26th Jun 2015 16:58
26 June 2015
Arricano Real Estate plc
("Arricano" or the "Company" or, together with its subsidiaries, the "Group")
Final Results for the 12 months ended 31 December 2014
Arricano is one of the leading real estate developers and operators of shopping centres in the Ukraine.
Today, Arricano owns and operates five completed shopping centres comprising 144,050 sqm of gross leasable area, a 49.9% shareholding in Sky Mall and land for a further three sites currently under development.
Highlights
· Total revenues were USD22.8 million (2013: USD25.3 million), reflecting in part the Company's decision to mitigate some of the impact of the fall in the Ukrainian Hryvnia for tenants during the year
· Operating profit was USD10. 5 million (2013: USD10.5 million), both figures including revaluation gains and adjustments to operating expenses explained below.
· Total fair valuation of the Company's portfolio was USD205.6 million as at 31 December 2014 (2013: USD287.8 million), which excludes the fair value of Sky Mall
· Expanded the portfolio with the addition of a fifth shopping centre, SEC Prospect, which opened in September 2014
· Excluding the recently opened SEC Prospect which is as at 31 December 2014 78% let, but including South Gallery stage 2 in take-up phase, overall occupancy rates for 2014 fluctuated and ended on 92.8% against 98.2% in 2013.
· As at 31 December 2014, the Company's borrowings at project level remain conservative with a loan to investment property value ratio of 29.6% per cent, compared to 2013 number of 25%
Rupert Cottrell, Chairman of Arricano, commented: "In the context of the market in which we have been operating, Arricano remains in a good position. In 2014, the Company expanded the size of its portfolio by 21% with the completion of two projects. Occupancy remains high, and with the support of our major shareholder, we will be in a good position to benefit, when Ukraine normalises."
For further information please contact:
Arricano Real Estate plc Mykhailo Merkulov
| Tel: +380 44 569 6708 |
Financial PR Novella Tim Robertson/Ben Heath
|
Tel: +44 (0)20 3151 7008 |
Nominated Adviser and Joint Broker: Smith & Williamson Corporate Finance Limited Azhic Basirov
|
Tel: +44 (0)20 7131 4000 |
Joint Broker: Whitman Howard Limited Ranald McGregor-Smith
|
Tel: +44 (0)20 7087 4555 |
Chairman's Statement
We had been hoping to report that the economic and geo-political situation in Ukraine had improved from the outset of the financial year. However in practice, this has not occurred and the conflict has escalated which has had a significant impact on the Ukrainian Hryvnia and, consequently, the results we are reporting are affected by the movements of the Hryvnia against the US Dollar.
However, against this difficult background, Arricano has actually performed well, with relatively low levels of third party borrowings and occupancy in the five shopping centres remaining high at 88.5%, increasing to 97.5% when SEC Prospect in Kyiv is excluded which opened in September 2014 on plan and on budget.
As a result, today Arricano has 144,050 sqm of completed assets spread across five shopping centres that generated total income of approximately USD22.8 million for the year ended 31 December 2014. In addition to the Company's five shopping centres, the Company also owns title rights for 14 ha. of development land divided into three specific sites which are at varying stages of development and has an interest in Sky Mall with 67,369 sqm of leasable area.
Unavoidably, the events in Eastern Ukraine together with the significant fall in the value of the Ukrainian Hryvnia have impacted on the value of our real estate portfolio. The portfolio of assets was externally and independently valued as at 31 December 2014 by Expandia LLC, part of the CBRE Affiliate Network. The expanded portfolio was valued at USD205.6 million (2013: USD287.8 million). The valuation reflects the inclusion of SEC Prospect as a trading entity.
In August 2014, we announced that the London Court of International Arbitration tribunal had made an award declaring that Arricano validly exercised the call option in 2010 whereby it sought to acquire the remaining shareholding of 50.03% of the holding company of the Sky Mall shopping centre in Kyiv. The price of the option exercise is USD51.4 million. In early 2015 a further tribunal ruling confirmed that the Arricano beneficiaries had satisfied the required conditions for their obligations under the call option agreement.
During the year, Yarema Kovaliv was appointed to the board as a non-executive director having been Acting Chief Executive Officer. Simultaneously, Mykhailo Merkulov was appointed Chief Executive (non-Board appointment) in September 2014. Hillar Teder stepped down from his position as non-executive director of the Company at the same time as Mr. Kovaliv joined the Board. Hillar Teder is the Company's largest shareholder and has been instrumental in ensuring the Company is financially secure and continues to be highly supportive. Since the year end, Mr. Merkulov has joined the Board and Mr. Kovaliv resigned to take up a position in the Ukrainian government.
Our commercial objective has always been to use the cash generative completed portfolio to support the addition of further lettable space and the development of new shopping centre and entertainment complexes. We have continued this strategy albeit more cautiously and 2014 saw the opening of SEC Prospect and the completion of the SEC South Gallery Stage 2 in Simferopol, both being significant achievements given the market environment.
The Board is not recommending a dividend for this period, however, it is the Company's intention to make distributions to shareholders in the future in line with the profitability of the business.
Looking ahead, we will continue to take a very cautious approach to expansion whilst there are so many unknowns. Our primary focus is on safeguarding our assets, working supportively with our 400+ tenants and positioning the business for the medium to long term.
2015 is likely to be another challenging year for the business from the perspective of the economic and political situation in Ukraine. We have worked hard to structure the business so that it will be able to benefit from the recovery when it arrives. Ukraine remains severely structurally undersupplied in terms of good to high quality retail space and Arricano continues to establish a market leading portfolio of shopping and entertainment centres in key Ukrainian cities.
Rupert Cottrell
Chairman
23 June 2015
Chief Executive Officer's Report
Introduction
This has been a very unusual year dominated by political and economic problems, nevertheless, Arricano has managed to continue to operate successfully shown most clearly by the fact that we have increased the size of our completed portfolio by 21% with the opening of SEC Prospect and the extension to SEC Simferopol and trading has continued broadly as normal.
Excluding the new openings, our portfolio is virtually fully let and given the circumstances, the trading performance of the business has been good with no material defaults and new lettings progressing in the new space introduced into the portfolio.
Results
Our customers are our priority and we recognise the impact the 50% fall in the value of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against the USD has had upon our tenants who are all on USD linked rents. However, in the period under review, we have managed to continuously substitute and rotate tenants in order to preserve high occupancy.
Revenues were lower than the prior year at USD22.8 million reflecting the very different market environment and our decision to share some of the risk on currency fluctuations with a number of our tenants by temporarily fixing the foreign exchange rate coefficients on a case by case basis. As a result, the NOI (net operating income) of the operating properties was USD20.8 million compared to USD 23 million in 2013.
The loss before tax was USD69.6million (2013: profit USD4.1 million), reflecting the provisions being made for matured loans made by the Company and investments in Assofit. The total comprehensive loss for the year which includes the impact of the foreign currency movements is equal to USD 169.9 million.
Costs across the business have been reduced where possible to reflect the reduction in revenues and the future uncertainty given the wider market environment. Staff numbers have been reduced at head office and the individual centres through implementation of a programme of operational efficiencies.
Bank debt at the year-end was USD 60.9 million, with the majority of borrowings at the project level at an average rate of 9.7%. Loans mature between 2018 and 2020 and the Company's loan to investment property value ratio is comparatively low at 29.6%. In addition, there was USD3.1 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted deposits, as at 31 December 2014.
People
I would like to pay particular tribute to all the employees of Arricano and thank them for their commitment during what has been a very difficult period for everyone on a personal and a professional level. I am pleased to be able to confirm that so far only one Arricano employee has been drafted to serve in the Ukrainian army and we were delighted when he returned safely and once again took up his position in the Company.
The Market
Despite the extraordinary events of the last 12 months, the business has operated relatively normally, the five shopping and entertainment centres have opened every day and footfall across the portfolio was slightly higher in 2014 compared to the prior year. Unsurprisingly, consumer spending was down especially for imported goods most exposed to the significant currency fluctuations but overall trading continued. Consequently, there has been a decline in leased GLA (gross leasable area), although it has not been noticeable due to the lenient landlord-tenant policy implemented.
The increase in footfall numbers across the portfolio is attributable to pro-active marketing programmes. In particular, the Company has staged a series of events in each of the shopping centres that have been an important part of attracting people in. These events have ranged from celebrations of holidays and consumer-intensive events to neighbourhood engagement campaigns. The marketing team has also worked effectively to build the social media profile of each centre, promoting our business to a different, younger demographic and thereby introducing potential new customers.
Also as part of responding to the economic challenges, the Company sought to generate additional revenue streams by increasing revenue from advertising through the increased use of billboards across the portfolio and increased commercialisation of shared communal premises such as general access walkways.
The opening of the Prospect centre in Kyiv in September 2014 demonstrated our commitment to developing the business for the long-term in spite of the ongoing conflict. Prospect opened with occupancy at 50% with Auchan, the international hypermarket as co-investor and cornerstone tenant. All other comparable developments have been suspended or delayed and as a consequence it was the only new space that came into the market during 2014. This scarcity of new retail space worked to our advantage, resulting in a number of new lettings. By 31 December 2014, occupancy at Prospect rose to 78%, a very impressive beginning.
Outlook
The Company sees 2015 as a year of opportunity for its business. We hope that the geopolitical situation will stabilise and the military conflict in the east of the country will at least move to a more dormant phase, which would result in economic stabilisation that is much needed after the turmoil of 2014.
Ukraine was always seen as the last remaining sizeable real estate market in Europe that was still underdeveloped in terms of retail space. With reducing security risks and improving economic fundamentals we believe it is going to once again garner the attention of investors willing to capitalise on the attractively priced assets after the market correction in 2014.
New retailers have been eyeing the market for some time and if the economic fundamentals improve as expected then we will benefit. The Company already has new leases in the pipeline for 2015 for the two projects that are currently in the uptake phase.
From an operational perspective looking forward we are acting conservatively whilst continuing to build the portfolio for the long term. We are not taking on any new projects but we are progressing the ones currently in the portfolio. The Company is actively pursuing innovations in business, employing new retail formats, and new marketing activities with a strong focus on digital marketing and footfall engagement.
The Company is already actively engaged in the automation of routine management tasks in order to provide more efficiency to day-to-day activities and allow valuable labour resources to be engaged in more value added activities.
Overall the Company aims to convert the current outdated 'build and lease' paradigm into an agile hospitality focused business, changing the appeal from a pure B2B to focusing on customers that ultimately drive the revenue of the Company's tenants and of the Company itself.
Mykhailo Merkulov
Chief Executive Officer
23 June 2015
Operating Portfolio
In the following section we have provided an overview of each asset in the completed portfolio.
Sun Gallery (Kryvyi Rih)
Sun Gallery, opened in 2008, is one of the largest shopping malls in Kryvyi Rih. It is located at 30-richchia Peremohy Square, in the Saksahanskyi district in the northeastern part of Kryvyi Rih. It has easy car access and good public transport links. The primary shopping centre catchment area includes almost the whole territory of the Saksahanskyi district and part of the Zhovtnevyi district. The secondary area covers the Dovhyntsivskyi district.
The shopping centre is on two levels, spanning a total GLA of approximately 35,600 sq. m. There are approximately 80 gallery tenants, a children's entertainment zone, a food court with restaurants and cafes, a bowling alley, and anchor tenants electronics store Comfy and hypermarket Auchan.
Key statistics
• GLA - c. 35,600 sq. m.
• Vacancy rate as at 31 December 2014 - 3.5 per cent.
• Visitors (2014) - 4.2 million
• Bank debt at 31 December 2014 - USD9.7million
• Valuation at 31 December 2014 - USD21.9million
City Mall (Zaporizhzhia)
City Mall is one of the largest shopping centres in Zaporizhzhia with a total GLA of approximately 21,450 sq. m. on a single level. The shopping centre is located on the Dnipro river approximately 3 km from Zaporizhzhia city centre, between two densely populated areas of Zaporizhzhia in the Zhovtnevyi administrative district (1b Zaporizska street), with convenient accessibility by public and private transport.
The second phase of City Mall was opened in April 2011 and comprises a gallery with approximately 80 international and local tenants, a food court with 10 restaurants, a children's entertainment zone and parking which is shared with DIY superstore Epicenter. City Mall's anchor tenants are the hypermarket Auchan, which is the largest in the city, and the electronics store Comfy.
Key statistics
• GLA - c. 21,450 sq. m.
• Vacancy rate as at 31 December 2014 - 1 per cent.
• Visitors (2014) - 5.1 million
• Bank debt at 31 December 2014 - USD12.6 million
• Valuation at 31 December 2014 - USD25.9 million
South Gallery (Simferopol)
The site is located in the north of Simferopol, about five minutes' driving distance from one of the city's major crossroads, Moskovska Square. The site is linked to the city centre and residential areas east of the city by one of the main thoroughfares of Simferopol. The primary shopping centre catchment area includes northern parts of the Kyivskyi and Zaliznychnyi districts. The secondary area covers almost the whole city, except for its very southern parts.
South Gallery shopping centre (Phases I and II) is situated on a land plot with a total area of 10.2 ha. Phase I of the shopping centre includes the tenants Auchan (international hypermarket chain) and a Comfy electronics store, with a small gallery. Phase II of the South Gallery shopping centre was officially opened on 27 February 2014.
Phase I of the South Gallery initially opened with a 13,100 sq.m. GLA, and Phase II extended this to 32,200 sq.m. South Gallery boasts xx tenants and the largest entertainment centre for children, "Baby Boom", in Crimea.
Key statistics
• GLA - c. 32,200 sq. m.
• Vacancy rate as at 31 December 2014 - 17 per cent.
• Visitors (11 months of 2014) - 4.2 million
• Bank debt at 31 December 2014 - USD6.5million
• Valuation at 31 December 2014 - USD27.8 million
RayON (Kyiv)
The RayON shopping centre was opened to the public in August 2012. The shopping centre is located in the north east of Kyiv along the left bank of the Dnipro river, with satisfactory transportation links.
The shopping centre has a GLA of approximately 24,350 sq. m on two levels, with approximately 860 parking spaces. The concept for RayON is a district shopping centre, which focuses on food, clothing and convenience products. The shopping centre is anchored by a Silpo foods supermarket, one of the biggest supermarket chains in Ukraine and a member of the Fozzy group. Electronics supermarket Comfy also operates within the shopping centre.
RayON has several restaurants and a children's entertainment zone to complement the retail facilities. RayON is located in the middle of the Desnjanski district, one of the most densely populated areas in Kyiv, with an estimated catchment area of approximately 170,000.
Key statistics
• GLA - c. 24,350 sq. m.
• Vacancy rate as at 31 December 2014 - 4 per cent.
• Visitors (2014) - 5.7 million
• Bank debt at 31 December 2014 - USD21.8million
• Valuation at 31 December 2014 - USD41.6 million
In early 2014, a claim was lodged with the Commercial Court in Kyiv contesting the Group's ownership of RayON. On 05 September 2014 this claim was resolved in favour of Arricano and duly dismissed. During the period RayON continued to operate as normal and there was no impact on the trading of the Group.
Prospect/Krasnotkatska (Kyiv)
The Prospect shopping centre and entertainment complex was opened on 25 September 2014 (cold opening) and is located directly on the inner ring road of Kyiv on the left bank of the Dnipro River in the Desnianskyi administrative district, with good accessibility for vehicles and public transport links. Prospect was the only new professional retail scheme to open in Kyiv in 2014, with a GLA of approximately 30,450 sq. m.
Occupancy levels are experiencing steady growth and reaching 78% as of the date this announcement is written, presenting growth over the year-end figure.
The Company has refinanced the existing indebtedness on the property from Oschadbank with a new loan from EBRD, furthering the existing long standing partnership with the financial institution committed to support growth in socially responsible sectors of Ukraine economy.
Within the project there was also a joint venture with an SPV of retail operator Auchan, Real Estate F.C.A.U LLC, in which their own hypermarket block was constructed with an estimated GBA of approximately 11,700 sq. m. (excluding parking).
• GLA - c. 30,450 sq. m.
• Vacancy rate as at 31 December 2014 - 27 per cent.
• Visitors (3 months, 2014) - 3.1 million
• Bank debt at 31 December 2014 - USD10.9 million
• Valuation at 31 December 2014 - USD38.9 million
Portfolio-Investment Property
Sky Mall (Kyiv)
Sky Mall is one of the largest shopping centres in Kyiv, built to an award-winning design by the international architectural firm Chapman Taylor. It is home to top-quality brands, which include TopShop and Marks & Spencer, and anchored by the hypermarket Auchan, Comfy and stores of the Inditex Group. The first phase of the shopping centre (hypermarket) opened in 2007 and the second phase of the development opened in August 2010. It is located in the Dniprovskyi district of Kyiv on Vatutina Avenue, on the left bank of the Dnipro River. The shopping centre has good motor vehicle access and public transport links.
The GLA of the current operating centre (Phases I and II) is approximately 68,000 sq. m, with approximately 1,880 parking spaces. The shopping centre spans three levels with a cinema, children's and entertainment zone, food court, hypermarket and gallery shops.
It is anticipated that the third phase, which may be developed provided such development will be feasible at the time, would add a further GLA of approximately 46,500 sq. m. The third phase of development envisages an extension of the existing gallery with the addition of retail, leisure and entertainment space and the development of a number of stand-alone ("big box") retailers (furniture and DIY). Several preliminary concepts are available for the development of the third phase.
The Company currently owns 49.97 per cent. of the holding company of the asset, however its attempt to exercise its right to buy out the majority interest in Sky Mall in 2010 has been delayed by legal and arbitration proceedings. The exercise price of the option is USD 51.4 million. The Company intends to proceed as soon as practicable with the acquisition of this interest. Currently a 100% provision for impairment has been made with regards to the Skymall asset..
Key statistics
• Arricano ownership - 49.97 per cent.
• GLA - c. 67, 369 sq. m.
Development Properties
Lukianivka (Kyiv)
The Lukianivka development property is located on the right bank of Kyiv in the Shevchenkivskyi administrative district. The land plot has a total area of 4.14 hectares. The Group is planning to construct its flagship shopping centre in the central business district of Kyiv, with a more upmarket vision in terms of the concept and tenant mix. The Lukianivka development property allows for the construction of a multi-use complex, consisting of a shopping and leisure centre including, inter alia, a hypermarket, shops and shopping galleries, a leisure and entertainment area, a food court restaurants and a service area. The property would also have two underground parking levels and one seven-storey residential building, construction of which will continue after completion of the shopping centre. It is expected that the GLA of the shopping and entertainment centre would be approximately 47,000 sq. m. The Group obtained the relevant building consent in June 2013.
Land plot: | 4.14 hectares |
Title: | leasehold title plus title to several buildings (historical landmarks) on the site |
Development: | retail, leisure and entertainment centre |
Gross construction area (GBA): | c.71,300 sq. m. for the shopping centre (plus c.38,500 sq. m. GBA for parking and c.6,600 sq. m. for the residential block) |
Gross leasable area (GLA): | c.47,000 sq. m. |
Gross saleable area: | c.5,000 sq. m.* |
Parking spaces: | to include roof parking and underground parking |
Type: | city shopping centre (pocket hypermarket anchored) with residential |
* This comprises mainly residential space with a small amount of commercial property.
Rozumovska (Odesa)
The Black Sea port of Odesa is Ukraine's fourth largest city, with over one million inhabitants, and is a popular leisure destination. The Rozumovska development property is located partly on the façade of Rozumovska Street close to its intersection with Balkovska Street, in the Malynovskyi administrative district of Odesa, in close proximity to public transportation links.
The site is located opposite the city's main bus station. Rozumovska Street connects directly to the highway to Kyiv.
The Group has signed a lease agreement for the land plot with a total area of 4.5 hectares. The Rozumovska development property is expected to be a three-storey shopping and entertainment centre with a sufficient number of parking spaces to accommodate customer demand. The target GLA is approximately 38,000 sq. m., including a hypermarket, shops and shopping galleries, a leisure and entertainment area, a food court restaurants and a service area. The preliminary design concept of the project has been completed and the developer is currently applying for the relevant consents and permits, given current market conditions, completion is now targeted for 2016.
Land plot: | 4.5 hectares |
Location: | Odesa |
Title: | buildings and companies owning the site have been purchased, but land title still needs to be allocated |
Development: | retail, leisure and entertainment centre |
Gross construction area (GBA): | c. 71,000 sq. m. |
Gross leasable area (GLA): | 38,000 sq. m. |
Parking spaces: | 1,387 (771 deck parking, 616 roof parking spaces) |
Type: | Regional mall (hypermarket anchored) |
Petrivka (Kyiv)
The Petrivka development property is located on the right bank of the Dnipro river in Kyiv, in the Obolonskyi administrative district. The site has an area of 5.4 ha. The Group is currently considering the best use of the site, which could include both residential and retail use. If the site is to be developed as a shopping centre, the management expects the GLA to be approximately 31,450 sq. m.
Finance Report
The Company's revenue mainly consists of rental income from the portfolio of the completed properties. During the year ended 31 December 2014 the Company's rental income comprised USD22.8 million (2013: USD25.3 million). The decrease in revenues reflects the very difficult market environment and the Company's decision to mitigate some of the impact of the fall in the value of the Ukrainian Hryvnia on tenants by fixing the exchange rates for certain periods.
Unsurprisingly in 2014, the total fair valuation of the Company's portfolio was USD205.6 million as at 31 December 2014 (2013: USD287.8 million). The change reflected the decrease in USD revenue forecasts due to discounts provided to tenants and the increased yields applied at valuation that have changed with the market conditions and perceived security risks.
Due to the influence of the currency devaluation and the presentational characteristics applied in the consolidated financial statements, the revaluation of the investment property showed a gain of USD42.2 million compared to a gain of USD1.7 million in 2013. Although there has been a decrease in the overall portfolio value, the specifics of accounting for foreign exchange cross calculations among subsidiaries in different currency requires the new value is calculated in USD to be booked in the functional currency of the domicile of the property (Ukrainian Hryvnia in Ukraine). The dynamics of the decrease in USD value and the devaluation of the functional currency do not match; resulting in an increase in the Hryvnia amount, which translates to the gain in the USD presentation in the consolidated accounts. It is outweighed by the foreign exchange losses booked after the net profit figure (described further).
The Company has worked to reduce the cost base during 2014 to help offset the reduction in revenues, which was helped by the fact that operational costs are fixed in Hryvnia for the short term. Operating expenses were USD8.3 million, excluding the allowance for bad debts (2013: respectively USD12.2 million).
Employee costs reduced by 20.5% per cent for the year ended 31 December 2014 as compared to the previous year, aided by the devaluation of the Hryvnia. The 25% decrease compared to the 40% devaluation of Hryvnia is explained by the gradual devaluation of wages throughout the year.
The resultant profit from operating activities has been negatively influenced by a USD 42,6 million bad debts allowance, resulting in a 2014 figure of USD 10.5 million and USD10.5 million in 2013, both including revaluation gains
The fluctuations and the rapid devaluation of the Hryvnia have resulted in USD146.5 million of foreign exchange losses on monetary items that form part of the net investment in the foreign operation, net of tax effect; and foreign currency translation gain of USD55.3 million, both booked under other comprehensive income in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. This is partially offset by the revaluation gain booked above to the net profit (loss) figure of USD42.2 million.
Net finance expenses in 2014 increased by USD73.6million, as a result of foreign exchange losses of USD49.8 million and the impairment of the Assofit asset (Skymall) of USD20.7 in the finance costs line. Bare finance costs have increased by USD5.3 million from USD10.3 million in 2013 to USD15.6 million in 2014.
The Company's net loss for the year ended 31 December 2014, was USD78.6 million (2013 profit: USD3.2 million). One of the main drivers in the net loss has been the foreign exchange losses in the finance costs line, accounted above the net profit figure, and the impairments applied to the assets during preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Net Asset Value as at 31 December 2014 was USD61.7 million (2013: USD231.5 million), resulting in an Adjusted Net Asset Value per Share of USD0.59 (2013: USD2.24). The decrease in NAV was driven principally by the loss carried to the balance sheet and the impact of the foreign exchange losses. and the impairments applied to the loan granted by the Company and the Company's treatment of the available-for-sale financial asset of Assofit.
Total assets, as at 31 December 2014, amounted to USD239.9 million, a decrease of 41.4% from the year end 31 December 2013 mainly relating to the impairments applied, the decrease in investment property value, and cash and prepayment decreases.
Cash balances as at 31 December 2014 including cash equivalents and both current and long term deposits amounted to USD3.1 million (2013: USD13.3 million).
In 2014 the Group entered into loan agreements with EBRD for the refinancing of the Prospect property as part of the announced liquidity support program by the Bank for the Ukrainian corporate sector.
Overall, during the year the Company repaid USD25.6 million of borrowings, while attracting USD19.3 million of new borrowings.
In the acquisition of subsidiaries in 2013, the Company agreed deferred consideration of USD20 million to be paid by April 2015. This amount is included within other liabilities of the Company and, subsequent to the year end, has been re-scheduled to April 2016.
Tetyana Kolesnyk
Acting Chief Financial Officer
23 June 2015
Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2014.
Note | 2014 (amended) | 2013 | |||
(in thousands of USD, except earnings per share) | |||||
Revenue | 22 | 22,791 | 25,299 | ||
Other income | 420 | 1,233 | |||
Gain on revaluation of investment property | 7, 12 | 42,250 | 1,751 | ||
Goods, raw materials and services used | 23 | (809) | (983) | ||
Operating expenses | 24 | (50,898) | (12,727) | ||
Employee costs | (3,013) | (3,789) | |||
Depreciation and amortisation | (276) | (249) | |||
|
| ||||
Profit from operating activities | 10,465 | 10,535 | |||
|
| ||||
Finance income | 25 | 6,071 | 3,831 | ||
Finance costs | 25 | (86,119) | (10,265) | ||
|
| ||||
(Loss) profit before income tax | (69,583) | 4,101 | |||
Income tax expense | 26 | (9,013) | (904) | ||
|
| ||||
Net (loss) profit for the year | (78,596) | 3,197 | |||
|
| ||||
Items that will be reclassified to profit or loss: | |||||
Foreign exchange losses on monetary items that form part of net investment in the foreign operation, net of tax effect | (146,523) | - | |||
Foreign currency translation differences | 55,252 | - | |||
|
| ||||
Total items that will be reclassified to profit or loss | (91,271) | - | |||
|
| ||||
Other comprehensive loss | (91,271) | - | |||
|
| ||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income for the year | (169,867) | 3,197 | |||
|
| ||||
Weighted average number of shares (in shares) | 15 | 103,270,637 | 84,262,942 | ||
|
| ||||
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share, USD | (0.76107) | 0.03794 | |||
|
| ||||
Consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2014
| Note | 31 December 2014 (amended) | 31 December 2013
|
(in thousands of USD) | |||
Assets | |||
Non-current assets | |||
Investment property | 7 | 205,552 | 287,799 |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 8 | - | 20,727 |
Deferred tax asset | 26 | - | 1,520 |
Long-term loans receivable | 9 | 1,562 | 1,519 |
Long-term VAT recoverable | 10 | 6,575 | 10,882 |
Property and equipment | 433 | 537 | |
Intangible assets | 33 | 64 | |
Restricted deposits | 14 | 897 | 820 |
|
| ||
Total non-current assets | 215,052 | 323,868 | |
|
| ||
Current assets | |||
Inventories | 3 | 4 | |
Trade and other receivables | 11 | 1,331 | 4,324 |
Loans receivable | 9 | 8,790 | 48,469 |
Prepayments made and other assets | 13 | 576 | 10,116 |
VAT recoverable | 10 | 2,273 | 4,612 |
Assets classified as held for sale | 12 | 9,702 | 5,833 |
Restricted deposits | 14 | 1,385 | 663 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 14 | 832 | 11,840 |
|
| ||
Total current assets | 24,892 | 85,861 | |
|
| ||
Total assets | 239,944 | 409,729 | |
|
|
Equity and Liabilities |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
Share capital | 15 | 67 | 67 |
Share premium |
| 183,727 | 183,727 |
Additional paid-in capital |
| 59,713 | 59,713 |
Retained earnings |
| (28,087) | 50,509 |
Other reserves |
| (61,983) | (61,983) |
Foreign currency translation differences |
| (91,783) | (512) |
|
|
| |
Total equity |
| 61,654 | 231,521 |
|
|
| |
Non-current liabilities |
| ||
Long-term borrowings | 17 | 52,734 | 62,391 |
Advances received | 20 | 1,158 | 2,900 |
Finance lease liability | 18 | 8,128 | 11,248 |
Trade and other payables | 19 | 5,558 | - |
Other long-term liabilities | 21 | 141 | 10,222 |
Deferred tax liability | 26 | 1,471 | 5,443 |
|
|
| |
Total non-current liabilities |
| 69,190 | 92,204 |
|
|
| |
Current liabilities |
| ||
Short-term borrowings | 17 | 44,222 | 40,623 |
Trade and other payables | 19 | 37,221 | 13,745 |
Tax payables |
| 163 | 272 |
Advances received | 20 | 6,153 | 20,628 |
Current portion of finance lease liability | 18 | 2 | 89 |
Other liabilities | 21 | 20,412 | 10,151 |
Liabilities classified as held for sale |
| 927 | 496 |
|
|
| |
Total current liabilities |
| 109,100 | 86,004 |
|
|
| |
Total liabilities |
| 178,290 | 178,208 |
|
|
| |
Total equity and liabilities |
| 239,944 | 409,729 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statement of Cash Flow for the year ended 31 December 2014
Note | 2014 (amended) | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | |||
(Loss) profit before income tax | (69,583) | 4,101 | |
Adjustments for: | |||
Finance income | 25 | (6,071) | (3,831) |
Finance costs, excluding foreign exchange loss and impairment of available-for-sale financial assets | 25 |
15,573 |
10,265 |
Gain on revaluation of investment property | 7, 12 | (42,250) | (1,751) |
Impairment of available-for-sale financial assets | 6, 8, 25 | 20,727 | - |
Depreciation and amortisation | 276 | 249 | |
Unrealised foreign exchange loss | 49,457 | - | |
VAT refundable written-off | 24 | 1,096 | - |
Allowance for bad debts | 24 | 42,625 | 541 |
|
| ||
Operating cash flows before changes in working capital | 11,850 | 9,574 | |
|
| ||
Change in inventories | (19) | 87 | |
Change in trade and other receivables | (1,408) | (923) | |
Change in prepayments made and other assets | (14) | (496) | |
Change in VAT recoverable | 3,498 | 1,966 | |
Change in trade and other payables | 2,827 | (1,202) | |
Change in advances received | (176) | 1,064 | |
Change in other liabilities | 23 | (31) | |
Income tax paid | (192) | - | |
Interest paid | (10,893) | (11,578) | |
|
| ||
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities | 5,496 | (1,539) | |
|
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | - | 4,233 | |
Acquisition of investment property, excluding capitalised borrowing costs, and settlements of payables due to constructors | (1,865) | (41,172) | |
Acquisition of property and equipment | (447) | (296) | |
Prepayments made | - | (5,217) | |
Advances received | - | 4,801 | |
Loans granted | (65) | (240) | |
Loans repaid | 136 | 85 | |
Change in VAT recoverable | (4,907) | (5,426) | |
Placement of the restricted deposit | (1,020) | (1,483) | |
Interest received | 103 | 156 | |
|
| ||
Cash flows used in investing activities | (8,065) | (44,559) | |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities | |||
Proceeds from issue of shares, net of equity costs | - | 22,243 | |
Proceeds from borrowings, net of transaction costs | 19,332 | 85,945 | |
Repayment of borrowings | (25,646) | (57,015) | |
Finance lease payments | (940) | (797) | |
Withdrawal of other reserves | - | (3) | |
|
| ||
Cash flows (used in) from financing activities | (7,254) | 50,373 | |
|
| ||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (9,823) | 4,275 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January | 11,840 | 7,565 | |
Effect of movements in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (1,185) | - | |
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December | 832 | 11,840 | |
|
|
Non-cash movements
During the year ended 31 December 2014, acquisition of investment property of USD 3,334 thousand was financed through finance leases (2013: USD 5,144 thousand).
Consolidated statement of changes in equity as at and for the year ended 31 December 2014
| Attributable to equity holders of the parent | |||||||
| Share capital | Share premium | Additional paid-in capital | Retained earnings | Other reserves | Foreign currency translation differences | Total |
|
(In thousands of USD) |
| |||||||
Balances at 1 January 2013 | 54 | 159,981 | 59,713 | 47,312 | (131,980) | (512) | 134,568 |
|
Total comprehensive income for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit and total other comprehensive income | - | - | - | 3,197 | - | - | 3,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year | - | - | - | 3,197 | - | - | 3,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Transactions with owners, recognised directly in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture of shares (refer to note 15) | (13) | (69,987) | - | - | - | - | (70,000) |
|
Reversal of reserve for unpaid shares (refer to note 15) | - | - | - | - | 70,000 | - | 70,000 |
|
Increase in share capital through contribution in kind from shareholders | 26 | 93,733 | - | - | - | - | 93,759 |
|
Other movements | - | - | - | - | (3) | - | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total transactions with owners | 13 | 23,746 | - | - | 69,997 | - | 93,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balances at 31 December 2013 | 67 | 183,727 | 59,713 | 50,509 | (61,983) | (512) | 231,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Attributable to equity holders of the parent | ||||||||
| Share capital | Share premium | Additional paid-in capital | Retained earnings | Other reserves | Foreign currency translation differences | Total | ||
(In thousands of USD) | |||||||||
Balances at 1 January 2014 | 67 | 183,727 | 59,713 | 50,509 | (61,983) | (512) | 231,521 | ||
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss (amended) Other comprehensive loss | - | - | - | (78,596) | - | - | (78,596) | ||
Foreign exchange losses on monetary items that form part of net investment in the foreign operation, net of tax effect | - | - | - | - | - | (146,523) | (146,523) | ||
Foreign currency translation differences | - | - | - | - | - | 55,252 | 55,252 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total comprehensive loss for the year | - | - | - | (78,956) | - | (91,271) | (169,867) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Balances at 31 December 2014 (amended) | 67 | 183,727 | 59,713 | (28,087) | (61,983) | (91,783) | 61,654 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
1. Background
(a) Organization and operations
Arricano Real Estate PLC (Arricano, the Company or the Parent Company) is a public company that was incorporated in Cyprus and is listed on the London Alternative Investment Market (London AIM). The Parent Company's registered address is office 1002, 10th floor, Nicolaou Pentadromos Centre, Thessalonikis Street, 3025 Limassol, Cyprus. Arricano and its subsidiaries are referred to as the Group, and their principal place of business is in Ukraine.
The main activities of the Group are investing in the development of new properties in Ukraine and leasing them out. As at 31 December 2014, the Group operates five shopping centres in Kyiv, Simferopol, Zaporizhzhya and Kryvyi Rig with a total leasable area of over 144,050 square meters and is in the process of development of two new investment projects in Kyiv and Odesa.
(b) Ukrainian business environment
Ukraine's political and economic situation has deteriorated significantly since the Government's decision not to sign the Association Agreement and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement with the European Union in late November 2013. Political and social unrest combined with rising regional tensions has deepened the ongoing economic crisis and has resulted in a widening of the state budget deficit and a depletion of the National Bank of Ukraine's foreign currency reserves and, as a result, a further downgrading of the Ukrainian sovereign debt credit ratings. In February 2014, following the devaluation of the national currency, the National Bank of Ukraine introduced certain administrative restrictions on currency conversion transactions and also announced a transition to a floating foreign exchange rate regime. The final resolution and the effects of the political and economic crisis are difficult to predict but may have further severe effects on the Ukrainian economy.
In March 2014, the regional parliament in the Republic of Crimea declared its independence from Ukraine and signed an agreement with the Russian Federation outlining the Republic of Crimea's intention to join the Russian Federation. Effective from 1 May 2014 the national currency of the Republic of Crimea is the Russian Rouble. The Ukrainian state authorities and authorities of other leading countries do not recognise these declarations and agreements as they believe they are in violation of the Ukrainian constitution and international law.
However, as a result of these events and the Crimean parliament no longer recognising the authority of the Ukrainian national government, the Ukrainian authorities are not currently able to enforce Ukrainian laws on the territory of the Republic of Crimea.
As at 31 December 2014, the carrying value of the Group's investment property located in Simferopol, the administrative centre of the Republic of Crimea, amounted to USD 27,800 thousand. The ultimate effect of these developments in the Republic of Crimea on the Group's ability to continue operations in this region, to realise its related assets and to maintain and secure its ownership rights cannot yet be determined.
Whilst management believes it is taking appropriate measures to support the sustainability of the Group's business in the current circumstances, a continuation of the current unstable business environment could negatively affect the Group's results and financial position in a manner not currently determinable. These consolidated financial statements reflect management's current assessment of the impact of the Ukrainian business environment on the operations and the financial position of the Group. The future business environment may differ from management's assessment.
(c) Cyprus business environment
The Cyprus economy has been adversely affected from the crisis in the Cyprus banking system in conjunction with the inability of the Republic of Cyprus to borrow from international markets. As a result, the Republic of Cyprus entered into negotiations with the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund (the "Troika"), for financial support, which resulted into an agreement and the Eurogroup decision of 25 March 2013.
The current economic environment of Cyprus is not expected to have a significant impact on the operations of the Company as the Company does not hold significant funds in Cypriot financial institutions.
On the basis of the evaluation performed, the Group's management has concluded that no additional provisions or impairment charges are necessary .The Group's management believes that it is taking all the necessary measures to maintain the viability of the Group and the development of its business in the current business and economic environment.
2. Basis of preparation
(a) Statement of compliance
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union (EU) and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113.
(b) Basis of measurement
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost basis except for investment property, including investment property classified as held for sale, which is carried at fair value.
(c) Functional and presentation currency
The functional currency of Arricano Real Estate PLC is the US dollar (USD). The majority of Group entities are located in Ukraine and have the Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH) as their functional currency, except for Voyazh-Krym LLC, which has the Russian Rouble (RUB) as its functional currency starting from 1 May 2014, following the changes in the Ukrainian business environment described in note 1(b). The Group entities located in Cyprus and Isle of Man have the US dollar as their functional currency, since substantially all transactions and balances of these entities are denominated in US dollars.
For the benefits of principal users, the management chose to present the consolidated financial statements in USD, rounded to the nearest thousand.
In translating the consolidated financial statements into USD the Group follows a translation policy in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standard IAS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates and the following procedures are performed:
- Historical rates: for the equity accounts except for net profit or loss and other comprehensive income (loss) for the year.
- Year-end rate: for all assets and liabilities.
- Rates at the dates of the transactions: for the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and for capital transactions.
UAH and RUB are not freely convertible currencies outside Ukraine and the Russian Federation, and, accordingly, any conversion of UAH and RUB amounts into USD should not be construed as a representation that UAH and RUB amounts have been, could be, or will be in the future, convertible into USD at the exchange rate shown, or any other exchange rate (also refer to note 3(b)(i)).
The principal USD exchange rates used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are as follows.
Year-end USD exchange rates as at 31 December are as follows:
Currency | 2014 | 2013 |
UAH | 15.77 | 7.99 |
RUB | 56.26 | 32.72* |
Average USD exchange rates for the year ended 31 December are as follows:
Currency | 2014 | 2013 |
UAH | 11.87 | 7.99 |
RUB | 38.60 | 31.91* |
* no balances and transactions were translated from RUB to USD as at 31 December 2013 and for the year ended 31 December 2013.
As at the date of these consolidated financial statements are authorised for issue, 23 June 2015, the exchange rate is UAH 21.77 to USD 1.00 and RUB 53.56 to USD 1.00.
(d) Use of judgments, estimates and assumptions
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRSs as adopted by the EU requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.
In particular, information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated financial statements and have significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within the next financial year are included in the following notes:
· note 2(c) - determination of functional currency,
· note 3(b)(i) - application of foreign currency exchange rates,
· note 7 - valuation of investment property,
· note 8 - valuation of available-for-sale financial assets,
· note 9 - valuation and presentation of loans receivable,
· note 11 - valuation of trade and other receivables,
· note 12(a) - classification of assets held for sale,
· note 26 - calculation of deferred tax.
(e) Going concern
The Group incurred a net loss of USD 78,596 thousand in 2014 and, as at 31 December 2014, the Group's current liabilities exceed current assets by USD 84,208 thousand.
At the same time, the Group has positive equity of USD 61,654 thousand as at 31 December 2014 and positive cash flows from operating activities amounting to USD 5,496 thousand for the year then ended.
Management is undertaking the following measures in order to ensure the Group's continued operation on a going concern basis:
· During the year ended 31 December 2014, the Group has finalised the construction of the new shopping centre "Prospect" located in Kyiv which started its operations in September 2014. In accordance with the budget for 2015, net operating income from this shopping centre is estimated at USD 4,461 thousand. Management expects positive cash-flows from operations of shopping centre "Prospect" in 2015;
· In March 2015, the Group signed an amendment to the share exchange agreement in order to postpone the settlement of the deferred consideration payable of USD 20,000 thousand from 30 April 2015 to 30 April 2016 (refer to note 30(a));
· In March 2015, the Group signed an amendment to the loan agreement with Bytenem Co Limited in order to postpone the settlement of the outstanding balance of USD 17,471 thousand from 14 March 2015 to 14 March 2016 (refer to note 30(a));
· In December 2014, the Group concluded a new loan agreement with the EBRD for a facility up to USD 25,000 thousand to refinance an existing loan due to Oshchadbank amounting to USD 10,000 thousand and to repay amounts due to constructors of USD 15,000 thousand;
· The Group has financial support from the ultimate controlling party. Based on representations received from an entity under common control, management believes that the Group will not be required to settle the outstanding loan payable to International Baltic Investments of USD 15,582 thousand in 2015. In addition, management believes that the Group will be able to obtain new loans from entities under common control should this be required for operational and other needs of the Group.
Management believes that the measures that it undertakes, as described above, will allow the Group to operate on a going concern basis in the foreseeable future. Therefore, management believes that the going concern basis for preparing these consolidated financial statements is appropriate and there is no significant uncertainty regarding the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.
These consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realisation of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.
(f) Measurement of fair values
A number of the Group's accounting policies and disclosures require the measurement of fair values, for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.
When measuring the fair value of an asset or a liability, the Group uses market observable data as far as possible. Fair values are categorised into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows:
· Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
· Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).
· Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
If the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or a liability might be categorised in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, then the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety in the same level of the fair value hierarchy as the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement.
The Group recognises transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy at the end of the reporting period during which the change has occurred. Further information about the assumptions made in measuring fair values is included in the following notes:
· Note 7 - investment property; and
· Note 27(e)(iii) - fair values.
3. Significant accounting policies
The accounting policies set out in the full financial statements are applied consistently to all periods presented in this announcement, and have been applied consistently by Group entities.
4. Changes in presentation of related party disclosures
During the year ended 31 December 2014, the Group management became aware that one of the Group's counterparties which has been providing and continues to provide major construction services to the Group, and which was considered by management to be a related party up to and including 2013 due to its relationship with the ultimate controlling party of the Company, was disposed in 2011 out of control of the ultimate controlling party to an entity in which a close family member of one of the Company's minority shareholders has significant interest. As of the date of this disposal, the Company no longer has a reportable related party relationship with the said counterparty. Consequently, as at 31 December 2014, the transactions and balances with this counterparty are not presented as related party relationships and corresponding changes to comparative information were made in these consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
5. Acquisition of subsidiaries
On 12 September 2013, the Group acquired Twible Holdings Limited and its subsidiary LLC Comfort Market Luks, Gelida Holding Limited and its subsidiary LLC Mezokred Holding, Sapete Holdings Limited and its subsidiary LLC Vektor Capital, Wayfield Limited and its subsidiary LLC Budkhol from entities under common control. The acquisition of these subsidiaries was accounted for as an acquisition of assets and liabilities as they did not meet the definition of a business according to IFRS 3 Business Combinations and the Group has transferred 28,350,214 ordinary shares issued for the purposes of IPO in exchange for these assets and liabilities. In addition, the Group has agreed to pay a deferred consideration related to acquisition of the shares of Wayfield Limited and its subsidiary LLC Budkhol via a cash payment of USD 20,000 thousands in two tranches. The first tranche amounting to USD 10,000 thousand was to be paid before 30 April 2014, while the payment of the second tranche was to be paid not later than 30 April 2015. The Group is liable to pay quarterly interest on any deferred consideration outstanding at the rate of 9.75% per annum.
In May 2014, the Group signed an amendment to the share exchange agreement in order to postpone the payment of USD 10,000 thousand from 30 April 2014 to 30 April 2015 (refer to note 21). In March 2015, the Group signed an amendment to the share exchange agreement in order to postpone the payment of USD 20,000 thousand from 30 April 2015 to 30 April 2016 (refer to notes 21, 30(a)).
The fair value of the shares transferred in the above transaction was determined by reference to the market price of the Parent Company's ordinary shares of USD 2.33 per share. This price was determined based on the price of shares settled by a third party in cash on the date the Parent Company was admitted for trading. The excess of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities over the fair value of shares transferred and deferred consideration payable was recognised as contribution from the shareholder within share premium.
The cost of the acquisition was allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired based on their relative fair values as follows:
(in thousands of USD) | |
Investment property | 86,859 |
Long-term VAT recoverable | 2,579 |
Property and equipment | 8 |
Trade and other receivables | 15 |
Loans receivable | 1,209 |
Prepayments made | 3,752 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 4,233 |
Assets classified as held for sale (refer to note 12) | 5,833 |
Finance lease liability | (2,155) |
Other long-term liabilities | (253) |
Short-term borrowings | (2) |
Trade and other payables | (206) |
Tax payables | (25) |
Advances received | (9,835) |
Liabilities classified as held for sale | (496) |
|
|
Net identifiable assets and liabilities | 91,516 |
| |
Deferred consideration (refer to note 21) | 20,000 |
Fair value of the shares transferred (refer to note 15) | 66,056 |
|
|
Fair value of consideration transferred | 86,056 |
| |
Contribution from shareholders | 5,460 |
|
The share purchase agreements stipulated that certain loans payable by the acquired subsidiaries to a third party and entities under common control are to be re-assigned to Arricano for a nominal amount of EUR 1 each. Accordingly, as at the date of acquisition the relative fair value of these loans is considered to be nil despite that formal legal procedures for loan re-assignment were only substantially completed in the fourth quarter of 2013.
As at 12 September 2013, included in investment property are priority land lease rights for three land plots located in Odesa amounting to USD 10,900 thousand in total. These priority land lease rights were recognised since LLC Vektor Capital, being the owner of non-residential premises located on these land plots, had the priority right to conclude land lease agreements with the Odesa City Council. On 17 December 2013, these land lease agreements were approved to be concluded with formal sign-off finalised on 20 March 2014 (refer to note 18).
6. Amendments to the consolidated financial statements that were authorized for issue
Subsequent to the date that the original consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2014 were authorised for issue, 28 April 2015, management was able to obtain additional information about matters affecting the recoverable values of certain assets and proceeded to amend the consolidated financial statements of the Group as at and for the year ended 31 December 2014 and submit anew the consolidated financial statements for approval and authorization for issuance.
Management determined that certain corrections to the amounts initially reported are required:
· Recognition of impairment of available-for-sale financial asset for the amount of USD 20,727 thousand as at 31 December 2014 (refer to note 8);
· Recognition of impairment of loans receivable for the amount of USD 39,761 thousand, including accrued interest in the amount of USD 9,761 thousand (refer to note 9).
·
The table below represents the summarised impact of the corrections to the originally reported amounts on the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2014:
31 December 2014 | Amendments | 31 December 2014 | |||||
(as originally reported) | (amended) | ||||||
(in thousands of USD) |
| ||||||
| |||||||
Assets |
| ||||||
Non-current assets |
| ||||||
Investment property | 205,552 | - | 205,552 |
| |||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 20,727 | (20,727) | - |
| |||
Deferred tax asset | - | - | - |
| |||
Long-term loans receivable | 41,323 | (39,761) | 1,562 |
| |||
Long-term VAT recoverable | 6,575 | - | 6,575 |
| |||
Property and equipment | 433 | - | 433 |
| |||
Intangible assets | 33 | - | 33 |
| |||
Restricted deposits | 897 | - | 897 |
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
Total non-current assets | 275,540 | (60,488) | 215,052 |
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
Current assets |
| ||||||
Inventories | 3 | - | 3 |
| |||
Trade and other receivables | 1,331 | - | 1,331 |
| |||
Loans receivable | 8,790 | - | 8,790 |
| |||
Prepayments made and other assets | 576 | - | 576 |
| |||
VAT recoverable | 2,273 | - | 2,273 |
| |||
Assets classified as held for sale | 9,702 | - | 9,702 |
| |||
Restricted deposits | 1,385 | - | 1,385 |
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 832 | - | 832 |
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
Total current assets | 24,892 | - | 24,892 |
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
Total assets | 300,432 | (60,488) | 239,944 |
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
31 December 2014 | Amendments | 31 December 2014 | |
(as originally reported) | (amended) | ||
(in thousands of USD) | |||
Equity and Liabilities | |||
Equity | |||
Share capital | 67 | - | 67 |
Share premium | 183,727 | - | 183,727 |
Additional paid-in capital | 59,713 | - | 59,713 |
Retained earnings | 32,401 | (60,488) | (28,087) |
Other reserves | (61,983) | - | (61,983) |
Foreign currency translation differences |
(91,783) |
- |
(91,783) |
|
|
| |
Total equity | 122,142 | (60,488) | 61,654 |
|
|
| |
Non-current liabilities | |||
Long-term borrowings | 52,734 | - | 52,734 |
Advances received | 1,158 | - | 1,158 |
Finance lease liability | 8,128 | - | 8,128 |
Trade and other payables | 5,558 | - | 5,558 |
Other long-term liabilities | 141 | - | 141 |
Deferred tax liability | 1,471 | - | 1,471 |
|
|
| |
Total non-current liabilities | 69,190 | - | 69,190 |
|
|
| |
Current liabilities | |||
Short-term borrowings | 44,222 | - | 44,222 |
Trade and other payables | 37,221 | - | 37,221 |
Tax payables | 163 | - | 163 |
Advances received | 6,153 | - | 6,153 |
Current portion of finance lease liability |
2 |
- |
2 |
Other liabilities | 20,412 | - | 20,412 |
Liabilities classified as held for sale | 927 | - | 927 |
| - |
| |
Total current liabilities | 109,100 | - | 109,100 |
|
|
| |
Total liabilities | 178,290 | - | 178,290 |
|
|
| |
Total equity and liabilities | 300,432 | (60,488) | 239,944 |
|
|
|
The table below represents the summarised impact of the correction to the originally reported amounts on the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2014:
2014 | Amendments | 2014 | |||
(as originally reported) | (amended)
| ||||
(in thousands of USD, except earnings per share) |
| ||||
Revenue | 22,791 | - | 22,791 |
| |
Other income | 420 | - | 420 |
| |
Gain on revaluation of investment property | 42,250 | - | 42,250 |
| |
Goods, raw materials and services used | (809) | - | (809) |
| |
Operating expenses | (11,137) | (39,761) | (50,898) |
| |
Employee costs | (3,013) | - | (3,013) |
| |
Depreciation and amortisation | (276) | - | 276) |
| |
Profit from operating activities | 50,226 | (39,761) | 10,465 |
| |
Finance income | 6,071 | - | 6,071 |
| |
Finance costs | (65,392) | (20,727) | (86,119) |
| |
(Loss) profit before income tax | (9,095) | (60,488) | (69,583) |
| |
Income tax expense | (9,013) | - | (9,013) |
| |
Net (loss) profit for the year | (18,108) | (60,488) |
(78,596) |
| |
Items that will be reclassified to profit or loss: |
| ||||
Foreign exchange losses on monetary items that form part of net investment in the foreign operation, net of tax effect | (146,523) |
- | (146,523) |
| |
Foreign currency translation differences | 55,252 | - | 55,252 |
| |
Total items that will be reclassified to profit or loss | (91,271) | - |
(91,271) |
| |
Other comprehensive loss | (91,271) | - |
(91,271) |
| |
Total comprehensive (loss) income for the year | (109,379) | (60,488) |
(169,867) |
| |
Weighted average number of shares (in shares) | 103,270,637 | - | 103,270,637 |
| |
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share, USD | (0.17534) | - | (0.76107) |
| |
7. Investment property
(a) Movements in investment property
Movements in investment properties for the year ended 31 December are as follows:
Land held on freehold | Land held on leasehold | Buildings | Prepayment for investment property | Property under construction |
Total | ||||||
(in thousands of USD) | |||||||||||
At 1 January 2013 | 9,200 | 10,369 | 136,198 | - | 5,449 | 161,216 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Additions | - | 5,144 | 199 | 11,672 | 20,958 | 37,973 | |||||
Additions through assets acquisition | - | 62,256 | - | 1,244 | 23,359 | 86,859 | |||||
Transfers | - | - | 23,453 | (5,412) | (18,041) | - | |||||
Fair value gains (losses) on revaluation | (200) | (300) | 2,251 | - | - | 1,751 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
At 31 December 2013/ 1 January 2014 | 9,000 | 77,469 | 162,101 | 7,504 | 31,725 | 287,799 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Additions | - | 3,334 | 18,315 | 541 | 20,590 | 42,780 | |||||
Transfers* | - | - | 31,446 | (5,393) | (26,053) | - | |||||
Fair value gains on revaluation | 3,280 | 11,792 | 24,897 | - | - | 39,969 | |||||
Transfer to assets held for sale | - | (5,596) | - | (15) | (733) | (6,344) | |||||
Currency translation adjustment | (5,380) | (39,727) | (98,505) | (2,582) | (12,458) | (158,652) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
At 31 December 2014 | 6,900 | 47,272 | 138,254 | 55 | 13,071 | 205,552 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
* As at 31 December 2014, the Group had not obtained the title documents for the shopping centre "Prospect" in Kyiv with a total gross leasable area (GLA) of nearly 30,400 square meters and a carrying value of USD 29,100 thousand. On 5 March 2015, the Group has obtained title documents for the shopping center "Prospect". In September 2014, this shopping centre started its operations.
During the year ended 31 December 2014, acquisition of a land plot held on leasehold of USD 3,334 thousand was financed through finance lease (2013: USD 5,144 thousand) (refer to note 18).
During the year ended 31 December 2014, 79% of total construction services were purchased from one company (2013: 79% of total construction services) (refer to note 4).
During the year ended 31 December 2014, capitalised borrowing costs related to the construction of the new shopping centre in Kyiv amounted to USD 476 thousands (2013: USD 795 thousand and were related to the construction of the new shopping centre in Simferopol), with a capitalisation rate of 11.5% (2013: 11%).
As at 31 December 2014, in connection with loans and borrowings, the Group pledged as security investment property with a carrying value of USD 143,878 thousand (2013: USD 193,111 thousand) (refer to note 28(a)).
(b) Determination of fair value
The fair value measurement, developed for determination of fair value of the Group's investment property, is categorised within Level 3 category due to significance of unobservable inputs to the entire measurement, except for the land held on the leasehold which is not associated with completed property and is therefore categorised within Level 2 category. As at 31 December 2014, the fair value of land held on leasehold categorized within Level 2 category is USD 25,800 thousand (2013: USD 49,700 thousand). To assist with the estimation of the fair value of the Group's investment property as at 31 December 2014, which is represented by the shopping centres, management engaged registered independent appraiser Expandia LLC, part of the CBRE Affiliate network, having a recognised professional qualification and recent experience in the location and categories of the projects being valued.
The fair values are based on the estimated rental value of property. A market yield is applied to the estimated rental value to arrive at the gross property valuation. When actual rents differ materially from the estimated rental value, adjustments are made to reflect actual rents. The valuation is prepared in accordance with the practice standards contained in the Appraisal and Valuation Standards published by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors ("RICS") or in accordance with International Valuation Standards published by the International Valuation Standards Council.
Valuations reflect, when appropriate, the type of tenants actually in occupation or responsible for meeting lease commitments or likely to be in occupation after letting vacant accommodation, the allocation of maintenance and insurance responsibilities between the Company and the lessee, and the remaining economic life of the property. When rent reviews or lease renewals are pending with anticipated reversionary increases, it is assumed that all notices, and when appropriate counter-notices, have been served validly and within the appropriate time.
Land parcels are valued based on market prices for similar properties.
As at 31 December 2014, the estimation of fair value is made using a net present value calculation based on certain assumptions, the most important of which are as follows:
· monthly rental rates, ranging from USD 3.00 to USD 35.00 per sq.m., which are based on contractual and market rental rates, adjusted for discounts or fixation of rental rates in Ukrainian Hryvnia at a pre-agreed exchange rate, occupancy rates ranging from 71% to 99% and discount rates ranging from 12.50% to 19.00% p.a, which represent key unobservable inputs for determination of fair value;
· all relevant licenses and permits, to the extent not yet received, will be obtained, in accordance with the timetables as set out in the investment project plans.
As at 31 December 2013, the estimation of fair value is made using a net present value calculation based on certain assumptions, the most important of which are as follows:
· monthly rental rates which were based on contractual and market rental rates ranging from USD 3.00 to USD 48.70 per sq.m., occupancy rates ranging from 95% to 99% and discount rates ranging from 13.50% to 17.20% p.a, which represent key unobservable inputs for determination of fair value;
· all relevant licenses and permits, to the extent not yet received, will be obtained, in accordance with the timetables as set out in the investment project plans.
The reconciliation from the opening balances to the closing balances for Level 3 fair value measurements is presented in note 7(a).
As at 31 December 2014, fair value of investment property denominated in functional currency amounted to UAH 2,950,175 thousand and RUB 1,035,233 thousand (31 December 2013: UAH 2,300,375 thousand). The increase in fair value of investment property results from increased rental rates invoiced in Ukrainian Hryvnia due to the increase in the exchange rates applied to the USD equivalent of rental rates fixed in the contracts.
Sensitivity at the date of valuation
The valuation model used to assess the fair value of investment property as at 31 December 2014 is particularly sensitive to unobservable inputs in the following areas:
· If rental rates are 1% less than those used in valuation models, the fair value of investment properties would be USD 1,603 thousand (2013: USD 1,756 thousand) lower. If rental rates are 1% higher, then the fair value of investment properties would be USD 1,603 thousand (2013: USD 1,756 thousand) higher.
· If the discount rate applied is 1% higher than that used in the valuation models, the fair value of investment properties would be USD 10,362 thousand (2013: USD 11,747 thousand) lower. If the discount rate is 1% less, then the fair value of investment properties would be USD 11,908 thousand (2013: USD 13,563 thousand) higher.
· If the occupancy rates are 1% higher than those used in the valuation models, the fair value of investment properties would be USD 1,351 thousand higher (2013: if the occupancy rates are 1% higher than those used in the valuation models, or are assumed to be 100% for the shopping centers in Zaporizhzhya and Kyiv, the fair value of investment properties would be USD 1,813 thousand higher). If the occupancy rates are 1% less, then the fair value of investment properties would be USD 1,430 thousand (2013: USD 3,040 thousand) lower.
8. Available-for-sale financial assets
As at 31 December 2013, available-for-sale financial assets are represented by the investment in Assofit Holdings Limited, in which the Group holds 49.97% of nominal voting rights without retaining significant influence.
Assofit Holdings Limited (Assofit) is not a publicly listed entity and consequently does not have published price quotations of its shares. Also, management believes that the range and variability of fair value estimates for the investment in Assofit is significant. Thus, management believes that the fair value of equity investment in Assofit cannot be measured reliably, therefore this equity investment is measured as cost less impairment.
As at 31 December 2013, Assofit was operating Skymall shopping centre with a total gross leasable area of nearly 65,600 square metres through its wholly owned subsidiary Prizma Beta LLC. As at 31 December 2013, management assessed impairment indicators for investment in Assofit. As a result of this analysis, management concluded that as at 31 December 2013 there were no indicators of impairment of investment in Assofit based on the following:
· Historically, Assofit generated strong positive cash flows and the major underlying asset of Assofit is Skymall shopping centre that as at 31 December 2011 was measured at fair value, as determined by an independent qualified appraiser using the income approach. There were no decreases in rental rates for similar properties since that date up to 31 December 2013 which could materially decrease the fair value of the shopping centre. Also, many of the tenants have long-term contracts where only upward revision of rental rates is possible;
· Assofit was operating under direction of a receiver appointed by the court to protect the rights of Arricano as a minority shareholder. Therefore, potential transfer of significant assets from the entity was deemed to be controlled by the receiver;
· As at 31 December 2013, a significant portion of liabilities of Assofit was represented by loans payable by the Ukrainian subsidiary of Assofit, Prizma Beta LLC, to Filgate Credit Enterprises Limited. In accordance with a final award issued by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Tribunal on 9 June 2011, these loans together with accrued interest were to be assigned from Filgate Credit Enterprises Limited to the entity under joint control of Arricano and Stockman Interhold S.A., the majority shareholder of Assofit, for a nominal price of EUR 1 each.
On 28 January 2014, the Highest Economic Court of Ukraine upheld the rulings of the lower instances courts to re-assign the abovementioned loans payable amounting to USD 120,000 thousand to Assofit. A subsequent appeal of Filgate Credit Enterprises Limited to the Supreme Court of Ukraine was not satisfied, thus leaving the abovementioned decision of the Highest Economic Court of Ukraine unchanged and in effect. These loans were reassigned to Torsem Co Limited, jointly owned by two BVI holding companies. As 31 December 2013, Arricano had a right to acquire one of the abovementioned BVI holding companies in accordance with the final award issued by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Tribunal on 9 June 2011. Management believed this right proved that value of investment into Assofit significantly exceeded its carrying amount.
In September 2014, Assofit transferred the shares of Prizma Beta LLC to Financial and Investment Solutions BV, a company registered in the Netherlands, despite the fact that an Interim Receiver was appointed in Assofit with the responsibility of collecting and safeguarding Assofit's assets. Further, in September 2014, Joint-Stock Bank Pivdennyi PJSC, Ukraine, which had an outstanding mortgage loan from Prizma Beta LLC of USD 32,000 thousand, exercised its right to recover the above-mentioned loan by means of reposession of ownership rights to the Skymall shopping centre which was pledged to secure this loan in September 2014. Consequently, Assofit has lost legal control over the Skymall shopping centre. The Group is contesting the eligibility of these developments in court (refer to note 28 (d)(i)). As a result of the abovementioned events, as at 31 December 2014 there are indications that the carrying amount of available-for-sale financial assets might not be recoverable. Correspondingly, management has performed an impairment assessment of available-for-sale financial assets as at that date. Based on the results of this assessment, management has determined that due to loss of the legal control over major asset, represented by the Skymall shopping centre, investment in Assofit fully is impaired as at 31 December 2014.
9. Loans receivable
Loans receivable as at 31 December are as follows:
2014
| 2013
| |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Non-current assets |
|
|
Long-term loans receivable due from third parties | 1,340 | 1,340 |
Accrued interest receivable due from third parties | 222 | 179 |
Long-term loans receivable due from related parties | 30,000 | - |
Accrued interest receivable due from related parties | 9,761 | - |
Impairment of loans receivable due from related parties | (39,761) | - |
|
|
|
| 1,562 | 1,519 |
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
Short-term loans receivable due from related parties | 401 | 30,879 |
Accrued interest receivable due from related parties | - | 8,579 |
Short-term loans receivable due from third parties | 7,576 | 8,088 |
Accrued interest receivable due from third parties | 1,149 | 923 |
Impairment of loans receivable due from related parties | (336) | - |
|
|
|
| 8,790 | 48,469 |
|
|
|
Loans receivable from third parties
As at 31 December 2014 and 2013, the long-term loans receivable from third party have their maturity date on 31 December 2018, are unsecured and bear a 3.2% interest rate per annum that is fully capitalised and to be repaid together with the principal.
As at 31 December 2014, short-term loans receivable due from third parties in the amount of USD 8,199 thousand (2013: USD 7,973 thousand) are represented by a loan, which bears a 3.2% interest rate per annum and is overdue. Management of the Group believes that it will be able to recover this loan receivable due from the third party due to the existence of sufficient assets of a short-term nature at the borrower and, accordingly, this loan receivable is not considered to be impaired. Should actual collections prove to be less than management estimates, the Group will be required to record additional impairment expense in the next reporting period. The Group management exercises significant judgment in presentation of this loan due within current assets.
Loans receivable from related parties
In July 2011 the Parent Company granted a loan to Weather Empire Limited with the purpose of buying 1,077 shares in the Parent Company's share capital from Retail Real Estate S.A. As at 31 December 2014, the resulting loan receivable of USD 39,761 thousand (2013: USD 38,579 thousand), including accrued interest of USD 9,761 thousand (2013: USD 8,579 thousand), is unsecured, bears a 3% fixed interest rate that is fully capitalised and repayable together with the principal and is overdue.
In July 2013 the shares of Weather Empire Limited were transferred to the Parent Company's major shareholders pro-rata to their ownership rights due to non-exercising of its conversion rights by ELQ Investors II Ltd and later on or about 12 August 2013 were transferred in full to Retail Real Estate S.A. Subsequent to this transfer, settlement of the loan by Weather Empire Limited depends on the intention and ability of the Company's majority shareholder and ultimate controlling party to repay this loan.
As at 31 December 2013, this loan was presented within current assets in accordance with its contractual maturity.
As at 31 December 2014, this loan is overdue and management considers this to be irrecoverable. In this respect management has proceeded with the full impairment of that loan receivable of USD 39,761 thousand, including accrued interest of USD 9,761 thousand, as at 31 December 2014. Corresponding impairment loss of USD 39,761 thousand has been recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for 2014.
Included in short-term loans receivable as at 31 December 2014 is also a loan due from PrJSC Dniprovska Prystan, a subsidiary of Assofit Holdings Limited, amounting to USD 336 thousand (2013: USD 664 thousand) which is overdue. Full amount of receivable was impaired as of 31 December 2014.
As at 31 December 2014, the remaining short-term loans receivable granted to related parties and third parties of USD 591 thousand are due within one year, unsecured and interest-free (2013: USD 1,253 thousand).
10. VAT recoverable
Management presents VAT recoverable within non-current and current assets based on the expected timing of VAT liabilities being available against which VAT recoverable can be utilised.
Management expects that long-term VAT recoverable will be recovered in full by 2018.
11. Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables as at 31 December are as follows:
|
| |
(in thousands of USD) | 2014 | 2013 |
Trade receivables from related parties | 5,394 | 10,761 |
Other receivables from related parties | 9,391 | 9,654 |
Allowance for impairment | (14,409) | (17,282) |
|
| |
376 | 3,133 | |
|
| |
Trade receivables from third parties | 982 | 1,426 |
Other receivables from third parties | 100 | 53 |
Allowance for impairment | (127) | (288) |
|
| |
955 | 1,191 | |
|
| |
1,331 | 4,324 | |
|
|
Trade receivables are mainly comprised of accounts receivable from related party, OKey Ukraine, under the common control of the ultimate controlling party. The Group ceased working with OKey Ukraine in August 2009. As the result of financial difficulties faced by this tenant, an allowance for impairment is recognised.
As at 31 December 2014, included in other receivables from related parties are receivables from Dniprovska Prystan PrJSC amounting to USD 9,029 thousand (2013: USD 9,260 thousand), which are overdue. In 2012, the court ruled to initiate bankruptcy proceedings against the mentioned related party and, as at 31 December 2014, the decision which would declare Dniprovska Prystan PrJSC insolvent has not yet been made. Full amount of receivable was impaired as at 31 December 2014.
12. Assets held for sale
(a) Movements in assets held for sale
Movements in assets classified as held for sale for the year ended 31 December are as follows:
Land held on leasehold | Buildings | Prepayment for investment property | Property under construction | Other assets |
Total | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||||||
At 1 January 2013 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions through assets acquisition (refer to note 5) | - | 423 | - | - | 5,410 | 5,833 |
At 1 January 2014 | - | 423 | - | - | 5,410 | 5,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from investment property | 5,596 | - | 15 | 733 | - | 6,344 |
Transfer from VAT recoverable | - | - | - | - | 83 | 83 |
Additions | 80 | - | 104 | 55 | - | 239 |
Transfers | - | - | (84) | 84 | - | - |
Fair value gain on revaluation | 2,281 | - | - | - | - | 2,281 |
Currency translation adjustment | (1,961) | (208) | (11) | (218) | (2,680) | (5,078) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 31 December 2014 | 5,996 | 215 | 24 | 654 | 2,813 | 9,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3 April 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company committed to a plan to sell Gelida Holding Limited and its subsidiary Mezokred Holding LLC to the ultimate controlling party of the Group. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the abovementioned subsidiaries are presented as classified as held for sale as at 31 December 2014. Assets of these subsidiaries are represented by investment property, which is a land plot, including the finance lease asset, measured at fair value of USD 5,996 thousand, prepayments for investment property in the amount of USD 24 thousand, property under construction measured at cost of USD 654 thousand and other assets of USD 71 thousand as at 31 December 2014. As at 31 December 2014, the Group recognised a gain on revaluation of this land plot in the amount of USD 2,281 thousand. During the year ended 31 December 2014, additions to land plot held on leasehold of USD 80 thousand were financed through finance lease. Based on representation obtained from the ultimate controlling party, management believes that subsidiaries Gelida Holding Limited and Mezokred Holding LLC will be sold without causing financial losses or equity reduction to Arricano. Accordingly, management believes that the assets of these subsidiaries are not impaired and are appropriately classified as held for sale as at 31 December 2014.
As at 31 December 2014, the Group is involved as a defendant in a lawsuit alleging invalidation of a resolution of the Kyiv City Council, according to which the latter has approved an allocation of a land plot for construction of the hypermarket to Mezokred Holding LLC and entitled Mezokred Holding LLC to lease this land plot for a period of 25 years (refer to note 28(d)(iii)).
Included in other assets classified as held for sale as at 31 December 2014, is a land plot with a carrying amount of USD 2,742 thousand (2013: USD 5,410 thousand), which is intended to be transferred by one of the Group's subsidiaries, Comfort Market Luks LLC, to a third party in accordance with an investment agreement concluded between the parties.
Based on this investment agreement, Comfort Market Luks LLC acted as an intermediary in the construction of a hypermarket with a total estimated area of 11,769 square meters and a parking lot with a total estimated area of 20,650 square meters.
As at 31 December 2013, the advance payment received under the investment agreement with a third party amounted to USD 14,636 thousand (refer to note 20). Simultaneously, Comfort Market Luks LLC concluded a contract of mandate, according to which this third party acted as a representative of the developer in the construction of this hypermarket and parking lot. As at 31 December 2013, prepayment made to this third party and other assets under the contract of mandate amounted to USD 8,110 thousand and prepayments made to other third parties and other assets under the abovementioned investment agreement amounted to USD 784 thousand (refer to note 13). As at 31 December 2014, the construction of the hypermarket and a parking lot is finalised and, except for the abovementioned land plot to be transferred, the investment agreement is considered to be executed. Management expects that the land plot will be transferred to the third party in 2015 subject to completion of formal legal procedures. As at 31 December 2014, advance payment received under this investment agreement amounts to USD 2,917 thousand (refer to note 20) and will be settled upon transfer of the land plot.
(b) Determination of fair value
The fair value measurement, developed for determination of fair value of the Group's investment property classified as held for sale, which is represented by a land plot, is based on market prices for similar properties and is categorised within the Level 2 category. To assist with the estimation of the fair value of the investment property classified as held for sale as at 31 December 2014, management engaged registered independent appraiser Expandia LLC, part of the CBRE Affiliate network, having a recognised professional qualification and recent experience in the location and categories of the projects being valued.
13. Prepayments made and other assets
As at 31 December 2014, prepayments made are represented by other prepaid miscellaneous expenses in the amount of USD 576 thousand (2013: USD 1,222 thousand). As at 31 December 2013, the prepayments made also included prepayments made and other assets under the investment agreement and the associated contract of mandate for the amount of USD 8,894 thousand in total (refer to note 12).
14. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents as at 31 December are as follows:
(in thousands of USD) | 2014 | 2013 |
|
|
|
Bank balances | 510 | 2,892 |
Call deposits | 193 | 8,798 |
Cash in transit | 129 | 150 |
| ||
| 832 | 11,840 |
|
Excluded from cash and cash equivalents as at 31 December 2014 are restricted deposits in amounts of USD 1,385 thousand and USD 897 thousand with maturity in 2015 and 2020, respectively (2013: USD 663 thousand and USD 820 thousand, with a maturity in 2014 and 2020, respectively). These deposits serve as pledge under three different loan facilities (refer note 28(a)).
As at 31 December 2014, cash and cash equivalents placed with two bank institutions amounted to USD 612 thousand, or 74% of the total balance of cash and cash equivalents (2013: USD 11,476 thousand, or 97%). In accordance with Moody's rating, these banks are rated as Caa2 and A2 as at 31 December 2014 (2013: both banks were rated as A2).
15. Share capital
Share capital as at 31 December is as follows:
| 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 |
| Number of shares | US dollars | EUR | Number of shares | US dollars | EUR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and fully paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January | 103,270,637 | 66,750 | 51,635 | 85,026,309 | 53,856 | 42,513 |
Forfeiture of shares | - | - | - | (20,406,309) | (12,789) | (10,203) |
Issue of shares | - | - | - | 38,650,637 | 25,683 | 19,325 |
| ||||||
At 31 December | 103,270,637 | 66,750 | 51,635 | 103,270,637 | 66,750 | 51,635 |
| ||||||
Authorised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 January | 106,000,000 | 68,564 | 53,000 | 85,026,320 | 53,856 | 42,513 |
Forfeiture of shares | - | - | - | (20,406,309) | (12,789) | (10,203) |
Issue of shares | - | - | - | 41,379,989 | 27,497 | 20,690 |
| ||||||
At 31 December | 106,000,000 | 68,564 | 53,000 | 106,000,000 | 68,564 | 53,000 |
| ||||||
Par value, EUR | - | - | 0.0005 | - | - | 0.0005 |
|
All shares rank equally with regard to the Parent Company's residual assets. The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time, and are entitled to one vote per share at meetings of the Parent Company.
During the years ended 31 December 2014 and 2013 the Group did not declare any dividends.
Initial public offering of the Company's shares
In 2012, the Parent Company was contemplating an initial public offering of its shares (the "IPO") at the London AIM.
The Company's authorised share capital was increased to meet the minimum requirements established for the share capital of public companies under the laws of Cyprus. On 12 September 2012 the authorised share capital of the Company was divided into 3,231,000 ordinary shares of nominal value Euro 0.01 each and on the same day the authorised share capital was further increased to Euro 42,513.16 divided into 4,251,316 ordinary shares of nominal value Euro 0.01 each by the creation of 1,020,316 ordinary shares of Euro 0.01 each. On 19 September 2012 the authorised share capital was further divided into 85,026,320 ordinary shares with nominal value of Euro 0.0005 each, of which 64,620,000 ordinary shares with nominal value of EUR 0.0005 each were allotted to existing shareholders.
Further, with a view to fulfill obligations of the Company under share purchase agreements with new investors, concluded with a view to facilitate the IPO process, on 26 September 2012 the Board of Directors of the Company took a decision on allotment of 20,406,309 shares to new investors for a total consideration of USD 70,000 thousand. As at 31 December 2012, these shares were unpaid.
Subsequent to allotment of these shares, the Company did not fulfill certain conditions stipulated in share purchase agreements. In particular, it had neither completed the listing on the London AIM nor had it completed the purchase of certain properties for development. Under those circumstances, share purchase agreements require the Company and the investors to take all necessary steps to unwind the purchase of the shares by the investors. The Board of Directors of the Company made a call on unpaid shares by sending the necessary notices to investors. Further to the investors' non-compliance with the notices and non-payment of the consideration for the issue of the shares, on 16 April 2013 the Board of Directors of the Company initiated the procedure for the forfeiture of the shares in question. It was expected that upon completion of the forfeiture of the shares issued to the new investors, the Company's Board of Directors will make its decision with regards to the disposal of the shares forfeited as it deemed appropriate and in the interests of the Company. Thus, as at 31 December 2012 the effect related to forfeiture of the shares was recognised in other reserves within equity. Subsequently, in accordance with the decision of the Board of Directors of the Company, dated 25 May 2013, unpaid shares were legally forfeited, which resulted in a decrease in share capital by USD 13 thousand, share premium by USD 69,987 thousand and increase in other reserves by USD 70,000 thousand.
Further, as part of the initial public offering (IPO) of the Company's shares at London AIM, on 20 July 2013 the Shareholders approved the increase of the Company's authorised share capital to EUR 53,000 (or USD 68,564) divided into 106,000,000 ordinary shares of nominal value EUR 0.0005 each.
On 12 September 2013 the Company was admitted for trading on London AIM. As a result of the IPO, the Company placed 38,650,637 ordinary shares and had an effect on equity of USD 93,759 thousand. 28,350,214 ordinary shares were transferred to entities under common control as consideration for acquired subsidiaries at a fair value of USD 66,056 thousand (refer to note 5) and 10,300,423 ordinary shares that were settled in cash at a price of USD 2.33 per share. Cash proceeds from placement of 10,300,423 ordinary shares, net of direct costs related to the IPO process of USD 1,757 thousand, amounted to USD 22,243 thousand.
Call option agreement with ELQ Investors II Ltd.
On 14 July 2011 the Company entered into a transaction pursuant to which ELQ Investors II Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Goldman Sachs Group Inc, provided the Company with convertible loans in the maximum amount of up to USD 40 million at an interest rate of 11.5% per annum. Out of the maximum amount, USD 30 million were provided to the Company. The funds were used by the Company to provide a loan (with an initial interest at 11.85% p.a.) to Weather Empire Limited (a special purpose vehicle incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) in order to purchase 1,077 shares (or 16.67% of subscribed share capital) in the Company from Retail Real Estate S.A.
As part of the transaction, ELQ Investors II Ltd. received one Initial Arricano Share. The shares purchased by Weather Empire Limited were held under escrow by a Cypriot escrow agent, Themis Professional Services Limited. In accordance with a call option agreement, from 14 July 2011 ELQ Investors II Ltd. obtained the right to receive the entire issued capital of Weather Empire Limited, which in turn held the 1,077 ordinary shares of the Company, for USD 1. However, the conversion right expired in July 2013 and accordingly the loan due to ELQ Investors II Ltd became repayable.
In July 2013, the Company entered into a settlement and release deed, in accordance with which related parties of the Group and UBS AG agreed to settle the Company's indebtedness due to ELQ Investors II Ltd. Simultaneously, the Company concluded two loan agreements with these related parties amounting to USD 36,974 thousand in total. One loan amounting to USD 8,475 thousand was repaid on 20 September 2013. As at 31 December 2013, the loan amounting to USD 28,500 thousand was payable on demand by 17 December 2014 at the latest. Also, the Company issued an irrevocable guarantee to UBS AG securing the repayment of the loan obtained by the related party for the amount of USD 28,800 thousand and the interest accrued thereon. During the year ended 31 December 2014, the Group signed an amended loan agreement with this related party, stipulating a decrease of the loan principal to USD 15,300 thousand and prolongation of the final repayment date until 13 August 2017, although the loan remains payable on demand in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement (refer to note 17). Accordingly, the amount secured by the irrevocable guarantee issued to UBS AG was decreased to USD 15,300 thousand, plus interest accrued thereon and other specified costs related to the loan facility provided by UBS AG. Later in 2014, the related party settled its liabilities to UBS AG in full, and, as at 31 December 2014, the Company's obligations under the irrevocable guarantee issued to UBS AG were extinguished.
16. Earnings per share
The calculation of basic earnings per share for the year ended 31 December 2014 was based on the loss for the year ended 31 December 2014 attributable to ordinary shareholders of USD 78,596 thousand, and a weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding as at 31 December 2014 of 103,270,637.
The calculation of basic earnings per share for the year ended 31 December 2013 was based on the profit for the year ended 31 December 2013 attributable to ordinary shareholders of USD 3,197 thousand and a weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding of 84,262,942.
The Group has no potential dilutive ordinary shares.
17. Loans and borrowings
This note provides information about the contractual terms of loans. For more information about the Group's exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk, refer to note 27.
| 2014 | 2013 |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
|
|
|
Non-current |
|
|
Secured bank loans | 50,073 | 62,391 |
Unsecured loans from related parties | 2,661 | - |
| ||
| 52,734 | 62,391 |
| ||
Current |
|
|
Secured bank loans (current portion of long-term bank loans) | 10,808 | 10,277 |
Unsecured loans from related parties (including current portion of long-term loans from related parties) | 33,203 | 30,121 |
Unsecured loans from third parties | 211 | 225 |
| ||
| 44,222 | 40,623 |
| ||
| 96,956 | 103,014 |
|
Terms and debt repayment schedule
As at 31 December 2014, the terms and debt repayment schedule of loans and borrowings are as follows:
| Currency | Nominal interest rate | Contractual year of maturity | Carrying value | ||
(in thousands of USD) |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Secured bank loans |
|
|
|
| ||
OJSC "Bank "St.Petersburg" | USD | 10.50% | 2015-2020 | 21,804 | ||
EBRD | USD | 3M LIBOR + 6.5% | 2015-2018 | 16,355 | ||
Raiffeisen Bank Aval | USD | 10.75% | 2015-2020 | 12,624 | ||
Oshchadbank | USD | 11.50% | 2020 | 10,098 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| 60,881 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
Unsecured loans from related parties |
|
|
|
| ||
International Baltic Investments | USD | 10.55% | 2017 | 15,582 | ||
Bytenem Co Limited | USD | 12.00% | 2015 | 17,471 | ||
Retail Real Estate OU | USD | 10.50% | 2019 | 2,722 | ||
Loans from other related parties | UAH | 0.00% | 2015 | 89 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| 35,864 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
Unsecured loans from third parties |
|
|
|
| ||
Other | UAH/USD | 0.00%-3.20% | 2013-2015 | 211 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| 211 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| 96,956 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
As at 31 December 2013, the terms and debt repayment schedule of loans and borrowings are as follows:
| Currency | Nominal interest rate | Contractual year of maturity | Carrying value |
(in thousands of USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured bank loans |
|
|
|
|
OJSC "Bank "St.Petersburg" | USD | 10.50% | 2014-2020 | 24,849 |
EBRD | USD | 3M LIBOR + 4.5% | 2014-2018 | 23,441 |
Raiffeisen Bank Aval | USD | 10.75% | 2014-2020 | 14,287 |
Oshchadbank | USD | 11.50% | 2020 | 10,091 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 72,668 |
|
|
|
| |
Unsecured loans from related parties |
|
|
|
|
International Baltic Investments | USD | 9.55% | 2014 | 29,808 |
Loans from other related parties | UAH/USD | 0.00% | 2014 | 501 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 30,309 |
|
|
|
| |
Unsecured loans from third parties |
|
|
|
|
Other | USD | 3.20% | 2013 | 37 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 37 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 103,014 |
|
|
|
|
As at 31 December LIBOR for USD is as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 |
LIBOR USD 3M | 0.26% | 0.24% |
For a description of assets pledged by the Group in connection with loans and borrowings refer to note 28(a).
OJSC "Bank "St. Petersburg"
In April 2013, the Group concluded two loan agreements with OJSC "Bank "St. Petersburg" to settle the debts due to constructors in respect of the shopping centre "RayOn" located in Kyiv and to finance the construction of the shopping centre "South Gallery" located in Simferopil for the amounts of USD 14,000 thousand and USD 11,000 thousand, respectively.
PJSC Raiffeisen Bank Aval
In June 2013, the Group concluded loan agreement with PJSC Raiffeisen Bank Aval for an irrevocable credit line with a limit of USD 15,000 thousand to refinance existing borrowings. The credit line bears 10.75% interest rate p.a. and matures in July 2020. The loan was provided to LLC Prizma Alfa, the entity owning shopping centre "City Mall".
Oshchadbank
In October 2013, the Group concluded a loan agreement with PJSC "State Savings Bank of Ukraine" (Oshchadbank) for an irrevocable credit line with a limit of USD 30,000 thousand to finance construction of the shopping centre "Prospect" that is developed by the Group's subsidiary LLC Comfort Market Luks. The credit line bears 11.5% interest rate p.a. and matures in September 2020. As at 31 December 2014 and 2013, the undrawn credit facilities from Oshchadbank amount to USD 20,000 thousand.
In March 2015, the Group settled the outstanding amount of loan payable to Oshchadbank using the funds received from the EBRD. The related loan agreement with Oshchadbank was terminated.
EBRD
In January 2014, the Group signed an amended loan agreement with the EBRD, stipulating an increase in annual interest rate to 3m LIBOR+6.5% effective from 17 March 2014 and an increase in the amount of loan principal payable in 2014 by USD 1,711 thousand.
In December 2014, the Group concluded a new loan agreement with the EBRD for the facility of USD 25,000 thousand to refinance an existing loan due to Oshchadbank and to repay amounts due to constructors. The new loan agreement concluded with EBRD bears interest rate of 1m LIBOR+7.5% and matures on 20 December 2020. In March 2015, the Group obtained a first tranche of USD 10,000 thousand. In April 2015, the Group obtained a second tranche of USD 9,000 thousand.
International Baltic Investments and Bytenem Co Limited
In May 2014, the Group signed a loan agreement with Bytenem Co Limited for a total amount of USD 13,051 thousand. The loan bears an annual interest rate of 12% and matures in March 2015. In July 2014, the Group signed an amended loan agreement with Bytenem Co Limited and the amount of the loan facility was increased up to USD 16,051 thousand. In March 2015, the Group signed an amended loan agreement with Bytenem Co Limited stipulating a prolongation of the maturity date until March 2016 (refer to note 30(a)).
During the year ended 31 December 2014, the Group repaid USD 13,500 thousand of loan principal to International Baltic Investments, using the funds of USD 10,043 thousand obtained from Bytenem Co Limited and own funds of USD 3,457 thousand. During the year ended 31 December 2014, the Group signed an amended loan agreement with International Baltic Investments, stipulating an increase in the interest rate to 10.55% per annum, a prolongation of the final repayment date until 13 August 2017 and a decrease of the principal amount to USD 15,300 thousand (refer to note 15). Despite the fact that the final repayment date was prolonged, the loan remains payable on demand in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Retail Real Estate OU
In September 2014, the Group concluded a loan agreement with a related party for an irrevocable credit line with a limit of USD 10,000 thousand to finance working capital replenishment. The loan bears 10.5% interest per annum and matures in September 2019. As at 31 December 2014, the undrawn credit facilities from this related party amount to USD 7,339 thousand.
18. Finance lease liability
Finance lease liabilities as at 31 December are payable as follows:
| Future minimum lease payments | Interest | Present value of minimum lease payments | Future minimum lease payments | Interest | Present value of minimum lease payments | |||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands of USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Less than six months | 377 | 376 | 1 | 629 | 600 | 29 |
| ||||||||||||||
Between six and twelve months | 377 | 376 | 1 | 815 | 755 | 60 |
| ||||||||||||||
Between one and two years | 755 | 754 | 1 | 1,146 | 1,143 | 3 |
| ||||||||||||||
Between two and five years | 3,492 | 3,483 | 9 | 4,245 | 4,223 | 22 |
| ||||||||||||||
More than five years | 52,380 | 44,262 | 8,118 | 68,916 | 57,693 | 11,223 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 57,381 | 49,251 | 8,130 | 75,751 | 64,414 | 11,337 |
| ||||||||||||||
The imputed finance costs on the liability are based on the Group's incremental borrowing rate ranging from 13.0% to 17.2% as at 31 December 2014 and 2013.
During the year ended 31 December 2014, the Group has finalised the construction of the new shopping centre "Prospect" located in Kyiv, which led to an increase in future minimum lease payments due to modification of a lease pursuant to the increased value of the land leased by Comfort Market Luks LLC. Accordingly, the resulting change in finance lease liability amounting to USD 2,061 thousand was recognised as finance lease asset and presented within investment property.
Also, during the year ended 31 December 2014, as a result of change in land lease rate indices imposed by state authorities, the Group derecognised a finance lease liability amounting to USD 151 thousand (refer to note 25) in profit and loss for the year ended 31 December 2014 in respect of land plots in Kryvyi Rig, and recognised an additional finance lease asset for the amount of USD 1,273 thousand in respect of land plots in Kyiv, Zaporizhzhya and Odessa.
On 17 December 2013, the Odesa City Council approved principal terms of land lease agreements to be concluded with one of the Group's subsidiaries, LLC Vektor Capital (refer to note 5) and approved a land allocation project and detailed zoning plan, in accordance with which the Group plans to develop a shopping centre on the land plots concerned. As a result, the Group assumed that the inception and commencement dates of the lease occurred and recognised acquisition of the investment property through the finance lease for the amount of USD 5,144 thousand. In March 2014, these land lease agreements were formally signed.
Future minimum lease payments as at 31 December 2014 and 2013 are based on management's assessment that is based on actual lease payments effective as at 31 December 2014 and 2013, respectively, and expected contractual changes in the lease payments. The future lease payments are subject to review and approval by the municipal authorities and may differ from management's assessment.
The contractual maturity of land lease agreements is ranging from 2016 to 2038. The Group intends to prolong these lease agreements for the period of usage of the investment property being constructed on the leased land. Consequently, the minimum lease payments are calculated for a period of 50 years.
19. Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables as at 31 December are as follows:
(in thousands of USD) | 2014 | 2013 |
Non-current liabilities | ||
Payables for construction works | 5,549 | - |
Trade and other payables to third parties | 9 | |
|
| |
5,558 | - | |
|
| |
Current liabilities |
| |
Payables for construction works | 32,881 | 10,959 |
Trade and other payables to related parties | 1,420 | 225 |
Trade and other payables to third parties | 2,920 | 2,561 |
|
| |
37,221 | 13,745 | |
|
|
In view of the anticipated signing of a subordination deed with the EBRD (refer to note 30(a)), on 31 December 2014 the Group agreed postponement of the settlement of payables due to the company providing major construction services to the Group (refer to note 4). As a result, settlement of payables for construction works of USD 6,547 thousand has been prolonged until 20 December 2020. Consequently, these payables were initially recognised at fair value of USD 2,181 thousand, determined by discounting future expected cash flows at the effective interest rate of 18.02% per annum, with a resulting gain of USD 4,366 thousand (refer to note 25) recognised in profit or loss. As at 31 December 2014, these payables are presented within non-current liabilities.
Also, included in payables for construction works as at 31 December 2014 are payables under a commission agreement concluded with a third party for the total amount of USD 4,142 thousand with maturity on 15 September 2019. As at 31 December 2014, these payables relate to construction works performed at shopping centre "Prospect", are presented in accordance with their contractual maturity and stated at amortised cost under the effective interest rate of 6.01% per annum.
The Group's exposure to currency and liquidity risk related to trade and other payables is disclosed in note 27.
20. Advances received
Advances from customers as at 31 December are as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 |
(in thousands of USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current | ||
Advances from third parties | 1,158 | 2,900 |
| ||
| 1,158 | 2,900 |
| ||
Current | ||
Advances received under investment agreement (refer to note 12(a)) | 2,917 | 14,636 |
Advances from third parties | 3,192 | 5,906 |
Advances from related parties | 44 | 86 |
| ||
| 6,153 | 20,628 |
| ||
| 7,311 | 23,528 |
In September 2009, the Group received a prepayment from an anchor tenant for the period of ten years. As at 31 December 2014, the non-current portion of the prepayment amounts to USD 1,158 thousand and the current portion amounts to USD 312 thousand (2013: USD 2,900 thousand and USD 615 thousand, respectively). Remaining advances from third parties are mainly represented by prepayments from tenants for two months of rental payments.
21. Other liabilities
As at 31 December 2014, other liabilities are represented by deferred consideration of USD 20,412 thousand (2013: USD 20,151 thousand), including accrued interest of USD 412 thousand (2013: USD 151 thousand), that is payable in respect of the acquisition of Wayfield Limited and its subsidiary Budkhol LLC (refer to note 5), and other long-term liabilities amounting to USD 141 thousand (2013: USD 222 thousand). In May 2014, the Group signed an amendment to the share exchange agreement in order to postpone the repayment of USD 10,000 thousand from 30 April 2014 to 30 April 2015. In March 2015, the Group signed an amendment to the share exchange agreement in order to postpone the payment of USD 20,000 thousand from 30 April 2015 to 30 April 2016 (refer to note 30(a)). Deferred consideration is presented in accordance with its contractual maturity as at 31 December 2014 and 2013 and bears a 9.75% interest rate per annum.
22. Revenue
Revenue for the years ended 31 December is as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Rental income from investment properties | 22,249 | 24,937 |
Other sales revenue | 542 | 362 |
|
| |
22,791 | 25,299 | |
|
|
For the year ended 31 December 2014, 21% of the Group's rental income was earned from two tenants (13% and 8%, respectively) (2013: 21%, 11% and 10%, respectively).
In accordance with the terms of the contracts with tenants, rental rates are fixed in USD and invoices are issued in UAH using the exchange rates established by the National Bank of Ukraine effective at the date of invoice.
Starting from March 2014, the Group provides the tenants with temporary discounts to contractual rental rates, or temporarily fixates the exchange rates to be applied to USD equivalent of contractual rental rates at lower levels as compared to the exchange rates established by the National Bank of Ukraine.
Management believes that these measures will allow the Group to maintain occupancy rates in the shopping centre at a relatively high level in the deteriorated Ukrainian business environment. Management believes that these measures are temporary until the Ukrainian business environment stabilises.
Direct operating expenses arising from investment property that generated rental income during the year ended 31 December are as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Advertising (note 24) | 799 | 807 |
Security services (note 24) | 436 | 427 |
Repair, maintenance and building services (note 23) | 377 | 442 |
Communal public services (note 23) | 269 | 398 |
Land taxes (note 24) | 94 | 174 |
|
| |
1,975 | 2,248 | |
|
|
No direct operating expenses arising from investment property that did not generate rental income during 2014 and 2013 occurred.
23. Goods, raw materials and services used
Goods, raw materials and services used for the years ended 31 December are as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Repair, maintenance and building services (note 22) | 377 | 442 |
Communal public services (note 22) | 269 | 398 |
Other costs | 163 | 143 |
|
| |
809 | 983 | |
|
|
24. Operating expenses
Operating expenses for the years ended 31 December are as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Allowance for bad debts | 42,625 | 541 |
Management, consulting and legal services | 3,639 | 8,141 |
VAT refundable written-off | 1,096 | - |
Advertising (note 22) | 799 | 807 |
Security services (note 22) | 436 | 427 |
Office expenses and communication services | 373 | 584 |
Auditors' fees | 269 | 255 |
Administrative expenses | 162 | 116 |
Land taxes (note 22) | 94 | 174 |
Other | 1,405 | 1,682 |
|
| |
50,898 | 12,727 | |
|
|
VAT refundable written-off represents VAT input, originated under the Ukrainian legislation at the subsidiary located in the Republic of Crimea, which is not recognised by the Crimean authorities upon annexation of the region to the Russian Federation.
25. Finance income and finance costs
Finance income and finance costs for the years ended 31 December are as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Gain on initial recognition of trade and other payables at fair value (refer to note 19) |
4,366 |
- |
Interest income | 1,451 | 3,541 |
Finance income from derecognition of finance lease liability (refer to note 18) |
151 |
- |
Other finance income | 103 | 290 |
|
| |
Finance income | 6,071 | 3,831 |
|
| |
Interest expense | (9,373) | (8,091) |
Interest expense on deferred consideration (refer to notes 5 and 21) | (1,982) | (593) |
Foreign exchange loss | (49,819) | - |
Impairment of available-for-sale financial asset | (20,727) | - |
Other finance costs | (4,218) | (1,581) |
|
| |
Finance costs | (86,119) | (10,265) |
|
| |
Net finance cost | (80,048) | (6,434) |
|
|
26. Income tax expense
(a) Income tax expense
Income taxes for the years ended 31 December are as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Current tax expense | 153 | - |
Deferred tax expense | 8,860 | 904 |
|
| |
Total income tax expense | 9,013 | 904 |
|
|
As at 31 December 2013, based on the Ukrainian tax legislation enacted in December 2010 with amendments in December 2013, the corporate tax rate in Ukraine was 19% for 2013, 18% for 2014, 17% for 2015 and 16% from 2016 onwards. On 31 March 2014, several changes were introduced to the Ukrainian tax legislation, resulting in the corporate profit tax rate for 2014 and afterwards being fixed at 18%.
While computing the deferred tax liability that arises on the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax values of assets and liabilities of Voyazh-Krym LLC, registered in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, as at 31 December 2014, management of the Group reflected the tax consequences that are applicable under the legislation of the Russian Federation that is being applied for all companies operating in the Republic of Crimea. In absence of clear regulations that will be applicable to the Republic of Crimea after 1 January 2015, management expects that reversal of temporary differences will be done under the Laws of the Russian Federation. The applicable tax rate for the entities operating under the laws of the Russian Federation is 20%.
The applicable tax rates are 12.5% for Cyprus companies and 0% for companies incorporated in the Isle of Man.
(b) Reconciliation of effective tax rate
The difference between the total expected income tax expense for the years ended 31 December computed by applying the Ukrainian statutory income tax rate to (loss) profit before tax and the reported tax expense is as follows:
2014 | % | 2013 | % | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||||
(Loss) profit before tax | (69,583) | 100% | 4,101 | 100% |
|
|
|
| |
Income tax (benefit) expense at statutory rate | (12,525) | 18% | 779 | 19% |
Effect of different tax rates on taxable (loss) profit in other jurisdictions | (1,731) | 2% | (1,558) | (38%) |
Non-deductible expenses | 12,899 | (18%) | 2,322 | 57% |
Tax exempt income | - | - | (491) | (12%) |
Change in unrecognised deferred tax assets | 6,268 | (9%) | 168 | 4% |
Changes in expected pattern of realisation of temporary difference | - | - | (316) | (8%) |
Change in tax rates | 457 | (1%) | - | - |
Foreign currency translation difference | 3,645 | (5%) | - | - |
|
|
|
| |
Effective income tax expense | 9,013 | (13%) | 904 | 22% |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(c) Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
As at 31 December deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following items:
Assets | Liabilities | Net | ||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||||||
Investment property | 703 | 568 | (15,249) | (9,166) | (14,546) | (8,598) |
Property and equipment | - | 3 | (2) | - | (2) | 3 |
Trade and other receivables | 987 | 1,737 | (13) | - | 974 | 1,737 |
Assets classified as held for sale | - | - | (494) | - | (494) | - |
Trade and other payables | 1,497 | - | (10) | (9) | 1,487 | (9) |
Advances received | 855 | 581 | - | - | 855 | 581 |
Short-term borrowings | 9 | 8 | (6) | - | 3 | 8 |
Long-term borrowings | - | - | (14) | (24) | (14) | (24) |
Other long-term payables | 516 | 12 | (24) | - | 492 | 12 |
Tax loss carry-forwards | 9,734 | 2,367 | - | - | 9,734 | 2,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) | 14,301 | 5,276 | (15,812) | (9,199) | (1,511) | (3,923) |
Offset of deferred tax assets and liabilities | (14,301) | (3,756) | 14,301 | 3,756 | - | - |
Transfer to liabilities classified as held for sale | - | - | 40 | - | 40 | - |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | - | 1,520 | (1,471) | (5,443) | (1,471) | (3,923) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Movements in recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
Movements in recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities during the year ended 31 December 2014 are as follows:
Balance as at 1 January 2014 asset (liability) | Recognised in profit or loss | Recognised in OCI | Transferred to Liabilities held for sale | Foreign currency translation adjustment | Balance as at 31 December 2014 asset (liability) | ||||||
(in thousands of USD) |
| ||||||||||
Investment property | (8,598) | (12,980) | - | 324 | 6,708 | (14,546) | |||||
Property and equipment | 3 | (5) |
- |
- |
- | (2) | |||||
Trade and other receivables | 1,737 | 124 |
- |
- | (887) | 974 | |||||
Assets classified as held for sale | - | (657) | - |
- | 163 | (494) | |||||
Trade and other payables | (9) | 1,983 |
- |
10 |
(497) | 1,487 | |||||
Advances received | 581 | 745 | - | - | (471) | 855 | |||||
Short-term borrowings | 8 | (1) | - | - | (4) | 3 | |||||
Long-term borrowings | (24) | (2) | - | - | 12 | (14) | |||||
Other long-term payables | 12 | 646 |
- |
- |
(166) | 492 | |||||
Tax loss carry-forwards | 2,367 | 1,287 |
9,854 |
(294) |
(3,480) | 9,734 | |||||
|
|
| 40 |
|
| ||||||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) | (3,923) | (8,860) | 9,854 |
40 | 1,378 | (1,511) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Movements in recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities during the year ended 31 December 2013 are as follows:
Balance as at 1 January 2013 asset (liability) | Recognised in profit or loss | Foreign currency translation adjustment | Balance as at 31 December 2013 asset (liability) | |||||
(in thousands of USD) |
| |||||||
Investment property | (7,354) | (1,244) | - | (8,598) |
| |||
Property and equipment | (8) | 11 | - | 3 |
| |||
Trade and other receivables | 1,781 | (44) | - | 1,737 |
| |||
Trade and other payables | (4) | (5) | - | (9) |
| |||
Advances received | 797 | (216) | - | 581 |
| |||
Prepaid expenses | 10 | (10) | - | - |
| |||
Short-term borrowings | 12 | (4) | - | 8 |
| |||
Long-term borrowings | - | (24) | - | (24) |
| |||
Other long-term payables | - | 12 | - | 12 |
| |||
Tax loss carry-forwards | 1,747 | 620 | - | 2,367 |
| |||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) | (3,019) | (904) | - | (3,923) |
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(e) Unrecognised deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets as at 31 December 2014 have not been recognised in respect of the following items:
Balance as at 1 January 2014 | Utilisation of previously unrecognised temporary differences | Increase in unrecognised temporary differences | Foreign currency translation adjustment | Balance as at 31 December 2014 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands of USD) |
| |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables | 607 | - | - | (332) | 275 |
| ||||||||||
Other long-term payables | - | 69 | - | 69 |
| |||||||||||
Trade and other payables | - | - | 740 | (9) | 731 |
| ||||||||||
Advances from customers | 265 | - | - | (145) | 120 |
| ||||||||||
Tax loss carry-forwards | 3,844 | (76) | 22,049 | (8,476) | 17,341 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
4,716 | (76) | 22,858 | (8,962) | 18,536 |
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Deferred tax assets as at 31 December 2013 have not been recognised in respect of the following items:
Balance as at 1 January 2013 | Utilisation of previously unrecognised temporary differences | Increase in unrecognised temporary differences | Balance as at 31 December 2013 | |||||||||
(in thousands of USD) |
| |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables | 607 | - | - | 607 | ||||||||
Advances from customers | 265 | - | - | 265 | ||||||||
Tax loss carry-forwards | 3,676 | (196) | 364 | 3,844 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
4,548 | (196) | 364 | 4,716 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
In accordance with existing Ukrainian legislation tax losses can be carried forward and utilised indefinitely. Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of those items since it is not probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the Group can utilise the benefits therefrom. During the year ended 31 December 2014, unrecognised temporary differences of USD 18,294 thousand relate to items recognised in other comprehensive income.
27. Financial risk management
(a) Overview
The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:
· credit risk
· liquidity risk
· market risk
This note presents information about the Group's exposure to each of the above risks, the Group's objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout these consolidated financial statements.
(b) Risk management framework
The management has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework.
The Group's risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group's activities.
The Group, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to develop a disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.
The Group's Audit Committee oversees how management monitors compliance with the Group's risk management policies and procedures and reviews the adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group.
(c) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Group's loans and receivables and available-for-sale financial assets.
(i) Trade and other receivables
The Group's exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. However, management also considers the demographics of the Group's customer base, including the default risk of the industry and country, in which customers operate, as these factors may have an influence on credit risk, particularly in the currently challenging economic circumstances. There is no significant concentration of receivables from a single customer. In 2014 and 2013, 100% of the Group's revenue is attributable to sales transactions with customers in Ukraine and the Republic of Crimea.
Management has no formal credit policy in place for customers other than regular tenants and the exposure to credit risk is approved and monitored on an ongoing basis individually for all other significant customers.
The Group does not require collateral in respect of trade and other receivables.
The Group establishes an allowance for impairment that represents its estimate of incurred losses in respect of trade and other receivables and loans receivable. The main components of this allowance are a specific loss component that relates to individually significant exposures, and a collective loss component established for groups of similar assets in respect of losses that have been incurred but not yet identified. The collective loss allowance is determined based on historical data of payment statistics for similar financial assets.
(ii) Guarantees
The Group considers that financial guarantee contracts entered into by the Group to guarantee the indebtedness of related parties to be insurance arrangements, and accounts for them as such. In this respect, the Group treats the guarantee contract as a contingent liability until such time as it becomes probable that the Group will be required to make a payment under the guarantee.
As at 31 December 2013, the Parent Company issued an irrevocable guarantee to UBS AG securing the repayment of the loan by a related party for the amount of USD 28,800 thousand and the interest accrued thereon and all losses incurred therewith. No provision for the related party's obligation under this guarantee was recognised in these consolidated financial statements since management believed that as at 31 December 2013 it was not probable that there will be an outflow of economic resources in relation to this guarantee. As at 31 December 2014, the Parent Company's obligations under this guarantee were extinguished (refer to note 15).
(iii) Exposure to credit risk
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure.
In addition to the credit risk, the Group is exposed to the risk of non-recoverability of VAT recoverable and prepaid expenses amounting in total to USD 9,424 thousand as at 31 December 2014 (2013: USD 16,716 thousand).
(iv) Impairment losses
The ageing of trade and other receivables as at 31 December was:
2014 | 2014 | 2013 | 2013 | |
Gross | Impairment | Gross | Impairment | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||||
Not past due | 876 | - | 1,561 | - |
Past due 0 - 30 days | 50 | - | 2,739 | - |
Past due 31 - 60 days | 24 | - | 17 | - |
Past due 61 - 90 days | 4 | - | 7 | - |
Past due 91 - 360 days | 7 | (7) | 288 | (288) |
More than one year | 14,906 | (14,529) | 17,282 | (17,282) |
|
|
|
| |
15,867 | (14,536) | 21,894 | (17,570) | |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impairment of financial assets is as follows:
31 December 2014 | 31 December 2013 |
| |||||
(in thousands of USD) |
| ||||||
Allowance for impairment of trade and other receivables | 14,536 | 17,570 |
| ||||
Allowance for impairment of loans receivable | 40,097 | - |
| ||||
Allowance for impairment of available-for-sale financial assets | 20,727 | - |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
75,360 | 17,570 |
| |||||
|
|
| |||||
The movement in the allowance for impairment in respect of financial assets during the years ended 31 December was as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Balance at 1 January | (17,570) | (16,740) |
Impairment loss recognised | (63,352) | (541) |
Impairment losses related to acquisition of assets | - | (289) |
Foreign currency translation differences | 5,562 | - |
|
| |
Balance at 31 December | (75,360) | (17,570) |
|
|
(d) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting the obligations associated with its financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. The Group's approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group's reputation.
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including interest payments as at 31 December 2014:
Contractual cash flows | |||||||
Carrying amount | Total | 2 months or less | 2 - 12 months | 1 - 2 years | 2 - 5 years | More than 5 years | |
(in thousands of USD) | |||||||
Secured bank loans | 60,881 | 80,959 | 1,681 | 14,542 | 15,067 | 30,509 | 19,160 |
Unsecured loans from related parties | 35,864 | 37,279 | 15,282 | 18,218 | 280 | 3,499 | - |
Unsecured loans from third parties | 211 | 211 | 38 | 173 | - | - | - |
Finance lease liability | 8,130 | 57,381 | 230 | 524 | 755 | 3,492 | 52,380 |
Trade and other payables | 42,779 | 47,775 | 4,340 | 33,117 | 1,968 | 1,803 | 6,547 |
Other liabilities | 20,553 | 21,194 | - | 21,053 | 141 | - | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
168,418 | 244,799 | 21,571 | 87,627 | 18,211 | 39,303 | 78,087 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including interest payments as at 31 December 2013:
Contractual cash flows | |||||||
Carrying amount | Total | 2 months or less | 2 - 12 months | 1 - 2 years | 2 - 5 years | More than 5 years | |
(in thousands of USD) | |||||||
Secured bank loans | 72,668 | 94,082 | 1,051 | 15,307 | 19,232 | 43,282 | 15,210 |
Unsecured loans from related parties | 30,121 | 30,121 | 29,620 | 501 | - | - | - |
Unsecured loans from third parties | 225 | 225 | 225 | - | - | - | - |
Finance lease liability | 11,337 | 75,751 | 148 | 1,296 | 1,146 | 4,245 | 68,916 |
Trade and other payables | 13,745 | 13,745 | 204 | 13,541 | - | - | - |
Other liabilities | 20,373 | 21,939 | - | 11,346 | 10,593 | - | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
148,469 | 235,863 | 31,248 | 41,991 | 30,971 | 47,527 | 84,126 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the Group's income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return.
(i) Currency risk
Group entities located in UkraineThe Group is exposed to currency risk on sales, purchases and borrowings that are denominated in a currency other than the Ukrainian Hryvnias (UAH), primarily the U.S. Dollar (USD), but also Euro (EUR) and GB Pound (GBP).
Interest on borrowings is denominated in the currency of the borrowing. Generally, borrowings are denominated in USD which does not always match the cash flows generated by the underlying operation of the Group, primarily executed in UAH.
Exposure to currency risk
The Group's exposure to foreign currency risk as at 31 December was as follows based on notional amounts:
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
USD | EUR | GBP | USD | EUR | GBP | ||
(in thousands of USD) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 12 | 4 | - | 168 | 1 | - | |
Restricted deposits | 580 | - | - | 575 | - | - | |
Secured bank loans | (60,881) | - | - | (72,668) | - | - | |
Trade and other payables | (352) | (7,914) | (153) | (1,631) | (741) | (302) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net short position | (60,641) | (7,910) | (153) | (73,556) | (740) | (302) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A 40 percent weakening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against the following currencies as at 31 December would have decreased net profit (increased net loss) and decreased equity by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.
2014 | 2013 | |||
Profit or loss | Equity | Profit or loss | Equity | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||||
USD | (19,890) | (19,890) | (23,832) | (23,832) |
EUR | (2,594) | (2,594) | (240) | (240) |
GBP | (50) | (50) | (98) | (98) |
A 40 percent strengthening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against these currencies at 31 December would have had the equal but opposite effect on these currencies to the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
Intra-group borrowings
The Group entities located in Ukraine are exposed to currency risk on intra-group borrowings, eliminated in these consolidated financial statements that are denominated in a currency other than the Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH), primarily the U.S. Dollar (USD). These borrowings are treated as part of net investment in a foreign operation with foreign exchange gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income and presented in the translation reserve in equity.
The effect of translation of these loans payable by Ukrainian subsidiaries from functional currency to presentation currency resulted in a foreign exchange loss of USD 146,523 thousand, including tax effect, recognised directly in other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2014.
A 40 percent weakening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against the USD would have decreased other comprehensive income (increased other comprehensive loss) for the year ended 31 December 2014 and equity as at 31 December 2014 by USD 78,801 thousand (2013: USD 71,642 thousand). This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.
A 40 percent strengthening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against these currencies would have had the equal but opposite effect to the amounts mentioned above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
Group entities located in the Republic of Crimea
The Group entity, located in the Republic of Crimea, is exposed to currency risk on purchases and borrowings that are denominated in a currency other than the Russian Rouble (RUB), primarily the Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH).
Exposure to currency risk
The exposure to foreign currency risk is as follows based on notional amounts:
31 December 2014 | 31 December 2013 | ||
UAH | UAH | ||
(in thousands of USD) | |||
Trade and other payables | (5,797) | - | |
|
| ||
Net short position | (5,797) | - | |
|
|
A 30 percent strengthening of the Russian Rouble against the Ukrainian Hryvnias would have decreased net loss and increased equity by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.
2014 | 2013 |
| |||||||
Profit or loss | Equity | Profit or loss | Equity |
| |||||
(in thousands of USD) |
| ||||||||
| |||||||||
UAH | 1,391 | 1,391 | - | - |
| ||||
A 30 percent weakening of the Russian Rouble against the Ukrainian Hryvnia would have had the equal but opposite effect to the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
(ii) Interest rate risk
Changes in interest rates impact primarily loans and borrowings by changing either their fair value (fixed rate debt) or their future cash flows (variable rate debt). Management does not have a formal policy of determining how much of the Group's exposure should be to fixed or variable rates. However, at the time of obtaining new financing management uses its judgment to decide whether a fixed or variable rate would be more favorable to the Group over the expected period until maturity.
Refer to notes 9, 17, 18 and 21 for information about maturity dates and effective interest rates of fixed rate and variable rate financial instruments. Re-pricing for fixed rate financial instruments occurs at maturity of fixed rate financial instruments.
Profile
The interest rate profile of the Group's interest-bearing financial instruments as at 31 December was as follows:
2014 | 2013 | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||
Fixed rate instruments | ||
Loans receivable | 9,761 | 48,071 |
Loans and borrowings | (80,601) | (79,072) |
Other liabilities | (20,412) | (20,151) |
Finance lease liability | (8,130) | (11,337) |
|
| |
(99,382) | (62,489) | |
|
| |
Variable rate instruments |
|
|
Loans and borrowings | (16,355) | (23,441) |
|
| |
(16,355) | (23,441) | |
|
|
The Group does not account for any fixed rate financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss or as available-for-sale, and the Group does not designate derivatives (interest rate swaps) as hedging instruments under a fair value hedge accounting model. Therefore a change in interest rates at the reporting date would not affect profit or loss or equity.
Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
An increase of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have decreased equity as at 31 December and would have decreased net profit (increased net loss) for the year ended 31 December by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.
2014 | 2013 | |||
Profit or loss | Equity | Profit or loss | Equity | |
(in thousands of USD) | ||||
Loans and borrowings | (134) | (134) | (190) | (190) |
|
|
|
| |
(134) | (134) | (190) | (190) | |
|
|
|
|
A decrease of 100 basis points in interest rates at 31 December would have had the equal but opposite effect to the amounts shown above.
(iii) Fair values
Estimated fair values of the financial assets and liabilities have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to produce the estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realised in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair values.
The estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined using discounted cash flow and other appropriate valuation methodologies, at year-end, and are not indicative of the fair value of those instruments at the date these consolidated financial statements are prepared or distributed. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Group's entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected cash flows, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors.
Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities not considered financial instruments. In addition, tax ramifications related to the realisation of the unrealised gains and losses can have an effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered.
Management believes that for all the financial assets and liabilities the carrying value is estimated to approximate the fair value as at 31 December 2014 and 2013, except for the available-for-sale financial assets, fair value of which cannot be measured reliably. Such fair value was estimated by discounting the expected future cash flows under the market interest rate for similar financial instruments that prevails as at the reporting date. The estimated fair value is categorised within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
(f) Capital management
Management defines capital as total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent. The Group has no formal policy for capital management but management seeks to maintain a sufficient capital base for meeting the Group's operational and strategic needs, and to maintain confidence of market participants. The Group strives to achieve with efficient cash management, and constant monitoring of the Group's investment projects. With these measures the Group aims for steady profits growth. There were no changes in the Group's approach to capital management during the year.
28. Commitments and contingencies
(a) Pledged assets
As at 31 December, in connection with loans and borrowings, the Group pledged the following assets:
| 2014 | 2013 |
(in thousands of USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment property (note 7) | 143,878 | 193,111 |
Restricted deposits (note 14) | 2,282 | 1,483 |
| ||
| 146,160 | 194,594 |
|
As at 31 December 2014 and 2013, the Group has also pledged the following:
Future rights on income of Prizma Alfa LLC under all lease agreements;
Investments in the following subsidiaries: PrJSC Grandinvest, PrJSC UkrPanGroup and PrJSC Livoberezhzhiainvest;
Property rights under the Investment Agreement between PrJSC Grandinvest, PrJSC Livoberezhzhiainvest and LLC "Voyazh Krym".
(b) Construction commitments
The Group entered into contracts with third parties to construct a shopping centre in Kyiv and a shopping centre in Odesa for the amount of USD 36,503 thousand as at 31 December 2014 (2013: USD 25,751 thousand under the contract to construct two shopping centres in Kyiv).
(c) Operating leases commitments
The Group as lessor
The Group entered into lease agreements on its investment property portfolio that consists of five shopping centres. These non-cancellable lease agreements have remaining terms from one to ten years. All agreements include a clause to enable upward revision of the rent rate on an annual basis according to prevailing market conditions.
The future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable leases as at 31 December are as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 |
(in thousands of USD) |
|
|
Less than one year | 5,228 | 1,491 |
Between one and five years | 4,415 | 1,470 |
More than five years | 1,392 | - |
| ||
| 11,035 | 2,961 |
| ||
|
|
(d) Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, the Group is subject to legal actions and complaints.
Legal case in respect of Assofit Holdings Limited
As at 31 December 2014 and 2013, the Group is involved in an arbitration dispute with Stockman Interhold S.A. (Stockman), being the majority shareholder of Assofit Holdings Limited (Assofit), regarding invalidation of the Call Option Agreement. In accordance with this Call Option Agreement, Arricano was granted the option to acquire the shareholding of Stockman being equal to 50.03 per cent in the share capital of Assofit during the period starting from 15 November 2010 up to 15 March 2011. In November 2010, the Company sought to exercise the option granted by the Call Option Agreement, however the buy-out was suspended by legal and arbitration proceedings that were initiated by Stockman in relation to the validity of the termination of the agreement relating to the call option under the Call Option Agreement. The case was considered by The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA).
On 13 December 2011, the sole arbitrator rendered an award declaring that Stockman had validly terminated the Call Option Agreement. The Company appealed the award before the High Court of England and Wales and its appeal was partially successful. As a result the court remitted the question of whether the Company has validly exercised the call option granted under the Call Option Agreement to be considered a new by the sole arbitrator.
On 19 August 2014, the sole arbitrator of LCIA has made an award declaring that Arricano validly exercised the call option in 2010 whereby it sought to acquire a shareholding of 50.03% of Assofit. The Company was ordered to deposit the call option price agreed in 2010 with independent third party by 1 January 2015. On 19 September 2014, Stockman appealed against this award at the High Court of England and Wales. As at the date that these consolidated financial statements are authorised for issuance, this challenge remains pending before the High Court. On 31 March 2015, the sole arbitrator has issued an award declaring that Arricano properly deposited the option price with independent third parties by 1 January 2015, that Arricano's right to acquire shares pursuant to the second award has not expired and that Stockman's conditional obligation to transfer (or procure the transfer of) the shares to Arricano pursuant to the second award has not expired. The sole arbitrator also directed the parties to negotiate an escrow agreement to govern the terms on which the monies deposited by Arricano should be held going forward. As at the date that these consolidated financial statement are authorized for issuance, further steps on this case are to be determined by the parties and the sole arbitrator.
On 16 June 2015, the sole arbitrator issued an order which established a procedural timetable for determination of Arricano's claim for damages and requested Stockman to provide disclosures in relation to Assofit's assets and financial affairs.
On 12 March 2012, Arricano filed an application to the District Court of Larnaca to wind up its associate, Assofit Holdings Limited, on grounds of oppression of minority. Within the frame of this application, on 30 March 2012 Arricano has successfully applied for the appointment of a receiver at the level of Assofit Holdings Limited in order to protect its assets until consideration of the winding up application is completed. On 9 January 2014, based on an interim order of the District Court of Larnaca the powers of the receiver to appoint or change the Board of Directors of Assofit or management of the Ukrainian subsidiaries were temporarily nullified without affecting the powers of the receiver to protect Assofit's assets. The receiver contested this interim order with the District Court of Larnaca. On 21 January 2014, Arricano filed the certiorari application with the Supreme Court of Cyprus to suspend this interim order based on procedural grounds. On 14 November 2014, the court removed all the restrictions that were imposed in the past on the Receiver's powers. On 30 January 2015, following Stockman's application, the court cancelled its previous interim orders on appointment of the Receiver. As at the date that these consolidated financial statements are authorised for issue, Assofit is not under receivership.
On 14 October 2013 Stockman, Assofit and the Ukrainian subsidiary of Assofit initiated legal proceedings before the District Court of Nicosia for the alleged violation of fiduciary duties by Arricano, Hillar Teder (the Group's ultimate controlling party) and Dragon Ukrainian Properties and Development PLC (a shareholder of the Group) and recovery of the funds lent based on the loan agreement between Assofit and Filgate. On 7 March 2014, Arricano filed its Defence and Counterclaim against Stockman, Assofit and Prizma Beta LLC, on the basis of a series of violations of the fiduciary duties by Stockman and its nominees. At the date that these consolidated financial statements are authorised for issuance these litigation proceedings remain pending.
On 20 August 2014, Arricano commenced legal proceedings before the District Court of Nicosia against Assofit, Stockman, Omniserve Ltd and Althor Property Investments Ltd ("Althor Property"). In the aforementioned process, Arricano succeeded in obtaining interim orders. The interim orders imposed restrictions on the transfer and/or otherwise alienation of Stockman's shares in Assofit as well on Stockman's voting and shareholding rights and inter alia, ordered Althor Property to transfer the Assofit shares it received back to Stockman.
In September 2014, Assofit Holdings Limited transferred the shares of Prizma Beta LLC to Financial and Investment Solutions BV, a company registered in the Netherlands, despite the fact that an Interim Receiver was appointed in Assofit at that period of time with the responsibility of collecting and safeguarding Assofit's assets. Further in September 2014, Joint-Stock Bank Pivdeniy PJSC, Ukraine, which had an outstanding mortgage loan due from Prizma Beta LLC of USD 32,000 thousand, exercised its right to recover the abovementioned loan by means of reposession of ownership rights to the Skymall shopping centre which was pledged to secure this loan in September 2014. Management of the Group believes that these transfers are illegal and requests that the Group will transfer to Stockman the call option deposit placed as at 31 December 2014 only after these transfers are nullified. As at the date that these consolidated financial statements are authorised for issuance, shares of Prizma Beta LLC and ownership rights for the Skymall shopping centre remain to be alienated.
Legal case in respect of PrJSC Livoberezhzhiainvest
On 5 March 2014, PrJSC Dniprovska Prystan, acting through the asset manager (a bankruptcy receiver) as appointed by the court within its bankruptcy proceedings, filed a claim against PrJSC Livoberezhzhiainvest to nullify the ownership rights to the shopping centre "RayON" and to return the shopping centre to PrJSC Dniprovska Prystan. On 13 August 2014, the Commercial Court of the city of Kyiv ruled a decision in favor of the PrJSC Livoberezhzhiainvest and confirmed PrJSC Livoberezhzhiainvest's ownership rights to the shopping centre. On 27 August 2014, this decision came into force. The decision was not appealed by PrJSC Dniprovska Prystan and on 13 October 2014 the limitation period set for submission of the appeal claim expired.
Legal case in respect of Mezokred Holding LLC
On 17 April 2014, an individual filed a claim against Mezokred Holding LLC to nullify the resolution issued by the Kyiv City Council, according to which the latter has approved an allocation to Mezokred Holding LLC of a land plot in the Obolon District of Kyiv for construction of a hypermarket and entitled Mezokred Holding LLC to lease this land plot for a period of 25 years. On 21 May 2014 and 15 July 2014, the Kyiv Administrative Court and Kyiv Court of Appeal ruled against the Group. On 4 August 2014, the Group filed a cessation appeal and this appeal was accepted by the court.
On 6 August 2014, the public prosecutor filed a new claim against Mezokred Holding LLC to recognise the lease agreement for a land plot in Obolon District of Kyiv as invalid. On 12 September 2014 the first instance court ruled to suspend the hearings on this case until passing of the ruling of the court in respect of the claim issued on 17 April 2014. On 26 November 2014, the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine cancelled the judgments of lower courts in respect of the claim, issued on 17 April 2014, and returned the case for new consideration to the first instance court. The respective hearing of the first instance court is scheduled on 23 June 2015. Management believes that the Group will be successful in defending its title to the lease agreement for the land plot concerned further in court, if this is required. Should this not be the case, the Group may ultimately lose its lease rights for the land plot concerned and title to the related investment property. As at 31 December 2014, the fair value of the land plot and property under construction at Mezokred Holding LLC is USD 5,996 thousand and USD 654 thousand, respectively (refer to note 12).
Management is unaware of any other significant actual, pending or threatened claims against the Group.
(e) Taxation contingencies
The Group performs most of its operations in Ukraine and therefore within the jurisdiction of the Ukrainian tax authorities. The Ukrainian tax system can be characterized by numerous taxes and frequently changing legislation which may be applied retroactively, open to wide interpretation and in some cases are conflicting. Instances of inconsistent opinions between local, regional, and national tax authorities and between the Ministry of Finance and other state authorities are not unusual. Tax declarations are subject to review and investigation by a number of authorities that are enacted by law to impose severe fines, penalties and interest charges. A tax year remains open for review by the tax authorities during the three subsequent calendar years, however under certain circumstances a tax year may remain open longer.
These facts create tax risks substantially more significant than typically found in countries with more developed systems. Management believes that it has adequately provided for tax liabilities based on its interpretation of tax legislation and official pronouncements. However, the interpretations of the relevant authorities could differ and the effect on these consolidated financial statements, if the authorities were successful in enforcing their interpretations, could be significant. No provisions for potential tax assessments have been made in these consolidated financial statements.
As a result of the events described in note 1(b), Ukrainian authorities are not currently able to enforce Ukrainian laws on the territory of the Republic of Crimea. Starting from April 2014, this territory is subject to the transitional provisions of tax rules established by the Russian government to ensure gradual introduction of federal laws into the territory. Although these transitional provisions were thought to put certain relief on the entities registered in the Republic of Crimea, interpretations of these provisions by the tax authorities may be different from the tax payers' view. Management believes that it has adequately provided for tax liabilities based on its understanding of the official pronouncements. In absence of practice of applying new taxation rules by the tax authorities, the effect of potential disagreements in tax treatment of the Group's operations in the Republic of Crimea on the consolidated financial statements cannot presently be determined and can be significant.
Effective from 1 January 2015, the territory of the Republic of Crimea is subject to general legislation of the Russian Federation. The taxation system in the Russian Federation continues to evolve and is characterised by frequent changes in legislation, official pronouncements and court decisions, which are sometimes contradictory and subject to varying interpretation by different tax authorities. This may create additional tax risks for the Group going forward.
29. Related party transactions
(a) Control relationships
The Group's shareholders are Retail Real Estate S.A., Vunderbuilt S.A., Dragon - Ukrainian Properties and Development plc, Weather Empire Limited, Sigma Real Estate Limited, Rauno Teder and Jüri Põld. The Group's ultimate controlling party is Estonian individual Hillar Teder. Hillar Teder indirectly controls 63.79% of the voting shares of the Company. Apart from this, the adult son of Hillar Teder controls 7.48% of the voting shares of the Company.
(b) Transactions with management and close family members
Key management remuneration
Key management compensation included in the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2014 is represented by salary and bonuses of USD 524 thousand (2013: USD 675 thousand).
(c) Transactions and balances with entities under common control
Outstanding balances with entities under common control as at 31 December are as follows:
| 2014
| 2013 (re-presented) |
|
|
|
(in thousands of USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans receivable | 39,761 | - |
Short-term loans receivable | 401 | 39,458 |
Trade receivables | 5,394 | 10,761 |
Other receivables | 9,391 | 9,654 |
Provision for impairment of trade and other receivables and loans receivable from related parties | (54,506) | (17,282) |
| ||
| 441 | 42,591 |
| ||
Other long-term liabilities | - | 10,000 |
Long-term loans and borrowings | 2,661 | - |
Short-term loans and borrowings | 33,184 | 30,121 |
Trade and other payables | 1,420 | 225 |
Advances received | 44 | 86 |
Other liabilities | 20,412 | 10,151 |
| ||
| 57,721 | 50,583 |
|
None of the balances are secured. The terms and conditions of significant transactions and balances with entities under common control are described in notes 9, 11, 17 and 21.
Expenses incurred and income earned from transactions with entities under common control for the years ended 31 December are as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 |
|
|
|
(in thousands of USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense | (5,169) | (1,960) |
Other finance costs | (2,314) | - |
Interest income | 1,182 | 3,112 |
Operating expenses | (43,161) | (547) |
Prices for related party transactions are determined on an ongoing basis.
(d) Guarantees issued by related parties
The Group's related parties issued guarantees securing loans payable by Ukrainian subsidiaries of Arricano Real Estate PLC to the EBRD (loans payable by Grandinvest PrJSC, UkrPanGroup PrJSC), OJSC "Bank "St.Petersburg" (loans payable by Livoberezhzhiainvest PrJSC) and Oshchadbank (loan payable by Comfort Market Luks LLC). The guarantees cover the total amount of outstanding liabilities in relation to EBRD loans as at 31 December 2014 of USD 16,355 thousand (2013: USD 23,441 thousand), in relation to OJSC "Bank "St.Petersburg" as at 31 December 2014 of USD 21,804 thousand (2013: USD 24,849 thousand) and in relation to Oshchadbank as at 31 December 2014 of USD 10,098 thousand (2013: USD 10,091 thousand).
30. Events subsequent to the reporting date
(a) Changes in terms of loans and borrowings
As part of the process of obtaining funds under the new loan agreement with the EBRD signed in December 2014 (refer to note 17) the Group undertook the following actions in February 2015:
- signed the subordination and share retention deed with the EBRD, according to which the outstanding liabilities of Comfort Market Luks LLC are deemed to be subordinated to the outstanding loan payable to the EBRD,
- pledged its investments in Comfort Market Luks LLC and future rights on income of this subsidiary under all lease agreements to the EBRD.
In March 2015, the Group settled the loan payable to Oshchadbank of USD 10,000 thousand and interest accrued thereon using the funds received from the EBRD. The respective loan agreement and pledge agreements with Oshchadbank were terminated. In April 2015, the Group obtained a second tranche of USD 9,000 thousand.
In March 2015, the Group signed an amendment to the share exchange agreement in order to postpone the settlement of the deferred consideration payable of USD 20,000 thousand from 30 April 2015 to 30 April 2016 (refer to notes 2(e), 5, 21).
In March 2015, the Group signed an amendment to the loan agreement with Bytenem Co Limited in order to postpone the settlement of the outstanding balance of USD 17,471 thousand from 14 March 2015 to 14 March 2016 (refer to notes 2(e), 17).
In June 2015, the Group signed an amendment to the loan agreement with OJSC "Bank "St.Petersburg" stipulating a decrease in the amount of loan principal payable in 2015 by USD 2,397 thousand, a decrease in the amount of the deposit pledged as a collateral from USD 1,385 thousand to USD 1,200 thousand and an obligation to the Group to replace the existing pledge of investment property with a carrying amount of USD 40,700 thousand as at 31 December 2014 for other investment properties acceptable to OJSC "Bank "St.Petersburg" until 31 December 2015.
(b) Changes in the Group's structure
On 28 April 2015 the Group approved to liquidate Crimsonville Investments Limited. As at the date of these consolidated financial statements, this subsidiary is not yet liquidated.
(c) Devaluation of the Ukrainian Hryvnia
Subsequent to the reporting date, the UAH has further devaluated by more than 40% to the USD as compared to 31 December 2014 (refer to note 2(c)).
The potential effect on the consolidated financial statements is disclosed in Note 27(e)(i).
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF
ARRICANO REAL ESTATE PLC
Report on the consolidated financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Arricano Real Estate Plc (the ''Company'') and its subsidiaries (together with the Company, referred to as "the Group") on pages 4 to 69 which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2014, the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Board of Directors' responsibility for the financial statements
The Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113, and for such internal controls as the Board of Directors determines are necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Independent Auditors' responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal controls relevant to the entity's preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the Board of Directors as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of Arricano Real Estate Plc as at 31 December 2014, and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and the requirements of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113.
Emphasis of matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the following:
1. To notes 12 and 28 (d)(iii) to the consolidated financial statements, which describe that, as at 31 December 2014, the Group was involved as a defendant in a lawsuit in respect of nullifying lease rights of the subsidiary for the land plot with a carrying amount of USD 5,996 thousand and nullifying the state authority's permits for the construction on the land. The ultimate outcome of the matter cannot be currently determined.
2. To note 1(b) to the consolidated financial statements, which describes the political and social unrest and regional tensions that started in November 2013 and escalated in 2014 in Ukraine. The events referred to in note 1(b) have adversely affected the Group and could continue to adversely affect the Group's results and financial position in a manner not currently determinable.
3. To note 3(b)(i), which describes the resulting significant uncertainties on the foreign currency exchange market in Ukraine. These uncertainties may have significant impact on the Group's results and financial position to the extent not currently determinable.
4. To note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, which indicates and gives reasons for the amendment of the consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2014, previously approved by the Board on 28 April 2015.
Our opinion is not qualified in respect of these matters.
Report on other legal requirements
Pursuant to the additional requirements of the Auditors and Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts Laws of 2009 and 2013, we report the following:
· We have obtained all the information and explanations we considered necessary for the purposes of our audit.
· In our opinion, proper books of account have been kept by the Company, so far as it appears from our examination of the books.
· The consolidated financial statements are in agreement with the books of account.
· In our opinion and to the best of the information available to us and according to the explanations given to us, the consolidated financial statements give the information required by the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113, in the manner so required.
· In our opinion, the information given in the report of the Board of Directors on pages 2 and 3 is consistent with the consolidated financial statements.
Other matter
This report, including the opinion expressed herein, has been prepared for and only for the Company's members as a body in accordance with Section 34 of the Auditors and Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts Laws of 2009 and 2013 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving the aforementioned opinion, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whose knowledge this report may come.
Michalis A. Loizides, FCA
Certified Public Accountant and Registered Auditor
for and on behalf of
KPMG Limited
Certified Public Accountants and Registered Auditors
11, June 16th 1943 Street
3022 Limassol
Cyprus
23 June 2015
Related Shares:
ARO.L