18th Jun 2015 07:00
Charles Stanley Group PLC
Results for the year ended 31 March 2015
Charles Stanley, one of the UK's leading independently owned, full service investment management groups, today it announces its preliminary results for the year ended 31 March 2015 in accordance with FCA Listing Rule 9.7A.
Highlights:
· Total funds increased 6% to £21.3 billion (2014: £20.1 billion)
· Discretionary funds increased 13% to £9.3 billion (2014: £8.2 billion)
· Revenue increased 1% to £149.7 million (2014: £149.0 million)
· Charles Stanley Direct account holders grew to over 20,000 with revenues up 37.1%
· Adjusted profit before tax £4.2 million (2014: £13.5 million)
· Loss before tax £6.1 million (2014: profit £6.1 million)
· Earnings per share
o Underlying EPS from continuing operations 13.14p (2014: 24.98p)
o Reported loss per share (13.46p) (2014: reported earnings per share 10.51p)
· Dividend per share of 5.00p (2014: 12.25p)
· Appointment of Paul Abberley as Chief Executive and Ben Money-Coutts as Chief Financial Officer
· Strategic Review undertaken by management
Post Period
· Contracts exchanged for sale of Charles Stanley Securities and non-binding Heads of Agreement entered into for Charles Stanley Financial Solutions
· £15.8 million raised through private placing
Commenting on the results, Paul Abberley, Chief Executive Officer of Charles Stanley Group, said:
"The past year has been one of substantial change for Charles Stanley. Whilst several of the underlying elements of the results give cause for encouragement, the overall result leaves significant room for improvement.
As such, our immediate priorities have been firstly to ensure our staff continue to aim for the highest possible level of client delivery and secondly to address the near term deterioration in profitability. Alongside these initiatives, we have refined our strategy to ensure that greater emphasis is placed on developing the core Investment Management business, while retaining and building only those other activities which directly complement and enhance this core activity. With our strengthened management team, we are implementing the new strategy in earnest.
We are confident that the core activities of Charles Stanley are sound and are committed to delivering significant progress over the coming financial year."
For further information, please contact:
Charles Stanley Joanne Vowles, Public Relations Manager Via Redleaf | Canaccord Genuity Martin Green 020 7523 4619 | Peel Hunt Guy Wiehahn 020 7418 8893 | Redleaf Communications Rebecca Sanders-Hewett Richard Gotla 020 7382 4730 |
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
The year to 31 March 2015 has seen some of the most significant changes in Charles Stanley in the two centuries since the business was first established. While we marginally increased our revenue, our profits have been adversely impacted by the changes and we ended the year with a loss before tax of £6.1 million (2014: profit £6.1 million). After amending for adjusting items we recorded an underlying profit before tax of £4.2 million compared with £13.5 million the previous year.
Throughout the year our management and client-facing investment teams have been heavily engaged in the major programme to which I referred last year, of upgrading our systems and our record-keeping to meet the rising regulatory expectations across our area of the financial services sector. This has led to a substantial re-modelling of the interface with our extensive client base, which is moving forward on schedule to completion very shortly. The outcome is intended to reinforce our high-quality offer of service to our clients by ensuring we build and maintain a deep understanding of each client's circumstances and thus the suitability of the service provided. We are hugely appreciative of our clients' forbearance in what has been a very demanding process.
The decline in our profitability is essentially due to a combination of the rising costs associated with these changes, and, to an extent, the inevitable diversion of focus from business generation. But the upside is that we firmly believe that we have built a stronger base to take our business forward.
MANAGEMENT
These developments have coincided with some significant management changes and the initiatives described below have further enhanced the effectiveness of the Board. European legislation now dictates that the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of financial services businesses should be separate. Accordingly, our Nomination Committee was tasked with seeking a new Chief Executive Officer. After a rigorous process the Board was delighted to appoint Paul Abberley to this role. Paul, who has held senior executive roles in the Aviva group, joined us in May last year as Chief Investment Officer, and was confirmed as our new Chief Executive Officer in December on receipt of approval from the FCA. I continue to serve as Non-executive Chairman.
In January 2015 we were further delighted to accept the recommendation of our Nomination Committee to appoint Ben Money-Coutts as our Chief Financial Officer (CFO), in place of James Rawlingson, who stepped down at that time, and to whom I should like to express the Board's thanks. Ben joined us in May 2013 and subsequently held senior positions in the Company prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer.
At our 31 March 2015 year-end Michael Clark stepped down as a Director, having served throughout the entire 27 years since Charles Stanley was transformed from a partnership to an incorporated company. Michael continues to be employed by the Group, and I should like to pay the warmest tribute to him on behalf of us all for his long service to Charles Stanley.
This has been a very busy and demanding year for my fellow Non-executive Directors, who, between them, chair our Remuneration, Audit, Nomination and Risk Committees and I should like to thank them warmly for their support of the Group. Their reports are set out on later pages.
Overall the Company's Board has been reduced in size and its committee structure streamlined, further enhancing its effectiveness during an important phase in the Company's development. Separately, a Chief Risk Officer (CRO) has been appointed and now leads an independent risk function.
STRATEGY
Historically our strategy has been to develop the business of the Group as evenly as possible across a broad waterfront of different business lines, though all essentially built around our core proposition of a high quality of investment management, advisory and administration services to a range of different (but complementary) client segments. Over the past couple of years this strategy has been finessed so that greater emphasis is now placed on developing the core business, while retaining and building only those ancillary businesses which directly support and feed into the core activity. Examples of the latter are our successful and growing EBS SIPP operation, and our expanding Financial Planning offering.
Charles Stanley Direct, our award-winning direct-to-client digital platform, has continued to build its client base and Assets under Administration, and this, too, is a key element in our strategy going forward. Clients of our Discretionary and Advisory services increasingly seek digital access to every aspect of their accounts. We believe that clients will welcome our planned strategic development of greater cross-functionality between these different elements of our service.
As a consequence of our increased focus and as announced previously, we have been progressing with the sale of our corporate broking division, Charles Stanley Securities, and our employee benefits business Charles Stanley Financial Solutions Ltd, both of which are not regarded as core. On the 17 June the Group announced contracts had been exchanged with Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited regarding the sale of Charles Stanley Securities. Further announcements regarding the sale of Charles Stanley Financial Solutions Ltd will be issued in due course.
CAPITAL
A further area on which the Board has focused during the year has been the Group's capital position. The maintenance of high cash balances has always been a significant strategic objective, and although these remain high, the effect of reduced profitability and maintained dividends, has been to reduce these below target levels. At the year-end the cash balance stood at £28.5 million compared with £38.6 million a year earlier. So just after the year-end, in April 2015, the Group arranged a fund-raising which was fully taken up, predominantly by existing institutional shareholders, raising £15.8 million net of expenses. We are extremely grateful to our shareholders for their proactive support.
DIVIDEND
In light of the reported loss for the latest year, and in order not to dilute the newly increased capital, the Board has reluctantly decided to re-base its dividend payments. While the interim dividend, paid in November 2014, was maintained at 3.00p per share, it has been decided to recommend a final dividend of 2.00p per share, which compares with last year's final dividend of 9.25p. This was flagged to shareholders at the time of the fund-raising in early April, and is now confirmed as the Board's recommendation. We fully expect, once profitability picks up, to return to our previous pattern of steadily increasing dividends over time, with dividend cover at least two times (as adjusted for the amortisation of intangibles).
EMPLOYEES
This has been a challenging year for everyone in the Group and this is my opportunity to say thank you to them all, on behalf of the Directors and shareholders, for coping with all the demands in such good spirit, in taking their Company - your Company - further ahead.
OUTLOOK
The changes in key management in the Group are bedding in well. We are going through a significant process of change so as to refocus Charles Stanley, ensuring the continued excellence of our client service and to place ourselves at the front of the regulatory curve. There is a substantial programme of work ahead of us but I believe that shareholders should have every confidence in the team that we have built to take this forward.
As always both the domestic and global economic conditions have a very significant effect on our business. Despite some obvious geopolitical risks, the broader outlook seems more benign than it has for several years. Growth has returned to our economy and to that of the USA, and there are better signs of an uptick in Europe too. True, the signals from China could herald a slow-down in world growth. The forthcoming UK referendum on Britain's EU membership creates some - but perhaps limited - uncertainty. On the other hand this could well turn out to be positive, with the chance of meaningful reforms giving a boost to growth across Europe.
While remaining, as always, very cautious, I think there are signs for a little more optimism in the year ahead.
Sir David Howard
Chairman
18 June 2015
CHIEF EXECUTIVE'S REPORT
Having been appointed Chief Executive Officer in late 2014 my immediate priorities have been threefold:
· Ensuring our staff continue to aim for the highest possible level of client delivery. Client service and outcomes form the bedrock upon which we will continue to grow Charles Stanley;
· Diagnose and address the near term deterioration in profitability; and
· Review, and as necessary, reshape our corporate strategy.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Several of the underlying elements of the Group's financial performance for the year ending 31 March 2015 were encouraging but the overall result was unsatisfactory.
Total Funds under Management and Administration (FuMA) grew 6.0% to £21.3 billion, revenues rose 0.5% to £149.7 million, but our underlying profit before tax fell from £13.5 million to £4.2 million and our actual reported profit turned from a profit before tax of £6.1 million in 2014 to a loss before tax of £6.1 million in 2015. This loss resulted in a decline in net assets attributable to equity shareholders to £68.9 million (2014: £83.4 million) and of our year-end cash balance from £38.6 million the preceding year to £28.5 million.
· Underlying these disappointing numbers there are nevertheless some encouraging trends, most notably:13.4% growth of Discretionary Funds under Management;
· 23.0% increase in fees generated from our Managed investment activities; and
· 35.1% growth of Charles Stanley Direct's Assets under Administration (AuA) on its core direct-to-client platform and 37.1% increase in revenues.
These figures give substance to the view that the core activities of the Group and quality of client service are fundamentally sound, but that much needs to be done to drive greater overall revenue growth and the productivity of our staff whilst ensuring tight control of our cost base.
KEY INITIATIVES FOR THE YEAR AHEAD
Implementation of the revised strategy will begin in earnest. We will focus exclusively on wealth management in the UK, and accordingly have already announced our intention to dispose of non-core operations.
We remain an investment-led firm and retain our commitment to providing genuinely bespoke investment management for our clients. We know our clients value a personal service, delivered by an empowered investment professional. Our investment offering will continue to extend to Advisory and Execution-only services in addition to the core Discretionary portfolio management.
Increasingly, our clients require advice and we are renewing our commitment to make such support available. Our Financial Planning staff will be combined into a single Financial Planning division, enlarged over time, and offering a high quality and consistent suite of services, focussing upon but not limited to, retirement and inheritance.
A number of our teams provide both specialist Asset Management products to clients and research support to our core Investment Management division. These units include PAN Asset Management, the Collectives Portfolios Service, the IHT portfolio service, Matterley funds, Discretionary Fund Management and the central Research function. They will now be restructured and combined into a single Asset Management division. This will allow for the cost-effective leveraging over a broad range of investment specialisms. Research support for our private client investment teams will be further enhanced. Asset management solutions will be offered to financial intermediaries and wholesale and institutional clients.
We will continue to provide a broad range of platforms and wrappers, reflecting the varying needs of our clients. These will include SIPP administration, delivered by our EBS unit.
Finally, while known for our personal service, we are also acutely aware that our clients require high quality digital access to our products and services. Indeed, whether by choice or because more practical, some will continue to use this route exclusively. Accordingly, we remain committed to our highly regarded Charles Stanley Direct offering. The innovative delivery developed within the platform will be leveraged across the Charles Stanley offering, benefitting all clients.
We expect the benefits from the implementation of the strategy to take a number of years to have full effect. We have set ourselves the primary financial objective of building our operating margin to at least 15% in 2018 and expect it to grow further beyond that.
In summary, we will be active at four points on the value chain and thus vertically integrated. Each point will be managed as a profit centre and thus Financial Planning, provision of Platforms and Wrappers, Investment Management and Asset Management will each contribute to the long term growth of both our profits and our margin. Implementation of the revised strategy will be a multi-year exercise, but meaningful progress will be delivered in the current financial year.
Paul Abberley
Chief Executive Officer
18 June 2015
STRATEGIC REPORT
OUR BUSINESS
Charles Stanley remains one of the UK's leading independently owned private client investment management firms. We have a long heritage, dating back to 1792, which includes membership of the Stock Exchange under the Charles Stanley name since the 1850s. We manage and administer over £21.3 billion of assets on behalf of 80,577 clients, many of whom have been with us over decades or generations due to the excellence of our services and commitment to client care.
These principles of service will remain at the heart of everything we do. However, in recent times we have begun to take significant steps to refocus our business and realign our model with the changing requirements of our clients, our regulator and our market place. The desire to modernise the business has been evident in the changes we have made to our senior management team and by the commitment we have made to enact the recommendations of the Strategic Review of our business.
This Strategic Review, led by our new Chief Executive Officer, has involved a thorough analysis of our businesses with a view to identifying those which have the capacity to develop further and contribute to our overall vision of building Charles Stanley into the UK's leading Wealth Management Business by 2020. The benchmarks we employ to evaluate the extent to which we have achieved this vision shall be to seek top quartile, independently assessed performance in the following three key areas.
1. Client satisfaction;
2. Equity market rating (on a like-for-like basis with our peers); and
3. Staff engagement.
The timescale for the delivery of this vision demonstrates that we consider the process of redefining and then benefitting from our revised strategy as a major and long term project which will require considerable endeavour from our employees and perhaps some degree of patience from our shareholders.
Our core activity is to provide investment management services to an affluent private client base, although we very frequently act on behalf of charities, corporates and trusts. Over the past decade we have increasingly focused on a fully Discretionary fee paying service. Our Discretionary Managed client base now accounts for 43.7% of our clients' Funds under Management and Administration, up from 8.9% at the turn of the millennium. This trend can also be seen in the balance of our revenues which is now provided in the majority by fee-based income. To complement our investment management business we are refining the offering provided by various of our central investment management teams (Matterley funds, Pan Asset Management, the Collectives Portfolio service, IHT Portfolio service, Discretionary Fund management and the central Research Function) into an Asset Management division, which is a range of investment solutions emerging directly from our Investment Process. We are taking steps to improve and extend the scope of our Investment Process as a part of this exercise.
Alongside this, we also retain a strong commitment to providing a spectrum of services and regard our Advisory business and Execution-only services as an integral part of our Investment Management offering. Furthermore, we remain excited by the prospects for growth in the online self-directed market which Charles Stanley Direct services. We also believe the market place for Financial Planning services will develop considerably in the future and is one which fits naturally with our core competencies. Accordingly we are looking to develop further our Financial Planning offering as we can see this being both an increasingly integrated product but also as a source of new clients being introduced to the firm.
We believe we have a natural competitive advantage in these businesses which, when correctly leveraged, will offer a differentiated and superior service for our clients. By comparison, in the instance of Charles Stanley Securities and Charles Stanley Financial Solutions, although we have every confidence that both businesses are well positioned to serve their client bases, we have decided that they do not have the desired degree of commonality with our target market to justify continued ownership by the Group. Accordingly, we have announced our intention to dispose of these activities. The exchange of contracts with Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited for the sale of Charles Stanley Securities was announced to the market on the 17 June 2015. The sale process of Charles Stanley Financial Solutions is still ongoing.
We rely upon our team of over 300 investment managers and financial planners located in offices through the country to deliver our services and products to our clients. We believe that a close personal relationship between adviser and clients is essential to the development of our business and is consistent with the reputation for client satisfaction that we enjoy. Geographical decentralisation supports this. We also remain committed to a truly bespoke service in which investment professionals achieve superior risk assessed performance by really listening to, and understanding the needs and desires, of their clients.
We will continue to be investment-led and to regard a personal service as the heart of our offering. With this as our foundation we have taken considerable steps to respond to the changing needs of our customers and our regulators in delivering our investment solutions. This will inevitably lead to us developing a more targeted and differentiated investment management service. Over the last 18 months we have carried out a programme to understand the financial circumstances and investment objectives of our clients with a greater depth and rigour than ever before. Although this has involved an enormous commitment of our time and resources we believe that the quality of the portfolios that we will deliver as a result will strengthen the longevity of our client relationships over the medium to longer term. We are currently in the midst of a review and reorganisation of our investment process and the consequent tools that we are able to put at the disposal of our investment managers. This review will enhance the quality and extent of the general asset allocation guidance which is produced by the Group, and will be made available as a supporting framework from which our investment manager can design bespoke portfolios.
We are confident that the ingredients of the Charles Stanley business remain as attractive today as at any other point in our history, and that following the implementation of our Strategic Review we will be in an excellent position to drive greater value for all of our stakeholders.
OUR SERVICES
Investment Management
The core of our business is contained within our Investment Management Services division. This accounts for approximately 87.7% of the total assets. We manage and administer 81.2% of Group revenue. The services of our Investment Management division are provided by our investment managers via our network of regional branches and London Head Office.
Within our Investment Management division our flagship offering is Discretionary Investment Management. This is predominantly a fee-based service directed at Private Clients who wish to delegate the management of their investment portfolio to a recognised professional. Our investment managers create bespoke portfolios tailored to the individual objectives and personal risk tolerances of their clients. Our investment managers use their own investment expertise and experience, and a wealth of in-house research and tax efficient wrappers provided by the Group to manage client assets. We are currently upgrading our investment process with a view to providing our investment managers with an even stronger asset allocation framework to serve as the foundation for the bespoke portfolios they create.
Within our Discretionary Investment Management service we also offer our Collectives Portfolio Service and Pan Asset Management. Both are model-based services which provide clients a low cost method of gaining access to our investment process and expertise via exposure to collective investment vehicles as opposed to direct exposure to individual securities. These products are primarily aimed at clients with modest investible assets and for whom a fully bespoke portfolio is not cost effective. The model solutions are available to all of our investment managers and are also made selectively available to financial intermediaries via external investment platforms. We shall be making changes to the operation of our model-based services as part of the upgrading of our central investment proposition into an Asset Management division. We would expect this to be a considerable area of growth for the Group over time.
Within the Investment Management Services division we offer a full suite of Advisory, Dealing and Execution services. We provide Advisory Managed services to those clients who wish to have their investment portfolios managed by an investment professional but wish to retain the ultimate decision making power over individual investment decisions. We report the assets we manage within our Advisory Managed business together with the assets of our Discretionary Managed business and describe this as our Managed business.
We selectively offer an Advisory Dealing service to a number of individuals with a keen interest in and considerable experience of investment and markets. This remains an important part of our offering as it still accounts for £2.1 billion of our Funds under Management and Administration. Accordingly it is one which we will continue to offer to appropriate clients. Our Execution-only service provides a dealing, custody and administration service to clients who wish to make their investment decisions over all or part of their portfolio, and who accordingly require no advice. This service may be accessed via an Investment Manager, through a dedicated telephone-based dealing service or online via Charles Stanley Direct.
Across the Investment Management Service division we offer clients access to a variety of services and products which are designed to ensure the efficient administration of their portfolios both from a custodial and a tax perspective. We offer clients the opportunity to hold their investments with us via a Charles Stanley Nominee account or via CREST personal membership and offer clients a full cash management service. From a tax efficiency viewpoint, we also offer clients access to our in-house Individual Savings Accounts, Self-Invested Personal Pensions and Inheritance Tax Portfolio Service.
Charles Stanley Direct
Charles Stanley Direct has been developed in recent years to service the requirements of a growing customer base that wish to use an online platform to conduct aspects of their investment activities and are comfortable in making their decisions without access to advice. We believe that this group of clients will continue to grow. Since its launch in 2013, Charles Stanley Direct has attracted more than 20,000 accounts and now has well in excess of £1 billion of Assets under Administration.
Financial Planning
Our financial planners advise clients across the full spectrum of their needs with a particular expertise in the pensions, retirement and inheritance fields. The Financial Planning service is offered through our branch network and is delivered alongside an investment management service. We believe the financial planning market will continue to grow and is complementary to our core investment management activities. We will seek to roll out this service further and extend our team of Chartered Financial Planners accordingly.
OUR MARKETS
Charles Stanley operates solely within the UK's wealth management industry. This is a sizeable market place with over £737 billion¹ of assets being administered by UK based Wealth Management institutions. The table below sets out the total assets managed by Charles Stanley and those we consider to be its immediate peers.
Total | |
FuMA² | |
Firm | £ billion |
Brewin Dolphin | 39.1 |
Brooks MacDonald | 7.5 |
Charles Stanley Group PLC | 21.3 |
Close Brothers AM | 10.6 |
Investec Wealth Management Ltd | 27.8 |
JM Finn | 8.1 |
Quilters | 17.5 |
Rathbone Brothers Plc | 28.9 |
Smith and Williamson | 16.0 |
Total | 176.8 |
¹The ComPeer Limited- The UK Wealth Management Industry Q12015.
²Figures based on latest audited accounts and other publicly available information. All are as at 31 March 2015, with the exception of Close Brothers AM which is as at 30 April 2015.
Despite its size the market remains highly fragmented with at least 180 firms in operation. The top 10 firms control only 31% of the market place.
We believe the industry will continue to undergo rapid change. For example we estimate that the number of individuals with between £50,000 and £5 million of investible assets will increase 18% by 2018. This is partly evidence of the pace of retirement of the baby boomer generation gathering speed. The UK has an increasing number of elderly, with a disproportionate amount of wealth concentrated in individuals over 65 years old. This group is faced with making provision for long years of retirement as life expectancies continue to increase. This will inevitably increase the demand for investment management and financial planning services.
There is no doubt that the recent changes that have been made to pensions legislation both in regard to auto-enrolment and in the removal of the requirement for annuity purchases will increase the pool of capital available to the wealth management industry. We anticipate that we will need to extend the provision of our services to a changing client base and that the industry will respond to these trends with an evolving product suite.
Our industry is also confronting the challenges posed by the increasing technological requirements of our natural client base. Our clients are increasingly comfortable in handling their financial affairs on mobile devices and are managing sizeable transactions via this medium. There is an increasing demand for up to the minute online access to investment portfolios and the ability to trade remotely. Although we have developed a number of innovative solutions to these changing requirements it remains an ongoing challenge to ensure that the technological capabilities can service these needs, and ensure that access and transactions are carried out with the requisite levels of security.
Furthermore, the regulatory environment in which we operate has been rapidly developing and we anticipate that this trend will continue. We, like many others in the industry, have been investing heavily to ensure that our processes and systems place us in a position to comply with the increased regulatory scrutiny in which we manage our clients' money. We believe that the investment we have made will lead us to be in a better position to service our clients' needs.
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KPI | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Progress |
Funds under Management and Administration (FuMA) | £17.7bn | £20.1bn | £21.3bn | +£1.2bn (+6%) since 2014 |
Discretionary FuM inflows | 17% | 26% | 5% | 5% net inflow as a percentage of opening FuM |
Discretionary service yield | 95bps | 97bps | 91bps | -6bps since 2014 |
Advisory Managed service yield | 70bps | 69bps | 71bps | +2bps since 2014 |
FuMA per CF30 | £51.3m | £55.0m | £60.1m | +£5.1m (+9%) since 2014 |
Discretionary income per CF30 | £154k | £183k | £208k | +£25k (+14%) since 2014 |
Support staff to CF30 ratio | 1.75 | 1.84 | 1.97 | +0.13 since 2014 |
Fees to revenue ratio | 60% | 61% | 66% | +5% since 2014 |
Costs to revenue ratio | 93.3% | 96.2% | 105.0% | +8.8% since 2014 |
Underlying profit before tax | £13.5m | £13.5m | £4.2m | -69% since 2014 |
- Continuing | £15.1m | £11.3m | £6.0m | |
- Held for sale | (£1.6m) | £2.2m | (£1.8m) | |
Underlying earnings per share for continuing operations | 29.84p | 29.84p | 9.20p | -69% since 2014 |
- Continuing | 33.16p | 24.98p | 13.14p | |
- Held for sale | (3.32p) | 4.86p | (3.94p) | |
Dividend growth | 4.5% | 4.5% | (59.2%) | -63.7% since 2014 |
Dividend cover | 1.3 | 0.9 | (1.1) | -2 since 2014 |
Capital adequacy ratio | 192% | 154% | 107% | -47% since 2014* |
Return on capital employed | 10.6% | 6.7% | (8.3%) | -15% since 2014 |
*A placing to raise £15.8 million was concluded in April 2015, which would increase the Group's capital adequacy ratio from 107% to 154%
REVIEW OF THE YEAR
Charles Stanley's performance
Whilst elements of Charles Stanley's financial performance for the year ended 31 March 2015 were encouraging, most notably the continued growth of our Funds under Management and Administration (FuMA), the growing proportion of Discretionary Managed funds, and the continued rapid growth of Charles Stanley Direct, other critical aspects of the Group's performance were disappointing, most obviously the deterioration of the operating margin owing to increased costs. These factors, together with a number of other charges, ultimately led to a reported pre-tax loss for the year of £6.1 million.
Funds under Management and Administration
Total Funds under Management and Administration at 31 March 2015 reached a new high of £21.3 billion, up 6.0% from £20.1 billion at 31 March 2014. Within this, Managed Funds increased 9.8% with Discretionary Funds up 13.4% to £9.3 billion and Advisory Managed Funds constant at £3.0 billion.
Administered Funds increased 1.1% and Advisory Dealing Funds declined to £2.1 billion. Nevertheless, we retain a strong commitment to providing an Advisory Dealing service as part of our full spectrum offering, although we see it becoming a more specialist service for individuals with a keen interest in and considerable experience of investments and markets, and thus priced accordingly. Execution-only funds grew 6.2% to £6.9 billion with particularly strong growth of 35.1% through our direct-to-client platform, Charles Stanley Direct.
2015 | 2014 | Change | ||
£bn | £bn | £bn | % | |
Discretionary | 9.3 | 8.2 | 1.1 | 13.4% |
Advisory Managed | 3.0 | 3.0 | - | -% |
Total Managed | 12.3 | 11.2 | 1.1 | 9.8% |
Advisory Dealing | 2.1 | 2.4 | (0.3) | (12.5%) |
Execution-only | 6.9 | 6.5 | 0.4 | 6.2% |
Total Administered | 9.0 | 8.9 | 0.1 | 1.1% |
Total Funds | 21.3 | 20.1 | 1.2 | 6.0% |
FTSE 100 Index | 6,773 | 6598 | 175 | 2.7% |
WMA Stock Market Balanced Index | 3,684 | 3385 | 299 | 8.8% |
Overview of financial performance
The Group's financial performance is shown below as split between its continuing activities and those of its businesses which are Held for sale (Charles Stanley Securities and Charles Stanley Financial Solutions). The table shows the underlying results along with the results on a statutory basis. The underlying performance includes adjustments widely used by our listed peer group and equity research analysts.
| Continuing operations | Held for Sale | Underlying performance | Adjusting items | Reported performance |
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
2015 | |||||
Revenue | 141.0 | 8.7 | 149.7 | - | 149.7 |
Costs | (135.2) | (10.5) | (145.7) | (11.5) | (157.2) |
Other income | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
Operating contribution | 5.9 | (1.8) | 4.1 | (11.5) | (7.4) |
Finance and other income | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Profit/(loss) before tax | 6.0 | (1.8) | 4.2 | (10.3) | (6.1) |
Pre-tax profit margin | 4.3% | (20.7%) | 2.8% | - | (4.1%) |
Earnings per share | 13.14p | (3.94p) | 9.20p | (22.66p) | (13.46p) |
2014 | |||||
Revenue | 134.4 | 14.6 | 149.0 | - | 149.0 |
Costs | (123.6) | (12.4) | (136.0) | (7.4) | (143.4) |
Other income | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
Operating contribution | 10.9 | 2.2 | 13.1 | (7.4) | 5.7 |
Finance and other income | 0.4 | - | 0.4 | - | 0.4 |
Profit before tax | 11.3 | 2.2 | 13.5 | (7.4) | 6.1 |
Pre-tax profit margin | 8.4% | 15.1% | 9.1% | - | 4.1% |
Earnings per share | 24.98p | 4.86p | 29.84p | (19.33p) | 10.51p |
Group revenue
Group revenue from continuing activities increased by 4.9% to £141.0 million for 2015 from £134.4 million in 2014. Revenues of the Held for sale activities of Charles Stanley Securities and Charles Stanley Financial Solutions declined 40.4% largely as a result in a fall in corporate finance fees. As a consequence overall Group revenues were up 0.5% to £149.7 million from £149.0 million in the prior year.
Group underlying operating expenses
Group operating expenses from continuing activities increased 9.4% from £123.6 million in 2014 to £135.2 million in 2015. Approximately 74.0% of this increase was accounted for by headcount and associated remuneration increases, and 7.8% by establishment due to the Group taking an additional floor at its main London office. The expenses of the Held for sale activities declined 15.3% to £10.5 million largely due to a £3.7 million reduction in the variable remuneration paid to Charles Stanley Securities staff. Combined underlying operating expenses were £145.7 million (2014: £136.0 million).
Group underlying pre-tax profit margin
The Group's pre-tax profit margin for its core continuing operations fell from 8.4% for 2014 to 4.3% for 2015 and that of its Held for sale activities from 15.1% in 2014 to a negative margin of (20.7%) in 2015. In overall terms, the pre-tax profit margin fell from 9.1% to 2.8%. The main driver of this decline was the sharp increase in the cost base against relatively flat revenues. This level of profitability is unsustainable and the Board's highest single priority regarding financial performance is to restore the margin to at least 15% by no later than calendar year 2018.
Adjusting items
The Board considers the underlying profit before tax and earnings per share as a better reflection of business performance rather than looking at results on a statutory basis only. To calculate the underlying results we have excluded the items detailed below.
2015 | 2014 | |
£m | £m | |
Charles Stanley Direct and other investment one-off costs | - | 1.3 |
Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) Levy | 1.3 | 1.2 |
Amortisation of client relationships | 1.8 | 2.5 |
Branch acquisition costs | 0.3 | 2.4 |
Impairment of assets | 8.3 | - |
Non-recurring professional costs | 0.1 | - |
Reduction in deferred consideration | (0.3) | - |
Sale of Fund asset | (1.2) | - |
Adjusting items | 10.3 | 7.4 |
FSCS Levy (£1.3 million)
The Group incurred FSCS Levy charges of £1.6 million for the period. During the year the FSCS was successful in recovering some of its costs in relation to claims made in previous years. As a result the Group received a rebate of £0.3 million of its 2011 Levy.
Amortisation of client relationships (£1.8 million)
Payments made to new investment managers and third parties for introduction of customer relationships that are judged to be intangible assets are capitalised. We amortise these intangibles over the useful life of the client relationship, which has been assessed to be 10 years. We have excluded amortisation charges for the client relationships from the underlying profit as it is a significant non-cash item.
Branch acquisition costs (£0.3 million)
The Group was joined by a team of investment managers in Leicester in October 2013. This led to various one-off costs due to their being in a start-up phase. No further acquisition costs are expected in relation to this branch.
Impairment of assets (£8.3 million)
The Board has conducted a thorough review of the carrying value of the goodwill relating to a number of assets and has decided it would be appropriate to write down the goodwill associated with a number of activities as summarised below:
Impairment charge £m | Residual value £m | |
Charles Stanley Direct | 3.0 | 5.2 |
Charles Stanley Financial Solutions (including Plymouth EB) | 2.0 | 1.5 |
Durlacher | 1.5 | - |
Truro | 0.8 | 0.3 |
Pan Asset | 0.3 | 0.9 |
Impairment of other assets | 0.7 | 0.3 |
Total | 8.3 | 8.2 |
Full details on the basis of these impairment charges can be found in note 14.
Non-recurring professional costs (£0.1 million)
At the request of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Group engaged Ernst & Young to help review its processes for conducting client suitability assessments, make recommendations for their improvement, and subsequent validation testing to ensure changes made in line with these recommendations had been implemented and were working as intended. This process has now been concluded.
Reduction in deferred consideration (profit £0.3 million)
Last year as part of the acquisition of Pan Asset Capital Management Limited (PAN) an estimate based on the Funds under Management was made of the deferred consideration payable. The Funds under Management of PAN have since fallen and as a result the deferred consideration payable has decreased
Sale of Fund asset (profit £1.2 million)
In September 2014 the Group sold the Matterley Undervalued Asset Fund to Miton Group for an initial consideration of £0.75 million. Based on the current level of assets in the fund, further deferred consideration of £0.45 million will be payable in December 2015 and has therefore been recognised through the income statement in the current financial year.
Taxation
Even though the Group is reporting a loss before tax, its continuing operations have a small taxable profit, hence a small tax expense of £0.04 million in relation to the current financial year (2014: expense £1.4 million). A full reconciliation of the tax charge on continuing activities is provided in note 12 of the financial statements. A tax credit of £0.3 million arises on the losses attributable to the discontinued activities and this is shown separately in note 12.
Earnings/(loss) per share
The basic loss per share for the year ended 31 March 2015 was (13.46p) compared with earnings of 10.51p in 2014. On an underlying basis for continuing operations, earnings per share fell 47.4% to 13.14p (2014: 24.98p).
Dividends
In view of the Group's trading performance for the year and the need to strengthen the Group's capital reserves, the Board has proposed a final dividend of 2.00p. Taken together with the interim dividend of 3.00p, this will represent a total dividend for the year of 5.00p (2014: 12.25p).
Divisional review
The Group is currently comprised of four operating divisions as summarised below:
Investment Management Services | Provision of investment services to individuals, companies, trusts and charities. |
Financial Services | Financial planning and wealth management, SIPP and SSAS administration and employee benefits. |
Charles Stanley Direct | Direct-to-client online investment service. |
Charles Stanley Securities | Advisory, broking and corporate finance services for smaller and mid-cap UK listed companies. This business is Held for sale and treated as a discontinued activity. |
Charles Stanley Securities, and the employee benefits business, Charles Stanley Financial Solutions are both recognised as assets Held for sale.
The split of funds, revenue, underlying expenses and underlying operating profit/(loss) between the divisions, and also between continuing operations and Held for sale operations, is summarised in the following tables.
Fund analysis
Total | IM Services | Financial Services | Charles Stanley Direct | Total | IM Services | Financial Services | Charles Stanley Direct | |
£bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | |
Discretionary | 9.31 | 8.63 | 0.68 | - | 8.23 | 7.56 | 0.67 | - |
Advisory managed | 2.97 | 2.70 | 0.27 | - | 2.99 | 2.73 | 0.26 | - |
Advisory dealing | 2.05 | 2.05 | - | - | 2.39 | 2.39 | - | - |
Execution only | 6.92 | 5.26 | 0.02 | 1.64 | 6.48 | 5.04 | 0.02 | 1.42 |
Total Funds | 21.25 | 18.64 | 0.97 | 1.64 | 20.09 | 17.72 | 0.95 | 1.42 |
Revenue analysis
2015 | 2014 | Change | ||
£m | £m | £m | % | |
Investment Management Services | 121.6 | 117.3 | 4.3 | 3.7% |
Financial Services | 15.1 | 13.5 | 1.6 | 11.9% |
Charles Stanley Direct | 4.8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 37.1% |
Charles Stanley Securities | 8.2 | 14.7 | (6.5) | (44.2%) |
Total revenue | 149.7 | 149.0 | 0.7 | 0.5% |
Continuing operations | 141.0 | 134.4 | 6.6 | 4.9% |
Held for sale | 8.7 | 14.6 | (5.9) | (40.4%) |
Total revenue | 149.7 | 149.0 | 0.7 | 0.5% |
Underlying cost analysis
The underlying costs of each division including direct and allocated costs, but excluding one-off adjusting items.
2015 |
2014 |
Change | ||
£m | £m | £m | % | |
Investment Management Services | 111.3 | 101.6 | (9.7) | (9.5%) |
Financial Services | 17.8 | 15.2 | (2.6) | (17.1%) |
Charles Stanley Direct | 6.7 | 5.6 | (1.1) | (19.6%) |
Charles Stanley Securities | 9.9 | 13.6 | 3.7 | 27.2% |
Total underlying costs | 145.7 | 136.0 | (9.7) | (7.1%) |
Continuing operations | 135.2 | 123.6 | (11.6) | (9.4%) |
Held for sale | 10.5 | 12.4 | 1.9 | 15.3% |
Total underlying costs | 145.7 | 136.0 | (9.7) | (7.1%) |
Where possible, administrative expenses are charged directly to the division to which they are attributable. However, a significant proportion of the Group's administrative expenditure is incurred by middle and back office functions. Examples of these include our Operations, Finance, Information Technology, Compliance, Risk, Internal Audit, Marketing, Professional and Facilities departments as well as the costs associated with being a publicly listed company. Historically the Group has allocated some but not all of these expenses to the four operating divisions. In order to understand better the profitability of each division, the Board has conducted a full cost allocation exercise. Accordingly, the total administrative expenses of £157.2 million attributed to the operating divisions include £57.9 million of centrally allocated costs.
In 2014 £26.5 million of central costs were allocated to divisions and £23.4 million remained unallocated. These costs totalling £49.9 million have now been fully allocated to provide prior year comparatives. It should be noted that elements of the allocation are judgemental and that in the event a business or division is sold, any fixed or semi-variable costs that have been allocated to them would need to be reallocated to other areas (as they would, for example, in relation to the costs associated with being a publicly listed company).
Underlying profit/(loss) analysis
The underlying profit/(loss) for each division after taking account of central cost allocations, is shown in the following table:
2015 |
2014 |
Change | ||
£m | £m | £m | % | |
Investment Management Services* | 10.4 | 15.8 | (5.4) | (34.2%) |
Financial Services | (2.7) | (1.7) | (1.0) | (58.8%) |
Charles Stanley Direct | (1.9) | (2.1) | 0.2 | 9.5% |
Charles Stanley Securities | (1.7) | 1.1 | (2.8) | (254.5%) |
Divisional operating profit | 4.1 | 13.1 | (9.0) | (68.7%) |
Finance and other income | 0.1 | 0.4 | (0.3) | (75.0%) |
Underlying profit before tax | 4.2 | 13.5 | (9.3) | (68.8%) |
Continuing operations | 6.0 | 11.3 | (5.3) | (46.9%) |
Held for sale | (1.8) | 2.2 | (4.0) | (181.8%) |
Underlying profit before tax | 4.2 | 13.5 | (9.3) | (68.8%) |
*Includes other income
Investment Management Services (IMS)
Our Investment Management Services division lies at the centre of our business, accounting for 87.7% of total funds and 81.2% of Group revenue.
The services this division provides are summarised below:
Managed
| Discretionary portfolio management Advisory portfolio management |
Administered
| Advisory share dealing Execution-only share dealing (excluding online services) |
Investment Management income is generated from:
· Investment Management fees, which are based on a percentage of the value of clients' funds;
· Administration fees based on a combination of percentage of funds and fixed fees;
· Commissions charged on transactions undertaken on behalf of clients; and
· Interest turn on cash balances.
Year-on-year changes in the key performance indicators for our Investment Management Services division are shown in the table below:
2015 | 2014 | |
FuMA at 31 March | £18.6bn | £17.7bn |
FuM at 31 March | £11.3bn | £10.3bn |
Net revenue margin on Managed Funds | 86bps | 89bps |
Commission Earning Bargains | 377,701 | 465,024 |
FUMA per CF30 | £67.1m | £62.8m |
Direct Employment Cost Ratio | 50.1% | 46.8% |
Funds under Management and Administration
FuMA is the main driver for the financial performance of the Investment Management Services division. Investment Management FuMA has increased by 5.1% from £17.7 billion at the beginning of the year to £18.6 billion at 31 March 2015. Managed Funds, comprising Discretionary Managed and Advisory Managed Funds, respectively changed by +14.1% and (1.1%), in part owing to a shift of Advisory Managed funds to the Discretionary service. This is expected to be a continuing pattern.
Managed | Administered | Total | Change | |
£bn | £bn | £bn | % | |
Funds at 1 April 2014 | 10.3 | 7.4 | 17.7 | |
New investment managers | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | |
Net inflow/(outflow) from existing clients | 0.1 | (0.8) | (0.7) | |
Lost clients | (0.2) | (0.2) | (0.4) | |
Net inflow/(outflow) of funds | 0.2 | (0.8) | (0.6) | (3.4%) |
Market movement | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 8.5% |
Funds at 31 March 2015 | 11.3 | 7.3 | 18.6 | 5.1% |
Fund flows during the past financial year were substantially driven by market movement rather than net inflow of new funds. This was disappointing but we believe it was substantially accounted for by our investment managers being heavily engaged in the client suitability repapering exercise which has been a very major undertaking. Whilst ensuring the suitability of our services for our clients and alignment of their investment portfolios to their requirements is an ongoing undertaking, the upgrade programme we have been undertaking draws to its conclusion at the end of June 2015. We are hopeful that with the conclusion of this exercise, our investment managers will be able to focus more time on marketing activity. We can expect that this, along with the Group bringing greater focus to its overall marketing strategy (one of its key initiatives), will lead to increasing levels of new business.
Financial performance
The financial performance of the IMS division is detailed in the table below:
Underlying profit before tax |
Adjusting items | Reported profit before tax | |
2015 | £m | £m | £m |
Revenue | 121.6 | - | 121.6 |
Costs | (70.6) | (1.4) | (72.0) |
Other income | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
Operating contribution | 51.1 | (1.4) | 49.7 |
Allocated costs | (40.7) | (3.9) | (44.6) |
Operating profit | 10.4 | (5.3) | 5.1 |
2014 | £m | £m | £m |
Revenue | 117.3 | - | 117.3 |
Costs | (63.2) | (3.4) | (66.6) |
Other income | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
Operating contribution | 54.2 | (3.4) | 50.8 |
Allocated costs | (38.4) | (2.4) | (40.8) |
Operating profit | 15.8 | (5.8) | 10.0 |
IMS Revenues
The revenues of the IMS division comprise Investment Management fees, trading commission and interest turn. Revenue within IMS increased 3.7% to £121.6 million in 2015 from £117.3 million in the previous year. This can largely be attributed to the growth in Funds under Management over the period driven by market gains.
Income generated from Managed services is shown in the following table:
Income from managed clients | March 2015 | March 2014 | Change | |||||
Total | Disc | Adv | Total | Disc | Adv | |||
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | % | |
Fees | 62.1 | 48.9 | 13.2 | 50.5 | 39.4 | 11.1 | 11.6 | 23.0% |
Commission | 28.3 | 22.7 | 5.6 | 31.3 | 24.6 | 6.7 | (3.0) | (9.6%) |
Interest | 2.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 0.4 | (0.8) | (25.0%) |
92.8 | 73.5 | 19.3 | 85.0 | 66.8 | 18.2 | 7.8 | 9.2% | |
£bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | % | |
Average funds | 10.8 | 8.1 | 2.7 | 9.6 | 6.9 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 12.5% |
bps | bps | bps | bps | bps | bps | bps | % | |
Revenue margin | 86 | 91 | 71 | 89 | 97 | 69 | (4.0) | (4.5%) |
The very healthy growth of 23.0% in fees from £50.5 million to £62.1 million in our Managed business was partially offset by a decline in commission of 9.6% from £31.3 million at the end of last year to £28.3 million in the current year. This trend has been driven by our focus on encouraging more clients toward a fee-paying Discretionary service at the expense of charging lower commission or none at all. Commission revenues further declined as a result of lower dealing activity. In overall terms, the volume of commission-earning bargains declined 18.8% year on year. Finally, interest turn on aggregated client cash balances, where we share with clients the benefits of wholesale rates that we can achieve on large balances (typically in excess of £1 billion at any one time) versus what can be achieved on individual small retail deposits, declined 25.0% on the prior year to £2.4 million. In the near term it is likely that this aspect of our revenues will decline further as we remain in a low interest rate environment, and few banks wish to take these deposits because of the high level of regulatory capital they are required to set aside against client cash.
Whilst our overall revenues from Managed business increased in 2015, our revenue margin on Funds under Management declined from 89bps to 86bps. This is a key performance indicator and one we will be seeking to improve upon in coming years. Although superficially we believe it does not appear to be out of step with our competitors, we believe it is low relative to the average size of client portfolio we manage.
The revenue performance of the administered element of our Investment Management division's business is summarised in the table below. This comprises Advisory Dealing and Execution-only services. Total revenue fell 10.8% from £32.3 million in 2014 to £28.8 million in 2015. The drivers of this performance were similar to that of the Managed business, in this instance comprising higher fees and higher interest turn (because of higher average cash balances held by clients) offset by a marginal decrease in FuMA and commission income.
Income from administered clients | March 2015 | March 2014 | Change | |||||
Total | Disc | Adv | Total | Disc | Adv | |||
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | % | |
Fees | 9.2 | 3.1 | 6.1 | 8.6 | 3.1 | 5.5 | 0.6 | 7.0% |
Commission | 17.6 | 5.6 | 12.0 | 21.9 | 8.0 | 13.9 | (4.3) | (19.6%) |
Interest | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 11.1% |
28.8 | 9.3 | 19.5 | 32.3 | 11.8 | 20.5 | (3.5) | (10.8%) |
IMS costs
IMS's underlying costs increased 9.5% during the year from £101.6 million to £111.3 million and including adjusting items they increased 8.6%. The major contributory elements to this increase of £9.7 million were employment costs (£6.4 million), IT costs (£1.4 million) and establishment costs (£0.6 million).
By far the most significant cost the division incurs is employment costs (as is the case for the entire Group) which rose to 50.1% of revenues from 46.8% in the prior year. Improving productivity of our investment management teams is a key area of focus for the Board. This can be achieved by increasing the FuMA managed by each investment manager; increasing the revenues charged on those assets, optimising the ratio of front office to middle and back office staff by improving and standardising workflow processes, and by revising compensation structures.
IMS operating profit
IMS achieved an underlying operating profit of £10.4 million, a decline of 34.2% since the prior year. This decline was caused by its increased cost base. Its operating margin was 8.6% compared to 13.5% in 2014.
Financial Services
The Financial Services division currently comprises a number of different activities including:
Financial Planning and Wealth Management
| Financial Planning and Wealth Management across the full spectrum of client needs with a particular expertise in the fields of pensions, retirement and inheritance. |
EBS Management PLC
| Pensions administration both for Charles Stanley clients and for third parties. |
Charles Stanley Pan Asset
| Investment management services focussed on asset allocation and passive investments. |
Matterley | Fund management. |
Charles Stanley Financial Solutions
| Employee benefits consulting. This business is classified as Held for sale. |
The trading performance of the Financial Services division is set out in the table below, where continuing operations have been identified separately.
2015 | Underlying profit/(loss) before tax | Total adjusting items | Reported profit/(loss) before tax |
Total (Continuing and Held for Sale) | £m | £m | £m |
Revenue | 15.1 | - | 15.1 |
Costs | (14.3) | - | (14.3) |
Other income | - | - | - |
Operating contribution | 0.8 | - | 0.8 |
Allocated costs | (3.5) | (2.3) | (5.8) |
Operating loss | (2.7) | (2.3) | (5.0) |
Continuing Operations only | |||
Revenue | 11.9 | - | 11.9 |
Costs | (10.9) | - | (10.9) |
Other income | - | - | - |
Operating contribution | 1.0 | - | 1.0 |
Allocated costs | (3.5) | (0.3) | (3.8) |
Operating loss | (2.5) | (0.3) | (2.8) |
2014 | |||
Revenue | 13.5 | - | 13.5 |
Costs | (11.7) | - | (11.7) |
Other income | - | - | - |
Operating contribution | 1.8 | - | 1.8 |
Allocated costs | (3.5) | (0.3) | (3.8) |
Operating loss | (1.7) | (0.3) | (2.0) |
Total revenue for the Financial Services division grew by 11.9% from £13.5 million to £15.1 million. This includes a full year of revenue for Charles Stanley Pan Asset which was acquired in December 2013. Excluding assets Held for sale (Charles Stanley Financial Solutions), revenues grew 19.0% to £11.9 million (2014: £10.0 million). An analysis of revenue by business is given below.
Financial Services Division revenue
2015 | Financial Planning and Wealth Management |
EBS Management |
Charles Stanley Pan Asset |
Matterley | Charles Stanley Financial Solutions |
Total |
£m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
Revenue | 5.6 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 15.1 |
Direct costs | (4.6) | (2.2) | (1.5) | (2.6) | (3.4) | (14.3) |
Operating contribution | 1.0 | 0.2 | (0.2) | - | (0.2) | 0.8 |
Allocated costs | (3.5) | |||||
Underlying loss before tax | (2.7) | |||||
2014 | ||||||
Revenue | 4.8 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 13.5 |
Direct costs | (3.5) | (1.9) | (0.5) | (1.8) | (4.0) | (11.7) |
Operating contribution | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | (0.5) | 1.8 |
Allocated costs | (3.5) | |||||
Underlying loss before tax | (1.7) |
Financial Planning and Wealth Management
The Financial Planning and Wealth Management department has increased its gross revenue by 16.7% over the year from £4.8 million to £5.6 million. This is a satisfactory result despite trail commission being replaced by adviser charging and customer agreed remuneration. We have addressed the issues raised by the RDR and believe the business is well placed to face the challenges presented, such as the changes to pension scheme regulations.
Direct costs in the business increased by £1.1 million to £4.6 million (2014: £3.5 million), as a result of increased employment costs arising from the recruitment of a number of senior financial planners into the division to grow the business. Consequently, the operating contribution has decreased by 23.1%.
EBS Management PLC
During 2015 EBS continued to achieve strong growth of schemes under administration, up 31.0% since 2014. Whilst this is the leading indicator of the health of the business, its revenues and profits lagged for two key reasons. First, the majority of the scheme growth came from lower margin white-labelled SIPPs which have had a negative impact on our average revenue per scheme under administration. We improved the pricing on a number of our schemes toward the end of the financial year which will drive revenues more strongly in the future. Secondly, we have had to recruit a number of additional staff to deal with both the sheer volume of additional schemes and all the changes brought about by the Government's overhaul of pension scheme legislation and flexibility of drawdown. In the upcoming year, the Group intends to invest in new systems for EBS at an estimated cost of approximately £0.4 million. With over 10,000 SIPPs and SSASs already under administration and with continued strong growth in scheme numbers despite almost no direct sales or marketing effort, EBS has the scale to merit this systems spend. The Board believes this investment will significantly improve EBS's operating efficiency, scalability and control environment, thereby supporting its continued development with significantly improved operating margins.
Charles Stanley Pan Asset Capital Management
Charles Stanley Pan Asset (PAN) made a full year's contribution of revenue for the first time in 2015 of £1.3 million, having been acquired in December 2013. Planned cost savings have begun to be realised now that the team has been integrated with the rest of the Group's Investment Management operations.
A proportion of the consideration for PAN was paid in December 2014 and a further amount is payable in June 2015. The amount payable is contingent upon PAN's FuMA being above £500 million. As at 31 December 2014, the FuMA was £488 million which was below the required amount, therefore no deferred consideration was paid on that date. As at 31 March 2015, PAN's FuMA was £512 million, upon which we anticipate £40,000 will be payable in June 2015. We will continue to monitor the FuMA up to the due date in June 2015.
Matterley
Matterley manages a range of open ended investment funds, predominantly targeted internally either toward smaller clients to provide them with proper asset diversification in a cost efficient fashion or to meet specific needs (for example the UK & International Growth Fund which is managed by our successful Court of Protection team).
During the year the Matterley Undervalued Assets Fund was sold to Miton Group for an initial consideration of £0.75 million and a deferred payment based on the Assets under Management (AuM) of the Fund. As at 31 March 2015, we have recognised a deferred payment of £0.45 million based on its AuM at that date.
Excluding the Undervalued Assets Fund, the Matterley funds have seen growth of 19.6% since the previous year, with notable growth in the UK & International Growth fund.
March | March | ||
2015 | 2014 | ||
£m | £m | Growth | |
FP Matterley Regular High Income Fund | 69.9 | 59.5 | 17.5% |
FP Matterley Equity Fund | 10.7 | 10.7 | - |
FP Matterley International Growth Fund | 19.8 | 16.7 | 18.6% |
FP Matterley UK & International Growth Fund | 100.1 | 80.7 | 24.0% |
FP Matterley Undervalued Assets Fund | - | 92.7 | (100.0%) |
Total | 200.5 | 260.3 | (23.0%) |
Since the year-end, we have launched the Matterley Bond Opportunities Fund. This Fund, co-run by Peter Geikie-Cobb and Jeremy Palliser, aims to achieve a total return of 5-6%, combining both income and capital growth along with downside protection strategies. The Fund will invest predominantly in highly liquid investments and is an Absolute Return Bond Fund.
Charles Stanley Financial Solutions Limited
Charles Stanley Financial Solutions' revenues declined marginally during the year from £3.5 million in 2014 to £3.2 million in 2015.
Although we have every confidence that the business is well positioned to serve its client base, it faces potential headwinds in relation to the capping of pension charges and removal of pensions commissions from April 2016. We have decided that the company does not have the desired degree of commonality with our core Investment Management and Financial Planning services, so consequently it is now Held for sale.
Charles Stanley Direct
Charles Stanley Direct currently generates revenue from the following:
· Direct to client (D2C) platform;
· Manage Fidelity's share-trading contract; and
· Garrison business.
Charles Stanley Direct is our full service Direct-to-client digital investment platform. It has been well received by the market since its launch in March 2013, and most recently won the Leading Innovator in Consumer Platforms award at the Aberdeen UK Platform Awards 2014. Since January 2015, the management structure has been overhauled and costs in the business have been closely reviewed. The period of high start-up costs has now passed and the operational gearing has been improved significantly.
Charles Stanley Direct's financial performance for the year ended 31 March 2015 is shown below:
2015 | Underlying loss before tax |
Adjusting items | Reported loss before tax |
£m | £m | £m | |
Revenue | 4.8 | - | 4.8 |
Costs | (4.7) | (0.1) | (4.8) |
Other income | - | - | - |
Operating contribution | 0.1 | (0.1) | - |
Allocated costs | (2.0) | (3.8) | (5.8) |
Operating loss | (1.9) | (3.9) | (5.8) |
2014 | |||
£m | £m | £m | |
Revenue | 3.5 | - | 3.5 |
Costs | (2.8) | (1.3) | (4.1) |
Other income | - | - | - |
Operating contribution | 0.7 | (1.3) | (0.6) |
Allocated costs | (2.8) | - | (2.8) |
Operating loss | (2.1) | (1.3) | (3.4) |
Revenues in the business have increased by 37.1% with some 7,141 new accounts opened in the year, taking the total to 20,595. Average client size is steadily improving at £63,000 per client. Underlying direct operating costs have increased year on year from £2.8 million in 2014 to £4.7 million; however, allocated costs have decreased by 28.6%. After allocated costs, the division reported an underlying operating loss of £1.9 million (2014: £2.1 million). The total Assets under Administration stood at £1.6 billion as at 31 March 2015 (2014: £1.4 billion).
Costs in the business have been significantly addressed in 2015 and stabilised and the website has been reworked in closer alignment with the Charles Stanley Group with new brochureware offering a cleaner message to new clients. The service is already seeing greater interaction and improved client journeys to registration as a result. New client acquisition is served by a digital marketing strategy encompassing paid search, display advertising, re-targeting and social media advertising as well as by internal broker and Garrison transfers.
The service desk in Edinburgh and the investment helpdesk in Beverley continue to handle significant numbers of client calls on a monthly basis, as well as handling a large amount of the administration functions for the service. Digital efficiencies continue to be sought in the service centre processes and this efficiency drive will continue in the upcoming financial year. The progress that has been made to date has been pleasing.
The Board has conducted a thorough review of the carrying value of the goodwill relating to Charles Stanley Direct and in particular its Garrison Investment Analysis business. It has been decided that an appropriate write down of goodwill associated with Charles Stanley Direct is £3.0 million leaving a residual value of £5.2 million.
Charles Stanley Securities
Charles Stanley Securities provides advisory, broking and corporate finance services for the smaller and mid-cap sector. It has experienced a decrease in revenue of 44.2% from £14.7 million in 2014 to £8.2 million in the current financial year primarily as a result of reduced corporate finance fees as well as lower secondary commissions in equity and bond trading. Although its costs have fallen as variable remuneration paid to staff has been reduced significantly, the decline in revenues has led to the division declaring a loss for the year of £1.7 million (2014: profit £1.1 million).
2015 | Underlying profit/(loss) before tax |
Total (Continuing and Held for Sale) | £m |
Revenue | 8.2 |
Cost | (8.2) |
Other income | - |
Operating contribution | - |
Allocated costs | (1.7) |
Operating loss | (1.7) |
Continuing Operations | |
Revenue | 2.7 |
Cost | (2.2) |
Other income | - |
Operating contribution | 0.5 |
Allocated costs | (0.6) |
Operating loss | (0.1) |
2014 | |
Revenue | 14.7 |
Cost | (11.1) |
Other income | - |
Operating contribution | 3.6 |
Allocated costs | (2.5) |
Operating profit | 1.1 |
As part of its strategic review of the Group, the Board concluded that Charles Stanley Securities was not a part of the core activities of the Group. In June the Group announced contracts had been exchanged with Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited for the sale of the division excluding the Equities Trading business. For this reason the division is treated as a discontinued activity and included as an asset Held for sale in our accounts for the year ended 31 March 2015.
FINANCIAL POSITION
Charles Stanley & Co. Limited (CSC) is an IFPRU 125K Limited Licence firm regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and the consolidated regulatory capital position is shown as though the Group was subject to the same regime. At 31 March 2015, the Group had regulatory capital resources of £37.7 million as shown in the table below:
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Tier 1 capital resources | 67,291 | 83,403 |
Prudential deduction* | (29,561) | (35,286) |
Total capital resources | 37,730 | 48,117 |
*Prudential deductions include all intangible assets and certain deferred tax assets.
The Group monitors a range of capital and liquidity statistics on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. The Group's internal risk appetite is to maintain capital levels of at least 125% of the regulatory capital requirement. Capital levels fell below this internal target level during the year to 31 March 2015, arising from adverse trading results and movements in the defined benefit pension scheme. The Group's capital position was strengthened following the capital-raising in April 2015, and the Group continues to monitor capital levels carefully. The Group maintained a surplus of regulatory capital at all times during the year.
As required under FCA rules, the Group maintains an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), which includes performing a range of stress tests to determine the appropriate level of regulatory capital and liquidity that the Group needs to hold. The last review conducted and signed off by the Board was in April 2015. The ICAAP process includes the performance of a number of stress tests to determine the appropriate levels of regulatory capital and liquidity that the Group needs to hold. Capital forecasts are performed monthly and take into account expected dividends and intangible asset acquisitions and disposals as well as expected trading results.
The Group's Pillar III disclosures are published annually on our website (www.charles-stanley.co.uk/ investor-relations/pillar-3-disclosure) and provide further details about regulatory capital resources and requirements.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets arise principally from acquired Funds under Management and are categorised as client relationships. Goodwill arises on consolidation. At 31 March 2015, the total carrying value of intangible assets was £29.1 million (2014: £35.3 million). This figure includes £3.0 million disclosed as Held for sale assets. During the year £1.6 million in customer relationships and £2.6 million of internally generated software were capitalised. No goodwill was acquired during the year or in 2014.
Client relationship intangibles are amortised over the estimated useful life of the client relationship - 10 years.
Goodwill arising from business combinations is not amortised, but is subject to an annual impairment test. Following this review impairment charges have been allocated against goodwill, including £1.5 million in respect of the Durlacher business, £0.3 million in respect of Pan Asset, £2.0 million in respect of Charles Stanley Financial Solutions and the Plymouth employee benefits business, and £3.0 million in respect of Charles Stanley Direct.
Further details on the Group's intangibles are provided in note 14.
Capital expenditure
During the year the Group has continued to invest in its infrastructure, principally through the enhancement of ICT infrastructure through purchase of enhanced mainframe systems (£1.6 million) and the refurbishment of our offices (£0.9 million). Improving the systems continues to be a focus of the Group, whether through improving existing systems or investing in new ones.
Further details on the Group's capital expenditure are provided in note 17 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2015.
Defined benefit pension scheme
The Group operates one defined benefit pension scheme, which has been closed to new members for several years. Each year actuarial valuations are carried out based on the position at 31 March 2015.
The fall in discount rates used to value the scheme's liabilities has outweighed growth in asset prices during the year. As a result the scheme deficit increased to £13.1 million at 31 March 2015 (2014: £6.9 million).
The Group has established a working party to examine the extent that pension risk can be mitigated, and expects to take positive steps in this regard during the current financial year.
Further details on the Group's defined benefit pension scheme and the assumptions underpinning the valuation are provided in note 9.
Cash at bank
Risk targets have been set to help the Group monitor the bank balances (see risks and uncertainties below).
The Group experienced downward pressure on its cash balances during the year, arising from the adverse trading results noted above. Bank balances are monitored daily and forecast to ensure they do not fall below £25 million. Cash balances were £28.5 million at 31 March 2015 and strengthened post year-end following the capital raising referred to above.
The Group regularly reviews the counterparties with whom it holds both client and its own monies and determines that all operations are in accordance with the policy set by the Treasury Committee.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
A Board Risk Committee comprising two independent Non-executive Directors was formed. In addition a Chief Risk Officer was appointed reporting to the Risk Committee and the Chief Executive Officer.
The Board has developed and approved a Risk Appetite Statement (RAS). The RAS is a core component to the Group's risk management framework and was developed taking into consideration the Group's strategic objectives, strategy and business plans. This new level of RAS articulation is driving the implementation of more robust risk monitoring and risk reporting process, which continue to evolve. As the Group implements these processes, the Board will periodically review the RAS to ensure that it continues to reflect the risk appetite of the Group.
The RAS sets out the Group's tolerance to various types of risk and includes both quantitative and qualitative measures against which management and Board monitor risk on a periodic basis.
Set out on the next four pages are the key risks relevant to the Group's long term performance.
RISK | DESCRIPTION | KEY MITIGANTS AND CONTROLS |
Financial Risk | Charles Stanley is committed to maintaining its financial strength in order to support its business objectives, meeting its regulatory capital requirements and providing shareholders with an acceptable return on their investment. | To achieve the Group's financial goals the following targets have been set: · Return on Equity - 4% for 2016 rising to 7% in 2017; · Cash balances - £25m; · Regulatory Capital - 125% of the requirement + pension risk; and · Dividend Cover - 2x earnings per Ordinary Share. These are monitored by the Board on a regular basis. |
Acquisition/ divestment Risk | At present Charles Stanley has no acquisition plans; it is recognised that the Group may be subject to acquisition-related risks in the future. As the Group re-structures around its core wealth management strategy, certain peripheral activities and teams may be divested during 2015. | Any proposed acquisition should offer an immediate and sustainable increase in the Group's market share in the local or national market and have minimal execution risks associated with it and allow the Group to maintain conservative levels of liquidity and capital. A number of specific quantitative and qualitative parameters are used to assess the appropriateness of potential new acquisitions and divestments: · Target operational cash breakeven point should not be expected to exceed 18 months; · Number of "significant" acquisitions should not generally exceed three deals per 18 months; · The target company should not be involved in any potential or existing litigation, which the Group's management consider to be unmanageable or which could impact on the Group's reputation and/or acquisition criteria; and · Divestments should fit in with the Group's strategy and aim to maximise the profit and loss impact whilst reducing the Group's capital requirements. In particular, attention should be paid to any long term risks and liabilities which might remain after the divestment. |
Customer outcome Risk | Treating customers fairly and achieving the right outcome for our customers is of paramount importance to the Group. | All clients are risk-profiled to ensure the Group clearly defines, agrees and manages its clients' portfolios in accordance with these risk profiles and investment objectives. Suitability is a major focus for the Group which has quality assurance processes in place to assess suitability reviews performed by its investment managers. Careful monitoring of investment decision making against the risk profile helps to ensure it achieves appropriate and suitable outcomes. The Group measures these outcomes in a number of ways including: · Number and nature of complaints; · Internal client suitability file reviews; and · Customer surveys. |
Operational risk | Operational risk is defined as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. The Group operates in a business environment that is subject to significant technological, regulatory and economic changes. | Insurance cover is in place, which is reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that the amount of cover is appropriate to manage the impact of operational losses against the Group's capital reserves. The Group records and monitors its operational losses and near misses. Management is required to notify the Board of all significant operational incidents. Furthermore, management regularly reports to the Board in relation to the total dealing and trading losses. |
Fraud risk | Fraud is one of the key risks the Group is exposed to and it includes, but is not limited to, incidents such as the following: external cyber-attacks, identity fraud, and broker fraud. Charles Stanley is part of a cross-industry effort to combat fraudulent activity. Data-sharing initiatives have provided us with valuable intelligence to assist us in protecting our franchise and our clients. | The Group operates a number of IT platforms which have controls in place designed to prevent cyber-attacks, phishing and other relatively common occurrences. Whilst the Group has no appetite for any fraud-related incident, it recognises that certain attempts at fraud (i.e. those relating to external fraud) may be outside of its control. Consequently, specific risk parameters in relation to fraud are in place, which drive monitoring and reporting to the Board: · In relation to internal fraud, the Board will be made aware of all instances of internal fraud attempts (whether successful or not) and any incidents; and · In relation to external fraud, the Board will be made aware of any unusual (but unsuccessful) external fraud attempt as well as all successful attempts. |
Financial crime risk | Financial crime risk is the risk of reduction in earnings and / or value, through financial or reputational loss, associated with financial crime and failure to comply with related regulatory obligations. These losses may include censure, fines or the cost of litigation. This includes risks associated with money laundering, market abuse, sanctions breaches, fraud, bribery and adverse media through monitoring of the client base. | The Compliance Committee serves as the principal forum for reviewing and challenging the management of financial crime risk including the overall strategy and performance and engagement with financial crime authorities. The Compliance Committee is accountable for ensuring that, at Group level, financial crime risks are effectively identified and managed within risk appetite and that strategies for financial crime prevention are effectively coordinated and implemented across the Group. |
People risk | The Group recognises that its reputation and financial success is dependent on the performance of its people. Charles Stanley personnel establish and maintain close relationships with its clients and the loss of key personnel can have a significant impact on the Group from an operational, reputational and financial perspective. | Charles Stanley has historically had low levels of staff turnover but key departures may be symptomatic of more fundamental issues within the organisation that require attention. Senior level departures will consequently trigger a formal exit review assessment. |
Credit and counterparty risk | Charles Stanley is exposed to credit risk through the potential failure of its clients or counterparties to fulfil their contractual obligations. | The Group's Treasury Committee is responsible for the initial assessment and ongoing monitoring of deposit taking counterparties. The Board has defined the following criteria, which govern how management manages the Group's credit and counterparty risk: · Assets will only be placed and maintained with counterparties (i.e. authorised institutions or groups) that are deemed to be financially sound as determined by Charles Stanley's Treasury Committee; · Client and Group cash held at any individual counterparty group or authorised institution should not exceed its respective counterparty limit set by the Treasury Committee unless a written approval has been provided by the Treasury Committee; The Market Exposure Committee (MEC) is responsible for the Group's market exposure. In particular it is responsible for counterparty limits for the purpose of trading; · Counterparties with no set trading limits will be assessed on an individual basis at the time of the trade by the MEC; and · Breaches of any of these counterparty trading limits without approval will be escalated immediately to the MEC. |
Market risk | Charles Stanley does not undertake any propriety trading other than that arising from incidental dealing errors and therefore takes no market risk. Losses in relation to dealing errors are captured as operational losses.
| N/A |
Pension risk | Charles Stanley continues to support a defined benefit (DB) pension scheme which accordingly exposes the firm to pension risk. The scheme is closed to new members and is regularly reviewed for viability. | The deficit level is monitored regularly and currently stands at £13.1 million. Macroeconomic factors (e.g. long term bond yields) are also monitored and persistently negative macroeconomic trends that could impact on the DB scheme's investment performance are reported to the Board. The Risk Committee has set up a working group to take appropriate steps to mitigate future liabilities. |
Regulatory risk | Charles Stanley operates in a heavily regulated financial services sector. Compliance with regulation is paramount to the Group, and management recognises that the Group undertakes numerous control-related activities to manage the Group's regulatory risk. | Management monitors developments in regulation, assesses the impact on the business and implements any changes that will be required to meet those requirements and ensure that the Group's capital levels meet or exceed the regulatory requirements. Periodic reviews are conducted internally to reduce the likelihood of significant regulatory breaches, which could result in regulatory censure or fines. |
Reputational risk | The Group has built a reputation as a high quality provider of investment management and client services. This has been carefully developed over many years and there is a risk that reputational damage could lead to a loss of its existing client base, which could possibly lead to financial loss. | The risk is monitored and managed by an emphasis on compliance with all aspects of relevant regulation. |
Conduct risk | The Group's conduct starts with 'the tone at the top' which is reflected in the standard of conduct which employees and associates hold themselves to. Conduct risk has been a major theme across the financial services industry and is at the heart of everything the Group does. | In order to evidence good conduct the Board has established a governance framework flowing down to the board committees and management processes which are designed to ensure that appropriate controls, checks and balances are in place with safety valves where decisions and processes can be challenged. |
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Charles Stanley has an enviable track record in relation to the quality and breadth of its private client wealth management services, its commitment to innovation and the scale of its operations. However, as the financial results for the past financial year show, its strategy and business model has failed to keep pace profitably with the challenges the external environment has posed in the form of increased competition, greater complexity in achieving clients' financial requirements and increased regulation.
Although the basic steps to return the Group to a sustainable level of profitability are not complex (focus on core strengths, eliminate loss making activities, increase revenues and control costs) - the timescale for enacting them is likely to be a number of years because both client and staff relationships have to be managed sensitively. Moving too quickly on certain aspects will raise just as many risks as moving too slowly.
Having made changes to the management team, strengthened our balance sheet and defined our strategy, our focus over the next twelve months will be on execution. In particular we will:
§ Review our pricing architecture in conjunction with our service levels;
§ Review our compensation and incentivisation arrangements to ensure alignment of interests between client outcomes, shareholder returns and staff engagement;
§ Work to improve the co-ordination of the range of our activities, both front and back office, to improve client service and drive operating efficiencies; and
§ Dispose of our non-core activities, Charles Stanley Securities and Charles Stanley Financial Solutions.
Approval
This report in its entirety has been approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf by:
Paul Abberley Ben Money-Coutts
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
18 June 2015
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015
2015 | 2014 | ||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
Continuing operations | |||
Revenue | 5 | 144,264 | 137,895 |
Administrative expenses | 5 | (141,875) | (134,856) |
Impairment of intangible assets and investments | 5 | (8,277) | - |
Other income | 132 | 140 | |
Operating (loss)/profit | 6 | (5,756) | 3,179 |
Gain on sale of business | 1,200 | - | |
Finance income | 185 | 483 | |
Finance costs | (75) | (85) | |
Net finance income | 110 | 398 | |
(Loss)/profit before tax | (4,446) | 3,577 | |
Tax expense | 12 | (413) | (783) |
(Loss)/profit from continuing operations | (4,859) | 2,794 | |
Discontinued operations | |||
(Loss)/profit from discontinued operations | (1,287) | 1,963 | |
(Loss)/profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders | (6,146) | 4,757 | |
Earnings per share | |||
Basic | 7 | (13.46p) | 10.51p |
Diluted | 7 | (13.46p) | 10.42p |
Earnings per share continuing operations | |||
Basic | 7 | (10.64p) | 6.17p |
Diluted | 7 | (10.64p) | 6.12p |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015
2015 | 2014 | ||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
(Loss)/profit for the year | (6,146) | 4,757 | |
Other comprehensive income | |||
Items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss | |||
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment | - | (67) | |
Related tax | - | 16 | |
Remeasurement of the defined benefit obligation | 9 | (5,950) | 2,290 |
Related tax | 15 | 1,189 | (677) |
(4,761) | 1,562 | ||
Items that are or may be reclassified to profit or loss | |||
Available for sale financial assets - net change in fair value | 16 | (407) | 136 |
Available for sale financial assets - reclassified to profit or loss | 16 | 560 | 140 |
Related tax | 15 | 70 | 33 |
223 | 309 | ||
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax | (4,538) | 1,871 | |
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to owners of the Company | (10,684) | 6,628 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015
31 March | 31 March | ||
2015 | 2014 | ||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
Assets | |||
Intangible assets and goodwill | 14 | 26,097 | 35,286 |
Property, plant and equipment | 13,287 | 13,749 | |
Net deferred tax assets | 15 | 2,558 | 1,282 |
Available for sale financial assets | 16 | 7,054 | 7,300 |
Trade and other receivables | 419 | 1,467 | |
Non-current assets | 49,415 | 59,084 | |
Trade and other receivables | 267,494 | 212,737 | |
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 100 | 117 | |
Assets Held for sale | 13 | 4,190 | - |
Cash and cash equivalents | 28,453 | 38,567 | |
Current assets | 300,237 | 251,421 | |
Total assets | 349,652 | 310,505 |
Equity | |||
Share capital | 17 | 11,490 | 11,314 |
Share premium | 17 | 4,139 | 2,597 |
Revaluation reserve | 2,706 | 2,483 | |
Retained earnings | 50,559 | 67,009 | |
Equity attributable to owners of the Company | 68,894 | 83,403 | |
Non-controlling interests | 24 | 24 | |
Total equity | 68,918 | 83,427 | |
Liabilities | |||
Trade and other payables | - | 116 | |
Borrowings | 18 | 1,824 | 1,970 |
Employee benefits | 9 | 13,087 | 6,933 |
Non-current liabilities | 14,911 | 9,019 | |
Trade and other payables | 265,123 | 217,135 | |
Borrowings | 18 | 150 | 150 |
Current tax liabilities | 12 | 152 | 774 |
Liabilities Held for sale | 13 | 398 | - |
Current liabilities | 265,823 | 218,059 | |
Total liabilities | 280,734 | 227,078 | |
Total equity and liabilities | 349,652 | 310,505 |
Approved by the Board on 18 June 2015 Company registration number 48796 (England and Wales)
Paul Abberley Ben Money-Coutts Directors
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015
Share capital | Share premium | Revaluation reserve | Retained earnings | Total | Non-controlling interests | Total equity | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
1 April 2014 | 11,314 | 2,597 | 2,483 | 67,009 | 83,403 | 24 | 83,427 |
Loss for the year | - | - | - | (6,146) | (6,146) | - | (6,146) |
Other comprehensive income: | |||||||
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Deferred tax on property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Revaluation of available for sale financial assets | |||||||
- net loss from change in fair values | - | - | (407) | - | (407) | - | (407) |
- net profit on disposal transferred to profit or loss | - | - | 560 | - | 560 | - | 560 |
Deferred tax on available for sale financial assets | - | - | 70 | - | 70 | - | 70 |
Defined benefit plan actuarial losses | - | - | - | (5,950) | (5,950) | - | (5,950) |
Deferred tax on defined benefit plan actuarial losses | - | - | - | 1,189 | 1, 189 | - | 1,189 |
Total other comprehensive income for the year | - | - | 223 | (4,761) | (4,538) | - | (4,538) |
Total comprehensive income for the year | - | - | 223 | (10,907) | (10,684) | - | (10,684) |
Dividends paid | - | - | - | (5,593) | (5,593) | - | (5,593) |
Share options - value of employee services | - | - | - | 50 | 50 | - | 50 |
- issue of shares | 176 | 1,542 | - | - | 1,718 | - | 1,718 |
31 March 2015 | 11,490 | 4,139 | 2,706 | 50,559 | 68,894 | 24 | 68,918 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015
Share capital | Share premium | Revaluation reserve | Retained earnings | Total | Non-controlling interests | Total equity | ||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
1 April 2013 | 11,309 | 2,549 | 2,225 | 65,882 | 81,965 | 53 | 82,018 | |
Profit for the year | - | - | - | 4,757 | 4,757 | - | 4,757 | |
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment | - | - | (67) | - | (67) | - | (67) | |
Deferred tax on property, plant and equipment | - | - | 16 | - | 16 | - | 16 | |
Revaluation of available for sale financial assets | ||||||||
- net gain from change in fair values | - | - | 136 | - | 136 | - | 136 | |
- net profit on disposal transferred to profit or loss | - | - | 140 | - | 140 | - | 140 | |
Deferred tax on available for sale financial assets | - | - | 33 | - | 33 | - | 33 | |
Defined benefit plan actuarial gains | - | - | - | 2,290 | 2,290 | - | 2,290 | |
Deferred tax on defined benefit plan actuarial gains | - | - | - | (677) | (677) | - | (677) | |
Total other comprehensive income for the year | - | - | 258 | 1,613 | 1,871 | - | 1,871 | |
Total comprehensive income for the year | - | - | 258 | 6,370 | 6,628 | - | 6,628 | |
Dividends paid | - | - | - | (5,429) | (5,429) | (29) | (5,458) | |
Share options - value of employee services | - | - | - | 186 | 186 | - | 186 | |
- issue of shares | 5 | 48 | - | - | 53 | - | 53 | |
31 March 2014 | 11,314 | 2,597 | 2,483 | 67,009 | 83,403 | 24 | 83,427 | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015
2015 | 2014 | ||
Notes | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |||
Cash generated from operating activities | 20 | 948 | 17,343 |
Interest received | 110 | 324 | |
Interest paid | (75) | (85) | |
Tax paid | (711) | (2,384) | |
Net cash from operating activities | 272 | 15,198 | |
Cash flows from investing activities | |||
Acquisition of subsidiaries and other businesses | - | (1,208) | |
Acquisition of intangible assets | 14 | (4,243) | (2,272) |
Proceeds from disposal of Fund asset | 750 | - | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (2,865) | (10,552) | |
Purchase of available for sale financial assets | 16 | (471) | (2,479) |
Proceeds from sale of available for sale financial assets | 445 | 2,644 | |
Dividends received | 132 | 140 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (6,252) | (13,727) | |
Cash flows from financing activities | |||
Proceeds from issue of ordinary share capital | 17 | 1,718 | 53 |
Cash inflow from debt and lease financing | - | 2,120 | |
Repayment of borrowings | (146) | - | |
Dividends paid | 8 | (5,593) | (5,458) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (4,021) | (3,285) | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (10,001) | (1,814) | |
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year | 38,567 | 40,381 | |
Cash and cash equivalents end of year | 28,566 | 38,567 | |
Cash and cash equivalents shown in current assets | 28,453 | 38,567 | |
Cash classified as assets Held for sale | 113 | - | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 28,566 | 38,567 |
The Group has elected to present a Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows that analyses all cash flows in total, i.e. including both continuing and discontinued operation; amounts relating to discontinued operations are disclosed in Note 13.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015
1 REPORTING ENTITY
Charles Stanley Group PLC (the Company) is the parent Company of a group of companies (the Group) which provides a range of investment and financial services within the United Kingdom.
The Company is a public limited company which is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom. The address of its registered office is 25 Luke Street, London EC2A 4AR.
The consolidated financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board on 18 June 2015.
2 BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
The financial information set out in these financial statements does not constitute the Company's statutory accounts for the years ended 31 March 2015 or 2014. Statutory accounts for 2014 have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies, and those for 2015 will be delivered in due course. The auditor has reported on those accounts; their reports were (i) unqualified, (ii) did not include a reference to any matters to which the auditor drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying their report and (iii) did not contain a statement under section 498 (2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006.
The results have been prepared on a basis consistent with the accounting policies set out in the statutory financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015 except as explained below. The condensed financial information as set out in this report is unaudited and does not comprise statutory accounts for the purposes of the Companies Act 2006.
The comparative figures for the year ended 31 March 2014 have been taken from, but do not constitute, the Group's statutory financial statements for that financial year. Those financial statements have been reported on by the Group's auditors and delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The report was unqualified. Certain comparative figures have been amended to conform to current period presentation.
The Directors are satisfied that the Group has sufficient resources to continue in operation for the foreseeable future, a period of not less than 12 months from the date of this report. Accordingly they continue to adopt the going concern basis in presenting and preparing the financial statements.
3 CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Except for the changes below, the Group has consistently followed the same accounting policies, presentation and methods of computation in these consolidated financial statements as applied in the Group's consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2014.
The Group has adopted the following new standards and amendments to standards, including any consequential amendments to other standards, with a date of initial application of 1 April 2014.
a) IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
As a result of IFRS 10, the Group has changed its accounting policy for determining whether it has control over and consequently whether it consolidates its investees. IFRS 10 introduces a new control model that focuses on whether the Group has power over an investee, exposure or rights to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and ability to use its power to affect those returns. Adoption of IFRS 10 did not change the Group's determination of control over any of its subsidiaries.
b) IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements
As a result of IFRS 11, the Group has changed its accounting policy for its interests in joint arrangements. Adoption of IFRS 11 has not impacted the Group financial statements as the Group does not have interests in joint arrangements.
c) IFRS 12 Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities
The Group has adopted the amendments of IFRS 12 relating to the disclosure of interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and unconsolidated structured entities. As a result, the Group has included disclosures of its holdings in unconsolidated structured entities (see note 26 in the Annual Report and Accounts 2015).
d) Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets (Amendments to IAS 36) (2013)
The Group has adopted the amendments to IAS 36 (2013). As a result, the Group has expanded its disclosures of recoverable amounts when they are based on fair values less costs of disposals and an impairment is recognised. Refer to note 14 for further details.
e) Discontinued operations
A discontinued operation is a component of the Group's business, the operations and cash flows of which can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the Group and which:
· represents a separate major line of business or geographic area of operations;
· is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographic area of operations; or
· is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to re-sale.
Classification as a discontinued operation occurs at the earlier of disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classified as Held for sale.
When an operation is classified as a discontinued operation, the comparative statement of profit or loss and OCI is re-presented as if the opinion had been discontinued from the start of the comparative year.
4 USE OF JUDGEMENTS AND ESTIMATES
In preparing these consolidated financial statements, and the Parent Company financial statements, management has made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of the Group's accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and judgements are reviewed on an ongoing basis taking account of historical experience and future expectations.
4.1 Intangible assets and goodwill (note 14)
For the purposes of impairment testing, the Company and the Group value goodwill and client relationships based on the valuation of individual units making up the relevant intangible asset in accordance with the accounting policy set out in note 36 in the Annual Report and Accounts 2015. These fair value calculations require the use of assumptions which are set out in more detail in note 14.
During the period the Group assessed the recoverable amount of the Durlacher business and the Charles Stanley Financial Solutions business. As a result impairment charges of £1.5 million and £0.9 million respectively were recognised.
The Plymouth employee benefits (EB) business has not been included as part of the sale of Charles Stanley Financial Solutions. The Group assessed the recoverable amount of the Plymouth EB business. As a result an impairment charge of £1.1 million has been recognised.
The recoverable amount of the Charles Stanley Direct goodwill was assessed based on the projected revenue and profitability. Two of the three different revenue streams are forecast to decline over the next 2-3 years, while the third stream (Direct-to-client) is forecast to continue to grow Assets under Administration and client accounts. The carrying amount of the Charles Stanley Direct goodwill was determined to be higher than the recoverable amount and an impairment charge of £3.0 million has been recognised.
The impairment charges were allocated fully to goodwill and are included in administrative expenses in the consolidated income statement. For further details on these impairments refer to note 14.
The Group also performed a review of the deferred consideration payable on the acquisition of Pan Asset Capital Management. As a result the deferred consideration payable has been reduced by £0.3 million and an impairment charge has been recognised to reduce the Pan Asset Capital Management intangible asset.
It was concluded that no other impairments to the carrying value of goodwill or intangible assets are required.
During the period the Group reassessed the useful life of client lists acquired. As a result the Group determined that the useful life of client lists acquired should be in line with client lists that are acquired under a business combination and so the useful life of client lists acquired was changed to 10 years. The impact of this for the current reporting period is that costs are proportionally lower by £0.4 million, and this is included within administrative expenses in the consolidated income statement.
The Group performed a review on the likelihood of retaining the Truro clients after the business left the Group to join a rival firm. The Group determined that it was unlikely that a significant portion of those clients would be retained and as such an impairment charge of £0.8 million has been recognised.
4.2 Revenue recognition (note 5)
Fee income receivable is estimated based on current portfolio valuations, historical experience of debt collection and future expectations.
4.3 Retirement benefit obligations (note 9)
In consultation with its actuary the Company and the Group make estimates about a number of long term trends and market conditions to determine the value of the deficit on its retirement benefit scheme. These long term forecasts and estimates are highly judgemental and subject to the risk that actual events may be significantly different from those forecast.
The valuation performed as at 31 March 2015 resulted in an increase in the actuarial deficit of £6million which has been reflected in these financial statements.
4.4 Available for sale assets and other receivables (note 16)
Unlisted available for sale financial assets include an investment in Euroclear plc. The fair value of this investment has been estimated by the Directors using dividend yield.
During the year the investment and loan in Masterlist was reviewed based on the net asset value of the operating entity. As a result, the value was impaired by £0.75 million from £1.0 million to £0.25 million.
No new information has become available that would require a change in the valuation of any further unlisted investments.
4.5 Legal action (note 21)
A competitor company has taken legal action against the Group. Charles Stanley has lodged a defence against the claim. The legal process in relation to this action is continuing and considerable uncertainty exists in relation to the possible outcome. Significant judgement has therefore had to be exercised in assessing the likely economic impact, if any, to the Group.
5 OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Group currently has four strategic divisions which are its reportable segments. These segments are the basis on which the Group reports its performance to the Board, which is the Group's chief operating decision maker. The operations of each division are described below:
Division | Operations |
Investment Management Services | Provision of investment services to individuals, companies, trusts and charities; |
Financial Services | Financial planning and wealth management, SIPP and SSAS administration and employee benefits; |
Charles Stanley Direct | Direct-to-client investment service including online dealing; and |
Charles Stanley Securities | Advisory, broking and corporate finance services for smaller and mid-cap UK listed companies. |
The Group has exchanged contracts with Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited for the sale of the Charles Stanley Securities division. The agreement is for the whole division apart from the equity trading business (CSS Equity Trading), which will stay with the Group. Charles Stanley Securities, apart from the equity trading business, has been classified as discontinued operations.
Continued operations | Discontinued operations | ||||||
Investment Management Services | Financial Services | Charles Stanley Direct | CSS Equity trading | Central | Total | ||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Year ended 31 March 2015 | |||||||
Fees | |||||||
Investment management | 56,558 | 1,689 | - | - | - | - | 58,247 |
Administration | 19,224 | 13,021 | 3,982 | 45 | - | 120 | 36,392 |
Corporate Finance | - | - | - | - | - | 4,536 | 4,536 |
75,782 | 14,710 | 3,982 | 45 | 4,656 | 99,175 | ||
Commission | 45,809 | 408 | 858 | 2,670 | - | 770 | 50,515 |
Total revenue | 121,591 | 15,118 | 4,840 | 2,715 | - | 5,426 | 149,690 |
Administrative expenses | (72,030) | (14,274) | (4,841) | (2,243) | (57,855) | (5,964) | (157,207) |
Other income | 132 | - | - | - | - | - | 132 |
Operating contribution | 49,693 | 844 | (1) | 472 | (57,855) | (538) | (7,385) |
Allocated costs | (44,623) | (5,817) | (5,760) | (564) | 57,855 | (1,091) | - |
Operating profit | 5,070 | (4,973) | (5,761) | (92) | - | (1,629) | (7,385) |
Segment assets | 267,940 | 6,909 | 7,198 | 1,974 | 63,600 | 2,031 | 349,652 |
Segment liabilities | (240,123) | (1,200) | (80) | (6,249) | (33,082) | - | (280,734) |
Continued operations | Discontinued operations | ||||||
Investment Management Services | Financial Services | Charles Stanley Direct | CSS Equity trading | Central | Total | ||
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Year ended 31 March 2014 | |||||||
Fees | |||||||
Investment management | 44,592 | 885 | - | - | - | - | 45,477 |
Administration | 19,534 | 12,254 | 2,727 | 368 | - | 109 | 34,992 |
Corporate Finance | - | - | - | - | - | 10,157 | 10,157 |
64,126 | 13,139 | 2,727 | 368 | - | 10,266 | 90,626 | |
Commission | 53,203 | 424 | 753 | 3,155 | - | 867 | 58,402 |
Total revenue | 117,329 | 13,563 | 3,480 | 3,523 | - | 11,133 | 149,028 |
Administrative expenses | (66,622) | (11,727) | (4,077) | (4,514) | (49,908) | (6,592) | (143,440) |
Other income | 140 | - | - | - | - | - | 140 |
Operating contribution | 50,847 | 1,836 | (597) | (991) | (49,908) | 4,541 | 5,728 |
Allocated costs | (40,801) | (3,791) | (2,787) | (537) | 49,908 | (1,992) | - |
Operating profit | 10,046 | (1,955) | (3,384) | (1,528) | - | 2,549 | 5,728 |
Segment assets | 212,211 | 12,530 | 12,115 | 4,347 | 67,144 | 2,158 | 310,505 |
Segment liabilities | (189,364) | (1,289) | (204) | (2,471) | (33,750) | - | (227,078) |
The revenue split between the divisions for the prior year has been amended from last year to better reflect the allocation of income in the current year.
The costs that have been allocated to the divisions for the prior year has been changed to reflect the new cost allocation methodology put in place in the current year.
6 OPERATING PROFIT
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
The following items have been included in arriving at the results: | ||
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment: | ||
Owned assets | 3,150 | 2,707 |
Amortisation and impairment | 10,358 | 2,747 |
Impairment of equity investment | 500 | - |
Impairment of loan | 250 | - |
Auditors' remuneration: | ||
Audit of the Company's annual accounts | 80 | 73 |
Audit of the Company's subsidiaries | 210 | 240 |
Services relating to taxation | 41 | 49 |
Other assurance services | 60 | 81 |
All other services | 46 | 628 |
Gains on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | (29) | 75 |
Gains on foreign currency exchange | (76) | 20 |
Operating lease rentals payable | 2,829 | 2,301 |
Financial Services Compensation Scheme Levy | 1,317 | 1,200 |
7 EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Directors believe that a truer reflection of the performance of the Group's ongoing business is given by the measure of underlying earnings per share. "Underlying earnings" represent earnings before one-off costs, FSCS Levy and amortisation of customer relationships. This measure is also followed by the analyst community as a benchmark of the Group's ongoing performance.
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Weighted average number of shares in issue in the year | 45,655 | 45,243 |
Effect of share options | 66 | 420 |
Diluted weighted average number of shares in issue during the year | 45,721 | 45,663 |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Reported earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders | (6,146) | 4,757 |
Charles Stanley Direct and other investment costs | - | 1,278 |
Amortisation of customer relationships | 1,800 | 2,440 |
Financial Services Compensation Scheme Levy | 1,317 | 1,200 |
Branch acquisition costs | 259 | 2,417 |
Non-recurring professional fees | 99 | - |
Sale of Fund asset | (1,200) | - |
Impairment of assets | 8,277 | - |
Reduction in deferred consideration | (348) | - |
Tax on adjusting items | (2,143) | (1,687) |
Underlying earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,915 | 10,405 |
Based on reported earnings | ||
Basic earnings per share | (13.46p) | 10.51p |
Diluted earnings per share | (13.46p) | 10.42p |
Based on underlying earnings | ||
Basic earnings per share | 4.19p | 23.00p |
Diluted earnings per share | 4.19p | 22.79p |
8 DIVIDENDS PAID
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Final paid for 2014: 9.25p per share (2013: 9.00p) | 4,223 | 4,072 |
Interim paid for 2015: 3.00p per share (2014: 3.00p) | 1,370 | 1,357 |
5,593 | 5,429 | |
Amount paid by subsidiary to non-controlling interests in the year | - | 29 |
9 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Group operates a defined contribution pension scheme. The assets of the scheme are held separately from those of the Group in independently administered funds.
The Group also sponsors the Charles Stanley & Co. Limited Retirement Benefits Scheme (the "plan"), which is a funded defined benefit arrangement. This is a separate trustee-administered fund holding the pension plan assets to meet long term pension liabilities for some 74 past and 30 present employees. The level of retirement benefit is principally based on salary earned in the last three years of employment prior to leaving active service and is linked to changes in inflation following retirement.
The plan is subject to the funding legislation, which came into force on 30 December 2005, outlined in the Pensions Act 2004. This, together with documents issued by the Pensions Regulator, and Guidance Notes adopted by the Financial Reporting Council, set out the framework for funding defined benefit occupational pension plans in the UK.
The trustees of the plan are required to act in the best interests of the plan's beneficiaries. The appointment of the trustees is determined by the plan's trust documentation. It is policy that at least one third of all trustees should be nominated by the members.
A full actuarial valuation is currently being carried out as at 13 May 2014 in accordance with the scheme funding requirements of the Pensions Act 2004 and the funding of the plan is agreed between the Group and the trustees in line with those requirements. These in particular require the surplus/deficit to be calculated using conservative, as opposed to best estimate actuarial assumptions.
The actuarial valuation at 13 May 2011 showed a deficit of £1,989,000. The Group has agreed with the trustees that it will aim to eliminate the deficit over a period of 7 years from 13 May 2012 by the payment of annual contributions of £315,000 in respect of the deficit. In addition and in accordance with the actuarial valuation, the Group has agreed with the trustees that it will pay 25.5% of pensionable earnings in respect of the cost of accruing benefits and will meet expenses of the plan and levies to the Pension Protection Fund. Member contributions are payable at a rate of 3% (except for Directors) and this is included within the rate of 25.5%.
For the purposes of IAS 19 the preliminary results of the actuarial valuation as at 13 May 2014, which was carried out by a qualified actuary, has been updated on an approximate basis to 31 March 2015. There have been no changes in the valuation methodology adopted for this period's disclosures compared to the previous period's disclosures.
Amounts included in the statement of financial position
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Fair value of plan assets | 30,778 | 29,893 | 29,833 |
Present valuation of defined benefit obligation | (43,865) | (36,826) | (38,809) |
Deficit in scheme | (13,087) | (6,933) | (8,976) |
Impact of asset ceiling | - | - | - |
Liability to be recognised | (13,087) | (6,933) | (8,976) |
Deferred tax | 2,617 | 1,387 | 2,064 |
Net liability to be recognised | (10,470) | (5,546) | (6,912) |
The present value of plan liabilities is measured by discounting the best estimate of future cash flows to be paid out by the plan using the projected unit credit method. The value calculated in this way is reflected in the net liability in the balance sheet as shown above.
The projected unit credit method is an accrued benefits valuation method in which allowance is made for projected earnings increases. The accumulated benefit obligation is an alternative actuarial measure of the plan liabilities, whose calculation differs from that under the projected unit credit method in that it includes no assumption for future earnings increases. In assessing this figure for the purpose of these disclosures, allowance has been made for future statutory revaluation of benefits up to retirement. At the balance sheet date the accumulated benefit obligation was £43,865,000.
All actuarial gains and losses are recognised in the year in which they occur in the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income.
The Group has reviewed the implications of the guidance provided by IFRIC 14 and has concluded that it is not necessary to make any adjustments to the IAS19 figures in respect of an asset ceiling or Minimum Funding Requirements as at 31 March 2015.
Reconciliation of opening and closing balances of the fair value of plan assets
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Fair value of assets at 1 April | 29,893 | 29,833 |
Interest income | 1,324 | 1,280 |
Return on plan assets | 490 | 928 |
Contributions be employer | 716 | 805 |
Contributions by plan participants | 49 | 57 |
Benefits paid, death in service insurance premiums and expenses | (1,694) | (3,010) |
Fair value of assets at 31 March | 30,778 | 29,893 |
The actual return on the scheme assets over the year ended 31 March 2015 was £1,814,000 (2014: £2,208,000).
Reconciliation of opening and closing balances of the present value of the defined benefit obligation
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Defined benefit obligation at 1 April | 36,826 | 38,809 |
Current service cost | 610 | 707 |
Interest cost | 1,634 | 1,677 |
Employee contributions | 49 | 57 |
Actuarial gains due to scheme experience | (1,041) | (882) |
Actuarial gains due to changes in demographic assumptions | (531) | - |
Actuarial loss due to changes in financial assumptions | 8,012 | (532) |
Benefits paid, death in service insurance premiums and expenses | (1,694) | (3,010) |
Defined benefit obligation at 31 March | 43,865 | 36,826 |
There have been no plan amendments, curtailments or settlements in the year.
Defined benefit costs recognised in the income statement | 2015 | 2014 |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Current service cost | 610 | 707 |
Net interest costs | 310 | 397 |
Total | 920 | 1,104 |
Defined benefit costs recognised in statement of comprehensive income
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Return on plan assets | 490 | 928 | 1581 | (725) | 805 |
Experience gains arising on the scheme liabilities | 1,041 | 882 | 271 | 473 | 1,049 |
Effects of changes in the demographic assumptions underlying the present value of the defined benefit obligation | 531 | - | - | - | - |
Effects of changes in the financial assumptions underlying the present value of the defined benefit obligation | (8,012) | 532 | (4,668) | (2,453) | (421) |
Adjustment related to previous years | - | (52) | - | - | - |
Total amount recognised in statement of comprehensive income | (5,950) | 2,290 | (2,816) | (2,705) | 1,433 |
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Equity | 23,749 | 21,676 | 16,837 | 14,343 | 12,638 |
Bonds | 6,073 | 5,832 | 6,519 | 5,973 | 7,481 |
Cash | 956 | 2,385 | 6,477 | 5,881 | 4,717 |
Total assets | 30,778 | 29,893 | 29,833 | 26,197 | 24,836 |
Assumptions | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 |
% | % | % | % | % | |
Inflation - RPI | 3.10 | 3.40 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 3.40 |
Salary increases | 2.20 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Rate of discount
| 3.20 | 4.50 | 4.45 | 5.05 | 5.55 |
Allowance for pension in payment increases of RPI or 5% p.a. if less | 3.30 | 3.60 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 3.35 |
Allowance for revaluation of deferred pensions of RPI or 5% p.a. if less | 3.10 | 3.40 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 3.40 |
The Occupational Pensions (Revaluation) Order 2010 issued in July 2010 confirmed the government's intention to move to using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rather than the Retail Price Index (RPI) as the inflation measure for determining the minimum pension increases to be applied to the statutory index-linked features of retirement benefits. Charles Stanley has used RPI in calculating the liability for 2015.
The mortality assumptions adopted at 31 March 2015 are 100% of the standard tables S2PxA, Year of Birth, no age rating for males and females, projected using CMI_2013 converging to 1.50% p.a. These imply the following life expectancies:
Life expectancy at age 65 | ||
Male retiring in 2015 | 22.7 | |
Female retiring in 2015 | 24.7 | |
Male retiring in 2035 | 24.9 | |
Female retiring in 2035 | 27.0 |
The fair value of assets shown above includes £1.0 million (2014: £1.3 million) of shares in Charles Stanley Group PLC. None of the other fair values include any property occupied by, or other assets used by the Group. All of the scheme assets have quoted market prices in an active market with the exception of the trustee's bank account balance.
It is the policy of the trustees and the Group to review the investment strategy at the time of each funding valuation. The trustees' investment objectives and the process to measure and manage risks inherent in the plan investment strategy are documented in the plan's Statement of Investment Principles.
There are no asset-liability matching strategies currently being used by the plan.
Analysis of the sensitivity to the principal assumptions of the present value of the defined benefit obligation
Change in assumption | Change in liabilities | |
Discount rate | Decrease of 0.25% | Increase by 4.9% |
Rate of inflation | Increase of 0.25% | Increase by 1.4% |
Rate of mortality | Increase in life expectancy of 1 year | Increase by 3.2% |
The sensitivities shown are approximate. Each sensitivity considers one change in isolation. The inflation sensitivity includes the impact of changes to the assumptions for revaluation, salary growth and pension increases. The average duration of the defined benefit obligation at the period ended 31 March 2015 is 20 years.
The plan typically exposes the Group to actuarial risks such as investment risk, interest rate risk, salary growth risk, mortality risk and longevity risk. A decrease in corporate bond yields, a rise in inflation or an increase in life expectancy would result in an increase to plan liabilities. This would detrimentally impact the balance sheet position and may give rise to increased charges in future income statements. This effect would be partially offset by an increase in the value of the plan's bond holdings, and in qualifying death in service insurance policies that cover the mortality risk. Additionally, caps on inflationary increases are in place to protect the plan against extreme inflation.
The best estimate of contributions to be paid by the Group to the plan for the period commencing 1 April 2015 is £745,000.
10 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EXPENSES
The average number of persons employed (including Directors) during the year was 960 (2014: 872).
Continuing operations | Discontinued operations | |||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Staff costs for the Group during the year: | ||||
Wages and salaries | 51,656 | 47,473 | 4,842 | 6,766 |
Social security contributions | 5,355 | 5,147 | 539 | 568 |
Share-based payments | 48 | 173 | 2 | 13 |
Pension costs | ||||
Defined contribution plans | 3,619 | 2,973 | 474 | 445 |
Defined benefit plan | 920 | 1,104 | - | - |
61,598 | 56,870 | 5,857 | 7,792 |
11 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Results from discontinued operations
In June 2015 the Group announced to the market that contracts had been exchanged with Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited regarding the sale of Charles Stanley Securities (excluding the Equity Sales Trading operation). Charles Stanley Securities was not previously classified as a discontinued operation. The comparative consolidated income statement has been restated to show the discontinued operation separately from continuing operations.
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Revenue | 5,426 | 11,133 |
Expenses | (7,055) | (8,584) |
Results from operating activities | (1,629) | 2,549 |
Income tax credit/(expense) | 342 | (586) |
(Loss)/profit for the year | (1,287) | 1,963 |
Earnings per share from discontinued operations | ||
2015 | 2014 | |
Basic | (2.82p) | 4.34p |
Diluted | (2.82p) | 4.30p |
Cash flows (used in)/from discontinued operations | ||
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,502) | 2,398 |
Net cash flow for the year | (1,502) | 2,398 |
Effect of disposal on the financial position of the Group | ||
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Intangible assets | 1,524 | 1,524 |
Trade and other receivables | 507 | 634 |
Net assets and liabilities | 2,031 | 2,158 |
12 TAX EXPENSE
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Analysis of charge in year | ||
Current taxation | 419 | 1,249 |
Current year | 14 | 3 |
Adjustment in respect of prior years | ||
Deferred taxation | ||
Origination and reversal of temporary differences | ||
Current year | (20) | (191) |
Adjustment in respect of prior years | - | (278) |
Tax expense on continuing operations | 413 | 783 |
In addition to the amount charged to the income statement, deferred tax of £70,000 (2014: (£33,000)) relating to the revaluation of the Group's available for sale financial assets has been charged/(credited) directly to equity, £nil (2014: £16,000) relating to the Group's revaluation of freehold property has been charged/(credited) directly to equity, and deferred tax of £1,189,000 (2014: £677,000) relating to the retirement benefit scheme actuarial deficit has been credited directly to equity.
Reductions in the UK corporation tax rate from 23% to 21% (effective 1 April 2014) and to 20% (effective from 1 April 2013) were substantially enacted on 2 July 2013. This will reduce the Company's future current tax charge accordingly.
The deferred tax asset at 31 March 2015 has been calculated based on the rate of 20%, as substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
The tax charge for the year is lower than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 21% (2014: 23%). The differences are explained below.
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Profit before tax from continuing operations | (4,446) | 3,577 |
Profit multiplied by rate of corporation tax in the UK of 21% (2014: 23%) | (934) | 823 |
Tax effects of: | ||
Income not subject to tax | (36) | (70) |
Expenses not allowed for tax | 154 | 218 |
Share based payments | 90 | (123) |
Adjustments in respect of prior years | 14 | (217) |
Effect of change in tax rate on deferred tax | - | (58) |
Intangible asset amortisation and impairments | 1,309 | - |
Other adjustments | (184) | 210 |
1,347 | (40) | |
Tax charge for the year | 413 | 783 |
13 DISPOSAL GROUP HELD FOR SALE
In April 2015 the Group announced that a Heads of Terms Agreement had been signed regarding the sale of Charles Stanley Financial Solutions Limited. Charles Stanley Financial Solutions has been presented as a disposal group Held for sale.
Impairment losses of £0.7 million for write-downs of the disposal group to the lower of its carrying amount and its fair value less costs to sell have been included in impairment of intangible assets in the consolidated income statement. The impairment losses have been applied to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill within the disposal group.
At 31 March the disposal group was stated at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell and comprised the following assets and liabilities:
2015 | ||
£'000 | ||
Intangible assets | 1,550 | |
Deferred tax assets | 3 | |
Trade and other receivables | 493 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 113 | |
Assets Held for sale | 2,159 | |
Trade and other payables | 396 | |
Current tax liabilities | 2 | |
Liabilities Held for sale | 398 |
In June 2015 the Group announced to the market that contracts had been exchanged with Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited regarding the sale of Charles Stanley Securities (excluding the Equity Sales Trading operation). Charles Stanley Securities has been presented as a disposal group Held for sale.
At 31 March the disposal group was stated at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell and comprised the following assets.
2015 | ||
£'000 | ||
Intangible assets | 1,524 | |
Trade and other receivables | 507 | |
Assets Held for sale | 2,031 |
There were no liabilities.
14 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill | Customer relationships | Internally generated software | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Cost | ||||
1 April 2013 (restated)* | 25,450 | 17,481 | 915 | 43,846 |
Purchased in the year | - | 2,272 | - | 2,272 |
Acquired through a business combination | - | 1,400 | - | 1,400 |
Transfer from office equipment and motor vehicles | - | - | 625 | 625 |
31 March 2014 | 25,450 | 21,153 | 1,540 | 48,143 |
Purchased in the year | - | 1,616 | 2,627 | 4,243 |
Transfer to assets Held for sale | (3,943) | - | - | (3,943) |
31 March 2015 | 21,507 | 22,769 | 4,167 | 48,443 |
Amortisation | ||||
1 April 2013 | - | 10,110 | - | 10,110 |
Amortisation during the year | - | 2,440 | 307 | 2,747 |
31 March 2014 | - | 12,550 | 307 | 12,857 |
Impairment during the year | 6,380 | 1,148 | - | 7,528 |
Amortisation during the year | - | 1,800 | 1,030 | 2,830 |
Transfer to assets Held for sale | (869) | - | - | (869) |
31 March 2015 | 5,511 | 15,498 | 1,337 | 22,346 |
Net book value | ||||
31 March 2015 | 15,996 | 7,271 | 2,830 | 26,097 |
31 March 2014 | 25,450 | 8,603 | 1,233 | 35,286 |
31 March 2013 | 25,450 | 7,371 | 915 | 33,736 |
None of the intangible assets have been pledged as security.
*see note 14 c) below
a) Goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to the Group's operating division as follows:
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Investment Management Services | 9,105 | 10,556 |
Financial Services | 1,644 | 5,123 |
Charles Stanley Direct | 5,247 | 8,247 |
Charles Stanley Securities | - | 1,524 |
15,996 | 25,450 |
The recoverable amounts of goodwill allocated to the Cash Generating Unit (CGU) are determined by first calculating the fair value less cost to sell. If the fair value less cost to sell is found to be lower than the carrying amount the recoverable amount is then determined based on value in use calculations. The fair value less cost to sell calculations are largely based on a percentage of Funds under Management. Where this approach is not appropriate a turnover multiple is used.
The rates used are those implied by recent transactions in the market or, where appropriate, similar quoted businesses. When calculating the fair value less cost to sell, key assumptions were stress tested to determine whether the calculations were sensitive to a reasonable possible change in these assumptions.
The value in use calculations use pre-tax cash flow projections based on revenue and expense forecasts.
i) Investment Management Services
Following the strategic decision to cease providing Execution-only access to traded options, the Group assessed the recoverable amount of the Durlacher business. As a result, an impairment charge of £1.5 million has been recognised. The impairment charge was allocated fully to goodwill, reducing the Durlacher carrying value to nil, and is included in impairment of intangible assets and investments in the consolidated income statement. The recoverable amount of the Durlacher business was assessed as nil as the business has been shut down.
ii) Financial Services
During the year the Group confirmed that negotiations had been ongoing regarding the sale of the Charles Stanley Financial Solutions business to a third party. As at 31 March 2015 a Heads of Terms Agreement has been signed. The recoverable amount has been calculated based on the key elements of the agreement. As a result an impairment charge of £0.9 million has been recognised. The impairment charge was fully allocated to goodwill, reducing the Charles Stanley Financial Solutions goodwill to £1.5 million, and is included in impairment of intangible assets in the consolidated income statement. The goodwill of Charles Stanley Financial Solutions has been reclassified as assets Held for sale. The Plymouth employee benefits (EB) business has not been included as part of the sale of Charles Stanley Financial Solutions. The Group assessed the recoverable amount of the Plymouth EB business. As a result an impairment charge of £1.1 million has been recognised. The impairment charge was allocated fully to goodwill, reducing the Plymouth EB carrying value to nil, and is included in impairment of intangible assets and investments in the consolidated income statement.
iii) Charles Stanley Direct
The recoverable amount of the CGU was assessed based on the projected revenue and profitability of the business over the next four years. The three different revenue streams of the business (direct-to-client; Fidelity; Garrison) were assessed. The Fidelity and Garrison revenue streams are forecast to reduce towards 2018 and 2019. The Direct-to-client stream is forecast to continue growing Assets under Administration, client account numbers and thus ultimately revenue. A value in use calculation was performed using the forecast profitability of the division over the next four years. The forecast profitability assumed certain inflows of FuM based on recent historical fund inflows. The carrying amount of the CGU was determined to be higher than the recoverable amount and an impairment charge of £3.0 million has been recognised. The impairment charge was allocated fully to goodwill, reducing the Charles Stanley Direct carrying value to £5.2 million, and is included in the impairment of intangible assets and investments in the consolidated income statement.
The key assumptions used in the valuation were as follows:
Discount rate 12%
Funds under Management growth rate 18% compound growth rate (over a 5 year period)
Operating costs to remain relatively stable over the period
iv) Charles Stanley Securities
The CGU has been recognised at the lower of:
§ fair value less costs to sell
§ carrying value
The fair value less costs to sell of the CGU was greater than its carrying value. The carrying value is supported by the expected proceeds from the sale of the business. The carrying value of Charles Stanley Securities (£1.5 million) has been reclassified as assets Held for sale.
b) Customer relationships
Purchases of customer relationships relate to payments made to investment managers and third parties for the introduction of customer relationships.
During the year the Truro business left the Group to join a rival firm. The Group performed a review on the likelihood of retaining the Truro clients. The Group determined that it was unlikely that a significant portion of those clients would be retained and as such and impairment charge of £0.8 million has been recognised to reduce the Truro intangible asset to £0.3 million.
A proportion of the consideration payable for Charles Stanley Pan Asset Capital Management is contingent upon certain AuM targets being achieved. The Group performed a review on the likelihood that the target levels will be achieved. The Group determined that it was unlikely that the targets will be achieved and as a result both the deferred consideration has been reduced and also an impairment charge has been recognised to reduce the Charles Stanley Pan Asset Capital Management intangible asset to £0.9 million (from £1.2 million).
c) Internally generated software
The cost and accumulated amortisation for the prior year were reclassified to include internally generated software, which had been reclassified from office equipment, included in property, plant and equipment. This reclassification has represented the substance of internally generated software, which is software designed, developed and commercialised by the Group.
15 NET DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
Employee benefits |
Share-based payments |
Deferred capital allowances | Tax losses forward and other timing differences |
Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Deferred tax assets | |||||
1 April 2013 | 2,064 | 301 | (36) | - | 2,329 |
Acquired through a business combination | - | - | - | 240 | 240 |
Recognised in profit or loss | |||||
Current year | - | 152 | 29 | - | 181 |
Prior year | - | - | 220 | - | 220 |
Change in rate | - | 40 | - | - | 40 |
- | 192 | 249 | - | 441 | |
Recognised in other comprehensive income | |||||
Current year | (677) | - | - | - | (677) |
31 March 2014 | 1,387 | 493 | 213 | 240 | 2,333 |
Acquired through a business combination | - | - | - | - | - |
Recognised in profit or loss | |||||
Current year | 41 | (410) | 134 | - | (235) |
Prior year | - | - | - | - | - |
Change in rate | - | (23) | (10) | - | (33) |
Transfer to assets Held for sale | - | - | (3) | - | (3) |
41 | (433) | 121 | - | (271) | |
Recognised in other comprehensive income | |||||
Current year | 1,189 | - | - | - | 1,189 |
31 March 2015 | 2,617 | 60 | 334 | 240 | 3,251 |
On the acquisition of a subsidiary in the prior year the Group recognised a deferred tax asset relating to tax losses forward of £240,000. The fair value assessment at acquisition was based on current forecasts for that business. There is a further potential tax asset of £578,000 not recognised in these financial statements.
|
Intangible assets |
Property plant and equipment |
Available for sale financial assets |
Total |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Deferred tax assets | ||||
1 April 2013 | (136) | (23) | (675) | (834) |
Acquired through a business combination | (294) | - | - | (294) |
Recognised in profit or loss | ||||
Current year | 10 | - | - | 10 |
Change in rate | 18 | - | - | 18 |
28 | - | - | 28 | |
Recognised in other comprehensive income | ||||
Current year | - | 16 | 33 | 49 |
31 March 2014 | (402) | (7) | (642) | (1,051) |
Recognised in profit or loss | ||||
Current year | 280 | - | - | 280 |
Change in rate | 8 | - | - | 8 |
288 | - | - | 288 | |
Recognised in other comprehensive income | ||||
Current year | - | - | 70 | 70 |
31 March 2015 | (114) | (7) | (572) | (693) |
Net deferred tax assets | ||||
31 March 2015 | 2,558 | |||
Net deferred tax assets | ||||
31 March 2014 | 1,282 |
Deferred income taxes are calculated on all temporary differences under the liability method using an effective tax rate of 20% (2014: 4.21% or 20%) depending on when the relevant timing difference unwinds.
16 AVAILABLE FOR SALE FINANCIAL ASSETS
Listed investments | Unlisted investments | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Fair value | |||
1 April 2013 | 3,554 | 3,483 | 7,037 |
Additions | 2,479 | - | 2,479 |
Disposals | (2,492) | - | (2,492) |
Revaluation in year | (10) | 286 | 276 |
31 March 2014 | 3,531 | 3,769 | 7,300 |
Additions | 471 | - | 471 |
Disposals | (370) | - | (370) |
Revaluation in year | 153 | - | 153 |
Impairment | - | (500) | (500) |
31 March 2015 | 3,785 | 3,269 | 7,054 |
The fair value of listed investments is determined by reference to quoted prices on active markets.
Listed investments include a £2.0 million holding in Gilts which is pledged to our clearing house.
Unlisted investments include the Group's holding of 6,030 shares in Euroclear plc for which no observable market data is available as to its value. The Directors believe it is appropriate to value this holding on a dividend yield basis.
Previous revaluation now realised on disposal amounted to £62,000 (2014: £140,000).
During the year the Group revalued and impaired its equity investment in Masterlist. The valuation was based on the Net Asset Value of the operating entity of Masterlist. As a result, the shares owned by the Group have been impaired to nil. The £0.5 million impairment charge is included within impairment of intangible assets and investments in the consolidated income statement.
17 CAPITAL AND RESERVES
Number shares | Ordinary shares | Share premium | Total | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Authorised shares with a par value of 25p each | 80,000 | 20,000 | - | 20,000 |
Allotted and fully paid: | ||||
1 April 2013 | 45,236 | 11,309 | 2,549 | 13,858 |
Exercise of share options | 21 | 5 | 48 | 53 |
31 March 2014 | 45,257 | 11,314 | 2,597 | 13,911 |
Exercise of share options | 705 | 176 | 1,542 | 1,718 |
31 March 2015 | 45,962 | 11,490 | 4,139 | 15,629 |
The rights and obligations attaching to the Company's ordinary shares are set out in the Report and Accounts 2015 of the Directors.
During the year 704,414 ordinary shares were issued fully paid for cash at an average price of £2.44 each following the exercise of options by employees. These shares had a nominal value of £176,104 and a total consideration of £1,717,637.
In April 2015 the Group undertook a capital raising. 4,596,000 shares were issued at £3.55 per share. These shares had a nominal value of £1,149,000 and a total consideration of £16,315,800.
18 BORROWINGS
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Current | ||
Bank loan | 150 | 150 |
150 | 150 | |
Non-current | ||
Bank loan | 1,824 | 1,970 |
The Bank of England base rate redeemable loan note was redeemable on demand.
The bank loan is secured by property disclosed in note 15 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2015. The loan is repayable in 20 quarterly instalments with the final balance due on 18 August 2018. It bears interest at 2.75% per annum above the Bank of England base rate (currently 0.5%).
19 FAIR VALUES AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Through its normal operations the Group is exposed to a number of risks, the most significant of which are market, credit and liquidity risks.
Market risk
This is the risk that arises from fluctuations in values of, or income from, assets or in interest or exchange rates. The Group only trades as principal for the purposes of executing client orders. Other principal positions may arise from dealing errors.
All position limits are monitored daily in accordance with policies determined by the Board.
The Group has small currency exposures. We run positions in a variety of currencies, principally the US dollar, to support clients' dealing activities. Group policy requires any significant net exposures to be hedged using forward currency contracts as soon as a commitment is made.
Equity risk
The Group is exposed to equity market risk through its equity holdings. These comprise: i) available for sale financial investments, ii) held for trading assets and liabilities and iii) the impact on investment management fees.
The Group has performed sensitivity analysis assessing the impact of a 10% increase or decrease in underlying equity prices. The results shown below are indicative of the impact at the year end.
i) Available for sale investments
Note 16 summarises the available for sale investments held at the year-end date, and the disposals and fair value movements made in the year.
Approximately 50% of the Group's available for sale investments are unlisted. A 10% increase/decrease in the Group's investments would have an impact on reserves of £705,000 (2014: £701,000).
ii) Held for trading assets and liabilities
The Group's exposure to market risk on its held for trading positions is monitored daily and reported to the appropriate Directors and senior management. Positions are monitored against limits set down by the Risk and Regulatory Review Group/Compliance Committee. Any breaches of the limits are notified immediately to the Compliance Director.
A 10% increase/decrease in equity prices of trading assets and liabilities would increase/decrease profit in the Income statement by £10,000 (2014: £12,000).
iii) Investment Management fees
A 10% increase/decrease in equity prices would increase/decrease profit on investment management fees in the Income statement by £3.9 million (2014: £3.2 million).
Foreign exchange risk
The table below summarises the Group's currency exposure arising from unmatched monetary assets or liabilities not denominated in the Group's functional currency:
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Net assets | ||
Euros | 195 | 229 |
US Dollars | 490 | 551 |
Other currencies | 391 | 1,065 |
1,076 | 1,845 |
The Group's activities are primarily denominated in British pounds and it does not enter into forward exchange contracts for hedging anticipated transactions. The risk of adverse currency movements for settlement of non-GBP trades on behalf of clients is not borne by the Group. The Group is exposed to currency risk for settlement of non-GBP trade suppliers and miscellaneous income streams. At 31 March 2015 these totalled £23,629 (2014: £73,775).
Interest rate risk
The Group has interest-bearing assets, principally in cash and cash deposits and available for sale financial assets, and liabilities including loan notes accruing interest at fixed rates. The Group views such exposure to interest rate fluctuations as immaterial. If interest rates had been 200 basis points higher profit for the year would have been £571,060 higher (2014: £771,000). If interest rates had been 200 basis points lower profit for the year would have been £110,000 lower (2014: £325,000).
Credit risk
This represents the risk of loss through default by counterparty. The most significant risk to the Group is either a client or market counterparty failing to settle a trade. Given the wide range of retail clients of the Group it is not considered that a material default by connected counterparties would arise. Other credit risks, such as Free Delivery of stock or cash, are not deemed to be significant as the Group has an effective credit control department to recover any monies or stock owed through default.
The Group monitors both the collateral requirements of individual client accounts, as well as any debit balances that occur if stock purchases are not settled on due date, or that are due to losses that have been incurred during client trading activity, on a daily basis.
Shares are only delivered free of payment to a client or their agents once settlement has been achieved and there is no outstanding debit balance on the account. In the event of an error, it will again be made immediately apparent the next day when both the debit balances and collateral requirements of clients' accounts are monitored.
On occasion delivery of stock to a recognised professional counterparty may take place free of payment via an electronic settlement system, but only on prior confirmation from their custodians that the required funds in settlement will be wired to our appropriate bank account. There have been no instances where this has created an irrecoverable loss.
Exposures for trades that are outstanding beyond the contractual settlement date are monitored on a daily basis.
The Group has a Market Exposure Committee (MEC) (comprising three Charles Stanley Group PLC Directors and other Charles Stanley senior managers as deemed necessary) that reviews exposures to market counterparties on a daily basis. The Committee also sets exposure limits to individual market counterparties.
Trade receivables represent monies due from clients and market counterparties. The risk department undertakes reviews of new accounts and periodically reviews all counterparties.
Cash and cash equivalents are held with regulated financial institutions with investment grade credit rating. The list of approved banks is reviewed at least annually by the Treasury Committee. The Group has no concerns over the credit quality of these institutions.
The following table of financial assets analyses amounts by ageing:
As at 31 March 2015 | Neither due | Past due but not impaired | ||||
nor impaired | 0-3 months | 3-6 months | 6-12 months | Over 1 year | Carrying value | |
£'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
Trade and other receivables | 254,706 | 6,630 | 799 | 421 | 75 | 262,631 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 28,453 | - | - | - | - | 28,453 |
As at 31 March 2014 | ||||||
Trade and other receivables | 175,407 | 31,234 | 536 | 1251 | 54 | 208,482 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 38,567 | - | - | - | - | 38,567 |
Excluded from the above are assets of £339,300 (2014: £665,000) for which provision of £339,300 has been made (2014: £665,000).
Liquidity risk
This is the risk that the Group, although solvent, either does not have available sufficient financial resources to enable it to meet its obligations as they fall due, or can secure such resources only at excessive cost.
The Group maintains a mixture of cash and cash equivalents that is designed to meet the Group's operational and trading activities. The Group does not use the wholesale markets for any funding and is confident that it has sufficient liquidity for the foreseeable future. At 31 March 2015 the Group had £28.6 million in bank accounts and accordingly a high degree of liquidity.
The Group's liquidity risk is overwhelmingly short term in nature and arises from the settlement of trades within the stockbroking business.
The treasury function operates within strict policies and procedures approved by the Board, which include strict controls on the use of financial instruments in managing the Group's risk. Our policy is to use a combination of high credit rated banks to deposit client money. This is done to guard against the risk of using only one bank.
The Group's financial instruments comprise borrowings, cash and liquid resources, and various items including trade debtors and trade creditors that arise directly from its operations. We review the credit quality of counterparties and we limit aggregate credit exposures accordingly.
The majority of the short-term creditors arise from settlement of clients' trading activities, and it is the policy to pay stockbroking creditors on Settlement Day or when the stock is delivered, whichever is later. The policy is also to pay suppliers in accordance with their payment terms.
The Group's financial liabilities comprise trade and other payables and financial liabilities which are all repayable on demand or within three months.
Capital risk management
The Group has an internal capital adequacy assessment process, as required by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which it uses to manage capital. This assessment is Group-wide and covers current and projected capital requirements. The Group is satisfied that there is and will be sufficient capital to meet these requirements.
The process, which has been approved by the Board of Directors, includes both qualitative and quantitative analysis of the requirements as calculated using both Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 methodologies. Any change to the Group's business activities is considered within this framework.
Capital adequacy is monitored daily by the Group's management for all regulated companies within the Group. Compliance with FCA regulatory requirements was maintained during the year.
The regulatory capital resources of the Group at 31 March 2015 calculated in accordance with FCA definitions were as follows:
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
Tier 1 | ||
Ordinary shares | 11,490 | 11,314 |
Share premium | 4,139 | 2,597 |
Retained earnings | 50,559 | 67,009 |
Other reserves | 1,103 | 2,483 |
67,291 | 83,403 | |
Prudential deductions | (29,561) | (35,286) |
Total capital resources | 37,730 | 48,117 |
In April 2015 the Group undertook a capital raising, the details of which are disclosed in note 17.
Fair value of financial instruments
a) Accounting classifications and fair values
The following table shows the carrying amounts and fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities, including their levels in the fair value hierarchy.
Carrying amount | Held for trading | Loans and receivables | Available for sale | Other financial liabilities | Total | |
Note | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
As at 31 March 2015 | ||||||
Financial assets measured at fair value | ||||||
Available for sale investments | 16 | - | - | 7,054 | - | 7,054 |
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss - listed investments | 100 | - | - | - | 100 | |
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss - deferred consideration | - | 450 | - | - | 450 | |
Total | 100 | 450 | 7,054 | - | 7,604 | |
Financial assets not measured at fair value | ||||||
Trade and other receivables | - | 262,181 | - | - | 262,181 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | - | 28,453 | - | - | 28,453 | |
Total | - | 290,634 | - | - | 290,634 | |
Financial liabilities measured at fair value | ||||||
Contingent consideration | - | - | - | 40 | 40 | |
Total | - | - | 40 | 40 | ||
Financial liabilities not measured at fair value | ||||||
Borrowings | 18 | - | - | - | 1,974 | 1,974 |
Trade and other payables | - | - | - | 265,792 | 265,792 | |
Total | - | - | - | 267,766 | 267,766 |
Fair value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||
Note | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
As at 31 March 2015 | ||||||
Financial assets measured at fair value | ||||||
Available for sale investments | 16 | 3,785 | - | 3,269 | 7,054 | |
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss - listed investments | 100 | - | - | 100 | ||
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss - deferred consideration | - | - | 450 | 450 | ||
Total | 3,885 | - | 3,719 | 7,604 | ||
Financial liabilities measured at fair value | ||||||
Contingent consideration | - | - | 40 | 40 | ||
Total | - | - | 40 | 40 |
The carrying value of financial assets and liabilities not held at fair value (cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, trade and other payables and borrowings) is not significantly different from the fair value.
Carrying amount | Held for trading | Loans and receivables | Available for sale | Other financial liabilities | Total | |
Note | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
As at 31 March 2014 | ||||||
Financial assets measured at fair value | ||||||
Available for sale investments | 16 | - | - | 7,300 | - | 7,300 |
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | 117 | - | - | - | 117 | |
Total | 117 | - | 7,300 | - | 7,417 | |
Financial assets not measured at fair value | ||||||
Trade and other receivables | - | 208,482 | - | - | 208,482 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | - | 38,567 | - | - | 38,567 | |
Total | - | 247,049 | - | - | 247,049 | |
Financial liabilities measured at fair value | - | - | - | 388 | 388 | |
Total | - | - | - | 388 | 388 | |
Financial liabilities not measured at fair value | ||||||
Borrowings | 18 | - | - | - | 2,120 | 2,120 |
Trade and other payables | - | - | - | 217,135 | 217,135 | |
Total | - | - | - | 219,255 | 219,255 |
Fair value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||
Note | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | ||
As at 31 March 2014 | ||||||
Financial assets measured at fair value | ||||||
Available for sale investments | 16 | 3,531 | - | 3,769 | 7,300 | |
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | 117 | - | - | 117 | ||
Total | 3,648 | - | 3,769 | 7,417 | ||
Financial liabilities measured at fair value | ||||||
Contingent consideration | - | - | 388 | 388 | ||
Total | - | - | 388 | 388 |
b) Measurement of fair values | |
i) | Valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs |
Financial instruments measured at fair value The table below analyses recurring fair value measurements for financial assets.
These fair value measurements are categorised into different levels in the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs to valuation techniques used. The different levels are defined as follows.
Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Group can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices).
Level 3 - Inputs for assets that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs).
|
Performance condition | Valuation technique | Significant unobservable inputs | Inter-relationship between significant unobservable inputs and fair value |
Equity Securities: Euroclear | The fair value is determined by considering the dividend yield where the expected dividend is determined | Expected dividend growth rate, which includes an adjustment for currency volatility (45%) | The estimate fair value would increase if the expected dividend growth rate was higher |
Financial instruments not measured at fair value | |||
Trade and other receivables | Discounted cash flows | Not applicable | |
Cash and cash equivalents | Discounted cash flows | Not applicable | |
Borrowings | Discounted cash flows | Not applicable | |
Trade and other payables | Discounted cash flows | Not applicable | |
Deferred consideration | Percentage of Funds under Management | Management view that clients will not leave | The deferred consideration would decrease if Funds under Management were lower |
There were no transfers between any of the levels of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended 31 March 2015.
ii) Level 3 fair values
Details of the determination of Level 3 fair value measurements are set out below.
Equity securities - available for sale | |
£'000 | |
Balance at 1 April 2014 | 3,769 |
Total unrealised gains and losses for the period included in profit or loss | |
Impairment | (500) |
Total gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income: | |
Net change in fair value of available for sale financial assets | - |
Balance at 31 March 2015 | 3,269 |
The Group has an established control framework with respect to the measurement of fair values. If one or more significant inputs are not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3. Specific valuation techniques used to value the financial instrument grouped under level 3 include discounting future cash flows and calculating the dividend yield. All valuations performed are presented to the Group Executive Directors for final approval. Significant valuation issues are reported to the Group Audit Committee.
Equity securities - available for sale
The level 3 balance comprises amounts relating to holdings in unlisted investments. At 31 March 2015 these unlisted investments had a fair value of £3.3 million (31 March 2014: £3.8 million). Included within this balance is the Group's holding of 6,030 Euroclear plc shares with a fair value of £3.1 million (31 March 2014: £3.1 million).
This fair value has been determined using a valuation technique that used significant unobservable inputs.
This was because the shares are not listed on an exchange. During the year, Euroclear conducted a tender process for the buy-back of its shares. The successful bidders ranged in prices from €640 - €790 per share. The Group's bid was unsuccessful as the price tendered was above the maximum accepted of price of €790 per share. The Group's current valuation of Euroclear values the shares at €720, the mid-range point in the range.
For the Euroclear investment a 1% increase/decrease in the expected dividend yield would increase/decrease other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity by £20,000 (31 March 2014: £20,000).
Contingent consideration
The level 3 balance comprises an amount payable on the acquisition of Evercore Pan Asset Capital Management Limited (PAN) and an amount due for the sale of the Matterley Undervalued Asset Fund to Miton Group.
At 31 March 2015 the fair value of the deferred consideration for the acquisition of PAN was £40,057.
The fair value is determined using a percentage of PAN's Funds under Management. The significant unobservable input is management's view that no further clients will leave which would decrease PAN's Funds under Management, which in turn would reduce the contingent consideration payable.
A 1% increase/decrease in Funds under Management would increase/decrease contingent consideration by £0.01 million.
For the sale of the Matterley Undervalued Asset Fund an initial consideration of £0.75 million was paid on completion of the transaction in December. Further consideration will be paid subject to the overall level of funds transferred to Miton Group.
At 31 March 2015 the fair value of the deferred consideration to be received was £0.45 million.
The fair value is determined by estimating the total Funds under Management as at December 2015 and is payable then.
The significant unobservable input is management's view that the Funds under Management won't move into a higher banding which as per the agreement will mean a further £0.1 million will be due.
A 1% increase in the anticipated value of funds transferred would increase the deferred consideration recognised by £0.1 million and a 1% decrease would have no impact.
20 RECONCILIATION OF NET PROFIT TO CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS
2015 | 2014 | |
£'000 | £'000 | |
(Loss)/profit before tax | (6,075) | 6,126 |
Adjustments for | ||
Depreciation | 3,150 | 2,707 |
Amortisation and impairment of assets | 11,108 | 2,747 |
Share-based payments - value of employee services | 50 | 186 |
Retirement benefit scheme | 204 | 247 |
Dividend income | (132) | (140) |
Interest income | (110) | (324) |
Interest expense | 75 | 85 |
Profit on disposal of available for sale financial assets | (75) | (159) |
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 178 | - |
Profit on disposal of Fund asset | (750) | - |
Changes in working capital: | ||
Decrease in financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 17 | 54 |
(Increase)/decrease in receivables | (54,960) | 48,331 |
Increase/(decrease) in payables | 48,268 | (42,517) |
Net cash inflow from operations | 948 | 17,343 |
21 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
A competitor company has taken legal action against the Group in relation to staff who chose to leave them and join Charles Stanley, claiming losses of £1.6 million plus legal costs. The Group has lodged a robust defence, both in relation to the merits of the claim itself and the quantum of the claim. Nevertheless, the Group has recognised a provision of £0.25 million (2014: £0.25 million) in respect of this potential liability. Significant judgement has had to be exercised in assessing the possible outcome of the claim and, due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, and there is a risk that the ultimate loss will be greater than this amount.
A recent ruling by the European Court of Justice indicated that under the European Working Time Directive, 'normal pay' for the purposes of calculating statutory holiday pay includes contractual commission as well as basic salary. The UK Employment Tribunal considered the implications for UK employers under the Working Time Directive 1998 and, as expected, has ruled in a similar manner to the European Courts of Justice, although it has also ruled that non-guaranteed overtime payments should be included for the purposes of calculating holiday pay entitlements. The decision by the UK Employment Tribunal is currently subject to appeal and, as yet, no hearing date has been set to consider it. Based on this information and advice to date, the Group does not expect the impact to be material. However, in the event that analysis, judgements and/or appeals are determined to ultimately be different, the Group may be exposed to a material additional liability.
22 COMMITMENTS
At 31 March 2015 capital expenditure authorised and contracted for but not provided in the financial statements amounted to nil (2014: nil).
23 POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
In April the Group announced plans to raise £15.8 million net of expenses by way of a share placing to institutional investors. The Group's brokers placed 4,596,000 shares at 355p per share. The placing shares represented just under 10% of the current issued ordinary share capital of the Group. The placing shares were admitted for trading on the main market for listed securities of the London Stock Exchange on the 17th April 2015.
In May 2015 the Group signed a Heads of Terms Agreement with Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited regarding the sale of Charles Stanley Securities (excluding the Equity Sales Trading) operation. On the 17 June the Group announced to the market that contracts have been exchanged, subject to certain conditions being met. The final sale price is capped at £6.5 million.
Also in April 2015 the Group signed a Heads of Agreement regarding the sale of Charles Stanley Financial Solutions Limited to its management team.
Related Shares:
CAY.L