% | 675000, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Lenina Street, 140/1 |
| |||
LLC Transit
|
| Russia
| 100% | 676572, Amur Region, Selemdzhinskiy District, Fevralsk Urban Village, Vysotskogo Street, 1 |
| |||
Pokrovskiy Mining College |
| Russia | 99.38% | 676244, Amur Region, Zeya, Zolotogorskoe Shosse, 6 |
| |||
Universal Mining Inc. |
| Guyana | 100% | Lot 8 Pere Street, Kitty, Georgetown |
| |||
Petropavlovsk (Cyprus) Limited |
| Cyprus | 100% | 14 Souliou Street, Aglantzia, Nicosia, 2102 |
| |||
Malomyrskiy Rudnik (Cyprus) Ltd |
| Cyprus | 100% | 14 Souliou Street, Aglantzia, Nicosia, 2102 |
| |||
Voltimand Limited |
| Cyprus | 100% | 14 Souliou Street, Aglantzia, Nicosia, 2102 |
| |||
Horatio Limited |
| Cyprus | 100% | 14 Souliou Street, Aglantzia, Nicosia, 2102 |
| |||
Sicinius Limited |
| Cyprus | 100% | 14 Souliou Street, Aglantzia, Nicosia, 2102 |
| |||
Syncrom High Corporation Ltd |
| Cyprus | 100% | 14 Souliou Street, Aglantzia, Nicosia, 2102 |
| |||
Cayiron Limited |
| Cayman Islands | 100% | Clifton House, 75 Fort Street, PO Box 1350, Grand Cayman, KY1-1108 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Associates |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
IRC Limited (b) |
| HK | 31.10% | 6H, 9 Queen's Road Central, Central, Hong Kong |
| |||
Subsidiaries of IRC |
|
|
|
|
| |||
LLC Petropavlovsk- Iron Ore |
| Russia | 31.10% | 127055, Moscow, Lesnaya Street, 43, Office 313 |
| |||
LLC Olekminsky Rudnik |
| Russia | 31.10% | 676253, Amur Region, Tyndinskiy District, Village Olekma |
| |||
LLC KS GOK |
| Russia | 31.10% | 679000, The Jewish Autonomous Region, Birobidzhan, 60-Letiya SSSR Street, Building 22B |
| |||
LLC Garinsky Mining & Metallurgical Complex |
| Russia | 30.97% | 675027, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Ignatievskaya Road, 19 |
| |||
LLC Kostenginskiy GOK |
| Russia | 31.10% | 679000, The Jewish Autonomous Region, Birobidzhan, 60-Letiya SSSR Street, Building 22B. |
| |||
LLC Orlovsko-Sokhatinskiy Rudnik |
| Russia | 31.10% | 675027, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Ignatievskaya Road, 19 |
| |||
JSC Giproruda |
| Russia | 21.85% | St. Petersburg, Leninskiy Prospect,151 |
| |||
LLC SHMTP | Russia | 31.10% | 682818, RF, Khabarovsk Territory, Town Sovetskaya Gavan, Pervomayskaya Street, 48A |
| ||||
LLC Amursnab |
| Russia | 31.07% | 127055, Moscow, Lesnaya Street, 43, Office 313 |
| |||
LLC Uralmining |
| Russia | 31.10% | 105082, Moscow, Spartakovskaya Square, 14, Building 1 |
| |||
LLC Gorniy Park |
| Russia | 18.75% | 101000, Moscow, Pokrovka Street,1/13/6 Building 2, Office 35 |
| |||
LLC Garinskaya Infrastructure |
| Russia | 31.10% | 675027, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, Ignatievskaya Road, 19 |
| |||
LLC TOK |
| Russia | 31.10% | 676282, Amur Region, Tynda, Sovetskaya Street,1A |
| |||
Lucilius Investments Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Kapucius Services Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Lapwing Limited |
| Cyprus | 30.97% | Themistokli Dervi 12, Palais D' Ivoire, 2nd Floor, 1066 Nicosia |
| |||
Russian Titan Company Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Brasenose Services Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Tenaviva Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Esimanor Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Metellus Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Dardanius Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.09% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Rumier Holdings Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Guiner Enterprises Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Expokom Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Arfin Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Caedmon Limited |
| Cyprus | 18.75% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Thorholdco (Cyprus) Limited |
| Cyprus | 31.10% | Souliou 14, Aglantzia, 2102 Nicosia |
| |||
Heilongjiang Jiatal Titanium Co., Limited |
| China | 31.10% | 668, Songxing Street, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang Province |
| |||
Ariti HK Limited |
| Hong Kong | 31.10% | 6H, 9 Queen's Road Central, Central, Hong Kong |
| |||
Ariva HK Limited |
| Hong Kong | 31.10% | 6H, 9 Queen's Road Central, Central, Hong Kong |
| |||
Thorrouble Limited
|
| Cayman Islands | 31.10% | P.O. Box 31119 Grand Pavilion, Hibiscus Way, 802 West Bay Road, Grand Cayman, KY1-1205 |
| |||
Thordollar Limited
|
| Cayman Islands | 31.10% | P.O. Box 31119 Grand Pavilion, Hibiscus Way, 802 West Bay Road, Grand Cayman, KY1-1205 |
| |||
Thorholdco Limited
|
| Cayman Islands | 31.10% | P.O. Box 31119 Grand Pavilion, Hibiscus Way, 802 West Bay Road, Grand Cayman, KY1-1205 |
| |||
Aricom UK Limited |
| UK | 31.10% | 11 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HH |
| |||
Aricom Limited |
| UK | 31.10% | 11 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HH |
| |||
Joint ventures of IRC |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Heilongjiang Jianlong Vanadium Industries Co., Limited |
| China | 14.31% | Building 50, Block12, Advanced Business Park, No. 188.West Road, South Ring 4, Fengtai District, Bejing |
| |||
(a) In the ordinary class of shares.
(b) IRC Limited and its principal subsidiary and joint venture undertakings.
The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)
Throughout this Press Release, when discussing the Group's financial performance, reference is made to APMs.
Each of the APMs is defined and calculated by the Group and as such they are non-IFRS measures because they may include or exclude certain items that an IFRS measure ordinarily would or would not take into account. APMs should not be regarded as an alternative or substitute for the equivalent measures calculated and presented in accordance with IFRS but instead should be seen as additional information provided to investors to enable the comparison of information between different reporting periods of the Group.
Although the APMs used by the Group may be calculated in a different manner and defined differently by other peers in the precious metals mining sector (despite being similar in title), they are nonetheless relevant and commonly used measures for the industry in which Petropavlovsk operates. These and similar measures are used widely by certain investors, analysts and other interested parties as supplemental measures of financial performance.
Some of the APMs form part of the Group's Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), which are used to monitor progress and performance against strategic objectives and to benchmark the performance of the business each year.
A discussion of the relevance of each APM as well as a description of how they are calculated is set out below, with reconciliation to IFRS equivalents from the consolidated IFRS financial statements (Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss (SPL), Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (SFP), Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (SCF) and the notes to the consolidated IFRS financial statements).
Total Cash Costs (TCC)
Definition
The total cash cost per ounce is the cost of producing and selling an ounce of gold from the Group's four hard-rock operations.
Calculation
TCC are calculated by the Group as operating cash costs less co-product revenue and cost of flotation concentrate. TCC per oz are calculated as total cash costs divided by the ounces of gold sold. TCC per oz are presented on a segment basis.
Operating cash costs are defined by the Group as operating cash expenses plus refinery and transportation costs, other taxes, mining tax and the amortisation of deferred stripping costs. This also equates to the Group's segment result as reported under IFRS plus each segment's share of results of associates, loss/gain on disposal of subsidiaries, impairment of ore stockpiles and gold in circuit, impairment of exploration and evaluation assets, impairment of mining assets, impairment of non-trading loans, central administration expenses, depreciation and accrual for additional mining tax minus each segment's revenue from external customers. Operating cash costs are presented on a segment basis.
Operating cash expenses are defined by the Group as the total of staff costs, materials, fuel, electricity, other external services, other operating expenses, and the movement in ore stockpiles, work in progress and bullion in process attributable to gold production (excluding deferred stripping costs). The main cost drivers affecting operating cash expenses are stripping ratios, production volumes of ore mined / processed, recovery rates, cost inflation and fluctuations in the rouble to US dollar exchange rate.
Other companies may calculate this measure differently.
Relevance
The Group closely monitors its current and projected costs to track and benchmark the ongoing efficiency and effectiveness of its operations. This monitoring includes analysing fluctuations in the components that operating cash costs and cost per tonne mined and processed to identify where and how efficiencies may be made.
Reconciliation
The tables below provide a reconciliation between operating expenses and total cash costs to calculate the cash cost per ounce sold for relevant periods.
2018 | Ref |
Pioneer |
Pokrovskiy |
Malomir |
Albyn | Corporate and other |
Total |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Operating expenses | SPL |
|
|
|
|
| 388,643 |
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gains | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 8,450 |
Depreciation | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (102,236) |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 101,695 |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(12,192) |
Impairment of ore stockpiles | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (18,021) |
Impairment of gold in circuit | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (2,125) |
Central administration expenses | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (39,195) |
Operating cash costs | note 4 | 108,466 | 8,667 | 63,913 | 112,687 | 31,286 | 325,019 |
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segment | note 4 |
|
|
|
| (31,286) | (31,286) |
Deduct: silver revenue | note 4 | (591) | (29) | (61) | (160) | - | (841) |
Deduct: cost of flotation concentrate | note 4 | - | - | (2,558) | - | - | (2,558) |
Total Сash Сosts |
| 107,875 | 8,638 | 61,294 | 112,527 | - | 290,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ounces sold | oz | 135,001 | 6,442 | 77,448 | 150,720 |
| 369,611 |
Total Сash Сost per ounce sold | US$/oz | 799 | 1,341 | 791 | 747 |
| 786 |
2017
| Ref |
Pioneer |
Pokrovskiy |
Malomir |
Albyn | Corporate and other |
Total |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Operating expenses | SPL |
|
|
|
|
| 522,267 |
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange losses | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (746) |
Accrual for additional mining tax | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (19,852) |
Depreciation | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (104,800) |
Reversal of impairment of ore stockpiles | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 4,702 |
Impairment of gold in circuit | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (3,890) |
Impairment of non-trading loans | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (629) |
Central administration expenses | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (39,944) |
Operating cash costs | note 4 | 127,657 | 39,988 | 61,079 | 98,354 | 30,030 | 357,108 |
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segment | note 4 |
|
|
|
| (30,030) | (30,030) |
Deduct: silver revenue | note 4 | (743) | (121) | (42) | (185) | - | (1,091) |
Total Сash Сosts |
| 126,914 | 39,867 | 61,037 | 98,169 | - | 325,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ounces sold | oz | 160,421 | 32,250 | 65,678 | 181,485 |
| 439,834 |
Total Сash Сost per ounce sold | US$/oz | 791 | 1,236 | 929 | 541 |
| 741 |
All in Sustaining Costs (AISC)
Definition
AISC includes both operating and capital costs required to sustain gold production on an ongoing basis, over and above the direct mining and selling costs shown by TCC.
Calculation
AISC are calculated by the Group as TCC plus/(minus) impairment/(reversal of impairment) of ore stockpiles and gold in circuit, central administration expenses, plus capitalised stripping at end of the period, minus capitalised stripping at beginning of the period, plus close-down and site restoration and sustaining capital and exploration expenditure. This is then divided by the ounces of gold sold. AISC are presented on a segment basis.
AISC are calculated in accordance with guidelines for reporting AISC as published by the World Gold Council in June 2013. Other companies may calculate this measure differently.
Relevance
AISC allows for a better understanding of the true cost of producing gold once key components such as central admin costs and the cost of sustaining capital and exploration expenditure are taken into account. Management uses this measure to monitor the performance of our assets and their ability to generate positive cash flows.
Reconciliation
The tables below provide a reconciliation between total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs to calculate all-in sustaining cost per ounce sold for relevant periods.
2018 | Ref |
Pioneer |
Pokrovskiy |
Malomir |
Albyn | Corporate and other |
Total |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Total cash costs |
| 107,875 | 8,638 | 61,294 | 112,527 | - | 290,334 |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of ore stockpiles | note 6 | - | - | 309 | 17,712 | - | 18,021 |
Impairment of gold in circuit | note 6 | 1,415 | 17 | 536 | 157 | - | 2,125 |
Central administration expenses | note 6 | 14,316 | 683 | 8,214 | 15,982 | - | 39,195 |
Net capitalised stripping | note 15 | 21,970 | - | 895 | (15,644) | - | 7,221 |
Site restoration costs |
| 172 | - | 559 | 511 | - | 1,242 |
Sustaining exploration expenditures |
| 8,902 | - | 5,502 | 4,079 | - | 18,483 |
Sustaining Capital Expenditures |
| 20,003 | - | 4,612 | 11,471 | - | 36,085 |
All-in Sustaining Costs |
| 174,653 | 9,338 | 81,921 | 146,795 | - | 412,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ounces sold | oz | 135,001 | 6,442 | 77,448 | 150,720 | - | 369,611 |
All-in Sustaining Costs per ounce sold | US$/oz | 1,294 | 1,449 | 1,058 | 974 | - | 1,117 |
2017 | Ref |
Pioneer |
Pokrovskiy |
Malomir |
Albyn | Corporate and other |
Total |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Total cash costs |
| 126,914 | 39,867 | 61,037 | 98,169 | - | 325,987 |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Reversal of impairment)/ impairment of ore stockpiles | note 6 | (1,347) | 175 | 304 | (1,592) | - | (2,460) |
Impairment of gold in circuit | note 6 | 2,594 | 733 | 563 | - | - | 3,890 |
Central administration expenses | note 6 | 14,569 | 2,929 | 5,965 | 16,481 | - | 39,944 |
Net capitalised stripping | note 15 | 917 | - | 7,024 | 5,639 | - | 13,580 |
Site restoration costs |
| 101 | 201 | 327 | 868 | - | 1,497 |
Sustaining exploration expenditures |
| 5,993 | 37 | 3,789 | 6,318 | - | 16,137 |
Sustaining Capital Expenditures |
| 15,351 | 159 | 4,929 | 4,510 | - | 24,949 |
All-in Sustaining Costs |
| 165,092 | 44,101 | 83,938 | 130,393 | - | 423,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ounces sold | oz | 160,421 | 32,250 | 65,678 | 181,485 | - | 439,834 |
All-in Sustaining Costs per ounce sold | US$/oz | 1,029 | 1,367 | 1,278 | 718 | - | 963 |
All in Costs (AIC)
Definition
AIC comprises of AISC as well as capital expenditures for major growth projects or enhancement capital for significant improvements at existing operations.
Calculation
AIC are calculated by the Group as AISC plus non-sustaining exploration and capital expenditure and (reversal of impairment)/impairment of refractory ore stockpiles. This is then divided by the ounces of gold sold. AIC are presented on a segment basis.
AIC is calculated in accordance with guidelines for reporting AIC as published by the World Gold Council in June 2013. Other companies may calculate this measure differently.
Relevance
AIC reflect the costs of producing gold over the life-cycle of a mine.
Reconciliation
The tables below provide a reconciliation between all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs to calculate all-in cost per ounce sold for relevant periods.
2018 | Ref |
Pioneer |
Pokrovskiy |
Malomir |
Albyn | Corporate and other |
Total |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
All-in Sustaining Costs |
| 174,653 | 9,338 | 81,921 | 146,795 | - | 412,707 |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration expenditure |
| 1,092 | - | 1,084 | 971 | - | 3,147 |
Capital Expenditure |
| 22,740 | - | 53,910 | - | - | 76,650 |
All-in costs |
| 198,485 | 9,338 | 136,915 | 147,766 | - | 492,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ounces sold | oz | 135,001 | 6,442 | 77,448 | 150,720 | - | 369,611 |
All-in costs per ounce sold | US$/oz | 1,470 | 1,449 | 1,768 | 980 | - | 1,332 |
2017 | Ref |
Pioneer |
Pokrovskiy |
Malomir |
Albyn | Corporate and other |
Total |
|
| US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
All-in Sustaining Costs |
| 165,092 | 44,101 | 83,938 | 130,393 | - | 423,524 |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of impairment of ore stockpiles | note 6 | (2,242) | - | - | - | - | (2,242) |
Exploration expenditure |
| 5,592 | - | 44 | 127 | - | 5,763 |
Capital Expenditure |
| 18,237 | - | 22,972 | - | - | 41,209 |
All-in costs |
| 186,679 | 44,101 | 106,954 | 130,520 | - | 468,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ounces sold | oz | 160,421 | 32,250 | 65,678 | 181,485 | - | 439,834 |
All-in costs per ounce sold | US$/oz | 1,164 | 1,367 | 1,628 | 719 | - | 1,065 |
Average Realised Gold Sales Price
Definition
The average realised gold sales price is the mean price at which the Group sold its gold production output throughout the reporting period, including the realised effect of cash flow hedge contracts during the period.
Calculation
The average realised gold sales price is calculated by dividing total revenue received from gold sales (including the realised effect of any hedging contracts) by the total quantity of gold sold during the period. Other companies may calculate this measure differently.
Relevance
As gold is the key commodity produced and sold by the Group, the average realised gold sales price is a key driver behind the Group's revenues and profitability.
Reconciliation
The average realised gold price has been calculated as set out in the table below.
| Ref |
| 2018 | 2017 |
Gold revenue | note 4 | US$'000 | 466,674 | 555,092 |
Gold sold |
| ounces | 369,611 | 439,834 |
Average realised gold price |
| US$/oz | 1,263 | 1,262 |
Capital Expenditure (CAPEX)
Definition
CAPEX is the investment required by the Group to explore and develop its gold assets and keep current plants and other equipment at its gold mines in good working order.
Calculation
CAPEX represents cash flows used in investing activities, namely Purchases of property, plant and equipment and Expenditure of exploration and evaluation assets.
Relevance
Capital expenditure is necessary in order not only to maintain but also to develop and grow the business. Capex requirements need to be balanced in line with the Group's strategy and provide an optimal allocation of the Group's funds.
Reconciliation
The table below provides a reconciliation between capital expenditure and cash flows used in investing activities.
|
| Ref |
| 31 December 2018 US$'000 | 31 December 2017 US$'000 |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
| SCF |
| 131,213 | 82,295 |
Expenditure on exploration and evaluation assets |
|
SCF |
| 3,153 | 5,763 |
Total Capital Expenditure |
|
|
| 134,366 | 88,058 |
Net Debt
Definition
Net Debt shows how indebted a company is after total debt and any cash (or its equivalent) are netted off against each other.
Calculation
Net Debt is calculated as the sum of current borrowings and non-current borrowings less cash and cash equivalents. Other companies may calculate this measure differently.
Relevance
Management considers Net Debt a key measure of the Company's leverage and its ability to repay debt as well showing what progress is being made in strengthening the statement of financial position. The measure is also widely used by various stakeholders.
Reconciliation
The table below provides calculation of net debt at relevant reporting dates.
| Ref | 31 December 2018 US$'000 | 31 December 2017 US$'000 |
Cash and cash equivalents | SFP | 26,152 | 11,415 |
Borrowings | SFP | (594,177) | (596,474) |
Net debt |
| (568,025) | (585,059) |
Underlying EBITDA
Definition
EBITDA is a common measure used to assess profitability without the impact of different financing methods, tax, asset depreciation and amortisation of intangibles and items of an exceptional / non-recurring nature, or those that could make comparison of results from prior periods less meaningful.
Calculation
Underlying EBITDA is calculated as profit/(loss) for the period before financial income, financial expenses, foreign exchange gains and losses, fair value changes, taxation, depreciation, impairment charges and accrual for additional mining tax. Other companies may calculate this measure differently.
Relevance
Underlying EBITDA is an indicator of the Group's ability to generate operating cash flows, which are the source of funding for the Group's working capital requirements, capital expenditure and debt service obligations. The measure is also widely used by various stakeholders.
Reconciliation
The tables below provide reconciliations between net profit and Underlying EBITDA as well as reconciliation between operating profit and Underlying EBITDA for relevant periods.
| Ref | 2018 US$'000 | 2017 (restated) US$'000 |
Profit for the period | SPL | 25,929 | 37,141 |
Add/(less): |
|
|
|
Investment income | SPL | (3,775) | (760) |
Interest expense | SPL | 29,520 | 25,905 |
Other finance gains | SPL | (13,905) | (2,199) |
Other finance losses | SPL | 32,354 | 28,470 |
Foreign exchange (gains)/losses | note 6 | (8,450) | 746 |
Accrual for additional mining tax | note 6 | - | 19,852 |
Taxation | SPL | 56,489 | 11,804 |
Depreciation | note 6 | 102,236 | 104,800 |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | note 6 | 12,192 | - |
Impairment/(reversal of impairment) of ore stockpiles | note 6 | 18,021 | (4,702) |
Impairment of gold in circuit | note 6 | 2,125 | 3,890 |
Impairment of non-trading loans | note 6 | - | 629 |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets | note 6 | (101,695) | - |
Share of results of associates (a) | note 14 | (8,065) | (28,744) |
Underlying EBITDA |
| 142,976 | 196,832 |
(a) Group's share of interest expense, investment income, other finance gains and losses, foreign exchange gains and losses, taxation, depreciation and impairment/reversal of impairment recognised by an associate and impairment recognised against investment in the associate.
2018 |
|
Pioneer |
Pokrovskiy |
Malomir |
Albyn | Corporate and other | Consolidated |
| Ref | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Operating profit | SPL |
|
|
|
|
| 126,612 |
Foreign exchange gains | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| (8,450) |
Segment result | note 4 | 24,751 | (1,163) | 84,913 | 17,312 | (7,651) | 118,162 |
Add/ (less): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation | notes 4,6 | 36,982 | 681 | 22,701 | 41,427 | 445 | 102,236 |
Reversal of impairment of mining assets | notes 4,6 | - | - | (82,958) | - | (18,737) | (101,695) |
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets | notes 4,6 | - | - | 12,192 | - | - | 12,192 |
Impairment of ore stockpiles | notes 4,6 | - | - | 309 | 17,712 | - | 18,021 |
Impairment of gold in circuit | notes 4,6 | 1,415 | 17 | 536 | 157 | - | 2,125 |
Share of results of associates (a) | note 14 |
|
|
|
| (8,065) | (8,065) |
Underlying EBITDA |
| 63,148 | (465) | 37,693 | 76,608 | (34,008) | 142,976 |
2017 (restated) |
|
Pioneer |
Pokrovskiy |
Malomir |
Albyn | Corporate and other | Consolidated |
| Ref | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 |
Operating profit | SPL |
|
|
|
|
| 100,361 |
Foreign exchange losses | note 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 746 |
Segment result | note 4 | 33,794 | (9,455) | 1,455 | 79,686 | (4,373) | 101,107 |
Add/ (less): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for additional mining tax | notes 4,6 | 6,511 | 2,255 | 2,780 | 8,306 | - | 19,852 |
Depreciation | notes 4,6 | 36,168 | 7,112 | 16,959 | 44,346 | 215 | 104,800 |
(Reversal of impairment) / impairment of ore stockpiles |
notes 4,6 |
(3,589) |
175 |
304 |
(1,592) | - |
(4,702) |
Impairment of gold in circuit | notes 4,6 | 2,594 | 733 | 563 | - | - | 3,890 |
Impairment of non-trading loans | notes 4,6 | - | - | - | - | 629 | 629 |
Share of results of associates (a) | note 14 |
|
|
|
| (28,744) | (28,744) |
Underlying EBITDA |
| 75,478 | 820 | 22,061 | 130,746 | (32,273) | 196,832 |
(b) Group's share of interest expense, investment income, other finance gains and losses, foreign exchange gains and losses, taxation, depreciation and impairment/reversal of impairment recognised by an associate and impairment recognised against investment in the associate.
Reserve and Resources Update
Petropavlovsk reports its Resources and Ore Reserves in accordance with the JORC Code. As at 31 December 2018, Group Mineral Resources amounted to 20.52Moz (2017: 20.86Moz), including Reserves of 8.21Moz (2017: 8.15Moz).
The marginal decrease in total Mineral Resources results from a combination of mine depletion (0.49Moz), the disposal of non-core satellite assets (0.30Moz) and the sterilisation of a part of the Pokrovskiy open pit resource by the development of a POX tailings facility (0.12Moz). The decrease has been more than compensated for through discoveries at Pioneer, Albyn and Malomir leading to a gross 0.45Moz increase in Mineral Resources over the year at these mines. Ore Reserves increased by 0.56Moz to a total of 8.21Moz.
At Pioneer, new resources and reserve zones were discovered at Katrin (non-refractory), Nikolaevskaya and Ulunginskaya (both refractory). The deposits appear suitable for both open pit mining (Katrin and Ulunginskaya) and underground mining (Nikolaevskaya).
At Albyn, an increase in resources is associated with discoveries along the western extension of the Albyn ore body. These extensions occur in a down dip direction which allows for an initial Resource estimation for potential underground mining at Albyn. During 2018, results of exploration completed in H2 2017 at the south group of mineralised zones at Unglichikanskoye were reinterpreted and included in Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimates. This resulted in a 101koz increase in Mineral Resources and a 42koz increase in Ore Reserves for the project.
At Malomir, an increase in both Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves relates to the successful exploration of low-grade stock work mineralisation discovered at Quartzitovoye. The mineralisation was discovered west of the main Quartzitovoe pit, an area currently sterilised by the underground operations. It can be mined via open pit after 2023 once the mining at the Quartzitovoye underground mine is completed and the mine is decommissioned. In addition, metallurgical tests confirmed that existing resin-in-pulp (RIP) tailings contained 0.17Moz of gold at 0.5g/t average grade and this material can be re-processed via flotation and POX. Consequently, these additions have now been included into Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve statements. All these additions are refractory.
Total Reserves for underground mining marginally increased from 0.43Moz to 0.44Moz, whilst underlying Mineral Resources for potential underground mining increased by 26% from 0.94Moz to 1.19Moz. This increase is largely attributable to new Mineral Resources estimated at Pioneer's Nikolaevskaya Zone and below the Albyn main pit. Because the existing open pit at Pokrovka 1 has now been decommissioned and used as POX tailings storage further open pit mining in this area is no longer feasible. A higher-grade part of Mineral Resources remaining below this open pit was re-classified and reported as a Resource for potential underground mining. This change contributed to the overall increase in underground Mineral Resources.
Following successful commissioning of the Pokrovskiy POX Hub, some of the transitional Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves suitable for either RIP or refractory processing, were reclassified from non-refractory to refractory. Due to this change and due to the success of the 2018 exploration campaign, total refractory Resources increased by 2.69Moz to 12.33Moz (from 9.64Moz). There was a corresponding decrease in the non-refractory Mineral Resources which declined from 11.23Moz to 8.19Moz. This change also reflects mine depletion and disposals. All the ounces disposed of were non-refractory. As the result of this re-classification, first refractory Reserve and Resources were classified at Elginskoye within the Albyn project.
The tables below provide a summary and an asset-by-asset breakdown of Group Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.
Group Total Ore Reserves as at 31/12/2018 (in accordance with the JORC Code 2012(1)) | |||||||||
Category | Non Refractory | Refractory | Total | ||||||
Tonnage(kt) | Grade | Metal(Moz) | Tonnage(kt) | Grade | Metal(Moz) | Tonnage(kt) | Grade | Metal(Moz) | |
(g/t Au) | (g/t Au) | (g/t Au) | |||||||
Total Open Pit and Underground Ore Reserve | |||||||||
Proven | 17,943 | 0.69 | 0.40 | 31,417 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 49,360 | 0.77 | 1.23 |
Probable | 64,572 | 1.21 | 2.50 | 146,426 | 0.95 | 4.48 | 210,999 | 1.03 | 6.98 |
Total (P+P) | 82,516 | 1.09 | 2.90 | 177,843 | 0.93 | 5.31 | 260,359 | 0.98 | 8.21 |
Open Pit Ore Reserve | |||||||||
Proven | 17,616 | 0.57 | 0.32 | 31,417 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 49,033 | 0.73 | 1.15 |
Probable | 63,193 | 1.13 | 2.29 | 145,774 | 0.92 | 4.32 | 208,967 | 0.98 | 6.61 |
Total (P+P) | 80,809 | 1.01 | 2.61 | 177,191 | 0.90 | 5.15 | 258,000 | 0.94 | 7.76 |
Underground Reserve | |||||||||
Proven | 327 | 7.21 | 0.08 | - | - | - | 327 | 7.21 | 0.08 |
Probable | 1,379 | 4.68 | 0.21 | 652 | 7.60 | 0.16 | 2,031 | 5.62 | 0.37 |
Total (P+P) | 1,707 | 5.16 | 0.28 | 652 | 7.60 | 0.16 | 2,359 | 5.84 | 0.44 |
Note: Figures may not add up due to rounding |
Group Mineral Resources as at 31/12/2018 (in accordance with the JORC Code 2012(1)) | |||||||||
Category | Non-Refractory | Refractory | Total | ||||||
Tonnage (kt) | Grade (g/t Au) | Metal (Moz) | Tonnage (kt) | Grade (g/t Au) | Metal (Moz) | Tonnage (kt) | Grade (g/t Au) | Metal (Moz) | |
Total Open Pit and Underground Mineral Resource | |||||||||
Measured | 33,735 | 0.96 | 1.04 | 36,043 | 0.82 | 0.95 | 69,778 | 0.89 | 1.99 |
Indicated | 144,365 | 1.03 | 4.80 | 273,370 | 0.83 | 7.25 | 417,735 | 0.90 | 12.06 |
Sub-total (M+I) | 178,099 | 1.02 | 5.84 | 309,414 | 0.82 | 8.20 | 487,513 | 0.90 | 14.05 |
Inferred | 58,154 | 1.25 | 2.34 | 178,034 | 0.72 | 4.13 | 236,188 | 0.85 | 6.47 |
Open Pit Mineral Resource | |||||||||
Measured | 32,481 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 36,043 | 0.82 | 0.95 | 68,525 | 0.81 | 1.79 |
Indicated | 141,080 | 0.97 | 4.41 | 272,044 | 0.80 | 7.03 | 413,124 | 0.86 | 11.44 |
Sub-total (M+I) | 173,561 | 0.94 | 5.25 | 308,088 | 0.81 | 7.98 | 481,649 | 0.85 | 13.24 |
Inferred | 54,822 | 1.15 | 2.04 | 177,248 | 0.71 | 4.06 | 232,070 | 0.82 | 6.09 |
Underground Mineral Resource | |||||||||
Measured | 1,253 | 4.93 | 0.20 | - | - | - | 1,253 | 4.93 | 0.20 |
Indicated | 3,285 | 3.70 | 0.39 | 1,326 | 5.21 | 0.22 | 4,611 | 4.13 | 0.61 |
Sub-total (M+I) | 4,538 | 4.04 | 0.59 | 1,326 | 5.21 | 0.22 | 5,864 | 4.30 | 0.81 |
Inferred | 3,332 | 2.89 | 0.31 | 786 | 2.68 | 0.07 | 4,118 | 2.85 | 0.38 |
Note: Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Ore Reserves. Figures may not add up due to rounding |
Asset-by-Asset Breakdown of Ore Reserves
Summary of Ore Reserves by Asset as at 31/12/2018 (in accordance with JORC Code 2012(1)) | ||||||||||
|
| Non Refractory | Refractory | Total | ||||||
| Category | Tonnage (kt) | Grade(g/t Au) | Gold(Moz Au) | Tonnage (kt) | Grade(g/t Au) | Gold(Moz Au) | Tonnage (kt) | Grade(g/t Au) | Gold(Moz Au) |
Pioneer Open Pit | Proven | 8,946 | 0.44 | 0.13 | 12,208 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 21,154 | 0.64 | 0.44 |
Probable | 13,654 | 0.84 | 0.37 | 66,647 | 0.79 | 1.69 | 80,301 | 0.80 | 2.06 | |
Total(P+P) | 22,600 | 0.68 | 0.49 | 78,854 | 0.79 | 2.00 | 101,454 | 0.77 | 2.50 | |
Pioneer U/ground | Proven | 152 | 5.03 | 0.02 | - | - | - | 152 | 5.03 | 0.02 |
Probable | 1,027 | 4.75 | 0.16 | 652 | 7.60 | 0.16 | 1,679 | 5.86 | 0.32 | |
Total(P+P) | 1,179 | 4.78 | 0.18 | 652 | 7.60 | 0.16 | 1,831 | 5.79 | 0.34 | |
Pioneer Total | Proven | 9,098 | 0.51 | 0.15 | 12,208 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 21,305 | 0.67 | 0.46 |
Probable | 14,681 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 67,299 | 0.86 | 1.85 | 81,980 | 0.90 | 2.37 | |
Total(P+P) | 23,779 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 79,506 | 0.85 | 2.16 | 103,285 | 0.85 | 2.84 | |
Malomir Open Pit | Proven | 126 | 1.00 | 0.004 | 19,210 | 0.84 | 0.52 | 19,335 | 0.84 | 0.52 |
Probable | 618 | 1.37 | 0.03 | 68,434 | 1.00 | 2.20 | 69,051 | 1.00 | 2.23 | |
Total(P+P) | 743 | 1.31 | 0.03 | 87,643 | 0.97 | 2.72 | 88,386 | 0.97 | 2.75 | |
Malomir U/ground | Proven | 176 | 9.09 | 0.05 | - | - | - | 176 | 9.09 | 0.05 |
Probable | 352 | 4.48 | 0.05 | - | - | - | 352 | 4.48 | 0.05 | |
Total(P+P) | 528 | 6.01 | 0.10 | - | - | - | 528 | 6.01 | 0.10 | |
Malomir Total | Proven | 301 | 5.72 | 0.05 | 19,210 | 0.84 | 0.52 | 19,511 | 0.92 | 0.58 |
Probable | 970 | 2.50 | 0.08 | 68,434 | 1.00 | 2.20 | 69,403 | 1.02 | 2.28 | |
Total(P+P) | 1,271 | 3.26 | 0.13 | 87,643 | 0.97 | 2.72 | 88,914 | 1.00 | 2.86 | |
Albyn | Proven | 6,516 | 0.45 | 0.09 | - | - | - | 6,516 | 0.45 | 0.09 |
Probable | 46,726 | 1.20 | 1.80 | 10,694 | 1.23 | 0.42 | 57,420 | 1.20 | 2.22 | |
Total(P+P) | 53,243 | 1.11 | 1.89 | 10,694 | 1.23 | 0.42 | 63,936 | 1.13 | 2.32 | |
Tokur | Proven | 2,028 | 1.47 | 0.10 | - | - | - | 2,028 | 1.47 | 0.10 |
Probable | 2,195 | 1.44 | 0.10 | - | - | - | 2,195 | 1.44 | 0.10 | |
Total(P+P) | 4,223 | 1.45 | 0.20 | - | - | - | 4,223 | 1.45 | 0.20 |
Notes:
(1) Group Ore Reserves statements are prepared internally as an update of the April 2017 WAI estimate; Pioneer, Malomir and Albyn Reserves were prepared in February 2019 in accordance with JORC Code 2012; Tokur Reserves were prepared in 2010 in accordance with JORC Code 2004 and there have been no changes to the Tokur estimates since that date
(2) Pioneer, Malomir and Albyn Ore Reserves for open pit extraction are estimated within economical pit shells using a $1,200/oz gold price assumption and applying other modifying factors based on the projected performance of these operating mines. Tokur Reserves have been based on a $1,000/oz gold price assumption, together with operating costs assumptions relevant at the time of the estimate
(3) The Open Pit Reserve cut-off grade for reporting varies from 0.3 to 0.5g/t Au, depending on the asset and processing method
(4) Underground Ore Reserve estimates use a mine design with decline access, trackless mining equipment and a sublevel open stope mining method with or without back fill
(5) Reserve figures have been adjusted for anticipated dilution and mine recovery
(6) The Underground Reserve cut-off grade for reporting is 1.5g/t Au for Pioneer and 1.7g/t Au for Malomir
(7) In accordance with JORC Code, all open pit and underground designs have been based on Measured and Indicated Resources In addition to the Proven and Probable Reserves quoted above, the design captures the following Inferred Resource:
- Pioneer: 1,281kt @1.04g/t (0.04Moz) of non-refractory and 8,600kt @ 0.61g/t (0.17Moz) of refractory
- Malomir: 277kt @ 3.00g/t (0.03Moz) of non-refractory and 2,644kt @ 0.96g/t (0.08Moz) of refractory
- Albyn 1,921 @ 1.38g/t (0.09Moz) of non-refractory and 348kt @ 1.08g/t (0.01Moz) of refractory
(8) Figures may not add up due to rounding
Asset-by-Asset Breakdown of Mineral Resources
Summary of Mineral Resources by Asset as at 31/12/2018 (in accordance with JORC Code 2012(2)) | ||||||||||
|
| Non-Refractory | Refractory | Total | ||||||
| Category | Tonnage (kt) | Grade(g/t Au) | Gold(Moz Au) | Tonnage (kt) | Grade(g/t Au) | Gold(Moz Au) | Tonnage (kt) | Grade(g/t Au) | Gold(Moz Au) |
Pokrovskiy Open Pit | Measured | 4,182 | 0.70 | 0.09 | - | - | - | 4,182 | 0.70 | 0.09 |
Indicated | 19,954 | 0.62 | 0.40 | - | - | - | 19,954 | 0.62 | 0.40 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 24,136 | 0.63 | 0.49 | - | - | - | 24,136 | 0.63 | 0.49 | |
Inferred | 5,872 | 0.88 | 0.17 | - | - | - | 5,872 | 0.88 | 0.17 | |
Pokrovskiy Underground | Measured | 827 | 3.20 | 0.09 | - | - | - | 827 | 3.20 | 0.09 |
Indicated | 1,196 | 2.45 | 0.09 | - | - | - | 1,196 | 2.45 | 0.09 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 2,023 | 2.76 | 0.18 | - | - | - | 2,023 | 2.76 | 0.18 | |
Inferred | 506 | 2.96 | 0.05 | - | - | - | 506 | 2.96 | 0.05 | |
Pokrovskiy Total | Measured | 5,009 | 1.11 | 0.18 | - | - | - | 5,009 | 1.11 | 0.18 |
Indicated | 21,150 | 0.72 | 0.49 | - | - | - | 21,150 | 0.72 | 0.49 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 26,159 | 0.79 | 0.67 | - | - | - | 26,159 | 0.79 | 0.67 | |
Inferred | 6,378 | 1.04 | 0.21 | - | - | - | 6,378 | 1.04 | 0.21 | |
PioneerOpen Pit | Measured | 9,190 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 15,918 | 0.79 | 0.40 | 25,107 | 0.67 | 0.54 |
Indicated | 37,752 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 124,578 | 0.69 | 2.76 | 162,330 | 0.69 | 3.60 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 46,941 | 0.65 | 0.98 | 140,496 | 0.70 | 3.16 | 187,437 | 0.69 | 4.14 | |
Inferred | 6,827 | 0.74 | 0.16 | 55,803 | 0.58 | 1.04 | 62,629 | 0.60 | 1.21 | |
Pioneer U/ground | Measured | 183 | 6.38 | 0.04 | - | - | - | 183 | 6.38 | 0.04 |
Indicated | 1,311 | 4.95 | 0.21 | 1,326 | 5.21 | 0.22 | 2,637 | 5.08 | 0.43 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 1,495 | 5.12 | 0.25 | 1,326 | 5.21 | 0.22 | 2,820 | 5.16 | 0.47 | |
Inferred | 511 | 3.59 | 0.06 | 786 | 2.68 | 0.07 | 1,297 | 3.04 | 0.13 | |
PioneerTotal | Measured | 9,373 | 0.57 | 0.17 | 15,918 | 0.79 | 0.40 | 25,291 | 0.71 | 0.58 |
Indicated | 39,064 | 0.84 | 1.05 | 125,904 | 0.74 | 2.98 | 164,968 | 0.76 | 4.03 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 48,437 | 0.78 | 1.22 | 141,822 | 0.74 | 3.39 | 190,258 | 0.75 | 4.61 | |
Inferred | 7,338 | 0.94 | 0.22 | 56,589 | 0.61 | 1.11 | 63,927 | 0.65 | 1.33 | |
MalomirOpen Pit | Measured | 135 | 0.99 | 0.004 | 20,113 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 20,248 | 0.84 | 0.55 |
Indicated | 802 | 1.19 | 0.03 | 132,686 | 0.87 | 3.71 | 133,488 | 0.87 | 3.74 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 936 | 1.16 | 0.03 | 152,800 | 0.87 | 4.25 | 153,736 | 0.87 | 4.29 | |
Inferred | 513 | 0.82 | 0.01 | 106,862 | 0.71 | 2.45 | 107,375 | 0.71 | 2.47 | |
Malomir U/ground | Measured | 243 | 9.71 | 0.08 | - | - | - | 243 | 9.71 | 0.08 |
Indicated | 403 | 4.37 | 0.06 | - | - | - | 403 | 4.37 | 0.06 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 646 | 6.38 | 0.13 | - | - | - | 646 | 6.38 | 0.13 | |
Inferred | 354 | 3.45 | 0.04 | - | - | - | 354 | 3.45 | 0.04 | |
MalomirTotal | Measured | 378 | 6.60 | 0.08 | 20,113 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 20,492 | 0.95 | 0.62 |
Indicated | 1,204 | 2.25 | 0.09 | 132,686 | 0.87 | 3.71 | 133,891 | 0.88 | 3.79 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 1,582 | 3.29 | 0.17 | 152,800 | 0.87 | 4.25 | 154,382 | 0.89 | 4.42 | |
Inferred | 867 | 1.89 | 0.05 | 106,862 | 0.71 | 2.45 | 107,728 | 0.72 | 2.51 | |
Albyn Open Pit | Measured | 7,023 | 0.50 | 0.11 | - | - | - | 7,023 | 0.50 | 0.11 |
Indicated | 66,477 | 1.21 | 2.59 | 14,792 | 1.19 | 0.57 | 81,256 | 1.21 | 3.16 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 73,499 | 1.15 | 2.71 | 14,792 | 1.19 | 0.57 | 88,291 | 1.15 | 3.27 | |
Inferred | 30,904 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 14,584 | 1.20 | 0.56 | 45,488 | 1.29 | 1.88 | |
Albyn U/ground | Measured | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Indicated | 375 | 2.61 | 0.03 | - | - | - | 375 | 2.61 | 0.03 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 375 | 2.61 | 0.03 | - | - | - | 375 | 2.61 | 0.03 | |
Inferred | 1,961 | 2.58 | 0.16 | - | - | - | 1,961 | 2.58 | 0.16 | |
Albyn Total | Measured | 7,023 | 0.50 | 0.11 | - | - | - | 7,023 | 0.50 | 0.11 |
Indicated | 66,852 | 1.22 | 2.63 | 14,792 | 1.19 | 0.57 | 81,644 | 1.22 | 3.19 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 73,874 | 1.15 | 2.74 | 14,792 | 1.19 | 0.57 | 88,666 | 1.16 | 3.31 | |
Inferred | 32,866 | 1.40 | 1.48 | 14,584 | 1.20 | 0.56 | 47,449 | 1.34 | 2.04 | |
Tokur | Measured | 11,952 | 1.30 | 0.50 | - | - | - | 11,952 | 1.30 | 0.50 |
Indicated | 16,096 | 1.06 | 0.55 | - | - | - | 16,096 | 1.06 | 0.55 | |
Sub-total (M+I) | 28,048 | 1.16 | 1.05 | - | - | - | 28,048 | 1.16 | 1.05 | |
Inferred | 10,706 | 1.09 | 0.38 | - | - | - | 10,706 | 1.09 | 0.38 |
Notes:
(1) Mineral Resources include Ore Reserves
(2) Mineral Resource estimates for Pokrovskiy, Pioneer, Malomir and Albyn were prepared internally by the Group in accordance with JORC Code 2012 as an update of the April 2017 statement audited by WAI; Mineral Resources for Tokur were reviewed by WAI in 2010 in accordance with JORC Code 2004 and there have been no changes to the Tokur estimates since that date
(3) Open Pit Mineral Resources for Pokrovskiy, Pioneer, Malomir and Albyn are constrained by conceptual open-pit shells at a $1,500/oz long term gold price; Tokur Mineral Resources have no open pit constraints
(4) The cut-off grade for Mineral Resources for open pit mining varies from 0.30 to 0.35g/t depending on the type of mineralisation and proposed processing method
(5) A cut-off grade of1.5g/t is used to report Mineral Resources for potential underground mining
(6) Mineral Resources are not Reserves until they have demonstrated economic viability based on a feasibility or pre-feasibility study
(7) Grade represents estimated contained metal in the ground and has not been adjusted for metallurgical recovery
FY 2018 Development Highlights
Below are some of the development highlights for 2018. Further details on the production performance from each of our mines was provided on 23 January 2019 and can be accessed at: http://www.petropavlovsk.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Q4-2018-FY-2018-Production-Update-FINAL.pdf
POX Hub Commissioning
The Pressure Oxidation (POX) Hub at Pokrovskiy lies at the heart of the Group's growth prospects and enables Petropavlovsk to unlock the value of 5.3Moz of refractory gold reserves. This plant repositions the Group as a technological and operational leader, both within a Russian and global context.
The commissioning of the oxygen plant in August 2018 saw the POX Hub enter a dry commissioning phase. Hot commissioning of the POX Hub and supporting equipment followed in November 2018 when the first refractory concentrate was processed in autoclave 1. This successfully achieved gold recovery of 93% which was in-line with the design parameters for double refractory Malomir concentrate. Following the successful commissioning of autoclave 1, the second autoclave was commissioned in late December 2018 and reached design capacity ahead of schedule.
The resulting pulp from the POX plant was processed using conventional RIP technology at the recently refurbished Pokrovskiy plant and the first gold doré pour took place at the end of December 2018. As of January 2019, both autoclaves were operating in-line with design capacity for Malomir concentrate, processing 11.5 to 12 tonnes per hour at a recovery of 93% - 94%. During the ramp-up process a technical issue emerged in the thickener/filtration stage when a part of solid phase was escaping into a liquid phase causing gold loss. This resulted in recovery rates dropping temporarily to 84% in February despite oxidation rates in the autoclaves remaining at design parameter. These technical issues were successfully resolved by the engineering team and a stable 91% recovery was achieved in March. The Company continues to work towards achieving stable 94% recoveries for the second half of 2019.
The third and fourth autoclaves at the POX Hub have been tested and shown to be fully-functioning. These additional lines are ready to begin operating at full capacity once supplies of third-party concentrate can be secured with potential spare capacity of up to 250kt per annum depending on the specific properties of the concentrate to be processed. The Company is currently seeking to purchase refractory concentrate from third parties.
Looking forward, the expansion of the existing Malomir flotation plant and construction of a new flotation plant at Pioneer will help to produce enough concentrate to fill all four lines of the POX Hub. At full capacity, the POX plant will be able to process 400ktpa to 500ktpa, depending on the properties of concentrate.
Malomir Flotation (Stage 1 - 3.6Mtpa)
The Malomir flotation plant is a two-stage development. Stage 1 has a total capacity of 3.6Mtpa across two parallel 1.8Mtpa processing lines, with the first line becoming operational in July 2018 and the second in October 2018. With both lines ramped up to full capacity, in 2018, the plant produced 46kt of high-grade refractory concentrate with grades up to 36g/t. Concentrate was initially stockpiled for transportation to the POX Hub site for processing into doré ahead of the staged autoclave commissioning in Q4 2018.
Several improvements have been made to the Malomir flotation flowsheet, including a more efficient flotation reagent to suppress carbon. This eliminated the need for a carbon flotation stage and which has reduced associated gold losses. As a result, the concentrate grade was up to 50% higher than was originally planned (24g/t vs 36-40g/t).
In addition to improved concentrate grades, concentrate yields improved from 5.5% to c.2.8% (using lower grade ores) which has reduced the amount of material requiring transport to the POX Hub. This has several important cost implications, including lowering transportation costs and costs at the POX Hub.
Stage 2 will expand the flotation plant to 5.4Mtpa by adding a third 1.8Mtpa line. The Stage 2 expansion is currently scheduled to being construction in 2020, although Management are considering fast-tracking its development to maximise utilisation of capacity at the POX Hub.
Exploration
Pioneer
One of the most significant exploration results was achieved at Katrin, Nikolaevskaya and at the Ulunginskaya zones. Some early stage exploration also took place at Aprelskiy and Ulagach.
2018 drilling at Katrin predominantly focused on in-filling the existing drill grid, with only a few of the holes targeting ore body extensions. The most significant 2018 Katrin intersections include:
- 16.8m @ 1.75g/t (C-516-25, interval 167.6m-184.4m)
- 18.0m @ 1.41g/t (C-516-23, interval 146.0m-164.0m)
- 11.0m @ 1.90g/t (C-515-23, interval 117.4m-128.4m)
- 4.3m @ 1.21g/t (C-507-38, interval 62.5m-66.8m)
- 13.4m @ 1.01g/t (C-507-44, interval 132.6m-146.0m)
These intersections have been included in the Katrin resource estimate, resulting in an increase in both Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Katrin Ore Reserves increased by 30koz (before depletion).
A total of 34 drill holes were completed at Nikolaevskaya during H1 2018, principally targeting open pit resources with particular emphasis on in-filling the existing drill grid and increasing confidence in the resource estimate.
Of the five drill holes drilled 150 to 200m north of Nikolaevskaya, outside known mineralisation, one particular drill hole (no C-2297) intersected with a high-grade interval (23.2m @ 3.33g/t, including 6.3m @ 8.54g/t) at a depth of 75m from surface. This new and previously unknown zone of mineralisation may become an attractive open pit and / or underground mining target and as such warrants further exploration. Exploration at Nikolaevskaya in 2018 resulted in 57koz and 63koz increases in Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, respectively. Average grades of Nikolaevskaya underground Reserves increased by 40% from 5.43g/t to 7.60g/t.
Exploration at the Shirokaya zone (an area part of Alexandra, north of Pioneer) involved mostly in-fill drilling to improve confidence in the resource estimate. The results are in-line with the existing resource model and expect to convert some of the Inferred Resources into the Indicated category, which should allow increase in Shirokaya Ore Reserve. Most of the Shirokaya mineralisation is refractory and relatively low grade; as such, this area is not a high priority for further 2019 exploration.
A new 270m zone of refractory zone of mineralisation named Ulunginskaya, located south-east of the Pioneer plant, was delineated during H1 2018. The zone has a north to south strike with a steep dip. It was proven by drilling on 40m to 80m spaced drill profiles to a depth of 100 to 120m from the surface, and remains open at depth.
Significant intersections include:
- 45.5m @ 1.69g/t (C-2452, interval 93.3m - 138.8m)
- 20.7m @ 1.38g/t (C-2481, interval 100.5m - 121.2m)
- 15.1m @ 0.62g/t (C-2486A, interval 92.1m - 107.2m)
- 27.0m @ 0.86g/t (C-2499, interval 97.6m - 124.6m)
Formal Ulunginskaya resource estimates on have now been completed, adding 74koz and 21koz of gold to the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve statement respectively. As the mineralisation has been proven to be refractory, Ulunginskaya is not a high priority for further exploration.
Early stage exploration was carried out at the Aprelskiy exploration target, an area of extensive historical alluvial production located 15km west of the Pioneer processing plant. Thirteen drill holes were completed there in H1 2018. The best intersections include:
- 0.8m @ 2.69g/t (86-32)
- 2.2m @ 1.89g/t (C-88-6)
- 1.6m @ 1.38g/t (C-90-4)
- 4.6m @ 0.85g/t (C-94-6)
- 2.2m @ 1.21g/t (C-98-30)
The gold grades at Aprelskiy are associated with quartz veins and veinlets containing arsenopyrite-pyrite sulphide mineralisation. Although the mineralisation discovered so far is unlikely to represent an immediate development interest due to its narrow thickness and relatively low grade, the presence of significant alluvial gold deposits historically known at Aprelskiy suggest further exploration may identify a more attractive mining target.
Early stage exploration continued at Ulagach, an exploration target 20km east of Pokrovskiy and 10km south of Katrin. Trenches completed over the gold and gold-arsenic geochemical anomalies identified after evaluation of 2017 field work results discovered three intersections:
- 7.2m @ 1.74g/t
- 1.5m @ 0.74 g/t
- 2.0m @ 0.79g/t
Gold mineralisation discovered at Ulagach associated with disseminated sulphides hosted within Jurassic sandstone close to a contact with Cretaceous granitoids. As Ulagach geology has certain similarities with the geology of Pioneer and Pokrovskiy, Group specialists believe it offers potential for discovery of a gold mineralisation of a significant scale.
Exploration completed at the North East Bakhmut underground mine during H1 2018 was production-related and as such did not result in any significant resource expansion.
Albyn
In H1 2018, exploration at Albyn targeted deeper extensions of both the Sukholozhskiy zone and the main ore body at Albyn. A total of 52 drill holes were drilled, including 49 resource definition holes on a nominal 40m x 40m grid at Suchlozhskiy and 3 prospecting holes to prove deeper extensions of the main Albyn ore body. The results received to date are very encouraging - the prospecting hole completed at Albyn (C-225-28-313), intersected two intervals of gold mineralisation potentially suitable for underground mining: 417.7m - 427.7m (10.0m @ 4.41g/t) and 439.6m-443.6m (4.0m @ 3.76g/t). These intersections are situated 150m and 180m below the final Albyn pit, respectively, and mineralisation still remains open in a down-dip direction.
Resource definition and resource expansion drilling at Sukholozhskiy intersected further down-dip extensions with the best intersections:
- 1.7m @ 12.1g/t (C-139-5, interval 156.5-158.2m)
- 2.5m @ 7.84g/t (C-139-5A, interval 185.3m-187.8m)
- 1.4m @ 55.51g/t (C-143-4, interval 214.6m-216.0m)
- 1.9m @ 7.86g/t (C-133-4, interval 193.0m-194.9m)
- 1.0m @ 18.1g/t (C-129-3, interval 184.2m-184.9m)
- 0.8m @ 13.8g/t (C-191-031, interval 80.2m-81.0m)
Given Sukholozhskiy was an attractive body, this area was mined during 2018. Petropavlovsk's geologists believe an exploration target for potential underground mining at Albyn would be at least equivalent in size to total gold produced to date from Albyn (1Moz). Metallurgical tests completed to date suggest deeper extensions of Albyn are non-refractory and suitable for processing through the existing Albyn processing plant.
A small amount of exploration, including trenches, has been completed at Yasnoye and some other smaller exploration targets near Albyn. This work identified new gold mineralisation which warrants further work, but this remains a low priority compared to Elginskoye, Unglichikanskoye and Albyn.
Malomir
All exploration undertaken at Malomir relates to underground mining at Quartzitovoye and predominantly involved reserve definition drilling and sampling. Ten drill holes completed at zone 49 proved 50m strike and 100m down dip extensions of high-grade mineralisation which is yet to be incorporated into the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimate. New significant zone 49 intersections include:
- 1.6m @ 17.75g/t (C-608P-2, interval 62.4-64.0m)
- 2.0m @ 10.5g/t (C-613P-21, interval 35.0-37.0m)
- 1.0m @ 19.7g/t (C-613P-21, interval 96.5-97.5m)
- 13.0m @ 25.17g/t (C-612P-20, interval 90.5-103.5m)
- 2.9m @ 5.67g/t (C-612P-21, interval 70.1-73.0m)
Zone 49 remains open downdip and offers further potential to increase resources and reserves for underground mining. In addition, underground workings intersected low grade stockwork between Quartzitovoye areas 1 and 2, which is suitable for open pit mining once the Quartzitovoye underground mine is completed; 112koz of Ore Reserves were added in this area in 2018.
Khabarovsk Exploration Assets
In H2 2018 the Group acquired two early stage exploration assets in Khabarovsk region:
- Verkhne Udskaya and
- Chogarskaya
Both properties are in proximity to known alluvial gold deposits and have geology deemed to be favourable for hosting orogenic type hard rock gold deposits. Both areas were subject to a systematic hard rock early stage exploration/prospecting in the 1960s when the government funded 1:200 000 scale mapping and prospecting programmes. Later, from 2005 to 2006 smaller scale prospecting programmes focussed on exploration targets identified by the 1960s programme. Historical trenching and geological traverses identified grades up to 68g/t in selected samples. Significant Verkhne Udskaya historical trench intersections include:
- 8.0m@ 2.5g/t,
- 7.0m @ 3.93g/t,
- 3.0m @ 3.2g/t and
- 2.0m @ 2.2g/t
Historical work only involved trenching and geological traverses. No drilling was completed at these properties to date therefore Verkhne Udskaya and Chogarskaya are considered underexplored and offering potential for significant discoveries. Verkhne Udskaya and Chogarskaya are located 120km and 160km north-north west and north from Malomir respectively. These licences are priorities for 2019 exploration programme.
Refinancing of ICBC Facility
One of the Board and Management's key objectives in 2018 was to reduce the risk associated with the Company's guarantee of an outstanding project finance facility between its associate company, IRC, and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC). As a result, in December 2018, Petropavlovsk assisted IRC to enter a new $240m facility with Gazprombank under more favourable terms.
Under the new facility, Petropavlovsk's guarantee has been reduced from $169m to $160m, initially consisting of a 'Corporate Guarantee' of $120m and a two-year 'Fixed Term' guarantee $40m. The $120m Corporate Guarantee will be released subject to certain operational conditions being satisfied at IRC's main K&S project with the current expectation that these will be satisfied within two to three years. Thereafter, Petropavlovsk is subject to a series of back-to-back two-year fixed term guarantees of $40m. For the last year, the Fixed Term guarantee increases to $120m to cover the final principal and interest repayments.
The table below provides an overview of the new facility guaranteed by Petropavlovsk:
| Corporate Guarantee | Fixed Term Guarantee |
2019 | $120m | $40m |
2020 | ||
2021 | $40m | |
2022 |
| |
2023 |
| $40m |
2024 |
| |
2025 |
| $120m |
2026 |
|
The new Gazprombank facility's guaranteed structure is on more favourable terms than the ICBC facility and provides IRC with an extended period to repay its debt finance, maturing in 2026. The arrangement is expected to alleviate the cashflow position of IRC and provide it with a more manageable repayment schedule in line with the proposed ramp up of K&S.
The refinancing of the ICBC loan was completed following the approval of the new facility by Petropavlovsk shareholders at a General Meeting held on 12 March 2019. On 19 March 2019, IRC made a drawdown of $169 million to fully repay K&S's outstanding principal indebtedness under the ICBC facility, with the remaining $3 million being drawn as working capital for K&S. On the 25 March 2019, Petropavlovsk received the Rouble equivalent of approximately $57 million as full repayment for the two bridge loans advanced by Petropavlovsk to IRC during 2018.
The successful conclusion of the refinancing decreases our balance sheet risk exposure at an important time in the Company's phase of development and growth, underpinned by the POX Hub.
Q1 Production Update
Production and sales
Gold production (000oz) | |||
Asset | Q1 2019 | Q1 2018 | |
Pioneer | 21.9 | 40.9 | |
Albyn | 41.3 | 39.4 | |
Malomir1 | 44.5 | 27.9 | |
Pokrovskiy | - | 4.3 | |
Total | 107.7 | 112.6 |
1Production at Malomir includes 27.7koz produced via the POX Hub
§ Total gold production for the quarter were 107.7koz, representing a modest 4% decrease from the previous year (Q1 2018: 112.6koz) reflecting the closure of the Pokroviskiy mine
§ The average realised gold sales price¨ averaged $1,278/oz (including $(26)/oz from hedging), a decrease of 1% from Q1 2018
Flotation of refractory ores at Malomir to produce gold concentrate
§ During the quarter, test work was carried out to understand the viability of processing lower grade refractory materials at Malomir. This was conducted on stockpiles of non-reserve tonnes containing 0.73g/t of gold removed as part of stripping activities at the Malomir central pit
§ The test works proved highly successful, yielding 25kt of 22.8g/t of economic concentrate despite the lower feed grade. The resulting c.2.8% concentrate yield was significantly better than the 5.5% design, which reduces transport costs and lowers the amount of material to be processed at the POX Hub
§ After the second quarter, the flotation lines at Malomir will be treating material with grades that are in-line with the mine plan (1.2 - 1.3g/t). This will also raise the grade of the concentrate produced
Refractory gold concentrate processing at the POX Hub
§ Approximately 32kt of refractory gold in concentrate grading 32g/t was processed by the POX Hub representing material produced and stockpiled in 2018 as well as concentrates produced during Q1 2019
§ During ramp-up, while the second line of the POX Hub was undergoing commissioning, an issue developed in the thickening stage. This affected material after it had been processed by the autoclaves leading to losses of gold and a drop in overall plant recovery rates in February to 84%
§ The issue has been resolved resulting in recoveries increasing back up to a stable 91% in March. The lower recovery in February is not reflective of the performance of autoclaves where recoveries matched design rates. The plant remains on track to reach its 94% recovery design-rate during the year
§ POX capacity is determined by the level of sulphur in refractory concentrate, with lower sulphur leading to an increase in plant capacity. Once additional flotation lines have been installed at Malomir and Pioneer, the Company expects the POX Hub to be able to treat 200kt per annum of concentrate from Malomir (at 27.0% sulphur) and 240kt per annum from Pioneer (at 22.5% sulphur). As such, the Company envisages that the total amount of material treated from its own mines will be 440kt at full capacity
§ Ahead of adding flotation capacity at Malomir and Pioneer, currently scheduled for 2020 and 2023, respectively, the third and fourth autoclaves at the POX Hub were tested during the quarter and shown to be fully-functioning. These lines can be started once a sufficient supply of third-party concentrate is secured to ensure stable production at full capacity.
Purchase of third-party refractory gold concentrates for the POX Hub
§ During the quarter, the Company successfully trialled concentrates from two third party sources and is actively seeking to secure additional supply from across the region
§ As at the time of this release, two batches of third-party material have been secured, with one having gold grades of up to 75g/t
§ Pilot testing indicates recoveries of between 92% to 96% are achievable, with the variance depending on the specific properties of the concentrate
Operational Data
Pioneer open pit and underground mining operations
| Units | Q1 2019 | Q1 2018 |
Mining operations |
|
|
|
Total material moved | m3 '000 | 5,059 | 4,087 |
Ore mined | t '000 | 331 | 1,341 |
Average grade | g/t | 0.95 | 0.93 |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 10.1 | 40.3 |
Processing operations (RIP plant) |
|
| |
Total milled | t '000 | 1,407 | 1,597 |
Average grade | g/t | 0.60 | 0.87 |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 27.4 | 44.4 |
Recovery | % | 81.3 | 77.0 |
Gold recovered | oz. '000 | 22.2 | 34.2 |
Heap leach operations |
|
| |
Total stacked | t '000 | - | - |
Average grade | g/t | - | - |
Gold content | oz. '000 | - | - |
Recovery | % | - | - |
Gold recovered | oz. '000 | - | - |
Pioneer gold production (doré) | oz. '000 | 21.9 | 40.9 |
At Pioneer, open pit mining took place in the first quarter at Yuzhnaya, Alexandra, Kulisnaya, Katrin and Bazoviy in the Sosnovy license. Underground mining operations resumed at NE Bakhmut No3 and work development continued at NE Bakhmut No2.
At the NE Bakhmut, ore was produced from the main body 1-7 (at -5 m sublevel) as well as from smaller satellite bodies 1-7/2 and 1-7/4; both located north of the main ore body. Underground mining at NE Bakhmut No3 site was complicated by water inflow and poor ground conditions which affected mining rates and resulted in dilution and reduced run-of-mine grades. Several measures were undertaken to overcome these issues, including minimising the time lag between the completion of sublevel development and the commencement of stope mining as well as cement backfilling.
At the NE Bakhmut No2, mining and development workings were carried out between elevations from +70m to +55m, as per the development plan, ahead of production in Q4 2019.
Ore mined from the open pits and underground, along with some stockpiled ore material, was processed at the RIP plant. As the open pits become deeper at Yuzhnaya, Alexandra, Kulisnaya ore is less weathered which has affected productivity in the crushing circuit, resulting in lower volumes of milled ore.
As such, a combination of factors contributed to production being below budget by 6.7koz.
Albyn open pit mining operations
| Units | Q1 2019 | Q1 2018 |
Mining Operations |
|
|
|
Total material moved | m3 '000 | 3,223 | 4,942 |
Ore mined | t '000 | 1,056 | 867 |
Average grade | g/t | 1.24 | 0.97 |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 42.1 | 27.1 |
Processing operations (RIP Plant) |
|
| |
Total milled | t '000 | 1,137 | 1,137 |
Average grade | g/t | 1.15 | 1.07 |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 41.9 | 39.2 |
Recovery | % | 93.7 | 93.6 |
Gold recovered | oz. '000 | 39.3 | 36.7 |
Albyn gold production (doré) | oz. '000 | 41.3 | 39.4 |
At Albyn, mining continued in the central Albyn open pit targeting the main mineralised zone together with smaller, secondary, parallel zones to the south. Ore from the main orebody was mined from the central section of the pit at the 510m elevation level. The smaller parallel zones were mined from benches located between 605m and 620m elevations as well as between 570m and 590m elevations. Approximately 200kt of ore grading 1.2g/t was mined above budget which resulting in 4.3koz of gold production above plan.
Malomir open pit and underground mining operations
| Units | Q1 2019 | Q1 2018 |
Mining Operations |
|
|
|
Total material moved | m3 '000 | 1,923 | 1,979 |
Non-refractory ore | t '000 | 96 | 643 |
Average grade | g/t | 6.17 | 1.35 |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 19.0 | 28.0 |
Refractory ore | t '000 | 1,304 | - |
Average grade | g/t | 0.84 | - |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 35.2 | - |
Processing operations (RIP plant) |
|
| |
Total milled | t '000 | 168 | 873 |
Average grade | g/t | 3.98 | 1.24 |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 21.5 | 34.7 |
Recovery | % | 82.3 | 75.1 |
Gold recovered1 | oz. '000 | 17.7 | 26.1 |
Flotation Plant |
|
| |
Ore | t '000 | 895 | - |
Grade | g/t | 0.73 | - |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 21.1 | - |
Recovery | % | 87.0 | - |
Yield | % | 2.8 | - |
Concentrate produced | t '000 | 25 | - |
Grade | g/t | 22.8 | - |
Gold content | oz. '000 | 18.3 | - |
POX Plant |
|
| |
Concentrate treated | t '000 | 32 | - |
Grade | g/t | 32.2 | - |
Gold in concentrate | oz. '000 | 33.1 | - |
Recovery | % | 83.8 | - |
Gold recovered1 | oz. '000 | 27.7 | - |
Malomir gold production (doré)1 | oz. '000 | 44.5 | 27.9 |
1Numbers may not add up due to gold in circuit
At Malomir, mining of non-refractory ores continued in the first quarter at Quartzitovoye, both from open-pit and underground. In the Quartzitovoye open pit, the northern flank of ore body '55' was mined from 415m - 405m elevation which completes this section and further operations will now on take place on the southern flank.
Underground mining works below the Quartzitovoye open pit included stope mining from sublevels located between elevation of 285m and 390m above sea level in the southern, central and northern parts of ore body '55'. A total of 67kt of underground ore was mined at an average grade of 8.26g/t.
All non-refractory ore was processed at the RIP plant, where gold recovered exceeded targets by 6.2koz. This was primarily due to a larger quantity of high-grade ores mined from underground and higher RIP recoveries.
The mining of refractory ores continued in the Central pit where a total of 1,304kt was produced. Since the volume of low-grade material produced through stripping activities at the Central pit was sufficient to undertake trial processing, this material was treated at the flotation plant in order to determine the economic viability of mining lower grade ores at Malomir. During the trial, 895kt of 0.73g/t low-grade material was processed which enabled flotation regimes for low-grade materials to be understood and defined. Given acceptable recovery rates of between 86.6% and 87.7% were achieved with a low average yield of c.2.8% resulting in economic concentrate grades of 22-24g/t, the trial is considered to have been successful.
During the quarter, 25kt of flotation concentrate was produced with an average grade of 22.8g/t. At the POX Hub, 32kt of concentrate was processed at an average grade of 32g/t exceeding the budget of 24.9koz with 2.8koz of gold recovered above the budget of 24.9koz.
Pokrovskiy open pit mining operations
| Units | Q1 2019 | Q1 2018 |
Mining Operations |
|
|
|
Total material moved | m3 '000 | - | 152 |
Ore mined | t '000 | - | 116 |
Average grade | g/t | - | 0.59 |
Gold content | oz. '000 | - | 2.2 |
Pokrovskiy processing operations (RIP plant) |
|
| |
Total milled | t '000 | - | 223 |
Average grade | g/t | - | 0.55 |
Gold content | oz. '000 | - | 4.0 |
Recovery | % | - | 94.2 |
Gold recovered | oz. '000 | - | 3.7 |
Heap leach operations |
|
| |
Total stacked | t '000 | - | - |
Average grade | g/t | - | - |
Gold content | oz. '000 | - | - |
Recovery | % | - | - |
Gold recovered | oz. '000 | - | - |
Pokrovskiy gold production (doré) | oz. '000 | - | 4.3 |
The Pokrovskiy mine and processing facilities ceased operations in Q1 2018. The site has now been replaced by the POX Hub. As such there was no mining or production from the Pokrovskiy mine in Q1 2019.
¨ See "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs
[1] Historically, the Company has used the term gold sales in respect of gold output for a given reporting period. During the 2018 period when gold in refractory concentrates was produced ahead of POX commissioning (with no certainty of immediately successful commissioning which would enable revenue to be generated from selling gold), the Company differentiated between gold 'produced' and gold 'sales' in its disclosure. For 2019 and future periods, the Company will revert to reporting gold sales only
¨ See "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs
¨ See "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs
¨ See "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs
¨ Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Net Debt is an Alternative Performance Measure (APM), which is not defined or calculated in accordance with IFRS. Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ Underlying EBITDA is an Alternative Performance Measure (APM), which is not defined or calculated in accordance with IFRS. Go to "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs.
¨ See "The Use and Application of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)" section for further information on our APMs
Related Shares:
POG.L