Become a Member
  • Track your favourite stocks
  • Create & monitor portfolios
  • Daily portfolio value
Sign Up
Quickpicks
Add shares to your
quickpicks to
display them here!

1st Quarter Results

8th May 2014 07:00

RNS Number : 5356G
Randgold Resources Ld
08 May 2014
 



RANDGOLD RESOURCES LIMITEDIncorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands Reg. No. 62686LSE Trading Symbol: RRSNASDAQ Trading Symbol: GOLD

 

ROBUST Q1 PERFORMANCE SETS PACE AS RANDGOLD CHASES DOWN 2014 TARGET

 

London, 8 May 2014 - A robust first quarter performance got Randgold Resources off to a strong start as it set out to crack the million-ounce production mark for the year.

 

Results for the three months to 31 March, published today, show the company produced a record 283 763 ounces, boosted by an increased contribution from Kibali. Kibali began commercial production in October last year and started commissioning its second sulphide mill circuit during the past quarter. The mine was officially opened by Democratic Republic of Congo's Minister of Mines Martin Kabwelulu last week.

 

Gold sales of $363 million were up quarter on quarter, following a 3% increase in the average gold price received, and on the corresponding prior year quarter despite a 21% drop in the average gold price received. Total cash cost per ounce of $685 was up 9% quarter on quarter but down 19% on the corresponding prior year quarter on the back of the ramp-up of production at Kibali and significantly higher grades and recovery at the Loulo-Gounkoto complex in Mali. Profit from mining decreased by 4% quarter on quarter to $171 million, due to the increase in costs, but was up 14% on the corresponding quarter in 2013.

 

Operationally Loulo's underground mines sustained their increasing delivery with another record output by both Yalea and Gara. Production and development at Kibali were on target. Tongon in Côte d'Ivoire again struggled with a below par throughput rate as the Vibrocone crushers, intended to address this issue, continued to experience mechanical failures.

 

Chief executive Mark Bristow said overall Randgold's operations and development projects had both performed well and the company's total cash cost and production guidance for the year remained intact.

 

"We have looked closely at our mines to ensure that they will still be profitable at $1 000/oz and we'll continue to review all operations against a range of gold price scenarios. We have a solid 2014 budget in place and we have effectively banked our five-year plan. Our focus is now on rolling this out over a 10-year period," he said.

 

"Kibali's reserve base will take it beyond the 10 years at around 600 000 ounces per year. At the Loulo-Gounkoto complex, the potential for resource conversion at Yalea and Gara and the high grade underground project at Gounkoto should also enable it to deliver 600 000 ounces and more per year over 10 years, however, there is still work to do to optimise production in the last 4 years of the 10 year plan. Together with the Tongon Life of Mine extension plan, these potential reserve extensions should give us time to deliver a new world class discovery from our portfolio of quality greenfields prospects."

 

Bristow said to improve the chances of such a discovery the turnover of targets was being accelerated, with 45 marginal targets having been rejected to reduce the total to 115. Key hunting grounds for a new discovery were Côte d'Ivoire, the Loulo district and neighbouring Senegal, and the northeast DRC which hosts Kibali as well as Randgold's Kilogold joint venture.

 

 

RANDGOLD ENQUIRIES:

Chief ExecutiveMark Bristow+44 788 071 1386+44 779 775 2288

Financial DirectorGraham Shuttleworth+44 1534 735 333+44 779 771 1338

Investor & Media RelationsKathy du Plessis+44 20 7557 7738Email: [email protected]

Website: www.randgoldresources.com

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED 31 MARCH 2014

 

§ Group achieves another quarter of record gold production

§ Gold sales up quarter on quarter and on the corresponding prior year quarter

§ Cash costs up quarter on quarter but significantly down on the corresponding prior year quarter

§ Profits down quarter on quarter but up on corresponding prior year quarter

§ Continued increase in delivery by Loulo; underground consolidates solid performance

§ Tongon crushers to be replaced to increase throughput following crusher failures

§ Kibali gold mine officially opened

§ Kibali increases production as sulphide stream commissioning commences

§ Exploration focuses on reserve conversion in Mali and Côte d'Ivoire

§ Shareholders approve $0.50 per share dividend

 

 

Randgold Resources Limited ('Randgold') had 92.5 million shares in issue as at 31 March 2014.

 

 

 

 

SUMMARISED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

$000

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Average gold price received ($/oz)

1 296

1 257

1 638

1 376

Gold sales*

362 919

356 168

309 046

1 266 712

Total cash costs*

191 886

177 825

158 631

657 951

Profit from mining activity*

171 033

178 343

150 415

608 761

Exploration and corporate expenditure

10 829

8 538

12 985

49 485

Profit for the period

85 119

92 446

81 615

325 747

Profit attributable to equity shareholders

74 340

81 101

69 648

278 382

Net cash generated from operations

49 770

209 785

92 027

464 466

Cash and cash equivalents+

11 319

38 151

250 210

38 151

Gold on hand at period end#

4 831

-

31 180

-

Group production* (oz)

283 763

281 477

199 013

910 374

Group sales* (oz)

280 024

283 254

188 654

920 248

Group total cash cost per ounce* ($)

685

628

841

715

Group cash operating cost per ounce* ($)

623

566

757

645

Basic earnings per share ($)

0.80

0.88

0.76

3.02

+ Cash and cash equivalents excludes $10.9 million at 31 March 2014 ($6.1 million at 31 December 2013 and $37.4 million at 31 March 2013) that relates to the group's attributable cash held in Morila, Kibali and the group's asset leasing companies which are equity accounted.

* Refer to explanation of non-GAAP measures provided. Randgold consolidates 100% of Loulo, Gounkoto and Tongon, 40% of Morila and 45% of Kibali in the consolidated non-GAAP measures.

# Gold on hand represents gold in doré at the mines (attributable share) multiplied by the prevailing spot gold price at the end of the period.

The results in this report have been neither reviewed nor audited. All financial numbers are in US dollars ($) unless otherwise stated.

 

 

 

COMMENTS

 

 

Gold sales for the quarter of $362.9 million increased by 2% compared to the previous quarter due to a 3% increase in the average gold price received of $1 296/oz (Q4 2013: $1 257/oz), offset by a 1% decrease in ounces sold. Compared to the corresponding quarter in 2013, gold sales were up by 17% as a result of a 48% increase in ounces sold, offset by a 21% decrease in the average gold price received (Q1 2013: $1 638/oz). The group produced a record 283 763oz during the quarter, boosted by Kibali's increased contribution up 1% on the previous quarter and 43% on the prior year corresponding quarter.

 

Total cash costs for the quarter under review of $191.9 million were 8% higher than the previous quarter, reflecting the increase in production and throughput at Kibali which began commercial production at the start of October 2013 and started commissioning the second phase sulphide mill stream during the current quarter. Total cash cost per ounce increased by 9% quarter on quarter to $685/oz but was 19% lower when compared to Q1 2013. The increase in cash cost per ounce for the quarter compared to the previous quarter was the result of lower production at Tongon on the back of a drop in throughput and head grades as well as lower recoveries at the Loulo-Gounkoto complex. The drop in cash cost per ounce for the quarter compared to the corresponding quarter of 2013 reflects the production at Kibali, as well as significantly higher grades and recovery at Loulo-Gounkoto.

 

Profit from mining decreased by 4% to $171.0 million from the previous quarter, due to the increase in costs as mentioned above but increased by 14% on the corresponding quarter of the previous year (Q1 2013: $150.4 million), mainly due to the ramp up of production at Kibali.

 

Exploration and corporate expenditure of $10.8 million for the current quarter increased by 27% on the previous quarter due to an increase in corporate staff expenditure, partially offset by a reduction in exploration costs during the quarter. Exploration and corporate expenditure decreased by 17% on the corresponding quarter of 2013 due to lower exploration expenditure.

 

Depreciation and amortisation of $36.6 million increased by 95% against the previous quarter and was down 27% from Q1 2013, following an adjustment in Q4 2013. Traditionally adjustments are made to the depreciation charge at the end of each year to align it with the group's tonnes milled basis, as opposed to the straight line Life of Mine (LOM) base used by the operations during the first three quarters of the year. The tonnes milled basis calculation is now being performed on a quarterly basis, therefore no significant adjustments are expected at year end to align the cumulative quarterly depreciation charge with the tonnes milled policy.

 

Other income of $3.6 million compares to $1.5 million during the prior quarter and to $7.7 million in the corresponding quarter of 2013. Other income includes management fees received from Morila and Kibali. The quarter ended 31 December 2013 also included other expenses of $11.1 million. The movements are also a result of operational exchange gains accounted for in the current quarter compared to exchange losses in the previous quarter arising from the settlement of invoices in currencies other than the US dollar, as well as the translation of balances denominated in currencies such as South African rand, Canadian dollar and the euro to the US dollar rate and reflects movements in these currencies during the quarter.

 

Share of profits from equity joint ventures decreased by $2.3 million from the previous quarter and increased by $18.0 million on the corresponding quarter in 2013. The decrease quarter on quarter is the result of reduced production at Morila during the quarter. The increase from the corresponding quarter in 2013 is due to Kibali starting production in Q4 2013. Share of profits of equity joint ventures include profits from Morila, Kibali and the group's asset leasing joint ventures.

 

Income tax expenses of $22.9 million decreased by 38% quarter on quarter and increased by 510% from the corresponding quarter in 2013. The decrease from the prior quarter was due to deferred tax adjustments made in the previous quarter which relates to the year end depreciation charges as discussed earlier. The increase from the corresponding quarter in 2013 is the result of the end of Gounkoto's corporate tax holiday in June 2013.

 

Basic earnings per share decreased by 9% to $0.80 (Q4 2013: $0.88) and increased by 5% from Q1 2013, following the movements in profit described above.

 

 

 

OPERATIONS

 

 

LOULO-GOUNKOTO COMPLEX

The combined Loulo-Gounkoto gold production for the quarter was 168 752oz (Loulo 92 852oz and Gounkoto 75 900oz), in line with the previous quarter (Q4 2013: 168 965oz). During the quarter 1 104Kt ore tonnes were processed (Q4 2013: 1 113Kt) at a grade of 5.3g/t (Q4 2013: 5.1g/t). However, recoveries decreased to 90.2%, from 92.7% in the previous quarter, due to the higher sulphide content of the ore fed from Yalea.

 

Total cash cost per ounce increased to $649/oz (Q4 2013: $605/oz) mainly due to the decrease in recovery, movements in the gold inventory and an increase in the open pit strip ratio, in line with plan.

 

LOULO-GOUNKOTO COMPLEX RESULTS

 

 

 

$000

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Mining

Tonnes mined (000)

6 780

7 391

10 598

33 188

Ore tonnes mined (000)

1 117

1 157

1 325

5 165

Milling

Tonnes processed (000)

1 104

1 113

1 126

4 463

Head grade milled (g/t)

5.3

5.1

4.1

4.6

Recovery (%)

90.2

92.7

83.3

88.4

Ounces produced

168 752

168 965

125 091

580 364

Ounces sold

165 013

168 965

119 341

587 550

Average price received ($/oz)

1 294

1 274

1 639

1 376

Cash operating costs* ($/oz)

571

528

788

621

Total cash costs* ($/oz)

649

605

886

704

Gold on hand at period end# ($000)

4 831

-

20 675

-

Profit from mining activity* ($000)

106 506

113 078

89 919

394 633

Gold sales* ($000)

213 568

215 218

195 637

808 311

* Refer to explanation of non-GAAP measures provided.

# Gold on hand represents gold in doré at the mines multiplied by the prevailing spot gold price at the end of the period.

 

LOULO

No Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) were recorded during the quarter and the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) decreased from 1.29 in Q4 2013 to zero in Q1 2014.

 

On a standalone basis, Loulo produced 92 852oz of gold (Q4 2013: 89 232oz) at a total cash cost of $685/oz (Q4 2013: $660/oz). The increase in production was due to a 3% increase in tonnes processed together with the increase in the head grade to 5.1g/t, in line with plan, partially offset by lower recoveries from feeding a higher proportion of the Yalea ore. Costs were negatively impacted by movements in the gold inventory. Profit from mining of $55.4 million was up on the previous quarter's $54.8 million, reflecting the increased production and sales, partially offset by higher cost of production.

 

Loulo underground production increased again during Q1, resulting in record production ounces from both Yalea and Gara, having enhanced the Cement Aggregate Fill (CAF) capacity prior to the introduction of the Paste Fill which is expected in the second quarter. Ore tonnes mined increased to 677 392t, a 13% improvement on the previous record quarter of 598 643t.

 

Development metres decreased by 8% from 5 086m in Q4 2013 to 4 744m in Q1 2014, in line with plan to reduce the development profile as the CAF capacity builds up. The development profile and backfill system were optimised to sustain the production profile.

 

LOULO STANDALONE RESULTS

 

 

 

$000

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Mining

Tonnes mined (000)

733

656

2 373

4 251

Ore tonnes mined (000)

677

599

819

2 541

Milling

Tonnes processed (000)

632

613

744

2 432

Head grade milled (g/t)

5.1

4.9

4.4

4.5

Recovery (%)

90.3

92.7

83.3

88.0

Ounces produced

92 852

89 232

87 963

308 420

Ounces sold

90 787

89 232

84 044

312 748

Average price received ($/oz)

1 296

1 274

1 644

1 397

Cash operating costs* ($/oz)

608

584

761

692

Total cash costs* ($/oz)

685

660

860

776

Gold on hand at period end# ($000)

2 668

-

13 188

-

Profit from mining activity* ($000)

55 412

54 781

65 913

194 190

Gold sales* ($000)

117 627

113 648

138 174

436 950

Randgold owns 80% of Loulo and the State of Mali 20%. Randgold has funded the whole investment in Loulo by way of shareholder loans and therefore controls 100% of the cash flows from Loulo until the shareholder loans are repaid. Randgold consolidates 100% of Loulo and shows the non-controlling interest separately.

* Refer to explanation of non-GAAP measures provided.

# Gold on hand represents gold in doré at the mines multiplied by the prevailing spot gold price at the end of the period.

 

Yalea underground mine

During Q1, a total of 2 572m of development was completed and 409 721t of ore at 6.1g/t was hauled to surface. The Yalea project has completed 49 670m of development to date. The Yalea declines have advanced to 3 699m from surface at a vertical depth of 458m.

 

The improvement in total ore tonnes mined was the result of the positive impact of waste filling in the mined out stopes increasing ore handling capacity via the conveyor system, which also resulted in power savings.

 

YALEA UNDERGROUND RESULTS

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Ore tonnes mined

409 721

366 322

279 983

1 353 008

Development metres

2 572

004

2 882

11 847

 

Gara underground mine

During this quarter a total of 2 172m of development and 267 671t at 4.6g/t were hauled to surface. The project has completed 29 514m of development to date. The Gara declines have advanced to 2 937m from surface at a vertical depth of 393m.

 

Record production of 267 671t was achieved during the quarter, an improvement of 15% from 232 321 tonnes in Q4, due to the commissioning of the conveyor system and completion of the stockpiles as well as improvement in ventilation system and increase in backfill capacity.

 

GARA UNDERGROUND RESULTS

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Ore tonnes mined

267 671

232 321

182 930

832 059

Development metres

2 172

2 082

2 761

9 822

 

Loulo mineral resource and reserve update

Mineral resources are in line with last year's numbers. However, reserves decreased due to depletion and changes to the mine plan to ensure profitability at $1 000/oz. This resulted in a reduction of capital development metres and reserves at Gara. The underground mines are now depleting high grade ounces from the reserve inventory but the mine is optimistic that these reserves can be replenished in the coming years.

 

The mineral resource and reserve base for Loulo at the end of 2013, along with a comparison to figures at the end of 2012, is tabulated below:

 

LOULO RESOURCES AND RESERVES

 

Tonnes (Mt)

 

Grade (g/t)

 

Gold (Moz)

Attributable

gold*** 80% (Moz)

at 31 December

Category

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

MINERAL RESOURCES*

Stockpiles

Measured

2.2

1.9

1.9

1.7

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.08

Open pits

Measured

0.5

1.3

2.4

3.1

0.04

0.1

0.03

0.1

Indicated

4.3

4.5

2.9

2.9

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.3

Inferred

6.2

6.2

2.3

2.3

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.4

Underground

Measured

8.7

3.3

4.4

3.9

1.2

0.4

1.0

0.3

Indicated

36

45

5.1

5.1

5.9

7.4

4.7

5.9

Inferred

12

11

4.1

4.0

1.5

1.4

1.2

1.1

Total mineral resources

Measured and indicated

52

56

4.6

4.7

7.7

8.4

6.2

6.8

Inferred

18

17

3.5

3.4

2.0

1.8

1.6

1.4

MINERAL RESERVES**

Stockpiles

Proven

2.2

1.9

1.9

1.7

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.08

Open pits

Proven

-

0.3

-

4.2

-

0.05

-

0.04

Probable

2.9

1.9

2.9

2.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

Underground

Probable

29

36

5.3

5.2

4.9

6.0

3.9

4.8

Total mineral reserves

Proven and probable

34

40

4.9

4.9

5.3

6.3

4.2

5.1

* Open pit mineral resources are the insitu mineral resources falling within the $1 500/oz pit shell reported at an average cut-off of 0.5g/t. Underground mineral resources are those insitu mineral resources of the Yalea and Gara deposits that fall below the design pits and are reported at cut-off of 1.7g/t foYalea and 1.6g/t for GaraMineraresources for Gara and Yalea were generated z Abdoulaye Ngom, 

an officer of the companyunder the supervision of Mr Jonathan Kleynhans, an officer of the company and competent person.

** Open pit mineral reserves are reported at a gold price of $1 000/oz and an average cut-off of 1.1g/t and include dilution and ore loss factors. Open pimineral reserves were calculated by Mr Shaun Gillespie, an independent consultant and competent person.  Underground mineral reserves are reported at agold price of $1 000/oz and a cut-off of 2.5g/t for Yalea underground and 2.4g/t for Gara 

underground, and include dilution and ore loss factorsUnderground mineral reserves were calculated by MAndrew Fox, an 

independent consultant and competent person.

*** Attributable gold (Moz) refers to the quantity attributable to Randgold based on its 80% interest in Loulo.

Mineral resource and mineral reserve numbers are reported as per JORC 2012 and as such are reported to the second significant digit.

See comments and US disclaimer in this report.

 

GOUNKOTO

No LTIs were recorded during the quarter in the line with the previous quarter.

 

On a standalone basis, Gounkoto produced 75 900oz of gold (Q4 2013: 79 733oz) at a total cash cost of $604/oz (Q4 2013: $543/oz). The 5% decrease in ounces produced reflects the company's strategy to increase the feed from Loulo, in line with the mines' respective reserves. The increase in costs mainly reflects an increase in the strip ratio, in line with plan to increase waste mining during the quarter.

 

Profit from mining of $51.1 million for the quarter was lower than the $58.3 million in Q4 2013, as a result of the decrease in ounces produced and higher cost of production.

 

A further dividend of $26.2 million was declared and paid to shareholders in February 2014.

 

GOUNKOTO STANDALONE RESULTS

 

 

 

$000

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Mining

Tonnes mined (000)

6 047

6 735

8 225

28 936

Ore tonnes mined (000)

439

558

506

2 624

Milling

Tonnes processed (000)

473

500

382

2 032

Head grade milled (g/t)

5.5

5.3

3.6

4.7

Recovery (%)

90.0

92.7

83.3

88.8

Ounces produced

75 900

79 733

37 128

271 943

Ounces sold

74 225

79 733

35 297

274 802

Average price received ($/oz)

1 293

1 274

1 628

1 351

Cash operating costs* ($/oz)

527

466

850

541

Total cash costs* ($/oz)

604

543

948

622

Gold on hand at period end# ($000)

2 163

-

7 487

-

Profit from mining activity* ($000)

51 094

58 296

24 006

200 444

Gold sales* ($000)

95 941

101 570

57 463

371 361

Randgold owns 80% of Gounkoto and the State of Mali 20%. Randgold consolidates 100% of Gounkoto and shows the non-controlling interest separately.

* Refer to explanation of non-GAAP measures provided.

# Gold on hand represents gold in doré at the mines multiplied by the prevailing spot gold price at the end of the period.

 

Gounkoto underground project

Drilling continued on the Gounkoto underground project during the quarter, focussed on the MZ3 extension, which is described in detail under the exploration section of this report.

 

Hydrogeological feasibility work continued with analysis of the deep piezometer holes. This has shown that the current pit dewatering system has not impacted the groundwater flow regime beyond the immediate boundary of the open pit. Instead, the relatively large groundwater level fluctuations (between 10m and 20m) are related to seasonal changes in recharge. Drainage of high pressure fractures and fault zones that the mine development will intersect will be a priority. Numerical models are currently being developed to evaluate the underground drainage requirements and quantify the mining induced impacts on the surrounding water flow regime.

 

Mine design continued using the September 2013 block model which was used in the reserve declaration. Comparisons with previous models based on the same cut-off grade and stope geometry parameters, show that there are now low grade areas that exist in the centre of the orebody. These will be used as pillars where appropriate. Overall metal content is similar to the December 2012 model with local variation (level to level). There are some poor ground conditions in the deeper parts of the MZ2 lode associated with a brittle fault, which may result in the loss of ore material and therefore the exploration and geotechnical focus is on the extension to MZ3 where high grade intersections have been returned.

 

The future work programme for the feasibility study include:

§ Update resource model with latest drilling information and drill out MZ3 lode during Q2 2014.

§ Complete open pit underground interface study.

§ Complete trade-off to define higher gold price open pit scenario vs low gold price underground scenario.

§ Progress geotechnical rock mass model to extend and cover MZ3.

§ Generate a 3D hydrological model and integrate with the above mine design to generate pump test rates for the mine scheduled during Q2 2014.

§ Update mining schedule on resource model.

 

Gounkoto mineral resource and reserve update

Mineral resources and reserves have changed due to depletion and changes to the orebody model. Infill grade control drilling has shown that the Gounkoto geology is more complex than originally modelled with the mineralisation comprising of a principal east dipping zone and lower grade footwall mineralisation that dips steeply to the west, resulting in lower grade and tonnage. New data drilled to test this model have recently yielded higher grade intersections with the potential to improve on the current estimates.

 

The mineral resource and reserve base for Gounkoto at the end of 2013, with a comparison to figures at the end of 2012, is tabulated below:

 

GOUNKOTO MINERAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES

 

Tonnes (Mt)

 

Grade (g/t)

 

Gold (Moz)

Attributable

gold*** 80% (Moz)

at 31 December

Category

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

MINERAL RESOURCES*

Stockpiles

Measured

1.5

0.9

2.4

2.1

0.1

0.06

0.09

0.05

Open pits

Measured

3.4

1.2

4.8

2.3

0.5

0.09

0.4

0.07

Indicated

18

20

3.8

4.5

2.2

2.9

1.8

2.3

Measured and indicated

23

22

3.8

4.3

2.9

3.0

2.3

2.4

Inferred

2.7

2.5

3.3

3.1

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

Underground

Indicated

5.1

4.9

6.8

6.9

1.1

1.1

0.9

0.9

Inferred

0.9

1.5

4.9

4.8

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

Total mineral resources

Measured

4.9

2.1

4.1

2.2

0.6

0.1

0.5

0.1

Indicated

23

25

4.4

5.0

3.3

4.0

2.7

3.2

Inferred

3.5

4.0

3.7

3.8

0.4

0.5

0.3

0.4

MINERAL RESERVES**

Stockpiles

Proven

1.5

0.9

2.4

2.1

0.1

0.06

0.09

0.05

Open pits

Proven

0.4

0.9

2.5

2.7

0.03

0.08

0.03

0.06

Probable

15

17

4.5

5.0

2.1

2.6

1.7

2.1

Total mineral

reserves

Proven and probable

17

18

4.3

4.7

2.3

2.8

1.8

2.2

* Open pit mineral resources are the insitu mineral resources falling within the $1 500/oz pit shell reported at a 0.5g/t cut-off. Underground mineral resources are those insitu mineral resources within the Jog Zone below the $1 500/oz pit shell reported at 2.0g/t cut-off. Mineral resources were generated by Mr Abdoulaye Ngom, an officer of the company, under the supervision of Jonathan Kleynhans, an officer of the company and competent person.

** Open pit mineral reserves are reported at a gold price of $1 000/oz and 1.38g/t cut-off and include dilution and ore loss factors. Open pit mineral reserves were calculated by Mr Shaun Gillespie, an officer of the company and competent person.

*** Attributable gold (Moz) refers to the quantity attributable to Randgold based on its 80% interest in Gounkoto.

Mineral resource and mineral reserve numbers are reported as per JORC 2012 and as such are reported to the second significant digit.

See comments and US disclaimer in this report.

 

MORILA

1 LTI was recorded during this quarter compared to zero LTIs during the previous quarter and the LTIFR was 1.55% compared to zero during the previous quarter.

 

During the quarter, 24 631oz of gold were produced, 18% lower than the previous quarter (Q4 2013: 30 008oz), following the decrease in head grade from 1.4g/t to 1.3g/t, and a decrease in throughput from 722kt to 665kt. The main reason for the reduction in throughput is the increase in larger boulders encountered in the marginal ore stockpile and the reduced quantity of finer material encountered in this stockpile. A trommel reject conveyor is currently being installed to feed the pebble crusher with scats in order to increase the throughput rate.

 

Total cash costs of $952/oz was 12% higher than the previous quarter's $851/oz as result of the lower throughput and lower head grade and consequential lower gold production. Profit from mining of $8.7 million was 29% lower than the previous quarter's $12.2 million as a result of the reduced ounces produced and sold.

 

The Pit4S push back project continued during the first quarter with total tonnes mined of 4 430Kt, including 76 674t of ore at 2.4g/t, compared to 3 353Kt of waste material mined in the previous quarter.

 

The agribusiness projects progressed during the quarter as a second batch of rearing chicks were introduced in early February and a far better survival rate was experienced. The 4 Community Out Growers each received 150 Layers in November and December and have to date produced a total of 27 742 eggs.

 

MORILA RESULTS

 

 

 

$000

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Mining

Tonnes mined (000)

4 430

3 545

-

6 803

Ore tonnes mined (000)

77

-

-

-

Milling

Tonnes processed (000)

665

722

1 078

3 576

Head grade milled (g/t)

1.3

1.4

1.2

1.4

Recovery (%)

91.7

91.1

90.2

91.3

Ounces produced

24 631

30 008

38 547

141 822

Ounces sold

24 631

30 387

37 317

141 822

Average price received ($/oz)

1 305

1 252

1 632

1 408

Cash operating costs* ($/oz)

890

776

660

679

Total cash costs* ($/oz)

952

851

758

763

Profit from mining activity* ($000)

8 697

12 196

32 607

91 418

Attributable (40%)

Gold sales* ($000)

12 856

15 222

24 359

79 870

Ounces produced

9 852

12 003

15 419

56 729

Ounces sold

9 852

12 155

14 927

56 729

Gold on hand at period end# ($000)

-

-

786

-

Profit from mining activity* ($000)

3 479

4 878

13 043

36 567

Randgold owns 40% of Morila with the State of Mali and joint venture partner owning 20% and 40% respectively. The group equity accounts for its 40% joint venture holding in Morila.

* Refer to explanation of non-GAAP measures provided.

# Gold on hand represents gold in doré at the mines multiplied by the prevailing spot gold price at the end of the period.

 

Morila mineral resource and reserve update

Mineral resources currently consist of the remaining stockpile material, open pittable ore made available through a pushback in the south of the pit and portion of the Tailings Storage Facility (TSF). The ore reserve consists of marginal stockpiles, open pit material and the higher grade portion of the TSF.

 

The mineral resource and reserve base for Morila at the end of 2013, with a comparison to figures at the end of 2012, is tabulated below:

 

MORILA MINERAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES

 

Tonnes (MT)

 

Grade (g/t)

 

Gold (Moz)

Attributable

gold*** 40% (Moz)

at 31 December

Category

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

MINERAL RESOURCES*

Stockpiles

Measured

0.6

3.9

1.1

1.1

0.02

0.1

0.01

0.06

Inferred

2.1

2.1

0.8

0.8

0.05

0.05

0.02

0.02

TSF

Indicated

15

-

0.5

-

0.2

-

0.1

-

Inferred

9.7

39

0.5

0.4

0.2

0.5

0.06

0.2

Open pit

Indicated

1.0

1.0

3.1

3.1

0.1

0.1

0.04

0.04

Inferred

0.3

0.4

3.8

3.6

0.04

0.04

0.02

0.02

Total mineral resources

Measured andIndicated

16

4.9

0.7

1.6

0.4

0.2

0.1

0.1

Inferred

12

41

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.6

0.1

0.2

MINERAL RESERVES**

Stockpiles

Probable

0.6

3.9

1.0

1.1

0.02

0.1

0.01

0.06

TSF

Probable

13

-

0.5

-

0.2

-

0.09

-

Open pit

Probable

0.9

1.0

2.9

2.9

0.08

0.1

0.03

0.04

Total mineral

reserves

Proven and probable

14

4.9

0.7

1.5

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.09

* Open pit mineral resources are those located within the $1 300/oz pit shell reported at $1 500/oz cut-off of 0.58g/t. Stockpile mineral resources are also reported at a $1 500/oz gold price and reported at a 0.57g/t cut-off. TSF mineral resources are reported at a $1 500/oz gold price and reported at a 0.33g/t cut-off. Open pit mineral resources were generated by Miss Paula Ogilvie, independent consultant, under the supervision of Jonathan Kleynhans, an officer of the company and competent person. TSF mineral resources were generated by BMRE independent consultants, under the supervision of Jonathan Kleynhans, an officer of the company and competent person.

** Open pit mineral reserves are located within the $1 300/oz pit shell, but reported at $1 000/oz cut-off grade of 0.87g/t. Stockpile mineral reserves are reported at a $1 000/oz cut-off grade of 0.85g/t. TSF mineral reserves are reported at a $1 000/oz cut-off grade of 0.50g/t. Mineral reserves were calculated by Mr Shaun Gillespie, an officer of the company and competent person.

*** Attributable gold (Moz) refers to the quantity attributed to Randgold based on its 40% interest in Morila.

Mineral resource and mineral reserves are quoted as per JORC 2012 and thus reported to the second significant digit.

See comments and US disclaimer in this report.

 

TONGON

No LTIs were recorded in Q1. The LTIFR decreased from 0.9 in Q4 2013 to zero in Q1 2014.

 

Tongon produced 54 512oz of gold in Q1 (Q4 2013: 60 819oz) at total cash cost of $958/oz (Q4 2013: $830/oz). The decrease in production is due to a 4% drop in mill throughput and a 8% drop in the head grade milled. Operating costs were mainly impacted by an increase in powerhouse fuel consumption stemming from the failure of the grid power transformer in December 2013 which was subsequently repaired in February. Total cash cost per ounce was also negatively impacted by the drop in the head grade milled.

 

Total tonnes mined increased by 3% while ore tonnes mined decreased by 8% compared to the previous quarter, in line with planned cut-backs and hanging wall waste mining in the Southern Zone pit. The planned ramp-up of mill throughput into 2014 did not occur as a result of repeated mechanical failures of key components of the newly installed Vibrocone crushers. All actions taken to date to engineer out these Vibrocone crusher defects have not resulted in any significant benefit in increasing throughput or quality of the crushed product, as was originally specified and designed. As such the mine and the crusher supplier, Sandvik, have mutually agreed to change out all the existing Vibrocone crushers with conventional Sandvik CH660 cone crushers and to combine the replacement with an upgraded flowsheet, including additional equipment and circuits, to achieve the required capacity. The cost of the change out, removal and circuit modification will be carried out by Sandvik.

 

Profit from mining activity of $18.6 million decreased from the previous quarter's $26.4 million reflecting the decrease in ounces sold andhigher cost of production, partially offset by a 4% higher average gold price received.    

 

TONGON RESULTS

 

 

 

$000

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Mining

Tonnes mined (000)

6 418

6 228

6 845

27 237

Ore tonnes mined (000)

898

977

929

4 081

Milling

Tonnes processed (000)

984

1 021

944

3 866

Head grade milled (g/t)

2.2

2.4

2.5

2.4

Recovery (%)

76.9

76.8

78.2

77.0

Ounces produced

54 512

60 819

58 503

233 591

Ounces sold

54 512

62 444

54 386

236 279

Average price received ($/oz)

1 298

1 253

1 637

1 394

Cash operating costs* ($/oz)

919

792

768

786

Total cash costs* ($/oz)

958

830

817

828

Gold on hand at period end# ($000)

-

-

9 718

-

Profit from mining activity* ($000)

18 567

26 422

44 595

133 907

Gold sales* ($000)

70 770

78 244

89 010

329 448

Randgold owns 89% of Tongon with the State of Côte d'Ivoire and outside shareholders owning 10% and 1% respectively. Randgold has funded the whole investment in Tongon by way of shareholder loans and therefore controls 100% of the cash flows from Tongon until the shareholder loans are repaid. Randgold consolidates 100% of Tongon and shows the non-controlling interest separately.

* Refer to explanation of non-GAAP measures provided.

# Gold on hand represents gold in doré at the mines multiplied by the prevailing spot gold price at the end of the period.

 

Tongon mineral resource and reserve update

Only the SZ geological model was updated in 2013 due to new data from infill grade control drilling, advanced grade control drilling and exploration data, whilst the NZ model remains unchanged from 2011 resource update. Changes to the mineral resource and reserves are due to depletions from mining activities and model changes. Model changes have resulted in a drop in the resource and reserve grades. Grades increase near the base of the pits and drilling is planned to test the extent of this potential.

 

The mineral resource and reserve base for Tongon at the end of 2013, with a comparison to figures at the end of 2012, is tabulated below:

 

TONGON MINERAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES

 

Tonnes (Mt)

 

Grade (g/t)

 

Gold (Moz)

Attributable

gold*** 89% (Moz)

at 31 December

Category

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

MINERAL RESOURCES*

Stockpiles

Measured

3.3

2.5

1.4

1.4

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

Open pits

Measured

5.7

-

2.6

-

0.5

-

0.4

-

Indicated

24

32

2.5

2.7

1.9

2.8

1.7

2.5

Inferred

4.6

3.0

2.6

2.5

0.4

0.2

0.4

0.2

Underground

Indicated

-

0.5

-

2.6

-

0.04

-

-

Inferred

7.5

7.1

2.8

2.8

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.6

Total mineral resources

Measuredand Indicated

33

35

2.4

2.6

2.5

3.0

2.2

2.7

Inferred

12

10

2.7

2.7

1.1

0.9

1.0

0.8

MINERAL RESERVES**

Stockpiles

Proven

3.3

2.5

1.4

1.4

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

Open pits

Probable

28

31

2.3

2.5

2.1

2.5

1.8

2.2

Total mineral reserves

Proven and probable

31

34

2.2

2.4

2.2

2.6

2.0

2.4

* Open pit mineral resources are the insitu mineral resources falling within the $1 500/oz pit shell reported at a 0.5g/t cut-off. Underground mineral resources are those insitu mineral resources below the NZ $1 500/oz pit shell reported at a 2.0g/t cut-off. Mineral resources were generated by Mr Babacar Diouf (NZ) and Mr Simon Bottoms (SZ), both officers of the company, and supervised by Mr Jonathan Kleynhans, an officer of the company and competent person.

** Open pit mineral reserves ore reported at a gold price of $1 000/oz and 0.84glt cut off and include dilution and ore loss factors. Open pit mineral reserves were calculated by Mr Shaun Gillespie, an officer of the company and competent person.

*** Attributable gold (Moz) refers to the quantity attributed to Randgold based on its 89% interest in Tongon SA.

Mineral resource and reserve numbers are reported as per JORC 2012 and as such reported to the second significant digit.

See comments and US disclaimer in this report.

 

KIBALI 

1 LTI was recorded during the quarter compared to 2 in the previous quarter and the LTIFR decreased from 0.43 in Q4 2013 to 0.28 in Q1 2014.

 

Kibali made good progress with the construction and commissioning of the second (sulphide) metallurgical mill stream and exceeded the gold production target for the quarter. Kibali produced 112 549oz during Q1, an increase of 28% on the previous quarter. Tonnes processed increased by 54% as the second sulphide mill stream was brought online. The head grade milled decreased by 11% to 3.3g/t, in line with plan while recoveries were down as a result of the second mill stream commissioning activity which together with the lower head grade impacted on total cash cost, which increased by 14% to $530/oz (Q4 2013: $464/oz).

 

Notwithstanding the increase in total cash costs, profit from the mining activity increased by 26% to $86.3 million following the increase in gold production and higher average gold price received.

 

KIBALI RESULTS

 

 

 

$000

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Mining

Tonnes mined (000)

7 327

6 325

5 096

25 004

Ore tonnes mined (000)

1 380

1 178

1 040

4 335

Milling

Tonnes processed (000)

1 244

808

-

808

Head grade milled (g/t)

3.3

3.7

-

3.7

Recovery (%)

85.7

91.3

-

91.3

Ounces produced

112 549

88 200

-

88 200

Ounces sold

112 549

88 200

-

88 200

Average price received ($/oz)

1 297

1 238

-

1 238

Cash operating costs* ($/oz)

494

433

-

433

Total cash costs* ($/oz)

530

464

-

464

Profit from mining activity* ($000)

86 331

68 282

-

68 282

Attributable (45%)

Gold sales* ($000)

65 713

49 153

-

49 153

Ounces produced

50 647

39 690

-

39 690

Ounces sold

50 647

39 690

-

39 690

Profit from mining activity* ($000)

38 849

30 727

-

30 727

Randgold owns 45% of Kibali with the DRC government and joint venture partner owning 10% and 45% respectively. The group equity accounts for its 45% joint venture holding in Kibali.

* Refer to explanation of non-GAAP measures provided.

 

Construction of the metallurgical facility and infrastructure

The construction and commissioning of the metallurgical facility and infrastructure remained on plan. The secondary crushing, flotation and concentrate handling facility in respect of the sulphide circuit was handed over from construction for commissioning at the end of Q1.

 

Work on the Nzoro 2 hydro electrical facility continued and commissioning of the system including the electrical distribution and protection systems will commence at the beginning of Q2 2014.

 

Construction of the underground mine

Vertical shaft system

By the end of Q1 the main sink passed the halfway mark and reached a depth of 417 vertical metres with a quarterly performance of 221m, slightly ahead of plan.

 

KIBALI VERTICAL SHAFT RESULTS

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Vertical metres

221

93

-

195

 

Decline shaft system

During the quarter, the decline shaft system again advanced at a rate ahead of the target. An advance of some 1 658m was achieved during the quarter which brings the total decline development since the programme started to 5 605m.

 

Priority during the quarter was given to a third access to the 5000 lode as well as the main ventilation system which will enable Kibali to start with ore drive development at the beginning of 2014. The new mine schedule is expected to enable first ore stoping to commence at the end of Q4 2014, with the first raisebore and paste plant construction on schedule to support this activity. The mining of the two main substations in C and B1 decline was completed during the quarter and the main pump station was accessed.

 

KIBALI UNDERGROUND DECLINE RESULTS

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Ore tonnes mined

2 350

-

-

-

Development metres

1 658

1 367

493

3 947

 

Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)

The construction of the Roman Catholic Complex neared completion at the end of Q1 with the steel roof structure of the church being lifted into place. The church building is expected to be completed by the middle of Q2 2014 which will bring to an end the construction phase of the RAP programme.

 

The community grievance system is operating effectively and an elected Community Forum is in place and functioning.

 

Capital expenditure

The capital expenditure for the quarter amounted to $107.9 million. The capital estimate for phases 1 and 2 of the project has been updated and is now estimated at $1.81 billion, excluding pre-production mining expenses (previously estimated at $1.77 billion).

 

Kibali mineral resource and reserve update

Mineral resources increased to 22Moz due to extensions of KCD open pit and underground mineral resources as well as significant increase in Gorumbwa inferred open pit mineral resources. This is after the removal of the Kibali South inferred deposit and depletions from mining activities. Open pit mineral reserves are in line with last year after depletion. Underground mineral reserves have increased to 8Moz due to the increase in the resource as well optimisation of the mine design thereby reducing costs.

 

The mineral resource and reserve base for Kibali at the end of 2013, with a comparison to figures at the end of 2012, is tabulated below:

 

KIBALI MINERAL RESOURCES AND ORE RESERVES

 

Tonnes (Mt)

 

Grade (g/t)

 

Gold (Moz)

Attributable gold*** 45% (Moz)

at 31 December

Category

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

MINERAL RESOURCES*

Stockpiles

Measured

3.6

0.07

2.2

2.2

0.2

0.01

0.1

0.002

Open pits

Measured

2.3

4.3

2.4

3.0

0.2

0.4

0.08

0.2

Indicated

81

76

2.1

2.1

5.4

5.2

2.4

2.4

Inferred

29

38

2.3

1.9

2.1

2.4

1.0

1.1

Underground

Indicated

68

54

5.2

5.4

11

9.4

5.1

4.2

Inferred

31

17

3.1

2.8

3.1

1.5

1.4

0.7

Total mineral resources

Measured and indicated

154

135

3.5

3.5

17

15

7.7

6.8

Inferred

60

55

2.7

2.2

5.2

3.9

2.3

1.8

MINERAL RESERVES**

Stockpiles

Proven

3.6

0.07

2.2

2.2

0.2

0.01

0.1

0.002

Open pits

Proven

1.9

3.5

2.5

3.3

0.2

0.4

0.07

0.2

Probable

40

41

2.5

2.5

3.2

3.3

1.4

1.5

Underground

Probable

44

39

5.7

5.8

8.0

7.2

3.6

3.2

Total mineral reserves

Proven and probable

89

83

4.0

4.1

12

11

5.2

4.9

* Open pit mineral resources are the insitu mineral resources falling within the $1 500/oz pit shell reported at a cut-off of 0.5g/t. Underground mineral resources are those insitu mineral resources at the KCD deposit that fall below the 5 685m RL elevation, reported at a cut-off of 1.5g/t. Mineral resources were generated by Mr Ernest Doh, an officer of the company and competent person.

** Open pit mineral reserves are reported at a gold price of $1 000/oz and an average cut-off of 0.9g/t and include dilution and ore loss factors. Open pit mineral reserves were calculated by Mr Nicholas Coomson, an officer of the company and a competent person. Underground mineral reserves are reported at a gold price of $1 000/oz and a cut-off of 2.4g/t and include dilution and ore loss factors. Underground mineral reserves were calculated by Mr Tim Peters, an independent consultant and a competent person.

*** Attributable gold (Moz) refers to the quantity attributable to Randgold based on its 45% interest in the Kibali gold mine.

Mineral resource and mineral reserves are quoted as per JORC 2012 guidelines and thus reported to the second significant digit.

See comments and US disclaimer in this report.

 

 

 

EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES

 

 

Q1 has seen the implementation of an exploration strategy based on 2 key components: reserve growth and a new discovery.

 

The current reserves, which are drilled out and banked at gold price of $1 000/oz support the group's growing production profile and rolling 5 year mine plan. In order to maintain that plan and extend it to a 10 year plan there are key gaps that need to be addressed through the addition of reserves, focused on the following targets:

§ Conversion of 1Moz at +5g/t from the Gounkoto Jog Zone underground project;

§ Conversion of 0.6Moz at +5g/t of inferred ounces at Yalea underground;

§ Conversion of 0.23Moz at +5g/t of inferred ounces at Gara underground;

§ Conversion of 0.35Moz at +3g/t of inferred ounces at Gorumbwa open pit (Kibali); and

§ The evaluation of low grade satellite ounces to the Tongon plant and integration into the mine plan.

 

In order to improve the opportunity to discover a new world class gold deposit, a critical review of the resource triangle was undertaken and dormant targets, as well as targets that have been in the triangle for more than 2 years, were rejected. This has had the effect of reducing the total number of targets by 45 to 115. Key to effecting this strategy is the acceleration in the turnover of targets within the triangle and the replenishment of permits.

 

Key areas of focus for a new discovery are:

§ Ivory Coast;

§ The Loulo district and Senegal-Mali shear zone including the Bakolobi joint venture and the new Legend joint venture;

§ Northeast DRC including both Kibali and the Kilogold joint venture; and

§ Senegal both within our permit holding on the Mako Belt and Bambadji on the Senegal-Mali shear zone adjacent to the Loulo District.

 

MALI

Gounkoto

At Gounkoto, an extensive drill programme has been completed around the deposit with holes testing deep targets in the footwall, down plunge to the south and below the pit on Main Zone 1. Work has continued to define MZ4 and explore its relationship with P64 which has resulted in a new geological model for Gounkoto combining all zones of mineralisation as well as P64, this will result in a new pit optimisation due for completion in Q2. Work continues to explore the northern extensions of the Gounkoto system. In the Jog Zone, work has focused on MZ3 where drilling has confirmed the extension of high grade mineralisation at depth to the north of the existing underground project. Hole 402 intersected 20.6m at 5.21g/t from 535m (including 2.9m at 9.71g/t and 5m at 11.49g/t). This opens up a large area of potential due to the wide spacing of existing drilling and rigs are now infilling this target. Hole 406 designed to test the extension of a south plunge to high grade mineralisation in MZ1 to the south of the deposit returned 2.95m at 2.19g/t from 409m and indicates the structure narrows to the south with less dilation and mineralisation.

 

Exploration across the Gounkoto lease has been accelerated and new targets have been generated for testing in Q2. Results from the four targets tested in Q1: Sahnou, Djiguibah, Findogoleh and Sanou NW, did not meet expectations and have been rejected from the resource triangle. New high grade results have been returned from Toronto Gap (33g/t and 7g/t) and Bandankoto NW (24g/t).

 

Loulo

Exploration work at Loulo has been on the evaluation of identified targets within the permit as well as defining drill programmes to convert resources to reserve at both Gara and Yalea. Work on the Gara South and Yalea Ridge South targets this quarter has determined that both targets have limited potential to add significant ounces to the project with only limited surface exposure to mineralisation and no further work will be completed. A new target named Waraba has returned encouraging results from shear hosted mineralisation over a 400m strike in an area of artisanal mining, although it has a narrow width at surface (

 

A 380 line kilometre induced polarisation (IP) geophysical survey is underway in the northern half of the Loulo permit to provide a new layer of data to aid in mapping the underlying geology as well as the generation of new targets in an area that is underexplored.

 

 

Underground exploration

Yalea

A total of 37 diamond holes for 3 610m were drilled at Yalea during the quarter and three key areas were tested:

§ The low grade zone to the north of the Purple Patch in order to test a probable extension of the high grade. The results return grade higher than the block model above the underground cut off and therefore represents an opportunity to provide additional mining blocks. The weighted average intersection of the boreholes returned 28.4m at 3.92g/t versus the block model of 16.3m at 2.73g/t.

§ To test the narrowing of the Purple Patch between the 258L and 283L. The results confirm that the orebody narrows from the currently modelled 8.5m to 2.1m however the grade has increased from 8.5g/t to 19.2g/t. The thinning is due to the hangingwall and footwall structures pinching together and will result in a new mine design for this area.

§ A gap in the drill coverage in the southern part of the Purple Patch close to an EW Fault. The results confirm the orebody is narrower than currently modelled in close proximity to the fault 1.4m versus 6.2m but with a corresponding grade increase from 8g/t to 10.5g/t. This will result to a new mine design for these blocks.

 

One of the main strategies at Yalea is the conversion of inferred resources to the indicated category and ultimately reserves. There are currently 0.6Moz at 6g/t categorised as inferred at depth, below the Purple Patch. There are additional opportunities in the south of the deposit to increase the grade in an area of poor drill coverage and where ground conditions are poor with strong weathering on the hangingwall structure. A total of 8 980m of drilling has been designed and the programme commenced by quarter end.

 

Gara

At Gara, a total of 34 holes for 3 239m were drilled during the quarter. Results from Gara North marginal ore returned a narrower intersection but higher grade compared to the model: 11m at 3.17g/t versus 13.45m at 2.92g/t and offer an opportunity to identify additional mining blocks.

 

Similar to Yalea one of the key strategies at Gara is to convert inferred ounces to indicated and ultimately reserves, this amounts to 0.23Moz at 5.9g/t. 7 holes out of a total of 9 holes have been completed and have returned encouraging results with a weighted average intersection of 4.8m at 9.01g/t versus the block model of 8.25m at 5.12g/t. Mineralisation is associated with the hinge of a south plunging anticline, strongly disseminated pyrite and quartz carbonate veining of the quartz tourmaline host rock. High grade mineralisation is open down plunge and additional drill holes have been planned as further follow up. Individual drill results include: LOCP161: 4.7m at 7.71g/t from 332.7m, LOCP162: 4.1m at 22.00g/t from 473.10m and LOCP165: 4.65m at 17.83g/t from 465.85m.

 

Bakolobi (Taurus JV)

A 236km gradient array induced polarisation (IP) and resistivity, as well as ground magnetic survey has been completed across the northern part of the permit. This together with a detailed soil sampling survey identified eleven targets for follow-up, located within the main N-S trending structural corridor which hosts both the Fekola deposit (Papillon) to the south and Gounkoto to the north.

 

Work on the main Bakolobi target includes a resampling of old trenches: 27m at 2.23g/t including 9m at 5.67g/t in quartzite, and 10.4m at 1.98g/t including 4.4m at 4.25g/t in porphyry. Auger holes returned BaA221: 15m at 1.28g/t and BaA228: 22m at 2.34g/t in quartzites with silica and albite alteration. A drill motivation for 10 000m of RC drilling is in progress as per the terms of the joint venture agreement to test the priority targets in Q2.

 

Mali West

As part of our long term strategy in Western Mali we signed a new JV agreement with Legend Gold. Legend Gold which holds the rights to a portfolio of permits which straddle the highly prospective Senegal-Mali shear zone, directly south of the Sadiola gold mine, and which remain under explored. Randgold will fully fund exploration to completion of a prefeasibility study to acquire a 51% interest in the project. Legend has the option to co-fund the feasibility study to retain 49% or dilute to 35% with Randgold increasing its stake to 65%. Both parties fund development.

 

We have received a comprehensive dataset from Legend over the portfolio of permits including: airborne electromagnetic and magnetic data, geology, regolith, soil geochemistry, drilling (auger, RAB, RC and diamond), pitting and trenching. The results highlight anomalism coincident with the Senegal-Mali shear zone. The aim of the first phase of work is to integrate the various data layers and field mapping to enable a target generation exercise to prioritise targets for follow-up work. Randgold geologists have been mobilised to the project area to commence fieldwork. 

 

SENEGAL

Massawa

Geological studies continued at Massawa to refine models for the deposit following a surface trenching program in Q1. The current model for the Central Zone is one of broad envelopes of gold mineralisation. The work including grade control orientation studies, trenching and relogging of core is highlighting the potential for multiple narrow high grade lodes, which would result in a reduction in tonnes but a significant increase in grade. This will be captured in a new model and open pit and underground scenarios will also be tested. A recent trench excavated parallel to one of the high grade lodes (Ore Zone 5) to evaluate the continuity and grade distribution along the strike of the lode returned 49m at 42g/t, confirming the high grade, although the results were nuggety in nature with some values exceeding 1 000g/t.

 

The modelling of 4 satellite deposits (Sofia, Bambara, Tina and Delya) has returned inferred resources of 0.92Moz at 1.74g/t. There are 2 further satellite targets, namely Kawsara and Tombo with a combined geological potential of 1.9Moz at 0.7g/t. Additional exploration work continues to review all data layers and identify new targets and 'gap areas' to test. Results from the TKN target reveal the ocean floor basalt sequence to have highly anomalous back ground levels of gold but no economic source.

 

The mineral resources have increased due to the inclusion of satellite open pit inferred mineral resource deposits. The mineral reserves have stayed the same as the December 2010 declaration.

 

The mineral resource and reserve base for Massawa at the end of 2013, with a comparison to figures at the end of 2012, is tabulated below:

 

MASSAWA MINERAL RESOURCES AND ORE RESERVES

 

Tonnes (Mt)

 

Grade (g/t)

 

Gold (Moz)

Attributable gold*** 83% (Moz)

at 31 December

Category

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

MINERAL RESOURCES*

Open pits

Measured

0.2

-

5.1

-

0.2

-

0.03

-

Indicated

35

37

2.6

2.7

2.9

3.2

2.4

2.6

Inferred

22

1.2

1.9

3.3

1.3

0.1

1.1

0.1

Underground

Inferred

2.5

2.2

4.4

4.2

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.2

Total mineral resources

Measured and

Indicated

35

37

2.6

2.7

3.0

3.2

2.5

2.6

Inferred

24

3.4

2.1

3.9

1.7

0.4

1.4

0.4

MINERAL RESERVES**

Open pits

Probable

21

21

3.1

3.1

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.7

Total mineral reserves

Proven and probable

21

21

3.1

3.1

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.7

* Open pit mineral resources are the insitu mineral resources falling within the $1 500/oz pit shell reported at a cut-off of 0.5g/t. Underground mineral resources are those insitu mineral resources below the $1500/oz pit shell of the North 2 deposit reported at a 2.0g/t cut-off. Mineral resources were generated by Mr Babacar Diouf (CZ) and Mr Simon Bottoms (NZ and satellites) both officers of the company under the supervision of Jonathan Kleynhans an officer of the company and competent person

** Open pit mineral reserves are reported at a gold price of $1000/oz and 1.1g/t cut-off and include dilution and ore loss factors. Open pit mineral reserves were generated by Shaun Gillespie an officer of the company and competent person.

*** Attributable gold (Moz) refers to the quantity attributable to Randgold based on its 83% interest in the Massawa project.

Mineral resource and mineral reserves are quoted as per JORC 2012 guidelines and thus reported to the second significant digit.

See comments and US disclaimer in this report.

 

Bambadji

All historical exploration data covering the Bambadji permit was collated and reanalysed. In conclusion there are twelve second and third order soil anomalies which have received no follow-up work but locate within favourable geological and structural settings, however the regolith is complex with transported cover.

 

COTE D'IVOIRE

Throughout this quarter, exploration activities across the permits have focussed on a re-evaluation of the low grade mineralisation adjacent to the Tongon plant and accelerating field programmes designed on priority targets.

 

The Tongon mine is a low grade bulk mineable operation and within a 10km radius of the plant there are four targets with a combined geological estimate of 0.4Moz at 1.44g/t. These targets are being re-evaluated with updated geological models and drill programmes are being designed to add them to the future mine plan.

 

Results from both the Diaouala and Boundiali permits have failed to return results to support further work at this time.

 

Mankono permit

Significant progress was made on the geological understanding of the permit through regional mapping in the northern half of the permit and data compilation from regional pitting programmes in the south where outcrops are very rare. This work has demonstrated the existence of a wide sedimentary sequence in contact with volcanic units. Sediments are composed of feldspar-rich greywacke, fine grained siltstone, argillite and a large polymictic conglomerate units; the sedimentary sequence is folded as attested to by younging directions from cross bedding as well as repetition of the different lithologies. These sediments may represent a younger formation comparable to the Tarkwaian.

 

This volcanic and sedimentary package is intruded by mafic, tonalite and granite intrusions. Late diorite, quartz feldspar porphyries and felsic dykes are also mapped. Quartz with tourmaline veins occur associated with quartz-feldspar porphyry dykes along the fold axis of the folded sediments.

 

An infill soil sampling program has been completed on the area termed as Priority 1, which is a +21km long regional soil anomaly. Results so far have not only confirmed the regional trend returning a +15k long corridor with a series of significant anomalies of +50 ppb containing very high values of up to 4g/t; 2.25g/t, 1.46g/t and 1.0g/t. The anomalies are structurally controlled by NE and NS regional structures and are located on residual regolith. Furthermore, soil anomalies coincide with a significant geophysical anomaly at the contact between volcanic and sedimentary rocks. 5 individual targets have been generated and follow up work including pitting and trenching has commenced.

 

Fapoha permit

The geological interpretation completed for the entire permit has revealed a major sheared contact between volcanics and sediments. Volcanics are composed of andesite, tuffs and basalts, whereas sediments are identified as greywacke and argillite. Both volcanics and sediments are intruded by granodiorite, gabbros and late granites. The regional soil sampling programme defined numerous significant soil anomalies extending over +15km principally located along this major lithological boundary. Field traverses have validated the soil anomalies and confirmed an insitu nature. An intensive lithosampling programme has been completed over the anomalies where outcrop was present. 101 lithosamples were collected on chert, argillite, brecciated quartzite, gossan, and felsic intrusive, associated with shearing, folding and common disseminated pyrite. Results are pending. Infill soil sampling has commenced in the southern part of the permit where 4 targets are prioritised around a granodiorite intrusion, with a setting similar to the Tongon deposits.

 

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO

Kibali

At Kibali, we continue to build our knowledge of the geology, styles of mineralisation and structural controls on the mineral inventory. Kibali is a long life mine with over 10 years of reserve already banked and this knowledge building will help drive future resource conversion as well as new discoveries. The main focus in Q1 has been on the conversion of inferred resources at Gorumbwa and the evaluation of identified targets: Memekazi and Aindi Watsa.

 

Gorumbwa

Gorumbwa was mined open pit and underground via shaft access in the early 1950s and at times in the 1990s. The mine has since been inactive, and flooded. Resource conversion drilling of 32 holes for a total of 6 368m commenced and was completed during the quarter. Gorumbwa has an inferred resource of 7.82Mt at 3.66g/t Au for 0.92Moz within the $1 500/oz gold price pit shell. Drilling objectives were to convert approximately 0.37Moz within the $1 000/oz reserve pit shell.

 

Assay results for six holes have been received. Drill hole intersections were compared against the current block model for the deposit. The results show considerable variation to the current model with multiple intersections outside of the model as well as significant visible gold in the footwall of the deposit which has not been previously modelled however gold assay results are pending for these holes. Once all the results are returned a new model and optimisation will be completed.

 

GORUMBWA DRILL RESULTS RECEIVED IN Q1 2014

Borehole ID

From

(m)

To

(m)

Width

(m)

True width

(m)

Grade

(Au g/t)

Including

GDD044

90.0

110.0

20.0

19.4

3.66

5.5m at 7.6g/t from 104.45m

GDD045

22.0

30.0

8.0

7.85

1.96

43.5

55.0

11.5

11.27

0.85

97.0

109.0

12.0

11.78

4.17

2m at 16.7g/t from 107m

132.0

134.0

2.0

1.96

1.68

GDD046

100.0

102.0

2.0

1.95

1.97

110.0

113.9

3.9

3.8

1.90

132.0

145.5

13.5

13.26

3.95

6m at 6.92g/t from 134m

GDD047

0.0

4.0

4.0

3.95

3.32

75.0

77.0

2.0

1.98

2.23

92.0

96.0

4.0

3.95

3.05

1m at 7.96g/t from 95m

105.0

108.5

3.5

3.46

1.89

141.0

154.0

13.0

12.93

5.00

2m at 21.6g/t from 143m

GDD048

196.0

220.8

24.8

24

3.24

14.5m at 6.77g/t from 198m

224.0

242.3

18.3

17.67

1.56

1m at 14g/t from 239m

GDD050

223.9

258.8

34.9

34.02

4.10

10m at 9.25g/t from 223m

262.8

279.0

16.2

15.76

1.20

 

Memekazi Target

Memekazi is located approximately 1.8km southeast of the plant. It is a 400m long, east-northeast trending low ridge with coincident artisanal miner pits, anomalous gold-in-soil values and anomalous drill intersections from shallow (20m deep) scout RC drilling. Memekazi ridge is the western portion of a larger 2 500m by 1 000m trending gold-in-soil anomaly that extends out towards Renzi village in the east. Pit sampling has returned encouraging results including: 6.83g/t, 3.61g/t, 4.06g/t, 1.85g/t and 2.08g/t from silicified sericitic schist with sugary quartz or brecciated chert. A trenching programme is currently underway prior to RC drilling in planned for the next phase.

 

Aindi Watsa

The target is 6km to the southwest of the Kibali plant. Reviews of airborne magnetic and electromagnetic data indicate the target locates on a NE trending structure with a subtle kink. Regional scale soil samples highlight a 3km by 400m trending gold-in-soil anomaly (40ppb contour). Reconnaissance work commenced late in Q1 with infill soil sampling, trenching and pitting programmes.

 

Kilo joint venture

Regional soil sampling has progressed over the Isiro belt and is expected to finish within a month. So far results from Block 1 are weak, highlighting several incoherent line anomalies, however the values increase towards the SE of Block 1 returning a maximum of 130ppb. Block 2 shows similar incoherent line anomalies and with what appears to be increasing anomalism towards the NW of the grid. The maximum value of Block 2 is 130ppb.

 

On the Ngayu Belt detailed fact mapping and geological interpretation has progressed on the main Yambenda target. The 10km gold-in-soil anomaly appears to be spatially associated with steeply dipping outcrops of banded iron formation and has a coincident arsenic anomaly. Infill soil sampling and follow-up work including pitting and trenching will take place in Q2.

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

$000

Unaudited

quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Unaudited

quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Unaudited

quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

Audited

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

REVENUES

Gold sales on spot

284 350

291 794

284 687

1 137 690

Total revenues

284 350

291 794

284 687

1 137 690

Other income

3 632

1 544

7 682

6 028

Total income

287 982

293 338

292 369

1 143 718

COST AND EXPENSES

Mine production costs

130 543

134 468

136 129

536 229

Movement in production inventory and ore stockpiles

(2 854)

(10 095)

(18 492)

(49 730)

Depreciation and amortisation

36 605

18 766

49 845

130 638

Other mining and processing costs

15 970

12 186

17 577

61 319

 

Mining and processing costs

180 264

155 325

185 059

678 456

Transport and refining costs

706

657

578

2 663

Royalties

14 912

15 237

14 397

58 415

Exploration and corporate expenditure

10 829

8 538

12 985

49 485

Other expenses

-

11 071

-

-

Total costs

206 711

190 828

213 019

789 019

Finance income

204

(35)

486

1 242

Finance costs

(353)

(1 930)

(3 408)

(7 737)

 

Finance income/(costs) - net

(149)

(1 965)

(2 922)

(6 495)

Share of profits of equity accounted joint ventures

26 930

29 182

8 947

54 257

Profit before income tax

108 052

129 727

85 375

402 461

Income tax expense

(22 933)

(37 281)

(3 760)

(76 714)

Profit for the period

85 119

92 446

81 615

325 747

Other comprehensive income

Gain/(loss) on available-for-sale financial assets

605

495

(884)

(1 173)

Share of equity accounted joint ventures other comprehensive gain/(loss)

709

(42)

(164)

(400)

Total other comprehensive income/(expense)

1 314

453

(1 048)

(1 573)

Total comprehensive income

86 433

92 899

80 567

324 174

Profit attributable to:

Owners of the parent

74 340

81 101

69 648

278 382

Non-controlling interests

10 779

11 345

11 967

47 365

85 119

92 446

81 615

325 747

Total comprehensive income attributable to:

Owners of the parent

75 654

81 554

68 600

276 809

Non-controlling interests

10 779

11 345

11 967

47 365

86 433

92 899

80 567

324 174

Basic earnings per share ($)

0.80

0.88

0.76

3.02

Diluted earnings per share ($)

0.79

0.87

0.75

2.98

Average shares in issue (000)

92 504

92 243

92 191

92 213

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

 

$000

Unaudited

at

31 Mar

2014

Audited

at

31 Dec

2013

Unaudited

at

31 Mar

2013

Assets

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment

1 459 095

1 457 500

1 313 670

Cost

1 924 254

1 886 054

1 661 431

Accumulated depreciation and amortisations

(465 159)

(428 554)

(347 761)

Deferred tax

1 294

1 294

1 970

Long-term ore stockpiles

143 852

142 010

-

Trade and other receivables

50 700

49 023

-

Investments in equity accounted joint ventures

1 332 059

1 267 776

950 243

Other investments in joint ventures

50 198

52 459

45 015

 

Total investments in joint ventures

1 382 257

1 320 235

995 258

Total non-current assets

3 037 198

2 970 062

2 310 898

Current assets

Inventories and ore stockpiles

174 584

180 415

298 617

Trade and other receivables

210 756

186 054

219 628

Cash and cash equivalents

11 319

38 151

250 210

Available-for-sale financial assets

2 435

1 831

2 119

Total current assets

399 094

406 451

770 574

Total assets

3 436 292

3 376 513

3 081 472

Equity attributable to owners of the parent

2 963 979

2 879 041

2 695 747

Non-controlling interests

184 348

178 813

157 604

Total equity

3 148 327

3 057 854

2 853 351

Non-current liabilities

Loans from minority shareholders

2 766

2 929

3 151

Deferred tax

28 458

28 458

23 671

Provision for rehabilitation

49 177

49 177

52 575

Total non-current liabilities

80 401

80 564

79 397

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables

126 510

174 445

133 973

Current tax payable

81 054

63 650

14 751

Total current liabilities

207 564

238 095

148 724

Total equity and liabilities

3 436 292

3 376 513

3 081 472

These results are presented as the first quarter ended 31 March 2014. They have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRS) on a basis that is consistent with the accounting policies applied by the group in its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2013, and which will form the basis of the 2014 annual report. No new or amended accounting standards effective for 2013 have had a significant impact on the group. This announcement has been prepared in compliance with IAS 34 - Interim Financial Reporting. These results do not include all the notes of the type normally included in an annual financial report. Accordingly, this condensed report is to be read in conjunction with the annual report for the year 31 December 2013, and any public announcements made by the group during the reporting period. While the information included in this announcement has been prepared in accordance with the recognition and measurement criteria of IFRS, this announcement does not itself contain sufficient information to comply with IFRS. The auditors' report for the year ended 31 December 2013 was unqualified and did not include references to any matters which the auditor drew attention to by way of emphasis without qualifying their report.

 

Property, plant and equipment costs increased by $38.2 million for the quarter ended 31 March 2014. This can be mainly attributed to capital expenditure on decline developments at the Yalea and Gara underground mines at Loulo, as well as the backfill project.

 

The group's capital commitments (including its share of equity accounted joint ventures) at 31 March 2014 amounted to $78.1 million with the majority relating to Kibali ($42.7 million) and the Loulo-Gounkoto complex ($31.8 million).

 

The long term ore stockpiles balance of $143.9 million relates to the portion of ore stockpiles at Loulo, Gounkoto and Tongon expected to be processed after more than one year, in line with the respective life of mine plans.

 

Investments in equity accounted joint ventures reflect the group's share of its equity accounted investments, mainly at Kibali as well as Morila and the group's asset leasing joint ventures. Other investments in joint ventures reflect the group's loans advanced to RAL 1 Limited, one of the group's asset leasing joint ventures. The total investment in joint ventures primarily represents the original cost of acquiring Kibali, subsequent funding of the Kibali capital expenditure and the group's interest in leasing assets. The increase of $62.1 million in total investment in joint ventures mainly reflects funds advanced to Kibali during the quarter ($36.6 million), as well as the group's profit share from equity accounted joint ventures ($26.9 million), partially offset by a repayment received from RAL 1 ($2.2 million).

 

Inventories and ore stockpiles (including the allocation of a portion to non-current) of $318.4 million are in line with the balance at year-end of $322.4 million.

 

Trade and other receivables (including the allocation of a portion to non-current) at 31 March 2014, increased by 11% quarter on quarter. This is mainly the result of increases in gold debtor balances at Loulo and Tongon due to the timing of shipments, as well as increases in contractor advances at Loulo.

 

The total outstanding refundable VAT balances in Mali amount to $129.1 million (31 December 2013: $129.0 million) (including 100% of the Loulo and Gounkoto VAT receivables and the attributable portion of the Morila VAT receivable). Morila, Loulo and Gounkoto have the legal right under the terms of their respective mining conventions to offset other taxes payable to the Malian State against these refundable VAT balances. Management continues to pursue cash settlement of these VAT balances. The portion of the outstanding VAT balances which is not expected to be recovered within a one year time frame, amounting to $50.7 million, and is shown in the long term debtors. The group's share of the VAT balance at Kibali amounted to $45.8 million (31 December 2013: $36.4 million). The Morila and Kibali VAT balances are included in the group's investment in joint venture line.

 

The group had received claims for various taxes from the State of Mali totalling $123.0 million (31 December 2013: $123.0 million), in respect of the Loulo, Gounkoto and Morila mines and the Kankou Moussa gold sales operation. Having taken professional advice, the group considers the claimsto be wholly without merit or foundation and is strongly defending its position, including following the appropriate legal process for disputes within Mali. Accordingly, no provision has been made for the material claims. Loulo, Gounkoto and Morila have legally binding mining conventions which guarantee fiscal stability, govern the taxes applicable to the companies and allow for international arbitration in the event a dispute cannot be resolved in the country. Management continues to engage with the Malian authorities at the highest level to resolve this issue. During the prior year, Loulo submitted a request for arbitration at the International Court of the Settlement of Investment Disputes against the State of Mali in relation to certain of the disputed tax claims. The appointment of arbitrators has been finalised and the first procedural hearing took place during February 2014, although the outcome of this process is not expected to be concluded until 2015.

 

The decrease in cash of $26.8 million since 31 December 2013 largely reflects the group's continued investment in capital expenditure in its subsidiaries ($38.2 million), additional investments in joint ventures to fund capital expenditure ($36.6 million), especially at Kibali, as well as the State of Mali's portion of the Gounkoto dividends ($5.2 million) which were paid during the quarter. This was partially offset by strong operational cashflows ($49.8 million).

 

The company has access to a $200.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with HSBC and three other banks which matures in May 2016 and is at present undrawn. Based on the company's current cash resources and facilities, projected operating cash flows and capital expenditure, the company is confident it will be able to meet its obligations at the prevailing gold price.

 

Trade and other payables decreased by $47.9 million, mainly due to a drop in trade creditors at Loulo, Gounkoto and Tongon.

 

Current tax payable of $81.1 million increased by $17.4 million and includes a corporate tax provision of $53.8 million related to Gounkoto, following the cessation of the tax holiday on 1 June 2013, as well as an increase in the corporate tax liability at Loulo.  Tongon benefits from a five year tax holiday from the start of production in December 2010.

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT

 

$000

 Unaudited

quarterended

31 Mar

2014

Unaudited

quarterended

31 Mar

2013

Audited

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Profit after tax

85 119

81 615

325 747

Income tax expense

22 933

3 760

76 714

Profit before income tax

108 052

85 375

402 461

Share of profits of equity accounted joint ventures

(26 930)

(8 947)

(54 257)

Adjustment for non-cash items

43 415

57 949

166 519

Effects of change in operating working capital items

(69 246)

(46 735)

(46 982)

Receivables

(31 900)

(21 114)

(62 738)

Inventories and ore stockpiles

3 989

(26 008)

(49 816)

Trade and other payables

(41 335)

387

65 572

Dividends received from equity accounted joint ventures

-

8 000

18 974

Income tax paid

(5 521)

(3 615)

(22 249)

Net cash generated from operating activities

49 770

92 027

464 466

Additions to property, plant and equipment

(38 200)

(68 650)

(303 099)

Funds invested in equity accounted joint ventures

(36 644)

(134 028)

(424 906)

Loans repaid by equity accounted joint ventures

2 261

-

-

Net cash used by investing activities

(72 583)

(202 678)

(728 005)

Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares

1 225

29

1 184

Dividends paid to company's shareholders

-

-

(46 137)

Dividends paid to non-controlling interests

(5 244)

(13 036)

(27 225)

Net cash used by financing activities

(4 019)

(13 007)

(72 178)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(26 832)

(123 658)

(335 717)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

38 151

373 868

373 868

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

11 319

250 210

38 151

 

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

 

Number of

ordinary

shares

Share

capital

$000

Share

premium

$000

Other

reserves*

$000

Retained

earnings*

$000

Total equity

attributable

to owners

of parent*

$000

Non-controlling

interests*

$000

Total

equity*

$000

Balance - 31 Dec 2012 - audited

92 061 153

4 603

1 409 144

50 994

1 154 273

2 619 014

158 673

2 777 687

Share of other comprehensive expense of joint ventures

-

-

-

(164)

-

(164)

-

(164)

Fair value movement on available-for-sale financial assets

-

-

-

(884)

-

(884)

-

(884)

Other comprehensive expense

-

-

-

(1 048)

-

(1 048)

-

(1 048)

Net profit for the period

-

-

-

-

69 648

69 648

11 967

81 615

Total comprehensive income/ (expense) for the period

-

-

-

(1 048)

69 648

68 600

11 967

80 567

Share-based payments

-

-

-

6 883

-

6 883

-

6 883

Share options exercised

1 000

-

22

-

-

22

-

22

Reserves transfer on exercise of options previously expensed under IFRS 2

-

-

6

(6)

-

-

-

-

Shares vested#

134 228

7

11 036

(9 815)

-

1 228

-

1 228

Non-controlling interest share of Gounkoto dividend

-

-

-

-

-

-

(13 036)

(13 036)

Balance - 31 Mar 2013 - unaudited

92 196 381

4 610

1 420 208

47 008

1 223 921

2 695 747

157 604

2 853 351

Balance - 31 Dec 2013 - audited

92 245 531

4 612

1 423 513

64 398

1 386 518

2 879 041

178 813

3 057 854

Fair value movement on available-for-sale financial assets

-

-

-

605

-

605

-

605

Share of other comprehensive income of joint ventures

-

-

-

709

-

709

-

709

Other comprehensive income

-

-

-

1 314

-

1 314

-

1 314

Net profit for the period

-

-

-

-

74 340

74 340

10 779

85 119

Total comprehensive income for the period

-

-

-

1 314

74 340

75 654

10 779

86 433

Share-based payments

-

-

-

6 809

-

6 809

-

6 809

Share options exercised

29 300

2

1 223

-

-

1 225

-

1 225

Reserves transfer on exercise of options previously expensed under IFRS 2

-

-

479

(479)

-

-

-

-

Shares vested#

239 206

12

17 231

(15 993)

-

1 250

-

1 250

Non-controlling interest share of Gounkoto dividend

-

-

-

-

-

-

(5 244)

(5 244)

Balance - 31 Mar 2014 - unaudited

92 514 037

4 626

1 442 446

56 049

1 460 858

2 963 979

184 348

3 148 327

* Other reserves includes the cumulative charge recognised under IFRS 2 in respect of share option schemes (net of amounts transferred to share capital and share premium) as well as the foreign currency translation reserve and the movements in available-for-sale financial assets.

# Restricted shares were issued as remuneration to executive directors, non-executive directors and senior management. Shares were also issued to executive directors following approval of their 2013 and 2012 annual bonuses. The transfer between 'other reserves' and 'share premium' in respect of the shares vested represents the cost calculated in accordance with IFRS 2.

 

 

 

NON-GAAP MEASURES

 

 

Randgold has identified certain measures that it believes will assist understanding of the performance of the business. As the measures are not defined under IFRS they may not be directly comparable with other companies' adjusted measures. The non-GAAP measures are not intended to be a substitute for, or superior to, any IFRS measures of performance but management has included them as these are considered to be important comparables and key measures used within the business for assessing performance.

 

These measures are explained further below:

 

Total cash costs and cash cost per ounce are non-GAAP measures. Total cash costs and total cash cost per ounce are calculated using guidance issued by the Gold Institute. The Gold Institute was a non-profit industry association comprising leading gold producers, refiners, bullion suppliers and manufacturers. This institute has now been incorporated into the National Mining Association. The guidance was first issued in 1996 and revised in November 1999. Total cash costs, as defined in the Gold Institute's guidance, include mine production, transport and refinery costs, general and administrative costs, movement in production inventories and ore stockpiles, transfers to and from deferred stripping where relevant and royalties. Total cash costs and cash cost per ounce also include our share of our equity accounted joint ventures' total cash costs and cash cost per ounce.

 

Total cash cost per ounce is calculated by dividing total cash costs, as determined using the Gold Institute guidance, by gold ounces sold for the periods presented. Total cash costs and total cash cost per ounce are calculated on a consistent basis for the periods presented. Total cash costs and total cash cost per ounce should not be considered by investors as an alternative to operating profit or net profit attributable to shareholders, as an alternative to other IFRS measures or an indicator of our performance. The data does not have a meaning prescribed by IFRS and therefore amounts presented may not be comparable to data presented by gold producers who do not follow the guidance provided by the Gold Institute. In particular depreciation and amortisation would be included in a measure of total costs of producing gold under IFRS, but are not included in total cash costs under the guidance provided by the Gold Institute.

 

Furthermore, while the Gold Institute has provided a definition for the calculation of total cash costs and total cash cost per ounce, the calculation of these numbers may vary from company to company and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. However, Randgold believes that total cash cost per ounce is a useful indicator to investors and management of a mining company's performance as it provides an indication of a company's profitability and efficiency, the trends in cash costs as the company's operations mature, and a benchmark of performance to allow for comparison against other companies.

 

Cash operating costs and cash operating cost per ounce are calculated by deducting royalties from total cash costs. Cash operating cost per ounce is calculated by dividing cash operating costs by gold ounces sold for the periods presented.

 

Gold salesis a non-GAAP measure. It represents the sales of gold at spot and the gains/losses on hedge contracts which have been delivered into at the designated maturity date. It excludes gains/losses on hedge contracts which have been rolled forward to match future sales. This adjustment is considered appropriate because no cash is received/paid in respect of these contracts. Randgold currently does not have any hedge positions. Gold sales include our share of our equity accounted joint ventures' gold sales.

 

Profit from mining activity is calculated by subtracting total cash costs from gold sales for all periods presented. Profit from mining includes our share of our equity accounted joint ventures.

 

Gold on handrepresents gold in doré at the mines multiplied by the prevailing spot gold price at the end of the period. Gold on hand includes our share of our equity accounted joint ventures' gold on hand.

 

The group non-GAAP measures presented in the 'Summarised Financial Information' in the following table include the group's share of each operating mine, together with adjustments to eliminate inter-group transactions.

 

The following table reconciles gold sales, total cash costs and profit from mining activity as non-GAAP measures, to the information provided in the statement of comprehensive income, determined in accordance with IFRS, for each of the periods set out below:

 

NON-GAAP

$000

Unaudited quarter

ended

31 Mar

2014

Unaudited

quarter

ended

31 Dec

2013

Unaudited quarter

ended

31 Mar

2013

Unaudited

12 months

ended

31 Dec

2013

Gold sales per IFRS#

284 350

291 794

284 687

1 137 690

Gold sales adjustments for joint ventures+

78 569

64 374

24 359

129 022

Gold sales*

362 919

356 168

309 046

1 266 712

Mine production costs#

130 543

134 468

136 129

536 229

Movement in production inventory and ore stockpiles#

(2 854)

(10 095)

(18 492)

(49 730)

Transport and refining costs#

706

657

578

2 663

Royalties including adjustment for joint ventures

17 338

17 393

15 861

64 455

Royalty adjustment for joint ventures+

(2 426)

(2 156)

(1 464)

(6 040)

Total royalties#

14 912

15 237

14 397

58 415

Other mining and processing costs#

15 970

12 186

17 577

61 319

Cash costs adjustments for joint ventures+

32 609

25 372

8 442

49 055

Total cash costs*

191 886

177 825

158 631

657 951

Profit from mining activity*

171 033

178 343

150 415

608 761

Ounces sold

280 024

283 254

188 654

920 248

Total cash cost per ounce sold*

685

628

841

715

Cash operating cost per ounce sold*

623

566

757

645

Gold on hand at period end*

4 831

-

31 180

-

* Refer to explanation of non-GAAP measures provided.

# Figures extracted from IFRS results.

+ The group includes the gold sales and cash costs associated with the joint venture results in its non-GAAP measures. The gold sales adjustments per quarter reflect our 40% share of Morila's gold sales and 45% share of Kibali's gold sales. The cash costs adjustments per quarter primarily reflect our 40% share of Morila's cash costs, 45% of Kibali's cash costs, as well as our 50.1% share in RAL 1 Limited's (RAL 1) cash cost adjustments.

The cash costs adjustments per quarter primarily reflect our 40% share of Morila's cash costs, 45% of Kibali's cash costs, as well as our 50.1% share in RAL 1 Limited's (RAL 1) cash cost adjustments.

 

 

 

ANNUAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE DECLARATION

 

At 31 December

Tonnes(Mt)

Grade(g/t)

Gold(Moz)

Attributablegold (Moz)

Mine/project

Category

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

MINERAL RESOURCES

Kibali

45%

45%

Measured

5.9

4.4

2.3

3.0

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

Indicated

149

130

3.5

3.5

17

15

7.5

6.6

Sub total

Measured and indicated

154

135

3.5

3.5

17

15

7.7

6.8

Inferred

60

55

2.7

2.2

5.2

3.9

2.3

1.8

Loulo

80%

80%

Measured

11

6.5

3.8

3.1

1.4

0.7

1.1

0.5

Indiciated

40

50

4.9

4.9

6.3

7.8

5.0

6.2

Sub total

Measured and indicated

52

56

4.6

4.7

7.7

8.4

6.2

6.8

Inferred

18

17

3.5

3.4

2.0

1.8

1.6

1.4

Gounkoto

80%

80%

Measured

4.9

2.1

4.1

2.2

0.6

0.1

0.5

0.1

Indicated

23

25

4.4

5.0

3.3

4.0

2.7

3.2

Sub total

Measured and indicated

28

27

4.4

4.8

4.0

4.1

3.2

3.3

Inferred

3.5

4.0

3.7

3.8

0.4

0.5

0.3

0.4

Morila

40%

40%

Measured

0.6

3.9

1.1

1.1

0.02

0.1

0.01

0.06

Indicated

16

1.0

0.7

3.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.04

Sub total

Measured and indicated

16

4.9

0.7

1.6

0.4

0.2

0.1

0.1

Inferred

12

41

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.6

0.1

0.2

Tongon

89%

89%

Measured

9.0

2.5

2.2

1.4

0.6

0.1

0.6

0.1

Indicated

24

33

2.5

2.7

1.9

2.9

1.7

2.6

Sub total

Measured and indicated

33

35

2.4

2.6

2.5

3.0

2.2

2.7

Inferred

12

10

2.7

2.7

1.1

0.9

0.9

0.8

Massawa

83%

83%

Measured

0.2

-

5.1

-

0.03

-

0.03

-

Indicated

35

37

2.6

2.7

2.9

3.2

2.4

2.6

Sub total

Measured and indicated

35

37

2.6

2.7

3.0

3.2

2.5

2.6

Inferred

24

3.4

2.1

3.9

1.7

0.4

1.4

0.4

Total resources

Measured and indicated

318

295

3.4

3.6

35

34

22

22

Inferred

130

131

2.5

1.9

11

8.1

6.7

5.0

MINERAL RESERVES

Kibali

45%

45%

Proven

5.5

3.6

2.3

3.2

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

Probable

84

79

4.1

4.1

11

11

5.0

4.7

Sub total

Proven and probable

89

83

4.0

4.1

12

11

5.2

4.9

Loulo

80%

80%

Proven

2.2

2.3

1.9

2.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

Probable

31

38

5.1

5.1

5.1

6.2

4.1

4.9

Sub total

Proven and probable

34

40

4.9

4.9

5.3

6.3

4.2

5.1

Gounkoto

80%

80%

Proven

1.9

1.8

2.5

2.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Probable

15

17

4.5

5.0

2.1

2.6

1.7

2.1

Sub total

Proven and probable

17

18

4.3

4.7

2.3

2.8

1.8

2.2

Morila

40%

40%

Proven

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Probable

14

4.9

0.7

1.5

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.1

Sub total

Proven and probable

14

4.9

0.7

1.5

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.1

Tongon

89%

89%

Proven

3.3

2.5

1.4

1.4

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

Probable

28

31

2.3

2.5

2.1

2.5

1.8

2.2

Sub total

Proven and probable

31

34

2.2

2.4

2.2

2.6

2.0

2.4

Massawa

83%

83%

Probable

21

21

3.1

3.1

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.7

Sub total

Proven and probable

21

21

3.1

3.1

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.7

Total reserves

Proven and probable

205

201

3.6

3.9

24

25

15

16

NOTES TO THE ANNUAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE DECLARATION

Randgold reports its mineral resources and mineral reserves in accordance with the JORC 2012 code. As such numbers are reported to the second significant digit. They are equivalent to National Instrument 43-101. Mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade based on a gold price of $1 500/oz.

The reporting of mineral reserves is also in accordance with the SEC's Industry Guide 7. Pit optimisations are carried out at a gold price of $1 000/oz, except for Morila which is reported at $1 300/oz. Mineral reserves are reported at a cut-off grade based on $1 000/oz gold price within the pit designs. Underground reserves are also based on a gold price of $1 000/oz. Dilution and ore loss are incorporated into the calculation of reserves. Cautionary note to US investors: The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) permits mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proven and probable ore reserves. Randgold uses certain terms in this annual report such as 'resources', that the SEC does not recognise and strictly prohibits the company from including in its filings with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any parts of the company's resources will ever be converted into reserves which qualify as 'proven and probable reserves' for the purposes of the SEC's Industry Guide number 7.

See glossary of terms on website at www.randgoldresources.com.

 

 

 

PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS AND UNCERTAINTIES

 

 

The group is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which are the result of not only the business environment in which it operates but also of other factors over which it has little or no control. The board is responsible for the group's systems of risk management and internal control as well as reviewing their operational effectiveness on a regular basis.

 

The group's business units and functions assess the potential economic and non-economic consequences of their respective risks using a group level risk standard.

 

Principal risks and uncertainties are identified when the board, through the business unit or function, determines the potential consequences which could be materially significant at a group level or where the risk is connected and may trigger a succession of events that, in aggregate, become material to the group. Once identified, each principal risk and uncertainty is reviewed by the relevant internal experts and by the board.

 

A formal annual risk analysis and critical review is performed across the business to evaluate the risks the group faces and refresh these to reflect the changes in our business and operational profile. From this review a number of risks and uncertainties have been identified with regard to the successful delivery of the group's business plan. The key risks are set out in the following table and indicate the principal risks associated with the current business plan.

 

The group's strategy takes into account known risks but there may be additional risks unknown to the group and other risks, currently believed to be immaterial, which could develop into material risks. The risk factors outlined below omit the management detail on how each risk is managed and mitigated and the potential financial impact of the risks on the group.

 

A full analysis of the group's risk factors as well as its risk management processes are documented in the 2013 annual report which should be considered along with the 2013 annual report on Form 20F, both of which are available on the group's website www.randgoldresources.com.

 

The group has a clear framework for identifying and managing risk and our risk identification and mitigation processes have been designed to be responsive to the ever changing environments in which we operate. As such we are continually evaluating risks to ensure the business achieves its strategic objectives; however management believes the principal risks and uncertainties have not changed significantly from those described in the annual report and the annual report on Form 20F.

 

The principal risks and uncertainties may materialise individually, simultaneously or in combination and should be considered in connection with any forward looking statements in this document, the country analysis in the 2013 annual report and the 'Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements' of this report.

 

EXTERNAL RISKS

NATURE AND IMPACT

Gold price volatility

The gold price and demand are volatile and influenced by world economic conditions. Group earnings and cash flow are subject to the current gold price and therefore continued or significant declines in the gold price will affect earnings and cash flow. Group planning and forecasting are subject to gold price assumptions and therefore changes to the gold price may affect the group's ability to fund its capital projects.

Country risk

The group operates in jurisdictions where changes may occur to the political environment and governments may seek a greater share of mineral wealth. Inadequate monitoring of in-country political instability and uncertainty or failure to adapt to changes to terms applicable to the group's operations may impact the ability to sustain operations, prevent the group from making future investments or result in increased costs for the group.

Corporate, social and environmental responsibility

Some of the group's current and potential operations are located near communities that may regard these operations as being detrimental to them. Poor management of stakeholder communication and expectations with a lack of community development activities or regard for environmental responsibility may lead to the inability to sustain operations in the area and impact the group's ability to expand into other regions. Failure to understand social and environmental contexts can lead to insufficient planning, resourcing and costing of projects. Failure to comply with environmental regulations could lead to fines and, in the extreme, loss of operating licence.

Supply routes

Due to the remote location of the operations the disruption of supply routes may cause delays with construction and mine activities. Supply chain failures, disruptions or significantly increased costs within the supply chain could have an adverse effect on the group's operations.

FINANCIAL RISKS

NATURE AND IMPACT

Operating and capital cost control

Operating cost and capital cost control are a key factor in the group's profitability. Failure to control operating cost of production or operational objectives will result in reduced margins and profitability. Failure or inability to monitor capital expenditure and progress of capital projects may result in financial losses, overspend on projects and cause returns to be eroded. General cost inflation in the mining sector could affect the operations and projects resulting in significant pressure on operating and capital costs.

Insufficient liquidity, inappropriate financial strategy, poor treasury management and inability to access funding from global credit and capital markets

The group may be required to seek additional funding from the global credit and capital markets to develop its properties. Volatility and uncertainty in those markets could adversely affect the group's operations, treasury position and the ability to obtain financing and capital resources required by the business. Inappropriate treasury management of the group's surplus cash, counter party risk or significant changes in exchange rates could adversely affect the group's operations and profitability and in the extreme may impact on the group's ability to continue as a going concern.

In-country tax regimes

The group operates in jurisdictions which may change tax or fiscal regimes and regulations and, failure to adapt to such issues may result in fines and financial losses. Inability to enforce legislation over tax or incorrectly applied legislation may result in lengthy arbitration and loss of profits.

OPERATIONAL RISKS

NATURE AND IMPACT

Production, reserves and resources

The group's mining operations may yield less gold under actual production conditions than indicated by its gold reserve figures, which are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including mining and recovery factors, production costs and gold price. In such instances the group's profitability may be affected should actual production be lower than indicated reserves. Should the prevailing gold price not support or sustain the valuation the carrying value of assets may be impaired.

Environmental, health, safety and security incident

The mining sector is subject extensive health, safety and environmental laws, regulations and standards alongside stakeholder expectations. Failure to maintain environmental, health and safety standards' may result in significant environmental or safety incidents or deterioration in safety performance standards leading to loss of life or significant loss of time and disruption or damage to operations. Evolving regulation and standards could result in increased costs, litigation or in extreme cases may threaten the viability of an operation.

Risks associated with underground mining and geotechnical failure

The group has a number of underground projects which are subject to the extensive risks associated with underground mining. Failure to monitor or mitigate such risks may affect the profitability of the group and the operational performance. Failure to consider geotechnical failure in planning and then monitor the impact during operations may impact the geotechnical stability of pits and underground mining operations. Extreme weather conditions such as high rainfall may also impact the geotechnical stability of the pits and therefore could impact mining operations.

STRATEGIC RISKS

NATURE AND IMPACT

Lack of identification of new exploration targets and exploration failure

The replacement of reserves and resources is key to the long term delivery of the group's exploration led growth strategy and therefore the lack of identification of new exploration targets may lead to a loss of revenue and an inability to grow and meet strategic objectives. Exploration and development are costly activities with no guarantee of success, but are necessary for future growth of the group.

Failure to attract and retain its key staff and poor succession planning

The loss of any key staff or the lack of internal succession planning and the failure to attract appropriate staff within the group may cause short term disruption to the business and operations.

 

 

 

GENERAL

 

 

Overall the company has performed well in respect of both its operating assets and its capital expenditure projects. Consequently, the groups' overall key performance indicators set earlier in the year remain intact both in terms of total cash cost and production guidance for the year.

 

At the same time, the group remains focused on increasing its reserves and resources asset base, with significant brownfield and greenfield exploration across the portfolio aimed at adding value to its portfolio, whilst continuing to pursue direct and joint venture opportunities to expand its exploration footprint in the most prospective regions in Africa. Consequently, the corporate and exploration budget remains unchanged.

 

The directors confirm to the best of their knowledge that:

a) These first quarter results have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 as adopted by the European Union; and

b) The interim management report includes a fair review of the information required by the FCA's Disclosure and Transparency Rules (4.2.7R and 4.2.8R).

 

By order of the board

D M Bristow G P Shuttleworth

Chief Executive Financial Director

8 May 2014

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------RANDGOLD RESOURCES NEWS UPDATES

 

 

DIVIDEND MAINTAINED AT $0.50 PER SHARE

 

Following approval by shareholders at the company's annual general meeting on 6 May, Randgold has declared a final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2013 of $0.50 per share which is the same as that paid to shareholders last year and 80% higher than the company's maiden dividend in 2007.

 

An optional scrip dividend has also been approved enabling shareholders to elect to receive new ordinary shares or ADSs in the company instead of the cash dividend.

 

The optional scrip dividend is conditional on the admission of the new ordinary shares to the Official List of the Financial Conduct Authority and to trading on the London Stock Exchange's market for listed securities. Trading in the new ordinary shares is expected to commence on 30 May 2014.

 

Shareholders who do not elect to receive the dividend in ordinary shares will receive the cash dividend in pounds sterling or in US dollars on 30 May 2014. The exchange rate for the payment of the cash dividend in Pounds Sterling was set on 1 May 2014 at £1.00 : $1.6880.

 

In addition to voting for the cash dividend and the scrip dividend scheme, shareholders also voted in favour of all the other resolutions proposed at the meeting

 

 

CUTTING COSTS THROUGH COOPERATION

 

Procurement and supply are critical components of Randgold's business and in line with its drive to curb costs the company has embarked on a process of engaging with its business partners to reduce its consumables bill through a shortened and more efficient supply chain.

 

This follows the recent roll-out of the SAP system which, says group commercial and supply chain general manager Riaan Grobler, has given Randgold a clearer understanding of and stronger grip on its business.

 

"We're now harnessing the full benefits of SAP through collaborative demand planning within the organisation as well as with external suppliers. Improved collaboration has already reduced our stock levels, cost of supplies and consequently our working capital," he says.

 

"As we continue to integrate, our business partners will be able to consolidate demand and negotiate better shipping rates as well as reduced prices for procured goods. The next phase of our SAP implementation will automate certain data exchanges which should result in further efficiencies and reduced lead times."

 

Grobler says Randgold's East and West African supply chain partners have already managed to reduce clearing and transport costs significantly.

 

Successful price negotiations have been concluded, or are well advanced, with fuel, explosives, power and mining suppliers and contractors.

 

 

MODEL MINING CODE WILL DRAW INVESTORS TO CÔTE D'IVOIRE

 

Côte d'Ivoire's new mining code, developed in close collaboration with its mining industry, should accelerate the country's emergence as a significant gold producer, says Randgold chief executive Mark Bristow. Randgold operates the Tongon gold mine in Côte d'Ivoire and has extensive exploration holdings elsewhere in the country.

 

At a recent press briefing in Abidjan, Bristow noted that the depletion of the world's mature goldfields had shifted gold miners' focus to new regions, notably in Africa. Despite the continuing fallback in supply from South Africa, once the world's largest gold producer, Africa still accounted for 20% of global gold output, thanks to the recent growth of the gold mining industries elsewhere on the continent, notably in West Africa. "Considering the continent's vast mineral wealth, however, it still has a long way to go to deliver on its full potential," Bristow said. "Investors are deterred by the political and infrastructural risks associated with Africa, but in Côte d'Ivoire we have shown how these challenges can be overcome by a true partnership between a mining company, the government and the people."

 

This spirit of cooperation was evident in the process of formulating the new code, said Bristow, and he was sure that the country's mining companies would also be involved in the finalisation of the decree of application which will lay down the rules for the code's implementation. "It's now all about delivery by the government as well as the industry, but the principle has already been established that this country needs business partners, not barriers. That applies to the rest of the continent as well," he said.

 

Partnership implied a long term commitment to mutual goals between the partners, Bristow said. Randgold's commitment to Côte d'Ivoire was evident from its nurturing of the Tongon project through a protracted civil war and its investment in the development of the mine in the aftermath of that war. The mine was commissioned amidst the unrest which followed the disputed outcome of a presidential election but even so it made a profit in its first quarter of operation and every quarter since, and has made a significant contribution to the State's treasury at a time when it was most needed.

 

"Tongon has made good progress in dealing with a number of technical challenges but the issue of lower than expected recoveries is still being addressed. As we have reported before, this requires the expansion of the flotation circuit which is scheduled to be commissioned at the start of 2015, and the associated pressure on throughput and costs will have to be managed carefully," he said.

 

"Challenges in reaching consistent availability in the crushing plant have resulted in a joint decision with the supplier Sandvik to change the current equipment to conventional Sandvik CH660 cone crushers. Randgold is working closely with Sandvik to combine the replacement with an upgraded flow sheet including additional equipment and circuits to achieve the required capacity with an improved performance."

 

"Randgold is also investing some $6 million in exploration programmes on 12 active permits elsewhere in Côte d'Ivoire. Early results from the Mankono and Fapoho permits had confirmed significant gold in soil anomalies in favourable geological and structural settings. Drilling targets are currently being defined. Adjacent to the Tongon deposit, lower grade mineralisation in several satellite pits is being evaluated as part of a project to extend the mine's life," Bristow said.

 

 

KIBALI SUCCESS A TRIUMPH FOR PARTNERSHIP PHILOSOPHY

 

Democratic Republic of Congo's Minister of Mines Martin Kabwelulu last week officially opened the Kibali gold mine on behalf of the country's president, Joseph Kabila Kabange. The ceremony was attended by Province Orientale governor Jean Bamanisa Saidi, DRC cabinet ministers, ambassadors of various countries and local dignitaries.

 

Kibali, which will rank as one of the largest gold mines in Africa when it is in full production, is owned by Randgold Resources and AngloGold Ashanti, each with a 45% stake, and the DRC state gold mining company, Société Miniere de Kilo-Moto (SOKIMO). Kibali is being operated and developed by Randgold, and represents an investment of more than $2.5 billion by Randgold Resources and AngloGold Ashanti.

 

While still a work in progress - it is both an operating mine and a development project - Kibali produced 112 549 ounces of gold and made a profit from mining, before interest, tax and depreciation, of $86.3 million in the first quarter to 31 March 2014, up 26% on the three months to December 2013, its first production quarter. Current production is from its open pit mine and an oxide circuit. Commissioning of the sulphide circuit started during the past quarter and development of the underground mine remains on track with the vertical shaft reaching the halfway mark and the first underground ore accessed. The first of four hydropower stations is currently being commissioned and, with a capacity of 22 megawatt, it is the largest of its kind in the Province Orientale.

 

Speaking at the opening, Minister Kabwelulu said the success of the investment was a testimony to the world that the DRC government was determined to support investors and see its mining sector developed.

 

"The Province Orientale now boasts a world class operation and there is no doubt many economic activities will follow as a spin-off of what Kibali is achieving. The people of Province Orientale need to protect this significant investment zealously," the minister said.

 

Also speaking at the opening, Randgold chairman Philippe Liétard said the successful development of Kibali in the face of many infrastructural and other challenges was a triumph for the company's partnership philosophy.

 

"Here we have shown what can be achieved in Africa when we all work together: a government that understands the importance of attracting and retaining the investments that are necessary to build a modern economy; two mining companies that believe in sharing the value they create with all their stakeholders, especially the local community; a labour force that is eager to grasp the opportunity of working and learning; and a people who have welcomed us and supported our endeavours," Liétard said.

 

Also at the ceremony, Randgold chief executive Mark Bristow said the successful development of Kibali could herald the birth of a new DRC economic region to rival Katanga Province.

 

"To achieve that, we cannot rest here. We need to ensure that we deliver the returns expected by the investors who entrusted us with their money. We have to run a profitable mine, focused on long term viability, that pays taxes, and employs and develops citizens from this region and this country. Kibali must become the catalyst that triggers the additional investment required to grow a strong regional economy," he said.

 

"Wishful thinking will not make this happen. But if we continue to work together as partners pursuing a common goal - if mining companies, the government and communities cooperate as we did in the development of Kibali - then this dream of greater things will also come true."

 

AngloGold Ashanti chief executive Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan said that for Kibali's full potential to be realised it was of the utmost importance that the DRC's mining code remained supportive of the gold mining sector.

 

"The government now has an important opportunity to show the world that it is welcoming of gold mining by helping to create what can in a short time become one of the largest gold producers in the world and an engine of growth for this region and this country,"

he said.

 

 

RANDGOLD'S RESOURCE BASE EXPANDS AS IT PLANS FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS

 

Randgold increased its total attributable mineral resources in 2013 in a year that also delivered record production. The company's annual resource and reserve declaration, published in March as part of its annual report for 2013, shows attributable resources up 5% to 28.6 million ounces while reserves decreased by 8% to 15 million ounces, reflecting depletion by mining.

 

Reserve and resource management executive Rod Quick said all Randgold's mines were ramping up production and grade, which inevitably impacted on its reserve inventory.

 

"We are confident, however, that we will be able to replenish our reserves through ongoing exploration as well as resource conversion. This confidence is based on the robustness of our five-year plan as well as the prospectivity of the regions where we operate, demonstrated by our growing resources," he said.

 

At Kibali, total reserves now stand at 11.6 million ounces at 4g/t, up from 10.9 million ounces at 4.1g/t, as a result of an updated mine design on a resource base which grew to 22 million ounces. Quick said while current reserves supported a 13-year life of mine, only 53% of the current resource had been converted to reserves, leaving a significant opportunity to expand the reserves.

 

Loulo's reserves decreased to 5.3 million ounces by mining depletion, completion of the Yalea open pit and the redesign of the Gara underground mine to secure its continued profitability by reducing capital development. The neighbouring Gounkoto open pit mine also reported reduced reserves as a result of mining depletion and lower grades. The latest results from the underground feasibility study at Gounkoto have confirmed a mineral resource of over a million ounces at more than 6g/t.

 

Tongon's reserves were also depleted by mining but deep drilling has highlighted the potential for higher grades below the southern zone pits and further drilling is planned to test the depth extensions.

 

Based on current pay limits and the fact that Tongon is due to repay its capital next year, exploration is focused on near-mine resources which could extend Tongon's life beyond the current seven years.

 

The full 2013 annual resource and reserve declaration appears in the financial section of the report.

 

 

FROM EXPLORERS TO LEADING-EDGE UNDERGROUND MINERS

 

In just eight years, Randgold has grown from its exploration roots through open pit mining to become one of Africa's leading underground miners, with two world class mines in Yalea and Gara, a third being developed at Kibali and a fourth at feasibility stage at Gounkoto.

 

Chief executive Mark Bristow notes that when the company embarked on the Yalea development there was no underground mining tradition in Mali and almost no pool of mining experience to draw from.

 

"We paid some serious dues at Yalea but we learned a lot there, from our mistakes as well as the things we got right. We've now combined the best global practices in underground mining with our own first hand experience in a system that works very well for us. We've also built a highly competent underground team. This expertise will, I believe, position Randgold strongly to take advantage of significant underground gold deposit opportunities in Africa," he says.

 

An important contributor to Randgold's team-building success is its education and further education initiative, designed to produce African mining graduates as well as to provide graduates with managerial and financial skills. By doing this, Bristow says, Randgold is not only expanding its own intellectual capital but is grooming a new generation of engineers, metallurgists and geologists for Africa's growing mining industries.

 

Typical of this new breed is Mamou Toure, a Malian national, who is the underground manager for the Yalea and Gara mines. He designed, planned and built the main underground infrastructure for both mines, brought them up to the planned 220 000 tonnes per month production on a sustainable basis, and is currently introducing cement aggregate and paste fill into the two mines. Fellow Malian Mohamed Cisse graduated in mining engineering from the University of Pretoria in South Africa on a Randgold bursary and is now senior project engineer at Kibali. He has played a pivotal role in the design and construction of its open pit and underground mines.

 

In addition to training at local and international universities, Randgold also plans to provide intensive on-site courses in partnership with leading mining universities.

 

 

LIÉTARD PASSES BATON TO COLEMAN

 

Christopher Coleman has been appointed chairman of Randgold, succeeding Philippe Liétard who stepped down as chairman at the company's annual general meeting on 6 May after 10 years in the chair.

 

A whole-hearted supporter and facilitator of Randgold's strategy of creating value for all stakeholders through the discovery of worldclass gold deposits and their development into sustainably profitable mines, Liétard guided management in implementing the company's partnership and social licence philosophies, crucial to success in Africa. On his watch, one major discovery followed another, and Randgold built the Morila, Loulo, Gounkoto, Tongon and, most recently, Kibali mines, all of them profitable from their first quarter of operation. The Randgold brand, synonymous with delivery, was strongly established in global capital markets, where recognition has manifested itself in the company's membership of the FTSE 100 and NASDAQ indices, and its share price's consistent outperformance of its peers.

 

Randgold chief executive Mark Bristow said: "Philippe's passion for the business, his pursuit of excellence and his vision of a better future for Africa and all its children made him an inspirational role model for all at Randgold. His exceptional understanding of doing business in Africa, broad perspective and calm good sense helped to guide us safely through the many challenges Randgold has faced. We shall miss Philippe's presence on the board, but fortunately he is not completely lost to us: he has agreed to become the first chairman of the Nos Vies en Partage Foundation, the charitable foundation recently established by Randgold."

 

Mr Liétard said: "I am very fortunate to have been associated with this company and privileged to have worked with an amazingly talented and dedicated group of people, from the board and CEO down. I'm fully confident that the adventure will continue, just on a larger scale."

 

Mr Coleman, 45, has been an independent non-executive director of Randgold since 2008. A graduate of the London School of Economics, he is head of banking and asset finance at Rothschild. He will also succeed Mr Liétard as chairman of the Randgold governance and nomination committee while retaining his seat on the remuneration committee.

 

Mr Coleman said he was looking forward to working with the board and management as the company advanced to its next growth stage and he continues his long association with Randgold in his new role.

 

 

OPPORTUNITIES OUTWEIGH CHALLENGES FOR GOLD MINERS IN AFRICA

 

There are many challenges to mining in Africa but there are even more opportunities open to those with the vision to grasp them, Randgold CEO Mark Bristow told the PDAC convention in Toronto in March.

 

Bristow said the depletion of the traditional gold mining regions was forcing gold miners to turn to highly prospective emerging countries previously regarded as too risky. At the same time, the end of the Cold War had opened up gold fields in Africa and other emerging markets that had long been difficult or impossible to access.

 

"If you want to hunt elephants you have to go to elephant country, and if you want to find world class gold deposits, Africa is a very good place to look. West and Central Africa now rank high among the world's premier gold destinations," he said.

 

"I've been involved in mining in Africa for 30 years and in that time I have seen great changes in the continent. Slowly but steadily, if sometimes painfully, it is emerging from centuries of exploitation and oppression as its people increasingly demand economic and political freedom, and accountability from their leaders. I am proud that in its way, Randgold has pointed to what can be achieved here. Born and raised in Africa, run by Africans and focused entirely on African assets, Randgold has become a truly world-class company, listed on NASDAQ and the London Stock Exchange and a member of the FTSE 100, with some of the leading global funds as its shareholders."

 

He cautioned prospective investors in Africa that securing their social licence to do business there was as important as getting the technical and financial aspects of a project right. Randgold's success in Africa, he said, would not have been possible without its partnership philosophy, which recognises host countries and their people as stakeholders in the company.

 

"Mining should be seen as a force for good, which converts national assets into sustainable economic benefits, in close cooperation with governments and communities," he said.

 

Bristow also warned that the search for new multi-million ounce gold deposits was being hampered by the trend of junior mining companies neglecting their traditional role as explorers to focus on developing marginal assets. It would be better for the gold mining industry and for African mining countries, he said, if the juniors stopped trying to be developers of marginal assets and reverted to being explorers and entrepreneurs with a focus on finding world class deposits.

 

 

RECORD SAFETY PERFORMANCE AS GRI REPORT HIGHLIGHTS SUSTAINABILITY COMMITMENT

 

Despite the high level of activity from record production and big capital projects, Randgold Resources recorded its best ever safety performance in the first quarter of 2014, with a lost-time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) of 0.26 per million man hours.

 

Loulo, Gounkoto and Tongon had zero lost-time injuries for the quarter while Morila and Kibali had one each. Charles Wells, group general manager for sustainability, says this is a creditable safety performance considering that Randgold's sites are remote and that much of its workforce does not have a background in industrial production.

 

Wells also points out that the company's recently published sustainability report for 2013 was compiled according to the new GRI G4 guidelines, which focus on issues that are material to the group's business.

 

"Managing material sustainability issues is core to our business, so we support reporting standards that deliver information that is critical to the company and its stakeholders," he says.

 

"Before compiling the report, we questioned shareholders, union representatives, key suppliers and local authorities and communities, as well as our own executives and staff, to get their views on materiality. This engagement helped to clarify and direct our identification of Randgold's material issues."

 

The full sustainability report for 2013 is available on the website at www.randgoldresources.com.

 

 

2013 ANNUAL REPORT

 

Randgold has published its annual report for the year ended 31 December 2013 which is available for viewing and/or downloading on the company's website at www.randgoldresources.com. A copy has also been submitted to the National Storage Mechanism and is available for inspection at www.hemscott.com/nsm.do. The company has also filed its Form 20-F with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, which is also available for viewing and/or downloading from Randgold's website or at www.sec.gov. For a hard copy or CD containing the report, contact Kathy du Plessis at [email protected] or call +44 20 7557 7738.

 

Delivering value again

 

Just four years after the acquisition of the Moto project, as it was then known, the Kibali mine poured its first gold bar on 23 September 2013 - ahead of schedule and in line with budget. Kibali is the fifth world-class gold mine Randgold has built. And even as it moves into full production, taking its place among the front rank of the world's great gold mines, the Randgold exploration teams are hunting for the next big one in Africa's most prospective regions.

 

 

NOS VIES EN PARTAGE FOUNDATION TAKES OFF WITH $1 MILLION CHARITY MOTORBIKE RIDE

 

Randgold has incorporated its Nos Vies en Partage charity fundraising initiative into a foundation chaired by its recently retired board chairman Philippe Liétard. The purpose of the foundation is to help alleviate the plight of those people who do not benefit in any way from economic growth in Africa, particularly the many neglected women and children.

 

The initiative originated in a motorbike trip from Cape Town to Cairo chief executive Mark Bristow undertook in 2009 with his two sons and a few friends. They called their ride 3BOYZONBIKES. Seeing the extent of the poverty at first hand motivated him to start raising money for charity and the following year Bristow and some of Randgold's geologists took a motorbike trip through Senegal, Mali, Burkina Faso and Cote d'Ivoire to review Randgold's exploration prospects in those countries as well as to highlight the needs of the people. Dubbed 'Nos Vies en Partage' ('Sharing our Lives' in English), the trip raised $300 000 in donations from business partners.

 

In 2012, accompanied again by sons and friends, Bristow rode from the UK across Europe to Budapest before backtracking along the Mediterranean coast to cross over into Morocco and from there down through the Western Sahara to the Senegalese border. Meeting some colleagues there, the ride continued through Senegal, Mali and Côte d'Ivoire, raising $600 000.

 

In June this year, 3BOYZONBIKES will complete its circumnavigation of Africa by travelling from Abidjan in Côte d'Ivoire through Benin, Togo, Nigeria, Cameroon, Gabon, the Congo, the DRC, Angola and Namibia, ending in Cape Town. The aim this time is to raise $1 million for the Nos Vies en Partage Foundation. The ride's progress can be followed at the blog www.3boyzonbikes.com.

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

REGISTERED OFFICE 3rd Floor, Unity Chambers, 28 Halkett Street, St Helier, Jersey, JE2 4WJ, Channel Islands

REGISTRARS Computershare Investor Services (Jersey) Limited, Queensway House. Hilgrove Street, St Helier, Jersey JE1 1ES, Channel Islands

TRANSFER AGENTS Computershare Services PLC, PO Box 663, 7th Floor, Jupiter House, Triton Court, 14 Finsbury Square, London EC2A 1BR

INVESTOR AND MEDIA RELATIONS For further information contact Kathy du Plessis on telephone: +44 207 557 7738, e-mail: [email protected]

 

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this news release are forwardlooking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the US Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future price of gold, the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, the realisation of mineral reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production, reserve determination and reserve conversion rates. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as 'will', 'plans', 'expects' or 'does not expect', 'is expected', 'budget', 'scheduled', 'estimates', 'forecasts', 'intends', 'anticipates' or 'does not anticipate', or 'believes', or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results 'may', 'could', 'would', 'might' or 'will be taken', 'occur' or 'be achieved'. Assumptions upon which such forward-looking statements are based are in turn based on factors and events that are not within the control of Randgold Resources Limited ('Randgold') and there is no assurance they will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Randgold to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: risks related to mining operations, including political risks and instability and risks related to international operations, actual results of current exploration activities, conclusions of economic evaluations, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, as well as those factors discussed in Randgold's filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC'). Although Randgold has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ material ly from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Randgold does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. CAUTIONARY NOTE TO US INVESTORS: The SEC permits companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proven and probable ore reserves. We use certain terms in this report, such as 'resources', that the SEC does not recognise and strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any parts of our resources will ever be converted into reserves which qualify as 'proven and probable reserves' for the purposes of the SEC's Industry Guide number 7.

 

 

This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
QRFKMGGKRNRGDZM

Related Shares:

Randgold Resources
FTSE 100 Latest
Value8,420.04
Change2.70