1st Mar 2010 07:01
Specialist Energy Group plc
("Specialist Energy Group", the "Group" or the "Company")
Final Results for the 12 Months Ended 30 September 2009 and Change to Accounting Reference Date
The Company today announces its audited results for the 12 months to 30 September 2009. Please note that the final results to 30 September 2009 relate to the Company (formerly known as Nviro Cleantech plc) for the period prior to the reverse takeover of Southbank UK plc.
Further to the reverse takeover of Southbank UK plc and as stated in the Company's Admission Document dated 23 December 2009, the Company has changed its accounting reference date to 31 December. Therefore, it is the intention of the Company to announce audited interim results for the 3 month period to 31 December 2009 in due course (again these results will relate to the Company prior to the reverse takeover of Southbank UK plc). Thereafter, interim results for the six months to 30 June 2010 and final results for the 12 months to 31 December 2010 shall be reported in accordance with the AIM Rules for Companies and will include the performance of the Company's subsidiary Southbank UK plc.
The financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2009 will be posted to shareholders shortly and will also be available on the Company's website www.segroupplc.com.
Contact details:
Specialist Energy Group plc Ewan Lloyd-Baker, Chief Executive Officer Nick Flanagan, Finance Director |
Tel: 020 7747 8380 Tel: 020 7747 8384 |
Fairfax I.S. PLC Nomad and Broker Ewan Leggat / Laura Littley |
Tel: 020 7598 5368 |
GTH Media Relations Toby Hall Christian Pickel |
Tel: 020 7153 8039 Tel: 020 7153 8036 |
Specialist Energy Group plc
(formerly Nviro Cleantech plc)
Group Financial Statements
Year ended 30 September 2009
Highlights
Financial and Operational overview
·; Net cash of £3.39m at the year-end (2008: £10.95m)
·; Operating loss (excluding impairment charge) of £1.77m in the second half compared with £2.50m in the first half of the year to 30 September 2009
·; Overhead cash outflow reduced by over 50% in the second half of the year
·; Completion of reverse takeover by Southbank UK plc on 20 January 2010
·; Change of name to Specialist Energy Group plc
Chairman's and Chief Executive's review
From its inception Nviro has been engaged in commercialising clean technologies with the primary focus on the clean fuel technology, Vertus. 2009 saw dramatic and wide ranging changes in the world economy which had a knock-on impact on the business and its project portfolio. Without doubt there was a significant contribution from the economic climate to the issues facing Vertus Technologies, the clean coal subsidiary of the Group, which contributed to a series of setbacks at the first commercial pilot site in the first half of 2009. These setbacks led the then directors to reconsider the economic viability of the project and ultimately to conclude that there was a need to implement strategic partnerships in the energy market place.
The Company entered into discussions with Southbank UK plc, which through its subsidiary Hayward Tyler, designs, manufactures and services specialist pumps and motors for the power generation and energy sectors. These discussions led to the acquisition of Southbank by Nviro, which constituted a reverse takeover in view of the size of Southbank in relation to Nviro and the fundamental change to the Company's business. The transaction, which also raised £4 million of new equity, completed on 20 January 2010 and Nviro Cleantech plc changed its name to Specialist Energy Group plc.
The directors will focus the resources of the enlarged group on Hayward Tyler whilst continuing to pursue the opportunities to out-license the Vertus technology and, if possible, divest the other technologies. If the licensing discussions do not reach a satisfactory conclusion the intention is to cease development of the Vertus technology. Accordingly, the values of the intangible assets associated with the technologies have been impaired.
Vertus Technologies - Clean Fuels
This project was selected to lead the Company's commercialisation of rotary kiln technology in Cincinnati. At the start of 2009 the project team was under pressure to re-design the system to meet severe local emissions legislation in order to gain an operating permit. The permit was gained in late November 2008 however the impact of the re-design and the costs of building on the Ohio River floodplain saw potential costs for the site escalating during late 2008. Combined with the very poor economic conditions in the USA, which saw a rapid convergence of the price of emissions regulation compliant and non-compliant coals, the economic viability of Vertus project was severely impacted.
Recognition of these issues combined to put further development at serious risk, which led to the project being put on hold in March 2009 while a detailed review was undertaken. In turn this led to a decision to close the project in May as previously reported. Meanwhile a substantial review of the technology in the hot process laboratory, completed in Cincinnati in December 2008, was undertaken and a shortfall in the system performance expectations was clarified as a result. At the same time work was undertaken to understand those issues and to add to the technology portfolio for the production of clean fuels.
The result of the work carried out by the development team left the group at the year-end in a stronger position should new funds become available for investment by third party industrial partners, to provide clean fuel services to mine owners and energy producers in three key and substantial market sectors in future:
·; Low Rank Coals - (Lignites for example) to be dried, blended and upgraded
·; High Rank Coals - (Anthracite for example) to be manipulated to meet specific client application specifications
·; Blended Fuels - (For power generation in particular) to be created utilising cleaned coals and treated biomass to provide low carbon dioxide higher efficiency products.
Reducing operating costs was the focus for much of the year and addressing this area led to reductions, predominantly in the second half of the year, in overhead throughout the business and in staff. However, in light of the decision to focus the resources of the enlarged group on Hayward Tyler the intangible assets associated with the technology have been impaired.
Microrelease - MDF Recycling
The year saw successful trials to produce wood fibre from Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF) waste providing the source for production of a tonnage of finished MDF boards with various levels of recycled material content up to 25% by weight. These boards were able to achieve the recognised standards of testing for MDF boards for both board characteristics and machining qualities. A portion of these boards were used in smaller trial applications and others in a significant test in a major grocery group, which has since been extended to three additional locations. Furthermore the original supply of recycled fibre provided material for successful testing in some other application areas, which included plastic moulded materials and insulation applications.
Planning of the next stage of development, a small scale industrial unit followed by a full industrial unit capable of producing in excess of 2 tonnes per hour was accompanied by an application for a European Union grant providing for 1 Euro in every 4 Euros spent, up to a total cost of approximately 2.7m Euros. The objective of the grant programme is to build an industrial unit in conjunction with a recognised industry member to complete full production trials of the process and ongoing manufacture of recycled board.
Subsequent to the year-end an announcement was made that the grant had been won and a business partner is being sought to develop the technology independently.
Air Projects: (Organotect - Air analysis & Laseair - Air Cleaning)
Completion of the development programme for both of these projects was achieved during the year. As previously stated both products are capable of being integrated into existing systems or product portfolios of businesses operating in the clean air sector. Currently evaluation programmes or discussions are under way with such parties to take over these projects.
The Outlook
The advent of the enlarged group under Specialist Energy Group plc will see the business primarily focused upon the power generation market and the core engineering business of Hayward Tyler. Whilst this offers some potential market cooperation opportunities for the Clean Fuels technology the primary focus is on trying to monetise the existing Vertus technology through third parties. The other projects, Microrelease, Organotect and Laseair, are expected to be developed independently of SEG and at present carry no significant ongoing cost beyond maintaining the intellectual property and technical value up to the point of sale or third party partnerships. However, in the light of the stated intention of Southbank to focus the resources of the enlarged group on Hayward Tyler, the tangible and intangible assets associated with these technologies have been impaired.
Financial Review
Over the twelve months ended 30 September 2009 the Group recorded a pre-tax loss of £9.50m (2008: £3.17m) after impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets of £5.32m (2008: £Nil). The impairment charge resulted in part from the withdrawal, for commercial and technical reasons, from the Cincinnati Bulk Terminals ("CBT") site in Cincinnati in the first half of the year and in part because of the stated intention of Southbank UK plc ("Southbank"), with whom the Directors of Nviro had entered negotiations before the year end, to focus the resources of the combined entity on the Hayward Tyler business.
The operating loss, excluding the impairment charge, in the second half of the year was £1.77m compared with £2.50m in the first half of the year, reflecting management's efforts to reduce costs substantially while negotiations with Southbank and other potential commercial partners were under way. By the end of September 2009 the monthly overhead cash outflow had been reduced to substantially less than 50% of its level in March 2009.
Net cash outflow from operating activities for the year was £4.85m (2008: £2.65m), of which £2.43m occurred in the six months to 31 March 2009. Net cash at 30 September 2009 was £3.39m (2008: £10.95m).
Financial Outlook
Over the latter half of the year and in the period subsequent to the year end, the focus of the Board has been on achieving an outcome to negotiations with Southbank and other parties that secures the future of the company and, in particular, delivers early revenues and cash flow. The Board considers the successful completion of the offer for Southbank, which became unconditional in all respects on 20 January 2010, to represent such an outcome.
Chris Every Non-Executive Director |
|
Consolidated Income Statement for the year ended 30 September 2009
Note |
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
|
Continuing Operations: |
|
|
|
|
Research expenses |
|
|
(360) |
(329) |
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses |
4 |
|
(4,249) |
(3,108) |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property, plant & equipment |
10 |
|
(3,543) |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
8 |
|
(1,778) |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of provision |
15 |
|
337 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(9,593) |
(3,437) |
|
|
|
|
|
Share of results of joint venture |
16 |
|
(23) |
(19) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before interest |
|
|
(9,616) |
(3,456) |
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income |
2 |
|
119 |
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax |
|
|
(9,497) |
(3,173) |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
5 |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the financial year |
3 |
|
(9,497) |
(3,173) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share |
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
6 |
|
(£1.44) |
(£0.64) |
|
|
|
|
|
No minority interest in the losses has been recognised within these financial statements as the minority does not have a binding obligation to make additional investment to cover the losses. The loss is therefore wholly attributable to the equity holders of the parent.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 September 2009
|
Share capital
£'000 |
Share premium
£'000 |
Merger reserve
£'000 |
Share based payment reserve £'000 |
Translation reserve £'000 |
Retained earnings
£'000 |
Total equity
£'000 |
At 1 October 2007 |
44 |
6,582 |
4,585 |
286 |
- |
(5,052) |
6,445 |
Loss for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(3,173) |
(3,173) |
Foreign currency translation |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(3) |
- |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognised income and expense |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(3) |
(3,173) |
(3,176) |
Transfer on exercise of share options |
- |
- |
- |
(10) |
- |
10 |
- |
Issue of share capital, (net of issue expenses) |
22 |
9,435 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9,457 |
Share based payment charge |
- |
- |
- |
90 |
- |
- |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2008 |
66 |
16,017 |
4,585 |
366 |
(3) |
(8,215) |
12,816 |
Loss for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(9,497) |
(9,497) |
Foreign currency translation |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
- |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognised income and expense |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
(9,497) |
(9,485) |
Transfer on lapse of share options |
- |
- |
- |
(262) |
- |
262 |
- |
Share based payment charge |
- |
- |
- |
33 |
- |
- |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
66 |
16,017 |
4,585 |
137 |
9 |
(17,450) |
3,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All income and expenses are attributable to the equity holders of the parent company. None is attributable to the minority interest.
Company Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 September 2009
|
Share capital
£'000 |
Share premium
£'000 |
Merger reserve
£'000 |
Share based payment reserve £'000 |
Retained earnings
£'000 |
Total equity
£'000 |
At 1 October 2007 |
44 |
6,582 |
20,075 |
286 |
(598) |
26,389 |
Loss for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(150) |
(150) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognised income and expense |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(150) |
(150) |
Transfer on exercise of share options |
- |
- |
- |
(10) |
10 |
- |
Issue of share capital, (net of issue expenses) |
22 |
9,435 |
- |
- |
- |
9,457 |
Share based payment charge |
- |
- |
- |
90 |
- |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2008 |
66 |
16,017 |
20,075 |
366 |
(738) |
35,786 |
Loss for the year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(32,532) |
(32,532) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognised income and expense |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(32,532) |
(32,532) |
Transfer on lapse of share options |
- |
- |
- |
(262) |
262 |
- |
Share based payment charge |
- |
- |
- |
33 |
- |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
66 |
16,017 |
20,075 |
137 |
(33,008) |
3,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and Company Balance Sheets at 30 September 2009
|
|
Group |
Company |
||||||
|
Note |
2009 £'000 |
|
2008 £'000 |
|
2009 £'000 |
|
2008 £'000 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licence |
8 |
- |
|
923 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Development costs |
8 |
120 |
|
867 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
9 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
20,161 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
10 |
262 |
|
1,220 |
|
- |
|
1 |
|
Due from group undertakings |
11 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
382 |
|
3,010 |
|
- |
|
21,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables |
12 |
130 |
|
145 |
|
387 |
|
4,223 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
13 |
3,384 |
|
10,946 |
|
3,143 |
|
10,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
3,514 |
|
11,091 |
|
3,530 |
|
14,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
3,896 |
|
14,101 |
|
3,530 |
|
35,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
14 |
(484) |
|
(926) |
|
(243) |
|
(154) |
|
Provisions |
15 |
- |
|
(337) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
(484) |
|
(1,263) |
|
(243) |
|
(154) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in joint ventures |
16 |
(48) |
|
(22) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non current liabilities |
|
(48) |
|
(22) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
(532) |
|
(1,285) |
|
(243) |
|
(154) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
3,364 |
|
12,816 |
|
3,287 |
|
35,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and Company Balance Sheets at 30 September 2009 continued
|
|
Group
|
Company
|
|||||||||
|
|
2009
£’000
|
|
2008
£’000
|
|
2009
£’000
|
|
2008
£’000
|
||||
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Share capital
|
17
|
66
|
|
66
|
|
66
|
|
66
|
||||
Share premium reserve
|
18
|
16,017
|
|
16,017
|
|
16,017
|
|
16,017
|
||||
Merger reserve
|
19
|
4,585
|
|
4,585
|
|
20,075
|
|
20,075
|
||||
Share based payment reserve
|
20
|
137
|
|
366
|
|
137
|
|
366
|
||||
Translation reserve
|
21
|
9
|
|
(3)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
||||
Retained losses
|
22
|
(17,450)
|
|
(8,215)
|
|
(33,008)
|
|
(738)
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent
|
|
3,364
|
|
12,816
|
|
3,287
|
|
35,786
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Minority Interest
|
28
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Equity
|
|
3,364
|
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 26 February 2010
Consolidated and Company Cash Flow Statements for the year ended 30 September 2009
|
Note
|
Group
|
Company
|
||
|
|
Year ended 30 September 2009
£’000
|
Year ended 30 September 2008
£’000
|
Year ended 30 September 2009
£’000
|
Year ended 30 September 2008
£’000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow from operations
|
24
|
(4,849)
|
(2,649)
|
(7,446)
|
(4,988)
|
Interest paid
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Tax paid
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow from operating activities
|
|
(4,849)
|
(2,649)
|
(7,446)
|
(4,988)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received
|
|
119
|
283
|
119
|
283
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
(214)
|
(867)
|
-
|
-
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
(2,633)
|
(1,210)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (outflow) / inflow from investing activities
|
|
(2,728)
|
(1,794)
|
119
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on issue of shares
|
|
-
|
10,005
|
-
|
10,005
|
Costs on issue of shares
|
|
-
|
(548)
|
-
|
(548)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash inflow from financing activities
|
|
-
|
9,457
|
-
|
9,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(7,577)
|
5,014
|
(7,327)
|
4,752
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
10,946
|
5,932
|
10,470
|
5,718
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates
|
|
15
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
13
|
3,384
|
10,946
|
3,143
|
10,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Financial Statements
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of accounting
The consolidated and company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and interpretations adopted by the European Union and as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Acts 1931 to 2004 (IFRS).
The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.
Going Concern
As outlined in the post balance sheet events section of the director's report and in note 30, there was a reverse takeover of the Company by Southbank UK plc on 20 January 2010, proceeded by an issue of share capital on 19 January 2010 which raised estimated net proceeds of £3,160,000. At the time of the acquisition, and as a result of the successful concomitant fundraising, and the stated aims of Southbank plc towards the Nviro Cleantech businesses, the combined entity has no going concern issues.
Standards issued but not yet effective
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements the following Standards and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were in issue but not yet effective:
International Accounting Standards (IAS/IFRS) |
Effective date - Annual periods beginning on or after |
|
IFRS 1 |
First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards - Amendment relating to cost of an investment on first-time adoption |
1 January 2009 |
IFRS 2 |
Share Based Payment - Amendment relating to vesting conditions and cancellations |
1 January 2009 |
IFRS 3 |
Business Combinations - Comprehensive revision on applying the acquisition method |
1 July 2009 |
IFRS 7 & IAS 39 |
Financial instruments: Disclosures - reclassification of financial assets |
Effective 1 July 2008 |
IFRS 8 |
Operating Segments |
1 January 2009 |
IFRIC 15 |
Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate |
1 January 2009 |
IFRIC 17 |
Distributions of non cash assets to owner |
1 July 2009 |
IFRIC 18 |
Transfers of assets from customers |
Transfers received on or after 1 July 2009 |
IFRIC 19 |
Extinguishing financial liabilities with equity instruments |
1 July 2010 |
IAS 1 |
Presentation of Financial Statements - Amendments relating to disclosure of puttable instruments and obligations arising on liquidation |
1 January 2009 |
IAS 1 |
Presentation of Financial Statements - Amendments resulting from May 2008 annual improvements to IFRS's and other amendments |
1 January 2009 |
IAS 23 |
Borrowing costs - Comprehensive revision to prohibit immediate expensing |
1 January 2009 |
IAS 27 |
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements - Consequential amendments arising from amendments to IFRS 3 |
1 July 2009 |
IAS 28 |
Investments in Associates - Consequential amendments arising from amendments to IFRS 3 |
1 July 2009 |
IAS 31 |
Interests in Joint Ventures - Consequential amendments arising from amendments to IFRS 3 |
1 July 2009 |
IAS 31 |
Interests in Joint Ventures - Amendments resulting from May 2008 annual improvements to IFRS's |
1 January 2009 |
IAS 32 |
Financial Instruments: Presentation - Amendments relating to puttable instruments and obligations arising on liquidation |
1 January 2009 |
IAS 36 |
Impairment of Assets - Amendments resulting from May 2008 annual improvements to IFRS |
1 January 2009 |
IAS 39 |
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement - Amendments resulting from May 2008 annual improvements to IFRS and other amendments |
1 January 2009 |
IAS 39 |
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement - Amendments for eligible hedged items |
1 July 2009 |
April 2009 Annual Improvements
IFRS 2 |
Share-Based Payment |
1 July 2009 |
IFRS 5 |
Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations |
1 January 2010 |
IFRS 8 |
Operating Segments |
1 January 2010 |
IAS 1 |
Presentation of Financial Instruments |
1 January 2010 |
IAS 1 |
Statement of Cash Flows |
1 January 2010 |
IAS 17 |
Leases |
1 January 2010 |
IAS 36 |
Impairment of leases |
1 January 2010 |
IAS 38 |
Intangible assets |
1 July 2009 |
IAS 39 |
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement |
1 January 2010 |
The directors anticipate that the adoption of these Standards and Interpretations in future periods will have no material impact on the consolidated and company financial statements of the Group when the relevant standards and interpretations come into effect, except for the introduction of IFRS 8 Operating Segments. The Group does not currently disclose an analysis of segmental reporting as the group has not supplied a product or service during the year, however following the introduction of IFRS 8 it will now be required to do so.
As it is not obliged to do so, the company has not presented its income statement in these financial statements. The consolidated loss for the year includes a loss after tax of £32,532,229 (2008: £150,868) which is dealt with in the accounts of the Company.
Basis of consolidation
The Consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of Specialist Energy Group plc (formerly Nviro Cleantech plc) and all its subsidiaries made up to 30 September each year.
Control is achieved where the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to gain benefit from its activities.
Minority interests in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries are identified separately from the group's equity therin. Minority interests consist of the amount of those interests at the date of the business combination and the minority's share of changes in equity since the date of the combination. No minority interest in the losses in excess of the minority interest in the subsidiary's equity has been recognised within these financial statements as the minority does not have a binding obligation to make additional investment to cover the losses. All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.
Business Combinations
The company's controlling interest in its directly held, wholly owned subsidiary, Nviro Cleantech Limited was acquired through a transaction under common control, as defined in IFRS3, Business Combinations. The directors note that transactions under common control are outside the scope of IFRS 3 and that there is no guidance elsewhere in IFRS covering such transactions.
IAS 8, Accounting policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors contains guidance where a transaction falls outside the scope of IFRS. This requires, inter alia, that where IFRS does not contain guidance on a particular issue, the Directors may also consider the most recent pronouncements of other standard setting bodies that use a similar conceptual framework to develop accounting standards. In this regard it is noted that The United Kingdom Financial Reporting Standard No. 6 (FRS 6), outlines the situation when there is a transaction under common control. The guidance within the standard allows for merger accounting to be the method of accounting used.
Having considered the requirements of IAS 8 and the guidance included within FRS 6, it is considered appropriate to use a form of accounting named 'pooling of interests' when dealing with the transaction in which the Group acquired its controlling interest in Nviro Cleantech Limited. Pooling of interests has therefore been used to account for the transaction.
Joint Ventures
A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby the Group and other parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control.
Jointly controlled entities are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in jointly controlled entities are carried in the balance sheet at the Group's share of the net assets of the joint venture, and the Group's share of profits or losses for each financial year are recognised in the consolidated income statement.
Goodwill
Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group's interest in the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of a subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is initially recognised as an asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill which is recognised as an asset is reviewed for impairment at least annually. Any impairment is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Investments
Investments are recognised and derecognised on a trade date where a purchase or sale of an investment is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the investment within the timeframe established by the market concerned. Investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures are initially measured at cost, including transaction costs and are subsequently measured at cost less any impairment.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment loss. They are depreciated over their estimated useful lives on the following annual bases:
Assets under construction - No depreciation until construction of the assets is completed
Leasehold Improvements - Over the length of the lease
Plant and machinery - 3 to 10 years straight line
Computer Equipment - 33.3% straight line
The gain or loss ensuing on the disposal or retirement of an asset is determined as the difference between sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognised in the income statement.
Licences
Licences are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairement loss and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives on the following annual bases:
Licences - over the licence period
Impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible Assets other than Goodwill
At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its property, plant and equipment and intangible assets other than goodwill to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised as an expense immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.
Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised as income immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of an impairment is treated as a revaluation increase.
Financial Instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the balance sheet when the Group has become a party to the contractual priorities of the instrument.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and deposits held at call with banks.
Borrowings
All borrowing costs are recognised in the income statement over the term of the instrument using an effective rate of interest.
Financial liabilities and equity
Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Group after deducting all of its liabilities.
Equity instrumentsEquity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.
Other receivables
Other receivables are measured at initial recognition at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised in profit and loss when there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired. Objective evidence of impairment could include, the payment of debts becoming significantly overdue. The receivables are categorised as loans and receivables in these financial statements.
Trade payables
Trade payables are initially measured at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. They are categorised as other financial liabilities in these financial statements.
Operating loss
Operating loss is stated before, finance income, interests in joint ventures and taxation.
Leases
All leases are classified as operating leases. Rentals payable under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight line basis over the term of the relevant lease.
Segmental Reporting
A business segment is a group of assets and operations that provide a product or service and that is subject to risks and returns that are different from other business segments. A geographic segment is a group of assets and operations that provide a product or service within a particular economic environment and that is subject to risks and returns that are different from segments operating in different economic environments.
Research and Development
Expenditure on research activities is recognised as an expense in the period in which it is incurred.
An internally-generated intangible asset arising from the Group's business development of its various clean technologies is recognised only if all of the following conditions are met:
·; an asset is created that can be identified;
·; it is probable that the asset created will generate future economic benefits;
·; the development cost of the asset can be measured reliably;
·; the product or process is technically and commercially feasible; and
·; there is intent, and sufficient resources are available, to complete the development and to either sell or use the asset.
Where no internally-generated intangible asset can be recognised, development expenditure is recognised as an expense in the period in which it is incurred. Internally-generated intangible assets will be amortised on a straight-line basis over their useful lives by reference to their sale and use.
Taxation
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net accounting profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group's liability for current tax is calculated by using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realised or the liability is settled based upon tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it relates to items credited or charged directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity.
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Foreign currencies
The individual financial statements of each Group company are presented in the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates, (its functional currency). For the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position of each Group company are expressed in pounds sterling, which is the functional currency of the Company and the presentational currency for the consolidated financial statements.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the Group's overseas operations are translated into sterling at exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Exchange differences arising, if any, are classified as equity and transferred to the Group's translation reserve. Such translation differences are recognised as income or expenses in the period in which the operation is disposed of. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are initially recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in such currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Profits and losses arising on retranslation are included in the income statement.
At the beginning of the period, the functional currency of three of the Group's subsidiary undertakings was changed from pounds sterling to US$. The reason for the change was that a significant majority of transactions in each company are undertaken in US$. The change was adopted prospectively from 1st October 2008.
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation as a result of a past event and it is probable that the Group will be required to settle that obligation. Provisions are measured at the director's best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date and are discounted to present value where the effect is material.
Share Based Payment
The Group has applied the requirements of IFRS 2 Share based payment. The Group issues equity settled share based payments to certain employees and third parties. Equity settled share based payments are measured at fair value at the date of the grant. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity settled share based payments is expensed on a straight line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group's estimate of shares that will eventually vest and adjusted for the effect of non-market based vesting conditions.
Fair value is measured by use of the Black Scholes model. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects on non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation and uncertainty
In the process of applying the accounting policies of both the Company and the Group, as described above, management have made the following judgements that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements
Impairment of Investments
The carrying value of investments in the Company's accounts is reliant upon the outcome of the reverse takeover of the Company by Southbank UK plc on 20 January 2010. As has been highlighted in notes 10 and 30 to these financial statements, the directors of Southbank were clear that their interest in the transaction and the concomitant fundraising was in obtaining new cash resources to support their existing business and not in Nviro's technologies and this is clearly explained in the Offer Document. No resources are to be allocated to the Nviro technologies after the transaction has completed. The result of this is that the carrying value of investments has been significantly impaired, an impairment charge of £20,193,000 being put through the financial statements this year.
Impairment of Development costs and Licences
The carrying value of development costs and licences in the Group's accounts is reliant upon the outcome of the reverse takeover of the Company by Southbank UK plc on 20 January 2010. The carrying value of these assets has been significantly impaired, an impairment charge of £1,778,000 being put through the financial statements this year. See 'impairment of investments' above and also note 8 for an explanation of this impairment charge.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
As a consequence of the decision, based on currently prevailing economic conditions and on grounds of economic inviability, not to proceed at the CBT site in Cincinnati and the associated deferral of revenues, and also the reverse takeover of the Company by Southbank UK plc on 20 January 2010, management have concluded that an impairment charge of £3,543,000 should be booked against fixed assets under construction, leasehold improvements and plant and machinery across the Group's business units. See note 10 for a further explanation of the impairment charge.
No other material judgements have been made by management that could have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.
2. FINANCE INCOME
|
|
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank interest receivable |
|
|
119 |
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
3. LOSS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR
|
|
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
Loss for the financial year is arrived at after charging: |
|
|
|
|
Net foreign exchange losses |
|
|
29 |
70 |
Depreciation on owned assets |
|
|
48 |
25 |
Amortisation expense |
|
|
106 |
105 |
Research expense |
|
|
360 |
329 |
Rentals payable under operating leases |
|
|
110 |
29 |
Staff costs (see note 7) |
|
|
1,427 |
1,006 |
Auditors' remuneration for audit services |
|
|
75 |
75 |
Share based payment expense |
|
|
33 |
90 |
Impairment loss recognised on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,543 |
- |
Impairment loss recognised on development assets |
|
|
961 |
- |
Impairment loss recognised on licences |
|
|
817 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
The amortisation and depreciation charge of £154,000 (2008: £130,000) and the staff costs expense of £1,427,000 (2008: £1,006,000) are included within administrative expenses within the income statement.
Amounts payable to Baker Tilly UK Audit LLP and its related entities, in respect of both audit and non-audit services are set out below:
|
|
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
Fees payable to the auditors and associates for the statutory audit of the company and consolidated accounts |
|
|
35 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fees payable to the auditors and associates for other services: |
|
|
|
|
The audit of the company's subsidiaries |
|
|
40 |
40 |
Taxation services - Compliance services |
|
|
15 |
16 |
Taxation services - Advisory services |
|
|
13 |
21 |
Services relating to corporate finance transactions entered into or proposed to be entered into by or on behalf of the company or any of its associates |
|
|
40 |
- |
Other services |
|
|
15 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
The fees disclosed in 2009 represent the directors' estimate of the fees payable for the audit for the year ended 30 September 2009.
4. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Staff costs (see note 7) |
|
|
1,427 |
1,006 |
Professional fees |
|
|
1,362 |
1,174 |
Travelling expenses |
|
|
377 |
336 |
Rent and premises expenses |
|
|
145 |
34 |
Provision against other receivables |
|
|
200 |
- |
Depreciation and amortisation charge |
|
|
154 |
130 |
Other costs |
|
|
584 |
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,249 |
3,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
5. TAX
|
|
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
Current tax |
|
|
|
|
Corporation tax |
|
|
- |
- |
Adjustment in respect of prior years |
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current tax |
|
|
- |
- |
Deferred tax |
|
|
- |
- |
Adjustment in respect of prior years |
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax charge |
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is subject to Isle of Man taxation at the rate of 0%.
The charge for the year can be reconciled to the loss per the income statement as follows:
|
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax |
|
(9,497) |
(3,173) |
|
|
|
|
Tax at the UK corporation tax rate of 28% (2008: 29%) |
|
(2,659) |
(920) |
|
|
|
|
Factors affecting charge for the year |
|
|
|
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes |
|
1,241 |
7 |
Capital allowances for period in excess of depreciation |
|
3 |
- |
Tax losses not utilised |
|
903 |
819 |
Timing differences not recognised for deferred tax purposes |
|
|
(136) |
Losses not available for tax purposes |
|
507 |
230 |
Other timing differences |
|
5 |
- |
|
|
|
|
Group tax charge |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. As the availability of future profits against which to utilise a deferred tax asset is uncertain, no asset has been recognised in the year. The unrecognised deferred tax asset at 30 September 2009 is £3,601,199 (2008: £2,795,567).
Due to the change in ownership of the company on 19 January 2010, as outlined in note 30 to these financial statements, the status of the losses carried forward may be restricted if there is a major change in the nature and conduct of the loss making trade.
Losses not available for tax purposes mainly relate to losses incurred in jurisdictions with a nil% tax rate.
6. LOSS PER SHARE
Continuing operations
Basic loss per share of £1.44 (2008: £0.64) is based on the loss for the financial year of £9,497,000 (2008: loss of £3,173,000) and on 6,609,319 ordinary shares (2008: 4,929,847 ordinary shares) being the weighted average number of shares in issue throughout the year. As there is a loss for the year, there is no difference between the basic and the diluted loss per share. There are 1,631,202 (2008: 2,670,055) share options in issue that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, but have not been included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they are anti dilutive for the periods presented.
The calculation of the weighted average number of shares takes into account the subdivision of the ordinary share capital that took place on 15 January 2010 as outlined in note 30.
7. STAFF COSTS
The average monthly number of employees, (including executive directors) during the year was:
|
Group |
|
|
2009 Number |
2008 Number |
|
|
|
Management and finance |
5 |
4 |
Technical |
9 |
5 |
Administration |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
11 |
|
|
|
The costs incurred in respect of these employees were:
|
Group |
|
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
Wages and salaries |
1,589 |
1,006 |
Share based payments (see note 23) |
33 |
90 |
Social security costs |
122 |
115 |
|
|
|
|
1,744 |
1,211 |
|
|
|
Further information regarding the remuneration of directors is included within the Report of the Remuneration Committee on pages 19 to 21.
8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Group
|
Licence
£’000
|
Development costs
£’000
|
Total
£’000
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2007
|
1,054
|
-
|
1,054
|
|
Additions
|
-
|
867
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2008
|
1,054
|
867
|
1,921
|
|
Additions
|
-
|
214
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2009
|
1,054
|
1,081
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortisation
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2007
|
26
|
-
|
26
|
|
Charge for the year
|
105
|
-
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2008
|
131
|
-
|
131
|
|
Charge for the year
|
106
|
-
|
106
|
|
Impairment charge
|
817
|
961
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2009
|
1,054
|
961
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value: 30 September 2007
|
1,028
|
-
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value: 30 September 2008
|
923
|
867
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value: 30 September 2009
|
-
|
120
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
An impairment charge of £1,778,000 (2008: £Nil) has been identified in the year across the Group's intangible asset balances. No amortisation has been charged on development expenditure as the cash generating units to which the assets have been allocated are not yet revenue generating.
See note 10 for an explanation of the calculation of the impairment charge.
9. INVESTMENTS
Company |
Investment in subsidiary undertakings £'000 |
Cost |
|
At 1 October 2007 |
20,201 |
Adjustment in the year |
(40) |
|
|
At 30 September 2008 |
20,161 |
Additions |
32 |
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
20,193 |
|
|
Provision for impairment |
|
At 1 October 2007 |
- |
Impairment in the year |
- |
|
|
At 30 September 2008 |
- |
Impairment in the year |
20,193 |
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
20,193 |
|
|
Net Book Value: 30 September 2007 |
20,201 |
|
|
Net Book Value: 30 September 2008 |
20,161 |
|
|
Net Book Value: 30 September 2009 |
- |
|
|
The company owns more than 20% of the following entities:
Name of undertaking |
Place of incorporation |
% ownership/voting power |
Principal activity |
|
|
|
|
Nviro Cleantech Limited |
England & Wales |
100 |
Administration |
Laseair Limited |
England & Wales |
80 |
Development & exploitation of clean technologies |
Microrelease Limited |
England & Wales |
80 |
Development & exploitation of clean technologies |
Organotect Limited |
United States |
65 |
Development & exploitation of clean technologies |
Nviro Cleantech Inc. |
United States |
100 |
Administration |
Vertus Technologies US LLC |
United States |
100 |
Development & exploitation of clean technologies |
Vertus Technologies Industrial LLC |
United States |
100 |
Development & exploitation of clean technologies |
Vertus Technologies Limited |
Cayman Islands |
100 |
Development & exploitation of clean technologies |
Nvrio Cleantech Limited |
Cayman Islands |
100 |
Holding company |
Balama Nviro Limited |
British Virgin Islands |
50 |
Holding company |
Balama Nviro Limited |
Hong Kong |
50 |
Development & exploitation of clean technologies |
All companies are owned indirectly by Nviro Cleantech plc except for Nviro Cleantech Limited and the results for all have been included within the consolidation.
An impairment review has been undertaken on the value of the company's investment in its subsidiary undertakings. This has been undertaken in light of the reverse acquisition of the Company by Southbank UK plc that completed post year end as outlined in note 30. The value of the Company's investment in its subsidiary undertakings has been fully written down by £20,193,000. Further information as to why the impairment is necessary can be found in note 10, property, plant and equipment and note 30, post balance sheet events.
The additions relate to subsidiary undertaking's share of the share option charge for the year.
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Group |
Leasehold improvements
£'000 |
Assets in the course of construction £'000 |
Plant & Machinery
£'000 |
Computer Equipment
£'000 |
Total
£'000 |
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2007 |
- |
- |
33 |
3 |
36 |
Additions |
46 |
1,141 |
20 |
3 |
1,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2008 |
46 |
1,141 |
53 |
6 |
1,246 |
Additions |
38 |
2,584 |
1 |
10 |
2,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
84 |
3,725 |
54 |
16 |
3,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2007 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
1 |
Charge for the year |
9 |
- |
14 |
2 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2008 |
9 |
- |
15 |
2 |
26 |
Charge for the year |
27 |
- |
17 |
4 |
48 |
Impairment charge |
48 |
3,473 |
22 |
- |
3,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
84 |
3,473 |
54 |
6 |
3,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value: 30 September 2007 |
- |
- |
32 |
3 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value: 30 September 2008 |
37 |
1,141 |
38 |
4 |
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book value: 30 September 2009 |
- |
252 |
- |
10 |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As outlined in note 30, post balance sheet events, the acquisition of Southbank UK plc was completed on 20 January 2010. This acquisition took the form of a reverse takeover of the Company by Southbank UK plc. This reverse takeover, which was announced as a proposal before the year end, has, therefore, brought about an anticipated change in policy towards the Nviro technologies. Throughout the period of negotiation, which commenced in earnest in August 2009, the directors of Southbank were clear that their interest in the transaction and the concomitant fundraising was in obtaining new cash resources to support their existing business and not in Nviro's technologies and this is clearly explained in the Offer Document. No resources are to be allocated to the Nviro technologies after the transaction has completed.
This, and the absence of any firm offers for the technologies from credible commercial partners, has led the Directors to consider that the property, plant and equipment and intangible assets relating to the Microrelease, Laseair and Organotect technologies have been impaired and should as a consequence be written down to a nil value.
The Directors also consider that the property, plant and equipment and intangible assets relating to the Clean Fuels technology have been impaired. During the final quarter of 2008 Vertus suffered a combination of setbacks at its first commercial pilot site which was under construction at Cincinnati Bulk Terminals' ("CBT") riverside site in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. By the end of 2008 it became apparent that such re-engineering of the Vertus technology was substantially increasing the capital and operating costs of the site under construction in Cincinnati. In addition, the impact of the economic situation in the coal marketplace for the Ohio region, the uncertainties and unexpected changes in the US Clean Air legislation and rapidly falling gas prices culminated in a reduction of the margins between Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality compliant and non-compliant coals by ten times in just one month (source: Energy Information Administration figures, January 2009). This prompted the directors of Nviro to reconsider the economic viability of the CBT project going forward and led to a strategic review of the Nviro's business which was completed in March 2009.
Further to the strategic review, it became clear that it would be very challenging to continue to build a commercial, cost-effective plant on the CBT site and in May 2009 Nviro's withdrawal from the site was initiated by mutual agreement with CBT.
An offer has been received for the Clean Fuel assets including the related intellectual property. After giving consideration to the points outlined above and the strategic issues arising from the reverse acquisition, the directors believe that the property, plant and equipment and intangible assets relating to the Clean Fuel technology should be written down to the value outlined in the offer.
The result is an impairment charge for property plant and equipment for the year ended 30 September 2009 of £3,543,000 (2008: £Nil).
Company |
Computer equipment £'000 |
Cost |
|
At 1 October 2007 |
2 |
Additions |
- |
|
|
At 30 September 2008 |
2 |
Additions |
- |
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
2 |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
At 1 October 2007 |
- |
Charge for the year |
1 |
|
|
At 30 September 2008 |
1 |
Charge for the year |
1 |
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
2 |
|
|
Net book value: 30 September 2007 |
2 |
|
|
Net book value: 30 September 2008 |
1 |
|
|
Net Book value: 30 September 2009 |
- |
|
|
|
|
11. OTHER NON CURRENT ASSET
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due from group undertakings |
- |
- |
- |
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
The loan due from group undertakings has been fully impaired during the year due to the reasons outlined in notes 10 and 30.
12. RECEIVABLES
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Due within one year: |
|
|
|
|
Other receivables |
282 |
61 |
- |
- |
Provision against other receivables |
(200) |
- |
- |
- |
Prepayments and accrued income |
48 |
84 |
17 |
21 |
Due from group undertakings |
- |
- |
370 |
4,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
145 |
387 |
4,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
The directors consider that the carrying amount of other receivables approximates to their fair value.
Group
Although there is no specific repayment date attached to the amount, £200,000 (2008: £Nil) of other receivables are considered to be impaired and have hence been provided against. The directors do not believe that this debt will be repaid to the Group due to a dispute with the debtor. There is no other movement in the allowance account for impairment other than the new provision in the year. All of the Group's other receivables are denominated in sterling except for £73,587 (2008:£102,981) denominated in $US.
Company
All of the Company's other receivables are denominated in sterling at 30 September 2009 and 2008. There are no specific repayment terms attached to the amounts due from Group undertakings. An impairment of £10,815,878 (2008: £Nil) has been charged against the amount due from group undertakings due to the reasons outlined in note 10.
13. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
Cash and cash equivalents per balance sheet |
3,384 |
10,946 |
3,143 |
10,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
All of the Group's and Company's cash and cash equivalents at 30 September 2009 and 2008 are at floating interest rates except for £474,483 (2008: £200,000), which is held on deposit, accruing interest at 0.5% below the Bank of England base rate per annum.
All of the Group's cash and cash equivalents at 30 September 2009 are in sterling except for £117,761 (2008: £201,741) held in $US. All of the Company's cash and cash equivalents at 30 September 2009 and 2008 are in sterling.
The directors consider that the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value.
14. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables |
130 |
504 |
32 |
19 |
Other payables |
33 |
41 |
- |
- |
Accruals and deferred income |
321 |
381 |
185 |
108 |
Due to group undertakings |
- |
- |
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
484 |
926 |
243 |
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables principally comprise amounts outstanding for trade purchases and ongoing costs. The average credit period taken for trade purchases is 25 days (2008: 42 days). The directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other payables approximates to their fair value.
The Group and Company have financial risk management policies in place to ensure that all payables are paid within the credit timeframe and no interest has been charged by any suppliers as a result of late payment of invoices during the year.
15. PROVISIONS
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2008 |
337 |
337 |
- |
- |
Reduction in provisions during the year |
(337) |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2009 |
- |
337 |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
The provision relating to a dispute with a supplier in existence at the beginning of the year was reversed during the period, after the completion of the legal case regarding the dispute. No monies were payable as a result of the settlement of the issue.
16. JOINT VENTURE UNDERTAKINGS
The Group holds a 50 per cent investment in Balama Nviro Limited, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. Through this company, it holds a 50% investment in a company also named Balama Nviro Limited, a company incorporated in Hong Kong. In both instances, the Group holds the ownership of 50% of the ordinary share capital of the entities. The principal activity of the joint venture is the development and exploitation of clean technologies.
At 30 September 2009 the joint ventures had no capital commitments or contingent liabilities. The results of the joint ventures for the period ended 30 September 2009 have not been audited.
A summary of the results of the joint ventures for the year ended 30 September 2009 is shown below.
|
Group share of results |
|
2009 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
(23) |
|
Finance Income |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax |
|
(23) |
|
Tax |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss after tax |
|
(23) |
|
|
|
|
|
Group share of net liabilities |
|
2009 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non current assets |
|
- |
|
|
Current assets |
|
1 |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
(49) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of net liabilities |
|
(48) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2007 |
|
- |
||
Share of loss |
|
(19) |
||
Exchange differences |
|
(3) |
||
|
|
|
||
At 1 October 2008 |
|
(22) |
||
Share of loss |
|
(23) |
||
Exchange differences |
|
(3) |
||
|
|
|
||
At 31 September 2009 |
|
(48) |
||
|
|
|
||
17. SHARE CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
2009
£’000
|
2008
£’000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorised:
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000,000 ordinary shares of 0.1p each
|
|
|
|
200
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allotted, called up and fully paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October
|
|
|
|
66
|
44
|
Issues during the year
|
|
|
|
-
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September
|
|
|
|
66
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has one class of ordinary shares which carry no right to fixed income.
Share Options
A total of 308,000 (2008: 160,000) options over the ordinary share capital of the company were granted to a number of employees during the course of the year as follows,
Grant date |
Number of options |
|
Exercise price |
Exercise period |
09/10/08 |
30,000 |
employee |
£0.33 |
7,500 exercisable immediately upon grant until 08/10/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/09 - 08/10/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/10 - 08/10/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/11 - 08/10/18 |
01/12/08 |
18,000 |
employee |
£0.22 |
4,500 exercisable immediately upon grant until 30/11/18 4,500 exercisable between 01/01/09 - 30/11/18 4,500 exercisable between 01/01/10 - 30/11/18 4,500 exercisable between 01/01/11 - 30/11/18 |
28/05/09 |
200,000 |
employee |
£0.07 |
50,000 exercisable immediately upon grant until 27/05/18 50,000 exercisable between 01/01/09 - 27/05/18 50,000 exercisable between 01/01/10 - 27/05/18 50,000 exercisable between 01/01/11 - 27/05/18 |
02/06/09 |
30,000 |
employee |
£0.09 |
7,500 exercisable immediately upon grant until 01/06/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/09 - 01/06/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/10 - 01/06/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/11 - 01/06/18 |
22/06/09 |
30,000 |
employee |
£0.07 |
7,500 exercisable immediately upon grant until 21/06/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/09 - 21/06/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/10 - 21/06/18 7,500 exercisable between 01/01/11 - 21/06/18 |
18. SHARE PREMIUM RESERVE
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
At 1 October |
16,017 |
6,582 |
16,017 |
6,582 |
Issue of share capital |
- |
9,983 |
- |
9,983 |
Expenses connected to issue of share capital |
- |
(548) |
- |
(548) |
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September |
16,017 |
16,017 |
16,017 |
16,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
The share premium reserve comprises of the difference between the issue value of shares issued and the par value of those shares, less expenses connected to the issue of share capital. |
19. MERGER RESERVE
Group
|
|
|
£’000
|
At 30 September 2008 and 30 September 2009
|
4,585
|
|
|
Company
|
£’000
|
|
|
At 30 September 2008 and 30 September 2009
|
20,075
|
|
|
On 3 July 2007, the Group entered into a share swap agreement whereby the shareholders of Nviro Cleantech Limited agreed to swap their interest in the shares of Nviro Cleantech Limited for shares in Nviro Cleantech plc, a newly incorporated company. The consideration for the share swap was the issue of 31,916,199 ordinary shares of £0.001 each. This transaction was accounted for as a group reconstruction and consequently merger accounting has been adopted.
20. SHARE BASED PAYMENT RESERVE
|
Group and company |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October |
366 |
286 |
|
Share based payment charge |
33 |
90 |
|
Transfer to profit and loss reserve on cancellation / exercise of share options |
(262) |
(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September |
137 |
366 |
|
|
|
|
The share based payment reserve of both the Group and the Company, comprises of the fair value of the share options issued by the Group that has been expensed.
21. TRANSLATION RESERVE
Group |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
1 October |
|
(3) |
- |
Exchange differences |
|
12 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
30 September |
|
9 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
The translation reserve comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of operations that do not have a Sterling functional currency. Exchange differences arising are classified as equity and transferred to the Group's translation reserve.
22. RETAINED LOSSES
Group |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
1 October |
|
(8,215) |
(5,052) |
Loss for the year |
|
(9,497) |
(3,173) |
Transfer from share based payment reserve on cancellation / exercise of options |
|
262 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
30 September |
|
(17,450) |
(8,215) |
|
|
|
|
Company |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
1 October |
(738) |
(598) |
Loss for the year |
(32,532) |
(150) |
Transfer from share based payment reserve on cancellation / exercise of options |
262 |
10 |
|
|
|
30 September |
(33,008) |
(738) |
|
|
|
23. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
As outlined in note 17, the group granted share options to various employees during the year. Details of the share options outstanding at the year end are as follows.
|
|
2009 |
2008 |
||
|
|
Number of share options |
Weighted average exercise price |
Number of share options |
Weighted average exercise price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
2,670,055 |
£0.38 |
2,560,055 |
£0.37 |
|
Granted during year |
308,000 |
£0.11 |
160,000 |
£0.47 |
|
Exercised during the year |
- |
- |
(50,000) |
£0.10 |
|
Lapsed during the year |
(1,346,853) |
£0.41 |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year |
1,631,202 |
£0.32 |
2,670,055 |
£0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year |
1,297,202 |
£0.33 |
1,940,122 |
£0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A share based payment charge has been calculated using the Black Scholes model to calculate the fair value of the share options. The inputs into the Black Scholes model are as follows;
|
|
2009 |
2008
|
|
Weighted average share price |
|
£0.32 |
£0.38 |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
£0.32 |
£0.38 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
38% |
36.0% |
|
Expected life |
|
6 years 9 months |
9 years 0 months |
|
Risk free rate |
|
1.23% |
5.25% |
|
Expected dividends |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
|
|
|
The expected volatility percentage was calculated by reference to the share price of the Company over different periods from the listing of the Company to 30 September 2009. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options outstanding at 30 September 2009 was 6 years 9 months (2008: 9 years). The outstanding options can be exercised at prices ranging from £0.07 to £0.58 and can be exercised over a 5 to 10 year period.
The Group recognised total expenses related to equity settled share based payment transactions in the form of options of £32,832 (2008: £90,030). Of this total, all related to employees including executive directors, (2008: £90,030). The majority of the options in existence have no performance criteria.
24. NOTES TO THE CASH FLOW STATEMENT
|
Group |
Company |
||
|
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss from continuing operations |
(9,593) |
(3,437) |
(32,651) |
(434) |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
48 |
25 |
1 |
1 |
Amortisation of intangible assets |
106 |
105 |
- |
- |
Share based payment expense |
33 |
90 |
2 |
90 |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment |
3,543 |
- |
- |
- |
Impairment of development costs and licence fees |
1,778 |
- |
- |
- |
Impairment of investments |
- |
- |
20,193 |
- |
Impairment of loan balances |
- |
- |
11,900 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows before movements in working capital |
(4,085) |
(3,217) |
(555) |
(343) |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
Decrease / (Increase) in trade and other receivables |
15 |
240 |
(6,980) |
(3,973) |
(Decrease) / Increase in trade and other payables |
(442) |
328 |
89 |
(672) |
Decrease in provisions |
(337) |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow from operations |
(4,849) |
(2,649) |
(7,446) |
(4,988) |
|
|
|
|
|
25. OPERATING LEASE ARRANGEMENTS
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Minimum lease payments under operating leases recognised in the Income Statement for the year |
` |
110 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
At the balance sheet date, the Group had outstanding commitments for future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases, which fall due as follows:
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
` |
13 |
7 |
Between one and two years |
|
- |
15 |
Between two and five years |
|
- |
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
165 |
|
|
|
|
Operating lease payments represent rentals payable by the Group for office property. The various leases all expire within one year.
26. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions between the Company's subsidiaries, that have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Transactions between the company and its subsidiaries were as follows, (all amounts are unsecured):
Company |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings (central funding) prior to the write off below |
11,186 |
4,202 |
Provision against amounts due from subsidiary undertakings |
(10,816) |
- |
|
|
|
Net amount due from subsidiary undertakings |
370 |
4,202 |
|
|
|
Loan due from subsidiary undertakings due between two and five years prior to the write off below |
1,085 |
1,085 |
Provision against amounts due from subsidiary undertakings |
(1,085) |
- |
|
|
|
Net amount due from subsidiary undertakings |
- |
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings |
(26) |
(27) |
|
|
|
Group
Transactions with related parties who are not members of the Group:
Core Capital Holdings LLC and Inflect Technologies Limited are both related parties by virtue of their shareholding in the Company. During the year they provided consultancy services to the Group totalling £132,739 (2008: £164,280) and £30,000 (2008: £82,500) respectively. At 30 September 2009 the Group owed the companies £1,500 and £Nil respectively (2008: £13,529 and £23,500 respectively). The University of Glasgow is a related party by virtue of its shareholding in one of the Groups' subsidiaries. During the year, the University of Glasgow provided consultancy services to the Group totalling £33,606 (2008 £282,845). At 30 September 2009, the Group owed the company £Nil (2008: £Nil). FIRA International Limited is also a related party by virtue of the shareholding of Chiltern Ventures Limited in one of the company's subsidiaries. During the year, FIRA International Limited provided consultancy services to the Group totalling £32,395 (2008: £138,300). At 30 September 2009, the Group owed the company £14,288 (2008: £Nil). None of these balances are secured.
Transactions with joint ventures:
During the year the Group recharged £Nil (2008: £21,390) of expenses to its joint venture undertaking, Balama Nviro Limited.
The remuneration of the directors and other key management personnel of the Group is set out below.
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Short term employee benefits (including non executive directors) |
|
359 |
683 |
Compensation for loss of office |
|
118 |
- |
Share based payments |
|
16 |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
493 |
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remuneration paid to the highest paid director is as follows: |
|
|
|
- Emoluments |
|
130 |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
230 |
|
|
|
|
The highest paid director did not exercise any share options during the year or receive any shares under a long term incentive scheme.
There are no retirement benefits accruing to directors. Further information about the remuneration of individual directors is provided in the report of the remuneration committee.
27. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
GROUP
The Group is exposed to the risks that arise from its use of financial instruments. This note describes the objectives, policies and processes of the Group for managing those risks and the methods used to measure them. Further quantitative information in respect of these risks is presented throughout these financial statements.
Capital risk management
The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities within the Group will be able to continue as a going concern while maximising the return to stakeholders. The Group funds itself through equity financing and as at the balance sheet date, did not employ any debt financing.
The capital structure of the group consists of equity, comprising issued capital, reserves and retained earnings.
The group has no externally imposed capital requirements.
Significant Accounting Policies
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in note 1 to these financial statements.
Principal financial instruments
The principal financial instruments used by the Group, from which financial instrument risk arises, are as follows:
·; Cash at bank
·; Trade and other payables
Categories of financial instruments
At 30 September 2009, the Group held the following financial assets:
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Loans and other receivables |
|
3,466 |
11,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,466 |
11,007 |
|
|
|
|
The analysis of loans and receivables is shown in the table below,
Loans and receivables |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Other receivables |
|
82 |
61 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
3,384 |
10,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,466 |
11,007 |
|
|
|
|
There have been no gains or losses during the year, (2008: £Nil) on loans and receivables.
At 30 September 2009, the Group held the following financial liabilities:
Other financial liabilities |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
|
484 |
926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
484 |
926 |
|
|
|
|
Market risk
The group's activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
Foreign currency risk management
During the year, the group had a number of overseas subsidiaries based in the Cayman Islands and the United States of America, (as outlined in note 9). The Group undertakes activities overseas, mostly in the United States and hence owns foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. The Group also pays for invoices denominated in a foreign currency in the same currency as the invoice. The Group therefore does suffer from a level of foreign currency risk. This risk is reduced by holding money in the currency that invoices are received in. The directors currently believe that foreign currency risk is at an acceptable level.
The carrying amount of the Group's foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at 30 September is as follows:
|
Assets |
Liabilities |
|||
|
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Dollar |
|
129 |
202 |
21 |
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
202 |
21 |
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency risk sensitivity
As highlighted above, as at 30 September 2009, the Group had no significant exposure to foreign currency risk. No sensitivity analysis on changes between the value of sterling compared with foreign currencies has therefore been prepared.
Interest rate risk management
The Group has minimal exposure to interest rate risk. As outlined earlier, it has no exposure to debt financing and has no interest rate bearing liabilities. It is exposed to interest rate risk on its financial assets being its cash at bank balances. The interest rate receivable on these balances is either 0.50% below the Bank of England base rate or nil%. The Group gave careful consideration to which organisation it should use for its banking services and interest rates available was one aspect of the decision. The directors currently believe that interest rate risk is at an acceptable level.
Interest rate sensitivity
The sensitivity analyses below have been determined based on the exposure to interest rates for all interest bearing financial assets at the balance sheet date. For floating rate assets, the analysis is prepared assuming the amount of the asset outstanding at the balance sheet date was outstanding for the whole year. A 0.5% increase or decrease is used when reporting interest rate risk internally to key management and represents management's assessment of the reasonable possible change in interest rates.
At 30 September 2009, if interest rates had been 0.50% higher / (lower) and all other variables were held constant, the Group's net loss would (decrease) / increase by £17,920 (2008: increase / (decrease) by £53,730). This is attributable to the Group's exposure to interest rates on its variable rate cash balances. There would be no impact on the Group's equity balances.
At 30 September 2009, the Group had £Nil (2008: £Nil) of borrowings subject to variable rate interest.
Credit risk management
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group. Credit risk arises principally from the Group's cash balances, with further minimal risk arising due to other receivables. The Group gives careful consideration to which organisations it uses for banking services in order to minimise credit risk. As the Group is in the pre-revenue stage of its development, it has no customers and therefore no need for a credit check policy. Such a policy will be introduced as and when required. Management considers the above measures to be sufficient to control the credit risk exposure.
The concentration of the Group's credit risk is considered by counterparty, geography and currency. The Group has a significant concentration of cash held on deposit with one large bank in the United Kingdom. At 30 September 2009, the concentration of credit risk held with that bank was £3,383,890 (2008: £10,745,968). There are no other significant concentrations of credit risk at the balance sheet date.
At 30 September 2009, the Group held no collateral (2008: Nil) as security against any financial asset. £200,000 of financial assets (2008: £Nil) have been provided against as outlined in note 12. There were no problems with the credit quality of any other financial asset in either year.
The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements, net of any allowances for losses, represents the Group's maximum exposure to credit risk without taking account of the value of any collateral obtained. At both 30 September 2009 and 30 September 2008, no financial assets were past their due date. As a result, there has been no impairment of financial assets during the year other than the impairment of other receivables outlined above
Liquidity risk management
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting its financial obligations as they fall due. Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the board of directors. The board manages liquidity risk by regularly reviewing the group's gearing levels, cash flow projections and associated headroom and ensuring that excess banking facilities are available for future use. The group maintains good relationships with its banks, all of whom are banks with high credit ratings and its cash requirements are anticipated via the budgetary process. At 30 September 2009, the Group had £3.58 million of cash reserves. Note 30 to these accounts gives details of post balance sheet events that effect the liquidity position of the Group, namely, the acquisition of Southbank UK plc.
Maturity of financial assets and liabilities
All of the Group's non derivative financial liabilities and its financial assets in both the year to 30 September 2009 and the year to 30 September 2008 are either payable or receivable within one year.
COMPANY
The Company is exposed to the risks that arise from its use of financial instruments. This note describes the objectives, policies and processes of the Company for managing those risks and the methods used to measure them. Further quantitative information in respect of these risks is presented throughout these financial statements.
Capital risk management
The Company manages its capital to ensure that it will be able to continue as a going concern while maximising the return to stakeholders. The Company funds itself through equity financing and as at the balance sheet date, did not employ any debt financing.
The capital structure of the Company consists of equity, comprising issued capital, reserves and retained earnings.
The Company has no externally imposed capital requirements.
Significant Accounting Policies
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in note 1 to these financial statements.
Principal financial instruments
The principal financial instruments used by the Company, from which financial instrument risk arises, are as follows:
·; Cash at bank
·; Trade and other payables
·; Other receivables
Categories of financial instruments
At 30 September 2009, the Company held the following financial assets:
Loans and receivables |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Other receivables (including amounts due from group undertakings) |
|
370 |
5,287 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
3,143 |
10,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,513 |
15,757 |
|
|
|
|
There have been no gains or losses during the year, (2008: £Nil) on loans and receivables.
At 30 September 2009, the Company held the following financial liabilities:
Other financial liabilities |
|
2009 £'000 |
2008 £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables (including amounts due to group undertakings) |
|
243 |
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
154 |
|
|
|
|
Market risk
The Company has minimal assets and liabilities held in foreign currencies and does not trade in overseas markets. The Company therefore has minimal exposure to foreign exchange risk. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash at bank balances.
Interest rate risk management
The Company has minimal exposure to interest rate risk. As outlined above, it has no exposure to debt financing and has no interest rate bearing liabilities. It is exposed to interest rate risk on its financial assets being its cash at bank balances. The interest rate receivable on these balances is either 0.50% below the Bank of England base rate or nil%. The Company gave careful consideration to which organisation it should use for its banking services and interest rates available was one aspect of the decision. The directors currently believe that interest rate risk is at an acceptable level.
The Company's exposures to interest rates on financial assets are detailed in the liquidity risk management section of this note.
Interest rate sensitivity
The sensitivity analyses below have been determined based on the exposure to interest rates for all interest bearing financial assets at the balance sheet date. For floating rate assets, the analysis is prepared assuming the amount of the liability outstanding at the balance sheet date was outstanding for the whole year. A 0.50% increase or decrease is used when reporting interest rate risk internally to key management and represents management's assessment of the reasonably possible change in interest rates.
At 30 September 2009, if interest rates had been 0.50% higher / (lower) and all other variables were held constant, the Company's net loss would (decrease) / increase by £15,716 (2008: increase / (decrease) by £52,350). This is attributable to the Company's exposure to interest rates on its variable rate cash balances. There would be no impact on the Company's equity balances.
At 30 September 2009, the Company had £Nil (2008: £Nil) of borrowings subject to variable rate interest.
Credit risk management
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Company. Credit risk arises principally from the Company's cash balances and the balances due to it from other Group undertakings. An allowance for impairment is made where there is an identified loss event which, based on previous experience, is evidence of a reduction in the recoverability of the cash flows. Management considers the above measures to be sufficient to control the credit risk exposure.
The concentration of the Company's credit risk is considered by counterparty, geography and currency. The Company has a significant concentration of cash held on deposit with one large bank in the United Kingdom. At 30 September 2009, the concentration of credit risk held with that bank was £3,143,298 (2008: £10,469,871).
The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements, net of any allowances for losses, represents the Company's maximum exposure to credit risk without taking account of the value of any collateral obtained. £11,900,414 (2008: £Nil) of financial assets have been impaired during the year, all of which related to amounts due from group undertakings. No other financial assets are past their due date.
At 30 September 2009, the Company held no collateral (2008: Nil) as security against any financial asset. No financial assets (2008: £Nil) were past their due date and there were no problems with the credit quality of any financial asset in either year apart from the impairment outlined above.
Liquidity risk management
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting its financial obligations as they fall due. Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the board of directors. The board manages liquidity risk by regularly reviewing the company's gearing levels, cash flow projections and associated headroom and ensuring that excess banking facilities are available for future use. The Company maintains good relationships with its banks, all of whom are banks with high credit ratings and its cash requirements are anticipated via the budgetary process. At 30 September 2009, the Company had £3.14 million of cash reserves. Note 30 to these accounts gives details of post balance sheet events that effect the liquidity position of the Company, namely, the acquisition of Southbank UK plc.
Maturity of financial assets and liabilities
All of the Company's non derivative financial liabilities for both the years ending 30 September 2009 and 2008 are due within one year. The maturity profile of the Company's financial assets is shown in the table below:
2009 |
|
Receivable in less than one year £'000 |
Receivable between 2-5 years £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Other receivables (including amounts due from group undertakings) |
|
370 |
- |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
3,143 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,513 |
- |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Receivable in less than one year £'000 |
Receivable between 2-5 years £'000 |
|
|
|
|
Other receivables (including amounts due from group undertakings) |
|
4,202 |
1,085 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
10,470 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,672 |
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
28. MINORITY INTEREST
Equity attributable to the minority interest is £Nil at both 30 September 2009 and 30 September 2008, as the minority does not have a binding obligation to make additional investment to cover the losses of the Group. There are net liabilities in the relevant companies.
29. CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
At 30 September 2009, the Group had committed itself to future expenditure on capital contracts to the value of £Nil, (2008:£861,000).
30. POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
On 23 December 2009, the boards of Nviro Cleantech plc and Southbank UK plc ("Southbank") reached agreement on the terms of a recommended offer for the whole of the issued share capital of Southbank. Completion of the acquisition of Southbank took place on 20 January 2010.
On 15 January 2010, the Company undertook a share re-organisation. The existing share capital at that time of 66,093,190 ordinary shares of 0.1p each, was sub-divided into 6,609,319 ordinary shares of 1p each.
On 19 January 2010, prior to the acquisition outlined above, a total of 5,263,200 new ordinary shares of 1p each were issued at 76p per share, raising gross proceeds of £4 million pre expenses.
Based on the placing price of 76p per Nviro share, post the share re-organisation outlined above, the entire issued and to be issued share capital of Southbank UK plc was valued at £10.05 million.
Following the acquisition and upon re-admittance to AIM, the Company's issued ordinary share capital consisted of 19,957,265 ordinary shares of 1p each.
Owing to the timing of the transaction, the initial accounting for the business combination is incomplete. The Company will therefore provide details of the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired, the fair value of shares issued and the basis for determining that fair value and of any goodwill created, in the next financial reporting period. The acquisition will be accounted for as a reverse acquisition.
The Company changed its name on 19 January 2010 to Specialist Energy Group plc.
Detailed income statement (company)
Year ended 30 September 2009 £'000 |
Year ended 30 September 2008 £'000 |
|
Continuing Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses: |
|
|
Directors remuneration |
66 |
75 |
Employers NI expense |
4 |
4 |
Legal fees |
18 |
41 |
Audit and accountancy fees |
39 |
41 |
Consultancy fees |
39 |
39 |
Professional fees |
117 |
125 |
Share based payment expenses |
4 |
44 |
Windmill project expenses |
215 |
- |
Non recoverable vat |
51 |
47 |
Other expenses |
5 |
18 |
Impairment of intercompany loans |
11,900 |
- |
Impairment of investment |
20,193 |
- |
|
|
|
Loss before interest |
(32,651) |
(434) |
|
|
|
Finance income |
119 |
283 |
|
|
|
Loss before tax |
(32,532) |
(151) |
|
|
|
Tax |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Loss for the financial year |
(32,532) |
(151) |
|
|
|
Related Shares:
HAYT.L